Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2022 May 31;14(5):e25548. doi: 10.7759/cureus.25548

Resolution of Visual Field Defect in Macroprolactinoma After Treatment With Cabergoline

Kimitaka Shibue 1,, Momoko Yamakawa 2, Namiko Nishida 3, Akihiro Hamasaki 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC9246700  PMID: 35783884

Abstract

We report the case of a 49-year-old woman presenting with amenorrhea and progressive visual field defect for one month. Endocrinological workup revealed a high concentration of serum prolactin, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed pituitary macroadenoma with extrasellar extension as well as compression of optic nerves. Treatment with a dopamine agonist, cabergoline, for eight weeks led to the resolution of the visual field defect accompanied by a rapid decrease in the serum prolactin level. Follow-up MRI three months after the initial diagnosis revealed alleviation of visible mechanical compression of the optic chiasm by the tumor. We considered that the absence of retinal nerve damage and prompt initiation of cabergoline contributed to the rapid recovery of the visual acuity.

Keywords: pituitary adenoma size and eye, magnetic resonance imaging and pituitary adenoma, visual field defect, cabergoline, prolactinoma

Introduction

Prolactinoma is one of the major secretory benign pituitary tumors, accounting for over half of all pituitary adenomas [1]. It is predominant in women (10 times more prevalent than in men) [2], but the sex difference disappears after menopause [3]. Prolactinoma is characterized by hyperprolactinemia due to the hypersecretion of prolactin from the tumor [4]. While macroprolactinomas are typically detected due to the presence of amenorrhea and galactorrhea, derived from their hormonal characteristics, they are also indicated by neurological symptoms, such as visual field defect and headache. Although visual field defect due to mechanical compression of the optic chiasm by the pituitary tumor can be transient, visual complications often become permanent if the diagnosis is delayed or retinal ganglion cells are damaged due to the long-term compression of the optic nerves [5].

Herein, we report a case of macroprolactinoma presented with amenorrhea and progressive visual disturbance and resolved by the prompt initiation of a dopamine agonist, cabergoline. This case indicates the significance of adequate evaluation of a mechanical complication caused by a pituitary tumor shortly after the initial diagnosis.

Case presentation

A 49-year-old woman with hypertension presented to the Ophthalmology Department of our hospital with blurred vision left hemianopsia and difficulty in character recognition on reading persisting for one month. Although she had also been aware of amenorrhea over the previous months, she self-diagnosed it as the occurrence of natural menopause and did not seek consultation. She did not have a history of galactorrhea. A blood sample test revealed an elevated serum concentration of prolactin (4,452 ng/mL), consistent with prolactinoma (Table 1).

Table 1. Results of an endocrinological blood test after hospitalization.

Parameters Value
ACTH  (pg/mL)                         27.2
hGH (ng/mL)                           0.28
FreeT4 (ng/dL) 0.94
FreeT3 (pg/mL) 2.67
TSH (μIU/mL)                        1.54
LH  (mIU/mL)                           1.56
FSH  (mIU/mL)                          11.5
Cortisol (μg/dL) 6.6
Prolactin (ng/dL) 4452
IGF-1 (ng/mL) 164

A physical exam did not show eyelid ptosis or diplopia. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conducted for the differential diagnosis of optic neuritis and pituitary adenoma revealed a solid pituitary tumor (28 mm) excluding the optic chiasm on the left side and invading the right cavernous sinus. The top of the tumor showed poor contrast, suggesting intratumor hemorrhage. The pituitary stalk deviated to the left side and there was a lesion showing early contrast on the left side of the tumor, suggesting compression of the frontal lobe of the pituitary (Figures 1A1B, left).

Figure 1. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the case.

Figure 1

(A) Magnetic resonance (MR) image of the pituitary adenoma on the day of onset (Upper panel: coronal, T1W, Lower panel: horizontal, T2W. Red arrows indicate the pituitary adenoma). (B) Dynamic contrast-enhanced image of macroprolactinoma on day 8 (left panel) and day 83 (right panel). Early phase (upper panel) and delayed phase (lower panel) are shown.

A visual test in the Ophthalmology Department demonstrated a severe drop in visual acuity and bitemporal hemianopia (Figure 2A). A critical flicker frequency (CFF) test showed a decreased value for the left eye, suggesting compression of the optic nerve (Figure 2B).

Figure 2. Clinical course of the macroprolactinoma.

Figure 2

(A) Time-course of serum prolactin (PRL) concentration with ophthalmic examinations and the dose of cabergoline. (B) Time-dependent change of visual acuity and critical flicker frequency (CFF) test. (C) Time-dependent resolution of visual field defect. Visual field assessment was performed of both eyes on days 0, 42, and 83.

On the other hand, optical coherence tomography (OCT) at the time of diagnosis as well as after cabergoline treatment revealed no retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thinning (Figure 3). Collectively, we made a diagnosis of macroprolactinoma accompanied by the complication of acute-onset visual disturbance. Treatment with cabergoline, a dopamine agonist, was initiated at a dose of 0.25 mg once a week and increased to 0.5 mg once a week in the fourth week. The serum prolactin level showed a rapid decrease (Figure 2A) with a resolution of the right central hemianopia on day 42. While left hemianopia remained at that time, it was also resolved on day 83, together with the CFF value (Figures 2B2C). OCT performed on day 0 (pre-treatment) and day 42 (after the initiation of the cabergoline treatment) showed a preserved retinal nerve layer thickness throughout the clinical course (Figure 3). MRI taken on day 83 revealed tumor shrinkage (28 to 24 mm) (Figure 1B, right).

Figure 3. Pre- and post-treatment examination of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.

Figure 3

Measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness with OCT on days 0 and 42. RNFL was measured using Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) and analyzed with Heidelberg eye explorer software version 1.9.14.0. Green circles around the optic disc were drawn to measure the peripapillary RNFL thickness. 

Discussion

Common clinical features associated with macroprolactinoma are classified based on their causes: elevated circulating prolactin causes hypogonadism, amenorrhea, infertility, and galactorrhea while visual field defects and headache are due to mechanical compression derived from extrasellar extension of the tumor primarily by macroprolactinoma (>1 cm) or giant prolactinoma (> 4 cm) [6]. A large prolactinoma is associated with an increased risk of vision problems. A literature review revealed that >70% of patients with giant prolactinoma exhibited some type of visual disturbance [7]. From a mechanical perspective, while prolactinoma can extend in various directions, a suprasellar extension of the pituitary adenoma [8] is prone to causing visual field defects, being consistent with our case.

Cabergoline, a dopamine agonist, is the first-line medication for prolactinoma [9-11] providing therapeutic effects regardless of sex, age, or initial prolactin value [12]. Cabergoline use is also associated with a favorable prognosis regarding visual acuity [13,14].

Prognostic factors of visual acuity in prolactinoma patients are critical because they have direct effects on their long-term quality of life. Regarding pituitary adenoma treated with surgical resection, preoperative visual acuity is a prognostic factor for postoperative visual acuity and the visual field [15]. From an ophthalmologic viewpoint, abnormalities in the RNFL are useful to assess ocular damage caused by pituitary tumors [16].

While the preoperative RNFL thickness is considered to be a useful prognostic indicator of long-term visual recovery after trans-sphenoidal-approach surgery for pituitary adenoma [17], there are reported cases in which visual recovery was not associated with the RNFL thickness [18], and so this warrants further discussion. As a new parameter of OCT, analyzing the ganglion cell complex (GCC) [19] is considered to be a promising measurement strategy.

In our case, the patient consulted the hospital one month after the first subjective visual problem. Based on the preceding amenorrhea noted many months before the presentation and the absence of thinning of the retinal nerve layer at the time of diagnosis, we consider that the duration of optic nerve compression was short, contributing to the resolution of the visual disturbance. While a prospective study of prolactinoma patients who started cabergoline with 0.25-0.5 mg twice weekly reported marked resolution of visual defects up to three months [20], we could achieve sufficient improvement with a lower dose (0.25-0.5 mg once weekly) of cabergoline. As a long-term effect of cabergoline, secondary visual field deterioration due to chiasmal herniation [14] has been reported. We will continue to closely monitor the patient in the outpatient clinic, paying attention to the change in visual acuity in association with the prolactin level.

Conclusions

We report a case of macroprolactinoma with a resolution of visual disturbance. In this case, serial ophthalmological exams including the measurement of visual fields, CFF, and OCT contributed to predicting the resolution of the disturbance in vision. These results were instrumental in predicting the visual outcome in accord with the pharmacological treatment. Seeking immediate medical attention after the onset of visual disturbance and optical assessment at the time of diagnosis may contribute to the restoration of visual acuity with no impairment of the prognosis.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Identification of an optimal prolactin threshold to determine prolactinoma size using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Leca BM, Mytilinaiou M, Tsoli M, et al. Sci Rep. 2021;11:9801. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89256-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Macroprolactinoma: a diagnostic and therapeutic update. Iglesias P, Díez JJ. QJM. 2013;106:495–504. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcs240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Epidemiology and management challenges in prolactinomas. Vroonen L, Daly AF, Beckers A. Neuroendocrinology. 2019;109:20–27. doi: 10.1159/000497746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prolactinomas. Eduardo WL, Fialho C, Monica R. Presse Medicale. 2021;50:104080. doi: 10.1016/j.lpm.2021.104080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Visual prognostic value of the pattern electroretinogram in chiasmal compression. Parmar DN, Sofat A, Bowman R, Bartlett JR, Holder GE. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:1024–1026. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.9.1024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Atypical giant suprasellar prolactinoma presenting with visual field changes in the absence of symptoms of hyperprolactinemia. Sun S, Mo JQ, Levy ML, Crawford J. Cureus. 2021;13:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Therapy of endocrine disease: the challenges in managing giant prolactinomas. Maiter D, Delgrange E. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014;170:0–27. doi: 10.1530/EJE-14-0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pituitary adenomas: historical perspective, surgical management and future directions. Theodros D, Patel M, Ruzevick J, Lim M, Bettegowda C. CNS Oncol. 2015;4:411–429. doi: 10.2217/cns.15.21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cabergoline in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: a study in 455 patients. Verhelst J, Abs R, Maiter D, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metabolism. 1999;84:2518–2522. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.7.5810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Treatment of pituitary and other tumours with cabergoline: new mechanisms and potential broader applications. Lin S, Zhang A, Zhang X, Wu ZB. Neuroendocrinology. 2020;110:477–488. doi: 10.1159/000504000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.The role of dopamine agonists in pituitary adenomas. Giraldi EA, Ioachimescu AG. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020;49:453–474. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2020.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Management and outcomes of giant prolactinoma: a series of 71 patients. Hamidi O, Van Gompel J, Gruber L, et al. Endocr Pract. 2019;25:340–352. doi: 10.4158/EP-2018-0392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori VM, Schlechte JA, Wass JA. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:273–288. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Management of endocrine disease: visual morbidity in patients with pituitary adenoma. Lithgow K, Batra R, Matthews T, Karavitaki N. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;181:0–97. doi: 10.1530/EJE-19-0349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Prognostic factors for visual recovery after transsphenoidal pituitary adenectomy. Lee S, Kim SJ, Yu YS, Kim YH, Paek SH, Kim DG, Jung HW. Br J Neurosurg. 2013;27:425–429. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2013.767316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.In vivo retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography predicts visual recovery after surgery for parachiasmal tumors. Danesh-Meyer HV, Papchenko T, Savino PJ, Law A, Evans J, Gamble GD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:1879–1885. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-1127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Prognostic utility of optical coherence tomography for long-term visual recovery following pituitary tumor surgery. Wang MT, King J, Symons RC, et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;218:247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Optical coherent tomography predicts long-term visual outcome of pituitary adenoma surgery: new perspectives from a 5-year follow-up study. Chung YS, Na M, Yoo J, et al. Neurosurgery. 2020;88:106–112. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Optical coherence tomography retinal ganglion cell complex analysis for the detection of early chiasmal compression. Blanch RJ, Micieli JA, Oyesiku NM, Newman NJ, Biousse V. Pituitary. 2018;21:515–523. doi: 10.1007/s11102-018-0906-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Prospective study of high-dose cabergoline treatment of prolactinomas in 150 patients. Ono M, Miki N, Kawamata T, et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4721–4727. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES