Correction to: Biophysical Reviews (2020) 12:969–987
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12551-020-00738-w
Table 1 of the original article was published with an error in the “Confocal microscope”.
Table 1.
The resolutions achieved by different imaging modalities of the myocardium (Eugene Lin, 2009)
| Imaging modality | Spatial resolution full width at half maximum (FWHM) |
|---|---|
| Echocardiography | ~ 0.5–2 mm |
| CT | 0.5–0.625 mm |
| MRI | 1–2 mm |
| PET | 4–10 mm |
| SPECT | 4–15 mm |
| Electron microscope | 1–10 nm |
| Confocal microscope | 250 nm |
Incorrect data: 5–50 nm
Correct data: 250 nm
The corrected Table 1 is shown below.
The original article has been corrected.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
