Skip to main content
Journal of Arrhythmia logoLink to Journal of Arrhythmia
. 2022 Mar 14;38(3):363–368. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12694

Incidence of non‐benign arrhythmia in neonatal intensive care unit: 18 years experience from a single center

Yuji Doi 1,, Kazutoshi Ueda 1, Kayo Ogino 1, Tomohiro Hayashi 1, Akihito Takahashi 1, Kenji Waki 1, Yoshio Arakaki 1
PMCID: PMC9237287  PMID: 35785397

Abstract

Background

Non‐benign arrhythmias, which require urgent recognition and care in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) settings, are rare but can severely impact neonates. We aimed to clarify the epidemiology and characteristics of non‐benign arrhythmias and their influence on neonates.

Methods

This single‐center retrospective study included patients admitted to the NICU at Kurashiki Central Hospital between January 2001 and December 2019. Only patients with structurally normal hearts were included. The use of direct cardioversion (DC), antiarrhythmic agents, and the presence of risk factors was reviewed from medical records.

Results

Of the 8082 admissions, 2919 patients (36.1%) were low birth weight infants (LBWI) weighing less than 1500 g. There were 23 patients with arrhythmias (nine of them were LBWIs) with an incidence of 0.28%. There were 16 patients with tachyarrhythmia (eight supraventricular tachycardia [SVT] cases, three atrial flutters [AFL] cases, three ventricular tachycardia cases, two junctional ectopic tachycardia cases), and seven with bradyarrhythmia (all with complete atrioventricular [AV] block). For tachyarrhythmia cases, seven patients required DC, and eight were on antiarrhythmic agents at the time of discharge. Two patients (28.5%) with complete AV block required pacemaker implantation before discharge. The treatment strategy was dependent on the type of arrhythmia. All patients were discharged without significant morbidities.

Conclusions

The incidence of non‐benign arrhythmias was as low as 0.28%. Arrhythmias can be managed successfully in neonates, yet risk factors related to mortality warrant further study.

Keywords: arrhythmia, congenital AVB, LBWI, NICU, SVT

1. INTRODUCTION

The incidence of neonatal arrhythmia is estimated to be 1%–5% during the first 10 days of life. 1 Meanwhile, the incidence of arrhythmias in the NICU ranges from 0.37% to as high as 10%, with most being benign arrhythmias, such as premature atrial contractions (PACs) and premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), which require no medical intervention. 2 , 3 While the incidence of non‐benign arrhythmia is lower than that of benign arrhythmia, they require urgent recognition and treatment, as they lead to morbidity and potentially mortality. 4 , 5 As most previous reports included patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) who have a higher incidence of arrhythmias compared to the general population, we sought to investigate the incidence and characteristics of non‐benign arrhythmias in patients with normal hearts in NICU settings.

2. METHODS

A single‐center retrospective study was conducted at the Kurashiki Central Hospital (Okayama, Japan). Among patients admitted to the NICU between January 2001 and December 2019, those with non‐benign arrhythmias were included in this study. Our center serves as a tertiary center; therefore, most of the neonates with arrhythmias in surrounding areas are transferred to our center. As benign arrhythmias, such as PACs and PVCs, may be left unrecognized, we did not include patients exhibiting these signs because it is difficult to identify every patient and the incidence is likely to be underestimated. Patients with structural heart diseases, such as CHD or cardiac tumors, were excluded because they have a higher incidence of arrhythmias than patients without cardiac structural anomalies 6 , 7 and often require different treatment strategies.

Non‐benign arrhythmias are defined as those requiring urgent recognition and management, such as supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial flutter (AFL), ventricular tachycardia (VT), and junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET). SVT included atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and atrial tachycardia (AT). Congenital complete atrioventricular block (CAVB), sick sinus syndrome (SSS), and hereditary arrhythmias, such as long QT syndrome (LQTS), are considered non‐benign. Patient characteristics such as gestational week, birth weight, sex, and Apgar—both 1‐ and 5‐minute scores at birth were collected from the medical records. Some possible risk factors of arrhythmias, such as the placement of an umbilical catheter, application of nebulizer therapy, low blood sugar (blood sugar less than 50 mg/dL), and electrolyte disturbances, 3 , 5 were collected. The admission period and use of direct cardioversion (DC) or antiarrhythmic agents (AAs) were also reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS ver. 26.0(IBM Corp.).

3. RESULTS

During the study period, there were 8082 admissions to the NICU, of which 2919 (36.1%) were low birth weight infants (LBWIs) (those with birth weight less than 1500 g). Of these, 23 patients had non‐benign arrhythmia (incidence = 0.28%) and nine patients with non‐benign arrhythmia were LBWIs. Additionally, there were 16 patients with tachyarrhythmia and 7 patients with bradyarrhythmia. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Patient characteristics

Total number of patients 23
Incidence 23/8082(0.28%)
Gestational week 36.8 ± 3.0
Body weight (g) 2708 ± 673
Male 8/15(53.3%)
Apgar score at 1 and 5 min 7.5 ± 1.1/ 8.9 ± 0.7 (1 min/5 min)
Admission period(days) 31.7 ± 24.3
Low blood sugar 7/23(30.4%)
Smoking habit of the mother 2/23(8.7%)
Use of catecholamine 2/23(8.7%)
Use of SABA 0
Umbilical catheter 0
Electrolyte disturbance 0

Note: Patient background and possible risk factors related to tachyarrhythmia between normal and low birth weight infants.

Abbreviations: DC, direct cardioversion; LBWIs, low birth weight infants; NBWIs, normal birth weight infants, SABA, short‐acting beta‐agonist.

3.1. Tachyarrhythmias

Of the 16 tachyarrhythmia cases, nine were males (9/16, 56.3%) and seven (7/16, 43.7%) had a prenatal diagnosis. Among the seven patients with prenatal diagnosis, six were born via emergency cesarean section due to non‐reassuring fetal status caused by tachyarrhythmia. Tachyarrhythmias diagnoses were as follows: SVT, eight cases (50%); AFL, three cases (18.8%); VT, three cases (18.8%); JET, two cases (12.4%). A spontaneous resolution was achieved in three (13%) patients. DC was performed in seven cases (44%), which was successful in five cases (three AFL cases and two AT cases; success rate of 71% [5/7]). AA was prescribed in eight cases (8/16, 50%), including two patients who did not respond to DC. All patients were on AAs when they were discharged, and all but one patient with JET remained on AAs at the time of the latest follow‐up. While there were two patients with congenital JET, one had a relatively stable course. This patient was treated with intravenous procainamide, which was converted slowly to oral flecainide. The other patient had fetal ascites, and the mother was administered digoxin. The patient required mechanical ventilation for respiratory failure caused by massive ascites. Drainage via peritoneal puncture was performed, and oral flecainide and intravenous landiolol were initiated. Landiolol was later converted to oral propranolol, and JET was managed successfully, after which ascites did not recur. The patient is currently aged 1.8 years and is on a flecainide and propranolol treatment regimen. Neither of the patients with congenital JET required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The types of AA and patient characteristics are shown in Table 2. All 16 patients were successfully discharged without any comorbidities.

TABLE 2.

Characteristics of patients with tachyarrhythmia

Case Body weight (g) Arrhythmia type HR of tachycardia Prenatal diagnosis Apgar score (1/5 min) Risk factors Clinical symptoms Use of DC/Successful termination Antiarrhythmic agents Admission period (days) Medication discontinuation Follow up period (years) Outcomes
1 1572 AT 218 YES 8/9 Low blood sugar Tachycardia only YES/YES None 41 4.8 No recurrence
2 2490 AT 206 YES 8/9 Low blood sugar Tachycardia only YES/YES None 40 1.0 No recurrence
3 3004 AT 210 NO 9/10 None Tachycardia only YES/NO Procainamide → Flecainide + Propranolol 24 By 2 years old 3.0 No recurrence
4 2560 AT 180 NO 8/9 Low blood sugar Tachycardia only NO Digoxin + Flecainide + Propranolol 21 By 1 year old 3.0 No recurrence
5 2384 AT (short run) NA NO 6/10 None Tachycardia only NO None 8 0.1 Spontaneous resolution
6 2786 PSVT 175 YES 7/9 Low blood sugar Tachycardia only NO Procainamide + Propranolol 71 At 6 months old 1.0 No recurrence
7 2488 PSVT 250 NO 7/8 None Tachycardia only NO Procainamide 20 At 5 years old 8.0 RFCA performed in other hospital at 11 years old
8 3232 PSVT 190 NO 8/9 None Tachycardia only NO Digoxin + Verapamil 23 By 3 years old 4.5 No recurrence
9 3280 AFL 180 YES 8/9 None Tachycardia only YES/YES None 10 1.3 No recurrence
10 3884 AFL 210 YES 7/8 None Tachycardia only YES/YES None 17 0.5 No recurrence
11 3225 AFL 230 NO 8/9 None Tachycardia only YES/YES None 6 2.3 No recurrence
12 1792 VT NA NO 6/9 Use of catecholamine Hemodynamic compromise NO None 56 7.3 Spontaneous resolution
13 2778 VT 140 YES 9/10 Use of catecholamine Poor feeding YES/NO Procainamide → Amiodarone 48 At 2 months old 4.5 No recurrence
14 3002 VT (short run) 197 NO 8/9 None Tachycardia only NO None 11 1.2 Spontaneous resolution
15 3410 JET 167 YES 6/8 Smoking habit of mother Massive ascitesRespiratory failure NO Flecainide + Landiolol → Flecainide + Propranolol 56 Under medication 2.3 No recurrence
16 3756 JET 214 NO 9/10 None Poor feeding NO Propranolol → Procainamide → Flecainide 27 At 4 months old 0.3 Lost to follow up

Abbreviations: AT, atrial tachycardia; DC, direct cardioversion; HR, heart rate; JET, junctional ectopic tachycardia; NA, not available; RFCA, radiofrequency catheter ablation; SVT, supraventricular tachycardia; VT, ventricular tachycardia; WPW, Wolf‐Parkinson‐White syndrome.

3.2. Bradyarrhythmia and other complications

There were seven patients with bradyarrhythmia, all with congenital CAVBs. There were no patients with SSS or LQTS. All patients had a prenatal diagnosis, and five patients (71%) were related to maternal anti‐Ro/SSA or anti‐La/SSB autoantibodies. Of the two patients with negative maternal anti‐Ro/SSA or anti‐La/SSB autoantibodies, normal sinus rhythm was recovered in one patient by day 5 and was maintained thereafter. Only one patient was treated with maternal dexamethasone (which was administered at a different hospital before the baby was transferred to our hospital after birth). Of the seven patients, two patients were delivered via emergency cesarean section because of fetal growth retardation caused by CAVB. All seven patients were discharged without any sequelae. Overall, four patients required pacemaker implantation (PMI). Two patients underwent PMI on the days they were born, as the ventricular rate did not increase despite the use of isoproterenol and exhibited signs of hemodynamic compromise. The other two patients were discharged from the NICU without any intervention yet required PMI later in life. One underwent PMI at 9 months of age due to failure to thrive, and the ventricular rate did not increase despite the initiation of 2 mg/kg/day of oral cilostazol. The other patient underwent PMI at 1.8 years of age due to left ventricular dysfunction. Among the three patients without PMI, one patient with spontaneously converted normal sinus rhythm was no longer under observation. The other two patients were aged 5.3 and 8.2 years, respectively, at the latest follow‐up. Both were hemodynamically stable with sufficient psychomotor development. One patient who is currently 5.3 years of age without PMI has been treated with oral cilostazol since birth. Oral cilostazol administration was started on day seven at a dose of 4 mg/kg/day as the average ventricular rate decreased to <50. After initiation of cilostazol, the average ventricular rate increased to >50 and the same ventricular rate was maintained thereafter. The patient characteristics are described in Table 3.

TABLE 3.

Characteristics of patients with complete atrioventricular block

Case Body weight (g) Prenatal diagnosis

Presence of anti

SS‐A/B antibody

Maternal use of Dexamethasone Risk factors Symptoms in NICU Medication Admission period (days) PMI Indication for PMI Follow up period (years)
1 2734 Yes Yes Unknown None Hemodynamic compromise Isoproterenol 18 At day 0 Heart failure 19.5
2 2126 Yes No No None Hemodynamic compromise Isoproterenol 42 At day 0 Heart failure 15.9
3 2558 Yes Yes Yes Low blood sugar None Oral cilostazol 30 No 5.3
4 2968 Yes Yes No Low blood sugar None No 18 No 8.2
5 3086 Yes No No Smoking habit of mother Spontaneous resolution No 16 No 4.5
6 2102 Yes Yes No None None Oral cilostazol 16 At 9 months old Failure to thrive 6.4
7 1084 Yes Yes No Low blood sugar None No 110 At 1.8 years old Ventricular dysfunction 5.8

Abbreviations: NICU, neonatal intensive care unit; PMI, pacemaker implantation.

4. DISCUSSION

The incidence of tachyarrhythmia was 0.28% in our study, which is much lower than the general incidence of neonatal arrhythmia. 1 This disparity likely occurred because we included only patients with non‐benign arrhythmias and excluded patients with structural heart disease. Moreover, as most LBWIs are likely to be discharged within 5 days in Japan, those who have arrhythmias after 5 days of birth are likely to be admitted to the general ward rather than to the NICU. Our center also manages the patients according to this timeline, which may have contributed to the discrepancy in the incidence of arrhythmias. However, the incidence at our institution was similar to that reported in some previous reports. Isik et al. reported the incidence of arrhythmia as 0.38%, including benign arrhythmias, such as PAC, with a block and a non‐benign arrhythmia incidence of 0.20%. 2 The arrhythmia incidence reported by Kundak et al. was 0.70%, which included non‐benign arrhythmia and patients with CHD8. When patients with CHD were excluded, the total incidence was 0.36%, which is not significantly different from that in our study, considering that Kundak et al. included non‐benign arrhythmias as well. Badrawi reported the arrhythmia incidence to be as high as 10%, with the non‐benign arrhythmia incidence being 1.5%. 3 This is because they performed Holter ECG to discover any arrhythmias that could be left unnoticed. Their report may reflect the true incidence of arrhythmias determined via Holter ECG, yet infrequent PACs or PVCs are arrhythmias that may have resolved spontaneously even when unidentified and untreated. While male infants are considered to have a higher incidence of arrhythmias, 3 , 8 , 9 we did not find any difference in incidence between male and female infants in our study (male, 48%).

SVT was the most common type of tachyarrhythmia, accounting for 50% of all arrhythmias. This is consistent with previous reports. 1 , 8 SVT can generally be managed well by medication, exhibiting a low recurrence rate after medications are discontinued. 9 , 10 , 11 The same finding was reflected in our study, as there was no recurrence in seven of eight patients with SVT (87%). Other arrhythmias such as AFL and VT also have excellent prognoses, 12 , 13 , 14 and are likely to resolve spontaneously early in life after treatment. 14 However, prompt recognition is warranted as arrhythmia may cause heart failure; AFL caused heart failure in more than 30% of neonates. 12 While most neonatal tachyarrhythmias have a favorable prognosis, congenital JET (defined as JET occurring within the first 6 months of birth) has a poor prognosis, with a mortality rate as high as 35%. 15 , 16 Two patients with congenital JET in our series were safely discharged. However, one patient had a difficult course, as mentioned previously. Congenital JET requires extra care among neonatal tachyarrhythmias.

In addition to tachyarrhythmias, only congenital CAVB was observed in our study. Congenital CAVB is the most common non‐benign bradyarrhythmia that occurs in NICU settings, 5 , 8 with an incidence of 1 in every 15,000–20,000 live births. 17 , 18 The majority of congenital CAVB cases are caused by injury of the conduction system due to an inflammatory response triggered by the presence of anti‐Ro/SSA or anti‐La/SSB autoantibodies. Herein, five of seven cases (71%) were related to anti‐Ro/SSA or anti‐La/SSB autoantibodies. For those with positive anti‐Ro/SSA or anti‐La/SSB autoantibodies and without CAVB, there are no standardized follow‐up protocols. Therefore, we usually follow them up on an outpatient basis for 1 year. It remains controversial if early detection of CAVB in the fetus and maternal treatment with dexamethasone results in a favorable prognosis, 19 , 20 as only one mother was treated with dexamethasone. The mortality rate of congenital CAVB is reported to be as high as 20%, 21 with a higher mortality rate among neonates with ventricular rates less than 55. 22 PMI is necessary for patients exhibiting signs of heart failure, including failure to thrive; however, the optimal timing of PMI for asymptomatic patients remains controversial as well. While pacing sites in neonates or small infants tend to be the right ventricular wall via epicardial leads, long‐term right ventricle pacing is associated with the risk of inducing dilated cardiomyopathy. 23 , 24 Thus, we attempted to defer the PMI whenever possible. While there are limited options for medical treatment for CAVB, we tried cilostazol, which is sometimes effective in increasing the ventricular rate. 25 , 26 It seemed to be effective in one of our patients, yet further investigation is warranted to determine the effects of cilostazol in infants or small children.

The overall mortality rate of neonatal arrhythmia could be as high as 23.6% 8 ; however, mortality was not recorded in our study. This may be because we excluded patients with CHD and did not observe any concomitant electrolyte disturbances. Among the noted risk factors, electrolyte disturbance is strongly related to mortality. 8 While some types of arrhythmias, such as JET, need extra care in acute management, arrhythmias can be managed successfully when risk factors, such as electrolyte disturbance, are controlled.

This study has several limitations. First, it was a single‐center retrospective study with a relatively small sample size. Second, because of the study's retrospective nature, we may have missed some cases with paroxysmal arrhythmias resolving spontaneously, such as short runs of AT or VT. While patients in the NICU are generally observed with a monitor ECG, it is difficult to interpret the waveform when the babies are crying, which may have overlooked some tachyarrhythmias. Thus, the true incidence may have been underestimated.

5. CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of non‐benign arrhythmias was as low as 0.28% in NICU settings. While neonates with non‐benign arrhythmias had a favorable prognosis, further investigation is warranted to study the risk factors related to mortality.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest for this article.

DECLARATIONS

Approval of the research protocol: This study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent: Need of individual informed consent was weaved by the local IRB for this was a retrospective study.

Doi Y, Ueda K, Ogino K, Hayashi T, Takahashi A, Waki K, Incidence of non‐benign arrhythmia in neonatal intensive care unit: 18 years experience from a single center. J Arrhythmia. 2022;38:363–368. 10.1002/joa3.12694

REFERENCES

  • 1. Dubin AM. Arrhythmias in the newborn. NeoReviews. 2000;1:e146–51. 10.1542/neo.1-8-e146 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Isik DU, Celik IH, Kavurt S, Aydemir O, Kibar AE, Bas AY, et al. A case series of neonatal arrhythmias. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:1344–7. 10.3109/14767058.2015.1048679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Badrawi N, Hegazy RA, Tokovic E, Lotfy W, Mahmoud F, Aly H. Arrhythmia in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Cardiol. 2009;30:325–30. 10.1007/s00246-008-9355-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Killen SAS, Fish FA. Fetal and neonatal arrhythmias. NeoReviews. 2008;9:e242–52. 10.1542/neo.9-6-e242 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Silva A, Soares P, Flor‐de‐Lima F, Moura C, Areias JC, Guimarães H. Neonatal arrhythmias—morbidity and mortality at discharge. J Pediatr Neonatal Individ Med. 2016;5:e050212. 10.7363/050212 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Cappato R, Schlüter M, Weiss C, Antz M, Koschyk DH, Hofmann T, et al. Radiofrequency current catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways in Ebstein's anomaly. Circulation. 1996;94:376–83. 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.376 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Miyake CY, Del Nido PJ, Alexander ME, Cecchin F, Berul CI, Triedman JK, et al. Cardiac tumors and associated arrhythmias in pediatric patients, with observations on surgical therapy for ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:1903–9. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kundak AA, Dilli D, Karagöl B, Karadağ N, Zenciroğlu A, Okumuş N, et al. Non benign neonatal arrhythmias observed in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit. Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80:555–9. 10.1007/s12098-012-0852-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Srinivasan C, Balaji S. Neonatal supraventricular tachycardia. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019;19:222–31. 10.1016/j.ipej.2019.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Salerno JC, Kertesz NJ, Friedman RA, Fenrich AL Jr. Clinical course of atrial ectopic tachycardia is age‐dependent: results and treatment in children < 3 or ≧3 years of age. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:438–44. 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.09.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Saul JP, Walsh EP, Triedman JK. Mechanisms and therapy of complex arrhythmias in pediatric patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:1129–48. 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1995.tb00392.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Casey FA, Mccrindle BW, Hamilton RM, Gow RM. Neonatal atrial flutter: significant early morbidity and excellent long‐term prognosis. Am Heart J. 1997;133:302–6. 10.1016/s0002-8703(97)70224-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yılmaz‐Semerci S, Bornaun H, Kurnaz D, Cebeci B, Babayigit A, Büyükkale G, et al. Neonatal atrial flutter: three cases and review of the literature. Turk J Pediatr. 2018;60:306–9. 10.24953/turkjped.2018.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. De Rosa G, Butera G, Chessa M, Pardeo M, Bria S, Buonuomo PS, et al. Outcome of newborns with asymptomatic monomorphic ventricular arrhythmia. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006;91:F419–22. 10.1136/adc.2005.092932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Villain E, Vetter VL, Garcia JM, Herre J, Cifarelli A, Garson A Jr. Evolving concepts in the management of congenital junctional ectopic tachycardia. A multicenter study. Circulation. 1990;81:1544–9. 10.1161/01.cir.81.5.1544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kylat RI, Samson RA. Junctional ectopic tachycardia in infants and children. J Arrhythm. 2020;36:59–66. 10.1002/joa3.12282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Yater WM. Congenital heart block: review of the literature; report of a case with incomplete heterotaxy; the electrocardiogeam in dextrocardia. Am J Dis Child. 1929;38:112–36. 10.1001/archpedi.1929.01930070124016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Michaelsson M, Riesenfeld T, Jonzon A. Natural history of congenital complete atrioventricular block. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997;20:2098–101. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb03636.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Manolis AA, Manolis TA, Melita H, Manolis AS. Congenital heart block: pace earlier (childhood) than later (adulthood). Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2020;30:275–86. 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Bordachar P, Zachary W, Ploux S, Labrousse L, Haissaguerre M, Thambo JB. Pathophysiology, clinical course, and management of congenital complete atrioventricular block. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:760–6. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.12.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Chandler SF, Fynn‐Thompson F, Mah DY. Role of cardiac pacing in congenital complete heart block. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2017;15:853–61. 10.1080/14779072.2017.1376655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Michäelsson M, Engle MA. Congenital complete heart block: an international study of the natural history. Cardiovasc Clin. 1972;4:85–101. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Kiehl EL, Makki T, Kumar R, Gumber D, Kwon DH, Rickard JW, et al. Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing‐induced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:2272–8. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Khurshid S, Liang JJ, Owens A, Lin D, Schaller R, Epstein AE, et al. Longer paced QRS duration is associated with increased prevalence of right ventricular pacing‐induced cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1174–9. 10.1111/jce.13045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Atarashi H, Endoh Y, Saitoh H, Kishida H, Hayakawa H. Chronotropic effects of cilostazol, a new antithrombotic agent, in patients with bradyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;31:534–9. 10.1097/00005344-199804000-00010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Toyonaga S, Nakatsu T, Murakami T, Kusachi S, Mashima K, Tominaga Y, et al. Effects of cilostazol on heart rate and its variation in patients with atrial fibrillation associated with bradycardia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2000;5:183–91. 10.1054/JCPT.2000.8696 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Arrhythmia are provided here courtesy of Japanese Heart Rhythm Society

RESOURCES