Skip to main content
Journal of Insect Science logoLink to Journal of Insect Science
. 2022 Jul 3;22(4):3. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieac039

Arthropod Community in Hybrid Hazelnut Plantings in the Midwestern United States

Ariadna Chediack 1,2,, Patrick J Liesch 3, Hailey N Shanovich 4, Brian H Aukema 5
Editor: Kris Godfrey
PMCID: PMC9250698  PMID: 35780384

Abstract

There is a lack of knowledge of the arthropod communities in both wild hazelnut and cultivated hybrid hazelnut ecosystems in the Midwestern United States. Our goal was to characterize the composition of these arthropod communities in hazelnut plantings. We surveyed six experimental plantings of hazelnuts in Wisconsin and two in Minnesota during growing seasons, from May 2017 to August 2021. We used four methods to survey the arthropod community of these plantings: ad libitum survey of specimen observations and collection, dissection of hazelnut buds and nuts, cone traps placed on the ground, and beat sheet sampling of plants. We registered 116 different morphospecies of five classes and 83 families. Arthropods with known feeding habits were grouped into four guilds: 59 herbivores, 36 carnivores (predators, parasites, and parasitoids), 4 decomposers (detritivores and scavengers), and 4 omnivores. While we registered 12 herbivorous species that could potentially cause damage to hazelnuts, we directly observed nine of them feeding upon or damaging plant parts: Phytoptus avellanae s.l. Nalepa (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae), Curculio obtusus Blanchard and Strophosoma melanogrammum Förster (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Popillia japonica Newman (Coleoptera: Scarabeidae), Parthenolecanium sp. (Hemiptera: Coccidae), Euschistus servus euschistoides Say (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae), Acleris sp., and Choristoneura rosaceana Harris (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). We also registered eight species of parasites or parasitoids that could offer biocontrol services in the cropping system. These findings provide a foundation for future targeted studies on potential pests and beneficial arthropods, as well as ecological interactions within the hybrid hazelnut ecosystem in the Midwest.

Keywords: hazelnuts, Corylus avellana, Corylus americana, insect community, arthropod survey


Hazel plants (Corylus avellana Linnaeus) (Fagales: Betulaceae) are trees whose nuts have been prehistorically a source of food for humans (Holst 2010). They have been cultivated in Eurasia for hundreds of years. In the United States, the European hazelnut is mainly cultivated in the Pacific Northwestern (PNW) states of Oregon and Washington. About 99% of the hazelnut crop in the United States is produced in Oregon, setting this country in fourth place with about 5% of the world crop (Mehlenbacher and Olsen 1997, Oregon Department of Agriculture 2021). In the Midwestern region of the United States, the climatic conditions and presence of disease, like the Eastern Filbert Blight, are not suitable for C. avellana to thrive or produce nuts (Gold 2016, Taghavi et al. 2018). However, there are two native Corylus species to this region, the American hazelnut (Corylus americana Marshall) and the beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta Marshall). In the Eastern and Midwest states, there is a growing initiative to develop hybrid hazelnuts (C. avellana × C. americana or C. avellana × C. cornuta) that combine the disease resistance and cold hardiness of the native species with yield and processing characteristics of nuts of C. avellana for production in these regions. The global demand for hazelnuts is rising, both for fresh eating and for oil because the nuts are high in vitamins and oil content (Molnar et al. 2005, Braun and Jensen 2015, Braun et al. 2019).

Like in other cropping systems, there is a diverse suite of arthropods associated with Corylus spp. Descriptions of arthropod communities associated with hazelnut ecosystems, including harmful pests, are mostly from plantings of European hazelnuts in the Eastern Hemisphere (Villaronga and García-Mari 1988, Tavella et al. 1997, Snare 2006) and the PNW region in the United States (AliNiazee 1980, 1998; Brenner 1986; Walton et al. 2007, 2009; Wiman and Bell 2021). According to AliNiazee (1998), there are 280 species of insects and mites associated with hazelnuts plantings in Turkey, with approximately 150 species feeding on hazelnut plants, but only 47 species cause most of the damage. In the United States, AliNiazee (1998) identified about 150 species of insects and mites in hazelnut ecosystems in the PNW, with approximately half of those species being beneficial. AliNiazee (1980), Snare (2006), Walton et al. (2007, 2009), and Wiman and Bell (2021) mention 27 species of arthropods that cause damage to hazelnut cultivars in Oregon and Washington spanning both specialist and generalist feeding habits.

Arthropods associated with hazelnut plantings have never been surveyed in the Eastern or Midwest regions of the United States. Little is known about arthropod communities associated with native beaked hazelnut or American hazelnut other than the hazelnut weevil (Curculio obtusus Blanchard) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) (Treadwell 1996). Our goal was to characterize the composition of arthropod communities present in hazelnut experimental plantings in the Upper Midwestern United States. Knowledge of potential arthropod pests and beneficial natural enemies is a crucial first step in ecological research needed to create pest management recommendations, should they become required.

Methods

We surveyed arthropods in eight hybrid hazelnut research plantings throughout the Upper Midwestern United States, six in Wisconsin: Bayfield, Ashland, Hayward, Spooner, Tomahawk, and Stoughton; and two in Minnesota: Rosemount and Saint Paul (Table 1). In each of these locations, there are trials of hybrid hazelnut genotypes. Plantings’ ages varied from 12 yr to a few months; the latter where new plants were installed within the primary plantings. The weed control methods used varied among plantings (Table 1). No insecticide was used in any plantings.

Table 1.

Location and characteristics of each experimental hybrid and American hazelnut planting in the Upper Midwest of the United States

Planting State Coordinates Size (ha) Year planted Weed control
Ashland Wisconsin 46°35ʹ04ʹʹN 90°57ʹ56ʹʹW 0.19 2012 Herbicide in early spring, weed-whipping and hand weeding as needed, and one mowing in late summer.
Bayfield Wisconsin 46°50ʹ19ʹʹN 90°50ʹ02ʹʹW 1.53 2009 Herbicide in early spring, weed-whipping and hand weeding as needed, and one mowing in late summer.
Hayward Wisconsin 45°59ʹ47ʹʹN 91°30ʹ26ʹʹW 0.83 2014 Herbicide in early spring, weed-whipping and hand weeding as needed, and mowing two or three times per season.
Spooner Wisconsin 45°49ʹ22ʹʹN 91°52ʹ05ʹʹW 0.36 2011 Herbicide in early spring, weed-whipping and hand weeding as needed, and mowing two or three times per season.
Stoughton Wisconsin 42°56ʹ37ʹʹN 89°09ʹ41ʹʹW 0.35 2011 Mowing once or twice per season.
Tomahawk Wisconsin 45°30ʹ23ʹʹN 89°32ʹ59ʹʹW 0.21 2012 Weed whipping once in late summer.
Rosemount Minnesota 44°43ʹ36ʹʹN 93°05ʹ59ʹʹW 0.18 2011-2013 Weed whipping and mowing as needed
Saint Paul Minnesota 44°59ʹ53ʹʹN 93°10ʹ30ʹʹW 0.68 2009 Weed whipping and mowing as needed

We used four methods of arthropod sampling (with some variability across sites, described below): 1) ad libitum survey by specimen collection and visual observations while working in the field throughout each growing season at all locations (both on hazelnut plants and other vegetation within the plantings); 2) collection and dissection of hazelnut buds and nuts, both during the growing period and after harvest, at all locations; 3) four metal mesh cone weevil traps placed on the ground, each one under a different hazelnut plant in Bayfield only in 2019 and 2020, checked weekly with all arthropod specimens collected (Treadwell 1996 and Mulder et al. 2012); 4) beat sheet sampling done weekly from May to July of 2020 and 2021 in both Minnesota locations via beating 12 random hazel plants with a stick 10 times over a one square meter white canvas. Across all methods, the Bayfield planting was the most visited and intensely sampled planting in Wisconsin.

For Wisconsin locations, arthropods were collected or observed for 5 yr, from May to October 2017 to 2020, and May to July in 2021. Specimens were collected into sealable plastic bags or 7 ml plastic vials and stored in a refrigerator at ~4°C or in 70% isopropyl alcohol. Specimens representing new records for the state of Wisconsin were deposited in the Wisconsin Insect Research Collection. Specimens were identified to species level when possible. Some specimens, such as larvae, were identified to family or genus level based on the availability of taxonomic keys for those groups (MacKay 1962; McAlpine 1981, 1987; Vickery and Kevan 1986; Stehr 1987, 1991; Anderson and Howden 1994; Arnett and Thomas 2001, 2002; Wagner et al. 2001; Johnson and Triplehorn 2004; Wagner 2005; Packer et al. 2007; Bright and Bouchard 2008; Paiero et al. 2013; Hoebeke and Sprichier 2016; Whitehead et al. 2018).

For Minnesota locations, arthropods were observed or collected from April to August of 2020 and 2021. All weevils were collected into sealable plastic bags and frozen until they could be identified to species. Buprestid specimens were identified to genus by Patrick Perish (University of Minnesota). All other arthropods were identified by HNS and confirmed by uploading photographs to iNaturalist (www.inaturalist.org).

We organized all species or morphospecies into four guilds according to their feeding habits: carnivores (natural enemies such as predators, parasites and parasitoids), decomposers (detritivores and scavengers), herbivores, and omnivores. In the cases where the juveniles are carnivorous, but the adults are herbivorous, we placed the arthropod into the carnivore guild. When we could not identify the species, or the taxa has a wide spectrum of feeding habits, we elected not to assign a guild. We did not include ticks, some spiders, adult Lepidoptera, or common species of Diptera unless of natural enemy importance, such as syrphid flies.

Results

We recorded 116 morphospecies of 83 families, 18 orders, and five classes. One superfamily (Chalcidoidea; Hymenoptera), was included in our tally, as well as two of Odonata and Trichoptera that were not identified to family level. Of the 116 morphospecies, only 75 of them were identified to species or genera (Table 2). For the four guilds, we recorded 59 morphospecies of arthropods that are considered herbivores, 36 carnivores, 4 omnivores, and 4 decomposers.

Table 2.

Arthropods observed and collected in hybrid hazelnut experimental plantings in six Wisconsin locations (A=Ashland, B=Bayfield, H=Hayward, S=Spooner, St=Stoughton, T=Tomahawk), and two in Minnesota (R=Rosemount, and SP=Saint Paul). Feeding habits (D=detritivore, H=herbivore, Pr=predator, Ps=parasite or parasitoid, O=omnivore, S=scavenger) separated by commas include habit of different spp. within the group, separated by hyphen are habit of immature vs adult individual within the species

Class Order Family Scientific name Common name Feeding habits Location Life Stage
Arachnida Eriophyoidea Phytoptidae Phytoptus avellanae s.l. (Nalepa) Filbert bud mite H A, B, H, S,
T, R, SP
Immature and adult
Mesostigmata Phytoseiidae Pr B Adult
Aranae Araneidae Araneus trifolium (Hentz) Shamrock orbweaver Pr B, S Adult
Argiope sp. Pr St Adult
Argiope aurantia (Lucas) Yellow garden spider Pr SP Adult
Argiope trifasciata (Forsskål) Whitebacked garden spider Pr S Adult
Philodromidae Thanatus sp. Pr B Adult
Salticidae Dendryphantina sp. Pr R, SP
Phidippus sp. Bold jumper spider Pr S Adult
Thomisidae Mecaphesa sp. Crab spiders Pr R Immature and adult
Collembola Entomobryomorpha Entomobryidae Spring tail D, Pr B Adult
Diplopoda Polyxenida Polyxenidae Bristle millipedes D, Pr B Adult
Insecta Coleoptera Buprestidae Agrilus spp. Jewel beetles H R, SP Adult
Carabidae Harpalus sp. Ground beetle O B Adult
Chrysomelidae Anomoea laticlavia (Förster) Claycolored leaf beetle H T Adult
Diachus auratus (Fabricius) Bronze leaf beetle H B Adult
Pachybrachis sp. Scriptured leaf beetle H B Adult
Tricholochmaea sp. Leaf beetle H B Adult
Coccinellidae Brachiacantha ursina (Fabricius) Ursine spur leg lady beetle Pr SP Adult
Coccinella septemounctata (Linnaeus) Sevenspotted lady beetle Pr B Adult
Hyperaspis sp. Sigil lady beetle Pr B Adult
Curculionidae Barypeithes pellucidus (Boheman) Hairy spider weevil H B Adult
Calomycertus setarius (Roelofs) Imported long-horned weevil H R Adult
Curculio obtusus (Blanchard) Hazelnut weevil H B, H, T, R, S, SP Immature and adult
Larinus carlinae (Schoenherr) Canada thistle bud weevil H R Adult
Larinus obtusus (Gyllenhal) Knapweed seedhead weevil H B, H Adult
Lixus concavus (Say) Rhubarb weevil H R Adult
Otiorhynchus ovatus (Linnaeus) Strawberry root weevil H B Adult
Phyllobius oblongus (Linnaeus) European snout weevil or brown leaf weevil H B Adult
Polydrusus formosus (Mayer) Green immigrant leaf weevil H B, H, R, SP, T Adult
Polydrusus impressifrons (Gyllenhal) Pale green weevil or leaf weevil H R, SP Adult
Romualdius scaber (Linnaeus) Crusted root weevil H B Adult
Strophosoma melanogrammum (Förster) Nut leaf weevil H B Adult
Tychius sp. Alfalfa weevil H B Adult
Elateridae Aeolus sp. Click beetle H B Adult
Melanotus spp. Click beetle H B Adult
Lampyridae Firefly Pr B Adult
Photinus sp. Firefly Pr R, St Adult
Latridiidae Corticarina sp. Minute brown scavenger beetle S B Adult
Lycidae Calopetron reticulatum (Fabricius) Banded net-wing beetle Pr-H B Adult
Mycetophagidae Typhaea stercorea (Linnaeus) Hairy fungus beetle B Adult
Phalacridae Shining flower beetle H B Adult
Ptinidae Ptinid or Anobiid beetle H, O, S B Adult
Scarabeidae Popillia japonica (Newman) Japanese beetle H R, SP, St Adult
Tenebrionidae Isomira sp. Comb-clawed beetle S B Adult
Dermaptera Forficulidae Forficula auricularia (Linnaeus) European earwig O B, S Adult
Diptera Anthomyiidae Root maggot fly H, Pr, Ps B Adult
Asilidae Promachus sp. Robber fly Pr B Adult
Chloropidae Frit fly H, Pr, Ps, S B Adult
Dolichopodidae Longlegged fly H, Pr B Adult
Drosophilidae Vinegar fly B Adult
Fanniidae S B Adult
Hybotidae Platypalpus sp. Hybotid dance fly Pr B Adult
Phoridae Scuttle fly H, Pr, Ps, S B Adult
Polleniidae Pollenia sp. Cluster fly H, Pr, Ps B Adult
Psilidae Rust fly H B Adult
Sciaridae Dark wing fungus gnat D B Adult
Syrphidae Eupeodes sp. Hover fly Pr-H B Adult
Tachinidae Ps-H S Larvae found in slug moth caterpillar
Therevidae Stiletto fly Pr-H B Adult
Tipulidae Crane fly O B Adult
Hemiptera Alydidae Alydus sp. Broad headed bug H, S B, S Adult
Aphidae Aphids H B Immature and adult
Caliscelidae Piglet bug H B Adult
Cercopidae Spittle bug H B Immature and adult
Cicadellidae Leafhopper H B Adult
Coccidae Parthenolecanium sp. Lecanium scales H B, H, S All stages
Dictyopharidae Planthopper H B Adult
Lygaeidae Milkweed bug H B Immature
Pentatomidae Euschistus servus euschistoides (Say) Brown stink bug H B, S, A, SP Immature and adult
Euschistus tristigmus (Say) Dusky stink bug H SP
Podisus maculiventris (Say) Spined soldier bug H SP Adult
Reduviidae (Latreille) Assassin bugs Pr B Egg mass
Rhyparochromidae Slaterobius insignis (Uhler) Dirt-colored seed bug H B Adult
Hymenoptera Andrenidae Mining bees H B Adult
Apidae Apid bees H B, S Adult
Braconidae Parasitoid wasp Ps B Adult and mass of cocoons
Aleiodes sp. Mummy-wasp Ps H, S Parasitoid in a caterpillar
Superfam: Chalcidoidea Ps B Adult
Crabronidae (Latreille) Crabronid wasp Pr B Adult
Eupelmidae Chalcid wasp Ps B Adult
Formicidae Formica sp. Field ants Pr B, S Adult
Tetramorium immigrans (Santschi) Pavement ant O B Adult
Halictidae Sphecodes sp. Cuckoo bee Ps-H B Adult
Lasioglossum sp. Sweat bee H B Adult
Ichneumonidae Ps B Adult
Megachilidae Osmia sp. Mason bee H B Adult
Pompilidae (Latreille) Spider wasp Ps-Pr B Adult
Tenthredinidae Craesus sp. Sawfly H R, S Immature
Sphecidae Threaded-waist wasp Ps-H B Adult
Vespidae Polistes sp. Paper wasp Pr-H S Nest and adult
Lepidoptera Coleophoridae Casebearer H B Cocoon
Erebidae Halysidota tessellaris (J. E. Smith) Pale or banded tussock moth H B, S, SP Immature
Lymantria dispar (Linnaeus) Gypsy moth H B Immature
Geometridae Erannis tiliaria (Harris) Linden looper caterpillar H S Immature
Lasiocampidae Malacosoma americanum (Fabricius) Eastern tent caterpillar H T Immature
Malacosoma disstria (Hübner) Forest tent caterpillar H B, S Immature
Limacodidae Lithacodes sp. Yellow-shouldered slug moth H S Immature
Noctuidae Looper moth H B Immature
Notodontidae Schizura unicornis (J.E.Smith) Unicorn caterpillar H S Immature
Nymphalidae Danaus plexippus (Linnaeus) Monarch H B, H Adult
Psychidae Psyche casta (Pallas) Bagworm H B Adult and cocoons
Saturniidae Antheraea polyphemus (Cramer) Polyphemus moth H B, R, S, SP Immature, cocoon, and adult
Hyalophora cecropia (Linnaeus) Cecropia moth or giant silk moth H H, S Immature
Sphingidae Poanias excaecata (J.E.Smith) Blind sphinx moth H B, H, S Immature
Tortricidae Acleris sp. Leafroller H B Immature
Choristoneura rosaceana (Harris) Oblique banded leafroller H B Immature and adult
Neuroptera Chysopidae Green lacewing Pr B Adult
Mantispidae Climaciella brunnea (Say) Brown mantid fly Pr R Adult
Odonata Dragonflies Pr A, B, H, S Adult
Orthoptera Acrididae Melanoplus bivittatus (Say) Two-striped grasshopper H A, B, S Immature and adult
Slanted faced grasshopper H B Immature
Phasmatodea Diapheromeridae Diapheromera femorata (Say) Northern walkingstick H S Adult
Thysanoptera Phlaeothripidae Tube tailed thrips Pr B Adult. In hazelnut bud infested with filbert bud mites
Trichoptera Caddisfly B Adult
Malacostraca Isopoda Oniscidae Sowbugs D B Adult

Eight species of herbivores, C. obtusus, Phytoptus avellanae s.l. Nalepa (Eriophyoidea: Phytoptidae), Agrilus spp. (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), Strophosoma melanogrammum Förster (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Popillia japonica Newman (Coleptera: Scarabeidae), Euschistus servus Say (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae), Parthenolecanium sp. (Hemiptera: Coccidae), and aphids (Hemiptera: Aphidiade) were observed feeding on various parts of the hazelnut plants. Acleris sp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and Choristoneura rosaceana Harris (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) larvae were collected from rolled hazel leaves on the plant. Larvae of two species of tent caterpillars (Malacosoma disstria Hübner and M. americanum Fabricius) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) and sawfly larvae (Craesus sp.) (Lepidoptera: Tenthredinidae) were observed on hazelnut leaves with signs of herbivory; however, we did not directly see these larvae feeding on the plants. In 2017, we collected the first record of S. melanogrammum for Wisconsin.

Among the carnivores, we identified eight species of spiders, and eight parasites and parasitoids. We found two natural enemies inside galls formed by P. avellanae: a predatory mite (Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae) and a tube tailed thrips (Thysanoptera: Phlaeothripidae). We also found a tachinid fly larva (Diptera: Tachinidae) inside a slug moth caterpillar (Lithacodes sp.) (Lepidoptera: Limacodidae) and a mummy wasp, Aleiodes sp. (Braconidae: Hymenoptera), parasitizing an unidentified caterpillar.

Discussion

Hazelnut planting ecosystems in the Midwestern United States have a richness of species close to that described by AliNiazee (1998) for the PNW, with about half of the species known as, or with the potential, to be beneficial arthropod species. Of the two species of filbert bud mites (Eriophyoidea) reported causing bud galls in hazelnuts, only P. avellanae was present in our eight plantings. This mite is an exotic species, that arrived in the United States most likely from the introduction of European hazelnut cultivars (Ourecky and Slate 1969). Other pest arthropods reported by AliNiazee (1980, 1998), Treadwell (1996), Snare (2006), Walton et al. (2007), and Wiman and Bell (2021) present in our hazelnut plantings are C. rosaceana, Parthenolecanium sp. scales, M. disstria and C. obtusus. This latter mentioned species is the only one found inside the hazelnut shell feeding on the kernel. Except for P avellanae and C. obtusus, none of the other herbivorous species or morphospecies observed were seen in quantities that sparked concern of economically damaging levels. The Japanese beetle (P. japonica), present in Minnesota and Wisconsin, was abundant, although it is not known to what extent it may cause damage of economic consequence to hazelnut.

Strophosoma melanogrammum and Otiorhynchus ovatus Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) are two introduced and invasive species from Europe observed and collected in abundance in Bayfield. Based on reports from Alford (2014), Nielsen et al. (2004), and Urban (1999), S. melanogrammum is considered a pest on oaks, hazels, and greenery plantations in Europe as it feeds on hazelnut vegetative and floral buds, among other vegetative parts. Strophosoma melanogrammum is a parthenogenetic species that may have the potential to become a pest to hazelnut plantings in the Midwestern region. This species was only recorded in Bayfield. We do not know how or when it arrived at the area.

Natural enemies found in Oregon hazelnut orchards that we also observed in our plantings included one species of Chrysopidae, Forficula auricularia Linnaeus (Dermaptera: Forficulidae), ladybird beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and syrphid flies (Diptera: Syrphidae) (Walton et al. 2009). We also noted several species of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders. Collectively, none of these natural enemies likely have large impacts on hazelnut pests such as C. obtusus. The two predatory morphospecies we detected inside the galls formed by P. avellanae, a predatory mite and a tube tailed thrips, may be natural enemies of the harmful filbert bud mites and warrant future studies. Other important beneficial morphospecies recorded were tachinid flies and two families of parasitoid wasps, Braconidae and Ichneumonidae, that were quite abundant. Some species found were beneficial for reasons other than biological control of hazelnut pests, such as Larinus obtusus Gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). The latter insect aids in the control of the spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe Linnaeus) (Asterales: Asteraceae) (Panke et al. 2012, WSU 2021), which is an introduced aggressive invasive plant species. Many other species found that were either assigned a decomposer guild or not assigned a guild could provide other essential services to the hazelnut ecosystem such as carbon cycling and serving as alternative food sources for natural enemies.

This base line list of species or morphospecies present in hybrid hazelnut plantings in the Upper Midwest provides a foundation for future research on possible pests, beneficial arthropods, and ecological interactions which are needed to understand the complexity of these ecosystems, and to develop pest management plans for this novel crop.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jason Fischbach (University of Wisconsin-Madison, Bayfield County Extension) for comments on earlier drafts of this work. We thank Alexa Koch, Patrick Perish, and Pheylan Anderson (University of Minnesota) for help sampling arthropods in Minnesota plantings, and Hannah Figgins (University of Wisconsin) for help sampling in Wisconsin plantings. We thank Dr. Matthew Bertone (North Carolina State University) for identifying the filbert bud mites found in Minnesota plantings and Drs. Ralph Holzenthal and Robin Thompson (University of Minnesota Insect Collection) for assistance in procuring Curculionidae taxonomic keys. We thank Patrick Perish (University of Minnesota) for identification of buprestids, Theresa LaChappelle (University of Wisconsin- Madison, Bayfield County Extension) for assistance in mailing samples; and Schraufnagel Glass (Ashland, WI) for donating metal mesh for the weevil traps. This work was supported in part by funds from the USDA-Specialty Crop Multi-State Grant Program #SCMP1702 and USDA-Specialty Crop Research Initiative #H007913501 and United States Department of Agriculture-Specialty Crop Research Initiative Grant 2019-51181-30025.

Contributor Information

Ariadna Chediack, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Bayfield County Extension, Washburn, WI, 54891, USA; Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Ave., 432 Hodson Hall, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.

Patrick J Liesch, Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1630 Linden Drive, 240 Russell Labs. Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Hailey N Shanovich, Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Ave., 432 Hodson Hall, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.

Brian H Aukema, Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 1980 Folwell Ave., 432 Hodson Hall, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.

Author Contributions

A.Ch.: Conceptualization; Investigation; Data curation; Methodology; Writing—original draft. P.J.L.: Investigation; Writing—review and editing. HNS: Investigation; Data curation; Methodology; Writing—review and editing. B.H.A.: Funding acquisition; Project administration; Resources; Writing—review and editing.

References Cited

  1. Alford, D.V. 2014. Pests of fruit crops: a colour handbook. 2nd edition. Ch. 4- p. 170. CRC Press,Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
  2. AliNiazee, M.T. 1980. Filbert insects and mite pests. Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Corvallis. Station Bulletin 643, pp 15. [Google Scholar]
  3. AliNiazee, M. T. 1998. Ecology and management of hazelnut pests. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 395–419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson, R., and Howden A. T.. . 1994. Tychius meliloti Stephens new to Canada with a brief review of the species of Tychius Germar introduced into North America (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Can. Entomol. 126: 1363–1368. [Google Scholar]
  5. Arnett, R.H. and Thomas M.C. (eds.). 2001. American beetles, vol I. CRC Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  6. Arnett, R.H. and Thomas M.C. (eds.). 2002. American beetles, vol II. CRC Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  7. Braun, L. C., Demchick M. C., Fischbach J. A., Turnquist K., and Kern A.. . 2019. Yield, quality and genetic diversity of hybrid hazelnut selections in the Upper Midwest of the USA. Agroforest Syst. 93: 1081–1091. [Google Scholar]
  8. Braun, L., and Jensen J.. . 2015. Growing hybrid hazelnuts. Rural Advantage. Promoting the interconnection of agriculture, the environment and rural communities. 3rd version. Pp 12. https://www.midwesthazelnuts.org/uploads/3/8/3/5/38359971/hazel_production_guide_v_3__jan_2015.pdf
  9. Brenner, D. McCaskie. 1986. Variation in wild hazelnuts (Corylus cornuta, Marsh) of the Northwest United States. Master’s thesis, University of Oregon. Pp 118. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bright, D.E. and Bouchard P.. . 2008. Insects and arachnids of Canada, Pt. 25: coleoptera, curculionidae, entiminae. National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, CA. [Google Scholar]
  11. Gold, K. M. 2016. Eastern filbert Blight. University of Wisconsin Garden Facts. XHT1253. Extension, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Pp 2. https://hort.extension.wisc.edu/files/2017/01/Eastern_Filbert_Blight.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. Hoebeke, E. R., and Sprichiger S. -E.. . 2016. Larinus turbinatus gyllenhal (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixinae), a Eurasian weevil new to North America with a summary of other adventive Larinus in North America and a key to species. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 118: 261–272. [Google Scholar]
  13. Holst, D. 2010. Hazelnut economy of early Holocene hunter-gatherers: a case study from Mesolithic Duvensee, northern Germany. J. Archaeol. Sci. 37: 2871–2880. [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, N. and Triplehorn C.A.. . 2004. Borror and DeLong’s introduction to the study of insects, 7th ed. Brooks/Cole, Florence, KY. [Google Scholar]
  15. MacKay, M. R. 1962. Larvae of the North American tortricinae. Mem. Ent. Soc. Can. 94: 5–182. [Google Scholar]
  16. McAlpine, J. F. (Ed.) 1981. Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol I. Research Branch Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, CA. [Google Scholar]
  17. McAlpine, J. F. (Ed.) 1987. Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol II. Research Branch Agriculture Canada,Ottawa, CA. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mehlenbacher, S. A., and Olsen J.. . 1997. The hazelnut industry in Oregon, USA. Acta Hortic. 1997:445–445. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.1997.445.45 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Molnar, T.J., Goffreda J.C. and Funk C.R.. . 2005. Developing hazelnuts for the Eastern United States. In: Proc. VIth Internal. Congress of Hazelnut, Eds:Tous J., Rovira M. and Romero A.. Acta Hortic. 686:609–617.
  20. Mulder, P. G., Harris M. K., and Grantham R. G.. . 2012. Biology and management of the pecan weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Integr. Pest Manag. 3: 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nielsen, C., Eilenberg J., Harding S. and Vestergaard S.. . 2004. Biological Control of Weevils (Strophosoma melanogrammum and S. capitatum) in Greenery Plantations in Denmark. Pesticides Research No. 91. Ministry of the Environment. Environmental Protection Agency. Pp 75. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266094043 [Google Scholar]
  22. Oregon Department of Agriculture. 2021. Oregon agricultural statistics.https://www.oregon.gov/oda/shared/Documents/Publications/Administration/ORAgFactsFigures.pdf
  23. Ourecky, D.K., Slate G. L.. . 1969. Susceptibility of filbert varieties and hybrids to the filbert bud mite, Phytoptus avellanae Nal. Northern Nut Growers Association Annual Report: 89–91 [Google Scholar]
  24. Packer, L., Genaro J.A. and Sheffield C.S.. . 2007. The bee genera of eastern Canada. Can. J. Arthropod. Identif. 3. doi: 10.3752/cjai.2007.03 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Paiero, S.M., Marshall S.A., McPherson J.E. and Ma M.-S.. . 2013. Stink bugs (Pentatomidae) and parent bugs (Acanthosomatidae) of Ontario and adjacent areas: a key to species and a review of the fauna. Can. J. Arthropod. Identif. 24. doi: 10.3752/cjai.2013.24 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Panke, B., deRegnier R. and Renz M.. . 2012. Spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe). University of Wisconsin-Extension, Fact Sheet. Management of invasive plants in Wisconsin: Spotted Knapweed (A3924-13), Madison, Wisconsin. Pp 4. [Google Scholar]
  27. Snare, L. 2006. Pest and disease analysis in hazelnuts. NSW Department of Primary Industries. Horticultural Australia Ltd.,Sydney, NSW. Pp 68. https://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/117984/pest-disease-analysis-of-hazelnuts.pdf [Google Scholar]
  28. Stehr, F. (Ed.) 1987. Immature insects, vol. I. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA. [Google Scholar]
  29. Stehr, F. (Ed.) 1991. Immature insects, vol. II. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, IA. [Google Scholar]
  30. Taghavi, T., Dale A., Saxena P., Galic D., Rahemi A., Kelly J., and Suarez E.. . 2018. Flowering of hazelnuts cultivars and how it relates to temperature in southern Ontario. Act. Hort. 1226: 134–136. [Google Scholar]
  31. Tavella, L., Arzone A.; Sariott C.o, and Sonnati C.. . 1997. Coreidae and Pentatomidae harmful to hazelnuts in Northern Italy (Rhynchota Heteroptera). IV International Symposium on Hazelnut. Acta Hortic. 445:65. [Google Scholar]
  32. Treadwell, L. 1996. Aspects of larval development, intershrub movement, and nut infestation by the hazelnut weevil (Curculio obtusus) utilizing discrete shrubs of beaked hazelnut (Corylus cornuta). Master’s thesis, University of Maine. Pp 66. [Google Scholar]
  33. Urban, J. 1999. Strophosoma melanogrammum Forst. – A pest on young beech trees and European mountain ash in the Zdar region. J. of Forest Sci. 45: 64–80. [Google Scholar]
  34. Vickery, V.R. and Kevan D.K. McE.. . 1986. The Insect and arachnids of Canada, part 14: the grasshoppers, crickets, and related insects of Canada and adjacent regions. Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa, CA. [Google Scholar]
  35. Villaronga, P., y García-Mari F.. 1988. Los ácaros tetraníquidos y sus enemigos naturales del cultivo del avellano en Cataluña. Bol. San. Veg. Plagas, 14:39–44. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wagner, D.L. 2005. Caterpillars of eastern North America; a guide to identification and natural history. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wagner, D.L., Ferguson D.C., McCabe T.L., and Reardon R.C.. . 2001. Geometroid caterpillars of northeastern and Appalachian forests. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  38. Walton, V.M., Chambers U., Dreves A., Bruck D.J., and Olsen J.. . 2007. Identification of invasive and reemerging pests on hazelnuts. Oregon State University, Extension Service. EM 8946E. Pp 5. https://catalog.extension.oregonstate.edu/em8946 [Google Scholar]
  39. Walton, V., Chambers U., and Olsen J.. . 2009. Hazelnut pest and beneficial insects: an identification guide. Oregon State University, Extension Service. EM 8979-E. Pp 4. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wiman, N. and Bell N.. . 2021. Hazelnut pests. Section H: Nut crops. In Pacific Northwest Pest Management Handbooks. Pp H 2-15. Oregon State University, Washington State University and University of Idaho. https://pnwhandbooks.org/sites/pnwhandbooks/files/insect/chapterpdf/nut.pdf [Google Scholar]
  41. Whitehead, D. R., Chamorro M. L., and Anderson R. S.. . 2018. An illustrated key to the species of Curculio Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) of North America east of the Mississippi River. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 120: 616–641. [Google Scholar]
  42. Washington State University, Extension (WSU). 2021. Integrated weed control. Larinus obtusus. WSU, Puyallup, WA. http://invasives.wsu.edu/biological/larinusobtusus.htm [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Insect Science are provided here courtesy of University of Wisconsin Libraries

RESOURCES