ABSTRACT
The oncogenic gammaherpesviruses, including human Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), and murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68, γHV68, MuHV-4), are associated with numerous malignancies, including B cell lymphomas and nasopharyngeal carcinoma. These viruses employ numerous molecular strategies to colonize the host, including the expression of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). As the first viral ncRNAs identified, EBV-encoded RNA 1 and 2 (EBER1 and EBER2, respectively) have been investigated extensively for decades; however, their specific in vivo functions remain largely unknown. In work here, we used chimeric MHV68 viruses in an in vivo complementation system to test whether EBV EBER2 contributes to acute and/or chronic phases of infection. Expression of EBER2 derived from EBV strain B95-8 resulted in a significant expansion of latently infected B cells in vivo, which was accompanied by a decrease in virus-infected plasma cells. EBV strains typically carry one of two variants of EBER2, which differ primarily by a 5-nucleotide core polymorphism identified initially in the EBV strain M81. Strikingly, mutation of the 5 nucleotides that define this core polymorphism resulted in the loss of the infected B cell expansion and restored plasma cell infection. This work reveals that the B95-8 variant of EBER2 promotes the expansion of the latently infected B cell pool in vivo and may do so in part through inhibition of terminal differentiation. These findings provide new insight into mechanisms by which viral ncRNAs promote in vivo colonization and further and provide further evidence of the inherent tumorigenic risks associated with gammaherpesvirus manipulation of B cell differentiation.
KEYWORDS: EBV, Epstein-Barr virus, EBER, MHV68, noncoding RNA, B lymphocytes, gammaherpesviruses, latency, lymphoma
OBSERVATION
The oncogenic gammaherpesviruses, including human Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV), and murine gammaherpesvirus 68 (MHV68, γHV68, MuHV-4), lead directly to the development of multiple types of malignancies, including B cell lymphomas (1). A central characteristic of gammaherpesviruses is the ability to establish lifelong latency in B cells, which is critical for tumorigenesis (1). However, the precise underlying mechanisms by which these viruses establish latency in vivo remain poorly understood. Gammaherpesviruses employ multiple means to promote latency establishment in B cells, including the expression of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) (1, 2). Notably, although the EBV-encoded RNAs 1 and 2 (EBER1 and EBER2) are among the first viral ncRNAs ever identified (3, 4), their specific in vivo functions remain largely unknown (2, 5). MHV68 encodes eight small ncRNAs termed tRNA-miRNA-encoded RNAs (TMERs) (6, 7), which share similarity to the EBV EBERs in terms of length, secondary structure, polymerase III usage, and expression profiles (8). Each 200- to 250-nucleotide (nt) TMER is comprised of a tRNA-like element (vtRNA) that harbors a polymerase III promoter, followed by one or two downstream pre-miRNA stem-loops (SL1 and SL2) (Fig. 1A) (6, 9). Both the EBV EBERs and the MHV68 TMERs are expressed extensively in vivo in latently infected B cells and tumor cells (2, 5, 6, 10), strongly suggesting that they contribute to chronic infection and pathogenesis. Consistent with this idea, we have demonstrated previously that TMER4 and EBER1 share a conserved in vivo function in promoting hematogenous dissemination of infected B cells to peripheral sites of latency (8, 11).
Here, we used a similar ncRNA complementation approach in the MHV68 in vivo system to determine whether EBER2 contributes to the acute and/or latent phases of infection. To first test the ability of EBER2 to promote hematogenous dissemination in vivo (11), we generated a recombinant virus in which TMER4 was fully replaced by a EBER2 sequence derived from the prototype EBV strain B95-8 (E2.b) (Fig. 1A and B) (12). In parallel, we generated a control virus carrying E2.b with mutations in the polymerase III promoter (E2.bPro). A Northern blot confirmed EBER2 expression following infection with E2.b virus but not E2.bPro virus (Fig. 1C). We then infected wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice intranasally (i.n.) with mutant and control viruses and determined their ability to establish latent infection in the spleen (Fig. 1D and E) (7, 13). Consistent with our previous reports (8, 11), the frequency of splenocytes harboring the viral genome was significantly decreased in mice infected with TMER4-defient virus (WT: 1 in 380; T4.Pro: 1 in 1,600) but restored to a frequency nearly equivalent to WT virus in mice infected with virus expressing EBER1 in place of TMER4 (ΔT4.E1: 1 in 460). As expected, the TMER4-deficient virus carrying E2.b with a promoter mutation was attenuated to a level (ΔT4.E2.bPro: 1 in 1,500) nearly equivalent to the TMER4 promoter mutant. Intriguingly though, the expression of native E2.b in place of TMER4 not only fully restored the dissemination defect but also induced a significant increase in the frequency of latently infected cells in the spleen (ΔT4.E2.b, 1 in 110) compared with the WT virus. Notably, increased numbers of latently infected cells were not a result of altered acute infection, as insertion of E2.b had no effect on lytic virus replication in vitro or in vivo (Fig. 1F and G). Together, these results demonstrated that EBER2 derived from B95-8 promotes latency establishment equivalently to TMER4 and EBER1 but, in addition, significantly enhances latent infection at peripheral sites compared with TMER4 or EBER1.
The 172-nt sequence of EBER2 is generally well-conserved among EBV strains recovered from B cell lymphomas and lymphoma-derived B cell lines. However, it was reported recently that some EBV strains, including strain M81, which displays differential association with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (14, 15), carry EBER2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that may contribute to the virus life cycle (16–19). Included among the M81 EBER2 SNPs are nucleotides at positions 44, 46, 57, 61, 93, 168, and 170 that are present in M81 and many EBV strains from China but differ from the nucleotides that are conserved among most EBV strains from other parts of the world (14, 15), including the B95-8 EBER2 expressed by the ΔT4.E2.b virus. Notably, 5 of these SNPs appear to be linked; in an alignment of the 1,144 EBV genome sequences in GenBank carrying full-length EBER2 sequences (see Fig. S1 and Text S1 in the supplemental material), 31.7% of the sequences carried all 5 of SNPs at positions 44, 46, 57, 61, and 93, whereas the SNPs at positions 168 and 170 were variable among strains, accounting for a variant frequency of 75.4% and 14.6%, respectively (see Table S1 in the supplemental material).
To determine whether the 5 nts present at positions 44, 46, 57, 61, and 93 in the B95-8 polymorphism contributed to EBER2 function in latency, we generated a version of the ΔT4.E2.b virus in which those 5 bases were mutated to match the M81 EBER2 polymorphism (ΔT4.E2.m) (Fig. 2A and B). A northern blot confirmed EBER2 expression during ΔT4.E2.m virus infection (Fig. 2C). We then determined the ability of the ΔT4.E2.m virus to establish splenic latency in mice following i.n. inoculation (Fig. 2D and E). While E2.m expression in place of TMER4 fully restored the dissemination defect of TMER4-deficient virus (WT: 1 in 430; ΔT4.E2.bPro: 1 in 1,600; ΔT4.E2.m: 1 in 500), it failed to promote the enhanced latency observed with E2.b (ΔT4.E2.b: 1 in 140). The ability of E2.b to promote splenic latency was not due to enhanced dissemination from mucosal sites because a similar increase in splenic latency was observed even when the ΔT4.E2.b virus was administered by intraperitoneal (i.p.) inoculation (Fig. 2F). Moreover, the increased number of latently infected cells present in ΔT4.E2.b-infected mice was not a result of increased reactivation, as cells carrying E2.b demonstrated decreased reactivation (WT: 1 in 21,000; ΔT4.E2.b: 1 in 112,000) (Fig. 2G). Thus, these findings demonstrated that EBER2 promotes increased in vivo latency through a mechanism dependent upon the 5-nt polymorphism present in EBV strain B95-8.
Gammaherpesviruses deploy multiple molecular strategies to modulate the balance between latency and reactivation and thereby establish lifelong infection in B cells (1, 5). For example, terminal differentiation of infected B cells to plasma cells results in reactivation of EBV, KSHV, and MHV68 (20–22). Because B cells are a primary reservoir for both EBV and MHV68 latency (1, 5) and plasma cells are a major source of reactivating virus in MHV68-infected mice (23), we determined whether B95-8 EBER2 promotes B cell latency through inhibition of plasma cell differentiation. To do so, we used multiparametric flow cytometry to analyze total and virus-positive B cells, germinal center (GC) B cells, and plasma cells in infected mice at 16 days postinfection (dpi) (Fig. 2H to J, see Fig. S2 and S3 in the supplemental material). We observed that the virus expressing E2.b in place of TMER4 had no significant impact on the numbers of total B cells, GC B cells, and plasma cells (Fig. S3), compared with the WT virus and virus expressing E2.m in place of TMER4. In contrast and as expected, the percentage of B cells infected with E2.b virus was significantly increased (Fig. 2H), compared with WT virus and E2.m virus. Consistent with the critical role of GC B cells as a major latency reservoir during latency establishment (24–26), this striking increase in B cell infection with the virus expressing E2.b correlated with a significantly increased frequency of latently infected GC B cells (Fig. 2I). Notably though, despite an overall increase in the number of B cells infected with E2.b virus, the percentage of plasma cells infected with E2.b virus was significantly reduced compared with that of control samples (Fig. 2J). Thus, these data indicate that B95-8 EBER2 promotes the expansion of the latently infected B cell pool, which is accompanied by a decrease in the infection of plasma cells.
Together, these findings cumulatively demonstrate that B95-8 EBER2 promotes B cell latency in vivo through a mechanism that involves impaired terminal differentiation to plasma cells. EBV is well known to both induce and repress specific intracellular signaling pathways in B cells. Alteration of these processes is thought to drive the differentiation of infected naive follicular B cells, independent of antigen, through germinal center reactions and into the long-lived memory B cell compartment. Our finding that B95-8 EBER2 may promote B cell latency in part through suppressing differentiation to plasma cells is strongly supported by previous studies that have implicated EBV-encoded LMP1, EBNA3A, and EBNA3C in the repression of terminal differentiation to plasma cells (27, 28). It is notable that previous MHV68 studies have not observed increased GC B cell infection under genetic mutant conditions that reduce plasma cell infection (22, 23, 29). This discrepancy likely points to differences in the requirement of individual genes for highly specific stages in GC reactions. For example, if B95-8 EBER2 promotes recycling through the GC dark zone, this would likely simultaneously result in increased GC B cell proliferation and decreased plasma cell differentiation. In contrast, virus genes that contribute to GC entry would likely reduce infection of both GC B cells and plasma cells. An alternate interpretation is that, compared with M81 EBER2, B95-8 EBER2 viruses may have a reduced ability to promote or maintain infection in B cells that are able to become CD138 positive. Extensive further work will be required to dissect these differences.
Most importantly, our data indicate that the presence of B95-8 EBER2 drives expansion of the latently infected B cell pool, presumably due to additional rounds of proliferation that result from sustained retention of infected cells in the GC. The differences observed here between B95-8 EBER2 and M81 EBER2 contrast from the recently published observation (30) that both EBER2 variants can drive equivalent levels of proliferation in primary B cells in vitro and in an immunodeficient xenograft model in vivo. However, the difference from our results likely reflects the strength of utilizing a natural infection system in the context of a fully immunocompetent host. This scenario requires virus-infected B cells to navigate the complex, multistage environment of the GC while simultaneously evading immune detection and thus in some situations may reveal differentiation-stage phenotypes that cannot be mimicked accurately in other systems. Our findings with regard to the ability of B95-8 EBER2 to drive increased GC B cell infection is particularly notable due to the high-risk environment of the GC, with GC B cells demonstrating a high propensity for mutation due to the genetic mechanisms that operate during immunoglobulin affinity maturation (reviewed in reference 31). Accordingly, GC B cells are the cellular origins of the majority of B cell lymphomas, including EBV+ Burkitt B cell lymphomas (reviewed in reference 32). Consistent with this, the studies presented here link the ability of EBER2 to expand the latently infected B cell pool, dependent on a 5-nt polymorphism which is found in EBV strain B95-8 and is the predominant variant found in most parts of the world except China. Together, this work provides new insight into a critical role for EBV EBER2 in driving the expansion of the latently infected B cell pool in vivo through fine-tuning virus-induced B cell differentiation, provides further insight into key functional differences between polymorphic variants of EBER2, and may point to an unappreciated role for EBER2 in promoting B cell lymphomagenesis.
Cell culture.
NIH 3T12 murine fibroblasts (ATCC; CCL-164) were grown and maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Corning 10-013-CM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlanta Biologicals; S12450) and 1× penicillin-streptomycin solution (Corning; 30-002-CI) at 37°C and 5% CO2.
Generation of recombinant viruses.
A recombinant marker virus, MHV68.ORF73βla, expressing β-lactamase as a fusion to mLANA, derived from bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) containing wild-type (WT) MHV68 (33), has been described previously (34) and used as the parental WT virus here. An MHV68 TMER4 promoter mutant (MHV68.T4.Pro) that is deficient in the expression of the TMER4 and MHV68.ΔT4.E1 virus that expresses EBV EBER1 in place of TMER4 was described previously (8). MHV68 TMER4-deficient viruses, namely, MHV68.ΔT4.E2.b and MHV68.ΔT4.E2.bPro, in which TMER4 was fully replaced by B95-8 EBER2 (E2.b; GenBank no. AJ507799.2) or E2.b with mutations in the polymerase III promoter (designated E2.bPro), respectively, were generated on the MHV68.ORF73βla BAC backbone by en passant mutagenesis, as described previously (13, 35). The sequence of E2.b plus 5′ 100 nucleotides (nts) and 3′ 30 nts was used to replace TMER4 plus 5′ 41 nts and 3′ 9 nts. To generate E2.bPro, the E2.b promoter region A and B boxes GTTGCCCTAGTGGTT and AGGTCAAGTCCC were mutated to AGCTGTTGTCCACAC and CACATTCCCGTA, respectively (Fig. 1A). To determine the contribution of the 5 nts present at positions 44, 46, 57, 61, and 93 in the B95-8 EBER2 to viral latency, a version of the ΔT4.E2.b virus in which those 5 nts were mutated to match the M81 EBER2 polymorphism (designated MHV68.ΔT4.E2.m) was generated on the MHV68.ΔT4.E2.b BAC backbone. Thus, the E2.b and E2.m viruses differed only at positions 44 (T → G), 46 (A → T), 57 (A → G), 61 (A → T), and 93 (A → C) of the EBER2 sequence (Fig. 2A). Mutations in all viruses were verified by enzymatic digestion and sequencing of the purified BAC clone.
Northern blots.
NIH 3T12 murine fibroblasts were infected with MHV68 at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5 and then harvested and subjected to RNA extraction using TRIzol reagent (Ambion; 15596018) at 18 h postinfection. Northern blots for identification of EBER2 expression were performed as described previously (11), using the RNA probe primer 5′-ATTAGAGAATCCTGACTTGCAAATGCTCT-3′.
Mice infections.
Seven- to 8-week-old C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and housed at the University of Florida (Gainesville, FL) in accordance with all federal and university guidelines. All animal protocols were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Florida. Mice were inoculated intranasally (i.n.) or intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 104 PFU of virus in 30 μL serum-free DMEM under isoflurane anesthesia.
Latency assays.
Mice were i.n. or i.p. infected with the indicated viruses for 16 days and then the spleens from three mice per group per experiment were harvested, pooled, and homogenized. The red blood cells were removed by treating cells with red cell lysis buffer (0.144 M ammonium chloride and 0.017 M Tris [pH 7.2]). The resulting single-cell suspensions were subsequently filtered through a 100-μm nylon cell strainer (Corning; 352360). Limiting dilution nested PCR (LDPCR) was performed to determine the frequency of splenocytes harboring the MHV68 viral genome, as described previously (7, 13, 36). Briefly, single-cell suspensions were 3-fold diluted serially in a background of RAW 264.7 murine macrophages to maintain a total of 104 cells per PCR. Dilutions were then plated in 96-well PCR plates (Eppendorf; 951020460) at 12 wells per dilution. A positive-control plasmid carrying the MHV68 ORF72 gene was plated at 10, 1, or 0.1 copies per reaction on a background of 104 RAW 264.7 cells. RAW 264.7 cells with no plasmid were also plated as a negative control. Following plating, the cells were lysed with proteinase K at 56°C for 8 h, followed by inactivation at 95°C for 20 min. Two rounds of PCR were then performed using primers specific for MHV68 ORF72 (primers for round 1 PCR, 5′-GAGATCTGTACTCAGGCACCTGT-3′ and 5′-GGATTTCTTGACAGCTCCCTG-3′; and primers for round 2 PCR, 5′-TGTCAGCTGTTGTTGCTCCT-3′ and 5′-CTCCGTCAGGATAACAACGTC-3′), as described previously (7, 36). The resulting 195-bp amplicons were visualized on a 3% agarose gel. Data are expressed as the mean and standard errors of the percentages of PCRs positive for the viral genome at each cell dilution.
Viral lytic replication assays.
For viral multistep growth curve assays in vitro, NIH 3T12 murine fibroblasts were seeded at 2 × 105 cells/well in 6-well plates (Corning; 3506). Twenty-four hours later, the cells were infected with the indicated viruses at an MOI of 0.05 in duplicate. At the indicated time points postinfection, the cells and supernatants were harvested and stored at −80°C. For acute lytic replication assays in vivo, mice were i.n. infected with the indicated viruses and then the lungs were harvested at 4 days postinfection (dpi) and stored at −80°C. Subsequently, samples were homogenized, and viral titers were then determined by plaque assays.
Plaque assays.
Plaque assays were performed as described previously (7, 11, 13). Briefly, NIH 3T12 murine fibroblasts were seeded at 2 × 105 cells/well in 6-well plates 1 day before infection. Samples from infected NIH 3T12 cells (for viral growth curve in vitro) or lungs (for acute lytic replication in vivo) were 10-fold diluted serially in serum-free DMEM, added to the plates in duplicate, and then overlaid with a 1:1 mixture of methyl cellulose (Acros Organics; 258115000) and 2× modified Eagle medium (Gibco; 11935-046) containing 10% FBS and 1× penicillin-streptomycin solution. Seven days later, neutral red stain was added and plaques were then counted.
Reactivation assays.
The spleens from three mice per group per experiment were harvested and pooled, and splenocytes were prepared at 16 dpi. Limiting dilution ex vivo reactivation assays were then performed to determine the frequency of splenocytes reactivating from latency, as described previously (7, 36). Briefly, the splenocytes were resuspended at 106 cells/mL and subjected to a serial 2-fold dilution. The diluted cells were plated onto permissive mouse embryonic fibroblast monolayers in 96-well tissue culture plates (Corning; 3585) at 24 wells per dilution, starting at 105 cells/well. Cell monolayers were scored for cytopathic effect due to the presence of reactivating virus at 14 to 21 days after plating.
Flow cytometry.
The infection of B cells, GC B cells, and plasma cells were quantified by flow cytometric analysis using staining with the β-lactamase substrate CCF4-AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific; K1096) for virus-infected cells and staining with a combination of antibodies directed against specific B cell, GC B cell, and plasma cell surface markers, as described previously (13, 34). Briefly, splenocytes from infected mice at 16 dpi were blocked in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] supplemented with 2% FBS and 0.1% sodium azide) containing rat anti-mouse CD16/CD32 at 1:50 (BD Biosciences; 553141). The cells were then stained with Alexa Fluor 700 (BD Biosciences; 557958) or APC-R700 (BD Biosciences; 565473) rat anti-mouse CD19 at 1:200, Alexa Fluor 647 rat anti-mouse T- and B-cell activation antigen GL7 at 1:200 (BD Biosciences; 561529), and APC rat anti-mouse CD138 at 1:200 (BD Biosciences; 558626). Following cell surface marker staining, the cells were resuspended and incubated in freshly prepared staining buffer containing the CCF4-AM substrate. FACS acquisition was performed on a BD LSR II or Symphony A3 flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The cell subsets were gated as follows: total B cells (CD19+), virus-positive B cells (CCF4-AM+ CD19+), total GC B cells (CD19+ GL7+), virus-positive GC B cells (CCF4-AM+ CD19+ GL7+), total plasma cells (CD19low/− CD138+), and virus-positive plasma cells (CCF4-AM+ CD19low/− CD138+). Data were analyzed using FlowJo v10 software (FlowJo LLC, Ashland, OR).
Statistical analysis.
All data were analyzed using Prism 8 software (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). The frequencies of cells positive for the viral genome or reactivating virus were determined by Poisson distribution from nonlinear regression, as indicated by the line at 63.2%. Statistical significance was determined by the Student’s t test.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
S.A.T. was supported by NIH P01CA214091 and R01CA262902. N.L. was supported by NIH R21AI151073. E.K.F. was supported by NIH P01CA214091 and R01CA243793. N.U. was supported by a fellowship from the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society. P.J.F. was supported by MRC grant MR/S0022597/1 and the Imperial NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.
Y.W. and S.A.T. designed research; Y.W., N.U., M.K., and P.J.F. performed research. Y.W., B.A.H., M.K., and N.L. contributed reagents. Y.W., B.A.H., M.K., N.U., P.J.F., N.L., E.K.F., and S.A.T. analyzed the data. Y.W. and S.A.T. wrote the manuscript.
We declare no competing interest.
Contributor Information
Scott A. Tibbetts, Email: stibbe@ufl.edu.
Margaret E. Ackerman, Dartmouth College
REFERENCES
- 1.Wang Y, Tibbetts SA, Krug LT. 2021. Conquering the host: determinants of pathogenesis learned from murine gammaherpesvirus 68. Annu Rev Virol 8:349–371. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-011921-082615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tycowski KT, Guo YE, Lee N, Moss WN, Vallery TK, Xie M, Steitz JA. 2015. Viral noncoding RNAs: more surprises. Genes Dev 29:567–584. doi: 10.1101/gad.259077.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lerner MR, Andrews NC, Miller G, Steitz JA. 1981. Two small RNAs encoded by Epstein-Barr virus and complexed with protein are precipitated by antibodies from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:805–809. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.2.805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Arrand JR, Rymo L. 1982. Characterization of the major Epstein-Barr virus-specific RNA in Burkitt lymphoma-derived cells. J Virol 41:376–389. doi: 10.1128/JVI.41.2.376-389.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Münz C. 2019. Latency and lytic replication in Epstein–Barr virus-associated oncogenesis. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:691–700. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0249-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bowden RJ, Simas JP, Davis AJ, Efstathiou S. 1997. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 encodes tRNA-like sequences which are expressed during latency. J Gen Virol 78:1675–1687. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-78-7-1675. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Feldman ER, Kara M, Coleman CB, Grau KR, Oko LM, Krueger BJ, Renne R, van Dyk LF, Tibbetts SA. 2014. Virus-encoded microRNAs facilitate gammaherpesvirus latency and pathogenesis in vivo. mBio 5:e00981-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00981-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hoffman BA, Wang Y, Feldman ER, Tibbetts SA. 2019. Epstein–Barr virus EBER1 and murine gammaherpesvirus TMER4 share conserved in vivo function to promote B cell egress and dissemination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:25392–25394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1915752116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Diebel KW, Smith AL, Van Dyk LF. 2010. Mature and functional viral miRNAs transcribed from novel RNA polymerase III promoters. RNA 16:170–185. doi: 10.1261/rna.1873910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Simas JP, Swann D, Bowden R, Efstathiou S. 1999. Analysis of murine gammaherpesvirus-68 transcription during lytic and latent infection. J Gen Virol 80:75–82. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-80-1-75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Feldman ER, Kara M, Oko LM, Grau KR, Krueger BJ, Zhang J, Feng P, van Dyk LF, Renne R, Tibbetts SA. 2016. A gammaherpesvirus noncoding RNA is essential for hematogenous dissemination and establishment of peripheral latency. mSphere 1:e00105-15. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00105-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miller G, Shope T, Lisco H, Stitt D, Lipman M. 1972. Epstein-Barr virus: transformation, cytopathic changes, and viral antigens in squirrel monkey and marmoset leukocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:383–387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.2.383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang Y, Feldman ER, Bullard WL, Tibbetts SA. 2019. A gammaherpesvirus microRNA targets EWSR1 (Ewing Sarcoma breakpoint region 1) in vivo to promote latent infection of germinal center B cells. mBio 10:e00996-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00996-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Desgranges C, Lenoir G, De-Thé G, Seigneurin JM, Hilgers J, Dubouch P. 1976. In vitro transforming activity of EBV. I-Establishment and properties of two EBV strains (M81 and M72) produced by immortalized Callithrix jacchus lymphocytes. Biomedicine 25:349–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Desgranges C, Lavoué MF, Patet J, De-Thé G. 1979. In vitro transforming activity of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). II. Differences between M81 and B95-8 EBV strains. Biomedicine 30:102–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Correia S, Bridges R, Wegner F, Venturini C, Palser A, Middeldorp JM, Cohen JI, Lorenzetti MA, Bassano I, White RE, Kellam P, Breuer J, Farrell PJ. 2018. Sequence variation of Epstein-Barr virus: viral types, geography, codon usage, and diseases. J Virol 92:e01132-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01132-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hui KF, Chan TF, Yang W, Shen JJ, Lam KP, Kwok H, Sham PC, Tsao SW, Kwong DL, Lung ML, Chiang AKS. 2019. High risk Epstein-Barr virus variants characterized by distinct polymorphisms in the EBER locus are strongly associated with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Cancer 144:3031–3042. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li Z, Tsai M-H, Shumilov A, Baccianti F, Tsao SW, Poirey R, Delecluse H-J. 2019. Epstein–Barr virus ncRNA from a nasopharyngeal carcinoma induces an inflammatory response that promotes virus production. Nat Microbiol 4:2475–2486. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0546-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Farrell PJ, White RE. 2021. Do Epstein–Barr virus mutations and natural genome sequence variations contribute to disease? Biomolecules 12:17. doi: 10.3390/biom12010017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Reusch JA, Nawandar DM, Wright KL, Kenney SC, Mertz JE. 2015. Cellular differentiation regulator BLIMP1 induces Epstein-Barr virus lytic reactivation in epithelial and B cells by activating transcription from both the R and Z promoters. J Virol 89:1731–1743. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02781-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gong D, Dai X, Xiao Y, Du Y, Chapa TJ, Johnson JR, Li X, Krogan NJ, Deng H, Wu T-T, Sun R. 2017. Virus-like vesicles of Kaposi’s Sarcoma-associated herpesvirus activate lytic replication by triggering differentiation signaling. J Virol 91:e00362-17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00362-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Siegel AM, Rangaswamy US, Napier RJ, Speck SH. 2010. Blimp-1-dependent plasma cell differentiation is required for efficient maintenance of murine gammaherpesvirus latency and antiviral antibody responses. J Virol 84:674–685. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01306-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liang X, Collins CM, Mendel JB, Iwakoshi NN, Speck SH. 2009. Gammaherpesvirus-driven plasma cell differentiation regulates virus reactivation from latently infected B lymphocytes. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000677. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Collins CM, Speck SH. 2012. Tracking murine gammaherpesvirus 68 infection of germinal center B cells in vivo. PLoS One 7:e33230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Flaño E, Husain SM, Sample JT, Woodland DL, Blackman MA. 2000. Latent murine γ-herpesvirus infection is established in activated B cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages. J Immunol 165:1074–1081. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.2.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Flaño E, Kim I-J, Woodland DL, Blackman MA. 2002. γHerpesvirus latency is preferentially maintained in splenic germinal center and memory B cells. J Exp Med 196:1363–1372. doi: 10.1084/jem.20020890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vrzalikova K, Vockerodt M, Leonard S, Bell A, Wei W, Schrader A, Wright KL, Kube D, Rowe M, Woodman CB, Murray PG. 2011. Down-regulation of BLIMP1α by the EBV oncogene, LMP-1, disrupts the plasma cell differentiation program and prevents viral replication in B cells: implications for the pathogenesis of EBV-associated B-cell lymphomas. Blood 117:5907–5917. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-307710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Styles CT, Bazot Q, Parker GA, White RE, Paschos K, Allday MJ. 2017. EBV epigenetically suppresses the B cell-to-plasma cell differentiation pathway while establishing long-term latency. PLoS Biol 15:e2001992. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gammaherpesvirus M, Gene M, Owens SM, Oldenburg DG, White DW, Craig J. 2020. Deletion of murine gammaherpesvirus gene M2 in activation-induced cytidine deaminase-expressing B cells impairs host colonization and viral reactivation. J Virol 95:e01933-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01933-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li Z, Baccianti F, Delecluse S, Tsai M, Shumilov A, Cheng X, Ma S, Hoffmann I, Poirey R, Delecluse H-J. 2021. The Epstein–Barr virus noncoding RNA EBER2 transactivates the UCHL1 deubiquitinase to accelerate cell growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2115508118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115508118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mesin L, Ersching J, Victora GD. 2016. Germinal center B cell dynamics. Immunity 45:471–482. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.09.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shannon-Lowe C, Rickinson A. 2019. The global landscape of EBV-associated tumors. Front Oncol 9:713. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Adler H, Messerle M, Wagner M, Koszinowski UH. 2000. Cloning and mutagenesis of the murine gammaherpesvirus 68 genome as an infectious bacterial artificial chromosome. J Virol 74:6964–6974. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.15.6964-6974.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nealy MS, Coleman CB, Li H, Tibbetts SA. 2010. Use of a virus-encoded enzymatic marker reveals that a stable fraction of memory B cells expresses latency-associated nuclear antigen throughout chronic gammaherpesvirus infection. J Virol 84:7523–7534. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02572-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tischer KB, von Einem J, Kaufer B, Osterrieder N. 2006. Two-step Red-mediated recombination for versatile high-efficiency markerless DNA manipulation in Escherichia coli. Biotechniques 40:191–196. doi: 10.2144/000112096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tibbetts SA, McClellan JS, Gangappa S, Speck SH, Virgin IH. 2003. Effective vaccination against long-term gammaherpesvirus latency. J Virol 77:2522–2529. doi: 10.1128/jvi.77.4.2522-2529.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.