Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270249

Glycolaldehyde induces synergistic effects on vascular inflammation in TNF-α-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells

Hee-Weon Lee 1, Min Ji Gu 1, Guijae Yoo 1, In-Wook Choi 1, Sang-Hoon Lee 1,2, Yoonsook Kim 1, Sang Keun Ha 1,2,*
Editor: Masuko Ushio-Fukai3
PMCID: PMC9255721  PMID: 35788200

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disease that contributes to disease progression is associated with the expression of adhesion molecules in vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). Glycolaldehyde (GA) has been shown to impair cellular function in various disorders, including diabetes, and renal diseases. This study investigated the effect of GA on the expression of adhesion molecules in the mouse VSMC line, MOVAS-1. Co-incubation of VSMCs with GA (25–50 μM) dose-dependently increased the protein and mRNA level of Vcam-1 and ICAM-1. Additionally, GA upregulated intracellular ROS production and phosphorylation of MAPK and NK-κB. GA also elevated TNF-α-induced PI3K-AKT activation. Furthermore, GA enhanced TNF-α-activated IκBα kinase activation, subsequent IκBα degradation, and nuclear translocation of NF-κB. These findings suggest that GA stumulated VSMC adhesive capacity and the induction of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in VSMCs through inhibition of MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways, providing insights into the effect of GA to induce inflammation within atherosclerotic lesions.

Introduction

Atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory disorder characterized by accumulation of lipids and recruitment of leukocytes in arterial vessels. These phenomena are similar in other vascular diseases such as cardiovascular disease [1, 2]. As arteriosclerosis progresses, vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) physically interact with inflammatory leukocytes; this is an essential factor in the occurrence and exacerbation of the disease. It also indicates that VSMCs have an essential role in the progression of atherosclerosis [35]. The cellular adhesion molecules (CAM), such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) in blood vessels have a critical role in the progression of lesions in atherosclerosis [6]. In the early stage of atherosclerosis, the expression of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 is upregulated as the inflammatory response increases, and the increased expression of CAM promotes the accumulation of inflammatory leukocytes in the vascular endothelium [68]. Furthermore, as atherosclerosis progresses, inflammatory cytokines are secreted from endothelial cells and phagocytes, which further stimulate the inflammatory responses [9, 10]. Based on these findings, the regulation of CAM expression on VSMCs is critical for the control of lesions. In addition, factors related to the expression of CAM may control the inflammatory process in VSMCs.

Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) known as glycotoxins are oxidizing compounds that are pathogenic in chronic inflammatory disorders including diabetes and atherosclerosis [11]. In the metabolic process, the generation of AGE is a normal phenomenon. However, excessive production and accumulation of AGEs are toxic to the organisms [12]. AGEs directly induces the secretion of various cytokines, hormones and free radicals in cells, resulting in cell thickening, infiltration of inflammatory cells and accumulation of extracellular matrix [13, 14]. The deposition of AGEs is involved in the activation of inflammatory cytokines and exacerbation of atherosclerosis in arterial vessels [15]. At the same time, it causes the initiation and generation of oxidative stress through the production of oxygen free radicals. However, the process of AGE accumulation and lesion progression are only partially understood in vascular disease. Likewise, it is not clear how to control the disease. Damage to VSMCs caused by AGEs has been shown to be mediated by inflammatory responses and ROS, suggesting that this is one of the mechanisms by which AGEs may alter the function of VSMCs [16]. Therefore, precursors that play an important role in AGE production are an important part of this mechanism. The AGE-RAGE axis is known to induce cellular oxidative stress in endothelial cells. Typically, low-molecular-weight carbonyl compounds such as methylglyoxal (MGO) and glyoxal (GO) are formed under hyperglycemic conditions and act as precursors to AGE [17, 18]. They also form adducts on proteins, leading to cellular dysfunction associated with complications of diabetes. Therefore, we tried to determine the effect of GA-induced AGE in the atherosclerotic environment using GA, which acts as a precursor to AGE production [19].

Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily and is expressed on VSMCs and endothelial cells [20]. In atherosclerosis, the binding of AGE to RAGE is enhanced in vascular cells and causes increased oxidant stress in the vascular wall [21]. The binding of AGE to RAGE stimulates the signaling pathways involving mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kB), and induces oxidative stress by increasing of ROS generation, inducing various cellular responses [22, 23]. In addition, accumulated evidences showed that oxidative stress through the AGE-AGE axis induces an inflammatory responses of blood vessels in atherosclerosis [24]. However, the effects of the inflammatory responses induced by the precursors of AGE are less well understood, and mechanisms causing inflammatory reactions have not been studied. In addition, many studies have been studied to confirm the effects of various AGEs, but studies using GA precursors have not been conducted. We confirmed how synergistic effect of GA, a precursor of AGE, was in the cellular environment of atherosclerosis-induced conditions. Therefore, this study determined to investigate the mechanisms and synergistic effects of action of the AGE precursor glycolaldehyde (GA) in CAM accumulation after TNF-α treatment.

Materials and methods

Chemical reagents and antibodies

GA (23147-58-2) and aminoguanidine (AG, 1937-19-5) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Gibco (BRL, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Reporter plasmid pGL3-NF-κB and pCMV-β-gal used in the luciferase assay system were obtained from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Most chemicals, including MAPK inhibitors, were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated. Antibodies against target molecules were obtained from Cell signaling (Danvers, MA, USA), LSBio (Seattle, WA, USA), and Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) unless otherwise stated. The following antibodies were used: AGEs (LS-C664030) from LSBio (Seattle, WA, USA), VCAM-1 (#39036), RAGE (#42544), phospho-p65 (#3033), p65 (#8242), phospho-IκB (#2859), IκB (#9242); all from Cell Signaling Technologies (Danvers, MA, USA), ICAM-1 (sc8439), phospho-ERK (sc81492), ERK (sc7383), phospho-JNK (sc81502), JNK (sc6254), phospho-p38 (sc166182), p38 (sc271120), phospho-PI3K (sc166365), phospho-AKT (sc514032), TNF-α (sc52746), IL-6 (ab57315); all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Cell culture

The mouse VSMC line MOVAS-1 was purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA) and grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS. The cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2 and sub-cultured once every two days.

Human aorta VSMC (HA-VSMC) was purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA) and grown in DMEM high-glucose medium with L-glutamine (PAA Laboratories, Pasching, Austria) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Biochrom) at 37°C and 5% CO2 and sub-cultured once every three or four days. After GA or TNF-α (Sigma, 94948-59-1) treatment (dilution for use), the cells were lysed with homogenization buffer.

Assessment of cell proliferation

This technique uses the principle that mitochondria reduce MTT to insoluble formazan. Cell proliferation was investigated for about 2 h using the MTT quantitative colorimetric assay to detect the mitochondrial activity in living cells. Cell proliferation was investigated for about 2 h using the MTT quantitative colorimetric assay to detect the mitochondrial activity in living cells. The absorbance was measured using an ELISA reader (Molecular Devices, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at 540 nm.

ROS production assay

ROS production was quantified by fluorescence microscopy (ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany) using a 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate probe (DCF-DA). Mouse VSMCs were incubated with 10 μM of DCF-DA under dark conditions for 30 min at 37°C, and rinsed with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). ROS production was measured using an ELISA plate reader (Molecular Devices) at 488 nm excitation and 522 nm emission wavelengths.

Immunoblotting

Cells were stimulated with different concentrations of GA (25–50 μM). After stimulation, the cultured cells were rinsed in PBS and suspended in a homogenizer lysis buffer comprised of 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% NP-40, 1 μg/ml pepstatin, 2 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin and 100 μg/ml phenylsulfonyl fluoride and 150 mM NaCl in 50 mM Tris, pH 8.0. The protein concentration was determined using a DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with bovine serum albumin as the standard. The whole cell lysates were seperated by 6–15% SDS-PAGE and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk in TBST (Mixture of Tris-buffered saline and Polysorbate 20) at 20–22°C for 1 h, and probed with the appropriate primary (1:500) and secondary (1:5000) antibodies. These blots were developed using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (DOGEN, Seoul, Korea).

Cytosol and nuclear extract preparation

Nuclear/Cytosol fractionation kit (ab289882) was purchased from abcam (Cambridge, UK). The cultured cells were pelleted by centrifugation, and then rinsed 2–3 times in iced PBS. Pelleted cells were resuspended in buffer A (10 mM HEPES, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.05% NP40 (or 0.05% Igepal or Tergitol) pH 7.9) and incubated on ice for 1 h with vortexing. Subsequently, cytosol extract in the supernatant was obtained by centrifugation. The nuclear protein pelleted by centrifugation was suspended in Buffer C (5 mM HEPES, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 26% glycerol (v/v), pH 7.9) and incubated on ice for 1 h with vortexing every 15 min. The supernatant containing the nuclear protein extract is separated by centrifugation and transferred to a new centrifuge tube to obtain pure nuclear protein. Separated cytoplasmic and nuclear proteins were stored at -20°C.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)

Cells were stimulated in the presence or absence of GA (25–50 μg/mL) for 24 h. After GA treatment, total RNA was isolated from cultured cells using RNA extraction kit (Kusatsu, St. Shiga, Japan) and used for cDNA synthesis (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). After cDNA synthesis, 10 μL of SYBR green premix (BioRad), 8 μL of sterile water, and 1 μL each of forward and reverse primer were mixed to obtain the total volume of 20 μL. Fluorescence was measured at each cycle. The RT-PCR primer sequences used to examine the expression of cytokines are indicated in Table 1.

Table 1. Primer sequences and real-time PCR conditions.

Gene Forward primer (5’ → 3’) Reverse primer (5’ → 3’)
Vcam-1 CCC AAG GAT CCA GAG ATT CA TAA GGT GAG GGT GGC ATT TC
Icam-1 CCT GTT TCC TGC CTC TGA AG GTC TGC TGA GAC CCC TCT TG
RAGE AGG AGG AAG AGG AGG AGC GT TGG CAA GGT GGG GTT ATA CAG
TNF- CCC TCA CAC TCA GAT CAT CTT CT GCT ACG ACG TGG GCT ACA G
IL-6 CCA CGG CCT TCC CTA CTT C TTG GGA GTG GTA TCC TCT GTG A
GAPDH TGC ATC CTG CAC CAC CAA TCC ACG ATG CCA AAG TTG TC

Immunofluorescence microscopy

The expression of NF-κB proteins in GA-stimulated cells was determined by immunofluorescence microscopy. VSMCs were rinsed in PBS and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBS for 30 min at 20–22°C. The cells were permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h and then, incubated with antibodies against NF-κB p65 overnight at 4°C. Following PBS washing, the cells were incubated for 1 h with anti-rabbit IgG-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) in PBS with 0.2% Triton X-100. The samples were photographed using an LSM 900 fluorescence microscope (ZEISS).

Statistical analyses

Each result is reported as mean ± S.E.M. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine significance among the groups, after which the modified t–test and two-way ANOVA were used for comparison between individual groups. Significant values (p < 0.05) are represented by an asterisk.

Results

GA induces TNF-α-induced vascular cell adhesion molecule expression

To determine whether GA regulates the CAM protein VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, VSMCs were incubated with various concentrations of GA (25–50 μM) under TNF-α (10 ng/mL) treatment. TNF-α upregulated the expression of CAM in stimulated MOVAS-1 cells. In addition, GA treatment significantly upregulated the expression of TNF-stimulated CAM expression in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 1A and 1B). In particular, it was confirmed that the expression of CAM proteins was markedly increased when treated with 50 μM of GA. We also elucidated the mRNA level of adhesion molecules by qRT-PCR analysis. VSMCs were pretreated with various GA concentrations (25–50 μM) in the presence of TNF-α for the same durations as previously described. As shown in Fig 1C and 1D, GA treated VSMCs had markedly upregulated VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 mRNA levels, which was comparable to their protein expression. To confirm whether GA regulate adhesion molecules in TNF-α-treated HA-VSMCs, human primary cells, we investigated the effects of GA on TNF-α-induced CAM proteins in HA-VSMCs (Fig 1E and 1F). GA also significantly increased adhesion molecules expression in primary cells. Taken together, these data demonstrated remarkable induction of CAM expression by GA in TNF-α-activated VSMCs, indicating that GA is a cause of deteriorating VSMCs by regulating the mRNA and protein levels of the CAM proteins.

Fig 1. Effects of GA on TNF-α-stimulated adhesion molecule protein and mRNA levels in VSMCs.

Fig 1

(A and B) The mouse VSMCs, MOVAS-1 cells, were incubated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 8 h. The CAM protein levels of whole cells were investigated by western blotting. (C and D) MOVAS-1 cells were stimulated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 4 h. The mRNA level of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 was investigated by qRT-PCR. GAPDH served as the internal control. (E and F) The human primary cells, HA-VSMCs, were incubated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 24 h. Results are shown as means ± SEM from a representative experiment (n = 5). *p<0.05 significantly different from the group treated with TNF-α.

GA induces TNF-α-induced AGEs and RAGE expression

To evaluate the effect of GA on the formation of AG in TNF-α treated VSMCs, we investigated the protein level of AGE by western blot analysis. VSMCs were treated with GA at 25–50 μM for 24 h in the presence of TNF-α. GA remarkably increased the production of AGE in a concentration-dependent manner. However, when AG, an AGE inhibitor, was added, AGE production was suppressed when compared with GA treatment at 50 μM (Fig 2A). We also assessed the effect of GA on the RAGE protein and mRNA expression was increased in a concentration-dependent manner in VSMCs. VSMCs were incubated to GA at various concentrations (25–50 μM) for 24 h, which increased protein and mRNA expression of RAGE in VSMCs in a concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, AG, an agent that inhibits AGE, decreased RAGE protein and mRNA levels (Fig 2B and 2C). Our data showed that GA increases AGE and RAGE production. Furthermore, these findings revealed that the production of RAGE by GA plays a key role in VSMCs.

Fig 2. Effects of GA on the expression of AGE and RAGE in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs.

Fig 2

(A and B) The mouse VSMCs, MOVAS-1 cells, were incubated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 24 h. (B) MOVAS-1 cells were stimulated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 4 h. The whole cell lysates were investigated by western blot assay. Results are shown as means ± SEM from a representative experiment (n = 5). *p<0.05 significantly different from the group treated with TNF-α.

GA increases TNF-α-induced activation of NF-κB

It is well known that NF-κB is a transcription factor that has a critical role in the inflammatory response in chronic inflammatory diseases. Further, NF-κB acts as an important mediator of adhesion molecule expression. Interestingly, NF-kB contains the promoter of VCAM-1 and plays a critical role in the inflammatory response. Therefore, we elucidated the effect of GA on the activation of NF-kB. The MOVAS-1 cells were incubated with different GA concentrations in the presence of TNF-α for 4 h. As shown in Fig 3A and 3B, western blot analysis exhibited that GA stimulated NF-κB p65 translocation from cytosol to the nucleus and increased IκBα phosphorylation. In contrast, the increased levels of NF-κB p65 and IκBα were significantly suppressed by pre-incubation with AG followed by GA treatment. Furthermore, immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that nuclear translocation of p65 subunits was accelerated by GA in TNF-α-activated MOVAS-1 cells (Fig 3C). Collectively, our data suggested that GA stimulates NF-κB activation through IκBα proteolytic degradation and phosphorylation of NF-κB subunits.

Fig 3. Effects of GA on TNF-α-induced activation and translocation of NF-κB in VSMCs.

Fig 3

(A, B) The mouse VSMCs, MOVAS-1 cells, were stimulated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 4 h. The nuclear protein levels of p65 and IκBα were identified by Western blot assay to demonstrate the translocation of NF-κB p65. (C) MOVAS-1 cells were stimulated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 4 h. After stimulation, the cells were incubated with the NF-κB p65 primary antibody followed by FITC-labeled anti-rabbit IgG antibody. The cells were observed using fluorescence microscopy at 600× magnification. The level of lamia A and α-tubulin was measured for nuclear and cytosol as an internal control, respectively. Results are shown as means ± SEM from a representative experiment (n = 5). *p<0.05 significantly different from the group treated with TNF-α.

Effect of GA on MAPKs in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs

Previous studies reported that treatment of TNF-α increases the activation of MAPK, thereby increasing the expression of CAM. In this study, we demonstrated that treatment of GA further stimulates TNF-α-activated cells, affecting CAM expression. Therefore, we investigated whether the induction effect of GA on CAM formation was dependent on the MAPKs pathway. Fig 4A shows the levels of ERK1/2, JNK, and p38 MAPK in the TNF-α-activated cells. In addition, MAPK phosphorylation was increased following GA treatment. To confirm whether MAPK pathways regulate adhesion molecules and inflammatory cytokine production in TNF-α-treated MOVAS-1 cells, we investigated the effects of MAPK inhibitors, pathway-specific inhibitors, on TNF-α-induced CAM and inflammatory cytokine secretion. VSMCs were pretreated with inhibitors for 2 h before TNF-α exposure and found inhibitory effects on the TNF-α-activated adhesion molecules and inflammatory cytokine levels (Fig 4B). Among MAPK pathways, TNF-α-induced phosphorylation of ERK1/2 showed the greatest attenuation following inhibitor pretreatment. The progression of arteriosclerotic lesions by TNF-α in VSMCs is well known from several researches. However, the stimulatory effect and related pathways of GA that enhance the expression of adhesion molecules in arteriosclerosis are unknown. These data demonstrated that the expression of molecules through MAPK signaling is further advanced by GA in VSMCs.

Fig 4. Effects of GA on the phosphorylation of MAPKs in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs.

Fig 4

(A) The mouse VSMCs, MOVAS-1 cells, were incubated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 30 min. (B) MOVAS-1 cells were incubated with GA and TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of the ERK1/2 inhibitor PD98059 (20 μM), the JNK inhibitor SP600125 (10 μM), and the p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 (10 μM). MAPKs protein levels were determined by western blot assay. Results are shown as means ± SEM from a representative experiment (n = 5). *p<0.05 significantly different from the group treated with TNF-α.

Effects of GA on ROS production and PI3K-AKT activation in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs

Next, we evaluated the effect of GA on ROS production when an inflammatory reaction occurs in VSMCs. Atherosclerosis is well known as a chronic inflammatory disease and its lesion is exacerbated by ROS production in inflammatory reactions. VSMCs were stimulated with different concentrations of GA (25–50 μM) in the presence of TNF-α (10 ng/mL). GA significantly induced ROS production in TNF-α-induced VSMCs in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig 5A). We also confirmed the effect of GA on ROS production using immunofluorescence microscopy (Fig 5B). At the highest concentration of GA treatment (50 μM), ROS level was increased by approximately three times. On the other hand, it was confirmed that ROS production was suppressed when GA-treated cells were incubated with AG (1 mM). In addition, GA-induced ROS production was closely related to the activation of NF-κB according to IKB degradation and phosphorylation of MAPKs. Because it was confirmed that ROS generation in vascular cells activates NF-κB and GA treatment further promotes phosphorylation of MAPKs and NF-κB through the production of ROS. To examine whether GA modulated PI3K-AKT signaling pathway in TNF-α-induced MOVAS-1 cells, the cells were treated with or without different concentrations of GA in the presence of TNF-α (10 ng/mL). GA treatment increased the phosphorylation of PI3k and AKT in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs (Fig 5C and 5D). These finding indicated that GA has a critical role in upregulating PI3K and AKT expression.

Fig 5. Effects of GA on the production of ROS and PI3K-AKT activation in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs.

Fig 5

(A) MOVAS-1 cells were incubated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 2 h. The level of ROS was determined as described in materials and methods. (B) The production of ROS in the VSMCs was evaluated using the immunofluorescence microscopy. (C and D) MOVAS-1 cells were activated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 4 h. Protein level of PI3K and AKT was determined by Western blot assay. The level of β-actin was measured as an internal control. Results are shown as means ± SEM from a representative experiment (n = 5). *p<0.05 significantly different from the group treated with TNF-α.

Effect of GA on cytokine production in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs

We next examined whether GA influenced the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines in TNF-α-activated VSMCs. As shown in Fig 6A and 6B, TNF-α markedly upregulated inflammatory expression. GA further increased the production of TNF-α and IL-6 in a concentration-dependent manner. Moreover, we investigated whether GA could affect pro-inflammatory cytokine expression at the transcriptional level using qRT-PCR analysis. The mRNA expression levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were higher in GA-treated cells compared to control cells (Fig 6 C and 6D). These results correlated with the upregulation of protein expressions, suggesting that GA modulates production of pro-inflammatory cytokines at both protein and mRNA levels in stimulated VSMCs. Collectively, these findings suggested that GA modulates inflammatory responses upregulating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines.

Fig 6. Effects of GA on the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs.

Fig 6

(A and B) The mouse VSMCs, MOVAS-1 cells, were stimulated with TNF-α (10 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of GA (25 and 50 μM) for 4 h. The protein levels of TNF-α and IL-6 were measured by western blot assay. (C and D) The mRNA expression of TNF-α and IL-6 was measured by qRT-PCR. Results are shown as means ± SEM from a representative experiment (n = 5). *p<0.05 significantly different from the group treated with TNF-α.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated that treatment of GA, an AGE precursor, elevated the expression of adhesion molecules VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in stimulated VSMCs. In addition, GA treatment upregulated the expression of CAM proteins through MAPK/NF-κB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. Regulation of CAM proteins VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 will require a critical strategy to prevent and regulate chronic inflammatory disorders including atherosclerosis. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to report that GA, a precursor of AGE, affects atherosclerosis by regulating adhesion molecule expression in VSMCs [25, 26]. Concentrations of GA in normal or diseased organisms have not been quantified till date; however most researches have estimated the physiological concentrations which range from 0.1 to 1 mM [27]. Additionally, other AGE precursors similar to GA, such as glyceraldehyde and glyoxal, are also being used at similar concentrations [28, 29]. Therefore, we examined the effect of GA at those concentrations. Quantification of plasma GA level is a crucial important factor in organisms. However, it has not been studied in previous studies. Accordingly, we are planning to proceed with animal experiments for novel finding.

The expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, might contribute to adhesion molecule expression in atherosclerotic lesions, which have been found to induce the expression of CAM proteins VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 in VSMCs [2, 9, 30]. Moreover, TNF-α stimulates RAGE expression [20, 31]. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the AGE-RAGE axis may be a critical intermediate signaling factor to induce inflammatory responses through TNF-α in VSMCs.

Progression of the AGE-RAGE axis causes inflammation and exacerbates the lesion in atherosclerosis. In addition, atherosclerosis is advanced through various signaling systems stimulated by chronic inflammation [10, 32]. It is an important biochemical abnormality accompanying inflammation in the development of atherosclerosis, which plays a critical role. AGE production is a deleterious factor as it not only induces atherosclerotic disease by binding with and activating RAGE in vascular cells but also modifies proteins such as extracellular matrix and circulating lipoproteins [6, 25, 33]. The AGE–RAGE interaction affects cellular signaling, promotes inflammatory mediator expression, and enhances pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion. Genetic manipulation and pharmacological inhibition of the AGE-RAGE pathway showed that the AGE-RAGE pathway is essential in inflammatory responses, specifically in vascular complications [12, 26, 31, 34]. Recent researches have revealed the latent roles of RAGE in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. VSMCs exhibit elevated expression of RAGE, which upon interaction with its ligands, increase the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and CAM proteins [3537]. Taken together, RAGE may act a pivotal role in vascular diseases by activating inflammation.

Stimulation of RAGE is also known to be related to ROS production, NF-κB activation, as well as recruitment of pro-inflammatory cells. Moreover, RAGE activation is involved in activation of myriads of diverse signaling pathways such as the MAPK, PI3K-AKT, and JAK/STAT pathways [20, 38, 39]. Additionally, it has been known that cells may regulate the expression of adhesion molecules in VSMCs via the MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways. Therefore, the phosphorylation of MAPK and NF-κB has an essential role in the regulation of the inflammatory response in vascular disease. Additionally, it is important to phosphorylate and degrade IκB for activation of NF-κB [4042]. This study demonstrated that GA to regulates cell adhesion molecules expressed through the AGE-RAGE axis via the MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway in VSMCs [7]. We determined that GA remarkably induced the phosphorylation of MAPKs, and the activation of NF-κB in activated VSMCs, suggesting that GA treatment increased TNF-α-induced VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression through the MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathways.

A number of cytokine cause an increase in ROS levels in VSMCs. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, increase production inflammatory responses. Moreover, increasing evidence indicates that ROS is related to the mechanism of atherosclerosis progression [9, 26, 43]. In this study, treatment of GA remarkably increased ROS production in TNF-α-stimulated VSMCs. It has been indicated that ROS activate several transcriptional factors in VSMCs and may function as a pivotal factor in inflammatory signals that trigger MAPK/NF-κB and PI3K/AKT pathway activation [10]. Furthermore, ROS may to activate the expression of VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 through activation of the NF-κB activation, strongly indicating a possible connection between ROS production and NF-κB signaling. Certainly, these data have indicated that GA-induced NF-κB activity stimulated the TNF-α-stimulated CAM protein expression. Therefore, the effect of GA is due to the adhesion molecules produced by the activation of the MAPK/NF-kB and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in vascular cells.

In summary, GA stimulated adhesion molecules expression in TNF-α-activated VSMCs. These data indicated a detrimental effect of AGEs in VSMCs. In addition, the effect of GA was mediated by ROS production, phosphorylation of MAPK/NF-κB, and activation of PI3K-AKT. Therefore, our findings have identified GA as a potential detrimental factor in progression of atherosclerosis.

Supporting information

S1 Graphical abstract

(PDF)

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

Abbreviations

AGE

advanced glycation end products

GA

glycolaldehyde

ICAM-1

intercellular adhesion molecule-1

IκBα

nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor alpha

IL-6

interleukin-6

MAPKs

mitogen-activated protein kinase

NF-κB

nuclear factor-kappa B

PI3K

Phosphoinositide 3-kinase

RAGE

receptor for advanced glycation end products

TNF-α

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

VCAM-1

vascular cell adhesion molecule-1

VSMC

Vascular smooth muscle cell

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E 0210200) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (NRF-2020R1A2C2012608). The fundes have role in conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, and writing of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Yamagishi S-i, Nakamura N, Suematsu M, Kaseda K, Matsui TJMM. Advanced Glycation End Products: A Molecular Target for Vascular Complications in Diabetes. 2015;21(1):S32–S40. doi: 10.2119/molmed.2015.00067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Basta G, Schmidt AM, De Caterina R. Advanced glycation end products and vascular inflammation: implications for accelerated atherosclerosis in diabetes. Cardiovascular Research. 2004;63(4):582–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.05.001 %J Cardiovascular Research. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Libby P. Atherosclerosis: the new view. Scientific American. 2002;286(5):46–55. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0502-46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ross R. Mechanisms of atherosclerosis—a review. Advances in nephrology from the Necker Hospital. 1990;19:79–86. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vanhoutte P. Endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis. European heart journal. 1997;18(suppl_E):19–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Galkina E, Ley K. Vascular adhesion molecules in atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2007;27(11):2292–301. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.149179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Cybulsky MI, Iiyama K, Li H, Zhu S, Chen M, Iiyama M, et al. A major role for VCAM-1, but not ICAM-1, in early atherosclerosis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2001;107(10):1255–62. doi: 10.1172/JCI11871 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Preiss DJ, Sattar N. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1: a viable therapeutic target for atherosclerosis? 2007;61(4):697–701. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01330.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mullenix PS, Andersen CA, Starnes BWJAoVS. Atherosclerosis as Inflammation. 2005;19(1):130–8. doi: 10.1007/s10016-004-0153-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lim S, Park S. Role of vascular smooth muscle cell in the inflammation of atherosclerosis. BMB Rep. 2014;47(1):1–7. doi: 10.5483/bmbrep.2014.47.1.285 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Chappey O, Dosquet C, Wautier MP, Wautier JLJEjoci. Advanced glycation end products, oxidant stress and vascular lesions. 1997;27(2):97–108. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1997.710624.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ramasamy R, Vannucci SJ, Yan SSD, Herold K, Yan SF, Schmidt AM. Advanced glycation end products and RAGE: a common thread in aging, diabetes, neurodegeneration, and inflammation. Glycobiology. 2005;15(7):16R–28R. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwi053%JGlycobiology [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Soldatos G, Cooper MEJCHR. Advanced glycation end products and vascular structure and function. 2006;8(6):472–8. doi: 10.1007/s11906-006-0025-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vlassara H. Advanced glycation end-products and atherosclerosis. Annals of medicine. 1996;28(5):419–26. doi: 10.3109/07853899608999102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bierhaus A, Humpert PM, Stern DM, Arnold B, Nawroth PPJAotNYAoS. Advanced glycation end product receptor‐mediated cellular dysfunction. 2005;1043(1):676–80. doi: 10.1196/annals.1333.077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.San Martin A, Foncea R, Laurindo FR, Ebensperger R, Griendling KK, Leighton F. Nox1-based NADPH oxidase-derived superoxide is required for VSMC activation by advanced glycation end-products. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2007;42(11):1671–9. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2007.02.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gomes R, Sousa silva M, Quintas A, Cordeiro C, Freire A, Pereira P, et al. Argpyrimidine, a methylglyoxal-derived advanced glycation end-product in familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy. Biochemical Journal. 2005;385(2):339–45. doi: 10.1042/BJ20040833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hanssen NM, Stehouwer CD, Schalkwijk CG. Methylglyoxal and glyoxalase I in atherosclerosis. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2014;42(2):443–9. doi: 10.1042/BST20140001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cantero A-V, Portero-Otín M, Ayala V, Auge N, Sanson M, Elbaz M, et al. Methylglyoxal induces advanced glycation end product (AGEs) formation and dysfunction of PDGF receptor-β: implications for diabetic atherosclerosis. The FASEB Journal. 2007;21(12):3096–106. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7536com [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xie J, Méndez JD, Méndez-Valenzuela V, Aguilar-Hernández MM. Cellular signalling of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). Cellular Signalling. 2013;25(11):2185–97. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.06.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oldfield MD, Bach LA, Forbes JM, Nikolic-Paterson D, McRobert A, Thallas V, et al. Advanced glycation end products cause epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation via the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). The Journal of clinical investigation. 2001;108(12):1853–63. doi: 10.1172/JCI11951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tanikawa T, Okada Y, Tanikawa R, Tanaka Y. Advanced glycation end products induce calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells through RAGE/p38 MAPK. Journal of vascular research. 2009;46(6):572–80. doi: 10.1159/000226225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schmidt AM, Hori O, Chen JX, Li JF, Crandall J, Zhang J, et al. Advanced glycation endproducts interacting with their endothelial receptor induce expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) in cultured human endothelial cells and in mice. A potential mechanism for the accelerated vasculopathy of diabetes. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1995;96(3):1395–403. doi: 10.1172/JCI118175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yamagishi S-i, Maeda S, Matsui T, Ueda S, Fukami K, Okuda S. Role of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) and oxidative stress in vascular complications in diabetes. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-General Subjects. 2012;1820(5):663–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sano H, Nagai R, Matsumoto K, Horiuchi S. Receptors for proteins modified by advanced glycation endproducts (AGE)—their functional role in atherosclerosis. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 1999;107(3):333–46. doi: 10.1016/s0047-6374(99)00011-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wei Q, Ren X, Jiang Y, Jin H, Liu N, Li J. Advanced glycation end products accelerate rat vascular calcification through RAGE/oxidative stress. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2013;13(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-13-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sato K, Tatsunami R, Yama K, Tampo YJB, Bulletin P. Glycolaldehyde induces cytotoxicity and increases glutathione and multidrug-resistance-associated protein levels in Schwann cells. 2013;36(7):1111–7. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b13-00046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brown BE, Dean RT, Davies MJJD. Glycation of low-density lipoproteins by methylglyoxal and glycolaldehyde gives rise to the in vitro formation of lipid-laden cells. 2005;48(2):361–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ukeda H, Hasegawa Y, Ishi T, Sawamura MJB, biotechnology, biochemistry. Inactivation of Cu, Zn-superoxide dismutase by intermediates of Maillard reaction and glycolytic pathway and some sugars. 1997;61(12):2039–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Neumann A, Schinzel R, Palm D, Riederer P, Münch G. High molecular weight hyaluronic acid inhibits advanced glycation endproduct-induced NF-κB activation and cytokine expression. 1999;453(3):283–7. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00731-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bierhaus A, Humpert PM, Morcos M, Wendt T, Chavakis T, Arnold B, et al. Understanding RAGE, the receptor for advanced glycation end products. 2005;83(11):876–86. doi: 10.1007/s00109-005-0688-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Linton MF, Fazio S. Macrophages, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. International Journal of Obesity. 2003;27(S3):S35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hansson GK. Immune mechanisms in atherosclerosis. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology. 2001;21(12):1876–90. doi: 10.1161/hq1201.100220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Schmidt AM, Yan SD, Yan SF, Stern DM. The biology of the receptor for advanced glycation end products and its ligands. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Molecular Cell Research. 2000;1498(2):99–111. 10.1016/S0167-4889(00)00087-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang F-l, Gao H-q, Wu J-m, Ma Y-b, You B-a, Li B-y, et al. Selective Inhibition by Grape Seed Proanthocyanidin Extracts of Cell Adhesion Molecule Expression Induced by Advanced Glycation End Products in Endothelial Cells. 2006;48(2):47–53. doi: 10.1097/01.fjc.0000242058.72471.0c -200608000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wang Z, Jiang Y, Liu N, Ren L, Zhu Y, An Y, et al. Advanced glycation end-product Nɛ-carboxymethyl-Lysine accelerates progression of atherosclerotic calcification in diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2012;221(2):387–96. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ishibashi Y, Matsui T, Takeuchi M, Yamagishi S-i. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) inhibits advanced glycation end product (AGE)-induced up-regulation of VCAM-1 mRNA levels in endothelial cells by suppressing AGE receptor (RAGE) expression. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010;391(3):1405–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.12.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Adamopoulos C, Piperi C, Gargalionis AN, Dalagiorgou G, Spilioti E, Korkolopoulou P, et al. Advanced glycation end products upregulate lysyl oxidase and endothelin-1 in human aortic endothelial cells via parallel activation of ERK1/2–NF-κB and JNK–AP-1 signaling pathways. 2016;73(8):1685–98. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-2091-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Zhou Y-J, Yang H-W, Wang X-G, Zhang H. Hepatocyte growth factor prevents advanced glycation end products-induced injury and oxidative stress through a PI3K/Akt-dependent pathway in human endothelial cells. Life Sciences. 2009;85(19):670–7. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Morita M, Yano S, Yamaguchi T, Sugimoto T. Advanced glycation end products-induced reactive oxygen species generation is partly through NF-kappa B activation in human aortic endothelial cells. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2013;27(1):11–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang X, Song Y, Han X, Feng L, Wang R, Zhang M, et al. Liquiritin attenuates advanced glycation end products-induced endothelial dysfunction via RAGE/NF-κB pathway in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. 2013;374(1):191–201. doi: 10.1007/s11010-012-1519-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sousa MM, Yan SD, Stern D, Saraiva MJ. Interaction of the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) with Transthyretin Triggers Nuclear Transcription Factor kB (NF-kB) Activation. Laboratory Investigation. 2000;80(7):1101–10. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.3780116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ross R, Glomset JA. Atherosclerosis and the arterial smooth muscle cell. Science. 1973;180(4093):1332–9. doi: 10.1126/science.180.4093.1332 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Masuko Ushio-Fukai

26 Jul 2021

PONE-D-21-14321

Glycolaldehyde induces vascular inflammation in TNF-α-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Sang Keun Ha

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the all points raised by the reviewers during the review process.

Especially, purity of nuclear and cytosol fractionation should be shown by including the specific nuclear and cytosolic markers in both fractions. Efffects of GA only should be included. Manuscripts have several mistakes and erros, which should be corrected.

From Editor: This study only uses mouse VSMC line, MOVAS-1, which may not reflect intact phenotype.Some key data should be repeated using primary VSMC. In additon, all the averaged graphs should be expressed by dot plots reflecting the individual raw value.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 09 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Masuko Ushio-Fukai, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements: 

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E 0210200) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (NRF-2020R1A2C2012608)"

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"This research was supported by the Main Research Program (E 0210200) of the Korea Food Research Institute (KFRI) funded by the Ministry of Science and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIT) (NRF-2020R1A2C2012608).

The fundes have role in conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, project administration, and writing of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf

3. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. 

  

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: No

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Lee et al found that GA further increased TNFα-induced inflammatory gene expression in mouse VSMC and concluded that GA may contribute atherosclerosis development. This study is not well presented and overstated statements with limited data.

There are several intermediates for AGE formation such as dicarbonyl compounds, such as methylglyoxal, glyoxal, 3-deoxyglucosone as well as GA. What is the rationale to use GA, not other intermediate, in this study?. How GA links with atherosclerosis development?

In introduction, authors described that previous studies reported that deposition of AGE is involved in atherosclerosis via increasing inflammation (Ref 15). Then it is highly expected that AGE precursor, GA involves in inflammation during atherosclerosis. Authors should explain what is new in this study in introduction section.

Reference is missing in last paragraph of introduction section (Line 77-86).

Give detail about source of GA and aminoguanidine, antibodies (especially AGE, RAGE etc), homogenization buffer etc in method section.

As TNF dose mentioned in figures, how authors made 10 nM concentration of TNF.

In Fig 3A, GA increased p-P65 translocation into nucleus but p-P65 in cytosolic fraction also increased. How authors interpret this data?

What is the procedure for nuclear and cytosolic fractionation?. Authors need to show successful fractionation using markers.

In Fig 4B, recombinant TNF treatment decreased protein expression of TNF by SP600125. What is the mechanism?

Provide replication of each experiment in figure legend.

There are several mistakes and missing reference throughout the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: According to previous literature the role of Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) which binds to the Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) to stimulate the signaling pathways involving in various cellular responses has been established. Indeed in investigating the mechanisms and effects of action of the AGE precursor glycolaldehyde (GA) in inflammation is interesting.

In abstract author claims that “This study investigated the effect of GA on the expression of adhesion molecules in the mouse VSMC line, MOVAS-1”. But throughout the figures author did not show any data related to the treatment of GA only. Instead, all data are reflected with the presence of TNF alpha stimulation. TNF alpha is a well known pro-inflammatory reagent to induce CAM proteins and MAPK signaling. Therefore, the effect of GA on the inflammation is still in question which is the aim of this study.

In addition, the effect of AG inhibitor is not convincing, mainly the Fig 3C, P65 nuclear translocations. Author should provide the good IF images with high resolution to confirm the role of GA on inflammation.

In Fig 1A, TNF-α treatment have no effect on VCAM1 expression which is not acceptable.

In Fig 3A author should confirm the purity of nuclear and cytosolic fractionation by their respective marker proteins. Actin is not accepted as the loading control for this blot.

In Fig 3B, why p-IkBα protein expression is high in basal level while total IkBα protein have no expression in basal.

In Fig 4B, there is a discrepancy in labelling, western blot labelled as TNFα while the respective quantification in bar graph represents IL-1b.

Overall, this manuscript does not fit for publication in PLoS One as it currently stands.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270249.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


16 Sep 2021

[September 10, 2021]

Masuko Ushio-Fukai

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS ONE

Dear Editor:

I wish to submit our revised manuscript (PONE-D-21-14321) entitled “Glycolaldehyde induces synergistic effects on vascular inflammation in TNF-α-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells” for publication in PLOS ONE.

We are grateful to the reviewers for their comments and suggestions, which have helped us to improve our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript based on their comments and have provided our point-by-point responses to each of their comments below.

Editor’s comment

1. Especially, purity of nuclear and cytosol fractionation should be shown by including the specific nuclear and cytosolic markers in both fractions. Efffects of GA only should be included. Manuscripts have several mistakes and errors, which should be corrected.

Response: We agree with the editor's opinion. Therefore, we separated the nucleus from the cytoplasm and proceeded with the experiment again and used appropriate markers. In addition, we screened the effect of GA alone before the experiment to confirm the effect of GA on atherosclerosis. We confirmed that treatment of GA alone had a significant effect. Therefore, we confirmed the synergistic effect of TNF-α and GA.

2. This study only uses mouse VSMC line, MOVAS-1, which may not reflect intact phenotype. Some key data should be repeated using primary VSMC. In additon, all the averaged graphs should be expressed by dot plots reflecting the individual raw value.

Response: Based on the editor's opinion, we experimented with the primary cell HS-VSMC for key results. Also, we replaced all average graphs by expressing them as point plots. (Fig. 1E and F)

Reviewer 1’s comment

1. Lee et al found that GA further increased TNFα-induced inflammatory gene expression in mouse VSMC and concluded that GA may contribute atherosclerosis development. This study is not well presented and overstated statements with limited data.

Response: We agree with reviewer’s comments. Therefore, we have explained and modified our results within the scope of our study without exaggeration more explicit. (Page 3, Lines 64-65 / Page 10, Lines 232 / Page 11, Lines 246 / Page 12, Lines 280 / Page 13, Lines 285 / Page 15, Lines 352)

2. There are several intermediates for AGE formation such as dicarbonyl compounds, such as methylglyoxal, glyoxal, 3-deoxyglucosone as well as GA. What is the rationale to use GA, not other intermediate, in this study? How GA links with atherosclerosis development?

Response: It is really an important factor. In many studies, many studies have been conducted on the occurrence and development of diseases caused by AGEs. According to several studies, various precursors are known to affect blood vessels by producing AGEs. In addition, AGEs play a role in exacerbating diseases due to excessive oxidative stress and inflammatory responses. It was confirmed that GA also induces this response in cells. We determined that various precursors may play a role based on the study of the effects of AGEs. Therefore, various types of precursors were used to evaluate their effects on VSMCs. As a result, it was confirmed that GA had the greatest effect in VSMCs.

Therefore, we conducted this study using GA on atherosclerosis. This study shows for the first time the acute effects of precursors due to vascular oxidative stress and inflammatory responses, which may provide a better understanding of the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis.

3. In introduction, authors described that previous studies reported that deposition of AGE is involved in atherosclerosis via increasing inflammation (Ref 15). Then it is highly expected that AGE precursor, GA involves in inflammation during atherosclerosis. Authors should explain what is new in this study in introduction section.

Response: In response to comments from the reviewers, we added a note on the relationship between GA and inflammation in the Introduction section. (Page 4, Lines 76-85 / Page 4, Lines 96 - Page 5, Lines 100)

4. Reference is missing in last paragraph of introduction section (Line 77-86).

Response: We have attached references to Lines 77-86 in the Introduction section. (Page 4, Lines 86-93)

5. Give detail about source of GA and aminoguanidine, antibodies (especially AGE, RAGE etc), homogenization buffer etc in method section.

Response: We have added sources and information such as chemicals, antibodies and buffers in materials and methods section. (Page 6, Lines 123-124 / Page 6, Lines 130-136 / Page 7, Lines 165- Page 8, Lines 168)

6. As TNF dose mentioned in figures, how authors made 10 nM concentration of TNF-α.

Response: We selected a concentration of 10 nM to induce inflammation for the atherosclerotic environment in VSMC, known through many previous studies. (Page 7, Lines 145-146)

7. In Fig 3A, GA increased p-P65 translocation into nucleus but p-P65 in cytosolic fraction also increased. How authors interpret this data?

Response: We used beta-actin as a loading control in our existing data. Therefore, it was not possible to know exactly whether the nucleus and cytoplasm were properly separated. We separated the nucleus and cytoplasm again and conducted the experiment again using precise control of the nucleus and cytoplasm, and added accurate results. In the previous study, the phosphorylation form of p65 was increased in the nucleus and cytosol in the TNF-a-induced atherosclerosis model. Our results showed that p65 phosphorylation was increased by GA in the nucleus and cytoplasm. These results were similar to those reported in several previous studies. (Fig. 3A and B)

References

- Kuzhuvelil B. Harikumar, Bokyung Sung, Manoj K. Pandey, Sushovan Guha, Sunil Krishnan and Bharat B. Aggarwal. 2010, 77 (5) 818-827

- Simon Gerhardt, Veronika König, Monika Doll, Tsige Hailemariam-Jahn, Igor Hrgovic, Nadja Zöller, Roland Kaufmann, Stefan Kippenberger and Markus Meissner. 2015, 12-49

8. What is the procedure for nuclear and cytosolic fractionation? Authors need to show successful fractionation using markers.

Response: We have added a method for isolating the cytosol and nucleus of cells to the materials and methods section. In addition, cytosol and nuclear markers were identified and used through re-experiment. (Page 8, Lines 176-183 / Fig. 3A)

9. In Fig 4B, recombinant TNF treatment decreased protein expression of TNF by SP600125. What is the mechanism?

Provide replication of each experiment in figure legend.

Response: In many previous studies, there have been studies that MAPK is involved in TNF-α-induced VSMCs inflammation and the mechanism of adhesion protein development. Among them, JNK plays a key role in this mechanism. Therefore, we confirmed the effect of MAPK, which plays a key role in the inflammatory response in various immune cells as well as in VSMCs, and determined the effect of each MAPK. In addition, we have provided the replication of each experiment in the figure legend following comments from the reviewers. (Page 25, Lines 578-579 / Page 25, Lines 586-587 / Page 26, Lines 596-598 / Page 26, Lines 606-607 / Page 26, Lines 616-617 / Page 27, Lines 624-625)

10. There are several mistakes and missing reference throughout the manuscript.

Response: We reviewed and corrected the mistakes of the manuscript as a whole according to the opinions of the reviewers. We also added missing references. (Page 4, Lines 76-93 / Manuscript)

Reviewer 2’s comment

1. In abstract author claims that “This study investigated the effect of GA on the expression of adhesion molecules in the mouse VSMC line, MOVAS-1”. But throughout the figures author did not show any data related to the treatment of GA only. Instead, all data are reflected with the presence of TNF alpha stimulation. TNF alpha is well known pro-inflammatory reagent to induce CAM proteins and MAPK signaling. Therefore, the effect of GA on the inflammation is still in question which is the aim of this study.

Response: We understand the comments of the reviewers well. We also initially confirmed the effect of GA alone treatment. However, we confirmed that GA alone had a significant effect. Therefore, we confirmed the synergistic effect of GA by creating an atherosclerotic environment in cells through TNF-α. In addition, we use these data to demonstrate that GA has a synergistic effect on TNF-α-induced atherosclerosis.

2. In addition, the effect of AG inhibitor is not convincing, mainly the Fig 3C, P65 nuclear translocations. Author should provide the good IF images with high resolution to confirm the role of GA on inflammation.

Response: We provide high-resolution IF images based on comments from reviewer. Please let us know if you have additional requests for correction of IF images. We will make further corrections. (Fig. 3C)

3. In Fig 1A, TNF-α treatment have no effect on VCAM1 expression which is not acceptable.

Response: We confirmed the effect of TNF-α through several screening procedures. Therefore, a result with a clear effect by GA was selected. However, we agree with the reviewer. Thus, we corrected the data for results in which the effect of TNF-α treatment was clearly visible. (Fig 1A)

4. In Fig 3A author should confirm the purity of nuclear and cytosolic fractionation by their respective marker proteins. Actin is not accepted as the loading control for this blot.

Response: We confirmed and replaced the cytoplasmic and nuclear markers through re-experiment according to the opinions of the reviewers. (Fig 3A)

5. In Fig 3B, why p-IkBα protein expression is high in basal level while total IkBα protein have no expression in basal.

Response: We understand the opinions of our reviewers. We used this band to show the trend of the WB results. We used beta-actin as a loading control in our existing data. Therefore, it was not possible to know exactly whether the nucleus and cytoplasm were properly separated. We separated the nucleus and cytoplasm again and conducted the experiment again using precise control of the nucleus and cytoplasm, and added accurate results. As the reviewer said, we conducted a re-experiment to confirm the exact expression of IkBa and modified it to a more accurate result. (Fig 3B)

6. In Fig 4B, there is a discrepancy in labelling, western blot labelled as TNF-α while the respective quantification in bar graph represents IL-1β.

Response: We have corrected the discrepancy between the picture and the cover. (Fig 4B)

We hope that the questions raised by the editors have been adequately addressed and appreciate your prompt attention to this manuscript. We are looking forward to having this paper published in PLOS ONE.

Sincerely,

Sang Keun Ha

Korea Food Research Institute

245, Nongsaengmyeong-ro, Iseo-myeon

Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do 55365

Republic of Korea

Phone: +82-63-219-9358

E mail: skha@kfri.re.kr

Attachment

Submitted filename: response letter.docx

Decision Letter 1

Masuko Ushio-Fukai

4 Jan 2022

PONE-D-21-14321R1Glycolaldehyde induces synergistic effects on vascular inflammation in TNF-α-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cellsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Sang Keun Ha

Thank you for submitting your revised manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised by 2 reviewers during the review process. Especially, representative blots and cell fractionation assays should be revised.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 18 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Masuko Ushio-Fukai, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors revised manuscript based on reviewer’s comment, but several responses are not satisfactory.

For subcellular fraction (cytosolic and nuclear) assay, the procedure is not well described. What is meaning of buffer A, buffer B. Which kit used for this experiment. In figure 3A, what is the expression level of tubulin in NE and what is the level of Lamin A in CE. This will give the purity of fractions.

What software used for statistical analysis. Which test used for ANOVA.

In response to replication of experiments, Authors mentioned “quintuplicates” in figure legend. This will confuse the readers. Authors should follow the journal format (such as N=5).

Several representative blots are not good (Fig 2B; Fig 4A; Fig 6B), Replace with representative blots.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for your revised manuscript. The current manuscript has improved a lot. Still, I have some minor concerns on the following issues.

In the section of method and materials “Cytosol and nuclear extract preparation” protocol needs detailed information about the kit (like Company name and catalog number) or what is the composition of “buffer A” and “buffer B”.

Fig 2B immunoblot images are not acceptable for publication. Image’s qualities need to be improved.

In Fig 4B immunoblot, 3rd lane and 5th lane labelling are same, but the TNFα and VCAM1 expression in 3rd and 5th lane are completely different. Author should re-check the labelling and the quantification graph as well.

Overall, this manuscript does not fit for publication in PLoS One as it currently stands.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 5;17(7):e0270249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270249.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


16 Mar 2022

[March 4, 2022]

Jouranl office

PLOS ONE

Dear Editor:

I wish to submit our revised manuscript (PONE-D-21-14321) entitled “Glycolaldehyde induces synergistic effects on vascular inflammation in TNF-α-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells” for publication in PLOS ONE.

We are grateful to the reviewers for their comments and suggestions, which have helped us to improve our manuscript. We have revised the manuscript based on their comments and have provided our point-by-point responses to each of their comments below.

Reviewer 1’s comment

1. For subcellular fraction (cytosolic and nuclear) assay, the procedure is not well described. What is meaning of buffer A, buffer B. Which kit used for this experiment. In figure 3A, what is the expression level of tubulin in NE and what is the level of Lamin A in CE. This will give the purity of fractions.

Response: We added a description of the separation of the nuclear and cytosol. (Page 8, Lines 176-186) In addition, experiments were conducted to confirm the separation of the nucleus and cytoplasm.

2. What software used for statistical analysis. Which test used for ANOVA.

Response: We added the method used for statistical analysis. (Page 9, Lines 206-210)

3. In response to replication of experiments, Authors mentioned “quintuplicates” in figure legend. This will confuse the readers, Authors should follow the journal format (such as N=5).

Response: We modified it to fit the journal format, as mentioned by reviewers. (Page 25, Lines 594; Page 26, Lines 602, 613; Page 27, Lines 622, 632, 640)

4. Several representative blots are not good (Fig 2B; Fig 4A; Fig 6B), Replace with representative blots.

Response: We modified the quality of the bands mentioned. (Fig 2B, Fig 4A, Fig 4B, Fig 5C, Fig 6B)

Reviewer 2’s comment

1. In the section of method and materials “cytosol and nuclear extract preparation” protocol needs detailed information about the kit (like company name and catalog number) or what is the composition of “buffer A” and “buffer B”.

Response: We added information about the kit and composition to the buffer. (Page 8, Lines 176-186)

2. Fig 2B immunoblot images are not acceptable for publication. Image’s qualities need to be improved.

Response: We modified the quality of the bands mentioned. (Fig 2B)

3. In Fig 4B immunoblot, 3rd lane and 5th lane labelling are same, but the TNFa and VCAM1 expression in 3rd and 5th lane are completely different. Author should re-check the labelling and the quantification graph as well.

Response: We checked the bands again and corrected the quantitative graph. (Fig 4B)

We hope that the questions raised by the editors have been adequately addressed and appreciate your prompt attention to this manuscript. We are looking forward to having this paper published in PLOS ONE.

Sincerely,

Sang Keun Ha

Korea Food Research Institute

245, Nongsaengmyeong-ro, Iseo-myeon

Wanju-gun, Jeollabuk-do 55365

Republic of Korea

Phone: +82-63-219-9358

E mail: skha@kfri.re.kr

Attachment

Submitted filename: response letter.docx

Decision Letter 2

Masuko Ushio-Fukai

8 Jun 2022

Glycolaldehyde induces synergistic effects on vascular inflammation in TNF-α-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells

PONE-D-21-14321R2

Dear Dr. Sang Keun Ha

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Masuko Ushio-Fukai, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: All comments raised by reviewer has been addressed. No other comments

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Masuko Ushio-Fukai

24 Jun 2022

PONE-D-21-14321R2

Glycolaldehyde induces synergistic effects on vascular inflammation in TNF-α-stimulated vascular smooth muscle cells

Dear Dr. Ha:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Masuko Ushio-Fukai

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Graphical abstract

    (PDF)

    S1 Raw images

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response letter.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response letter.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES