ABSTRACT
Fungi produce a wide diversity of secondary metabolites with interesting biological activities for the health, industrial, and agricultural sectors. While fungal genomes have revealed an unexpectedly high number of biosynthetic pathways that far exceeds the number of known molecules, accessing and characterizing this hidden diversity remain highly challenging. Here, we applied a combined phylogenetic dereplication and comparative genomics strategy to explore eight lichenizing fungi. The determination of the evolutionary relationships of aromatic polyketide pathways resulted in the identification of an uncharacterized biosynthetic pathway that is conserved in distant fungal lineages. The heterologous expression of the homologue from Aspergillus parvulus linked this pathway to naphthalenone compounds, which were detected in cultures when the pathway was expressed. Our unbiased and rational strategy generated evolutionary knowledge that ultimately linked biosynthetic genes to naphthalenone polyketides. Applied to many more genomes, this approach can unlock the full exploitation of the fungal kingdom for molecule discovery.
KEYWORDS: biosynthetic gene clusters, comparative genomics, phylogeny, heterologous expression, Aspergillus parvulus, Aspergillus oryzae, lichen, polyketide, nonreducing polyketide synthase, acetyl tetrahydroxynaphthalene
INTRODUCTION
Fungi are an illustrious source of small bioactive compounds, called natural products or secondary metabolites (SMs), which are not strictly required for growth and reproduction. Instead, they serve as chemical mediators of interactions with the physical environment and with other organisms. At present, fungal SMs are experiencing a renewed interest in drug discovery after the high-throughput screening of libraries of synthetic compounds showed its limitation in yielding new bioactive molecules (1). Fungi have provided us with key antimicrobial compounds, like the first broad-spectrum antibiotic, penicillin, and the first antifungal compound of the caspofungin class, demonstrating their life-changing potential (2, 3). The genomic era has revealed that the fungal kingdom has been underexploited because fungal genomes encode an outstanding number of biosynthetic pathways that is far higher than the number of known fungal molecules (4).
The ever-increasing number of fungal genomes provides an exciting opportunity to identify novel bioactive molecules, but at the same time, such a vast amount of data represents a significant challenge to successful exploitation. So far, analyses of fungal genomes have mostly been restricted to searching the genes involved in the production of already known molecules (5–8) or to surveying the global biosynthetic potential of a given fungus or fungal lineage (9–11). While providing interesting frameworks for functional analyses, such approaches do not allow the rational exploitation of fungal genomes for molecule discovery.
Phylogenetic studies have revealed that closely related SM biosynthetic enzymes tend to share similar catalytic activities and produce similar chemical backbones (12, 13). Prioritizing functional studies using so-called phylogenetic dereplication to discover novel backbones have been rudimentarily employed only. Using this approach, Harvey and coworkers selected 41 biosynthetic pathways from diverse fungal species for functional studies, leading to the detection of 22 compounds, including a few novel ones (14). This previous report showed the potential of this approach to prioritize functional analyses for molecule discovery, but it did not make full use of the evolutionary information underlying phylogenetic relationships, and it did not make use of comparative genomics. Comparing evolutionarily related biosynthetic pathways is necessary to resolve complex metabolic patterns in distinct fungi. Thus, evolution-informed analysis of fungal biosynthetic pathways is still an unexplored ground for molecule discovery and the full exploitation of fungal genomes (15).
Fungal SMs are highly structurally diverse and exhibit various biological activities, yet SM biosynthesis relies on a few classes of core enzymes, including polyketide synthases (PKSs), nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs), and terpene cyclases (TCs) (16). In addition to the core enzyme, the biosynthesis of a given SM typically involves other so-called tailoring enzymes, which are encoded by genes that are usually organized into biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), meaning that they colocalize in the genome and are coregulated (16). Within the fungal kingdom, the Ascomycota show the greatest potential, with 12 to 68 BGCs on average per fungal genome (17). Within the Ascomycota, the Lecanoromycetes class is particularly interesting because it comprises species with the highest number of PKSs per genome. Most known polyketides from the Lecanoromycetes are structurally related and comprise an orsellinic acid-like backbone, as in depsides (atranorin, lecanoric acid, and sekikaic acid), depsidones (lobaric acid), and depsones (picrolichenic acid) (18). Other known Lecanoromycetes polyketides exhibit chemical structures like anthra- and naphthoquinones (parietin, rhodocladonic acid, and cristazarin), dibenzofurans (usnic acid and pannaric acid), or chromones (lepraric acid) (19). Despite many known compounds, to date, only atranorin and lecanoric acid have been functionally linked to their respective BGCs (20, 21). A few compounds have been putatively assigned to BGCs based on genomic and transcriptomic information (6, 21–23), but they remain to be functionally validated, and thus, the vast majority of lichen compounds remain unassigned to BGCs. In addition, genetic and chemoinformatic analyses of BGCs in Ascomycota fungi suggest that the Lecanoromycetes comprise a reservoir of fairly dissimilar biosynthetic pathways compared to other classes of the Ascomycota, and therefore, their genetic and chemical potential has remained far from characterized (9).
In this study, we present how an evolution-informed strategy that combines phylogenetic dereplication and comparative genomics can be used to prioritize BGC functional characterization, link BGCs to molecules, and, ultimately, fully exploit fungal chemical diversity. The phylogenetic dereplication of nonreducing polyketide synthases (nrPKSs) encoded in eight Lecanoromycetes genomes revealed a novel biosynthetic pathway in Lobaria pulmonaria and Umbilicaria pustulata lichen mycobionts. A comparative genomics approach identified a homologous pathway in Aspergillus parvulus, and its nrPKS was functionally characterized using heterologous expression in Aspergillus oryzae. Thanks to the determination of the evolutionary relationships between polyketide BGCs, we were able to predict chemical diversity in distinct fungal lineages, and we suggest that L. pulmonaria and U. pustulata may produce SMs unreported for these species, which might play a role during their interaction with their respective photobionts.
RESULTS
Mining and phylogenetic dereplication of biosynthetic pathways encoded in Lecanoromycetes genomes identify an uncharacterized aromatic polyketide pathway.
Although Lecanoromycetes fungi have been extensively screened for bioactive molecules, most of these compounds belong to very few polyketide chemical classes, and the few published genome analyses indicated an unexpectedly high potential to produce diverse polyketides (9). While this potential has been explored to link BGCs to known molecules, it has not been used to identify novel biosynthetic pathways. For this purpose, a maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of 79 predicted nrPKSs retrieved from eight Lecanoromycetes genomes (Cladonia grayi, Xanthoria parietina, Usnea florida, Lobaria pulmonaria, Acarospora strigata, Dibaeis baeomyces, Graphis scripta, and Umbilicaria pustulata) was built together with 87 characterized nrPKSs from the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster (MIBiG) database (24) and from the literature (Fig. 1; see also Data Sets S1 to S3 in the supplemental material).
FIG 1.
Phylogenetic dereplication of nonreducing polyketide synthases (nrPKSs) from eight Lecanoromycetes. A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was built with reference characterized nrPKSs from the MIBiG database (24) and from the literature (see Data Set S4 in the supplemental material). Ultrafast bootstrap values of >95 are shown. The tree is midpoint rooted. The nine phylogenetic groups as reported in previous analyses are indicated, with backbone molecules produced by the characterized nrPKSs shown next to each clade. Two new phylogenetic groups, X and XI, are highlighted in red. DMOA, 3,5-demethylorsellinic acid; MOA, methylorsellinic acid; OA, orsellinic acid; T4HN, 1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene; AT4HN, 2-acetyl-1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene; YWA1, 2,5,6,8-tetrahydroxy-2-methyl-2,3-dihydro-4H-naphtho[2,3-b]pyran-4-one.
Protein sequences of nonreducing polyketide synthases, hydroxynaphthalene reductases, and scytalone dehydratases. Download Data Set S1, TXT file, 0.4 MB (461.8KB, txt) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Protein alignments of nonreducing polyketide synthases, hydroxynaphthalene reductases, and scytalone dehydratases. Download Data Set S2, TXT file, 0.4 MB (377KB, txt) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Phylogenetic trees of nonreducing polyketide synthases, hydroxynaphthalene reductases, and scytalone dehydratases. Download Data Set S3, TXT file, 0.03 MB (28.8KB, txt) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Curated gene models. Download Data Set S4, TXT file, 0.1 MB (69.7KB, txt) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
The tree is divided into 13 strongly supported clades, 8 of which correspond to previously defined nrPKS groups based on phylogeny and cyclization patterns (12, 21, 25). However, our analyses indicate that groups I, II, and IV should each be split into two subgroups that are consistent with the precursors released from the nrPKSs (Fig. 1). All nrPKS groups (IIa, IIb, III, IVa, IVb, and V) that produce polyketides with two or more aromatic rings share an origin, while other nrPKS groups that produce polyketides with a single aromatic ring seem to form three different clades (groups Ia and Ib; group VIII; and groups VI, VII, and IX). The most common Lecanoromycetes compounds, depsides, depsidones, depsones, and dibenzofurans, are thus likely produced by such single-ring-polyketide-producing nrPKSs. Consistently, the nrPKS involved in the production of atranorin belongs to group IX (21). Anthraquinones and xanthones like parietin and lichexanthone are likely produced by nrPKSs from group V because this clade comprises characterized nrPKSs involved in the biosynthesis of emodin-derived anthraquinones (Fig. 1).
In addition to these nine previously reported groups, two additional phylogenetic clades are strongly supported and are referred to as new phylogenetic groups X and XI (Fig. 1). Group X appears basal to groups Ia and Ib and thus likely comprises enzymes that produce polyketides with a single aromatic ring. The nrPKS involved in the production of the depside lecanoric acid in Pseudevernia furfuracea belongs to this clade (20), confirming that nrPKSs in this group produce orsellinic acid derivatives. In contrast, group XI does not comprise any characterized nrPKS. The basal position to group V suggests that the polyketides released by nrPKSs from group XI contain several aromatic rings. This group contains only four nrPKSs from L. pulmonaria, C. grayi, and U. pustulata, but manual curation of gene models revealed that Clagr3_1822 is actually a pseudogene because it contains a disruptive mutation (Data Set S4). A single nrPKS from D. baeomyces is not related to any group and forms an outgroup to groups II to V and XI. Based on this phylogenetic dereplication, the vast majority of nrPKSs in the Lecanoromycetes fall into groups for which the chemical backbone can be predicted, which will be useful to assign known molecules to BGCs. We then embarked on characterizing the new group XI of fungal nrPKSs as it may be involved in the production of new polyketides in lichenizing and other fungi.
Group XI nrPKSs belong to a novel conserved biosynthetic gene cluster.
Because the phylogenetic dereplication was performed with functionally characterized nrPKSs only, it was not known whether group XI nrPKSs are restricted to the Lecanoromycetes or are present in other distant fungal species. To answer this question, we sought close homologues of the four group XI nrPKSs in available Ascomycota predicted proteomes. In total, we identified 20 other closely related nrPKSs, which expanded group XI to distant fungal lineages, including Leotiomycetes, Dothideomycetes, and Eurotiomycetes (Fig. 2A and Data Sets S1 to S3). The phylogeny of these homologues indicates that Lobpul1_1267156, Lobpul1_565180, and Umbpus1_102407 are actually paralogues (Fig. 2A). The Lobpul1_1267156 clade is further divided into two well-supported branches, both of which comprise Dothideomycetes sequences, also suggesting paralogy or horizontal transfer from Eurotiomycetes to Dothideomycetes (Fig. 2A).
FIG 2.
A novel biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC) from Lobaria pulmonaria and Umbilicaria pustulata is conserved in distant fungal species. (A) A maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was built with homologues of group XI nonreducing polyketide synthases (nrPKSs), and the melanin nrPKS from Colletotrichum lagenarium was used as an outgroup. Ultrafast bootstrap values of >95 are shown. (B) Loci of nrPKS genes as predicted by fungiSMASH (42) were compared using Clinker (51). Colored arrows and connections show conserved genes that are predicted to be part of the BGC. Orange nrPKS arrows correspond to genes with disruptive mutations (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Homologous genes that were found at another genomic location are depicted with double slashes. THN, tetrahydroxynaphthalene.
BLASTp search for proteins from the Aspergillus parvulus group XI biosynthetic pathway. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.03 MB (27.9KB, xlsx) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
We then compared the genomic loci of all Lobpul1_1267156 homologues in order to predict the borders of a putative conserved BGC. Genes that encode putative tailoring enzymes were identified, based on their functional conserved domains, at all loci but one (Fig. 2B and Table S1). Although the Lobpul1_565180 paralogue is predicted to be functional, this locus does not comprise any putative tailoring gene. A flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-binding oxidoreductase tailoring gene is located upstream of the nrPKS gene in all species, and both genes appear to share a bidirectional promoter, except in Oidiodendron maius, in which an O-methyltransferase gene is inserted in between (Fig. 2B). A set of six other tailoring genes (encoding an O-acyltransferase, an O-methyltransferase, a tetrahydroxynaphthalene [T4HN] reductase, a scytalone dehydratase, an aldo-keto reductase, and a second FAD-binding oxidoreductase) and one putative regulatory gene encoding an NmrA-like protein are conserved in most of the fungal species and form a predicted BGC (Fig. 2B and Table S1). In addition, a gene encoding a GroES-like alcohol dehydrogenase enzyme is present at the locus in eight distant species, and a close homologue was found at a different locus in Didymocrea sadasivanii and Neofusicoccum parvum (Fig. 2B and Table S1). Similarly, close homologues of the aldo-keto reductase and NmrA-like protein-encoding genes were found at another locus in O. maius. Close homologues of the O-methyltransferase and O-acyltransferase genes are also found at a different locus in Atropellis piniphila and N. parvum, respectively. In Aspergillus species exclusively, a gene encoding a putative transcription factor is also found at the locus. Disruptive mutations were detected in the nrPKS gene not only in C. grayi but also in Setosphaeria turcica, suggesting a nonfunctional pathway in both species (Fig. 2B, Table S1, and Data Set S4). Similarly, disruptive mutations were found in a few tailoring genes, including the T4HN reductase and scytalone dehydratase genes in L. pulmonaria, and the insertion of a long sequence in an intron of the keto reductase gene in S. turcica likely makes it nonfunctional (Table S1 and Data Set S4). Although the phylogeny suggests a complex evolutionary history with several paralogues, the comparative genomics analysis indicates that nrPKS group XI belongs to a conserved BGC with little diversification between fungal species.
Ancestral duplication of T4HN reductase and scytalone dehydratase genes.
Two tailoring genes from the predicted group XI BGC encode a T4HN reductase and a scytalone dehydratase. These two enzymes are well characterized and act together to dehydroxylate intermediates in the conserved dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) melanin (26) and anthraquinone cladofulvin (27) biosynthetic pathways. Especially, both genes in group XI appear to share a bidirectional promoter (Fig. 2B), a gene organization also found in the Aspergillus fumigatus DHN (ARP1 and ARP2) (28, 29) and Cladosporium fulvum cladofulvin (27) BGCs, suggesting a common origin. A previous report indicated that ARP1 and ARP2 are distant paralogues of claB and claC that have been recruited in different biosynthetic pathways (30). Phylogenetic analyses of these enzymes, including the group XI sequences, are consistent with these previous findings (Fig. 3 and Data Sets S1 to S3) and reveal that group XI T4HN reductase and scytalone dehydratase are distinct paralogues with a similar evolutionary history. While claB and claC are most closely related to SCD1 and 3HNR, respectively, from the DHN melanin pathway found in Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes, the group XI gene pair could originate from an ancestral duplication of the ARP1-ARP2 gene pair (Fig. 3).
FIG 3.
Coevolution between hydroxynaphthalene reductases (Hnr) and scytalone dehydratases. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees of homologues of scytalone dehydratases (A) and tetra- and tri-Hnr proteins (B) are shown (52). Paralogues that share a bidirectional promoter in the group XI, DHN melanin, and cladofulvin biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) are highlighted. Ultrafast bootstrap values of >95 are shown.
Aspparv1_81212 is a hexaketide synthase that produces AT4HN.
Although many biosynthetic pathways from other fungi have been successfully characterized in Aspergillus oryzae (31, 32), no PKS from the Lecanoromycetes has so far been successfully expressed in this heterologous host for unknown reasons (33). Because the Lobpul1_1267156 BGC is well conserved (Fig. 2), we chose to functionally characterize in A. oryzae the homologous nrPKS from A. parvulus, Aspparv1_81212, as it belongs to a complete predicted BGC (Fig. 2B). A. oryzae transformants expressing Aspparv1_81212 produced two novel compounds compared to transformants carrying an empty vector (Fig. 4 and Fig. S1). Product 1 (retention time [RT] = 9.35 min; maximum UV absorption [UV max] = 197, 230, 278, 322, and 405 nm; m/z = 233 [M − H]−) exhibits a yellow color and has an exact mass of 235.0577 [M + H]+ as determined by high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) (Fig. S2). Product 1 was identified as 2-acetyl-1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (AT4HN) (Fig. 4) using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) (Data Set S5) and by comparing mass and UV spectra to previously published data (34). Product 2 (RT = 8.65 min; UV max = 197, 241, 276, and 325 nm; m/z = 191 [M − H]−) was identified as the pyrone 6,8-dihydroxy-3-methylisocoumarin based on NMR analyses (Data Set S5) and published data (35). Such pyrones are known shunt metabolites from nrPKSs when the final thioesterase (TE) domain is inactivated (34). However, such shunt pyrones harbor the same length as that of the polyketide released by the fully functional nrPKS (34). While product 1 is a hexaketide released through TE-catalyzed Claisen cyclization, product 2 is a pentaketide that seems to be released after the incorporation of four malonyl-CoAs through spontaneous O-C cyclization (34). Analysis of the transcripts in A. oryzae transformants showed that a single mature nrPKS is expressed (Fig. S1), meaning that this nrPKS can release two polyketides of different lengths. The three transformants yielded AT4HN as the major product (83, 56, and 350 mg/L) compared to the pyrone (7, 13, and 219 mg/mL). The yield difference between the transformants most likely reflects differences in gene expression due to the integration of the plasmid at different genomic loci. These results demonstrate that the Aspparv1_81212 homologue encodes a PKS that releases the hexaketide AT4HN as the first stable intermediate. Thus, group XI PKSs produce the same backbone as those of certain PKSs in group II (Fig. 1).
FIG 4.
Heterologous expression of the group XI nonreducing polyketide synthase from Aspergillus parvulus. Organic extracts of 4-day-old Aspergillus oryzae NSAR1 transformants carrying an empty vector or expressing Aspparv1_81212 (three independent transformants) were analyzed using UV-HPLC. Major product 1 was identified as acetyl-tetrahydroxynaphthalene (AT4HN). Minor product 2 was identified as 6,8-dihydroxy-3-methylisocoumarin.
Expression of Aspparv1_81212 in Aspergillus oryzae transformants. (A) Expression of Aspparv1_81212 and H2B genes in Aspergillus oryzae transformants. M indicates the BenchTop 1-kb ladder (Promega), the negative control contains water, and the positive control for Aspparv1_81212 contains plasmid pTYGSarg::Aspparv1_81212. (B) Analysis of Aspparv1_81212 expression by A. oryzae transformants. F1 to F7 designate fragments of the Aspparv1_81212 gene; M designates the BenchTop 1-kb ladder (Promega). All fragments have the expected sizes (F1, 1,007 bp; F2, 1,059 bp; F3, 1,044 bp; F4, 1,030 bp; F5, 1,035 bp; F6, 1,029 bp; F7, 628 bp). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.8 MB (787.6KB, pdf) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data for metabolite 1 produced by Aspergillus oryzae NSAR1 transformants expressing Aspparv1_81212. The compound with molecular formula C12H11O5 and a mass of 235.0577 (highlighted in green) is consistent with acetyl tetrahydroxynaphthalene. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.2 MB (191.8KB, pdf) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
1H and 13C NMR spectra of products 1, 2, and 4. Download Data Set S5, PDF file, 0.6 MB (608.2KB, pdf) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
The group XI biosynthetic gene cluster is linked to the production of 6-O-methylasparvenone and ethylparvulenone in Aspergillus parvulus.
A. parvulus is known to produce several polyketides that could structurally derive from compound 1, namely, the naphthalenone asparvenone compound 3, parvulenone compound 5, and methylated or ethylated derivatives 4, 6, and 7 (36) (Fig. 5A). Analysis of organic extracts from A. parvulus grown under conditions conducive to naphthalenone production (37) detected the presence of compound 4 (RT = 15.25 min; m/z = 237 [M + H]+; UV max = 219 and 288 nm) and compound 7 (RT = 12.6 min; m/z = 249 [M − H]−; UV max = 216, 262, and 308 nm) (Fig. 5B). Product 4 was confirmed to be 6-O-methylasparvenone by NMR (Data Set S5).
FIG 5.
Correlation between the expression of the group XI biosynthetic gene cluster and the production of naphthalenone compounds in Aspergillus parvulus. (A) Chemical structures of naphthalenone compounds reported for A. parvulus. (B) UV-HPLC traces of organic extracts obtained from a 6-day-old A. parvulus culture in malt extract (conducive) or Czapek-Dox (nonconducive) liquid medium. Analysis of UV spectra and extraction of mass ions (electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry [ESI-MS]) of naphthalenone compounds shown in panel A identified products 4 and 7, provided as representative of results from three replicates. (C) Expression of predicted genes at the Aspparv1_81212 locus in A. parvulus grown under conducive and nonconducive conditions as determined by RT-PCR. The H2B housekeeping gene was used as an expression control.
We then assessed if the predicted Aspparv1_81212 BGC is expressed when compounds 4 and 7 are produced. With the exception of the predicted and not conserved thioreductase Aspparv1_171930 gene, all genes predicted to be part of the BGC were found to be significantly expressed compared to the housekeeping gene H2B (Fig. 5C). The H2B transcript exhibit similar signal intensities in both cultures. In comparison to H2B signals, a condition nonconducive to naphthalenone production shows the very limited expression of most genes apart from the genes encoding an NmrA-like protein (Aspparv1_193045) and a GroES-like alcohol dehydrogenase (Aspparv1_81192), which exhibit similar or slightly lower expression levels. These results make it uncertain whether these two genes belong to the BGC or not. The flanking genes Aspparv1_171941 and Aspparv1_201406 seem to be expressed at slightly higher levels under conducive conditions, but they encode a mitochondrial carrier protein and a cupin protein, respectively (Table 1), which are unlikely to be involved in naphthalenone biosynthesis. The other flanking and housekeeping genes do not show coregulation (Fig. 5C). These results show that most of the genes from the predicted BGC in A. parvulus are coregulated and that their expression correlates with the production of naphthalenones. Thus, the predicted BGC comprises 9 genes likely involved in the production of asparvenone and derivatives, and the corresponding genes were named APR1 to APR9 (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Functions of proteins encoded in the predicted group XI biosynthetic gene cluster and flanking genes in Aspergillus parvulusa
| Protein ID |
Gene name |
Protein function | Pfam domain, E value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 171943 | Protein kinase | PF00069.27, 4.4e−49 | |
| PF07714.19, 2.3e−23 | |||
| 171942 | Unknown | No hit | |
| 171941 | Mitochondrial carrier protein | PF00153.29, 2.9e−07 | |
| 201406 | Cupin superfamily protein | PF06172.13, 2.0e−51 | |
| 201405 | APR9 | Zn/Cys transcription factor | PF00172, 7.37e−09 |
| 171936 | APR8 | Aldo-keto reductase | PF00248, 6.40e−144 |
| 201403 | APR7 | FAD-binding oxidoreductase | PF01565, 7.49e−19 |
| PF08031, 2.42e−11 | |||
| 201402 | APR5 | Scytalone dehydratase | PF02982, 6.74e−57 |
| 213579 | APR6 | T4HN reductase | PF13561, 1.26e−91 |
| 193045 | NmrA-like protein | PF05368, 4.70e−91 | |
| 171934 | APR3 | O-Acyltransferase | PF13813, 6.04e−20 |
| 81217 | APR2 | FAD-binding oxidoreductase | PF01565, 4.34e−29 |
| PF08031, 4.12e−06 | |||
| 81212 | APR1 | Nonreducing polyketide synthase | SAT (PF16073), 1.04e−57 |
| KS (PF00109), 1.07e−82 | |||
| KS_C (PF02801), 8.67e−41 | |||
| AcT (PF00698), 3.56e−38 | |||
| PT (TIGR04532), 8.65e−13 | |||
| PP-b (PF00550), 21.89e−07 | |||
| PP-b (PF00550), 2.06e−10 | |||
| TE (PF00975), 3.61e−23 | |||
| 171930 | Thioredoxin | PF00085.22, 3.8e−19 | |
| 193042 | APR4 | S-Adenosylmethionine-dependent O-methyltransferase | PF00891, 3.87e−20 |
| 81192 | GroES-like alcohol dehydrogenase | PF08240, 4.76e−07 | |
| PF00107, 6.14e−06 | |||
| 171927 | WD domain-containing protein | PF11816.10, 6.4e−59 | |
| PF00400.3, 1.0e−05 | |||
| 81165 | PP loop family protein | PF01171.22, 1.6e−48 | |
| 81156 | RhoGEF protein | PF00621.22, 4.1e−25 | |
| PF12015.10, 1.7e−11 | |||
T4HN, tetrahydroxynaphthalene.
DISCUSSION
Evolutionary relationships of biosynthetic gene clusters inform fungal chemical diversity.
The phylogenetic dereplication of nrPKSs encoded in the genomes of eight lichenizing fungi has revealed two new phylogenetic groups, of which group XI was not functionally characterized. Comparative genomics allowed the prediction of a BGC that was found to be expressed in A. parvulus when naphthalenone compounds were produced. These findings demonstrate that the combination of phylogenetic dereplication and comparative genomics is a powerful strategy that not only provides new insights into the evolution of fungal BGCs but also allows relevant prioritization of functional characterization without a priori knowledge about chemical structures.
Although chemical backbone 1 produced by Apr1 is already known (38), this result was unexpected because group XI is a sister clade of the anthraquinone-producing group V nrPKSs and is not related to group IIa, which comprises nrPKSs that are known to produce compound 1 (Fig. 1). Similar to orsellinic acid that is produced by nrPKSs from distantly related clades (Fig. 1), compound 1 appears to be a common chemical backbone produced by enzymes that have diverged long ago.
Compound 1 is a precursor of DHN melanin in certain species like Exophiala dermatitidis, in which it is further converted to T4HN via the removal of the acetyl group by the polyketide-shortening enzyme WdYg1p (38). A similar reaction is catalyzed by the homologue Ayg1 to convert YWA1 into T4HN in A. fumigatus (39). No homologue of WdYg1p could be identified in the A. parvulus genome, indicating that compound 1 could not be converted to T4HN in this fungus. Similarly, several homologues of T4HN reductase and scytalone dehydratase were found encoded in the A. parvulus genome, but none of them correspond to paralogues involved in the DHN melanin pathway (Fig. 3). Similarly, other Aspergillus species included in this study lack these paralogues (Fig. 3), suggesting that the DHN melanin pathway has been lost in all of them. In contrast, Dothideomycetes and Leotiomycetes species carry both DHN melanin and naphthalenone BGCs, and a few appear to also contain a BGC related to the cladofulvin one. Noteworthy, in O. maius, the closest homologues of both the hydroxynaphthalene reductase and scytalone dehydratase genes form an outgroup to the group XI clades (Fig. 3; see also Table S1 in the supplemental material) and are located at another locus next to genes encoding an nrPKS (Oidma1_51005) and a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (Oidma1_157855). Consistent with the phylogenetic position, these paralogues correspond to a different biosynthetic pathway in this species. Altogether, the phylogenetic analyses and genomic organizations suggest that the group XI BGC has an ancestral origin, possibly with the recruitment of paralogues from the DHN or cladofulvin pathways after gene duplication and of other tailoring genes that have resulted in the BGC for naphthalenone production in fungi.
Gene content diversification of the group XI biosynthetic gene cluster correlates with the chemical diversity of naphthalenone compounds.
Our results suggest that product 1 is the initial chemical backbone to produce products 4 and 7, which is consistent with the previous proposition that a hexaketide precursor is the starting molecule of product 4 (36). We also found that the pentaketide pyrone product 2 is released at the same time as product 1. Traces of product 2 were detected in organic extracts of A. parvulus (Fig. S3), which indicates that the release of product 2 is likely not a misfunction of the nrPKS in A. oryzae. However, the release of product 2 in A. parvulus needs to be confirmed to validate this hypothesis. In addition, the predicted catalytic activities of tailoring enzymes encoded at the APR1 locus are consistent with necessary modifications to convert product 1 into product 4 or 7. DHN biosynthesis in fungi involves the removal of two hydroxyl groups through the sequential action of a hydroxynaphthalene reductase (4Hnr/Arp2 and 3Hnr) and a scytalone dehydratase (Scd1/Arp1) (26). Similarly, ClaB and ClaC in C. fulvum are paralogues of 3Hnr and Scd1, which catalyze the removal of a hydroxyl group from emodin to yield chrysophanol hydroquinone in the cladofulvin pathway (27). In A. parvulus, the removal of the C-3 and C-6 hydroxyl groups, as found in products 4 and 7 compared to product 1, likely involves Apr5 and Apr6, the paralogues of Arp1 and Arp2, respectively (Fig. 3 and 6). The presence of the predicted O-methyltransferase (Apr4) and O-acyltransferase (Apr3) encoded in the BGC is consistent with the methylation and ethylation observed in products 4 and 7, respectively (Fig. 6). A particular feature of product 4 is the reduction of the ketone, which could involve Apr8, a predicted aldo-keto reductase (Fig. 6), and possibly another enzyme to remove the resulting hydroxyl group. In a similar reaction to produce product 4, the acetyl group added by Apr3 is likely reduced by Apr8, followed by the removal of the hydroxyl group to yield the ethyl group. The oxidoreductases Apr2 and Apr7 could be involved in the complete reduction of the aromatic ring and/or the selective oxidation of C-5 (Fig. 6). Because the BGC is fully conserved in all Aspergillus species in which an APR1 orthologue was found as well as in Atropellis piniphila, Sporormia fimetaria, Dothidotthia symphoricarpi, Karstenula rhodostoma, Paraconiothyrium sporulosum, Bimuria novae-zelandiae, and D. sadasivanii (Fig. 2B and Table S1), we expect all these species to produce naphthalenone molecules related to products 4 and 7. The absence of APR3 in D. symphoricarpi indicates that derivatives of product 4 may be produced only (Fig. 2B and Table S1).
FIG 6.
Prediction of enzymatic requirements for the production of diverse naphthalenones in fungi. Aspergillus parvulus produces compounds 4 and 7, while Neofusicoccum parvum produces compound 8, consistent with the gene component of the group XI biosynthetic gene cluster (BGC). Based on the BGC content, Apr2 and Apr7 are likely responsible for the hydroxylation at C-5. Apr5 and Apr6 are expected to jointly remove the hydroxyl groups at C-3 and C-6. Apr8 is predicted to reduce and Apr3 is predicted to acetylate the keto group, respectively. The combination of Apr3 and Apr8 is expected to be responsible for yielding compound 7. Apr4 is predicted to be responsible for the methylation of the oxygen at C-3. Dashed arrows indicate that several steps are most likely required between hypothetical intermediates, either spontaneously or through the action of enzymes that remain to be identified. The predicted BGC in Lobaria pulmonaria suggests that this species produces the hypothetical compound 9, while Umbilicaria pustulata and Oidiodendron maius are predicted to produce derivatives of the hypothetical compound 10. Genes with identified disruptive mutations are labeled with a star. O-MeT, O-methyltransferase; red, reductase; O-AcT, O-acetyltransferase; SCD, scytalone dehydratase.
Search for product 2 in organic extracts from Aspergillus parvulus. Shown is the extracted mass of product 2 (191 in negative mode) in extracts under conducive and nonconducive conditions, with UV spectra. Purified product 2 produced by an Aspergillus oryzae transformant is shown as a reference. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.2 MB (164.4KB, pdf) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
The fungus N. parvum is known to produce diverse naphthalenones, including botryosphaerone D compound 8 (40), which differs from compound 4 only by the presence of the C-6 hydroxyl group (Fig. 6). The group XI BGC in N. parvum comprises five genes only (Fig. 2), including APR8 and APR4, which encode the predicted aldo-keto reductase and O-methyltransferase, consistent with the chemical structure of compound 8. The presence of the O-acyltransferase Apr3, although encoded at a different locus in the genome (Fig. 2B), suggests that N. parvum could also produce a molecule related to compound 7. Orthologues of APR5 and APR6 could not be identified in the genome of N. parvum, which likely explains why both the C-3 and C-8 hydroxyl groups remain in compound 8 (Fig. 3 and Table S1). Because the N. parvum genome also lacks the oxidoreductase gene APR7 (Table S1), this suggests that both Apr2 and Apr7 may be functionally redundant. Further functional validation of these tailoring enzymes is being performed to address such biosynthetic hypotheses.
The BGC composition in L. pulmonaria and Melanops tulasnei is limited to APR1 and APR2 only, as in L. pulmonaria, both the APR5 and APR6 genes contain disruptive mutations that make the proteins likely not functional (Table S1 and Data Sets S1 to S3). Thus, these two species could produce compounds related to compound 9 (Fig. 6). In addition to APR1 and APR2, U. pustulata and O. maius also comprise the aldo-keto reductase APR8 gene (Fig. 2B and Table S1), suggesting that they might produce compounds related to compound 10 (Fig. 6). The presence of the O-methyltransferase APR4 gene in O. maius suggests that a methylated derivative of compound 10 is produced (Fig. 6). Assigning functions of tailoring genes to biosynthetic steps of the naphthalenone pathway in A. parvulus will allow the reconstruction of pathways encoded in the genomes of other fungi, including the lichen mycobionts, and validate these hypotheses.
Conclusions.
Combining phylogenetic dereplication and comparative genomics is a powerful strategy to prioritize the functional characterization of BGCs without any a priori knowledge other than evolutionary novelty. While most fungal genomes are used to either list their production potential or find BGCs for known molecules of interest, our approach generates knowledge on the evolution of fungal BGCs, potentially finds novel molecules, and otherwise links genes to already known molecules, as found here. This strategy is very promising to unlock the full rational exploitation of fungal genomes for BGC characterization and molecule discovery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fungal genomes and sequences.
Genome assemblies and gene predictions of Cladonia grayi Cgr/DA2myc/ss v2.0, Xanthoria parietina 46-1-SA22 v1.1, Usnea florida ATCC 18376 v1.0, Lobaria pulmonaria Scotland reference genome v1.0, Acarospora strigata CBS 132363, Dibaeis baeomyces, Graphis scripta CBS 132367, and Umbilicaria pustulata were retrieved from the Joint Genome Institute (JGI) MycoCosm repository (41). BGCs were predicted using fungiSMASH 4 with default parameters (42). Predicted nrPKSs were selected based on the presence of the signature SAT starter unit:ACP transacylase (PF16073) and PT product template (TIGR04532) conserved domains. Gene models for homologues of APR1, APR5, APR6, and APR8 were curated manually (see Data Set S4 in the supplemental material). Characterized nrPKSs were retrieved from the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster (MIBiG) database (24) and from the literature (Data Sets S1 to S3). Close homologues of A. parvulus Apr1 were retrieved from the MycoCosm repository using BLASTp. Another BLASTp search with each A. parvulus protein predicted in the pathway was performed on filtered proteins of each species containing the group XI BGC, allowing the identification of genes located at a different locus (Table S1).
Phylogenetic trees.
Protein alignments were performed using Clustal Omega v1.2.4 (43), with the KS keto-synthase domain PF00195.19 as a guide (parameters –hmm –in) in the case of nrPKS sequences. Poorly aligned regions were removed using trimaL 1.4.rev15 (build 2013-12-17; parameter -automated1) (44). Maximum likelihood trees were built with IQ-TREE v1.6.11-he860b03_0 bioconda (45) with model finder (30) and ultrafast bootstrapping as well as an approximate Bayes test (46) and a Shimodaira-Hasegawa approximate likelihood-ratio test (47) (parameters –bb 1000 -nt AUTO -mset LG -alrt 1000 -abayes -m MFP). The resulting trees were visualized using iTOL (48). All curated alignments and phylogenetic tree files are provided in Data Sets S1 to S3.
Fungal strains and growth conditions.
A. parvulus CBS 136.61 from the CBS collection (Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, The Netherlands) was grown for 6 days in malt extract broth (MB) (filtered malt extract at 400 mL/L [pH 7.0]) liquid medium at 25°C under constant agitation at 200 rpm or on malt extract agar (MEA) (50 g/L [pH 5.4]; Oxoid) plates. For total RNA isolation and secondary-metabolite extraction, A. parvulus was grown for 6 days in 50 mL Difco Czapek-Dox (CZD) broth (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ) or MB (pH 3.5) liquid medium at 25°C under constant agitation at 200 rpm. A. oryzae NSAR1 was grown on MEA plates for 5 days at 30°C. A. oryzae transformants were grown on selective CZD medium without arginine (35 g/L Difco CZD broth [BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ], 1 g/L ammonium sulfate [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO], 0.5 g/L adenine [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO], 1.5 g/L methionine [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO]). For the induction of the PamyB promoter and polyketide production (49), transformants were grown at 30°C for 5 days in Yeast Malt Agar (YMA) (3 g/L Difco yeast extract, 3 g/L Difco malt extract, 5 g/L Difco Bacto peptone, 10 g/L glucose [Merck, Kenilworth, NJ]) liquid or agar (Ferwo 700 agar) medium. The mycelium from transformants grown in liquid YMA cultures was used to extract total RNA.
Nucleic acid extraction and RT-PCR.
The mycelium of A. parvulus or A. oryzae from liquid cultures was filtered through a paper filter, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and ground using a mortar and pestle. Genomic DNA was isolated using the DNeasy plant minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For total RNA extraction, 100 mg of the ground mycelium was mixed with 1 mL of Invitrogen TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) in a 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tube and incubated for 5 min at 25°C. The resulting lysate was mixed with 0.2 mL chloroform, gently mixed by hand, and incubated for 5 min. Samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 15 min at room temperature. The aqueous phase was transferred into a new microcentrifuge tube, mixed with 0.5 volumes of 100% ethanol, and loaded into a column from the NucleoSpin RNA extraction kit (Macherey-Nagel, Allentown, PA). Downstream steps were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Five hundred nanograms of total RNA was used to synthesize cDNA using oligo(dT) primers and GoScript reverse transcription (RT) mix (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR was performed for each A. parvulus gene at the APR1 locus and the housekeeping control gene H2B (Table S2) using GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). To confirm APR1 expression in A. oryzae transformants, primers specific for the A. parvulus APR1 and A. oryzae H2B genes (Table S2) were used with GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI).
Oligonucleotides used in this study. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.1KB, xlsx) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Gene amplification and plasmid digestion.
The five exons of APR1 (JGI protein identifier 81212) were amplified from genomic DNA of A. parvulus using primers that harbor 15-bp sequences homologous to the previous and next exons (Table S2), with the exception of the forward and reverse primers used to amplify the first and last exons, respectively, which harbor 30-bp sequences homologous to the pEYA2 plasmid (49) (Table S2). The last exon was amplified to include a 100-bp downstream terminator sequence. All PCR fragments were amplified using Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. One microgram of the pEYA2 plasmid was digested overnight with 10 U NotI at 37°C (Promega, Madison, WI). Fragments of the expected size and the linearized plasmid were purified from a 0.8% agarose gel or directly from the PCR mix using a Geneclean II kit (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA).
Transformation-associated recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
A strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae BMA 64 with a ura3− auxotrophic marker was used for transformation-associated recombination according to a protocol adapted from the one described previously (50). S. cerevisiae was grown overnight at 30°C in 3 mL yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) medium (20 g/L d-glucose [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO], 20 g/L Difco peptone, 10 g/L Difco yeast extract). Two milliliters containing 108 cells was transferred into 50 mL YPD medium and incubated at 30°C under agitation at 200 rpm for about 5 h until reaching an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 1 to 1.5. Yeast cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 2,500 rpm at 4°C. The cells were resuspended in 20 mL of a filter-sterilized lithium acetate (LiAc)-dithiothreitol (DTT) solution (100 mM LiAc, 10 mM DTT, 0.6 M sorbitol, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]) and incubated at room temperature for 30 min under agitation at 100 rpm. The cells were centrifuged for 5 min at 2,500 rpm at 4°C, and the supernatant was discarded. Cells were washed in 7 mL of ice-cold 1 M sorbitol and centrifuged at 2,500 rpm three times. Finally, the cells were resuspended in 400 μL of ice-cold 1 M sorbitol. Eight microliters of the cell suspension was mixed with 6 μL of the NotI-linearized pEYA2 plasmid and 2 μL of each APR1 exon fragment in a prechilled electroporation cuvette. After a 5-min incubation on ice, cells were electroporated (1,500 V and 200 Ω) and mixed immediately with 1 mL of ice-cold 1 M sorbitol. Cells were incubated for 1.5 h at 30°C without agitation and then centrifuged, and 200 μL was plated onto synthetic dropout agar medium (SDM) (20 g/L agar, 20 g/L d-glucose [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO], 1.92 g/L yeast dropout supplements without uracil [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO], 6.7 g/L yeast nitrogen base without amino acids [Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO]). Plates were incubated for 3 to 7 days at 30°C. Yeast transformants were transferred to a new selective plate and grown overnight. Single colonies were transferred into a microcentrifuge tube in 30 μL of 25 mM NaOH and boiled for 10 min at 100°C. Next, 1 μL was used for PCR screening with GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI) and primers APR1_F and APR1_R (Table S2). Positive transformants were grown overnight in liquid SDM to isolate the pEYA2::APR1 plasmid using the Zymoprep yeast plasmid miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA), and the obtained plasmid was subsequently introduced into electrocompetent Escherichia coli DH5α cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) using an electroporation method according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR screening was performed by transferring individual colonies into the PCR mixture with GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). The pEYA2::APR1 plasmid was isolated from confirmed positive clones using the Zyppy plasmid miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA), and the plasmid was validated by sequencing (Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea).
Construction of the expression vector.
Seventy nanograms of the pEYA2::APR1 entry vector and 100 ng of the pTYGSarg destination vector (49) were mixed with 1 μL of the Gateway LR Clonase II enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) in a 5-μL final volume, and the reaction mixture was incubated at 25°C for 2 h. The total reaction mixture was introduced into chemically competent E. coli DH5α cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) using a heat shock protocol. The pTYGSarg::APR1 expression vector was isolated from positive colonies using the Zyppy plasmid miniprep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA).
Transformation A. oryzae NSAR1.
Spores from A. oryzae NSAR1 were harvested from MEA plates in 5 mL of sterile water, and 1 mL of this spore suspension was inoculated into 50 mL of MB liquid medium and grown overnight at 28°C with shaking at 200 rpm. Germinating spores were collected by centrifugation at room temperature for 10 min at 3,500 rpm and resuspended in 25 mL of 0.8 M NaCl. After centrifugation for 10 min at 3,500 rpm at room temperature, germinated spores were resuspended in 10 mL of a freshly made filter-sterilized protoplasting solution (200 mg Trichoderma lysing enzyme [Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA] and 50 mg Driselase [Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA] in 0.8 M NaCl) and incubated at 30°C for 2 to 2.5 h with shaking at 100 rpm. Protoplasts were filtered through sterile Miracloth and then centrifuged for 5 min at 3,000 rpm at 4°C. Protoplasts were resuspended in 200 μL of solution 1 (0.8 M NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, and 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]) and aliquoted to 100 μL in 2-mL microcentrifuge tubes. Ten micrograms of the pTYGSarg::APR1 expression plasmid or the empty vector pTYGSarg was added to protoplasts, and the mixture was incubated on ice for 2 min. One milliliter of solution 2 (60% [wt/vol] polyethylene glycol 3350 [PEG 3350], 0.8 M NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2, and 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]) was added, and the tubes were gently inverted before incubation at room temperature for 20 min. Protoplasts were then mixed with 25 mL of cooled selective CZD top 1.5% agar without arginine supplemented with 1 M sorbitol and immediately plated onto selective CZD bottom 0.8% agar without arginine supplemented with 1 M sorbitol. Transformation plates were incubated at 30°C for 3 to 10 days.
Secondary-metabolite extraction and HPLC-MS analyses.
Secondary metabolites from 6-day-old A. parvulus or 5-day-old A. oryzae transformant liquid culture filtrates were isolated with a 1:1 volume of ethyl acetate (VWR Chemicals, Radnor, PA). After shaking on an orbital shaker for at least 1 h, the organic phase was transferred to a 50-mL tube and evaporated under nitrogen flow. The resulting solid was dissolved in acetonitrile. Organic extracts were analyzed with a Shimadzu LC-2030 3D-Prominence-i PDA system coupled to a Shimadzu LCMS-2020 mass spectrometer and equipped with a Shimadzu Shim-pack GIST C18-HP reversed-phase column (3 μm, 4.6 by 100 mm). The following method was used: a linear gradient of buffer B (0 to 95%) for 20 min, 5 min of 95% buffer B, and then 100% buffer A for 5 min. Water with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) for high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or 0.05% formic acid for mass spectrometry (MS)-coupled analyses was used as buffer A, and acetonitrile (LCMS grade) with 0.1% TFA for HPLC or 0.05% formic acid for MS-coupled analyses was used as buffer B. The flow rate was 1 mL/min or 0.5 mL/min for HPLC or MS-coupled analyses, respectively. The equipment was controlled and results were analyzed using Shimadzu LabSolutions LCMS software.
Compound purification.
Crude organic extracts were fractionated using a Shimadzu preparative HPLC system consisting of a CBM-20A controller, an LC-20AP pump, an SPD-20A detector, and an FRC-10A fraction collector, equipped with a C18 reversed-phase Reprosil column (10 μm, 120 Å, 250 by 22 mm). The system was controlled with Shimadzu LabSolutions software. A 12.5-mL flow was used with a linear gradient of buffer B (0 to 95%), 5 min of 95% buffer B, and then 100% buffer A for 5 min.
HRMS and NMR.
HRMS was performed using an LCT instrument (Micromass Ltd., Manchester, UK). Calibration was done with sodium formate, and measurements were acquired for samples mixed with sodium formate. 1H (600 MHz) and 13C (151 MHz) NMR analyses were performed for samples reconstituted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on a Bruker 600 spectrometer and analyzed using MNOVA software. Chemical shifts for protons are reported in parts per million downfield from tetramethylsilane and are referenced to residual protium in the solvent (1H NMR, DMSO-d6 at 2.50 ppm). Chemical shifts for carbons are reported in parts per million downfield from tetramethylsilane and are referenced to the carbon resonances of the residual solvent peak (13C NMR, DMSO-d6 at 39.52 ± 0.06 ppm). NMR data are represented as follows: chemical shift, multiplicity (s, singlet; bs, broad singlet; d, doublet; dd, doublet of doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; ddd, doublet of doublet of doublets; dtd, doublet of triplet of doublets; m, multiplet), coupling constants (hertz), and integration.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
O.V.M. was financially supported by a research fund from the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) (Onderz.fonds AZ 3163). J.C.N.-M. was financially supported by the Odo van Vloten foundation.
The sequence data were produced by the U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/) in collaboration with the user community. We thank the principal investigators Scott Baker, Mikael Andersen, Richard Hamelin, Olafur Andresson, Paul Dyer, Joseph Spatafora, and Jon Magnusson for their permission to use the genomes. We thank Albert Heck and Arjan Barendregt for their help with HRMS measurements and Geert-Jan Boons and Justyna Dobruchowska for their help with NMR measurements.
Conceptualization, O.V.M. and J.C.; Methodology, O.V.M., J.C.N.-M., and J.C.; Formal Analysis, O.V.M., J.C.N.-M., and J.C.; Investigation, O.V.M., D.H., J.V.N., and J.H.; Writing – Original Draft, O.V.M.; Writing – Review & Editing, O.V.M., J.C.N.-M., and J.C.; Visualization, O.V.M. and J.C.; Funding Acquisition, J.D.H. and J.C.; Resources, J.D.H. and J.C.; Supervision, J.C.
We declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Jérôme Collemare, Email: j.collemare@wi.knaw.nl.
B. Gillian Turgeon, Cornell University.
REFERENCES
- 1.Atanasov AG, Zotchev SB, Dirsch VM, International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce, Supuran CT. 2021. Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov 20:200–216. doi: 10.1038/s41573-020-00114-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Quinn R. 2013. Rethinking antibiotic research and development: World War II and the penicillin collaborative. Am J Public Health 103:426–434. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schueffler A, Anke T. 2014. Fungal natural products in research and development. Nat Prod Rep 31:1425–1448. doi: 10.1039/c4np00060a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Scherlach K, Hertweck C. 2021. Mining and unearthing hidden biosynthetic potential. Nat Commun 12:3864. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24133-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Singh G, Armaleo D, Dal Grande F, Schmitt I. 2021. Depside and depsidone synthesis in lichenized fungi comes into focus through a genome-wide comparison of the olivetoric acid and physodic acid chemotypes of Pseudevernia furfuracea. Biomolecules 11:1445. doi: 10.3390/biom11101445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Armaleo D, Sun X, Culberson C. 2011. Insights from the first putative biosynthetic gene cluster for a lichen depside and depsidone. Mycologia 103:741–754. doi: 10.3852/10-335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kakule TB, Sardar D, Lin Z, Schmidt EW. 2013. Two related pyrrolidinedione synthetase loci in Fusarium heterosporum ATCC 74349 produce divergent metabolites. ACS Chem Biol 8:1549–1557. doi: 10.1021/cb400159f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chen L, Yue Q, Zhang X, Xiang M, Wang C, Li S, Che Y, Ortiz-López FJ, Bills GF, Liu X, An Z. 2013. Genomics-driven discovery of the pneumocandin biosynthetic gene cluster in the fungus Glarea lozoyensis. BMC Genomics 14:339. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Robey MT, Caesar LK, Drott MT, Keller NP, Kelleher NL. 2021. An interpreted atlas of biosynthetic gene clusters from 1,000 fungal genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2020230118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2020230118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tang S, Zhang W, Li Z, Li H, Geng C, Huang X, Lu X. 2020. Discovery and characterization of a PKS-NRPS hybrid in Aspergillus terreus by genome mining. J Nat Prod 83:473–480. doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b01140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kjærbølling I, Vesth TC, Frisvad JC, Nybo JL, Theobald S, Kuo A, Bowyer P, Matsuda Y, Mondo S, Lyhne EK, Kogle ME, Clum A, Lipzen A, Salamov A, Ngan CY, Daum C, Chiniquy J, Barry K, LaButti K, Haridas S, Simmons BA, Magnuson JK, Mortensen UH, Larsen TO, Grigoriev IV, Baker SE, Andersen MR. 2018. Linking secondary metabolites to gene clusters through genome sequencing of six diverse Aspergillus species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E753–E761. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715954115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Throckmorton K, Wiemann P, Keller NP. 2015. Evolution of chemical diversity in a group of non-reduced polyketide gene clusters: using phylogenetics to inform the search for novel fungal natural products. Toxins (Basel) 7:3572–3607. doi: 10.3390/toxins7093572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Theobald S, Vesth TC, Andersen MR. 2019. Genus level analysis of PKS-NRPS and NRPS-PKS hybrids reveals their origin in Aspergilli. BMC Genomics 20:847. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6114-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Harvey CJB, Tang M, Schlecht U, Horecka J, Fischer CR, Lin H-C, Li J, Naughton B, Cherry J, Miranda M, Li YF, Chu AM, Hennessy JR, Vandova GA, Inglis D, Aiyar RS, Steinmetz LM, Davis RW, Medema MH, Sattely E, Khosla C, Onge RPS, Tang Y, Hillenmeyer ME. 2018. HEx: a heterologous expression platform for the discovery of fungal natural products. Sci Adv 4:eaar5459. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aar5459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adamek M, Alanjary M, Ziemert N. 2019. Applied evolution: phylogeny-based approaches in natural products research. Nat Prod Rep 36:1295–1312. doi: 10.1039/c9np00027e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Keller NP. 2019. Fungal secondary metabolism: regulation, function and drug discovery. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:167–180. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0121-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mosunova O, Navarro-Muñoz JC, Collemare J. 2021. The biosynthesis of fungal secondary metabolites: from fundamentals to biotechnological applications, p 458–476. In Zaragoza Ó, Casadevall A (ed), Encyclopedia of mycology. Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom. 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.21072-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ranković B, Kosanić M. 2015. Lichens as a potential source of bioactive secondary metabolites, p 1–26. In Ranković B (ed), Lichen secondary metabolites: bioactive properties and pharmaceutical potential. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. 10.1007/978-3-319-13374-4_1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Culberson CF. 1970. Supplement to “Chemical and botanical guide to lichen products.” Bryologist 73:177–377. doi: 10.2307/3241261. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kealey JT, Craig JP, Barr PJ. 2021. Identification of a lichen depside polyketide synthase gene by heterologous expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng Commun 13:e00172. doi: 10.1016/j.mec.2021.e00172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim W, Liu R, Woo S, Kang KB, Park H, Yu YH, Ha H-H, Oh S-Y, Yang JH, Kim H, Yun S-H, Hur J-S, Turgeon BG. 2021. Linking a gene cluster to atranorin, a major cortical substance of lichens, through genetic dereplication and heterologous expression. mBio 12:e01111-21. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01111-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jeong M-H, Park C-H, Kim JA, Choi ED, Kim S, Hur J-S, Park S-Y. 2021. Production and activity of cristazarin in the lichen-forming fungus Cladonia metacorallifera. J Fungi (Basel) 7:601. doi: 10.3390/jof7080601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bertrand RL, Sorensen JL. 2018. A comprehensive catalogue of polyketide synthase gene clusters in lichenizing fungi. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 45:1067–1081. doi: 10.1007/s10295-018-2080-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kautsar SA, Blin K, Shaw S, Navarro-Muñoz JC, Terlouw BR, van der Hooft JJJ, van Santen JA, Tracanna V, Suarez Duran HG, Pascal Andreu V, Selem-Mojica N, Alanjary M, Robinson SL, Lund G, Epstein SC, Sisto AC, Charkoudian LK, Collemare J, Linington RG, Weber T, Medema MH. 2020. MIBiG 2.0: a repository for biosynthetic gene clusters of known function. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D454–D458. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu L, Zhang Z, Shao C-L, Wang J-L, Bai H, Wang C-Y. 2015. Bioinformatical analysis of the sequences, structures and functions of fungal polyketide synthase product template domains. Sci Rep 5:10463. doi: 10.1038/srep10463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schumacher J. 2016. DHN melanin biosynthesis in the plant pathogenic fungus Botrytis cinerea is based on two developmentally regulated key enzyme (PKS)-encoding genes. Mol Microbiol 99:729–748. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Griffiths S, Mesarich CH, Saccomanno B, Vaisberg A, De Wit PJGM, Cox R, Collemare J. 2016. Elucidation of cladofulvin biosynthesis reveals a cytochrome P450 monooxygenase required for anthraquinone dimerization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:6851–6856. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603528113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jackson JC, Higgins LA, Lin X. 2009. Conidiation color mutants of Aspergillus fumigatus are highly pathogenic to the heterologous insect host Galleria mellonella. PLoS One 4:e4224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tsai H-F, Washburn RG, Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ. 1997. Aspergillus fumigatus arp1 modulates conidial pigmentation and complement deposition. Mol Microbiol 26:175–183. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5681921.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. 2017. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 14:587–589. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Skellam E. 2019. Strategies for engineering natural product biosynthesis in fungi. Trends Biotechnol 37:416–427. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Meng X, Fang Y, Ding M, Zhang Y, Jia K, Li Z, Collemare J, Liu W. 2022. Developing fungal heterologous expression platforms to explore and improve the production of natural products from fungal biodiversity. Biotechnol Adv 54:107866. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2021.107866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bertrand RL, Sorensen JL. 2019. Lost in translation: challenges with heterologous expression of lichen polyketide synthases. ChemistrySelect 4:6473–6483. doi: 10.1002/slct.201901762. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vagstad AL, Hill EA, Labonte JW, Townsend CA. 2012. Characterization of a fungal thioesterase having Claisen cyclase and deacetylase activities in melanin biosynthesis. Chem Biol 19:1525–1534. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Feng L-X, Zhang B-Y, Zhu H-J, Pan L, Cao F. 2020. Bioactive metabolites from Talaromyces purpureogenus, an endophytic fungus from Panax notoginseng. Chem Nat Compd 56:974–976. doi: 10.1007/s10600-020-03206-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Simpson TJ, Stenzel DJ. 1981. 13C and 2H n.m.r. studies on the biosynthesis of O-methylasparvenone, a hexaketide metabolite of Aspergillus parvulus. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 5:239–240. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bartman CD, Campbell IM. 1979. Naphthalenone production in Aspergillus parvulus. Can J Microbiol 25:130–137. doi: 10.1139/m79-021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Wheeler MH, Abramczyk D, Puckhaber LS, Naruse M, Ebizuka Y, Fujii I, Szaniszlo PJ. 2008. New biosynthetic step in the melanin pathway of Wangiella (Exophiala) dermatitidis: evidence for 2-acetyl-1,3,6,8-tetrahydroxynaphthalene as a novel precursor. Eukaryot Cell 7:1699–1711. doi: 10.1128/EC.00179-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Tsai H-F, Wheeler MH, Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ. 1999. A developmentally regulated gene cluster involved in conidial pigment biosynthesis in Aspergillus fumigatus. J Bacteriol 181:6469–6477. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.20.6469-6477.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Burruano S, Giambra S, Mondello V, Dellagreca M, Basso S, Tuzi A, Andolfi A. 2016. Naphthalenone polyketides produced by Neofusicoccum parvum, a fungus associated with grapevine Botryosphaeria dieback. Phytopathol Mediterr 55:197–206. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Grigoriev IV, Nikitin R, Haridas S, Kuo A, Ohm R, Otillar R, Riley R, Salamov A, Zhao X, Korzeniewski F, Smirnova T, Nordberg H, Dubchak I, Shabalov I. 2014. MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D699–D704. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Blin K, Wolf T, Chevrette MG, Lu X, Schwalen CJ, Kautsar SA, Suarez Duran HG, de Los Santos ELC, Kim HU, Nave M, Dickschat JS, Mitchell DA, Shelest E, Breitling R, Takano E, Lee SY, Weber T, Medema MH. 2017. antiSMASH 4.0—improvements in chemistry prediction and gene cluster boundary identification. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W36–W41. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sievers F, Higgins DG. 2018. Clustal Omega for making accurate alignments of many protein sequences. Protein Sci 27:135–145. doi: 10.1002/pro.3290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Capella-Gutiérrez S, Silla-Martínez JM, Gabaldón T. 2009. trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25:1972–1973. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. 2015. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 32:268–274. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Anisimova M, Gil M, Dufayard J-F, Dessimoz C, Gascuel O. 2011. Survey of branch support methods demonstrates accuracy, power, and robustness of fast likelihood-based approximation schemes. Syst Biol 60:685–699. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syr041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 59:307–321. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lazarus CM, Williams K, Bailey AM. 2014. Reconstructing fungal natural product biosynthetic pathways. Nat Prod Rep 10:1339–1347. doi: 10.1039/c4np00084f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kombrink A. 2012. Heterologous production of fungal effectors in Pichia pastoris. Methods Mol Biol 835:209–217. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-501-5_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gilchrist CLM, Chooi Y-H. 2021. Clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics 37:2473–2475. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Griffiths SA, Cox RJ, Overdijk EJR, Mesarich CH, Saccomanno B, Lazarus CM, de Wit PJGM, Collemare J. 2018. Assignment of a dubious gene cluster to melanin biosynthesis in the tomato fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum. PLoS One 13:e0209600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Protein sequences of nonreducing polyketide synthases, hydroxynaphthalene reductases, and scytalone dehydratases. Download Data Set S1, TXT file, 0.4 MB (461.8KB, txt) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Protein alignments of nonreducing polyketide synthases, hydroxynaphthalene reductases, and scytalone dehydratases. Download Data Set S2, TXT file, 0.4 MB (377KB, txt) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Phylogenetic trees of nonreducing polyketide synthases, hydroxynaphthalene reductases, and scytalone dehydratases. Download Data Set S3, TXT file, 0.03 MB (28.8KB, txt) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Curated gene models. Download Data Set S4, TXT file, 0.1 MB (69.7KB, txt) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
BLASTp search for proteins from the Aspergillus parvulus group XI biosynthetic pathway. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.03 MB (27.9KB, xlsx) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Expression of Aspparv1_81212 in Aspergillus oryzae transformants. (A) Expression of Aspparv1_81212 and H2B genes in Aspergillus oryzae transformants. M indicates the BenchTop 1-kb ladder (Promega), the negative control contains water, and the positive control for Aspparv1_81212 contains plasmid pTYGSarg::Aspparv1_81212. (B) Analysis of Aspparv1_81212 expression by A. oryzae transformants. F1 to F7 designate fragments of the Aspparv1_81212 gene; M designates the BenchTop 1-kb ladder (Promega). All fragments have the expected sizes (F1, 1,007 bp; F2, 1,059 bp; F3, 1,044 bp; F4, 1,030 bp; F5, 1,035 bp; F6, 1,029 bp; F7, 628 bp). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.8 MB (787.6KB, pdf) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data for metabolite 1 produced by Aspergillus oryzae NSAR1 transformants expressing Aspparv1_81212. The compound with molecular formula C12H11O5 and a mass of 235.0577 (highlighted in green) is consistent with acetyl tetrahydroxynaphthalene. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.2 MB (191.8KB, pdf) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
1H and 13C NMR spectra of products 1, 2, and 4. Download Data Set S5, PDF file, 0.6 MB (608.2KB, pdf) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Search for product 2 in organic extracts from Aspergillus parvulus. Shown is the extracted mass of product 2 (191 in negative mode) in extracts under conducive and nonconducive conditions, with UV spectra. Purified product 2 produced by an Aspergillus oryzae transformant is shown as a reference. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.2 MB (164.4KB, pdf) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
Oligonucleotides used in this study. Download Table S2, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (12.1KB, xlsx) .
Copyright © 2022 Mosunova et al.
This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.






