Skip to main content
PeerJ logoLink to PeerJ
. 2022 Jul 1;10:e13667. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13667

Genetic diversity of enterotoxigenic Bacillus cereus strains in coriander in southwestern Mexico

Daniel Alexander Castulo-Arcos 1, Roberto Adame-Gómez 1, Natividad Castro-Alarcón 2, Aketzalli Galán-Luciano 1, María Cristina Santiago Dionisio 3, Marco A Leyva-Vázquez 4, Jose-Humberto Perez-Olais 5, Jeiry Toribio-Jiménez 6, Arturo Ramirez-Peralta 1,
Editor: Hector Mora-Montes
PMCID: PMC9252179  PMID: 35795180

Abstract

Background

Coriander, like other leafy green vegetables, is available all year round and is commonly consumed raw in Mexico as in other countries in the preparation of street or homemade food. Bacillus cereus (B. cereus) is a microorganism that can reach coriander because it is usually found in the soil and in some regions the vegetables are irrigated with polluted water. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determinate the presence of B. cereus in coriander used for human consumption in southwestern Mexico and determine the toxigenic profile, biofilm production, genes associated with the production of biofilms, sporulation rates, enzymatic profile, psychotropic properties, and genetic diversity of B. cereus.

Methods

Fresh coriander samples were collected from several vegetable retailers in different markets, microbiological analysis was performed. Molecular identification, genes related to the production of biofilm, and toxin gene profiling of B. cereus isolates were determined by PCR. The biofilm formation was measured by performing a crystal violet assay. The genetic diversity of B. cereus strains was determined by PCR of repetitive elements using oligonucleotide (GTG) 5.

Results

We found a frequency of B. cereus in vegetables was 20% (13/65). In this study, no strains with genes for the HBL toxin were found. In the case of genes related to biofilms, the frequency was low for sipW [5.8%, (1/17)] and tasA [11.7%, (2/17)]. B. cereus strains produce a low amount of biofilm with sporulation rates around 80%. As for genetic diversity, we observed that strains isolated from the same market, but different vegetable retailers are grouped into clusters. In the coriander marketed in southwestern Mexico, were found B. cereus strains with genes associated with the production of diarrheal toxins. Together, these results show actual information about the state of art of B. cereus strains circulating in the southwestern of Mexico.

Keywords: Bacillus cereus, Coriander, Genetic diversity, Enterotoxin

Introduction

Coriander is one of the most used species in gastronomy (Laribi et al., 2015), being Mexico one of the leading producers of this vegetable (FAO, 2017). By 2017, Mexico exported 64,000 tons of coriander, bound for five nations, highlighting the significant volume contributing to international markets, particularly the United States, which acquired 98.1% of that year’s production (SIAP, 2018). Like other leafy green vegetables, coriander is available all year round and is commonly consumed raw in Mexico as in other countries (Campbell et al., 2001; Gómez-Aldapa et al., 2016). It has been associated with food poisoning by various microorganisms such as Escherichia coli O157 (Whittaker et al., 2009), Salmonella (Campbell et al., 2001), and Cyclospora cayetanensis (C. cayetanensis) (Abanyie et al., 2015). The study of the coriander microbiome has shown the presence of other microorganisms, including the order Bacillales (Jarvis et al., 2015). Within the Bacillales group is Bacillus cereus (B. cereus), a microorganism that can reach coriander because it is usually found in the soil. Furthermore, the formation of spores is considered an important mechanism of contamination and environmental resistance (Vilain et al., 2009).

B. cereus share a high phenotypic, and genotypic similarity with other Bacillus species, which is why they have been included in a group called the B. cereus group or B. cereus sensu lato (Helgason et al., 2000). The Bacillus cereus sensu lato significantly impacts human health, agriculture, and food processing (Rasko et al., 2005). Various Bacillus strains have been used as biocontrol for phytopathogens in agriculture, including Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri, Erysiphe heraclei, Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Fragariae, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, tobacco streak virus, and tomato spot virus (Wang et al., 2022; Hong et al., 2022; Saravanan et al., 2021; Ahmed et al., 2021). Also, has been described the bioremediation activity of some strains against heavy metals and pyrethroid-type pesticides such as cypermethrin and fenpropathrin (Bhatt et al., 2021, 2020; Xiao et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2012, 2014; Arora, 2020). Even with the multiple applications of Bacillus strains, some strains of B. cereus can cause food poisoning due to the consumption of different products contaminated including vegetables, have also been described (Yu et al., 2019; Park et al., 2018).

B. cereus is a foodborne pathogen that can cause two of clinical symptoms: emetic and diarrheal syndrome (Stenfors Arnesen, Fagerlund & Granum, 2008). The first is associated with the production of cereulide toxin, encoded by the ces operon (Ehling-Schulz, Fricker & Scherer, 2004). The second is caused by the combination of one or three enterotoxins described in B. cereus: non-hemolytic toxin (NHE), hemolytic toxin (HBL), and cytotoxin K (CYTK) (Beecher et al., 2000; Lund, De Buyser & Granum, 2000; Lund & Granum, 1996). B. cereus has been previously reported in vegetables such as broccoli, carrots, lettuce, coriander (Flores-Urbán et al., 2014), spinach (Tango et al., 2014), and in fresh salads (Becker et al., 2019). The production of biofilms on the surface of lettuce has even been reported as a possible B. cereus persistence mechanism in the product (Elhariry, 2011). B. cereus in vegetables is relevant because the promotion and consumption of these products have increased due to their nutritional characteristics (World Health Organization, 2003; Su & Arab, 2006). However, most of these are consumed raw or minimally cooked, being considered the main route of exposure to this microorganism (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2016). Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the toxigenic profile of the B. cereus strains from vegetables due to the potential described above and their differentiation from B. thuringiensis, which could be applied as a biopesticide and is not associated with food poisoning (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2016). Also, it is important to highlight the characteristics of the strains that allow them to be found in the final product, including the psychrophilic capacity, the production of biofilms, and spores. Finally, the information on B. cereus in Mexico in vegetables is scarce, so updating this information is necessary so that it can be included if needed, in current health legislation. Therefore, this study aims to determine the toxigenic profile, biofilm production, genes associated with the production of biofilms, sporulation rates, enzymatic profile, psychotropic properties and, genetic diversity of B. cereus strains from coriander in southwestern Mexico.

Materials and Methods

Coriander samples

In this study, a total of 65 fresh coriander samples were included, these were purchased each week from 10 vegetable retailers from two municipal markets for 6 weeks and five samples of coriander purchased in the city’s main supermarkets were included. The coriander’s samples were transported to the laboratory in sterile bags at room temperature. Once in the laboratory, the samples were analyzed without exceeding 1 h.

Microbiological analysis

The microbiological analysis of coriander was only carried out with the leaves and not with the stems. Briefly, 25 g of coriander leaves were homogenized with 225 mL of 0.8% NaCl solution for 1 min. Once the samples were homogenized, additional 10-fold dilutions were made. The search for B. cereus was performed on Mannitol Egg Yolk Polymyxin (MYP) agar (Bioxon, Mexico). Later, 0.1 mL of the factorial dilutions were streaked on MYP agar and incubated for 24 h at 30 °C. We consider suspicious colonies of B. cereus those that show pink coloration with a halo of precipitation. The strains were confirmed as B. cereus by hemolytic capacity on 5% sheep blood agar (ISO, 2004).

Molecular identification and toxin gene profiling of B. cereus isolates

From bacterial cultures, a thermal shock was performed to obtain the chromosomal DNA. In brief, cells from one colony were suspended in sterile water, heated at 95 °C for 3 min, and then placed on ice. After centrifugation, the supernatant was used as template for the molecular identification and toxin profile (Adame-Gómez et al., 2020).

The differentiation of B. cereus group was targeted on gyrB gene, and the toxin gene profiles from nheABC, hblABD, ces, and cytK gene. The reaction mixes (25 µL) contained the following: 12.5 µL of REDTaq Ready Mix DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA), 11 µL of sterile Milli-Q water, 0.5 µL of the genomic DNA template (concentration about 10–20 ng/µL), and 0.02 µM of each primer. The oligonucleotides and the conditions of the different PCRs are shown in Table 1. The PCR products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis at 80 V for 120 min the gels were stained with Midori Green (Nippon Genetics, Düren, Germany) and visualized on an LED transilluminator. The B. cereus ATCC14579 strain was used as a positive control for amplifying the gyrB, hbl, plcR-cytK, sipW and tasA genes. Strain B. cereus BC133 was used as a positive control for nhe amplification. This strain was previously isolated and characterized in the laboratory from infant formula powdered. The strain B. subtilis BC001 was used as a negative control for nhe, hbl, plcR and cytk. The BC001 strain was isolated from infant formula powdered and previously characterized in the laboratory.

Table 1. Polymerase chain reaction cycling conditions and primer sequences.

Gene Primer sequences PCR cycling conditions Reference
gyrB F-GCC CTG GTA TGT ATA TTG GAT CTA C
R-GGT CAT AAT AAC TTC TAC AGC AGG A
Initial denaturation of 2 min at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s at, 52 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 30 s, and final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. (Wei et al., 2018)
nheABC F-AAG CIG CTC TTC GIA TTC
R-ITI GTT GAA ATA AGC TGT GG
Initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 49 °C for 1 min and at 72 °C for 1 min, and final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. (Ehling-Schulz et al., 2006)
hblABD F-GTA AAT TAI GAT GAI CAA TTT C
R-AGA ATA GGC ATT CAT AGA TT
ces F-TTG TTG GAA TTG TCG CAG AG
R-GTA AGC GGA CCT GTC TGT AAC AAC
Initial denaturation of 2 min at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s at, 52 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 30 s and a final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min.
cytK-plcR P1-CAA AAC TCT ATG CAA TTA TGC AT
P3-ACC AGT TGT ATT AAT AAC GGC AAT C
Initial denaturation of 2 min at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s at, 52 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 30 s, and final elongation at 72 °C for 10 min. (Oltuszak-Walczak & Walczak, 2013)
tasA F-AGC AGC TTT AGT TGG TGG AG
R-GTA ACT TAT CGC CTT GGA ATTG
Initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 59 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 45 s, and final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min. (Caro-Astorga et al., 2015)
sipW F-AGA TAA TTA GCA ACG CGA TCTC
R-AGA AAT AGC GGA ATA ACC AAGC
Initial denaturation of 5 min at 94 °C, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 54 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, and a final elongation at 72 °C for 5 min.

Note:

I: inosine.

Biofilm production

Biofilms were generated in glass tubes with 3 mL of brain heart infusion (BHI) broth (Bioxon, Mexico City, Mexico). The broths were inoculated with 0.3 mL of a previous bacterial culture of 24 h. The tubes were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h under static conditions, once the incubation time had elapsed, the microbial growth was evaluated at an absorbance of 600 nm. After the medium was removed, the tubes were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Adhered biofilms were stained with a 0.1% crystal violet solution for (BD Difco, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) 30 min. The glass tubes were washed three times with PBS and incubated with 70% alcohol for 30 min to release the crystal violet attached to the biofilms. The solubilized crystal violet was quantified by absorbance at 595 nm (Castelijn et al., 2012). We used the B. cereus strain ATCC14579 as a positive control and the culture medium without inoculum was used as a negative control.

Determination of genes related to biofilm production in B. cereus

The sipW and tasA genes were amplified by PCR. The final reaction mix contains 0.2 µM of each dNTP, 3 µM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of the oligonucleotides, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Ampliqon, Odense, Denmark), 5 µL of 10× buffer, and 100 ng of DNA as template. The PCR conditions and oligonucleotides used were described by Caro-Astorga et al. (2015) and are shown in Table 1. The PCR products were analyzed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis at 80 V for 60 min, the Gels were stained with Midori Green (Nippon Genetics, Düren, Germany) and visualized on an LED transilluminator. The B. cereus ATCC14579 strain was used as a positive control.

Enzymatic profile

The capacity of the strains to degrade casein was tested on soy agar plates supplemented with 15% skimmed milk and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h, the presence of clear zones around the colonies indicates hydrolysis of the casein (Claus & Berkeley, 1986).

The ability to hydrolyze starch was determined on soy agar plates with 0.25% starch. The inoculated plates were incubated at 30 °C for 3 days. A drop of Lugol’s iodine solution was placed on the edge of the colonies obtained after incubation. Amylolytic properties were confirmed by the change from the blue to the yellow color of the reagent (Claus & Berkeley, 1986).

Analysis of presumed psychotropic properties

All strains were screened for their psychotropic growth at 7 °C ± 1 °C. They were plated on Tryptone Soya Agar (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) and incubated at 7 °C ± 1 °C for 7 days. Growth was checked after 24, 48, 72 h, and 1 week (Berthold-Pluta et al., 2019).

Determination of sporulation rates

Before removing the BHI broth from the biofilm production assay, 100 µL of culture was taken and resuspended in 900 µL of sterile distilled water, dilutions were made by factor 10, of which 100 µL were dispersed on BHI agar for calculate number of cells. The initial dilution was subjected to 80 °C for 10 min to eliminate vegetative cells; once the time had elapsed, dilutions were made by factor 10, of which 100 µL were dispersed on BHI agar for calculate spores. The both plates were incubated at 30 °C for 48 h, with the respective colony-forming units (CFU) counting. The experiments were repeated in triplicate (Hayrapetyan et al., 2015).

Genetic diversity of B. cereus strains

The 17 strains of B. cereus were selected to determine the diversity among the iso-lates from PCR of repetitive elements using oligonucleotide (GTG) 5 (De Jonghe et al., 2008). The electro-phoretic patterns obtained were analyzed using the NTSYs software. Genetic similarity was determined via the DICE coefficient and represented in a dendrogram from hierarchical clustering. A coefficient of DICE >0.8 was used to group the strains into a cluster.

Statistical analysis

The results represent the average of at least two independent experiments. All continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The sporulation rate and biofilm formation by B. cereus strains were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Bonferroni correction (Bonferroni post hoc test). For all tests, a p-value of 0.05 was assumed to be the minimum level of significance.

Results

The prevalence of B. cereus in vegetables by molecular identification of the gyrB gene was 20% (13/65); A greater number of strains were recovered (17 strains) because more than one strain with different colonial morphology characteristics was isolated in three samples (samples 57, 58 and 62). No suspicious colony morphologies were found for B. mycoides (opaque colonies that are characteristically hairy in appearance, often referred to as rhizoid). The cry gene was used to discriminate B. thuringiensis; however, all strains were negative. B. cereus strains were isolated only in coriander from municipal markets and not in coriander from supermarkets. In this study, all samples exceeded 105 CFU/g.

The most common enterotoxin gene was nhe [76.4%, (13/17)], followed by cytK [82.3%, (14/17)]; in this study, no strains with genes for the HBL toxin and cereulide toxin were found (Fig. 1). In the case of genes related to biofilms, the frequency was low for sipW [5.8%, (1/17)] and tasA [11.7%, (2/17)]. Sporulation rates were 80% for most strains, while biofilm production was low in all strains (Fig. 2). Only two strains negative for genes for toxins and biofilm-related genes were found in this study. The most common enterotoxigenic profile was the combination of the nhe and cytK genes, this profile was found in 12 strains; two strains were found that were only positive for the cytK gene, one strain only had the nhe gene. Of the genes related to biofilms, only one strain presented the two genes of interest (sipWtasA), and one strain showed only the tasA gene. Also, a high frequency of protease production [47%, (8/17)] and low amylase production [17.6%, (3/17)] was observed in the strains. Most of the strains were able to grow in the first three days at temperatures of 7 °C [88.2% (15/17)]. Of the strains that grew after one day of incubation, 80% (4/5) were positive for an enterotoxin gene (Table 2).

Figure 1. Molecular identification of toxins genes of B. cereus from coriander isolation.

Figure 1

(A) Amplification of cytotoxin K gene (cytk-PlcR, 320 bp) lane 1: Control negative B. subtilis, lane 2: positive control B. cereus ATCC14579, lane 3: BC006, lane 4: molecular weight market of 100 bp, lane 5: amplification of hemolytic BL gene (hbl, 1,091 bp) positive control B. cereus ATCC14579. (B) Amplification of no-hemolytic enterotoxin gene (nhe, 766 bp) lane 1: molecular weight market of 100 bp, lane 2: positive control B. cereus BC133, lanes 3,5: BC006 and BC030, lane 4: negative control B. subtilis.

Figure 2. Determination of sporulation rates, biofilm production and genes related to biofilms of B cereus strains from coriander.

Figure 2

Determination of sporulation rates, biofilm production and genes related to biofilms of B cereus strains from coriander. (A) Sporulation rates of all B. cereus strain. The bars are the means of % spores. The same letter indicates that there are no statistically significant differences. (a and c, p = 0.05) (a and b, p = 0.0001). In the X axis are the % spores and, in the Y axis is the strains. ANOVA post hoc Bonferroni. The experiments were performed in duplicate. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of the PCR products of tasA and sipW genes. Lane 1: positive control for sipW (488 bp) B. cereus ATCC14579, lane 2: sipW+ strain, lane 3: positive control for tasA (488 bp) B. cereus ATCC14579, lane 4: tasA+ strain, lane 5: molecular weight market of 100 bp. (C) Determination of biofilm production all B. cereus strains. The bars are the means of absorbance of crystal violet. The strains are indicated in the X axis, and abdorbance to 595nm is indicated by the Y axis. ANOVA. The experiments were performed in duplicate.

Table 2. Genetic, enzymatic and psychrophilic profiles of B. cereus strains.

Strain Toxin profile Biofilm related genes Enzymes Psychrophilia (days)
nhe hbl cytK ces sipW tasA Amylases Proteases
BC006 + + + 3
BC010 1
BC030 + + + + + 2
BC032 + 1
BC034 3
BC039 + + 2
BC040 + + 3
BC041 + 3
BC047 + + 3
BC050 + + + 3
BC057 + + + 1
BC057B + + + 1
BC058 + + + + 3
BC058B + + + 2
BC058C + + +
BC064 + + +
BC064B + + + 1

Note:

BC, Bacillus cereus.

As for genetic diversity, we observed that strains isolated from the same market, but different vegetable retailers are grouped into a cluster (BC010 and BC034, BC032 and BC040; y BC058C, B064B); however, we also observed isolated strains from different markets that are grouped in clusters (BC039 and BC064; BC030 and BC050). Regarding enzymatic and virulence profiles, the strains are distributed throughout the dendrogram; in the case of enterotoxin-negative strains, they are grouped in a cluster (BC010 and BC034). The strains isolated from the same coriander sample do not present the same genetic profile and are not grouped in the same cluster (BC057, BC057B/ BC058, BC058B, BC058C). Strains isolated from samples from the same vendor but purchased in different weeks did not cluster (BC006/ BC010) (BC039/ BC041) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Dendrogram obtained by GTG5 of strains of the B. cereus group.

Figure 3

Seventeen strains from coriander were positive to gyrB which were characterized and grouped into 12 main groups and four clones. DICE test was used, and the strains were grouped by hierarchy clustering. A coefficient of DICE >0.8 was used to group the strains into a cluster. VR is the vegetable retailer number and M is the market number.

Discussion

B. cereus is a microorganism that is usually found in the soil due to the production of spores (Vilain et al., 2006) and the symbiotic relationships with other organisms such as arthropods (Mukhopadhyay & Chatterjee, 2016); therefore, the contamination of vegetables by this microorganism is evident, from pre-harvest, harvest, and post-harvest (Maffei et al., 2016). For the above, the isolation and characterization of B. cereus in coriander are important because it is a high vegetable consumption in Mexico. A country that is also actively involved in exporting this product.

The frequency of B. cereus in coriander is like that reported in the analysis of vegetables in France (Glasset et al., 2016) and Korea (Kim et al., 2016); however, it differs from other countries, even where coriander samples were processed, including Mexico, where the prevalence is three times higher (Flores-Urbán et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2020). One possible explanation is that we only included the leaves in our study and not the stems. It is important to further analyze the frequency of this organism even with the methodological difference. It has shown that the microbiological composition of the soil (the main source of contamination of vegetables by B. cereus) can vary according to various chemical agents or biological that can be added as part of the harvest.

For example, it has been observed that green manures favor the presence of various bacterial genera (Longa et al., 2017) or the presence of pesticides; in this sense, even strains of Bacillus with degradation capabilities of the pesticide have been isolated (Jiang et al., 2019) or with high resistance to heavy metals (Ayangbenro & Babalola, 2020). Also, by collecting soil samples from four farms enriched with Clostridium strains, the inhibition of B. cereus and B. mycoides has been demonstrated. Metabolites extracted from the soil found that the metabolite that is attributed to antimicrobial activity against strains of B. cereus was isocaproic-hydroxy-2- (Pahalagedara et al., 2020).

And not only would soil explain the differential distribution of B. cereus strains in vegetables, but also the characteristics of the vegetables themselves. For example, green leafy vegetables are rich in cellulose in stems and leaves; However, bulb-shaped vegetables are rich in starch (Hurtado-Barroso et al., 2019). This carbohydrate can be metabolized by strains of B. cereus that possess the enzyme amylase. The above could explain the differences in variations in the frequency of B. cereus in different vegetables.

B. cereus is a microorganism commonly found in soil; therefore, it is not surprising that it is widely distributed in vegetable-growing areas. Consequently, it is important to detect this microorganism from the pre-harvest and not only during the sale. The latter is to identify other possible routes of contamination and strategies for the control of the microorganism.

In this study, all samples exceeded 105 CFU/g. In this sense, the FDA estimates that infectious doses above 106 CFU/g are needed to cause disease (Tallent et al., 2021). For one food poisoning to occur, it depends not only on the infectious dose but also on the characteristics of the microorganism (Granum & Lund, 2006; EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2016). Therefore, lower numbers of CFU/g strains, such as those found in this study, should not be estimated. Other regulatory institutions establish limits for this microorganism in ready-to-eat foods (vegetables could fall into this group). Food microbiological guidelines in Hong Kong, China state that the amounts of B. cereus in ready-to-eat foods must be between 103–105 CFU/g to be considered acceptable (Food & Environmental Hygiene Department, 2014).

Meanwhile, the microbiological standards of the United Kingdom establish that in ready-to-eat foods, the limit to consider them acceptable is 103–105 CFU/g (Health Protection Agency, 2009). Finally, the Australian and New Zealand legislation for ready-to-eat foods considers a B. cereus level of 102–103 CFU/g acceptable (New South Wales Food Authority, 2009). Unfortunately, in Mexico, the current sanitary legislation does not consider B. cereus in ready-to-eat foods such as vegetables or other products, highlighting the importance of this type of study to demonstrate the circulation of this microorganism. Furthermore, it is essential to consider that most of the strains in this study are psychrophilic, which allows them to continue growing at refrigeration temperatures. The above would increase the probability of consuming products with a high number of CFUs close to the infectious dose. On the other hand, cleaning these products has been considered a strategy to reduce the microbial load (Hilgren & Salverda, 2000). In this sense, we must emphasize that the production of biofilms by this microorganism has been described, which favors not only its environmental resistance but also its resistance to disinfectant agents (Hussain, Kwon & Oh, 2018; Majed et al., 2016).

Regarding the enterotoxigenic profile, in this study, a high frequency of genes coding for NHE and CYTK enterotoxin was found, which is like that reported in Korea (Park et al., 2018) and France (Glasset et al., 2016) in vegetables and in general with various studies in other food matrices (Ankolekar, Rahmati & Labbé, 2009; Chaves, Cavados & Vivoni, 2012; Chon et al., 2012; Guinebretière, Broussolle & Nguyen-The, 2002; Hansen & Hendriksen, 2001; Ouoba, Thorsen & Varnam, 2008). It is important to note that a significant variety of studies in vegetables report strains with HBL enterotoxin genes (Flores-Urbán et al., 2014; Longa et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2020; Drewnowska et al., 2020; Gdoura-Ben Amor et al., 2019; Zervas et al., 2020); however, in this study, no strains with genes for the HBL toxin were found.

In addition, the presence of the ces gene that codes for cereulide was not found, which has been previously reported (Altayar & Sutherland, 2006; Chon et al., 2012; Ouoba, Thorsen & Varnam, 2008). We can also attribute it to all strains included in the study being psychrophilic and reported that the emetic strains could not grow at lower temperatures than non-emetic strains (Carlin et al., 2006). Regarding distribution, high frequencies of positive strains for ces genes have been reported more frequently in some European countries (Glasset et al., 2016; Berthold-Pluta et al., 2019; Gdoura-Ben Amor et al., 2019), which coincides with a higher rate of emetic syndrome cases in this region (Eurosurveillance Editorial Team, 2013). In this last point, it has also been observed that the distribution of psychrophilic and mesophilic strains and virulence factors is determined by the geographical area, considering that the environment plays an important role in the distribution of the microorganism (Drewnowska et al., 2020).

It described that B. cereus might produce biofilms on roots of plants, and consumption of the roots from various nematodes could promote dispersion of the high part of the plant (Majed et al., 2016); besides roots, it described that could produce biofilms on the surface of vegetables (Ehling-Schulz, Fricker & Scherer, 2004; Tatsika et al., 2019); which could explain the presence of this microorganism in vegetables. However, in this study, the production of biofilms was low, and as the frequency of the sipW and tasA genes. In a previous study, we found a differential distribution of the sipW and tasA genes according to the origin of the B. cereus strains, finding a high frequency in strains from eggs compared to strains from other foods (Adame-Gómez et al., 2020).

Therefore, it is considered that another mechanism that could explain the presence of B. cereus in coriander is the production of spores. We determine the sporulation rates and, we find that all strains produce in vitro rates of sporulation around 80%. We consider that this could be the reason for its presence or persistence in vegetables. We are remarking that spores are resistant to high and low temperatures, desiccation, dis-infecting agents, ionizing radiation, and ultraviolet light. The spores allow its wide distribution in the soil, water, air, plants, and animals; and therefore, in food products (Vidic et al., 2020).

The sporulation of B. cereus as the main mechanism of persistence in vegetables has been shown previously, in which the B. cereus strain DSM2302 cannot survive on melon leaves. The B. cereus DSM 2302 strain cannot sporulate due to the lack of genes for the intermediate and late sporulation phases; however, it does have genes related to biofilm production. Sporulation protects the strains against adverse environmental conditions in the plant. For example, it has been described that carbon and nitrogen sources are scarce in melon leaves, and there is a high level of secondary metabolites such as flavonoids (Antequera-Gómez et al., 2021).

The evaluation of genetic diversity by the (GTG)5 genotyping showed that 12 strains grouped into at least six clusters. Four clusters contain strains from different vendors but the same market. The rest include strains from different markets. On the one hand, this study evidences the wide genetic diversity of B. cereus strains previously described in other food matrices with this same technique (Sánchez-Chica et al., 2021a; Sánchez-Chica et al., 2021b; Samapundo et al., 2011; Samapundo et al., 2014). On the other hand, the concentration of coriander producers in the markets coming from different locations near the region, with possible differences in pre-harvest, harvest, and post-harvest stages, could explain this genetic diversity.

Regarding the safety of coriander, outbreaks of cyclosporiasis, as well as Salmonella have been reported in the USA associated with the consumption of this product of Mexican origin (Campbell et al., 2001; Abanyie et al., 2015). Therefore, it is important to continue the search for pathogens such as C. cayetanensis and Salmonella in coriander but also highlight the presence of other food-associated pathogens such as B. cereus.

In the coriander marketed in southwestern Mexico, different strains of B. cereus were found with genes associated with the production of diarrheal toxins, which is why it is important to search for strategies to control the microorganism and its legislation, as well as other microorganisms such as Salmonella.

Conclusions

  • The prevalence of B. cereus in vegetables by molecular identification of the gyrB gene was 20%

  • The most common enterotoxin gene was nhe [76.4%, (13/17)], followed by cytK [82.3%, (14/17)]

  • In the case of genes related to biofilms, the frequency was low for sipW [5.8%, (1/17)] and tasA [11.7%, (2/17)]

  • The sporulation rates could be responsible for the presence of B. cereus in vegetables due to the resist characteristic of the spores previously reported.

  • Further analyses are necessary for identification and molecular characterization of other strains of B. cereus in vegetables for human consumption.

Supplemental Information

Supplemental Information 1. Raw data of sporulation rates and biofilm.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13667/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Uncropped gels.

The GTG figure was taken in a different capture system

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13667/supp-2

Funding Statement

Daniel Alexander Castulo-Arcos received a fellowship from the National Science and Technology Council as support for this work. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Daniel Alexander Castulo-Arcos performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Roberto Adame-Gómez performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Natividad Castro-Alarcón conceived and designed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, and approved the final draft.

Aketzalli Galán-Luciano performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, discussion, and approved the final draft.

María Cristina Santiago Dionisio conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Marco A. Leyva-Vázquez analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Jose-Humberto Perez-Olais analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Jeiry Toribio-Jiménez analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Arturo Ramirez-Peralta conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Data Availability

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements of sporulation rates and biofilm are available in the Supplemental Files.

References

  • Abanyie et al. (2015).Abanyie F, Harvey RR, Harris JR, Wiegand RE, Gaul L, DESVignes-Kendrick M, Irvin K, Williams I, Hall RL, Herwaldt B, Gray EB, Qvarnstrom Y, Wise ME, Cantu V, Cantey PT, Bosch S, Da Silva AJ, Fields A, Bishop H, Wellman A, Beal J, Wilson N, Fiore AE, Tauxe R, Lance S, Slutsker L, Parise M. Multistate outbreaks of Cyclospora cayetanensis infections associated with fresh produce: focus on the Texas investigations. Epidemiology and Infection. 2015;143(16):3451–3458. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815000370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Adame-Gómez et al. (2020).Adame-Gómez R, Cruz-Facundo IM, García-Díaz LL, Ramírez-Sandoval Y, Pérez-Valdespino A, Ortuño-Pineda C, Santiago-Dionisio MC, Ramírez-Peralta A. Biofilm production by enterotoxigenic strains of Bacillus cereus in different materials and under different environmental conditions. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7):1071. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8071071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ahmed et al. (2021).Ahmed HFA, Seleiman MF, Al-Saif AM, Alshiekheid MA, Battaglia ML, Taha RS. Biological control of celery powdery mildew disease caused by Erysiphe heraclei DC in vitro and in vivo conditions. Plants (Basel) 2021;10(11):2342. doi: 10.3390/plants10112342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Altayar & Sutherland (2006).Altayar M, Sutherland AD. Bacillus cereus is common in the environment but emetic toxin-producing isolates are rare. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2006;100(1):7–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02764.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ankolekar, Rahmati & Labbé (2009).Ankolekar C, Rahmati T, Labbé RG. Detection of toxigenic Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis spores in U.S. rice. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2009;128(3):460–466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Antequera-Gómez et al. (2021).Antequera-Gómez ML, Díaz-Martínez L, Guadix JA, Sánchez-Tévar AM, Sopeña-Torres S, Hierrezuelo J, Doan HK, Leveau JHJ, Vicente A, Romero D. Sporulation is dispensable for the vegetable-associated life cycle of the human pathogen Bacillus cereus. Microbial Biotechnology. 2021;14(4):1550–1565. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Arora (2020).Arora PK. Bacilli-mediated degradation of xenobiotic compounds and heavy metals. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 2020;8:570307. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.570307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ayangbenro & Babalola (2020).Ayangbenro AS, Babalola OO. Genomic analysis of Bacillus cereus NWUAB01 and its heavy metal removal from polluted soil. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):19660. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75170-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Becker et al. (2019).Becker B, Stoll D, Schulz P, Kulling S, Huch M. Microbial contamination of organically and conventionally produced fresh vegetable salads and herbs from retail markets in southwest germany. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 2019;16(4):269–275. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2018.2541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beecher et al. (2000).Beecher DJ, Olsen TW, Somers EB, Wong AC. Evidence for contribution of tripartite hemolysin BL, phosphatidylcho-line-preferring phospholipase C, and collagenase to virulence of Bacillus cereus endophthalmitis. Infection and Immunity. 2000;68(9):5269–5276. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.9.5269-5276.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Berthold-Pluta et al. (2019).Berthold-Pluta A, Pluta A, Garbowska M, Stefańska I. Prevalence and toxicity characterization of Bacillus cereus in food products from Poland. Foods. 2019;8(7):269. doi: 10.3390/foods8070269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bhatt et al. (2020).Bhatt P, Huang Y, Zhang W, Sharma A, Chen S. Enhanced cypermethrin degradation kinetics and metabolic pathway in Bacillus thuringiensis strain SG4. Microorganisms. 2020;8(2):223. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bhatt et al. (2021).Bhatt P, Sharma A, Rene ER, Kumar AJ, Zhang W, Chen S. Bioremediation of fipronil using Bacillus sp. FA3: mechanism, kinetics and resource recovery potential from contaminated environments. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2021;39:101712. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Campbell et al. (2001).Campbell JV, Mohle-Boetani J, Reporter R, Abbott S, Farrar J, Brandl M, Mandrell R, Werner SB. An outbreak of Salmonella serotype Thompson associated with fresh cilantro. Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2001;183(6):984–987. doi: 10.1086/319254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Carlin et al. (2006).Carlin F, Fricker M, Pielaat A, Heisterkamp S, Shaheen R, Salonen MS, Svensson B, Nguyenthe C, Ehlingschulz M. Emetic toxin-producing strains of Bacillus cereus show distinct characteristics within the Bacillus cereus group. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2006;109(1–2):132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2006.01.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Caro-Astorga et al. (2015).Caro-Astorga J, Pérez-García A, Vicente A, Romero DA. Genomic region involved in the formation of adhesin fibers in Bacillus Cereus biofilms. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2015;5:6887. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Castelijn et al. (2012).Castelijn GAA, van der Veen S, Zwietering MH, Moezelaar R, Abee T. Diversity in biofilm formation and production of curli fimbriae and cellulose of Salmonella Typhimurium strains of different origin in high and low nutrient medium. Biofouling. 2012;28(1):51–63. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2011.648927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chaves, Cavados & Vivoni (2012).Chaves JQ, Cavados CF, Vivoni AM. Molecular and toxigenic characterization of Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis strains isolated from commercial ground roasted coffee. Journal of Food Protection. 2012;75(3):518–522. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-11-325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2014).Chen S, Chang C, Deng Y, An S, Dong YH, Zhou J, Hu M, Zhong G, Zhang LH. Fenpropathrin biodegradation pathway in Bacillus sp. DG-02 and its potential for bioremediation of pyrethroid-contaminated soils. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2014;62(10):2147–2157. doi: 10.1021/jf404908j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chen et al. (2012).Chen S, Luo J, Hu M, Lai K, Geng P, Huang H. Enhancement of cypermethrin degradation by a coculture of Bacillus cereus ZH-3 and Streptomyces aureus HP-S-01. Bioresource Technology. 2012;110:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chon et al. (2012).Chon JW, Kim JH, Lee SJ, Hyeon JY, Seo KH. Toxin profile, antibiotic resistance, and phenotypic and molecular characterization of Bacillus cereus in Sunsik. Food Microbiology. 2012;32(1):217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2012.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Claus & Berkeley (1986).Claus D, Berkeley CW. The genus Bacillus. In: Sneath PHA, Mair NS, Sharpe ME, Holt JG, editors. The genus Bacillus. Baltimore, MD, USA: The Williams and Wilkins Co; 1986. pp. 1105–1139. [Google Scholar]
  • De Jonghe et al. (2008).De Jonghe V, Coorevits A, Vandroemme J, Heyrman J, Herman L, De Vos P, Heyndrickx M. Intraspecific genotypic diversity of Bacillus species from raw milk. International Dairy Journal. 2008;18(5):496–505. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2007.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Drewnowska et al. (2020).Drewnowska JM, Stefanska N, Czerniecka M, Zambrowski G, Swiecicka I. Potential enterotoxicity of phylogenetically diverse Bacillus cereus sensu lato soil isolates from different geographical locations. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2020;86(11):e03032-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03032-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) (2016).EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) Risks for public health related to the presence of Bacillus cereus and other Bacillus spp. Including Bacillus thuringiensis in foodstuffs. EFSA Journal. 2016;14(7):122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Ehling-Schulz, Fricker & Scherer (2004).Ehling-Schulz M, Fricker M, Scherer S. Bacillus cereus, the causative agent of an emetic type of food-borne illness. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research. 2004;48(7):479–487. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200400055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ehling-Schulz et al. (2006).Ehling-Schulz M, Guinebretiere MH, Monthan A, Berge O, Fricker M, Svensson B. Toxin gene profiling of enterotoxic and emetic Bacillus Cereus. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2006;260(2):232–240. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00320.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Elhariry (2011).Elhariry HM. Attachment strength and biofilm forming ability of Bacillus cereus on green-leafy vegetables: cabbage and lettuce. Food Microbiology. 2011;28(7):1266–1274. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2011.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Eurosurveillance Editorial Team (2013).Eurosurveillance Editorial Team The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2011 has been published. Euro Surveillance: Bulletin Europeen Sur Les Maladies Transmissibles = European Communicable Disease Bulletin. 2013;18(15):20449. doi: 10.2807/ese.18.15.20449-en. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • FAO (2017).FAO Comité del CODEX sobre especias y hierbas culinarias (CX/SCH 17/023/12). FAO. 2017. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh
  • Flores-Urbán et al. (2014).Flores-Urbán KA, Natividad-Bonifacio I, Vázquez-Quiñones CR, Vázquez-Salinas C, Quiñones-Ramírez EI. Detection of toxigenic Bacillus cereus strains isolated from vegetables in Mexico City. Journal of Food Protection. 2014;77(12):2144–2147. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Food & Environmental Hygiene Department (2014).Food and Environmental Hygiene Department Microbiological Guidelines for Food. Hong Kong: Food and environmental hygiene department. 2014. https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/food_leg/food_leg_mgref.html https://www.cfs.gov.hk/english/food_leg/food_leg_mgref.html
  • Gdoura-Ben Amor et al. (2019).Gdoura-Ben Amor M, Jan S, Baron F, Grosset N, Culot A, Gdoura R, Gautier M, Techer C. Toxigenic potential and antimicrobial sus-ceptibility of Bacillus cereus group bacteria isolated from Tunisian foodstuffs. BMC Microbiology. 2019;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12866-019-1571-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Glasset et al. (2016).Glasset B, Herbin S, Guillier L, Cadel-Six S, Vignaud ML, Grout J, Pairaud S, Michel V, Hennekinne JA, Ramarao N, Brisabois A. Bacillus cereus-induced food-borne outbreaks in France, 2007 to 2014: epidemiology and genetic characterisation. Eurosurveillance. 2016;21(48):30413. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2016.21.48.30413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gómez-Aldapa et al. (2016).Gómez-Aldapa CA, Segovia-Cruz JA, Cerna-Cortes JF, Rangel-Vargas E, Salas-Rangel LP, Gutiérrez-Alcántara EJ, Castro-Rosas J. Prevalence and behavior of multidrug-resistant shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, enteropathogenic E. coli and entero-toxigenic E. coli on coriander. Food Microbiology. 2016;59:97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.05.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Granum & Lund (2006).Granum PE, Lund T. Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2006;157(2):223–228. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1997.tb12776.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guinebretière, Broussolle & Nguyen-The (2002).Guinebretière MH, Broussolle V, Nguyen-The C. Enterotoxigenic profiles of food-poisoning and food-borne Bacillus cereus strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2002;40(8):3053–3056. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.3053-3056.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hansen & Hendriksen (2001).Hansen BM, Hendriksen NB. Detection of enterotoxic Bacillus cereus and Bacillus thuringiensis strains by PCR analysis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001;67(1):185–189. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.1.185-189.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hayrapetyan et al. (2015).Hayrapetyan H, Muller L, Tempelaars M, Abee T, Nierop Groot M. Comparative analysis of biofilm formation by Bacillus cereus reference strains and undomesticated food isolates and the effect of free iron. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2015;200:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Health Protection Agency (2009).Health Protection Agency . Guidelines for assessing the microbiological safety of ready-to-eat foods placed on the market [S/OL] London: Health Protection Agency; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • Helgason et al. (2000).Helgason E, Okstad OA, Caugant DA, Johansen HA, Fouet A, Mock M, Hegna I, Kolstø AB. Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and Bacillus thuringiensis—one species on the basis of genetic evidence. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000;66(6):2627–2630. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.6.2627-2630.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hilgren & Salverda (2000).Hilgren JD, Salverda JA. Antimicrobial efficacy of a peroxyacetic/octanoic acid mixture in fresh-cut-vegetable process waters. Journal of Food Science. 2000;65(8):1376–1379. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb10615.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Hong et al. (2022).Hong S, Kim TY, Won SJ, Moon JH, Ajuna HB, Kim KY, Ahn YS. Control of fungal diseases and fruit yield improvement of strawberry using Bacillus velezensis CE 100. Microorganisms. 2022;10(2):365. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10020365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hurtado-Barroso et al. (2019).Hurtado-Barroso S, Tresserra-Rimbau A, Vallverdú-Queralt A, Lamuela-Raventós RM. Organic food and the impact on human health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2019;59(4):704–714. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2017.1394815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hussain, Kwon & Oh (2018).Hussain MS, Kwon M, Oh DH. Impact of manganese and heme on biofilm formation of Bacillus cereus food isolates. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(7):e0200958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ISO (2004).ISO Microbiology of food and animal feeding stuffs—Horizontal method for the enumeration of presumptive Bacillus cereus—Colony-count technique at 30 degrees C. ISO 7932. 2004. https://www.iso.org/standard/38219.html https://www.iso.org/standard/38219.html
  • Jarvis et al. (2015).Jarvis KG, White JR, Grim CJ, Ewing L, Ottesen AR, Beaubrun JJ, Pettengill JB, Brown E, Hanes DE. Cilantro microbiome before and after nonselective pre-enrichment for Salmonella using 16S rRNA and metagenomic sequencing. BMC Microbiology. 2015;15(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0497-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang et al. (2019).Jiang J, Tang M, Chen J, Yang Y. Identification and degradation characteristics of Bacillus cereus strain WD-2 isolated from prochloraz-manganese-contaminated soils. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(8):e0220975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim et al. (2016).Kim HJ, Koo M, Hwang D, Choi JH, Kim SM, Oh SW. Contamination patterns and molecular typing of Bacillus cereus in fresh-cut vegetable salad processing. Applied Biological Chemistry. 2016;59(4):573–577. doi: 10.1007/s13765-016-0198-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • Laribi et al. (2015).Laribi B, Kouki K, M’Hamdi M, Bettaieb T. Coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.) and its bioactive constituents. Fitoterapia. 2015;103(5):9–26. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2015.03.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Longa et al. (2017).Longa CMO, Nicola L, Antonielli L, Mescalchin E, Zanzotti R, Turco E, Pertot I. Soil microbiota respond to green manure in organic vineyards. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2017;123(6):1547–1560. doi: 10.1111/jam.13606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lund, De Buyser & Granum (2000).Lund T, De Buyser ML, Granum PE. A new cytotoxin from Bacillus cereus that may cause necrotic enteritis. Molecular Microbiology. 2000;38(2):254–261. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lund & Granum (1996).Lund T, Granum PE. Characterisation of a non-haemolytic enterotoxin complex from Bacillus cereus isolated after a foodborne outbreak. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 1996;141(2–3):151–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1996.tb08377.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Maffei et al. (2016).Maffei DF, Batalha EY, Landgraf M, Schaffner DW, Franco BD. Microbiology of organic and conventionally grown fresh produce. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2016;47:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Majed et al. (2016).Majed R, Faille C, Kallassy M, Gohar M. Bacillus cereus biofilms-same, only different. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7(745):1054. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mukhopadhyay & Chatterjee (2016).Mukhopadhyay P, Chatterjee S. Characterization and control of symbiotic Bacillus cereus isolated from the mid gut of Anopheles subpictus Grassi. Journal of Parasitic Diseases. 2016;40(4):1414–1421. doi: 10.1007/s12639-015-0704-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • New South Wales Food Authority (2009).New South Wales Food Authority . A Guide to Interpreting Microbiological Results [S/OL]. [2017-01-20]. NSW/FA/CP028/0906. Newington, CT: New South Wales Food Authority; 2009. Microbiological quality guide for ready-to-eat foods. [Google Scholar]
  • Oltuszak-Walczak & Walczak (2013).Oltuszak-Walczak E, Walczak P. PCR detection of CytK gene in Bacillus Cereus group strains isolated from food samples. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2013;95(2):295–301. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ouoba, Thorsen & Varnam (2008).Ouoba LI, Thorsen L, Varnam AH. Enterotoxins and emetic toxins production by Bacillus cereus and other species of Bacillus isolated from Soumbala and Bikalga, African alkaline fermented food condiments. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2008;124(3):224–230. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pahalagedara et al. (2020).Pahalagedara ASNW, Flint S, Palmer J, Subbaraj A, Brightwell G, Gupta TB. Antimicrobial activity of soil clostridium enriched conditioned media against Bacillus mycoides, Bacillus cereus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:608998. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.608998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Park et al. (2018).Park KM, Jeong M, Park KJ, Koo M. Prevalence, enterotoxin genes, and antibiotic resistance of Bacillus cereus isolated from raw vegetables in Korea. Journal of Food Protection. 2018;81(10):1590–1597. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-18-205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rasko et al. (2005).Rasko D, Altherr M, Han C, Ravel J. Genomics of the group of organisms. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2005;29(2):303–329. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Samapundo et al. (2014).Samapundo S, Devlieghere F, Xhaferi R, Heyndrickx M. Incidence, diversity and characteristics of spores of psychrotol-erant spore formers in various REPFEDS produced in Belgium. Food Microbiology. 2014;44:288–295. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Samapundo et al. (2011).Samapundo S, Heyndrickx M, Xhaferi R, Devlieghere F. Incidence, diversity and toxin gene characteristics of Bacillus cereus group strains isolated from food products marketed in Belgium. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2011;150(1):34–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez-Chica et al. (2021a).Sánchez-Chica J, Correa MM, Aceves-Diez AE, Castañeda-Sandoval LM. Enterotoxin gene distribution and genotypes of Bacillus cereus sensu lato isolated from cassava starch. Toxins (Basel) 2021a;13(2):131. doi: 10.3390/toxins13020131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez-Chica et al. (2021b).Sánchez-Chica J, Correa MM, Aceves-Diez AE, Castañeda-Sandoval LM. Genetic and toxigenic diversity of Bacillus cereus group isolated from powdered foods. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2021b;58(5):1892–1899. doi: 10.1007/s13197-020-04700-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Saravanan et al. (2021).Saravanan R, Nakkeeran S, Saranya N, Senthilraja C, Renukadevi P, Krishnamoorthy AS, El Enshasy HA, El-Adawi H, Malathi VG, Salmen SH, Ansari MJ, Khan N, Sayyed RZ. Mining the genome of Bacillus velezensis VB7 (CP047587) for MAMP genes and non-ribosomal peptide synthetase gene clusters conferring antiviral and antifungal activity. Microorganisms. 2021;9(12):2511. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • SIAP (2018).SIAP México exportó 64 mil 647 toneladas de cilantro, en 2017. 2018. https://www.gob.mx/siap/es/articulos/mexico-exporto-64-mil-647-toneladas-de-cilantro-en-2017?idiom=es https://www.gob.mx/siap/es/articulos/mexico-exporto-64-mil-647-toneladas-de-cilantro-en-2017?idiom=es
  • Stenfors Arnesen, Fagerlund & Granum (2008).Stenfors Arnesen LP, Fagerlund A, Granum PE. From soil to gut: Bacillus cereus and its food poisoning toxins. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2008;32(4):579–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Su & Arab (2006).Su LJ, Arab L. Salad and raw vegetable consumption and nutritional status in the adult US population: results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2006;106(9):1394–1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tallent et al. (2021).Tallent MS, Knolhoff A, Rhodehamel EJ, Harmon SM, Bennett RW. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) Main Page: Chapter 14: Bacillus cereus. Food and Drug Administration. 2021. https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-14-bacillus-cereus https://www.fda.gov/food/laboratory-methods-food/bam-chapter-14-bacillus-cereus
  • Tango et al. (2014).Tango CN, Choi NJ, Chung MS, Oh DH. Bacteriological quality of vegetables from organic and conventional production in different areas of Korea. Journal of Food Protection. 2014;77(8):1411–1417. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-13-514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tatsika et al. (2019).Tatsika S, Karamanoli K, Karayanni H, Genitsaris S. Metagenomic characterization of bacterial communities on ready-to-eat vegetables and effects of household washing on their diversity and composition. Pathogens. 2019;8(1):37. doi: 10.3390/pathogens8010037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vidic et al. (2020).Vidic J, Chaix C, Manzano M, Heyndrickx M. Food sensing: detection of Bacillus cereus spores in dairy products. Biosensors (Basel) 2020;10(3):15. doi: 10.3390/bios10030015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilain et al. (2006).Vilain S, Luo Y, Hildreth MB, Brözel VS. Analysis of the life cycle of the soil saprophyte Bacillus cereus in liquid soil extract and in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72(7):4970–4977. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03076-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vilain et al. (2009).Vilain S, Pretorius JM, Theron J, Brözel VS. DNA as an adhesin: Bacillus cereus requires extracellular DNA to form biofilms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2009;75(9):2861–2868. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01317-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang et al. (2022).Wang X, Liang L, Shao H, Ye X, Yang X, Chen X, Shi Y, Zhang L, Xu L, Wang J. Isolation of the novel strain bacillus amyloliquefaciens F9 and identification of lipopeptide extract components responsible for activity against xanthomonas citri subsp. citri. Plants (Basel) 2022;11(3):457. doi: 10.3390/plants11030457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wei et al. (2018).Wei S, Chelliah R, Park B-J, Park J-H, Forghani F, Park Y-S, Cho M-S, Park D-S, Oh D-H. Molecular discrimination of Bacillus cereus group species in foods (lettuce, spinach, and kimbap) using quantitative real-time PCR targeting groEL and gyrB. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2018;115:312–320. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.12.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Whittaker et al. (2009).Whittaker PJ, Sopwith W, Quigley C, Gillespie I, Willshaw GA, Lycett C, Surman-Lee S, Baxter D, Adak GK, Syed Q. A national outbreak of verotoxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 associated with consumption of lemon-and-coriander chicken wraps from a su-permarket chain. Epidemiology and Infection. 2009;137(3):375–382. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808001702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • World Health Organization (2003).World Health Organization Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption around the world. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. 2003. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/activities/technical-support-to-member-states/promoting-fruit-and-vegetable-consumption https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/activities/technical-support-to-member-states/promoting-fruit-and-vegetable-consumption
  • Xiao et al. (2015).Xiao Y, Chen S, Gao Y, Hu W, Hu M, Zhong G. Isolation of a novel beta-cypermethrin degrading strain Bacillus subtilis BSF01 and its biodegradation pathway. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2015;99(6):2849–2859. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-6164-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu et al. (2020).Yu P, Yu S, Wang J, Guo H, Zhang Y, Liao X, Zhang J, Wu S, Gu Q, Xue L, Zeng H, Pang R, Lei T, Zhang J, Wu Q, Ding Y. Bacillus cereus isolated from vegetables in china: incidence, genetic diversity, virulence genes, and antimicrobial resistance. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2020;11:848. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yu et al. (2019).Yu P, Yu S, Wang J, Guo H, Zhang Y, Liao X, Zhang J, Wu S, Gu Q, Xue L, Zeng H, Pang R, Lei T, Zhang J, Wu Q, Ding Y. Bacillus cereus Isolated From Vegetables in China: incidence, genetic diversity, virulence genes, and antimicrobial resistance. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:948. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zervas et al. (2020).Zervas A, Aggerbeck MR, Allaga H, Güzel M, Hendriks M, Jonuškienė I, Kedves O, Kupeli A, Lamovšek J, Mülner P, Munday D, Namli Ş, Samut H, Tomičić R, Tomičić Z, Yeni F, Zghal RZ, Zhao X, Sanchis-Borja V, Hendriksen NB. Identification and characterization of 33 bacillus cereus sensu lato isolates from agricultural fields from eleven widely distributed countries by whole genome se-quencing. Microorganisms. 2020;8(12):2028. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8122028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Information 1. Raw data of sporulation rates and biofilm.
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13667/supp-1
Supplemental Information 2. Uncropped gels.

The GTG figure was taken in a different capture system

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13667/supp-2

Data Availability Statement

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw measurements of sporulation rates and biofilm are available in the Supplemental Files.


Articles from PeerJ are provided here courtesy of PeerJ, Inc

RESOURCES