Abstract
Objectives
HIV self-testing has been available in Spain since 2017 as a diagnostic tool to promote earlier diagnosis. We aimed to assess awareness and previous use of HIV self-testing in a sample of men who have sex with men (MSM) recruited online more than 2 years after its legal authorization in Spain.
Methods
We analyzed 5,492 MSM recruited between May and July 2020 in gay dating apps/websites and other social networks. We estimated the proportion of participants who were aware of the existence of HIV self-testing and the proportion who reported previous use. To identify factors associated with both outcomes we built two Poisson regression models. Among those who reported previous use we described several aspects related to their last self-test.
Results
Awareness of HIV self-test was reported by 29.7% and its previous use by 5% of participants. Awareness was independently associated with recruitment in gay dating apps/websites, being ≥40 years old, born in Spain-other European countries, having higher educational level, living in medium-small municipalities and living sex life openly. Independent associations were also found with having received a sexually transmitted infection diagnosis (STI) or an HIV negative test in the last 12 months, and being HIV positive. Use was significantly higher among participants who were paid for sex or diagnosed with an STI in the last 12 months and who received their last HIV test in the preceding year. Self-testing occurred recently, with kits acquired at pharmacies and carried out alone.
Conclusion
Awareness and use probably have not increased sufficiently in order to make a relevant impact to the promotion of early HIV diagnosis. Additional efforts, mainly focused on less favored MSM, should be made to take better advantage of the possibilities offered by this testing option.
Keywords: early diagnosis, HIV self-testing (HIVST), self-diagnosis, infectious disease, men who have sex with men (MSM)
Introduction
In 2020, 1.925 new HIV cases were reported to the Spanish surveillance system of which 52.2% were acquired through sex between men (1). Early diagnosis is the gateway to treatment which reduces morbidity (2, 3) and mortality (4) and drastically reduces the probability of transmission to an uninfected individual (5). Early diagnosis is in fact one of the main elements of the UNAIDS 95-95-95 strategy to end the HIV epidemic. According to this strategy, by 2030, 95% of people living with HIV should be diagnosed, 95% of whom should be on treatment, 95% of whom should have undetectable viral load (6).
Testing in Spain is offered confidentially and free of cost at all levels of the national health system. It is also offered in sexual health clinics which are public, free, low threshold facilities oriented toward the most vulnerable population groups (7). Outside clinical settings, rapid testing is also offered free of cost in Community Based Organizations (8) and in community pharmacies (9). However, in Spain 16.5% of MSM living with HIV remain undiagnosed (10) and delayed diagnosis is still common with 39.6% of newly diagnosed MSM in 2020 presenting at a late stage of infection (CD4 count of <350 mm3) (1).
HIV self-testing is the latest incorporation to already existing testing options and aims at making HIV diagnosis more accessible. In Spain, it was authorized in December 2017 (11) and can now be purchased at pharmacies at a cost of 25–30 euros. In this methodology, individuals need to perform their own test and interpret the results. Self-testing kits can be blood or saliva based and, if reactive, confirmatory testing is required. Clinical trials have proven its capacity to increase testing frequency among MSM (12–14) and online studies conclude that self-testing is highly acceptable to MSM (15) who are largely in favor of it (16).
Nevertheless, its real use is difficult to ascertain since no data is available on the number of self-testing kits sold. Additionally, surveillance data does not publish information on the type of test used in newly diagnosed individuals. Self-reported data on awareness about the existence of self-testing and previous use is one way of overcoming this data shortage. In Spain, a number of studies assessed awareness about the existence and use of self-testing by MSM in online recruited samples (15, 17) and among attendees of a rapid testing program (18). All of them found lower levels of awareness than in other European countries (17, 19) whereas the level of use also sat in the lower range (17, 19). All the aforementioned studies present data collected before self-testing authorization in the studied countries. Media attention, promotion campaigns and mouth to ear following authorization probably led to higher levels of awareness but very few studies have assessed this aspect post-authorization. The only study that evaluated both outcomes after the legal authorization of HIV self-testing was conducted in Spain and is in line with this hypothesis: level of awareness and use was substantially higher than in previous studies conducted in Spain (20). However, this study analyzed a sample of MSM who were seeking to be tested for HIV in Madrid and Barcelona, the two largest cities of Spain. Thus, by definition, it did not include participants who had never sought testing and those who already were HIV positive. Additionally, the sample was comprised almost exclusively by participants who lived in the aforementioned major cities both of which are more than 1.000.000 inhabitants and did not include MSM from medium-sized cities and rural areas who might have different testing needs.
In this study, we analyzed an online sample of MSM recruited through gay dating websites/apps and other social networks more than 2 years after the authorization of HIV self-testing in Spain and assessed their awareness of its existence as well as the level of previous use and describe several aspects related to the self-testing process.
Methods
Participants
We performed an online based cross-sectional study between May and July 2020. We included 5,492 participants who were male at birth, who reported ever having had anal sex with another man and who were legally old enough to have sex at the moment of participation.
No sample size calculation was performed. We used non-probabilistic convenience sampling to recruit the largest possible sample of MSM.
Recruitment and Data Collection Instrument
Recruitment was mainly carried out using two dissemination methods. First, participants were invited to participate through personal messages and promotional banners distributed through gay dating apps and websites. Invitations were only presented to participants accessing from Spain. Secondly, we also contacted several Spanish youtubers and Instagram influencers with LGTB oriented content who agreed to promote the study (hereafter Social networks other than dating apps). We provided unique links to each recruitment site to identify the recruitment site of each participant. Those interested in participating were directed to an initial screen where they were informed about the aim of the study, the funding source and the approximate length of the questionnaire (10–15 min). To avoid multiple participation, the initial screen also included a request to only complete the questionnaire once if invitation was received through various ways. Additionally, to further limit the possibility of multiple responses from one individual, we used the option given by the software of only allowing the completion of one questionnaire per electronic device. After reading the initial screen, those who decided to participate were redirected to the questionnaire after checking a box to confirm that they were old enough to legally have sex in Spain (16 years old) and that they wanted to participate in the study. No incentive was offered in exchange for participation which also limited the chances of multiple participation.
Data was collected through a self-administered questionnaire that included questions assessing sociodemography, outness, sex of lifetime sexual partners, sexual behavior in the last 12 months, history of Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI), testing history and HIV serostatus. It also included a section to assess whether participants knew about the existence of self-testing (awareness) and if they had already used it at the moment of survey completion (use). We also included questions to asses overall sexualized drug use and “Chemsex.” The latter was defined as having taken mephedrone and/or methamphetamine and/or gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) (21) within 6 h before or during anal sex. To assess sex of lifetime sexual partner, participants were asked to choose one of the following options: (a) I have never had sex neither with men nor with women, (b) I have had sex only with women, (c) I have had sex more often with women, but at least once with a man, (d) I have had sex equally with men and women, (e) I have had sex more often with men, but at least once with a woman and (f) I have had sex only with men. Those who chose answer (a) or (b) were excluded from participation.
To assess economic status, we asked participants to choose one of the following response options: (a) “Very comfortable,” (b) “Comfortable,” (c) “It's tight, I have to be careful to make ends meet,” (d) “I make ends meet with difficulty” (e) “I make ends meet with debts.” Based on this question we built a three category variable: options (a) and (b) were collapsded into the “Comfortable-very comfortable” category, (d) and (e) into the “difficult” category and option (c) conformed the “tight” category.
The questionnaire was designed in the context of a research Project (the Methysos Project) which focused on MSM and had HIV-self testing among its several areas of interest. The research group, developed a draft version of the questionnaire which was shared with several experts on the field who critically reviewed it. The suggested changes were discussed and incorporated into the questionnaire. Afterwards, the questionnaire was piloted to check its internal consistency.
Awareness and use comprised our main outcomes. Awareness was assessed with the following question: “Did you know that in Spain you can buy an HIV self-test at the pharmacy or parapharmacy without the need of a prescription?” Participants had to choose between the following response options: (1) No, I did not now, (2) I had heard something but was not sure and (3) Yes, I knew. Use was assessed by asking: “Have you ever tested for HIV using a self-testing kit?” In this case, participants had to choose between Yes and No. For participants who reported previous use, we included a set of questions to assess the number of self-tests performed in the past, time since last use, place of acquisition of the last self-testing kit and the person with whom participants were with during their last self-testing episode. We created a three category variable to assess serostatus and testing history. The first category is comprised by participants who did not meet current recommendations for MSM of undergoing HIV testing at least every 12 months (22). Never-testers and participants who reported having tested more than 12 months ago were included in this category. The second category was comprised by participants who received their last test in the previous 12 months. The third and last category was comprised by those who reported being HIV positive. The survey was anonymous and confidential and no variables enabling personal identification were collected. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (CEI PI 35_2020-v3).
Data Analysis
We first performed a descriptive analysis of the main characteristics of the sample. Secondly, we estimated the proportion of participants who reported awareness and use of HIV-self testing by relevant independent variables. Awareness of self-testing was collapsed in a two-category variable: (1) “Yes, I knew”; (2) “No, I did not” or “I had heard something but was not sure.” To estimate the factors associated with awareness and with use, we used Poisson regression with robust variance in the framework of generalized linear models' analysis (23, 24) to calculate the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). We initially included all the relevant variables with a significance level ≤ 0.20 and employed the minimum Akaike information criterion and the minimum Bayesian Schwartz information criterion for model comparisons and to select the optimal model. For those who reported having used it in the past, we assessed the number of times used, time since last use, where was the last self-test acquired and who was he with the last time they self-tested.
Results
Main Characteristics of Participants
Seventy-two percent of the study participants were recruited through gay dating apps and websites, and 26.6% through Social networks other than dating apps. Forty-five percent were ≥40 years of age, 82.8% were born in Spain and 54.7% had finished a university degree at the moment of participation. Approximately 65% reported having a comfortable or very comfortable economic situation and 31.6% lived in cities of >1.000.000 inhabitants. More than half (54.4%) lived their sex-life with other men openly. Regarding sexual behaviors, 63.2% reported only having had sex with other men in the past (and never with women), 71.8% were involved in condomless anal sex in the last 12 months and 23.9% and 22.5% had paid and received money in exchange for sex in the same time period. Almost half (46.2%) reported having been diagnosed with an STI in the past (16.2% in the last 12 months) and 10% had been involved in Chemsex in the previous 12 months. An HIV positive serostatus was reported by 14% whereas 55.2% received their last negative test in the last 12 months and 30.8% had never been tested or had received their last negative test >12 months ago (of whom 15.3% were never testers and 15.5% had tested more than 12 months ago) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Main characteristics of study participants (N = 5,492).
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Recruitment site | ||
| Gay dating apps/websites | 3,954 | 72.0 |
| Social networks other than dating apps | 1,460 | 26.6 |
| Other* | 78 | 1.4 |
| Age at the moment of participation (years) | ||
| <30 | 1,534 | 27.9 |
| 30–39 | 1,489 | 27.1 |
| ≥40 | 2,469 | 45.0 |
| Place of birth | ||
| Spain | 4,547 | 82.8 |
| Latin America | 736 | 13.4 |
| European countries other than Spain | 164 | 3.0 |
| Other countries | 45 | 0.8 |
| University education | 3,003 | 54.7 |
| Economic situation | ||
| Comfortable-very comfortable | 3,547 | 64.7 |
| Tight | 1,488 | 27.1 |
| Difficult | 448 | 8.2 |
| Inhabitants of place of residency | ||
| More than 1,000,000 inhabitants | 1,731 | 31.6 |
| 100,000–1,000,000 | 1,812 | 33.1 |
| 10,000–99,999 | 1,283 | 23.4 |
| <10,000 | 646 | 11.8 |
| Lives sex life with other men... | ||
| Openly | 2,984 | 54.4 |
| Discreetly | 2,009 | 36.6 |
| Hidden/In total secrecy | 497 | 9.1 |
| Has had sex only with men | 3,472 | 63.2 |
| Number of male sexual partners with whom he had condomless | ||
| anal sex (last 12 months) | ||
| None | 1,546 | 28.2 |
| One | 1,550 | 28.2 |
| 2–4 | 1,228 | 22.4 |
| 5–9 | 417 | 7.6 |
| 10 or more | 749 | 13.6 |
| Has paid for sex in the last 12 months | 1,307 | 23.9 |
| Has been paid for sex in the last 12 months | 1,234 | 22.5 |
| History of STI** | ||
| Never diagnosed with an STI | 2,924 | 53.8 |
| Diagnosed in the last 12 months | 878 | 16.2 |
| Diagnosed more than 12 months ago | 1,634 | 30.1 |
| Has been involved in chemsex (last 12 months)*** | 520 | 10.0 |
| HIV testing history/serostatus | ||
| Never tested & last tested >12 months ago | 1,690 | 30.8 |
| Last tested <12 months ago | 3,029 | 55.2 |
| HIV positive | 768 | 14.0 |
% estimated over cases with valid data.
Public health agency and NGOs.
STI, Sexually transmitted infections.
Mephedrone and/or methamphetamine and/or gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) within 6 h before or during anal sex.
Awareness of the Availability of HIV Self-Testing Kits in Pharmacies Without the Need of a Prescription
Overall, 29.7% of all MSM reported being aware of the existence of HIV self-testing (Table 2). On the multivariable analysis, awareness was associated with recruitment in gay dating websites/apps [Adj.PR = 1.2; (CI 95%: 1.1–1.3)] and being ≥ 40 years old [Adj.PR = 1.2; (CI 95%: 1.0–1.3)]. Compared to participants born in Latin America, awareness was higher among those born in Spain [Adj.PR = 1.5; (CI 95%: 1.3–1.7)] and other European countries [Adj.PR = 1.4; (CI 95%: 1.1–1.8)]. Compared to those who reported having up to compulsory secondary education, awareness was higher among those who had upper secondary [Adj.PR = 1.2; (CI 95%: 1.0–1.4)] or university education [Adj.PR = 1.3; (CI 95%: 1.1–1.6)]. Living in cities of under 1.000.000 inhabitants [100.000–1.000.000 Adj.PR = 1.2; (CI 95%: 1.1–1.4); 10.000–99.999 Adj.PR = 1.2; (CI 95%: 1.1–1.3); <10.000 Adj.PR = 1.2; (CI 95%: 1.0–1.3)] and living sex life with other men openly [Adj.PR = 1.4; (CI 95%: 1.1–1.7)] were also associated with higher awareness. Finally, it was higher among those reported having received an STI diagnosis in the last 12 months [Adj.PR = 1.2; (CI 95%: 1.1–1.4)] and among those who reported having received their last HIV negative test <12 months ago [Adj.PR = 1.5; (CI 95%: 1.4–1.7)] or being HIV positive [Adj.PR = 1.9; (CI 95%: 1.6–2.2)].
Table 2.
Proportion of participants who were aware of the existence of HIV self-testing and associated factors (N = 5,492).
| N | % | cPR | 95% CI | aPR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 1,632 | 29.7 | ||||
| Recruitment site | ||||||
| Social networks other than dating apps and others* | 359 | 23.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Gay dating apps/websites | 1,273 | 32.2 | 1.4 | 1.2–1.6 | 1.2 | 1.1–1.3 |
| Age at the moment of participation (years) | ||||||
| <30 | 372 | 24.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| 30–39 | 441 | 29.6 | 1.2 | 1.1–1.4 | 1.1 | 0.9–1.2 |
| ≥40 | 819 | 33.2 | 1.4 | 1.2–1.5 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.3 |
| Place of birth | ||||||
| Latin America | 156 | 21.2 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Spain | 1,413 | 31.1 | 1.5 | 1.2–1.7 | 1.5 | 1.3–1.7 |
| Other European countries | 52 | 31.7 | 1.5 | 1.1–2.0 | 1.4 | 1.1–1.8 |
| Other countries | 11 | 24.4 | 1.2 | 0.6–2.1 | 1.2 | 0.7–1.9 |
| Education | ||||||
| Up to compulsory secondary education | 131 | 24.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Upper secondary education | 541 | 27.7 | 1.1 | 0.9–1.4 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.4 |
| University education | 959 | 31.9 | 1.3 | 1.1–1.6 | 1.3 | 1.1–1.6 |
| Economic situation | ||||||
| Difficult | 113 | 25.2 | 1.0 | |||
| Tight | 401 | 26.9 | 1.1 | 0.9–1.3 | ||
| Comfortable-very comfortable | 1,118 | 31.5 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.5 | ||
| Inhabitants of place of residency | ||||||
| More than 1,000,000 inhabitants | 476 | 27.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| 100,000–1,000,000 | 587 | 32.4 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.3 | 1.2 | 1.1–1.4 |
| 10,000–99,999 | 381 | 29.7 | 1.1 | 0.9–1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1–1.3 |
| <10,000 | 183 | 28.3 | 1.0 | 0.9–1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.3 |
| Lives sex life with other men... | ||||||
| Hidden/In total secrecy | 109 | 21.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Discreetly | 533 | 26.5 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.5 | 1.1 | 0.9–1.3 |
| Openly | 988 | 33.1 | 1.5 | 1.2–1.8 | 1.4 | 1.1–1.7 |
| Number of male sexual partners with whom he had condomless anal sex (last 12 months) | ||||||
| None | 463 | 29.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| One | 386 | 24.9 | 0.8 | 0.7–1.0 | 0.8 | 0.8–1.0 |
| 2–4 | 362 | 29.5 | 1.0 | 0.9–1.1 | 0.9 | 0.8–1.0 |
| 5–9 | 132 | 31.7 | 1.1 | 0.9–1.3 | 0.9 | 0.8–1.1 |
| 10 or more | 287 | 38.3 | 1.3 | 1.1–1.5 | 0.9 | 0.8–1.1 |
| Has been paid for sex in the last 12 months | ||||||
| No | 1,227 | 28.9 | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 401 | 32.5 | 1.1 | 1.0–1.3 | ||
| History of STI** | ||||||
| Never diagnosed with an STI | 735 | 25.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Diagnosed more than 12 months ago | 537 | 32.9 | 1.3 | 1.2–1.5 | 1.1 | 1.0–1.2 |
| Diagnosed in the last 12 months | 343 | 39.1 | 1.6 | 1.4–1.8 | 1.2 | 1.1–1.4 |
| Has been involved in chemsex***(last 12 months) | ||||||
| No | 1,364 | 29.2 | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 187 | 36.0 | 1.2 | 1.1–1.4 | ||
| HIV testing history/serostatus | ||||||
| Never tested & last tested >12 months ago | 326 | 19.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Last tested <12 months ago | 974 | 32.2 | 1.7 | 1.5–1.9 | 1.5 | 1.4–1.7 |
| HIV positive | 328 | 42.7 | 2.2 | 1.9–2.6 | 1.9 | 1.6–2.2 |
% estimated over cases with valid data. cPR, Crude Prevalence Ratio; aPR, Adjusted Prevalence Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.
Others includes, Public health agency and NGOs.
STI, Sexually transmitted infections.
Mephedrone and/or methamphetamine and/or gamma hydroxybutyrate (GHB) within 6 h before or during anal sex.
Previous Use of HIV Self-Testing Kits
Five percent reported having already used an HIV self-test before the day of survey completion. On the multivariable analysis, previous use was higher among participants who reported having been paid for sex in the last 12 months [Adj.PR = 1.4; (CI 95%: 1.1–1.8)], in those who reported having been diagnosed with an STI in the last 12 months [Adj.PR = 1.4; (CI 95%: 1.0–1.8)] and among those who reported having been tested for HIV in the previous 12 months [Adj.PR = 4.7 (CI 95%: 3.1–7.1)] (Table 3). Among participants who reported previous use of a self-test, over half (52.2%) reported having used it only once, 65.9% used their last self-test in the previous 12 months, 62.4% acquired it over the counter at a pharmacy and 71.6% used it alone (Table 4).
Table 3.
Proportion of participants who had used a self-testing kit in the past and associated factors (N = 5,488).
| N | % | cPR | 95%CI | aPR | 95%CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 275 | 5.0 | ||||
| Recruitmen site | ||||||
| Social networks other than dating apps and others* | 66 | 4.3 | 1.0 | |||
| Gay dating apps/websites | 209 | 5.3 | 1.2 | 0.9–1.6 | ||
| Age at the moment of participation (years) | ||||||
| <30 | 80 | 5.2 | 1.2 | 0.9–1.6 | ||
| 30–39 | 89 | 6.0 | 1.4 | 1.1–1.8 | ||
| ≥40 | 106 | 4.3 | 1.0 | |||
| Place of birth | ||||||
| Latin America | 31 | 4.2 | 1.0 | |||
| Spain | 226 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 0.8–1.7 | ||
| European countries other than Spain | 14 | 8.5 | 2.0 | 1.1–3.8 | ||
| Other countries | 4 | 8.9 | 2.1 | 0.7–6.0 | ||
| Education | ||||||
| Up to compulsory secondary education | 17 | 3.2 | 1.0 | |||
| Upper secondary education | 88 | 4.5 | 1.4 | 0.8–2.4 | ||
| University education | 169 | 5.6 | 1.8 | 1.1–2.9 | ||
| Lives sex life with other men... | ||||||
| Hidden/In total secrecy | 14 | 2.8 | 1.0 | |||
| Discreetly | 85 | 4.2 | 1.5 | 0.9–2.6 | ||
| Openly | 175 | 5.9 | 2.1 | 1.2–3.6 | ||
| Number of male sexual partners with whom he had condomless anal sex (last 12 months) | ||||||
| None | 66 | 4.3 | 1.0 | |||
| One | 63 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.7–1.3 | ||
| 2–4 | 58 | 4.7 | 1.1 | 0.8–1.6 | ||
| 5–9 | 29 | 7.0 | 1.6 | 1.1–2.5 | ||
| 10 or more | 59 | 7.9 | 1.8 | 1.3–2.6 | ||
| Has paid for sex in the last 12 months | ||||||
| No | 198 | 4.8 | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 77 | 5.9 | 1.2 | 1.0–1.6 | ||
| Has been paid for sex in the last 12 months | ||||||
| No | 193 | 4.5 | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 80 | 6.5 | 1.4 | 1.1–1.9 | 1.4 | 1.1–1.8 |
| Unprotected intercourse with women (last 12 months) | ||||||
| No | 255 | 4.9 | 1.0 | |||
| Yes | 20 | 6.6 | 1.3 | 0.8–2.1 | ||
| History of STI** | ||||||
| Never diagnosed with an STI | 129 | 4.4 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Diagnosed more than 12 months ago | 74 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.8–1.4 | 1.0 | 0.7–1.3 |
| Diagnosed in the last 12 months | 68 | 7.8 | 1.8 | 1.3–2.4 | 1.4 | 1.0–1.8 |
| HIV testing history/serostatus | ||||||
| Never tested & last tested >12 months ago | 25 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Last tested <12 months ago | 230 | 7.6 | 5.1 | 3.4–7.8 | 4.7 | 3.1–7.1 |
| HIV positive | 20 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 1.0–3.2 | 1.4 | 0.7–2.6 |
% estimated over cases with valid data. cPR, Crude Prevalence Ratio; aPR, Adjusted Prevalence Ratio (adjusted by age); CI, Confidence Interval.
Others includes, Public health agency and NGOs.
STI, Sexually transmitted infections.
Table 4.
Number of self tets performed, times since last self-testing episode, place of acquisition and company during last episode among participants who reported having used a self-test in the past (N = 275).
| N | % | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of self-testing kits used* | ||
| One | 143 | 52.2 |
| Two | 51 | 18.6 |
| Three or more | 80 | 29.2 |
| Time since last self-test* | ||
| ≤ 12 months | 180 | 65.9 |
| >12–24 | 49 | 17.9 |
| >24 months to 5 years | 34 | 12.5 |
| >5 years ago | 10 | 3.7 |
| Where was the last self-test acquired* | ||
| At a pharmacy (over the counter) | 171 | 62.4 |
| At an online pharmacy | 36 | 13.1 |
| Vending machine | 0 | 0.0 |
| At a country (other than Spain) where it is legally sold | 19 | 6.9 |
| Purchased it on the internet without having certainty about its legality | 7 | 2.6 |
| Others | 41 | 15.0 |
| With whom did he self-test last time | ||
| Alone | 197 | 71.6 |
| Stable partner | 25 | 9.1 |
| Occasional partner | 8 | 2.9 |
| Friend | 27 | 9.8 |
| Family member | 5 | 1.8 |
| CBO/NGO staff | 6 | 2.2 |
| Health profesional | 3 | 1.1 |
| Others** | 4 | 1.5 |
% estimated over cases with valid data.
Due to missing values, the total does not add up to 275.
Others include: pharmacist, psychologist and “I do not remember”.
Discussion
Awareness and previous use in this online sample of MSM recruited more than 2 years after its legal authorization in Spain remains low. Awareness was found to be higher in participants recruited in gay dating websites/apps, older and European individuals, with educational levels above compulsory secondary education, who lived in medium to small sized municipalities and who lived their sex life with other men in an open manner. Awareness was also higher among those who reported having been diagnosed with an STI in the last 12 months and among HIV positive individuals. Use was higher in those who reported having been paid for sex or diagnosed with an STI in the last 12 months and among participants who received their last negative HIV test in the last 12 months.
We recruited a large and varied online sample of MSM using gay dating apps-websites and other social networks. Thus, we were able to include relevant subgroups such as MSM living in medium and small sized municipalities as well as never tested and HIV positive individuals. The overall awareness rate was notably higher than in previous studies conducted before its legal authorization in Spain (15, 17) and other European countries such as Denmark, Greece, Portugal, Romania or Slovenia and very similar to that found in Germany, Belgium (17) and France (19). The higher level of awareness found in our study—when compared to pre-approval studies conducted in Spain—is probably explained by the media attention and promotion that followed its approval. In fact, in the only study conducted post-approval, awareness among attendees of sexual health clinics and community-based testing programs in Madrid and Barcelona (20) was very similar to what has been found in the present study. However, in spite of its growth, awareness is still very low and additional efforts need to be made to improve it in MSM. In this sense, the popularization of COVID 19 self-testing devices could have increased the readiness of both the general and MSM populations for self-diagnostic technologies and offers an opportunity to roll-out effective self-testing promotion campaigns.
Awareness is relevant because it is a necessary condition to access self-testing. Our multivariable analysis revealed that it is higher in participants recruited through gay dating websites suggesting the need of promoting this methodology in other online settings serving MSM with a different profile such as YouTube, Instagram and other social networks. Concerning sociodemography, increased awareness was found among participants who were over 40 years of age, born in European countries and with higher educational level. These findings highlight the need of raising awareness among less favored groups such as Latin-American migrants and those with lower educational level to reduce testing access inequities. Although the variable assessing economic situation was not retained in the final model, when considering the promotion of self-testing among less favored subpopulations it is important to note, that regardless of the level of awareness, the current price of 25–30 euros could be an important barrier as has been suggested in previous studies (25).
The higher level of awareness found in residents of medium and small size cities and towns is an encouraging finding since MSM from less populated municipalities could have lower access to HIV testing than MSM residing in larger cities. Home-based testing has been highlighted as a preferential testing option by rural MSM in studies (26–28) conducted in the US. This finding needs to be confirmed in the European context but the higher levels of awareness found in our study could be an expression of the need of increased access to HIV testing in this subgroup of MSM. Awareness was also higher among MSM who lived their sex life with other men in an open manner which is in line with previous studies (20) and highlights the need of increasing it among less open MSM. In fact, the latter could be facing stigma and discrimination related barriers and the privacy and anonymity offered by self-testing could facilitate access to testing (29).
The higher awareness found among those diagnosed with an STI in the last 12 months could reflect a “worried well” situation since higher rates of STI are generally associated with increased risk of condomless sex. However, in our sample, we did not find associations between higher rates of condomless anal sex and awareness.
The association was especially intense among HIV positive MSM. This is the first time that awareness is assessed in already diagnosed individuals who comprise a non-negligible subgroup of the MSM population. Although, they cannot directly benefit from this testing methodology HIV positive individuals could recommend it to peers, friends and sexual partners and could help to increase awareness among MSM. On the other hand, it is important to underline the low levels of awareness found among undertested MSM. This is a relevant finding as data from modeling studies highlight the importance of specifically targeting never testers as the most efficient way of averting new infections through HIV self-testing strategies (30).
Similar to awareness, the proportion of participants who reported previous use was higher than in online studies conducted among MSM before its authorization in Spain (15, 17) and other European countries (17) and very similar to a study conducted in Spain after its approval (20). Nevertheless, previous use still remains very low. The increase of use of HIV self-testing could lead to a rise of testing frequency in MSM and, if accompanied of prompt linkage to care, could contribute to curbing the epidemic in this population group. There are several possible strategies to increase the low use found in our study. First, use will not increase before MSM are made aware of the existence of this testing option and, as noted before, awareness in Spain is still low. If promotion of HIV self-testing is left to mouth to ear, use will probably increase very slowly. Promotion campaigns focusing on those MSM groups who do not know about the existence of self-testing, should be conducted to raise the number of MSM who use a self-testing kit to check their serostatus. In this sense, the new Spanish plan for the prevention and control of HIV and STIs (2021–2030) includes the visibilization of self-testing (31) as one of its activities. Second, to overcome the aforementioned price barrier, partly or fully publicly funded distribution of HIV self-testing could increase its use (14) especially in less favored individuals and in MSM with ongoing sexual behaviors for whom a test each 3 months is recommended. Third, diversification of distribution strategies could also increase self-testing. In our sample, most MSM acquired their last self-test over the counter at a pharmacy but online marketing and distribution could help improve access to self-testing as suggested by a number of studies (12). This is especially important for MSM living in rural areas who can have limited access to pharmacy offices. Satisfaction with the self-testing experience will not affect overall use but will influence the decision on whether to use a self-test again. In our study we did not assess user satisfaction but almost half of the participants who had used a self-test reported having used it more than one time.
The use of self-testing was higher in certain subgroups. Thus, we found a higher use in two high risk groups such as those who had been paid for sex and among MSM who received an STI diagnosis in the last 12 months. For sex workers, HIV self-testing could offer the possibility of checking their (and their clients) serostatus before engaging in sexual encounters. However, this practice is risky due to longer window periods and reduced accuracy of self-testing during acute infection (32) that can lead to false-negative results in a highly infectious stage (33). Similar to knowledge, use was substantially higher among those who received their self-test in the last 12 months suggesting the need of promoting self-testing especially among undertested individuals as a way of increasing the fulfillment of testing recommendations.
Results are not without limitations. Although we made an effort to recruit MSM from a varied range of sites, this is a convenience sample and extrapolating conclusions from this study to other MSM populations should be made with extreme caution. We did not ask participants about their sexual orientation since our approach to sexuality was strictly behavioral. We could not ascertain if any of the HIV positive participants were diagnosed as a consequence of using a self-test since the site where diagnosis occurred and the type of test used were not assessed. Self-testing presents challenges to document to what extent reactive results are being confirmed and linked to care and to quantify what is their contribution to the overall number of newly diagnosed individuals. However, unless surveillance units publish data on setting and type of test used for newly diagnosed individuals, it seems as a natural step that needs to be taken in future studies on HIV self-testing.
Awareness and use of HIV self-testing among MSM recruited online in Spain, has increased when compared to studies conducted before its legal authorization but remains low. In order to reach its full potential, the use of self-tests needs to be increased by improving awareness especially among less favored MSM such as Latin-American migrants, with lower education levels, who are undertested and less open about their sexuality. Additionally, the distribution and sale of self-testing through different ways could also contribute to increase its use.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Methysos Project Group
María del Carmen Burgos, César Pérez Romero, Lidia Herrero (Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid); José Antonio San Juan Bueno (Asociación Pink Peace, Madrid); David Palma Díaz, Francisca Roman Urrestaruzo, Jesus E Ospina, Miguel Alarcón Gutiérrez (Agència de Salut Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona); Jorge del Romero, Oskar Ayerdi, Carmen Rodríguez, Sonsoles del Corral Del Campo, Natividad Jerez Zamora, Marta Ruiz Fernández, Montserrat González Polo (Centro Sanitario Sandoval, Madrid); María Jesús Barbera Gracia, Jorge-Néstor García-Pérez, Luis López Pérez, Claudia Broto Cortes, Julio Morais Martin (Unitat d'Infeccions de Transmissió Sexual Drassanes, Hospital de la Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona).
Author Contributions
LF, PG, and M-JB conceived, designed, and supervised the study. J-MG and PG organized the recruitment of participants. J-MG, MD, JP, and LS contributed to the recruitment of subject and data collection. J-MG, JH, MD, LS, and JP performed the main analyses. J-MG, JH, PG, and M-JB wrote the manuscript. JH, LF, and M-JB were responsible for drafting and critical revisions of the manuscript. J-MG, JH, LF, MD, JP, LS, PG, M-JB, and the additional members of the Methysos Project Group made substantive contributions to the current article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This work received funding from the National Drugs Plan (Ministry of Health, Government of Spain, 2019I017).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank following websites, companies and institutions who collaborated in the recruitment: Pink Peace, Wapo, Bakala, MachoBB, Scruff, Xtudr, GROWLr, Grindr, Chem-Safe. We would also like to thank Gabriel José Martin (youtube) @frewaskachannel and @tigrilloig (Instagram).
References
- 1.Unidad De Vigilancia De VIH Y Comportamientos De Riesgo . Vigilancia Epidemiológica Del VIH Y Sida En España 2020: Sistema De Información Sobre Nuevos Diagnósticos De VIH Y Registro Nacional De Casos De Sida. Plan Nacional Sobre El Sida - D.G. De Salud Pública, Calidad E Innovación/Centro Nacional De Epidemiología - ISCIII. (2021). Available online at: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/ciudadanos/enfLesiones/enfTransmisibles/sida/vigilancia/Informe_VIH_SIDA_WEB.pdf (accessed February 15, 2022).
- 2.Danel C, Moh R, Gabillard D, Badje A, Le Carrou J, Ouassa T, et al. A trial of early antiretrovirals and isoniazid preventive therapy in Africa. N Engl J Med. (2015) 373:808–22. 10.1056/NEJMoa1507198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lundgren JD, Babiker AG, Gordin F, Emery S, Grund B, Sharma S, et al. Initiation of antiretroviral therapy in early asymptomatic hiv infection. N Engl J Med. (2015) 373:795–807. 10.1056/NEJMoa1506816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rodger AJ, Lodwick R, Schechter M, Deeks S, Amin J, Gilson R, et al. Mortality in well controlled hiv in the continuous antiretroviral therapy arms of the smart and esprit trials compared with the general population. AIDS. (2013) 27:973–9. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835cae9c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, Vernazza P, Collins S, van Lunzen J, et al. Sexual activity without condoms and risk of hiv transmission in serodifferent couples when the hiv-positive partner is using suppressive antiretroviral therapy. JAMA. (2016) 316:171–81. 10.1001/jama.2016.5148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.UNAIDS . Understanding Fast-Track. Accelerating Action to End the Aids Epidemic by 2030. Geneva. (2015). Available online at: https://www.unaids.org/sites/default/files/media_asset/201506_JC2743_Understanding_FastTrack_en.pdf (accessed February 15, 2022). [Google Scholar]
- 7.Diez M, Bleda MJ, Varela JR, Ordonana J, Azpiri MA, Vall M, et al. Trends in hiv testing, prevalence among first-time testers, and incidence in most-at-risk populations in spain: the Epi-Vih study, 2000 to 2009. Euro Surv. (2014) 19:20971. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES2014.19.47.20971 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Balbuena SF, Hoyos J, Belza MJ, Pujol F, Álvarez J, Zulaica D, et al. Hiv rapid testing programs in non-clinical settings have the potential to constitute a major diagnostic option for msm in spain. AIDS Behav. (2017) 21:525–33. 10.1007/s10461-016-1597-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fernández-Balbuena S, Belza MJ, Zulaica D, Martinez JL, Marcos H, Rifá B, et al. Widening the access to hiv testing: the contribution of three in-pharmacy testing programmes in Spain. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0134631. 10.1371/journal.pone.0134631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vourli G, Noori T, Pharris A, Porter K, Axelsson M, Begovac J, et al. Human immunodeficiency virus continuum of care in 11 european union countries at the end of 2016 overall and by key population: have we made progress? Clin Infect Dis. (2020) 71:2905–16. 10.1093/cid/ciaa696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boletín Oficial Del Estado . Real Decreto 1083/2017, De 29 De Diciembre, Por El Que Se Modifica El Real Decreto 1662/2000, De 29 De Septiembre, Sobre Productos Sanitarios Para Diagnóstico ≪in Vitro≫, Con Objeto De Regular La Venta Al Público Y La Publicidad De Los Productos De Autodiagnóstico Para La Detección Del VIH. BOE Pp 130888–130889. (2017). Available online at: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2017/12/30/pdfs/BOE-A-2017-15858.pdf (accessed February 15, 2022).
- 12.McGuire M, de Waal A, Karellis A, Janssen R, Engel N, Sampath R, et al. Hiv self-testing with digital supports as the new paradigm: a systematic review of global evidence (2010-2021). EClin Med. (2021) 39:101059. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Witzel TC, Wright T, McCabe L, Gabriel MM, Wolton A, Gafos M, et al. Impact and acceptability of hiv self-testing for trans men and trans women: a mixed-methods subgroup analysis of the selphi randomised controlled trial and process evaluation in england and wales. EClin Med. (2021) 32:100700. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang Y, Jamil MS, Smith KS, Applegate TL, Prestage G, Holt M, et al. The longer-term effects of access to hiv self-tests on hiv testing frequency in high-risk gay and bisexual men: follow-up data from a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Reg Health Western Pacific. (2021) 14:100214. 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Koutentakis K, Rosales-Statkus ME, Hoyos J, Fernández-Balbuena S, Ruiz M, Agustí C, et al. Knowledge and use of unauthorized hiv self-test kits among men who have sex with men in spain, following approval of an over-the-counter self-test in the U.S: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. (2016) 16:532. 10.1186/s12889-016-3204-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoyos J, Guerras JM, Maté T, Agustí C, Fernández-López L, Fuente L, et al. Opinions towards key operational aspects for the implementation of hiv self-testing in spain: a comparison between stakeholders and potential users. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2021) 18:1428. 10.3390/ijerph18041428 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hoyos J, Belza MJ, Fernández S, Perez S, de la Fuente L, Arranz B, et al. Euro HIV Edat Project. Kab/P Study on the Implementation of Innovative HIV Testing Strategies: Main Results of a Study Conducted among Msm Stakeholders. (2017). Available online at: https://eurohivedat.eu/arxius/ehe_docsmenu_docsmenu_doc_154-Final_Report_KABP_study_on_the_implementation_of_innovative_HIV_testing_strategies.pdf (accessed February 15, 2022).
- 18.Belza MJ, Figueroa C, Rosales-Statkus ME, Ruiz M, Vallejo F, de la Fuente L. Low knowledge and anecdotal use of unauthorized online hiv self-test kits among attendees at a street-based hiv rapid testing programme in Spain. Int J Infect Dis. (2014) 25:196–200. 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.03.1379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Greacen T, Friboulet D, Fugon L, Hefez S, Lorente N, Spire B. Access to and use of unauthorised online hiv self-tests by internet-using french-speaking men who have sex with men. Sexually Trans Infect. (2012) 88:368–74. 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Guerras JM, Belza MJ, Fuster MJ, Fuente L, Garcia de Olalla P, Palma D, et al. Knowledge and prior use of hiv self-testing in madrid and barcelona among men who have sex with men more than one year after its legal authorization in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2022) 19:1096. 10.3390/ijerph19031096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Guerras JM, Hoyos J, Agusti C, Casabona J, Sordo L, Pulido J, et al. Substance use in sexual context among spanish resident men who have sex with men. Adicciones. (2022) 34:37–50. 10.20882/adicciones.1371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.European Centre for Disease Prevention Control . Public Health Guidance on HIV, Hepatitis B C Testing in the EU/EEA. In an Integrated Approach. ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden. (2018). Available online at: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/hiv-hep-testing-guidance_0.pdf (accessed April 25, 2022). [Google Scholar]
- 23.Barros AJ, Hirakata VN. Alternatives for logistic regression in cross-sectional studies: an empirical comparison of models that directly estimate the prevalence ratio. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2003) 3:21. 10.1186/1471-2288-3-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Espelt A, Marí-Dell'Olmo M, Penelo E, Bosque-Prous M. Applied prevalence ratio estimation with different regression models: an example from a cross-national study on substance use research. Adicciones. (2016) 29:105–12. 10.20882/adicciones.823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Rosales-Statkus ME, Belza-Egozcue MJ, Fernández-Balbuena S, Hoyos J, Ruiz-García M, de la Fuente L. Who and how many of the potential users would be willing to pay the current or a lower price of the hiv self-test? The opinion of participants in a feasibility study of hiv self-testing in Spain. Enfermed Infec Microbiol Clin. (2014) 32:302–5. 10.1016/j.eimc.2013.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hubach RD, O'Neil AM, Stowe M, Hamrick J, Giano Z, Currin JM. Preferred methods of hiv and sexually transmissible infection screening delivery among a rural sample of men who have sex with men. AIDS Patient Care STDs. (2020) 34:470–6. 10.11089/apc.2020.0170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mathews A, Farley S, Conserve DF, Knight K, Le'Marus A, Blumberg M, et al. “Meet people where they are”: a qualitative study of community barriers and facilitators to hiv testing and hiv self-testing among African Americans in urban and rural areas in North Carolina. BMC Public Health. (2020) 20:494. 10.1186/s12889-020-08582-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stephenson R, Freeland R, Sullivan SP, Riley E, Johnson BA, Mitchell J, et al. Home-based hiv testing and counseling for male couples (Project Nexus): a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protocols. (2017) 6:e101. 10.2196/resprot.7341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bjørnshagen V, Moseng BU, Ugreninov E. Who do you reach? A norwegian pilot project on hiv self-testing that targeted men who have sex with men. AIDS and behavior. (2020) 24:568–79. 10.1007/s10461-019-02484-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hamilton DT, Katz DA, Luo W, Stekler JD, Rosenberg ES, Sullivan PS, et al. Effective strategies to promote hiv self-testing for men who have sex with men: evidence from a mathematical model. Epidemics. (2021) 37:100518. 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.División De Control De VIH, ITS Hepatitis Virales Y Tuberculosis, (DCVIHT) . Plan De Prevención Y Control De La Infección Por El VIH Y Las ITS. Ministerio de Sanidad. (2021). Available online at: https://www.sanidad.gob.es/ciudadanos/enfLesiones/enfTransmisibles/sida/planNalSida/Plan_de_Prevencion_y_Control1.pdf (accessed February 15, 2022).
- 32.World Health Organization . Guidelines on HIV Self-Testing and Partner Notification: Supplement to Consolidated Guidelines on HIV Testing Services. Geneva. (2016). Available online at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/251655/9789241549868-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed February 15, 2022). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wawer MJ, Gray RH, Sewankambo NK, Serwadda D, Li X, Laeyendecker O, et al. Rates of hiv-1 transmission per coital act, by stage of hiv-1 infection, in Rakai, Uganda. J Infect Dis. (2005) 191:1403–9. 10.1086/429411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.