Skip to main content
Biophysical Reviews logoLink to Biophysical Reviews
. 2021 Nov 19;14(3):739. doi: 10.1007/s12551-021-00911-9

Correction to: Imaging tools for assessment of myocardial fibrosis in humans: the need for greater detail

Summer Hassan 1,2, Carolyn J Barrett 1, David J Crossman 1,
PMCID: PMC9250562  PMID: 35791383

Correction to: Biophysical Reviews (2020) 12:969–987

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-020-00738-w

Table 1 of the original article was published with an error in the “Confocal microscope”.

Table 1.

The resolutions achieved by different imaging modalities of the myocardium (Eugene Lin, 2009)

Imaging modality Spatial resolution full width at half maximum (FWHM)
Echocardiography ~ 0.5–2 mm
CT 0.5–0.625 mm
MRI 1–2 mm
PET 4–10 mm
SPECT 4–15 mm
Electron microscope 1–10 nm
Confocal microscope 250 nm

Incorrect data: 5–50 nm

Correct data: 250 nm

The corrected Table 1 is shown below.

The original article has been corrected.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


Articles from Biophysical Reviews are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES