Abstract
Neutrophil migration into the site of infection is necessary for antibacterial innate defense, whereas impaired neutrophil migration may result in excessive inflammation and even sepsis. The neutrophil migration directed by extracellular signals such as chemokines has been extensively studied, yet the intrinsic mechanism for determining neutrophil ability to migrate needs further investigation. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification is important in immunity and inflammation, and our preliminary data indicate downregulation of RNA m6A demethylase alkB homolog 5 (ALKBH5) in neutrophils during bacterial infection. Whether m6A modification and ALKBH5 might intrinsically modulate neutrophil innate response remain unknown. Here we report that ALKBH5 is required for antibacterial innate defense by enhancing intrinsic ability of neutrophil migration. We found that deficiency of ALKBH5 increased mortality of mice with polymicrobial sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), and Alkbh5-deficient CLP mice exhibited higher bacterial burden and massive proinflammatory cytokine production in the peritoneal cavity and blood because of less neutrophil migration. Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils had lower CXCR2 expression, thus exhibiting impaired migration toward chemokine CXCL2. Mechanistically, ALKBH5-mediated m6A demethylation empowered neutrophils with high migration capability through altering the RNA decay, consequently regulating protein expression of its targets, neutrophil migration-related molecules, including increased expression of neutrophil migration-promoting CXCR2 and NLRP12, but decreased expression of neutrophil migration-suppressive PTGER4, TNC, and WNK1. Our findings reveal a previously unknown role of ALKBH5 in imprinting migration-promoting transcriptome signatures in neutrophils and intrinsically promoting neutrophil migration for antibacterial defense, highlighting the potential application of targeting neutrophil m6A modification in controlling bacterial infections.
Subject terms: Innate immunity, Inflammation
Introduction
Neutrophils, a major component of innate immune response and dominant population of leukocytes in the peripheral blood, are essential for host innate defense against invading pathogens. During bacterial challenge, large amounts of neutrophils are mobilized and released from the bone marrow into the peripheral circulation and migrate to the sites of infection at a very early stage.1,2 Rapid and effective neutrophil migration and accumulation in the infection site is critical for antibacterial innate defense and subsequent inflammation resolution. The migration and function of neutrophils can be orchestrated by the extracellular signals such chemokines and cytokines, or by neutrophil intrinsic elements including chemokine receptors, cytoskeletal proteins, intracellular signaling mode, and cellular metabolism.3–7 As the first line of innate response, once neutrophil migration is impaired due to dysregulated processes above, the host cannot timely launch effective innate defense against bacterial infection, which may result in failure in bacterial clearance and lead to uncontrolled systemic inflammation and even sepsis. In other side, bacterial infection may hijack neutrophil migration to escape the host innate defense, contributing to persistent infections and unresolved inflammation.5,8 Therefore, identifying new intracellular molecules that intrinsically determine the migratory ability of neutrophils will, once properly targeted to activate, not only enhance antibacterial innate defense at the early stage of infection, but also appropriately induce the inflammation resolution to avoid tissue damage after the elimination of invading bacteria. Up to now, the extracellular signals for motivating and recruiting neutrophils have been well studied. However, the mechanisms for intrinsically determining neutrophil migration need to be further investigated.
Innate immune cells, including neutrophils, possess their own specific phenotypes and unique functions. It is well known that the cell-specific gene and protein expression patterns play essential roles in cellular phenotype determination and functional transformation, and the biological processes are regulated at multiple levels from gene transcription, post-transcription, to translation and post-translation.9 What are the key mechanisms for making innate immune cells with unique phenotypes and functions need to be fully understood. One critical question arises about the importance of epigenetic modifiers in determining neutrophil differentiation, behavior, and function during innate response and inflammation, or in conferring their cell type-specific responses to bacteria components, which also need to be well identified. Indeed, which epigenetic factor can intrinsically endow neutrophils, especially at the post-transcriptional level, with the ability to efficiently migrate to the site of infection remains unknown.
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA modification, as one type of epigenetic modifications, is the most abundant internal modification in mammalian mRNA and has been implicated in a variety of physiological and pathological processes.10 The methylation of m6A is mainly deposited by the m6A methyltransferases such as methyltransferase like 3 (METTL3) and methyltransferase like 14 (METTL14). The m6A demethylases ALKBH5 and fat mass and obesity associated (FTO) are responsible for removing m6A methylation.11 m6A RNA modification is extensively involved in immunity and inflammation. Emerging evidences show that the m6A modification and its methyltransferases are able to regulate the differentiation and function of innate and adaptive immune cells, such as dendritic cells (DCs), macrophages, NK cells, and T cells. For example, METTL3-mediated m6A modification increases translation of certain immune transcripts for physiological promotion of DC activation and DC-based T cell response.12 Besides, METTL3 controls T cell homeostasis and differentiation by enhancing decay of Socs gene family mRNA in T cells upon IL-7 signaling.13 The expression of METTL3 in tumor-infiltrating NK cells is decreased, which contributes to the impaired NK cell infiltration and function in the tumor microenvironment.14 Yet the effect of m6A RNA demethylases on immune cells is largely unexplored. We previously reported that m6A RNA demethylase ALKBH5 can rewire α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase (OGDH)-itaconate metabolism to promote viral replication in macrophages.15 Recent study revealed a specific function of ALKBH5 in controlling CD4+ T cell-mediated pathogenesis in autoimmunity.16 However, the intrinsic role of m6A RNA modification and ALKBH5 in neutrophils in antibacterial immunity is still unknown.
Inspired by our preliminary observation on the downregulation of ALKBH5 in neutrophils during bacterial infection, in this study, we investigated the roles of ALKBH5 and m6A RNA modification in intrinsically regulating neutrophil behavior in antibacterial innate defense.
Results
ALKBH5 is required for restraining bacterial infection and excessive inflammation
Firstly, we analyzed the expression of ALKBH5 and other m6A modulators during bacterial infection. In the differentiated HL-60 neutrophil-like (dHL-60) cells infected with Escherichia coli (E.coli), a prevalent species responsible for sepsis caused by Gram-negative bacteria,3,17 we observed declined protein expression of ALKBH5 whereas the unchanged protein levels of other m6A enzymes (including FTO, METTL3, and METTL14) upon bacterial infection (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1a). Accordingly, there were significantly increased global RNA m6A modification levels in dHL-60 human neutrohils upon E.coli infection (Fig. 1b), accompanying with the attenuated activity of RNA m6A demethylation in cells due to down-regulated protein levels of m6A demethylase ALKBH5. These results indicated that ALKBH5 and it-mediated RNA m6A demethylation might regulate neutrophil behavior or function during bacterial infection. By subjecting mice to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), a well-established model of abdominal polymicrobial bacterial infection that is most relevant for clinical sepsis,4,18 we found down-regulated mRNA expression of Alkbh5 in spleen, kidney, and brain of CLP mice (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1b) and significant lower protein levels of ALKBH5 in neutrophils isolated from peripheral blood and peritoneal fluid of sepsis mice than that from sham-operated controls (Fig. 1d). Mice injected with Staphylococcus aureus display a decreased Alkbh5 level in whole-blood than uninfected mice (GSE38531) (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Besides, the subcellular localization of ALKBH5, mainly in the nucleus of neutrophils, remained unchanged with or without E.coli infection (Supplementary Fig. 1d).
ALKBH5 is highly conserved between human and mouse.19 By using primary human neutrophils from healthy donors, we observed a significant decline in protein expression of ALKBH5 upon bacterial infection (Fig. 1e). These data further confirmed that ALKBH5 is down-regulated in both mouse and human neutrophils during bacterial infection, inspiring us to search public database for analyzing ALKBH5 expression in patients with bacterial infectious diseases such as sepsis. The analysis of the gene expression profiling datasets of a sepsis cohort (GSE5772) revealed that ALKBH5 is expressed at a lower level in neutrophils from peripheral blood of septic patients compared to that from non-septic control patients (Fig. 1f, left). Similarly, leukocytes from Critically ill patients with Gram-negative sepsis have a reduced expression of ALKBH5 (Fig. 1f, right), as showed in another sepsis cohort (GSE6535). These data are consistent with our observations on ALKBH5 downregulation in neutrophils upon bacterial infection or from sepsis mice. Therefore, the lower expression of ALKBH5 could be a risk hallmark in bacterial infectious diseases, and also might be associated with impaired antibacterial innate defense.
To investigate the effect of downregulated ALKBH5 in antibacterial host defense in vivo, we subjected Alkbh5-deficient mice15,20 and their wild-type (WT) littermates to CLP. Approximately 50% cecum ligation (mild CLP) can induce mid-grade sepsis, and ~75% cecum ligation-induced high-grade (lethal) sepsis is only used for testing survival.21 We found that Alkbh5-deficient mice had significantly increased mortality compared to their WT littermates when performed in a lethal form of CLP (Fig. 1g). In a mid-grade sepsis, the in vivo bacterial titer in the peritoneal lavage fluid (Fig. 1h) and blood (Fig. 1i) of Alkbh5-deficient mice markedly increased, especially at the late stage of sepsis. Consistent with these observations, Alkbh5 depletion led to a higher bacterial load in the spleen, lungs, liver, and kidney of CLP mice (Fig. 1j), revealing a crucial role for ALKBH5 in overall controlling of bacterial infection. Besides, the levels of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interleukin 1 beta (IL-1β) were higher during the resolution of infection, in peritoneal cavity or plasma of Alkbh5-deficient mice than WT littermates after a mild CLP (Fig. 1k, l). Therefore, Alkbh5-deficient CLP mice exhibited higher mortality, uncleared bacteria and uncontrolled inflammation, suggesting that ALKBH5 is necessary for effective bacterial clearance and preventing excessive inflammation in vivo.
ALKBH5 facilitates neutrophil accumulation in the site of infection in antibacterial defense
How does ALKBH5 promote antibacterial defense for bacterial clearance? Neutrophils are the main type of immune cells that first migrate into the sites of infection upon bacterial infection. Successful elimination of invading bacteria depends on efficient neutrophil accumulation in infection sites.2,22,23 As expected, FACS analysis showed that neutrophils flowed to the peritoneal cavity as part of the host defense in wild-type CLP mice, and accumulated in this infection site during sepsis (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2a). Neutrophils also represented the major immune cell population in the peritoneal cavity of wild-type mice undergoing sepsis, as their numbers significantly increased as compared to sham-operated controls (Fig. 2b). During sepsis, Alkbh5-deficient mice exhibited substantially reduced neutrophils in the peritoneal fluid than their WT littermates (Fig. 2c), suggesting that ALKBH5 is required for protective neutrophil accumulation in the site of infection.
Bacteria-induced inflammation and sepsis can cause neutrophil apoptosis and subsequent efferocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils by macrophages, which may result in decrease of neutrophil accumulation and contribute to prevention of excessive inflammation at the late stage of infection.6,24 Accompanying with the decreased numbers of peritoneal neutrophils, there was also a modest reduction in the numbers of macrophages in the peritoneal cavity of Alkbh5-deficient mice than in WT littermates 36 h after mild CLP (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 2b). Meanwhile, we observed no difference in the frequency of apoptotic neutrophils in the peritoneal cavity of Alkbh5-deficient mice when compared with WT littermates undergoing sepsis (Fig. 2e and Supplementary Fig. 2c). Besides, Alkbh5 deletion did not affect the count or apoptosis of neutrophils in bone marrow of mice under steady state (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 3a–c). These data suggest that apoptosis of neutrophils or macrophage-mediated efferocytosis are not the cause of reduced peritoneal neutrophils in Alkbh5-deficient CLP mice. Therefore, ALKBH5 promotes neutrophil accumulation in the site of infection for bacterial clearance.
ALKBH5 improves the migratory ability of neutrophils
Neutrophil recruitment from bone marrow to infectious tissues is critical for early innate responses. The accumulation of neutrophils in infection site is dependent on their remarkable ability to migrate within and through circulation, which is mainly triggered by interaction between chemokines and chemokine receptors.5 Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2 (CXCL2) and CXCL1 are largely responsible for driving neutrophil migration during bacterial infection and inflammation.2,6,16 Interestingly, we found that the levels of CXCL2 and CXCL1 in peritoneal cavity and plasma of Alkbh5-deficient mice were not decreased during sepsis, but even higher at 36 h after given mild CLP (the resolution phase of sepsis) (Fig. 3a, b). Yet deficiency of ALKBH5 did not affect the levels of CXCL2 and CXCL1 in plasma, peritoneal cavity, or bone marrow of mice in the steady state (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). These data excluded the possibility that the impaired neutrophil accumulation was due to decreased neutrophil-attracting chemokines in Alkbh5-deficient CLP mice. In addition to the significant decline of neutrophils in peritoneal cavity as mentioned above (Fig. 2c), we also observed lower number of neutrophils in the peripheral blood of Alkbh5-deficient mice than in WT littermates 36 h after mild CLP (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 4c). Meanwhile, there was no significant change in frequency of apoptotic neutrophils in blood of CLP mice upon loss of ALKBH5 (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 4d), excluding the possibility that the reduction of blood neutrophils in Alkbh5-deficient CLP mice was due to increased apoptosis of neutrophils. Together, these data suggest that the intrinsic migratory ability of Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils may be impaired, thus resulting in failed migration in response to extracellular chemotactic signals.
Chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 (CXCR2) is a critical chemokine receptor to be responsible for neutrophil chemotaxis to infection sites, driven by its CXC chemokine ligands such as CXCL2.2,25,26 Noticeably, Alkbh5-deficient mice exhibited decreased protein expression of CXCR2 on cell surface of neutrophils from blood and bone marrow as compared to that in WT littermates, after mild CLP (Fig. 3e, f). Transwell migration assay confirmed that Alkbh5-deficient bone marrow neutrophils exhibited significantly defective migration toward CXCL2 in vitro (Fig. 3g). During CLP-induced sepsis, CCL2 is a critical mediator for effective macrophage recruitment to peritoneal cavity and is mainly derived from peritoneal neutrophils.27 Yet deletion of ALKBH5 did not affect macrophage migration directly (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). Subsequent experiments showed the decreased peritoneal CCL2 levels in CLP mice upon ALKBH5 deletion (Supplementary Fig. 5c), implying that the reduced peritoneal macrophages in Alkbh5-deficient CLP mice may be attributed to less local CCL2 production by the reduced neutrophils in peritoneal cavity. Taken together, these results indicate that ALKBH5 expression in neutrophils directly endows neutrophils with the potent capability to effectively migrate at least toward chemokines, ensuring neutrophil recruitment from bone marrow to infectious tissues.
ALKBH5 imprints migration-promoting transcriptome signatures in neutrophils in antibacterial defense
Next we went further to investigate how ALKBH5 intrinsically improves the migratory ability of neutrophils, for examples, how to upregulate CXCR2 protein expression on neutrophils and what other intracellular melocules targeted by ALKBH5 for endowing neutrophil migration? We performed transcriptome-wide RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) on neutrophils isolated from the peritoneal cavity of Alkbh5-deficient mice and WT littermates during early stage of sepsis (12 h after mild CLP) or late stage of sepsis (36 h after mild CLP), respectively. Four biological replicates correlated strongly with each other, representing good reproducibility and reliability of data (Supplementary Fig. 6a, b). RNA-seq analysis showed that Alkbh5 deficiency in neutrophils resulted in up-regulation of 297 genes and down-regulation of 264 genes at the early stage of sepsis (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 6c), while up-regulation of 197 genes and down-regulation of 337 genes at the late stage of sepsis (Fig. 4b). A specific absence of Alkbh5 mRNA in Alkbh5–/– versus Alkbh5+/+ groups also confirmed efficient deletion of Alkbh5 gene in Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils in our system (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 6c).
Gene Ontology (GO) biological processes enrichment analysis of the significantly differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils compared with WT neutrophils showed that neutrophil migration made up the most significantly enriched biological processes with annotations of neutrophil association upon deletion of ALKBH5 at both the early and late stages of sepsis (Fig. 4c, d). Many significantly DEGs also encompassed transcriptional signatures related to neutrophils, specifically to neutrophil influx into the infection site, including chemotaxis, response to chemokine, extravasation, ERK1 and ERK2 cascade, and neutrophil homeostasis (Fig. 4c, d). During the late stage of sepsis, some varied genes were enriched for other neutrophil migration-associated processes such as chemokine production and p38MAPK pathway (Fig. 4d). Notably, ALKBH5 deletion led to significant suppression of Cxcr2 transcripts in neutrophils (Fig. 4e), which was consistent with our in vivo observation about decreased CXCR2 protein expression on Alkbh5-deficient peritoneal neutrophils during early stage of sepsis (Fig. 4g and Supplementary Fig. 7a).
Then, we focused on the differentially expressed genes that are critical for neutrophil migration (Fig. 4e, f). During the early stage of sepsis, lack of ALKBH5 significantly down-regulated the genes involved in promotion of neutrophil migration, such as NLR family pyrin domain containing 12 (Nlrp12) and matrix metallopeptidase 9 (Mmp9), in neutrophils; Conversely, ALKBH5 deletion increased mRNA expression of some inhibitory molecules for neutrophil migration such as tenascin C (Tnc) and Ptx3 (Fig. 4e). At the late stage of sepsis, the transcript levels of several neutrophil migration inhibitors, such as prostaglandin E receptor 4 (Ptger4), WNK lysine deficient protein kinase 1 (Wnk1), and Vcan, were significantly increased; while the transcript levels of multiple cytokine and chemokine receptors (such as Il1r1, Cxcr1, and Ccr7) and neutrophil-recruiting chemokines and proinflammatory factors (including Cxcl2, Cxcl3, Cxcl5, Il1a, Prok2, Csf3, Vegfa, S100a8, and S100a9)1,6 were decreased, in neutrophils from Alkbh5-deficient CLP mice (Fig. 4f). These above potential ALKBH5-targeted genes, which are involved in neutrophil migration, further highlight the importance of ALKBH5 in endowing neutrophil migration in innate defense.
Neutrophil migration requires the coordination of signaling pathways at the front and rear of cell that lead to neutrophil polarization and motility, which is characterized by a polarized morphology.3 Neutrophils from bone marrow of normal mice were predominantly round in the steady state, while displayed membrane ruffles and polarized upon chemoattractant stimulation (Fig. 4h). Moreover, Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils exhibited an impaired neutrophil polarization compared with WT neutrophils in response to chemoattractant (Fig. 4h). Alongside the changed expression of neutrophil migration-associated genes, a few transcripts related to neutrophil activation pathway were observed to be altered in Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils (Fig. 4c). In vitro functional assays, using the same number of bone marrow neutrophils, showed that disruption of ALKBH5 had no direct effect on the phagocytosis or bacteria-killing capability of neutrophils (Supplementary Fig. 7b, c). Therefore, ALKBH5 drives a migration-promoting transcriptional landscape of neutrophils to enable their migration into the site of infection for bacterial eradication.
ALKBH5 enhances CXCR2 but suppresses migration-inhibitory molecule expression in neutrophils
In order to identify the downstream targets of ALKBH5 involved in neutrophil migration, we then confirmed the ALKBH5-driven transcriptional programs in neutrophils. In addition to Cxcr2, among those significantly differentially expressed genes indicated by RNA-seq data, another two critical intrinsic regulators of neutrophil migration, Nlrp12 and Ptger4 (also known as EP4), were substantially down- or up- regulated in Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils respectively (Fig. 4e, f). The innate sensor NLRP12 promotes neutrophil migration in innate defense,28,29 and Nlrp12-deficient neutrophils fail to respond to chemokines,30 indicating a cell-intrinsic role for NLRP12 in licensing neutrophil migration. Activation of G-protein coupled receptor family member PTGER4 can inhibit neutrophil migration to the inflamed sites of mice.31–33 qRT-PCR verification revealed that deletion of ALKBH5 significantly down-regulated the mRNA expression of Cxcr2 and Nlrp12, while up-regulated the Ptger4 mRNA level in peritoneal neutrophils from mice at the early or late stage of sepsis (Fig. 5a, b). In addition, RNA-seq analysis showed that neutrophils lack of ALKBH5 exhibited up-regulated mRNA expression of two neutrophil migration-suppressors Tnc and Wnk1, whereas decreased mRNA level of Il1r1 (Fig. 4e, f). The extracellular matrix protein TNC inhibits neutrophil chemotaxis.34 WNK1 decreases neutrophil accumulation in the peritoneum of mice.35 There were increased mRNA levels of Tnc and Wnk1, reduced Il1r1 transcripts in peritoneal neutrophils from Alkbh5-deficient mice than WT littermates undergoing sepsis (Fig. 5a, b).
Next we confirmed these potential target genes of ALKBH5 in human neutrophils through generation of ALKBH5 knockout HL-60 cell line via CRISPR-Cas9 technology (Supplementary Fig. 7d, e). ALKBH5 deficiency indeed reduced the mRNA expression of CXCR2 and NLRP12, while increased mRNA expression of PTGER4, TNC, and WNK1 in dHL-60 human neutrophils (Fig. 5c). These findings suggest that these five genes represent downstream targets of ALKBH5 and their expression can be directly regulated by ALKBH5. In addition, E.coli infection led to down-regulation of CXCR2 and NLRP12, up-regulation of PTGER4, TNC, and WNK1, in WT dHL-60 human neutrophils (Fig. 5d), which might due to the decreased expression of ALKBH5 protein in E.coli-infected neutrophils (Fig. 1).
We then asked whether the protein expression of these targets could be regulated by ALKBH5. The cell-surface expression of CXCR2 protein was significantly decreased on ALKBH5-deficient dHL-60 human neutrophils infected with E.coli (Fig. 5e, g), which was consistent with our in vivo results that loss of ALKBH5 declined CXCR2 protein expression on neutrophils from sepsis mice (Figs. 3e, f and 4g). Moreover, E.coli infection also markedly down-regulated the CXCR2 protein levels on WT dHL-60 human neutrophils (Fig. 5f, g), which might be caused by the reduced ALKBH5 protein in E.coli-infected neutrophils (Fig. 1a). In accordance with the RNA-seq and qRT-PCR data, deletion of ALKBH5 decreased NLRP12, while increased TNC protein expression in neutrophils during the early stage of infection (Fig. 5h). During the late stage of infection, higher protein levels of PTGER4 and WNK1 were detected in Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils (Fig. 5i). Therefore, ALKBH5 directly modulates the expression of these neutrophil migration-related genes in both mouse and human neutrophils, playing a conserved role in intrinsically promoting neutrophil migration.
ALKBH5-mediated m6A demethylation modulates RNA decay of target molecules for neutrophil migration
As RNA m6A demethylase, ALKBH5 post-transcriptionally regulates gene expression in m6A modification-dependent manner.16,36 To gain insight into the mechanism underlying the effect of ALKBH5 on its targets, we performed transcriptome-wide m6A methylation profiling (m6A-seq). The consensus m6A motifs were most significantly enriched within the m6A peaks with typical m6A peak distribution features (Fig. 6a, b), and m6A methylation sites were located primarily in the protein coding sequence region and 3′ untranslated region of transcripts (Fig. 6c), in neutrophils after bacteria challenge. These m6A methylation patterns were consistent with our previous study and other published works.15,37,38 Notably, our m6A-seq data (GSE127732) revealed that specific m6A peaks were clearly enriched on Cxcr2, Nlrp12, Ptger4, Tnc, and Wnk1 mRNAs, which were significantly increased upon loss of ALKBH5 (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Table. 1). Indeed, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP)-qPCR assay confirmed that the mRNAs of CXCR2, NLRP12, PTGER4, TNC, and WNK1 were associated with high enrichment binding of ALKBH5 in neutrophils (Fig. 6e). Therefore, these five genes are m6A targets, with their transcripts are strongly bound and directly modulated by ALKBH5.
m6A RNA modification modulates gene expression by affecting the alternative splicing, stability, and translation of mRNA.10,11,39 ALKBH5-mediated m6A demethylation has been demonstrated to promote or inhibit RNA decay of its different target transcripts under the same condition, respectively.38,40,41 There is only one isoform expression pattern of Cxcr2, Nlrp12, and Tnc transcripts. Besides, RNA-seq analysis indicated no significant difference in the alternative splicing pattern of Ptger4 and Wnk1 transcripts between WT and Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils (Supplementary Fig. 8a). RNA decay assays showed that the mRNA stability of CXCR2 and NLRP12 were significantly decreased in ALKBH5-deficient dHL-60 human neutrophils after transcription inhibition (Fig. 6f). Besides, loss of ALKBH5 markedly inhibited the mRNA decay of PTGER4, TNC, and WNK1 in dHL-60 neutrophils treated with actinomycin-D for different hours (Fig. 6g).
Taken together, ALKBH5 specifically removes m6A methylation on its target mRNAs to regulate their RNA decay, so as to directly alter the mRNA expression and consequently modulate protein expression of a class of neutrophil-intrinsic and migration-related molecules (e.g. Cxcr2, Nlrp12, Ptger4, Tnc, and Wnk1) for neutrophil migration in antibacterial innate defense.
Discussion
The previously undescribed role of m6A demethylase ALKBH5 is identified here in promoting antibacterial innate defense through intrinsic motivation of neutrophil migration. ALKBH5 empowers neutrophils to self-amplify their migration by: upregulation of neutrophil migration-promoting receptors that response to extracellular signals such as chemokines, whereas downregulation of neutrophil migration-suppressive molecules, through m6A demethylation-mediated changes in RNA decay. This intrinsically epigenetic mechanism enables neutrophil accumulation in the site of infection, and crucially, promotes effective bacterial clearance and hence prevents excess inflammatory responses.
Although a variety of extrinsic or intracellular molecules have been implicated in orchestrating the fates and behaviors of immune cells, it is largely unexplored whether immune cell migration might be intrinsically regulated by m6A RNA modification inside and its enzymes. We previously found that m6A modification is involved in CCR7-mediated DC migration by degradation of lnc-Dpf3,42,43 inspiring us to understand whether neutrophils can be well equipped with strong migration ability via m6A modification. During neuroinflammation, T cell-specific ALKBH5 ablation has been shown to diminish neutrophil recruitment into the central nervous system of mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by decreasing Cxcl2 mRNA stability in CD4+ T cells.16 Our findings in this study reveal previously unknown role of ALKBH5 and its m6A demethylation in neutrophil migration by endowing neutrophils with intrinsic ability to response to extrinsic chemokine signals and to migrate into infection sites. Indeed, Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils, which purified from bone marrow of mice in the steady state, display a significant defective migration ability toward CXCL2 in vitro. Moreover, deletion of ALKBH5 directly leads to alterations in RNA decay and consequent expression levels of neutrophil migration-related molecules in dHL-60 cells that infected with E.coli in vitro. These results together illustrate that nucleus located ALKBH5 intrinsically empowers neutrophil migration, providing new insights to the epigenetic mechanism for neutrophil migration in antibacterial innate defense.
As the major kind of effector cells in antibacterial defense, neutrophils might affect the recruitment or function of other immune cells including macrophages. The interplay between neutrophils and macrophages plays a central role in host innate defense against bacterial infection and sepsis.44 For instance, peritoneal neutrophil-derived CCL2 is critical for macrophage recruitment to local infection site during sepsis.27 In turn, abnormal levels of cytokines or chemokines produced by macrophages in inflamed sites can alter neutrophil recruitment.45 m6A RNA modification mediated by methyltransferase METTL3 has been identified as a positive regulator of macrophage activation through inducing the degradation of TLR signaling inhibitor Irakm transcripts, thus contributing to increased antibacterial activity of macrophages against S. typhimurium infection.46 Our results showed an indirect effect of ALKBH5 on promoting macrophage recruitment by increasing peritoneal CCL2 levels. In addition, RNA-seq data also indicated the down-regulated expression of some other chemokines and cytokines such as colony stimulating factor 1 (Csf1, also known as M-CSF) in Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils, which also likely explains the decreased macrophages given that neutrophil-derived CSF1 controls recruitment of these cells to inflamed site.47 It is worth investigating whether ALKBH5 directly affects macrophage migration or innate function during bacterial infection in the future.
Downregulated CXCR2 expression on circulating neutrophils during sepsis or bacterial infection has been demonstrated previously and is correlated with impaired neutrophil chemotaxis into infectious sites.23,48 Previous study shows that lower expression of CXCR2 on neutrophils lead to reduced neutrophil influx to the peritoneal cavity of CLP mice, accompanied by increased bacteria load and higher inflammatory cytokines in peritoneal cavity and blood,2,49 which are in agreement with our observations in Alkbh5-deficient CLP mice when compared to WT CLP mice. The expression of CXCR2 on neutrophils has been reported that can be down-regulated by: TLR4 activation-triggered expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2), a serine-threonine protein kinase that causes CXCR2 be phosphorylated so as to induce CXCR2 internalization;2 or sepsis-induced decline in the level of acetylation of histone H3, an activation mark, at the CXCR2 promoter in neutrophils.49 Besides, extracellular mediators such as iNOS-derived NO also reduce CXCR2 expression in severe sepsis.48 Here we found that bacterial infection-induced downregulation of ALKBH5 might be responsible for decreased CXCR2 on neutrophils, and mechanistically, ALKBH5 promotes CXCR2 expression by removing m6A methylation on its RNA thus to prevent CXCR2 mRNA degradation. In addition to the previous findings that focused mainly on the regulation of CXCR2 expression via post-translational modification or at gene transcription level, our present study reveals a previously unrecognized epigenetic mechanism, that is m6A RNA modification-mediated post-transcriptional regulation, in modulating the mRNA stability and expression of CXCR2 as well as other key players involved in neutrophil migration.
During pathogen-host interaction, the pathogens have developed strategies to escape from the host innate defense by disabling innate cell function or utilizing the negative regulatory mechanism of immune response, for instance, the epigenetic dysregulation caused by ALKBH5 downregulation, as observed in this study. One question remains regarding the mechanisms of bacterial infection-induced suppression of ALKBH5 in neutrophils. Bacterial infection-induced activation of TLR2 and TLR4 in neutrophils have been demonstrated to impair neutrophil migration.2,23 In epithelial cells, ALKBH5 is decreased in response to infection by Streptococcus suis and Cryptosporidium parvum, with the involvement of TLR/MYD88/NF-кB signaling activation.50 Future study is needed to reveal the mechanisms underlying downregulation of ALKBH5 during bacterial infection, for example, to clarify whether it is due to the activation of TLRs signaling or even reprogramming metabolic status, which will contribute to develop corresponding intervention strategies for bacterial infections.
Besides, ALKBH5 might enhance neutrophil expansion through regulating other biological process. It has been proposed that neutrophils have phenotypic heterogeneity and functional plasticity in tumor, ranging from pro-inflammatory, anti-tumor ‘N1’ neutrophils to anti-inflammatory, pro-tumor ‘N2’ neutrophils.51 Does a similar plasticity of neutrophils exist at sites of bacterial infection and under control of ALKBH5? Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals that bacterial infection reprograms the structure of the neutrophil population and the dynamic transition between each subpopulation.52 Abdominal sepsis-induced emergency myelopoiesis, an important source of neutrophils, is reported to be promoted by Tet2-mediated mRNA oxidation, another kind of RNA modification.18 Our RNA-seq data imply that deletion of ALKBH5 also affects the expression of other genes involved in regulation of neutrophil behavior. For instance, Alkbh5-deficient neutrophils display decreased levels of granulopoiesis marker Csf3r (G-CSF receptor), and reduced expression of cell adhesion molecules including Sell (also known as L-selectin or CD62L), selp (also known as P-selectin or CD62P), and Selplg (selectin P ligand). The possible roles of ALKBH5 in distinct neutrophil subpopulations, emergency granulopoiesis, and neutrophil adhesion need further investigation.
Failure of neutrophil migration and lack of functional neutrophils in the infection site have been widely observed in sepsis patients and bacterial infections, which are associated with increased mortality and higher bacterial burden.53–56 How to reverse the suppressed state of neutrophil migration to restore and even improve antibacterial host defense is one of the most challenging issues for the treatment of severe bacterial infections or sepsis. Consisting with the decreased ALKBH5 level observed in severe sepsis patients, our findings show that ALKBH5 is down-expressed in primary human neutrophils during bacterial infection or in neutrophils from sepsis mice, and deficiency of ALKBH5 impairs neutrophil migration and antibacterial innate defense. Therefore, activation or upregulation of the ALKBH5-m6A demethylation axis, an intrinsic mechanism for driving efficient neutrophil migration, may be a potentially promising approach to the treatment of sepsis and other bacterial infectious diseases.
Materials and methods
Mice and animal models
C57BL/6 mice were from Beijing Vital River Laboratory (Beijing, China). Alkbh5-deficient mice (Alkbh5–/–) on a C57BL/6 background were obtained as before.15,20 Genotyping of the offspring mice by using wild-type (WT) primers: F1, 5ʹ- CGATCCGTGGTAAATCTG-3ʹ, R1, 5ʹ-TAAGTAAGTGCCTGAATGG-3ʹ; Alkbh5–/– primers: F2, 5ʹ-AATCTGACGGAGTATCAAAGACTGGAAAAGG-3ʹ, R2, 5ʹ-AAGGAGACCACATTCATAGAACTCGAACTCC-3ʹ. All mice were bred and maintained under specific-pathogen-free conditions and 6–10-week-old littermate mice were used. All mouse experiments were performed according to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, with the approval of the Animals Care and Use Committees of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Sciences of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (ACUC-A01-2020-004).
Cecal ligation and puncture
In all, 6–10-week-old mice were used in this study. The rodent model of sepsis was performed as previously described.18,21 All experiments included age-matched controls. In brief, the peritoneal cavity was opened after the mouse was anesthetized, and the cecum was exteriorized and ligated at different points distal of the ileo-cecal valve using a nonabsorbable 7-0 suture. To induce mid-grade sepsis (mild CLP), ~50% of the cecum was ligated. To induce high-grade sepsis (lethal), ~75% of the cecum was ligated. Only experiments testing survival used high-grade sepsis. The distal end of the cecum was then perforated using a 21 G needle, and a small drop of feces was extruded through the puncture. The cecum was relocated into the peritoneal cavity and the peritoneum was closed. Sham-operated animals that underwent identical laparotomy but without cecal puncture were used as controls.
Cell isolation and culture
Neutrophil isolation
Mouse neutrophils were isolated from peritoneal cavity, peripheral blood, or bone marrow by Percoll density gradient as previously described.23 Human primary neutrophils were isolated from the peripheral blood of healthy human donors using gradient separation as previously described.57 Cells were resuspended in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) for subsequent experiments or in 1× PBS for flow cytometry analysis.
Mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) were prepared by culturing in endotoxin-free DMEM medium with 10% (v/v) FBS (Gibco) and recombinant mouse M-CSF (R&D Systems) and were treated as indicated on day 6.
HL-60 and RAW 264.7 cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured as required. In detail, HL-60 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (w/o Hepes) medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (Gibco) and penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C, 5% CO2. For neutrophil differentiation (dHL-60), the medium was supplemented with 1 μM retinoic acid (ATRA, Sigma) for HL-60 cells for 4 days.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The peripheral blood samples from healthy donors were collected in this study. Using of human subjects in this study was approved by The INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD of Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Project No: 083-2022). The written informed consents were obtained from all participants before the study.
Bacterial culture and infection
Escherichia coli (E.coli, JM109 strain, B528410-0001) was purchased from Sanger Biotech and grown in LB medium on a shaker at 37 °C overnight. For bacterial infection, dHL-60 cells, human primary neutrophils, or mouse neutrophils were infected with 1 × 106 CFUs of E.coli (JM109 strain, 1:1 ratio) for indicated time.
RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) or RNAfast200 kit (FASTAGEN). In total, 1 μg acquired RNA was reversely transcribed into cDNA using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (FSQ-301, TOYOBO) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, then followed by real-time PCR analysis with SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (QPK-201, TOYOBO). Products were measured by QuantStudio 7 Flex (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The relative RNA expression level was normalized to Gapdh or GAPDH according to the △△Ct calculation method. Primer sequences used for targets are shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Western blot
The immunoblot analysis was performed as described previously.15 Briefly, cells were lysed with RIPA buffer (20–188, Millipore) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For the separation of nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins, cells were firstly lysed with cytoplasmic lysis buffer (Tris 10 mM, NaCl 10 mM, MgCl2 3 mM, Nonidet P-40 0.1%) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 3 min, and the supernatant was collected for the detection of cytoplasmic proteins. After three washes with cytoplasmic lysis buffer, the nuclei were lysed with RIPA buffer. Protein concentrations were measured with BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). ALKBH5 (HPA007196) and METTL14 (HPA038002) antibodies were from Sigma. YTHDF1 (17479-1-AP) and PTGER4 (66921-1-Ig) antibodies were from Proteintech. METTL3 (ab195352), FTO (ab92821), and Tenascin C (ab108930) antibodies were from Abcam. WNK1 (MA5-35466) and NLRP12 (PA5-89879) antibodies were from Invitrogen. GAPDH (M171-3) and YTHDF2 (RN123PW) antibodies were from MBL. Lamin A/C (4777 S) antibody was from CST. Goat anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (ZB-2301) and goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP (ZB-2305) antibodies were from ZSGB-BIO.
m6A dot blot
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) or RNAfast200 (FASTAGEN). Poly(A) + mRNA was isolated using the Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (61006, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were quantified by 2200 Tape Station (Agilent). Equal amounts mRNA was denatured at 65 °C for 15 min followed by chilling on ice immediately and mixed at 3:2 ratio with glyoxal loading dye (Ambion). mRNA was dropped directly onto the Hybond-N + membrane (GE Healthcare) and performed UV crosslinking. The membranes were washed with 0.1% PBST (0.1% Tween-20 in 1 × PBS, pH 7.4) and blocked with 5% non-fat milk in 0.1% PBST (Blocking buffer). Then, the anti-m6A antibody (202003, Synaptic Systems) was diluted 1:500 in blocking buffer and incubated with the membranes for 2 h at room temperature with gentle shaking. The membranes were washed extensively and incubated with goat anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP (1:1,000 dilution, ZB-2301, ZSGB-BIO) for 2 h at room temperature. After extensive wash, the membranes were developed by enhanced chemiluminescence with Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare). Equal RNA loading was verified by methylene blue (MB) staining.
Bacterial counts
We determined bacterial counts by colony-forming unit (CFU) assay as described previously.2 Briefly, whole blood, peritoneal lavage fluid, and indicated organs were harvested from mice using standard techniques. Then, all samples were diluted by 1 × PBS and ultrasonic grinding, followed serially diluted and plated on LB agar dishes. Then incubated the dishes at 37 °C. The number of bacterial colonies was assessed 24 h later.
ELISA
The concentrations of IL-6, IL-1β, CXCL2, CXCL1 or CCL2 in the peritoneal lavage fluid, plasma, or bone marrow of mice were determined with ELISA kits (R&D Systems, M6000B, MLB00C, MM200, MKC00B, MJE00B) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Flow cytometry
Single-cells suspensions were obtained from peritoneal lavage fluid, peripheral blood, and bone marrow of 6 to 10-week-old Alkbh5–/– mice and WT littermates, then were labeled with fluorescently labeled antibodies as described previously15 and filtered through 40-μm cell strainers. All the samples were analyzed on LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo (TreeStar). Antibodies that used for staining cells are as following: Mouse: PE-Cy5 anti-mouse CD45 (BD Pharmingen), APC or PE-Cy7 anti-mouse CD11b (BD Biosciences), FITC anti-mouse Ly6G (BD Biosciences), PerCP or PE-Cy7 anti-mouse F4/80 (Biolegend), APC anti-mouse CXCR2 (Biolegend). Human: PE anti-human CXCR2 (Biolegend). Cell apoptosis: APC Annexin V (Biolegend), PerCP 7-AAD (Biolegend). Cells were defined as: mouse neutrophils (Ly6G+ CD11b+), mouse macrophages (F4/80+ CD11b+), and apoptotic neutrophils (Ly6G+ CD11b+ Annexin V+).
Transwell migration assay
In vitro migration assay was performed as previously described.2
For neutrophil migration assay
Neutrophils isolated from bone marrow of mice (1 × 106 cells/ml) were incubated with indicated E.coli strains for 2 h. Then 200 μl neutrophils (1 × 106 cells/ml) were allowed to migrate toward CXCL2 (30 ng/ml, R&D Systems) in 500 μl medium or medium alone at 37 °C with 5% CO2, in 24-well microchamber using 3-μm-pore polycarbonate Transwell plates (Corning). After 2 h, cells that migrated through the membrane were stained with FITC anti-mouse Ly6G (BD Biosciences) or Trypan Blue (Countstar) and counted by Automated Cell Counter (Countstar).
For macrophage migration assay
BMDMs or RAW 264.7 cells were seeded into the upper chambers of 8-μm-pore filter plates (Costar) with an approximate number of 4 × 104 cells. Recombinant CCL2 chemokine (100 ng/ml, MCE) in 500 μl DMEM medium was added into the lower chamber. Plates were incubated in an incubator with the constant temperature of 37 °C and 5% CO2. Cells passed through membrane were harvested through a carefully removal of cells on the upper side by using wet cotton swabs. Filters were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Solarbio) for half an hour, and then were stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min. The cells on the filters were counted under a microscope after washing for three times.
Neutrophil polarization assay
The polarization assay was performed as previously described.3 Briefly, neutrophils obtained from bone marrow of mice in the steady state were resuspended at a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml in RPMI-1640 supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS. Cells were incubated with 1 × 106 CFUs/ml of E.coli (JM109 strain) for 2 h and then stimulated with CXCL2 (30 ng/ml, R&D Systems) for 1 h. Images were captured using a 40 × objective on an Evos FL Auto 2 microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The percentage of neutrophils extending pseudopods or ruffling was calculated from fields captured at the indicated time points after chemoattractant stimulation.
In vitro phagocytosis assay
In vitro phagocytosis assay was performed as previously described.3,45 Briefly, pHrodo Deep Red E.coli bioparticles (Invitrogen) were reconstituted in HBSS and opsonized with 12.5% mouse serum at 37 °C for 30 min. Bone marrow neutrophils from normal mice were infected with serum-opsonized pHrodo Deep Red E.coli bioparticles (1:1 ratio), which fluoresce brightly red only in low pH of phagosomes. After incubated at 37 °C for 2 h, cells were washed and resuspended in ice-cold HBSS. The internalized bioparticles were detected by FACS analysis. Phagocytosis efficiency (Phagocytosis index) was expressed as MFI of the internalized pHrodo Deep Red E.coli bioparticles per neutrophil.
In vitro bacterial killing assay
In vitro bacterial killing assay was performed as previously described.3,45 Neutrophils were isolated from the bone marrow of mice in the steady state, and then were separated by centrifugation over a three-layer Percoll gradient. Live E.coli particles (JM109 strain, 1:1 ratio) were opsonized with mouse serum at 37 °C for 30 min and then incubated with neutrophils in HBSS (without mouse serum) at 37 °C for 2 h. Samples were then serially diluted and spread on LB agar plates and incubated at 37 °C. The number of live E.coli particles in each sample was determined after overnight incubation at 37 °C.
RNA-seq
Total RNA was isolated from Alkbh5–/– and WT peritoneal neutrophils with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) and then subjected to Poly(A) + mRNA purification via Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (61006, Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were quantified by 2200 Tape Station (Agilent). The RNA libraries were prepared with NEBNext Ultra II Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (NEB) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Four independent biological replicates were performed for RNA-seq.
m6A specific methylated RNA immunoprecipitation combined with high-throughput sequencing (m6A-seq)
m6A-seq was as performed as our previous protocol.15 In detail, about 500 μg total RNA from cells were extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) then subjected to Poly(A) + mRNA purification via Dynabeads mRNA Purification Kit (61006, Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then RNA fragmentation, immunoprecipitated of m6A-containing RNA fragments, and library preparation were performed. Briefly, purified poly(A) + mRNA was fragmented into ~ 100 nt and incubated with anti-m6A antibody (202003, Synaptic System) for 2 h at 4 °C, then were immunoprecipitated by incubation with Protein A/G beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 h at 4 °C. Captured RNA was competitively eluted by m6A nucleotide and purified by ethanol precipitation. The input mRNA sample (input) and purified mRNA sample (IP) were used for library construction by TruSeq Stranded mRNA Library Preparation kit (Illumina) and were quantified by BioAnalyzer High Sensitivity DNA chip according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two independent biological replicates were performed for m6A-seq.
Analysis of high-throughput sequencing data
General processing
All samples were sequenced on Illumina NovaSeq 6000 with paired-end. Samples were sequenced together in one flow cell in two lanes, and the reads from two lanes of each sample were combined for analysis. After removing adapters and low-quality bases, the Fastq files were aligned to the reference genome (mm10 or hg38) using Hisat2. Reads mapped to tRNA and rRNA were removed and each sample obtained ~25 million useful reads for the following analysis.
RNA-seq and gene expression analysis
Stringtie (v2.1.4) was used to calculate the TPM of each gene to represent their mRNA expression level. The differential genes were identified by a negative binomial model using the DEseq2 package, combining information from all replicates. The significantly differentially expressed genes have to meet all following criteria: P value ≤ 0.05, log2 (fold-change) ≥1 or log2 (fold-change) ≤−1. The Gene Ontology biological processes enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes were conducted by R package ClusterProfiler (v3.14.3).
m6A-seq analysis
On the basis of our m6A-seq data (GSE127732), the m6A peak calling was processed as our previously described.15 The longest isoform of each gene was scanned using a 100-bp sliding window with 10-bp steps. We excluded windows with read counts less than 1/20 of the top window in both the input and m6A-IP sample to reduce bias from potentially inaccurate gene structure annotation and the arbitrary use of the longest isoform. Sequence motifs on m6A peaks and P value were identified by HOMER.
Generation of ALKBH5 knockout cell line
ALKBH5 knockout HL-60 cell line was constructed by using the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing system. Single-guide RNA (sgRNA) targeting sequences (5ʹ-GGCCAAGCGCAAGTATCAGGAGG-3ʹ and 5ʹ-GCTGGTGATCCAAAAGCTGGTGG-3ʹ) were designed using the MIT online tool (http://crispr.mit.edu/), then synthesized and inserted into the pGL3-U6-sgRNA expression vector (Addgene). For generating ALKBH5-knockout cells, HL-60 cells were transfected with human ALKBH5-targeting, control sgRNA expression vectors and Cas9 expression plasmids (Addgene) by electroporation using SF Cell Line 4D-NucleofectorTM X Kit L and Lonza Nucleofector™4D (Lonza). Then, HL-60 cells were selected with 0.0875 μg/ml puromycin (Invivogen) and 1.5 μg/ml blasticidin (Invivogen) in culture medium for 1 week. Single-cell colonies were picked and the knockout efficiency was determined by genomic DNA sequencing and Western blot at DNA and protein expression levels.
RNA immunoprecipitation-qPCR
RIP-qPCR assay was performed as previously described.41 Briefly, neutrophils (~3 × 107 cells for each sample) were harvested and lysed in IP lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific) and then incubated with 10 μg anti-ALKBH5 antibody (Sigma) or 10 μg control anti-IgG antibody (Millipore) at 4 °C overnight. Then, the cell lysates were mixed with protein A/G beads (Thermo Scientific) at 4 °C for 2 h. The beads were washed 6 times using IP lysis buffer and then resuspended in proteinase K to incubate at 56 °C for 1 h. The immunoprecipitated and input RNAs were isolated using the TRIzol reagent for further RT-qPCR analysis.
RNA decay assay
ALKBH5-/- and WT dHL-60 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml in 12-well plates, actinomycin D (A1410, Sigma) was added to the cell medium to block de novo RNA synthesis at a final concentration of 5 μg/ml. After incubation for indicated time points, cells were collected and RNA samples were extracted for qRT-PCR to determine the mRNA levels of indicated genes. The data were normalized to the t = 0 time point.
Statistical analysis
Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated using two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test for pairwise comparison of variables, or Kaplan-Meier for survival curves. All general statistical analyses were used a confidence interval of 95%. Sample sizes were determined on the basis of previous experiments using similar methodologies and were detailed in each figure legend. Data shown are representative of at least three independent experiments, including blots. For in vivo studies, mice were randomly assigned to treatment groups. All stated replicates are biological replicates.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Zhiqing Li (Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China) for helpful discussion. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071793, 81788101), the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-1-017), the Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (7212069), and the Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST (2019QNRC001).
Author contributions
Y.Liu. designed the experiments. Y.Liu., R.S., L.Z., X.Z., F.L., and J.Y. performed the experiments. Z.L. and Y.Li. conducted bioinformatics analysis. Y.N. provided Alkbh5-deficient mice. X.C. and Y.Liu. analyzed data and wrote the paper. Y.Liu. and X.C. supervised research, coordination, and strategy. All authors have read and approved the article.
Data availability
All data are available in the manuscript or the supplementary materials. RNA-seq and m6A-seq raw data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database under accession numbers GSE198316, GSE201060, and GSE127732, respectively.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests. Dr. Xuetao Cao is one of the Associate Editors of Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, but he/she has not been involved in the process of the manuscript handling.
Contributor Information
Yang Liu, Email: yliu@immunol.org.
Xuetao Cao, Email: caoxt@immunol.org.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41392-022-01020-z.
References
- 1.Burn GL, et al. The Neutrophil. Immunity. 2021;54:1377–1391. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2021.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alves-Filho JC, et al. Interleukin-33 attenuates sepsis by enhancing neutrophil influx to the site of infection. Nat. Med. 2010;16:708–712. doi: 10.1038/nm.2156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sakai J, et al. Reactive oxygen species-induced actin glutathionylation controls actin dynamics in neutrophils. Immunity. 2012;37:1037–1049. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.08.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Moreno SE, et al. IL-12, but not IL-18, is critical to neutrophil activation and resistance to polymicrobial sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture. J. Immunol. 2006;177:3218–3224. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.3218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nemeth T, Sperandio M, Mocsai A. Neutrophils as emerging therapeutic targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020;19:253–275. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0054-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.de Oliveira S, Rosowski EE, Huttenlocher A. Neutrophil migration in infection and wound repair: going forward in reverse. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016;16:378–391. doi: 10.1038/nri.2016.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pu Q, et al. Bitter receptor TAS2R138 facilitates lipid droplet degradation in neutrophils during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2021;6:210. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00602-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Uderhardt S, Knopf J, Herrmann M. Neutrophil swarm control: what goes up must come down. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2021;6:416. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00836-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Zhang Q, Cao X. Epigenetic remodeling in innate immunity and inflammation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2021;39:279–311. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-093019-123619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jiang X, et al. The role of m6A modification in the biological functions and diseases. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2021;6:74. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00450-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Frye M, Harada BT, Behm M, He C. RNA modifications modulate gene expression during development. Science. 2018;361:1346–1349. doi: 10.1126/science.aau1646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wang H, et al. Mettl3-mediated mRNA m(6)A methylation promotes dendritic cell activation. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1898. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09903-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li HB, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation controls T cell homeostasis by targeting the IL-7/STAT5/SOCS pathways. Nature. 2017;548:338–342. doi: 10.1038/nature23450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Song H, et al. METTL3-mediated m(6)A RNA methylation promotes the anti-tumour immunity of natural killer cells. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5522. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25803-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Liu Y, et al. N (6)-methyladenosine RNA modification-mediated cellular metabolism rewiring inhibits viral replication. Science. 2019;365:1171–1176. doi: 10.1126/science.aax4468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhou, J. et al. m(6)A demethylase ALKBH5 controls CD4(+) T cell pathogenicity and promotes autoimmunity. Sci Adv. 7, eabg0470 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 17.Spite M, et al. Resolvin D2 is a potent regulator of leukocytes and controls microbial sepsis. Nature. 2009;461:1287–1291. doi: 10.1038/nature08541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shen Q, et al. Tet2 promotes pathogen infection-induced myelopoiesis through mRNA oxidation. Nature. 2018;554:123–127. doi: 10.1038/nature25434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Aik W, et al. Structure of human RNA N(6)-methyladenine demethylase ALKBH5 provides insights into its mechanisms of nucleic acid recognition and demethylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:4741–4754. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zheng G, et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol. Cell. 2013;49:18–29. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rittirsch D, Huber-Lang MS, Flierl MA, Ward PA. Immunodesign of experimental sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat. Protoc. 2009;4:31–36. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nedeva C, et al. TREML4 receptor regulates inflammation and innate immune cell death during polymicrobial sepsis. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:1585–1596. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0789-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Alves-Filho JC, et al. Regulation of chemokine receptor by Toll-like receptor 2 is critical to neutrophil migration and resistance to polymicrobial sepsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:4018–4023. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900196106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kourtzelis I, et al. DEL-1 promotes macrophage efferocytosis and clearance of inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:40–49. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0249-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang X, et al. The role of CXCR2 in acute inflammatory responses and its antagonists as anti-inflammatory therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2019;26:28–33. doi: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bajrami B, et al. G-CSF maintains controlled neutrophil mobilization during acute inflammation by negatively regulating CXCR2 signaling. J. Exp. Med. 2016;213:1999–2018. doi: 10.1084/jem.20160393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Song Z, et al. Progranulin plays a central role in host defense during sepsis by promoting macrophage recruitment. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2016;194:1219–1232. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201601-0056OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ulland TK, et al. Nlrp12 mutation causes C57BL/6J strain-specific defect in neutrophil recruitment. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13180. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hornick EE, et al. Nlrp12 mediates adverse neutrophil recruitment during influenza virus infection. J. Immunol. 2018;200:1188–1197. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Arthur JC, et al. Cutting edge: NLRP12 controls dendritic and myeloid cell migration to affect contact hypersensitivity. J. Immunol. 2010;185:4515–4519. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kabashima K, et al. The prostaglandin receptor EP4 suppresses colitis, mucosal damage and CD4 cell activation in the gut. J. Clin. Invest. 2002;109:883–893. doi: 10.1172/JCI0214459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hattori R, Shimizu S, Majima Y, Shimizu T. EP4 agonist inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced mucus secretion in airway epithelial cells. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2008;117:51–58. doi: 10.1177/000348940811700111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mizuno R, et al. In vivo imaging reveals PKA regulation of ERK activity during neutrophil recruitment to inflamed intestines. J. Exp. Med. 2014;211:1123–1136. doi: 10.1084/jem.20132112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Loike JD, et al. Blockade of alpha 5 beta 1 integrins reverses the inhibitory effect of tenascin on chemotaxis of human monocytes and polymorphonuclear leukocytes through three-dimensional gels of extracellular matrix proteins. J. Immunol. 2001;166:7534–7542. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Mayes-Hopfinger L, et al. Chloride sensing by WNK1 regulates NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pyroptosis. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:4546. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24784-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tang C, et al. ALKBH5-dependent m6A demethylation controls splicing and stability of long 3’-UTR mRNAs in male germ cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E325–E333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710828115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang S, et al. m(6)A demethylase ALKBH5 maintains tumorigenicity of glioblastoma stem-like cells by sustaining FOXM1 expression and cell proliferation program. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:591–606 e596. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shen C, et al. RNA demethylase ALKBH5 selectively promotes tumorigenesis and cancer stem cell self-renewal in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:64–80 e69. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Li S, et al. Nuclear Aurora kinase A switches m(6)A reader YTHDC1 to enhance an oncogenic RNA splicing of tumor suppressor RBM4. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2022;7:97. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-00905-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang J, et al. Leukemogenic chromatin alterations promote AML leukemia stem cells via a KDM4C-ALKBH5-AXL signaling axis. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;27:81–97 e88. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chen Y, et al. ALKBH5 suppresses malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma via m(6)A-guided epigenetic inhibition of LYPD1. Mol. Cancer. 2020;19:123. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01239-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Liu J, Zhang X, Cheng Y, Cao X. Dendritic cell migration in inflammation and immunity. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021;18:2461–2471. doi: 10.1038/s41423-021-00726-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liu J, et al. CCR7 chemokine receptor-inducible lnc-Dpf3 restrains dendritic cell migration by inhibiting HIF-1alpha-mediated glycolysis. Immunity. 2019;50:600–615 e615. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schiwon M, et al. Crosstalk between sentinel and helper macrophages permits neutrophil migration into infected uroepithelium. Cell. 2014;156:456–468. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Li Y, et al. Targeted deletion of tumor suppressor PTEN augments neutrophil function and enhances host defense in neutropenia-associated pneumonia. Blood. 2009;113:4930–4941. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-06-161414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tong, J. et al. Pooled CRISPR screening identifies m(6)A as a positive regulator of macrophage activation. Sci Adv. 7, eabd4742 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Wang Y, et al. Nonredundant roles of keratinocyte-derived IL-34 and neutrophil-derived CSF1 in Langerhans cell renewal in the steady state and during inflammation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2016;46:552–559. doi: 10.1002/eji.201545917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rios-Santos F, et al. Down-regulation of CXCR2 on neutrophils in severe sepsis is mediated by inducible nitric oxide synthase-derived nitric oxide. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2007;175:490–497. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200601-103OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ishii M, et al. CRTH2 is a critical regulator of neutrophil migration and resistance to polymicrobial sepsis. J. Immunol. 2012;188:5655–5664. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Xia Z, et al. m(6)A mRNA methylation regulates epithelial innate antimicrobial defense against cryptosporidial infection. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:705232. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.705232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ng LG, Ostuni R, Hidalgo A. Heterogeneity of neutrophils. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2019;19:255–265. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0141-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Xie X, et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals neutrophil heterogeneity in homeostasis and infection. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:1119–1133. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-0736-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Cecconi M, Evans L, Levy M, Rhodes A. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet. 2018;392:75–87. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30696-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Venet F, Monneret G. Advances in the understanding and treatment of sepsis-induced immunosuppression. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2018;14:121–137. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hampson P, et al. Neutrophil dysfunction, immature granulocytes, and cell-free dna are early biomarkers of sepsis in burn-injured patients: a prospective observational cohort study. Ann. Surg. 2017;265:1241–1249. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Reddy RC, et al. Sepsis-induced inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis is mediated by activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} Blood. 2008;112:4250–4258. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-128967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Arandjelovic S, et al. A noncanonical role for the engulfment gene ELMO1 in neutrophils that promotes inflammatory arthritis. Nat. Immunol. 2019;20:141–151. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0293-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are available in the manuscript or the supplementary materials. RNA-seq and m6A-seq raw data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus database under accession numbers GSE198316, GSE201060, and GSE127732, respectively.