The authors wish to make the following corrections to this paper [1]:
1. Change in Figure 1
The authors wish to correct the text in Figure 1. In the published article, there was a mistake in the text of Figure 1f. The text “60%(Air)” in the published article is replaced by “Air”. The corrected figure appears below.
2. Change in Figure 4
The authors wish to make a correction to the text in Figure 4. The title of Figure 4g, “sO2 before fluence compensation” in the published article is replaced by “sO2 after fluence compensation”. The corrected figure appears below.
3. Change in Figure 6
The authors wish to correct the x-axis of Figure 6b. With dual-wavelength imaging, the frame rate becomes half, which was not considered in the original article by mistake. The corrected figure appears below.
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Reference
- 1.Bulsink R., Kuniyil Ajith Singh M., Xavierselvan M., Mallidi S., Steenbergen W., Francis K.J. Oxygen Saturation Imaging Using LED-Based Photoacoustic System. Sensors. 2021;21:283. doi: 10.3390/s21010283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]