Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive type of breast cancer. Unlike other subtypes of breast cancer, TNBC lacks hormone and growth factor receptor targets. Colchicine-binding site inhibitors (CBSIs) targeting tubulin have been recognized as attractive agents for cancer therapy, but there are no CBSI drugs currently FDA-approved. CH-2-77 has been reported to have potent anti-proliferative activity against a panel of cancer cells in vitro and efficacious anti-tumor effects on melanoma xenografts, yet, its anti-cancer activity specifically against TNBC is unknown. Herein, we demonstrate that CH-2-77 inhibits the proliferation of both paclitaxel-sensitive and paclitaxel-resistant TNBC cells with an average IC50 of 3 nM. CH-2-77 also efficiently disrupts the microtubule assembly, inhibits the migration and invasion of TNBC cells, and induces G2/M cell cycle arrest. The increased number of apoptotic cells and the pattern of expression of apoptosis-related proteins in treated MDA-MB-231 cells suggests that CH-2-77 induces cell apoptosis through the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. In vivo, CH-2-77 shows acceptable overall pharmacokinetics and strongly suppresses the growth of orthotopic MDA-MB-231 xenografts without gross cumulative toxicities when administered 5 times a week. The in vivo efficacy of CH-2-77 (20 mg/kg) is comparable to that of CA4P (28 mg/kg), a CBSI that went through clinical trials. Importantly, CH-2-77 prevents lung metastasis originating from the mammary fat pad in a dose-dependent manner. Our data demonstrate that CH-2-77 is a promising new generation of tubulin inhibitors that inhibit the growth and metastasis of TNBC, and it is worthy of further development as an anticancer agent.
Keywords: Triple-negative breast cancer, colchicine-binding site inhibitor, tubulin, anti-tumor, metastasis
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the world, resulting in approximately 9.6 million deaths globally in 2018. Breast cancer accounts for around 2.09 million cases and 620,000 deaths, making it the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women. Breast cancer is classified into four major molecular subtypes by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) receptor expression: luminal A (ER/PR-positive/HER2-negative), luminal B (ER/PR-negative/HER2-positive), HER2-overexpressing, and triple-negative (TNBC, ER/PR/HER2-negative) (1). Each subtype has different treatment responses, diverse disease progression, sites of metastasis, and distinct clinical outcomes (1–3). The common treatment options for breast cancer include surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, and immunotherapy.
TNBC accounts for nearly 15–20% of all diagnosed breast cancers (4), and can be subdivided into 6 different subtypes, which are basal-like (BL1 and BL2), immunomodulatory, mesenchymal, mesenchymal stem-like, luminal androgen receptor, and unstable subtype (5,6). TNBCs are highly aggressive, associated with early recurrence and a tendency to spread to the lung, liver, and central nervous system, and patients have poor relapse-free survival rates (7,8). The prognosis of TNBC patients is relatively poor since they cannot benefit from endocrine therapy or treatments targeting HER2. Therefore, TNBC breast cancer patients require unique treatments, and general cytotoxic chemotherapies are the basis of standard treatment regimens (2,9).
Colchicine-binding site inhibitors (CBSIs) are microtubule-destabilizing agents that target the interface of α,β-tubulin heterodimers (10). Extensive preclinical studies have shown that CBSIs are effective for the treatment of various tumor types (11–13). Compared to many microtubule-targeting agents (e.g. vincristine, or paclitaxel, interacting with tubulin through vinca site or paclitaxel site, respectively) that are frequently used for treating cancer, CBSIs are less vulnerable to transporter-mediated drug resistance (e.g. overexpression of ABC-transporters) (14–16), have better aqueous solubility (17,18), possess potent anticancer effects against cancer cells overexpressing β3-tubulin (19,20) and show vascular disrupting activities (21–23). These features highlight the clinical potential of new CBSIs for effective TNBC therapy while avoiding the limitations of current anti-tubulin drugs, including adverse side effects and the frequent onset of drug resistance due to drug efflux.
CH-2-77 is a CBSI with a nanomolar IC50 against a panel of cancer cell lines, including the metastatic TNBC cell line model MDA-MB-231. It has potent anti-tumor efficacy, inhibiting the growth of melanoma A375 xenografts in vivo (24). Our current study reports the efficacy of CH-2-77 in TNBC. In vitro, CH-2-77 showed nanomolar anti-proliferative activity on a panel of TNBC cells, including paclitaxel-resistant TNBC cells, inhibited the migration and invasion, arrested cell cycle in the G2/M phase, and induced cancer cell death by disrupting microtubule dynamics. In vivo, CH-2-77 demonstrated acceptable pharmacokinetic properties and inhibited both primary tumor growth and lung metastasis in the MDA-MB-231 TNBC orthotopic xenograft model. In a direct head-to-head comparison with combretastatin A4 (CA4) phosphate (CA4P, also known as fosbretabulin), a CBSI that went through multiple clinical trials, CH-2-77 at an equivalent dose (20 mg/kg) had similar anti-tumor efficacy as CA4P (28 mg/kg, equivalent of 20 mg/kg for the active CA4). Together, these results strongly suggest that CH-2-77 is a promising drug candidate for the treatment of metastatic TNBC.
Materials and Methods
Chemical compounds and cell culture
Colchicine and paclitaxel were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and LC Laboratories, respectively. CH-2-77 (purity >98%) was synthesized according to the previously reported method (24). Human MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and Mia PaCa-2 cells were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) in 2017 or 2019, and cultured in DMEM (Mediatech, Inc.) supplemented with FBS (10%, Atlanta Biologicals) and antibiotic-antimycotic solution (1%, AA, Sigma-Aldrich) in 5% CO2 at 37°C. Paclitaxel-resistant sublines (MDA-MB-231/TxR and MDA-MB-468/TxR) were generated by treating parental cells with paclitaxel, gradually increasing the concentration until the cells sustained growth in media containing 100 nM of paclitaxel. Colchicine-resistant Mia PaCa-2 cells were generated by treating Mia PaCa-2 cells with colchicine gradually and continually until cells were stable in growth media containing 100 nM of colchicine. Two TNBC cell lines were derived from patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors regenerated and excised from host mice, cHCI-2 (a treatment-naïve line), and cHCI-10 (a taxane-resistant line); the original PDX models were generously provided by Dr. Alana Welm through the Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) pre-clinical research resource. The cHCI-2 and c-HCI-10 cells were described in (18) and cultured in M97 growth medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% AA solution (25). All cells used in the experiments were in lower passages and were monthly screened for mycoplasma using the MycoAlert kit (Lonza) and were authenticated at the University of Arizona Genetics Core or HCI.
Cell proliferation assay
MDA-MB-231 (3,000 cells/well), MDA-MB-231/TxR (5,000 cells/well), MDA-MB-468 (7,500 cells/well), and MDA-MB-468/TxR (7,500 cells/well) were seeded overnight into 96-well plates and treated with each compound at increasing concentrations (0.1 nM to 3 μM) as described in (18). cHCI-2 and cHCI-10 PDX cells were seeded overnight at 20,000 cells/well into 96-well plates and incubated with each compound for 5 days before the addition of the MTS reagent. During treatment, PDX cells were also imaged by an IncuCyte S3 live-cell imager (Sartorius), and representative images at the start time point and endpoint were captured. IC50 values were calculated as described before (18). All experiments were conducted using three biological replicates with at least three technical replicates per treatment per cell line.
Colony formation assay
MDA-MB-231 or MDA-MB-468 cells were seeded in 12-well plates at a density of 500 or 800 cells per well and once one single cell had proliferated to 4 cells, cells were treated with colchicine, paclitaxel, or CH-2-77 (1, 2, and 4 nM) as in (18). Experiments were repeated by treating MDA-MB-231 or MDA-MB-468 cells with CH-2-77 (2.5, 5, and 10 nM), and at endpoint were fixed, stained, and quantified. Data are representative of two biological replicates with three technical replicates per treatment per cell line.
Immunofluorescence staining
105 MDA-MB-231 cells or 2 × 105 MDA-MB-468 cells were seeded onto coverslips and allowed to attach overnight. Growth medium containing 2.5 nM or 5 nM of each compound was then added, and cells were treated for 24 h following the steps described in (18). Cells in interphase and mitosis were imaged using a Keyence BZ-X700 immunofluorescence microscope.
Western blot analysis
Cells grown to 70% confluence were treated with colchicine (10 nM), paclitaxel (10 nM) or CH-2-77 (2.5 nM, 5 nM and 10 nM) for 24 h. Protein samples were prepared as in (16). Primary antibodies included rabbit anti-cleaved-PARP (#5625, 1:1,000, Cell Signaling Technology, CST), rabbit anti-PARP (#9542, 1:1,000, CST), mouse anti-acetyl-α-tubulin (#12152, 1:1,000, CST), mouse anti-α-tubulin (#62204, 1:2,000, Invitrogen), rabbit anti-cleaved-caspase 9 (#7237, 1:1,000, CST), mouse anti-β-actin (#3700, 1:2,000, CST), rabbit anti-Bax (#2772, 1:1,000, CST), mouse anti-Bcl-2 (#sc-7382, 1:250, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) and were detected with horse anti-mouse-IgG-HRP (#7076, 1:1,000, CST) or goat anti-rabbit-IgG-HRP (#7074, 1:1,000, CST) secondary antibodies. Membranes were washed 3 times with TBST, then incubated with ECL reagent (Bio-Rad) for 5 min and developed using X-ray film.
Migration and invasion
The potential of CH-2-77 (4 nM) to inhibit migration or invasion of TNBC cells (5 × 104 for MDA-MB-231 and 105 for MDA-MB-468) was investigated by using Transwell non-coated inserts (#353097, Corning) or Transwell chambers coated with Matrigel (#354480) as in (18), respectively. Representative images of migrated or invaded cells were quantified using the Keyence microscope hybrid cell counting module. Data are representative of two biological replicates with three technical replicates per treatment per cell line.
Wound healing assay
The anti-migration activity of CH-2-77 was further evaluated in comparison with colchicine or paclitaxel treatment in a scratch assay (18). After creating a scratch wound, cells were treated with 4 nM of each compound for 24 h (MDA-MB-231) or 48 h (MDA-MB-468). Representative wound images were acquired with an Evos microscope (Life Technologies) throughout treatment and the % of wound area was quantified by ImageJ. Data are representative of two biological replicates with three technical replicates per treatment per cell line.
Cell apoptosis and cell cycle analysis
Cells were seeded overnight and incubated with colchicine (10 nM), paclitaxel (10 nM), and CH-2-77 (2.5 nM, 5 nM, and 10 nM) for 24 h. Then, cells were digested with trypsin-EDTA (#2520056, Gibco) and stained with Annexin-V-FITC (eBioscience, 5 μL) and propidium iodide (PI, 10 μL) in Annexin-V-FITC binding buffer (100 μL) for 10 min. Apoptotic cells were detected by flow cytometry. For cell cycle distribution, cells with the same treatments as the apoptosis assay were harvested, washed, and fixed. After permeabilization, cells were stained with rabbit anti-phospho-histone H3 (Ser 10) antibody (#9701, 1:50, CST) for 1 h at room temperature followed by a 30 min incubation with Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (# A-11008, 1:50, Molecular Probes). After washing 2 times with PBS, cells were resuspended in PI/RNase staining solution and detected by cytometry after a 5 min incubation. Cells in sub-G1, G1, S, and G2 phases were gated by a reported method (18). The experiment was conducted using three biological replicates with three technical replicates per treatment per cell line.
Pharmacokinetic assessment of CH-2-77
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Envigo, Indianapolis, IN), weighing 200–250 g, were used in the pharmacokinetic studies. Groups of 5 animals were administered either 5 mg/kg CH-2-77 by intravenous injection via a femoral vein catheter or 20 mg/kg by oral gavage after an overnight fast. Both doses were formulated in PEG300/Tween80 (80%/20%), with a constant administration volume of the dosing solution of 1 mL/kg. Blood was collected in heparinized tubes via a jugular vein catheter at 10 pre-defined time points post-dose after the intravenous administration (0.08, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 h), and at 9 times points after oral administration (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 h). Plasma was immediately separated by centrifugation (6,000×g for 10 min at 4°C) and stored at −70°C until analysis. The study was conducted according to the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC).
Quantification of CH-2-77 concentrations in plasma was performed in duplicate by LC-MS/MS as in (26), except that organic mobile phase used was methanol. Detection was performed using the mass transitions of m/z 308.3→184.1 for CH-2-77 and m/z 378.4→210.0 for the internal standard (IS). The accuracy of the assay was within ± 10.3% and the precision (coefficient of variation) was <14%, with a lower limit of quantitation of 0.98 ng/mL. The obtained CH-2-77 plasma concentration-time profiles were analyzed by standard noncompartmental pharmacokinetic procedures (27) using Phoenix WinNonlin v.8.1 (Certara, Princeton, NJ).
In vivo efficacy of CH-2-77 in orthotopic MDA-MB-231 xenograft models
The maximum tolerable dose (MTD) study of CH-2-77 was conducted in NSG immunocompromised mice (Jax Labs, strain # 005557) using 4 doses (10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg and 40 mg/kg, n=4) daily with IP injection. Mouse body weight (b.w.) was recorded every day. The efficacy of CH-2-77 was assessed in an orthotopic TNBC xenograft model using methods previously reported (18). All protocols and treatments were approved by the UTHSC IACUC (protocol #: 17-080 or 20-0181). When the average tumor volume was ~100 mm3, mice were randomized into 4 groups based on the tumor volume and b.w.: vehicle (PEG300:Tween 80:saline=4:1:10; n=6), CH-2-77 at 5 mg/kg (n=6), 10 mg/kg (n=6), or 20 mg/kg (n=7). CH-2-77 treatment and vehicle were administered 5 times/week by IP injection (100 μL per 20g/b.w.). Tumor volumes, measured by digital caliper and calculated by the formula tumor width2 × tumor length × 0.5, and mouse b.w. were recorded twice or three times a week, respectively. When the mean tumor volume reached ~1,000 mm3 in the vehicle control group, mice were euthanized. Tumors and major organs were removed, photographed, and formalin-fixed for histopathology. Lungs were sent to the UTHSC Research Histology Core for paraffin embedding, sectioning, and staining with H&E. The in vivo efficacy of CH-2-77 was further evaluated in the same orthotopic TNBC xenograft model with a reference compound, CA4P. When the average tumor volume reached ~100 mm3, mice were randomized into 3 groups: vehicle (n=5), CH-2-77 at 20 mg/kg (n=6), and CA4P at 28 mg/kg (n=6). Vehicle, CH-2-77, and CA4P treatments were administered 5 times/week by IP injection. Tumor volumes and b.w. weight were recorded two or three times per week. When mean tumor volume reached ~600 mm3 in the vehicle control group, mice were euthanized. Tumors and major organs were removed, measured, and photographed.
Statistical analysis
All experimental data were expressed as the mean ± SEM and analyzed by GraphPad Prism. One-way ANOVA analysis followed by Dunnett’s test was used for the cell apoptosis assays. Student’s t-tests were used for in vitro migration and invasion assays. One-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, were applied to in vivo experiments. Statistical significance is presented as *p <0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.
Data Availability Statement
The data generated in this study are available within the article and its supplementary data files.
Results
Anti-proliferative effect of CH-2-77 on TNBC cells in vitro
CH-2-77 (Fig. 1A) possesses nanomolar potency against a panel of melanoma and breast cancer cell lines, as well as paclitaxel-resistant prostate or melanoma cell lines (24). To determine the effect on TNBC, the anti-proliferative activity of CH-2-77 was first evaluated using two widely used TNBC cell lines, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468, and their paclitaxel-resistant sublines. MTS assays showed that CH-2-77 inhibited TNBC cell growth with an average IC50 of 2.5 nM (Table 1). Moreover, CH-2-77 overcame paclitaxel resistance with similar cytotoxicity as for parental cells, whereas the potencies of colchicine and paclitaxel were decreased in paclitaxel-resistant cells (Table 1). The efficacy of CH-2-77 was also compared to that of colchicine or paclitaxel on two PDX cell lines from TNBC patients, cHCI-2 (treatment-naïve) and cHCI-10 (taxane refractory) (Table 1). After 5 days of treatment, CH-2-77 (2.5 nM) inhibited the proliferation of both cHCI-2 and cHCI-10 cells, while colchicine treatments showed limited effects in suppressing the growth of either PDX line at a concentration of 10 nM (Supplementary Fig. S1A). Paclitaxel at 10 nM reduced the proliferation of treatment-naïve cHCI-2 cells, but had no activity in suppressing the growth of taxane-resistant cHCI-10 cells. In addition, we tested the efficacy of CH-2-77 against colchicine-resistant cells using a colchicine-resistant pancreatic cancer cell line, Mia PaCa-2/ColxR. As shown in Table 1, while the IC50 of colchicine increased about 5 times and that of paclitaxel increased 2 times in Mia PaCa-2/ColxR compared to parental Mia PaCa-2 cells, CH-2-77 maintained its single-digit IC50 on Mia PaCa-2/ColxR cells with an IC50 of 3 nM, suggesting the potential of CH-2-77 to overcome both paclitaxel and colchicine resistance in cancer cells.
Figure 1.

CH-2-77 impairs the colony formation and microtubule organization and stability of TNBC cells. (A) Chemical structure of CH-2-77. (B) Bar graphs show the anti-colony formation effects of CH-2-77 on MDA-MB-231 or MDA-MB-468 cells compared to colchicine and paclitaxel in the low nanomolar range (1 to 4 nM). The percentage (%) of colony area in each treatment group was quantified by comparing to the colony area observed in the control group. (C) MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 2.5 nM or 5 nM of colchicine, paclitaxel, or CH-2-77 were imaged using a Keyence microscope (×20 magnification). Inserts shown in the bottom right corner show tubulin for mitotic cells (×40 magnification). Cells were stained for α-tubulin (red) and the nucleus (blue). (D) The expression of α-tubulin and acylated-α-tubulin in CH-2-77-treated MDA-MB-231 cells (24 h) was determined by western blot. GAPDH is the loading control. (E-F) Immunocytochemistry and western blot experiments were repeated in MDA-MB-468 cells with similar conditions as in C and D.
Table 1.
Cytotoxicity of CH-2-77 in a panel of TNBC cell lines, including paclitaxel-resistant cell sublines and PDX models.
| Cell lines | Mean IC50 ± SEM (nM) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| CH-2-77 | Colchicine | Paclitaxel | |
| MDA-MB-231 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 23.7 ± 3.1 | 0.9 ± 0.1 |
| MDA-MB-231/TxR | 2.2 ± 0.5 | 36.8 ± 6.4 | 111.8 ± 37.8 |
| MDA-MB-468 | 3.2 ± 0.9 | 7.9 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 0.2 |
| MDA-MB-468/TxR | 3.0 ± 0.6 | 41.9 ± 5.7 | 151.9 ± 23.8 |
| cHCI-2 | 5.6 ± 1.8 | 16.6 ± 6.9 | 12.7 ± 5.8 |
| cHCI-10 | 3.9 ± 1.7 | 23.4 ± 8.4 | 43.6 ± 8.2 |
| Mia PaCa-2 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 20.3 ± 2.3 | 5.5 ± 0.6 |
| Mia PaCa-2/ColxR | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 113.4 ± 18.4 | 10.6 ± 1.1 |
MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells were then treated with CH-2-77, colchicine, or paclitaxel in the low nanomolar range (1 to 4 nM) to compare anti-colony formation activity. CH-2-77 potently reduced the colony formation of both TNBC cell lines at a concentration of 4 nM (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. S1B). Consistent with the IC50 values, colchicine had no effect in inhibiting colony formation of TNBC cells at any concentration, while paclitaxel robustly inhibited colony formation in both cell lines, with activity in MDA-MB-231 cells even at 1 nM. At higher concentrations, CH-2-77 repressed colony formation in a concentration-dependent manner in both cell lines (Supplementary Fig. S1C).
CH-2-77 disrupts microtubule stability in TNBC cells
Next, we determined the ability of CH-2-77 to disturb microtubule assembly in TNBC cells. We treated MDA-MB-231 cells with 2.5 nM or 5 nM of CH-2-77, using colchicine and paclitaxel as controls. As a microtubule-stabilizing agent, paclitaxel condensed microtubules during interphase and the mitotic phase (Fig. 1C). Cells treated with 2.5 nM of colchicine showed similarly organized and intact microtubule structures as untreated cells, suggesting the limited potency of colchicine. As expected, 5 nM of colchicine caused disseminated and depolymerized microtubule arrangement in MDA-MB-231 cells during interphase, although it did not dissolve the microtubules in the mitotic cells. CH-2-77-treated cells showed similar disorganized and damaged microtubule networks as the 5 nM of colchicine-treated cells, and 2.5 nM of CH-2-77 induced unpolymerized microtubules in both interphase and mitotic MDA-MB-231 cells. Acetylation on Lys40 of α-tubulin was reported to stabilize microtubules, thus, we determined levels of acylated-α-tubulin versus α-tubulin on MDA-MB-231 cells treated with CH-2-77 (2.5 nM, 5 nM, and 10 nM) by western blot (28,29). A high concentration of CH-2-77 (10 nM) decreased the levels of acylated-α-tubulin and α-tubulin, suggesting that CH-2-77 interferes with microtubule stability at high concentrations (Fig. 1D). Similar results were obtained in MDA-MB-468 cells (Fig. 1E–F).
CH-2-77 suppresses TNBC cell migration and invasion
Since microtubules are critical for cell migration (30–32), we next investigated the ability of CH-2-77 to impair random cell migration in both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells. By the scratch wound assay, we compared the effect of CH-2-77 with colchicine and paclitaxel to delay filling the wounds. As displayed in Fig. 2A, after 24 h of incubation, the wounds of untreated MDA-MB-231 cells were almost closed, and 4 nM of colchicine treatment closed similar to untreated control cells. However, CH-2-77 showed comparable anti-wound healing effects as paclitaxel. Similar results were obtained in MDA-MB-468 cells treated with colchicine, paclitaxel, and CH-2-77. We then performed Transwell assays to confirm the potency of CH-2-77 to inhibit TNBC cell migration (chemotaxis) and invasion through Matrigel (Fig. 2B–C). As anticipated, 4 nM of CH-2-77 significantly inhibited the chemotactic migration and invasion of TNBC cells, with a 70% and a 63% inhibition of migration in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells, respectively, and a 69% and a 53% suppression of invasion in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells, respectively.
Figure 2.

CH-2-77 inhibits cell migration and invasion of TNBC cells. (A) The wound healing assay showed the effects of colchicine, paclitaxel, and CH-2-77 to prevent wound closure in MDA-MB-231 cells or MDA-MB-468 cells at a concentration of 4 nM. Representative images were captured at indicated time points after drug treatment for both cell lines. % wound area of each treatment group was compared to their counterparts at the start point (0 h). P values were determined relative to the control group. (B-C) A Transwell chemotaxis migration using Transwell noncoated inserts (B) or invasion assay using Transwell chambers coated with Matrigel (C) was performed using TNBC cells treated with 4 nM of CH-2-77. Representative cell images were acquired from the lower wells. The migration or invasion potential of CH-2-77-treated TNBC cells was calculated as the percentage of migrated or invaded cells relative to the cells in the control group (set to 100%).
CH-2-77 treatment causes G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis of TNBC cells
We previously reported the CBSI VERU-111 as a potent tubulin-destabilizing agent in TNBC cells by inducing G2/M cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (16,18). As a structurally modified analogue of VERU-111, CH-2-77 was then evaluated for similar cell cycle disruption and apoptosis induction in TNBC cells. As displayed in Fig. 3A and Supplementary Fig. S2A, CH-2-77 treatment arrested both TNBC cell lines at the G2/M phase in a concentration-dependent manner. MDA-MB-231 cells were primarily arrested in the M phase whereas MDA-MB-468 cells accumulated in the G2 phase. Colchicine treatment had little effect on cell cycle progression in TNBC cells, while paclitaxel arrested the cells into the M phase and the subG1 phase, which was consistent with its widely reported potent cytotoxicity in vitro. We also determined the effect of CH-2-77 in inducing apoptosis using Annexin-V/PI co-staining (Fig. 3B and Supplementary Fig. S2B). Apoptosis was significantly induced by CH-2-77 at a concentration of 10 nM, with greater efficacy compared to colchicine or paclitaxel. Next, to determine if CH-2-77 treatment led to the TNBC cell apoptosis, western blotting for a panel of apoptosis markers was performed, including PARP, a known cell death protein (33,34). We first compared the capacity of CH-2-77 to induce the cleavage of PARP after treatment with colchicine or paclitaxel (Fig. 3C). Consistent with the Annexin-V/PI results shown in Fig. 3B, CH-2-77 increased the levels of cleaved-PARP, with greater induction than observed for either colchicine or paclitaxel (at 10 nM). A clear increase in cleaved-PARP levels was observed in CH-2-77-treated TNBC cells along with a concomitant decrease in full-length PARP levels, indicating CH-2-77 causes apoptosis through the cleavage of PARP (Fig. 3D). Bax is a pro-apoptotic marker and Bcl-2 is an anti-apoptotic marker (35–37). In CH-2-77 treated-MDA-MB-231 cells, the levels of Bax, cleaved-Caspase-3, and cleaved-Caspase-9 were upregulated in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 3E), and CH-2-77 was simultaneously able to decrease levels of Bcl-2, demonstrating that CH-2-77 induces apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 cells through the intrinsic apoptosis pathway.
Figure 3.

CH-2-77 induces cell cycle arrest and cell apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells. (A) Effects of increasing concentrations of CH-2-77 (2.5 nM, 5 nM and 10 nM), or 10 nM of colchicine (COL) or 10 nM of paclitaxel (PTX) on TNBC cell cycle distribution after 24 h treatment as detected by phospho-histone H3 (Ser10)/PI co-staining. (B) Annexin-V/PI co-staining evaluated the extent of apoptosis in TNBC cells with the same drug treatments as in A. (C) Expression of cleaved-PARP was compared in both TNBC cell lines by western blot after treatment as in A. GAPDH was used as a loading control. (D) Western blot analysis was repeated after 24 h of exposure to CH-2-77 treatment to compare levels of full-length PARP and the cleaved active PARP counterpart (cleaved-PARP). β-actin was used as a loading control. (E) Expression of a panel of apoptosis-related proteins, cleaved-caspase-9, cleaved-caspase-3, Bax, and Bcl-2, were compared in MDA-MB-231 cells after CH-2-77 treatments for 24 h. Either GAPDH or β-actin was used as a loading control.
Pharmacokinetics of CH-2-77
To ensure sufficient in vivo metabolic stability and systemic exposure for anti-tumor activity, the pharmacokinetics of CH-2-77 were investigated in rats (Fig. 4). CH-2-77 concentrations followed reproducible pharmacokinetics with multi-phase behavior. After intravenous administration, concentrations fell rapidly over the first 2 hours with a half-life (t½) of approximate 22 min, followed by an intermediate phase between 2 and 8 hours where concentrations declined with a t½ of approximately 111 min, and a long terminal phase after 8 hours with a terminal t½ of 799 ± 245 min. The area-under the concentration-time curve (AUC) as a measure of systemic exposure after a 5 mg/kg dose was 51.1 ± 19.8 min*μg/mL with peak concentrations (Cmax) of 1,440 ± 361 ng/mL. The clearance of CH-2-77 was 110 ± 41.3 mL/min/kg, or 12-fold higher compared to VERU-111 (9.05 mL/min/kg) (38), and the tissue distribution was more pronounced with a volume of distribution at a steady state (Vss) of 11.3 ± 5.46 L/kg (compared to 1.8 ± 0.2 L/kg for VERU-111). Oral bioavailability was minimal at 0.3%. Overall, these pharmacokinetic properties leave room for future improvements but were deemed sufficient to embark on in vivo efficacy studies for CH-2-77, acknowledging that frequent dosing to achieve systemic exposure near the MTD would likely be required for anti-tumor activity.
Figure 4.

Plasma concentration-time profile (geomean ± 95%CI) of CH-2-77 in rats (n=5) after intravenous administration of 5 mg/kg.
Efficacy of CH-2-77 in an orthotopic metastatic TNBC xenograft model
Before conducting the in vivo study, we completed a MTD study to identify a safe maximum dose of CH-2-77. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S3, at the dose of 30 mg/kg, CH-2-77 caused around 10% of body weight loss in mice after only 3 consecutive days of treatment, and 100% of mortality in all NSG mice (n=4) after only 5 doses. Thus, based on promising in vitro potencies, the acceptable pharmacokinetic parameters, and the MTD results, and since the duration of treatment was expected to last approximately three weeks, the anti-tumor effects of CH-2-77 on TNBC were next determined in vivo using a dose of 20 mg/kg. An orthotopic TNBC xenograft model with high penetrance of lung metastasis from the mammary fat was used, MDA-MB-231. The average tumor volume in CH-2-77-treated mice was significantly smaller than the vehicle group, in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). There was no significant body weight loss observed in any treatment group, showing the absence of cumulative toxicity of CH-2-77 in this model (Fig. 5B). When the tumors in the vehicle group grew to a mean of ~1,000 mm3, all mice were euthanized and tissues were harvested. Compared to the vehicle control, the reduction in mean final tumor volume and mean final tumor wet weight of tumors from the CH-2-77 treatment groups confirmed its in vivo potency. The maximum inhibitory effect of CH-2-77 on primary tumor growth was observed at the 20 mg/kg dose (Fig. 5C–D). As reported in our previous study using VERU-111, orthotopic MDA-MB-231 xenografts efficiently metastasize to the lungs (18). Since CH-2-77 inhibits the migration and invasion of TNBC cells in vitro, all lungs were sectioned and stained with H&E to evaluate the anti-metastatic activity of CH-2-77. Multiple lung metastases with large nodule sizes were observed in the vehicle group (Fig. 5E–F). The 5 mg/kg CH-2-77 treatment regimen reduced the average number of lung nodules from 48 to 36, without statistical significance. However, the 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg doses suppressed lung metastasis, with the mean number of lung metastases as 16 and 4, respectively. In the 20 mg/kg CH-2-77 cohort, only sparsely located small lesions were observed.
Figure 5.

CH-2-77 inhibits primary tumor growth and lung metastasis in an orthotopic MDA-MB-231 TNBC xenograft model in a dose-dependent manner. Mean tumor volume ± SEM (A) and mouse body weights ± SEM (B) of each group were monitored 2–3 times/week during therapy. CH-2-77 was given to mice 5 times a week intraperitoneally. At study endpoint, ex vivo tumor volume ± SD (C) and tumor wet weights (in grams) ± SD (D) were measured. The mean values are shown above each scatter bar graph. (E) Lung metastases ± SD of each group after manually counting nodules in H&E stained whole lung sections. The mean number of metastases is indicated above each bar. (F) Representative images of H&E stained lung images; metastases are indicated by black arrows.
Efficacy of CH-2-77 in an orthotopic metastatic TNBC xenograft model in comparison with CA4P as a reference compound
To compare the efficacy of CH-2-77 with a CBSI that entered clinical trials, the in vivo efficacy of CH-2-77 was determined in a MDA-MB-231 xenograft model using a potent CBSI, CA4P (also known as fosbretabulin, a prodrug of CA4). The percent change in tumor growth over time in response to CH-2-77 (20 mg/kg) was similar between the two MDA-MB-231 xenograft experiments shown in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, demonstrating the reproducibility of the in vivo CH-2-77 results (Supplementary Fig. S4A–B). The average tumor volume of both CH-2-77 (20 mg/kg) and CA4P (28 mg/kg, equivalent to 20 mg/kg of the active parent compound CA4) treatment groups was significantly reduced in comparison to the vehicle group, but with no significant loss in body weight (Fig. 6A–B and Supplementary Fig. S4C–H). When compared to the vehicle control group, the ex vivo tumor volume and final wet weights of both treatment groups also confirmed that both treatments were similarly potent in vivo (Fig. 6C–D). A representative picture of tumors from each cohort is shown in Fig. 6E. These results demonstrate that CH-2-77 at a dose of 20 mg/kg has equivalent in vivo efficacy relative to the clinical trial reference compound, CA4P (28 mg/kg).
Figure 6.

CH-2-77 inhibits primary tumor growth in an orthotopic MDA-MB-231 TNBC xenograft model in comparison with CA4P. Mean tumor volume ± SEM (A) and mouse body weights ± SEM (B) of each group were monitored 2–3 times/week during therapy. At study endpoint, ex vivo tumor volume ± SEM (C) and tumor wet weights (in grams) ± SEM (D) were measured. The mean values are shown above each scatter bar graph. (E) Tumor images representative of each group’s mean ex vivo tumor volume and tumor wet weight.
Discussion
Systemic chemotherapy is often the only viable option for early-stage and advanced TNBC patients to reduce and to prevent tumor progression and metastasis, including anthracyclines, platinum-based regimens, taxanes, and other cytotoxic agents (39–41). Although taxanes are highly successful in breast cancer treatment, their clinical use is often limited by narrow therapeutic windows, poor aqueous solubility, and drug resistance mediated by ABC transporters (42). To address these limitations, numerous studies have focused on developing CBSIs, which are reported to have significantly less susceptibility to multidrug resistance and to show additional therapeutic activities as compared to taxanes and vinca alkaloids, such as tumor vasculature disruption effects (43,44).
We have previously reported the efficacy of a well-tolerated CBSI, VERU-111, in suppressing tumor growth and metastasis in vitro and in vivo (18). Recently, a novel series of VERU-111 analogs were generated and evaluated by our team (24). Among all the analogues tested, CH-2-77 [compound 4v, in the original report (24)] was the most potent, and significantly inhibited melanoma growth in vivo. Since CH-2-77 showed an IC50 value of 1.7 nM against MDA-MB-231 cells in the abovementioned report, we determined the efficacy of CH-2-77 in TNBC models. The anti-proliferative activity of CH-2-77 was first determined using a panel of diverse TNBC cell lines, including paclitaxel-resistant cells and patient-derived cell lines (cHCI-2 and cHCI-10). CH-2-77 maintained cytotoxicity in all cell lines tested in the nanomolar range and was more potent than colchicine. Although CH-2-77 was less cytotoxic than paclitaxel in paclitaxel-sensitive parental TNBC cells, it was more effective in both PDX cell lines, and more importantly, retained efficacy in the paclitaxel-resistant MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 TNBC sublines. Additionally, we showed that CH-2-77 could overcome colchicine resistance, while the efficacy of paclitaxel was reduced in colchicine-resistant cells, demonstrating a distinct advantage of CH-2-77 to overcome colchicine resistance. Interestingly, although CH-2-77 consistently shows high potency against cancer cells in vitro with nanomolar potency, its affinity to microtubules is in the micromolar range as determined in our previous study (24). It is not clear at this point why this inconsistency exists. CH-2-77 as a new molecule has not been thoroughly characterized at this stage. While our current experimental data clearly showed that it targets the colchicine site in tubulin, we cannot rule out the possibility that it has additional high-affinity drug target(s), as many small molecule drugs do. Alternatively, it may also be possible that CH-2-77 may undergo certain intracellular transformation, leading to a more active molecule to exert its potent nanomolar cytotoxicity. We will investigate this inconsistency in future studies to further elucidate its mechanisms of action.
Previous crystal structure and tubulin polymerization studies have shown that CH-2-77 targets the colchicine-binding site of tubulin and inhibits tubulin polymerization (24). To confirm this effect in TNBC, we visualized the microtubule structure of TNBC cells treated with CH-2-77 by immunofluorescence. As expected, CH-2-77 treatment induced microtubule depolymerization on both MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells. At the concentration of 2.5 nM, CH-2-77 induced the formation of multipolar spindles and disorganized microtubule assembly in mitotic MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells. However, we did not observe any dividing TNBC cells in the CH-2-77 treatment groups, presumably due to the cytotoxic activity of CH-2-77 since 5 nM of CH-2-77 killed all mitotic cells. Using CH-2-77-treated TNBC cells, we also determined the levels of acylated-α-tubulin and α-tubulin. CH-2-77 induced the degradation of acylated-α-tubulin and α-tubulin at the concentration of 10 nM, while 2.5 nM or 5 nM of CH-2-77 seemed to have a limited effect. This observation was in contrast to the obvious microtubule disorganization observed by immunofluorescence caused by CH-2-77 treatment, suggesting that α-tubulin acetylation might be indirectly affected by microtubule-destabilizing agents with an unclear mechanism and may require a high concentration of anti-tubulin agents to be observed (45,46).
Similar to VERU-111, CH-2-77 significantly inhibited the migration and invasion of both TNBC cell lines but exhibited twice the potency of VERU-111 (18). CH-2-77 also induced G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis of MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells in the low nanomolar range. We determined the protein levels of cleaved-PARP, an indicator of cell apoptosis, on TNBC cells treated with CH-2-77. CH-2-77 caused a marked increase of cleaved-PARP in TNBC cells, and its effect was stronger than observed for paclitaxel at the same concentration (10 nM). We also compared the protein levels of cleaved-caspase-3, which is induced by intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis pathways, but we only observed the upregulation of cleaved-caspase-3 in response to CH-2-77 in MDA-MB-231 cells. Therefore, MDA-MB-231 cells were profiled for additional apoptosis marker evaluations (47). Both cleaved-caspase-8 and cleaved-caspase-9 are upstream regulators of caspase-3 cleavage, whereas the caspase-8 pathway is mainly involved in the extrinsic pathway and the caspase-9 pathway is mainly involved in the intrinsic pathway (48,49). Since only cleavage of caspase-9 was observed on MDA-MB-231 cells after CH-2-77 treatment, but cleavage of caspase-8 was not, we speculate that CH-2-77 treatment induces apoptosis of MDA-MB-231 cells through the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway. This conclusion is consistent with observations of changes in the protein levels of the anti-apoptotic protein, Bcl-2 (repressed), and the pro-apoptotic protein, Bax (induced) in CH-2-77 treated MDA-MB-231 cells.
Before evaluating the anti-tumor efficacy of CH-2-77 in vivo, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of CH-2-77 in rats. Although oral bioavailability of CH-2-77 was poor and the clearance was relatively high as compared to VERU-111, plasma exposure after intraperitoneal administration was deemed to be potentially sufficient to result in in vivo efficacy in an orthotopic metastatic TNBC xenograft model based on previously reported hepatic microsomal stability in mice (50). Therefore, we designed our in vivo efficacy study to dose the mice 5 times per week at three dose levels. We chose the highly metastatic MDA-MB-231 orthotopic xenograft model to demonstrate the anti-cancer effects of CH-2-77 in TNBC. In comparison to the strong primary tumor growth suppression observed in an A375 melanoma xenograft model, CH-2-77 was not able to fully inhibit the growth of the MDA-MB-231 xenografts, suggesting the relatively enhanced malignancy of TNBC (24). However, CH-2-77 significantly inhibited the growth of MDA-MB-231 xenografts in a dose-dependent manner, without gross symptoms of cumulative toxicities, even at the highest dose of 20 mg/kg. Moreover, CH-2-77 repressed spontaneous lung metastasis originating from the mammary fat pad tumors.
Overall, CH-2-77 as a novel CBSI shows great promise in overcoming both paclitaxel resistance and colchicine resistance. Moreover, its in vivo efficacy (20 mg/kg) in an aggressive xenograft TNBC model is similar to a CBSI that went through multiple clinical trials, CA4P (28 mg/kg). From our previous studies using a melanoma model (24), CH-2-77 induced 88.5% of tumor inhibition at a dose of 20 mg/kg, suggesting that CH-2-77 is efficacious for other solid tumors in addition to TNBC. Because of potent cytotoxicity, the efficacy of CH-2-77 could likely be further enhanced by encapsulation in nanoparticles or used as a warhead in antibody-drug conjugates targeting TNBC in the future. In addition to CH-2-77, we recently developed a new series of 6-aryl-2-benzoyl-pyridines, some of which have improved metabolic stability and pharmacokinetic parameters as compared to CH-2-77 in vitro and in vivo (50). Therefore, we are currently devoting efforts to remedy any metabolic shortcomings of CH-2-77, while maintaining its low nanomolar potency, and we expect that more efficacious chemotherapeutic drug candidates for TNBC will be developed soon.
Conclusion
In summary, we report herein that CH-2-77 potently inhibits the proliferation, migration, and invasion of TNBC cells. In particular, in vitro studies showed that CH-2-77 induces G2/M phase cell cycle arrest and expedites TNBC cell apoptosis primarily through the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptosis pathway. Moreover, CH-2-77 demonstrated remarkable anti-tumor and anti-metastatic efficacy in an orthotopic TNBC xenograft model. CH-2-77 was able to suppress lung metastasis derived from the primary tumor in a dose-dependent manner without overt toxicities. Overall, further development of the CH-2-77 scaffold holds potential as a frontline or second-line chemotherapy for patients who progress on taxanes to more effectively treat TNBC patients and to improve survival from metastatic disease.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
All flow cytometry data were generated in the Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting core (FCCS) at UTHSC with the assistance of Dr. Tony Marion and Dr. Deidre Daria. We thank Dr. Alana Welm at the Huntsman Cancer Institute (HCI) for providing the original PDX models for generating cHCI-2 and cHCI-10 cells. This work is supported by DoD grants W81XWH2010011 (W. Li) and W81XWH2010019 (T.N. Seagroves). Additional support is provided by NIH grants R01CA148706 (W. Li and D.D. Miller), 1S10OD010678 and 1S10RR026377 to W. Li, and NIH grant 1S10OD016226 to B. Meibohm. The contents of the article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the DoD or the NIH.
Abbreviations list:
- b.w.
body weight
- CBSI
colchicine-binding site inhibitor
- HER2
human epidermal growth factor 2
- ER
estrogen receptor
- PR
progesterone receptor
- IP
intraperitoneal
- IV
intravenous
- PTX
paclitaxel
- TNBC
triple-negative breast cancer
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: W.L. and D.D.M. report receiving sponsored research agreement grants from Veru, Inc. who licensed these compounds for commercial development. However, Veru, Inc. did not have any input or influence in the experimental design, data collection, and data analyses in this manuscript. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by other authors.
References:
- 1.Tong CWS, Wu M, Cho WCS, To KKW. Recent Advances in the Treatment of Breast Cancer. Front Oncol 2018;8:227 doi 10.3389/fonc.2018.00227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Al-Mahmood S, Sapiezynski J, Garbuzenko OB, Minko T. Metastatic and triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and treatment options. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2018;8(5):1483–507 doi 10.1007/s13346-018-0551-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MC, Voduc D, Speers CH, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2010;28(20):3271–7 doi 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.9820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yeh J, Chun J, Schwartz S, Wang A, Kern E, Guth AA, et al. Clinical Characteristics in Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Int J Breast Cancer 2017;2017:1796145 doi 10.1155/2017/1796145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, Sanders ME, Chakravarthy AB, Shyr Y, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 2011;121(7):2750–67 doi 10.1172/JCI45014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hwang SY, Park S, Kwon Y. Recent therapeutic trends and promising targets in triple negative breast cancer. Pharmacol Ther 2019;199:30–57 doi 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13(15 Pt 1):4429–34 doi 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-3045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bae SY, La Choi Y, Kim S, Kim M, Kim J, Jung SP, et al. HER3 status by immunohistochemistry is correlated with poor prognosis in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;139(3):741–50 doi 10.1007/s10549-013-2570-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(8):1275–81 doi 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.4147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dumontet C, Jordan MA. Microtubule-binding agents: a dynamic field of cancer therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2010;9(10):790–803 doi 10.1038/nrd3253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kong Y, Smith J, Li K, Cui J, Han J, Hou S, et al. Development of a novel near-infrared fluorescent theranostic combretastain A-4 analogue, YK-5–252, to target triple negative breast cancer. Bioorg Med Chem 2017;25(7):2226–33 doi 10.1016/j.bmc.2017.02.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fu DJ, Liu SM, Yang JJ, Li J. Novel piperidine derivatives as colchicine binding site inhibitors induce apoptosis and inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transition against prostate cancer PC3 cells. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 2020;35(1):1403–13 doi 10.1080/14756366.2020.1783664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bai Z, Gao M, Zhang H, Guan Q, Xu J, Li Y, et al. BZML, a novel colchicine binding site inhibitor, overcomes multidrug resistance in A549/Taxol cells by inhibiting P-gp function and inducing mitotic catastrophe. Cancer Lett 2017;402:81–92 doi 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wang Z, Chen J, Wang J, Ahn S, Li CM, Lu Y, et al. Novel tubulin polymerization inhibitors overcome multidrug resistance and reduce melanoma lung metastasis. Pharm Res 2012;29(11):3040–52 doi 10.1007/s11095-012-0726-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mangiatordi GF, Trisciuzzi D, Alberga D, Denora N, Iacobazzi RM, Gadaleta D, et al. Novel chemotypes targeting tubulin at the colchicine binding site and unbiasing P-glycoprotein. Eur J Med Chem 2017;139:792–803 doi 10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.07.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mahmud F, Deng S, Chen H, Miller DD, Li W. Orally available tubulin inhibitor VERU-111 enhances antitumor efficacy in paclitaxel-resistant lung cancer. Cancer Lett 2020;495:76–88 doi 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.09.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wu X, Wang Q, Li W. Recent Advances in Heterocyclic Tubulin Inhibitors Targeting the Colchicine Binding Site. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 2016;16(10):1325–38 doi 10.2174/1871520616666160219161921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Deng S, Krutilina RI, Wang Q, Lin Z, Parke DN, Playa HC, et al. An Orally Available Tubulin Inhibitor, VERU-111, Suppresses Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Tumor Growth and Metastasis and Bypasses Taxane Resistance. Mol Cancer Ther 2020;19(2):348–63 doi 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stengel C, Newman SP, Leese MP, Potter BV, Reed MJ, Purohit A. Class III beta-tubulin expression and in vitro resistance to microtubule targeting agents. Br J Cancer 2010;102(2):316–24 doi 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Karki R, Mariani M, Andreoli M, He S, Scambia G, Shahabi S, et al. betaIII-Tubulin: biomarker of taxane resistance or drug target? Expert Opin Ther Targets 2013;17(4):461–72 doi 10.1517/14728222.2013.766170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Furst R, Vollmar AM. A new perspective on old drugs: non-mitotic actions of tubulin-binding drugs play a major role in cancer treatment. Pharmazie 2013;68(7):478–83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ji YT, Liu YN, Liu ZP. Tubulin colchicine binding site inhibitors as vascular disrupting agents in clinical developments. Curr Med Chem 2015;22(11):1348–60 doi 10.2174/0929867322666150114163732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Banerjee S, Arnst KE, Wang Y, Kumar G, Deng S, Yang L, et al. Heterocyclic-Fused Pyrimidines as Novel Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitors Targeting the Colchicine Binding Site: Structural Basis and Antitumor Efficacy. J Med Chem 2018;61(4):1704–18 doi 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chen H, Deng S, Wang Y, Albadari N, Kumar G, Ma D, et al. Structure-Activity Relationship Study of Novel 6-Aryl-2-benzoyl-pyridines as Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitors with Potent Antiproliferative Properties. J Med Chem 2020;63(2):827–46 doi 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b01815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.DeRose YS, Gligorich KM, Wang G, Georgelas A, Bowman P, Courdy SJ, et al. Patient-derived models of human breast cancer: protocols for in vitro and in vivo applications in tumor biology and translational medicine. Curr Protoc Pharmacol 2013;Chapter 14:Unit14 23 doi 10.1002/0471141755.ph1423s60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Banerjee S, Mahmud F, Deng S, Ma L, Yun MK, Fakayode SO, et al. X-ray Crystallography-Guided Design, Antitumor Efficacy, and QSAR Analysis of Metabolically Stable Cyclopenta-Pyrimidinyl Dihydroquinoxalinone as a Potent Tubulin Polymerization Inhibitor. J Med Chem 2021;64(17):13072–95 doi 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Budha NR, Mehrotra N, Tangallapally R, Rakesh, Qi J, Daniels AJ, et al. Pharmacokinetically-guided lead optimization of nitrofuranylamide anti-tuberculosis agents. AAPS J 2008;10(1):157–65 doi 10.1208/s12248-008-9017-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Garnham CP, Roll-Mecak A. The chemical complexity of cellular microtubules: tubulin post-translational modification enzymes and their roles in tuning microtubule functions. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2012;69(7):442–63 doi 10.1002/cm.21027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eshun-Wilson L, Zhang R, Portran D, Nachury MV, Toso DB, Lohr T, et al. Effects of alpha-tubulin acetylation on microtubule structure and stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019;116(21):10366–71 doi 10.1073/pnas.1900441116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Garcin C, Straube A. Microtubules in cell migration. Essays Biochem 2019;63(5):509–20 doi 10.1042/EBC20190016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bance B, Seetharaman S, Leduc C, Boeda B, Etienne-Manneville S. Microtubule acetylation but not detyrosination promotes focal adhesion dynamics and astrocyte migration. J Cell Sci 2019;132(7) doi 10.1242/jcs.225805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pantelidou C, Sonzogni O, De Oliveria Taveira M, Mehta AK, Kothari A, Wang D, et al. PARP Inhibitor Efficacy Depends on CD8(+) T-cell Recruitment via Intratumoral STING Pathway Activation in BRCA-Deficient Models of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov 2019;9(6):722–37 doi 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-1218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xu Y, Huang S, Liu ZG, Han J. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 signaling to mitochondria in necrotic cell death requires RIP1/TRAF2-mediated JNK1 activation. J Biol Chem 2006;281(13):8788–95 doi 10.1074/jbc.M508135200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jubin T, Kadam A, Jariwala M, Bhatt S, Sutariya S, Gani AR, et al. The PARP family: insights into functional aspects of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in cell growth and survival. Cell Prolif 2016;49(4):421–37 doi 10.1111/cpr.12268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boulares AH, Yakovlev AG, Ivanova V, Stoica BA, Wang G, Iyer S, et al. Role of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage in apoptosis. Caspase 3-resistant PARP mutant increases rates of apoptosis in transfected cells. J Biol Chem 1999;274(33):22932–40 doi 10.1074/jbc.274.33.22932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Westphal D, Kluck RM, Dewson G. Building blocks of the apoptotic pore: how Bax and Bak are activated and oligomerize during apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 2014;21(2):196–205 doi 10.1038/cdd.2013.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yang Y, Zong M, Xu W, Zhang Y, Wang B, Yang M, et al. Natural pyrethrins induces apoptosis in human hepatocyte cells via Bax- and Bcl-2-mediated mitochondrial pathway. Chem Biol Interact 2017;262:38–45 doi 10.1016/j.cbi.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li CM, Lu Y, Chen J, Costello TA, Narayanan R, Dalton MN, et al. Orally bioavailable tubulin antagonists for paclitaxel-refractory cancer. Pharm Res 2012;29(11):3053–63 doi 10.1007/s11095-012-0814-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Cai F, Luis MAF, Lin X, Wang M, Cai L, Cen C, et al. Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in the chemotherapy treatment of breast cancer: Preventive strategies and treatment. Mol Clin Oncol 2019;11(1):15–23 doi 10.3892/mco.2019.1854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Abal M, Andreu JM, Barasoain I. Taxanes: microtubule and centrosome targets, and cell cycle dependent mechanisms of action. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 2003;3(3):193–203 doi 10.2174/1568009033481967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Siddik ZH. Cisplatin: mode of cytotoxic action and molecular basis of resistance. Oncogene 2003;22(47):7265–79 doi 10.1038/sj.onc.1206933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Perez EA. Microtubule inhibitors: Differentiating tubulin-inhibiting agents based on mechanisms of action, clinical activity, and resistance. Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(8):2086–95 doi 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kanthou C, Tozer GM. Microtubule depolymerizing vascular disrupting agents: novel therapeutic agents for oncology and other pathologies. Int J Exp Pathol 2009;90(3):284–94 doi 10.1111/j.1365-2613.2009.00651.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Xu Q, Qi H, Sun M, Zuo D, Jiang X, Wen Z, et al. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 3-Alkyl-1,5-Diaryl-1H-Pyrazoles as Rigid Analogues of Combretastatin A-4 with Potent Antiproliferative Activity. PLoS One 2015;10(6):e0128710 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0128710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Fortin S, Bouchon B, Chambon C, Lacroix J, Moreau E, Chezal JM, et al. Characterization of the covalent binding of N-phenyl-N’-(2-chloroethyl)ureas to {beta}-tubulin: importance of Glu198 in microtubule stability. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2011;336(2):460–7 doi 10.1124/jpet.110.171082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang J, Li Y, Yan W, Li W, Qiu Q, Ye H, et al. Covalent modification of Cys-239 in beta-tubulin by small molecules as a strategy to promote tubulin heterodimer degradation. J Biol Chem 2019;294(20):8161–70 doi 10.1074/jbc.RA118.006325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Harrington HA, Ho KL, Ghosh S, Tung KC. Construction and analysis of a modular model of caspase activation in apoptosis. Theor Biol Med Model 2008;5:26 doi 10.1186/1742-4682-5-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Malhotra U, Zaidi AH, Kosovec JE, Kasi PM, Komatsu Y, Rotoloni CL, et al. Prognostic value and targeted inhibition of survivin expression in esophageal adenocarcinoma and cancer-adjacent squamous epithelium. PLoS One 2013;8(11):e78343 doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0078343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ma M, Wang X, Liu N, Shan F, Feng Y. Low-dose naltrexone inhibits colorectal cancer progression and promotes apoptosis by increasing M1-type macrophages and activating the Bax/Bcl-2/caspase-3/PARP pathway. Int Immunopharmacol 2020;83:106388 doi 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Chen H, Deng S, Albadari N, Yun MK, Zhang S, Li Y, et al. Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Stable Colchicine-Binding Site Tubulin Inhibitors 6-Aryl-2-benzoyl-pyridines as Potential Anticancer Agents. J Med Chem 2021. doi 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data generated in this study are available within the article and its supplementary data files.
