Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences logoLink to Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences
. 2022 Jun 18;5:100115. doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100115

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for rapid and easy identification of Omphalotus japonicus

Yohei Sugano a,⁎, Kozue Sakata b, Kosuke Nakamura c, Aoi Hosokawa a, Hirokazu Kouguchi d, Tomohiro Suzuki e, Kazunari Kondo b
PMCID: PMC9253582  PMID: 35800296

Highlights

  • •

    We constructed a LAMP to specifically detect toxic Omphalotus japonicus mushrooms.

  • •

    The process took less than 2 h from DNA extraction to detection.

  • •

    Results were determined visually using fluorescent detection reagents.

  • •

    This method can be used to identify food poisoning caused by O. japonicus.

Keywords: Loop-mediated isothermal amplification, Omphalotus japonicus, Food poisoning, Toxic mushroom, Genetic identification

Abstract

Omphalotus japonicus is a major toxic mushroom in Japan. When food poisoning caused by O. japonicus occurs, quick and accurate identification using a method that does not rely on morphological discrimination is required. Because the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method meets these requirements, we developed a LAMP method for detecting O. japonicus. Amplification occurred within 60 min, and the presence or absence of O. japonicus was confirmed within 2 h, including the DNA extraction protocol. The LAMP method did not show cross-reactivity with 13 species of edible mushrooms, had high specificity toward O. japonicus, and had sufficient detection sensitivity even in a mixed mushroom sample containing 1% O. japonicus. Additionally, O. japonicus could be detected in simulated food poisoning samples of heated and digested mushrooms, and in actual food poisoning residual samples.

1. Introduction

Many cases of mushroom food poisoning are caused by accidental ingestion because of the close resemblance of poisonous mushrooms to edible mushrooms. For example, Omphalotus japonicus and Entoloma rhodophylla are poisonous mushrooms that are often accidentally consumed, accounting for more than half of the food poisoning cases caused by mushrooms in Japan (Toda et al., 2012). In most food poisoning cases caused by O. japonicus, the mushrooms are mistaken for Lentinula edodes, Pleurotus ostreatus, and Panellus edulis, which are morphologically similar.

When food poisoning caused by O. japonicus occurs, it is difficult to morphologically identify the causative mushroom from a small amount of the causative food or vomitus. Therefore, a quick and accurate identification method that does not rely on morphological discrimination is required. The main toxic component of O. japonicus is illudin S (Nakanishi et al., 1965, Tada et al., 1964), which if ingested can cause toxic gastrointestinal symptoms, such as vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain, after approximately 30 min to 1 h. Therefore, chemical methods for detecting illudin S using GC/MS or LC/MS/MS, for example, have been reported (Kanamori-Kataoka et al., 2006, Kasahara and Itou, 2009). Identification of O. japonicus using a molecular biological method in addition to a chemical discrimination method will increase the reliability of any results. Mushrooms are generally classified using molecular biology techniques by analyzing the nucleotide sequence information of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region (Kirchmair et al., 2004, Matheny et al., 2006). Analysis of the ITS region of O. japonicus is one of the most reliable identification methods (Schoch et al., 2012); however, it takes several days to weeks from DNA extraction to nucleotide sequence analysis. To overcome this limitation, a method for detecting O. japonicus using PCR–RFLP (Sugano et al., 2017) or real-time PCR (Maeta et al., 2008, Tsuruda et al., 2012), which can identify the organism within a shorter time than nucleotide sequence analysis, has been reported.

We have been working on constructing a rapid identification method for O. japonicus using loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP). This method amplifies DNA under isothermal conditions of 60 °C–65 °C, and its amplification efficiency is reportedly 100 to 1000 times that of PCR (Notomi et al., 2000). The amplification reaction can be performed using a simple device, and the thermal cycler used for PCR can be used as a substitute. Additionally, the LAMP method is less sensitive to polymerase inhibitors than PCR (Zhang et al., 2019), and the target gene can be amplified even with a simple DNA extraction method. LAMP method amplification can be confirmed within a short time (≤60 min), and the presence or absence of amplification can be visually confirmed by adding a fluorescent detection reagent to the reaction solution, which avoids the need for agarose gel electrophoresis. Recently, battery-powered portable LAMP amplifiers have been become commercially available, and the LAMP method has been performed on-site. Against this background, this method has been further developed to detect various nucleic acids, such as viruses, bacteria, plants, and mushrooms (Kurosaki et al., 2007, Misawa et al., 2021, Ravan et al., 2016, Vaagt et al., 2013). In this study, we developed a method for identifying O. japonicus using the LAMP method to quickly identify the causative mushroom in food poisoning cases.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

The experimental samples used in this study are shown in Table 1. Samples of O. japonicus were collected in Yamagata and Shimane prefectures in Japan. Samples from cases of food poisoning with O. japonicus were collected at public health centers in Akita and Yamagata. Samples of edible mushrooms sold in Japan, including L. edodes, P. ostreatus, and P. edulis, were also collected. To prepare mixed samples, edible mushrooms and O. japonicus were homogenized separately in a food processor (MK-K78; Panasonic, Tokyo, Japan). Then, the homogenized O. japonicus was added to the homogenized edible mushrooms at 1%–100%(w/w) (Table S1).

Table 1.

Omphalotus japonicus and edible mushrooms used in this study.

ID Japanese name Species Locality Date of collection Remarks
OJ-1 Tsukiyotake Omphalotus japonicus Shimane, Japan 2008/Oct. Freeze-dried fruiting body isolated from the field
OJ-2 Yamagata, Japan 2006/Oct. Freeze-dried fruiting body isolated from the field
OJ-p1 Yamagata, Japan 2015/Oct. Frozen fruiting body cooked in miso soup that caused food poisoning
OJ-p2 Yamagata, Japan 2015/Nov. Frozen fruiting body cooked in oil that caused food poisoning
OJ-p3 Yamagata, Japan 2015/Sep. Frozen fruiting body that caused food poisoning
OJ-p4 Yamagata, Japan 2015/Sep. Frozen fruiting body that caused food poisoning
OJ-p5 Akita, Japan 2015/Oct. Frozen fruiting body that caused food poisoning
OJ-p6 Akita, Japan 2015/Oct. Frozen fruiting body that caused food poisoning
OJ-p7 Akita, Japan 2015/Oct. Frozen fruiting body that caused food poisoning
LE-1 Shiitake Lentinula edodes Hokkaido, Japan 2013/May. Commercial cultivar
LE-2 Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Nov. Commercial cultivar
PO-1 Hiratake Pleurotus ostreatus Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Jun. Commercial cultivar
PO-2 Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Nov. Commercial cultivar
PE-1 Mukitake Panellus edulis Saga, Japan 2014/Feb. Commercial cultivar
HM Bunasimeji Hypsizygus marmoreus Niigata, Japan 2013/Nov. Commercial cultivar
GF-1 Maitake Grifola frondosa Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Dec. Commercial cultivar
GF-2 Niigata, Japan 2013/Dec. Commercial cultivar
PEr Eringi Pleurotus eryngii Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Dec. Commercial cultivar
AB-1 Mushroom (Tsukuritake) Agaricus bisporus Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Dec. Commercial cultivar
AB-2 Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Dec. Commercial cultivar
PN Nameko Pholiota nameko Ibaraki, Japan 2013/Nov. Commercial cultivar
FV Enoki Flammulina velutipes Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Dec. Commercial cultivar
PC Tamogitake Pleurotus citrinopileatus Hokkaido, Japan 2013/Dec. Commercial cultivar
ES Urabenihoteisimeji Entoloma sarcopum Fukushima, Japan 2012/Oct. Fruiting body isolated from the field
Open in a new tab

2.2. DNA extraction

DNA was extracted for gene analysis and the LAMP method was performed using a DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Each sample was washed to avoid staining with distilled water. First, 200 μL of AP1 buffer was added to 100 mg of the sample, and the mixture was crushed with a BioMasher II homogenizer (Nippi, Tokyo, Japan). Next, 400 μL of AP1 buffer and RNase A 4 μL were added and the mixture was incubated at 65 °C for 15 min. P3 buffer (260 μL) was added and the sample was allowed to stand on ice for 10 min before centrifuging at room temperature at 14,000×g for 10 min. The supernatant was loaded on a QIAshredder spin column and centrifuged at room temperature at 14,000×g for 1 min, and the eluent was collected. Then, AW1 buffer was added at 1.5 times the volume of the eluent. Next, 650 μL of the sample was loaded onto the mini spin column and it was centrifuged at 10,000×g for 1 min at room temperature. The same operation was repeated until the entire solution was loaded. For washing, 500 μL of AW2 buffer was loaded on the mini spin column and it was centrifuged at 10,000×g at room temperature for 1 min. This washing operation was performed twice.

Furthermore, the mini spin column was centrifuged at room temperature at 10,000×g for 15 min and then transferred to a new centrifuge tube. After adding 40 μL of TE(pH 8.0)(Nippon gene, Tokyo, Japan) to the mini spin column and letting it stand for 5 min, it was centrifuged at room temperature at 10,000×g for 1 min to recover the eluent. The same procedure was repeated to obtain a total of 80 μL of DNA extract. The obtained DNA extract was prepared such that the DNA concentration was quantified to be 10 ng/μL using NanoDrop One. Additionally, for rapid and easy DNA extraction, 400 μL of PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was added to 100 mg of the mushroom sample (20 mg of the dry sample), and the mixture was crushed using the BioMasher II. After heating at 100 °C for 10 min, the resultant mixture was centrifuged at room temperature (13,000×g) for 2 min, and the supernatant was used as a DNA extract.

2.3. Gene analysis and primer design

To analyze the nucleotide sequence of the ITS region of the mushroom samples, PCR was performed using ITS Universal Primers ITS 1 (White et al., 1990) and ITS 4B (Gardes & Bruns, 1993) using KOD FX DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The forward primer (ITS1) was 5′-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3′, and the reverse primer (ITS 4B) was 5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′.

The PCR products were sequenced using the BigDye 3.1 kit and loaded on a 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The obtained nucleotide sequence was analyzed using GENETYX ver 13 (Genetyx, Tokyo, Japan) and BLAST. The nucleotide sequence characteristics of O. japonicus were selected by comparing the nucleotide sequences of the ITS regions of O. japonicus, L. edodes, P. ostreatus, and P. edulis. The primers for the LAMP method that specifically recognize O. japonicus were designed using PrimerExplorer V5 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Primers for detecting O. japonicus for use in LAMP.

Primer Sequence
F3 primer 5′-GAAGCTTGGACTGTGGAG-3′
B3 primer 5′-GTGAAAACAGACGATTAGAGAG-3′
FIP primer 5′-ACACCAAGGCTTAGGTCCGAACTAGATGTTCTCAGCTCCT-3′
BIP primer 5′-ATCTACGCCTTGGTGGTTTGATTTGAAATGAAAGCAGACAGA-3′
LF loop primer (optional) 5′-TAATCCGGTTTCCGCTAATGC-3′
LB loop primer (optional) 5′-CTCTTTGGTTGGGATAGCTGCAAC-3′ 
Open in a new tab

2.4. LAMP method

The LAMP method was performed using a Loopamp DNA amplification kit (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan). When it was necessary to confirm the amplification visually, the Loopamp fluorescent detection reagent (Eiken Chemical) was added to the reaction solution. The composition of the reaction solution was as follows: 10 ng of template DNA, 1 × reaction mix, 5 pmol of F3 primer, 5 pmol of B3 primer, 40 pmol of FIP primer, 40 pmol of BIP primer, 20 pmol of LF loop primer (optional), 20 pmol of LB loop primer (optional), 1 μL of fluorescent detection reagent (optional), and 1 μL of Bst DNA polymerase. The total volume was 25 μL. The amplification reaction was maintained at 63 °C for 1 h and then at 80 °C for 5 min to inactivate the enzyme. A turbidity measurement apparatus (LA-320C, Eiken Chemical) was used to confirm amplification in real-time. A fluorescent detection reagent was added to the reaction solution confirm amplification according to the presence or absence of fluorescence in the reaction solution after completion of the reaction under visible light and UV irradiation.

2.5. Construction of a positive control plasmid

As a positive control, a plasmid containing the ITS region of the O. japonicus was created. The ITS region of the O. japonicus amplified by PCR was inserted into pCR2.1-TOPO (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the TOPO TA cloning Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and cloned in the Escherichia coli Top10 strain. Plasmids were collected using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen).

2.6. Heating and digestion treatment to simulate food poisoning

To identify the causative food of food poisoning, mushrooms were heated and subjected to artificial digestion, and detection of O. japonicus was attempted using the LAMP method. First, 500 μL of distilled water was added to 100 mg of the mushroom sample. This was followed by heating at 100 °C for 30 min and centrifuging at room temperature (6,000×g) for 1 min, after which the supernatant was removed. Next, 500 μL of Disintegration Test Solution 1 (pH 1.2; Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan) was added and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h, followed by centrifugation at room temperature at 6,000×g for 1 min to remove the supernatant. For washing, distilled water was added and the mixture was centrifuged at room temperature at 6,000×g for 1 min, after which the supernatant was removed. The washing operation was repeated twice. DNA was extracted from the remaining precipitate and used as a sample for the LAMP method. PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used as a simple DNA extraction reagent for DNA extraction. For the simple DNA extraction reagent, 1 μL was used as a template in the reaction solution of the LAMP method.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Design of primers for LAMP to detect O. japonicus

The nucleotide sequences of the ITS region in O. japonicus, L. edodes, P. ostreatus, and P. edulis were compared to design primers for the LAMP method that could specifically recognize the characteristic sequence of O. japonicus. The ITS region is expected to have improved detection sensitivity because many copies are present in the genome. Additionally, databases of the ITS region are substantial, making it possible to design primers with high versatility. Primer design for the LAMP method was performed using PrimerExplorer V5. Primers that could amplify the target region (about 230 bp) in the ITS 2 region of O. japonicus were selected. Because the LAMP method has the property of being less susceptible to polymerase inhibitors (Zhang et al., 2019a, 2019b), this method targets a relatively short region of approximately 230 bases. To confirm the selectivity of the LAMP method for O. japonicus detection, we analyzed DNA extracted from O. japonicus and edible mushrooms (L. edodes, P. ostreatus, and P. edulis) (Fig. 1a). Clear amplification was confirmed only for O. japonicus and occurred approximately 35 min after the start of the reaction (Fig. 1b). The amplification could be determined both from the increase in turbidity (measured using the LA-320C) and the presence or absence of green fluorescence under visible and UV light with the addition of Loopamp fluorescent detection reagent (Fig. 1 c and d). To confirm that the LAMP did not show non-specific amplification, we analyzed DNA extracted from various edible mushrooms (13 species). None of the edible mushrooms showed amplification, whereas the DNA derived from O. japonicus showed clear amplification (Fig. S1). These results confirmed that this method had high selectivity for O. japonicus and no cross-reactivity with edible mushrooms.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

The LAMP method for O. japonicus detection using mushrooms (a), and a real-time turbidity measurement apparatus (LA-320C) (b), or under visible light (c), and UV irradiation (d) with addition of a fluorescent detection reagent. For the LAMP method, O. japonicus (1), L. edodes (3), P. ostreatus (4), and P. edulis (5) were used as samples. A plasmid with ITS regions of O. japonicus was used as a positive control (2), and water was used as the NTC (N).

3.2. Change in amplification rate using a loop primer

A loop primer with a sequence complementary to the single-stranded portion of the loop (between B1 and B2 or between F1 and F2) was added to improve the amplification rate by increasing the number of origin sites of DNA synthesis in the LAMP method. Loop primers were designed for the LAMP method for O. japonicus detection. The influence of the presence or absence of a loop primer on the amplification rate was confirmed using a plasmid (positive control plasmid) incorporating the ITS region of O. japonicus. With a loop primer, amplification started approximately 10–18 min earlier than without a loop primer, and the total determination time was approximately 40 min (Fig. S2). Furthermore, the detection sensitivity improved. Without loop primer (Fig. 2a), amplification was confirmed in only one sample (104 copies of the sample reacted in triplicate). With loop primer (Fig. S2b), amplification was confirmed in all 104 copies. Because the detection sensitivity was improved using the loop primer, there was no non-specific amplification for edible mushrooms and the high O. japonicus selectivity was maintained (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

The LAMP method with a loop primer for detecting O. japonicus using a real-time turbidity measurement apparatus (LA-320C) to confirm cross-reactivity with edible mushrooms. The LAMP method using a loop primer was performed on O. japonicus and the following edible mushrooms: L. edodes, P. ostreatus, P. edulis, H. marmoreus, G. frondosa, P. eryngii, A. bisporus, P. nameko, F. velutipes, P. citrinopileatus, and E. sarcopum (Table 1).

3.3. Detection of mixed samples of O. japonicus

Mixed samples containing 1%–100%(w/w) O. japonicus and edible mushrooms were prepared and analyzed by the LAMP method for O. japonicus detection (Table S1). Amplification was confirmed in all samples containing up to 1% O. japonicus (Fig. S3). Therefore, this method can be applied to samples that contain multiple species of mushrooms to confirm the presence or absence of O. japonicus.

3.4. Analysis of food poisoning samples of O. japonicus

To evaluate detection of O. japonicus in food poisoning samples, heated and digested mushroom samples were subjected to the LAMP method (Fig. S4a). For this method, a DNA solution was obtained from heated and digested mushrooms [O. japonicus (two samples), L. edodes, P. ostreatus, and P. edulis] and extracted rapidly and easily using PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent. When food poisoning occurs, speed is of the essence when identifying the cause for determining treatment. With this in mind, we extracted DNA using the PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent, which is rapid and easy. Amplification was confirmed only with O. japonicus, and O. japonicus could be detected even in residual foodstuffs and vomitus when food poisoning occurred. Therefore, the LAMP method was performed on remnants of samples of from food poisoning cases caused by O. japonicus (Fig. S4b). The LAMP method was conducted by heating and digesting the sample and then rapidly and easily performing DNA extraction. An increase in the O. japonicus gene in the LAMP method was observed in all samples. For sample OJ-p2, previously reported PCR–RFLP, real-time PCR, and ITS sequencing results (Sugano et al., 2017) identified the causative mushroom was P. edulis. The P. edulis was cooked with O. japonicus, and we considered that amplification of this sample detected a trace amount of O. japonicus DNA. This result shows that the detection ability of the LAMP method is high. In addition, with the rapid and easy DNA extraction method, it is possible to prepare a sample in approximately 30 min. Combined with the 60 min reaction time of the LAMP method, this allows for the presence or absence of O. japonicus to be determined within 2 h. Therefore, the LAMP method is much faster than PCR–RFLP or real-time PCR for O. japonicus detection.

4. Conclusion

The LAMP method detected only O. japonicus and false positives were not observed for many edible mushrooms, including L. edodes, P. ostreatus, and P. edulis. Furthermore, using the loop primer, amplification was achieved in a short reaction time of approximately 40 min. When combined with rapid and simple extraction of DNA, it was possible to identify O. japonicus within 2 h. It is expected that this method could be reliably used to identify the cause of food poisoning cases in which O. japonicus is suspected. In the near future, as the availability of portable LAMP amplifiers improves, application of the LAMP method at mushroom collection sites could be used to identify O. japonicus before consumption. This could actively prevent food poisoning cases.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mr. Keiji AOTSUKA, who has retired, for his total support. This work was supported by Health Labor Sciences Research Grants (H27-shokuhin-ippan-007, H30-shokuhin-ippan-008).

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100115.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are the Supplementary data to this article:

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.pptx (855.5KB, pptx)

References

  1. Gardes M., Bruns T.D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes-application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology. 1993;2(2):113–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1993.tb00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kanamori-Kataoka M., Seto Y., Kuramoto M. Development of a method for determining illudin S in food by gas chromatography-mass specrtometry. Journal of Health Science. 2006;52:237–242. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kasahara Y., Itou T. Determination of illudin S in Omphalotus guepiniformis and foods that caused food poisoning by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi (Food Hyg. Saf. Sci.) 2009;50:167–172. doi: 10.3358/shokueishi.50.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kirchmair M., Morandell S., Stolz D., Pöder R., Sturmbauer C. Phylogeny of the genus Omphalotus based on nuclear ribosomal DNA-sequences. Mycologia. 2004;96:1253–1260. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kurosaki Y., Takada A., Ebihara H., Grolla A., Kamo N., Feldmann H.…Yasuda J. Rapid and simple detection of Ebola virus by reverse transcription-loop-mediated isothermal amplification. Journal of Virological Methods. 2007;141:78–83. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2006.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Maeta K., Ochi T., Tokimoto K., Shimomura N., Maekawa N., Kawaguchi N.…Aimi T. Rapid species identification of cooked poisonous mushrooms by using real-time PCR. Applied and Environment Microbiology. 2008;74:3306–3309. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02082-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Matheny P.B., Curtis J.M., Hofstetter V., Aime M.C., Moncalvo J.M., Ge Z.W.…Hibbett D.S. Major clades of Agaricales: A multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia. 2006;98:982–995. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.98.6.982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Misawa S., Natsuhara D., Kiba Y., Yamamuro T., Suzuki R., Shibata T., Kitamura M. Rapid identification of Colchicum autumnale based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay. Forensic Toxicology. 2021;39(1):259–265. [Google Scholar]
  9. Nakanishi K., Ohashi M., Tada M., Yamada Y. Illudin S (lampterol) Tetrahedron. 1965;21:1231–1246. doi: 10.1016/0040-4020(65)80065-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Notomi T., Okayama H., Masubuchi H., Yonekawa T., Watanabe K., Amino N., Hase T. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification of DNA. Nucleic acids research. 2000;28(12):e63–e. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.12.e63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Ravan H., Amandadi M., Sanadgol N. A highly specific and sensitive loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for the detection of Escherichia coli O157: H7. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2016;91:161–165. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Schoch C.L., Seifert K.A., Huhndorf S., Robert V., Spouge J.L., Levesque C.A., Chen W., Fungal Barcoding Consortium, and Fungal Barcoding Consortium Author List Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109(16):6241–6246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117018109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sugano, Y., Sakata, K., Nakamura, K., Noguchi, A., Fukuda, N., Suzuki T., Kondo, K., (2017) Rapid Identification Method of Omphalotus japonicus by Polymerase Chain Reaction-Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zassi (Food Hyg. Saf. Sci.), 58, 113-23. [DOI] [PubMed]
  14. Tada M., Yamada Y., Bhacca N.S., Nakanishi K., Ohashi M. Structure and reactions of illudin S (lampterol) Chemical & Pharmaceutical Bulletin. 1964;12:853–855. doi: 10.1248/cpb.12.853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Toda, M., Uneyama, C., Toyofuku, H. Morikawa, K. (2012). Trends of food poisonings caused by natural toxins in Japan, 1989-2011. Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zassi (Food Hyg. Saf. Sci.), 53, 105-20. [DOI] [PubMed]
  16. Tsuruda S., Akaki K., Hiwaki H., Suzuki A., Akiyama H. Multiplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Omphalotus guepiniformis and Lentinula edodes. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2012;76:1343–1349. doi: 10.1271/bbb.120090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vaagt F., Haase I., Fischer M. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based method for rapid mushroom species identification. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 2013;61(8):1833–1840. doi: 10.1021/jf304824b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. White T.J., Bruns T., Lee S.J.W.T., Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. 1990;18(1):315–322. [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang H., Xu Y., Fohlerova Z., Chang H., Iliescu C., Neuzil P. LAMP-on-a-chip: Revising microfluidic platforms for loop-mediated DNA amplification. Trends in Analytical Chemistry: TRAC. 2019;113:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data 1
mmc1.pptx (855.5KB, pptx)

Articles from Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES