Skip to main content
Cells logoLink to Cells
. 2022 Jun 22;11(13):2002. doi: 10.3390/cells11132002

Enhanced Cognition and Neurogenesis in miR-146b Deficient Mice

Keerthana Chithanathan 1, Kelli Somelar 2, Monika Jürgenson 2, Tamara Žarkovskaja 2, Kapilraj Periyasamy 3, Ling Yan 1, Nathaniel Magilnick 4, Mark P Boldin 4, Ana Rebane 3, Li Tian 1, Alexander Zharkovsky 2,*
Editor: FengRu Tang
PMCID: PMC9265316  PMID: 35805086

Abstract

The miR-146 family consists of two microRNAs (miRNAs), miR-146a and miR-146b, which are both known to suppress a variety of immune responses. Here in this study, we show that miR-146b is abundantly expressed in neuronal cells, while miR-146a is mainly expressed in microglia and astroglia of adult mice. Accordingly, miR-146b deficient (Mir146b-/-) mice exhibited anxiety-like behaviors and enhanced cognition. Characterization of cellular composition of Mir146b-/- mice using flow cytometry revealed an increased number of neurons and a decreased abundancy of astroglia in the hippocampus and frontal cortex, whereas microglia abundancy remained unchanged. Immunohistochemistry showed a higher density of neurons in the frontal cortex of Mir146b-/- mice, enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis as evidenced by an increased proliferation, and survival of newly generated cells with enhanced maturation into neuronal phenotype. No microglial activation or signs of neuroinflammation were observed in Mir146b-/- mice. Further analysis demonstrated that miR-146b deficiency is associated with elevated expression of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (Gdnf) mRNA in the hippocampus, which might be at least in part responsible for the observed neuronal expansion and the behavioral phenotype. This hypothesis is partially supported by the positive correlation between performance of mice in the object recognition test and Gdnf mRNA expression in Mir146b-/- mice. Together, these results show the distinct function of miR-146b in controlling behaviors and provide new insights in understanding cell-specific function of miR-146b in the neuronal and astroglial organization of the mouse brain.

Keywords: miR-146b, cognition, anxiety, astrocytes, microglia, neurogenesis, neuronal development, Gdnf

1. Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a family of small, endogenous, noncoding RNAs which are approximately 22 nucleotides long and act at post-transcriptional level to regulate gene expression via binding to partially complementary mRNAs [1,2,3]. The brain expresses more distinct and a relatively high number of miRNAs than any other tissue in vertebrates [4]. Early microarray profiling analyses have shown that miRNAs are differentially expressed in brain regions [5] and in a cell-specific manner [6]. As miRNAs can influence expression of many target mRNAs, they are capable of modulating various physiological processes in the brain, such as neural differentiation [7] and synaptic plasticity [8], and are thereby proposed to regulate to regulate complex animal behaviors including cognition [9] and anxiety [10]. In addition, miRNAs are involved in the several brain pathologies including neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders [11,12,13].

The miR-146b belongs to the miR-146 family consisting of two miRNAs, miR-146a and miR-146b (miR-146a/b), which are encoded by two distinct genes located on different chromosomes and regulated by different pathways. Accordingly, the expression of miR-146a is upregulated through the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway [14], while miR-146b expression has been shown to be activated by signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) proteins [15,16]. As miR-146a/b differ only in two nucleotides, they probably target the same or a very similar set of genes [17,18]. The well-known target genes for miR-146a/b are TNF receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) and interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK1), both of which are from the NF-κB pathway and have been characterized already by an initial study on miR-146a/b [19]. Accordingly, there is ample evidence concerning the participation of the miR146 family in negative regulation of immune responses [14,15,16,17,18,20].

In the central nervous system, miR-146a has been reported to have immune suppressive function in microglia [21,22]. In addition, miR-146a has been related to autism, neural lineage determination, neurite outgrowth [23], differentiation of neural stem cells and hippocampal-dependent memory impairments [24]. The functions of miR-146b in the nervous system have been characterized by some existing studies. For example, one study showed that overexpression of miR-146b inhibited inflammatory responses via suppression of the activation of the NF-κB signaling in the brain in the rat encephalopathy models [25]. Another study in rats has shown that miR-146b overexpression with lentivirus vector could inhibit the proliferation of primary hippocampal neural stem cells [26]. A recent study has identified miR-146b as a candidate modulator of microglial activation [27]. In addition, miR-146b has also been reported to be a prognostic biomarker of gliomas, as it inhibits glioma cell proliferation and migration and induces apoptosis [28,29,30,31].

In this study, we used miR-146b deficient and wild type mice to explore the role of miR-146b in brain functions. We detected high expression of miR-146b in neuronal cells of the brain and observed that loss of miR-146b facilitates learning abilities and induces anxiety-like behaviors. Next, we found that lack of miR-146b affects cellular composition of the brain, reflected by the higher number of neurons, reduced number of astrocytes and increased hippocampal neurogenesis. In addition, we detected that miR-146b target GDNF mRNA is upregulated in Mir146b-/- mice in the hippocampus. No microglial activation or signs of neuroinflammation were observed in Mir146b-/- mice. Together, these results highlight the function of miR-146b in controlling cellular organization and behaviors in mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Experimental Design

Mir146b-/- mouse line on C57BL/6J background was generated by deletion of miR-146b encoding gene from mouse chromosome 19 as previously described in [17]. Mir146b-/- and corresponding WT mice used for this study were obtained by crossing Mir146b+/- heterozygous mice maintained and bred in the animal facility at the Laboratory Animal Centre at the Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, according to the Institute’s regulations. The generated animals were genotyped using the primer sequence:

  • 146b locus 5′ forward primer- 5′ CTCACACTCTTGTTCTTACCCAGTTCTT 3′;

  • 146b locus 3′ reverse primer- 5′ CAAACAAACAAACAAAAGGTTCAGCTAAG 3′;

  • 146b locus internal reverse primer-5′ACACACAGGGCATATGAGATCAGTTGGTT 3′ and same generation littermates were used in experiments. Two–three months old male mice were used for all experiments, which were undertaken in agreement with the guidelines established in the principles of laboratory animal care (Directive 2010/63/EU). All the mice were group-housed with a 12-h light/dark cycle with food and water available ad libitum. The Animal Experimentation Committee at the Estonian Ministry of Agriculture (no. 183, 2021) approved the experimental protocol. The sequence of the experiments performed is summarized in Table 1. The age of animals at the start of the experiments was approximately 2 months old. The age of animals at the time of sacrifice was approximately 3 months old.

Table 1.

Sequence of the experiments.

Time Point Task Assigned
Cohort 1 (WT and Mir146b-/-)
Day 0 Open field test
Day 4 Elevated plus maze
Day 8–10 Novel object recognition test
Day 13–14 Social dominance test
Day 17 Tail suspension test
Day 22 Sacrifice the animals and collect the tissues for flow cytometry, qPCR and immunohistochemistry
Cohort 2 (WT and Mir146b-/-)
Day 0–7 Contextual fear conditioning
Day 10 BrdU injections (300 mg/kg)
Day 31 Sacrifice animals for immunohistochemistry and qPCR

2.2. Novel Object Recognition Test (NORT)

NORT was performed as described by [32] in open chamber 50 cm × 50 cm × 50 cm (L × W × H), made up of brown wood. The objects were opaque glass cups of similar textures and colors but different sizes and shapes, and were heavy enough to prevent the mice from moving them. The experiment consisted of three phases: habituation, training and retention. During habituation phase, the animals were allowed to explore the empty arena without presence of any object for 5 min. Twenty-four hours later, in training phase, two identical objects were placed on a diagonal (both 10 cm from the corner) and each mouse was allowed to explore in the field for 5 min. The amount of time each mouse spent exploring both objects was recorded. Either 2 or 24 h later (retention phase), the mice explored the arena with presence of one familiar object and one novel object to measure their short-term recognition memory (STM) and long-term recognition memory (LTM), respectively. A preference ratio for each mouse was expressed as percentage of time spent exploring the new object (Tnew ×100)/(Tf + Tnew), where Tf and Tnew are the times spent exploring the familiar object and the novel object, respectively. The time spent exploring each object was scored by an observer “blind” to genotypes and in between trials. All of the objects were cleaned with 5% ethanol solution after each trial. Exploration was defined as sniffing or touching the object with the nose or forepaws.

2.3. Contextual Fear Conditioning (CFC) and Tone Fear Recall

The procedure was adapted from [24,33]. The setup was an experimental chamber 22 cm × 22 cm × 35 cm (L × W × H) located inside a larger noise-attenuating box, and a built-in ventilation fan provided a background noise. The floor of the box was made of stainless-steel rods designed for mice and connected to a scrambled shock generator (TSE Systems) containing a speaker for audible tone. The CFC experiment took place on seven consecutive days. On day 0, the mice were allowed to freely explore the conditioning chamber for 3 min and baseline freezing was measured. Immediately after that, conditioned stimuli tone (75 dB, 2 kHz, 30 s) paired with unconditioned stimuli foot shock (1 s, 0.50 mA, constant electric current) was automatically delivered with 1 min intervals for three times through a grid floor. After completing the conditioning session, the mice were returned to their home cage. On day 1, contextual fear retention was assessed at 24 h after the conditioning session by placing animals into conditioned context for 3 min in the absence of tone and foot shock, during which the duration of freezing time (absence of any movement other than that due to respiration) was measured. The extinction of contextual fear memory was measured from day 2 to day 6. Each day, animals were placed in the same context for 3 min and the freezing time was recorded. On day 7, tone fear recall was assessed by placing the mice in the novel context for 3 min and baseline freezing was measured. Immediately after that, tone (75 dB, 2 kHz, 30 s) was presented and freezing time was measured within the next three minutes.

2.4. Open Field Test (OFT)

OFT was used to assess anxiety and locomotion was performed according to [34]. Mice were placed in an experimental room for about 1 h before starting the experiment for their habituation. Each mouse was placed in the center of OFT chamber (45 cm × 45 cm × 45 cm) and allowed to explore freely for 30 min. The light luminosity was set to 500 lux throughout the box. During this time, the mice were monitored and data were collected and recorded by an analytical system (TSE Systems, Chesterfield, VA, USA). Anxiety was quantified by measuring the time spent by mice in central sector of the open field, while locomotor activity was measured by estimating total distance travelled.

2.5. Elevated Plus Maze (EPM)

The EPM test measuring anxiety was performed according to [32]; it was carried out in a plus-maze with setup consisting of a central zone (5 cm × 5 cm), two open arms (45 cm × 10 cm) and two arms closed by walls (45 cm × 10 cm and 15 cm in height). The maze is elevated 60 cm above the floor level. The animals were placed on the central zone of the EPM and allowed to explore plus-maze freely for 5 min with light luminosity set to 40 lux. A live video-tracking system (Noldus, with EthoVision XT version 8 software, Wageningen, the Netherlands) was used for automated animal tracking and data collection to measure the total number of entries, number of entries onto the open arms and time spent on the open arms. An observer “blind” to genotypes also scored the behavior. The level of anxiety was calculated as percentage of entries onto open arms and percentage of time spent on the open arms.

2.6. Tail Suspension Test (TST)

TST was performed as previously described by [35]. This test was used to measure learned hopelessness in mice, where the animals are placed to an inescapable stressful situation by hanging them in separate sections of the test apparatus on a wooden bar by the tip of their tail using an adhesive tape. During the 6 min test period, the behavior was recorded with a camera and the duration of immobility during the testing period was measured. Immobility was defined as a complete lack of movement other than respiration. However, small movements of forefeet and swinging caused by earlier movements were also scored as immobility. An observer “blind” to genotypes scored behavior.

2.7. Social Dominance Test (SDT)

SDT was adapted from [36]. This test was performed by placing the mice of different genotypes simultaneously into the opposite ends of a transparent plastic tube (30 cm long, 4.0 cm inner diameter). When the animals interacted in the tube, the more dominant animal forced its opponent out of the tube. The animal with four paws out of the tube was declared as loser, while the animal remaining inside the tube was considered the winner. Each match was set within 2 min. Matches lasting > 2 min were scored as “even”. Animal pairs were decided according to their matched body weight and each animal was encountered with the opponent for three rounds. Numbers of losses, wins and evens were counted and an average of three rounds was taken as percentage of win to assess the social dominance.

2.8. Flow Cytometry

Mice were euthanized with CO2. Dissected brain tissues (hippocampus and frontal cortex) were mechanically dissociated through 70 µm cell strainers (352350, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) in ice-cold flow buffer (phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with 1% fetal calf serum). Isolated cells were then blocked with 10% rat serum in ice-cold flow buffer for 1 h at 4 °C. The cells were stained with 0.5 µL of the following antibodies: anti-mouse CD11b-BV421 (101251, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD45-Brilliant Violet 650 (103151, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), MHCII-Brilliant Violet 711 (cat no. 107643, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), GLAST-APC (130-123-555, Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and O4-PE (130-117-357, Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) with the corresponding isotype control antibodies rat IgG2b-BV421 (400639), rat IgG2b-BV650 (400651), rat IgG2b-BV711 (400653), mouse IgG2a-APC (400219) and mouse IgM-PE (401611) (all from Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) in flow buffer for 1 h. After staining, cells were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), permeabilized with PBS containing 0.05% TritonX-100 at 4 °C for 30 min and incubated with an anti-VGLUT2 mAb-Alexa488 (MAB5504A4 Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) or isotype control mAb-Alexa488 (400132 Biolegend) for 1 h at 4 °C. The cells were washed with PBS, resuspended and acquired with Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA). In total, 100,000 events were recorded in all the samples. Data were analyzed by Kaluza v2.1 software (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN, USA). GLAST was used to measure number of astrocytes among total brain cells, CD11b was used to detect number of microglial cells, O4 was used to measure number of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPC), and the negative selection was used to measure the number of neurons among non-astrocytes. Number of VGLUT2+ cells was measured under the neuron gate. For measuring M1 microglial polarization, CD11b and CD45 was used to collect total microglial cells and MHCII was used to measure the percentage of M1 type of microglia.

2.9. Brain Volume Assessment and Immunohistochemistry

After behavioral experiments, animals were deeply anesthetized with chloral hydrate (300 mg/kg, i.p.) and transcardially perfused using 0.9% saline and then with 4% PFA in PBS (pH = 7.4). After fixation of the brain in PFA for 24 h, 40 µm-thick sections were cut on a Leica VT1000S vibro-microtome (Leica Microsystems Pvt Ltd., Wetzlar, Germany) and stored at −20 °C in the cryo-protectant (30% ethylene glycol, 30% glycerol in PBS; pH 7.4).

For measuring the volume of the whole brain and hippocampus, every sixth section was selected and was incubated in a 0.1M TRIS HCl buffer containing 0.025% trypsin and 0.1% CaCl2 for 10 min followed by washing with PBS. The sections were then incubated with Triton X-100 (0.25%) for 1 h and washed with PBS. Hematoxylin solution was first added to the section for about 30 s, followed by incubation with acidic alcohol solution (HCl 1% in ethanol 70%) for 10 s and washing with tap water. Eosin solution was added for 10 s and the sections were placed on the glass with water-based mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA) and cover-slipped. An average of 6–8 sections per animal were analyzed. For the analysis of the volume, sections were scanned using Leica SCN400 scanner (Leica Microsystems Pty Ltd., Wetzlar, Germany). The volumes of the areas of interest were calculated from the surface area, measured by Aperio Imagescope (v12.4.3.5008), and multiplied by the thickness of the sections and distance between sections.

For Ki67, NeuN and Iba1 staining, sections were washed three times in PBS and treated with 2% H2O2 solution for 20 min followed by incubation in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) at 85 °C for 30 min in water bath and then stood for 30 min at room temperature. Sections were then washed two times in PBS and once in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100. Blocking was done with solution containing 5% goat serum, 0.5% Tween-20, 0.25% Triton X-100 in 100 mM PBS for 1 h. Ki67 primary antibody (1:200, rabbit monoclonal antibody (SP6), ab16667, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was added for 24 h, NeuN primary antibody (1:200, rabbit anti-NeuN, D4G40, Cell signaling technology, Danvers, MA, USA) was added for 48 h, and Iba1 primary antibody (1: 700, rabbit anti-Iba1, CAF6806, FUJIFILM Wako Chemicals Europe GmbH, Neuss, Germany) was added for 72 h. All antibodies were added in blocking buffer and incubation was carried out at 4 °C. After being washed three times, the sections were incubated with secondary antibody (1:400 or 1:700, affinity purified goat anti-rabbit biotinylated IgG (H+L), Vector Laboratories) in blocking buffer at room temperature for 1 h. Ki67-, NeuN- and Iba1-positive cells were visualized using peroxydase method (ABC system and diaminobenzidine as chromogen, Vector Laboratories). The sections were dried, cleared with xylol and cover-slipped with mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA).

For quantifying morphological characteristics of microglia (cell size, cell body size, size dendritic processes), the images from sections stained for Iba1-positive cells were analyzed using image analysis software (ImageJ 1.48v, http://imagej.nih.gov/ij (accessed on 1 June 2022), National Institutes of Health, Rokville Pike, Bethesda, USA). To quantify morphological characteristics of Iba-1-positive cells, cell size, cell body size, size of dendritic processes and cell body size to cell ratio, an algorithm described in [37] was used. Briefly, images were converted into 8-bit format, before “adjusted threshold” and “analyze particles” functions were used to apply intensity thresholds and size filter. To measure the total cell size, the threshold was maintained at the level that was automatically provided by the ImageJ program, and size filter of 150 pixels was applied. To measure the total cell body size, the threshold was lowered 40 points and no size filter was applied.

The counts of Iba-1- or NeuN-positive cells were obtained from images according to the algorithm described previously in [38]. Briefly, images were converted to 8-bit, background was subtracted, and then obtained images were thresholded, binarized and counted using “analyze particles” command in ImageJ software.

2.10. Assessment of Neurogenesis in the Adult Mouse Dentate Gyrus

Cell proliferation in the dentate gyrus was assessed using immunohistochemical detection of Ki67 as endogenous marker of proliferating cells as described above.

Cell survival assessment was performed according to [39]. Briefly, mice received three BrdU injections (100 mg/kg, i.p, Sigma Aldrich, Berlington, MA, USA) in a total dosage of 300 mg/kg separated by the intervals of 2 h. After three weeks of injection, the animals were sacrificed and the brains were sectioned and stored in the cryo-protectant.

For BrdU immunohistochemistry, sections were incubated in 0.3% H2O2 solution for 30 min, washed three times in PBS and incubated with 0.1M Tris-HCl buffer containing 0.025% trypsin and 0.1% CaCl2 for 10 min followed by 2N HCl solution at 37 °C for 30 min. Blocking solution containing 2% normal goat serum and 0.25% Triton X-100 was added to the sections for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the sections were incubated for 24 h with blocking solution containing rat monoclonal antibody to BrdU (1:300, RF04-2, Bio-Rad) at 4 °C, followed by incubation in biotinylated rabbit anti-rat antibody (1:400, affinity purified, Lot R1121, Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA) for 1 h. BrdU-positive cells were visualized using the peroxidase method (ABC system and diaminobenzidine as chromogen, Vector Laboratories). The sections were dried, cleared with xylol and cover-slipped with mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Newark, CA, USA). Ki67 and BrdU-positive cells were counted in every sixth section within the dentate gyrus. All counts were performed using an Olympus BX-51 microscope. To estimate the total number of Ki67 and BrdU-positive cells in a given region, every sixth section was analyzed to obtain the sum of cell counts from each animal and then multiplied by six.

For doublecortin immunohistochemistry, sections were washed three times in 0.1 M Tris-Buffered Saline (TBS) and quenched in 3% H2O2 and 10% MetOH solution for 10 min. Sections were washed again in TBS and were blocked in 5% normal goat serum and 0.25% Triton X-100 in TBS for 1 h at room temperature. Next, sections were incubated with primary antibody (1:500, ab18723, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) in blocking solution for 48 h at 4 °C. The sections were rinsed twice with TBS and incubated with secondary antibody biotinylated goat anti-rabbit antibody (1:1000, Ref no BA-1000, Vector Laboratories) diluted in blocking buffer for 2 h. Doublecortin-positive cells were visualized using the standard immunoperoxidase method (ABC system, Vectastain ABC kit PK-6100, Vector Laboratories), with diaminobenzidine (DAB) as the chromogen (DAB Peroxidase Substrate SK-4100, Vector Laboratories). Total number of doublecortin-positive cells in a given region was obtained from every 24th section and the sum of cell counts was acquired and then multiplied by the 24.

For the determination of the phenotype of the newly generated cells, two sections from each animal which survived three weeks after the BrdU injection were analyzed for co-expression of BrdU and neuronal (calbindin, a marker for mature neurons) or glial (glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP, a marker for astrocytes) markers. For immunofluorescent double-labelling, sections were incubated with a mixture of anti-BrdU monoclonal antibody (1:200, RF04-2, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and rabbit anti-calbindin antibody (1:800, AB1778, Chemicon International Inc, Temecula, CA, USA) or rabbit anti-GFAP (1:800, Z0334, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Secondary antibodies such as goat anti-rat Alexa-594 antibody (1:800, A11007, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or goat anti-rabbit Alexa-488 (1:700, A11034, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used. Confocal microscope (LSM 710 Duo, Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with an argon laser was used to visualize fluorescent signals. 3D images were constructed from series of scans taken at 1.5μm intervals from the dentate gyri, using 40× objective and 2× digital zoom. For illustrative images, 100× objectives were used. Data are expressed as a percentage of BrdU-positive cells found in the granule cell layer and hilus of the dentate gyrus that expressed either calbindin or GFAP.

2.11. Isolation of Brain Cells

Brain cells were isolated as previously described in [40]. Tissues were mechanically homogenized and passed through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer (352350, BD Bioscience) with approximately 10–15 mL of 1X DPBS supplemented with 0.2% glucose into a 50 mL conical tube. Isotonic Percoll dilutions were made by diluting stock Percoll (GE-healthcare, 17-0891-01, Chicago, IL, USA) at a 9:1 ratio with 10X PBS to make stock isotonic Percoll (SIP), which is considered 100% SIP. The layers of Percoll were created by diluting the 100% SIP with 1X Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) to make 70% SIP, 50% SIP and 35% SIP. Obtained homogenate was then centrifuged at 600× g for 6 min at room temperature. Supernatant was decanted and the pellet resuspended in 6 mL of 70% SIP. The resuspended homogenate was transferred to a 15 mL tube and 3 mL of 50% SIP was carefully layered over. Another 3 mL of 35% SIP was carefully layered on top of the 50% SIP layer, and 2 mL of 1X DPBS was layered on top of the 35% layer. The prepared 15mL tubes were then centrifuged at 2000× g for 20 min at room temperature without brake. Three discrete layers were established after centrifugation. Microglial cells were collected from the interface between 70–50% SIP and astroglial cells were taken from 50–35% SIP; meanwhile, the remaining top layer consisted of myelin, and other cells were collected and subjected to characterization of neuronal marker. All isolated cells were resuspended in sterile 1X DPBS and centrifuged at 600× g for 6 min at room temperature to remove any remaining Percoll. Washed cells were subjected to purity check using qPCR and flow cytometry methods. GLAST was used to check purity of astrocytes, while Cx3cr1 and Slc17a6 were used to check purity of microglial and neuronal cells, followed by quantification of miRNA expression using Taqman miRNA assay.

2.12. RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR

Total RNAs were extracted from brain tissues (hippocampus) by using TRI Reagent® (TR 118) (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinati, OH, USA). To measure mRNA expression, cDNA was synthesized using RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) followed by qPCR using 5 × HOT FIREPol® EvaGreen® qPCR Supermix (Solis BioDyne, Tartu, Estonia) on a QuantStudio 12KFlex instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the instructions of the respective manufacturers. Primer sequences for target genes were given in the Table S1.

Quantification of miRNA expression was carried out using TaqMan® MicroRNA Assays hsa-miR-146a (Assay ID: 000468, Life technologies) and TaqMan® MicroRNA Assays hsa-miR-146b (Assay ID: 001097, Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For cRNA synthesis, TaqMan® MicroRNA reverse transcription kit (4366596, Thermo Scientific) and for qPCR, 5× HOT FIREPol® Probe qPCR Mix Plus (ROX) (Solis BioDyne) were used, respectively. U6 snRNA (Assay ID: 001973, Life Technologies) was used for the normalization of RT-qPCR. To measure cell-specific expression of miR-146a and miR-146b, the respective cell populations were isolated as described above and then miRNA expression in each cellular population was measured using Taqman miRNA assay.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad 8.0.1 was used for statistical analyses and graphical presentations. Student’s t-test, one-way and two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s test were used for post hoc multiple comparisons for statistical analyses, and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. In all figures, data are shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). For target search, we used TargetScanHuman Release 8.0 (https://www.targetscan.org/vert_80/, accessed on 1 June 2022) [41,42]. Of the transcripts, a total of 299 were conserved sites and 126 were poorly conserved sites. Pathway analysis was performed with g:GOSt tool available in g:Profiler platform, which estimates significance of overlap between functional groups and list of studied genes by calculating enrichment p-value using Fisher’s one-tailed test [43]. Only significantly (p < 0.05) overrepresented pathways associated with neuron development and function are shown. The associations between behavior in NORT and Gdnf mRNA expression were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation.

3. Results

3.1. miR-146b Is Highly Expressed in Neuronal Cells in the Mouse Brain

First, we evaluated relative expression of miR-146a/b in the hippocampus of WT mice and found that both miR-146a and miR-146b were expressed at similar levels in the hippocampal region of mice brains (p = 0.8472; Student’s t-test; Figure 1A). Next, to measure expression of miR-146a/b in different cell types, we isolated three cell populations (microglia, astroglia and remaining cell fraction, i.e., other cells) from adult WT brains. As expected, RT-qPCR and flow cytometry analysis of purified cell types showed that microglial marker Cx3cr1 mRNA was enriched in microglial fraction (F (2, 6) = 10.83, p = 0.0102; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1B). Staining with astroglial marker GLAST by flow cytometry showed enriched number of GLAST+ cells in astroglial fraction (F (2, 6) = 70.69, p = < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1C). The other cell fraction defined as neuronal cells expressed high levels of neuronal Slc17a6 mRNA (F (2, 6) = 65711, p = <0.0001; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1D). Interestingly, miR-146a was highly expressed in microglial cells and less in astroglial cells, and was much lower in the fraction containing mainly neuronal cells (F (2, 6) = 23.51, p = 0.0014; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1E). In contrast, miR-146b was more highly expressed in the neuronal fraction as compared to microglial and astroglial fractions (F (2, 6) = 18.48, p = 0.0027; one-way ANOVA; Figure 1F).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Expression of miR-146a and miR-146b in hippocampus and cellular fractions isolated from WT mice. (A) Quantification of miR-146a/b expression in the hippocampus of WT mice. Number of animals in (A) = 8–9, Student’s t-test. (BD) Characteristics of the cellular fractions isolated from the WT mouse brain. (B) Relative mRNA expression of microglial Cx3cr1. (C) Number of astroglial marker GLAST+ cells (determined by flow cytometry). (D) Relative expression of neuronal marker Slc17a6 mRNA levels. As fraction of “other cells” abundantly expressed neuronal marker Slc17a6 mRNA, this fraction was named as neuronal cells. (E) Quantification of miR-146a and (F) miR-146b in microglia, astroglia and neuronal cells of WT mice. Number of cell batches in experiments (BF) = 3, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Data represented as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

In general, Mir146b-/- mice did not present any differences regarding their development, body weight, food and water consumption, and premature mortalities. In addition, no visible abnormalities in brain structures were seen in adult Mir146b-/- mice. Volumetric assessment of whole brain (p = 0.5936; Student’s t-test; Figure S1A) and hippocampus (p = 0.1356; Student’s t-test; Figure S1B) did not reveal any changes as compared with WT mice. Together, these data demonstrate that despite miR-146b being highly expressed in neurons, lack of miR-146b does not cause major phenotypic impairments.

3.2. Mir146b-/- Mice Display Improved Recognition and Associative Memory

Several recent studies indicate that miR-146a might influence cognitive functions of mice [44,45,46]; however, no such studies had been performed for miR-146b. Therefore, and because miR-146b expression was higher in neuronal brain cells, we next performed a series of experiments to assess cognitive abilities and behavior of miR-146b-deficient mice. First, we performed NORT test, which takes advantage of the natural preference of mice for novel objects and is widely used to evaluate cognition, and in particular, recognition memory [47]. In this test, during the training session there were no significant differences in the time spent by mice of both genotypes exploring the two familiar objects (Figure S2), indicating that both genotypes Mir146b-/- and WT mice have the same motivation to explore new objects. However, during the test phase, when one of the familiar objects was replaced by another novel object, Mir146b-/- mice showed a significant preference for the novel object as compared to WT mice, both at 2-h (p = 0.0027; Student’s t-test; Figure 2A) and 24-h (p = <0.0001; Student’s t-test; Figure 2B) time-points following the training session.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Enhanced recognition and associative memory in Mir146b-/- mice. (A) Novel object preference of mice at 2-h (short-term memory) and (B) 24-h (long-term memory) in novel object recognition test. (C) Contextual fear retention. (D) Contextual fear extinction and (E) tone fear recall of WT and Mir146b-/- mice in contextual fear conditioning and tone fear recall. Number of animals = 11–15, Student’s t-test and two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Data represented as mean ± SEM; * p  <  0.05, ** p  <  0.01, **** p <0.0001.

Next, we assessed the associative memory of Mir146b-/- and WT mice by measuring contextual fear retention and extinction and tone fear recall. There were no differences detected in baseline freezing time between WT and Mir146b-/- mice (Figure S3). The mice were next exposed to the tone paired with foot-shock, and after 24 h of exposure, fear retention was measured in the same context. As expected, both WT and Mir146b-/- mice showed robust freezing response; however, Mir146b-/- mice demonstrated significantly longer freezing time compared to WT mice (p = 0.0171; Student’s t-test; Figure 2C). Fear extinction was assessed in absence of tone and foot shock from day 2 to day 6 in the same context; however, no differences in genotypes were detected between WT and Mir146b-/- mice (F (1, 95) = 3.117, p = 0.0807; two-way ANOVA; Figure 2D). Nevertheless, while tone fear recall was measured on day 7, Mir146b-/- mice demonstrated significantly longer freezing time compared to the controls (p = 0.0063; Student’s t-test; Figure 2E). These results indicate that miR-146b deficient mice have better ability to recognize novel objects and have better fear memory acquisition and recall as compared to WT mice.

3.3. Mir146b-/- Mice Showed Anxiety-like Behaviors but Had No Differences in Depression-like and Social-Dominant Behaviors

As anxiety is often associated with changes in the cognitive domain of the brain [48], we next evaluated anxiety-like behaviors in Mir146b-/- mice using OFT and EPM tests. In OFT, Mir-146b-/- mice showed no difference in the total distance travelled in the open field arena (p = 0.9592; Student’s t-test; Figure 3A) compared to their WT controls. However, the time spent in the central area of the open field was significantly lower in Mir146b-/- mice, indicating that these mice are more anxious than control animals (p = 0.0002; Student’s t-test; Figure 3B). However, no changes in the number of total entries (p = 0.4684; Student’s t-test; Figure 3C) and percentage entries onto open arms of the plus maze (p = 0.4470; Student’s t-test; Figure 3D) in Mir146b-/- mice were observed. In line with OFT test results, Mir146b-/- mice showed significant decrease in the percentage of time spent on the open arms of EPM as compared to the WT mice (p = 0.0027; Student’s t-test; Figure 3E).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

miR-146b deficiency causes anxiety-related behaviors. (A) Total distance travelled (locomotor activity). (B) Time spent in the central area of the open field test. (C) Total number of entries. (D) Percentage of entries onto the open arms. (E) Percentage of time spent on the open arms of elevated plus maze of Mir146b-/- mice and their WT littermates. Number of animals = 11–15, Student’s t-test. Data represented as mean ± SEM; ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

Previously, it has been reported that the expression levels of miR-146a/b are inversely correlated with severity of depression in patients with major depressive disorder [49,50]. Therefore, and because the depression is often associated with changes in anxiety and cognitive domain [51], we next evaluated whether miR-146b deficiency may contribute to the depression-like and social dominant behavior using TST and SDT tests. No significant differences between Mir146b-/- and WT mice were found in TST (p = 0.2243; Student’s t-test; Figure S4A) or SDT tests (p = 0.2476; Student’s t-test; Figure S4B). Together, these results indicate that loss of miR-146b causes anxiety-like behaviors, but does not induce depression-like behaviors or affect social behavior in mice.

3.4. Brain Cell Abundancy Is Altered in the Brain of Mir146b-/- Mice

Cellular composition is considered as another informative characteristic to understand the brain functions [52]. Thus, we next used flow cytometry to quantify major cell types, such as astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPC) and neuronal cells in hippocampus (HP) and frontal cortex (FC) of Mir146b-/- and WT mice.

The gating strategy of brain cells is depicted in the representative dot plots (Figure 4A). Isotype antibody staining as negative controls is shown in (Figure S5). Analysis of the hippocampal cells of Mir146b-/- mice demonstrated significantly reduced numbers of astrocytes (p = 0.0010; Student’s t-test; Figure 4B), and no differences were found in the number of microglia (p = 0.6168; Student’s t-test; Figure 4C) and OPCs (p = 0.0658; Student’s t-test; Figure 4D) compared to WT mice. Meanwhile, with negative selection we also observed an increased number of neuronal cells (p = 0.0033; Student’s t-test; Figure 4E), while with VGLUT2 staining we found increased number of VGLUT2+ glutamatergic neurons (p = 0.0019; Student’s t-test; Figure 4F) in Mir146b-/- mice. The changes in cellular content in FC of Mir146b-/- mice were similar to HP, showing decreased numbers of astroglia (p = 0.0211; Student’s t-test; Figure 4G) and no changes in microglial (p = 0.6372; Student’s t-test; Figure 4H) and OPCs number (p = 0.1786; Student’s t-test; Figure 4I), whereas increased numbers of neurons (p = 0.0339; Student’s t-test; Figure 4J) and VGLUT2+ glutamatergic neurons (p = < 0.0001; Student’s t-test; Figure 4K) were observed. To confirm flow cytometry results, we performed immunohistochemistry analysis using neuronal-specific marker NeuN followed by cell counting using tissue sections from FC. Similarly, with flow cytometry results, we detected increased neuronal density of NeuN+ cells (p = 0.0084; Student’s t-test; Figure 4L,M) in FC of Mir146b-/- as compared to WT mice. Altogether, these results suggest that miR-146b deficiency affects the abundance of astroglial and neuronal cells, with no significant changes of microglial and OPC cells in HP and FC.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

miR-146b deficiency causes altered brain cell abundancy in the hippocampus and frontal cortex of the mouse brain determined by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. (A) Representative graphs showing flow cytometry gating strategy for astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPC) and neurons. (B) Number of astrocytes among total brain cells. (C) Number of microglia, (D) OPC and (E) neurons among non-astrocytes. (F) Number of VGLUT2+ neurons in the hippocampus and (GK) frontal cortex of WT and Mir146b-/- mice. (L) Representative immunohistochemistry microphotographs of the frontal cortex NeuN+ sections at 40× and 200× magnification and (M) quantification of NeuN-positive neuronal density in the frontal cortex of WT and Mir146b-/- mice. Number of animals = 5–7, Student’s t-test. Data represented as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.

3.5. Increased Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult Mir146b-/- Mice

miR-146a has been shown to modulate the cell proliferation and differentiation of various cell types in vitro [17,23]. Therefore, and because Mir146b-/- mice had increased numbers of neuronal cells, we next assessed adult hippocampal neurogenesis in miR-146b-deficient mice. For the analysis of proliferative activity, we used immunohistochemical detection of proliferation marker Ki67 in the dentate gyrus of the adult hippocampus. We found that the number of Ki67+ cells in the proliferative zone of dentate gyrus was significantly higher in Mir146b-/- mice compared to their WT littermates (p = 0.0075; Student’s t-test; Figure 5A,E). To track cell survival, BrdU was administered (i.p) to the Mir146b-/- and WT mice, and three weeks later the brains were processed for immunohistochemistry to visualize BrdU+ cells in the dentate gyrus. A significantly higher fraction of survived BrdU+ cells were detected in Mir146b-/- mice compared to WT mice (p = 0.0281; Student’s t-test; Figure 5B,F). To assess whether loss of miR-146b affects newly generated cells at earlier stages of differentiation, we used doublecortin to label young post-mitotic neurons and found significantly higher number of doublecortin positive cells in the Mir146b-/- mice compared to WT mice (p = 0.0252; Student’s t-test; Figure 5C,G).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Increased adult hippocampal neurogenesis in Mir146b-/- mice. (A) Representative immunohistochemistry microphotographs of the hippocampal Ki67+ cells at 100× magnification and inserted microphotographs at 1000× magnification. (B) Illustrative microphotographs of the hippocampal BrdU+ cells at 100× magnification and inserted microphotographs at 1000× magnification. (C) Represented microphotographs of doublecortin positive cells taken at 100× magnification. (D) Illustrative images of BrdU, GFAP and calbindin signal and their co-localization in the hippocampus. (E) Quantitative graph showing increased number of Ki67 positive cells. (F) Increased number of BrdU+ cells. (G) Quantitative graphs showing number of doublecortin positive cells in the hippocampus of WT and Mir146b-/- mice. (H) Percentage of BrdU+ cells with GFAP and (I) calbindin in the dentate gyrus of WT and Mir146b-/- mice. Scale bar = 20 μm. Number of animals = 6, Student’s t-test. Data represented as mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

In order to determine the phenotype of the BrdU+ cells, we performed immunofluorescence analysis with the antibodies against BrdU, neuronal (calbindin) or astroglial (GFAP) markers. We found no differences in percentage of BrdU+ cells that co-localized with astroglial marker, GFAP (p = 0.1545; Student’s t-test; Figure 5D,H), whereas percentage of BrdU+ cells that co-localized with calbindin was higher in Mir146b-/- mice compared to the WT mice (p = 0.0002; Student’s t-test; Figure 5D,I). These results indicate that miR-146b deficiency results in increased proliferation, survival and differentiation of progenitors to neuronal lineage but not astroglial lineage.

3.6. miR-146b Deficiency Does Not Cause Microglial Activation in the Hippocampus

As numerous previous studies have demonstrated the immunomodulatory role of miR-146b [25,27], we further explored in more detail microglial morphology, microglial polarization and the expression of Il1b, Tnf, Il18 mRNA. No changes were observed in the density of Iba1-positive microglia (p = 0.8618; Student’s t-test; Figure 6A,B). We analyzed microglial morphological parameters such as microglial cell size (p = 0.7216; Student’s t-test; Figure 6D), cell body size (p = 0.4740; Student’s t-test; Figure 6E) and size of dendritic processes (p = 0.6132; Student’s t-test; Figure 6F), and found no difference between WT and Mir146b-/- mice. Next, we evaluated the expression of cytokines Il1b (p = 0.3853; Student’s t-test; Figure 6G), Tnf (p = 0.3853; Student’s t-test; Figure 6H), Il18 (p = 0.2043; Student’s t-test; Figure 6I) mRNA levels and found no differences between Mir146b-/- and the WT mice. Similarly, flow cytometry analysis did not reveal changes in the M1 microglial polarization in Mir146b-/- mice (p = 0.1780; Student’s t-test; Figure 6J). It is established that microglia are involved in the regulation of neurogenesis [53] via interaction of microglial fractalkine receptor Cx3cr1 with neuronal Cx3cl1 [54]. We next assessed whether observed enhancement of hippocampal neurogenesis in miR-146b deficient mice could possibly be mediated via fractalkine signaling and measured the expression of Cx3cr1 mRNA levels in the hippocampus of miR-146b deficient mice and their WT littermates. No differences in Cx3cr1 mRNA expression were observed between the groups (p = 0.6114; Student’s t-test; Figure 6K). These results indicate that loss of miR-146b neither influences microglial activation nor affects neurogenesis through fractalkine signaling in HP of Mir146b-/- mice.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

miR-146b deficiency does not cause microglial activation and signs of neuroinflammation in the hippocampus. (A) Representative images showing Iba1-positive cells at 100× magnification. (B) Quantitative graphs of Iba1 counting in WT and Mir146b-/- mice. (C) Representative images of Iba1 immunohistochemistry for morphological analysis at 400× magnification in the hippocampus of WT and Mir146b-/- mice. (D) Average cell size in pixels. (E) Cell body size in pixels. (F) Size of dendritic processes in pixels of microglial cells in the hippocampus. Number of animals = 5, Student’s t-test. (G) Relative mRNA expression of cytokines IL1b, (H) Tnf and (I) IL18. (J) Flow cytometry quantification of percentage of MHCII+ M1 type of microglia. (K) Relative mRNA expression of Cx3cr1 in the hippocampus of WT and Mir146b-/- mice. Number of animals = 7, Student’s t-test. Data represented as mean ± SEM, respectively.

3.7. Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (Gdnf) mRNA Is Upregulated in the Hippocampus of Mir146b-/- Mice

To explore which putative miR-146b targets may influence cognition, increased neuronal density in the FC and enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis, we performed a TargetScan [41] search in combination with pathway analysis with g:Profiler [43] as well as a literature search for verified targets. We selected 283 genes containing a total of 299 conserved and 126 poorly conserved sites with TargetScanHuman and subjected this list of genes to pathway and gene ontology group analysis. Interestingly, we detected multiple gene ontology groups associated with neuron development and function to be overrepresented among conserved miR-146a/b targets. Among all selected genes shown in (Table S2), we detected glia-derived neurotrophic factor (Gdnf) as a putative target for miR-146a/b. Gdnf is known to be expressed in neurons (https://www.brainrnaseq.org/ accessed on 1 June 2022) [55] and previously miR-146a had been shown to be to negatively regulate Gdnf expression [56]. Based on the literature, we also selected for analysis brain-derived neurotrophic factor (Bdnf) as a gene. This gene is expressed in astrocytes (https://www.brainrnaseq.org/ accessed on 1 June 2022) [55] and may alter miR-146b expression as Bdnf mutation Val66Met has been associated with altered expression of miR-146b and its downstream targets [57]. In addition, we choose for analysis miR-146a/b target Irak1, which is highly expressed in the glial cells (https://www.brainrnaseq.org/ accessed on 1 June 2022) [55]. The expression analysis of the selected targets by RT-qPCR demonstrated that Gdnf mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in the hippocampus of Mir146b-/- mice compared to WT littermates’ levels (p = 0.0477; Student’s t-test; Figure 7A), whereas there were no changes in Irak1 levels (p = 0.6547; Student’s t-test; Figure 7B) and Bdnf mRNA levels levels (p = 0.9968; Student’s t-test; Figure 7C). These data together suggest that miR-146b has capacity to modulate neuronal development due to its influence on expression of Gdnf and possible other factors involved in neuronal development.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Gdnf mRNA is upregulated in Mir146b-/- mice. (A) Relative mRNA expression of miR-146b targets Gdnf. (B) Bdnf and (C) Irak1 of WT and Mir146b-/- mice. Number of animals = 7, Student’s t-test. Data represented as mean ± SEM respectively; * p  <  0.05.

3.8. Association between Enhanced Cognition in NORT and Gdnf mRNA Expression of Mir146b-/- Mice

To find out whether the enhanced cognition in NORT has any correlation with enhanced expression of Gdnf in the hippocampus, we then employed Pearson’s analysis. We found that percentage of preference for the novel object in NORT was positively correlated with the levels of Gdnf mRNA expression at 2-h (r = 0.7617, p = 0.0466; Figure 8A) and 24-h (r = 0.7722, p = 0.0419; Figure 8B) time points in Mir146b-/- mice, while no significant correlation was observed in WT mice.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Pearson correlation of percentage of preference for the novel object in NORT with Gdnf mRNA expression in the hippocampus of WT and miR-146b deficient mice. Correlation analysis was performed at 2 h (A) and 24 h (B) in NORT.

4. Discussion

The results of this study show that despite sequence similarities between miR-146a/b, their cellular distribution is remarkably different in the mouse brain tissue. While miR-146a is abundantly expressed in the microglial cells, miR-146b was highly expressed in neurons and less in microglia and astroglia. Because the role of the neuronal miR-146b is completely unknown, we next performed a detailed assessment of behavior as well as cellular organization of the brain in Mir146b-/- mice.

One of the major findings of our study is that Mir146b-/- mice demonstrated enhanced episodic recognition memory. Furthermore, better memory acquisition and recall were shown in the contextual fear conditioning and tone recall tests. Interestingly, Mir146b-/- mice also demonstrated slightly increased anxiety in the OFT and EPM tests. In general, anxiety sensitizes sensory cortical systems to innocuous environmental stimuli and might thereby facilitate cognition. Thus, anxiety might play an important adaptive role in the process of cognition [58]. There is a consensus theory that anxiety is associated with better attention control [59], because of improvement in the selectivity of attention and probable better acquisition of the negative emotional stimuli [60]. Thus, the observed enhancement in cognition functions might be at least in part attributed to the increased anxiety levels and arousal. Despite the observed increased anxiety, the immobility time in TST was not changed, suggesting that miR-146b deficient mice do not demonstrate depression-like behavior.

Although we did not observe any changes in the volume of the brain and hippocampus, the experiments using flow cytometry showed abnormalities in the cellular composition in the brain of Mir146b-/- mice. We found that loss of miR-146b led to the increased number of neurons, decreased astrocytes and increased VGLUT2+ glutamatergic neurons in HP and FC of Mir146b-/- mice. Further immunohistochemistry revealed increased density of the neurons in FC sections of miR-146b deficient mice. Therefore, it might be proposed that the miR-146b deficiency results in the loss of control in the growth of the neuronal population, which results in the higher numbers of neuronal cells. In line with our results, it has previously been shown that miR-146b overexpression by lentivirus vector could inhibit the proliferation of primary hippocampal neural stem cells after transfection [26]. Since the neuronal proliferation in the FC is restricted to the prenatal period [61,62], we speculated that miR-146b has influence on neuronal generation during the early stages of the brain development; however, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. In addition, further experiments are needed to explore whether the observed decrease in the astroglia is also developmentally regulated. During development, the cross-regulatory interactions between elements of different pathways affect the process of cell fate assignment during neural and astroglial tissue patterning [63]. Both neurons and astroglia are produced from the radial glial progenitor cells and cross talk between important signaling pathways such as JAK-STAT signaling, Wnt signaling responsible for this switch from neurogenesis to gliogenesis phase and for differentiation of astrocytes [64]. As miR-146b has been shown to regulate the JAK-STAT [16] and Wnt signaling [65], the absence of miR-146b might cause perturbation in Wnt signaling, which in turn results in the reduction in astroglia during the early stages of development.

We also speculated that capacity of miR-146b to affect neuronal development might persist in the neurogenic region of the adult dentate gyrus. Indeed, mice deficient in miR-146b had enhanced neurogenesis in dentate gyrus, as demonstrated by the higher numbers of neuronal precursors, proliferative cells and their better survival. When assessing the phenotype of newly generated cells surviving, we found that a larger proportion expressed a mature neuronal marker, Calbindin, in miR-146b deficient mice, showing increased differentiation into neurons. As previous studies have demonstrated important roles of the adult dentate gyrus neurogenesis in the memory processing [66,67], we speculate that increased neurogenesis might be responsible for the observed enhanced learning and memory capability in Mir146b-/- mice.

As previously miR-146b had been shown to regulate immune responses in variety of cells and tissues [15,17,27], and because microglia can control adult neurogenesis through secretion of various soluble factors including cytokines [68,69], we studied in more detail the morphology of microglia cells. We did not observe signs of microglial activation in Mir146b-/- mice. Similarly, no change was observed in the mRNA levels of Cx3cr1, a fractalkine receptor essential in the regulation of the interactions between microglia and neurons [70]. These results suggest that microglia or microglia-derived factors are not involved in the promotion of the neuronal phenotype observed in Mir146b-/- mice.

In line with the neuronal phenotype of Mir146b-/- mice, the pathway analysis of conserved miR-146b targets revealed that neurogenesis-related genes are overrepresented among miR-146b target genes, indicating that miR-146b might influence neuronal development through several different genes. From putative targets, we selected Gdnf and explored its expression in the miR-146b deficient mouse brain. Indeed, we observed an increased expression of Gdnf mRNA in the hippocampus of Mir146b-/- mice. As Gdnf participates in proliferation, migration and differentiation of the neural cells [71], and might direct newly generated neurons to the specific neuronal phenotypes [72], we propose that upregulation of Gdnf in Mir146b-/- mice might contribute to increased neuronal proliferation and survival these mice. Further Gdnf mRNA expression was positively correlated with the observed cognitive behaviors in Mir146b-/- mice, thus upregulation of Gdnf mRNA expression might contribute to the promotion of enhanced cognition observed in miR-146b deficient mice. As previous studies have shown that Gdnf improves spatial learning in aged rats [73,74]. Interestingly, no difference was observed in mRNA levels of Bdnf, which is a factor potentially regulating miR-146b levels as well as Irak1, which is well-known target of miR-146b [19]. However, additional experiments are needed to assess whether there is effect on additional miR-146b targets. Further research is required to provide insight into causal relationships between behavioral and morphological consequences of miR-146b deletion.

In addition, previous studies have shown that electro acupuncture-stimulated hippocampal neurogenesis in the rat model of focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion was associated with an increased miR-146b expression, while inhibition of miR-146b reduced stimulatory effect of acupuncture on the hippocampal neurogenesis [75]. It should be noted that, aside from the novel neuronal functions of miR-146b described in our study, miR-146b is expressed in microglial cells and is involved in the negative regulation of neuroinflammation [25,27]. Previous studies have demonstrated that focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion can induce inflammation and that acupuncture is able to reduce neuroinflammation [76]. It is possible that acupuncture might improve neurogenesis via expression of anti-inflammatory miR-146b and that inhibition of neurogenesis by the miR-146b inhibition might involve an inflammatory component. This possibility should be studied in more detail further.

It is also important that further study is conducted around the possible roles of miR-146b in the regulation of apoptosis. There is compelling evidence that miR-146a is an important negative modulator of apoptosis via TAF9b/P53 [77] and SMAD3 pathways [78]. Recent studies demonstrated that miR-146b is also involved in the regulation of apoptosis and that over-expression of miR-146b promoted cell death [79]. Furthermore, miR-146b-5p inhibits tumorigenesis and metastasis of gall bladder cancer by targeting toll-like receptor 4 via the NF-κB pathway [80]. Thus, it is not ruled out that deficiency in miR-146b will result in the suppression of apoptosis, which might also have an impact on the increased neuronal density in the miR-146b deficient mice. Further research is required to provide insight into possible roles of miR-146b in the regulation of neuronal apoptosis as well as causal relationships between behavioral and morphological consequences of miR-146b deletion.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, our data provide new evidence that miR-146b has important roles in the control of the proliferation and differentiation of neuronal precursors during the development as well as in adulthood. In addition, we show that miR-146b is able to control adult hippocampal neurogenesis, which might be relevant for the observed enhanced cognition and fear. Our data indicate that miR-146b probably exerts its actions via regulation of Gdnf expression, which explains why deficiency in miR-146b leads to the activation of neurogenesis. Our data also open new avenues for the regulation of hippocampal neurogenesis via modulation of miR-146b. In addition, miR-146b might be used as a biomarker for tumors of neuronal origin.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Anu Remm for helping with genotyping of Mir146b-/- mice and Mario Plaas for brain volumetric measurements.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/cells11132002/s1, Figure S1: Mir146b-/- mice have no differences in the volume of brain and hippocampus; Figure S2: Mir146b-/- and WT mice same motivation to explore the objects in NORT; Figure S3: Baseline freezing of Mir146b-/- and WT mice in CFC. Figure S4: Mir146b-/- mice have no depression-like behavior and social dominant behavior; Figure S5: Representative dot plots of isotype controls used in flow cytometric analysis for gating; Table S1: RT-qPCR Primers used in this study; Table S2: Gene ontology groups with neurological function and targeted by miR-146a/b.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.C. and A.Z.; methodology, K.C., K.S., M.J., T.Ž., K.P., L.Y., N.M. and M.P.B.; software, K.C.; validation, K.C. and K.P.; formal analysis, K.C.; investigation, K.C., K.S. and M.J.; resources, A.Z., L.T. and A.R.; data curation, K.C. and K.P.; writing—original draft preparation, K.C.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, K.C.; supervision, A.Z., A.R. and L.T.; project administration, A.Z.; funding acquisition, A.Z., A.R. and L.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The use of mice was conducted in accordance with the regulations and guidelines approved by the Laboratory Animal Centre at the Institute of Biomedicine and Translational Medicine, University of Tartu, Estonia. All animal procedures were conducted in accordance with the European Communities Directive (2010/63/EU) with permit (No. 183, 2021) from the Estonian National Board of Animal Experiments.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

A.Z. is supported by the Estonian Research Council personal research funding team grant project No. PRG878. L.T. is supported by the Estonian Research Council-European Union Regional Developmental Fund Mobilitas Pluss Program No. MOBTT77 and A.R. is supported by European Regional Development Fund (Project No. 2014-2020.4.01.15-0012) and personal grant from Estonian Research Council, PRG1259.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Bartel D.P. Metazoan Micrornas. Cell. 2018;173:20–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Brennan G.P., Henshall D.C. MicroRNAs as Regulators of Brain Function and Targets for Treatment of Epilepsy. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020;16:506–519. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0369-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Su Z.-F., Sun Z.-W., Zhang Y., Wang S., Yu Q.-G., Wu Z.-B. Regulatory Effects of MiR-146a/b on the Function of Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Acute Ischemic Stroke in Mice. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2017;33:369–378. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Adlakha Y.K., Saini N. Brain MicroRNAs and Insights into Biological Functions and Therapeutic Potential of Brain Enriched MiRNA-128. Mol. Cancer. 2014;13:33. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bak M., Silahtaroglu A., Møller M., Christensen M., Rath M.F., Skryabin B., Tommerup N., Kauppinen S. MicroRNA Expression in the Adult Mouse Central Nervous System. Rna. 2008;14:432–444. doi: 10.1261/rna.783108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.He M., Liu Y., Wang X., Zhang M.Q., Hannon G.J., Huang Z.J. Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain. Neuron. 2012;73:35–48. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kuwabara T., Hsieh J., Nakashima K., Taira K., Gage F.H. A Small Modulatory DsRNA Specifies the Fate of Adult Neural Stem Cells. Cell. 2004;116:779–793. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00248-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schratt G.M., Tuebing F., Nigh E.A., Kane C.G., Sabatini M.E., Kiebler M., Greenberg M.E. A Brain-Specific MicroRNA Regulates Dendritic Spine Development. Nature. 2006;439:283–289. doi: 10.1038/nature04367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aten S., Hansen K.F., Hoyt K.R., Obrietan K. The MiR-132/212 Locus: A Complex Regulator of Neuronal Plasticity, Gene Expression and Cognition. RNA Dis. 2016;3:e1375. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Yan H.-L., Sun X.-W., Wang Z.-M., Liu P.-P., Mi T.-W., Liu C., Wang Y.-Y., He X.-C., Du H.-Z., Liu C.-M., et al. MiR-137 Deficiency Causes Anxiety-like Behaviors in Mice. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019;12:260. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2019.00260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jauhari A., Singh T., Mishra S., Shankar J., Yadav S. Coordinated Action of MiR-146a and Parkin Gene Regulate Rotenone-Induced Neurodegeneration. Toxicol. Sci. 2020;176:433–445. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfaa066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Launay J., Mouillet-Richard S., Baudry A., Pietri M., Kellermann O. Raphe-Mediated Signals Control the Hippocampal Response to SRI Antidepressants via MiR-16. Transl. Psychiatry. 2011;1:e56. doi: 10.1038/tp.2011.54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lopez J.P., Fiori L.M., Cruceanu C., Lin R., Labonte B., Cates H.M., Heller E.A., Vialou V., Ku S.M., Gerald C., et al. MicroRNAs 146a/b-5 and 425-3p and 24-3p Are Markers of Antidepressant Response and Regulate MAPK/Wnt-System Genes. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15497. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.So A.Y., Zhao J.L., Baltimore D. The Yin and Yang of Micro RNA s: Leukemia and Immunity. Immunol. Rev. 2013;253:129–145. doi: 10.1111/imr.12043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Curtale G., Mirolo M., Renzi T.A., Rossato M., Bazzoni F., Locati M. Negative Regulation of Toll-like Receptor 4 Signaling by IL-10–Dependent MicroRNA-146b. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:11499–11504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219852110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xiang M., Birkbak N.J., Vafaizadeh V., Walker S.R., Yeh J.E., Liu S., Kroll Y., Boldin M., Taganov K., Groner B., et al. STAT3 Induction of MiR-146b Forms a Feedback Loop to Inhibit the NF-ΚB to IL-6 Signaling Axis and STAT3-Driven Cancer Phenotypes. Sci. Signal. 2014;7:ra11. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Hermann H., Runnel T., Aab A., Baurecht H., Rodriguez E., Magilnick N., Urgard E., Šahmatova L., Prans E., Maslovskaja J., et al. MiR-146b Probably Assists MiRNA-146a in the Suppression of Keratinocyte Proliferation and Inflammatory Responses in Psoriasis. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2017;137:1945–1954. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paterson M.R., Kriegel A.J. MiR-146a/b: A Family with Shared Seeds and Different Roots. Physiol. Genom. 2017;49:243–252. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00133.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Taganov K.D., Boldin M.P., Chang K.-J., Baltimore D. NF-ΚB-Dependent Induction of MicroRNA MiR-146, an Inhibitor Targeted to Signaling Proteins of Innate Immune Responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:12481–12486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605298103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lee H.-M., Kim T.S., Jo E.-K. MiR-146 and MiR-125 in the Regulation of Innate Immunity and Inflammation. BMB Rep. 2016;49:311. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2016.49.6.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Deng M., Du G., Zhao J., Du X. MiR-146a Negatively Regulates the Induction of Proinflammatory Cytokines in Response to Japanese Encephalitis Virus Infection in Microglial Cells. Arch. Virol. 2017;162:1495–1505. doi: 10.1007/s00705-017-3226-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Saba R., Gushue S., Huzarewich R.L., Manguiat K., Medina S., Robertson C., Booth S.A. MicroRNA 146a (MiR-146a) Is over-Expressed during Prion Disease and Modulates the Innate Immune Response and the Microglial Activation State. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e30832. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nguyen L.S., Fregeac J., Bole-Feysot C., Cagnard N., Iyer A., Anink J., Aronica E., Alibeu O., Nitschke P., Colleaux L. Role of MiR-146a in Neural Stem Cell Differentiation and Neural Lineage Determination: Relevance for Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Mol. Autism. 2018;9:38. doi: 10.1186/s13229-018-0219-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Fregeac J., Moriceau S., Poli A., Nguyen L.S., Oury F., Colleaux L. Loss of the Neurodevelopmental Disease-Associated Gene MiR-146a Impairs Neural Progenitor Differentiation and Causes Learning and Memory Deficits. Mol. Autism. 2020;11:22. doi: 10.1186/s13229-020-00328-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yang G., Zhao Y. Overexpression of MiR-146b-5p Ameliorates Neonatal Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy by Inhibiting IRAK1/TRAF6/TAK1/NF-AB Signaling. Yonsei Med. J. 2020;61:660. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.8.660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dai Y., Chen L., He X., Lin H., Jia W., Chen L., Tao J., Liu W. Construction of MiR-146b Overexpression Lentiviral Vector and the Effect on the Proliferation of Hippocampal Neural Stem Cells. Chin. J. Tissue Eng. Res. 2021;25:3024. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bokobza C., Joshi P., Schang A., Csaba Z., Faivre V., Montané A., Galland A., Benmamar-Badel A., Bosher E., Lebon S., et al. MiR-146b Protects the Perinatal Brain against Microglia-Induced Hypomyelination. Ann. Neurol. 2022;91:48–65. doi: 10.1002/ana.26263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Katakowski M., Zheng X., Jiang F., Rogers T., Szalad A., Chopp M. MiR-146b-5p Suppresses EGFR Expression and Reduces in Vitro Migration and Invasion of Glioma. Cancer Investig. 2010;28:1024–1030. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2010.512596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu J., Xu J., Li H., Sun C., Yu L., Li Y., Shi C., Zhou X., Bian X., Ping Y., et al. MiR-146b-5p Functions as a Tumor Suppressor by Targeting TRAF6 and Predicts the Prognosis of Human Gliomas. Oncotarget. 2015;6:29129. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xia H., Qi Y., Ng S.S., Chen X., Li D., Chen S., Ge R., Jiang S., Li G., Chen Y., et al. MicroRNA-146b Inhibits Glioma Cell Migration and Invasion by Targeting MMPs. Brain Res. 2009;1269:158–165. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang L., Wang J., Fu Z., Ai Y., Li Y., Wang Y., Wang Y. Sevoflurane Suppresses Migration and Invasion of Glioma Cells by Regulating MiR-146b-5p and MMP16. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019;47:3306–3314. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1648282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Jürgenson M., Aonurm-Helm A., Zharkovsky A. Behavioral Profile of Mice with Impaired Cognition in the Elevated Plus-Maze Due to a Deficiency in Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2010;96:461–468. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2010.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tronson N.C., Schrick C., Fischer A., Sananbenesi F., Pouysségur J., Radulovic J. Regulatory Mechanisms of Fear Extinction and Depression-like Behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33:1570–1583. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yan L., Jayaram M., Chithanathan K., Zharkovsky A., Tian L. Sex-Specific Microglial Activation and SARS-CoV-2 Receptor Expression Induced by Chronic Unpredictable Stress. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2021;15:750373. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.750373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jürgenson M., Aonurm-Helm A., Zharkovsky A. Partial Reduction in Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule (NCAM) in Heterozygous Mice Induces Depression-Related Behaviour without Cognitive Impairment. Brain Res. 2012;1447:106–118. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Piirainen S., Chithanathan K., Bisht K., Piirsalu M., Savage J.C., Tremblay M., Tian L. Microglia Contribute to Social Behavioral Adaptation to Chronic Stress. Glia. 2021;69:2459–2473. doi: 10.1002/glia.24053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hovens I.B., Nyakas C., Schoemaker R.G. A Novel Method for Evaluating Microglial Activation Using Ionized Calcium-Binding Adaptor Protein-1 Staining: Cell Body to Cell Size Ratio. Neuroimmunol. Neuroinflamm. 2014;1:82–88. doi: 10.4103/2347-8659.139719. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jürgenson M., Zharkovskaja T., Noortoots A., Morozova M., Beniashvili A., Zapolski M., Zharkovsky A. Effects of the Drug Combination Memantine and Melatonin on Impaired Memory and Brain Neuronal Deficits in an Amyloid-Predominant Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019;71:1695–1705. doi: 10.1111/jphp.13165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Somelar K., Jürgenson M., Jaako K., Anier K., Aonurm-Helm A., Zvejniece L., Zharkovsky A. Development of Depression-like Behavior and Altered Hippocampal Neurogenesis in a Mouse Model of Chronic Neuropathic Pain. Brain Res. 2021;1758:147329. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Agalave N.M., Lane B.T., Mody P.H., Szabo-Pardi T.A., Burton M.D. Isolation, Culture, and Downstream Characterization of Primary Microglia and Astrocytes from Adult Rodent Brain and Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. Methods. 2020;340:108742. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Agarwal V., Bell G.W., Nam J.-W., Bartel D.P. Predicting Effective MicroRNA Target Sites in Mammalian MRNAs. eLife. 2015;4:e05005. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.McGeary S.E., Lin K.S., Shi C.Y., Pham T.M., Bisaria N., Kelley G.M., Bartel D.P. The Biochemical Basis of MicroRNA Targeting Efficacy. Science. 2019;366:eaav1741. doi: 10.1126/science.aav1741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reimand J., Kull M., Peterson H., Hansen J., Vilo J. g:Profiler—A Web-Based Toolset for Functional Profiling of Gene Lists from Large-Scale Experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35((Suppl. 2)):W193–W200. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ansari A., Maffioletti E., Milanesi E., Marizzoni M., Frisoni G.B., Blin O., Richardson J.C., Bordet R., Forloni G., Gennarelli M., et al. MiR-146a and MiR-181a Are Involved in the Progression of Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2019;82:102–109. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Cui L., Li Y., Ma G., Wang Y., Cai Y., Liu S., Chen Y., Li J., Xie Y., Liu G. A Functional Polymorphism in the Promoter Region of MicroRNA-146a Is Associated with the Risk of Alzheimer Disease and the Rate of Cognitive Decline in Patients. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e89019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhan-Qiang H., Hai-Hua Q., Chi Z., Miao W., Cui Z., Zi-Yin L., Jing H., Yi-Wei W. MiR-146a Aggravates Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease-like Pathology by Triggering Oxidative Stress through MAPK Signaling. Neurología. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2020.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ennaceur A., Delacour J. A New One-Trial Test for Neurobiological Studies of Memory in Rats. 1: Behavioral Data. Behav. Brain Res. 1988;31:47–59. doi: 10.1016/0166-4328(88)90157-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ma L. Depression, Anxiety, and Apathy in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Current Perspectives. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2020;12:9. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Enatescu V.R., Papava I., Enatescu I., Antonescu M., Anghel A., Seclaman E., Sirbu I.O., Marian C. Circulating Plasma Micro RNAs in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Treated with Antidepressants: A Pilot Study. Psychiatry Investig. 2016;13:549. doi: 10.4306/pi.2016.13.5.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hung Y.-Y., Wu M.-K., Tsai M.-C., Huang Y.-L., Kang H.-Y. Aberrant Expression of Intracellular Let-7e, MiR-146a, and MiR-155 Correlates with Severity of Depression in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder and Is Ameliorated after Antidepressant Treatment. Cells. 2019;8:647. doi: 10.3390/cells8070647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lindert J., Paul K.C., Lachman M.E., Ritz B., Seeman T.E. Depression-, Anxiety-, and Anger and Cognitive Functions: Findings From a Longitudinal Prospective Study. Front. Psychiatry. 2021;12:665742. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.665742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Von Bartheld C.S., Wouters F.S. Quantitative Techniques for Imaging Cells and Tissues. Cell Tissue Res. 2015;360:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2149-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.De Lucia C., Rinchon A., Olmos-Alonso A., Riecken K., Fehse B., Boche D., Perry V.H., Gomez-Nicola D. Microglia Regulate Hippocampal Neurogenesis during Chronic Neurodegeneration. Brain Behav. Immun. 2016;55:179–190. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bachstetter A.D., Morganti J.M., Jernberg J., Schlunk A., Mitchell S.H., Brewster K.W., Hudson C.E., Cole M.J., Harrison J.K., Bickford P.C., et al. Fractalkine and CX3CR1 Regulate Hippocampal Neurogenesis in Adult and Aged Rats. Neurobiol. Aging. 2011;32:2030–2044. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.11.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang Y., Chen K., Sloan S.A., Bennett M.L., Scholze A.R., O’Keeffe S., Phatnani H.P., Guarnieri P., Caneda C., Ruderisch N., et al. An RNA-Sequencing Transcriptome and Splicing Database of Glia, Neurons, and Vascular Cells of the Cerebral Cortex. J. Neurosci. 2014;34:11929–11947. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1860-14.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kumar A., Kopra J., Varendi K., Porokuokka L.L., Panhelainen A., Kuure S., Marshall P., Karalija N., Härma M.-A., Vilenius C., et al. GDNF Overexpression from the Native Locus Reveals Its Role in the Nigrostriatal Dopaminergic System Function. PLoS Genet. 2015;11:e1005710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hsu P.-K., Xu B., Mukai J., Karayiorgou M., Gogos J.A. The BDNF Val66Met Variant Affects Gene Expression through MiR-146b. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015;77:228–237. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Robinson O.J., Vytal K., Cornwell B.R., Grillon C. The Impact of Anxiety upon Cognition: Perspectives from Human Threat of Shock Studies. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2013;7:203. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hu K., Bauer A., Padmala S., Pessoa L. Threat of Bodily Harm Has Opposing Effects on Cognition. Emotion. 2012;12:28. doi: 10.1037/a0024345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Roozendaal B., Okuda S., Van der Zee E.A., McGaugh J.L. Glucocorticoid Enhancement of Memory Requires Arousal-Induced Noradrenergic Activation in the Basolateral Amygdala. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:6741–6746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601874103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kolk S.M., Rakic P. Development of Prefrontal Cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47:41–57. doi: 10.1038/s41386-021-01137-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kroon T., van Hugte E., van Linge L., Mansvelder H.D., Meredith R.M. Early Postnatal Development of Pyramidal Neurons across Layers of the Mouse Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41661-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bejoy J., Bijonowski B., Marzano M., Jeske R., Ma T., Li Y. Wnt-Notch Signaling Interactions during Neural and Astroglial Patterning of Human Stem Cells. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2020;26:419–431. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lee H.-C., Tan K.-L., Cheah P.-S., Ling K.-H. Potential Role of JAK-STAT Signaling Pathway in the Neurogenic-to-Gliogenic Shift in down Syndrome Brain. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:7434191. doi: 10.1155/2016/7434191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Deng X., Wu B., Xiao K., Kang J., Xie J., Zhang X., Fan Y. MiR-146b-5p Promotes Metastasis and Induces Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Thyroid Cancer by Targeting ZNRF3. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015;35:71–82. doi: 10.1159/000369676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kee N., Teixeira C.M., Wang A.H., Frankland P.W. Preferential Incorporation of Adult-Generated Granule Cells into Spatial Memory Networks in the Dentate Gyrus. Nat. Neurosci. 2007;10:355–362. doi: 10.1038/nn1847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Vivar C., Van Praag H. Functional Circuits of New Neurons in the Dentate Gyrus. Front. Neural Circuits. 2013;7:15. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2013.00015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Araki T., Ikegaya Y., Koyama R. The Effects of Microglia-and Astrocyte-derived Factors on Neurogenesis in Health and Disease. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2021;54:5880–5901. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kim S.U., de Vellis J. Microglia in Health and Disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2005;81:302–313. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Paolicelli R.C., Bolasco G., Pagani F., Maggi L., Scianni M., Panzanelli P., Giustetto M., Ferreira T.A., Guiducci E., Dumas L., et al. Synaptic Pruning by Microglia Is Necessary for Normal Brain Development. Science. 2011;333:1456–1458. doi: 10.1126/science.1202529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gianino S., Grider J.R., Cresswell J., Enomoto H., Heuckeroth R.O. GDNF Availability Determines Enteric Neuron Number by Controlling Precursor Proliferation. Development. 2003;130:2187–2198. doi: 10.1242/dev.00433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cortés D., Carballo-Molina O.A., Castellanos-Montiel M.J., Velasco I. The Non-Survival Effects of Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor on Neural Cells. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017;10:258. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pelleymounter M.A., Cullen M.J., Baker M.B., Healy D. Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (GDNF) Improves Spatial Learning in Aged Fischer 344 Rats. Psychobiology. 1999;27:397–401. doi: 10.3758/BF03332133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pertusa M., Garcia-Matas S., Mammeri H., Adell A., Rodrigo T., Mallet J., Cristofol R., Sarkis C., Sanfeliu C. Expression of GDNF Transgene in Astrocytes Improves Cognitive Deficits in Aged Rats. Neurobiol. Aging. 2008;29:1366–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.02.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Zhang S., Jin T., Wang L., Liu W., Zhang Y., Zheng Y., Lin Y., Yang M., He X., Lin H., et al. Electro-Acupuncture Promotes the Differentiation of Endogenous Neural Stem Cells via Exosomal MicroRNA 146b after Ischemic Stroke. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2020;14:223. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Li N., Guo Y., Gong Y., Zhang Y., Fan W., Yao K., Chen Z., Dou B., Lin X., Chen B., et al. The Anti-Inflammatory Actions and Mechanisms of Acupuncture from Acupoint to Target Organs via Neuro-Immune Regulation. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021;14:7191. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S341581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Pan J.-A., Tang Y., Yu J.-Y., Zhang H., Zhang J.-F., Wang C.-Q., Gu J. MiR-146a Attenuates Apoptosis and Modulates Autophagy by Targeting TAF9b/P53 Pathway in Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:668. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1901-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Qiu M., Li T., Wang B., Gong H., Huang T. MiR-146a-5p Regulated Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis by Targeting SMAD3 and SMAD4. Protein Pept. Lett. 2020;27:411–418. doi: 10.2174/0929866526666190911142926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Xu J., Zhang Z., Chen Q., Yang L., Yin J. MiR-146b Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Gastric Cancer by Targeting PTP1B. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2020;65:457–463. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05771-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ouyang B., Pan N., Zhang H., Xing C., Ji W. MiR-146b-5p Inhibits Tumorigenesis and Metastasis of Gallbladder Cancer by Targeting Toll-like Receptor 4 via the Nuclear Factor-κB Pathway. Oncol. Rep. 2021;45:15. doi: 10.3892/or.2021.7966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from Cells are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES