Abstract
Background and objectives
Cervical cancer is ranked as the third most prevalent cancer that affects women all over the world and Pap smear seems to be the single most critical intervention to prevent cervical cancer. In the present study, the effects of demographic factors (age, education level, job, income level, marriage age, pregnancy, child number, breastfeeding, and menopause), insurance type, disease history and screening (sono and mammography, breast problem) and cancer information on Pap smear screening and behavior stage of change were investigated and modeled using an artificial neural network model (ANN).
Materials and methods
Data were collected from a descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study. This research was conducted on 1898 female employees of governmental agencies of Birjand, a city located in the east of Iran. The questionnaire consisted of four parts (socioeconomic, reproductive characteristics, information about cervical cancer screening, and stage of change for cervical cancer screening). Multilayer feed-forward back-propagation neural networks were used to detect the patterns between variables using a neural network with 14 inputs and one output. To find out the neural network with the minimum sum of squared errors, we evaluated the performance of all neural networks using varying algorithms and numbers of neurons in the hidden layer. For this purpose, the data collected from 1898 women were analyzed using SPSS-22 software.
Results
In the optimal ANN model, the variables of marriage age, age, breastfeeding, and the number of children were identified as the most significant factors with 18.3, 16.3, 7.3, and 7.3 percent, respectively, whereas the history of cancer, job, pregnancy, and menopause had importance of lower than 5 percent.
Conclusion
Our findings showed that among many associated variables, the marriage age, age, breastfeeding, and the number of children were the most important predictors for the behavioral stage of change. Thus, it seems, focusing on these factors may lead to the adoption of effective programs and policies to improve cervical cancer screening practices in women.
Keywords: Artificial neural network, Cervical cancer, Pap smear, Predicting factor, Screening
1. Introduction
Cancers are the leading cause of death worldwide particularly in women in both high-income countries and middle-income countries [1]. Among the cancers, cervical cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies which were relatively well controlled for several decades in many high-income countries however; it remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in 42 countries, most of which are low-income and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) [2]. Approximately 85% of women who were diagnosed with cervical cancer and 88% of those who died from cervical cancer live in LMICs [1]. Based on the World Health Organization (WHO) report, low and middle-income countries have the highest cervical cancer rates due to different factors including irregular doctor visits, low access to health facilities, and unaffordable health care [3]. Based on the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), globally more than 569,000 new cases of cervical cancer are reported, and 311,000 women deaths occur annually due to cervical cancer [4,5].
The most widely accepted, method of cervical cancer screening in the early stages of the disease, which is inexpensive, simple, quick, and relatively painless is the Papanicolaou smear (Pap smear) [6]. Cervical cancer can be prevented through primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention methods [7]. Primary prevention method includes education for having safe sexual practices and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination [8]. HPV vaccination is considered as one of the proven approaches to prevent cervical cancer however, in many countries, implementation of HPV vaccination is limited (4). The secondary prevention method involves cervical cancer screening of asymptomatic patients and management of precancerous lesions before they turn into cancer via Pap smear [9,10]. Experiences from the developed world show, broad and effective coverage of screening programs can lead to a reduction in cervical cancer incidences and mortality associated with this cancer [6,11]. The screening programs for cervical cancer in Iran are free of charge and widely accessible in public health centers however, Iranian women commonly avail these cervical cancer screening services resulting in a high rate of death from cervical cancer in Iran [12].
Several epidemiological studies have shown the role of risk factors such as sexually transmitted infections [13], reproductive and behavioral factors [14] in the incidence of cancer which among them, HPV infection is the most important risk factor [15,16]. Also, sociodemographic factors which influence women’s screening practices include age, marital status, education level, employment status, smoking, long-term hormonal contraceptive use, and income level [17,18], which some of them are modifiable variables and can impact the well-being of individuals [19].
Since decision-making processes for Pap smear screening are very complex and women may be in different stages of readiness of adopting a behavior change hence, the transtheoretical model (TTM) of behavior change was used in this study. Also, based on the TTM model, health-seeking behavior is a dynamic process. This model has four basic principles: the stages of change, self-efficacy, decisional balance, and processes of change [20,21].
By modeling the relationships of neurons in the human brain, artificial neural networks (ANN) were identified, predicted, and classified the pattern of association between variables [22]. This type of modeling has been used in psychiatry, medicine, etc. with a lower sum of square error and higher correlation coefficients than conventional models such as the response surface methodology (RSM) [23,24].
Results from a study conducted by Schaffter et al., (2020) on 144,231 mammograms from 85,580 American women and 166,578 examinations from 68,008 Swedish women showed no single artificial intelligence algorithm outperformed the US community radiologist benchmarks [25]. Another study was conducted by Natarajan et al. (2019) on 231 patients for diabetic retinopathy screenings. In this study, the use of an offline artificial intelligence system on a smartphone-enabled screening of referable diabetic retinopathy in remote areas where services of an ophthalmologist are unavailable with sensitivity and specificity of 100.0% and 88.4%, respectively vs. 85.2% and 92.0% with ophthalmologist grading using the same images, respectively [26]. Also, Bhatt et al., (2021) used singular multi-class classification methodology and Progressive Resizing and Transfer Learning on Deep Neural Network models for cervical cells from Whole Slide Images (WSI). The images showed accuracy (99.70%), precision (99.70%), and recall (99.72%) F-Beta (99.63%), and Kappa scores (99.31%), which supersede the scores obtained through principal methodologies [27]. Using the data obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) database of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Raghupathiet al., (2012) used neural networks to analyze the combined influence of multiple behavioral habits on chronic diseases. Neural networks have the advantage for analyzing large and complex data sets which herein, makes it possible to identify populations of patients in behavioral risk categories for delivery of wellness programs relating to chronic diseases [28].
1.1. Objectives
In this study, we used the multilayer feed-forward back-propagation neural network as one of the popular neural networks in predicting and modeling [29]. For this purpose, we used 80% of the observed data in the training set and the remaining 20% in the model evaluation.
2. Methods
This study was descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional research in which the factors related to the stage of change in cervical cancer screening were investigated. The sample populations of this study were female employees of governmental agencies in Birjand, a city located in the east of Iran. The sampling was conducted using a survey and the self-administered questionnaire was completed by 1898 employed women. Inclusion criteria for participation in this study included female employees who were married and aged between 20 and 65 years, with no personal history of cervical cancer, and willingness to participate in the survey. Therefore, we excluded females with a history of hysterectomy or gynecological cancer and women <20 years old and single.
The data were collected using a four-part questionnaire. The first section contains socioeconomic characteristics (age, education, marital status, job, family income, and insurance). The second part of the questionnaire included questions about reproductive and pregnancy characteristics (marriage age, first gestational age, number of children, lactation, and menopause status). The third section of the questionnaire consisted of information about cervical cancer, the history of problems in breasts, and the history of cancer in the close family members, the history of referral for mammography or ultrasound. The four section of the questionnaire consisted of women’s performance and intention regarding screening behaviors of Pap smear.
To evaluate cervical cancer screening behavior stages of change, we used the single item with 3 choices as a stage of behavior changes that was adapted from the mammography stage of change scale described elsewhere [30,31]. Thus, three stages of Pap smear adoption are defined as 1-Pre-contemplation (women who have never had any prior Pap smear and are not planning to get a Pap smear in the coming year) or Relapse (women who have had one or more Pap smears in the previous years but do not intend to have another one in the coming year), 2-Contemplation (women who are planning to get a Pap smear in the coming year, but have not done yet), 3-Action (women who have had a Pap smear with age-specific interval and intent to have another one) or Maintenance (women who have two or more Pap smears on schedule and intend to continue). The content validity of this scale was assessed by summing up the opinions of the expert panel (three health educators, four gynecologists and midwives, two epidemiologists, and one community health nurse). The reliability of this item was also assessed by 20 women who matched with the sample and were out of the target group of this study.
2.1. Statistical analysis
In regression analysis, restricted assumptions like normality may be avoided when predicting variables that are categorical such as our study. One of the best ways to overcome this dilemma is using models like ANN models. Since a sufficient sample size was available in the present study, the ANN model seemed to be one of the best analysis methods. The three main components of the neural network are neuron, structure, and weight. The number of input and output layer neurons is determined based on the number of input and response variables. Therefore, the structure of the neural network is determined according to the number of neurons in a hidden layer, the type of connection between neurons in this layer and other layers, and their connection functions [32]. The proper connection function was selected between hyperbolic tangent or sigmoid, to connect the neurons of the input and hidden layers and linear, hyperbolic tangent, SoftMax, or sigmoid functions to connect the neurons of the hidden and output layers in our study [33,34]. Subsequently, we determined the number of optimal neurons in the hidden layer by increasing them to 46 neurons in a network that used the optimal function to connect the neurons of different layers. To avoid the effect of random weight allocation and random correlations, we repeated each grid three times and used their mean sum of square errors as an appropriate indicator in the model evaluation. In the network training, 1519 data were used and the model was confirmed using the remaining 379 data. The performance of the optimal ANN was presented according to the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy area under the ROC curve (AUC) results. Finally, the importance of input variables including age, education level, job, income level, marriage age, pregnancy, child number, breastfeeding, and menopause, insurance type, disease history (sono and mammography, breast problem, and cancer), and cancer information was determined on Pap smear screening behavior stage of change (output variable). All analyses were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA).
3. Results
To determine the best function that can connect different layers of the neural network among the different functions in the connecting input, hidden, and output layers; we examined the results of the neural network with 2 neurons in the hidden layer (Fig. 1A). As can be seen, the neural network with hyperbolic tangent between the neurons of the input and hidden layers and sigmoid function between the neurons of the hidden and output layers had the least mean square error in both the training and validation sets. Furthermore, increasing the number of neurons in the hidden layer did not have an impact on improving the performance of the network (Fig. 1B). Therefore, the neural network with two neurons in the hidden layer and the hyperbolic tangent function for connecting the input-hidden and the sigmoid function for connecting the hidden-output layers with 2.737 e-01 and 2.4996e-01 total mean square errors are optimal in training and validation sets, respectively (Fig. 1). This neural network was able to predict the Pap smear behavior stage of change effectively using these variables (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
A) The mean square error of ANN models in both training and validation phase for different transfer functions; B) The mean square error of selected ANN transfer function models in both training and validation phase for different hidden neurons.
Fig. 2.
Roc curve of the Artificial Neural Network model.
As shown in Table 1, 79 participants out of 471 participants and 20 participants out of 113 participants for the precontemplation - Relapse stage in training and validation sets were correctly categorized by the perfect ANNs model. This model also detected 815 participants out of 855 and 223 participants out of 230 participants for the Action-Maintenance stage in training and validation sets by the variables mentioned in the study, but the optimal model was not able to predict women in the contemplation stage correctly. Table 1 also revealed that sensitivity, specificity, and AUC in the validation set were higher than 0.65, 0.43, and 0.59, respectively.
Table 1.
Power of the different variables for predicting Pap Smear Screening behavior based on triples threshold values in training and validation groups separately.
| Actual outcome | Training set (n = 1519) | Validation set (n = 379) | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||||
| Precontemplation-Relapse | Contemplation | Action-Maintenance | Precontemplation-Relapse | Contemplation | Action-Maintenance | ||||
| Precontemplation-Relapse | 79 (16.8%) | 0 | 392 | 20 (17.7%) | 0 | 93 | 0.598 | 0.72 | 0.48 |
| Contemplation | 42 | 0 (0%) | 151 | 4 | 0 (0%) | 32 | 0.632 | 0.67 | 0.48 |
| Action-Maintenance | 40 | 0 | 815 (95.3%) | 7 | 0 | 223 (97%) | 0.644 | 0.69 | 0.43 |
The importance of pregnancy characters, socioeconomic factors, and disease screening information were respectively 40.10, 39.80, and 20.10 percent (Fig. 3). Among the variables, marriage age, age, breastfeeding, children number, and education were identified as the most important factors with 18.3, 16.3, 7.3, 7.3, and 7.2 percent, respectively.
Fig. 3.
The importance variables from the selected Artificial Neural Network.
As you see in Table 2, women who are 30 years old or younger are often in Precontemplation-Relapse stage and similar stage. Women who are older than 30 years old are often in the Action-Maintenance stage. Women in the Action-Maintenance stage had significantly lower marriage age than other participants. Most mothers that had a baby and experienced breastfeeding were in the Action-Maintenance stage, although about 64 percent of mothers that had no baby and breastfeeding were in Precontemplation-Relapse or Contemplation stage.
Table 2.
Comparing pap smear behavior stage between different marriage age, age, breast feeding, child number, education, and income categories.
| Variables | Precontemplation-Relapse | Contemplation | Action-Maintenance | P-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | ||
| Age | |||||||
| 20–30 | 85 | 46.7 | 42 | 23.1 | 55 | 30.2 | <0.001 |
| 30–40 | 262 | 28.6 | 119 | 13 | 534 | 58.4 | |
| 40–50 | 174 | 28.4 | 53 | 8.6 | 386 | 63 | |
| ≥50 | 63 | 33.5 | 15 | 8 | 110 | 58.5 | |
| Marriage age | 23.46 ± 3.64 | 24.07 ± 4.03 | 22.95 ± 3.61 | <0.001β,γ | |||
| Breast feeding | |||||||
| No | 154 | 44.5 | 68 | 19.7 | 124 | 35.8 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 430 | 27.7 | 161 | 10.4 | 961 | 61.9 | |
| Child number | |||||||
| 0 | 138 | 44.7 | 65 | 21 | 106 | 34.3 | <0.001 |
| 1 | 159 | 27 | 88 | 15 | 341 | 58 | |
| 2 | 173 | 26.7 | 50 | 7.7 | 424 | 65.5 | |
| 3 | 82 | 31.2 | 20 | 7.6 | 161 | 61.2 | |
| ≥4 | 32 | 35.2 | 6 | 6.6 | 53 | 58.2 | |
| Education | |||||||
| Under diploma | 25 | 33.8 | 3 | 4.1 | 46 | 62.2 | 0.57 |
| Diploma | 57 | 30.5 | 22 | 11.8 | 108 | 57.8 | |
| Associate | 73 | 33.2 | 24 | 10.9 | 123 | 55.9 | |
| Bachelor | 338 | 30.3 | 146 | 13.1 | 631 | 56.6 | |
| Master or higher | 91 | 30.1 | 34 | 11.3 | 177 | 58.6 | |
significant between Precontemplation-Relapse and Contemplation.
significant between Precontemplation-Relapse and Action-Maintenance.
significant between Contemplation and Action-Maintenance.
4. Discussion
ANN models including many different architectures and methods are widely used in many medical applications with better accuracy in results.
Previous studies investigated manual screening methods. Cervigram images in the detection of cervical cancer improved the accuracy of predicting cancer susceptibility, recurrence, and mortality by using ANN models [35–38], however, in this study, ANN was considered as the modeling of predicting Pap smear screening behavior stage.
Our result showed that women who are younger than 30 years of age are often in the Pre-contempltion-relapse stage. Those who are in their 30s or older are often in the action-maintenance stage.
Our result was supported by Tung et al. (2019) who showed more of the older participants aged 40–65 was in a more advanced stage (Action/Maintenance) than younger women and Abbas et al. (2021) who indicated that 67.8% of women were in the Precontemplation Stage of change for performing the Pap smear [39,40]. This is in contrast with the results obtained by Krok-Schoen et al. (2016) which was conducted on 90 women living in Ohio Appalachian and showed that women who are younger than 50 years old are in the action stage in the second visit as well as the results obtained by Studts et al. (2013) who did a study on 345 Appalachian women aged 40–64 years [41,42].
There may be a greater likelihood of obstetric and gynecological problems with aging women who would likely visit more often health clinics and undergo cancer screening. Another possible explanation is that young women are more likely to be unmarried and the gynecological care they receive (Pap test) before marriage may be not be acceptable [43].
Also, people in the action-maintenance stage had significantly lower marriage age than other participants.
Our result is consistent with a community-based cross-sectional study by Aynalem et al. (2020) which was performed on 822 women in the Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia who had started sexual intercourse at age of 16 and younger and were more likely to utilize cervical cancer screening as compared to those women who had started sexual intercourse after their age of 16 years [44] and it is in contrast with National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) study stratified by age (15–17, 18–20, 21–29) and sexual activity by Henderson et al. (2013) that showed among females ages 15–17, the proportion screened decreased from 23% to 12% [45]. The possible explanation is that women who start their sexual intercourse earlier have increased lifetime sexual activities and likely experience an increased chance of being infected with sexually transmitted diseases (STD) and abnormal Pap test results which in turn lead to visit health facilities.
Our study indicated that most mothers who had a baby and experienced breastfeeding were in the action-maintenance stage.
This is following a cross-sectional study by Visanuyothin et al. (2015) on 675 women aged 30–60 years who found those who had children were more likely to be caregivers. Also, the study conducted by Buki et al. (2007) on 467 Latina women [46,47] and is inconsistent with a qualitative study by Haji Rasul et al. (2016) on 22 women that showed multiple full-term pregnancies did not affect cervical cancer screening [48].
It is explainable that previous contact with reproductive health services in earlier parity of women may increase their awareness about consequences of cervical cancer and they have less fear and embarrassment about undergoing a Pap smear test than the women who have no children. Therefore, the utilization of screening services in the form of gynecological checkups can be directly related to the parity of women [49].
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, our findings showed that among many associated variables, the marriage age, age, breastfeeding, and children number were important predictors for the behavioral stage of change. Therefore, it seems to focus on these factors which most of which are modifiable factors, in an appropriate manner in which to influencing cervical cancer screening adherence.
Acknowledgments
The authors of this study gratefully acknowledge the Research Council of Birjand University of Medical Sciences for funding this study (the research Project No.: 5465).
Footnotes
Authorship contributions
EA, MM and ZT designed the research study.
MM and ZT organized the project and performed the research EA analyzed the data and performed statistical analysis.
EA, MM and ZT wrote the paper.
All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and submission of the manuscript.
Ethical approval
The research protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Birjand University of Medical Sciences (Ethical code: IR.BUMS.REC.1399.192). Also, informed consent was obtained from all of the participants before entering the study. All procedures were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the criteria of the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Multilayer feed-forward back-propagation ANNs were used to detect the patterns between variables using a neural network with 14 inputs and one output.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
References
- 1. Ginsburg O, Bray F, Coleman MP, Vanderpuye V, Eniu A, Kotha SR, et al. The global burden of women’s cancers: a grand challenge in global health (London, England) Lancet. 2017;389(10071):847–60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31392-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(2):e191–203. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Woldetsadik AB, Amhare AF, Bitew ST, Pei L, Lei J, Han J. Socio-demographic characteristics and associated factors influencing cervical cancer screening among women attending in St. Paul’s Teaching and Referral Hospital, Ethiopia. BMC Wom Health. 2020;20:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00927-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ferlay J, Ervik M, Lam F, Colombet M, Mery L, Piñeros M, et al. Global cancer observatory: cancer today. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 5. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Mishra GA, Pimple SA, Shastri SS. An overview of prevention and early detection of cervical cancers. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol: Off J Indian Soc Med Paediatr Oncol. 2011;32(3):125. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.92808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Committee Opinion No. 641: human papillomavirus vaccination. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(3):e38–43. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Control CfD. Prevention Frequently asked questions about HPV vaccine safety. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Miller AB, Nazeer S, Fonn S, Brandup-Lukanow A, Rehman R, Cronje H, et al. Report on consensus conference on cervical cancer screening and management. Int J Cancer. 2000;86(3):440–7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(20000501)86:3<440::aid-ijc22>3.0.co;2-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Aggarwal P. WJCO. World. 2014;5(4):775–80. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Canfell K, Kim JJ, Brisson M, Keane A, Simms KT, Caruana M, et al. Mortality impact of achieving WHO cervical cancer elimination targets: a comparative modelling analysis in 78 low-income and lower-middle-income countries. Lancet. 2020;395(10224):591–603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30157-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Miri MR, Moodi M, Sharif-Zadeh G-R, Malaki Moghadam H, Miri M, Norozi E. Cognitive predictors of cervical cancer screening’s stages of change among sample of Iranian women health volunteers: a path analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0193638. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Giuliano AR, Nyitray AG, Kreimer AR, Pierce Campbell CM, Goodman MT, Sudenga SL, et al. UROGIN 2014 roadmap: differences in human papillomavirus infection natural history, transmission and human papillomavirus-related cancer incidence by gender and anatomic site of infection. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(12):2752–60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Momenimovahed Z, Salehiniya H. Cervical cancer in Iran: integrative insights of epidemiological analysis. Biomedicine. 2018;8(3) doi: 10.1051/bmdcn/2018080318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Crosbie EJ, Einstein MH, Franceschi S, Kitchener HC. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet. 2013;382(9895):889–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60022-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Flores YN, Bishai DM, Shah KV, Lazcano-Ponce E, Lörincz A, Hernández M, et al. Risk factors for cervical cancer among HPV positive women in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50:49–58. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342008000100011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Megahed M. Saudi young females’ level of knowledge regarding cervical and breast cancer. Int J Nurs Sci. 2012;2(5):47–52. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Bruni L, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, Albero G, Aldea M, Serrano B, Valencia S, et al. Human papillomavirus and related diseases in the world. ICO Inform Centre HPV Cancer (HPV Inform Centre) 2015;4(8) [Google Scholar]
- 19.Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. John Wiley & Sons; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tung W-C, Smith-Gagen J, Lu M, Warfield M. Application of the transtheoretical model to Cervical cancer screening in Latina women. J Immigr Minority Health. 2016;18(5):1168–74. doi: 10.1007/s10903-015-0183-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1983;51(3):390. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.3.390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Feng S, Li L, Cen L, Huang J. Using MLP networks to design a production scheduling system. Comput Oper Res. 2003;30(6):821–32. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Zaki MR, Varshosaz J, Fathi M. Preparation of agar nanospheres: comparison of response surface and artificial neural network modeling by a genetic algorithm approach. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;122:314–20. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Karaca Y, Hayta Ş. Application and comparison of ANN and SVM for diagnostic classification for cognitive functioning. Appl Math Sci. 2016;10(64):3187–99. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Schaffter T, Buist DS, Lee CI, Nikulin Y, Ribli D, Guan Y, et al. Evaluation of combined artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment to interpret screening mammograms. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e200265. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Natarajan S, Jain A, Krishnan R, Rogye A, Sivaprasad S. Diagnostic accuracy of community-based diabetic retinopathy screening with an offline artificial intelligence system on a smartphone. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(10):1182–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.2923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bhatt AR, Ganatra A, Kotecha K. Cervical cancer detection in pap smear whole slide images using convNet with transfer learning and progressive resizing. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021;7:e348. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Raghupathi V, Raghupathi W, editors. Healthcare. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; 2017. Preventive healthcare: a neural network analysis of behavioral habits and chronic diseases. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Karlik B, Olgac AV. Performance analysis of various activation functions in generalized MLP architectures of neural networks. Int J Artif Intell Expet Syst. 2011;1(4):111–22. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Rakowski W, Dube CA, Goldstein MG. Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography. Health Educ Res. 1996;11(1):77–96. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Moodi M, Rezaeian M, Mostafavi F, Sharifirad G. The study of mammography screening behavior based on stage of change model in Isfahanian women of age 40 and older: a population-based study. J Adv Med Biomed Res. 2013;21(84):24–35. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ghaedi AM, Vafaei A. Applications of artificial neural networks for adsorption removal of dyes from aqueous solution: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;245:20–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2017.04.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhang Z, Barkoula N-M, Karger-Kocsis J, Friedrich K. Artificial neural network predictions on erosive wear of polymers. Wear. 2003;255(1–6):708–13. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Gardner J, Craven M, Dow C, Hines E. The prediction of bacteria type and culture growth phase by an electronic nose with a multi-layer perceptron network. Meas Sci Technol. 1998;9(1):120. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Elayaraja P, Suganthi M. Automatic approach for cervical cancer detection and segmentation using neural network classifier. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev APJCP: APJCP. 2018;19(12):3571. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2018.19.12.3571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Tan X, Li K, Zhang J, Wang W, Wu B, Wu J, et al. Automatic model for cervical cancer screening based on convolutional neural network: a retrospective, multicohort, multicenter study. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01742-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Priya S, Karthikeyan N. A heuristic and ANN based classification model for early screening of cervical cancer. Int J Comput Intell Syst. 2020;13(1):1092–100. [Google Scholar]
- 38. Machmud R, Wijaya A. Behavior determinant based cervical cancer early detection with machine learning algorithm. Adv Sci Lett. 2016;22(10):3120–3. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Tung W-C, Granner M, Lu M, Sohn J. Demographics, self-efficacy, benefits/barriers, stages of adopting Pap testing among Korean American women. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(4):510–5. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2018.1525693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Abbas HK, Naji AB. Women’s readiness to conduct pap smear test at primary health care centers in baghdad city: the health belief model as A theoretical framework. Med Leg Update. 2021;21(2):284–9. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Krok-Schoen JL, Oliveri JM, Young GS, Katz ML, Tatum CM, Paskett ED. Evaluating the stage of change model to a cervical cancer screening intervention among Ohio Appalachian women. Women Health. 2016;56(4):468–86. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2015.1101736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Studts CR, Tarasenko YN, Schoenberg NE. Barriers to cervical cancer screening among middle-aged and older rural Appalachian women. J Community Health. 2013;38(3):500–12. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9639-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Gor BJ, Chilton JA, Camingue PT, Hajek RA. Young Asian Americans’ knowledge and perceptions of cervical cancer and the human papillomavirus. J Immigr Minority Health. 2011;13(1):81–6. doi: 10.1007/s10903-010-9343-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Aynalem BY, Anteneh KT, Enyew MM. Utilization of cervical cancer screening and associated factors among women in Debremarkos town, Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia: community based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Henderson JT, Saraiya M, Martinez G, Harper CC, Sawaya GF. Changes to cervical cancer prevention guidelines: effects on screening among US women ages 15–29. Prev Med. 2013;56(1):25–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Visanuyothin S, Chompikul J, Mongkolchati A. Determinants of cervical cancer screening adherence in urban areas of Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8(6):543–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2015.04.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Buki LP, Jamison J, Anderson CJ, Cuadra AM. Differences in predictors of cervical and breast cancer screening by screening need in uninsured Latina women. Cancer Interdiscipl Int J Am Cancer Soc. 2007;110(7):1578–85. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Haji Rasul V, Cheraghi MA, Behboodi Moghadam Z. Exploring the impact of individual factors in taking cervical cancer screening: a content analysis. J Client Center Nurs Care. 2016;2(4):239–48. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Sankaranarayanan R, Rajkumar R, Arrossi S, Theresa R, Esmy PO, Mahé C, et al. Determinants of participation of women in a cervical cancer visual screening trial in rural south India. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003;27(6):457–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2003.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



