Abstract
Background:
Brain injury is a serious and common complication of critical congenital heart disease (CHD). Impaired autonomic development (assessed by heart rate variability; HRV) is associated with brain injury in other high-risk neonatal populations.
Objective:
To determine whether impaired early neonatal HRV is associated with pre-operative brain injury in CHD.
Methods:
In infants with critical CHD, we evaluated HRV during the first 24 hours of cardiac ICU (CICU) admission using time-domain (RMS1, RMS2, and alpha 1) and frequency-domain metrics (LF, nLF, HF, nHF). Pre-operative brain MRI was scored for injury using an established system. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to determine the association between HRV and pre-operative brain injury.
Results:
We enrolled 34 infants with median birth gestational age (GA) of 38.8 weeks (IQR 38.1-39.1). Median postnatal age (PNA) at pre-operative brain MRI was 2 days (IQR 1-3 days). Thirteen infants had MRI evidence of brain injury. RMS 1 and RMS 2 were inversely correlated with pre-operative brain injury.
Conclusions:
Time-domain metrics of autonomic function measured within the first 24 hours of admission to the CICU are associated with pre-operative brain injury, and may perform better than frequency domain metrics under non-stationary conditions such as critical illness.
Introduction
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common form of congenital malformation, affecting 4-12/1000 live births.1,2 Neurologic disability is a common complication of CHD and its management, with potential for lifelong debilitating consequences.3–7 The mechanisms underlying brain injury and neurologic morbidity in these infants are likely multifactorial and probably cumulative, starting in the fetal period and extending from birth to the intraoperative period and beyond.8–11
Neonates with CHD are particularly vulnerable to brain injury due to a unique combination of immature brain development and impaired cerebral perfusion and/or oxygenation. White matter injury, including periventricular leukomalacia, is commonly found both pre- and post-operatively.12,13 Metabolic and structural brain development are impaired in critical CHD, with term neonates displaying decreased N-acetylaspartate-to-choline ratios, increased lactate, delayed cerebral maturation, and decreased cerebral volumes compared with control term neonates.5,6,14 Microstructural and metabolic brain development appear to be strongly related to preoperative brain injury in CHD 14, and may be related to differences in cerebral circulation.15 Impaired brain perfusion and oxygenation are likely contributors to both impaired cerebral maturation and brain injury in CHD.16,17
Currently, brain imaging studies, with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the gold standard, are used to detect brain injury in critically ill infants. However, clinical instability in such patients may preclude leaving the intensive care unit (ICU) for brain imaging studies. In addition, imaging studies may only detect brain injury after the threshold of reversibility has passed.
We have previously shown that autonomic function is associated with brain injury patterns in other high-risk neonates.18 The ANS plays a critical role in neurogenic control of the cardiopulmonary and cerebral circulation and is one system responsible for intrinsic neuroprotection. ANS dysfunction may lead to impairment of critical intrinsic neuroprotective reflexes (e.g. cerebral pressure autoregulation (CAR)), leaving the infant vulnerable to irreversible brain injury from insults such as hypoperfusion and hypoxemia that commonly occur in CHD.19–23 We have previously described significant autonomic dysfunction in newborns with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and transposition of the great arteries (TGA), two forms of critical CHD.24 Impaired ANS development may lead to adverse neurologic outcome in several ways. Immature cardiorespiratory control may predispose to cerebral hypoxia-ischemia and brain injury. The brainstem ANS plays an important activity-based role in the development of higher cortical and subcortical centers; impaired maturation of the ANS might, therefore, lead to long-term neurodevelopmental and psycho-affective dysfunction in later life.25
Autonomic function may be measured using signals such as heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate. 26 Heart rate variability (HRV), which measures variation in beat-to-beat intervals between successive R waves on electrocardiography (ECG) recordings, is the most widely used measure of autonomic function in neonates, given the non-invasive nature of the measurement (by ECG). We use HRV in this study as a metric of ANS function in neonates with CHD. HRV can be calculated using standard ICU continuous ECG monitoring and analyzed by both time- and frequency-domain approaches. Time-domain analysis (metrics include RMS 1, RMS 2, alpha 1, and alpha2) determines both long-term (RMS 2, alpha 2) and short-term (RMS 1, alpha 1) HRV. Long-term HRV metrics (RMS 2, alpha 2) reflect both sympathetic and baroreceptor-mediated parasympathetic function, while short-term HRV metrics (RMS 1, alpha 1) reflect predominantly parasympathetic function. RMS metrics indicate the variability between R-R intervals on ECG, while alpha metrics indicate the autocorrection in the R-R intervals. Among frequency-domain metrics, low-frequency (LF, 0.05-0.25 Hz) HRV characterizes sympathetic and parasympathetic tone and changes related to baroreflex function,27,28 while high frequency (HF, 0.3-1 Hz ) HRV reflects parasympathetic tone and is impacted by the respiratory rate.28 Frequency domain approaches may be less reliable in non-stationary conditions.29 Lower metrics of HRV indicate immature or impaired autonomic function.
In this study, we sought to extend our earlier studies of HRV in critically ill infants including those with CHD.24,29,30 We tested the hypothesis that HRV over the first 24 hours of cardiac ICU (CICU) admission would be associated with pre-operative brain injury (by MRI) in a cohort of infants with critical CHD. These data may help elucidate mechanisms of brain injury in infants with CHD as well as set the stage for the development of supplemental neuromonitoring strategies in infants who are too unstable to tolerate brain imaging.
Methods
Participants
All subjects in this single-center study were part of a prospective, observational MRI study in which pregnant women with a fetal diagnosis of critical CHD, i.e., infants expected to require cardiac surgery within the first 30 postnatal days 31,32 of age, were recruited. Subjects underwent fetal MRI and postnatal, pre-operative brain MRI. The Institutional Review Board of Children’s National Hospital approved this study and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Inclusion criteria were infants with critical CHD (i) admitted to the Children’s National Hospital Cardiac ICU (CICU) within 72 hours of birth, (ii) with postnatal, pre-operative MRI studies, and (iii) archived ECG data for the first 24 hours after CICU admission. Exclusion criteria included documented (i) genetic or chromosomal abnormalities, (ii) congenital infection, or (iii) multiple gestation.
Given that our population consisted of a heterogeneous group of infants with CHD, we categorized them as (i) two ventricle without aortic obstruction (2V-AO; n=14), (ii) two ventricle with aortic obstruction (2V+ AO; n=1) (iii) single ventricle without aortic obstruction (SV-AO; n=5), or (iv) single ventricle with aortic obstruction (SV+AO; n=14). For the purposes of this study, we compared either SV (n=19) vs. 2V (n=15) or AO (n=15) vs. no AO (n=19).
Continuous physiologic signals were retrospectively obtained from a large central archive. Relevant clinical data were abstracted from the medical record. A total of 34 infants had both postnatal, pre-operative brain MRI and continuous ECG data of sufficient quality to calculate time- and frequency-domain metrics of HRV.
Conventional MRI Studies
MR imaging was performed preoperatively on a 3T magnet (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI). Sequences obtained included conventional T1- and T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI), and gradient-echo (GRE) sequences, as well as MR spectroscopy of the basal ganglia. Our neuroradiologist (JM) reviewed postnatal, pre-operative brain MRI and scored MRIs according to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormality Scoring System used by Andropoulos et al. 33 This scoring system categorizes brain MRI abnormalities as (i) white matter injury (WMI) , (ii) infarction (INF), (iii) intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), (iv) punctate lesions (PL), (v) lactate peak on MRS (lactate), (vi) intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), (vii) subdural hemorrhage (SDH), or (viii) deep venous sinus thrombosis (DVST). Abnormalities in each category are given a score of 0-3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe) and weighted by a significance multiplier.33 For WMI, INF, and IPH the significance multiplier is 3, for PL and lactate the significance multiplier is 2, and for IVH, SDH, and DVST the significance multiplier is 1. Scores used in the analysis are derived from summated scores of all categories after application of the significance multiplier.
Physiologic Signal Collection
We retrospectively retrieved ECG data from the Phillips Data Warehouse system (DWS) (IntelliVue MP-70, Philips, MA) or the RDE system (IntelliVue Information Center; Philips Healthcare). We retrieved ECG over the course of the first 24 hours of admission to Children’s National CICU. The sampling rate of the ECG retrieved from DWS and the RDE was 250 Hz and 125 Hz, respectively. We processed all data offline using computer programs developed in MATLAB 2018 (Mathworks, Inc, Natick, MA).
Heart Rate Variability Analysis
We bandpass filtered the ECG signals between 0.5-60 Hz.34,35 After identifying R-waves, we calculated beat-to-beat interval (RRi). 29,35,36 After partitioning RRi into 10-minute end-to-end epochs, we calculated HRV metrics (LF, HF, nLF, nHF, alpha 1, alpha 2, RMS1, RMS2) for RRi in each epoch. We averaged every metric over the entire recording period and obtained one representative value for the metric per study.
To calculate frequency-domain metrics (LF, nLF, HF, nHF), we used the Welch periodogram approach with a frequency resolution of 0.016Hz to estimate a power spectrum of RRi in every 10-minute epoch. Low-frequency (LF) was calculated as the median of the logarithm of the power in 0.05-0.25 Hz, and high-frequency (HF) was calculated as the median of the logarithm of the power in 0.3-1 Hz. Normalized low-frequency (nLF) and normalized high-frequency (nHF) were calculated as the ratio of the sum of the powers in low- and high-frequencies bands to the total power. Total power was defined as the sum of the powers in the frequency band between 0.05 – 2 Hz.
We used detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA), a modified root mean square analysis, to calculate the time domain metrics. 37,38 DFA involves five steps. First, the profile function, the mean value of the RRi is subtracted from the RRi series and the cumulative sum, is calculated. Then, we partition the profile into end-to-end windows containing ‘s’ number of beats and use a fourth-degree polynomial to fit the profile in each window. Next, we calculate the local fluctuation function as the root mean square (RMS) of the difference between the profile and best fits. Last, we use the median of the local fluctuation function from all the windows to calculate the fluctuation function. We repeat steps 1-3 for different window sizes.39 The window size is varied from 6 beats to one-fourth of the number of RRi samples in the 10-minute epoch. We calculated the time domain metrics RMS1 (s) and RMS 2 (s) as the maximum value of the fluctuation function for “s” between 15-50 beats and 100-150 beats, respectively. Alpha 1 and alpha 2 were calculated as the slope of the fluctuation and “s” in a double logarithmic plot from 15-30 beats and 35-150 beats, respectively. Autocorrelation in the RRi is characterized by the alpha metrics.40 RMS (sec) metrics characterize the variability in the RRi.40
Statistical Analysis
We calculated Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient to determine correlation between brain injury scores and HRV metrics. We used SAS (ver. 9.3, Cary, NC) to conduct all analyses with statistical significance considered for P <0.05. Two-sided significance testing was used, with no adjustment for multiple comparisons. We present data as median (Q1-Q3) or frequency and percent. Group comparisons were made using either t-tests or Fisher’s exact test, where appropriate.
Results
Patient Population
Thirty-four infants met inclusion criteria. Clinical and demographic characteristics of our cohort are outlined in Table 1. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between groups no matter the CHD classification (Table 1). Overall, the median maternal age was 30.0 years (IQR 26.2-35.0), 19 (55.9%) infants were delivered via caesarean section, and median GA at birth was 38.9 weeks (IQR 38.1-39.1). As part of the original prospective study, a total of 33/34 infants underwent at least one fetal MRI prior to birth (Table 2). On the first fetal MRI, one fetus was found to have a single abnormal appearing sulcus. One fetus had pontine and vermian hypoplasia vs. dysplasia and was found to have a Blake’s pouch cyst and small pontine measurements on the second fetal MRI. One fetus had mild ventriculomegaly on the second fetal MRI. There was no evidence of brain injury on fetal MRI in any fetus included in our cohort.
Table 1.
Clinical and Demographic Characteristics.
| Single Ventricle vs. 2 Ventricle | Aortic Obstruction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||||
| Single Ventricle (n=19) | 2 Ventricle (n=15) | No, Aortic Obstr. (n=19) | Yes, Aortic Obstr. (n=15) | All (n=34) | |
| Maternal Age | 29.0 (26.2-33.9) | 32.0 (25.6-35.5) | 31.0 (25.6-35.0) | 29.0 (26.2-35.0) | 30.0 (26.2-35.0) |
| Mode of delivery | |||||
| C-section | 11 (57.9) | 8 (53.3) | 10 (52.6) | 9 (60.0) | 19 (55.9) |
| Vaginal | 8 (42.1) | 7 (46.7) | 9 (47.4) | 6 (40.0) | 15 (44.1) |
| GA at birth (weeks) | 38.7 (38.1-39.1) | 39.0 (38.0-39.3) | 38.9 (38.0-39.1) | 38.7 (38.1-39.3) | 38.9 (38.1-39.1) |
| Gender (male) | 12 (63.2) | 12 (80.0) | 16 (84.2) | 8 (53.3) | 24 (70.6) |
| Birthweight (g) | 2972 (2775-3500) | 3300 (2780-3580) | 3150 (2775-3500) | 2972 (2780-3637) | 3078 (2780-3500) |
| BW z-score | −0.39 (−1.20-0.51) | 0.05 (−1.01-0.52) | −0.01 (−1.01-0.26) | −0.39 (−1.11-0.61) | −0.26 (−1.01-0.51) |
| APGAR 1 | 8.00 (8.00-8.00) | 8.00 (7.00-8.00) | 8.00 (7.00-8.00) | 8.00 (8.00-8.00) | 8.00 (8.00-8.00) |
| APGAR 5 | 9.00 (8.00-9.00) | 8.00 (8.00-8.00) | 8.00 (8.00-9.00) | 9.00 (8.00-9.00) | 8.00 (8.00-9.00) |
Values are median (25th-75th percentile) or frequency (percent). GA, gestational age; BW, birthweight
Table 2.
Fetal MRI Findings.
| Single Ventricle vs. 2 Ventricle | Aortic Obstruction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Ventricle (n=19) | 2 Ventricle (n=15) | No, Aortic Obstr. (n=19) | Yes, Aortic Obstr. (n=15) | All (n=34) | |
| 1st Fetal MRI | |||||
| Fetal MRI | 18 (94.7) | 15 (100) | 19 (100) | 14 (93.3) | 33 (97.1) |
| GA, weeks | 29.1 (26.1-33.4) | 31.4 (28.43-32.4) | 31.4 (28.4-33.4) | 28.4 (26.14-33.0) | 30.3 (27.0-33.0) |
| Brain injury | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Abnormal development | 2 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (14.3) | 2 (0.0) |
| 2nd Fetal MRI | |||||
| Fetal MRI | 11 (57.9) | 12 (80.0) | 14 (74.0) | 9 (60.0) | 23 (67.6) |
| GA, weeks | 34.6 (33.7-35.6) | 35.9 (35.2-37.3) | 35.7 (34.7-36.7) | 34.3 (33.7-35.6) | 35.4 (34.3-36.6) |
| Brain injury | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Abnormal development | 2 (18.2) | 1 (8.3) | 1 (7.1) | 2 (22.2) | 3 (8.9) |
Values are median (25th-75th percentile) or frequency (percent). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; GA, gestational age
HRV and Brain Injury Scores
As outlined in Table 3, our cohort had a median gestational age of 39.1 weeks at the time of the postnatal, pre-operative brain MRI. A total of 13 (38.2%) infants had brain injury on pre-operative MRI. Among infants with pre-operative brain injury, 6 (46.2%) had mild brain injury, 5 (38.5%) had moderate brain injury, and 2 (5.9%) had severe brain injury. A total of 9 infants had white matter injury (WMI), 1 infant had intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH), 2 infants had punctate lesions (PL), 5 infants had intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and 4 infants had subdural hematoma (SDH). Of the 4 infants with SDH, 3 had SDH including the interhemispheric fissure (subscore of 2) and 1 had a small supratentorial SDH. No infants in our cohort had cerebral infarction, lactate peak on MRS, or deep venous sinus thrombosis on pre-operative MRI. Among infants with SDH, 3 of 4 had hemorrhage or injury in at least one category in addition to SDH (one with SDH +IVH+WMI+IPH, one with SDH+IVH+PL, one with SDH+IVH). All 5 infants with IVH had at least one other category of injury (one with SDH +IVH+WMI+IPH, one with SDH+IVH+PL, one with SDH+IVH, two with IVH+WMI).
Table 3.
Pre-Operative MRI and Brain Injury Scores
| Single Ventricle vs. 2 Ventricle | Aortic Obstruction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Ventricle (n=19) | 2 Ventricle (n=15) | No, Aortic Obstr. (n=19) | Yes, Aortic Obstr. (n=15) | All (n=34) | |
| GA at pre-operative MRI | 39.00 (38.6-39.6) | 39.14 (38.3-39.4) | 39.14 (38.3-39.4) | 39.14 (38.6-39.6) | 39.14 (38.4-39.4) |
| Number with brain injury (total) | 5 (36.8) | 8 (53.3) | 8 (42.1) | 5 (33.3) | 13 (38.2) |
| Mild (total score 1-5) | 1 (20.0) | 5 (71.4) | 4 (50.0) | 2 (40.0) | 6 (46.2) |
| Moderate (total score 6-10) | 2 (40.0) | 3 (20.0) | 4 (50.0) | 1 (20.0) | 5 (38.5) |
| Severe (total score >10) | 2 (40.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (40.0) | 2 (5.9) |
Values are median (25th-75th percentile) or frequency (percent). GA, gestational age.
We found that time domain metrics RMS 1 and RMS2 significantly negatively correlated (p <0.01) with total brain injury score. This inverse correlation seemed to be driven predominantly by scores for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and subdural hematoma (SDH), which were also significantly inversely correlated with RMS1 and RMS2 values of HRV (Table 4). While we did not find a significant correlation between total brain injury scores and other metrics of HRV, there was a significant negative correlation between time domain metric Alpha1 and brain injury subscores for punctate lesions and IVH. All significant correlations between total brain injury scores or subscores and HRV metrics occurred between time domain metrics of HRV. No infants in our cohort had a cerebral infarction, deep venous sinus thrombosis (DVST), or lactate peak on MRS on pre-operative brain MRI. We found no correlation between frequency domain metrics of HRV (LF, HF, nLF and nHF) and pre-operative brain injury scores in our cohort.
Table 4.
Spearman Correlation of Spectral and Time Domain Metrics with Brain Injury Scores and Subscores.
| Alpha 1 | Alpha 2 | RMS 1 | RMS 2 | nLF | nHF | LF | HF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Injury total | −0.29 | 0.22 | −0.45† | −0.42† | −0.03 | 0.00 | −0.31 | −0.31 |
| WMI | −0.08 | 0.16 | −0.32 | −0.25 | 0.05 | −0.02 | −0.31 | −0.33 |
| Infarct | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| IP Hemm | −0.20 | 0.19 | −0.17 | −0.04 | −0.17 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.12 |
| Punctate Les | −0.36‡ | −0.04 | −0.03 | −0.17 | −0.27 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.22 |
| Lactate MRS | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| IVH | −0.44† | 0.22 | −0.39‡ | −0.39‡ | −0.25 | 0.15 | −0.11 | −0.13 |
| SDH | −0.32 | 0.30 | −0.42‡ | −0.34‡ | −0.04 | −0.05 | −0.13 | −0.09 |
| DVST | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
alpha 1, alpha short; alpha 2, alpha long; RMS 1, root mean square 1; RMS 2, root mean square 2; nLF, normalized low frequency; nHF, normalized high frequency; LF, low frequency; HF, high frequency; Injury total, total brain injury score; WMI, white matter injury; infarct, brain infarction; IP Hemm, intraparenchymal hemorrhage; Punctate les, punctate lesion; Lactate MRS, lactate peak present on magnetic resonance spectroscopy; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; SDH, subdural hematoma; DVST, deep venous sinus thrombosis
P< 0.05,
P<0.01
Pregnancy Conditions and Illness Severity
Pregnancy conditions and markers of illness severity prior to pre-operative MRI within our cohort are described in Table 5. No infant in our study had cardiac arrest or required ECMO prior to MRI. A total of 12 neonates underwent balloon atrial septostomy, 5 (24%) with no preop brain injury and 7 (54%) with brain injury. There was no significant difference in the rates of maternal or gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension/pre-eclampsia, or chorioamnionitis between the brain injured vs. non-brain injured groups. We also found no significant difference between brain injured vs. non-brain injured groups with regards to lowest pH, highest pCO2, need for balloon atrial septostomy, or need for other cardiac intervention prior to MRI.
Table 5.
Pregnancy Conditions and Illness Severity Prior to Pre-Operative MRI.
| No Brain Injury (n=21) | Brain Injury (n=13) | Total (n=34) | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy Conditions | ||||
|
| ||||
| Maternal diabetes | 2 (10) | 1 (8) | 3 (9) | 0.999 |
| HTN/Pre-Eclampsia | 2 (10) | 2 (15) | 4 (12) | 0.627 |
| Chorioamnionitis | 1 (5) | 1 (8) | 2 (6) | 0.999 |
|
| ||||
| Illness Severity | ||||
|
| ||||
| Arrest/ECMO | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | -- |
| Balloon atrial septostomy | 5 (24) | 7 (54) | 12 (35) | 0.139 |
| Other Cardiac Procedure | 1 (5) | 0 (0) | 1 (3) | 0.999 |
| Lowest pH | 7.34 (7.29-7.37) | 7.32 (7.28-7.33) | 7.32 (7.28-7.35) | 0.736 |
| Highest CO2 | 40.4 (36.7-44.7) | 42.2 (39-44) | 41.6(36.7-44.7) | 0.215 |
Values are median (25th-75th percentile) or frequency (percent). Maternal diabetes, gestational or pre-existing diabetes mellitus; HTN, pregnancy induced hypertension; Arrest/ECMO, cardiac arrest or need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; P-values calculated by Fisher’s Exact Test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney for continuous variables.
Discussion
In the current study of newborn infants with critical CHD, we show that lower autonomic tone, as measured by three time-domain metrics of HRV (RMS1, RMS2, and alpha 1), is associated with higher total brain injury scores on pre-operative brain MRI. The ANS controls the cardiovascular system via interaction between its sympathetic and parasympathetic branches that modulate heart rate and peripheral vascular resistance. ANS function is associated with cardiovascular, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental outcomes later in life.25,41–46 Impaired or immature sympathetic function is associated with brain injury in other populations, and this may be due to the effects of altered sympathetic-parasympathetic balance on cerebral pressure autoregulation, cardiac output, and baroreflex function.47 A functional and appropriately mature autonomic nervous system is known to play a key role in neuroprotection, but there is much left to study regarding the interplay between these systems in the critically ill neonate and in CHD, specifically.
ANS development is prolonged, spanning the fetal period and continuing after birth 48,49. The sympathetic division of the ANS begins to develop early in gestation and continues to mature steadily throughout the fetal period. The myelinated vagus nerve develops during the third trimester and begins to exert parasympathetic influence 50,51, resulting in a steep increase in parasympathetic tone near term 24,43,52.
In an earlier report, we showed that autonomic tone, as measured by HRV, is depressed in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome or transposition of the great arteries in the early transitional, pre-operative period, suggesting that ANS development is delayed in the CHD population. 24 Fetal HRV is lower in fetuses with hypoplastic left heart syndrome than controls in the third trimester, and similar trends have been noted in fetuses with tetralogy of Fallot and transposition of the great arteries. 53
Understanding the interplay between brain injury, brain maturity, and ANS function may help elucidate mechanisms of brain injury in CHD. Mechanisms underlying delayed ANS development in CHD remain poorly understood. CHD may result in chronic cerebral hypoxia, hypoperfusion, or both, beginning in the fetal period. There is considerable evidence to support delayed brain growth and development in infants with critical CHD 54–56, which may, in turn, result in delayed development of the ANS. We hypothesize, based upon this study and others, that chronic fetal cerebral hypoxia or hypoperfusion contributes to delayed structural brain maturation and delayed ANS maturation, leaving survivors of CHD more vulnerable to brain injury.
With regard to brain injury, it may be that intrinsic autoregulatory mechanisms controlled by the ANS play some role in cerebral blood flow and perfusion by participating in regulation of vasoconstriction and vasodilation of the cerebral vessels in response to changes in blood pressure, oxygenation, and CO2 levels.47,57 Human and animal studies suggest that sympathetic inputs to the cerebral vasculature in fetuses and neonates may play a more important role in cerebrovascular tone in infants than in than adults.58,59 In one study of infants with birth asphyxia, cerebral blood flow varied significantly with variations in blood pressure, suggesting that cerebral pressure autoregulation is impaired in distressed infants.60 We hypothesize that this may be one mechanism by which ANS function and brain injury may be linked. Further studies will be needed to investigate this possibility.
Our findings suggest that impaired ANS function correlates with total preoperative brain injury score in infants with critical CHD. We found no difference in rates of common prenatal conditions, including gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension/pre-eclampsia, and chorioamnionitis between brain injured vs. non-brain injured neonates with CHD, but our cohort had relatively low rates of high-risk pregnancy conditions. Future studies with a larger cohort will be necessary to better evaluate the relationship between prenatal conditions, brain injury, and autonomic function in CHD. We also found no difference in markers of postnatal illness severity, such as lowest pH, highest pCO2, and need for cardiac interventions prior to surgery, between CHD neonates with pre-operative brain injury vs. those without. However, our population was relatively homogeneous with respect to illness severity markers, and no infant in our cohort experienced cardiac arrest or required ECMO prior to MRI. Relationships between illness severity, brain injury, and ANS function should be investigated in larger studies.
It is notable that we found no association between brain injury scores and frequency domain metrics of HRV in the CHD population. We have reported this phenomenon previously in a study of premature infants.29 Our data suggest that time domain metrics may more accurately reflect HRV under non-stationary conditions such as critical illness.
In this study, we used the brain injury scoring system developed by Andropoulos et. al. that includes white matter injury, infarction, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, punctate lesions, lactate on MRS, intraventricular hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage, and deep venous sinus thrombosis.33 This scoring system has been utilized previously in the CHD population by our group and others. 61–63 While we did find a significant negative/inverse correlation between RMS 1 and RMS 2 and total brain injury score, we only found a trend toward significance between RMS1 and RMS 2 and subscores for white matter injury (WMI), which is one of the most commonly noted types of brain injury in CHD. The lack of correlation with subscores for white matter injury may be related to the relatively low levels of injury in our cohort and the fact that the majority of injury we did see was relatively mild. This will need to be addressed in larger studies.
We found that RMS 1 and RMS 2 were inversely correlated with subscores for intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) and subdural hematoma (SDH). The Andropoulos scoring system includes points for subdural hemorrhage, although some authors have questioned the relevance for long-term outcome of small subdural hemorrhage in neonates.64 Notably, small posterior fossa subdural hemorrhages are considered “normal” by the Andropoulos scoring system, in that they contribute zero points to the injury score. Only supratentorial SDH contribute to the injury score, and even then, they have a significance multiplier of 1, so they contribute far less to the total score than white matter injury or intraparenchymal hemorrhage, which have a significance multiplier of 3. Others have shown that infants with supratentorial SDH (the type of SDH in our cohort) have normal developmental outcomes at 24 months.64 In our cohort, 3 of 4 infants with SDH had at least one other type brain injury subcategory as scored by the Andropoulos system, and 5/5 infants with IVH had at brain injury in at least one other subcategory. Our findings of an inverse correlation between HRV metrics and SDH and IVH may reflect the fact that SDH and IVH appear to be associated with other types of injury resulting in an overall higher burden of injury among infants with SDH and IVH, rather reflecting a correlation between HRV and isolated SDH or IVH. We cannot assess the clinical impact of SDH on our cohort with the available data, but this finding warrants further study.
While our study has many strengths, it is limited by its relatively small size. Within our cohort of 34 infants with critical CHD, only 13 had brain injury on pre-operative MRI, and only 2 of those had severe brain injury. Our study was performed in a stand-alone children’s hospital in which all patients are out born. While the majority of the participants in this study were transferred within the first 24 hours of birth (and all were transferred within the first 72 hours), we were not able to obtain HRV data immediately following birth. This study included neonates with a variety of CHD lesions which have different circulatory pathophysiologies. We consider the fact that our data show a significant inverse correlation between time domain metrics of HRV (indicating impaired ANS function or delayed ANS maturation) and brain injury scores despite this heterogeneity to be a strength, but more precise understanding of the interplay between autonomic function and brain injury in CHD may be gained by studying larger populations with similar heart defects and physiology. Our study was insufficiently powered to evaluate the influence of specific cardiac defects on brain injury due to the heterogeneity of cardiac defects in our population. Although we show a significant association between HRV metrics and brain injury, we are unable to determine the causal direction of this association, i.e. whether alterations in autonomic function measured by HRV preceded brain injury or whether brain injury influenced autonomic function (HRV), as previously described by us in otherwise healthy term infants with perinatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.65–67 While the subjects in our study had fetal brain MRI studies without brain injury in the third trimester, we are not able to able to exclude perinatal brain injury between the fetal MRI studies and the onset of our HRV recordings.
In the future, larger studies may determine the precise mechanisms and interplay between autonomic function, as measured by HRV, and brain injury in CHD. Future studies using serial HRV measures and brain MRI in fetuses and infants with critical CHD may help to clarify the temporal and causal relationships between autonomic function and brain injury in this vulnerable population. Future studies using real-time and simultaneous monitoring of cerebral oxygenation, blood pressure, and heart rate variability in critically ill infants may better elucidate any connections between cerebral autoregulation, autonomic function, and brain injury in this vulnerable population. While much remains to be learned, understanding HRV and whether it may serve as a marker for brain injury or brain maturation may set the stage for the development of novel methods of neuromonitoring in the CICU using HRV. Such novel neuromonitoring techniques may prove clinically valuable given that many infants with critical CHD may be too unstable to risk transport from the ICU to the MRI scanner. For now, we show a significant negative correlation between early postnatal time-domain metrics of HRV and total pre-operative brain injury score in infants with critical CHD.
Impact.
Autonomic dysfunction, measured by heart rate variability (HRV), in early transition is associated with pre-operative brain injury in neonates with critical congenital heart disease.
These data extend our earlier findings by providing further evidence for (i) autonomic dysfunction in infants with CHD, and (ii) an association between autonomic dysfunction and brain injury in critically ill neonates.
These data support the notion that further investigation of HRV as a biomarker for brain injury risk is warranted in infants with critical CHD.
Financial Support
Grant support for this project is from Canadian Institute of Health Research, MOP-8111 and National Institutes of Health: NHLBI R01 HL116585-01
Footnotes
Disclosures
The authors have no financial conflicts of interests to disclose
Consent
The Institutional Review Board of Children’s National Hospital approved this study and written informed consent was obtained from each participant.
References
- 1.Grech V & Gatt M Syndromes and Malformations Associated with Congenital Heart Disease in a Population-Based Study. Int J Cardiol 68, 151–156 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tennstedt C, Chaoui R, Korner H & Dietel M Spectrum of Congenital Heart Defects and Extracardiac Malformations Associated with Chromosomal Abnormalities: Results of a Seven Year Necropsy Study. Heart 82, 34–39 (1999). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Donofrio MT, Duplessis AJ & Limperopoulos C Impact of Congenital Heart Disease on Fetal Brain Development and Injury. Curr Opin Pediatr 23, 502–511 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shillingford AJ et al. Aortic Morphometry and Microcephaly in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. Cardiol Young 17, 189–195 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Licht DJ et al. Brain Maturation Is Delayed in Infants with Complex Congenital Heart Defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137, 529–536; discussion 536-527 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miller SP et al. Abnormal Brain Development in Newborns with Congenital Heart Disease. The New England journal of medicine 357, 1928–1938 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sarajuuri A et al. Neurodevelopmental Burden at Age 5 Years in Patients with Univentricular Heart. Pediatrics 130, e1636–1646 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mulkey SB et al. Multi-Tiered Analysis of Brain Injury in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatric cardiology 34, 1772–1784 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Limperopoulos C et al. Neurodevelopmental Status of Newborns and Infants with Congenital Heart Defects before and after Open Heart Surgery. J Pediatr 137, 638–645 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Limperopoulos C et al. Neurologic Status of Newborns with Congenital Heart Defects before Open Heart Surgery. Pediatrics 103, 402–408. (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Donofrio MT & Massaro AN Impact of Congenital Heart Disease on Brain Development and Neurodevelopmental Outcome. Int J Pediatr 2010 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mahle WT et al. An Mri Study of Neurological Injury before and after Congenital Heart Surgery. Circulation 106, I109–114 (2002). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Beca J et al. New White Matter Brain Injury after Infant Heart Surgery Is Associated with Diagnostic Group and the Use of Circulatory Arrest. Circulation 127, 971–979 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dimitropoulos A et al. Brain Injury and Development in Newborns with Critical Congenital Heart Disease. Neurology 81, 241–248 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ortinau C et al. Regional Alterations in Cerebral Growth Exist Preoperatively in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143, 1264–1270 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sethi V et al. Single-Ventricle Anatomy Predicts Delayed Microstructural Brain Development. Pediatr Res 73, 661–667 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Petit CJ et al. Preoperative Brain Injury in Transposition of the Great Arteries Is Associated with Oxygenation and Time to Surgery, Not Balloon Atrial Septostomy. Circulation 119, 709–716 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Heart Rate Variability. Standards of Measurement, Physiological Interpretation, and Clinical Use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 17, 354–381 (1996). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Al-Shargabi T et al. Changes in Autonomic Tone in Premature Infants Developing Necrotizing Enterocolitis. Amer J Perinatol 35, 1079–1086 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Doheny KK et al. Diminished Vagal Tone Is a Predictive Biomarker of Necrotizing Enterocolitis-Risk in Preterm Infants. Neurogastroenterol Motil 26, 832–840 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vergales BD et al. Depressed Heart Rate Variability Is Associated with Abnormal Eeg, Mri, and Death in Neonates with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy. Am J Perinatol 31, 855–862 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Stone ML et al. Abnormal Heart Rate Characteristics before Clinical Diagnosis of Necrotizing Enterocolitis. J Perinatol 33, 847–850 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fairchild KD & Aschner JL Hero Monitoring to Reduce Mortality in Nicu Patients. Research and Report in Neonatology 2, 65–76 (2012). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mulkey SB et al. Heart Rate Variability Is Depressed in the Early Transitional Period for Newborns with Complex Congenital Heart Disease. Clin Auton Res 30, 165–172 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Porges SW & Furman SA The Early Development of the Autonomic Nervous System Provides a Neural Platform for Social Behavior: A Polyvagal Perspective. Infant and child development 20, 106–118 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schlatterer SD & du Plessis AJ Exposures Influencing the Developing Central Autonomic Nervous System. Birth Defects Res 113, 845–863 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Malliani A, Lombardi F & Pagani M Power Spectrum Analysis of Heart Rate Variability: A Tool to Explore Neural Regulatory Mechanisms. Br Heart J 71, 1–2 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Valenza G, Citi L, Saul JP & Barbieri R Measures of Sympathetic and Parasympathetic Autonomic Outflow from Heartbeat Dynamics. J Appl Physiol (1985) 125, 19–39 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schlatterer SD et al. Autonomic Development in Preterm Infants Is Associated with Morbidity of Prematurity. Pediatr Res (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mulkey SB et al. Autonomic Nervous System Maturation in the Premature Extrauterine Milieu. Pediatr Res 89, 863–868 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zun Z & Limperopoulos C Placental Perfusion Imaging Using Velocity-Selective Arterial Spin Labeling. Magn Reson Med 80, 1036–1047 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.De Asis-Cruz J, Donofrio MT, Vezina G & Limperopoulos C Aberrant Brain Functional Connectivity in Newborns with Congenital Heart Disease before Cardiac Surgery. Neuroimage Clin 17, 31–42 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Andropoulos DB et al. Brain Immaturity Is Associated with Brain Injury before and after Neonatal Cardiac Surgery with High-Flow Bypass and Cerebral Oxygenation Monitoring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139, 543–556 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ulusar UD et al. Adaptive Rule Based Fetal Qrs Complex Detection Using Hilbert Transform. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2009, 4666–4669 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kota S et al. Identification of Qrs Complex in Non-Stationary Electrocardiogram of Sick Infants. Computers in biology and medicine 87, 211–216 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ulusar UD et al. Adaptive Rule Based Fetal Qrs Complex Detection Using Hilbert Transform. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 1, 4666–4669 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Govindan RB Detrended Fluctuation Analysis Using Orthogonal Polynomials. Phys Rev E 101, 010201 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Govindan RB, Preissl H, Eswaran H, Campbell JQ, and Lowery CL Detrended Fluctuation Analysis of Short Data Sets: Ana Pplication to Fetal Cardiac. PhysD: Nonlinear Phenom 226, 23–31 (2007). [Google Scholar]
- 39.Govindan RB et al. Detrended Fluctuation Analysis of Non-Stationary Cardiac Beat-to-Beat Interval of Sick Infants. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 108, 40005-p40001-p40006 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mulkey SB et al. The Effect of Labor and Delivery Mode on Electrocortical and Brainstem Autonomic Function During Neonatal Transition. Sci Rep 9, 11020 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Montagna A & Nosarti C Socio-Emotional Development Following Very Preterm Birth: Pathways to Psychopathology. Front Psychol 7, 80 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hack M, Schluchter M, Cartar L & Rahman M Blood Pressure among Very Low Birth Weight (<1.5 Kg) Young Adults. Pediatr Res 58, 677–684 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mulkey SB & du Plessis AJ Autonomic Nervous System Development and Its Impact on Neuropsychiatric Outcome. Pediatr Res 85, 120–126 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Siddiqui S, Fifer WP, Ordonez-Retamar M, Nugent JD & Williams IA An Antenatal Marker of Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Infants with Congenital Heart Disease. J Perinatol 37, 953–957 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Haraldsdottir K et al. Heart Rate Recovery after Maximal Exercise Is Impaired in Healthy Young Adults Born Preterm. Eur J Appl Physiol 119, 857–866 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Thiriez G et al. Altered Autonomic Control in Preterm Newborns with Impaired Neurological Outcomes. Clin Auton Res 25, 233–242 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Fyfe KL, Yiallourou SR, Wong FY & Horne RS The Development of Cardiovascular and Cerebral Vascular Control in Preterm Infants. Sleep Med Rev 18, 299–310 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Fyfe KL et al. The Effect of Gestational Age at Birth on Post-Term Maturation of Heart Rate Variability. Sleep 38, 1635–1644 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Karin J, Hirsch M & Akselrod S An Estimate of Fetal Autonomic State by Spectral Analysis of Fetal Heart Rate Fluctuations. Pediatr Res 34, 134–138 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Porges SW The Polyvagal Theory (WW Norton & Company, 2011). [Google Scholar]
- 51.Longin E, Gerstner T, Schaible T, Lenz T & Konig S Maturation of the Autonomic Nervous System: Differences in Heart Rate Variability in Premature Vs. Term Infants. J Perinat Med 34, 303–308 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Clairambault J, Curzi-Dascalova L, Kauffmann F, Medigue C & Leffler C Heart Rate Variability in Normal Sleeping Full-Term and Preterm Neonates. Early Hum Dev 28, 169–183 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Siddiqui S et al. Autonomic Regulation in Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease. Early Hum Dev 91, 195–198 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Limperopoulos C et al. Brain Volume and Metabolism in Fetuses with Congenital Heart Disease: Evaluation with Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy. Circulation 121, 26–33 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Clouchoux C et al. Delayed Cortical Development in Fetuses with Complex Congenital Heart Disease. Cereb Cortex 23, 2932–2943 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.McQuillen PS, Goff DA & Licht DJ Effects of Congenital Heart Disease on Brain Development. Progress in pediatric cardiology 29, 79–85 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.JL S in Fetal and Neonatal Physiology (Polin RA, F. W, Abman SH ed.) 789–793 (Elsevier, 2011). [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bevan R et al. Responsiveness of Human Infant Cerebral Arteries to Sympathetic Nerve Stimulation and Vasoactive Agents. Pediatr Res 44, 730–739 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hayashi S, Park MK & Kuehl TJ Higher Sensitivity of Cerebral Arteries Isolated from Premature and Newborn Baboons to Adrenergic and Cholinergic Stimulation. Life Sci 35, 253–260 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Lou HC, Lassen NA & Friis-Hansen B Impaired Autoregulation of Cerebral Blood Flow in the Distressed Newborn Infant. J Pediatr 94, 118–121 (1979). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kosiorek A et al. Predictors of Neurological Outcome Following Infant Cardiac Surgery without Deep Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest. Pediatric cardiology (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Schlatterer SD et al. Placental Pathology and Neuroimaging Correlates in Neonates with Congenital Heart Disease. Sci Rep 9, 4137 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Andropoulos DB et al. The Association between Brain Injury, Perioperative Anesthetic Exposure, and 12-Month Neurodevelopmental Outcomes after Neonatal Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Paediatr Anaesth 24, 266–274 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rooks VJ et al. Prevalence and Evolution of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Asymptomatic Term Infants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29, 1082–1089 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Schneebaum Sender N et al. Effects of Regional Brain Injury on the Newborn Autonomic Nervous System. Early Hum Dev 90, 893–896 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Metzler M et al. Pattern of Brain Injury and Depressed Heart Rate Variability in Newborns with Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy. Pediatr Res 82, 438–443 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Schneebaum Sender N et al. Cerebral Modulation of the Autonomic Nervous System in Term Infants. J Perinatol 37, 558–562 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
