Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Neurol. 2022 Apr 1;35(2):249–257. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001036

Exploring the vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex for therapeutic benefit in chronic spinal cord injury

Ona Bloom a,b, Kevin J Tracey a,b, Valentin A Pavlov a,b
PMCID: PMC9258775  NIHMSID: NIHMS1788324  PMID: 35102123

Abstract

Purpose of review

To describe features and implications of chronic systemic inflammation in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to summarize the growing therapeutic possibilities to explore the vagus nerve-mediated inflammatory reflex in this context.

Recent findings

The discovery of the inflammatory reflex provides a rationale to explore neuromodulation modalities, that is, electrical vagus nerve stimulation and pharmacological cholinergic modalities to regulate inflammation after SCI.

Summary

Inflammation in individuals with SCI may negatively impact functional recovery and medical consequences after SCI. Exploring the potential of the vagus nerve-based inflammatory reflex to restore autonomic regulation and control inflammation may provide a novel approach for functional improvement in SCI.

Keywords: autonomic nervous system, galantamine, inflammation, inflammatory reflex, spinal cord injury, vagus nerve, vagus nerve stimulation

INTRODUCTION

There are an estimated 2.5 million individuals living with chronic traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), and 17 730 new cases of SCI in the United States each year [1]. Neurologically incomplete tetraplegia is now the most common injury level and severity in the United States [1]. Despite advances in clinical care, life expectancy for people with SCI is significantly lower than for uninjured people [1]. Infections, which often cause pneumonia and sepsis, are the leading causes of mortality for individuals with SCI [13].

In addition to motor and sensory dysfunction, SCI is associated with descending supraspinal autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysregulation, resulting in multiorgan system dysfunction that promotes serious medical consequences [46]. These include autonomic dysreflexia, immune dysfunction and inflammation, hypertension, blood pressure instability, obesity and metabolic disorders, and an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke [4,6,7]. Inflammation potentiates many of these common medical consequences of SCI. A meta-analysis of data from more than 250 individuals with chronic SCI showed that 76% had elevated levels of the inflammatory biomarker C-reactive protein (CRP), in parallel with obesity and metabolic derangements [8]. Systemic inflammation can also promote CNS inflammation, that is, neuroinflammation [7,9]. In preclinical studies of lupus, studies have shown that stress or infection can cause breaches in the blood–brain barrier, enabling high molecular weight mediators, such as antibodies to enter the brain, where they are neurotoxic and alter neuronal function [10]. A similar scenario is possible in acute or chronic SCI, where environmental conditions promoting breach of the vascular permeability barriers (brain or spinal cord), such as infection are common. Increasing evidence indicates that persistent chronic inflammation may block neurological recovery and rehabilitation for people with SCI, both acutely and chronically [1113].

Despite its clinical relevance, inflammation is often untreated in people with chronic SCI. Over the past 20 years, studies have shown that the vagus nerve, which belongs to the parasympathetic branch of the ANS, regulates inflammation within the inflammatory reflex [1417]. Mechanistic preclinical studies showed that electrical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) parameters can influence production of specific inflammatory cytokines systemically [18]. Recent clinical studies demonstrated safety and efficacy of bioelectronic VNS to reduce chronic inflammation in multiple clinical populations [19,20]. Of note, reduced vagal tone is reported in people with chronic SCI at rest and in response to orthostatic provocation [21,22].

Here, we provide an overview of inflammation in chronic SCI, the inflammatory reflex, and clinically available approaches, including bioelectronic VNS and the cholinergic drug galantamine, to target this physiological mechanism to control inflammation, which, when paired with rehabilitation or other therapeutic modalities, may provide the opportunity to improve functional abilities across the lifespan of people with SCI [23]. Then, we describe potential mechanisms and special considerations for alleviating inflammation targeting the inflammatory reflex in the SCI population.

INFLAMMATION IN CHRONIC SPINAL CORD INJURY: SOURCES AND POTENTIAL DOWNSTREAM EFFECTS

Inflammation is a protective mechanism against infection and injury when it is localized and resolved in a timely manner. However, various forms of excessive, unresolved, and chronic inflammation are implicated in the pathogenesis of many disorders. The regulation of inflammation involves a complex interplay between immune, hormonal, and neural mechanisms at organismal, cellular, and molecular levels. Both the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the ANS regulate inflammation as described in more detail below.

A detailed understanding of immune dysfunction and inflammation in acute SCI is growing [9,13,24] but much less is known in chronic SCI [7]. As recently reviewed elsewhere [7], relatively small clinical studies have demonstrated elevated systemic inflammatory proteins (cytokines and adipokines) in persons with chronic SCI, including IL-2, IL-6, TNF, MIF, and HMGB1, using reliable but low-throughput methods. More recently, functional genomics studies identified broader changes in whole blood or white blood cell gene expression in persons with chronic SCI compared with uninjured persons [25,26]. For example, there is upregulation of pattern recognition receptor genes that are essential to innate immunity, the Toll-like receptors (TLR), as well as downregulation of natural killer cell genes and adaptive immunity pathways [26].

SCI is characterized by a pronounced sympathetic dysfunction because of the loss of supraspinal control [4]. Dysregulation of the sympathetic outflow (which could be because of injury to the SNS itself or in its regulation), in SCI results in disruption of cardiovascular and immune homeostasis and inflammation – higher level injuries are associated with a more profound alterations [3,2730] (Fig. 1). Systemic inflammation in chronic SCI correlates inversely with mobility status and is higher in persons who are nonambulatory [3133]. Autonomic dysreflexia, blood pressure fluctuations, episodes of hypertension and orthostatic hypotension, and persistent hypertension are characteristic manifestations of cardiovascular dysfunction in chronic SCI [4,6,34] (Fig. 1). In preclinical models, acute SCI at thoracic level 3 (T3) is linked to enhanced catecholaminergic output to the spleen, which leads to impaired antibody production, lymphocyte apoptosis, and immune suppression [27,35,36]. Immunosuppression in chronic SCI coexists with increased levels of inflammation and may be mechanistically linked, as inflammation induces suppressive immune cell phenotypes [29,37].

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1.

A role for the vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex in alleviating inflammation and cardiometabolic derangements in chronic spinal cord injury – anatomical and functional considerations. Chronic SCI is associated with profound autonomic dysfunction, cardiometabolic, and immune dysregulation, as well as inflammation, which are related to interruption of the normal function of sympathetic preganglionic neurons. These neurons synapse (not shown) in paravertebral ganglia and through postganglionic catecholaminergic fibers innervate the heart, lungs, blood vessels, glands, and other tissues. Other preganglionic neurons, that is, specifically those residing at the thoracic level T5–T12, forming the greater splanchnic nerve and the lesser splanchnic nerve, pass through the paravertebral ganglia and make synaptic contacts with postganglionic fibers in prevertebral ganglia, including the celiac-superior mesenteric ganglion complex. These postganglionic fibers innervate the spleen (via the splenic nerve), and (not shown) the liver, kidney, pancreas, and parts of the gastrointestinal tract and control immune and metabolic processes. Chronic SCI is also associated with obesity and development of metabolic syndrome. The efferent vagus nerve originating in the brainstem dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMN) and nucleus ambiguus (NA) innervates the heart, lungs, and many other visceral organs and plays a critical role in the regulation of cardiometabolic homeostasis. The efferent vagus nerve also innervates the celiac-superior mesenteric ganglion complex and interacts with the splenic nerve. This interaction is key for the vagus nerve regulation of immune function and inflammation within the inflammatory reflex. Bioelectronic vagus nerve stimulation of the cervical vagus nerve has been shown to suppress pro-inflammatory cytokine levels and alleviate aberrant inflammation and to have overall beneficial effects in many chronic conditions in preclinical settings and lately in people with chronic inflammatory disorders. The cholinergic drug galantamine also suppresses inflammation acting through a brain-mediated activation of the efferent vagus nerve-based arm of the inflammatory reflex. Galantamine alleviates inflammatory and metabolic derangements and improves the sympatho/vagal balance in people with metabolic syndrome. These anatomical and functional considerations and experimental evidence for beneficial effects of vagus nerve stimulation and galantamine in SCI indicate new possibilities for utilizing these two approaches in future studies for improving functional outcomes of chronic spinal cord injury patients. See the main text for details. SCI, spinal cord injury.

A causal relationship has been described and proposed between SCI level-dependent changes in autonomic and immune system dysfunction [3,24,27,28,3840]. People with SCI rostral to thoracic level 6 (T6), where sympathetic nervous system (SNS) fibers exit the spinal cord and (after synapsing with postganglionic fibers) innervate many organs (Fig. 1), have the greatest inflammation and infection susceptibility acutely after SCI [3,24,27,28,41]. This is important in light of the fact that the most common level of injury is cervical and the most common neurological status is incomplete tetraplegia [1]. Deconditioning, because of reduced physical activity with long-term paralysis also promotes autonomic downregulation, which may further promote inflammation [42]. Immune cells are regulated by noradrenaline, and changes in catecholamines may modulate inflammation directly and indirectly [17,4345]. Autonomic injury severity in people with chronic SCI has been characterized using supine plasma noradrenaline levels to indicate ‘autonomic completeness’ [34,46]. More recently, the International Standards to Document Remaining Autonomic Function after SCI (ISAFSCI) has been developed to aid in the clinical description of ANS dysfunction in people with SCI [5,47]. In a recent study, TLR-signaling genes were most elevated in persons with chronic SCI rostral to T6 [26]. In that study, there were also distinct differences in gene expression by injury severity.

Preclinical data supports the concept that systemic inflammation negatively impacts functional recovery and systemic anti-inflammatory interventions promote functional improvements. For example, minocycline is neuroprotective in acute SCI and improved locomotor function in mice after SCI [48,49]. Inhibition of regulatory T-cell function with anti-CD25 antibodies promoted locomotor recovery in mice after chronic SCI [49]. In a rat model of chronic SCI, systemic administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) triggered intraspinal inflammation [50]. In that study, animals that received LPS together with high-intensity rehabilitation training had better neurological recovery, suggesting to the authors that ‘mild neuroinflammation’ that resolves may enhance rehabilitation after SCI. In contrast, LPS alone was administered alone or in combination with low-intensity rehabilitation training, animals had worse recovery. In a recent double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH), a new strategy to induce neuroplasticity in individuals with chronic SCI, pretreatment with the anti-inflammatory steroid prednisolone increased serum levels of IL-10 and enhanced plasticity induced by AIH, indicated by increased ankle strength [12]. There is also growing literature indicating that inflammation promotes neuropathic pain [51,52], which is widely experienced in chronic SCI and often unresolved by pharmacological treatments [53,54].

Of note, newly injured individuals with SCI are at increased risk for developing rapid obesity concurrent with muscle atrophy, osteoporosis, and other medical consequences that promote metabolic syndrome (Fig. 1) [6,5558]. Hepatic dysfunction and inflammation has been also documented in SCI acutely and chronically, and linked to dysfunctional ANS regulation [5961]. Individuals with SCI gain an average of 10 kg in total fat mass, including abdominal fat, within the first 2 years after injury and lose 3.2% of lean body tissue per decade [56]. The prevalence of obesity is estimated to be 40–60% in the SCI population [6265]. Fat tissue itself is a potent source of inflammation, and weight loss reduces inflammation [66]. Thus, fat reduction in individuals SCI is considered an important strategy to reduce inflammation [65,67]. However, interventions that reduce body fat and inflammation, remain challenging in individuals with SCI.

NEURAL CONTROL OF INFLAMMATION

The sympathetic and parasympathetic parts of the ANS and the brain are critically involved in the regulation of immunity and inflammation [44]. As previously reviewed, the sympathetic part of the ANS regulates immune responses through the release of norepinephrine from postganglionic sympathetic nerve fibers innervating many organs, and via epinephrine secreted in the adrenal medulla and acting as a hormone [4,27,29,45]. The vagus nerve – the main nerve of the parasympathetic part of the ANS is also importantly implicated in the regulation of inflammation as recently reviewed [17] and described in more detail below.

The inflammatory reflex and its therapeutic exploration

Insights during the last 20 years have highlighted the role of the vagus nerve and the brain in the regulation of immunity and inflammation [14,15]. The vagus nerve constitutes afferent (about 80%) and efferent fibers. The efferent vagus nerve originates in two brainstem nuclei – the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus (DMN) and nucleus ambiguus, innervates major peripheral organs, and controls vital physiological functions, including heart rate, breathing, gastrointestinal and pancreatic secretion, and hepatic metabolism through the release of acetylcholine (Fig. 1). The inflammatory reflex is a brain-integrated physiological mechanism based on afferent and efferent vagus nerve circuitry that detects and controls peripheral inflammatory alterations, for example, pro-inflammatory cytokines [15]. This control is mediated through the release of acetylcholine, which interacts with the alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7nAChR) on macrophages and other immune cells. Consequent suppression of NF-κB nuclear translocation and other intracellular mechanisms ultimately leads to inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and other pro-inflammatory cytokine production [43]. Acetylcholine is released from efferent vagus nerve cholinergic axonal endings in organs innervated by the vagus nerve, such as the liver, gastrointestinal tract, and pancreas. The efferent vagus nerve also interacts with the splenic nerve in the celiac-superior mesenteric ganglion complex, and this interaction facilitates the suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the spleen within the inflammatory reflex [15,68] (Fig. 1). In the spleen, norepinephrine released from catecholaminergic splenic nerve endings binds to beta adrenergic receptors expressed on a subset of T cells, which contain the enzyme choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) that synthesizes acetylcholine [69]. This interaction triggers the release of acetylcholine that suppresses TNF and other pro-inflammatory cytokine production as demonstrated in endotoxemia, colitis, and other inflammatory conditions [45,69,70].

VNS applied to the cervical portion of the nerve has been instrumental in studying the inflammatory reflex and delineating physiological and cellular mechanisms of neuroimmune communication [14] (Fig. 1). The anti-inflammatory and disease-alleviating efficacy of VNS has been demonstrated in many animal models, including endotoxemia, sepsis, arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease (colitis). In addition to VNS, pharmacological cholinergic modalities including α7nAChR agonists and acetylcholinesterase inhibitors have been shown to suppress aberrant inflammation and alleviate disease severity in preclinical models of numerous diseases [23,71]. One of these compounds is galantamine – a centrally acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitor that is clinically approved for the symptomatic treatment of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease [71]. Galantamine has a significant anti-inflammatory efficacy that has been demonstrated in many animal models of diseases characterized by immune and metabolic dysregulation as recently reviewed in detail [23] (Fig. 1). Chronic inflammation as a result of immune and metabolic dysregulation plays a central role in promoting insulin resistance, and other metabolic derangements in obesity, metabolic syndrome, and type 2 diabetes [71]. Galantamine has been shown to alleviate the chronic inflammatory state, abdominal fat accumulation, insulin resistance, hepatic steatosis, and other metabolic abnormalities in mice with high-fat diet-induced obesity and features of metabolic syndrome [72]. These preclinical insights and the fact that galantamine is a clinically approved drug provided a rationale and facilitated performing recent clinical studies with galantamine in individuals with metabolic syndrome as described in detail below [72,73]. VNS has been also actively explored in treating obesity and obesity-associated inflammation and metabolic manifestations as previously summarized [17,43]. Both VNS and pharmacological cholinergic modalities have been currently explored in the treatment of COVID-19, and these approaches may be of specific interest for obese individuals with this viral disease [71].

Current clinical exploration of vagus nerve stimulation and galantamine in chronic inflammatory diseases

Abundant preclinical evidence with VNS has provided a rationale for performing clinical trials employing bioelectronic VNS in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and other disorders [19,20] within the growing field of Bioelectronic Medicine [19,20,74]. In a study with rheumatoid arthritis patients who had previously failed treatments with anti-TNF antibody and other biological treatments, implanted device VNS carried out one to four times daily significantly improved the disease scores that were correlated with suppressed TNF production [19]. These findings were recently complemented in a 12-week implanted miniaturized device VNS study with rheumatoid arthritis patients, which also included a sham-stimulated group [75]. The efficacy of bioelectronic VNS for 6 months is also demonstrated in a study with patients with Crohn’s disease [20]. Patients subjected to VNS with documented remission at 6 months remain in remission at 12-month follow-up and their vagal tone (assessed by heart rate variability analysis) is increased [76]. In addition, implanted device-generated VNS has been used in rehabilitation of patients postischemic stroke [77,78]. Recently, in a pivotal, sham-controlled trial, patients were implanted with VNS devices and subjected to standard rehabilitation paired with either VNS or with sham stimulation three times per week for 6 weeks at in-clinic settings followed by a home exercise program. Patients in the group with added VNS had significantly better clinical responses compared with the control group that was retained even 90 days after the in-clinic therapy [77]. In addition to implanted bioelectronic device VNS, noninvasive approaches have been utilized. One of these approaches is transcutaneous auricular VNS in which the stimulation is applied on an area of the ear that is innervated by the auricular sensory branch of the vagus nerve. Another noninvasive method is using a device on the neck that delivers electrical current to the cervical vagus nerve. These two approaches have been successfully explored in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, and several other chronic inflammatory and autoimmune disorders [7983]. Noninvasive electrical transcutaneous stimulation has also been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the adjunct treatment of symptoms of acute opioid withdrawal [83]. These studies demonstrate the utility of bioelectronic VNS as a new, efficient, relatively nonexpensive, and well tolerated therapeutic alternative.

In addition to VNS, the FDA-approved drug galantamine has been clinically explored – in treating people with metabolic syndrome [72,73]. The metabolic syndrome is a constellation of conditions, including obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and hyperglycosemia, that is associated with significantly higher risks for cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, cancer, and other debilitating and lethal diseases [71]. The metabolic syndrome has reached pandemic proportions, and many people are unsuccessful in controlling it with behavioral interventions, such as weight loss and exercise. Chronic inflammation is a major underlying pathological event that drives further pathogenesis in patients with metabolic syndrome [71]. Performing a clinical trial with galantamine in people with metabolic syndrome supported by findings from animal studies and the fact that this centrally acting acetylcholinesterase inhibitor is a clinically approved drug for Alzheimer’s disease [23,84]. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial treatments of patients with the metabolic syndrome with relatively low galantamine doses (8 mg, escalated to 16 mg daily) for 12 weeks significantly suppressed plasma TNF and leptin levels, increased plasma adiponectin levels, and ameliorates oxidative stress [72,73]. These beneficial effects are associated with a decrease in insulin levels and alleviated insulin resistance [72,73]. In addition, analysis of heart rate variability reveals that galantamine treatment modulates the autonomic regulation and sympathovagal balance towards lower sympathetic and higher vagal activity [72,73] (Fig. 1). The well established safety profile of galantamine that stretches back for decades and abundant rationale from preclinical investigations drive active clinical exploration of galantamine in many other disorders characterized by inflammatory, metabolic, and cognitive derangements, including Parkinson disease, schizophrenia, and autism spectrum disorder [23].

TOWARDS CLINICAL TRIALS WITH BIOELECTRONIC VAGUS NERVE STIMULATION AND PHARMACOLOGICAL CHOLINERGIC MODALITIES IN CHRONIC SPINAL CORD INJURY

Preclinical studies have generated experimental evidence for efficacy of VNS and galantamine in SCI [8587]. VNS in a closed-loop configuration combined with rehabilitative training considerably improve recovery of forelimb motor function compared with rehabilitation alone in models of contusive SCI at spinal level C5/6 [86]. Utilizing bioelectronic technological advances, the real-time closed-loop VNS paradigm in this study was designed to generate VNS immediately after the most successful forelimb movements as a result of motor rehabilitation [86]. The proposed mechanism of VNS is through strengthening synaptic connectivity from remaining motor networks to the grasping muscles in the forelimb [86]. VNS delivered through cuff electrodes implanted 7 weeks after bilateral C7/8 SCI (that damages distal motor neuron pools) in combination with rehabilitative training results in better recovery of forelimb function compared with rehabilitative training alone [86]. A recent preclinical study investigated the safety of acute VNS on cardiovascular parameters in a rat model of complete transection at the level of T3, 1 month after SCI [88]. A dose response of continuous VNS showed decreases in sensitivity for heart rate and blood pressure in SCI compared with control (uninjured animals). Intermittent VNS stimulation showed heart rate reduction in rat SCI and no change in blood pressure. Importantly, VNS did not trigger or exacerbate autonomic dysreflexia and the effects lasted only while VNS was present. In a rat model of cervical contusion SCI, compared with rehabilitation alone, rehabilitation along with VNS promoted functional recovery of forelimb strength [87]. Of note, treatment with galantamine results in improved functional recovery and decreased lesion sizes in rats subjected to SCI [85].

These observations support the possibility of performing clinical trials utilizing VNS in combination with rehabilitation approaches for functional recovery of patients with incomplete cervical SCI. In addition, considering the anti-inflammatory and beneficial metabolic efficacy of VNS [43,71] and cholinergic drugs, for example, galantamine [23,72,73], these two approaches can be evaluated in future clinical trials for alleviating the interrelated inflammatory and cardiovascular and metabolic burdens in patients with chronic SCI (Fig. 1).

In planning potential clinical application of VNS or other modalities to influence the inflammatory reflex, there may be special considerations in the SCI population, who have been demonstrated to have altered vagal tone. The high frequency component of heart rate variability (HRV), indicating cardiac vagal control, correlated with other outcomes of autonomic regulation in people with SCI, such as supine and upright heart rates, blood pressures, and plasma catecholamine levels [46]. Cardiac autonomic control in people with SCI has been investigated during orthostatic provocation, where the expected increase in heart rate was diminished in those with tetraplegia [22]. Individuals with chronic SCI did not have a vagal activation in response to the cold face test, which could be because of reduced physical activity and/or from the injury itself [21]. Another subset of people with SCI, that is, those with obesity and metabolic syndrome, may also specifically benefit from therapeutic strategies utilizing VNS or galantamine.

Of course, in addition to efficacy, the safety of bioelectronic VNS and the use of galantamine should be considered and evaluated specifically in people with chronic SCI. As reviewed here, bioelectronic VNS is an emerging therapy for chronic inflammatory disorders and the safety and efficacy of this approach were recently evaluated in patients with multidrug-refractory rheumatoid arthritis [75]. Surgery-related adverse symptoms were Horner’s syndrome (in one patient) and vocal cord paralysis (in another patient) that were resolved without clinically significant sequelae. No device-related or treatment-related serious adverse events were found. As the authors summarized ‘VNS with a miniaturised neurostimulator was safe and well tolerated and reduced signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with multidrug-refractory disease’. In another recent study with noninvasive VNS in 30 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, four adverse effects, including a superficial skin abrasion at the point of contact where the device touched the ear and other three (most likely not related to the device) were observed [74]. Of note, no patient dropped out of the study because of adverse effects. In both studies, the need for further evaluation in larger randomized sham-controlled studies was emphasized. The abundant information available from prior studies of galantamine in the context of Alzheimer’s disease indicates that relatively high drug doses – 24 and 32 mg/day may cause gastrointestinal disturbances, such as nausea and other adverse effects [89]. However, these adverse effects can be considerably reduced using a lower galantamine dose or slowly escalating the drug dose to achieve a favorable tolerability profile [90]. Of note, no significant adverse effects were observed in the study of galantamine in patients with MetS in which the initial drug dose (8 mg/day) for 4 weeks was subsequently increased to 16 mg/day for the remaining period of the study [72]. In addition, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with galantamine (up to 24 mg/day) for 10 weeks in children with autism, no significant difference in the frequency of adverse effects between the galantamine and the placebo arms was observed [91].

CONCLUSION

Persistent systemic inflammation is present in individuals with chronic SCI, where it accompanies autonomic dysfunction. It is increasingly appreciated that in addition to the correlation between inflammation and metabolic syndrome, which is common in individuals with SCI, inflammation may also dampen neuroplasticity and functional recovery. In many other clinical areas, including neurological disorders/conditions, such as stroke, therapeutic exploration of the vagus nerve-mediated inflammatory reflex is being successfully applied; VNS appears to increase neuroplasticity (albeit the underlying mechanisms remain to be elucidated) and to suppress chronic inflammation. Interest is growing in understanding the multimodal effects of VNS and cholinergic drugs, such as galantamine in the context of SCI, where they may suppress inflammation, alleviate cardiometabolic derangements, increase neuroplasticity, and have an overall beneficial health impact.

KEY POINTS.

  • Aberrant inflammation is a major but modifiable health issue in chronic SCI.

  • The vagus nerve-based inflammatory reflex can be modulated to reduce inflammation in preclinical settings and in patients with chronic diseases.

  • There is autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction linked to inflammatory and cardiometabolic dysregulation in chronic SCI.

  • Electrical vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or pharmacological modalities, such as galantamine can be explored to activate the inflammatory reflex for therapeutic benefit in chronic SCI.

Acknowledgements

The authors apologize to colleagues whose relevant work was not cited because of space limitations. Figure 1 was created using Biorender.

Financial support and sponsorship

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute of General Medical Sciences Grants: R01GM128008 and R01GM121102 (to V.A.P.), 1R35GM118182 (to K.J.T.), and the New York Spinal Cord Injury Research Board (to O.B).

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

K.J.T and V.A.P. have co-authored patents broadly related to the content of this review. They have assigned their rights to the Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research.

REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

■ of special interest

■■ of outstanding interest

  • 1.National Spinal Cord Injury Statisical Center, Center NSCIS: The 2020 Annual Statistical Report for the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems. University of Alabama at Birmingham; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.DeJong G, Tian W, Hsieh CH, et al. Rehospitalization in the first year of traumatic spinal cord injury after discharge from medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013; 94:S87–S97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Failli V, Kopp MA, Gericke C, et al. Functional neurological recovery after spinal cord injury is impaired in patients with infections. Brain 2012; 135(Pt 11):3238–3250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wecht JM, Harel NY, Guest J, et al. Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in spinal cord injury: epidemiology, diagnosis, and management. Semin Neurol 2020; 40:550–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krassioukov A, Biering-Sorensen F, Donovan W, et al. , Autonomic Standards Committee of the American Spinal Injury Association/International Spinal Cord S.. International standards to document remaining autonomic function after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2012; 35:201–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bauman W, Korsten M, Radulovic M, et al. 31st G. Heiner Sell Lectureship: secondary medical consequences of spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 2012; 18:352–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bloom O, Herman PE, Spungen AM. Systemic inflammation in traumatic spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2020; 325:1131–1143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nash MS, Tractenberg RE, Mendez AJ, et al. Cardiometabolic syndrome in people with spinal cord injury/disease: guideline-derived and nonguideline risk components in a pooled sample. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 97:1696–1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kwon BK, Bloom O, Wanner IB, et al. Neurochemical biomarkers in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2019; 57:819–831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Degiorgio LA, Konstantinov KN, Lee SC, et al. A subset of lupus anti-DNA antibodies cross-reacts with the NR2 glutamate receptor in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Med 2001; 7:1189–1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Casha S, Zygun D, McGowan MD, et al. Results of a phase II placebo-controlled randomized trial of minocycline in acute spinal cord injury. Brain 2012; 135:1224–1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sandhu MS, Gray E, Kocherginsky M, et al. Prednisolone pretreatment enhances intermittent hypoxia-induced plasticity in persons with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2019; 33:911–921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kwon BK, Stammers AM, Belanger LM, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers of injury severity in acute human spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27:669–682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Borovikova LV, Ivanova S, Zhang M, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin. Nature 2000; 405:458–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tracey KJ. The inflammatory reflex. Nature 2002; 420:853–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tracey KJ. Physiology and immunology of the cholinergic antiinflammatory pathway. J Clin Invest 2007; 117:289–296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chang EH, Chavan SS, Pavlov VA. Cholinergic control of inflammation, metabolic dysfunction, and cognitive impairment in obesity-associated disorders: mechanisms and novel therapeutic opportunities. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tsaava T, Datta-Chaudhuri T, Addorisio ME, et al. Specific vagus nerve stimulation parameters alter serum cytokine levels in the absence of inflammation. Bioelectron Med 2020; 6:8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Koopman FA, Chavan SS, Miljko S, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2016; 113:8284–8289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bonaz B, Sinniger V, Hoffmann D, et al. Chronic vagus nerve stimulation in Crohn’s disease: a 6-month follow-up pilot study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016; 28:948–953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wecht JM, Weir JP, DeMeersman RE, et al. Cold face test in persons with spinal cord injury: age versus inactivity. Clin Auton Res 2009; 19:221–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wecht JM, Weir JP, Bauman WA. Blunted heart rate response to vagal withdrawal in persons with tetraplegia. Clin Auton Res 2006; 16:378–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Metz CN, Pavlov VA. Treating disorders across the lifespan by modulating cholinergic signaling with galantamine. J Neurochem 2020; 158:1359–1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Riegger T, Conrad S, Schluesener HJ, et al. Immune depression syndrome following human spinal cord injury (SCI): a pilot study. Neuroscience 2009; 158:1194–1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saltzman JW, Battaglino RA, Salles L, et al. B-cell maturation antigen, a proliferation-inducing ligand, and B-cell activating factor are candidate mediators of spinal cord injury-induced autoimmunity. J Neurotrauma 2013; 30:434–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Herman P, Stein A, Gibbs K, et al. Persons with chronic spinal cord injury have decreased natural killer cell and increased toll-like receptor/inflammatory gene expression. J Neurotrauma 2018; 35:1819–1829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Prüss H, Tedeschi A, Thiriot A, et al. Spinal cord injury-induced immunodeficiency is mediated by a sympathetic-neuroendocrine adrenal reflex. Nat Neurosci 2017; 20:1549–1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Brommer B, Engel O, Kopp MA, et al. Spinal cord injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome enhances infection susceptibility dependent on lesion level. Brain 2016; 139:692–707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fouad K, Popovich PG, Kopp MA, Schwab JM. The neuroanatomical-functional paradox in spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurol 2021; 17:53–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hubli M, Gee CM, Krassioukov AV. Refined assessment of blood pressure instability after spinal cord injury. Am J Hypertens 2015; 28:173–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Morse LR, Stolzmann K, Nguyen HP, et al. Association between mobility mode and C-reactive protein levels in men with chronic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89:726–731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Neefkes-Zonneveld CR, Bakkum AJ, Bishop NC, et al. Effect of long-term physical activity and acute exercise on markers of systemic inflammation in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2015; 96:30–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schwab JM, Zhang Y, Kopp MA, et al. The paradox of chronic neuroinflammation, systemic immune suppression, autoimmunity after traumatic chronic spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2014; 258:121–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Claydon VE, Krassioukov AV. Orthostatic hypotension and autonomic pathways after spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2006; 23:1713–1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lucin KM, Sanders VM, Jones TB, et al. Impaired antibody synthesis after spinal cord injury is level dependent and is due to sympathetic nervous system dysregulation. Exp Neurol 2007; 207:75–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lucin KM, Sanders VM, Popovich PG. Stress hormones collaborate to induce lymphocyte apoptosis after high level spinal cord injury. J Neurochem 2009; 110:1409–1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mira JC, Brakenridge SC, Moldawer LL, Moore FA. Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome. Crit Care Clin 2017; 33:245–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Schnell L, Fearn S, Klassen H, et al. Acute inflammatory responses to mechanical lesions in the CNS: differences between brain and spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci 1999; 11:3648–3658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Riegger T, Conrad S, Liu K, et al. Spinal cord injury-induced immune depression syndrome (SCI-IDS). Eur J Neurosci 2007; 25:1743–1747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kopp MA, Watzlawick R, Martus P, et al. Long-term functional outcome in patients with acquired infections after acute spinal cord injury. Neurology 2017; 88:892–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kopp MA, Druschel C, Meisel C, et al. The SCIentinel study–prospective multicenter study to define the spinal cord injury-induced immune depression syndrome (SCI-IDS)–study protocol and interim feasibility data. BMC Neurol 2013; 13:168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wecht JM, De Meersman RE, Weir JP, et al. The effects of autonomic dysfunction and endurance training on cardiovascular control. Clin Auton Res 2001; 11:29–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. The vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex–linking immunity and metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2012; 8:743–754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. Neural regulation of immunity: molecular mechanisms and clinical translation. Nat Neurosci 2017; 20:156–166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. Neural circuitry and immunity. Immunol Res 2015; 63:38–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Claydon VE, Krassioukov AV. Clinical correlates of frequency analyses of cardiovascular control after spinal cord injury. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008; 294:H668–H678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alexander M, Wecht J, Krassioukov A, International Autonomic Standards Committee. Pulse article: Survey on the current usage of the International Standards for the Assessment of Autonomic Function after Spinal Cord Injury (ISAFSCI). Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2017; 3:17100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Teng YD, Choi H, Onario RC, et al. Minocycline inhibits contusion-triggered mitochondrial cytochrome c release and mitigates functional deficits after spinal cord injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2004; 101:3071–3076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Arnold SA, Hagg T. Anti-inflammatory treatments during the chronic phase of spinal cord injury improve locomotor function in adult mice. J Neurotrauma 2011; 28:1995–2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Torres-Espin A, Forero J, Fenrich KK, et al. Eliciting inflammation enables successful rehabilitative training in chronic spinal cord injury. Brain 2018; 141:1946–1962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hains BC, Waxman SG. Activated microglia contribute to the maintenance of chronic pain after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2006; 26:4308–4317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Walters ET. Neuroinflammatory contributions to pain after SCI: Roles for central glial mechanisms and nociceptor-mediated host defense. Exp Neurol 2014; 258:48–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Van Gorp S, Kessels AG, Joosten EA, et al. Pain prevalence and its determinants after spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Eur J Pain (United Kingdom) 2015; 19:5–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Siddall PJ, Middleton JW. Spinal cord injury-induced pain: mechanisms and treatments. Pain Manag 2015; 5:493–507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bauman WA, Spungen AM. Coronary heart disease in individuals with spinal cord injury: assessment of risk factors. Spinal Cord 2008; 46:466–476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Spungen AM, Adkins RH, Stewart CA, et al. Factors influencing body composition in persons with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study. J Appl Physiol 2003; 95:2398–2407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Nash MS, Groah SL, Gater DR, et al. Identification and managment of cardiometabolic risk after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2018; 42:643–677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nash MS, Bilzon JLJ. Guideline approaches for cardioendocrine disease surveillance and treatment following spinal cord injury. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 2018; 6:264–276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fleming JC, Bailey CS, Hundt H, et al. Remote inflammatory response in liver is dependent on the segmental level of spinal cord injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 72:1194–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rensen SS, Slaats Y, Nijhuis J, et al. Increased hepatic myeloperoxidase activity in obese subjects with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am J Pathol 2009; 175:1473–1482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sauerbeck AD, Laws JL, Bandaru VVR, et al. Spinal cord injury causes chronic liver pathology in rats. J Neurotrauma 2015; 32:159–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Gater DR. Obesity after spinal cord injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2007; 18:333–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gater DRJ, Farkas GJ, Berg AS, Castillo C. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in veterans with spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2019; 42:86–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shojaei MH, Alavinia SM, Craven BC. Management of obesity after spinal cord injury: a systematic review. J Spinal Cord Med 2017; 40:783–794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Rajan S, McNeely MJ, Warms C, Goldstein B. Clinical assessment and management of obesity in individuals with spinal cord injury: a review. J Spinal Cord Med 2008; 31:361–372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bianchi VE. Weight loss is a critical factor to reduce inflammation. Clin Nutr ESPEN 2018; 28:21–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Laughton GE, Buchholz AC, Martin Ginis KA, Goy RE; SHAPE SCI Research Group. Lowering body mass index cutoffs better identifies obese persons with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2009; 47:757–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kressel AM, Tsaava T, Levine YA, et al. Identification of a brainstem locus that inhibits tumor necrosis factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117:29803–29810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rosas-Ballina M, Olofsson PS, Ochani M, et al. Acetylcholine-synthesizing T cells relay neural signals in a vagus nerve circuit. Science (80) 2011; 334:98–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ji H, Rabbi MF, Labis B, et al. Central cholinergic activation of a vagus nerve-to-spleen circuit alleviates experimental colitis. Mucosal Immunol 2014; 7:335–347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Pavlov VA. The evolving obesity challenge: targeting the vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex in the response. Pharmacol Ther 2021; 222:107794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Consolim-Colombo FM, Sangaleti CT, Costa FO, et al. Galantamine alleviates inflammation and insulin resistance in patients with metabolic syndrome in a randomized trial. JCI insight 2017; 2:. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.■■.Sangaleti CT, Katayama KY, De Angelis K, et al. The cholinergic drug galantamine alleviates oxidative stress alongside anti-inflammatory and cardiometabolic effects in subjects with the metabolic syndrome in a randomized trial. Front Immunol 2021; 12:613979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study demonstrated that galantamine has beneficial anti-inflammatory and metabolic effects and modulates neural autonomic regulation in individuals with metabolic syndrome.
  • 74.Marsal S, Corominas H, de Agustín JJ, et al. Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation for rheumatoid arthritis: a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Rheumatol 2021; 3:e262–e269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Genovese MC, Gaylis NB, Sikes D, et al. Safety and efficacy of neurostimulation with a miniaturised vagus nerve stimulation device in patients with multidrug-refractory rheumatoid arthritis: a two-stage multicentre, randomised pilot study. Lancet Rheumatol 2020; 2:e527–e538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sinniger V, Pellissier S, Fauvelle F, et al. A 12-month pilot study outcomes of vagus nerve stimulation in Crohn’s disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2020; 32:e13911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.■■.Dawson J, Liu CY, Francisco GE, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. Lancet 2021; 397:1545–1553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that vagus nerve stimulation combined with rehabilitation yielded clinically meaningful improvements in upper limb function in individuals with chronic stroke.
  • 78.Dawson J, Pierce D, Dixit A, et al. Safety, feasibility, and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper-limb rehabilitation after ischemic stroke. Stroke 2016; 47:143–150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Tarn J, Legg S, Mitchell S, et al. The effects of noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation on fatigue and immune responses in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Neuromodulation 2019; 22:580–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Lerman I, Hauger R, Sorkin L, et al. Noninvasive transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation decreases whole blood culture-derived cytokines and chemokines: a randomized, blinded, healthy control pilot trial. Neuromodulation 2016; 19:283–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Addorisio ME, Imperato GH, de Vos AF, et al. Investigational treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with a vibrotactile device applied to the external ear. Bioelectron Med 2019; 5:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.■.Aranow C, Atish-Fregoso Y, Lesser M, et al. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation reduces pain and fatigue in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2021; 80:203–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This randomized clinical trial demonstrated that noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation alleviated pain and fatigue in individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • 83.Qureshi IS, Datta-Chaudhuri T, Tracey KJ, et al. Auricular neural stimulation as a new noninvasive treatment for opioid detoxification. Bioelectron Med 2020; 6:. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Satapathy SK, Ochani M, Dancho M, et al. Galantamine alleviates inflammation and other obesity-associated complications in high-fat diet-fed mice. Mol Med 2011; 17:599–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Sperling LE, Pires Reis K, Nicola F, et al. Galantamine improves functional recovery and reduces lesion size in a rat model of spinal cord injury. Brain Res 2019; 1724:146424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Ganzer PD, Darrow MJ, Meyers EC, et al. Closed-loop neuromodulation restores network connectivity and motor control after spinal cord injury. Elife 2018; 7:e32058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Darrow MJ, Torres M, Sosa MJ, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitative training enhances motor recovery after bilateral spinal cord injury to cervical forelimb motor pools. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2020; 34:200–209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Sachdeva R, Krassioukov AV, Bucksot JE, Hays SA. Acute cardiovascular responses to vagus nerve stimulation after experimental spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma 2020; 37:1149–1155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Raskind MA, Peskind ER, Wessel T, Yuan W. Galantamine in AD: a 6-month randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a 6-month extension. The Galantamine USA-1 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54:2261–2268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Tariot PN, Solomon PR, Morris JC, et al. A 5-month, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of galantamine in AD. The Galantamine USA-10 Study Group. Neurology 2000; 54:2269–2276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Ghaleiha A, Ghyasvand M, Mohammadi M-R, et al. Galantamine efficacy and tolerability as an augmentative therapy in autistic children: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Psychopharmacol 2014; 28:677–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES