Skip to main content
mSystems logoLink to mSystems
. 2022 May 23;7(3):e01500-21. doi: 10.1128/msystems.01500-21

Phylogenomic Analyses of Snodgrassella Isolates from Honeybees and Bumblebees Reveal Taxonomic and Functional Diversity

Luc Cornet a, Ilse Cleenwerck b, Jessy Praet b, Raphaël R Leonard c, Nicolas J Vereecken d, Denis Michez e, Guy Smagghe f, Denis Baurain c, Peter Vandamme b,
Editor: Monica T Pupog
PMCID: PMC9239279  PMID: 35604118

ABSTRACT

Snodgrassella is a genus of Betaproteobacteria that lives in the gut of honeybees (Apis spp.) and bumblebees (Bombus spp). It is part of a conserved microbiome that is composed of a few core phylotypes and is essential for bee health and metabolism. Phylogenomic analyses using whole-genome sequences of 75 Snodgrassella strains from 4 species of honeybees and 14 species of bumblebees showed that these strains formed a monophyletic lineage within the Neisseriaceae family, that Snodgrassella isolates from Asian honeybees diverged early from the other species in their evolution, that isolates from honeybees and bumblebees were well separated, and that this genus consists of at least seven species. We propose to formally name two new Snodgrassella species that were isolated from bumblebees: i.e., Snodgrassella gandavensis sp. nov. and Snodgrassella communis sp. nov. Possible evolutionary scenarios for 107 species- or group-specific genes revealed very limited evidence for horizontal gene transfer. Functional analyses revealed the importance of small proteins, defense mechanisms, amino acid transport and metabolism, inorganic ion transport and metabolism and carbohydrate transport and metabolism among these 107 specific genes.

IMPORTANCE The microbiome of honeybees (Apis spp.) and bumblebees (Bombus spp.) is highly conserved and represented by few phylotypes. This simplicity in taxon composition makes the bee’s microbiome an emergent model organism for the study of gut microbial communities. Since the description of the Snodgrassella genus, which was isolated from the gut of honeybees and bumblebees in 2013, a single species (i.e., Snodgrassella alvi), has been named. Here, we demonstrate that this genus is actually composed of at least seven species, two of which (Snodgrassella gandavensis sp. nov. and Snodgrassella communis sp. nov.) are formally described and named in the present publication. We also report the presence of 107 genes specific to Snodgrassella species, showing notably the importance of small proteins and defense mechanisms in this genus.

KEYWORDS: honeybee, bumblebee, microbiome, metagenomics, Snodgrassella, phylogenomics, species delineation, functional analysis, metabolic modeling

INTRODUCTION

Honeybees (Apis spp.) and bumblebees (Bombus spp.) harbor a gut microbiome that is important in health and metabolism (13). This microbiome is highly conserved, with 95% of the gut microbionts falling within a few phylotypes that include Actinobacteria (Bifidobacterium, Bombiscardovia), Bacteroidetes (Apibacter), Firmicutes (Lactobacillus [the so-called Firm-5 or Lacto-1 taxon], Bombilactobacillus [Firm-4, Lacto-2], and Apilactobacillus [Lacto-3]), Alphaproteobacteria (Bartonella, Bombella, Commensalibacter), Betaproteobacteria (Snodgrassella), and Gammaproteobacteria (Frischella, Gilliamella) (2, 418). The genera Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Bombilactobacillus, Gilliamella, and Snodgrassella are generally considered the core microbionts of honeybees and bumblebees (10, 19, 20). These gut-related organisms coevolved within their hosts during the last 80 million years (9, 10, 21) and contribute to carbohydrate digestion (2, 18, 22) and pathogen defense (2326). The importance of bees for ecosystem integrity, the contribution of the bee gut microbiota to its hosts’ health, and the relative simplicity of the taxonomic composition of the bee gut microbiota, along with their mode of transmission, which is mainly vertical, have made bees an emerging model organism for the study of gut-related microbial communities (1, 18, 2729).

Snodgrassella and Gilliamella are physically closely associated within the hindgut: the former grows in contact with the ileum epithelium, while the latter forms a dense biofilm on top of the Snodgrassella layer and is in contact with the gut lumen (9, 11, 30). As a result of intricate coevolution of these two bacteria, horizontal gene transfers (HGTs) have been reported between these two taxa (2, 31). Among others, they share Rhs toxin proteins, which are involved in type VI secretion system (T6SS)-mediated competition (2, 3234).

The formal description and naming of Snodgrassella alvi were based on three strains: one from a honeybee gut sample (wkB2T from Apis mellifera) and two from bumblebee gut samples (wkB12 from Bombus bimaculatus and wkB29 from Bombus vagans) (21). All three strains shared more than 99.1% of their small subunit (SSU [16S]) rRNA gene sequences, which allocated them within the Neisseriaceae family. Many additional strains have been reported since, and some phylogenetic analyses revealed a clear separation between Snodgrassella isolates of Apis spp. and those of Bombus spp. (1, 3235), whereas others reported that the two groups were not monophyletic (10, 22). In the present study, we used core gene phylogenomics to demonstrate the separation of Snodgrassella isolates into three clades: one colonizing Bombus spp. and two colonizing Apis spp. We report an early divergence of Snodgrassella strains from Asian honeybees, which implies that Apis-colonizing strains are paraphyletic. We used average nucleotide identity (ANI) analyses to demonstrate that the genus Snodgrassella consists of at least seven species. We further analyzed differential gene contents within these species and examined evolutionary scenarios for the emergence of 107 specific genes. We finally used our own Snodgrassella isolates to describe and formally name two of these novel species from bumblebees as Snodgrassella gandavensis, with LMG 30236 (=CECT 30450) as the type strain, and Snodgrassella communis, with LMG 28360 (=CECT 30451) as the type strain.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Species delimitation within the Snodgrassella genus.

We studied the diversity within the genus Snodgrassella using extensive phylogenomic and average nucleotide identity (ANI) analyses (Fig. 1). Highly conserved genes were selected to perform the phylogenomic analyses. Multiple events of HGT affecting Snodgrassella genomes have been reported (2, 31, 32), and such events may be damaging for inferring species phylogenies (3638). To minimize interference of HGT, we used shared Neisseriaceae core genes only, by incorporating 35 non-Snodgrassella bacteria from this family into our data set. We further imposed a strict unicopy presence onto core genes in order to avoid artifacts linked to paralogous sequences, which also have been reported to be deleterious to phylogenomic studies (39, 40). Finally, we enforced high geometric and functional indices (0.8 for both), resulting in the selection of genes with less than 20% gap insertions and 20% substitutions, respectively. Our phylogenomic data set was thus composed of 254 genes that were structurally and functionally conserved within the family Neisseriaceae. Our analyses of the Neisseriaceae phylogeny confirmed with 100% bootstrap support that the genus Snodgrassella is monophyletic within the family Neisseriaceae (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) (21, 41). Its nearest-neighbor taxon was Populibacter corticis (40). Prior to the description of P. corticis in 2017 (41), the lineage formed by Stenoxybacter acetivorans and Snodgrassella spp. was suggested to represent a gut-specific clade within the Betaproteobacteria, based on the observation that also S. acetivorans was isolated from an insect (i.e., termite gut sample) (21). The description of P. corticis, an organism isolated from bark tissue of poplar canker, appeared to disrupt this image, yet, more should be known about the latter organism before the hypothesis of a gut-specific clade within the Betaproteobacteria is abandoned. In the rest of the present study, we used P. corticis CFCC 13594T as an outgroup for studying Snodgrassella phylogeny.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Graphical abstract. We used 9 newly sequenced Snodgrassella genomes and 67 (including the outgroup) public genome assemblies to reconstruct the phylogeny of the genus Snodgrassella with 254 core genes, all functionally and structurally conserved in the Neisseriaceae family. We used independent phylogenetic methods (bootstrapping, leave-one-out analysis, and taxon sampling) to assess the robustness of our phylogenomic trees. Combined with an average nucleotide identity analysis, our results indicated new species delimitations within this genus. We further investigated specific gene contents within the species groups and their functional importance.

FIG S1

Neisseriaceae phylogeny. The maximum likelihood tree was inferred from 254 core genes under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 111 organisms by 86,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions. Bootstrap support values are shown at the nodes. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.02 MB (23.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Our amino acid- and nucleotide-based phylogenomic and leave-one-out analyses all revealed a clear separation between Snodgrassella isolates from A. mellifera and Bombus spp., with full support values in bootstrap and leave-one-out analyses (Fig. S2 and S3). The 75 Snodgrassella strains formed three clades. Those isolated from Asian honeybees, referred to as Apis group1, formed a monophyletic group separated from the two other clades with full support in both bootstrap and leave-one-out analyses (Fig. S2 and S3). The same three clades were reported by Powell et al. (42) using minD as a single phylogenetic marker gene. Yet, the latter study did not use an outgroup to root the obtained phylogeny. Using 254 core genes and P. corticis CFCC 13594T as an outgroup, we demonstrated that Apis group1 is the first diverging group of the Snodgrassella phylogeny (Fig. S2 and S3). The separation into three lineages was confirmed by removing P. corticis CFCC 13594T from the phylogenomic analyses in order to check the presence of a long-branch attraction artifact (Fig. S4). The Snodgrassella phylogeny showed shorter branch lengths in Snodgrassella isolates from Apis mellifera (here referred to as Apis group2) than those in isolates from Bombus spp. (Fig. 2). The latter represented five lineages (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The first, Bombus group1, was composed of four isolates from Bombus pensylvanicus (all collected in the United States) and was fully supported by the bootstrap and leave-one-out analyses (Fig. S2 and S3). The second, Bombus group2, consisted of a single isolate from Bombus nevadensis (United States). The three remaining groups were fully supported in the bootstrap and leave-one-out analyses as well and were referred to as Bombus group3, which was composed of three isolates from Bombus appositus (United States), Bombus group4, which was composed of two isolates from Bombus pascuorum and Bombus lapidarius (Belgium), and Bombus group5, which comprised 17 isolates collected from 11 Bombus species in Belgium and the United States (Fig. 2 and Table 1) and which included the isolates wkB12 and wkB29, reported by Kwong and Moran (21). This topology was confirmed with sparser taxon sampling, after removing 40 strains with dRep (43) and computing another large phylogenomic analysis (Fig. 3). The branching patterns of the seven groups were the same in all amino acid- and nucleotide-based trees inferred, except for Bombus group2. Bombus group2 appeared as a sister group of Bombus group3 and Bombus group4 in all analyses (with a bootstrap of <70), except in the nucleotide-based phylogenomic analysis, in which Bombus group2 branched with Bombus group1 (Fig. S3).

FIG 2.

FIG 2

Snodgrassella phylogeny and ANI comparison. A maximum likelihood tree was inferred from 254 core gene sequences under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML (71) from a supermatrix of 76 organisms by 86,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions. Only bootstrap values below 100 are shown at the nodes. (A) Host. Host species were taken from biosample metadata in the NCBI portal, except for the 9 newly sequenced genomes, for which the metadata were taken from reference 15. (B) ANI heat map. ANI values were computed with fastANI (74). A triangular matrix was constructed according to pairwise distances. Colors associated with ANI values are given in the fastANI key. (C) GTDB hits. The blue squares on the right were determined using GTDBtk on the genomes of the associated strains (77).

TABLE 1.

Details of the Snodgrassella strains and public assembliesa

Genome accession no. Strain no.b Species Group Isolation source Geographic origin Completeness (%) Contamination (%) Length No. of contigs (nt) N 50
GCF_002777775.1 wkB237* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Apis group1 A. andreniformis Singapore 99.57 0.85 2,321,012 21 327,688
GCF_002777855.1 wkB298* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Apis group1 A. cerana Singapore 99.57 0.85 2,338,271 42 300,195
GCF_002777655.1 wkB273* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Apis group1 A. florea Singapore 99.57 0.85 2,317,511 31 335,346
GCF_013344955.1 ESL0324 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,599,151 21 554,030
GCF_013344995.1 ESL0304 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,427,362 23 239,422
GCF_013346865.1 ESL0323 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,665,387 37 227,440
GCF_016100435.1 W8158 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 1.50 2,572,927 22 817,650
GCF_016100485.1 W6238H14 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 1.07 2,493,315 33 676,521
GCF_016100525.1 W6238H11 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 1.07 2,488,149 29 680,931
GCF_016100575.1 M0351 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 1.07 2,445,778 24 1,728,374
GCF_016100865.1 W8132 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 1.07 2,402,212 17 168,5768
GCF_016100875.1 W8124* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,374,073 13 1,777,221
GCF_016101225.1 W8135 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,403,944 18 1,368,577
GCF_016101245.1 W8134 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,404,985 18 1,368,577
GCF_016101465.1 M0110 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.64 2,542,136 49 358,478
GCF_016101495.1 M0112 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.64 2,542,583 47 358,478
GCF_016101535.1 M0118 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.64 2,544,967 53 358,478
GCF_000600005.1 wkB2* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,527,978 1 2,527,978
GCF_002088655.1 N-23 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.85 2,421,693 128 38,667
GCF_002088575.1 N9* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.85 2,403,335 129 42,232
GCF_002088755.1 N-S1 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.85 2,420,873 98 50,074
GCF_002088595.1 N-S2 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.85 2,421,229 73 61,427
GCF_002088635.1 N-S3* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.43 2,463,518 79 70,149
GCF_002088665.1 N-S4* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.85 2,421,486 38 133,936
GCF_002088765.1 N-S5 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.85 2,417,615 77 56,721
GCF_002088525.1 N-W4 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.85 2,421,251 75 55,544
GCF_002088555.1 N-W7* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Norway 99.57 0.85 2,423,318 62 70,113
GCF_002777865.1 PEB0171* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 1.28 2,520,622 77 117,138
GCF_002777875.1 PEB0178 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.15 1.37 2,524,932 135 43,076
GCF_002777735.1 wkB9 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.88 2,548,535 15 663,898
GCF_002088405.1 A-10-12 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.43 2,501,655 63 65,004
GCF_002089015.1 A11 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,430,265 122 42,222
GCF_002088695.1 A-11-12 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.43 2,500,985 90 53,637
GCF_002088735.1 A-1-12* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.43 2,502,286 58 91,493
GCF_002088675.1 A12* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,399,919 214 19,825
GCF_002088395.1 A2* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,425,186 84 56,386
GCF_002088585.1 A-2-12 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.43 2,502,682 75 64,388
GCF_002088455.1 A3 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,428,731 109 44,108
GCF_002088475.1 A5 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,430,376 120 40,275
GCF_002088465.1 A-5-24 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.43 2,490,743 172 28,499
GCF_002088515.1 A-9-24 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.43 2,501,107 62 83,544
GCF_002088415.1 Aw-18 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,497,111 88 55,786
GCF_002019415.1 Aw-20* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,498,497 65 75,805
GCF_003202885.1 ESL0196* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Switzerland 99.57 0.43 2,446,304 15 1,281,809
GCF_002777925.1 MS1-3 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 99.57 0.85 2,500,663 93 50,239
GCF_002777695.1 wkB332* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Malaysia 99.57 1.28 2,487,419 30 502,922
GCF_002777815.1 wkB339 Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera Malaysia 99.57 0.85 2,499,917 27 431,105
GCF_002406645.1 E1* Snodgrassella alvi Apis group2 A. mellifera USA 98.24 0.85 2,388,322 156 47,816
GCF_002777705.1 HK3* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group1 B. pensylvanicus USA 99.57 0.85 2,609,176 74 92,612
GCF_002777795.1 HK9x* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group1 B. pensylvanicus USA 99.57 0.90 2,568,638 110 120,216
GCF_002777325.1 Pens2-2-5 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group1 B. pensylvanicus USA 99.57 0.43 2,486,143 132 102,952
GCF_002777745.1 WF3-3* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group1 B. pensylvanicus USA 99.57 0.85 2,603,503 67 133,888
GCF_002777825.1 Nev4-2* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group2 B. nevadensis USA 91.45 1.28 2,582,966 90 95,658
GCF_002777315.1 App2-2* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group3 B. appositus USA 99.15 0.00 2,483,892 119 47,667
GCF_002777425.1 App4-8 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group3 B. appositus USA 99.57 0.43 2,577,724 115 71,597
GCF_002777465.1 App6-4* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group3 B. appositus USA 99.57 0.85 2,623,320 108 97,352
GCA_914768095 R-53680* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group4 B. lapidarius Belgium 99.57 0.43 2,526,951 46 155,676
GCA_914768025 LMG 30236* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group4 B. pascuorum Belgium 99.57 0.00 2,507,157 45 132,469
GCF_000695565.1 wkB12* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. bimaculatus USA 99.57 0.43 2,438,497 34 337,275
GCF_002777415.1 Fer1-2* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. fervidus USA 99.57 0.85 2,442,708 66 153,029
GCF_002777485.1 Fer2-2* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. fervidus USA 99.57 0.85 2,358,796 53 132,767
GCF_002777335.1 Gris2-3-4 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. griseocollis USA 99.57 0.43 2,417,520 62 183,509
GCF_002777525.1 Gris1-3 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. griseocollis USA 99.57 0.48 2,441,972 58 128,979
GCF_002777615.1 Gris1-6 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. griseocollis USA 99.57 0.43 2,459,690 50 149,104
GCF_002777595.1 Gris3-4 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. griseocollis USA 99.57 0.43 2,453,208 48 122,377
GCA_914768055 R-53528* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. hypnorum Belgium 99.57 0.43 2,287,013 43 179,794
GCF_002777345.1 Snod2-1-5* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. impatiens USA 99.57 0.43 2,355,707 62 146,579
GCA_914768015 R-54863* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. lapidarius Belgium 99.57 0.43 2,434,137 60 124,074
GCA_914768085 R-54236 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. lucorum Belgium 99.57 0.43 2,314,670 26 184,956
GCA_914768035 R-54678* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. lucorum Belgium 99.57 0.43 2,265,685 32 179,671
GCF_002777635.1 Occ4-2* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. occidentalis USA 99.57 0.43 2,487,519 54 151,012
GCA_914768065 R-53633* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. pascuorum Belgium 99.57 0.43 2,402,464 42 196,721
GCA_914768075 R-54841 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. terrestris Belgium 99.57 0.43 2,400,984 40 170,243
GCA_914768045 LMG 28360* Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. terrestris Belgium 99.57 0.43 2,310,392 28 184,956
GCF_000695545.1 wkB29 Snodgrassella sp. nov. Bombus group5 B. vagans USA 99.57 0.43 2,398,206 88 184,072
GCF_001590725.1 CFCC 13594* Populibacter corticis Outgroup P. canker USA 98.72 0.00 2,372,914 131 95,649
a

Completeness and contamination values/metrics were estimated with CheckM (61). Assembly statistics were computed with QUAST (62).

b

Asterisks indicate the strains retained by dRep after dereplication.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Snodgrassella phylogeny, after dereplication of highly similar genomes, and metabolic analysis per species group. (A) Maximum likelihood tree inferred on 254 core genes under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML (71) from a supermatrix of 36 organisms by 86,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions. Bootstrap support values are shown at the nodes. (B) Functional analyses were performed using COG (68) and Mantis (53). Numbers indicated in the pie charts correspond to absolute numbers of OGs identified in the respective Snodgrassella subgroups. Specific genes were computed for entire groups before dereplication.

FIG S2

Comparison of the Snodgrassella bootstrap protein phylogeny and the leave-one-out protein phylogeny. The maximum likelihood tree (right panel) was inferred on 254 core genes under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 76 organisms by 86,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions. One hundred concatenations of 70,000-aa-long subsamples of the core genes were generated, and the corresponding trees were computed with RAxML. Bootstrap and leave-one-out support values are shown at the nodes. The leave-one-out tree (left panel) is a cladogram without informative branch lengths. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.05 MB (53.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Comparison of the Snodgrassella bootstrap DNA phylogeny and the leave-one-out DNA phylogeny. (A) The maximum likelihood tree was inferred on 254 core genes under the GTRGAMMA model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 76 organisms by 264,981 aligned nucleotides, using two different partitions for codon positions 1&2 and position 3. One hundred concatenations of 100,000 nucleotides of the core genes were generated, and the corresponding trees were computed with RAxML. Trees were inferred using only codon positions 1&2 (B) and using two different partitions for codon positions 1&2 and position 3 (C). Bootstrap and leave-one-out support values are shown at the nodes. The leave-one-out trees are cladograms without informative branch lengths. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.08 MB (78.9KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Unrooted Snodgrassella phylogeny. The maximum likelihood tree was inferred from 254 core genes under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 75 organisms (without P. corticis) by 86,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions, after removal of the outgroup. Bootstrap support values are shown at the nodes. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.02 MB (22.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

To quantify the taxonomic divergence between the observed phylogenomic groups, we performed ANI analyses. The latter are generally used for species delimitation in bacterial taxonomy (44), with ANI values of about 95 to 96% corresponding to the species delineation threshold (45, 46). The ANI analysis (Fig. 2, part ANI) revealed values within each of the phylogenomic groups (except Bombus group2, for which only a single genome was available) that were consistently above 95% ANI, while ANI values between genome sequences of different groups were consistently below 87%. Therefore, each of the seven phylogenomic groups corresponded to a distinct Snodgrassella species in modern bacterial taxonomy. These seven species also corresponded with the seven Snodgrassella species defined in the GTDB database (https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/searches?s=al&q=Snodgrassella) (47) (Fig. 2, GTDB part). Additional Snodgrassella species likely exist as gut symbionts in stingless bees and Bombus species from as yet poorly examined continents, as suggested by their SSU rRNA phylogeny (10). The S. alvi strain wkB2T clustered within Apis group2, and by taxonomic convention, the name S. alvi should therefore be restricted to organisms from Apis group2. All other phylogenomic groups detected in the present and in earlier studies represent novel Snodgrassella species. Below we propose to formally name Bombus group4 as Snodgrassella gandavensis, with LMG 30236 (=CECT 30450) as the type strain, and Bombus group5 as Snodgrassella communis, with LMG 28360 (=CECT 30451) as the type strain. The formal naming of the remaining phylogenomic groups (i.e., Apis group1, Bombus group1, Bombus group2, and Bombus group3) can be done upon characterization and public deposit of reference cultures to conform to standard practices in bacterial taxonomy (44).

It has been suggested that the transmission mode of Snodgrassella between workers and larvae is mainly vertical within a colony (27, 32, 48). Although for most of the groups (i.e., Snodgrassella species) detected in the present study, only a limited number of isolates or genomes were available, our data showed that indeed several Snodgrassella species occur in more than one Bombus species, and therefore this rejects strict cospeciation. This result is in agreement with data reported by Powel et al. (42), who demonstrated that Bombus group5 Snodgrassella (i.e., S. communis) was detected in several Bombus species, and with the experimental demonstration of host jumps in Bombus species (2). The close phylogenetic relationship between Snodgrassella species associated with bumblebees and Snodgrassella species associated with the Western honeybee additionally supports the hypothesis of horizontal transfer of symbionts between bee clades. The origin of extant bumblebees is estimated to the Miocene, as based on fossil records and molecular phylogeny (49, 50). The origin of this clade is associated with a global cooling of the Palearctic region (51). Ancestors of bumblebees were likely sharing host plants with the Western honeybee ancestor clade, which is also associated with a temperate climate, and not with the Apis cerana honeybee clade, which is associated with a subtropical to tropical warmer climate. Overall, the similarity of microbiota among corbiculate bees seems to be related to both phylogeny and sharing of common habitats/climates.

Specific gene analysis.

Snodgrassella has been coevolving with other bacteria in the gut of honeybees and bumblebees for 80 million years (9, 10, 21). Interestingly the age of the common ancestor of the clade of the hosts (i.e., corbiculate bees, which include both bumblebees and honeybees) is also estimated round ~85 million years (52). Different species and genotypes have evolved and may have developed different functions in their hosts. We investigated the presence of group-specific genes (i.e., genes that are exclusively present in one group [or species] and that are shared by all members of this group) and determined their functionalities. The rationale was that a conserved gene probably confers a benefit to members of that group. We detected 107 specific genes: 19 were specific for Apis group1, 12 for Apis group2 (i.e., S. alvi), 10 for Bombus group1, 12 for Bombus group3, 24 for Bombus group4 (S. gandavensis), and 1 for Bombus group5 (S. communis) (Fig. 3). No specific genes were found for Bombus group2. In a next step, genes shared by multiple groups or species were examined. Only two group combinations presented specific genes: Apis group1 and Apis group2 shared 4 genes that were absent in all others, and all Snodgrassella spp. together shared 25 genes (Fig. 3).

Of these 107 genes, 37 did not correspond to proteins known in COG or Mantis (53). The latter is the most recent and comprehensive tool for protein annotation and contains Pfam, eggnog, NPFM, TIGRfams, and Kofam family data for the three domains of life (53). These 37 proteins were relatively short (median, 53 amino acids [aa]; interquartile range [IQR], 46 aa) compared to the rest of the 107 genes (median, 197 aa; IQR, 202.25), with only six proteins above 100 aa (Table 2). Small proteins in bacteria can have roles in transport and signal transduction, can act as chaperones, can be involved in stress responses or virulence (54, 55), and can also be used as bacteriocins (56). Unknown genes are a recurrent issue in metagenomic studies, where they may represent up to 40% of the genes (57). Besides these genes without a match, 24 genes encoded proteins with unknown function but with hits in COG or Mantis, while six genes had a general predicted function only and could not be affiliated with a metabolic pathway. Together, 67 of 107 specific genes (62.6%) and their putative benefits remained unknown (Table 2 and Fig. 3).

TABLE 2.

Functional analysis of the specific genesa

Group Gene IDb Length (aa) Gene product Mapping tool COG pathway Function
Apis group1 GC_00003784 100     Unknown  
GC_00004036 330 AfsA Mantis Defense mechanisms 2-Oxo-3-(phosphooxy)propyl 3-oxoalkanoate synthase
GC_00004009 235 GlnQ COG Amino acid transport and metabolism ABC-type polar amino acid transport system, ATPase component (GlnQ) (PDB no. 4YMS)
GC_00003806 86     Unknown  
GC_00003947 43     Unknown  
GC_00003950 83   Mantis Defense mechanisms Permeases of drug metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily
GC_00003860 32     Unknown  
GC_00003920 32     Unknown  
GC_00003767 110     Unknown  
GC_00004005 86     Unknown  
GC_00004028 78     Unknown  
GC_00003774 33   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00003768 98 SoxR COG Transcription DNA-binding transcriptional regulator, MerR family (SoxR) (PDB no. 2VZ4)
GC_00003846 53     Unknown  
GC_00004043 69     Unknown  
GC_00004011 39 vWA-MoxR Mantis Defense mechanisms vWA-MoxR-associated protein middle region (VMAP-M) 1—sensing of invasive entities (EMBL)
GC_00003887 53     Unknown  
GC_00004656 72     Unknown  
GC_00003916 47     Unknown  
 
Apis group2 GC_00001836* 230   COG Function unknown Uncharacterized protein, contains DUF2461 domain
GC_00001864 244   Mantis Function unknown Uncharacterized protein
GC_00001813 75 YozG COG Transcription DNA-binding transcriptional regulator, XRE family (YozG) (PDB no. 3TYR)
GC_00001812* 213 PspE COG Inorganic ion transport and metabolism Rhodanese-related sulfurtransferase (PspE) (PDB no. 1TQ1)
GC_00001818* 598 LepA COG Translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis Translation elongation factor EF-4, membrane-bound GTPase (LepA) (PDB no. 3DEG)
GC_00001830 114   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001846 394 AraJ COG Carbohydrate transport and metabolism Predicted arabinose efflux permease AraJ, MFS family (AraJ) (PDB no. 4LDS)
GC_00001829 101 MdaB COG General function prediction only Putative NADPH-quinone reductase (modulator of drug activity B) (MdaB) (PDB no. 1D4A)
GC_00001849 289   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001848 355 Lys9 COG Amino acid transport and metabolism Saccharopine dehydrogenase, NADP-dependent (Lys9) (PDB no. 1E5L)
GC_00001833 272 FTR1 COG Inorganic ion transport and metabolism High-affinity Fe2+/Pb2+ permease (FTR1)
GC_00001824* 180   Mantis Function unknown  
 
Apis group1&2 GC_00001778 262 YaaA Mantis Stress response Peroxide stress protein YaaA
GC_00001768 183     Unknown  
GC_00001766 167 PadC COG Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism Phenolic acid decarboxylase (PadC) (PDB no. 2GC9)
GC_00001776 328   Mantis General function prediction only Short C-terminal domain
 
Bombus group1 GC_00003663 110 MSP7_C Mantis General function prediction only MSP7-like protein C-terminal domain
GC_00003592 76   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00003535 31     Unknown  
GC_00003491 70 GmrSD COG Defense mechanisms DNAse/DNA nickase specific for phosphorothioated or glycosylated phage DNA, GmrSD/DndB/SspE family
GC_00003648 62   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00003489 29     Unknown  
GC_00003623 29     Unknown  
GC_00003493 35     Unknown  
GC_00003540 69     Unknown  
GC_00003502 41   Mantis Function unknown  
 
Bombus group3 GC_00004090 277   Mantis Defense mechanisms Rhs family protein
GC_00003889 86 DHAD Mantis Amino acid transport and metabolism Dihydroxy-acid dehydratase
GC_00003888 115     Unknown  
GC_00003882 62   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00003783 69     Unknown  
GC_00004096 680   Mantis Defense mechanisms Rhs family protein
GC_00003945 52     Unknown  
GC_00003718 266   Mantis Defense mechanisms Rhs family protein
GC_00003802 94     Unknown  
GC_00004066 361   Mantis Defense mechanisms Rhs family protein
GC_00003778 83   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00003796 71   Mantis General function prediction only Deoxyhypusine monooxygenase activity
 
Bombus group4 GC_00004382 166   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00004653 110   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00004442 38     Unknown  
GC_00004629 47     Unknown  
GC_00004489 36     Function unknown  
GC_00004467 254 MMPL COG Defense mechanisms Predicted exporter protein, RND superfamily (MMPL) (PDB no. 5KHN) drug exporter
GC_00004294* 395 AraJ COG Carbohydrate transport and metabolism Predicted arabinose efflux permease AraJ, MFS family (AraJ) (PDB no. 4LDS)
GC_00004680 160     Unknown  
GC_00004725 34     Unknown  
GC_00004304 69 Fic_N COG Transcription Fic family protein (PDB no. 3CUC)
GC_00004186 46     Unknown  
GC_00004560* 62 HIS2 COG Amino acid transport and metabolism Histidinol phosphatase or related hydrolase of the PHP family (HIS2) (PDB no. 1M65)
GC_00004631 33     Unknown  
GC_00004357 80     Unknown  
GC_00004742 64     Unknown  
GC_00004735 30     Unknown  
GC_00004255 104   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00004450 61     Unknown  
GC_00004308 72   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00004249 38   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00004340 39     Unknown  
GC_00004716 34     Unknown  
GC_00004446 33     Unknown  
GC_00004728 66   Mantis Function unknown  
 
Bombus group5 GC_00002418 120     Unknown  
 
Apis-Bombus groups GC_00001509 376   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001371 68   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001428* 270 NlpA COG Inorganic ion transport and metabolism ABC-type metal ion transport system, periplasmic component/surface antigen (NlpA) (PDB no. 1P99)
GC_00001520 548 DAK1 COG Carbohydrate transport and metabolism Dihydroxyacetone kinase (DAK1) (PDB no. 1UN8)
GC_00001461 309 DnaJ COG Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones DnaJ-class molecular chaperone with C-terminal Zn finger domain (DnaJ) (PDB no. 1BQ0)
GC_00001484 273 YvaK COG Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism Esterase/lipase (YvaK) (PDB no. 4DIU)
GC_00001382 118   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001454 299 YjjU COG Lipid transport and metabolism Predicted phospholipase, patatin/cPLA2 family (YjjU)
GC_00001527 359   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001467 142   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001482 268 NosY COG Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones ABC-type transport system involved in multicopper enzyme maturation, permease component (NosY)
GC_00001439 381   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001398 208   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001393 135 EmrE COG Defense mechanisms Multidrug transporter EmrE and related cation transporters (EmrE) (PDB no. 2I68)
GC_00001469 144 ElaA COG General function prediction only Predicted N-acyltransferase, GNAT family (ElaA) (PDB no. 1XEB
GC_00001463 296 SpeB COG Amino acid transport and metabolism Arginase/agmatinase family enzyme (SpeB) (PDB no. 1CEV)
GC_00001414 118 EmrE COG Defense mechanisms Multidrug transporter EmrE and related cation transporters (EmrE) (PDB no. 2I68)
GC_00001408* 277 NlpA COG Inorganic ion transport and metabolism ABC-type metal ion transport system, periplasmic component/surface antigen (NlpA) (PDB no. 1P99)
GC_00001441 142   Mantis Function unknown  
GC_00001474 186   Mantis General function prediction only Peptidase activity
GC_00001539 248 MtnX COG Amino acid transport and metabolism 2-Hydroxy-3-keto-5-methylthiopentenyl-1-phosphate phosphatase (methionine salvage) (MtnX) (PDB no. 2FEA)
GC_00001507 251   COG Mobilome: prophages, transposons Phage repressor protein C, contains Cro/C1-type HTH and peptidase s24 domains
GC_00001374 530 AspB COG Amino acid transport and metabolism Aspartate/methionine/tyrosine aminotransferase (AspB) (PDB no. 2O0R)
GC_00001419 471 ArgD COG Amino acid transport and metabolism Acetylornithine aminotransferase/4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase (ArgD) (PDB no. 1SF2)
GC_00001464 225 YaeF/YiiX Mantis Amino acid transport and metabolism Permuted papain-like amidase enzyme, YaeF/YiiX, C92 family
a

Functional analyses were performed with anvi’o (67), using COGs (68) and Mantis (53). Pathways correspond to COG pathways as indicated by anvi’o. Unknown genes correspond to genes without hits (unseen in databases).

b

Asterisks indicate putative HGT events.

Eleven of the 40 identified specific genes represented defense mechanisms, which are important for gut colonization in bees (14) (Table 2 and Fig. 3). The two most conserved defense mechanisms (4 genes each) corresponded to drug exporter and Rhs proteins (Table 2). These two defense mechanisms generate similar benefits and can provide competitive advantages. Steele and Moran (34) recently demonstrated that Rhs proteins represent different toxins, which are injected in neighboring cells through a type VI secretion system (T6SS) (2, 3234). The four Rhs proteins found in the present study were specific genes of Bombus group3, a gut symbiont thus far detected only in B. appositus. The presence of specific toxins in these three strains might explain the specificity for their host by T6SS mediated-competition. The last three defense mechanisms included proteins for glycosylation of phage DNA (Bombus group1), sensing of invasive viruses, and antibiotic production (Apis group1) (Table 2). Apis group1 possessed a specific protein closely related to the 2-oxo-3-(phosphooxy)propyl 3-oxoalkanoate synthase, which triggers the production of the antibiotic virginiamycin in Streptomyces virginiae (58).

Among the remaining identified specific genes, 9 genes belonged to the metabolic category amino acid transport and metabolism, 4 genes belonged to inorganic ion transport and metabolism, and 4 genes belonged to carbohydrate transport and metabolism (Fig. 3). Because host gut environments are scarce in iron and amino acids, de novo biosynthetic pathways and iron importers have been reported to be essential for gut host colonization (59). Specific genes linked to carbohydrate metabolism might provide a benefit linked to a carbohydrate-rich diet (1), even if such genes are more commonly found in Gilliamella than Snodgrassella genomes (30). The 12 remaining identified specific genes represented different metabolic pathways with unclear function in, or benefit to, the host (Table 2).

Horizontal gene transfer.

Horizontal gene transfer is a process that plays a major role in bacterial evolution. Because of the spatial proximity of Snodgrassella and other gut bacteria during 80 million years of coevolution, HGT events may have impacted the specific gene complement. We investigated the potential presence of such events by using MetaCHIP (60). We included all bee gut symbiont genomes available in RefSeq (561 genomes: i.e., 75 of Snodgrassella plus 486 of representatives of other bee gut symbionts) to maximize the odds of HGT detection and detected only 57 events of HGT in which Snodgrassella spp. were a donor or recipient (Fig. S5 and Table S3). This is less than the 87 events reported by Kwong et al. (2). MetaCHIP is designed to infer HGT from genomes assembled from microbial communities (60) and detects potential HGT events using a BLAST best-hit approach and then validates these hits by performing a duplication-transfer-loss (DTL) reconciliation between a species tree and an individual gene tree. The DTL filter used by MetaCHIP is more stringent than the BLAST E value threshold of 1e−50 used by Kwong et al. (2), which may explain this difference.

FIG S5

Gene flow between phylotype genomes of RefSeq bee gut symbionts. HGT events were inferred with MetaCHIP on the 561 phylotype genomes (75 Snodgrassella plus 486 other bacterial bee gut phylotypes) present in RefSeq. Taxonomy of the genomes was determined by GTDBtk. Bands connect donors and recipients of HGT events (as determined using MetaCHIP); colors correspond to the donor of the genes. Widths of bands correspond to the number of HGTs, also indicated on the border of the circular plot. Download FIG S5, PDF file, 0.03 MB (32KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

HGT events reported between the 486 phylotype genomes of RefSeq and Snodgrassella. Functional analyses were performed with Mantis. Download Table S3, PDF file, 0.4 MB (428.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

None of the 107 specific genes described above was present among the 57 HGT-affected genes detected by MetaCHIP using BLASTP and a filter on 98% identity (Table S3). We investigated the absence of HGT in the group of 107 specific genes further by enriching the comparison with orthologous sequences taken from the 561 gut symbiont genomes used above and with orthologous sequences from the 247 genomes unrelated to the bee gut ecosystem, thereby also covering bacterial and archaeal diversity (Fig. 4). This allowed us to analyze the taxonomic diversity of the specific genes and revealed that 68 genes were unique to Snodgrassella, while 39 genes were found in other bacteria too (27 genes in multiple other bacteria and 12 genes in only one other bacterium) (Fig. 4). The evolutionary history of the 68 genes unique to Snodgrassella is explained more easily by duplication in Snodgrassella than by acquisition by HGT or gene loss in all other bacteria. In contrast, the 27 specific genes found in other bee gut symbionts or in other bacteria unrelated to the bee gut microbiome suggest that gene loss in other Neisseriaceae was the most plausible evolutionary path of the genes. We computed individual gene trees for these 27 OGs (available at https://github.com/Lcornet/SNOD) and compared them manually to species trees (Fig. S6). For only 8 genes out of the 27 (indicated in Table 2), Snodgrassella sequences clustered with those of other bee gut symbionts, which may suggest HGT events. For 12 genes (out of 107), no convincing evidence of HGT was detected because these genes were only present in two species, making the comparison to the species tree impossible. Ten of the latter genes were detected in Gilliamella and Snodgrassella only, and two were detected in Snodgrassella and Frischella only. These genes included three out of four specific Rhs proteins of Bombus group3, which were shared with Gilliamella genomes.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Orthologous enrichment of group-specific genes. A total of 107 specific genes from bee gut bacteria (including 75 Snodgrassella genomes) were enriched with sequences from 486 genomes from bee gut bacteria and 247 genomes from bacteria not related to the bee gut ecosystem, using Forty-Two (75, 76). The y axis represents the absolute number of sequences, and the x axis represents individual genes. Genes were grouped by species group: A.G.1 for Apis group1 (19 genes), A.G.2 for Apis group2 (12 genes), A.G.1&2 for the two Apis groups together (4 genes), B.G.1 for Bombus group1 (10 genes), B.G.3 for Bombus group3 (12 genes), B.G.4 for Bombus group4 (24 genes), B.G.5 for Bombus group5 (1 gene), and A.B.G for Apis and Bombus groups together (25 genes).

FIG S6

Gut bacterium phylogenomic tree, used as a species tree for HGT inference. The maximum likelihood tree was inferred on 76 core genes (unicopy genes determined by CheckM) under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 843 organisms by 12,930 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions. Bootstrap support values are shown at the nodes. Download FIG S6, PDF file, 0.02 MB (21.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Conclusion.

In the present study, we used highly conserved Neisseriaceae core genes to perform multiple phylogenomic analyses. We demonstrated monophyly of Snodgrassella strains isolated from bumblebees and paraphyly of strains isolated from honeybees. We also demonstrated that Snodgrassella strains from Asian honeybees are an early diverging group. Combined with ANI analyses, our data further indicated that this genus comprises at least seven species. Below we describe and formally name two new Snodgrassella species from bumblebees: i.e., S. gandavensis sp. nov. for Bombus group4 (with LMG 30236 as the type strain) and S. communis sp. nov. for Bombus group5 (with LMG 28360 as the type strain). We detected 107 specific genes among these seven species. For the large majority of these 107 genes, there was no evidence for HGT. Functional analyses revealed the importance of small proteins, defense mechanisms, amino acid transport and metabolism, inorganic ion transport and metabolism, and carbohydrate transport and metabolism among these specific genes.

Description of Snodgrassella gandavensis sp. nov.

Snodgrassella gandavensis (gan.da.ven′sis. M.L. masc. adj. gandavensis, of Gandavum, the Latin name for Ghent, referring to the place where these bacteria were first isolated).

Cells are nonmotile, Gram stain-negative rods about 1.2 μm long and 0.8 μm wide that occur singly or in pairs. Optimal growth is on rich agar medium at 37°C in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. S. gandavensis grows under anaerobic conditions when supplemented with 10 mM KNO3, but not under aerobic conditions. The bacterium is positive for catalase activity and nitrate reduction and negative for oxidase activity.

The type strain is LMG 30236 (=CECT 30450), which was isolated in 2015 from the gut of Bombus pascuorum sampled in 2015 in Wetteren, Belgium. The whole-genome sequence of LMG 30236T has a size of 2.51 Mbp. The DNA G+C content is 43.76 mol%. The whole-genome sequence is publicly available under accession no. GCA_914768025.1. The 16S rRNA gene sequence is publicly available under accession no. OU943324.

Additional information is provided in Table 3 and the supplemental material.

TABLE 3.

Differential characteristics between Snodgrassella alvi, Snodgrassella gandavensis, and Snodgrassella communis

Characteristic Result fora:
S. alvi NCIMB 14803T S. gandavensis (Bombus group4)
S. communis (Bombus group5)
LMG 30236T R-53680 LMG 28360T R-53528 R-54236
Growth on BHI agar + + + +
Growth on AC agar with 2% NaCl ++ w w ++ + +
Urease production + + +
Growth on DNase agar +
Hydrolysis of Tween 20 + +
a

+, present; −, absent; w, weak reaction.

Description of Snodgrassella communis sp. nov.

Snodgrassella communis (com.mu’nis. L. fem. adj. communis, common, because of its wide host range).

Cells are nonmotile, Gram stain-negative rods about 1.2 μm long and 0.8 μm wide that occur singly or in pairs. Optimal growth is on rich agar medium at 37°C in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. S. communis grows under anaerobic conditions when supplemented with 10 mM KNO3. Growth under aerobic conditions is strain dependent. The organism is positive for catalase activity and nitrate reduction and negative for oxidase activity.

The type strain is LMG 28360 (=CECT 30451), which was isolated in 2013 from the gut of Bombus terrestris sampled in 2013 in Ghent, Belgium. The whole-genome sequence of LMG 28360T has a size of 2.31 Mbp. The DNA G+C content is 43.26 mol%. The whole-genome sequence is publicly available under accession no. GCA_914068745.1. The 16S rRNA gene sequence is publicly available under accession no. OU943323.

Additional information is provided in Table 3 and the supplemental material.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All custom scripts specifically developed for this study are available at https://github.com/Lcornet/SNOD.

Snodgrassella whole-genome sequences.

Whole-genome sequences of 75 Snodgrassella isolates were analyzed. To this end, all Snodgrassella genomes from the Reference Sequence database of NCBI (RefSeq) (61, 62) were downloaded on 25 June 2021. CheckM v1.1.3 (63) with the lineage_wf option was used to identify genomes with contamination levels below 5% and completeness above 95%, which yielded 66 RefSeq genomes. In addition, we determined whole-genome sequences of nine bumblebee isolates from an earlier study (15). Together, the genomes of 48 isolates originated from honeybee gut samples (from 4 species) and 27 from bumblebee gut samples (from 14 species). Assembly quality metrics for all 75 genomes were obtained with QUAST v5.0.2 (64). The isolates, along with their geographic origin, accession numbers, and CheckM and QUAST parameters, are listed in Table 1.

DNA extraction.

Genomic DNA was isolated using a Maxwell 16 tissue DNA purification kit (catalog no. AS1030) and a Maxwell 16 instrument (catalog no. AS2000). The integrity and purity of the DNA were evaluated on a 1.0% (wt/vol) agarose gel and by spectrophotometric measurements at 234, 260, and 280 nm. A Quantus fluorometer and a QuantiFluor ONE double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) system (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA) were used to estimate the DNA concentration.

Library construction and genome sequencing.

Library preparation and whole-genome sequencing were performed by the Oxford Genomics Centre (University of Oxford, United Kingdom). Library preparation was performed using an adapted protocol of the NEB prep kit. Paired-end sequence reads (PE150) were generated using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, Inc., USA).

Genome assembly.

Quality checking and trimming of the raw sequence reads and de novo genome assembly were performed using the Shovill v1.1.0 pipeline (https://github.com/tseemann/shovill), which uses SPAdes v3.14.0 (65) as its core and which subsamples reads to a sequencing depth of 150×. Contigs shorter than 500 bp were excluded from the final assembly. Quality checking of the assembly was performed using QUAST v5.0.2 (64) and CheckM v1.1.3 (63).

Core gene analysis.

ToRQuEMaDA (66), 10 June 2021 version, was used to select genomes representing the diversity of other Neisseriaceae (i.e., bacteria not belonging to the genus Snodgrassella). We selected 35 Neisseriaceae genomes using the following options of tqmd_cluster.pl: dist-threshold of 0.90, kmer-size of 12 and max-round of 10 and CheckM v1.1.3 activated (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The 110 genomes were then imported into the pangenomic workflow of anvi’o v7.1 (67). The genomes were first loaded individually into anvi’o using the anvi-gen-contigs-database script with default options, and NCBI COGs (68) were associated with each genome database using the anvi-run-ncbi-cogs script with default options. The consolidated database was constructed using the anvi-gen-genomes-storage script with default options and anvi-pan-genome script with the following options: min-occurrence of 2 and mcl-inflation of 10. The protein sequences of all genomes, along with their COG annotations, were extracted from the anvi’o database using the anvi-get-sequences-for-gene-clusters script with default options and the anvi-summarize script with default options, respectively. Functional and geometric indices of anvi’o were computed using the anvi-compute-gene-cluster-homogeneity script with default options. Orthologous groups (OGs) were reconstructed from anvi’o output files using the custom script anvio_pan-to-OGs.py with default options. Finally, core genes were selected using the custom script anvio_OGs-filtration.py with the following options: pfilter set to yes, fraction set to 1, unwanted orgs limit set to 0, cfilter set to yes, maxcopy set to 1, hfilter set to 1, maxfunctional index set to 0.8 and maxgeometricindex set to 0.8. These settings resulted in the selection of 254 core genes out of 11,185 OGs, present in 100% of the 110 Neisseriaceae genomes.

TABLE S1

Information about the 35 Neisseriaceae genomes used in the study. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.4 MB (381.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Phylogenomic analyses. (i) Neisseriaceae phylogeny.

The 254 protein OGs were aligned using the anvi’o workflow. Conserved sites were selected using BMGE v1.12 (69) with moderately severe settings (entropy cut-off = 0.5, gap cut-off = 0.2). A supermatrix of 110 organisms by 85,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions (0.15% missing character states) was generated using SCaFoS v1.30k (70), with default settings. A Neisseriaceae phylogenomic analysis was inferred using RAxML v8.1.17 (71) with 100 bootstrap replicates under the PROTGAMMALGF model.

(ii) Snodgrassella phylogeny.

Populibacter corticis (GCF_001590725.1) was selected as an outgroup for the Snodgrassella phylogenomic analysis. The concatenated sequences of 75 Snodgrassella and P. corticis genomes were extracted from the 254-core-gene supermatrix of Neisseriaceae to produce a supermatrix of 76 organisms by 85,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions (0.04% missing character states), from which a phylogenomic tree was inferred with RAxML as described above. A leave-one-out analysis was then performed by randomly deleting 20% of genes present in our data set. To this end, the corresponding alignments were also reduced to 76 organisms and used to construct 100 data sets of about 70,000 conserved positions by randomly combining alignment files using the script jack-ali-dir.pl from Bio-MUST-Core (available at https://metacpan.org/dist/Bio-MUST-Core). The 100 supermatrices were assembled using SCaFoS v1.30k (70) with default settings. Trees were inferred using RAxML v8.1.17 (71) using the fast experimental tree search method and the PROTGAMMALGF model. A consensus tree was built from the set of 100 trees using the program consense v3.695 (from the PHYLIP package [72], but modified to handle long sequence names), with default settings. In order to test the possible influence of a long branch attraction artifact, the outgroup was eliminated from the supermatrix, and a new phylogenomic analysis was performed with the same protocol as described above but on a matrix of 75 organisms by 85,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions (0.03% missing character states). We checked the effect of taxon sampling reduction by deleting 40 Snodgrassella strains from our supermatrix, while conserving their diversity and the outgroup, using dRep v2.2.3 (43) with default settings. A phylogenetic analysis was inferred with the same protocol described above but using a matrix of 36 organisms by 85,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions (0.22% missing character states). Subsequently, nucleotide-based phylogenomic trees were inferred from the 254 core genes. Protein sequence alignments were back-translated by capturing and aligning the corresponding DNA sequences with the program leel (available at https://metacpan.org/dist/Bio-MUST-Apps-FortyTwo). A supermatrix of 76 organisms by 264,981 aligned nucleotides (1.59% of missing character states) was generated using SCaFoS v1.30k (70). A large phylogenomic analysis was inferred using RAxML v8.1.17 (71) with 100 bootstrap replicates under the GTRGAMMA model and using two different partitions for codon positions 1 and 2 together (here, “1&2”) and position 3. As for the protein trees, leave-one-out analyses were then performed by random selection of genes to construct 100 data sets of about 100,000 aligned nucleotides. The consensus trees were produced with the same protocol described above, but using the GTRGAMMA model of RAxML v8.1.17 (71). Two leave-one-out analyses were generated: one using only codon positions 1&2 and one using two different partitions for codon positions 1&2 and 3.

Gut bacterial phylogeny.

A total of 486 genomes representing the main phylotypes of bacteria found in the gut of Apis spp. and Bombus spp. (excluding Snodgrassella) were downloaded from RefSeq, prior to filtering the genomes with CheckM v1.1.3 (63) as described above. Also, 247 additional genomes covering a broad diversity of bacteria and archaea were selected with ToRQuEMaDA (66) using the following options: dist-threshold of 0.90, kmer-size of 12 and max-round of 10, and CheckM activated (Table S2). To perform a large phylogenomic analysis, we used core genes extracted by CheckM. The CheckM taxon set option was first run to produce a lineage set file. Then the CheckM analyze option was run, using the bacterial domain set while providing 843 genomes as input (i.e., 75 Snodgrassella genomes, 35 Neisseriaceae genomes, and the 733 genomes mentioned above). The CheckM qa option was then used to produce the marker files. The custom script Checkm-to-OGs.py allowed us to reconstruct OGs from CheckM marker files, selecting only unicopy OGs, thereby producing 76 OGs. The OGs were aligned using MAFFT v7.453 (73), run with the anysymbol, auto and reorder parameters. Conserved sites were selected using BMGE v1.12 (69) with moderately severe settings (entropy cut-off = 0.5, gap cut-off = 0.2). A matrix of 843 organisms by 12,930 unambiguously aligned amino-acid positions (6.72% missing character states) was produced using SCaFoS v1.30k (70), with default settings. A phylogenomic tree was produced with the same protocol as above for large phylogenomics.

TABLE S2

Information about the 486 bacterial bee gut phylotypes (without Snodgrassella) and 247 other bacterial genomes (without the Neisseriaceae) used in the study. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.6 MB (647KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Average nucleotide identity analysis.

Pairwise average nucleotide identities were determined for 75 Snodgrassella genomes and the P. corticis (GCF_001590725.1) genome using fastANI v1.32 (74) with default settings.

Specific gene analysis.

A distinct anvi’o pangenomic data set using 75 genomes of Snodgrassella and P. corticis (GCF_001590725.1) was constructed using the same protocol described above. The custom script anvio_OGs-filtration.py was used to determine which genes occurred specifically in a given group of organisms. This specific gene analysis was performed on a set of 4,685 orthologous groups. We used the same options as for the core genes, with the exception that the number of representatives of a group was set to 0.6 (60%). The inflation number was set to 10 in anvi’o (67) with the value of 60% recovered orthologous groups, even if the inflation parameter was too strict for some of them. All members of a group had to comprise an OG before it was considered specific. An orthologous enrichment was then performed to compensate for the potential lack of sensitivity in orthology inference. In addition, to enrich the OGs with potentially absent members of the group due to the 60% threshold, the enrichment could also add any Snodgrassella from other groups to control that the added sequences were indeed specific and not the result of a false orthology inference. We performed the orthologous enrichment with Forty-Two v0210570 (75, 76) (available at https://metacpan.org/dist/Bio-MUST-Apps-FortyTwo). We used the 843 genomes that included the 75 Snodgrassella genomes to perform the enrichment. The custom script Confirm-OGs.py was used to validate the specific OGs based on the criteria that all Snodgrassella of the considered group, but no Snodgrassella from other groups, must be present in the OGs after enrichment. We performed this approach on all groups defined in the present study, as well as all pairwise combinations of them, including one with all groups together (i.e., all Snodgrassella strains). All nodes of the tree have also been tested to assess the presence of specific genes shared between groups defined in this study. A total of 107 individual gene phylogenies were computed by aligning the sequences using MAFFT v7.453 (73) with the same options described above, selecting the conserved sites with BMGE v1.12 (69) with the same options described above, and inferring the trees with RAxML v8.1.17 (71) with 100 bootstrap replicates under the PROTGAMMALGF model.

Metabolic analyses.

The functions of the group-specific OGs were first determined using NCBI COGs (68) if the information was available as a product of the anvi’o workflow. COG pathways and COG functions were used to label the metabolic functions. When COG analyses yielded no results, Mantis (53) was used with default settings, and the information from the consensus annotation file was used to label function. OGs without any hit in COG or Mantis analyses were considered unknown genes, while OGs having hits with proteins of unknown function were classified as “Unknown function.”

Horizontal gene transfer.

GTDBtk (77) was used to infer the GTDB taxonomy (47) of the 561 phylotype genomes (75 Snodgrassella and 486 representatives of the other bacterial bee gut phylotypes [described above]). MetaCHIP v1.10.15 (60) with default settings was then used to infer HGT. The group-specific genes were then searched in the MetaCHIP results using BLASTp v2.2.28 (78) with a threshold of 98% of identity on 95% of query length. Twenty-seven out of 107 single-gene phylogenies, containing Snodgrassella and at least one additional bacterial genus, generated during the specific gene analysis were manually inspected for HGT.

Biochemical characterization.

Biochemical characteristics were determined for the bumblebee isolates LMG 28360T, R-53528, R-54236, LMG 30236T, and R-53680, and for the type strain of S. alvi, NCIMB 14803.

Growth was tested on nutrient agar (Oxoid), tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Oxoid), brain heart infusion (BHI) agar (BD Difco), Columbia agar (Oxoid) supplemented with 5% sheep blood, and All Culture (AC) agar (2% tryptose, 0.3% beef extract, 0.3% yeast extract, 0.3% malt extract, 0.5% dextrose, 0.02% ascorbic acid, 1.5% agar [all wt/vol]) after 2, 3, and 4 days of incubation at 37°C in a CO2-enriched atmosphere (6% CO2, 15% O2) provided by CO2Gen Compact sachets (Oxoid). Hemolysis of sheep blood was checked. Growth was also tested at 37°C in ambient atmosphere (0.04% CO2, 20.95% O2) on AC agar and in an anaerobic atmosphere (9 to 13% CO2, <1% O2) provided by AnaeroGen sachets (Oxoid) on AC agar and on AC agar supplemented with 10 mM KNO3. For the tests mentioned below, cultures were incubated in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. The temperature growth range was tested after 2 days of incubation on AC agar at 4, 15, 20, 28, 37, 40, and 45°C. Cell and colony morphology, motility, oxidase and catalase activities and Gram stain reaction were assessed on cultures grown for 2 days on AC agar at 37°C. Motility was determined by examining wet mounts in broth by phase-contrast microscopy. Oxidase and catalase activities and Gram staining were tested using conventional procedures (79). The effect of NaCl on growth was investigated in AC broth supplemented with different concentrations of NaCl (0 to 10% with 1% intervals [wt/vol]) after 3 days of incubation. The pH range for growth was evaluated after 3 days of incubation in AC broth buffered at pH 4.0 to 9.0 at intervals of 1 pH unit using the following buffer systems: acetate buffer (pH 4.0 to 5.0), phosphate buffer (pH 6.0 to 8.0), and Tris-HCl (pH 9.0). Nitrate reduction and denitrification and urease, indole and H2S production were tested using standard microbiological procedures (79) after 72 h of incubation.

Cells were grown on DNase agar (Sigma-Aldrich), AC agar with 0.8% (wt/vol) gelatin (Merck), AC agar with 0.8% (wt/vol) soluble starch, AC agar with 1.3% (w/vol) dried skim milk (Oxoid), and AC agar with 1% (vol/vol) Tween 20 or 80 and were checked for growth after 72 of incubation and for DNase activity, gelatinase activity, and hydrolysis of starch, casein, and Tween 20 and 80, respectively.

Data availability.

L. Cornet and P. Vandamme have submitted data to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under project accession no. PRJEB47378, read accession no. SAMEA9570070 to SAMEA9570078, and genome accession no. GCA_914768015, GCA_914768025, GCA_914768035, GCA_914768045, GCA_914768055, GCA_914768065, GCA_914768075, GCA_914768085, and GCA_914768095. These database records are publicly available via the ENA website: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/home.

TEXT S1

Detailed species descriptions. Download Text S1, PDF file, 0.7 MB (737KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (411.7KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank David Colignon and the CÉCI for help with computing cluster usage and Cindy Snauwaert for performing the phenotypic characterization tests.

This work was supported by a research grant (no. B2/191/P2/BCCM GEN-ERA) financed by the Belgian State—Federal Public Planning Service Science Policy (BELSPO). Computational resources were provided by the Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif (CÉCI) funded by the F.R.S.-FNRS (2.5020.11) and through two research grants to D.B.: B2/191/P2/BCCM GEN-ERA (Belgian Science Policy Office—BELSPO) and CDR J.0008.20 (F.R.S.-FNRS). P.V., N.J.V., D.M., and G.S. were supported through funding from the FWO and F.R.S.-FNRS under the Excellence of Science (EOS) program for the project “Climate Change and Its Impact on Pollination Services” (CLiPS, no. 3094785).

L.C., I.C., D.B., and P.V. conceived the study. I.C. assembled the newly sequenced genomes. R.R.L. carried out the ToRQuEMaDA analyses. L.C. performed the rest of the analyses and drew the figures. L.C., I.C., D.M., D.B., and P.V. wrote the manuscript. P.V., D.B., N.J.V., D.M., and G.S. provided part of the funding. All authors read and revised the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Peter Vandamme, Email: peter.vandamme@ugent.be.

Monica T. Pupo, University of Sao Paulo

REFERENCES

  • 1.Engel P, Moran NA. 2013. Functional and evolutionary insights into the simple yet specific gut microbiota of the honeybee from metagenomic analysis. Gut Microbes 4:60–65. doi: 10.4161/gmic.22517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kwong WK, Engel P, Koch H, Moran NA. 2014. Genomics and host specialization of honeybee and bumble bee gut symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:11509–11514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405838111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zheng H, Perreau J, Powell JE, Han B, Zhang Z, Kwong WK, Tringe SG, Moran NA. 2019. Division of labor in honeybee gut microbiota for plant polysaccharide digestion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:25909–25916. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916224116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Billiet A, Meeus I, Nieuwerburgh FV, Deforce D, Wäckers F, Smagghe G. 2017. Colony contact contributes to the diversity of gut bacteria in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Insect Sci 24:270–277. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ellegaard KM, Brochet S, Bonilla-Rosso G, Emery O, Glover N, Hadadi N, Jaron KS, van der Meer JR, Robinson-Rechavi M, Sentchilo V, Tagini F, SAGE class 2016-17, Engel P. 2019. Genomic changes underlying host specialization in the bee gut symbiont Lactobacillus Firm5. Mol Ecol 28:2224–2237. doi: 10.1111/mec.15075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ellegaard KM, Engel P. 2018. New reference genome sequences for 17 bacterial strains of the honeybee gut microbiota. Microbiol Resour Announc 7:e00834-18. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00834-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guo J, Wu J, Chen Y, Evans JD, Dai R, Luo W, Li J. 2015. Characterization of gut bacteria at different developmental stages of Asian honeybees, Apis cerana. J Invertebr Pathol 127:110–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2015.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hammer TJ, Le E, Moran NA. 2021. Thermal niches of specialized gut symbionts: the case of social bees. Proc Biol Sci 288:20201480. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kwong WK, Moran NA. 2016. Gut microbial communities of social bees. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:374–384. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kwong WK, Medina LA, Koch H, Sing K-W, Soh EJY, Ascher JS, Jaffé R, Moran NA. 2017. Dynamic microbiome evolution in social bees. Sci Adv 3:e1600513. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martinson VG, Moy J, Moran NA. 2012. Establishment of characteristic gut bacteria during development of the honeybee worker. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:2830–2840. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07810-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Meeus I, Parmentier L, Billiet A, Maebe K, Nieuwerburgh FV, Deforce D, Wäckers F, Vandamme P, Smagghe G. 2015. 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing demonstrates that indoor-reared bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) harbor a core subset of bacteria normally associated with the wild host. PLoS One 10:e0125152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moran NA, Hansen AK, Powell JE, Sabree ZL. 2012. Distinctive gut microbiota of honeybees assessed using deep sampling from individual worker bees. PLoS One 7:e36393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Powell JE, Martinson VG, Urban-Mead K, Moran NA. 2014. Routes of acquisition of the gut microbiota of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Appl Environ Microbiol 80:7378–7387. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01861-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Praet J, Parmentier A, Schmid-Hempel R, Meeus I, Smagghe G, Vandamme P. 2018. Large-scale cultivation of the bumblebee gut microbiota reveals an underestimated bacterial species diversity capable of pathogen inhibition. Environ Microbiol 20:214–227. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sabree ZL, Hansen AK, Moran NA. 2012. Independent studies using deep sequencing resolve the same set of core bacterial species dominating gut communities of honeybees. PLoS One 7:e41250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tola YH, Waweru JW, Hurst GDD, Slippers B, Paredes JC. 2020. Characterization of the Kenyan honeybee (Apis mellifera) gut microbiota: a first look at tropical and sub-Saharan African bee associated microbiomes. Microorganisms 8:1721. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zheng H, Steele MI, Leonard SP, Motta EVS, Moran NA. 2018. Honeybees as models for gut microbiota research. Lab Anim (NY) 47:317–325. doi: 10.1038/s41684-018-0173-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martinson VG, Danforth BN, Minckley RL, Rueppell O, Tingek S, Moran NA. 2011. A simple and distinctive microbiota associated with honeybees and bumble bees. Mol Ecol 20:619–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04959.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang Z-J, Huang M-F, Qiu L-F, Song R-H, Zhang Z-X, Ding Y-W, Zhou X, Zhang X, Zheng H. 2021. Diversity and functional analysis of Chinese bumblebee gut microbiota reveal the metabolic niche and antibiotic resistance variation of Gilliamella. Insect Sci 28:302–314. doi: 10.1111/1744-7917.12770. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kwong WK, Moran NA. 2013. Cultivation and characterization of the gut symbionts of honeybees and bumble bees: description of Snodgrassella alvi gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Neisseriaceae of the Betaproteobacteria, and Gilliamella apicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of Orbaceae fam. nov., Orbales ord. nov., a sister taxon to the order “Enterobacteriales” of the Gammaproteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:2008–2018. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.044875-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Engel P, Stepanauskas R, Moran NA. 2014. Hidden diversity in honeybee gut symbionts detected by single-cell genomics. PLoS Genet 10:e1004596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bosmans L, Pozo MI, Verreth C, Crauwels S, Wilberts L, Sobhy IS, Wäckers F, Jacquemyn H, Lievens B. 2018. Habitat-specific variation in gut microbial communities and pathogen prevalence in bumblebee queens (Bombus terrestris). PLoS One 13:e0204612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Horak RD, Leonard SP, Moran NA. 2020. Symbionts shape host innate immunity in honeybees. Proc Biol Sci 287:20201184. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Maes PW, Rodrigues PAP, Oliver R, Mott BM, Anderson KE. 2016. Diet-related gut bacterial dysbiosis correlates with impaired development, increased mortality and Nosema disease in the honeybee (Apis mellifera). Mol Ecol 25:5439–5450. doi: 10.1111/mec.13862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rothman JA, Leger L, Graystock P, Russell K, McFrederick QS. 2019. The bumble bee microbiome increases survival of bees exposed to selenate toxicity. Environ Microbiol 21:3417–3429. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sauers LA, Sadd BM. 2019. An interaction between host and microbe genotypes determines colonization success of a key bumble bee gut microbiota member. Evolution 73:2333–2342. doi: 10.1111/evo.13853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Michez D, Rasmont P, Terzo M, Vereeckn NJ. 2019. Bees of Europe—Hymenoptera of Europe, vol 1. NAP Editions, Verrieres le Buisson, France. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maebe K, Vereecken NJ, Piot N, Reverté S, Cejas D, Michez D, Vandamme P, Smagghe G. 2021. The holobiont as a key to the adaptation and conservation of wild bees in the Anthropocene. Front Ecol Evol 9:849. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2021.781470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moran NA. 2015. Genomics of the honeybee microbiome. Curr Opin Insect Sci 10:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ludvigsen J, Amdam GV, Rudi K, L'Abée-Lund TM. 2018. Detection and characterization of streptomycin resistance (strA-strB) in a honeybee gut symbiont (Snodgrassella alvi) and the associated risk of antibiotic resistance transfer. Microb Ecol 76:588–591. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1171-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kwong WK, Moran NA. 2015. Evolution of host specialization in gut microbes: the bee gut as a model. Gut Microbes 6:214–220. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1047129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Steele MI, Kwong WK, Whiteley M, Moran NA. 2017. Diversification of type VI secretion system toxins reveals ancient antagonism among bee gut microbes. mBio 8:e01630-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01630-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Steele MI, Moran NA. 2021. Evolution of interbacterial antagonism in bee gut microbiota reflects host and symbiont diversification. mSystems 6:e00063-21. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00063-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Koch H, Abrol DP, Li J, Schmid-Hempel P. 2013. Diversity and evolutionary patterns of bacterial gut associates of corbiculate bees. Mol Ecol 22:2028–2044. doi: 10.1111/mec.12209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Galtier N. 2007. A model of horizontal gene transfer and the bacterial phylogeny problem. Syst Biol 56:633–642. doi: 10.1080/10635150701546231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gribaldo S, Brochier C. 2009. Phylogeny of prokaryotes: does it exist and why should we care? Res Microbiol 160:513–521. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stanhope MJ, Lupas A, Italia MJ, Koretke KK, Volker C, Brown JR. 2001. Phylogenetic analyses do not support horizontal gene transfers from bacteria to vertebrates. Nature 411:940–944. doi: 10.1038/35082058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Siu-Ting K, Torres-Sánchez M, San Mauro D, Wilcockson D, Wilkinson M, Pisani D, O'Connell MJ, Creevey CJ. 2019. Inadvertent paralog inclusion drives artifactual topologies and timetree estimates in phylogenomics. Mol Biol Evol 36:1344–1356. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Struck TH. 2013. The impact of paralogy on phylogenomic studies—a case study on annelid relationships. PLoS One 8:e62892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li Y, Xue H, Sang S, Lin C, Wang X. 2017. Phylogenetic analysis of family Neisseriaceae based on genome sequences and description of Populibacter corticis gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Neisseriaceae, isolated from symptomatic bark of Populus × euramericana canker. PLoS One 12:e0174506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Powell E, Ratnayeke N, Moran NA. 2016. Strain diversity and host specificity in a specialized gut symbiont of honeybees and bumblebees. Mol Ecol 25:4461–4471. doi: 10.1111/mec.13787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. 2017. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J 11:2864–2868. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse H-J, Ludwig W, Kämpfer PY. 2010. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:249–266. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.016949-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JMY. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. 2009. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19126–19131. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906412106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2018. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 36:996–1004. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dong Z-X, Li H-Y, Chen Y-F, Wang F, Deng X-Y, Lin L-B, Zhang Q-L, Li J-L, Guo J. 2020. Colonization of the gut microbiota of honeybee (Apis mellifera) workers at different developmental stages. Microbiol Res 231:126370. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2019.126370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dehon M, Engel MS, Gérard M, Aytekin AM, Ghisbain G, Williams PH, Rasmont P, Michez D. 2019. Morphometric analysis of fossil bumble bees (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombini) reveals their taxonomic affinities. Zookeys 891:71–118. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.891.36027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hines HM. 2008. Historical biogeography, divergence times, and diversification patterns of bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus). Syst Biol 57:58–75. doi: 10.1080/10635150801898912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Williams PH, Huang J, Rasmont P, An J. 2016. Early-diverging bumblebees from across the roof of the world: the high-mountain subgenus Mendacibombus revised from species’ gene coalescents and morphology (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Zootaxa 4204:1–72. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4204.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cardinal S, Straka J, Danforth BN. 2010. Comprehensive phylogeny of apid bees reveals the evolutionary origins and antiquity of cleptoparasitism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:16207–16211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006299107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Queirós P, Delogu F, Hickl O, May P, Wilmes P. 2021. Mantis: flexible and consensus-driven genome annotation. GigaScience 10:giab042. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giab042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Storz G, Wolf YI, Ramamurthi KS. 2014. Small proteins can no longer be ignored. Annu Rev Biochem 83:753–777. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-070611-102400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lluch‐Senar M, Delgado J, Chen W‐H, Lloréns‐Rico V, O'Reilly FJ, Wodke JA, Unal EB, Yus E, Martínez S, Nichols RJ, Ferrar T, Vivancos A, Schmeisky A, Stülke J, Noort V, Gavin A‐C, Bork P, Serrano L. 2015. Defining a minimal cell: essentiality of small ORFs and ncRNAs in a genome-reduced bacterium. Mol Syst Biol 11:780. doi: 10.15252/msb.20145558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Duval M, Cossart P. 2017. Small bacterial and phagic proteins: an updated view on a rapidly moving field. Curr Opin Microbiol 39:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Thomas AM, Segata N. 2019. Multiple levels of the unknown in microbiome research. BMC Biol 17:48. doi: 10.1186/s12915-019-0667-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.UniProt Consortium. 2021. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D480–D489. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Powell JE, Leonard SP, Kwong WK, Engel P, Moran NA. 2016. Genome-wide screen identifies host colonization determinants in a bacterial gut symbiont. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:13887–13892. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610856113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Song W, Wemheuer B, Zhang S, Steensen K, Thomas T. 2019. MetaCHIP: community-level horizontal gene transfer identification through the combination of best-match and phylogenetic approaches. Microbiome 7:36. doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0649-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, O'Neill K, Li W, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zheng C, Thibaud-Nissen F, Geer LY, Marchler-Bauer A, Pruitt KD. 2018. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nasko DJ, Koren S, Phillippy AM, Treangen TJ. 2018. RefSeq database growth influences the accuracy of k-mer-based lowest common ancestor species identification. Genome Biol 19:165. doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1554-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Léonard RR, Leleu M, Vlierberghe MV, Kerff F, Baurain D. 2020. ToRQuEMaDA: Tool for Retrieving Queried Eubacteria, Metadata and Dereplicating Assemblies. bioRxiv 2020.11.15.363259. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.15.363259v1.full.pdf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 67.Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, Delmont TO. 2015. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ 3:e1319. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV. 2000. The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 28:33–36. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Criscuolo A, Gribaldo S. 2010. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol Biol 10:210. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Roure B, Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Philippe H. 2007. SCaFoS: a tool for Selection, Concatenation and Fusion of Sequences for phylogenomics. BMC Evol Biol 7:S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-S1-S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Felsenstein J. 2004. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. https://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html.
  • 73.Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Irisarri I, Baurain D, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Sire J-Y, Kupfer A, Petersen J, Jarek M, Meyer A, Vences M, Philippe H. 2017. Phylotranscriptomic consolidation of the jawed vertebrate timetree. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1370–1378. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0240-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Simion P, Philippe H, Baurain D, Jager M, Richter DJ, Di Franco A, Roure B, Satoh N, Quéinnec É, Ereskovsky A, Lapébie P, Corre E, Delsuc F, King N, Wörheide G, Manuel M. 2017. A large and consistent phylogenomic dataset supports sponges as the sister group to all other animals. Curr Biol 27:958–967. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.02.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Boratyn GM, Schäffer AA, Agarwala R, Altschul SF, Lipman DJ, Madden TL. 2012. Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biol Direct 7:12. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.MacFaddin JF. 2000. Biochemical tests for identification of medical bacteria. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1

Neisseriaceae phylogeny. The maximum likelihood tree was inferred from 254 core genes under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 111 organisms by 86,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions. Bootstrap support values are shown at the nodes. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.02 MB (23.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2

Comparison of the Snodgrassella bootstrap protein phylogeny and the leave-one-out protein phylogeny. The maximum likelihood tree (right panel) was inferred on 254 core genes under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 76 organisms by 86,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions. One hundred concatenations of 70,000-aa-long subsamples of the core genes were generated, and the corresponding trees were computed with RAxML. Bootstrap and leave-one-out support values are shown at the nodes. The leave-one-out tree (left panel) is a cladogram without informative branch lengths. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.05 MB (53.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3

Comparison of the Snodgrassella bootstrap DNA phylogeny and the leave-one-out DNA phylogeny. (A) The maximum likelihood tree was inferred on 254 core genes under the GTRGAMMA model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 76 organisms by 264,981 aligned nucleotides, using two different partitions for codon positions 1&2 and position 3. One hundred concatenations of 100,000 nucleotides of the core genes were generated, and the corresponding trees were computed with RAxML. Trees were inferred using only codon positions 1&2 (B) and using two different partitions for codon positions 1&2 and position 3 (C). Bootstrap and leave-one-out support values are shown at the nodes. The leave-one-out trees are cladograms without informative branch lengths. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.08 MB (78.9KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4

Unrooted Snodgrassella phylogeny. The maximum likelihood tree was inferred from 254 core genes under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 75 organisms (without P. corticis) by 86,654 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions, after removal of the outgroup. Bootstrap support values are shown at the nodes. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.02 MB (22.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S5

Gene flow between phylotype genomes of RefSeq bee gut symbionts. HGT events were inferred with MetaCHIP on the 561 phylotype genomes (75 Snodgrassella plus 486 other bacterial bee gut phylotypes) present in RefSeq. Taxonomy of the genomes was determined by GTDBtk. Bands connect donors and recipients of HGT events (as determined using MetaCHIP); colors correspond to the donor of the genes. Widths of bands correspond to the number of HGTs, also indicated on the border of the circular plot. Download FIG S5, PDF file, 0.03 MB (32KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3

HGT events reported between the 486 phylotype genomes of RefSeq and Snodgrassella. Functional analyses were performed with Mantis. Download Table S3, PDF file, 0.4 MB (428.2KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S6

Gut bacterium phylogenomic tree, used as a species tree for HGT inference. The maximum likelihood tree was inferred on 76 core genes (unicopy genes determined by CheckM) under the PROTGAMMALGF model with RAxML from a supermatrix of 843 organisms by 12,930 unambiguously aligned amino acid positions. Bootstrap support values are shown at the nodes. Download FIG S6, PDF file, 0.02 MB (21.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1

Information about the 35 Neisseriaceae genomes used in the study. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.4 MB (381.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2

Information about the 486 bacterial bee gut phylotypes (without Snodgrassella) and 247 other bacterial genomes (without the Neisseriaceae) used in the study. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.6 MB (647KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TEXT S1

Detailed species descriptions. Download Text S1, PDF file, 0.7 MB (737KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (411.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

L. Cornet and P. Vandamme have submitted data to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under project accession no. PRJEB47378, read accession no. SAMEA9570070 to SAMEA9570078, and genome accession no. GCA_914768015, GCA_914768025, GCA_914768035, GCA_914768045, GCA_914768055, GCA_914768065, GCA_914768075, GCA_914768085, and GCA_914768095. These database records are publicly available via the ENA website: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/home.

TEXT S1

Detailed species descriptions. Download Text S1, PDF file, 0.7 MB (737KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2022 Cornet et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.


Articles from mSystems are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES