Highlights
-
•
We demonstrate the effect of ultrasonic irradiation on the crystalinity, stability, biocompatibility, and magnetic properties of chitosan-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (CS-SPIONs) by sonochemical method.
-
•
The sharp peaks of the XRD pattern were disappearing with increase in the sonication period but decrease in acoustic power.
-
•
Cell cytotoxicity and uptake show that above 70% of cells were viable at the highest concentration and the longest incubation duration.
-
•
The uptake and internalization of the sample by the cells were dose-dependent.
Keywords: SPIONs, Chitosan, Sonochemical synthesis, Crystalline, Stability, Functionalization
Abstract
Due to unique reaction conditions of the acoustic cavitation process, ultrasound-assisted synthesis of nanoparticles has attracted increased research attention. In this study, we demonstrate the effect of ultrasonic irradiation on the crystallinity, stability, biocompatibility, and magnetic properties of chitosan-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (CS-SPIONs). CS solution and colloidal suspension of SPIONs were mixed and sonicated using an ultrasonic probe of 1.3 cm tip size horn, frequency (20 kHz), and power (750 W). Different samples were sonicated for 1.5, 5, and 10 min with corresponding acoustic powers of 67, 40 and 36 W, and the samples were denoted S1.5, S5, and S10, respectively. The samples were characterized using X-ray diffractometer (XRD), Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), Transmission electronic microscope (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), Zeta sizer, and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). Cell cytotoxicity and cell uptake were investigated with human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK-293) cells through MTT assay and Prussian blue staining, respectively. The sharp peaks of the XRD pattern were disappearing with an increase in the sonication period but a decrease in acoustic power. EDX analysis also demonstrates that atomic and weight percentages of the various elements in the samples were decreasing with an increase in the sonication period. However, the Zeta potential (ζ) values increase with an increase in the sonication period.The saturation magnetization (Ms) of the S1.5 before and after the coating is 62.95 and 86.93 emu/g, respectively. Cell cytotoxicity and uptake of the S1.5 show that above 70% of cells were viable at the highest concentration and the longest incubation duration. Importantly, the CS-SPIONs synthesized by the sonochemical method are non-toxic and biocompatible.
1. Introduction
Sonochemical method is a non conventional and efficient route of fabricating, functionalizing, and doping iron oxide nanoparticles [1], [2], [3], [4]. In addition, it has been used to synthesize other nanomaterials which include gold [5], silver [6], and platinum [7]. The process generates several unique conditions such as acoustic cavitation process with temperature, pressure, and cooling rate of 5000 K, 2000 atm, and 1010 K/S, respectively. In addition to the localized hot spot generated by the sonochemical process, shock waves and microjets are produced [8]. These unique reaction conditions are the main advantages of the sonication process over the conventional techniques [9]. Recently these unique conditions have been exploited to rapidly and effectively graft functional groups onto the surface of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) [10].
SPIONs have considerably gathered much research attention due to their promising biomedical, and related applications [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. SPIONs in particular rmagnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles have superlative properties which include relatively least toxicity, high magnetic susceptibility, and superparamagnetic behavior [16], [17], [18]. However, one of the major disadvantages of SPIONs is the agglomeration of the particles owing to their high surface energies [19], [20]. To overcome this limitation, surface modifications of SPIONs with biocompatible materials are one of the reported strategies [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. Chitosan (CS) is a natural biopolymer with comprehensive biological and chemical properties which has been used to coat the surface of SPIONs [26], [27]. Structurally CS consists of amino and hydroxyl functional groups that enable CS to easily graft to the surface of SPIONs. Thereby, CS enhances the stability, biocompatibility, and biodegradability of SPIONs [28], [29].
Many works have reportedly coated CS on the SPIONs via Co-precipitation, thermomixer incubation, stirring, solvothermal, and reverse microemulsion methods for various biomedical applications including drug delivery, contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), biosensor, enzyme, and protein immobilization, and cancer chemotherapy [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. Unlike these methods which are laborious, time-consuming, and costly by requiring multiple reagents, several works have reportedly used facile and effective sonochemical methods to produce CS-SPIONs [35], [36], [37]. Successful functionalization of moieties on nanomaterials by the sonochemical method requires precise control and manipulation of several reactions and operational parameters such as sonication time, ultrasound frequency, energy input, and power [38], [39]. These conditions can allow a rapid, facile, and effective method of grafting biomolecules on SPIONs [40]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no work has studied the effect of ultrasonic irradiation on the physicochemical properties, cellular uptake, and biocompatibility of CS-SPIONs synthesized by the sonochemical method.
In this work, the influence of acoustic cavitation on the crystallization, stability, magnetization, toxicity, and biocompatibility of the CS coated SPIONs is reported. Herein, SPIONs ae prepared through co-precipitation method. Subsequently, CS solution was mixed with a colloidal suspension of SPIONs and ultrasonicatedat different sonication periods of (1.5, 5, and 10) min with corresponding ultrasonic power of (67, 40, 36) W, respectively. Physicochemical analyses of the functionalized SPIONs show that at a lower sonication period but higher acoustic power crystalline CS-SPIONs with enhanced saturation magnetization samples are produced.
2. Materials and method
Ferric chloride hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O, ≥98%), ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O, 98%), low molecular weight chitosan, Phosphate Buffer Saline (PBS, pH 7.4), Potassium hexacyanoferrate (II) trihydrate (K4Fe(CN)6·3H2O), and Eosin Y dye were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Concentrated ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH, 28–30%) was obtained from Merck. All chemicals were used as received without any purification. Ultrasonic irradiation was done using a Vibra-Cell probe with a 1.3 cm tip size horn, frequency (20 kHz), and power (750 W).
The human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK-293) cell lines were acquired from American Type Culture Collection (USA). Metabolic dye [4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl] −2,5-diphenyle tetrazolium (MTT), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were acquired from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Massachusetts, USA) and Bio Basic Inc. (Ontario, Canada), respectively. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), Fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin, streptomycin, and trypsin-ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (Trypsin-EDTA) were purchased from Gibco (Massachusetts, USA).
A. Synthesis of SPIONs:Bare SPIONs were synthesized by a modified co-precipitation method. Ferric (Fe3+, 1.33 g) and Ferrous (Fe2+, 0.6 g) salts were separately and completely dissolved in (40 ml) of deionized (DI) water for two minutes with sonication. Afterward, the iron solutions were mixed in a 100 ml three-neck round-bottom flask and mechanically stirred with a glass stirrer at 700 rpm under inert nitrogen gas to maintain the inert atmosphere. Next, 12.5 ml of ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH) was added drop-wise to the iron mixture and simultaneously heated up to 70 ± 3 °C for 20 min. The resulting SPIONs were subsequently separated from unreactive impurities using a permanent external magnet. The sample was washed three times with DI water and re-dispersed in DI water. The purified aqueous colloidal suspension of SPIONs was instantly utilized.
B. Synthesis of CS coated SPIONs: CS solution was prepared with 35 mg of CS powder which was dissolved in 100 ml aqueous acetic acid (0.35 M). Three samples (S1.5, S5, and S10) of CS-SPIONs were produced by adding 2 ml of the prepared CS solution to 25 ml colloidal suspension of SPIONs and sonicated without an iced bath (heat dissipation) for different sonication periods of 1.5, 5, and 10 min and powers of 67, 40, and 36 W respectively. The ultrasonic output power for each period was measured and calculated by Eq. (1) [41]. The results were left for 24 h. S1.5 is re-collected with the magnet and washed thoroughly with DI water. However, S5 and S10 were purified through centrifugation at 10000 rpm for 15 min at room temperature.
| (1) |
Where E is the consumed energy in Joules (J), and T is the reaction period in seconds (s).
S1.5 = 6045/90 = 67 W.
S5 = 12030/300 = 40 W.
S10 = 21619/600 = 36 W.
C. Characterization: To evaluate the structure, morphological properties, and sizes of the produced samples, X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANanalyticalX’pert PRO MRD PW 3040 with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = A°)), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) (FEI Nova NanoSEM 450), transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Zeiss Libra 120 at 100 kV), and ImageJ software were employed. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (PERKIN ELMER system 2000 FT-IR) was used to determine the surface functional groups of CS-SPIONs. Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX, analyzer Oxford Instruments X-Max) was deployed to identify elements present in the as-synthesized CS-SPIONs. The Zeta potential (stability) of the nanoparticles was measured via dynamic light scattering (DLS, ZETA SIZER Nanoseries Model ZEN 3600, Malvern Instruments). The magnetic properties of the samples were evaluated using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, LAKESHORE MODEL 7404) at room temperature.
D. Assessment of Cytotoxicity: In vitro cytotoxicity of CS coated SPIONs was examined in HEK-293 cells using the metabolic dye MTT assay. HEK-293 cells were cultured and grown in DMEM, supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS and 1% (v/v) antibiotics (penicillin/streptomycin) at 37 °C in 5% CO2 with 95% humidify. The assay was performed in a 96-well plate with the density of 1×104 cells seeded per well in 100 μl of complete growth medium and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cell seeding for 24 h, 100 μl of culture media containing five different concentrations (100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 μg/ml) of sample S1.5 was added to each well and incubated for24, 48, and 72 h, respectively. Six replicate wells were used for each control and treated concentration per micro-plate. After each time point, 30 μl MTT (2.5 mg/ml in PBS) was added to each well and the plates were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Afterward, the medium was removed, the DMSO (100 μl/well) was added for dissolving the crystals and the plates were incubated for 5 min. Then, the spectro photometric absorbance of the samples was measured using the micro-plate reader (ELx800, BioTek Instruments, USA) at 570 nm wavelength.
The percentage viability of cells was evaluated using Eq. (2a):
| (2a) |
E. Cell uptake of CS-SPIONs: In order to measure the uptake of the produced nanoparticles by HEK-293 cells, Prussian blue staining was utilized. HEK-293 cells were incubated with various concentrations (0, 50, 100, and 200 μg/ml) in 24-well plates at a density of 105 cells/well (n = 3) for 24 h. After incubation, cells were washed twice with PBS, fixed with 4% formalin (PBS-buffered formalin), and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. To stain intracellular iron, equal volumes of HCl (2.4 M) and K4Fe(CN)6·3H2O (0.24 M) were mixed to prepare the Prussian blue solution and incubated with the fixed cells for 30 min at room temperature. Afterward, the fixed cells were washed 2–3 times with autoclaved distilled water and counter-stained with Eosin Y dye for 30 s. Consequently, the cells were washed again with autoclaved distilled water 2–3 times and placed on a microscope to visualize and observe the cellular uptake of the nanoparticles.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. XRD analysis
The effects of different sonication periods on the crystalline structure and purity of the CS-SPIONs (Sbare, S1.5, S5, and S10) are shown in Fig. 1. The peaks correspond to the JCPDS database (Ref. Code 01-075-0033) of the Fe3O4 phase. Comparatively, the XRD peak intensity of Sbare and S1.5 are high as observed in Fig. 1(a and b). Both samples showed cubic inverse spinel crystal structure [42]. Using the diffraction planes (hkl), seven prominent characteristic peaks of Fe3O4: (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), (440) and (533). were observed in Sbare, and S1.5. Like the Sbare, the XRD result of S1.5 shows that the sonication conditions did not cause phase change in both samples.
Fig. 1.

XRD patterns of (a) Sbare, (b) S1.5, (c) S5 and (d) S10.
However, broadening of the main peaks and a decrease in intensities were observed in the XRD spectra of S5 and S10 as illustrated in Fig. 1(c and d). A shift in the d-spacing values of (220) and (311) planes is observed in both samples. The inter-planar spacing (d-spacing) values were calculated according to Eq. (2b).
| (2b) |
where hkl are Miller indices, λ is the wavelength of X-ray for CuKα = A°, and θ is the Bragg’s angle in degrees [43].
In addition, two peaks (422) and (533) in S5 and three peaks (400), (422), and (533) in S10 did not appear. These indicate that the crystallinity of the two samples was affected by the increase in the sonication period and the decrease in the acoustic power. This finding suggests that an increase in the ultrasonic period with an increase in the intense heating condition affects the crystalline structure of nanoparticles. This shortcoming can be minimized via heat dissipation, i.e. irradiating the mixtures under an iced bath environment [10].
3.2. Surface charge analysis
It is well known that the SPIONs are susceptible to agglomeration due to their high energy and large surface area. A large absolute Zeta Potential (ζ) value implies colloidal stability of the particles [44]. Generally, 30 mV is the common distinct criterion between stable and unstable colloidal suspensions. Particles with higher values are considered stable [45]. ζ values between ± 40 to ± 60 mV indicate excellent colloidal stability [46]. Experimental works show that the sonochemical route is one of the influential techniques that can break down large particle clusters into smaller ones or even discrete. This can extend stability (dispersibility) of aqueous media for a long duration [47], [48]. As shown in Fig. 2, the ζ values of the Sbare, S1.5, S5, and S10, are 35.9, 48.7, 48.9, and 56.9 mV, respectively. The results indicate that the samples are very stable [23], [31]. The values increase with increase in the sonication period. However, the ζ values of S1.5 and S5 are approximately the same. The increase in ζ values of the sonicated samples can probably be due to: 1) the ultrasonic irradiation increases the amount of positively charged amino group of CS that binds to the SPIONs or the electrostatic repulsion between the formed positive (–NH3+) charge on CS-SPIONs surface [23], [49]. 2) The acoustic cavitation process of the ultrasonic irradiation can influence the stability of the colloidal solutions through rapid grafting of the CS to the SPIONs while also preventing the agglomeration of the clusters [50].
Fig. 2.
Zeta potential results of Sbare (red line), S1.5 (green line), S5 (blue line) and S10 (black line).
3.3. Elemental analysis (Fe, O, C and N)
The EDX spectra were utilized for quantitative analysis of elements present in Sbare and CS-coated SPIONs (S1.5, S5, and S10). The corresponding elemental peaks in Sbare were due to Fe, O, and C elements, while CS-SPIONs exhibited additional N and C peaks. The presence of N in the spectraof S1.5, S5, and S10 confirms the presence of CS on the SPIONs surface. In the Sbare, C denotes contaminants which can be due to impurities from the substrate used during sample preparation. The atomic percentage and weight concentration of elements present in the samples are displayed in the upper right corner of Fig. 3a–d. It is important to observe here that only N’s atomic and weight percentage concentrations are further discussed because the element represents the binding of the terminal amino functional group of CS on the SPIONs. The atomic percentage of N in S1.5, S5, and S10 are 1.5, 1.29, and 0.75, respectively. The weight percentages are 0.64, 0.56, and 0.32, respectively. The atomic and weight percentage of N in S1.5 are higher than S5 and S10. The results show the number of N decreases with an increase in the sonication period but decreases in acoustic power. This shows that most CS grafted on the SPIONs at the 1.5 min sonication period.
Fig. 3.
Showing EDX spectra and quantification for the atomic and weight percentage concentration of various elements in the composition of (a) Sbare, (b) S1.5, (c) S5 and (d) S10.
Based on the XRD, zeta potential, and EDX results, S1.5 is the best and most preferable sample. This sample is used for further analyses such as FTIR, TEM, FESEM, VSM, cellular uptake, and cytotoxicity.
3.4. FTIR spectra
The successful grafting of CS on the SPIONs is confirmed using FTIR spectra as shown in Fig. 4. The absorption peak around 3276 cm−1 is observed in all three spectra corresponding to the (–OH) group. The peak around 3276 cm−1 and 1640 cm−1 are attributed to stretching and bending vibrations of the OH group absorbed due to water molecules (O—H) on the SPIONs surface, respectively. In the IR spectrum of Sbare (Fig. 4A), the energy absorbed at the 680 cm−1 is due to the metal oxide (M−O) vibration, which is the Fe-O bond of the iron oxide [51]. Although, it is previously reported that the characteristic ʋ1 and ʋ2 absorption band for Fe-O appeared at 590 and 445 cm−1, respectively [52], like the findings of Sureshkumaret al., the Fe-O band appeared at 686 cm−1 [51], the Fe-O of Sbare and S1.5 in Fig. 4(A and C), shifted to 680 and 639 cm−1, respectively. In the CS spectrum, Fig. 4(B), the absorption peak at 1638 cm−1 can be referred to the vibrational bending of N—H [53] which is the peak of the primary terminal amine group (–NH2) [54]. In Fig. 4B, the peaks at 1454 cm−1 and 1417 cm−1 match with C—H bending. The characteristic peaks at 2845 cm−1 and 2987 cm−1 appear as the stretching of the alkyl C—H group in CS and the sharp peak at 1015 cm−1. The stretching of C-O in CS appeared at 1045 and 1087 cm−1. This can be related to the alcoholic primary group. In comparison with the CS spectrum (Fig. 4B), the peak at 1638 cm−1 is shifted to 1642 cm−1 in the IR spectrum of S1.5 (Fig. 4C) due to amide absorption which corresponds to high intensity. The broad absorption peak is found to be relatively larger (shrink). This increase in absorption intensity can be explained by the fact that the hydrogen of the amino-functional group in CS forms a strong hydrogen bonding with the oxygen in SPIONs [55].
Fig. 4.

FTIR spectra of (A) Sbare, (B) CS, and (C) S1.5.
Moreover, the dip due to the N—H bending of the terminal amine group in S1.5 (Fig. 4C) is overlapped with the O—H dip at 1642 cm−1. The other dips that appeared in the spectrum correspond to the stretching and bending of C—H and stretching of C—O in the primary alcoholic group of the CS. The energy absorbed at 680 cm−1 that is assigned to the Fe-O band Sbare is shifted to 639 cm−1 in the S1.5. The shift is due to the binding of the functional amine group to the SPIONs. The other peaks which appeared in the IR spectrum of Sbare (Fig. 4A) are due to overlapping. The FTIR results indicate the successful attachment of CS onto the SPIONs surface. These findings further demonstrate the ability of ultrasonic irradiation to rapidly graft the amino group in CS onto the nanoparticles within a minimum sonication period of one and half minutes.
3.5. TEM analysis
The TEM micrograph of the Sbare and S1.5 are shown in Fig. 5(A and B), respectively. As illustrated in Fig. 5(B), like Sbare, the morphology of S1.5 nanoparticles maintained the spherical shapes surface modification. As shown in the inset of Fig. 5(A and B), the Sbare and S1.5 have average particles diameter of 10.9 and 11.1 nm, respectively. The increase in the size of S1.5 can be associated with the grafting of the CS on the SPIONs [56]. In addition to the findings of Yang et al., [57] which recently demonstrated that the use of ultrasonic irradiation of different power ranges between 0 and 500 W can decrease the size of nanoparticles exponentially with an increase in ultrasonic power, our result shows at minimum sonication period mono-dispersed CS coated SPIONs with a narrow size distribution can be prepared as shown in Fig. 5B.
Fig. 5.
TEM micrographs with scale-bar 100 nm and size distribution histogram of (A) Sbare and (B) S1.5.
3.6. FESEM observation and EDX mapping
The morphology of the CS-SPIONs was analyzed using FESEM. As shown in Fig. 6, the coated nanoparticles are spherically shaped and exhibit a uniform surface. Images of elemental mapping for the sample S1.5 are presented in Fig. 7. Fe, N, C, and O elements are evenly distributed across the sample. This further confirms the presence of CS on the surface of SPIONs.
Fig. 6.

FESEM image with scale-bar 100 nmof (S1.5).
Fig. 7.
EDX mapping image of S1.5. The bright spots exhibit the elemental distribution of Fe, N, C and O elements.
3.7. Magnetic properties
The magnetization results of Sbare and S1.5 are presented in Fig. 8. Both samples exhibit superparamagnetic behavior with no remanence and zero coercivity. The saturation magnetization (Ms) of Sbare and S1.5 at room temperature are found to be 62.95 and 86.93 emu/g, respectively. The results indicate that the sonochemical assisted functionalization process has no decline impact on the magnetic properties of SPIONs. Instead, the grafting process enhanced the Ms of the nanoparticles. The enhancement can probably be attributed to: 1) The proportion of magnetite vs. maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) in the core of CS-SPIONs [58]. The Fe3O4 nanoparticles have higher Ms and magnetic susceptibility compared to γ-Fe2O3 [59]. The uncoated ferrofluid can easily oxidize to γ-Fe2O3 due to exposure to air [60], thereby affecting the Ms of Sbare. However, rapid and instant coating of the SPIONs with CS layer retained the magnetite phase of the S1.5 with a high Ms value. 2) The refinement of the SPIONs during the grafting process by the acoustic cavitation process is another aspect that might enhance the magnetization. Recent studies have revealed that the ultrasonic irradiation's power and time can influence the purity, particle size, and particle refinement of the products[57], [61]. Although CS is a diamagnetic material which supposed to affect the Ms of the CS coated SPIONs, our result shows that the ultrasonic irradiation influenced the final Ms of the as-synthesized samples. However, this is an ongoing project further research is needed to establish the role of ultrasonic irradiation in influencing the Ms of the CS coated SPIONs.
Fig. 8.
Magnetization curve showing the hysteresis loop of the Sbare and S1.5 at room temperature.
Table 1 compares our results with similar works based on the sonochemical method. Our results show that at a minimum sonication period of 1.5 min and power of 67 W, highly stable, crystalline, and enhanced magnetic CS-SPIONs can be synthesized.Unlike other reports that prepare CS-SPIONs at higher sonication period, our result shows minimum sonication period is required to produce highly magnetic CS coated SPIONs.
Table 1.
Synthesis and characteristic comparison of the previous works on CS-SPIONs using sonochemical methods.
| Coated method | Coating reaction time | Particle size (nm) | ζ-potential (mV) | Saturation magnetization Ms(emu/g) |
Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bare SPIONs | CS-SPIONs | |||||
| Sonochemical | 30 min | 15.1 | ------- | 51.68 | 49.96 | [35] |
| Sonochemical | 20 min | ------- | ------- | 68.80 | 25.60 | [36] |
| Sonochemical | 30 min | 30 | High stability | ------- | 40.00 | [37] |
| Sonochemical | 1.5 min | 11.1 | 48.7 | 62.95 | 86.93 | Present study |
3.8. Cell viability
The cytotoxic effect of CS-SPIONs on HEK-293 cells is evaluated via MTT assay at different concentrations (100 to 500 μg/ml) and different incubation times (24 to 72 h). The results are presented in percentage cell viability. In the MTT assay, the enzyme activity in the mitochondria is detected by the reduction of MTT tetrazolium salts, which only occurs in living cells [62]. As presented in Fig. 9, the examined CS coated SPIONs had no obvious adverse effect on cell viability (no toxicity) at the doses used and incubation times. The viability of HEK-293 cells is reduced by increasing the concentrations of the nanoparticles and incubation times. However, the cell viability percentage was more than 70% at all concentrations and different incubation periods. Previous reports have demonstrated that nanoparticles with the viability of cells at 70% and above can be used as biocompatible nanomaterials [63]. This result confirmed that the CS-SPIONs synthesized by the sonochemical method were found to be non-toxic to HEK-293 cells. So, the samples have the potential used for biomedical applications.
Fig. 9.
Viability of HEK-293 cells after (24–72 h) incubation times with different concentrations (100–500 μg/ml) of S1.5. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM using Two-way ANOVA (multiple comparisons). Statistically, all the groups are highly significant compared to their control groups (p < 0.001).
3.9. Cell uptake of CS-SPIONs
Fig. 10(a–d) illustrates the Prussian blue staining of the HEK-293 cellular uptake. S1.5 is incubated at various concentrations (50 μg/ml to 200 μg/ml) for 24 h. It can be seen clearly from the first concentration of 50 μg/ml that the cytoplasm of the cells is stained blue. The blue color of the cytoplasm increases with an increase in the concentration of the nanoparticles. However, the cytoplasm of the control group is stained red, Fig. 10(a). The results indicate that the intracellular uptake (internalization) of the nanoparticles is dose-dependent. It is critical to understand that the cellular uptake of nanoparticles is considered for various biomedical applications, specifically in MRI, magnetic hyperthermia, and drug delivery. A previous study investigated that the concentration of nanoparticles and incubation period are the two main factors that affect the properties of the cellular uptake [64]. In our present study, we have demonstrated that the majority of cellular uptake of the CS-SPIONs occurs at the highest concentration within 24 h of incubation and more than 90% of the cells were viable at 200 μg/ml. This result implies the biocompatibility of the CS coated SPIONs produced with 1.5 min sonication period.
Fig. 10.
Prussian blue staining of the HEK-293 cells uptake of S1.5 at different concentrations (a) control, (b) 50 μg/ml (c) 100 μg/ml, and (d) 200 μg/ml for 24 h of incubation.
4. Conclusion
This study presents the influence of ultrasonic irradiation on the crystallization, stabilization, functionalization, magnetization, and biocompatibility of CS coated SPIONs. The results indicate that CS can be grafted onto the SPIONs with a minimum sonication period of 1.5 min and a maximum power of 67 W. In addition, Prussian blue staining of HEK-293 cells incubated with the highest concentration of 200 μg/ml confirmed the presence of the nanoparticles in the majority of the cells. Besides, the viability of HEK-293 cells was more than 70% after being exposed to the CS-SPIONs with the highest concentration and incubation time. This indicates the as-synthesized CS-SPIONs is biocompible.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MoHE) for providing Fundamental Research Grant Scheme with Project code: FRGS/1/2021/STG05/USM/02/6 in supporting this work.
Contributor Information
Nik Noor Ashikin Nik Ab Razak, Email: nnashikin@usm.my.
Bashiru Kayode Sodipo, Email: bashir.sodipo@kasu.edu.ng.
References
- 1.Dang F., Enomoto N., Hojo J., Enpuku K. Sonochemical synthesis of monodispersed magnetite nanoparticles by using an ethanol-water mixed solvent. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2009;16:649–654. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2008.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nazrul Islam M.d., Van Phong L.e., Jeong J.-R., Kim CheolGi. A facile route to sonochemical synthesis of magnetic iron oxide (Fe 3O4) nanoparticles. Thin Solid Films. 2011;519(23):8277–8279. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stephen Z.R., Dayringer C.J., Lim J.J., Revia R.A., Halbert M.V., Jeon M., Bakthavatsalam A., Ellenbogen R.G., Zhang M. Approach to Rapid Synthesis and Functionalization of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles for High Gene Transfection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:6320–6328. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b10883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Almessiere M.A., Slimani Y., Korkmaz A.D., Taskhandi N., Sertkol M., Baykal A., Shirsath S.E., Ercan B.O. Sonochemical synthesis of Eu3+ substituted CoFe2O4 nanoparticles and their structural, optical and magnetic properties. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019;58 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fuentes-García J.A., Santoyo-Salzar J., Rangel-Cortes E., Goya G.F., Cardozo-Mata V., Pescador-Rojas J.A. Effect of ultrasonic irradiation power on sonochemical synthesis of gold nanoparticles. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021;70 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.105274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Vinoth V., Wu J.J., Asiri A.M., Anandan S. Sonochemical synthesis of silver nanoparticles anchored reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for selective and sensitive detection of glutathione. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017;39:363–373. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jameel M.S., Aziz A.A., Dheyab M.A., Mehrdel B., Khaniabadi P.M., Khaniabadi B.M. Green sonochemical synthesis platinum nanoparticles as a novel contrast agent for computed tomography. Mater. Today Commun. 2021;27 doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Suslick K.S., Hammerton D.A., Cline R.E. The Sonochemical Hot Spot. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986;108:5641–5642. doi: 10.1021/ja00278a055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang H., Zhu J.J., Zhu J.M., Chen H.Y. Sonochemical method for the preparation of bismuth sulfide nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2002;106:3848–3854. doi: 10.1021/jp0135003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sodipo B.K., Aziz A.A. One minute synthesis of amino-silane functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles by sonochemical method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018;40:837–840. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.08.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lin M.M., Kim D.K., El Haj A.J., Dobson J. Development of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONS) for translation to clinical applications. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience. 2008;7:298–305. doi: 10.1109/TNB.2008.2011864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Qiao R., Yang C., Gao M. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: From preparations to in vivo MRI applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:6274–6293. doi: 10.1039/b902394a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.S. Laurent, D. Forge, M. Port, A. Roch, C. Robic, L. Vander Elst, R.N. Muller. Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: Synthesis, stabilization, vectorization, physicochemical characterizations and biological applications. Chem. Rev. 108. (2008). 2064–2110. 10.1021/cr068445e. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 14.Laurent S., Dutz S., Häfeli U.O., Mahmoudi M. Magnetic fluid hyperthermia: Focus on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;166:8–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2011.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sodipo B.K., Aziz A.A. Recent advances in synthesis and surface modification of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles with silica. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2016;416:275–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.05.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kandasamy G., Maity D. Recent advances in superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) for in vitro and in vivo cancer nanotheranostics. Int. J. Pharm. 2015;496:191–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ali A., Zafar H., Zia M., ul Haq I., Phull A.R., Ali J.S., Hussain A. Synthesis, characterization, applications, and challenges of iron oxide nanoparticles. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2016;9:49–67. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S99986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li Q., Kartikowati C.W., Horie S., Ogi T., Iwaki T., Okuyama K. Correlation between particle size/domain structure and magnetic properties of highly crystalline Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:9894. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09897-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mørup S., Hansen M.F., Frandsen C. Magnetic interactions between nanoparticles. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2010;1:182–190. doi: 10.3762/bjnano.1.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ling W., Wang M., Xiong C., Xie D., Chen Q., Chu X., Qiu X., Li Y., Xiao X. Synthesis, surface modification, and applications of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. 2019;34:1828–1844. doi: 10.1557/jmr.2019.129. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Balas M., Ciobanu C.S., Burtea C., Stan M.S., Bezirtzoglou E., Predoi D., Dinischiotu A. Synthesis, characterization, and toxicity evaluation of dextran-coated iron oxide nanoparticles. Metals (Basel). 2017;7 doi: 10.3390/met7020063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ge J., Zhai M., Zhang Y., Bian J., Wu J. Biocompatible Fe 3 O 4/chitosan scaffolds with high magnetism. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;128:406–413. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Khalkhali M., Rostamizadeh K., Sadighian S., Khoeini F., Naghibi M., Hamidi M. The impact of polymer coatings on magnetite nanoparticles performance as MRI contrast agents: A comparative study, DARU. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015;23 doi: 10.1186/s40199-015-0124-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mohamad Nor N., Abdul Razak K., Tan S.C., Noordin R. Properties of surface functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles (ferrofluid) conjugated antibody for lateral flow immunoassay application. J. Alloys Compd. 2012;538:100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.05.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Iqbal M.Z., Ren W., Saeed M., Chen T., Ma X., Yu X., Zhang J., Zhang L., Li A., Wu A. A facile fabrication route for binary transition metal oxide-based Janus nanoparticles for cancer theranostic applications. Nano Res. 2018;11:5735–5750. doi: 10.1007/s12274-017-1628-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Podrepšek G.H., Knez Ž., Leitgeb M. Development of chitosan functionalized magnetic nanoparticles with bioactive compounds. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1–25. doi: 10.3390/nano10101913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen H.J., Zhang Z.H., Luo L.J., Yao S.Z. Surface-imprinted chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes biosensor for detection of bovine serum albumin. Sensors Actuators, B Chem. 2012;163:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kim I.Y., Seo S.J., Moon H.S., Yoo M.K., Park I.Y., Kim B.C., Cho C.S. Chitosan and its derivatives for tissue engineering applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2008;26:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.A. OU, L. H, A. PI, A. OC, N. EI, O. EF. The Chemistry of Chitin and Chitosan Justifying their Nanomedical Utilities, Biochem. Pharmacol. Open Access. 07. (2018). 10.4172/2167-0501.1000241.
- 30.Ayyanaar S., Balachandran C., Bhaskar R.C., Kesavan M.P., Aoki S., Raja R.P., Rajesh J., Webster T.J., Rajagopal G. ROS-responsive chitosan coated magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as potential vehicles for targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2020;15:3333–3346. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S249240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Khmara I., Strbak O., Zavisova V., Koneracka M., Kubovcikova M., Antal I., Kavecansky V., Lucanska D., Dobrota D., Kopcansky P. Chitosan-stabilized iron oxide nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019;474:319–325. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.11.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sahin S., Ozmen I. Determination of optimum conditions for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase immobilization on chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles and its characterization. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2016;133:S25–S33. doi: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2016.11.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Shen M., Yu Y., Fan G., Chen G., min Jin Y., Tang W., Jia W. The synthesis and characterization of monodispersed chitosan-coated Fe3O4 nanoparticles via a facile one-step solvothermal process for adsorption of bovine serum albumin. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014;9:1–8. doi: 10.1186/1556-276X-9-296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhu L., Ma J., Jia N., Zhao Y., Shen H. Chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles as carriers of 5-Fluorouracil: Preparation, characterization and cytotoxicity studies. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2009;68:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2008.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shete P.B., Patil R.M., Thorat N.D., Prasad A., Ningthoujam R.S., Ghosh S.J., Pawar S.H. Magnetic chitosan nanocomposite for hyperthermia therapy application: Preparation, characterization and in vitro experiments. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014;288:149–157. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kim D.H., Kim K.N., Kim K.M., Lee Y.K. Targeting to carcinoma cells with chitosan- and starch-coated magnetic nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. – Part A. 2009;88:1–11. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhou Y.T., Nie H.L., Branford-White C., He Z.Y., Zhu L.M. Removal of Cu2+ from aqueous solution by chitosan-coated magnetic nanoparticles modified with α-ketoglutaric acid. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;330:29–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2008.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bang J.H., Suslick K.S. Applications of ultrasound to the synthesis of nanostructured materials. Adv. Mater. 2010;22:1039–1059. doi: 10.1002/adma.200904093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Suslick K.S. The Chemical Effects of Ultrasound. Sci. Am. 1989;260:80–86. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0289-80. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sodipo B.K., Aziz A.A. Optimization of sonochemical method of functionalizing Amino-Silane on superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles using Central Composite Design. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020;64 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Rayathulhan R., Sodipo B.K., Aziz A.A. Nucleation and growth of zinc oxide nanorods directly on metal wire by sonochemical method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2017;35:270–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2016.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nigam S., Barick K.C., Bahadur D. Development of citrate-stabilized Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Conjugation and release of doxorubicin for therapeutic applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2011;323:237–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2010.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Vara Prasad B.B.V.S., Ramesh K.V., Srinivas A. Structural and Magnetic Studies of Nano-crystalline Ferrites MFe2O4 (M = Zn, Ni, Cu, and Co) Synthesized Via Citrate Gel Autocombustion Method. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 2017;30:3523–3535. doi: 10.1007/s10948-017-4153-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Honary S., Zahir F. Effect of zeta potential on the properties of nano-drug delivery systems – A review (Part 1) Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2013;12:255–264. doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v12i2.19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Anand K., Gengan R.M., Phulukdaree A., Chuturgoon A. Agroforestry waste moringa oleifera petals mediated green synthesis of gold nanoparticles and their anti-cancer and catalytic activity. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015;21:1105–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2014.05.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Riddick T.M. Control of colloid stability through zeta potential. Blood. 1968;1:1. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Asadi A., Pourfattah F., Miklós Szilágyi I., Afrand M., Żyła G., Seon Ahn H., Wongwises S., Minh Nguyen H., Arabkoohsar A., Mahian O. Effect of sonication characteristics on stability, thermophysical properties, and heat transfer of nanofluids: A comprehensive review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019;58 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mahbubul I.M., Saidur R., Amalina M.A., Elcioglu E.B., Okutucu-Ozyurt T. Effective ultrasonication process for better colloidal dispersion of nanofluid. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015;26:361–369. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bhattacharya D., Sahu S.K., Banerjee I., Das M., Mishra D., Maiti T.K., Pramanik P. Synthesis, characterization, and in vitro biological evaluation of highly stable diversely functionalized superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2011;13:4173–4188. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0362-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dheyab M.A., Aziz A.A., Jameel M.S., Khaniabadi P.M., Mehrdel B. Mechanisms of effective gold shell on Fe3O4 core nanoparticles formation using sonochemistry method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2020;64 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sureshkumar V., Kiruba Daniel S.C.G., Ruckmani K., Sivakumar M. Fabrication of chitosan–magnetite nanocomposite strip for chromium removal. Appl. Nanosci. 2016;6:277–285. doi: 10.1007/s13204-015-0429-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ozkaya T., Toprak M.S., Baykal A., Kavas H., Köseoǧlu Y., Aktaş B. Synthesis of Fe3O4 nanoparticles at 100 °C and its magnetic characterization. J. Alloys Compd. 2009;472:18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.04.101. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang L.-Y., Zhu X.-J., Sun H.-W., Chi G.-R., Xu J.-X., Sun Y.-L. Control synthesis of magnetic Fe3O4-chitosan nanoparticles under UV irradiation in aqueous system. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2010;10(3):828–833. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yuwei C., Jianlong W. Preparation and characterization of magnetic chitosan nanoparticles and its application for Cu(II) removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;168:286–292. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.01.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Hong S., Chang Y., Rhee I. Chitosan-coated ferrite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles as a T2 contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2010;56:868–873. doi: 10.3938/jkps.56.868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Shi S.F., Jia J.F., Guo X.K., Zhao Y.P., Chen D.S., Guo Y.Y., Cheng T., Zhang X.L. Biocompatibility of chitosan-coated iron oxide nanoparticles with osteoblast cells. Int. J. Nanomedicine. 2012;7:5593–5602. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S34348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yang G., Lin W., Lai H., Tong J., Lei J., Yuan M., Zhang Y., Cui C. Understanding the relationship between particle size and ultrasonic treatment during the synthesis of metal nanoparticles. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021;73 doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dolores R., Raquel S., Adianez G.L. Sonochemical synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles loaded with folate and cisplatin: Effect of ultrasonic frequency. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2015;23:391–398. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Dheyab M.A., Aziz A.A., Jameel M.S., Noqta O.A., Mehrdel B. Synthesis and coating methods of biocompatible iron oxide/gold nanoparticle and nanocomposite for biomedical applications, Chinese. J. Phys. 2020;64:305–325. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2019.11.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ganapathe L.S., Mohamed M.A., Yunus R.M., Berhanuddin D.D. Magnetite (Fe3O4) nanoparticles in biomedical application: From synthesis to surface functionalisation. Magnetochemistry. 2020;6:1–35. doi: 10.3390/magnetochemistry6040068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mahdiani M., Soofivand F., Salavati-Niasari M. Investigation of experimental and instrumental parameters on properties of PbFe12O19 nanostructures prepared by sonochemical method. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018;40:271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chu P.W., Yang Z.J., Huang H.H., Chang A.A., Cheng Y.C., Wu G.J., Lan H.C. Low-dose bisphenol A activates the ERK signaling pathway and attenuates steroidogenic gene expression in human placental cells†. Biol. Reprod. 2018;98:250–258. doi: 10.1093/biolre/iox162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Mahmoudi M., Simchi A., Milani A.S., Stroeve P. Cell toxicity of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2009;336:510–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.04.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Wang R., Liu J., Liu Y., Zhong R., Yu X., Liu Q., Zhang L., Lv C., Mao K., Tang P. The cell uptake properties and hyperthermia performance of Zn0.5Fe2.5O4/SiO2 nanoparticles as magnetic hyperthermia agents. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2020;7 doi: 10.1098/rsos.191139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







