Skip to main content
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2022 Jun 24;10:921354. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.921354

Two-Photon Absorption: An Open Door to the NIR-II Biological Window?

Paige A Shaw 1, Ewan Forsyth 1, Fizza Haseeb 1, Shufan Yang 1, Mark Bradley 1, Maxime Klausen 1,*
PMCID: PMC9263132  PMID: 35815206

Abstract

The way in which photons travel through biological tissues and subsequently become scattered or absorbed is a key limitation for traditional optical medical imaging techniques using visible light. In contrast, near-infrared wavelengths, in particular those above 1000 nm, penetrate deeper in tissues and undergo less scattering and cause less photo-damage, which describes the so-called “second biological transparency window”. Unfortunately, current dyes and imaging probes have severely limited absorption profiles at such long wavelengths, and molecular engineering of novel NIR-II dyes can be a tedious and unpredictable process, which limits access to this optical window and impedes further developments. Two-photon (2P) absorption not only provides convenient access to this window by doubling the absorption wavelength of dyes, but also increases the possible resolution. This review aims to provide an update on the available 2P instrumentation and 2P luminescent materials available for optical imaging in the NIR-II window.

Keywords: two-photon absorption, infrared dyes, fluorescent imaging, near-infrared II, two-photon microscopy, tissue penetration, pulsed lasers

1 Introduction

Optical molecular imaging (OMI) technologies such as fluorescence imaging, Raman imaging, and optical coherence tomography, have emerged as safe and non-invasive tools to screen and monitor and diagnose disease in real-time, and follow treatment progress (Nicolson et al., 2021; Cao et al., 2019). Fluorescence-based OMI offers the ability to investigate biological systems with high spatio-temporal resolution and is now commonly applied to allow bio-molecular detection, drug distribution monitoring, image-guided surgery, and clinical diagnosis and therapy (Diao et al., 2015). The majority of in vivo fluorescence imaging approaches are performed using visible (400 nm–700 nm) and near-infrared I (NIR-I, 700 nm–900 nm) light due to the availability of light sources and detectors operating in this regime. However, the optical properties of tissues in this range of wavelengths intrinsically generate two challenges: a loss of signal due to poor penetration of light, and a low signal to background ratio (SBR) resulting from tissue auto-fluorescence (Zhang et al., 2016). The poor penetration of light in vivo arises due to the strong attenuation coefficients of tissue components, which causes photons to be scattered or absorbed by endogenous chromophores as they travel through tissues (Figure 1) (Keiser and Keiser, 2016). Tissue auto-fluorescence also represents a major limitation when imaging at shorter wavelengths. This loss in signal along with low SBR both contribute to the reduction in the resolution of the output image with increased depth, thereby limiting the optical imaging to micrometre depths.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Absorption and scattering coefficients of endogenous chromophores, tissues, and water over the visible and SWIR wavelengths (200–2000 nm). The downwards arrows represent the tissue penetration of light at these wavelengths, according to the values reported for human skin in ref. (Bashkatov et al., 2005). Dashed, dotted and solid outlines on penetration arrows represent the increase in imaging resolution with increased wavelengths. Adapted from values reported in ref (Jacques, 2015). and references therein.

Favorably, the spectral properties of biological tissues are strongly wavelength-dependent, which opens two windows of “biological optical transparency” that enable higher resolution fluorescence imaging (Nicolson et al., 2021; Cao et al., 2019; Sordillo et al., 2014a; Kenry et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2021; Hassan and Klaunberg, 2004; Li and Wang, 2018). Firstly, the absorption coefficients of tissue components such as whole blood (oxygenated HbO2 or deoxygenated Hb), or fat (Figure 1) strongly decrease when reaching red/NIR wavelengths, which constitutes a first “NIR-I″ transparency window (Bashkatov et al., 2005). Secondly, and more significantly, as the scattering coefficient of light is inversely proportional to the fourth power of its wavelength, photons of even longer wavelengths are more likely to continue on their intended linear trajectory rather than being scattered away due to their interactions within the tissue (Sordillo et al., 2014a; Wang et al., 2020a; Lockwood and Luo, 2016). For this reason, the use of low-energy light in the so-called “near-infrared II” (NIR-II) window (1000 nm–2000 nm), also known as the short-wave infrared region (SWIR), can not only help achieve higher penetration in biological tissue (Figure 1), but also aid in enhanced spatio-temporal resolution at fixed tissue depths, as well as reduce risks of photo-toxicity (Wang et al., 2020a; Ding et al., 2018). Moreover, tissue auto-fluorescence generated by endogenous molecules such as flavins, NADH, porphyrins, and collagens decreases significantly at longer wavelengths where these fluorophores do not absorb. Substantially diminished background auto-fluorescence is observed with NIR-II excitation, especially at wavelengths greater than 1500 nm; with this reduction in auto-fluorescence contributing to enhanced spatio-temporal resolution and fidelity in 3D images (Li and Wang, 2018; Ding et al., 2018; Tian et al., 2020). The NIR-II window can be further sub-divided into two wavelength ranges spanning across a peak in water absorption at 1450 nm (Figure 1), i.e. the NIR-IIa (1000–1400 nm), and the NIR-IIb (1500–1800 nm) (Ma et al., 2021a; Feng et al., 2021). In spite of a higher endogenous absorption re-emerging at such wavelengths, several studies have revealed that the higher absorption coefficient of water can be beneficial in depleting the amount of scattered photons, thereby allowing “ballistic” photons to travel deeper into the tissue. This effect is known as “absorption-induced resolution enhancement” and can therefore produce clearer fluorescence images (Yoo et al., 1991; Sordillo et al., 2014b; Carr et al., 2018a; Feng et al., 2021).

The advancement from the NIR-I to the NIR-II optical window in fluorescence imaging has been facilitated by the development of NIR-II-absorbing probes suitable for biological imaging and by the increased availability of photodetectors sensitive enough in this spectral range (Hong et al., 2017). Currently, a variety of NIR-II imaging probes, including single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), quantum dots (QDs), rare-earth doped nanoparticles (NPs), organic dyes, and semiconductor polymer NPs have been reported but these often have poor water solubility and limited physiological stability. Most significantly, as emitted photons are of lower energy than standard single-photon (1P) excitation, NIR-II-emitting fluorophores usually suffer from poor emission quantum yields (Φf). Risks are also associated with the use of inorganic nano-systems including possible toxicity and lack of tissue specificity (Ding et al., 2018; Cao et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021a; Chen et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). The specific design of NIR-II-absorbing organic probes for bio-imaging has become a key challenge in the discipline, involving the multi-step synthesis of bulky water insoluble structures which often require complex purification (Sordillo et al., 2014a; Hong et al., 2017; Wanderi and Cui, 2022). On the other hand, a number of visible and NIR-I-absorbing fluorophores exhibiting high quantum yields are commercially available, and have the ability to target a wide range of biological substrates (Carr et al., 2018b). Such dyes are comparatively easy to synthesise and are routinely used for bio-imaging using one-photon absorption (1PA) (Escobedo et al., 2010). The use of two-photon (2P) fluorescence microscopy can facilitate the imaging in the NIR-II window by targeting 1P-absorbing visible/NIR-I dyes but with the added advantage of deep tissue penetration, exceptional feature clarity and high SBR (Carr et al., 2018b).

First predicted theoretically by Maria Göppert-Mayer in 1929 (Göppert, 1929; Göppert-Mayer, 1931), 2P absorption (2PA) is a third-order, resonant non-linear optical (NLO) process (Vivas et al., 2018; Ewart and Guenther, 2005) using the combined energy of two photons to generate an electronic transition from the ground state (S0) to a singlet excited state (S n ) (Figure 2, left) (He et al., 2008; Pawlicki et al., 2009; Klausen and Blanchard-Desce, 2021; Pascal et al., 2021). Contrary to 1P excitation (1PE), 2P excitation (2PE) therefore requires near-simultaneous absorption of two photons of the same frequency ν (degenerate 2PA) or different frequencies ν1 and ν2 (non-degenerate 2PA). The excitation occurs as a two-step process, firstly involving a transition to a short-lived (sub-femtosecond) non-resonant excited state, called the “virtual state” (dashed line, Figure 2, left). Assuming that each chromophore is exposed to the same laser cross-section, photons must arrive on the attosecond timescale to further promote electron excitation to a singlet excited state. Furthermore, as with all non-linear processes, the relationship between the excitation light intensity and fluorescence intensity is non-linear (quadratic) and therefore excitation can only occur when the photon flux of the excitation light is in the range of 1020–1030 photons/(cm2·s) (Ewart and Guenther, 2005). This high energy density can be achieved by using an ultra-short (∼100 fs) pulsed (∼80 MHz) laser system (Ávila et al., 2019). In such non-linear conditions, the capacity of a dye to absorb 2P light differs from standard 1PE. The 2PA capacity of a dye is defined as its 2PA cross-section (e.g. the effective “photon-catching area” of the molecule), noted as σ2 and expressed in Göppert–Mayer unit (1 GM = 10–50 cm4·s·photon−1), as a tribute to Maria Göppert-Mayer’s work (He et al., 2008; Pawlicki et al., 2009; Klausen and Blanchard-Desce, 2021; Pascal et al., 2021).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(Left) Simplified Jablonski diagram illustrating the double-photon absorption and single-photon emission involved in 1PA vs. 2PA excitation (Middle) Demonstrates the quadratic excitation that arises in 2PA vs. 1PA, due to the requirement of two photons having to arrive simultaneously at a sample to result in excitation (Right) The resulting tissue is capable of producing fluorescence emission due to the location of the excitation photons in 2PA vs. 1PA, resulting in more focused, high-resolution images in 2PA fluorescence imaging.

After excitation and internal conversion, the electron relaxes to the lowest singlet excited state (Kasha’s rule), from where all radiative and non-radiative decays occur, regardless of the type of excitation. With regards to biomedical imaging applications, this is essential, as the fluorescence generated (emission wavelength and efficiency) during radiative decay is the same after either 1PE or 2PE (Denk et al., 1990; Ewart and Guenther, 2005; Benninger and Piston, 2013). The efficiency of the radiative decay process is quantified by the fluorescence quantum yield Φf, representing the number of photons emitted per photon absorbed. In microscopy applications, the overall brightness of a fluorescent imaging agent at a given wavelength is therefore defined as the product of its absorption capacity (ε(λ) in 1PA, or σ2 (λ) in 2PA) and its emission quantum yield Φf. In 2P applications, the 2P brightness σ2Φf thus allows direct comparison between fluorophores (Kim and Cho, 2015).

Further adding to the imaging benefits, as the quadratic nature of the 2P process confines the excitation to a femtoliter-sized volume where the light intensity is the highest, 2PE avoids photon absorption and fluorescence both above and below the focal point (Figure 2, middle and right). As the fluorescence only originates from the focal point without out-of-focus emission of light, 2P microscopy provides inherent “confocality”, which allows high-resolution and high contrast imaging of thick living samples (Denk et al., 1990; Piston, 2005). This also prevents extensive photo-bleaching and photo-toxicity in live samples (Looney et al., 2011; Lu et al., 2020). Thanks to such unparalleled advantages over linear 1PE, 2PA has not only been extensively employed in bio-imaging and cell signal monitoring (Benninger and Piston, 2013; Kim and Cho, 2015; Kucikas et al., 2021; Helmchen and Denk, 2005; Ricard et al., 2018), but also in photodynamic therapy (PDT) (Sun et al., 2017a) and drug delivery (Klausen and Blanchard-Desce, 2021). In the context of NIR-II bio-imaging in particular, 2PE provides alternative solutions to the challenges met with standard 1PE. While the development of 1P-absorbing NIR-II-emitting OMI probes intrinsically leads to a high loss in brightness, 2PA directly exploits the emissive properties of 1P dyes at shorter wavelengths, which circumvents any loss of fluorescence quantum yield. The detection of fluorescence is also maximized with the use of common visible/NIR detectors with high sensitivities compared to their NIR-II counterparts, and by the increased distance between excitation and emission wavelengths preventing loss of signal due to spectral overlap. In addition, while standard single-photon confocal can only image samples of up to 200 μm in thickness, 2P microscopy improves imaging penetration depth by at least 2-fold relative to confocal imaging (Wang et al., 2017; Rubart, 2004). Several studies have also shown improved biocompatibility of 2P imaging as compared to 1P confocal imaging (Wokosin et al., 1996a). Squirrel et al. demonstrated that 8h of confocal imaging at 514 nm resulted in the inhibition of hamster embryo development (Squirrell et al., 1999), even without staining. In contrast, embryo viability was maintained when imaged using a 1047 nm ultrashort pulsed laser with the same microscope system for a 24-hour period. Importantly, similar experiments have also demonstrated that even NIR-I femtosecond irradiation could impair cell division at low power, and even lead to complete cell destruction (König et al., 1997). Therefore, the development of 2P microscopy in the NIR-II optical window represents an opportunity for higher-resolution and safer cellular imaging and would also facilitate a wider range of biological imaging applications such as image-guided surgery, diagnostics, gene expression monitoring, and chemical sensing (Figure 3). Such advanced applications have not yet been fully explored in vivo with NIR-II 2PA, but have shown great promise in ex vivo examples or utilizing shorter wavelengths for 2PE (Paoli et al., 2009; Grienberger and Konnerth, 2012; Cao et al., 2013; Fan et al., 2018).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Overview of fluorophore categories and potential biomedical applications with 2PA NIR-II imaging.

In order to visualise, characterise and quantify biological entities, bright molecular imaging probes are needed (Yang et al., 2020a). To generate bright 2P microscopy images without causing considerable photo-damage to the sample at laser intensities required (1 GW·cm−2 at the focal plane; or ∼5 mW at the objective lens), it is estimated that the 2P brightness σ2Φf of the imaging agent should be more than 50 GM (Kim and Cho, 2015; Osmialowski et al., 2020). As such, breaking down the barriers to exploit NIR-II wavelengths in 2P bio-imaging involves three main challenges: (i) shifting the 2PA band of the imaging agent beyond 1000 nm, which typically involves 1PA above 500 nm; (ii) improving the 2PA cross-section σ2 above this wavelength, typically to values >50–100 GM; and (iii) retaining a high enough fluorescence quantum yield Φf to image tissues with high contrast. High water solubility, in vivo- and photo-stability, target specificity, and low toxicity are other general key criteria to develop ideal, clinically translatable OMI probes (Kim and Cho, 2015; Yang et al., 2020a; Rao et al., 2007; Yao and Belfield, 20122012). Small organic fluorophores (Wang et al., 2020a; Wu et al., 2022), aggregation induced emission (AIE) dyes (Lu et al., 2020; Zhu et al., 2018), inorganic and hybrid nanomaterials (Yao et al., 2014) and fluorescent proteins (FPs) are key types of materials that have been used in the development of OMI probes to date, and have shown high potential in the field of 2P in the NIR-II region (Figure 3). NIR-II-absorbing 2P-responsive dyes find applications in several additional areas beyond the scope of this review, such as optical power limiting (Pascal et al., 2021), chemical and ion sensing (Ricard et al., 2018), or targeted photo-therapies (Sun et al., 2017a; Zhao et al., 2019). In this review, we aim to present the current state of available luminescent 2P probes in a biological imaging and microscopy context, and highlight the recent progress and tremendous potential in this field. In the first subsection, we present the different classes of materials available for such applications and summarise their key optical properties in Table 1. We then present the available pulsed excitation sources used for such applications and discuss examples of 2P in vivo imaging in this “second optical window” by exploring imaging and lasing systems (Table 2), and tissue penetration depths (Table 3).

TABLE 1.

1PA, 2PA and emission properties of NIR-II chromophores reported in literature. Solvent and method of 2P properties are also noted for comparison.

Probe Chemical structure Solvent λ1PA max λem max Φf 1PA max λ2PA σ2 (λ) σ2 (λ)Φf Ref.
(nm) (nm) (nm) (nm) (GM) a (GM) a
Xanthenes
 Disodium fluorescein (1) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx1.jpg pH11 497 518 c 0.90 c 994 1000 2.7 2.4 b (Makarov et al., 2008; Mütze et al., 2012)
 PhenGreen FL (diacetate, uncomplexed) (2) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx2.jpg PBS 492 c 517 c 0.80 c 984 1074 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002)
 Rhodamine 6G (3) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx3.jpg MeOH 519 c 546 c 0.95 c 1038 1060 10 9.5 b (Makarov et al., 2008)
 Rhodamine B (4) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx4.jpg MeOH 553 c 627 c 0.70 c 1106 1040 39 27 b Makarov et al., 2008
 Rhodamine 101 (5) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx5.jpg EtOH 570 c 591 c 1.0 c 1140 1060 20 20 b (Li and She, 2010; Mütze et al., 2012)
 Rhodamine 123 (6) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx6.jpg PBS 507 529 c 0.90 c (EtOH) 1014 1090 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002)
 Alexa Fluor 488 (7) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx7.jpg NaPhos 491 519 c 0.92 c 980 1000 21 b 19 (Bestvater et al., 2002; Anderson and Webb, 2011; Mütze et al., 2012)
 Alexa Fluor 546 (8) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx8.jpg PBS 553 573 c 0.79 c 1112 1028 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002; Mütze et al., 2012)
 Alexa Fluor 568 (9) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx9.jpg PBS 578 c 603 c 0.69 c 1156 1060 n.d. n.d. (Mütze et al., 2012)
 Alexa Fluor 594 (10) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx10.jpg PBS 594 c 617 c 0.66 c 1180 1074 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002; Mütze et al., 2012)
 Alexa Fluor 610 (11) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx11.jpg PBS 612 c 628 c 1224 1010 n.d. n.d. (Mütze et al., 2012)
 Alexa Fluor 633 (12) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx12.jpg H2O 632 c 647 c 1264 1260 n.d. <5 (Kobat et al., 2009; Mütze et al., 2012)
 MitoTracker Red (13) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx13.jpg PBS 579 c 599 c 0.15 [187] 1158 1133 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002)
 CellTracker Red (14) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx14.jpg In vitro 585 c 602 c n.d. 1170 1080 n.d. n.d. (Rakhymzhan et al., 2017)
 Lissamine Rhodamine-IgG (15) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx15.jpg PBS 570 c 590 c 0.33 [188] 1140 1116 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002)
 Texas Red-IgG (16) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx16.jpg PBS 596 c 615 c 0.90 c 1192 1150 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002)
 ATTO 680 (17) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx17.jpg In vitro 681 c 698 c 0.30 c 1362 1260 n.d. n.d. (Rakhymzhan et al., 2017)
 Nile Red (18) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx18.jpg MeOH 550 636 0.40 1100 1057 104 42 (Hornum et al., 2020)
19 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx19.jpg MeOH 554 631 0.43 1108 1055 183 79 (Hornum et al., 2020)
20 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx20.jpg MeOH 569 632 0.45 1065 1050 123 55 (Hornum et al., 2020)
21 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx21.jpg MeOH 565 638 0.35 1130 1057 232 81 (Hornum et al., 2020)
Polymethines
 Cy3-IgG (22) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx22.jpg PBS 548 c 563 c 0.1 c 1096 1032 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002)
 Cy5 (23) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx23.jpg H2O 646 c 662 c 0.28 c 1292 1220 143 b ≈40 (Kobat et al., 2009)
 Cy5.5 (24) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx24.jpg H2O 673 c 691 c 0.21 c 1346 1280 286 b ≈60 (Kobat et al., 2009)
 Cy7 (25) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx25.jpg H2O 750 c 773 c 0.30 c 1500 1320 200 b ≈60 (Kobat et al., 2009)
26 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx26.jpg DMSO 753 780 0.17 1506 1552 240 41 b (Berezin et al., 2011)
 ICG (27) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx27.jpg DMSO 794 817 0.12 1588 1552 590 71 b (Berezin et al., 2011)
 Cypate (28) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx28.jpg DMSO 796 817 0.13 1592 1552 520 68 b (Berezin et al., 2011)
29 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx29.jpg DMSO 809 829 0.07 1618 1552 900 63 b (Berezin et al., 2011)
 DTTC (30) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx30.jpg DMSO 771 c 800 c 0.80 c 1542 1552 160 128 b (Berezin et al., 2011)
 DODCI (31) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx31.jpg EtOH 582 c 610 c 0.87 c (DMSO) 1164 1060 38 n.d. (Li and She, 2010)
 IR-140 (32) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx32.jpg DMSO 825 ≈840 0.06 1640 1552 950 57 b (Berezin et al., 2011)
33 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx33.jpg CH2Cl2 1064 ≈1080 0.05 2128 1800 2250 113 b (Hu et al., 2013)
CH3CN 1043 ≈1065 0.05 2086 1800 1050 53 b
34 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx34.jpg EtOH 650 665 n.d. 1300 1180 140 n.d. (Fu et al., 2007)
35 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx35.jpg EtOH 690 704 n.d. 1380 1260 150 n.d. (Fu et al., 2007)
36 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx36.jpg EtOH 770 n.d. n.d. 1540 1340 60 n.d. (Fu et al., 2007)
37 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx37.jpg EtOH 824 n.d. n.d. 1648 1480 600 n.d. (Fu et al., 2007)
 Alexa Fluor 647 (38) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx38.jpg H2O 650 c 665 c 0.33 c 1300 1240 133 b ≈44 (Kobat et al., 2009; Mütze et al., 2012)
 Alexa Fluor 680 (39) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx39.jpg H2O 679 c 702 c 0.36 c 1358 1280 203 b ≈73 (Kobat et al., 2009)
 Alexa Fluor 700 (40) d H2O 702 c 723 c 0.25 c 1404 1320 208 b ≈52 (Kobat et al., 2009)
 Alexa Fluor 750 (41) d H2O 753 c 778 c 0.12 c 1506 1320 292 b ≈35 (Kobat et al., 2009)
42 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx40.jpg MeOH 532 636 0.44 1064 1064 (900) 23 (570) 10 b (Pascal et al., 2017)
43 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx41.jpg MeOH 573 708 0.33 1146 1146 225 74 b (Pascal et al., 2017)
44 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx42.jpg MeOH 549 673 0.54 1098 1098 137 74 b (Pascal et al., 2017)
45 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx43.jpg Toluene 643 654 0.62 1286 1198 133 82 b (Ceymann et al., 2016)
46 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx44.jpg Toluene 700 714 0.75 1400 1274 100 75 b (Ceymann et al., 2016)
 Styryl 9M (47) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx45.jpg CHCl3 ≈625 ≈790 0.10 [189] ≈1250 1240 780 78 (Makarov et al., 2008)
 FM4-64 (48) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx46.jpg PBS
CHCl3 (López-Duarte et al., 2015)
471
564
691
761
n.d.
0.35
942
1128
1047 n.d. n.d. (Wokosin et al., 1996a; Nuriya et al., 2016)
 TO-PRO-3 (49) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx47.jpg H2O 641 c 657 c n.d. 1284 1110 n.d. n.d. (Smith et al., 2012)
50 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx48.jpg THF 562 598 0.07 1124 1070 167 12 b (Poronik et al., 2012)
51 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx49.jpg THF 615 655 0.02 1230 1150 214 4 b (Poronik et al., 2012)
Porphyrins
52 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx50.jpg CCl4 ≈770 ≈780 n.d. ≈1540 1020
1270
470
48
n.d. (Makarov et al., 2008)
53 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx51.jpg CCl4 ≈685 ≈700 n.d. ≈1370 1270 13 n.d. (Makarov et al., 2008)
54 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx52.jpg CHCl3 ≈525
≈605
≈680
710 n.d. ≈1050
≈1210
≈1360
≈1040
≈1220
≈1360
≈2000
≈500
≈200
n.d. (Nowak-Król et al., 2013)
BODIPYs
 LysoTracker Red (55) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx53.jpg PBS 577 c 590 c 0.07 1154 1100 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002)
 BODIPY-TR (56) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx54.jpg MOPS 589 c 616 c 0.90 c 1178 1060 269 b 242 (Bestvater et al., 2002; Mütze et al., 2012)
 IR-07 (57) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx55.jpg CH2Cl2 ∼700 750 0.30 ∼1400 1310 101 30 b (Zheng et al., 2009)
58 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx56.jpg THF 755 830 0.09 1560 1064 n.d n.d (Hu et al., 2020)
Dipoles – Quadrupoles – Miscellaneous
59 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx57.jpg NPs (Aq.) 480 678 0.17 960 1040 5.6 × 105 9520 (Alifu et al., 2017)
60 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx58.jpg H2O (0.1% DMSO) 530 740 n.d. 1060 1100 n.d. n.d. (Zhou et al., 2021)
61 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx59.jpg H2O 510 676 0.22 1020 1040 440 97 b (Massin et al., 2013)
62 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx60.jpg CH2Cl2 660 785 0.005 1320 1300 500 2.5 b (Ricci et al., 2017)
63 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx61.jpg CH2Cl2 678 782 0.0005 1356 1300 1400 0.7 b (Ricci et al., 2017)
64 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx62.jpg H2O ≈600 ≈725 0.21 ≈1200 1200 1.21 × 103 242 b (Wang et al., 2019b)
65 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx63.jpg CHCl3 634 704 0.16 1268 1250 920 147 b (Li et al., 2012)
66 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx64.jpg CHCl3 668 807 0.02 1336 1250 1200 24 b (Li et al., 2012)
67 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx65.jpg CHCl3 1088 1120 0.002 2176 2200 1300 2.6 b (Ni et al., 2016)
68 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx66.jpg CHCl3 1136 1193 0.0002 2272 2300 1500 0.3 b (Ni et al., 2016)
 Propidium iodide (69) graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx67.jpg PBS 536 c 617 c 0.20 c (dsDNA bound) 1072 1015 n.d. n.d. (Bestvater et al., 2002)
AIEgens and AIEDots
70 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx68.jpg NP (aq.) 613 790-810 0.14 1226 1040
1300
16100
1220
2240 b
170 b
(Qi et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021)
71 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx69.jpg NP (aq.)
THF
454
≈451
≈700
≈699
0.19 n.d. 908 1200 n.d. 76300 n.d. 14500 b n.d. (Wang et al., 2019c)
72 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx70.jpg NP (aq.)
H2O/DMSO
≈479
≈488
≈627
>627
0.06 n.d. ≈960 1040 n.d. 3200 n.d. 192 b n.d. (Samanta et al., 2021)
73 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx71.jpg NP (aq.)
Toluene
510
491
709
≈635
0.14 (solid state) 1020 1000 n.d. ≈520 n.d. 73 b n.d. (Zheng et al., 2018)
74 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx72.jpg NP (aq.)
Toluene
538
528
755
≈636
0.02 (solid state) 1076 1020 n.d. 887 n.d. 18 b n.d. (Zheng et al., 2018)
75 graphic file with name FCHEM_fchem-2022-921354_wc_tfx73.jpg NP (aq.)
THF
522
511
620
532
0.05n.d. 1044 1040 n.d. 2.9 ×106n.d. 1.5 × 105n.d. (Wang et al., 2015)
Carbon, hybrid and inorganic materials
76 SWCNT-based dopamine sensor H2O 600–1000 1000–1265 e 0.0023 1560 216000 497 b (Bonis-O'Donnell et al., 2017)
77 Aptamer-modified graphene oxide H2O 440–720 500–650 f 0.34 1120 36000 12240 b (Pramanik et al., 2014)
78 CDs prepared from urea and citric acid H2O 540 624 0.06 1080 1200 n.d. n.d. (Li et al., 2018)
79 Carbon quantum dots prepared from tris(4-aminophenyl)amine H2O 592 615 0.84 1184 1100 n.d. n.d. (Liu et al., 2020)
80 AuNP with SWCNT H2O 500–1100 775 n.d. 1100 n.d. n.d. (Olesiak-Banska et al., 2019)
81 Au25 cluster H2O 675 830 <0.001 1350 1290 2700 n.d. (Ramakrishna et al., 2008)
82 PEG-dithiolane AuNC H2O 355, 670 820 0.08 1370 1100 300 24 b (Oh et al., 2013)
83 Mn2+-ZnS QD H2O 318 586 0.65 636 1180 265 172 b (Subha et al., 2013)
84 PbS/CdS QD H2O 665 1270 0.18 1330 1550 530 95 b (Ni et al., 2022)
 QD605 (85) polymer-encapsulated CdSe-ZnS QD H2O 350–475 605 0.71 1000 66200 b 47000 (Larson et al., 2003)
Fluorescent proteins
 tdTomato (86) H2O 554 g 581 0.72 b 1108 1050 278 200 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
tdKatushka2 (87) H2O 588 g 633 0.44 b 1176 1100 143 63 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 dsRed2 (88) H2O 561 g 587 0.71 b 1126 1050 103 73 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 HcRFP (89) PBS 592 g 645 g 0.05 g 1184 1160 720 b 36 (Tsai et al., 2006)
 mCherry (90) H2O 587 g 610 0.24 b 1174 1080 27 6.4 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 mBanana (91) H2O 540 g 553 0.69 b 1080 1070 64 44 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
mStrawberry (92) H2O 574 g 596 0.34 b 1148 1070 20 6.8 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 mRFP (93) H2O 584 g 611 0.30 b 1168 1080 44 13 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 TagRFP (94) H2O 555 g 584 0.44 b 1110 1050 95 42 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 mOrange (95) H2O 548 g 565 0.70 b 1096 1080 67 47 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 eqFP650 (96) H2O 592 g 646 0.19 b 1184 1112 45 8.5 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 Katushka (97) H2O 588 g 635 0.35 b 1176 1080 66 23 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 Katushka2(98) H2O 588 g 633 0.44 b 1176 1140 62 27 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 mKate (99) pH8 588 g 635 0.27 b 1176 1118 52 14 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 mKate2 (100) H2O 588 g 633 0.42 b 1176 1140 72 30 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 mNeptune (101) H2O 600 g 651 0.17 b 1200 1104 70 12 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 mRaspberry (102) H2O 598 g 625 0.19 b 1196 1118 31 5.8 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 Neptune (103) H2O 600 g 647 0.22 b 1200 1104 72 16 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
 tdRFP (104) Aq. buffer 584 (Campbell et al., 2002) 579 0.68 1168 1110 20 13.7 (Drobizhev et al. 2011)
ab

Two-photon absorption cross-section value taken at the excitation wavelength λ2PA reported by the authors in the NIR-II window; note that this may differ from the maximum of the 2PA band. Value extrapolated from the data available and from the formula of the 2P brightness (= σ2 (λ) × ΦF).

c

1P properties as reported by commercial suppliers, reported in water unless indicated otherwise.

d

Chemical structures are propriety and undisclosed.

e

Chirality-dependant.

f

Excitation-dependant.

g

Properties extracted from the fluorescent protein database (Available at https://www.fpbase.org/, Accessed on 11/04/2022).

TABLE 2.

Benefits associated with Fibre lasers over traditional solid-state and OPO lasers (adapted from ref (RPMC, 2020))

Solid-State/OPO-Based Lasers Femtosecond Fibre Lasers
Large cumbersome design Lightweight, up to 10x smaller
Expensive Affordable
Less consistent pulse duration Pulse duration always maintained
Lower power at long wavelengths (crystal-based amplifiers) Maintains high power at long wavelengths (up to 4W at 920 nm)
Water-cooled Air-cooled
High cost of ownership Low maintenance and engineer fees (fast return on investment potential)

TABLE 3.

Current examples of 2PA in vivo experiments performed using NIR-II absorbing fluorophores.

λ2PA (nm) Imaging System Laser used λem (nm) Contrast media Depth (µm) Animal model Biological media imaged Administration Method Toxic. Test in vivo (Y/N) Year Ref
1550 Home-built system PolarOnyx Mercury Fibre laser 800 DTTC dye (30) 180 Mouse Resected kidney vasculature Intravenous injection N 2011 Berezin et al. (2011)
1200 Commercial Leica TCS SP8 MP Laser with OPO 630 Squaraine 45 40 Mouse Ear vasculature Ear blood vessel injection N 2019 Yi et al. (2019)
1057 Home-built with BioRad MRC 600 confocal microscope Nd:YLF solid state laser ∼590 FM4-64 dye (48) 45 Zebrafish embryo Body Pre-stained N 1996 Wokosin et al. (1996a)
1040 Home built with Olympus, BX61 FV1200 microscope Yb-doped photonic crystal fibre laser ∼700 Triphenylamine dipole 59 encapsulated in PSMA NPs 1200 Mouse Ear vasculature Brain vasculature Resected tumour vasculature Tail vein injection Y 2017 Alifu et al. (2017)
1100 Commercial Olympus FVMPE-RS InSight® DS with OPO 740 PDT-imaging agent 60 210 Mouse Resected tumour vasculature Intravenous injection Y 2021 Zhou et al. (2021)
1200 Commercial Olympus FVMPE-RS InSight® DS with OPO ∼700 BTZ SNPs (64) 1010 Mouse Brain vasculature Rectoorbital injection N 2019 Wang et al. (2019b)
1300 1. Home built with Olympus, BX61W1- FV1200 microscope 2. Home-Built system 1. PHAROS-10W with OPA 2. Laser from an OPA 810 AIEDots of BTZ dye 70 (∼35 nm) 1065 Mouse Ear vasculature Brain vasculature Tail vein injection Y 2018 Qi et al. (2018)
1040 Home built with Olympus, BX61 FV1200 microscope Mira HP and Mira OPA 790 AIEDots of BTZ dye 70 750 Mouse Brain vasculature Tail vein injection N 2021 Liu et al. (2021)
1200 Commercial Olympus FVMPE-RS InSight® DS with OPO ∼700 AIEDots of BTZ dye 71 800 Mouse Brain/Ear tumour vasculature Rectoorbital injection Y 2019 Wang et al. (2019c)
1040 Nikon A1 Confocal Microscope Laser with OPO ∼650 AIEDots of triphenylamine dye 72 800 Mouse Brain vasculature Retro orbital injection Y 2021 Samanta et al. (2021)
1040 Home built with Olympus, BX61W1-FV1000 Yb-doped photonic crystal fibre laser ∼620 AIEDots of BODIPY dye 75 700 Mouse Brain vasculature Intravenous injection Y 2015 Wang et al. (2015)
1100 Commercial Leica SP8 DIVE Laser with OPO 615 Carbon quantum dots 79 500 1. Zebrafish larvae
2. Mouse
1. Zebrafish Body (2PA)
2. Mouse (1PA)
1. Dots added to media
2. Intravenous injection
1. N 2. Y 2020 Liu et al. (2020)
1550 Home built with Olympus, BX61 FV1200 microscope FLCPA-01C Calmar fibre laser 1270 PbS/CdS quantum dots 84 220 Brain vasculature Intravenous injection N 2022 Ni et al. (2022)
1070 Home built system Ti:Sapphire laser with OPO ∼580 Red Fluorescent Protein (tdTomato 86) 300–500 Mouse Brain neurons Gene Expression (Six3 gene) N 2013 Yang et al. (2013)

2 NIR-II-Absorbing Luminescent Materials for 2P Bio-Imaging

2.1 Organic Fluorophores

Reaching the NIR-II window with 2P excitation typically involves using dyes with 1PA maxima ranging from orange to NIR-I wavelengths. The design of 2P-responsive organic fluorophores has been covered extensively in several reviews and falls beyond the immediate scope of this review (He et al., 2008; Pawlicki et al., 2009; Klausen and Blanchard-Desce, 2021; Pascal et al., 2021; Kim and Cho, 2015). However, to achieve such results the following parameters must be taken into account. Even more so than in the context of standard 1PE, the size/length of the π-conjugated system and the magnitude of intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) are major driving forces for the 2PA capacity of a chromophore. Therefore, selecting strong electron-donating (ED) and electron-withdrawing (EW) moieties or extending the π-conjugated backbone in a push–pull compound are typical strategies to cause both ICT-induced bathochromic shifts in absorption wavelengths and increase in 2PA cross-sections. Nonetheless, to achieve NIR-II absorption, the selection rules of 2PA should be considered due to their direct effect on allowed electronic transitions within the molecule, which in turn affects its maximum absorption wavelength. Symmetry-based selection rules state that 2P electronic transitions at 2 × λ1PA max wavelengths are forbidden in centrosymmetric chromophores. As a result, 2PA bands in symmetrical dyes are usually more intense, but shifted to higher energies, which can be a limitation in the design of NIR-II-absorbing dyes. Dipolar dyes present no such restriction as the transition to the first excited state is generally both 1P- and 2P-allowed. Therefore, 2P-absorbers with dipolar (D-π-A) or symmetrical (quadrupolar D-π-A-π-D, A-π-D-π-A; or octupolar D-(π-A)3, A-(π-D)3) structures, sometimes belonging to well-known classes of dyes, have been investigated in recent years and will be reviewed below. With the development and increased accessibility of SWIR pulsed laser technologies (Section 3, Tables 2 and 3), several studies have shown that remarkable potential resides in the pool of current biological stains and FDA approved fluorophores that offer such 1PA properties (Wokosin et al., 1996b; Bestvater et al., 2002; Fu et al., 2007; Makarov et al., 2008; Kobat et al., 2009) (Table 1).

2.1.1 Xanthene Derivatives

Thanks to their exceptional structural diversity, xanthene-type dyes are among the most widely used biological imaging agents. The highly versatile xanthene backbone allows for extensive structural modification, with the possibility to induce dramatic bathochromic shifts in absorption and emission through dye design. As a result, the 1PE bands of such fluorophores can range from green to NIR-II wavelengths (Liu and Scott, 2021), leading to the majority of current research being focused on the design of NIR-I to NIR-II 1P-absorbing xanthene dyes. To the best of our knowledge, only a small number of xanthene dyes have been specifically designed for 2PA in the NIR-II, but the vast number of commercially available probes in this family facilitates their use as a model for 2P measurements. This in turn has led to several seminal reports on their 2P properties at NIR-II wavelengths since the first examples in 1972 (Bradley et al., 1972).

The 2PA properties of several commercial fluorescein- and rhodamine-based probes have been studied thoroughly and are well reported (Bestvater et al., 2002; Makarov et al., 2008; Bradley et al., 1972; Li and She, 2010; Hermann and Ducuing, 1972). Fluoresceins, being the most blue-shifted xanthene dyes, possess almost no 2P response in the NIR-II window (Table 1), as evidenced by the negligible σ2 of disodium fluorescein (1) at 1060 nm (0.069 GM) (Makarov et al., 2008). However, the heavy metal indicator PhenGreen FLTM (2), a fluorescein derivative, was reported to show fluorescence when excited under 2PA at 1074 nm (Bestvater et al., 2002). Thanks to their higher internal charge transfer (ICT) and superior structural variety, Rhodamines possess a higher potential for 2PE in the NIR-II. Rhodamines 6G (3), B (4), 101 (5) and 123 (6) all present 2PA beyond 1000 nm (Table 1). Among them, Rhodamine B was reported with the highest 2PA cross-section in the early NIR-II window, with a second 2PA band at 1040 nm in MeOH (38 GM) (Makarov et al., 2008). Highly photo-stable Alexa FluorTM dyes 488 to 633 (7–12) were also reported with 2PA bands between 985 nm and 1264 nm respectively (Bestvater et al., 2002; Kobat et al., 2009; Anderson and Webb, 2011; Mütze et al., 2012). Alexa FluorTM 488 (7) responded moderately to 2PE at 1000 nm (Anderson and Webb, 2011), which corresponds to the tail of its absorption band. No quantification was performed on the other rhodamine-type Alexa FluorTM dyes, however, several other accessible cell-labelling and bioconjugatable rhodamine derivatives were investigated, such as MitoTracker Red (13), or Lissamine Rhodamine (15) and TexasRed (16) conjugates (Bestvater et al., 2002).

Phenoxazines are nitrogen-containing xanthene derivatives that also demonstrated 2PA properties in the NIR-II. Rakhymzhan et al. demonstrated the use of extended phenoxazine ATTO680 (17) in live cells under 2PE at 1260 nm (Rakhymzhan et al., 2017). Nile Red (18) is another well-known member of this class of dyes, and is commonly used as a reference for cross-section measurements using the 2P-excited fluorescence (2PEF) technique. In an effort to optimise the 2PA properties of Nile Red, Hornum et al. prepared and optically characterised a nu mber of halo-substituted Nile Red derivatives (Hornum et al., 2020). On this occasion, they measured a σ2 of 104 GM for Nile Red at 1057 nm. The σ2 of the reported derivatives were also measured between 1000 and 1200 nm, showing a substantial increase upon introduction of a trifluoromethyl group (compounds 19, 20 and 21). Interestingly, regio-isomer 2- (21) showed the highest gain in σ2 compared to isomers 3- and 4- (19 and 20). Nile Red derivatives are notably solvatochromic, which increased both their 2PA wavelengths and cross-sections by up to 313% with increasing polarity.

2.1.2 Polymethine Derivatives

Polymethine dyes consist of an alternating single and double-bond backbone, which connects two aromatic moieties. Cyanine (Cy) dyes are a member of this family of dyes, with the polymethine conjugated chain separating two nitrogen-containing heterocycles (i.e. indolenine, benzindole). These core structures can tolerate numerous structural changes including: i) lateral groups (i.e. sulfo, carboxyl) on the heterocycles to increase solubility; ii) cycloalkane-rings within longer polymethine chains (Cy7, Cy7.5, squarines) for structural rigidity and photo-property tuning; iii) flexible chains terminating in functional groups (i.e. carboxylic acid, alkyne, azide, NHS ester) for attachment to drug probes (Lee et al., 2008; Pham et al., 2008; Henary et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2019). The most recently reported NIR-II polymethines have been designed for 1P-excited fluorescence (1PEF), including BTC1070 which employed a pentamethine chain, benzothiopyrylium heterocycles and diethylamino ED moieties to achieve emission above 1000 nm (Wang et al., 2019a). Selection rules will affect differently polymethines bearing identical or different substituents on each side of the poly-ene chain, which will therefore modify the nature of their dominant 2P transition. Largely blue-shifted transitions can be observed in certain environments in the case of symmetrical polymethines.

The polymethine family includes several commercially available and FDA-approved derivatives that have been evaluated under 2PE (Table 1). In 2002, Bestvater et al. reported the 2PA spectrum of Cy3 (22), showing a response at 1032 nm (Bestvater et al., 2002), and modest 2P brightnesses were then measured by Fu et al. and Kobat et al. for the original Cy5 (23), Cy5.5 (24) and Cy7 (25) fluorophores in the 1200–1300 nm range (Fu et al., 2007; Kobat et al., 2009). While there is much reported about the structure-1P property relationships in custom-made polymethine dyes, even towards the NIR-I and -II regime, less is known about their 2P properties. Berezin et al. studied the 2P properties of several cyanine derivatives with comparable conjugation under 1552 nm excitation, by varying the central and hetero-aromatic moieties (Lee et al., 2008; Berezin et al., 2011). Strong absorption was reported at this wavelength for compound 26, a direct Cy7 analogue (240 GM).

Replacing the indolenine units with π-extended benzoindolenines causes an increase in ICT and oscillator strength leading to red-shifted optical properties and higher σ2. This is evidenced by the commercially available and FDA-approved dye indocyanine green (ICG, 27) whose σ2 is more than doubled compared to 26. Interestingly, ICG (27) was also used as a contrast agent for 2P fluorescence imaging at 790 nm (Kumari and Gupta, 2019), which leads to excitation in its blue-shifted S0→S2 band. The fluorophore thus presented an Anti-Kasha fluorescence at 570 nm, emitting directly from the S2 excited state, which provided it with an excitation-dependent 2PEF. ICG is now used in a clinical context for diagnostic purposes (Schaafsma et al., 2011; Hackethal et al., 2018), and therefore possesses a strong potential to develop 2P imaging past 1500 nm. Cypate (28), a bio-conjugatable version of ICG replacing both side sulfonate groups with carboxylic acids was also prepared and characterised, leading to similar optical properties (Berezin et al., 2011). Restriction of the polymethine chain with a phenylcyclohexene moiety (29) led to a 70% increase in cross-section but similar brightness. DTTC and DODCI (30 and 31), two benzothiazolyl and benzoxazolyl analogues of Cy7 and Cy5, were also used in studies at 1552 nm (Berezin et al., 2011) and 1060 nm (Li and She, 2010) respectively. The reported cross-section for DODCI was measured at a wavelength significantly different from the 2λ1PA value, but was still considerably lower than for DTTC which contains an extra double bond in its π-conjugated system. Introducing aromatic units at the 4-position of the heptamethine chain led to increased cross-sections, but halved the quantum yield. IR-140 (32) therefore has the largest cross-section in this class of dyes thanks to a diphenylamine unit attached to the central cyclopentene-heptamethine chain; however, this does not yield a high brightness due to a poor Φf. In this study, the best 2P brightness was calculated for DTTC, which was then selected for ex vivo 2PEF imaging of kidney tissue (Section 3) (Berezin et al., 2011). Additionally, the 2P properties of 2-azaazulene polymethine dye 33 were extensively studied theoretically and experimentally to elucidate their symmetrical character (Hu et al., 2013). By comparing the 2PA spectra of 33 in apolar dichloromethane and polar acetonitrile, the authors demonstrated a symmetry-breaking character in high polarity media leading to a restriction lifting of their forbidden transition at 2λ1PA max, which is a crucial observation for the development of NIR-II responsive polymethines. A set of structure-property relationships was also constructed by Fu et al. in a seminal report on the 2PA properties of polymethine dyes (Fu et al., 2007). Cross-sections ranging from 60 to 600 GM were measured in the NIR-II on different extended, locked and substituted cyanines (dyes 34–37), which is consistent with other reports on similar dyes. This demonstrated similar effects of conjugation lengths and ICT on the 2PA spectra and cross-sections. A strong increase in σ2 was noted in particular for cyanine 37, which presented the most constrained conformation. Alexa FluorTM 647 and 680 (38–39) are other commercially available polymethine analogues reported with moderate 2P brightnesses (Kobat et al., 2009; Mütze et al., 2012).

Adding ketones to the central polymethine chain was found to produce fluorescent dyes 42–44 that show significant red-shifting and quantum yield increase in protic solvents (Pascal et al., 2017). Because of their pseudo-quadrupolar character, these dyes exhibit strong blue-shifted 2PA bands in the NIR-I, with σ2 values ranging from 570 to 1400 GM at 900–970 nm. However, their transition at 2λ1PA remains partially allowed, which leads to a second weaker 2PA peak in the 1100 nm region, reaching 250 GM in the case of bis-acceptor dye 44. These dyes were modified to include hydrophilic, hydrophobic and water-solubilizing polymers, and were successfully used in 1P and 2P microscopy.

Squaraines are a particular example of keto-polymethine dyes combining two ED groups connected to a four strongly electron-deficient 4-membered ring system derived from squaric acid. This class of dyes is known for their potential to reach considerable 2PA cross-section values with relatively simple structures, which provides them with a high σ2 to molecular weight ratio (Chung et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2017b). Only a few examples of squaraine fluorophores were investigated in the NIR-II range; yet the simplest examples of squaraines, built from indolenine subunits, show intense 2PEF upon excitation past 1000 nm (Ceymann et al., 2016). Squaraine 45 and its malononitrile derivative 46 were described as bright red/NIR fluorophores (λem = 654 nm and 714 nm), with quantum yields of 0.62 and 0.75 respectively. Both dyes showed moderate 2P response (σ2 > 100 GM) around 1250 nm. Compound 45 was used for in vitro and in vivo for 2P imaging at 1200 nm (Yi et al., 2019). The authors demonstrated that the 2PEF of this small dye was enhanced 17.7 times in the presence of bovine serum albumin (BSA). Moreover, squaraine showed excellent photostability and low cytotoxicity. Interestingly, more advanced squaraine oligomers and branched structures were also investigated, showing high 2PA in the NIR-II (Scherer et al., 2002; Ceymann et al., 2016).

Other heptamethine cyanine dyes carrying different terminal heteroaromatic moieties (benzoindolenine, thiazole, oxazoles, azaindoles, flavyliums) have been developed and widely used as 1P contrast agents. Dimethylamino flavylium polymethine dyes have been shown to exhibit significant bathochromic shifts compared to their analogous Cy dyes, thus taking their 1PE up to 1026 nm (Cosco et al., 2017). Funabiki et al. also showed the importance of the counter-ion in benzo [cd]indolenyl-substituted heptamethine cyanine dyes (Funabiki et al., 2019). Already reaching the NIR-II window for in vivo 1PEF microscopy, these would be excellent candidates to have their 2P properties investigated.

A common trait of cyanine-type dyes is their pseudo-centrosymmetric character that can make the 2PA transition at 2λ1PA partially forbidden (Hu et al., 2013), and therefore reduce their 2P brightness in the NIR-II. Non-symmetrical polymethines are another important sub-class of dyes that adopt a dipolar character and therefore overcome this feature. The 2PA spectrum of the commercially available dye Styryl 9M (47) was reported by Makarov et al., which highlighted a high 2PA cross-section (750 GM), in the 1150–1250 nm region (Makarov et al., 2008). Styryl 9M was notably used for the detection of lysozyme amyloid fibrils with 2PE (Udayan et al., 2020). The nonpolar and viscous environment generated by the hydrophobic channels of lysozyme fibrils led to a strong bathochromic shift in the absorption spectrum of the dye, accompanied by an increase in quantum yield. FM4-64 (48) (Wokosin et al., 1996a) and To-Pro-3 (49) (Smith et al., 2012), two other non-symmetrical dipolar polymethines, were reportedly used in 2P imaging past 1064 nm. FM4-64 is also commonly used in second-harmonic generation experiments, which makes it a multi-modal imaging agent (Nuriya et al., 2016).

Merocyanines are a sub-group of dipolar polymethine chromophores constituted specifically of an amine (D) and a carbonyl (A) moiety, connected to each end of the poly-ene π-conjugated system. Merocyanines are typically sensitive to their local environment, with optical properties varying in contact with cell membranes, metal ions, or DNA; and 2PE was shown to be even more sensitive than 1PE to such variations in the local environment (Pascal et al., 2017). Fewer examples of 2P-responsive merocyanines have been reported in the NIR-II. However, in their investigation of keto-polymethines, Pascal et al. also reported a merocyanine-like dye 43 that showed a 2PA maximum at 1098 nm. Its moderate cross-section was compensated by a good Φf, which led to a brightness value of 74 GM in MeOH. An interesting example of advanced merocyanine design was also achieved by incorporating the polymethine system onto a cyclohexanetrione moiety (Poronik et al., 2012). The resulting octupolar (D-π)3-A structures 50 and 51 showed moderate 2PA response in the NIR-II transition ranging between 98 and 214 GM in THF.

2.1.3 Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Derivatives

Porphyrins, phthalocyanines and other types of polypyrrole derivatives are commonly used as contrast agents or photosensitizers in biomedical applications (Josefsen and Boyle, 2012). The particular properties of such compounds make it possible to tune multiple parameters such as the lifetime of the excited state, and therefore their emissive character, by metalation. The 2PA properties of Zn-tetrakis-(phenylthio)-phthalocyanine (52) and Si-naphthalocyanine dioctyloxide (53), both commercially available, were investigated by Makarov et al. (Makarov et al., 2008). Both dyes showed 2PA bands at 1270 nm in CCl4 with moderate cross-sections (Table 1). The silicon derivative however showed significant 2PA capacity in its higher energy band (470 GM at 1020 nm). In contrast, tetraphenylporphyrin showed virtually no absorption past 1000 nm, which is in accordance with the limited 1PA capacity associated with its red Q-band. Porphyrin derivatives can however exhibit large cross-sections, as fused-systems show an increase in both cross-section and λex2PA with the increasing number of rings (Yoon et al., 2007), although this can lead to preferential non-radiative behaviour. Only a few examples of polypyrrole design have led to NIR-II responsive fluorescent dyes specifically for 2P imaging applications. Meso substitution is nonetheless a typical design strategy to amplify the 2P response of porphyrin dyes (Nowak-Król et al., 2012), and porphyrin dimers bridged by a diketopyrrolopyrrole unit at this position were prepared to form highly absorbing D-π-A-π-D dyes (Nowak-Król et al., 2013). Although no quantification was performed in this study, the authors claim that their porphyrin dimer (54) remained fluorescent at 710 nm. A band structure characteristic of porphyrin dyes was observed on the 2PA spectrum, which leads to broad absorption between 1000 and 1450 nm. However, while these structures are of interest, their ability to be utilised in a bio-medical setting is limited due to poor solubility in aqueous environments, and the requirement of controlled self-assembly in vitro.

2.1.4 BODIPY Derivatives

BODIPY dyes are often used as fluorescent trackers for imaging thanks to their high brightness, narrow fluorescence peaks and low sensitivity to changes in pH and polarity. BODIPY structures are highly tunable, and extensions of the π-conjugated system in positions 3- and 5- can lead to strong bathochromic shifts that can be exploited in 2PA. Several commercially available cell stains belong to this class of dyes, such as LysoTracker Red (55) which shows 2PA at 1032 nm (Bestvater et al., 2002). BODIPY TR (56) is a π-extended derivative with high photostability that was reported with superior 2P brightness (>200 GM) at 1060 nm (Mütze et al., 2012). Extension at the 3- and 5- positions was also the strategy used by Zheng et al. to design the compound IR07 (57) in 2009 (Zheng et al., 2009). Albeit initially developed for optical power limiting applications, the dye still had a fluorescence quantum yield of 30% and a 2PA cross-section of 101 GM at 1310 nm in CH2Cl2, which makes it an interesting candidate for further developments in bio-imaging. Interestingly, Prasad and co-workers further extended this aminostyryl-BODIPY with phenylacetylenes, and used compound 58 under 2PE at 1064 nm (Hu et al., 2020). As this dye had a relatively low fluorescence quantum yield of 9% (in THF), the authors investigated its application in 2P photo-acoustic imaging instead of traditional 2P fluorescence.

Theoretical reports have also shown the potential of BODIPY derivatives as 2P and 3P imaging agents (Zhang et al., 2015), which opens the way towards the rational design of NIR-II fluorophores. More advanced dye-design strategies have also been applied to optimise the 2PA properties of BODIPY fluorophores beyond 1000 nm (see Section 2.1.5).

2.1.5 Dipoles, Quadrupoles and Advanced Design Strategies

By taking advantage of strong ICT, relatively simple D-π-A structures can sometimes lead to strongly red-shifted optical properties and important 2PA cross-sections. Importantly, in contrast to symmetrical dyes, their transitions at 2λ1PA max are usually allowed, which is an important factor to reach the NIR-II window in 2PA. Triphenylamines are an important ED building block of 2P-responsive dipoles. Examples of triphenylamine dipoles include dye 59 that was incorporated within a poly (styrene-co-maleic anhydride) (PSMA) polymer, thus forming fluorescent nanoparticles (NPs) with high chemical and optical stability across a broad pH range (Alifu et al., 2017). The dipole emits in the NIR-I region, and interestingly shows a bathochromic shift of λem in the solid state. When excited at 1040 nm (2PA) the PSMA NPs of 59 emit over a wide range of wavelengths (500–950 nm) with a maximum at 678 nm. A large cross-section was measured for these NPs (5.6 × 105 GM), and the fluorescence quantum yield could be tuned from 1.7% to 16.9% by modifying the weight ratio of dye to polymer. These NPs were used as contrast agents to facilitate the 2PA NIR-II imaging of mouse brain blood vessels at the deepest tissue penetration reported to date (Section 3.2, Table 3). Similar to 59, a second NIR-II absorbing triphenylamine dipole 60 was also utilised for imaging in vivo (Section 3.2, Table 3) while acting as a lysosomal photosensitizer for PDT (Zhou et al., 2021). Tuning the EW moiety shifted the 1PA properties of this dipole to the red compared to 59, allowing 2P imaging to be performed at 1100 nm, i.e. near the 2λ1PA value (530 nm).

Some other amino-substituted D-π-A dyes have been shown to exhibit strong solvochromatic or fluorogenic behaviour (Klymchenko, 2017). A reported water-soluble dipolar fluorophore (61) exhibited a large 2PA cross-section value at 1040 nm (440 GM) (Massin et al., 2013). Strong solvato-fluorogenic properties were demonstrated for this dye, with a fluorescence quantum yield of 0.22 in water, and therefore a 2P brightness close to 100 GM. Similar relatively simple structures have led to highly red-shifted 2P active dyes, which constitutes efficient dye design examples. Using a dialkylamino ED group and a pyridinium acceptor in a D-π-A structure led to dipole 62 that was reported with a σ2 of 500 GM at 1300 nm (Ricci et al., 2017). Interestingly, the corresponding D-π-A-π-D counterpart 63 was also prepared by the authors. With a C2v symmetry leading to a “bis-dipolar” character, this compound showed an enhanced cross-section at 1300 nm compared to dipole 62, but the emission quantum yield was reduced by an order of magnitude. With limited quantum yields, both dipole 62 and bis-dipole 63 showed limited 2P brightness. Benzothiadiazole (BTZ) and related derivatives are other typical moieties that have been used in the design of NIR-absorbing chromophores for 1P and 2P bio-imaging, in particular when incorporated as a strongly EW core in a D-π-A-π-D structure. This has led to a strong 2P response with the ability to extend beyond 1000 nm (Yao et al., 2016). However, these pseudo-centrosymmetrical chromophores, with forbidden transitions, can be counterproductive in NIR-II dye design. Moreover, water solubility can be a limitation for these molecules, and they tend to be used more commonly as AIE building blocks (Section 2.1.6), or incorporated in different types of NPs. For this purpose, Liu and co-workers prepared conjugated polymers from BTZ and thiophene derivatives (64) that proved highly NIR-emissive once incorporated in phospholipid-type NPs (Wang et al., 2019b). These polymer dots showed significant 2PA between 1000 and 1200 nm, with cross-sections in the 1000–2000 GM range. A 2P brightness of 242 GM was reported, along with impressive in vivo results (Section 3.2, Table 3).

Other advanced strategies have been applied to design NIR-II-absorbing 2P dyes with optimised 2PA cross-sections in the NIR-II, without focusing on emissive properties or imaging applications, which has been reviewed recently (Pascal et al., 2021). This includes the preparation of stable π-radical and diradical structures (Hisamune et al., 2015), macrocyclic dyes with controlled topology (Mobius dyes, meso-meso-linked porphyrin oligomers amongst others) (Tanaka et al., 2008), or multi-chromophoric systems with hybrid electronic transitions (Webster et al., 2009). During their investigation of singlet biradical dyes, Li et al. reported the preparation of zethrene derivatives (65 and 66) with strong 2PA properties at 1250 nm (Li et al., 2012). The compounds retained fluorescent properties, however, measurements were only performed in chloroform because of their lipophilic nature. Ni et al. reported quinodimethane-bridged BODIPY dimers (67 and 68) that showed up to 26% diradical character, which provided strong 1PA at the beginning of the NIR-II window at 1100 nm (Ni et al., 2016). The corresponding 2PA band was, therefore, shifted beyond 2000 nm (up to 1500 GM at 2300 nm). Although no application in imaging was envisioned, the authors report that their BODIPY derivatives remain fluorescent in chloroform solutions, with up to a 0.2% quantum yield of infrared emission. This low Φf value leads to very poor 2P brightness (up to 2.6 GM). The quinodimethane dimerization strategy was also used by Zeng et al. to prepare porphyrin dimers with intense 2PA cross-section at 1800 nm (Zeng et al., 2013). In this report, the Zinc and Magnesium porphyrin dimers showed emission bands in the 900 nm range (CH2Cl2). Self-assembly of porphyrin-oligomers and 4,4′-bipyridine has also led to record cross-sections (up to 2.3 × 105 GM) and strongly red-shifted 2PE (up to 1300 nm) by restricting rotation and enhancing electron transfer through the metal bridge (Drobizhev et al., 2006). Such strategies have led to σ2 of several thousands of GM above 1200 nm, but often lead to non-emissive compounds, typically because of preferential vibrational decay or very short excited state lifetimes (Cho et al., 2009). They are also susceptible to poor stability and lack of biocompatibility.

Other families of dyes have also been investigated with the goal of improving 2PA capacity in the NIR-II (Pascal et al., 2021), including for optical imaging applications. The classical dead cell stain propidium iodide (69) shows 2PA response at 1015 nm (Bestvater et al., 2002). Polyaromatic fluorophores such as diketopyrrolopyrroles have also been proposed as potential multi-photon imaging agents in theoretical reports (Ye et al., 2017).

2.1.6 Aggregation Induced Emission Dyes and Dots

Dye design strategies for 2P-responsive NIR-II fluorophores can lead to highly lipophilic aromatic structures prone to forming irregular aggregates in aqueous environments. Fluorescence quantum yields can thus be dramatically reduced as a result of a reduction in the rate of radiative decay (kr), either by significant bathochromic shifts leading to favoured non-radiative vibrational decay (knr) processes, by fluorescence quenching by water molecules, or by intermolecular π–π stacking, which is known as “aggregation-caused quenching”. Counteracting this effect, certain lipophilic organic dyes generate an organised solid-state arrangement of chromophores with a local lipophilic environment within nano-aggregates. While the dye molecules move freely in diluted solution form, the restriction of intramolecular motions (i.e. vibrations, rotations etc.) in this organised aggregated state causes a strong decrease in the probability of non-radiative decay, and therefore a strong increase in fluorescence (Figure 4A, left). The concept of “aggregation-induced emission” (AIE) was first described in 2001 by Tang and co-workers (Luo et al., 2001), and has since become a popular approach to the design of 1P and 2P theranostic agents (Zhu et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2020b; Lu et al., 2020; Han et al., 2021) and circumvent the limitations of standard NIR-dye design strategies. In contrast to traditional organic fluorophores, AIE luminogens (AIEgens) typically exhibit low fluorescence in dilute solutions, but both high Φf and photostability in the aggregated state, which are key requirements for high-resolution imaging.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

(Left) Illustration of AIEgen molecules in solution and aggregated state, and their corresponding simplified Jablonski diagrams showing the effect of motion restriction on the radiative (kr) and non-radiative (knr) relaxation pathways after 1PE or 2PE. (Right) Example of in vivo application of 2P microscopy with NIR-II-responsive AIEDots used to reconstruct images of a mouse brain. The 3D reconstruction of mouse brain vasculature is reprinted with permission from ref. (Qi et al., 2018). Copyright 2018 American Chemical Society.

In the context of 2P-imaging using NIR-II wavelengths, AIEgens provide a way to prepare highly NIR-shifted chromophores maintaining strong 2P brightness in water. The BTZ derivative 70 has been shown to exhibit AIE behaviour in two different studies, emitting NIR light after 2PE at 1200 nm (aqueous media) and 1300 nm (organic media) respectively (Qi et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2021). Significant cross-section values (1.6 × 104 GM at 1040 nm and 1220 GM at 1300 nm) were reported in the NIR-II for these AIEdots. The emission peak was measured at 810 nm with 14% quantum yield. This AIEgen was used to image mouse brain tissues with high resolution (Figure 4B, right), demonstrating the imaging benefits of NIR-II 2PA over NIR-I 1PA (Section 3.2, Table 3). The use of AIEgen dye 70 was then extended to 2P fluorescent lifetime imaging (2PFLIM) by the same research group (Liu et al., 2021). Replacing the arylamine EDG of this molecule with a propeller-shaped tetraphenylethene moiety (Wang et al., 2019c), a structure commonly used in the design of AIEgens, led to D-π-A-π-D dye 71 that was co-nanoprecipitated with a pegylated phospholipid. The 2PA spectrum of the resulting AIEdots showed a σ2 close to 1 × 105 GM both at the maximum of the low energy band (1150 nm) and in the tail of the high-energy band (1000 nm). With a fluorescence quantum yield of 19% in aqueous media and high photo-stability, these AIE dots showed high potential for in vivo imaging, which was demonstrated in tumour tissues and blood vessels (Section 3.2 and Table 3).

Outside of the BTZ class of dyes, a 2PA fluorescent nanoprobe made of a triphenylamine-based brominated AIEgen (dye 72) (Samanta et al., 2021), showing a similar structure to dipole 59 (Section 2.1.5), was reported. The triphenylamine ED group provides a good balance between strong twisted ICT in the molecule and unrestricted rotation to ensure possible AIE. These NPs showed large 2PA cross-section of 3 × 103 GM at 1040 nm and a Φf of 6%, which also allowed 2D and 3D imaging of brain vasculature (Section 3.2, Table 3). Similarly, four push–pull AIEgens based on a diphenylamine donor attached to different EW moieties (Zheng et al., 2018) were prepared. All 2PA bands extended somewhat past 1000 nm, but the highest cross-sections were obtained with the isophorone and furanone dipoles 73 and 74 (887 GM at 1020 nm for the latter) which showed great promise in ex vivo cell and tissue studies. Finally, the tetraphenylethene propeller-shaped moiety was attached to a BODIPY dye to prepare AIEgen 75. The NPs prepared from this dye showed a record absorption capacity past 1000 nm (2.9 × 106 GM at 1040 nm) (Wang et al., 2015), which is among the highest cross-section values in the NIR-II region all classes of materials combined. Therefore, AIEgens allow the combination of massive cross-sections, arising from the combined cross-section contribution of each dye in the NP, and of a fluorescence strongly switched-on in water. Both these factors combine to give unprecedented 2P brightness values (>104 GM), which makes them high-potential materials for 2P imaging in the NIR-II (Section 3.2, Table 3).

2.2 Carbon, Hybrid and Inorganic Nanomaterials

Carbon and metal-containing nanomaterials have been investigated for decades as a source of 2P-reponsive imaging agents thanks to unique electronic, physical and morphological properties. Such materials also tend to show higher brightness and photo-stability than organic dyes, and thanks to their surface functionalisation, they provide huge versatility to expand into multimodal and theranostic applications. The potential toxicity of metal and carbon nanomaterials is arguably the main limitation to their use for in vivo imaging.

Carbon nanomaterials have been a key focus of research in bio-imaging over the past decade owing to their unique optical properties, large surface area, and robust photostability allowing long-term imaging. Carbon dots (CDs), single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs), graphene derivatives and nanodiamonds have all been reported as luminescent 2P-active materials with imaging potential (Hong et al., 2015). In the NIR-II window, semiconducting SWCNTs have demonstrated strong potential, both because of their strong 2P response, and their NIR emission. In the context of optoneurology and neurotransmitter sensing, a dopamine-sensitive nanosensor was developed using SWCNT (76), and provided chirality-dependent fluorescent turn-on responses varying between 20% and 350% in the presence of the analyte (Bonis-O'Donnell et al., 2017). Sensing was performed at 1560 nm under 2PE with a σ2 estimated at 2.16 × 105 GM, but the fluorescence quantum yield of 76 remained limited (Φf = 0.0023). These nanosensors were embedded 2 mm into strongly scattering tissue phantoms mimicking brain tissues, which demonstrated that the light scattering decreased from 42% to 4% using NIR-II 2PE compared to traditional 1PE. In 2014 an aptamer-modified graphene oxide material (77) was used to show excitation dependant luminescence outputs and develop multi-channel and multi-colour imaging of multi-drug resistant bacteria (Pramanik et al., 2014). In particular, 2PE of the material at 1120 nm led to bright red-light emission, which allowed imaging of methicilin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) with a σ2 above 3.6 × 104 GM in aqueous solution. Recently, nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots were also reported with high luminescence and photosensitizing properties for antimicrobial applications (Kuo et al., 2022). Although the 2P properties of these graphene-based nano-objects were only measured up to 970 nm, they likely still possess 2P responses beyond 1000 nm. Finally, sulfoxide- and carbonyl-enriched CDs (78) were prepared by solvothermal treatment of readily available citric acid and urea. These CDs were brightly fluorescent at 760 nm under 1PE at 714 nm, with efficient NIR-II absorption upon 2P and three-photon (3P) excitation at 1200 and 1400 nm (Li et al., 2018). Carbon quantum dots prepared from tris(4-aminophenyl)amine (79) also led to ultra-narrow emission at 615 nm with high photoluminescence quantum yield (84%) (Liu et al., 2020). These CDs were used for in vitro for 2P imaging of tumor spheroids at 1100 nm, with a penetration depth reaching 200 μm. Further 2P in vivo imaging was carried out in zebrafish larvae, in which a maximum penetration depth of 500 μm was achieved (Section 3.2, Table 3).

Noble metal nano-objects are known to interact strongly with high-intensity light pulses, which is the source of interesting NLO properties (Olesiak-Banska et al., 2019). In recent reports, gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) have been used to develop a hybrid theranostic platform (80) combining anti-GD2 antibodies and SWCNTs for selective 2P imaging and efficient photothermal therapy of human melanoma cancer cells at 1100 nm (Tchounwou et al., 2015). Although no σ2 or Φf values were explicitly mentioned in the article, the authors measured the 2P-induced photoluminescence of the hybrid nanomaterial and evidenced that the strong plasmon-coupling generated by the gold increased the emission by 6 orders of magnitudes compared to the AuNPs or SWCNTs alone. The plasmon coupling also acted as a local nano-antenna to enhance the photothermal efficiency of this theranostic system. Recently, hybrid Au-Si NPs functionalised with a NIR-resonant cyanine dye were also exploited for tissue imaging with surface-enhanced resonance hyper-Raman scattering (SERHRS) (Olson et al., 2022), a vibrational 2P spectroscopy technique.

Gold nano-clusters (AuNCs) are ultrasmall nano-materials constituted of as little as a dozen atoms of gold. Due to the proximity of their size to the de Broglie wavelength of an electron, they do not exhibit the typical plasmon resonance observed in larger AuNPs, but instead show strong quantum confinement effects, leading to molecule-like electronic transitions and fluorescence properties. AuNCs with a number of gold atoms varying from 25 to 2406 had their 2P fluorescence properties measured in the NIR-I and -II regions (Ramakrishna et al., 2008). In the NIR-I (800 nm), 2PA cross-sections ranging from 5 × 105 to a 3 × 106 GM were reported; but interestingly, the σ2 value per gold atom decreased drastically with the size of the AuNC, eventually showing saturation when transitioning to standard AuNP behaviour. In the NIR-II, the Au25 clusters (81) showed a cross-section of 2700 GM at 1290 nm with emission of light at 830 nm, however the quantum yield value of such systems is said to be in the 10–7 range which limits their brightness. PEG-lipoic acid functionalised AuNCs (82) of 1.5 nm in size have also been discussed for cellular imaging (Oh et al., 2013). The 2PA cross-section of these AuNCs was above 300 GM at 1100 nm, and remained >100 GM at 1300 nm where the measurement ended. Fluorescence at 820 nm with a Φf of 4–8% was reported depending on the surface functional group, and the objects were stable for months and generally non-toxic.

Quantum dots (QDs) are crystalline semiconductor materials that also display quantum confinement effects due to their nanometer size (Wegner and Hildebrandt, 2015; Barroso, 2011). The dependency of the confinement energy on the QD’s diameter leads to size-dependent absorption and emission, with smaller NPs resulting in larger band gaps–and therefore blue-shifted emission, and larger NPs having more red-shifted emission. Their highly tunable size and properties, high stability, limited photobleaching, and reported 2PA cross-sections (>5.0 × 104 GM at ≥1000 nm) make them great candidates for OMI applications (Gui et al., 2017; Nyk et al., 2012). Due to their unique semiconducting energy profile, they also feature broad absorption bands which would make them ideal for 2PA NIR-II imaging where excitation wavelength can be laser-dependent (Section 3.1). The main drawbacks of QDs arise due to reports on potential toxicity related to their heavy metal components (Tsoi et al., 2013). Examples of 2P-responsive QDs in the NIR-II include Mn2+-doped ZnS QDs (83) reported in 2013 by Subha et al. (Subha et al., 2013), which presented 2P- and 3P-induced photoluminescence at 586 nm resulting from the electronic transitions of the manganese ions. A maximum 2PA cross-section of 265 GM was measured at 1180 nm, with an absorption band extending beyond 1250 nm (Figure 5A), which was higher than most standard dyes and fluorescent proteins (Section 2.3) reported at the time (Figure 5B). These QDs also possessed long photoluminescence lifetime (millisecond range).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

(A) 2PA spectrum of Mn2+-doped ZnS QDs in the range from 1050 to 1300 nm reported by Subha et al. (B) Comparison of σ2 values in Mn2+-doped ZnS QDs (curve g) with other standard chromophores (curves a–f) and fluorescent proteins (curves h–m): (a) Rhodamine B, (b) Fluorescein, (c) Coumarin 307, (d) Cascade blue, (e) Dansyl and (f) Lucifer Yellow), and (h) tdTomato, (i) mBanana (j) mRFP (k) mCherry (l) mStrawberry (m) mTangerine). Reprinted with permission from ref. (Subha et al., 2013). Copyright 2013 American Chemical Society.

Pioneering work combining 2P fluorescence and 2PFLIM using PbS/CdS QDs (84) as water-dispersible contrast agents was recently reported (Ni et al., 2022). These QDs allowed “NIR-to-NIR” imaging under 2PE at 1550 nm with a σ2 of 530 GM in water. Importantly, the QDs maintained bright fluorescence properties at 1270 nm, with a quantum yield of 18% in water, which is higher than most organic dyes at such long wavelengths. The high fluorescence lifetime (τ = 501 ns) of these QDs allowed the authors to implement a 2PFLIM system to complement 2P fluorescence imaging, and in vivo images of mouse brain blood vessels were obtained for the first time. As well as this, it is worth mentioning that Larson et al. reported polymer-encapsulated CdSe-ZnS QDs with 2P brightness of up to 4.7 × 104 GM, which is orders of magnitude higher than organic fluorescent probes (Larson et al., 2003). Although the measurements were only performed between 700 and 1000 nm at the time, brightness values proved relatively constant all over this range of wavelength thanks to their large absorption band; and QD605 (85), the brightest NP in their study, would likely still respond in the NIR-II regime.

2.3 Fluorescent Proteins

FPs are a class of proteins that contain chromophores that arise from specific amino-acid sequences in their polypeptide sequence undergoing a series of atypical transformations (Tsien, 1998; Shaner et al., 2004). Unlike the aforementioned examples that require injection or incubation with a contrast agent, FPs can be genetically encoded, and they can therefore generate luminescence with high target specificity. The 2P properties of NIR-II-responsive FPs have been well documented in the seminal work by Drobizhev et al. (2011). Several proteins absorbed efficiently above 1000 nm, and we limited our selection to the ones showing brightness values above 5 GM in Table 1 (compounds 86–104). Among them, the so-called “fruit proteins” have been reported with medium to strong 2P brightness in the 1000–1200 nm region (Figure 6) (Drobizhev et al., 2011; Drobizhev et al., 2009). With a maximum 2PA cross-section of 278 GM at 1050 nm, as well as an absorption band extending beyond 1200 nm, tdTomato (86) was reported as the brightest in the series (Shaner et al., 2004; Drobizhev et al., 2009). Proteins tdKatushka2 (87) and dsRed2 (88) follow with brightness values in the 50–100 GM range. As shown in Figure 6, the σ2Φf values per mature chromophore of FPs are comparable to those of organic fluorophores, and orders of magnitude lower than those of nanomaterials and AIEgens. Still, as highlighted by Drobizhev et al. (2011), these 2PA properties match well with current widespread NIR-II laser technologies such as Ti:Sapphire with optical parametric oscillators, neodymium (Nd)- and ytterbium (Yb)-doped fibre and glass lasers and chromium-forsterite (Cr-Mg2SiO4) lasers (Section 3.1) (Shaner et al., 2004; Drobizhev et al., 2009). FPs were therefore among the first luminescent trackers to be used successfully to perform 2P imaging of biological systems in the NIR-II window, and to develop new adapted multi-photon technologies. Gene expression in transgenic zebrafish embryo, tagged with a red FP (Hc-RFP, 89), was investigated by Tsai et al. using 2P imaging (Tsai et al., 2005; Tsai et al., 2006). Heart-specific regulatory elements of a zebrafish cardiac gene fused with the encoding element for Hc-RFP were injected into zebrafish embryos. This generated a zebrafish line that showed strong 2P red fluorescence in cardiac cells (Tsai et al., 2005). This red FP allowed imaging with a 1230 nm fs light source, providing superior imaging resolution compared with traditional green FP-based 2P microscopy. In addition, the properties of HcRFP were measured under 2PE by the same group, showing an excitation maximum around 1200 nm and an absorption cross-section of the same order as the green FP (GFP) (Tsai et al., 2006). The use of red FPs and mCherry (90) under OPO excitation has also been demonstrated (Herz et al., 2010) and compared against NIR-I activated GFP. The authors report that, in the cortex of fluorescent-protein-expressing mice, a maximal imaging depth of 508 μm was possible when imaging with tandem dimer RFP (TdRFP, 104) at 1110 nm, which represents an 80% enhancement compared to GFP-expressing mice imaged at 850 nm. The depth-dependent deterioration of the spatial resolution was also significantly lower at 1110 nm. Yang et al. induced the expression of the tdTomato protein in excitatory neurons of mice (Yang et al., 2013). The authors used this model to validate the development of their multi-colour OPO-based laser set up which was used successfully at 1070 nm for 2P imaging of the intact brain cortex (Section 3). Voigt et al. recently validated the design of a novel semiconductor-disk laser (SDL) by performing in vivo 2P imaging of FP-containing Drosophila larvae (Voigt et al., 2017).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

1PA and 2PA spectra of fluorescent proteins of the “fruit series”. Left axis shows the 2PA cross-section σ2 (λ) per mature chromophore, right axis shows corresponding σ2 (λ)Φf values. Adapted with permission from ref. (Drobizhev et al., 2009). Copyright 2009 American Chemical Society.

3 In vivo 2P-NIR-II Bio-Imaging: Instrumentation and Examples

Two-photon absorption is a third-order NLO phenomenon. As such, 2PA can be observed in many types of materials provided that the intensity of the electric field in the light source is strong enough to generate a non-linear polarisation in the material (He et al., 2008).

For 2PA imaging applications, high photon densities are required to ensure sufficient fluorophore excitation; requiring around one million times more photon flux compared to 1PA events (Le Bot, 2009). This involves the use of high intensity pulsed (mode-locked) lasers. Such systems provide brief but intense light pulses which results in high photon fluxes arriving at a sample to promote 2PE, while also keeping the average power low enough to prevent tissue damage. By reducing the average excitation power, the number of 1PA events are minimised, which is known to be the source of heating and resultant photo-damage. Laser requirements for 2P imaging are typically met with output powers of >1 W, pulse durations of <100 fs, repetition rates of typically between 80-100 MHz, and high peak powers (>100 kW). Lasers capable of producing pulses of light of durations shorter than picoseconds (10–12) do so using a method known as ‘mode locking’.

Recent years have shown an increase in successful 2PA NIR-II imaging with imaging depths of up to 1200 μm into tissue being claimed (Alifu et al., 2017). However, most lasers explored in current literature have their output wavelengths in the NIR-IIa region, with most reports showing imaging performed at lasing wavelengths of <1300 nm (Section 3.2, Table 3). This is likely due to the limited capacities of current lasers struggling to reach the power, portability and flexibility requirements at such long wavelengths.

Traditional systems for 2P imaging involve the use of solid-state lasers (Drobizhev et al., 2011; Ustione and Piston, 2011). However, due to their drawbacks, such lasers have limited applications in the NIR-II window. As such, lasing systems involving the use of optical parametric oscillators (OPOs), optical parametric amplifiers (OPAs), and fibre lasers, are more commonly used for 2P NIR-II imaging.

3.1 NIR-II Laser Technologies

3.1.1 NIR-II Solid-State Pulsed Lasers

The first paper demonstrating 2P imaging applications was demonstrated by Denk et al. (1990) in which a 25 mW colliding pulse, mode-locked dye laser with an emission of 630 nm was used. Historically, dye lasers dominated the field of tuneable lasers but were then replaced by solid-state lasers (often based on Ti:Sapphire crystal) due to their bulky structures, complex liquid handling systems, and the involvement of toxic and volatile dyes (Ferguson et al., 1993).

Solid-state ‘mode-locked’ lasers compatible with 2P imaging produce high-power light pulses on a femtosecond time-scale. Solid-state lasers typically consist of a solid gain media typically doped with rare-earth ions, such as ytterbium, chromium, and neodymium, and optically pumped by a diode laser (Chénais and Forget, 2012; Arbuzov et al., 2013). Solid-state ‘mode-locked’ lasers have been historically used in imaging applications for their convenience, high potential output powers, and low cost. However, their applications in the NIR-II is restricted due to their shorter emission wavelengths or limited wavelength tunability (Zhang et al., 2021b). Ti:Sapphire lasers have a range of advantages such as a wide tuning range, high output power, and femtosecond pulsing capability, however, they are not suited for 2P NIR-II imaging applications due to their emission wavelength (700–1000 nm) not reaching the NIR-II optical window.

Solid-state lasers based on crystals such as Cr:Forsterite are of particular interest as they can produce emission wavelengths between 1220 nm and 1270 nm and have been successfully applied in 2P NIR-II imaging applications with wavelengths of around 1230 nm (Shen et al., 2015; Tsai et al., 2005). Nd:YLF lasers are a common composition that produces a fixed lasing wavelength of 1047 nm (Squirrell et al., 1999; Wokosin et al., 1996b). As demonstrated in Section 2, the 2PE wavelength at 1047 nm overlaps with the absorption band of several bio-imaging dyes. However, both Cr:Forsterite and Nd:YLF mode-locked lasers lack a wide wavelength tuning range (Trägårdh et al., 2016), which implies that fluorescent probes must be carefully chosen in order to match the small bandwidths, therefore this tends to limit biological imaging to just one colour. An example of a solid-state laser being used for in vivo applications involve a Nd:YLF laser being used to perform 2P NIR-II imaging of a stained zebrafish embryo (Wokosin et al., 1996a) (Section 3.2, Table 3). To overcome the drawback of limited excitation wavelengths of such solid-state lasers, multi-colour 2P imaging can instead be achieved by using two tunable lasers in tandem, although this is a relatively high-cost solution. Other solutions have been found in utilising the second Stokes shift to extend output wavelengths in Ti:Sapphire laser systems, or in methods such as phase-shaping (Brenner et al., 2013; Trägårdh et al., 2016).

3.1.2 NIR-II OPO/OPA Systems

OPOs based on the second-order NLO interactions can convert the output wavelength of an input laser (pump) into two longer wavelengths with lower energy output waves, known as signal and idler (Trovatello et al., 2021). Both continuous wave (CW) and pulsed OPOs can be realised depending on requirements and applications (Sowade et al., 2013). In phase-matching conditions, parametric amplification occurs within a NLO crystal where all three waves are interacting (Trovatello et al., 2021). Wavelengths of the amplified signal can be tuned to access the near-, mid-, and far-infrared regions–which is often much harder to achieve in traditional laser systems. OPO systems have great potential in biological imaging applications as a wide range of wavelengths from a single laser allows multicolour imaging across the whole NIR spectrum, overcoming the limitations of standard solid-state systems. Such systems have only been commercially available within the last few decades, and have now extended lasing applications into the deep IR (up to 2500 nm) (Pascal et al., 2021), which has enabled the discovery of new 2P-absorbing organic molecules within this spectral range where other associated tools for optical investigation exist.

Traditional ‘mode-locked’ lasers in combination with OPO techniques now appear to be the laser system of choice for 2P NIR-II imaging applications (Table 3). Common 2P microscopes include a high-peak-power Ti:Sapphire laser used in combination with a compatible OPO, which can significantly extend the wavelength range. For example, the Blaze laser from Radiantis offers a “one box” Ti:Sapphire/OPO system with three output ports (pump, signal and idler). The pump laser (Ti:Sapphire) provides a tunable wavelength range of 730–1020 nm, the signal output provides a tunable wavelength range of 1000–1550 nm, and the idler output provides a tunable range of 1620–4000 nm. Unfortunately, the output power of the tunable OPO laser decreases dramatically when tuned to longer wavelengths due to the lower conversion efficiency and higher intrinsic loss. Here, the power drops from 2.2 W to 250 mW with increasing wavelength, thus limiting its imaging applications. Due to the difficulties in developing long-wavelength lasers that also match the power requirements for 2P imaging, most current examples in the NIR-II window are demonstrated with wavelengths between 1000-1300 nm. An example of the benefits of OPOs was demonstrated by Herz et al. who showed the increased tissue penetration performance by using an OPO laser compared to a traditional Ti:Sapphire laser (Herz et al., 2010). Recent advancement has led to the commercialisation of systems capable of 2P NIR-II imaging with the integration of OPO based lasers. The Olympus FVMPE-RS Multiphoton Microscope appears to be a popular system of choice for current 2P NIR-II in vivo imaging purposes, achieving impressive resolution and penetration depths (Section 3.2, Table 3) (Zhou et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2019b; Wang et al., 2019c; Liu et al., 2020). This microscope can image at wavelengths of up to 1300 nm and also contains detectors and other equipment required for plug-in bench top imaging. This is achieved by combining two lasers within the microscope, namely the MAi Tai DeepSee One Box ultra-fast laser (Ti:Sapphire-based for excitation up to 1040 nm), and an InSight® DS+™ OPO (up to 1348 nm). Also worth noting is the Leica TCS SP8 DIVE upright multiphoton/confocal microscope that claims to be the first multiphoton microscope with spectrally tunable detection. This microscope utilises an OPO laser source to realise a tunable output wavelength between 680-1300 nm and has also demonstrated 2P NIR-II imaging applications in vivo (Section 3.2, Table 3) (Liu et al., 2020).

Limitations of OPO lasers arise due to the requirements of a pump source with high spatial coherence and optical intensity, often requiring a diode-pumped solid-state laser. Furthermore, complex procedures have to be undertaken that require variation in the crystal’s temperature, orientation, and poling period in order to realise phase matching. Careful free-space alignment and temporal synchronisation are also required for the OPO cavity, which makes the system sensitive to external perturbation and hence a high-level of maintenance is needed. Power restraints, requirements of water cooling, bulkiness, high cost, and expensive maintenance requirements are further limitations for desirable “turn-key” 2P microscopy. To overcome these downfalls, other systems have been developed, such as OPAs. Although OPA systems have similar principles of converting the short-wavelength input pump to the output signal with wavelength in the NIR-II regime, they do not need cavity and temporal synchronisation which can result in a simpler structure and has a smaller footprint (Chen et al., 2020).

Yang et al. demonstrated 2P NIR-II imaging by using a multi-colour ultrafast OPO source (Yang et al., 2013), where brain tissues of a tdTomato-expressing mouse were imaged with 2PE at 1070 nm (Section 3.2, Table 3). Xu et al. have developed a periodically poled lithium niobate OPA system operating at 2-ps pulse duration (Xu et al., 2021). In their work, imaging at a depth of 40 μm was achieved in both label-free coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) and 2PE based imaging of mitochondrial flavin adenine dinucleotide autofluorescence in tissue samples.

3.1.3 Fibre Lasers

Fibre lasers were first demonstrated in the mid-1980s, followed by the development of high energy Q-switched fibre lasers and mode-locked fibre lasers (Rose, 2019). Fibre lasers consist of an optical fibre doped with rare-earth ions such as Erbium, Neodymium, or Ytterbium, similar to the elements used in their solid-state counterparts (Kim et al., 2012; Mohr et al., 2020). Light from a pump source is guided through this robust waveguide that provides a long gain medium length, resulting in a high optical gain (Rose, 2019).

Fibre lasers present unique optical and practical benefits for 2P NIR-II imaging by removing the requirement of bulk optics and free-space alignment, which offers the benefits of compactness, high stability, reduced initial and maintenance cost (Figure 7), and increased reliability compared to OPO lasers (Table 2). Simple air-cooling of fibre lasers is possible, due to the large surface-area of the fibre, compared to expensive and cumbersome water-cooling that traditional solid-state lasers require. This all results in greater flexibility for the end-user, with many in the near-future looking likely to replace the bulky and complex laser systems and provide a more ‘plug and play’ approach to 2P microscopy imaging.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

The approximate 5-years costs of traditional tunable 2PA lasers (green) and alternative fixed wavelengths lasers (yellow), demonstrating the economical benefits of fixed wavelength fibre lasers. Reproduced from the supplementary material of ref (Mohr et al., 2020) with permission from the authors.

Importantly, unlike solid-state lasers and OPO lasers that tend to decrease output power at longer wavelengths, fibre lasers can maintain high output powers at the wavelengths required for 2P imaging. This was demonstrated by Jung et al., whose initial attempts of the 2PE of Chrimson-expressing neurons with a conventional femtosecond Ti:Sapphire laser did not result in reliable activation of the target neurons (Jung et al., 2020). On the contrary, activation was observed upon 2P NIR-II excitation at 1070 nm (2W) by using a Yb-doped fibre laser which provided 5–10 times higher power output than the Ti:Sapphire laser. Another example of 2P NIR-II imaging was demonstrated by Kim et al., showing tridimensional 2P imaging of ex vivo nerve cells at 1060 nm using a Yb-doped fiber lasers (Kim et al., 2012).

The major challenge of developing high-power short-pulsed fibre lasers is to prevent the distortion of pulse shapes by nonlinear effects such as self-phase modulation and stimulated Raman scattering, which can consequently degrade peak power and 2PE efficiency (Liu and Yang, 2012). This could reduce the fluorescence signal and cause unwanted heating within the sample, and as such, certain technical approaches such as temporally stretching the pulse (Eisele, 2020) can be implemented to resolve this limitation. The tuning range of common fibre lasers for 2P imaging is below 100 nm due to the limited gain bandwidth. Current commercially available fibre lasers using common doping agents only provide distinct wavelengths of around 780 nm, 920 nm, 1050 nm, and 1550 nm (Eisele, 2020). Commonly used Yb-doped fibre lasers for 2P NIR-II imaging have a tunability range of around 1020–1080 nm (Liu and Yang, 2012). However, although difficult, methods for expanding the tunability range of fibre lasers are being explored by implementing nonlinear effects as well as temperature and magnetic field control (Wei et al., 2021). Zhang et al. also recently developed a CW fibre laser with an output wavelength tunable from 1000 to 1900 nm by utilising a random distributed feedback Raman fibre laser.

So far only a limited number of biological 2P NIR-II studies have been reported with fibre lasers despite their portability, ease-of-use, access to longer wavelengths, and high power features, possibly due to the lack of commercially available microscopes that integrates such lasers. However, in vivo studies using in-house built fibre lasers have demonstrated their high potential, both by performing 2P NIR-II imaging at 1550 nm–the longest wavelength so far reported (Berezin et al., 2011; Ni et al., 2022), and by reaching the deepest in vivo penetration (1040 nm) (Alifu et al., 2017) (Section 3.2, Table 3). In addition, the components of fibre lasers are much cheaper than OPO sources, as evidenced by Perillo et al. who developed a 2P NIR-II microscope using a mode-locked Yb-doped fibre laser for ∼$13000 and applied it to image FPs at 1060 nm with penetration depths of up to 900 μm (Perillo et al., 2016). In contrast, the cost of a OPO-based imaging system commonly used for similar 2P NIR-II applications, such as the Olympus FVMPE-RS (Section 3.2, Table 3) can be up to 10–100 times higher. Modern solutions will hopefully arise in time with the development of affordable commercial benchtop fibre lasers suitable for 2P NIR-II clinical applications.

3.2 In vivo Examples of 2P NIR-II Imaging

Clinically relevant examples of 2P NIR-II imaging have been reported using commercially available biological stains, FPs, and custom-made AIEgens. This section aims to discuss the probes presented in Section 2 in a photo-biological context, with a focus on in vivo examples.

The main aim of 2P NIR-II imaging is to improve resolution and depth perception when imaging. The latest examples of 2P NIR-II emitting materials being used in vivo (“in vivo” here indicating agents being administered in a living creature; including examples of imaging post-resection) can be seen in Table 3. As well as having outstanding applications for bio-imaging, recent advances in NIR-II 2PE have led to developments in other biological applications such as PDT and photoacoustic imaging (Wang et al., 2020b; Hu et al., 2020; Ma et al., 2021b).

In 1996, Wokosin et al. demonstrated the improved 2P NIR-II imaging resolution at a penetration depth of 55 μm into stained zebrafish embryos compared to traditional 1P confocal microscopy (Wokosin et al., 1996d). In this case, a traditional solid-state Nd:YLF mode-locked laser operating at 1057 nm was used to image safranin-stained embryos (a biological stain typically used for histology and cytology with an absorption and emission of ∼500 nm and ∼590 nm respectively) (Krumschnabel et al., 2014). Zebrafish have a history of being used for biological imaging due to their transparency resulting in limited photon scattering. In the more recent work of Liu et al., a penetration depth of 500 μm was reached in zebrafish larvae using red-emitting CDs 79 excited at 1100 nm using a commercial microscope (Leica SP8 DIVE) fitted with an OPO system for 2PE (Liu et al., 2020). DTTC (30) is another example of a commercial stain used for 2P NIR-II imaging, where a fibre laser was used to achieve an imaging depth of up to 210 μm at 1550 nm in a resected mouse kidney post-injection (Berezin et al., 2011).

Out of all in vivo studies reported in this range of wavelengths, AIEgen NPs and other NP-based systems appear to be the most popular choice to demonstrate superior penetration depth compared to other systems (Table 3). In the context of in vivo 2P imaging, NPs bypass the solubility limitation of organic dyes. They also show increased stability and cumulative size-related increase in 2PA cross-section; all of which make them promising imaging agents. The current record of tissue penetration was thus reported by Alifu et al. (Nowak-Król et al., 2013) using triphenylamine dipole 59 incorporated within PSMA-based NPs, which led to 2P imaging at a depth of 1200 µm into mouse brain vasculature. Using the BTZ-based AIEgen 70, 2P imaging of mouse brain tissues was achieved with high resolution and showed significant improvements, reaching a depth of 1064 μm at 1300 nm compared to 700 µm under 1PA (Table 3) (Qi et al., 2018). This highlights the sequential increased depth penetration of medical imaging using NIR-II wavelengths compared to shorter wavelengths, and the advantage of 2P over 1P microscopy. On a separate occasion, the same group used similar AIE NPs on a home built OPO laser-based system to demonstrate penetration depths of up to 750 μm at a shorter 2P wavelength (1040 nm) (Table 3) (Liu et al., 2021). Here, mouse brain vessels as small as 3.17 µm were imaged. The AIEdots prepared from compound 72 by Samanta et al. also allowed 800 μm brain tissue penetration under 2PE at 1040 nm (Table 3) (Samanta et al., 2021). Interestingly, record absorption capacity and unprecedented 2P brightness values (>104 GM) were measured for the tetraphenylethene-BODIPY (75) AIEDots made by Wang et al., but the reported penetration depth was not higher than in more recent studies (700 µm vs. 1200 µm) (Wang et al., 2015). As this is one of the older reports from these studies (2015) it is worth noting that newer technologies with optimum imaging systems could assist in taking this value to similar levels. The potential development of non-invasive imaging techniques using 2P NIR-II excitation was demonstrated by Wang et al. using polymer dots 64 as contrast agents (Wang et al., 2019b). The imaging of mice brains was achieved at an impressive penetration depth of 400 µm without craniotomy (intact skull) (Figure 8, a-l). The authors also showed the distinct resolution improvement using NIR-II light for 2P imaging when imaging at depths, when compared to light of shorter wavelengths (Figure 8, m). Among other classes of luminescent materials, in vivo 2P NIR-II imaging was shown for the first time using QDs as a contrast agent by Ni et al. with the PbS/CdS QDs 84 (Ni et al., 2022). Imaging depths of 220 µm were achieved in the mouse brain vasculature with a fibre laser operating at 1550 nm. Zhou et al. also demonstrated the potential of dual-functional dye 60 that combined 2PEF and ROS generation. 2P imaging of the probe was demonstrated using NIR-II irradiation and a white light laser was used to induce ROS generation in tumours of living mice, allowing for image-guided PDT (Zhou et al., 2021). A triphenylamine dipole was thus used as a theranostic agent to combine 2P imaging and cancer treatment in mice (Table 3).

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

2PA images of brain blood vessels in a mouse injected with CP dots. (a,b) 3D reconstructed second-harmonic generation images of mouse skull. (c–h) 2PA images at various vertical depths (0–400 μm) at 1200 nm excitation, 660–750 nm emission. (i–l) 3D reconstructed 2PA images of brain blood vessels. (m) comparison of 2PA images at excitation wavelengths of 800, 1040, and 1200 nm, of brain vasculature in a mouse injected with polymer dots. 2PA line intensity profiles with the different wavelengths across the blood vessels on the right were also acquired for the corresponding depths. Emission at 660–750 nm. Reprinted from ref (Wang et al., 2019b). with permission from John Wiley and Sons.

Unsurprisingly, commercially available OPO laser-based microscopes are popular systems for imaging experiments; with most examples performed in the early NIR-II range (1000–1300 nm) (Table 3) although imaging at wavelengths above 1200 nm could show the optimum optical benefits. This highlights the limitation of a lack of commercial imaging systems in the NIR-IIb range.

4 Discussion and Perspectives

The design of OMI probes usable in the “biological transparency windows” is arguably one of the most prevalent challenges in optobiology today. Shifting the 1PE band of dyes to the NIR-II is possible, but highly challenging as massive bathochromic shifts often come at the cost of fluorescence quantum yield and brightness. To circumvent this problem, 2P NIR-II imaging shows outstanding potential for expanding the applications of fluorescence-based medical imaging. By reducing auto-fluorescence and scattering while confining the excitation to a femtoliter-sized volume, this technique allows for dramatic resolution improvement and enhanced deep tissue imaging which would help the applications of image-guided surgery, point-by-point chemical detection, and image-based diagnostics reach their full potential. A wide range of probe design strategies have been implemented recently to achieve sufficient 2P brightness (>25 GM) in this wavelength range (Figure 9). Organic fluorophores have the benefit of low toxicity and easy functionalisation to change their optical and biological properties. Among them, xanthene and polymethine dyes hold great potential for 2P NIR-II imaging due to their versatility allowing bathochromic shifts in their optical properties while retaining a highly emissive character. However, in designing such contrast agents, dye design rules and choice of fluorophore should be considered carefully as centrosymmetric molecules can easily fail to reach the NIR-II range because of selection rules. In contrast, significantly higher σ2Φf values are witnessed when 2P absorbers are integrated into nanoparticle structures, including AIE systems, achieving unprecedented 2P brightnesses of up to 5.6 × 105 GM in the NIR-II. 2P NIR-II luminescent materials have the potential to expand into image guided surgery, diagnostics and chemical sensing due to the high resolution and penetration depths that can be reached, which can also expand to controlled photo-release in therapy applications (Sun et al., 2017a; Zhao et al., 2019). For in vivo imaging, unsurprisingly, AIEgens have proven to be the 2P dyes of choice. Such nanosystems also show good biocompatibility and high brightnesses and facilitate mouse brain vascular imaging at depths of up to 1200 µm, and even showed the potential for through-skull brain imaging. Nonetheless, such imaging agents require a certain amount of design and preparation, and more user-friendly solutions can be found in commercially available biological stains. Indeed, there is still to this day a significant gap in the availability and measurement of 2P properties of such dyes, even though many potential 2P dyes can be found in common cell stains (ICG, Alexa dyes etc.). Easily accessible and biologically compatible probes, and their custom-made derivatives, hold great potential in the development of 2P imaging in the NIR-II.

FIGURE 9.

FIGURE 9

Plot of the 2P brightness and corresponding NIR-II wavelengths of the contrast agents presented in this review (σ2Φf > 24 GM). The 2P contrast agents used in vivo are represented with a framed number. For clarity, a linear scale for brightnesses between 0 and 100 GM, and a logarithmic scale above 100 GM. The typical range of wavelengths covered by common SWIR lasers is shown for reference (power attenuation is represented by the fading colour; note that OPOs and OPAs can extend past 2000 nm).

Such compounds, as well as synthetic fluorophores with higher NIR absorption capacities, have likely not yet been categorised due to the difficulty in taking such measurements in this optical window due to the lack of commercial 2P solutions. Nevertheless, more recently, commercially available OPO-based laser imaging systems have facilitated greater access to 2P NIR-II measurements and 2P imaging. These new systems have led to a dramatic rise in publications of in vivo studies emerging from 2015 and beyond, and will likely continue to be developed to push the field. Fibre lasers offer huge promise in this sense, by facilitating the necessary power requirements to encourage imaging at wavelengths above 1300 nm, and to give rise to a new generation of imaging agents and biological applications. In this highly favourable context, we now hope that this review will serve as a motivation for researchers to explore the vast possibilities of multiphoton-excited luminescence in the NIR-II transparency windows.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Lin Xu (University of Southampton) for his input on laser systems and proofreading of Section 3.1 of the manuscript.

Author Contributions

PS, EF, FH, SY, and MK; investigation, writing and original draft preparation. PS, MK; validation and formal analysis. PS, EF, MB, MK; review and editing. MB, MK, EF; supervision. MK; conceptualisation and project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, United Kingdom) for funding of the programme grant EP/T020997, and for support of the Interdisciplinary Research Collaborations (EP/R018669/1 and EP/R005257) and of the CDT OPTIMA (EP/L016559).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Alifu N., Yan L., Zhang H., Zebibula A., Zhu Z., Xi W., et al. (2017). Organic Dye Doped Nanoparticles with NIR Emission and Biocompatibility for Ultra-deep In Vivo Two-Photon Microscopy under 1040 Nm Femtosecond Excitation. Dyes Pigments 143, 76–85. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.04.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson V. L., Webb W. W. (2011). Transmission Electron Microscopy Characterization of Fluorescently Labelled Amyloid β 1-40 and α-synuclein Aggregates. BMC Biotechnol. 11, 125. 10.1186/1472-6750-11-125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arbuzov V. I., Nikonorov N. V. (2013). “Neodymium, Erbium and Ytterbium Laser Glasses,” in Handbook of Solid-State Lasers. Editors Denker B., Shklovsky E. (Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; ), 110–138. 10.1533/9780857097507.1.110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ávila F. J., Gambín A., Artal P., Bueno J. M. (2019). In Vivo two-photon Microscopy of the Human Eye. Sci. Rep. 9, 10121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barroso M. M. (2011). Quantum Dots in Cell Biology. J. Histochem Cytochem. 59, 237–251. 10.1369/0022155411398487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bashkatov A. N., Genina E. A., Kochubey V. I., Tuchin V. V. (2005). Optical Properties of Human Skin, Subcutaneous and Mucous Tissues in the Wavelength Range from 400 to 2000 Nm. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 38, 2543–2555. 10.1088/0022-3727/38/15/004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Benninger R. K., Piston D. W. (2013). Two-photon Excitation Microscopy for the Study of Living Cells and Tissues. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. Chapter 4, Unit–24. 10.1002/0471143030.cb0411s59 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berezin M. Y., Zhan C., Lee H., Joo C., Akers W. J., Yazdanfar S., et al. (2011). Two-Photon Optical Properties of Near-Infrared Dyes at 1.55 μm Excitation. J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 11530–11535. 10.1021/jp207618e [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bestvater F., Spiess E., Stobrawa G., Hacker M., Feurer T., Porwol T., et al. (2002). Two-photon Fluorescence Absorption and Emission Spectra of Dyes Relevant for Cell Imaging. J. Microsc. 208, 108–115. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.2002.01074.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonis-O'Donnell J. T. D., Page R. H., Beyene A. G., Tindall E. G., McFarlane I. R., Landry M. P. (2017). Dual Near-Infrared Two-Photon Microscopy for Deep-Tissue Dopamine Nanosensor Imaging. Adv. Funct. Mat. 27, 1702112. 10.1002/adfm.201702112 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bradley D. J., Hutchinson M. H. R., Koetser H., Tolansky S. (1972). Interactions of Picosecond Laser Pulses with Organic Molecules II. Two-Photon Absorption Cross-Sections. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 329, 105–119. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brenner M. H., Cai D., Swanson J. A., Ogilvie J. P. (2013). Two-photon Imaging of Multiple Fluorescent Proteins by Phase-Shaping and Linear Unmixing with a Single Broadband Laser. Opt. Express 21, 17256–17264. 10.1364/oe.21.017256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Campbell R. E., Tour O., Palmer A. E., Steinbach P. A., Baird G. S., Zacharias D. A., et al. (2002). A Monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 7877–7882. 10.1073/pnas.082243699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cao J., Zhu B., Zheng K., He S., Meng L., Song J., et al. (2019). Recent Progress in NIR-II Contrast Agent for Biological Imaging. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 487. 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cao V. Y., Ye Y., Mastwal S. S., Lovinger D. M., Costa R. M., Wang K. H. (2013). In Vivo two-photon Imaging of Experience-dependent Molecular Changes in Cortical Neurons. J. Vis. Exp. 71, 50148. 10.3791/50148 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Carr J. A., Aellen M., Franke D., So P. T. C., Bruns O. T., Bawendi M. G. (2018). Absorption by Water Increases Fluorescence Image Contrast of Biological Tissue in the Shortwave Infrared. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 9080–9085. 10.1073/pnas.1803210115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carr J. A., Franke D., Caram J. R., Perkinson C. F., Saif M., Askoxylakis V., et al. (2018). Shortwave Infrared Fluorescence Imaging with the Clinically Approved Near-Infrared Dye Indocyanine Green. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 4465–4470. 10.1073/pnas.1718917115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ceymann H., Rosspeintner A., Schreck M. H., Mützel C., Stoy A., Vauthey E., et al. (2016). Cooperative Enhancement versus Additivity of Two-Photon-Absorption Cross Sections in Linear and Branched Squaraine Superchromophores. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 16404–16413. 10.1039/c6cp02312f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen B.-Y., Wu S., Yu Y.-J., Wu C.-T., Wang Y.-H., Jin G.-Y. (2020). 3.8 μm Mid-infrared Optical Parametric Amplifier Based on MgO:PPLN Crystal. Infrared Phys. Technol. 111, 103448. 10.1016/j.infrared.2020.103448 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen Y., Xue L., Zhu Q., Feng Y., Wu M. (2021). Recent Advances in Second Near-Infrared Region (NIR-II) Fluorophores and Biomedical Applications. Front. Chem. 9, 750404. 10.3389/fchem.2021.750404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chénais S., Forget S. (2012). Recent Advances in Solid-State Organic Lasers. Polym. Int. 61, 390–406. [Google Scholar]
  22. Cho S., Lim J. M., Hiroto S., Kim P., Shinokubo H., Osuka A., et al. (2009). Unusual Interchromophoric Interactions in β,β′ Directly and Doubly Linked Corrole Dimers: Prohibited Electronic Communication and Abnormal Singlet Ground States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 6412–6420. 10.1021/ja900220y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chung S.-J., Zheng S., Odani T., Beverina L., Fu J., Padilha L. A., et al. (2006). Extended Squaraine Dyes with Large Two-Photon Absorption Cross-Sections. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 14444–14445. 10.1021/ja065556m [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cosco E. D., Caram J. R., Bruns O. T., Franke D., Day R. A., Farr E. P., et al. (2017). Flavylium Polymethine Fluorophores for Near- and Shortwave Infrared Imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 13126–13129. 10.1002/anie.201706974 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Denk W., Strickler J. H., Webb W. W. (1990). Two-photon Laser Scanning Fluorescence Microscopy. Science 248, 73–76. 10.1126/science.2321027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Diao S., Blackburn J. L., Hong G., Antaris A. L., Chang J., Wu J. Z., et al. (2015). Fluorescence Imaging In Vivo at Wavelengths beyond 1500 Nm. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 14758–14762. 10.1002/anie.201507473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ding F., Zhan Y., Lu X., Sun Y. (2018). Recent Advances in Near-Infrared II Fluorophores for Multifunctional Biomedical Imaging. Chem. Sci. 9, 4370–4380. 10.1039/c8sc01153b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Drobizhev M., Makarov N. S., Tillo S. E., Hughes T. E., Rebane A. (2011). Two-photon Absorption Properties of Fluorescent Proteins. Nat. Methods 8, 393–399. 10.1038/nmeth.1596 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Drobizhev M., Stepanenko Y., Rebane A., Wilson C. J., Screen T. E. O., Anderson H. L. (2006). Strong Cooperative Enhancement of Two-Photon Absorption in Double-Strand Conjugated Porphyrin Ladder Arrays. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 12432–12433. 10.1021/ja0649623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Drobizhev M., Tillo S., Makarov N. S., Hughes T. E., Rebane A. (2009). Absolute Two-Photon Absorption Spectra and Two-Photon Brightness of Orange and Red Fluorescent Proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 855–859. 10.1021/jp8087379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Eisele M. (2020). Simplifying Two-Photon Microscopy. Wiley Analytical Science. [Google Scholar]
  32. Escobedo J. O., Rusin O., Lim S., Strongin R. M. (2010). NIR Dyes for Bioimaging Applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14, 64–70. 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.10.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ewart P. (2005). “Spectroscopy | Nonlinear Laser Spectroscopy,” in Encyclopedia of Modern Optics. Editor Guenther R.D. (Oxford: Elsevier; ), 109–119. 10.1016/b0-12-369395-0/00897-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Fan Y., Sun Y., Chang W., Zhang X., Tang J., Zhang L., et al. (2018). Bioluminescence Imaging and Two-Photon Microscopy Guided Laser Ablation of GBM Decreases Tumor Burden. Theranostics 8, 4072–4085. 10.7150/thno.25357 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Feng Z., Tang T., Wu T., Yu X., Zhang Y., Wang M., et al. (2021). Perfecting and Extending the Near-Infrared Imaging Window. Light Sci. Appl. 10, 197. 10.1038/s41377-021-00628-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ferguson A. I., Malcolm G. P. A. (1993). “Mode-Locked Solid State Lasers,” in Solid State Lasers: New Developments and Applications. Editors Inguscio M., Wallenstein R. (Boston, MA: Springer US; ), 29–44. 10.1007/978-1-4615-2998-9_3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Fu J., Padilha L. A., Hagan D. J., Van Stryland E. W., Przhonska O. V., Bondar M. V., et al. (2007). Molecular Structure-Two-Photon Absorption Property Relations in Polymethine Dyes. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 56–66. 10.1364/josab.24.000056 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Funabiki K., Yanagawa R., Kubota Y., Inuzuka T. (2019). Thermo- and Photo-Stable Symmetrical Benzo[cd]indolenyl-Substituted Heptamethine Cyanine Dye Carrying a Tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate that Absorbs Only Near-Infrared Light over 1000 Nm. New J. Chem. 43, 7491–7501. 10.1039/c9nj00867e [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Göppert M. (1929). Über die Wahrscheinlichkeit des Zusammenwirkens zweier Lichtquanten in einem Elementarakt. Sci. Nat. 17, 932. [Google Scholar]
  40. Göppert-Mayer M. (1931). Über Elementarakte mit zwei Quantensprüngen. Ann. Phys. 401, 273–294. [Google Scholar]
  41. Grienberger C., Konnerth A. (2012). Imaging Calcium in Neurons. Neuron 73, 862–885. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Gui R., Jin H., Wang Z., Tan L. (2017). Recent Advances in Optical Properties and Applications of Colloidal Quantum Dots under Two-Photon Excitation. Coord. Chem. Rev. 338, 141–185. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.02.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Hackethal A., Hirschburger M., Eicker S., Mücke T., Lindner C., Buchweitz O. (2018). Role of Indocyanine Green in Fluorescence Imaging with Near-Infrared Light to Identify Sentinel Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Vessels and Pathways Prior to Surgery - A Critical Evaluation of Options. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 78, 54–62. 10.1055/s-0043-123937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Han X., Ge F., Xu J. L., Bu X. H. (2021). Aggregation-induced Emission Materials for Nonlinear Optics. Aggregate 2, e28. 10.1002/agt2.28 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hassan M., Klaunberg B. A. (2004). Biomedical Applications of Fluorescence Imaging In Vivo . Comp. Med. 54, 635–644. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. He G. S., Tan L.-S., Zheng Q., Prasad P. N. (2008). Multiphoton Absorbing Materials: Molecular Designs, Characterizations, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 108, 1245–1330. 10.1021/cr050054x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Helmchen F., Denk W. (2005). Deep Tissue Two-Photon Microscopy. Nat. Methods 2, 932–940. 10.1038/nmeth818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Henary M., Mojzych M., Say M., Strekowski L. (2009). Functionalization of Benzo[c,d]indole System for the Synthesis of Visible and Near-Infrared Dyes. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 46, 84–87. 10.1002/jhet.39 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hermann J. P., Ducuing J. (1972). Dispersion of the Two-Photon Cross Section in Rhodamine Dyes. Opt. Commun. 6, 101–105. 10.1016/0030-4018(72)90204-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Herz J., Siffrin V., Hauser A. E., Brandt A. U., Leuenberger T., Radbruch H., et al. (2010). Expanding Two-Photon Intravital Microscopy to the Infrared by Means of Optical Parametric Oscillator. Biophys. J. 98, 715–723. 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.10.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Hisamune Y., Nishimura K., Isakari K., Ishida M., Mori S., Karasawa S., et al. (2015). Stable π Radical from a Contracted Doubly N-Confused Hexaphyrin by Double Palladium Metalation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 7323–7327. 10.1002/anie.201502285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hong G., Diao S., Antaris A. L., Dai H. (2015). Carbon Nanomaterials for Biological Imaging and Nanomedicinal Therapy. Chem. Rev. 115, 10816–10906. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hong G. S., Antaris A. L., Dai H. J. (2017). Near-infrared Fluorophores for Biomedical Imaging. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0010. 10.1038/s41551-016-0010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hornum M., Reinholdt P., Zaręba J. K., Jensen B. B., Wüstner D., Samoć M., et al. (2020). One- and Two-Photon Solvatochromism of the Fluorescent Dye Nile Red and its CF3, F and Br-Substituted Analogues. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 19, 1382–1391. 10.1039/d0pp00076k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hu H., Przhonska O. V., Terenziani F., Painelli A., Fishman D., Ensley T. R., et al. (2013). Two-photon Absorption Spectra of a Near-Infrared 2-azaazulene Polymethine Dye: Solvation and Ground-State Symmetry Breaking. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 7666–7678. 10.1039/c3cp50811k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hu W., Zhang H., He G. S., Baev A., Xia J., Huang W., et al. (2020). Organic NIR-II Photoacoustic Agent Utilizing Combined Two-Photon and Excited State Absorption at 1064 Nm. ACS Photonics 7, 3161–3165. 10.1021/acsphotonics.0c01227 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Jacques S. L. (2015). Generic Tissue Optical Properties. Available at: https://omlc.org/news/feb15/generic_optics/index.html.
  58. Josefsen L. B., Boyle R. W. (2012). Unique Diagnostic and Therapeutic Roles of Porphyrins and Phthalocyanines in Photodynamic Therapy, Imaging and Theranostics. Theranostics 2, 916–966. 10.7150/thno.4571 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Jung Y., Kennedy A., Chiu H., Mohammad F., Claridge-Chang A., Anderson D. J. (2020). Neurons that Function within an Integrator to Promote a Persistent Behavioral State in Drosophila. Neuron 105, 322–333. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.10.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Keiser G. (2016). “Light-Tissue Interactions,” in Biophotonics: Concepts to Applications. Editor Keiser G. (Singapore: Springer Singapore; ), 147–196. 10.1007/978-981-10-0945-7_6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Kenry Y., Duan Y., Liu B. (2018). Recent Advances of Optical Imaging in the Second Near-Infrared Window. Adv. Mat. 30, e1802394. 10.1002/adma.201802394 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim D. U., Song H., Song W., Kwon H.-S., Sung M., Kim D. Y. (2012). Two-photon Microscopy Using an Yb^3+-Doped Fiber Laser with Variable Pulse Widths. Opt. Express 20, 12341–12349. 10.1364/oe.20.012341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kim H. M., Cho B. R. (2015). Small-molecule Two-Photon Probes for Bioimaging Applications. Chem. Rev. 115, 5014–5055. 10.1021/cr5004425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Klausen M., Blanchard-Desce M. (2021). Two-photon Uncaging of Bioactive Compounds: Starter Guide to an Efficient IR Light Switch. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 48, 100423. 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2021.100423 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Klymchenko A. S. (2017). Solvatochromic and Fluorogenic Dyes as Environment-Sensitive Probes: Design and Biological Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 366–375. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00517 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kobat D., Durst M. E., Nishimura N., Wong A. W., Schaffer C. B., Xu C. (2009). Deep Tissue Multiphoton Microscopy Using Longer Wavelength Excitation. Opt. Express 17, 13354–13364. 10.1364/oe.17.013354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. König K., So P. T. C., Mantulin W. W., Gratton E. (1997). Cellular Response to Near-Infrared Femtosecond Laser Pulses in Two-Photon Microscopes. Opt. Lett. 22, 135–136. 10.1364/ol.22.000135 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Krumschnabel G., Eigentler A., Fasching M., Gnaiger E. (2014). “Use of Safranin for the Assessment of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential by High-Resolution Respirometry and Fluorometry,” in Methods in Enzymology. Editors Galluzzi L., Kroemer G. (Academic Press; ), 163–181. 10.1016/b978-0-12-416618-9.00009-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kucikas V., Werner M. P., Schmitz-Rode T., Louradour F., van Zandvoort M. (2021). Two-Photon Endoscopy: State of the Art and Perspectives. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2021, 1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kumari A., Gupta S. (2019). Two-photon Excitation and Direct Emission from S2 State of U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approved Near-Infrared Dye: Application of Anti-kasha's Rule for Two-Photon Fluorescence Imaging. J. Biophot. 12, e201800086. 10.1002/jbio.201800086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kuo W.-S., Wu P.-C., Chang C.-Y., Wang J.-Y., Chen P.-C., Hsieh M.-H., et al. (2022). Graphene Near Infrared-I/II Probe in Two-Photon Excitation-wavelength-independent Photoluminescence and Photoinactivation. Carbon 193, 205–215. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.03.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Larson D. R., Zipfel W. R., Williams R. M., Clark S. W., Bruchez M. P., Wise F. W., et al. (2003). Water-soluble Quantum Dots for Multiphoton Fluorescence Imaging In Vivo . Science 300, 1434–1436. 10.1126/science.1083780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Le Bot N. (2009). It Takes Two Photons to Tango. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, S17–S18. 10.1038/ncb1950 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lee H., Berezin M. Y., Henary M., Strekowski L., Achilefu S. (2008). Fluorescence Lifetime Properties of Near-Infrared Cyanine Dyes in Relation to Their Structures. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 200, 438–444. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2008.09.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Li C., Wang Q. (2018). Challenges and Opportunities for Intravital Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging Technology in the Second Transparency Window. ACS Nano 12, 9654–9659. 10.1021/acsnano.8b07536 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Li D., Jing P., Sun L., An Y., Shan X., Lu X., et al. (2018). Near-Infrared Excitation/Emission and Multiphoton-Induced Fluorescence of Carbon Dots. Adv. Mat. 30, e1705913. 10.1002/adma.201705913 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Li S., She C. Y. (2010). Two-photon Absorption Cross-Section Measurements in Common Laser Dyes at 1·06 μm. Opt. Acta Int. J. Opt. 29, 281–287. 10.1080/713820851 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li Y., Heng W.-K., Lee B. S., Aratani N., Zafra J. L., Bao N., et al. (2012). Kinetically Blocked Stable Heptazethrene and Octazethrene: Closed-Shell or Open-Shell in the Ground State? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 14913–14922. 10.1021/ja304618v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu C., Scott C. N. (2021). Design Strategies to Rhodamine Analogue Fluorophores for Near-Infrared II Biological Imaging Applications. Dyes Pigments 196, 109792. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2021.109792 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  80. Liu J., Yang L. (2012). Femtosecond Fiber Lasers for Biomedical Solutions. SPIE. [Google Scholar]
  81. Liu W., Zhang Y., Qi J., Qian J., Tang B. Z. (2021). NIR-II Excitation and NIR-I Emission Based Two-Photon Fluorescence Lifetime Microscopic Imaging Using Aggregation-Induced Emission Dots. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 37, 171–176. 10.1007/s40242-021-0405-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Liu Y., Gou H., Huang X., Zhang G., Xi K., Jia X. (2020). Rational Synthesis of Highly Efficient Ultra-narrow Red-Emitting Carbon Quantum Dots for NIR-II Two-Photon Bioimaging. Nanoscale 12, 1589–1601. 10.1039/c9nr09524a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Lockwood D. J. (2016). “Rayleigh and Mie Scattering,” in Encyclopedia of Color Science and Technology. Editor Luo M.R. (New York, NY: Springer New York; ), 1097–1107. 10.1007/978-1-4419-8071-7_218 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Looney M. R., Thornton E. E., Sen D., Lamm W. J., Glenny R. W., Krummel M. F. (2011). Stabilized Imaging of Immune Surveillance in the Mouse Lung. Nat. Methods 8, 91–96. 10.1038/nmeth.1543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. López-Duarte I., Chairatana P., Wu Y., Pérez-Moreno J., Bennett P. M., Reeve J. E., et al. (2015). Thiophene-based Dyes for Probing Membranes. Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 3792–3802. 10.1039/c4ob02507e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Lu Q., Wu C. J., Liu Z., Niu G., Yu X. (2020). Fluorescent AIE-Active Materials for Two-Photon Bioimaging Applications. Front. Chem. 8, 617463. 10.3389/fchem.2020.617463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Luo J., Xie Z., Lam J. W. Y., Cheng L., Tang B. Z., Chen H., et al. (2001). Aggregation-induced Emission of 1-Methyl-1,2,3,4,5-Pentaphenylsilole. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1740–1741. 10.1039/b105159h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Ma H., Zhao C., Meng H., Li R., Mao L., Hu D., et al. (2021). Multifunctional Organic Fluorescent Probe with Aggregation-Induced Emission Characteristics: Ultrafast Tumor Monitoring, Two-Photon Imaging, and Image-Guide Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 13, 7987–7996. 10.1021/acsami.0c21309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Ma Z., Wang F., Wang W., Zhong Y., Dai H. (2021). Deep Learning for In Vivo Near-Infrared Imaging. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, e2021446118. 10.1073/pnas.2021446118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Makarov N. S., Drobizhev M., Rebane A. (2008). Two-photon Absorption Standards in the 550-1600 Nm Excitation Wavelength Range. Opt. Express 16, 4029–4047. 10.1364/oe.16.004029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Massin J., Charaf-Eddin A., Appaix F., Bretonnière Y., Jacquemin D., van der Sanden B., et al. (2013). A Water Soluble Probe with Near Infrared Two-Photon Absorption and Polarity-Induced Fluorescence for Cerebral Vascular Imaging. Chem. Sci. 4, 2833–2843. 10.1039/c3sc22325f [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Meng F., Liu Y., Niu J., Lin W. (2017). A Novel Fluorescent Probe with a Large Stokes Shift for Real-Time Imaging Mitochondria in Different Living Cell Lines. Tetrahedron Lett. 58, 3287–3293. 10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.07.030 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Mohr M. A., Bushey D., Aggarwal A., Marvin J. S., Kim J. J., Marquez E. J., et al. (2020). jYCaMP: an Optimized Calcium Indicator for Two-Photon Imaging at Fiber Laser Wavelengths. Nat. Methods 17, 694–697. 10.1038/s41592-020-0835-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Mütze J., Iyer V., Macklin J. J., Colonell J., Karsh B., Petrášek Z., et al. (2012). Excitation Spectra and Brightness Optimization of Two-Photon Excited Probes. Biophysical J. 102, 934–944. 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Ni H., Wang Y., Tang T., Yu W., Li D., He M., et al. (2022). Quantum Dots Assisted In Vivo Two-Photon Microscopy with NIR-II Emission. Phot. Res. 10, 189–196. 10.1364/prj.441471 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Ni Y., Lee S., Son M., Aratani N., Ishida M., Samanta A., et al. (2016). A Diradical Approach towards BODIPY-Based Dyes with Intense Near-Infrared Absorption Around λ =1100 Nm. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2815–2819. 10.1002/anie.201511151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Nicolson F., Kircher M. F. (2021). “Theranostics: Agents for Diagnosis and Therapy,” in Molecular Imaging. Editors Ross B.D., Gambhir S.S. (Academic Press; ), 655–677. 10.1016/b978-0-12-816386-3.00040-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Nowak-Król A., Grzybowski M., Romiszewski J., Drobizhev M., Wicks G., Chotkowski M., et al. (2013). Strong Two-Photon Absorption Enhancement in a Unique Bis-Porphyrin Bearing a Diketopyrrolopyrrole Unit. Chem. Commun. 49, 8368–8370. 10.1039/c3cc44728f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Nowak-Król A., Wilson C. J., Drobizhev M., Kondratuk D. V., Rebane A., Anderson H. L., et al. (2012). Amplified Two-Photon Absorption inTrans-A2b2-Porphyrins Bearing Nitrophenylethynyl Substituents. ChemPhysChem 13, 3966–3972. 10.1002/cphc.201200507 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Nuriya M., Fukushima S., Momotake A., Shinotsuka T., Yasui M., Arai T. (2016). Multimodal Two-Photon Imaging Using a Second Harmonic Generation-specific Dye. Nat. Commun. 7, 11557. 10.1038/ncomms11557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Nyk M., Wawrzynczyk D., Szeremeta J., Samoc M. (2012). Spectrally Resolved Size-dependent Third-Order Nonlinear Optical Properties of Colloidal CdSe Quantum Dots. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 041102. 10.1063/1.3679381 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  102. Oh E., Fatemi F. K., Currie M., Delehanty J. B., Pons T., Fragola A., et al. (2013). PEGylated Luminescent Gold Nanoclusters: Synthesis, Characterization, Bioconjugation, and Application to One- and Two-Photon Cellular Imaging. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 30, 453–466. [Google Scholar]
  103. Olesiak-Banska J., Waszkielewicz M., Obstarczyk P., Samoc M. (2019). Two-photon Absorption and Photoluminescence of Colloidal Gold Nanoparticles and Nanoclusters. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 4087–4117. 10.1039/c8cs00849c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Olson J. E., Yu J. H., Thimes R. L., Camden J. P. (2022). Vibrational Two-Photon Microscopy for Tissue Imaging: Short-Wave Infrared Surface-Enhanced Resonance Hyper-Raman Scattering. J. Biophot. 15, e202100158. 10.1002/jbio.202100158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Osmialowski B., Petrusevich E. F., Antoniak M. A., Grela I., Bin Jassar M. A., Nyk M., et al. (2020). Controlling Two-Photon Action Cross Section by Changing a Single Heteroatom Position in Fluorescent Dyes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 5920–5925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Palit D. K., Singh A. K., Bhasikuttan A. C., Mittal J. P. (2001). Relaxation Dynamics in the Excited States of LDS-821 in Solution. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 6294–6304. 10.1021/jp004142r [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  107. Paoli J., Smedh M., Ericson M. B. (2009). Multiphoton Laser Scanning Microscopy-A Novel Diagnostic Method for Superficial Skin Cancers. Seminars Cutan. Med. Surg. 28, 190–195. 10.1016/j.sder.2009.06.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Pascal S., David S., Andraud C., Maury O. (2021). Near-infrared Dyes for Two-Photon Absorption in the Short-Wavelength Infrared: Strategies towards Optical Power Limiting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 6613–6658. 10.1039/d0cs01221a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Pascal S., Denis-Quanquin S., Appaix F., Duperray A., Grichine A., Le Guennic B., et al. (2017). Keto-polymethines: a Versatile Class of Dyes with Outstanding Spectroscopic Properties for in Cellulo and In Vivo Two-Photon Microscopy Imaging. Chem. Sci. 8, 381–394. 10.1039/c6sc02488b [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Pawlicki M., Collins H. A., Denning R. G., Anderson H. L. (2009). Two-photon Absorption and the Design of Two-Photon Dyes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 3244–3266. 10.1002/anie.200805257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Perillo E. P., McCracken J. E., Fernée D. C., Goldak J. R., Medina F. A., Miller D. R., et al. (2016). Deep In Vivo Two-Photon Microscopy with a Low Cost Custom Built Mode-Locked 1060 Nm Fiber Laser. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 324–334. 10.1364/boe.7.000324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Pham W., Cassell L., Gillman A., Koktysh D., Gore J. C. (2008). A Near-Infrared Dye for Multichannel Imaging. Chem. Commun. 2008, 1895–1897. 10.1039/b719028j [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Piston D. W. (2005). When Two Is Better Than One: Elements of Intravital Microscopy. PLoS Biol. 3, e207. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Poronik Y. M., Hugues V., Blanchard-Desce M., Gryko D. T. (2012). Octupolar Merocyanine Dyes: a New Class of Nonlinear Optical Chromophores. Chem. Eur. J. 18, 9258–9266. 10.1002/chem.201200718 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Pramanik A., Fan Z., Chavva S. R., Sinha S. S., Ray P. C. (2014). Highly Efficient and Excitation Tunable Two-Photon Luminescence Platform for Targeted Multi-Color MDRB Imaging Using Graphene Oxide. Sci. Rep. 4, 6090. 10.1038/srep06090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Qi J., Sun C., Li D., Zhang H., Yu W., Zebibula A., et al. (2018). Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogen with Near-Infrared-II Excitation and Near-Infrared-I Emission for Ultradeep Intravital Two-Photon Microscopy. ACS Nano 12, 7936–7945. 10.1021/acsnano.8b02452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Rakhymzhan A., Leben R., Zimmermann H., Günther R., Mex P., Reismann D., et al. (2017). Synergistic Strategy for Multicolor Two-Photon Microscopy: Application to the Analysis of Germinal Center Reactions In Vivo . Sci. Rep. 7, 7101. 10.1038/s41598-017-07165-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Ramakrishna G., Varnavski O., Kim J., Lee D., Goodson T. (2008). Quantum-sized Gold Clusters as Efficient Two-Photon Absorbers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 5032–5033. 10.1021/ja800341v [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Rao J., Dragulescu-Andrasi A., Yao H. (2007). Fluorescence Imaging In Vivo: Recent Advances. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18, 17–25. 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.01.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Ricard C., Arroyo E. D., He C. X., Portera-Cailliau C., Lepousez G., Canepari M., et al. (2018). Two-photon Probes for In Vivo Multicolor Microscopy of the Structure and Signals of Brain Cells. Brain Struct. Funct. 223, 3011–3043. 10.1007/s00429-018-1678-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Ricci F., Carlotti B., Keller B., Bonaccorso C., Fortuna C. G., Goodson T., et al. (2017). Enhancement of Two-Photon Absorption Parallels Intramolecular Charge-Transfer Efficiency in Quadrupolar versus Dipolar Cationic Chromophores. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 3987–4001. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b10629 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  122. Rose M. H. H. (2019). A History of the Laser: 1960 - 2019, Photonics Spectra. Photonics Media. [Google Scholar]
  123. RPMC (2020). Advantages of Two-Photon Microscopy Utilizing Femtosecond Fiber Lasers, Pulsed Lasers Blog Posts. RPMC Lasers. [Google Scholar]
  124. Rubart M. (2004). Two-photon Microscopy of Cells and Tissue. Circulation Res. 95, 1154–1166. 10.1161/01.res.0000150593.30324.42 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Samanta S., Huang M., Li S., Yang Z., He Y., Gu Z., et al. (2021). AIE-active Two-Photon Fluorescent Nanoprobe with NIR-II Light Excitability for Highly Efficient Deep Brain Vasculature Imaging. Theranostics 11, 2137–2148. 10.7150/thno.53780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Schaafsma B. E., Mieog J. S. D., Hutteman M., van der Vorst J. R., Kuppen P. J. K., Löwik C. W. G. M., et al. (2011). The Clinical Use of Indocyanine Green as a Near-Infrared Fluorescent Contrast Agent for Image-Guided Oncologic Surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 104, 323–332. 10.1002/jso.21943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Scherer D., Dörfler R., Feldner A., Vogtmann T., Schwoerer M., Lawrentz U., et al. (2002). Two-photon States in Squaraine Monomers and Oligomers. Chem. Phys. 279, 179–207. 10.1016/s0301-0104(02)00384-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  128. Shaner N. C., Campbell R. E., Steinbach P. A., Giepmans B. N. G., Palmer A. E., Tsien R. Y. (2004). Improved Monomeric Red, Orange and Yellow Fluorescent Proteins Derived from Discosoma Sp. Red Fluorescent Protein. Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 1567–1572. 10.1038/nbt1037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Shen Y.-F., Tsai M.-R., Chen S.-C., Leung Y.-S., Hsieh C.-T., Chen Y.-S., et al. (2015). Imaging Endogenous Bilirubins with Two-Photon Fluorescence of Bilirubin Dimers. Anal. Chem. 87, 7575–7582. 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b01903 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Smith P. G., Baldacchini T., Carter J., Zadoyan R. (2012). Two-Photon Microscopy/Multimodal Imaging: Femtosecond Laser Developments Advance Two-Photon Imaging. Spectra Physics: BioOptics World. [Google Scholar]
  131. Smith S. N., Steer R. P. (2001). The Photophysics of Lissamine Rhodamine-B Sulphonyl Chloride in Aqueous Solution: Implications for Fluorescent Protein-Dye Conjugates. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 139, 151–156. 10.1016/s1010-6030(01)00372-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  132. Sordillo L. A., Pratavieira S., Pu Y., Salas-Ramirez K., Shi L. Y., Zhang L., et al. (2014). Third Therapeutic Spectral Window for Deep Tissue Imaging. Opt. Biopsy Xii 2014, 8940. 10.1117/12.2040604 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  133. Sordillo L. A., Pu Y., Pratavieira S., Budansky Y., Alfano R. R. (2014). Deep Optical Imaging of Tissue Using the Second and Third Near-Infrared Spectral Windows. J. Biomed. Opt. 19, 056004. 10.1117/1.jbo.19.5.056004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Sowade R., Kiessling J., Breunig I. (2013). CW Laser Light Tunable from Blue to Red: OPOs Pave the Way. Germany: Photonik International. [Google Scholar]
  135. Squirrell J. M., Wokosin D. L., White J. G., Bavister B. D. (1999). Long-term Two-Photon Fluorescence Imaging of Mammalian Embryos without Compromising Viability. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 763–767. 10.1038/11698 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Subha R., Nalla V., Yu J. H., Jun S. W., Shin K., Hyeon T., et al. (2013). Efficient Photoluminescence of Mn2+-Doped ZnS Quantum Dots Excited by Two-Photon Absorption in Near-Infrared Window II. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 20905–20911. 10.1021/jp404124c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  137. Sun C.-L., Lv S.-K., Liu Y.-P., Liao Q., Zhang H.-L., Fu H., et al. (2017). Benzoindolic Squaraine Dyes with a Large Two-Photon Absorption Cross-Section. J. Mat. Chem. C 5, 1224–1230. 10.1039/c6tc04129a [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Sun C., Li B., Zhao M., Wang S., Lei Z., Lu L., et al. (2019). J-aggregates of Cyanine Dye for NIR-II In Vivo Dynamic Vascular Imaging beyond 1500 Nm. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19221–19225. 10.1021/jacs.9b10043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Sun Z., Zhang L.-P., Wu F., Zhao Y. (2017). Photosensitizers for Two-Photon Excited Photodynamic Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mat. 27, 1704079. 10.1002/adfm.201704079 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  140. Tanaka Y., Saito S., Mori S., Aratani N., Shinokubo H., Shibata N., et al. (2008). Metalation of Expanded Porphyrins: A Chemical Trigger Used to Produce Molecular Twisting and Möbius Aromaticity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47, 681–684. 10.1002/anie.200704407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Tchounwou C., Sinha S. S., Viraka Nellore B. P., Pramanik A., Kanchanapally R., Jones S., et al. (2015). Hybrid Theranostic Platform for Second Near-IR Window Light Triggered Selective Two-Photon Imaging and Photothermal Killing of Targeted Melanoma Cells. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 7, 20649–20656. 10.1021/acsami.5b05225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Tian R., Ma H., Zhu S., Lau J., Ma R., Liu Y., et al. (2020). Multiplexed NIR-II Probes for Lymph Node-Invaded Cancer Detection and Imaging-Guided Surgery. Adv. Mat. 32, e1907365. 10.1002/adma.201907365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Trägårdh J., Murtagh M., Robb G., Parsons M., Lin J., Spence D. J., et al. (2016). Two-Color, Two-Photon Imaging at Long Excitation Wavelengths Using a Diamond Raman Laser. Microsc. Microanal. 22, 803–807. 10.1017/s143192761601151x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Trovatello C., Marini A., Xu X., Lee C., Liu F., Curreli N., et al. (2021). Optical Parametric Amplification by Monolayer Transition Metal Dichalcogenides. Nat. Photonics 15, 6–10. 10.1038/s41566-020-00728-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  145. Tsai T.-H., Chen S.-Y., Tai S.-P., Lin C.-Y., Tsai H.-J., Sun C.-K. (2005). in In Vivo Two-Photon Fluorescence Imaging with Cr: Forsterite Lasers Using Transgenic Lines Tagged by HcRed. Editors Periasamy A., So P.T.C. (Biomedical Optics; ), 265. 10.1117/12.585732 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  146. Tsai T.-H., Lin C.-Y., Tsai H.-J., Chen S.-Y., Tai S.-P., Lin K.-H., et al. (2006). Biomolecular Imaging Based on Far-Red Fluorescent Protein with a High Two-Photon Excitation Action Cross Section. Opt. Lett. 31, 930–932. 10.1364/ol.31.000930 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Tsien R. Y. (1998). The Green Fluorescent Protein. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 509–544. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Tsoi K. M., Dai Q., Alman B. A., Chan W. C. W. (2013). Are Quantum Dots Toxic? Exploring the Discrepancy between Cell Culture and Animal Studies. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 662–671. 10.1021/ar300040z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Udayan S., Sherin D. R., Vijaykumar S., Manojkumar T. K., Nampoori V. P. N., Thomas S. (2020). Exploring the LDS 821 Dye as a Potential NIR Probe for the Two Photon Imaging of Amyloid Fibrils. Biomater. Sci. 8, 6082–6092. 10.1039/d0bm00548g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Ustione A., Piston D. W. (2011). A Simple Introduction to Multiphoton Microscopy. J. Microsc. 243, 221–226. 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03532.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Vivas M. G., De Boni L., Mendonça C. R. (2018). “Two-Photon Spectroscopy of Organic Materials,” in Molecular and Laser Spectroscopy. Editor Gupta V.P. (Elsevier; ), 165–191. [Google Scholar]
  152. Voigt F. F., Emaury F., Bethge P., Waldburger D., Link S. M., Carta S., et al. (2017). Multiphoton In Vivo Imaging with a Femtosecond Semiconductor Disk Laser. Biomed. Opt. Express 8, 3213–3231. 10.1364/boe.8.003213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Wanderi K., Cui Z. (2022). Organic Fluorescent Nanoprobes with NIR-IIb Characteristics for Deep Learning. Exploration 2, 20210097. 10.1002/exp.20210097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Wang S., Liu J., Goh C. C., Ng L. G., Liu B. (2019). NIR-II-Excited Intravital Two-Photon Microscopy Distinguishes Deep Cerebral and Tumor Vasculatures with an Ultrabright NIR-I AIE Luminogen. Adv. Mat. 31, e1904447. 10.1002/adma.201904447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Wang S., Chen H., Liu J., Chen C., Liu B. (2020). NIR-II Light Activated Photosensitizer with Aggregation-Induced Emission for Precise and Efficient Two-Photon Photodynamic Cancer Cell Ablation. Adv. Funct. Mat. 30, 2002546. 10.1002/adfm.202002546 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  156. Wang S., Fan Y., Li D., Sun C., Lei Z., Lu L., et al. (2019). Anti-quenching NIR-II Molecular Fluorophores for In Vivo High-Contrast Imaging and pH Sensing. Nat. Commun. 10, 1058. 10.1038/s41467-019-09043-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Wang S., Larina I. V. (2017). “High-resolution Imaging Techniques in Tissue Engineering,” in Monitoring and Evaluation of Biomaterials and Their Performance in Vivo . Editor Narayan R. J. (Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; ), 151–180. 10.1016/b978-0-08-100603-0.00008-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  158. Wang S., Li B., Zhang F. (2020). Molecular Fluorophores for Deep-Tissue Bioimaging. ACS Cent. Sci. 6, 1302–1316. 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00544 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Wang S., Liu J., Feng G., Ng L. G., Liu B. (2019). NIR-II Excitable Conjugated Polymer Dots with Bright NIR-I Emission for Deep In Vivo Two-Photon Brain Imaging through Intact Skull. Adv. Funct. Mat. 29, 1808365. 10.1002/adfm.201808365 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  160. Wang Y., Hu R., Xi W., Cai F., Wang S., Zhu Z., et al. (2015). Red Emissive AIE Nanodots with High Two-Photon Absorption Efficiency at 1040 Nm for Deep-Tissue In Vivo Imaging. Biomed. Opt. Express 6, 3783–3794. 10.1364/boe.6.003783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wang Z., Wang X., Wan J. B., Xu F., Zhao N., Chen M. (2021). Optical Imaging in the Second Near Infrared Window for Vascular Bioimaging. Small 17, e2103780. 10.1002/smll.202103780 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Webster S., Odom S. A., Padilha L. A., Przhonska O. V., Peceli D., Hu H., et al. (2009). Linear and Nonlinear Spectroscopy of a Porphyrin−Squaraine−Porphyrin Conjugated System. J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 14854–14867. 10.1021/jp904460f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Wegner K. D., Hildebrandt N. (2015). Quantum Dots: Bright and Versatile In Vitro and In Vivo Fluorescence Imaging Biosensors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 4792–4834. 10.1039/c4cs00532e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Wei Z., Chen S., Ding J., Sun B., Qi X., Lu B., et al. (2021). Recent Advance in Tunable Single-Frequency Fiber Laser Based on Two-Dimensional Materials. Front. Phys. 8. [Google Scholar]
  165. Wokosin D. L., Centonze V. E., Crittenden S., White J. (1996). Three-photon Excitation Fluorescence Imaging of Biological Specimens Using an All-Solid-State Laser. Bioimaging 4, 208–214. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  166. Wokosin D. L., Centonze V. E., White J. G., Hird S. N., Sepsenwol S., Malcolm G. P., et al. (1996). “Multiple-photon Excitation Imaging with an All-Solid-State Laser,” in Proceedings of SPIE - the International Society for Optical Engineering (United States: SPIE; ), 38–49. [Google Scholar]
  167. Wokosin D. L., Centonze V., White J. G., Armstrong D., Robertson G., Ferguson A. I. (1996). All-solid-state Ultrafast Lasers Facilitate Multiphoton Excitation Fluorescence Imaging. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2 (4), 1051–1065. 10.1109/2944.577337 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  168. Wu J., Shi Z., Zhu L., Li J., Han X., Xu M., et al. (2022). The Design and Bioimaging Applications of NIR Fluorescent Organic Dyes with High Brightness. Adv. Opt. Mater. 10, 2102514. 10.1002/adom.202102514 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  169. Xu D., Liang S., Xu L., Bourdakos K. N., Johnson P., Read J., et al. (2021). Widely-tunable Synchronisation-free Picosecond Laser Source for Multimodal CARS, SHG, and Two-Photon Microscopy. Biomed. Opt. Express 12, 1010–1019. 10.1364/boe.411620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Yang J., Fang M., Li Z. (2020). Organic Luminescent Materials: The Concentration on Aggregates from Aggregation-Induced Emission. Aggregate 1, 6–18. 10.1002/agt2.2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  171. Yang S., Adhikari S., Dobbala M., Adusumilli S., Rowley J. D., Ganikhanov F., et al. (2013). Multi-color Ultrafast Laser Platform for Nonlinear Optical Imaging Based on Independently Tunable Optical Parametric Oscillators. Appl. Phys. B 111, 617–625. 10.1007/s00340-013-5381-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  172. Yang X., Lovell J. F., Murthy N., Zhang Y. (2020). “Organic Fluorescent Probes for Diagnostics and Bio-Imaging,” in Fluorescent Imaging in Medicinal Chemistry. Editor Cheng Z. (Cham: Springer International Publishing; ), 33–53. 10.1007/7355_2019_88 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  173. Yao J., Yang M., Duan Y. (2014). Chemistry, Biology, and Medicine of Fluorescent Nanomaterials and Related Systems: New Insights into Biosensing, Bioimaging, Genomics, Diagnostics, and Therapy. Chem. Rev. 114, 6130–6178. 10.1021/cr200359p [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Yao S., Belfield K. D. (20122012). Two-Photon Fluorescent Probes for Bioimaging. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 3199–3217. 10.1002/ejoc.201200281 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  175. Yao S., Kim B., Yue X., Colon Gomez M. Y., Bondar M. V., Belfield K. D. (2016). Synthesis of Near-Infrared Fluorescent Two-Photon-Absorbing Fluorenyl Benzothiadiazole and Benzoselenadiazole Derivatives. ACS Omega 1, 1149–1156. 10.1021/acsomega.6b00289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Ye C.-x., Zhang J.-m., Lin X.-d., Zhang T., Wang B., He T.-c. (2017). Multiphoton Absorption of Three Chiral Diketopyrrolopyrrole Derivatives in Near-Infrared Window I and II. Opt. Mat. Express 7, 3529–3537. 10.1364/ome.7.003529 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  177. Yi R., Das P., Lin F., Shen B., Yang Z., Zhao Y., et al. (2019). Fluorescence Enhancement of Small Squaraine Dye and its Two-Photon Excited Fluorescence in Long-Term Near-Infrared I&II Bioimaging. Opt. Express 27, 12360–12372. 10.1364/oe.27.012360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Yoo K. M., Liu F., Alfano R. R. (1991). Imaging through a Scattering Wall Using Absorption. Opt. Lett. 16, 1068–1070. 10.1364/ol.16.001068 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Yoon M.-C., Noh S. B., Tsuda A., Nakamura Y., Osuka A., Kim D. (2007). Photophysics of Meso-β Doubly Linked Ni(II) Porphyrin Arrays: Large Two-Photon Absorption Cross-Section and Fast Energy Relaxation Dynamics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 10080–10081. 10.1021/ja0735655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Zeng W., Ishida M., Lee S., Sung Y. M., Zeng Z., Ni Y., et al. (2013). A P -Quinodimethane-Bridged Porphyrin Dimer. Chem. Eur. J. 19, 16814–16824. 10.1002/chem.201302023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Zhang H., Salo D., Kim D. M., Komarov S., Tai Y.-C., Berezin M. Y. (2016). Penetration Depth of Photons in Biological Tissues from Hyperspectral Imaging in Shortwave Infrared in Transmission and Reflection Geometries. J. Biomed. Opt. 21, 126006. 10.1117/1.jbo.21.12.126006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Zhang L., Zou L.-Y., Guo J.-F., Wang D., Ren A.-M. (2015). A Theoretical Study of a Series of Novel Two-Photon Nitric Oxide (NO) Fluorescent Probes Based on BODIPY. New J. Chem. 39, 8342–8355. 10.1039/c5nj01023c [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  183. Zhang N.-n., Lu C.-y., Chen M.-j., Xu X.-l., Shu G.-f., Du Y.-z., et al. (2021). Recent Advances in Near-Infrared II Imaging Technology for Biological Detection. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 132. 10.1186/s12951-021-00870-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Zhang N.-N., Lu C.-Y., Chen M.-J., Xu X.-L., Shu G.-F., Du Y.-Z., et al. (2021). Recent Advances in Near-Infrared II Imaging Technology for Biological Detection. J. Nanobiotechnol 19, 132. 10.1186/s12951-021-00870-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Zhao W., Zhao Y., Wang Q., Liu T., Sun J., Zhang R. (2019). Remote Light-Responsive Nanocarriers for Controlled Drug Delivery: Advances and Perspectives. Small 15, 1903060. 10.1002/smll.201903060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Zheng Q., He G. S., Prasad P. N. (2009). A Novel Near IR Two-Photon Absorbing Chromophore: Optical Limiting and Stabilization Performances at an Optical Communication Wavelength. Chem. Phys. Lett. 475, 250–255. 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.05.040 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  187. Zheng Z., Zhang T., Liu H., Chen Y., Kwok R. T. K., Ma C., et al. (2018). Bright Near-Infrared Aggregation-Induced Emission Luminogens with Strong Two-Photon Absorption, Excellent Organelle Specificity, and Efficient Photodynamic Therapy Potential. ACS Nano 12, 8145–8159. 10.1021/acsnano.8b03138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Zhou Y., Zhang D., He G., Liu C., Tu Y., Li X., et al. (2021). A Lysosomal Targeted NIR Photosensitizer for Photodynamic Therapy and Two-Photon Fluorescence Imaging. J. Mat. Chem. B 9, 1009–1017. 10.1039/d0tb02692a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Zhu C., Kwok R. T. K., Lam J. W. Y., Tang B. Z. (2018). Aggregation-Induced Emission: A Trailblazing Journey to the Field of Biomedicine. ACS Appl. Bio. Mat. 1, 1768–1786. 10.1021/acsabm.8b00600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES