Skip to main content
Insights into Imaging logoLink to Insights into Imaging
. 2022 Jul 7;13:115. doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01219-2

Synthetic MRI in children with tuberous sclerosis complex

Gokcen Coban 1,, Ekim Gumeler 1, Safak Parlak 1, Bahadir Konuskan 2, Jale Karakaya 3, Dilek Yalnizoglu 2, Banu Anlar 2, Kader K Oguz 1
PMCID: PMC9263007  PMID: 35796889

Abstract

Objective

The generation of numerous sequences and quantitative data in a short scanning time is the most potential advantage of Synthetic MRI (SyMRI). We aimed to test detection of the tubers and to determine underlying tissue characteristics, and morphometric alterations in the brain of pediatric tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) patients, using SyMRI.

Methods

Conventional brain MRI (cMRI) and SyMRI were prospectively obtained from 10 TSC patients and 18 healthy control subjects (HCs). Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated tubers on both scans. Additionally, automatically segmented volume calculation and myelin quantification, including the subcortical part of the tubers and normal-appearing brain parenchyma (NABP) of patients, were carried out using SyMRI.

Results

The cMRI and SyMRI comparison showed a very good correlation on the detection of the tubers (k = 0.82–0.94). Automatic segmentation of Non-gray matter/white matter/cerebrospinal fluid (Non), %Non/brain parenchymal volume, and %Non/intracranial volume was significantly higher; however, %Myelin/intracranial volume and %Myelin/brain parenchymal volume were significantly lower in the TSC patients (p < 0.05). The proton density values were significantly increased, and myelin fraction volume and myelin-correlated compound values were significantly decreased in the NABP in TSC patients on myelin maps (p < 0.05). The white-matter volume, myelin and white-matter fractional volume, longitudinal relaxation rate, transverse relaxation rate, and myelin-correlated compound values were significantly decreased in the subcortical part of tubers on quantification maps (p < 0.001) in TSC patients.

Conclusion

SyMRI enables the detection of cortical tubers and is a developing tool in the quantification of morphometric and tissue alterations in pediatric TSC patients with a rational scanning time.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13244-022-01219-2.

Keywords: Synthetic MRI, Tubers, Subcortical radial bands, Subependymal nodules, Tuberous sclerosis

Key points

  • Synthetic MRI (SyMRI) can provide quantitative information of the brain and may help to determine morphometric changes in tissue components.

  • SyMRI can detect the myelin amount of the brain in comparison with the conventional sequences.

  • SyMRI can show the abnormality in the normal-appearing white matter of the brain.

Background

Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a neurocutaneous syndrome occurring in 1/6000–10,000 newborns [1]. It is characterized by benign hamartomas in multiple organs including the brain. Hamartomas are composed of non-malignant and disorganized cells that usually demonstrate abnormal differentiation [2]. Lesions of TSC result from mutation of the TSC1 or TSC2 genes. These genes are negative regulators of the mammalian target of the rapamycin complex (mTORC) pathway. Abnormal mTORC activation induces the differentiation and migration of the cells in the subependymal region, the cortex, and along the cell migration pathways [3].

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the first choice to detect classical parenchymal abnormalities (cortical/subcortical tubers, subependymal nodules, subcortical radial bands, and subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGA)) in TSC patients [4]. Brain MRI is required every 1–3 years according to the recommendations of the 2012 International TSC Consensus Conference [5]. However, approximately half of TSC patients present with global intellectual impairment and developmental psychopathologies [6], which make them more uncooperative in the setting of the long acquisition times.

The SyMRI sequence is named ‘quantification of relaxation times and proton density by the multi-echo acquisition of a saturation recovery using turbo spin-echo readout’ (QRAPMASTER) [7] and facilitates segmentation of the brain automatically in addition to quantitative analysis of myelin with good accuracy and reproducibility. It takes about 6 min with full head coverage. The diagnostic ability of this FDA-approved sequence was previously searched for several diseases [813].

We aimed to detect cortical/subcortical tubers and determine tissue alterations, including myelin, in the brains of TSC patients using SyMRI, in this study. We hypothesized that SyMRI can detect cortical/subcortical tubers comparable to conventional MRI sequences and assess morphological and tissue changes quantitatively in pediatric TSC patients.

Materials and methods

This prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (#KA-180135). Informed consent was obtained from the parents of the children.

Participants and image acquisition

Pediatric patients with TSC, who were diagnosed and followed up by the Pediatric Neurology Department of Hacettepe University, a reference center for neurophakomatoses—between August 2019 and March 2020, enrolled in this study. Exclusion criteria were: (i) the presence of hydrocephalus, (ii) presence of any structural lesion incompatible with TSC, (iii) poor image quality, (iv) incidentally tumor in both groups, (v) signal abnormalities of WM in the healthy controls (HCs).

Ten children with TSC and 18 healthy children without neurological and systemic abnormalities participated. None of the 28 subjects received sedation or contrast media. Imaging was performed with a 1.5 T MR scanner (Aera; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a 20 channel phased array head coil. Conventional MRI (cMRI) sequences included axial FLAIR (TE/TR/TI: 78/7000/2220 ms, FOV: 230 × 185 mm; slice thickness (ST)/gaps: 5/2 mm; acquisition time (AT): 4 min 6 s; and voxel size: 0.4 × 0.4 × 5 mm), axial 3D T1W MPRAGE (TE/TR/:3/1680 ms, FOV: 240 × 195 mm; ST/gaps: 1.5/0.75 mm gaps; acquisition time (AT): 5 min 8 s; and voxel size: 0.8 × 0.8 × 1.5 mm), axial T2W turbo SE (TE/TR/:199/3240 ms, FOV: 230 × 185 mm; ST/gaps:5/2 mm; AT: 3 min 42 s; and voxel size: 0.4 × 0.4 × 5 mm).

The SyMRI (QRAPMASTER) was acquired in the axial plane as follows: FOV, 230 × 183 mm; voxel size, 1.5 × 1.5 mm; TE, 14, 28, 42, 56, 70 ms; TR, 4.244 s; TI, 0.0974, 0.5846, 1.8511, 4.0919 s; saturation flip angle, 120°; and AT, 6:05 min, slice thickness/gap: 4 mm/1 mm covering full brain in 30 slices.

The cMRI was performed before SyMRI. Total scanning time was 12:56 min and 6.05 min for cMRI and SyMRI, respectively.

Image analysis

SyMRI Diagnostic Software Version 11.2 (Synthetic MR AB, Linköping, Sweden) was used for image analysis. With this software, synthetic images are created and intracranial volume (ICV), brain parenchymal volume (BPV), brain parenchymal fraction (BPF = BPV/ICV), gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), Non-GM/WM/CSF, myelin (MY), and myelin fraction (MYF = MY/BPV) are quantified [14]. Also, SyMRI enables the quantification of the proton density (PD), the longitudinal relaxation rate (R1), and the transverse relaxation rate (R2). The acquisition voxel of MRI is formed by four partial volume compartments (free water partial volume, myelin partial volume, cellular partial volume, and excess parenchymal water partial volume). Each partial volume compartment has its relaxation properties (R1, R2, and PD values). Myelin volume can be achieved, by using this method, based on the assumption of the relaxation properties of the four partial volumes in a voxel. The total volume of WM, GM, CSF, Non-GM/WM/CSF, and myelin can be calculated by multiplying the volume fractions for each tissue type. The Non-GM/WM/CSF stands for the tissue not classified as GM, WM, or CSF and contains meninges, flow voids in larger blood vessels, and lesions [15].

Qualitative evaluation

Two blinded neuroradiologists (G.C. and E.G.) independently evaluated the presence and location of tubers on FLAIR images on both cMRI and SyMRI with a 3-week gap. For the quantitative analysis, the largest subcortical part of the tuber was chosen in consensus. Also, to search for any relationship between tuber load and brain morphometry, patients were grouped into 3 according to the number of tubers: group 1 (< 10), group 2 (from 11 to 19), group 3 (> 20).

SyMRI evaluation

An imaging workstation (syngo. via, Siemens, Germany) was used for raw image dataset piling-up. Automatic whole-brain segmentation yielded volumes of MY, BPV, BPF, ICV, MYF, GM, and Non-GM/WM/CSF in all subjects. The colored myelin-correlated compound (MyC), GM, and WM quantification maps were displayed. The segmented tissue properties were overlaid on the synthetic (Sy) T2W sequence. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on an image set and then copied to the contralateral side with the ‘mirror copy’ option available in the SyMRI Diagnostic Software Version 11.2.

First, the ROIs ranging from 0.2 ml – 0.6 ml were drawn from the right (R) and left (L) globus pallidum (GP), caudate nucleus (CN), internal capsule (IC), putamen, thalamus, and also from the center of the pons, and midbrain on the colored myelin maps overlaid on T2WI of SyMRI in patients and HCs (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). T2-lesion-free regions of each centrum semiovale (CS) were selected as ROIs of NABP.

A similar ROI (0.2 ml) was drawn on the subcortical part of the selected tubers and contralateral subcortical NABP on myelin quantification maps overlaid on the FLAIR sequence from the SyMRI technique for quantitative comparison of these structures. The same measurements were repeated for the colored WM and GM quantification maps. Measurements were excluded if the contralateral homologous structure was not free of the lesion (i.e. not NABP). The MyC, WMvol, GMvol, PD, R2, and R1 within ROIs were obtained. Then, those ROIs also yielded MYFvol, WMFvol, and GMFvol, which represented the mean amount of MY, WM, and GM within a single voxel, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables (age, sex) were compared between groups with the Chi-square test. Quantitative variables were tested for normal distribution with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Descriptive statistics were expressed as mean ± standard deviation for variables with normal distribution and median (min–max) for variables without normal distribution. For comparison, independent samples’ t test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used with normally and non-normally distributed variables, respectively. For comparison of continuous variables, the adjusted p-value was obtained by using the Benjamini–Hochberg (FDR) method [16].

The weighted kappa (K) analysis was used to evaluate interobserver agreement for MRI features. The kappa value was interpreted as poor (< 0.20), fair (0.21–0.40), moderate (0.41–0.60), good (0.61–0.80), or very good (0.81–1.00) for agreement. Confidence intervals (95% CI) of the kappa values were used to find possible non-overlapping intervals.

Comparison of the quantification (MYFvol, MyC, GMFvol, GMvol, WMFvol, WMvol, and PD, R2, R1 values) of subcortical part of the tubers and NABP was made by Wilcoxon test. The relationship of continuous and ordinal variables was examined with the Spearman rho correlation coefficient.

Among categorical variables, groups were compared using the Chi-square test. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship of continuous and ordinal variables with each other.

All analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23.0 software and R 3.6.3 program. p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The TSC patients (females/males: 6/4, mean age: 11.8 ± 3.1 (range 7–17) years) and HCs (females/males: 12/6, mean age: 11 ± 3 (range 5–16) years) were similar in terms of sex (p = 0.683) and age (p = 0.507). The demographic features of the TSC patients are given in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Qualitative evaluation

Interobserver agreement for the detection of tubers on SyMRI is given in Table 1. Raters’ detection of tubers on SyMRI showed a very good correlation (k = 0.80 to 0.94), especially in the frontal lobes (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Conventional MRI (cMRI) versus SyMRI for cortical/subcortical tuber detection

Localization of tubers CMRI versus SyMRI (Ob1) CMRI versus SyMRI (Ob2) Interobserver agreement on SyMRI Interobserver agreement on cMRI
Frontal 0.94 0.88 0.86 0.94
Parietal 0.92 0.86 0.84 0.88
Temporal 0.88 0.80 0.80 0.84
Occipital 0.90 0.82 0.84 0.88

Ob: observer, vs: versus

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Synthetic (Sy) T2-weighted (B) and Sy-FLAIR (D) images show cortical/subcortical tubers accurately as on the conventional T2W (A) and FLAIR (C) images

The tubers in TSC patients were located in the frontal (n = 114), parietal (n = 52), temporal (n = 41), and occipital (n = 24) lobes on cMRI (Additional file 1: Table S1). By categorization based on the number of tubers, there were 2 patients in group 1, 3 patients in group 2, 5 patients in group 3. There was no significant correlation between the volumes of WM, GM, CSF, Myelin, Non-WM/GM/CSF, and the tuber groups (p > 0.05).

SyMRI results

Automated whole-brain segmentation showed that the Non-GM/WM/CSF (Non), Non/BPV%, and Non/ICV% were significantly higher, and MY/ICV% and MY/BPV% were significantly lower in the TSC patients (p < 0.05) than HCs, although patients with TSC tended to have lower BPV, ICV, GM, and WM volumes compared to HCs (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of SyMRI parameters of TSC patients and healthy controls

Variables Healthy controls Tuberous sclerosis p-values
Median Min–max Median Min–max
BPV (ml) 1278 1125–1502 1202 1033–1476 .860
ICV (ml) 1400 1235–1599 1399 1176–1629 .705
WM (ml) 378 301–550 398 343–538 .561
GM (ml) 855 707–1012 821 727–996 .820
CSF (ml) 109 75–309 91 66–212 .561
MY (ml) 109 81–138 93 85–113 .118
Non-WM/GM/CSF (ml) 15 7.7–65 20 15–43 .035*
%Non/BPV 1.15 0.6–4.7 1.6 1.1–3.1 .049*
%MY/ICV 7.8 6.4–9.4 6.7 5.9–9 .05*
%MY/BPV 8.7 6.9–10 7.7 6.8–9.7 .035*
%Non/ICV 1.1 0.6–4.3 1.5 1–2.7 .050*
R NABP MyC 28.55 24.8–34.8 25.6 22–30 .035*
R NABP PD 66.9 62.8–69.4 68.9 66–71.2 .023*
L NABP MyCvol 0.18 0.10–0.20 0.16 0.14–0.19 .017*
L NABP MyC 28.5 24.6–32.3 26 23.5–29.9 .001*
L NABP PD 66.9 64–69 68.6 66–70 .001*
R Caudate MyC 7.2 4.5–8.7 5.35 2–7.3 .004*
R Caudate PD 81 79.8–82.7 82.2 80.8–86.7 .005*
L Caudate MyC 5.2 1–8.3 7.2 5.7–10 .004*
L Caudate PD 80.7 79.1–82 81.9 79.5–85.4 .023*
L Thalamus MyCvol 0.07 0.04–0.10 0.055 0.03–0.09 .009*
Pons MyCvol 0.09 0.07–0.12 0.07 0.06–0.09 .000*
Pons MYC 21.85 18–29 16.7 13.6–20.4 .000*
Pons PD 70.95 66.1–74 74.7 69.4–76.7 .002*

Units: MY (ml), R1 and R2 (s-1), BPV (ml), ICV (ml), WM (ml), GM (ml), PD (pu)

*Represents significance is < 0.05

On myelin-colored maps, the MYFvol and MyC values were significantly lower, and PD values were significantly higher in the caudate nucleus, putamen, pons, and both hemispheric NABP in TSC patients compared to HCs (p < 0.05, Table 2).

In patients with TSC, the MYFvol, MyC, WMvol, WMFvol, R2, R1 values were significantly decreased in the subcortical part of the tubers compared to contralateral NABP, on myelin and WM quantification maps (p < 0.001, Additional file 1: Table S2, Fig. 2); however, GMvol, GMFvol, and PD values were significantly increased on the GM quantification map (p < 0.001, Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Images of 10-year-old patients with TSC. Subcortical tuber in the frontal lobe (A, white arrow) is seen on the axial FLAIR image. Myelin maps (B and C) show prominently decreased R1, R2, PD, MyC, and MyCvol values on the left side (B, red ROI) compared with the normal side (C, red ROI). Also, the myelin map does not assign the tuber as green like in other myelinated areas

The observers noticed that cortical/subcortical tubers were automatically labeled on the Non-GM/WM/CSF, and GM quantification maps, but not labeled and calculated on WM and myelin quantification maps (Fig. 3 & Additional file 1: Fig S2). Also, the centrum of the subependymal nodules was automatically labeled as WM and the peripheral part of the subependymal nodules was labeled as myelin and GM on the corresponding quantification maps (Fig. 3 & Additional file 1: Fig. S2).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Myelin (A, B), WM (C), and GM (D) segmentation maps of a TSC patient. The subcortical part of the tuber on the right parietal white matter (A, red ROI) shows prominently decreased R1, R2, PD, MyC, and MyCvol values compared to the normal right side (B, red ROI). WM map (C) does not mark the subcortical tubers as WM. However, GM map (D) marks the subcortical tubers as GM

Discussion

This study reports the first qualitative and quantitative imaging analysis of TSC patients with SyMRI. We found significantly higher Non-GM/WM/CSF (Non), Non/BPV%, Non/ICV%, and lower MY/ICV%, MY/BPV% values, and alterations in myelin. Patients with TSC tended to have lower BPV, ICV, GM, and WM than HCs in our study, similar to previously reported by Riddler et al. who demonstrated significant GM alterations in basal ganglia, thalamus, and decreased WM volumes in TSC patients using computational morphometry by automated anatomical labeling [17]. By our exclusion criteria, we avoided the possible incremental effects of SEGA in this study. Therefore, our morphometric findings may more accurately reflect morphological abnormalities by the disease itself in TSC.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is another technique that can demonstrate microstructural tissue changes in certain diseases [18, 19]. Elevated apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and reduced fractional anisotropy (FA) throughout the WM tracts suggested alterations in the integrity of WM in TSC. Regarding the NABP in TSC, some studies showed the higher mean diffusivity (MD) and the lower FA values in the supratentorial NABP and perituberal WM in patients with TSC [20, 21]. Our results were similar to these DTI findings, showing that all values except PD were significantly decreased in the subcortical part of tubers and NABP on myelin quantification maps using SyMRI, in TSC patients. These findings may point to underlying myelin and/or axonal structural changes, similar to the studies conducted in MS, and neurofibromatosis type-1 patients [13, 22, 23], and also may explain the global neurocognitive deficits in TSC patients [6].

Histopathological studies reported increased heterotopic and dysplastic neurons with extensive astrocyte pathology in tubers and perituberal tissue [24, 25]. A study of histopathological correlation of TSC with DTI study showed that reduced FA and increased MD in the perituberal WM corresponded to reduced myelin in dysplastic tissue [26] alike to the previous rodent models [27, 28]. Validation of myelin values obtained by SyMRI was proved by good correlations with histological specimens [29] and other myelin measurement methods in healthy subjects [30]. Also, measurement of myelin with SyMRI was supported with Magnetization Transfer Saturation Index and with postmortem brain studies [30]. A prominent reduction in myelin content of NABP in TSC has also been shown herein, although the effects of astrocytosis or neuronal ectopia are not known because of lacking histopathological correlation. Correlative investigations of histological changes in myelin with SyMRI may shed light on actual histopathological contributions to these quantitative changes. Moreover, given that use of mTORC inhibitors changed the DTI metrics [31, 32] in WM, there is also a possible role for SyMRI in the follow-up of response to treatment in these patients.

Patients with TSC are likely to develop SEGA in up to 20% of TSC patients. Patients who have a SEGA may initially have no signs or symptoms of having a brain tumor, but only have symptoms when the tumor grows large enough to obstruct the CSF flow. In regard to SEGA, these children should undergo regular follow-up brain MRIs until approximately the age of 25 years after when the intervals can be extended under stable conditions [5]. Brain MRI every 1–3 years was also recommended by the 2012 International TSC Consensus Conference [5]. However, long acquisition times pose a challenge in imaging these patients due to accompanying cognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders. With SyMRI, shorter scan times are possible after the baseline cMRI examination, as we already pointed out in our previous work on NF-1 [13]. Automatically segmented volume calculations of the brain and quantitative data obtained with SyMRI could also be very promising and useful in follow-up comparisons. The obtained Non-GM/WM/CSF volume and percentage data may specifically provide a quantitative comparison of a load of subependymal nodules and cortical/subcortical tubers in patients' follow-up.

We performed this study using 2D Synthetic MRI due to the timing of this study; however, with recent developments a 3D imaging would give additional quantitative information such as regional cortical thickness and subcortical volumes, which showed good agreement with 3D synthetic T1-weighted images showed good agreement in conventional T1-weighted images [33, 34].

Several limitations exist in our study. First, this was a single-center feasibility study with relatively small sample size. This comes from the inclusion criteria of the patient group. We included only pediatric patients who did not require sedation in the MRI unit. Second, because the use of SyMRI was performed in a limited number of pediatric patients, we could not evaluate possible age effects on brain morphometry. We did not compare the SyMRI and conventional techniques for T1, T2 mapping because our protocol was limited to conventional sequences we used in the routine clinical practice. Neither correlations of volume measures with neuropsychological performance nor quantitative findings with histopathological abnormalities are available in this study due to pandemic situations that limited medical or surgical interventions.

Conclusion

SyMRI provides quantitative information in patients with TSC reflecting changes in morphometry and tissue properties. Thus, SyMRI offers a promising tool by quantification of brain tissue and revealing multi-contrast sequences in a single acquisition with a reasonable scan time, especially in young children.

Supplementary Information

13244_2022_1219_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13.1KB, docx)

Additional file 1. Supplementary Table 1. Demographic features of TSC patients and number of cortical/subcortical tubers according to localization on cMRI.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ali Avci at Siemens Healthcare and the Synthetic MRI team for their advice regarding the technical background of QRAPMASTER sequence and its postprocessing steps. We also thank enrollees and their parents for participating.

Abbreviations

AT

Acquisition time

BG

Basal ganglia

BPV

Brain parenchymal volume

cMRI

Conventional MRI

CSF

Cerebrospinal fluid

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

GM

Gray matter

GMFvol

The mean amount of GM within a single voxel

GP

Globus pallidum

HC

Healthy control

ICV

Intracranial volume

mTORC

Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 

MY

Myelin

MyC

Myelin-correlated compound volume

MyCvol

Myelin-correlated fraction volume

MYF

Myelin fraction (MY/BPV)

NABP

Normal-appearing brain parenchyma

PD

Proton density

R1

Longitudinal relaxation rate

R2

Transverse relaxation rate

SEGA

Subependymal giant cell astrocytomas

Sy

Synthetic

SyMRI

Synthetic MRI

TSC

Tuberous sclerosis complex

WM

White matter

WMFvol

The mean amount of WM within a single voxel

Author contributions

GC analyzed and interpreted the patient data and prepared the manuscript. GC, EG, KKO, and SP performed the literature research. GC and JK interpreted the patient data. GC, KKO, BA, BK, and DY edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The data are included in this publication.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained (#KA-180135). Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects (patients) in this study.

Consent for publication

All authors consent to the publication of this work.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Osborne JP, Fryer A, Webb D. Epidemiology of tuberous sclerosis. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1991;615:125–127. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb37754.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ess KC. The neurobiology of tuberous sclerosis complex. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2006;13(1):37–42. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2006.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Curatolo P, Verdecchia M, Bombardieri R. Tuberous sclerosis complex: a review of neurological aspects. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2002;6(1):15–23. doi: 10.1053/ejpn.2001.0538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kalantari BN, Salamon N. Neuroimaging of tuberous sclerosis: spectrum of pathologic findings and frontiers in imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:304–309. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.2928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krueger DA, Northrup H. International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Group. Tuberous sclerosis complex surveillance and management: recommendations of the 2012 International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Consensus Conference. Pediatr Neurol. 2013;49(4):255–265. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2013.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arulrajah S, Ertan G, Jordan L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging of normal-appearing white matter in children and young adults with tuberous sclerosis complex. Neuroradiology. 2009;51(11):781–786. doi: 10.1007/s00234-009-0563-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Warntjes JBM, Dahlqvist Leinhard O, West J, Lundberg P. Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(2):320–329. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Krauss W, Gunnarsson M, Andersson T. Accuracy and reproducibility of a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging method for concurrent measurements of tissue relaxation times and proton density. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(5):584–591. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2015.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hagiwara XA, Hori XM, Yokoyama XK, et al. Utility of a multiparametric quantitative mri model that assesses myelin and edema for evaluating plaques, periplaque white matter, and normal-appearing white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis: a feasibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(2):237–242. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Andica C, Hagiwara A, Nakazawa M, et al. The advantage of synthetic MRI for the visualization of early white matter change in an infant with sturge-weber syndrome. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2016;15(4):347–348. doi: 10.2463/mrms.ci.2015-0164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Virhammar XJ, Warntjes XM, Laurell XK, Larsson E-M. ADULT BRAIN quantitative MRI for rapid and user-independent monitoring of intracranial CSF volume in hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;37(5):797–801. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krauss W, Gunnarsson M, Nilsson M, Se WK. Conventional and synthetic MRI in multiple sclerosis: a comparative study. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:1692–1700. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5100-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Coban G, Parlak S, Gumeler E, et al. Synthetic MRI in Neurofibromatosis Type 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Andica C, Hagiwara A, Hori M, et al. Automated brain tissue and myelin volumetry based on quantitative MR imaging with various in-plane resolutions. J Neuroradiol. 2018;45(3):164–168. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Warntjes M, Engström M, Tisell A, Lundberg P. Modeling the presence of myelin and edema in the brain based on multi-parametric quantitative MRI. Ront Neurol. 2016;17(7):16. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc B. 1995;57:289–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ridler K, Suckling J, Higgings NJ, et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of memory deficits in Tuberous Sclerosis complex. Cereb Cortex. 2007;17(2):261–271. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Song SK, Sun SW, Ramsbottom MJ, Chang C, Russell J, Cross AH. Dysmyelination revealed through MRI as increased radial (but unchanged axial) diffusion of water. Neuroimage. 2002;17(3):1429–1436. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zamboni SL, Loenneker T, Boltshauser E, Martin E, Il'yasov KA. Contribution of diffusion tensor MR imaging in detecting cerebral microstructural changes in adults with neurofibromatosis type 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(4):773–776. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Garaci FG, Floris R, Bozzao A, et al. Increased brain apparent diffusion coefficient in tuberous sclerosis. Radiology. 2004;232:461–465. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2322030198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Karadag D, Mentzel HJ, Güllmar D, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in children and adolescents with tuberous sclerosis. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:980–983. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-1504-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.West J, Aalto A, Tisell A, et al. Normal appearing and diffusely abnormal white matter in patients with multiple sclerosis assessed with quantitative MR. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saccenti L, Hagiwara A, Andica C, et al. Myelin measurement using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a correlation study comparing various imaging techniques in patients with multiple sclerosis. Cells. 2020;9(2):393. doi: 10.3390/cells9020393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wong M, Crino PB. Tuberous sclerosis and epilepsy: role of astrocytes. Glia. 2012;60:1244–1250. doi: 10.1002/glia.22326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mühlebner A, van Scheppingen J, de Neef A, et al. Myelin pathology beyond white matter in tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) cortical tubers. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2020;79(10):1054–1064. doi: 10.1093/jnen/nlaa090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Peters JM, Struyven RR, Prohl AK, et al. White matter mean diffusivity correlates with myelination in tuberous sclerosis complex. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(7):1178–1190. doi: 10.1002/acn3.793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carson RP, Kelm ND, West KL, et al. Hypomyelination following the deletion of Tsc2 in oligodendrocyte precursors. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2:1041–1054. doi: 10.1002/acn3.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Meikle L, Talos DM, Onda H, et al. A mouse model of tuberous sclerosis: neuronal loss of Tsc1 causes dysplastic and ectopic neurons, reduced myelination, seizure activity, and limited survival. J Neurosci. 2007;27:5546–5558. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5540-06.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Warntjes JBM, Persson A, Berge J, Zech W. Myelin detection using rapid quantitative MR imaging correlated to macroscopically registered luxol fast blue-stained brain specimens. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:1096–1102. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hagiwara A, Hori M, Kamagata K, et al. Myelin measurement: comparison between simultaneous tissue relaxometry, magnetization transfer saturation index and T1w/T2w ratio methods. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28852-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Carson RP, Kelm ND, West KL, et al. Hypomyelination following deletion of Tsc2 in oligodendrocyte precursors. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2:1041–1054. doi: 10.1002/acn3.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Peters JM, Prohl A, Kapur K, et al. Longitudinal effects of everolimus on white matter diffusion in tuberous sclerosis complex. Pediatr Neurol. 2019;90:24–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2018.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fujita S, Hagiwara A, Hori M, et al. 3D quantitative synthetic MRI-derived cortical thickness and subcortical brain volumes: Scan-rescan repeatability and comparison with conventional T(1) -weighted images. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(6):1834–1842. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Fujita S, Yokoyama K, Hagiwara A, et al. 3D quantitative synthetic MRI in the evaluation of multiple sclerosis lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42(3):471–478. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

13244_2022_1219_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13.1KB, docx)

Additional file 1. Supplementary Table 1. Demographic features of TSC patients and number of cortical/subcortical tubers according to localization on cMRI.

Data Availability Statement

The data are included in this publication.


Articles from Insights into Imaging are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES