Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Intell Med. 2022 Mar 7;2(2):61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.imed.2022.03.001

Ketamine use disorder: preclinical, clinical, and neuroimaging evidence to support proposed mechanisms of actions

Leah Vines 1,#, Diana Sotelo 1,#, Allison Johnson 1, Evan Dennis 1, Peter Manza 1, Nora D Volkow 1, Gene-Jack Wang 1,*
PMCID: PMC9249268  NIHMSID: NIHMS1788545  PMID: 35783539

Abstract

Ketamine, a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, has been exclusively used as an anesthetic in medicine and has led to new insights into the pathophysiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. Clinical studies have shown that low subanesthetic doses of ketamine produce antidepressant effects for individuals with depression. However, its use as a treatment for psychiatric disorders has been limited due to its reinforcing effects and high potential for diversion and misuse. Preclinical studies have focused on understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying ketamine’s antidepressant effects, but a precise mechanism had yet to be elucidated. Here we review different hypotheses for ketamine’s mechanism of action including the direct inhibition and disinhibition of NMDA receptors, AMPAR activation, and heightened activation of monoaminergic systems. The proposed mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and their combined influence may exert the observed structural and functional neural impairments. Long term use of ketamine induces brain structural, functional impairments, and neurodevelopmental effects in both rodents and humans. Its misuse has increased rapidly in the past 20 years and is one of the most common addictive drugs used in Asia. The proposed mechanisms of action and supporting neuroimaging data allow for the development of tools to identify ‘biotypes’ of ketamine use disorder (KUD) using machine learning approaches, which could inform intervention and treatment.

Keywords: Ketamine, Neuroimaging, NMDA, Dopamine, Serotonin, Glutamatergic, GABA

1. Introduction

Ketamine, a derivative of phencyclidine (PCP), was developed in the 1960s and released for public use in 1970 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [1]. It is a noncompetitive antagonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors and has been used primarily as an anesthetic agent in humans and veterinary medicine [2]. Ketamine was also approved by the FDA for treatment-resistant depression (e.g. esketamine), and has also been proposed for the treatment of bipolar disorder, anxiety, and chronic pain [37]. However, ketamine has reinforcing effects, inducing self-administration and conditioned place preference in rats, consistent with its potential for misuse in humans [811]. As a result, misuse of ketamine for its rewarding effects has grown significantly and gained popularity globally, and particularly throughout Asia, as a party drug. The 2019 World Drug Report by the United Nations Office on Drugs Control [12] classified ketamine under new psychoactive substances (NPS) that could pose a threat to public health and not under the control of international drug conventions. The prevalence of illicit ketamine use varies from region to region with relatively low rates of 1.7% and 0.7% in the United Kingdom and Unites States, respectively [1314]. However, in some Asian countries, ketamine is one of most used illicit drugs and was the primary NPS seized in 2019 in East-Asia [1516]. Due to the illicit nature of the drug, precise numbers of people using ketamine may be higher than reported. The euphoric effects experienced at high doses known as the “K-hole” includes feelings of detachment from one’s physical environment and losing sense of time, space, balance, and verbal skills, creating an “out-of-body experience”. The rapid brain uptake and fast emergence of its effects (duration up to 3 hours) are believed to enhance the misuse and binge potential of ketamine; in support, ketamine users report the substance to be very addicting because of the short-lasting but euphoric effects; they also report chronic use is difficult to stop because it becomes a tool to engage in social interactions [17]. The lower price point of ketamine as a substitute for more expensive and less accessible drugs such as cocaine also might explain its growing popularity [18].

Along with its high potential for misuse, both preclinical and clinical studies provide considerable evidence that ketamine misuse is associated with deficits in brain structure and function. Ketamine’s effects appear to be largely mediated by the blockade of NMDA receptors, but it also has high affinity for dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT), glutamatergic, and GABAergic receptors. The precise mechanism of its pharmacological and addictive effects remains unclear. In this review, we will examine the various hypothesized models of ketamine’s mechanism of action biochemically and behaviorally. These models are not mutually exclusive; thus, this review will use diverse models to support findings observed in recent clinical research studies. We also examine the ways ketamine affects neurocircuit structure and function in both preclinical and clinical studies. First, we aim to explain the structural and functional impairments observed in chronic ketamine use and examine the hypothesized mediating effects such as affective dysfunction, polysubstance use, pattern of use (i.e., frequency), and cognitive deficits. We also examine neurodevelopmental effects observed in preclinical studies and attempt to determine how well they emulate the clinical findings. Finally, we discuss recent findings of ketamine use as a research tool to model schizophrenia and critique the consistencies between clinical and preclinical findings to determine the extent to which these models are species-specific. Evaluating this literature is crucial to help identify potential early-onset markers and more effective treatments for KUD. Since ketamine was developed in the 1960s, only studies from this time onward were searched. We reviewed original research articles using the database Pubmed and search engine Google Scholar. Additional references were identified from previous knowledge and recursive reference searching. Any research articles that focused on the neurological effects of ketamine before 1960 were excluded. The exclusion criteria were kept general to provide a broad and diverse understanding of the ketamine-induced brain changes.

2. Mechanisms of action

2.1. NMDA Receptor Antagonism

NMDA receptors are ligand-gated non-selective ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluRs) and are essential to physiological roles in the central nervous system [19]. They are involved in the regulation of synaptic plasticity including long-term potentiation and long-term depression, which are vital for learning and memory [2022]. Ketamine is a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist [23] that acts by blocking the flow of ions through the open channel [24]. This leads to the blockage of sensory inputs that manifest as schizophrenia-like symptoms [2526]. However, these positive and negative schizophrenia-like symptoms seem to be present for both acute and chronic administration. With chronic use, these effects are long-term, persisting beyond the withdrawal period [27]. Within the last decade, ketamine has gained popularity for its’ fast-acting antidepressant effects which may be explained by several potential mechanisms on brain function in a dose-dependent manner. Subanesthetic doses (2 mg/kg) lead to low micromolar concentrations of ketamine in the brain that leave a large fraction of NMDA receptors unblocked [2829], whereas anesthetic doses (10 mg/kg) block a higher NMDA receptor fraction [30]. Psychiatric effects have only been observed at subanesthetic doses [3031].

Miller et al. proposed two hypotheses for the antidepressant effects of ketamine: a disinhibition and a direct inhibition hypothesis [32]. The disinhibition hypothesis suggests ketamine blocks NMDA receptors on GABAergic interneurons increasing AMPA receptor expression and upregulating glutamatergic synapses that results in cortical disinhibition, particularly in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) [3334]. The direct inhibition hypothesis suggests ketamine inhibits NMDA receptors on pyramidal cells altering ongoing cellular pathways and triggering synaptic plasticity as demonstrated by evidence that deletion of GluN2B from cortical pyramidal cells mimics ketamine effects [35].

2.2. Monoaminergic systems

While ketamine appears to be largely mediated by NMDA receptor inhibition and subsequent AMPA receptor activation, recent studies have revealed that other pathways may also be involved. Kapur and Seeman demonstrated that ketamine has a direct effect on dopamine D2 receptors and serotonin 5-HT2 receptors [36]. A single subanesthetic dose of ketamine in rats led to a rapid increase in DA in the PFC of rats suggesting that repeated ketamine use could have a longer duration of effects on DA concentrations [3738]. A PET imaging study in rhesus monkeys with continuous infusion of ketamine resulted in higher brain uptake of [11C]-labeled cocaine analogs, [11C]β-CFT and [11C]β-CIT-FE, suggestive of an increase in brain dopamine transporter (DAT) availability by ketamine [39]. A recent study by Tan et al. explored the effects of ketamine in dopamine in vitro and in vivo. Acute exposure of pheochromocytoma (PC 12) cells and nerve growth factor (NGF) to ketamine differentiated PC-12 cells resulted in decreased cell viability and increased DA efflux. In mice three months of chronic ketamine administration up-regulated DA synthesis enzymatic activity in the brain resulting in a delayed and persistent up-regulation of subcortical DA systems [40]. These results suggest that long-term ketamine misuse may lead to DA dysregulation in the CNS. Chronic ketamine misuse in humans was associated with up-regulation of D1 receptor availability in the dorsolateral PFC, suggesting repeated recreational use may affect prefrontal dopaminergic transmission [41]. This upregulation may be driven by NMDA receptor blockade through D1-NMDA receptor blockade coupling [4243]. Like other substance use disorders (heroin, cocaine, and methamphetamines) D2 receptor availability was lower in KUD when compared to controls [4445]. This downregulation could be compensatory due to the chronic overstimulation of D2 receptors following drug induced increases in synaptic levels of dopamine [46]. In contrast, D1 receptor up-regulation is observed in ketamine and methamphetamine use disorder [41, 45]. Worsley et al. (2000) suggests that the increase of D1 receptors in methamphetamine use disorder may be attributed to a sensitization and positive feedback system as a result of prolonged dopaminergic stimulation. A similar mechanism might explain the upregulation of D1 receptors in ketamine users. However more research is needed to elucidate the mechanism underlying the upregulation of D1 receptors in KUD and to assess if they recover with the prolonged discontinuation of drug use.

Ketamine has also been shown to bind to serotonin 5HT2 receptors and to inhibit the uptake of 5-HT in vivo [47]. Studies of subanesthetic ketamine doses showed increased release of 5-HT, noradrenaline, and glutamate [38, 4850]. 5-HT efflux in the medial PFC (mPFC) by ketamine has been associated with NMDA receptor blockade [37, 48]. Subanesthetic doses of ketamine in the conscious monkey brain selectively enhanced serotonergic transmission by inhibition of the serotonin transporter (SERT) [51]. More recently, Lopez-Gil proposed that ketamine stimulates prefrontal glutamatergic projections to the dorsal raphe and the locus coeruleus, which in turn stimulate the release of serotonin and noradrenaline respectively [52].

2.3. Dose-dependent behavioral impairments

Neurochemical changes are often related to behavioral and physiological changes observed with drug exposures of misuse. Ketamine tolerance builds over time in a dose-dependent manner due to its’ fast-acting effects [53]. Preclinical evidence and clinical case reports show that ketamine displays high risk for dependence, especially at high doses that contribute to the development of tolerance [5458]. Over time there may be up to a 600% increase in ketamine dose needed compared to the one initially used [59]. With duration of use and increase in tolerance, there is a high potential for ketamine withdrawal upon cessation, with psychological symptoms similar to those from opiate withdrawal such as increased anxiety, depression, and craving [6062]. However, in general physical withdrawal symptoms such as sweating, shaking, and palpitations are not as prominent in ketamine dependence as with opioids and alcohol [56, 5960].

3. Baseline functional and structural impairments

3.1. Preclinical

Preclinical studies of ketamine have revealed significant changes in circuit function and structure including key regions typically thought of as central to the pathophysiology of drug addiction. Repeated ketamine exposure in non-human primates reduced functional activity in the substantia nigra, ventral tegmental area, and posterior cingulate cortex but increased activity in the striatum as assessed by BOLD signal changes [63]. Ketamine also disrupted white matter microstructure across several circuits in non-human primates including fronto-thalamo-temporal and striato-thalamic connections, consistent with DTI findings in human chronic ketamine users [64]. White matter abnormalities have been observed in various substance use disorder populations [65]. A possible explanation for the observed myelin abnormalities could be a result of ketamine’s neurotoxic effects as rodent and monkey research has shown neuronal apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway when administered in high doses [6668]. Another study revealed that ketamine exposure in mice over a period of six months resulted in neurodegeneration and hyperphosphorylation of tau proteins, which are hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease [69]. These preclinical studies highlight the harmful structural alterations that result from prolonged ketamine use.

In addition, repeated ketamine exposure induces persistent spatial working memory impairments that are evident for a prolonged period after acute drug withdrawal, suggesting long lasting alterations to PFC function [70]. Chronic administration of both subanesthetic and high doses of ketamine induce impairments in spatial learning, memory, and sustained attention in rodents [7174]. Acute administration of PCP another NMDA antagonist drug with dissociative effects similar to those of ketamine reduced potassium-stimulated dopamine release in the PFC of rodents [75]. Working memory is heavily mediated by the PFC and modulated by dopamine suggesting that impairments could be a result of altered function of PFC neurons expressing dopamine receptors. Basal glutamate levels may also be involved in spatial and working memory impairments [76] and are reduced during repeated exposure of NMDA antagonists in rodents [75], [77]. Studies have also demonstrated that repeated PCP exposure reduced the expression of GABAergic markers in the PFC of rodents, which is also critical in synchronizing pyramidal neuron activity in the PFC [7880]. This GABAergic dysfunction may also play a role in working memory impairment. These findings suggest that ketamine’s multiple mechanisms of action may all contribute to produce lasting neural alterations, with negative consequences to cognition and other behaviors.

3.2. Clinical

Chronic ketamine use in humans can cause global and regional brain neuroanatomical changes, some associated with other mediating factors. Structural MRI studies that evaluated gray matter and white matter volumes, and cortical thickness in chronic ketamine users found widespread reductions in prefrontal, parietal, temporal, left isthmus cingulate cortex, fusiform cortex, and lateral occipital cortices [8185]. This global reduction is more severe with greater frequency of use [81]. To determine whether these observed structural impairments are specific to KUD, researchers evaluated the mediating effects of affective dysfunction and polysubstance use disorders. Chronic ketamine users, compared to chronic users of other recreational drugs exhibited larger surface area, cortical thickness and regional volumes in the striatum [8182,86]. However, only the higher right caudate volume was associated with lower depressive symptoms in chronic ketamine users and in users who also chronically used stimulants [86]. The unique structure-behavior relationship involving the striatum is consistent with ketamine’s effects in dopaminergic function including its involvement with KUD [41].

Chronic ketamine use can also lead to alterations in functional connectivity in regions involved in processing drug cues. In a task-based fMRI study where participants viewed films depicting ketamine administration, sexual activity, and nicotine administration, chronic ketamine users compared to controls showed greater activation in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in the ketamine film condition only [87]. Altered function of the subgenual ACC (sgACC) is associated with heightened depressive symptoms, and sex differences were identified in this circuit (Li et al., 2017). Men had stronger functional connectivity between sgACC and bilateral temporal gyri associated with greater depressive symptoms, whereas women exhibited stronger connectivity between the sgACC and dmPFC in association with more severe depressive symptoms [64]. Clinical neuroimaging studies on depression often use the sgACC as the seed for functional connectivity analysis due to its role in affective processing and a primary target of brain stimulation therapies for treatment-resistant depression [8890]. However, it is unclear if these results are specific to comorbidities of chronic ketamine use and depression, or if depression alone is driving this abnormal functional connectivity. Future preclinical and clinical studies should further explore the observed sex differences to support or challenge these findings. Functional connectivity of thalamic nuclei is also altered in ketamine misuse, which may be problematic because the thalamus plays a critical role in integrating learning and decision-making behaviors, and disrupted function is a behavioral marker for substance use disorders (Balleine et al., 2015; Huang et al., 2018). Compared to healthy controls, individuals who use ketamine chronically exhibited lower functional connectivity between the thalamus and PFC, posterior parietal cortex, the motor cortex/supplementary motor areas, and temporal cortex [9394], which may be due to ketamine’s antagonism of thalamic NMDA receptors [1]. In addition, striatal functional connectivity is altered in chronic ketamine users, which may relate to affective dysregulation. Consistent with preclinical evidence, chronic ketamine users exhibit striatal hyperactivity at rest. In humans, heightened BOLD activity was observed between the caudate nucleus and dorsal ACC, and between the pallidum and the bilateral cerebellum, relative to healthy controls (Hung, et al., 2020; Liu, et al., 2020). A mediation analysis revealed that higher putamen-OFC connectivity is associated with greater self-reported impulsivity and longer duration of ketamine use. Interestingly, a study of individuals with opioid use disorder also observed a significant relationship between the striatal-OFC connectivity and self-reported impulsivity based on the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, but in the opposite direction [95]. This altered pattern in connectivity in relation to impulsivity may be attributed to the maladaptive decision making and reward-associated behaviors observed in substance use disorders, however the directionality of the relationship should be further explored (Kim & Im, 2019; Winstanley, 2007).

During spatial memory tasks, ketamine-dependent participants showed significantly lower activation of the right hippocampus and left caudate compared to healthy controls [98]. Based on preclinical findings it is speculated that these results are driven by neuronal apoptosis and upregulation of striatal D1 receptors due to NMDA-R blockade [99100]. Across preclinical and clinical studies, the consistency of these findings suggests spatial memory is clearly impaired in chronic ketamine users, however the evidence for other neurocognitive deficits is less robust. Ketamine-dependent participants have deficits in working memory and verbal learning, however, many studies cannot relate these behavioral impairments to differences in brain function or structure [8586,101]. Foundational studies suggest that working memory, verbal learning, and verbal fluency are linked to frontal and medial temporal function [102103]. Some speculate that the lack of a clear brain-behavior relationship underlying the cognitive deficits may be driven by compensatory mechanisms, including enhanced synaptogenesis to regulate excitatory input to pyramidal neurons following chronic NMDA receptor blockade from ketamine use [104105]. Future studies could employ longitudinal PET neuroimaging to better understand the brain-behavior relationships around chronic ketamine use and verbal learning/working memory impairments.

3.3. Neurodevelopmental effects of ketamine

Activation of NMDA receptors play an important role in neurodevelopment and disrupted NMDA receptor function is associated with several neurodevelopmental disorders [106]. Thus, it is important to consider the neurodevelopmental impact of ketamine on the fetuses of pregnant women who use the drug recreationally and on adolescent ketamine users, especially since ketamine is widely utilized and deemed safe as an analgesic and anesthetic in pediatric clinical settings, and adolescent ketamine misuse rates has increased in Asia over the past two decades [107108]. Little clinical research has been done in this area in the context of recreational use, and therefore we review mostly preclinical studies that have investigated the impact of ketamine on brain development.

The neurotoxic effects of ketamine on development were first demonstrated by Ikonomidou et al., with perinatal blockade of the NMDA receptors by ketamine leading to widespread apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain [109]. Since then, several rodent studies have investigated the different mechanisms and pathways underlying this developmental neurotoxicity [110111]. Notably, ketamine exposure in utero leads to behavioral and cognitive deficits in rat pups, as well as impaired PFC development [112]. The developmental neurotoxicity of ketamine has also been demonstrated in non-human primates. Slikker et al. found that ketamine-induced cell death in rhesus macaques was significantly greater when animals were exposed at gestational day 122 and postnatal day five than at postnatal day 35 [113]. Another study demonstrated that five hours of an hourly anesthetic dose of ketamine was sufficient to induce apoptosis in both prenatal (50–85 mg/kg) and neonatal (20–50mg/kg) macaques, with effects being 2.2 times greater when ketamine was given prenatally [66]. Taken together, these results indicate that the neurotoxic effects of ketamine are dependent on the dose, length and developmental stage of exposure.

There are several potential molecular mechanisms for the neurotoxic effects of ketamine during development: modulation of NMDA receptors, induction of oxidative stress, and the disruption of neurogenesis. In response to ketamine exposure, NMDA receptors become overexpressed, leading to toxic intracellular calcium levels and the generation of oxidative stress in the mitochondria and dysregulation of markers of neurogenesis [110,114]. Numerous studies have demonstrated an upregulation of NMDA receptors in response to ketamine exposure. In an early study by Wang et al., forebrain cultures were treated with ketamine, resulting in an upregulation of NMDA receptor expression [114115]. When 20 mg/kg of ketamine was administered to postnatal day (PND) 7 rats in six successive doses, NMDA receptor mRNA and subunit NR1 were upregulated compared to control rodents [72,114]. Importantly, the upregulation of NMDA receptors leads to the excitation of the glutaminergic system and acceleration of apoptosis in young neurons. This dysregulation may stem from ketamine NMDA antagonist effects while neurons are developing. In the same study by Shi et al. in 2010, NMDA receptor channel activity in forebrain slices of neonatal and adult rats exposed to varying concentrations of ketamine were measured using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings. Compared to adult neurons, neonatal neurons were more strongly inhibited at every concentration of ketamine, suggesting that immature neurons experience more extensive NMDA channel receptor blockade and may be more vulnerable to ketamine exposure during development.

NMDA receptor dysfunction also results in deregulation of neuronal calcium signaling and accumulation of toxic concentrations of calcium in the mitochondria. Increased expression of NMDA subunits leaves neurons more susceptible to the excitotoxic effects of glutamate once ketamine is cleared, leading to deregulation of calcium signaling and the generation of oxidative stress [114]. In ketamine-exposed forebrain slices, higher levels of 8-oxoguanine production, an indicator for reactive oxygen species, were found in addition to elevated NR1 expression. Calcium imaging showed significantly higher levels of calcium influx and elevated calcium concentrations in neurons exposed to ketamine compared to controls [116].

A large concern for the presence of oxidative stress from ketamine exposure during neurodevelopment, particularly in the hippocampus, is the impact on learning and memory. Acute administration of ketamine in adolescent rats led to a decrease in spatial working memory and a reduction of anxiety-like behaviors. In addition, brain glutamate levels increased, along with oxidative stress as noted by increased plasma malondialdehyde and decreased antioxidant enzyme activity [116117]. Early ketamine-exposed rodents (PND 7) showed significant learning deficits based on low performance on the Morris water maze and the passive avoidance tasks [118]. The deficits in memory and learning associated with ketamine exposure may stem from downregulation of the extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) signaling cascade [64,119]. Taken together, these results suggest that ketamine exposure during different periods of development leads to impairment in learning and memory via multiple molecular and cellular pathways.

Several studies have investigated the effect of ketamine on neural stem cells, with many noting dysregulated neurogenesis in the developing brain [120]. However, there are inconsistent results, with some noting increases and others decreases in neural stem cell proliferation in response to ketamine. This difference could stem from different methodologies, with some investigating neurogenesis in animal models like rodents, and others in culture cells. Preclinical evidence shows ketamine inhibits neural stem cell proliferation in the subventricular and subgranular zone, two key regions for neurogenesis in postnatal brains through a dose-dependent mechanism [116,121]. Migration of newborn neurons in the granule cell layer and growth of astrocytes in the hippocampus were also inhibited in PND 7 male rats [122]. More studies in this area are needed to determine the direction of dysregulation of neurogenesis caused by ketamine.

Clinical research on the neurotoxicity of ketamine exposure to pediatric populations is limited. However, Yan et al. found that infants who received three surgeries under ketamine anesthesia had cognitive, language, and motor impairments following the final surgery compared to baseline measures [118]. However, no significant differences between pre-and-post-operative performance were found among infant groups who received one or two surgeries under ketamine. In all three groups, the levels of S-100β, a measure of central nervous system damage, were significantly elevated following exposure to surgical ketamine anesthesia at 8mg/kg [118]. Moreover, in a clinical study by Bhutta et al. investigating the potential neuroprotective effects of ketamine at a lower dose of 2mg/kg against glutamate excitotoxicity, infants received either ketamine or placebo before cardiopulmonary bypass. While concentrations of C-reactive protein were lower in the ketamine group, no significant differences were found in the levels of various other biomarkers of inflammation/CNS injury or behavioral impairments [123]. Clinical evidence for ketamine-induced developmental neurotoxicity is limited, though it is important to note that in each of these studies, ketamine exposure was minimized and used as a surgical anesthetic. Animal studies have indicated that prolonged ketamine administration increases its harmful effects, and while findings in animal investigations cannot reliably be extrapolated to humans due to interspecies variability, repeated and prolonged exposure should be more representative of regular recreational ketamine use [66,113].

3.4. Ketamine as a model for schizophrenia

Several studies have utilized ketamine as a model for schizophrenia in rodents [124]. Subanesthetic doses of ketamine produce schizophrenia-like symptoms, including dissociative states, cognitive impairment, and delusional thinking [125126]. Ketamine’s effects on glutamatergic and dopaminergic systems resemble those implicated in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. The dysfunction of NMDA and dopamine receptors seen in schizophrenia parallels that of ketamine: both chronic ketamine users and schizophrenia patients display upregulated D1 receptor expression in the dorsolateral PFC, supporting the dopaminergic mechanism action of ketamine [41,127].

It is hypothesized that hyperdopaminergic signaling is responsible for the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, including delusions, hallucinations, disorganized speech, and catatonic behavior [128]. Ketamine may disrupt PFC function by interacting with dopaminergic transmission [38]. NMDA receptor dysfunction reduces the inhibitory control of PFC output neurons suggesting its role in schizophrenia [33]. As previously mentioned, ketamine’s effects at NMDA receptors are complex. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and microdialysis suggest a net positive effect of ketamine on excitatory transmission via excessive glutamate release [129131], which is hypothesized to drive the cognitive, morphological, and behavioral symptoms of schizophrenia [132]. Interestingly, administration of ketamine at anti-depressant doses appears to induce neurocircuitry changes linked to emergence of psychosis spectrum symptoms, and this may serve as a model of schizophrenia in humans [31], [133135]. Following a long-term intravenous infusion (45 mins – 1 hr) at a dose (0.3–0.5 mg/kg) close to that of the antidepressant uses of ketamine, healthy volunteers exhibited higher activation of the orbitofrontal cortex, pre-central gyrus, and paracentral lobule cingulate cortex in association with positive and negative psychosis symptoms [133135]. The exact mechanisms driving the emergence of psychosis symptoms is unclear, but it seems clear that there is a high prevalence of psychosis spectrum symptoms among chronic ketamine users [2526]. For instance, in 129 chronic ketamine users, 31.8% showed psychosis symptoms while only 20.9% exhibited depressive symptoms [136]. These findings underscore the need to better understand the link between ketamine and psychosis. Further, clinicians should be cautious when administering ketamine as an antidepressant in individuals who are at risk for developing psychosis.

4. Discussion

Given the increasing use of ketamine in Asia, there is a need for new tools that identify populations at risk of developing KUD. Diagnostic distinctions for SUDs typically rely on clinical symptoms and do not include the underlying neural correlates. There are currently no identified biomarkers of addiction that allow for the identification of relevant endophenotypes or clinical subtypes to influence personalized treatments [137]. However, it is well known that SUDs produce notable alterations in neural circuitry and structure. Machine learning of neuroimaging data possesses the potential to aid in the characterization of biotypes and endophenotypes specific to addiction, and for characterizing risk factors that may be used as biomarkers and allow for early intervention. This has been a promising approach in the mental health field in recent years, with a notable example being Drysdale (2016) who identified four biotypes of depression according to distinct whole-brain patterns of abnormal functional connectivity by using statistical clustering and fMRI [138]. In recent years, machine learning of neuroimaging data has also been applied to binge drinking behaviors and substance use disorders [139142].

Several studies have demonstrated that these approaches can discriminate between substance users and non-users. Meier et al. and Jing et al. have built models for predicting the risk of developing substance use disorders using risk factors from childhood to adolescence, such as adolescent use of tobacco and cannabis, childhood conduct disorder, and an early exposure to substances [143144]. Ruberu et al. proposed a model to predict scores on quantitative measures of hazardous use of alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco from information about the individual’s family and sociodemographic factors [145]. Another model included neighborhood-level predictors (socio-demographic factors, drug use variables, and protective resources) to predict the location and risk of drug overdose [146]. Since SUDs are complex and often involve comorbid conditions, machine learning offers the unique promise of disentangling relationships that traditional statistical approaches could not uncover [147]. Though at this time we are unaware of any studies using machine learning for KUD, the rich investigations that machine learning affords make this a promising area for future investigation.

5. Conclusion

To date, there is no approved pharmacotherapy for KUD. Huang et al. proposed the use of the antiepileptic drug, lamotrigine, because of its effect on glutamate release inhibition and a clinical case study where it reduced cravings [148]. By evaluating the multiple molecular mechanisms of action, better interventions for KUD can be developed. This review addressed the ubiquitous mechanism of actions of ketamine, acutely and chronically in both medical and non-medical settings. The evidence discussed supports the neurotoxic, NMDA receptor antagonistic effects of ketamine. However, the downstream, dose-dependent effects on GABA, 5-HT, and dopaminergic systems, and how these may drive behavioral deficits in ketamine misuse remains under debate. Collectively these potential mechanisms may explain the reductions in global brain volumes and abnormal function and behaviors specific to KUD [8185,87]. These results were most prominent in PFC regions, which is related to working memory impairments in rats following ketamine administration [70,75,7879,83]. Working memory impairments are observed in human chronic ketamine users, but no association with altered brain structure or function, possibly due to enhanced synaptogenesis as a compensatory mechanism [8586,101,104105]. The discrepancy between the preclinical and clinical evidence may be due to preclinical studies mostly evaluating acute effects and clinical studies evaluating chronic effects, thus research on the acute effects of ketamine on working memory in humans ought to be explore before determining whether the preclinical evidence translates readily to humans. The impairments in working memory may be explained by dopamine and GABA dysfunction following acute and chronic ketamine administration [7880]. Ketamine induces high rates of neuronal apoptosis and upregulation of D1 receptors, potentially explaining hippocampal and striatal hyperfunctioning during spatial memory tasks following acute and chronic administration [73,98100]. Neural and behavioral markers of ketamine administration are also evident at prenatal stages of neurodevelopment because immature neurons are sensitive to early ketamine exposure, resulting in dysregulated neurogenesis [72,118, 120]. The molecular mechanisms of early ketamine exposure are potentially driven by the downstream effects of NDMA receptor blockade of oxidation stress and heightened glutamatergic, calcium and ERK signaling [110,114,149]. Heightened plasma levels of neuroinflammatory markers and neuronal apoptosis were related to cognitive impairments in clinical studies, supporting the behavioral relevance of these molecular changes [116118,150]. Both preclinical and clinical evidence highlight striatal hyperfunction, which might be specific to KUD as compared to other drugs of abuse [63,151]. Striatal and PFC dysfunction are implicated in the positive and negative symptoms of psychosis from acute and chronic ketamine administration, presumably driven by hyperdopaminergic and glutamatergic signaling [33,128131]. There is a lack of evidence on whether chronic ketamine users exhibit changes in brain function associated with the severity of psychosis symptoms. Thus, it is inconclusive if chronic ketamine use in humans induces markers of schizophrenia as in rodents. The studies discussed in this review revealed robust results for neurotoxic effects of ketamine, but they have several limitations such as low sample sizes, limited mediation analyses of behavioral variables, and limited inclusion of chronic ketamine users. There are important differences between the pre-clinical and clinical studies regarding the effects of chronic use on brain structure and function because the clinical studies obtained ketamine doses through self-reported responses, while pre-clinical studies administered ketamine in a controlled experiment. Thus, it is unclear how well the dose-dependent effects observed in the pre-clinical studies map on to the doses used in the clinical studies. Also, individuals with KUD frequently used other drugs that might have interaction with the effects of ketamine in brain function. Future clinical studies should evaluate the influence of demographic factors such as age, sex and race/ethnicity, and changes in protein expression to analyze the synaptogenesis effects of ketamine. The application of machine learning approaches should also be considered for identifying risk factors, vulnerable populations, and biotypes to inform intervention and treatment of KUD. Further, a more diverse battery of psychological symptoms, behavioral measures, and brain structural/functional assessments in ketamine misusers will help clarify the precise mechanisms underpinning ketamine’s diverse effects. The expansion of studies in this field is imperative since ketamine is increasingly being administered for medical treatment throughout the world.

Acknowledgements

This work was accomplished with support from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (Y1AA-3009).

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • [1].Reier CE. Ketamine--”dissociative agent” or hallucinogen?. N Engl J Med 1971;284(14):791–792. doi: 10.1056/nejm197104082841415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Kurdi MS, Theerth KA, Deva RS. Ketamine: Current applications in anesthesia, pain, and critical care. Anesth Essays Res 2014;8(3):283–290. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.143110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Costi S, Van Dam NT, Murrough JW. Current Status of Ketamine and Related Therapies for Mood and Anxiety Disorders. Curr Behav Neurosci Rep 2015;2(4):216–225. doi: 10.1007/s40473-015-0052-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Jauhar S, Morrison P. Esketamine for treatment resistant depression. BMJ 2019;366:l5572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Romeo B, Choucha W, Fossati P, et al. Meta-analysis of short- and mid-term efficacy of ketamine in unipolar and bipolar depression. Psychiatry Res 2015;230(2):682–688. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Sheehy KA, Muller EA, Lippold C, et al. Subanesthetic ketamine infusions for the treatment of children and adolescents with chronic pain: a longitudinal study. BMC Pediatr 2015;15:198. doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0515-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Zgaia AO, Irimie A, Sandesc D, et al. The role of ketamine in the treatment of chronic cancer pain. Clujul Med 2015;88(4):457–461. doi: 10.15386/cjmed-500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Botanas CJ, de la Peña JB, Dela Peña IJ, et al. Methoxetamine, a ketamine derivative, produced conditioned place preference and was self-administered by rats: Evidence of its abuse potential. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2015;133:31–36. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2015.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].De Luca MT, Badiani A. Ketamine self-administration in the rat: evidence for a critical role of setting. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2011;214(2):549–556. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-2062-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Venniro M, Mutti A, Chiamulera C. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological factors that regulate the acquisition of ketamine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2015;232(24):4505–4514. doi: 10.1007/s00213-015-4077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Winger G, Hursh SR, Casey KL, et al. Relative reinforcing strength of three N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists with different onsets of action. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2002;301(2):690–697. doi: 10.1124/jpet.301.2.690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report 2019. 2019. Available from https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/30717/.
  • [13].European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. European Drug Report 2019: Trends and Developments. 2019. doi: 10.2810/191370. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Johnston LD, Miech RA, O’Malley PM, et al. Monitoring the Future national survery results on drug use 1975–2019: Overview, key findings on adolescent drug use. University of Michigan: Ann Arbor: Institute or Social Research, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Li JH, Vicknasingam B, Cheung YW, et al. To use or not to use: an update on licit and illicit ketamine use. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2011;2:11–20. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S15458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. World drug report 2021. 2021. Available from https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2021.html.
  • [17].Muetzelfeldt L, Kamboj SK, Rees H, et al. Journey through the K-hole: phenomenological aspects of ketamine use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008;95(3):219–229. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.01.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Joe-Laidler K, Hunt G. Sit Down to Float: The Cultural Meaning of Ketamine Use in Hong Kong. Addict Res Theory 2008;16(3):259–271. doi: 10.1080/16066350801983673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Hansen KB, Yi F, Perszyk RE, et al. NMDA Receptors in the Central Nervous System. Methods Mol Biol 2017;1677:1–80. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7321-7_1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Lisman JE, Fellous JM, Wang XJ. A role for NMDA-receptor channels in working memory. Nat Neurosci 1998;1(4):273–275. doi: 10.1038/1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Martin SJ, Grimwood PD, Morris RG. Synaptic plasticity and memory: an evaluation of the hypothesis. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000;23:649–711. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Mondadori C, Weiskrantz L. NMDA receptor blockers facilitate and impair learning via different mechanisms. Behav Neural Biol 1993;60(3):205–210. doi: 10.1016/0163-1047(93)90371-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Anis NA, Berry SC, Burton NR, et al. The dissociative anaesthetics, ketamine and phencyclidine, selectively reduce excitation of central mammalian neurones by N-methyl-aspartate. Br J Pharmacol 1983;79(2):565–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1983.tb11031.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].MacDonald JF, Miljkovic Z, Pennefather P. Use-dependent block of excitatory amino acid currents in cultured neurons by ketamine. J Neurophysiol 1987;58(2):251–266. doi: 10.1152/jn.1987.58.2.251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Cheng WJ, Chen CH, Chen CK, et al. Similar psychotic and cognitive profile between ketamine dependence with persistent psychosis and schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2018;199:313–318. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Xu K, Krystal JH, Ning Y, et al. Preliminary analysis of positive and negative syndrome scale in ketamine-associated psychosis in comparison with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 2015;61:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Chatterjee M, Ganguly S, Srivastava M, et al. Effect of ‘chronic’ versus ‘acute’ ketamine administration and its ‘withdrawal’ effect on behavioural alterations in mice: implications for experimental psychosis. Behav Brain Res 2011;216(1):247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Dravid SM, Erreger K, Yuan H, et al. Subunit-specific mechanisms and proton sensitivity of NMDA receptor channel block. J Physiol 2007;581(Pt 1):107–128. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.124958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Kotermanski SE, Wood JT, Johnson JW. Memantine binding to a superficial site on NMDA receptors contributes to partial trapping. J Physiol 2009;587(Pt 19):4589–4604. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.176297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Li N, Lee B, Liu RJ, et al. mTOR-dependent synapse formation underlies the rapid antidepressant effects of NMDA antagonists. Science 2010;329(5994):959–964. doi: 10.1126/science.1190287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Miller OH, Moran JT, Hall BJ. Two cellular hypotheses explaining the initiation of ketamine’s antidepressant actions: Direct inhibition and disinhibition. Neuropharmacology 2016;100:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Miller OH, Moran JT, Hall BJ. Two cellular hypotheses explaining the initiation of ketamine’s antidepressant actions: Direct inhibition and disinhibition. Neuropharmacology 2016;100:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Homayoun H, Moghaddam B. NMDA receptor hypofunction produces opposite effects on prefrontal cortex interneurons and pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 2007;27(43):11496–11500. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2213-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Schobel SA, Chaudhury NH, Khan UA, et al. Imaging patients with psychosis and a mouse model establishes a spreading pattern of hippocampal dysfunction and implicates glutamate as a driver. Neuron 2013;78(1):81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.02.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Miller OH, Yang L, Wang CC, et al. GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors regulate depression-like behavior and are critical for the rapid antidepressant actions of ketamine. Elife 2014;3:e03581. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Kapur S, Seeman P. NMDA receptor antagonists ketamine and PCP have direct effects on the dopamine D(2) and serotonin 5-HT(2)receptors-implications for models of schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry 2002;7(8):837–844. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4001093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Lindefors N, Barati S, O’Connor WT. Differential effects of single and repeated ketamine administration on dopamine, serotonin and GABA transmission in rat medial prefrontal cortex. Brain Res 1997;759(2):205–212. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00255-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Moghaddam B, Adams B, Verma A, et al. Activation of glutamatergic neurotransmission by ketamine: a novel step in the pathway from NMDA receptor blockade to dopaminergic and cognitive disruptions associated with the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci 1997;17(8):2921–2927. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-08-02921.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].Tsukada H, Nishiyama S, Kakiuchi T, et al. Ketamine alters the availability of striatal dopamine transporter as measured by [(11)C]beta-CFT and [(11)C]beta-CIT-FE in the monkey brain. Synapse 2001;42(4):273–280. doi: 10.1002/syn.10012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].Tan S, Lam WP, Wai MS, et al. Chronic ketamine administration modulates midbrain dopamine system in mice. PLoS One 2012;7(8):e43947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Narendran R, Frankle WG, Keefe R, et al. Altered prefrontal dopaminergic function in chronic recreational ketamine users. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(12):2352–2359. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [42].Fiorentini C, Gardoni F, Spano P, et al. Regulation of dopamine D1 receptor trafficking and desensitization by oligomerization with glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. J Biol Chem 2003;278(22):20196–20202. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M213140200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Scott L, Zelenin S, Malmersjö S, et al. Allosteric changes of the NMDA receptor trap diffusible dopamine 1 receptors in spines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103(3):762–767. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505557103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [44].Li B, Liu ML, Wu XP, et al. Effects of ketamine exposure on dopamine concentrations and dopamine type 2 receptor mRNA expression in rat brain tissue. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8(7):11181–11187. . [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [45].Worsley JN, Moszczynska A, Falardeau P, et al. Dopamine D1 receptor protein is elevated in nucleus accumbens of human, chronic methamphetamine users. Mol Psychiatry 2000;5(6):664–672. doi: 10.1038/sj.mp.4000760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [46].Di Chiara G The role of dopamine in drug abuse viewed from the perspective of its role in motivation. Drug Alcohol Depend 1995;38(2):95–137. doi: 10.1016/0376-8716(95)01118-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [47].Azzaro AJ, Smith DJ. The inhibitory action of ketamine HC1 on [3H]5-hydroxytryptamine accumulation by rat brain synaptosomal-rich fractions: comparison with [3H]catecholamine and [3H]gamma-aminobutyric acid uptake. Neuropharmacology 1977;16(5):349–356. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(77)90072-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [48].Amargós-Bosch M, López-Gil X, Artigas F, et al. Clozapine and olanzapine, but not haloperidol, suppress serotonin efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex elicited by phencyclidine and ketamine. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2006;9(5):565–573. doi: 10.1017/S1461145705005900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [49].López-Gil X, Babot Z, Amargós-Bosch M, et al. Clozapine and haloperidol differently suppress the MK-801-increased glutamatergic and serotonergic transmission in the medial prefrontal cortex of the rat. Neuropsychopharmacology 2007;32(10):2087–2097. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [50].Lorrain DS, Baccei CS, Bristow LJ, et al. Effects of ketamine and N-methyl-D-aspartate on glutamate and dopamine release in the rat prefrontal cortex: modulation by a group II selective metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist LY379268. Neuroscience 2003;117(3):697–706. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00652-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [51].Yamamoto S, Ohba H, Nishiyama S, et al. Subanesthetic doses of ketamine transiently decrease serotonin transporter activity: a PET study in conscious monkeys. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38(13):2666–2674. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [52].López-Gil X, Jiménez-Sánchez L, Campa L, et al. Role of Serotonin and Noradrenaline in the Rapid Antidepressant Action of Ketamine. ACS Chem Neurosci 2019;10(7):3318–3326. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [53].Gerb SA, Cook JE, Gochenauer AE, et al. Ketamine Tolerance in Sprague-Dawley Rats after Chronic Administration of Ketamine, Morphine, or Cocaine. Comp Med 2019;69(1):29–34. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-CM-18-000053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [54].Amemori T, Bures J. Ketamine blockade of spreading depression: rapid development of tolerance. Brain Res 1990;519(1–2):351–354. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90101-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [55].Critchlow DG. A case of ketamine dependence with discontinuation symptoms. Addiction 2006;101(8):1212–1213. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01494.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [56].Goyal S, Ambekar A, Ray R. Ketamine dependence in an anesthesiologist: an occupational hazard?. Indian J Psychol Med 2014;36(3):335–337. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.135395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [57].Moore NN, Bostwick JM. Ketamine dependence in anesthesia providers. Psychosomatics 1999;40(4):356–359. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(99)71231-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [58].Pal HR, Berry N, Kumar R, et al. Ketamine dependence. Anaesth Intensive Care 2002;30(3):382–384. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0203000323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [59].Morgan CJ, Rees H, Curran HV. Attentional bias to incentive stimuli in frequent ketamine users. Psychol Med 2008;38(9):1331–1340. doi: 10.1017/S0033291707002450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [60].Chen F, Ye Y, Dai X, et al. Metabolic effects of repeated ketamine administration in the rat brain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2020;522(3):592–598. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.11.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [61].Farrell M Opiate withdrawal. Addiction 1994;89(11):1471–1475. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03745.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [62].Lin PC, Lane HY, Lin CH. Spontaneous Remission of Ketamine Withdrawal-Related Depression. Clin Neuropharmacol 2016;39(1):51–52. doi: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [63].Yu H, Li Q, Wang D, et al. Mapping the central effects of chronic ketamine administration in an adolescent primate model by functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Neurotoxicology 2012;33(1):70–77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2011.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [64].Li Q, Shi L, Lu G, et al. Chronic Ketamine Exposure Causes White Matter Microstructural Abnormalities in Adolescent Cynomolgus Monkeys. Front Neurosci 2017;11:285. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [65].Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159(10):1642–1652. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [66].Brambrink AM, Evers AS, Avidan MS, et al. Ketamine-induced neuroapoptosis in the fetal and neonatal rhesus macaque brain. Anesthesiology 2012;116(2):372–384. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318242b2cd. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [67].Braun S, Gaza N, Werdehausen R, et al. Ketamine induces apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway in human lymphocytes and neuronal cells. Br J Anaesth 2010;105(3):347–354. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [68].Green SM, Coté CJ. Ketamine and neurotoxicity: clinical perspectives and implications for emergency medicine. Ann Emerg Med 2009;54(2):181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [69].Yeung LY, Wai MS, Fan M, et al. Hyperphosphorylated tau in the brains of mice and monkeys with long-term administration of ketamine. Toxicol Lett 2010;193(2):189–193. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2010.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [70].Enomoto T, Floresco SB. Disruptions in spatial working memory, but not short-term memory, induced by repeated ketamine exposure. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2009;33(4):668–675. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [71].Nikiforuk A, Popik P. The effects of acute and repeated administration of ketamine on attentional performance in the five-choice serial reaction time task in rats. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2014;24(8):1381–1393. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [72].Shi Q, Guo L, Patterson TA, et al. Gene expression profiling in the developing rat brain exposed to ketamine. Neuroscience 2010;166(3):852–863. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [73].Venâncio C, Magalhães A, Antunes L, et al. Impaired spatial memory after ketamine administration in chronic low doses. Curr Neuropharmacol 2011;9(1):251–255. doi: 10.2174/157015911795016912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [74].Wang J, Zhou M, Wang X, et al. Impact of ketamine on learning and memory function, neuronal apoptosis and its potential association with miR-214 and PTEN in adolescent rats. PLoS One 2014;9(6):e99855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [75].Murai R, Noda Y, Matsui K, et al. Hypofunctional glutamatergic neurotransmission in the prefrontal cortex is involved in the emotional deficit induced by repeated treatment with phencyclidine in mice: implications for abnormalities of glutamate release and NMDA-CaMKII signaling. Behav Brain Res 2007;180(2):152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [76].Romanides AJ, Duffy P, Kalivas PW. Glutamatergic and dopaminergic afferents to the prefrontal cortex regulate spatial working memory in rats. Neuroscience 1999;92(1):97–106. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(98)00747-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [77].Fattorini G, Melone M, Bragina L, et al. GLT-1 expression and Glu uptake in rat cerebral cortex are increased by phencyclidine. Glia 2008;56(12):1320–1327. doi: 10.1002/glia.20700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [78].Cochran SM, Kennedy M, McKerchar CE, et al. Induction of metabolic hypofunction and neurochemical deficits after chronic intermittent exposure to phencyclidine: differential modulation by antipsychotic drugs. Neuropsychopharmacology 2003;28(2):265–275. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [79].Lewis DA, Volk DW, Hashimoto T. Selective alterations in prefrontal cortical GABA neurotransmission in schizophrenia: a novel target for the treatment of working memory dysfunction. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2004;174(1):143–150. doi: 10.1007/s00213-003-1673-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [80].Pratt JA, Winchester C, Egerton A, et al. Modelling prefrontal cortex deficits in schizophrenia: implications for treatment. Br J Pharmacol 2008;153 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S465–S470. doi: 10.1038/bjp.2008.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [81].Chesters RA, Pepper F, Morgan C, et al. Brain volume in chronic ketamine users - relationship to sub-threshold psychotic symptoms and relevance to schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2021;10.1007/s00213–021-05873–0. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05873-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [82].Edward Roberts R, Curran HV, Friston KJ, et al. Abnormalities in white matter microstructure associated with chronic ketamine use. Neuropsychopharmacology 2014;39(2):329–338. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [83].Hung CC, Liu YH, Huang CC, et al. Effects of early ketamine exposure on cerebral gray matter volume and functional connectivity. Sci Rep 2020;10(1):15488. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-72320-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [84].Liao Y, Tang J, Corlett PR, et al. Reduced dorsal prefrontal gray matter after chronic ketamine use. Biol Psychiatry 2011;69(1):42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [85].Zhong J, Wu H, Wu F, et al. Cortical Thickness Changes in Chronic Ketamine Users. Front Psychiatry 2021;12:645471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.645471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [86].Liang H, Tang WK, Chu WCW, et al. Striatal and white matter volumes in chronic ketamine users with or without recent regular stimulant use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020;213:108063. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [87].Liao Y, Johnson M, Qi C, et al. Cue-Induced Brain Activation in Chronic Ketamine-Dependent Subjects, Cigarette Smokers, and Healthy Controls: A Task Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. Front Psychiatry 2018;9:88. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [88].Connolly CG, Wu J, Ho TC, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity of subgenual anterior cingulate cortex in depressed adolescents. Biol Psychiatry 2013;74(12):898–907. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [89].Johansen-Berg H, Gutman DA, Behrens TE, et al. Anatomical connectivity of the subgenual cingulate region targeted with deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Cereb Cortex 2008;18(6):1374–1383. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [90].Vogt BA. Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005;6(7):533–544. doi: 10.1038/nrn1704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [91].Balleine BW, Morris RW, Leung BK. Thalamocortical integration of instrumental learning and performance and their disintegration in addiction. Brain Res 2015;1628(Pt A):104–116. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [92].Huang AS, Mitchell JA, Haber SN, et al. The thalamus in drug addiction: from rodents to humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2018;373(1742):20170028. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [93].Höflich A, Hahn A, Küblböck M, et al. Ketamine-Induced Modulation of the Thalamo-Cortical Network in Healthy Volunteers As a Model for Schizophrenia. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2015;18(9):pyv040. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyv040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [94].Liao Y, Tang J, Liu J, et al. Decreased Thalamocortical Connectivity in Chronic Ketamine Users. PLoS One 2016;11(12):e0167381. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [95].Yang W, Wang S, Shao Z, et al. Novel circuit biomarker of impulsivity and craving in male heroin-dependent individuals. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021;219:108485. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [96].Kim B, Im HI. The role of the dorsal striatum in choice impulsivity. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2019;1451(1):92–111. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [97].Winstanley CA. The orbitofrontal cortex, impulsivity, and addiction: probing orbitofrontal dysfunction at the neural, neurochemical, and molecular level. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007;1121:639–655. doi: 10.1196/annals.1401.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [98].Morgan CJ, Dodds CM, Furby H, et al. Long-Term Heavy Ketamine Use is Associated with Spatial Memory Impairment and Altered Hippocampal Activation. Front Psychiatry 2014;5:149. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [99].Ding R, Li Y, Du A, et al. Changes in hippocampal AMPA receptors and cognitive impairments in chronic ketamine addiction models: another understanding of ketamine CNS toxicity. Sci Rep 2016;6:38771. doi: 10.1038/srep38771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [100].Duan TT, Tan JW, Yuan Q, et al. Acute ketamine induces hippocampal synaptic depression and spatial memory impairment through dopamine D1/D5 receptors. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2013;228(3):451–461. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3048-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [101].Morgan CJ, Muetzelfeldt L, Curran HV. Ketamine use, cognition and psychological wellbeing: a comparison of frequent, infrequent and ex-users with polydrug and non-using controls. Addiction 2009;104(1):77–87. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02394.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [102].Anderson ND, Guild EB, Cyr AA, et al. Contributions of frontal and medial temporal lobe functioning to the errorless learning advantage. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2012;22(2):169–186. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.639609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [103].Kamiński J, Sullivan S, Chung JM, et al. Persistently active neurons in human medial frontal and medial temporal lobe support working memory. Nat Neurosci 2017;20(4):590–601. doi: 10.1038/nn.4509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [104].Wang C, Liu F, Patterson TA, et al. Preclinical assessment of ketamine. CNS Neurosci Ther 2013;19(6):448–453. doi: 10.1111/cns.12079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [105].Wang CC, Held RG, Chang SC, et al. A critical role for GluN2B-containing NMDA receptors in cortical development and function. Neuron 2011;72(5):789–805. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [106].Burnashev N, Szepetowski P. NMDA receptor subunit mutations in neurodevelopmental disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2015;20:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [107].Chen WJ, Fu TC, Ting TT, et al. Use of ecstasy and other psychoactive substances among school-attending adolescents in Taiwan: national surveys 2004–2006. BMC Public Health 2009;9:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [108].Chou LC, Ho CY, Chen CY, et al. Truancy and illicit drug use among adolescents surveyed via street outreach. Addict Behav 2006;31(1):149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [109].Ikonomidou C, Bosch F, Miksa M, et al. Blockade of NMDA receptors and apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Science 1999;283(5398):70–74. doi: 10.1126/science.283.5398.70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [110].Kalopita K, Armakolas A, Philippou A, et al. Ketamine-induced neurotoxicity in neurodevelopment: A synopsis of main pathways based on recent in vivo experimental findings. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2021;37(1):37–42. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_415_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [111].Yan J, Jiang H. Dual effects of ketamine: neurotoxicity versus neuroprotection in anesthesia for the developing brain. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2014;26(2):155–160. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [112].Zhao T, Li C, Wei W, et al. Prenatal ketamine exposure causes abnormal development of prefrontal cortex in rat. Sci Rep 2016;6:26865. doi: 10.1038/srep26865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [113].Slikker W Jr, Zou X, Hotchkiss CE, et al. Ketamine-induced neuronal cell death in the perinatal rhesus monkey. Toxicol Sci 2007;98(1):145–158. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [114].Liu F, Paule MG, Ali S, et al. Ketamine-induced neurotoxicity and changes in gene expression in the developing rat brain. Curr Neuropharmacol 2011;9(1):256–261. doi: 10.2174/157015911795017155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [115].Wang C, Sadovova N, Fu X, et al. The role of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor in ketamine-induced apoptosis in rat forebrain culture. Neuroscience 2005;132(4):967–977. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.01.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [116].Li D, Mashour GA. Cortical dynamics during psychedelic and anesthetized states induced by ketamine. Neuroimage 2019;196:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [117].Onaolapo AY, Ayeni OJ, Ogundeji MO, et al. Subchronic ketamine alters behaviour, metabolic indices and brain morphology in adolescent rats: Involvement of oxidative stress, glutamate toxicity and caspase-3-mediated apoptosis. J Chem Neuroanat 2019;96:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2018.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [118].Yan J, Li YR, Zhang Y, et al. Repeated exposure to anesthetic ketamine can negatively impact neurodevelopment in infants: a prospective preliminary clinical study. J Child Neurol 2014;29(10):1333–1338. doi: 10.1177/0883073813517508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [119].Huang L, Liu Y, Jin W, et al. Ketamine potentiates hippocampal neurodegeneration and persistent learning and memory impairment through the PKCγ-ERK signaling pathway in the developing brain. Brain Res 2012;1476:164–171. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.07.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [120].Dong C, Rovnaghi CR, Anand KJ. Ketamine affects the neurogenesis of rat fetal neural stem progenitor cells via the PI3K/Akt-p27 signaling pathway. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 2014;101(5):355–363. doi: 10.1002/bdrb.21119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [121].Dong C, Rovnaghi CR, Anand KJ. Ketamine exposure during embryogenesis inhibits cellular proliferation in rat fetal cortical neurogenic regions. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016;60(5):579–587. doi: 10.1111/aas.12689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [122].Huang H, Liu CM, Sun J, et al. Ketamine Affects the Neurogenesis of the Hippocampal Dentate Gyrus in 7-Day-Old Rats. Neurotox Res 2016;30(2):185–198. doi: 10.1007/s12640-016-9615-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [123].Bhutta AT, Schmitz ML, Swearingen C, et al. Ketamine as a neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory agent in children undergoing surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass: a pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012;13(3):328–337. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31822f18f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [124].Frohlich J, Van Horn JD. Reviewing the ketamine model for schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol 2014;28(4):287–302. doi: 10.1177/0269881113512909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [125].Morgan CJ, Curran HV. Acute and chronic effects of ketamine upon human memory: a review. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2006;188(4):408–424. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0572-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [126].Sassano-Higgins S, Baron D, Juarez G, et al. A REVIEW OF KETAMINE ABUSE AND DIVERSION. Depress Anxiety 2016;33(8):718–727. doi: 10.1002/da.22536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [127].Laruelle M, Kegeles LS, Abi-Dargham A. Glutamate, dopamine, and schizophrenia: from pathophysiology to treatment. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003;1003:138–158. doi: 10.1196/annals.1300.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [128].Lau CI, Wang HC, Hsu JL, et al. Does the dopamine hypothesis explain schizophrenia?. Rev Neurosci 2013;24(4):389–400. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2013-0011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [129].Kim SY, Lee H, Kim HJ, et al. In vivo and ex vivo evidence for ketamine-induced hyperglutamatergic activity in the cerebral cortex of the rat: Potential relevance to schizophrenia. NMR Biomed 2011;24(10):1235–1242. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [130].Rowland LM, Bustillo JR, Mullins PG, et al. Effects of ketamine on anterior cingulate glutamate metabolism in healthy humans: a 4-T proton MRS study. Am J Psychiatry 2005;162(2):394–396. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.2.394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [131].Stone JM, Dietrich C, Edden R, et al. Ketamine effects on brain GABA and glutamate levels with 1H-MRS: relationship to ketamine-induced psychopathology. Mol Psychiatry 2012;17(7):664–665. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [132].Olney JW, Newcomer JW, Farber NB. NMDA receptor hypofunction model of schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 1999;33(6):523–533. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3956(99)00029-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [133].Deakin JF, Lees J, McKie S, et al. Glutamate and the neural basis of the subjective effects of ketamine: a pharmaco-magnetic resonance imaging study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2008;65(2):154–164. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [134].Driesen NR, McCarthy G, Bhagwagar Z, et al. Relationship of resting brain hyperconnectivity and schizophrenia-like symptoms produced by the NMDA receptor antagonist ketamine in humans. Mol Psychiatry 2013;18(11):1199–1204. doi: 10.1038/mp.2012.194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [135].Northoff G, Richter A, Bermpohl F, et al. NMDA hypofunction in the posterior cingulate as a model for schizophrenia: an exploratory ketamine administration study in fMRI. Schizophr Res 2005;72(2–3):235–248. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2004.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [136].Liang HJ, Tang KL, Chan F, et al. Ketamine users have high rates of psychosis and/or depression. J Addict Nurs 2015;26(1):8–13. doi: 10.1097/JAN.0000000000000060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [137].Volkow ND, Koob G, Baler R. Biomarkers in substance use disorders. ACS Chem Neurosci 2015;6(4):522–525. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.5b00067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [138].Drysdale AT, Grosenick L, Downar J, et al. Resting-state connectivity biomarkers define neurophysiological subtypes of depression. Nat Med 2017;23(1):28–38. doi: 10.1038/nm.4246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [139].Barenholtz E, Fitzgerald ND, Hahn WE. Machine-learning approaches to substance-abuse research: emerging trends and their implications. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2020;33(4):334–342. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [140].Gowin JL, Manza P, Ramchandani VA, et al. Neuropsychosocial markers of binge drinking in young adults. Mol Psychiatry 2021;26(9):4931–4943. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0771-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [141].Mill RD, Winfield EC, Cole MW, et al. Structural MRI and functional connectivity features predict current clinical status and persistence behavior in prescription opioid users. Neuroimage Clin 2021;30:102663. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [142].Stout DM, Harlé KM, Norman SB, et al. Resting-state connectivity subtype of comorbid PTSD and alcohol use disorder moderates improvement from integrated prolonged exposure therapy in Veterans. Psychol Med 2021;1–10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [143].Jing Y, Hu Z, Fan P, et al. Analysis of substance use and its outcomes by machine learning I. Childhood evaluation of liability to substance use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020;206:107605. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [144].Meier MH, Hall W, Caspi A, et al. Which adolescents develop persistent substance dependence in adulthood? Using population-representative longitudinal data to inform universal risk assessment. Psychol Med 2016;46(4):877–889. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [145].Ruberu TLM, Kenyon EA, Hudson KA, et al. Joint risk prediction for hazardous use of alcohol, cannabis, and tobacco among adolescents: A preliminary study using statistical and machine learning. Prev Med Rep 2022;25:101674. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [146].Bozorgi P, Porter DE, Eberth JM, et al. The leading neighborhood-level predictors of drug overdose: A mixed machine learning and spatial approach. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021;229(Pt B):109143. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [147].Stone AL, Becker LG, Huber AM, et al. Review of risk and protective factors of substance use and problem use in emerging adulthood. Addict Behav 2012;37(7):747–775. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [148].Huang MC, Chen LY, Chen CK, et al. Potential benefit of lamotrigine in managing ketamine use disorder. Med Hypotheses 2016;87:97–100. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [149].Liu RJ, Fuchikami M, Dwyer JM, et al. GSK-3 inhibition potentiates the synaptogenic and antidepressant-like effects of subthreshold doses of ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 2013;38(11):2268–2277. doi: 10.1038/npp.2013.128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [150].Paule MG, Li M, Allen RR, et al. Ketamine anesthesia during the first week of life can cause long-lasting cognitive deficits in rhesus monkeys. Neurotoxicol Teratol 2011;33(2):220–230. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [151].Hung CC, Zhang S, Chen CM, et al. Striatal functional connectivity in chronic ketamine users: a pilot study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2020;46(1):31–43. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1624764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES