Skip to main content
International Journal of Analytical Chemistry logoLink to International Journal of Analytical Chemistry
. 2022 Jun 29;2022:6909528. doi: 10.1155/2022/6909528

Review on Characterization, Properties, and Analytical Methods of Cefepime

Omkulthom Al kamaly 1,
PMCID: PMC9259364  PMID: 35814263

Abstract

Infection is one of the most important reasons for the increase in the number of deaths worldwide; it can be a bacterial or viral infection. As a result, there are many effective drugs against this infection, especially bacterial ones. Cefepime (CP) is one of the fourth generations of cephalosporins and is distinguished from others in that it can kill both positive and negative bacteria. Therefore, this study focused on the chemical properties of the drug, its uses, and its stability against bacteria. All analysis methods for this drug in pharmaceutical preparations, blood, or plasma were also presented. One of the important problems in these methods is using toxic solvents, which poses a danger to society and the environment. The presentation of these solvents will allow companies to manufacture and use more effective and less toxic solvents.

1. Introduction

Cefepime (CP) is one of the commonly used fourth-generation cephalosporins. Cefpirome and cefaclidine are other fourth-generation antibiotics. CP has adequate β-lactamase stability but with a low affinity for extended spectrum. The broad spectrum of CP is imposed to cover a wide range of positively and negatively pathogens [14]. Compared with ceftazidime from the fourth generation in vitro, CP has intensified activity against Gram (+) bacteria, excluding the species sensitive to methicillin, such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus [5, 6]. CP is more effective against extended-spectrum β-lactamase Gram (−) bacteria than other oxyimino-cephalosporins commercially available. [79].

The cefepime's chemical structure is displayed in Figure 1. The basic cephem ring at position 7 is modified chemically to increase the cephalosporins' stability against β-lactamase enzymes. Similarly, other antibiotics CP such as ceftazidime, cefoperazone, ceftizoxime, and ceftriaxone from the third-generation contain a 2-amino thiazolyl acetamido group substituted with an oxyimino in the same position. However, unlike other third-generation cephalosporins, CP possesses a cephem nucleus substituted with a positively charged NMR, making it a zwitterion [2]. This zwitterionic property permits penetration of CP to Gram (+) bacteria's porin channels rapidly [10, 11]. CP is used effectively to treat severe urinary and respiratory tract infections, as well as infections of the skin, soft tissues, and the women's reproductive tract among patients with febrile neutropenia. Treatment of pneumonia in cystic fibrosis patients with this medication is superior to that with ceftazidime.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The zwitterion form of cefepime (CP).

CP is considered an empirical monotherapy for pneumonia; it is widely used currently in hospitals for this approved indication and given to the patient with abdominal, urinary tract, febrile neutropenia, and skin or soft tissue infections. An earlier systematic published review of empirical monotherapy for the treatment of febrile neutropenia found CP to be associated with a higher mortality rate than other β-lactam antibiotics. It was unclear how the higher mortality rate was explained. CP was associated with more superinfections than other β-lactams, though the difference was not significant statistically. [12]. The authors in [1] established that the overall death rate was significantly lower in patients suffering from P. aeruginosa infections if treated with extended infusion CP.

2. Stability

In aqueous solutions, either acidic or basic, CP undergoes rapid degradation, resulting in hydrolysis (opening) of the β-lactam ring and simultaneous release of the side chain in the R-2 position from its particle. Because of hydrolysis of the β-lactam ring and separation of the NMP particle, two degradation products have been observed, neither of which demonstrate antimicrobial activity.2-[((2-amino-4-triazolyl) (methoxyimino)acetyl) amino] acetaldehyde is one of them [5]. The rate at which CP degrades in aqueous solutions, just like other β-lactam antibiotics, is determined by temperature, light, solvent composition, pH, antibiotic concentration, and the type of packaging. [7].

3. Chemistry

Cephalosporins, in general, contain a 4-membered β-lactam cycle connected to a 6-membered dihydrothiazine cycle [8]. The molecular weight of CP is 571.5 g, and its molecular formula is CI9H25N6O5S2·Cl·HCl·H2O. CP named chemically as (6R,7R)-7-((E)-2-(2-aminothiazol-4-yl)- 2-(methoxyimino) -acetamido)-3-((1-methylpyrrolidin-1-ium-1-yl) methyl)-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo [4.2.0] oct-2-ene- 2-carboxylate, its structure is shown in Figure 1, and it is characterized by high solubility in water. Furthermore, it is supplied as intravenous (IV) and intramuscular (IM) administration in doses equivalent to 2 g, 1 g, and 0.5 g of CP. It is formulated as a hydrochloride salt and used with L-arginine, adjusting the reconstituted solution at pH 4–6. [8].

CP is cited as an antibiotic from the fourth generation because its activity is a broad spectrum, and it has a high resistance to hydrolysis by β-lactamase [12]. CP possesses a quaternary positively charged nitrogen atom, thus, it is called a zwitterion. This character makes CP neutral enough and increases its ability to penetrate bacterial membranes [13]. CP has a side chain with a 2-amino thiazolyl acetamido group at position 7 and is substituted with the alpha-oxyimino group. The 2-carboxy-2-propoxyimino group in CP is replaced by the alkoxyimino group at position 7, as is the case with cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and ceftazidime. [14] This is expected to increase its stability against β-lactamases by avoiding the entrance of these enzymes into the nucleus. The antistaphylococcal activity is improved by substituting the group (7-[2-carboxy-2-propoxyimino]) in its side chain with an alkoxyimino substituent. Therefore, CP has a similar gram (−) spectrum and better antistaphylococcal activity than ceftazidime [14].

4. Mechanism of Action

The E. coli porin channel penetration by CP, cefaclidine, and cefpirome is at least 5–10 times faster than ceftazidime and cefotaxime. CP has stability against plasmid-mediated β-lactamase SHV-1 and SHV-2, OXA-1 and OXA-3, PSE-1, and PSE-2, and TEM-1 and TEM-2 [2]. The relative hydrolysis rates correspond to that of cefpirome [15,16], cefotaxime, latamoxef, and ceftazidime but are lesser than cefoperazone. Testing CP against 326 members of the Enterobacteriaceae found that it is more active than moxalactam, cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefpirome, and ceftazidime. Because CP has a low empathy for the major chromosomally mediated 13-lactamase, it is probably less influenced by the nonhydrolytic barrier mechanism of bacterial resistance. CP may demonstrate to be a powerful therapy for microbial infections that are unaffected by other antimicrobials. For instance, in a new study, CP resistance rarely appeared among cefotaxime and ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants [17].

5. Indications and Side Effects

The use of cefepime for treating UTIs in children has been perceived as safe and effective with the least adverse effects. Considering its broad spectrum of antimicrobial activity, it is a convenient candidate for early empiric curing of critically ill children, especially those who suffer from anatomical abnormalities of the urinary tract in which antibiotic-resistant microbes may be present less commonly [1820] as well as infections of the skin and skin structure can be treated with CP. Besides treating bacterial infections, CP is used to cure gynecologic and intraabdominal infections, febrile neutropenia, bacteremia, meningitis, and long-term bronchopulmonary infections associated with cystic fibrosis in pediatric patients [8]. The effect of the combination of nacubactam as a β-lactamase inhibitor and CP against Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumonia, which are carbapenem-resistant, was reported in [21] by the authors in [22]. Cefepime is highly effective in treating COVID-19 patients with moderate and severe symptoms. Cefepime has a highly antiviral effect and is effective against large-scale viruses, including SARS and MERS. When combined with antibiotics or steroids, cefepime is considered more effective than when taken alone.

There should be a consideration for CP neurotoxicity in older patients with myoclonus who are suffering recently from alterations in mental status and renal impairment [2326]. Seizures are the most common adverse reaction of cefepime on the central nervous system. It can also cause encephalopathy [27, 28]. Several drugs are known to cause nephrotoxicity, notably beta-lactamase inhibitors, and cephalosporins. Despite a few severe side effects, cefepime is a widely prescribed fourth-generation cephalosporin. Numerous reports suggested that cefepime may produce neurotoxicity, but there is no evidence that it causes acute interstitial nephritis. [29].

6. Analytical Methods for Determining CP

It is extremely imperative to quantify CP to manage bioequivalence and bioavailability studies besides pharmacokinetic parameters for curing observation. There are about 58 methods proposed for its analysis, either in pharmaceutical dosage forms, serum, or in plasma. These methods were collected from Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Science Direct. In this work, determination of CP by reverse phase-HPLC and HPLC, as shown in Table 1, was prevalent. With HPLC techniques, quantitative studies are characterized by the efficiency, specificity, speed, and accuracy with tracking capabilities. Table 2 contains micellar electrokinetic chromatographic methods. Some potentiometric and electrochemical methods are mentioned in Table 3, while the chromatographic technique is combined with other techniques such as LC, and HPLC. UPLC, MS, and MEKC are cited in Table 4. One of the commonly used techniques was UV absorption spectroscopy, which is used alone or with other techniques and based on colorimetry, fluorometry, and other spectrophotometric methods. All these methods are stated in Table 5. Table 6 includes gas chromatographic methods. Most of the summarized methods utilized different chemically toxic solvents as shown in all tables. Consequently, it is awfully significant for development and verification to select the analytical methods to be applied to reduce the number of toxic products. This is because it may destroy the environment, the instruments used, and the operators. To minimize such issues, it is imperative to pick an apparatus that is more specific and as sensible as other, which has low costs of analysis and therefore reduces power depletion (a factor that directly affects the last price of an outcome). It needs smaller quantities of solvents or that can recognize lower concentrations, it can retrieve dangerous solvents (in order to reduce the risk of pollution in the surroundings), and it can guide pharmaceutical companies and researchers to consume nontoxic solvents and enhance the habitat to decrease the risk of contamination. Hence, the analysis should take the contribution of universities and research centers into consideration to verify the quality of drugs and their safety in application to the public.

Table 1.

Detection of CP quantitatively by HPLC methods.

Column (C) Mobile phase Flow rate (ml/min) Wavelength (nm) Matrices Reference
Supelcosil ABZ + (5 μm;150 × 4.6 mm) 20 mM PDPB pH 2:ACN (94 : 6, v/v, v/v). 1 263 Human serum [30]
Hypersil BDS C18 Acetate buffer pH 4:ACN (97.2 : 2.8 v/v) 1 254 Human plasma [31]
Hypersil BDS C18 MeOH:25 mM SDPM pH 3 (87 : 13 v/v) 1 270 Plasma and vitreous fluid [32]
RP-C18 Acetate buffer pH 3.5 : MeOH/triethylamine (82 : 18 v/v) 1 263 Goat plasma and milk [33]
RP Ultrasphere XL-ODS C (75 × 4.6 mm I.D.) 20 mM AA pH 4 : 7% ACN 1 254 Human serum [34]
Onyx Monolithic C18 (20 cm– 4.6 mm) coupled to Phenomenex C18 GC (5 cm 4.6 mm) MeOH: 10 mM DPHP pH 7 (gradient) 1 254 Human plasma and dialysate [35]
C18 with pre-C NaOH buffer pH 3 : 1 M phosphoric acid: 0.01 Mn-octylamine pH 3.0 : ACN 1.3 259 Human urine [36]
μBondapak C18 (30 cm × 3.9 mm × 10 μm) ACN: acetate buffer (5 : 95 v/v) 2 280 Plasma and dialysate-ultrafiltrate from patients [37]
SupelcosilTMLC-18 (25 cm × 4.6 mm × 5 μm), with a C18 GC ACN: 0.075 M acetate buffer pH 5 (8 : 92, v/v) 0.8 230 Human plasma of burn patients [38]
100 × 4.6 mm i.d. Perkin Elmer phenyl C (5 µm) ACN (including 0.015 M pentane sulfonic acid sodium pH 3.4 + glacial acetic acid and 4 with 45% KOH):water (5.5 : 94 v/v) 1.5 280 Aqueous solution [39]
XTerra C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) supported by Phenomenex C18 GC (4 × 3.0 mm) MeOH : 40 mM phosphate buffer pH 3.2 1 260 Plasma and amniotic fluid [40]
LiChrospher 100 RP C18 (250 mm × 4 mm, 5 lm particles) MeOH: 10 mM phosphate buffer pH 7 (25 : 75 v/v) 1 256 Human serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine [41]
C18 Acetate buffer pH 5.1: ACN: MeOH (5 : 20 : 75 v/v) 1 212 Pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms [42]
Phenomenex ODS (4.6 × 250 mm, 5µ) ACN : AA pH 4.9 : (8 : 92) 1.5 256 Pharmaceutical formulations [43]
Acclaim 120 C18 (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm particle size) MeOH: sodium acetate buffer pH 6 (11 : 89 v/v) 1.8 220 Injections [44]
Luna C18 (250 × 4.6 mm; 5 μm) Ethanol : water (45 : 55 v/vv) 0.5 258 Pharmaceutical dosage Form [45]
C18 (250 × 25 mm) 25 μm Water: ACN (90 : 10 v/v) 1 212 CP in injections [46]
Princeton-100 C18 (4.6 mm i.d × 250 mm., 5 µn) ACN: 25 mM PDPB pH 6.2 (6 : 9 4 v/v) 1 210 Bulk and pharmaceuticals [47]
Hypersil Gold pentafluorophenyl (PFP) 6 (2.1 by 100 mm, 1.9 m) (a) 10 mM phosphoric acid
(b) ACN
0.5 260 Human plasma [48]
C18 (ACN/0.1 M phosphoric acid/NaOH buffer pH 3): 0.01 M n-octylamine pH 3 (gradient) 1 256 Human urine [49]

Table 2.

Micellar electrokinetic chromatographic methods for determination of CP.

Technique Column (C) Mobile phase or eluent Conditions Matrices Reference
MEKC Uncoated FSC of 50 μm 6 mM Na2B4O7, 10 mM Na2HPO4, 75 mM SDS pH 9.1 257∗∗, V of 15 kV Human serum and plasma [50]
MEKC Uncoated FSC of 40.2 cm × 50 μm id Tris with SDS : MeOH 214∗∗, V of 15 kV Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid [51]
MEKC Uncoated FSC of 31.2 cm (21 cm × 675 mm ID) 10 mM tris buffer pH 8.0 + 150 mM SDS and 20 mM tris buffer pH 9.0 + 200 mM SDS 254∗∗, V was 8 kV Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid [52]
MEKC Bare FSC of 50 µm, 5 mmol with length 56 cm Imidazole buffer pH 5.1 240∗∗, V of 25 kV NMP in CP for injection [53]
MEKC Uncoated FSC length 31.2 cm Tris buffer + SDS as an electrolyte solution 214∗∗, V of 15 kV Commercial injections [54]
MEKC + indirect UV MEKC [A 50 lm i.d 64.5 cm (56 cm detection length) bare FSC]
IC [Gel IC-Cation-SW C (4.6 50 mm, 5 lm) supported by a water's cation GC (4.6·50 mm, 10 lm)]
MEKC (10 mM creatinine pH 3.8)
IC (ACN: 0.01 mM nitric acid) (1 : 100)
225∗∗
MEKC (V of 30 kV)
IC (1)
NMP in CP for injection [55]
CZE FSC (48.6 cm × 50 µm i.d.) with 40.2 cm as a detection length 40.2 cm) 15 mm sodium borate buffer pH 9.3 215∗∗, V was 20 kV Pharmaceutical formulations and
human plasma
[56]

(ml/min); ∗∗ (nm).

Table 3.

Potentiometric and electrochemical methods for assay of CP.

Technique's name Solvents/Conditions Matrices Reference
PH potentiometry 264 ∗∗ and 230∗∗
Dilution with UB (0.1 M CH3COOH + 0.1 MH3PO4 + 0.1 MH3BO3)
Pharmaceutical preparation [57]
Electrochemical reduction and oxidation WE (glassy carbon electrode), RE (AgCl), AE (platinum wire)
The solutions were prepared in water and diluted with electrolytes
Pharmaceutical preparation [58]
Electrochemical Reduction A saturated AgCl (RE), WE (dropping mercury electrode), AE (glassy carbon) PB pH 2.7 (adjusted by 1 MH3PO4 + 1 M NaOH) Pharmaceutical formulations and human urine samples [59]
ASV + DPP RE (Ag/AgCl/saturated KC), WE (dropping-mercury electrode), AE (platinum wire)
For urine or plasma (PB pH 5.8), for serum (1 MH3PO4 and 1 M KOH pH 2.7) 0.1 M KCl used as ionic strength
Human urine, cerebrospinal fluid, and Serum [60]

Table 4.

Chromatographic technique with other techniques for determination of CP.

Technique Column (C) Mobile phase or eluent Conditions Matrices Reference
R-HPLC-UV + (SPE) C18 MeOH : ACN : AA 257∗∗
0.9
Nutrient admixtures [61]
LC LiChrosorb RP-C18 (250 × 4.6 mm I.D., 5 μm particle size) MeOH : mM monosodium phosphoric acid pH 3 (13 : 87 v/v) 270∗∗
1
The bile duct microdialysis probes [62]
HILIC LC-MS/MS HPLC Hypersil GOLD C (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm)
MS (spray voltage 3500 V, temperature 300°C, vaporizer temperature 400°C)
(a) 0.1% Formic acid:10 mM AA
(b) 0.1% Formic acid:10 mM AA : MeOH (1 : 1 v/v)
(c) 2-Propanol:acetone :ACN (1 : 1: 1 v/v/v)
Gas flow 6.5
Auxiliary gas flow 0.8
Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid [63]
UPLC-MS/MS RP Acquity BEH HILIC column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm, Waters) (a) (ACN)
(b) 20 mM AFB (Gradient)
0.5 Human plasma [64]
(LC-GC-FID) Extraction solvent (chloroform), SGE capillary C (30m × 0.25 mm) Water : MeOH (12 : 88 v/v) : NaCl : carbonate/bicarbonate buffer pH 512 Flow rate 30 Hydrogen gas was used for the FID rate of air which was 300 NMP in CP (pharmaceutical preparation) [65]
IC-SPE Metrosep C4 4 mm × 250 mm cation exchange at 30°C 5% ACN:0.01 mlL−1 nitric acid 265∗∗ NMP in CP. HCl [66]
SCX-LC/MS/MS Zorbax300-SCX (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 5 μm) (a) ACN : 25 mM AFB pH 2.79 (5 : 95 v/v)
(b) ACN : 500 mM AFB pH 2.79 + 25 mM AFB (30 : 70 v/v)
0.5
Curtain gas flow: 20psi; ion spray voltage: 5500 V; ion gas 1 and 2:
Mouse plasma [67]
LC-MS/MS Luna HILIC 200A, 100 × 2.0 mm, 3 μm (Phenomenex) with a GC ACN : 10 mM AFB pH 3.5 (72 : 28 v/v) 0.3 Plasma [68]
HPLC-MS/MS HPLC (Fortis reverse phase C8 (100 mm × 2.1 mm, 3 μm))
MS (voltage 1.5 kV)
(a) Water-formic acid:10 mM AFB (0.1 : 99.9 v/v), B. MeOH Gas flow rate, 600 l/h Human serum [69]
VAMS-LC/MS Phenomenex (2.6 μm, 100 Å, 50 × 4.6 mm) (a) Water : 5 mM AA pH 5
(b) 5 mM AA in water : ACN (10 : 90 v/v)
0.5 Human whole blood [70]
MEKC + UV + LC/MS PFP Nucleodur HPLC column MEKC (mM Na2B4O7 + 10 mM Na2HPO4 + 75 mM pH 9.1)
HPLC ((a) 5 mM AFB pH 3, (b) 100% CAN)
254∗∗
0.5
Urine [71]
HPLC + MS RP-C18 ACN : 10 mmolL−1 ammonium acetate (5 : 95) 0.8 Raw drug [72]

Table 5.

Spectrophotometric methods for the analysis of CP.

Technique's name Solvent for dissolving and dilution Conditions Matrices Reference
DRIR + XRD 8 ml of acetone was added as an eluent Spectral limits 3587,3557 cm−1 Different hydrated forms of CP.2HCl [73]
FTIR The samples were diluted to 1000 mg with KBr Potassium bromide was used as a diluent 4000–400 cm−1 Pharmaceutical formulations [74]
Savitzky–Golay differentiation filters and Fourier functions Solutions prepared in concentration 100 μg ml−1 in water 266∗∗ Human plasma [75]
Complexation with Hg Solutions were prepared in concentration 20–400 μg ml−1 in water 257∗∗ Pharmaceutical dosage forms [76]
Spectrophotometry with ammonium molybdate Solutions were prepared in concentration 1000 μg ml−1 in water 695∗∗ Pharmaceutical dosage forms [77]
Spectrofluorometry EXW (307), EMW (297), 435∗∗ Dosage forms [78]
Spectrophotometry using a tetrazolium Salt Solutions were prepared in concentration 20 μg ml−1 with MeOH 483∗∗ Pharmaceutical dosage forms [79]
UV spectrometry Diluted with UB (0.1 M CH3COOH + 0.1 M H3PO4 + 0.1 M H3BO3) 264∗∗, 230∗∗ Pharmaceutical preparation [57]
Fluorescence spectroscopy Solutions were prepared with doubly distilled water The EW was 280∗∗, 295∗∗The fluorescent intensity set at 341∗∗ Lysosome [80]
UV + FTIR Solutions were prepared in water; fluorescence intensity was measured in Tris/HCl solution pH 7.4 EW was 310∗∗ and EW set at 435∗∗ Pharmaceutical ingredient [81]
Spectrophotometry Solutions were prepared and diluted with 0.1 N NaOH 232∗∗ Pharmaceutical dosage forms [82]
Spectrophotometry Solutions were prepared and diluted with water 570∗∗ Pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms [83]
Derivative spectrophotometry Solutions were prepared and diluted with water 239, 254 Injections [84]
Direct-infusion electrospray ionization The solutions of NMP (N-methyl pyrrolidine) were prepared and diluted with water-MeOH (50 : 50) ESI (V of 2000 V) flow of 7 l min−1, GOT of 250°C NMP in CP [85]
FAIMS (V 75 and 375 V), electrode gaps (100 mm) with (700 mm) as a path length
Microbiological assay Powders were dissolved and diluted in water to give concentrations of 8.0, 16.0, and 32.0 μg m−1 580∗∗ Injectable preparations [86]

Table 6.

Gas chromatographic methods for detection of CP.

Technique Column (C) Conditions Matrices Reference
GC Wide-bore C (60m × 0.53 mm) coated with 100% polydimethylsiloxane (5 mm film) Flow rate for CG 40, hydrogen 4 and air 100 ml/min NMP in CP [86]
The sample was dissolved and diluted with chloroform
COT was 100°C, and the detector and the injector were 250°C

7. Conclusions

Cefepime is one of the important drugs from the cephalosporin group as it is distinguished from the rest of the group by its resistance to bacteria, which allows it to work on many positive and negative bacterial pathogens. The drug's stability is due to the chemical modification of its structure in the 7-position of the cephem ring, and the cephem nucleus substituted with a positively charged N-methyl-pyrrolidine, making it a zwitterion. This zwitterionic property permits penetration of the drug to Gram (+) bacteria's porin channels rapidly, so it is used effectively to treat severe urinary and respiratory tract infections. Furthermore, many recent studies have proven its worth in treating cases of skin, soft tissues, and the women's reproductive tract among patients with febrile neutropenia either it is found to be superior in the treatment of pneumonia in cystic fibrosis patients, which drew the attention of many researchers to analyse this drug in several methods in its dosage forms or in plasma or serum, and the most common analysis methods for this drug are HPLC.

Abbreviations

CP:

Cefepime

ACN:

Acetonitrile

NaOH:

Sodium hydroxide

KOH:

Potassium hydroxide

MeOH:

Methanol

PB:

Phosphate buffer

PDPB:

Potassium dihydrogen phosphate buffer

SDPM:

Sodium dihydrogen phosphate monohydrate

C40H84BrN:

Tetradecyl ammonium bromide

GC:

Guard column

DPHP:

Dibasic potassium hydrogen phosphate

AA:

Ammonium acetate

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

MEKC:

Micellar electrokinetic chromatography

CZE:

Capillary zone electrophoresis

Na2HPO4:

Disodium hydrogen phosphate

FSC:

Fused-silica capillary

V:

Voltage

ASV:

Adsorptive stripping voltammetry

VAMS:

Volumetric absorptive microsampling

DPP:

Differential pulse polarography

AE:

Auxiliary electrode

WE:

Working electrode

RE:

Reference electrode

SPE:

Solid-phase extraction

LC/MS/MS:

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

GC FID:

Gas chromatography-flame ionization detection

UHPLC:

Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography

UPLC–MS/MS:

Ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

SCX:

High-performance hydrophilic strong cation exchange

HILIC LC-MS/MS:

Interaction chromatography

IC-CD:

Ion chromatography-conductivity detection

AFB:

Ammonium formate buffer

AA:

Ammonium acetate

GC:

Gas Chromatography

CG:

Carrier gas

COT:

Column oven temperature

NMP:

N-methylpyrrolidine

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

EXW:

Excitation wavelength

EMW:

Emission wavelength.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Bauer K. A., West J. E., O’Brien J. M., Goff D. A. Extended-infusion cefepime reduces mortality in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy . 2013;57(7):2907–2912. doi: 10.1128/aac.02365-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Isler B., Harris P., Stewart A. G., Paterson D. L. An update on cefepime and its future role in combination with novel β-lactamase inhibitors for MDR Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy . 2020;76(3):550–560. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jean S.-S., Ko W.-C., Lu M.-C., Lee W.-S., Hsueh P.-R. Multicenter surveillance of in vitro activities of cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, omadacycline, eravacycline, and comparator antibiotics against Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex causing bloodstream infection in Taiwan, 2020. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy . 2021;20:1–13. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2021876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mahjobipoor H., Sajadi M., Honarman A., et al. A Comparison of Disk Diffusion Method and E-Test in Determining the Susceptibility and Resistance of Klebsiella and Acinetobacter Strains to Cefepime in Patients with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. Immunopathol Persa . 2022;8 [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kodym A., Pawłowska M., Rumiński J. K., Bartosińska A., Kieliba A. Stability of cefepime in aqueous eye drops. Die Pharmazie . 2011;66(1):17–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.O’Connor A., Lopez M. J., Eranki A. P. Cefepime . Tampa, FL, USA: StatPearls; 2020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stewart J. T., Warren F. W., Maddox F. C. Stability of cefepime hydrochloride injection in polypropylene syringes at -20°C, 4°C, and 22-24°C. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy . 1999;56(5):457–459. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/56.5.457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wynd M. A., Paladino J. A. Cefepime: a fourth-generation parenteral cephalosporin. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy . 1996;30(12):1414–1424. doi: 10.1177/106002809603001211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Akpaka P. E., Vaillant A., Wilson C., Jayaratne P. Extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) produced by gram-negative bacteria in Trinidad and Tobago. International Journal of Microbiology . 2021;2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/5582755.5582755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kessler R. E. Cefepime microbiologic profile and update. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal . 2001;20(3):331–336. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200103000-00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vasan A. K., Haloi N., Ulrich R. J., et al. Role of internal loop dynamics in antibiotic permeability of outer membrane porins. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 2022;119(8) doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117009119.e2117009119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yahav D., Paul M., Fraser A., Sarid N., Leibovici L. Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases . 2007;7(5):338–348. doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(07)70109-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lima L. M., Silva B. N. M. D., Barbosa G., Barreiro E. J. β-lactam antibiotics: an overview from a medicinal chemistry perspective. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry . 2020;208 doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112829.112829 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Naito T., Aburaki S., Kamachi H., Narita Y., Okumura J., Kawaguchi H. Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of a new series of cephalosporins, BMY-28142 and related compounds. Journal of Antibiotics . 1986;39(8):1092–1107. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.39.1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Grassi G. G., Grassi C. Cefepime: overview of activity in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy . 1993;32:87–94. doi: 10.1093/jac/32.suppl_b.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Roach E. J., Uehara T., Daigle D. M., Six D. A., Khursigara C. M. The next-generation β-lactamase inhibitor taniborbactam restores the morphological effects of cefepime in KPC-producing Escherichia coli. Microbiology Spectrum . 2021;9(2) doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00918-21.e00918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Barbhaiya R. H., Forgue S. T., Gleason C. R., et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefepime after single and multiple intravenous administrations in healthy subjects. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy . 1992;36(3):552–557. doi: 10.1128/aac.36.3.552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Arrieta A. C., Bradley J. S. Empiric use of cefepime in the treatment of serious urinary tract infections in children. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal . 2001;20(3):350–355. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200103000-00034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tang Y.-H., Lu P.-L., Huang H.-Y., Lin Y.-C. Clinical effectiveness of beta-lactams versus fluoroquinolones as empirical therapy in patients with diabetes mellitus hospitalized for urinary tract infections: a retrospective cohort study. PLoS One . 2022;17(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266416.e0266416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dunne M. W., Puttagunta S., Aronin S. I., Brossette S., Murray J., Gupta V. Impact of empirical antibiotic therapy on outcomes of outpatient urinary tract infection due to nonsusceptible enterobacterales. Microbiology Spectrum . 2022;10(1) doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02359-21.e02359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hagihara M., Kato H., Sugano T., et al. Pharmacodynamic evaluation of meropenem, cefepime, or aztreonam combined with a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, nacubactam, against carbapenem-resistant and/or carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli using a murine thigh-infection model. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents . 2021;57(5) doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106330.106330 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eid R. A., Elgendy M. O., El-Gendy A. O., et al. Efficacy of ceftazidime and cefepime in the management of COVID-19 patients: single center report from Egypt. Antibiotics . 2021;10(11):p. 1278. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Behal M. L., Thomas J. K., Thompson Bastin M. L., Mefford B. M. Cefepime Induced Neurotoxicity Following A Regimen Dose-Adjusted for Renal Function: Case Report and Review of the Literature . Lexington, KY, USA: Hospital Pharmacy; 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Payne L. E., Gagnon D. J, Riker R. R, et al. Cefepime-induced neurotoxicity: a systematic review. Critical Care . 2017;21(1):276–278. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1856-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Appa A. A., Jain R., Rakita R. M., Hakimian S., Pottinger P. S. Open forum infectious diseases . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press US; 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fugate J. E., Kalimullah E. A, Hocker S. E, Clark S. L, Wijdicks E. F, Rabinstein A. A. Cefepime neurotoxicity in the intensive care unit: a cause of severe, underappreciated encephalopathy. Critical Care . 2013;17(6):R264–R266. doi: 10.1186/cc13094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Keerty D., Shareef N. A., Ramsakal A., Haynes E., Syed M. Cefepime-Induced encephalopathy. Cureus . 2021;13(2) doi: 10.7759/cureus.13125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dakdouki G. K., Al-Awar G. N. Cefepime-induced encephalopathy. International Journal of Infectious Diseases . 2004;8(1):59–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2003.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mac K., Chavada R., Paull S., Howlin K., Wong J. Cefepime induced acute interstitial nephritis–a case report. BMC Nephrology . 2015;16(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12882-015-0004-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Breilh D., Lavallee C., Fratta A., Ducint D., Cony-Makhoul P., Saux M. C. Determination of cefepime and cefpirome in human serum by high-performance liquid chromatography using an ultrafiltration for antibiotics serum extraction. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications . 1999;734(1):121–127. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(99)00343-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Calahorra B., Campanero M. A., Sádaba B., Azanza J. R. Rapid high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of cefepime in human plasma. Biomedical Chromatography . 1999;13(4):272–275. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0801(199906)13:4<272::aid-bmc842>3.0.co;2-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Valassis I. N., Parissi-Poulou M., Macheras P. Quantitative determination of cefepime in plasma and vitreous fluid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications . 1999;721(2):249–255. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(98)00468-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.El‐Rabbat N. A., Abdel‐Wadood H. M., Sayed M., Mousa H. S. High‐performance liquid chromatographic determination and pharmacokinetic study of cefepime in goat plasma and milk after pre‐column derivatization with Hg (I) Journal of Separation Science . 2010;33:2599–2609. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201000294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Elkhaïli H., Linger L., Monteil H., Jehl F. High-performance liquid chromatographic assay for cefepime in serum. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications . 1997;690(1-2):181–188. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4347(96)00406-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Farthing C., Farthing D., Brophy D. F., et al. High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of cefepime and cefazolin in human plasma and dialysate. Chromatographia . 2008;67(5):365–368. doi: 10.1365/s10337-008-0529-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.González J. O., Palacios F. J., Mochón M. C., de la Rosa F. B. Simultaneous determination of cefepime and grepafloxacin in human urine by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2004;36(1):117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Isla A., Arzuaga A., Maynar J., et al. Determination of ceftazidime and cefepime in plasma and dialysate-ultrafiltrate from patients undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration by HPLC. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2005;39(5):996–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2005.05.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.López K. J., Bertoluci D. F., Vicente K. M., Dell’Aquilla A. M., Santos S. R. Simultaneous determination of cefepime, vancomycin and imipenem in human plasma of burn patients by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences . 2007;860(2):241–245. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.10.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Maddox F. C., Stewart J. T. HPLC determination of an aqueous cefepime and metronidazole mixture. Journal of Liquid Chromatography & Related Technologies . 1999;22(18):2807–2813. doi: 10.1081/jlc-100102060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Nemutlu E., Kır S., Katlan D., Beksaç M. S. Simultaneous multiresponse optimization of an HPLC method to separate seven cephalosporins in plasma and amniotic fluid: application to validation and quantification of cefepime, cefixime and cefoperazone. Talanta . 2009;80(1):117–126. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2009.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Palacios F. J., Mochon M. C., Sánchez J. J., López M. B., Pérez A. G. Validation of an HPLC method for determination of cefepime (a fourth-generation cephalosporin). Determination in human serum, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine. Pharmacokinetic profiles. Chromatographia . 2005;62(7):355–361. doi: 10.1365/s10337-005-0603-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kalyani L., Rao C. V. N. Stability indicating RP-HPLC method development and validation of cefepime and amikacin in pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2018;54 doi: 10.1590/s2175-97902018000317258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Behin S., Punitha I., Krishnan S. Stability studies of cefepime hydrochloride by stability indicating RP-HPLC method. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotech . 2013;6(3):2181–2186. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Shrestha B., Bhuyan N. R., Sinha B. N. Simultaneous determination of cefepime and tazobactam in injectables by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography method. Pharmaceutical Methods . 2014;5(1):20–26. doi: 10.5530/phm.2014.1.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Rodrigues D., Salgado H. Development and validation of a green analytical method of RP-HPLC for quantification of Cefepime hydrochloride in pharmaceutical dosage form: simple, sensitive and economic. Current Pharmaceutical Analysis . 2016;12(4):306–314. doi: 10.2174/1573412912666151221210921. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tamboli S. R., Patil D. D. RP-HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of cefepime hydrochloride and tazobactam sodium in bulk and pharmaceuticals. Journal of Chemistry . 2013;2013:6. doi: 10.1155/2013/208057.208057 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Legrand T., Vodovar D., Tournier N., Khoudour N., Hulin A. Simultaneous determination of eight β-lactam antibiotics, amoxicillin, cefazolin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cloxacillin, oxacillin, and piperacillin, in human plasma by using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy . 2016;60(8):4734–4742. doi: 10.1128/aac.00176-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.González J. O., Mochón M. C., de la Rosa F. B. Simultaneous determination of cefepime and the quinolones garenoxacin, moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in human urine by HPLC-UV. Microchimica Acta . 2005;151(1-2):39–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Theurillat R., Sendi P., Thormann W. An MEKC assay for the therapeutic drug monitoring of cefepime. Journal of Separation Science . 2013;36(17):2915–2921. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201300402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yang Y.-H., Wu W.-Y., Yeh H.-H., Chen S.-H. Simultaneous determination of cefepime and vancomycin in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid by MEKC with direct sample injection and application for bacterial meningitis. Electrophoresis . 2007;28(11):1788–1797. doi: 10.1002/elps.200600537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Tseng S. H., Yang Y. H., Chen Y. R., Chen S. H. Determination of cefepime in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid by micellar electrokinetic chromatography with direct sample injection. Electrophoresis . 2004;25:1641–1647. doi: 10.1002/elps.200405869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Prasanna S. J., Sharma H. K., Mukkanti K., Kumar V. J., Raja G., Sivakumaran M. Validation of capillary electrophoresis method for determination of N-methylpyrrolidine in cefepime for injection. Journal of Chromatographic Science . 2010;48(10):830–834. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/48.10.830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen Y.-R., Lin S.-J., Chou Y.-W., Wu H.-L., Chen S.-H. Simultaneous determination of cefepime and L-arginine by micellar electrokinetic chromato- graphy and applications to commercial injections. Journal of Separation Science . 2005;28(16):2173–2179. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200500081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu H., Sunderland V. Determination of N-methylpyrrolidine in cefepime for injection by capillary electrophoresis with indirect UV detection. Chromatographia . 2004;59(9):653–657. doi: 10.1365/s10337-004-0191-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Al‐Attas A., Nasr J. J., El‐Enany N., Belal F. A green capillary zone electrophoresis method for the simultaneous determination of piperacillin, tazobactam and cefepime in pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma. Biomedical Chromatography . 2015;29(12):1811–1818. doi: 10.1002/bmc.3500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Evagelou V., Tsantili-Kakoulidou A., Koupparis M. Determination of the dissociation constants of the cephalosporins cefepime and cefpirome using UV spectrometry and pH potentiometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2003;31(6):1119–1128. doi: 10.1016/s0731-7085(02)00653-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Özkan S. A., Uslu B., Zuman P. Electrochemical reduction and oxidation of the antibiotic cefepime at a carbon electrode. Analytica Chimica Acta . 2002;457(2):265–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Palacios F. J. J., Mochón M. C., Sánchez J. C. J., Carranza J. H. Electrochemical reduction of cefepime at the mercury electrode. Electroanalysis . 2000;12(4):296–300. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1521-4109(20000301)12:4<296::aid-elan296>3.0.co;2-o. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Palacios F. J. J., Mochón M. C., Sánchez J. C. J., Carranza J. H. Adsorptive stripping voltammetric determination of cefepime at the mercury electrode in human urine and cerebrospinal fluid, and differential pulse polarographic determination in serum. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2003;92(9):1854–1859. doi: 10.1002/jps.10438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Iqbal M., Bahari M., Darwis Y., et al. A RP-HPLC-UV method with solid phase extraction for determination of cefepime in total nutrient admixtures: application to stability studies. Current Pharmaceutical Analysis . 2012;8(1):68–74. doi: 10.2174/157341212798995548. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Chang Y. L., Chou M. H., Lin M. F., Chen C. F., Tsai T. H. Determination and pharmacokinetic study of unbound cefepime in rat bile by liquid chromatography with on-line microdialysis. Journal of Chromatography, A . 2001;914(1-2):77–82. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)01207-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rehm S., Rentsch K. M. HILIC LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of cefepime, imipenem and meropenem. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2020;186 doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113289.113289 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Mameli M., Vezzelli A., Verze’ S., et al. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the simultaneous quantitation of enmetazobactam and cefepime in human plasma. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2019;174:655–662. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.06.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Farajzadeh M. A., Goushjuii L., Bashour Y. A simple and rapid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method followed by GC‐FID for determination of N‐methylpyrrolidine in cefepime. Journal of Separation Science . 2010;33:3767–3773. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201000510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Page N., Stevenson R., Powell M. Analysis of N-methylpyrrolidine in cefepime hydrochloride by ion chromatography using suppressed conductivity detection with solid-phase extraction pre-treatment. Analytical Methods . 2014;6(4):1248–1253. doi: 10.1039/c3ay42041h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bu W., Sexton H., Fan X., et al. The novel sensitive and high throughput determination of cefepime in mouse plasma by SCX-LC/MS/MS method following off-line μElution 96-well solid-phase extraction to support systemic antibiotic programs. Journal of Chromatography B . 2010;878(19):1623–1628. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2010.03.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Patil K., Tambe H., Zope V., Chavan R., Yeole R., Patel M. Simultaneous determination of zidebactam and cefepime in dog plasma by LC-MS/MS and its application to pre-clinical pharmacokinetic study. Biomedical Chromatography . 2018;32(8):p. e4249. doi: 10.1002/bmc.4249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Paal M., Zoller M., Schuster C., Vogeser M., Schütze G. Simultaneous quantification of cefepime, meropenem, ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid and piperacillin in human serum using an isotope-dilution HPLC–MS/MS method. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2018;152:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2018.01.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Moorthy G. S., Vedar C., Zane N. R., et al. Development and validation of a volumetric absorptive microsampling- liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method for the analysis of cefepime in human whole blood: application to pediatric pharmacokinetic study. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2020;179 doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2019.113002.113002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kummer M., Šestáková N, Theurillat R, et al. Monitoring of cefepime in urine by micellar electrokinetic capillary chromatography with ultraviolet detection and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Journal of Separation Science . 2018;41(21):4067–4074. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201800763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Zhao L., Guo J.-F., Zhang A.-J., Zhao Y.-M. Rapid identification of the isomeric impurity in raw drug of cefepime dihydrochloride by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Yao xue xue bao= Acta pharmaceutica Sinica . 2005;40(4):361–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bugay D. E., Newman A. W., Findlay W. P. Quantitation of cefepime 2HCl dihydrate in cefepime 2HCl monohydrate by diffuse reflectance IR and powder X-ray diffraction techniques. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 1996;15(1):49–61. doi: 10.1016/0731-7085(96)01796-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Ali H. R. H., Ali R., Batakoushy H. A., Derayea S. M. Solid-state FTIR spectroscopic study of two binary mixtures: cefepime-metronidazole and cefoperazone-sulbactam. Journal of Spectroscopy . 2017;2017:6. doi: 10.1155/2017/5673214.5673214 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Abdel-Aziz O., Abdel-Ghany M. F., Nagi R., Abdel-Fattah L. Application of Savitzky-Golay differentiation filters and Fourier functions to simultaneous determination of cefepime and the co-administered drug, levofloxacin, in spiked human plasma. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy . 2015;139:449–455. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2014.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.El-Rabbat N., Abdel-Wadood H., Sayed M., Mousa H. Spectrophotometric analysis of cefepime through its hg(i) complex. Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2012;35(1):55–65. doi: 10.21608/bfsa.2012.64602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Elazazy M., Shalaby A., Elbolkiny M., Khalil H. Spectrophotometric determination of cefepime hydrochloride, cefoperazone sodium, ceftazidime pentahydrate. cefuroxime sodium and etamsylate using ammonium molybdate. Scientia Pharmaceutica . 2003;71(3):211–228. doi: 10.3797/scipharm.aut-03-20. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mostafa N. M., Abdel-Fattah L., Weshahy S. A., Hassan N. Y., Boltia S. A. Stability-indicating spectrofluorometric method for the determination of some cephalosporin drugs via their degradation products. Journal of AOAC International . 2015;98(2):361–370. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.14-088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Elazazy M. S., Shalaby A. A. Validated spectrophotometric assay of cefepime hydrochloride and cefuroxime sodium using a tetrazolium salt. E-Journal of Chemistry . 2012;9(4):2261–2267. doi: 10.1155/2012/959624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Han R., Liu B.-S., Li G., Zhang Q. Investigation on the interaction between lysozyme and cefepime hydrochloride by synchronous fluorescence and fluorescence quenching spectroscopy. Spectroscopy Letters . 2016;49(3):225–230. doi: 10.1080/00387010.2015.1133649. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Huang Y., Zhang Y., Yan Z., Liao S. Assay of ceftazidime and cefepime based on fluorescence quenching of carbon quantum dots. Luminescence . 2015;30(7):1133–1138. doi: 10.1002/bio.2871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nanda R. K., Navathar D. A., Kulkarni A. A., Patil S. S. Simultaneous spectrophotometric estimation of cefepime and tazobactam in pharmaceutical dosage form. International Journal of Chemistry Research . 2012;4(1):152–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Papanna R. K., Krishnegowda J. B., Nagaraja P. Spectrophotometric method for the determination of cefepime, cefazolin sodium and cefalothin sodium in pure and pharmaceutical dosage forms by using ninhydrin. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences . 2015;7(5):194–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ródenas V., Parra A., Garcia-Villanova J., Gómez M. D. Simultaneous determination of cefepime and L-arginine in injections by second-derivative spectrophotometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 1995;13(9):1095–1099. doi: 10.1016/0731-7085(95)01507-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Smith R. W., Cox L. B., Yudin A., Reynolds J. C., Powell M., Creaser C. S. Rapid determination of N-methylpyrrolidine in cefepime by combining direct infusion electrospray ionisation-time-of-flight mass spectrometry with field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry. Analytical Methods . 2015;7(1):34–39. doi: 10.1039/c4ay02026j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Souza M. J., Kulmann R. R., Silva L. M., Nogueira D. R., Zimmermann E. S., Schmidt C. A. Development and in-house validation of a microbiological assay for determination of cefepime in injectable preparations. Journal of AOAC International . 2006;89(5):1367–1372. doi: 10.1093/jaoac/89.5.1367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Chen G., Liu G., Qin F., Wang Y. A simple and sensitive GC method for determination of N-methylpyrrolidine in cefepime and its preparation. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis . 2003;33(4):797–801. doi: 10.1016/s0731-7085(03)00307-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Analytical Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES