Abstract
While young adults experienced mental health challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic, little is known about how their mental health needs were subsequently met through access to mental health services (MHS). From October to December 2020, we conducted an online survey of young adults (18–29 years) living in Canada and France to investigate factors associated with unmet MHS needs. Of the 3222 participants expressing a need to access MHS (50.7% of the total sample), 58.2% in Canada and 74.8% in France reported unmet MHS needs. In both countries, those who identified as men and those who lost income due to COVID-19, were more likely to report unmet MHS needs. In Canada, participants from Quebec, those living in rural areas, and those who experienced ethno-racial discrimination had higher odds of reporting such unmet needs. Urgent investments are needed to improve access to MHS for young adults during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Keywords: COVID-19, Young adults, Mental health, Health care access
Introduction
A growing body of evidence indicates that young adults (i.e., 18–29 years of age) have been particularly affected by the negative mental health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic (Czeisler et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2022; O’Connor et al., 2021; Pierce et al., 2020; Solomou & Constantinidou, 2020; Vahratian, Blumberg, Terlizzi, & Schiller, 2021). A number of empirical studies in European and North American countries reported increased levels of anxiety, depression, and suicidal thoughts among young adults, as a result of increasing social isolation and stress due to public health efforts to reduce onward COVID-19 transmission (e.g., episodes of quarantine, closure of schools and businesses, limits on social gathering) (Glowacz & Schmits, 2020; Lee et al., 2020; Wathelet et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2021). Previous surveys reported greater difficulty in accessing mental health supports and services among individuals most directly affected by COVID-19 (e.g., COVID-19 patients and their families, and healthcare workers) and those with pre-existing mental health conditions (Moreno et al., 2020; Murphy, Markey, O’ Donnell, Moloney, & Doody, 2021). However, there is limited evidence to date identifying the factors associated with access and barriers to mental health services for young adults. There are also limited comparative analyses examining access to mental health services across different national settings—a knowledge gap that may be hindering our capacity to inform actions to address mental health service inequities among young adults (Holmes et al., 2020; OECD, 2021). Therefore, our objective was to investigate the factors associated with unmet mental health service needs in a large and diverse sample of young adults in two high-income countries: Canada and France.
Methods
Study Design and Participants
From 8 October to 23 December 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey as part of the France Canada Observatory on COVID-19, Youth health and Social well-being (FOCUS) which aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social and health outcomes among young adults living in Canada and France.
At the time of the survey, several mitigation measures, including a curfew in metropolitan areas (October 17–30) and a nationwide lockdown (October 30-December 15) were in effect in France. In Canada, each province and territory gradually and independently implemented public health measures that ranged from orders to avoid non-essential travel and limit social gatherings, to the closure of schools and non-essential businesses.
Participants were recruited using convenience sampling through online advertisements on social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram). Eligibility criteria were: being of legal age (18 or 19 years old depending on the Canadian province or territory, and 18 years old in France) and less than 30 years old, and residing in Canada or France. Survey data were collected using Qualtrics and stored in a secure data storage environment at the British Columbia Centre on Substance Use. Informed consent was attained from participants prior to accessing the online questionnaire. Ethical approval was provided by the University of British Columbia Behavioural Research Ethics Board (H20-02053).
Access to Mental Health Services
To assess access to mental health services, participants were asked: “in the past 6 months, was there a time when you wanted to access mental health services (e.g., counselling, medication)?” (yes/no). For those who said “yes”, we asked if they were able to access mental health services. Participants who said “no” to this second question were classified as reporting unmet mental health service needs.
Covariates
Sociodemographic characteristics included: age, gender identity, sexual and trans identity, province/territory (Canada) or region (France) of residence, area of residency (e.g., urban, rural), foreign-born status (born in Canada or in metropolitan France), living arrangement, relationship status, employment, education, and income. Ethno-racial identity was collected in Canada, while in France, where this information cannot be solicited due to the prohibition of collecting such data, we asked participants to provide the country of birth of their parents and grandparents from both sides. This variable was created as a proxy for ethno-racial identity and to estimate the ethno-cultural origin of French participants and identify racialized youth. To do so, descendants of immigrants from Europe were collapsed with those who reported that their parents/grandparents were born in France. Based on the definition of descendants of immigrants from the French National Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE, 2020), French participants who reported that at least one of their parents (i.e., second generation of immigrants) or two of their grandparents from the same side were born outside France or Europe (i.e., third generation of immigrants), were considered as descendants of immigrants. Participants were also asked to report if they had ever experienced discrimination with regards to their ethno-racial identity (Canada) or their immigration background (in France) (hereafter referred to as “self-reported lifetime experiences of ethno-racial discrimination”). An interaction term between experienced ethno-racial discrimination and ethno-racial identity was constructed and tested in our initial models for each country to investigate possible effect modification. Lastly, we asked participants if they had lost any individual income since the onset of the pandemic (including salary, employment insurance, government assistance, etc.) and whether they had received any financial support (e.g., from friends, family or government) due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Statistical Analysis
We calculated descriptive statistics and proportions of reporting unmet mental health service needs for all variables in each country. Associations between covariates and the outcome were tested using multivariable logistic regression. We entered all variables with p < 0.20 in bivariate analyses into an initial multivariable model. We then used a backward selection procedure in the final model to retain only those covariates significantly associated (p < 0.05) with the outcome. Age, gender and province/region of residence were forced in the models, as they have already been described as key factors influencing access to mental health services (Alegría et al., 2018). Although the interaction terms between self-reported experiences of ethno-racial discrimination and ethno-racial identity were statistically significant in our bivariate analyses, these terms do not remain in our final model. All analyses were performed using SAS OnDemand for Academics (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Selection of the Study Population
Of the 8424 participants of the FOCUS survey, 6349 (75.4%) had complete sociodemographic data and completed the subsection on access to mental health services. Among them, 3222 (50.7%) participants reported the need to access mental services in the last six months, with a higher proportion in Canada compared to France (n = 2199; 64.7% versus n = 1023; 34.7%).
Study Population Characteristics
The majority of participants identified as women (69.2% in Canada and 64.5% in France), and reported living in large urban centre (55.8% in Canada and 52.7% in France) (see Table 1). Approximately half identified as straight/heterosexual (45.1% in Canada and 52.1% in France), and one-fifth identified as bisexual (26% in Canada and 19% in France). Respectively 12.3% in Canada and 10.6% in France self-identified as trans or were unsure of their trans identity. In Canada, two thirds were from the three provinces of British Columbia (22.2%), Ontario (21.5%), and Quebec (20.1%), and 87% identified as white. In France, most participants were from Ile-de-France (22.2%), South East (21.2%), and South West (17.9%), and 15% were classified as descendants of immigrants (among them, 75% were born in France, data not shown). Differences between countries were observed in terms of age (18–21 years, Canada vs France: 33.4% vs 46%), education level (53.9% with some university in Canada vs 33.1% in France), and employment status (38.9% employed in Canada vs 22% in France). In both samples, almost one third had ever experienced ethno-racial discrimination (29.7% in Canada and 28.6% in France). Higher proportions of young adults had lost some or all of their income (some income: 40.5% vs 19.5% in France; all income: 12.2% vs 6.3% in France), and had received financial support due to COVID-19 in Canada (60.2% vs 29.8 in France). Further details on socio-demographic characteristics of the study population in each country are described in Table 1.
Table 1.
Descriptive statistics in Canada and France, overall and according to unmet mental health service needs
| Canada (n = 2199) | France (n = 1023) | Unmet mental health service needs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada (n = 1280) | France (n = 766) | |||
| n (column %) | n (column %) | n (row %) | n (row %) | |
| Age (years) | ||||
| 18–21 | 735 (33.4) | 471 (46) | 436 (59.3) | 353 (74.9) |
| 22–25 | 828 (37.7) | 336 (32.8) | 467 (56.4) | 253 (75.3) |
| 26–29 | 636 (28.9) | 216 (21.1) | 377 (59.3) | 160 (74.1) |
| Gender identity | ||||
| Man | 393 (17.9) | 266 (26) | 253 (64.4) | 208 (78.2) |
| Woman | 1521 (69.2) | 660 (64.5) | 856 (56.3) | 484 (73.3) |
| Non-binary/other gender identity1 | 255 (11.6) | 82 (8) | 147 (57.6) | 62 (75.6) |
| Prefer not to say | 30 (1.4) | 15 (1.5) | 24 (80) | 12 (80) |
| Trans identity | ||||
| Yes or unsure | 271 (12.3) | 108 (10.6) | 157 (57.9) | 85 (78.7) |
| No | 1928 (87.7) | 915 (89.4) | 1123 (58.2) | 681 (74.4) |
| Sexual orientation | ||||
| Straight/heterosexual | 992 (45.1) | 533 (52.1) | 589 (59.4) | 394 (73.9) |
| Bisexual | 571 (26) | 194 (19) | 331 (58) | 157 (80.9) |
| Homosexual/gay, Lesbian | 165 (7.5) | 92 (9) | 90 (54.5) | 66 (71.7) |
| Other sexual minorities2 | 411 (18.7) | 157 (15.3) | 232 (56.4) | 118 (75.2) |
| Prefer not to say | 60 (2.7) | 47 (4.6) | 38 (63.3) | 31 (66) |
| Province of residence (Canada)3 | ||||
| Alberta | 307 (14) | – | 171 (55.7) | – |
| Atlantic | 256 (11.6) | – | 157 (61.3) | – |
| British Columbia | 489 (22.2) | – | 264 (54) | – |
| Manitoba | 89 (4) | – | 50 (56.2) | – |
| Ontario | 472 (21.5) | – | 254 (53.8) | – |
| Quebec | 443 (20.1) | – | 295 (66.6) | – |
| Saskatchewan | 82 (3.7) | – | 47 (57.3) | – |
| Territories | 61 (2.8) | – | 42 (68.9) | – |
| Region of residence (France)4 | ||||
| Ile-de-France | – | 227 (22.2) | – | 162 (71.4) |
| North East | – | 172 (16.8) | – | 127 (73.8) |
| West | – | 176 (17.2) | – | 131 (74.4) |
| Overseas | – | 11 (1.1) | – | 8 (72.7) |
| South East | – | 217 (21.2) | – | 164 (75.6) |
| South West | – | 183 (17.9) | – | 144 (78.7) |
| Missing data | – | 37 (3.6) | – | 30 (81.1) |
| Area of residency | ||||
| Large urban centre | 1226 (55.8) | 539 (52.7) | 680 (55.5) | 401 (74.4) |
| Medium city or town | 509 (23.1) | 213 (20.8) | 296 (58.2) | 155 (72.8) |
| Small city or rural area | 464 (21.1) | 271 (26.5) | 304 (65.5) | 210 (77.5) |
| Ethno-racial identity (Canada) | ||||
| White5 | 1913 (87) | – | 1099 (57.4) | – |
| Visible minorities, non-indigenous6 | 159 (7.2) | – | 101 (63.5) | – |
| Indigenous7 | 127 (5.8) | – | 80 (63) | – |
| Descendants of immigrants (France) | ||||
| No | – | 870 (85) | – | 649 (74.6) |
| Yes | – | 145 (14.2) | – | 111 (76.6) |
| Prefer not to say | – | 8 (0.8) | – | 6 (75) |
| Foreign-born status | ||||
| No | 1972 (89.7) | 946 (92.5) | 1144 (58) | 709 (74.9) |
| Yes | 223 (10.1) | 75 (7.3) | 135 (60.5) | 55 (73.3) |
| Prefer not to say | 4 (0.2) | 2 (0.2) | 1 (25) | 2 (100) |
| Self-reported lifetime experiences of ethno-racial discrimination | ||||
| No | 1523 (69.3) | 730 (71.4) | 852 (55.9) | 541 (74.1) |
| Yes | 653 (29.7) | 293 (28.6) | 415 (63.6) | 225 (76.8) |
| Prefer not to say | 23 (1) | 0 (0) | 13 (56.5) | 0 (0) |
| Ethno-racial identity (Canada)*Self-reported lifetime experiences of ethno-racial discrimination (Missing data, n = 23) | ||||
| White*yes | 430 (19.5) | – | 276 (64.2) | – |
| White*no | 1469 (66.8) | – | 816 (55.5) | – |
| Visible minorities, non-indigenous*yes | 131 (6) | – | 80 (61.1) | – |
| Visible minorities, non-indigenous*no | 22 (1) | – | 16 (72.7) | – |
| Indigenous*yes | 92 (4.2) | – | 59 (64.1) | – |
| Indigenous*no | 32 (1.5) | – | 20 (62.5) | – |
| Descendants of immigrants (France)*Self-reported lifetime experiences of ethno-racial discrimination (Missing data, n = 8) | ||||
| Not descendants of immigrants *yes | – | 196 (19.2) | – | 148 (75.5) |
| Not descendants of immigrants *no | – | 674 (65.9) | – | 501 (74.3) |
| Descendants of immigrants*yes | – | 93 (9.1) | – | 74 (79.6) |
| Descendants of immigrants*no | – | 52 (5.1) | – | 37 (71.1) |
| In a relationship | ||||
| Yes | 1199 (54.5) | 485 (47.4) | 678 (56.5) | 367 (75.7) |
| No | 987 (44.9) | 532 (52) | 593 (60.1) | 395 (74.2) |
| Missing data | 13 (0.6) | 6 (0.6) | 9 (69.2) | 4 (66.7) |
| Living arrangements | ||||
| Living alone | 330 (15) | 333 (32.6) | 178 (53.9) | 255 (76.6) |
| Living with parents/family members | 779 (35.4) | 326 (31.9) | 461 (59.2) | 252 (77.3) |
| Living with a partner | 560 (25.5) | 194 (19) | 338 (60.4) | 136 (70.1) |
| Living with roommate/friends/Other | 530 (24.1) | 170 (16.6) | 303 (57.2) | 123 (72.4) |
| Education | ||||
| High school or less | 287 (13.1) | 36 (3.5) | 180 (62.7) | 26 (72.2) |
| Some college | 531 (24.1) | 420 (41.1) | 340 (64) | 316 (75.2) |
| Some university | 1185 (53.9) | 339 (33.1) | 656 (55.4) | 258 (76.1) |
| University graduate | 194 (8.8) | 221 (21.6) | 103 (53.1) | 159 (71.9) |
| Missing data | 2 (0.1) | 7 (0.7) | 1 (50) | 7 (100) |
| Employment status | ||||
| Employed | 855 (38.9) | 226 (22.1) | 518 (60.6) | 161 (71.2) |
| Student and employed | 597 (27.1) | 201 (19.6) | 324 (54.3) | 154 (76.6) |
| Student | 484 (22) | 462 (45.2) | 279 (57.6) | 349 (75.5) |
| Unemployed | 240 (10.9) | 125 (12.2) | 143 (59.6) | 95 (76) |
| Missing data | 23 (1) | 9 (0.9) | 16 (69.6) | 7 (77.8) |
| Individual income ($CAD) | ||||
| I don’t have any income | 102 (4.6) | 253 (24.7) | 57 (55.9) | 195 (77.1) |
| < $20,000 | 1083 (49.2) | 535 (52.3) | 634 (58.5) | 401 (75) |
| $20,000–$39,999 | 511 (23.2) | 166 (16.2) | 298 (58.3) | 124 (74.7) |
| $40,000 or more | 387 (17.6) | 14 (1.4) | 213 (55) | 9 (64.3) |
| Missing data | 116 (5.3) | 55 (5.4) | 78 (67.2) | 37 (67.3) |
| Loss of income due to COVID-19 | ||||
| No | 844 (38.4) | 425 (41.5) | 434 (51.4) | 294 (69.2) |
| Yes, some of my income | 890 (40.5) | 199 (19.5) | 556 (62.5) | 154 (77.4) |
| Yes, all of my income | 268 (12.2) | 64 (6.3) | 179 (66.8) | 56 (87.5) |
| Not available | 197 (9) | 335 (32.7) | 111 (56.3) | 262 (78.2) |
| Financial support due to COVID-19 | ||||
| No | 874 (39.7) | 717 (70.1) | 492 (56.3) | 539 (75.2) |
| Yes | 1324 (60.2) | 305 (29.8) | 787 (59.4) | 226 (74.1) |
| Missing data | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
1Other gender identity included intersex, Two-spirit (only for Canada), and other gender identity with an open-text box
2Other sexual minority included asexual, pansexual, queer, Two-spirit (only for Canada) and other sexual identity with an open-text box
3Atlantic included the Canadian provinces of New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, and Nova Scotia and Territories included Nunavut, Yukon, and the Northwest Territories
4North East (Grand-Est, Hauts-de-France, Bourgogne Franche-Comté), South East (Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur, Corse), South West (Nouvelle Aquitaine, Occitanie), and West (Bretagne, Centre Val-de-Loire, Pays de la Loire, Normandie)
5Includes those who selected “white” only and those who reported “white and Latino” or “white and Middle-Eastern”
6Includes those who selected any ethno-racial category (one or more) other than white or Indigenous. The visible minority groups include: “Black”, “East Asian”, “Southeast Asian”, “Latino”, “Middle Eastern”, “South Asian”, and those who reported another race category that cannot be classified with a visible minority group
7Includes those who selected “Indigenous (e.g., First Nations, Métis, Inuk/Inuit descent)”
Descriptive Analysis of Unmet Mental Health Service Needs
Overall, 58.2% (n = 1280) of participants in Canada and 74.8% (n = 766) in France reported that they were not able to access the mental health services that they needed. In both countries (see Table 1), a higher proportion of participants who expressed unmet mental health service needs was found among those who identified as men (Canada: 64.4%; France: 78.2%), those living in rural areas (Canada: 65.5%; France: 77.5%), those who lost all of their income due to COVID-19 (Canada: 66.8%; France: 87.5%), and those who self-reported experiences of ethno-racial discrimination (Canada: 63.6%; France: 76.8%). In Canada, participants living in the territories (68.9%) and in Quebec (66.7%) reported higher unmet mental health service needs. In France, young adults residing in the southwest region (78.7%), those who identified as trans or were unsure of their trans identity (78.7%), and those who identified as bisexual (80.9%) reported unmet mental health service needs in greater proportion.
Factors Associated with Unmet Mental Health Service Needs
Our multivariable analysis showed that, in both countries, participants who identified as men (compared to woman, Canada: Odds Ratio (OR) [95% Confidence Intervals]: 1.35 [1.06–1.72]; France: OR 1.45 [1.02–2.07]) and those who lost some of their income (Canada: OR 1.71 [1.40–2.09]; France: OR 1.50 [1.01–2.25]) or all of their income due to COVID-19 (Canada: OR 1.95 [1.43–2.67]; France: OR 2.95 [1.32–6.58]) were more likely to report unmet mental health service needs. In Canada, young adults from Quebec (OR: 1.87 [1.41–2.48]), those living in rural areas (OR: 1.50 [1.17–1.93]), those who self-reported experiences of ethno-racial discrimination (OR: 1.3 [1.07–1.58]) had higher odds of reporting unmet mental health service needs. Conversely, those who were students and employed in Canada were less likely to report such unmet needs compared to employed (OR: 0.67 [0.53–0.85]).
Discussion
Our study highlighted that a high proportion of young adults (51% of the total sample) expressed the need to access mental health services within the context of the pandemic. These levels of needs, however, greatly varied between the two countries with a higher level in the Canadian sample (65%) compared to the French sample (35%). Multiple contextual factors including negative attitudes toward and perception of mental health issues and services may help explain this difference. One of these contextual factors may be a higher prevalence of stigma related to mental health issues in France compared to Canada where multiple large-scale mental health promotion and prevention interventions have been implemented in the last two decades (Centre for Addiction & Mental Health, 2013). Before the pandemic, a French mixed-methods survey reported negative perceptions regarding mental health services by pointing out that half of the interviewees thought that their physician did not know have sufficient skills to address mental health challenges and others reported feelings of fear and shame to express their mental health needs and concerns to their general practitioner (Rondet et al., 2015). Another reason may be that French individuals seem less inclined to express their personal mental health needs compared to Canadians. For example, data collected before the pandemic indicated that Canadian adults were more likely to self-report experiences of emotional distress than French adults (27% versus 12%) (Tikkanen, Fields, II, & Abrams, 2020). Another study conducted in December 2020 among French university students identified multiple perceived barriers to help-seeking for mental health problems, including a preference for self-reliance, poor emotional competence and mental health literacy (Theurel & Witt, 2022). These findings underscore the importance of developing and implementing tailored interventions to improve mental health literacy, reduce mental health-related stigma, and promote help-seeking attitudes among young adults (Xu et al., 2018).
About one in three young adults in Canada (58% of 65% who needed mental health services) and almost one on four young adults in France (75% of 35%) reported not being able to access the mental health services they needed between the first and the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (May-December 2020). Similar high rates of unmet mental health service needs were found in previous COVID-19 studies among youth with pre-existing mental health challenges in Canada (49%) (Hawke et al., 2020) and among young adults in France (67%) (Alleaume et al., 2021). While these results suggest a serious deficit in access to mental health services among young adults at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic, this trend was already occurring before the pandemic in both countries. For example, the Canadian Community Health Survey conducted in 2018 found that one quarter of young adults (18–34 years) who had a need for mental health care reported that their needs were fully unmet (Statistics Canada, 2019). Another survey among Canadian graduate students documented that only 37% among those who needed mental health services were satisfied with their access to mental health support before the pandemic, which decreased to 27% in April–May 2020 (Toronto Science Policy Network, 2020). In France, data from national cohort studies in 2009–2010 highlighted that less than 20% of young adults who reported mental health challenge had consulted a health service (Beck & Richard, 2013; de Monteynard et al., 2013). This limited access to mental health services has also been observed by youth organizations in UK (Takino, Hewlett, Nishina, & Prinz, 2021). A recent policy brief indicated that pre-pandemic weaknesses in mental health care systems, combined with a significant increase in mental health needs due to the pandemic, may have contributed to significant increases in unmet mental health needs among young adults (OECD, 2021).
Unfortunately, the capacity of existing mental health services was also impacted by the COVID-19 public health measures (e.g., lockdown). A WHO survey conducted in June–August 2020 indicated that more than two-thirds of mental health services globally were disrupted, especially school—and workplace-based mental health programs (World Health Organization, 2020). Although several digital adaptations and interventions have been implemented to support the mental health needs of young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic (Davenport et al., 2020; Zenone et al., 2021), several challenges remain for health services to provide virtual mental health support activities (e.g., telemedicine, online therapy) such as difficulty to reach people in need, develop quality services, and support to scale up those interventions (Bergin et al., 2020). For instance, technological and accessibility issues (e.g., poor internet connection, security concerns, safe private space) as well as lack of human connection (i.e., facilitating engagement and communication in a remote therapeutic relationship) were described as key barriers for accessing virtual mental health services by both clinicians and young adults (Hawke, Sheikhan, MacCon, & Henderson, 2021; Nicholas et al., 2021). Further research is needed to improve our understanding of the barriers and facilitators to access mental health services for young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.
Multiple contextual factors may help explain the high rate of unmet mental health service needs in France (74.8%) compared to Canada (58.2%). The lack of available mental health resources and services for young adults in France may reflect a limited health system capacity to meet their needs. Data collected before the pandemic reported that France had a lower supply of mental health workers (168 versus 277 professionals per 100,000 people in Canada), and a lower level of integration of mental health providers into the primary care service delivery system compared to Canada (31% versus 41%) (Tikkanen et al., 2020). During the pandemic, the first mental health initiative of the French Government was implemented in February 2021 (i.e., three free consultations with a mental health specialist for university students), while the Government of Canada has launched a series of initiatives to offer online no-cost mental health support resources, and counselling at an early stage of the pandemic (April 2020), both at the federal (i.e., “Wellness Together Canada” online portal) and provincial levels (e.g., Here2talk in British Columbia, Good2talk in Ontario and Nova Scotia). While our results suggest that mental health services access for young adults was slightly better in Canada, this varied between Canadian provinces. This may be explained by the decentralized healthcare system in Canada where public health services, including community and mental health services, are regulated and delivered at the provincial and territorial level (The Commonwealth Fund, 2020). Specifically, proportions of participants who experienced difficulty in accessing mental health services were higher in the territories (68.9%) and Quebec (66.6%) compared to those living in Alberta (55.7%), British Columbia (54%), and Ontario (53.8%). These higher rates of met mental health needs in these provinces may, in part, reflect the availability of integrated services of care for young adults (such as Alberta Integrated Youth Services Initiative in Alberta, Foundry in British Columbia and Youth Wellness Hubs in Ontario) that includes a variety of services (e.g., mental health and substance use services, primary care, education, peer and family supports). Furthermore, Quebec has been one of the most severely affected provinces of the pandemic (accounting for more than half of the total number of COVID-19 cases and death in Canada as of September 2020), leading health authorities to massively reallocate resources and professionals to acute care needs within hospitals and long-term care centres (Breton & Hudon, 2020). As such, this reprioritization of resources may have negatively affected the delivery and availability of mental health care during this period.
Our findings also provide important equity implications with regards to how certain population sub-groups have had greater difficulty in accessing mental health services. In both countries, those who lost income due to COVID-19 were over two times more likely to report unmet mental health service needs. While previous surveys in Canada and the U.S. reported associations between COVID-19-related financial loss and low household income and negative mental health outcomes (e.g., emotional distress, depression, suicide thoughts) (Hertz-Palmor et al., 2021; Jenkins et al., 2021), our findings reinforce the need to support young adults who experienced financial challenges due to COVID-19. Gender differences with regards to access to mental health services are consistent with previous survey reporting that young men are less likely than women to attend and engage in mental health services (Seidler et al., 2020). Several structural barriers to mental health services have been identified before the pandemic including lack of knowledge regarding available services, difficulty navigating the mental health system, and intake processes that may explain gender differences (Rice et al., 2018). Participants living in rural Canadian areas were also more likely to experience unmet mental health service needs, likely reflecting that less services are available in these jurisdictions. Previous COVID-19 studies in Canada reported that rural communities experienced high levels of anxiety (Zajacova et al., 2020), and difficulty in accessing online mental health services (Rush et al., 2021). Our study also suggests that young adults who self-reported experiences of ethno-racial discrimination were less likely to access mental health services. This finding is particularly concerning given that young adults who experienced ethno-racial discrimination during the pandemic have higher risks of reporting negative mental health outcomes, including poor mental health, psychological distress and depression (Hahm et al., 2021; Mpofu et al., 2022; Oh et al., 2021). A systematic review also indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic contributed to increased ethno-racial discrimination in high-income countries, including in social spaces, school/work or within clinical settings (Yashadhana et al., 2021). Such findings underscore the need to develop anti-racist and equity-oriented mental health policy and services that address social and health inequities persisting in young adults’ populations.
This study has some limitations. First, participants were recruited through advertisements on social media platforms, and as such, may not be fully representative of the young adult population in the two study countries. Our sample likely does not include those who did not have internet access and do not use social media. In addition, it is possible that those who were more interested in the issues investigated by our survey were also more likely to respond. To limit this selection bias, we developed and designed a series of thematic-oriented ads to cover a wide range of topics related to our survey (including ads with a focus on: COVID-19 measures, vaccinations, mental health, sexual health, substance use, socio-economic impacts) in order to target diverse groups of young adults on different social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, Reddit). Second, we did not collect information regarding the type (e.g., counselling, medication) and format (e.g., virtual or in-person) of mental health services preferred, and the type of barriers participants experienced in accessing mental health services. Third, our single item measure to assess experiences of ethno-racial discrimination does not account for the diversity and complexity of all forms of racial and ethnic experiences of racism that some young adults have encountered in their lifetime. In addition, our data set did not allow us to determine the settings in which these experiences happened and whether or not they occurred within the context of the pandemic. Because of the limited sample size of participants who self-identified as ethno-racial minorities, it was not possible to examine how experiences of ethno-racial discrimination differed across different racialized groups of youth. Further investigation is required to continue to identify the impact of ethno-racial discrimination on access to mental health services among youth ethno-racial minorities. Lastly, we did not collect history of mental health issues that may influence participants’ ability to access mental health services.
Despite these limitations, our study suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic may have critically influenced the relationship between mental health services and young adult’s population needs. For example, the COVID-19 public health measures have increased structural challenges for the health system to rapidly adapt service delivery (e.g., virtual connection) to provide mental health care (Moreno et al., 2020). These challenges may have made it more difficult to address the disparities that existed prior to the pandemic (i.e., gender inequity, geographic disparities). The pandemic context also exacerbated the expression of mental health needs among young adults, but most of these needs were not met through access to mental health services. This was especially the case for sub-groups of youth who have been particularly affected by the social impacts of the pandemic context (e.g., youth who lost income due to the pandemic). It is also more than likely that some of these sub-groups were not familiar with how to seek for help or access mental health services, which may contribute to the increase in prevalence of unmet mental health service needs. Finally, the COVID-19 pandemic may have intensified health inequities in terms of access to mental health services among young adults.
Conclusion
Urgent investment is needed to improve access to mental health services for young adults, especially among young men, those who have been financially impacted by COVID-19, those who experienced ethno-racial discrimination, and those living in rural areas. Promotion and support of mental health services should be prioritized among young adults populations to address their mental health needs and concerns during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the study participants for their contribution to the research, as well as current and past research staff involved with the FOCUS survey.
Author Contributions
PJC, MJR, and RK co-led the conceptualization of the study. PJC directed the formal analysis, and writing of the original draft. JJ conducted the formal analysis and further contributed to the writing of the original draft. NB was involved in data collection and project administration. OF, EJ, KB, TS, MJR and RK contributed to writing—review and editing of this manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Funding Reference Number: VR5 172673) and by the French National Research Agency (ANR-21-COVR-011). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. PJC is supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant # MFE—176609). NB received funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research during this study. RK hold Scholar Awards from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (Grant # 16808), which supported their time contributions to the study.
Data Availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors report no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Marie Jauffret-Roustide and Rod Knight have contributed equally to this work.
References
- Alegría M, Nakash O, NeMoyer A. Increasing equity in access to mental health care: A critical first step in improving service quality. World Psychiatry. 2018;17:43–44. doi: 10.1002/wps.20486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alleaume C, Verger P, Peretti-Watel P. Psychological support in general population during the COVID-19 lockdown in France: Needs and access. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(5):e0251707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beck, F., & Richard, J.-B. (2013). Les Comportements de santé des jeunes. Analyses du Baromètre santé 2010. In Baromètres Santé. Saint-Denis, Inpes. Retrieved from https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/etudes-et-enquetes/barometres-de-sante-publique-france/barometre-sante-2010
- Bergin AD, Vallejos EP, Davies EB, Daley D, Ford T, Harold G, Hetrick S, Kidner M, Long Y, Merry S, Morriss R, Hollis C. Preventive digital mental health interventions for children and young people: a review of the design and reporting of research. Npj Digital Medicine. 2020;3:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00339-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Breton, M., & Hudon, C. (2020). La première vague de Covid-19 en Suisse et les soins primaires. Revue Medicale Suisse, 16(713), 2127–2130. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33146965/ [PubMed]
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health. (2013). Mental health promotion for youth in Canada. Retrieved from http://hclinkontario.ca/images/Youth_MHP_Report_FINAL.pdf
- Czeisler MÉ, Lane RI, Petrosky E, Wiley JF, Christensen A, Njai R, Weaver MD, Robbins R, Facer-Childs ER, Barger LK, Czeisler CA, Rajaratnam SMW. Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic United States, June 24–30, 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2020;69(32):1049–1057. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davenport TA, Cheng VWS, Iorfino F, Hamilton B, Castaldi E, Burton A, Scott EM, Hickie IB. Flip the clinic: A digital health approach to youth mental health service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. JMIR Mental Health. 2020;7:e24578. doi: 10.2196/24578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Glowacz F, Schmits E. Psychological distress during the COVID-19 lockdown: The young adults most at risk. Psychiatry Research. 2020;293:113486. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hahm HC, Ha Y, Scott JC, Wongchai V, Chen JA, Liu CH. Perceived COVID-19-related anti-Asian discrimination predicts post traumatic stress disorder symptoms among Asian and Asian American young adults. Psychiatry Research. 2021;303:114084. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawke LD, Sheikhan NY, MacCon K, Henderson J. Going virtual: youth attitudes toward and experiences of virtual mental health and substance use services during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Health Services Research, 2021 doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06321-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawke LD, Barbic SP, Voineskos A, Szatmari P, Cleverley K, Hayes E, Relihan J, Daley M, Courtney D, Cheung A, Darnay K, Henderson JL. Impacts of COVID-19 on Youth mental health, substance use, and well-being: A rapid survey of clinical and community samples: Répercussions de la COVID-19 sur la santé mentale, l’utilisation de substances et le bien-être des adolescents : un sondage rapide d’échantillons cliniques et communautaires. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2020;65(10):701–709. doi: 10.1177/0706743720940562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hertz-Palmor N, Moore TM, Gothelf D, DiDomenico GE, Dekel I, Greenberg DM, Brown LA, Matalon N, Visoki E, White LK, Himes MM, Barzilay R. Association among income loss, financial strain and depressive symptoms during COVID-19: Evidence from two longitudinal studies. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021;291:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Holmes EA, O’Connor RC, Perry VH, Tracey I, Wessely S, Arseneault L, Ballard C, Christensen H, Silver RC, Everall I, Ford T, Bullmore E. Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:547–560. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- INSEE. (2020). Immigrés et descendants d’immigrés. Retrieved May 3, 2022, from https://www.insee.fr/fr/statistiques/4238373?sommaire=4238781#documentation
- Jenkins EK, McAuliffe C, Hirani S, Richardson C, Thomson KC, McGuinness L, Morris J, Kousoulis A, Gadermann A. A portrait of the early and differential mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Findings from the first wave of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey. Preventive Medicine. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones SE, Ethier KA, Hertz M, DeGue S, Le VD, Thornton J, Lim C, Dittus PJ, Geda S. Mental health, suicidality, and connectedness among high school students during the COVID-19 pandemic—adolescent behaviors and experiences survey, United States, January–June 2021. MMWR Supplements. 2022;71(3):16–21. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su7103a3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee CM, Cadigan JM, Rhew IC. Increases in loneliness among young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic and association with increases in mental health problems. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2020;67(5):714–717. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- de Monteynard LA, Younès N, Melchior M. Socio-demographic factors and use of health services for psychological reasons in young adults. Revue D’epidemiologie Et De Sante Publique. 2013;61(4):351–361. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2013.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moreno C, Wykes T, Galderisi S, Nordentoft M, Crossley N, Jones N, Cannon M, Correll CU, Byrne L, Carr S, Chen EY, Arango C. How mental health care should change as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:813–824. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30307-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mpofu JJ, Cooper AC, Ashley C, Geda S, Harding RL, Johns MM, Underwood JM. Perceived Racism and demographic, mental health, and behavioral characteristics among high school students during the COVID-19 pandemic—adolescent behaviors and experiences survey, United States, January–June2021. MMWR Supplements. 2022;71(3):22–27. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.su7103a4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murphy L, Markey K, O’Donnell C, Moloney M, Doody O. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and its related restrictions on people with pre-existent mental health conditions: A scoping review. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2021;35:375–394. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2021.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nicholas J, Bell IH, Thompson A, Valentine L, Simsir P, Sheppard H, Adams S. Implementation lessons from the transition to telehealth during COVID-19: A survey of clinicians and young people from youth mental health services. Psychiatry Research. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O’Connor RC, Wetherall K, Cleare S, McClelland H, Melson AJ, Niedzwiedz CL, O'Carroll RE, O'Connor DB, Platt S, Scowcroft E, Watson B, Robb KA. Mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Longitudinal analyses of adults in the UK COVID-19 Mental Health & Wellbeing study. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2021;218(6):326–333. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- OECD . Tackling the mental health impact of the COVID-19 crisis: An integrated, whole-of-society response. OECD; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Oh H, Marinovich C, Rajkumar R, Besecker M, Zhou S, Jacob L, Koyanagi A, Smith L. COVID-19 dimensions are related to depression and anxiety among US college students: Findings from the healthy minds survey 2020. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021;292:270–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pierce M, Hope H, Ford T, Hatch S, Hotopf M, John A, Kontopantelis E, Webb R, Wessely S, McManus S, Abel KM. Mental health before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal probability sample survey of the UK population. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7(10):883–892. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30308-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rice SM, Telford NR, Rickwood DJ, Parker AG. Young men’s access to community-based mental health care: Qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators. Journal of Mental Health. 2018;27(1):59–65. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2016.1276528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rondet C, Parizot I, Cadwallader JS, Lebas J, Chauvin P. Why underserved patients do not consult their general practitioner for depression: Results of a qualitative and a quantitative survey at a free outpatient clinic in Paris France. BMC Family Practice. 2015;16(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0273-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rush KL, Seaton C, Li E, Oelke ND, Pesut B. Rural use of health service and telemedicine during COVID-19: The role of access and eHealth literacy. Health Informatics Journal. 2021;27(2):146045822110200. doi: 10.1177/14604582211020064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seidler ZE, Rice SM, Dhillon HM, Cotton SM, Telford NR, McEachran J, Rickwood DJ. Patterns of youth mental health service use and discontinuation: Population data from Australia’s headspace model of care. Psychiatric Services. 2020;71(11):1104–1113. doi: 10.1176/APPI.PS.201900491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Solomou I, Constantinidou F. Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic and compliance with precautionary measures: Age and sex matter. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(14):4924. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Statistics Canada. (2019). Mental health indicators: Perceived need for mental health care. Retrieved from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1310061901&pickMembers%5B0%5D=1.1&pickMembers%5B1%5D=2.3
- Takino S, Hewlett E, Nishina Y, Prinz C. Supporting young people ’ s mental health through the COVID-19 crisis. OECD; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- The Commonwealth Fund. (2020). International Health Care System Profiles | Commonwealth Fund. Retrieved November 16, 2021, from https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/system-profiles
- Theurel A, Witt A. Identifying barriers to mental health help-seeking in French University students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Creative Education. 2022;13(02):437–449. doi: 10.4236/ce.2022.132025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tikkanen R, Fields K, Williams RD, Abrams MK. Mental health conditions and substance Use: Comparing U.S. needs and treatment capacity with those in other high-income countries. Commonwealth Fund. 2020 doi: 10.26099/09HT-RJ07. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Toronto Science Policy Network. (2020). The Early Impacts of COVID-19 on Graduate Students across Canada. Retrieved from www.toscipolicynet.ca/covid19-report/
- Vahratian A, Blumberg SJ, Terlizzi EP, Schiller JS. Symptoms of Anxiety or Depressive Disorder and Use of Mental Health Care Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic—United States, August 2020–February 2021. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2021;70(13):490–494. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wathelet M, Duhem S, Vaiva G, Baubet T, Habran E, Veerapa E, Debien C, Molenda S, Horn M, Grandgenèvre P, Notredame CE, D’Hondt F. Factors associated with mental health disorders among University students in France confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(10):e2025591. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25591. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on mental, neurological and substance use services: results of a rapid assessment. In World Health Organization. Retrieved from https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978924012455
- Xu Z, Huang F, Kösters M, Staiger T, Becker T, Thornicroft G, Rüsch N. Effectiveness of interventions to promote help-seeking for mental health problems: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2018;48:2658–2667. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718001265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yashadhana A, Derbas A, Biles J, Grant J. Pandemic-related racial discrimination and its health impact among non-Indigenous racially minoritized peoples in high-income contexts: A systematic review. Health Promotion International. 2021 doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zajacova A, Jehn A, Stackhouse M, Choi KH, Denice P, Haan M, Ramos H. Mental health and economic concerns from March to May during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Insights from an analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys. SSM - Population Health. 2020;12:100704. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zenone MA, Cianfrone M, Sharma R, Majid S, Rakhra J, Cruz K, Costales S, Sekhon M, Mathias S, Tugwell A, Barbic S, Barbic S. Supporting youth 12–24 during the COVID-19 pandemic: how Foundry is mobilizing to provide information, resources and hope across the province of British Columbia. Global Health Promotion. 2021;28(1):51–59. doi: 10.1177/1757975920984196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng J, Morstead T, Sin N, Klaiber P, Umberson D, Kamble S, DeLongis A. Psychological distress in North America during COVID-19: The role of pandemic-related stressors. Social Science and Medicine. 2021;270:113687. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.