Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 29.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):540. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70097-3

Developing biomarkers for cerebral amyloid angiopathy trials: do potential disease phenotypes hold promise? – Authors’ reply

Steven M Greenberg a, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman b, Geert Jan Biessels c, Mark van Buchem d, Charlotte Cordonnier e, Jin-Moo Lee f, Joan Montaner g, Julie A Schneider h, Eric E Smith i, Meike Vernooij j, David J Werring k
PMCID: PMC9242618  NIHMSID: NIHMS1805176  PMID: 24849857

We appreciate the insightful comments from Andreas Charidimou and Hans Rolf Jäger regarding the distinct phenotypes associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy and their effect on selection of outcome markers for clinical trials.1 As the authors correctly note, cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a complex entity that can follow several different pathways, each associated with its own cluster of biomarkers. It follows that a key factor in selection of outcome markers for a trial of cerebral amyloid angiopathy is the pathophysiological target of the particular treatment under investigation.

Although studies of phenotypes of cerebral amyloid angiopathy often focus on the extreme forms (such as microbleeders and macrobleeders), most patients probably fall into a mixed category in which various cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related vascular processes coexist. We therefore encourage investigators of cerebral amyloid angiopathy to collect and analyse a full range of measures of focal injury and overall brain structure and function.

Footnotes

We declare that we have no competing interests.

Reference

  • 1.Greenberg SM, Salman RA, Biessels GJ, et al. Outcome markers for clinical trials in cerebral amyloid angiopathy Lancet Neurol, 13 (2014), pp. 419–428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES