Abstract
The implications of vitamin D deficiency on the immune system have become clearer in recent years, being associated with less immune response following HBV vaccine. We aimed to elucidate the effect of vitamin D supplementation and UVB exposure on short- and long-term performance of hepatitis B vaccine. Forty-five male rabbits were randomly divided into 3 groups that were immunized with recombinant HBsAg. The first group (group I) represented a negative control group, whereas group III rabbits were administered with commercially available 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D as an alternative for UVB exposure in group II. Results showed that vitamin D concentrations were significantly higher in UVB exposed group compared to both negative control and vitamin D-supplemented groups during short- and long-time intervals. In addition, means of anti-HBsAg isotypes’ levels and anti-HBsAg IgG avidity% were significantly higher in negative control group compared to other groups during short- and long-time intervals. Moreover, vitamin D serum concentration was positively correlated with anti-HBsAg IgG level and avidity % in both negative control and vitamin D-supplemented groups, while it was negatively correlated with anti-HBsAg IgM level in negative control group. It can be concluded from the above results that UVB radiation may have both augmenting and suppressive effects and that circulating serum vitamin D concentration may have a positive association with premium immune modulation following HBV vaccination.
Keywords: HBV, Vitamin D, UVB, Immunoglobulins, Avidity
Introduction
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a major global health problem with approximately 300 million chronic HBV-infected individuals worldwide [1]. It is associated with up to 900,000 deaths every year mostly due to cirrhosis and HCC [2]. In Egypt, the frequency of positive HBsAg among general populations is about 1.5% [3]. Although the implementation of effective vaccination programs has resulted in a marked decrease in the incidence of new hepatitis B infection, it still remains a crucial cause of morbidity and mortality representing a major threat [4].
The development and maintenance of an efficient HBV-specific adaptive immune response represent the most important factors that can discriminate between HBV control and chronicity where B cells have been increasingly recognized to play an important role in the continuous control of HBV infection [5].
Hepatitis B vaccination has formerly been shown to be shaped by genetics and lifestyle factors [6], where there is widespread inter-individual variability in the magnitude of the antibody response after the second vaccination [7]. In addition, it has been observed that 10–15% of adults showed insufficient response by producing too few antibodies, as dictated by an anti-hepatitis B surface antigen immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration of less than 10 mIU/mL [8].
The importance of vitamin D in the regulation of immune responses has been revealed such that achieving vitamin D sufficiency may be an important factor for the development of proper vaccine responses and consequently public health [9]. A significant moderate correlation was observed between vitamin D status and immune response to BCG vaccine [10], whereas other study revealed that serum level of vitamin D does not affect the immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in the elderly [11]. It has been reported that vitamin D levels were inversely correlated with HBV-DNA loads being associated with the clinical courses of HBV infection [12]. However, the impact of vitamin D on the development of the hepatitis B vaccination antibody response needs further exploration [13].
The current study aimed to elucidate the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation and ultraviolet B (UVB) exposure on the performance of hepatitis B vaccine throughout different time intervals by assessment of anti-hepatitis B surface antigen immunoglobulins’ (IgM, IgG and IgA) levels and IgG avidity % in experimental animals.
Materials and methods
Experimental animals
The present study was conducted on a total of 45 rabbits (1.2–1.3 kg body weight and 9–10 weeks) that were obtained from the farm of Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University, Egypt. The rabbits were acclimatized for 1 week prior to the experiment in the animal house (one rabbit per each battery) of Medical Research Institute, Alexandria University. Animals had free access to chow diet (standard rabbit food pellets) and water at room temperature.
Ethical statement
All the experiments fulfil the guidelines of the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals (NIH Publications No. 8023, revised 1978) and recommendations of Egypt’s guide for the care and use of laboratory animals [14]. The current study follows the ARRIVE Guidelines for reporting animal research and a completed ARRIVE checklist is included.
Experimental design
Rabbits were randomly divided into three groups (15 rabbits each) that were immunized with recombinant HBsAg (Euvax BLG Chem. 10 μg/0.5 ml; purchased from the Vacsera, vaccination centers in Cairo) at a dose (0.34 ug/kg of body weight) by intramuscular injection as a total of 3 doses (baseline, 1st and 2nd doses) at 0, 1 and 3 weeks sequentially. The first group represented a negative control group (without vitamin D support); the second group (UVB exposed) was exposed to UVB lamp for 10 days according to protocol of UV irradiation (15 min at a wavelength 254 nm, power 20 w and 30-cm distance) [15]; and the third group (vitamin D supplemented) was administered with vitamin D orally at a dose of 1680 IU/1.3 kg (calculated as 0.60 ml of the provided vial/250 ml drinking water) [16]. The 2nd and 3rd groups were exposed to UVB irradiation and administered with oral vitamin D, respectively, for 10 days before being immunized with vaccine dose, as shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Experimental design
Blood sampling
Fresh peripheral venous blood samples (2 ml) were obtained from ear veins in uncoated plain tubes. Samples were collected at baseline (i.e. week 0 at initial vaccination for vitamin D assessment) and at 1 week interval for 7 weeks following baseline HBsAg immunization dose (as a short- and long-term assessment). The blood was allowed to clot for 30 min at 37 °C followed by 1 h at 4 °C. After centrifugation, serum was then separated and collected in dry clean eppendorf tubes to be stored at − 80 °C until use for determination of total vitamin D serum concentrations as well as HBsAg antibodies’ levels and avidity.
Serological assessments
Assessment of total vitamin D concentration by ELISA
Total vitamin D concentration was determined in sera from all the rabbits at baseline and at 1 week interval for 7 weeks after baseline HBsAg immunization dose using commercially available ELISA kit, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (abcam; Cat. No. ab213966).
Assessment of vaccine performance
Preliminary study for assessment of anti-HBsAg isotypes’ levels
HBsAg vaccine efficacy was monitored in sera collected from all the animals under study. Sera were assayed after each bleeding for anti-HBsAg specific classes of IgG, IgM and IgA by homemade ELISA using relevant HRP conjugated anti-rabbit IgG, IgM and IgA where the suitable concentrations for serum, coating HBsAg vaccine and HRP-conjugate were first identified [17]. Plates were initially coated with different concentrations of HBsAg (target vaccine) (0.5, 1, 2) µg/ml, serum samples (serially diluted from 1:10 to 1:200), and different dilutions of the conjugate (1:10,000 to 1:30,000). The absorbance of all wells was determined by an automated ELISA reader at a wavelength of 450 nm. The optical density (OD) was used to monitor the original level of anti-HBsAg specific classes in the test samples. Optimized working condition was as follows: 0.5 μg per well for vaccine coating, 1:100 of sample dilution and 1:10.000 of conjugate dilution.
Assessment of anti-HBsAg IgG avidity %
The strength of antigen–antibody interaction was assessed at various durations by incubation with denaturing agent (6-M urea) where pooled sera were prediluted 1:100 with a blocking buffer and dispensed in duplicates into wells coated with 0.5 μg/ml HBsAg [18]. The well contents were aspirated after incubation and were further incubated either in the presence or absence of 6-M urea where HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was then added to each well. The absorbance was determined by using EIA reader with wavelength set at 450 nm.
Statistical analysis
Values were expressed as mean ± SD and were analysed using SPSS statistical software version 18 (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Multiple comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey post hoc test. The correlation coefficients (r) between different assayed parameters were evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficient; p ≤ 0.05 was considered as the significance limit for all comparisons.
Results
Changes in vitamin D serum concentration in different groups during short- and long-time intervals of the study
The variations of vitamin D serum concentration along various time intervals in different groups are shown in Table 1. The mean of vitamin D serum concentration showed significant difference between different groups, where it was significantly upregulated in UVB-exposed group compared to both negative control and vitamin D-supplemented groups during both short- and long-time intervals of the study (p < 0.001). In addition, there was a significant difference in the kinetics of serum vitamin D concentrations throughout the experimental time in each group, where a relative increase was detected in negative control and vitamin D-supplemented groups throughout the experimental time. Regarding vitamin D concentrations in UVB-exposed group, a peak was observed in the 1st week followed by a gradual decline until the 5th week; however, another peak was detected in the 6th week.
Table 1.
Comparison between the different studied groups according to serum vitamin D concentration
| Vitamin D (ng/ml) | Negative control | UVB exposed | Vitamin D supplemented | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | 13.48 ± 1.01 | 29.69 ± 0.99 | 12.78 ± 0.92 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.262, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 1 | 15.72 ± 0.79 | 35.11 ± 1.9 | 15.12 ± 0.85 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.555, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 2 | 15.64 ± 1.37 | 29.64 ± 2.18 | 17.29 ± 0.73 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.06, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 3 | 17.51 ± 0.64 | 29.25 ± 1.83 | 18.34 ± 0.65 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.278, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 4 | 18.5 ± 0.67 | 25.08 ± 1.26 | 19.14 ± 0.79 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.298, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 5 | 18.28 ± 0.56 | 28.42 ± 1.15 | 20.1 ± 1.07 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 6 | 21.07 ± 1.11 | 33.72 ± 1.98 | 21.75 ± 1.75 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.634, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 7 | 20.7 ± 0.79 | 32.97 ± 1.61 | 19.91 ± 0.84 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.287, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| p0 | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | |
p: p value for comparing between the different studied groups
p0: p value for comparing between different weeks in each group
p1: p value for comparing between Negative cont. and UV exposed
p2: p value for comparing between Negative cont. and vitamin D-supplemented group
p3: p value for comparing between UV exposed and vitamin D-supplemented group
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Changes in anti-HBsAg isotypes’ (IgG, IgM and IgA) levels in different groups during short- and long-time intervals of the study
The changes of anti-HBsAg isotypes’ (IgG, IgM and IgA) levels along various time intervals in different studied groups are summarized in Table 2 and Fig. 2, where the results revealed that anti-HBsAg isotypes (IgG, IgM and IgA) levels were significantly higher in the negative control group compared to other groups during both short- and long-time intervals. There was also a significant difference in the kinetics of each isotype throughout the experimental time in each group, where serum anti-HBsAg IgM levels peaked in the 2nd and 4th weeks and then gradually declined throughout the experimental time, whereas anti-HBsAg IgG levels showed a relative increase in the studied groups throughout the experimental time; however, a decline was observed, following an increase, in UVB-exposed group in the 7th week. Regarding anti-HBsAg IgA levels, there was a constant increase till the 5th week followed by a gradual decline throughout the experimental time.
Table 2.
Comparison between the different studied groups according to different anti-HBsAg isotypes’ (IgG, IgM and IgA) levels
| Anti-HBsAg IgG | p | Anti-HBsAg IgM | p | Anti-HBsAg IgA | p | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negativecontrol | UVB exposed | Vitamin D supplemented | Negative control | UVB exposed | Vitamin D supplemented | Negative control | UVB exposed | Vitamin D supplemented | ||||
| Week 1 | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 0.66 ± 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.09 | < 0.001* | 0.53 ± 0.08 | 0.52 ± 0.09 | 0.48 ± 0.05 | 0.355 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.47 ± 0.04 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.008* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 = 0.089 | p1 = 0.014*, p2 = 0.974, p3 = 0.024* | |||||||||||
| Week 2 | 0.98 ± 0.11 | 0.72 ± 0.13 | 0.71 ± 0.05 | < 0.001* | 0.57 ± 0.05 | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 0.003* | 0.7 ± 0.06 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.59 ± 0.04 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 = 0.974 | p1 = 0.002*, p2 = 0.119, p3 = 0.223 | p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 = 0.003* | ||||||||||
| Week 3 | 0.91 ± 0.04 | 0.78 ± 0.13 | 0.87 ± 0.07 | 0.009* | 0.49 ± 0.06 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 0.099 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 0.5 ± 0.04 | 0.6 ± 0.03 | < 0.001* |
| p1 = 0.008*, p2 = 0.560, p3 = 0.085 | p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 < 0.001* | |||||||||||
| Week 4 | 1.2 ± 0.26 | 0.73 ± 0.18 | 0.86 ± 0.19 | < 0.001* | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.5 ± 0.04 | 0.068 | 1.01 ± 0.08 | 0.83 ± 0.05 | 0.94 ± 0.08 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.005*, p3 = 0.374 | p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.118, p3 = 0.009* | |||||||||||
| Week 5 | 1.19 ± 0.27 | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 0.90 ± 0.16 | < 0.001* | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.023* | 1.01 ± 0.07 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | < 0.001* |
| p1 = 0.001*, p2 = 0.006*, p3 = 0.788 | p1 = 0.018*, p2 = 0.398, p3 = 0.254 | p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.257, p3 < 0.001* | ||||||||||
| Week 6 | 1.23 ± 0.12 | 1.15 ± 0.10 | 1.10 ± 0.13 | 0.069 | 0.3 ± 0.03 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.076 | 0.91 ± 0.07 | 0.74 ± 0.05 | 0.89 ± 0.05 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.630, p3 < 0.001* | ||||||||||||
| Week 7 | 1.44 ± 0.14 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 1.13 ± 0.09 | < 0.001* | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.067 | 0.88 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.07 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 < 0.001* | p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.983, p3 < 0.001* | |||||||||||
| p0 | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | |||
p: p value for comparing between the different studied groups
p0: p value for comparing between different weeks in each group
p1: p value for comparing between Negative cont. and UV exposed
p2: p value for comparing between Negative cont. and vitamin D suppl
p3: p value for comparing between UV exposed and vitamin D suppl
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Fig. 2.
Kinetics of anti-HBsAg isotypes’ levels throughout experimental time in different groups after HBsAg immunization. (a) Kinetics of anti-HBsAg IgG levels, (b) kinetics of anti-HBsAg IgM levels, (c) kinetics of anti-HBsAg IgA levels
Changes in anti-HBsAg avidity % in different groups during short- and long-time intervals of the study
We further evaluated the strength of binding between the immunizing HBsAg and its corresponding anti-HBsAg IgG as an indicator of protective immunity after immunization with HBV vaccine. As shown in Table 3 and Fig. 3, the results reveal that mean anti-HBsAg IgG avidity% is significantly higher in the negative control group compared to the other groups during short- and long-time intervals. A significant difference was also observed in the kinetics of anti-HBsAg IgG avidity% throughout the experimental time in each group, where anti-HBsAg IgG avidity % showed a relative increase in negative control and vitamin D-supplemented groups throughout the experimental time; however, a gradual decline was detected following this relative increase in UVB-exposed group in the 5th week.
Table 3.
Comparison between the different studied groups according to anti-HBsAg IgG avidity %
| Anti-HbsAg IgG avidity % | p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative control | UVB exposed | Vitamin D supplemented | ||
| Week 1 | 72.67 ± 1.69 | 50.71 ± 1.55 | 59.98 ± 2.1 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 2 | 72.35 ± 2.96 | 66.24 ± 2.57 | 69.1 ± 1.83 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.018*, p3 = 0.045* | ||||
| Week 3 | 74.03 ± 3.7 | 68.61 ± 6 | 73.25 ± 3.25 | 0.025* |
| p1 = 0.031*, p2 = 0.920, p3 = 0.071 | ||||
| Week 4 | 85.1 ± 3.81 | 68.25 ± 1.3 | 75.78 ± 5.74 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 5 | 84.2 ± 2.97 | 66.97 ± 3.27 | 79.71 ± 5.7 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.058, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 6 | 85.7 ± 2.4 | 54.1 ± 8.6 | 78.74 ± 5.33 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.039*, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| Week 7 | 85.3 ± 2.98 | 53.8 ± 3.36 | 79.93 ± 4.5 | < 0.001* |
| p1 < 0.001*, p2 = 0.008*, p3 < 0.001* | ||||
| p0 | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | < 0.001* | |
p: p value for comparing between the different studied groups
p0: p value for comparing between different weeks in each group
p1: p value for comparing between Negative cont. and UV exposed
p2: p value for comparing between Negative cont. and vitamin D suppl
p3: p value for comparing between UV exposed and vitamin D suppl
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Fig. 3.
Kinetics of anti-HBsAg IgG avidity % in different groups throughout experimental time after HBsAg immunization
Association between serum vitamin D concentration and anti-HBsAg isotypes in different groups during short and long time intervals of the study
To elucidate the effect of vitamin D supplementation and UVB exposure on short- and long-term performance of hepatitis B vaccine, we analysed the association between vitamin D serum concentration with both anti-HBsAg immunoglobulins’ levels and avidity% (Table 4). The results showed that serum vitamin D concentration was positively correlated with anti-HBsAg IgG in both negative control (r = 0.756, p = 0.049) and vitamin D supplemented (r = 0.765, p = 0.045) groups, whereas it was negatively correlated with anti-HBsAg IgM in negative control group (r = − 0.775, p = 0.041). Regarding association with anti-HBsAg avidity %, vitamin D concentration was positively correlated with IgG avidity % in both negative control (r = 0.869, p = 0.011) and vitamin D-supplemented (r = 0.911, p = 0.004) groups.
Table 4.
Correlation between serum vitamin D concentration and anti-HBsAg isotypes’ levels as well as anti-HBsAg IgG avidity% in the different studied groups
| Anti-HBsAg-IgG | Anti-HBsAg IgM | Anti-HBsAg IgA | Anti-HBsAg IgG avidity % | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negativecontrol | UVBexposed | Vitamin D supplemented | Negative control | UVB exposed | Vitamin D supplemented | Negative control | UVB exposed | Vitamin D supplemented | Negative control | UVB exposed | Vitamin D supplemented | ||
| Vitamin D concentration | r | 0.756 | 0.211 | 0.765 | − 0.775 | − 0.329 | − 0.47 | 0.613 | − 0.411 | 0.729 | 0.869 | − 0.672 | 0.911 |
| p | 0.049* | 0.649 | 0.045* | 0.041* | 0.471 | 0.287 | 0.144 | 0.359 | 0.063 | 0.011* | 0.098 | 0.004* | |
r Pearson coefficient
*Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
Discussion
Although HBV vaccination is the most effective approach to prevent HBV infection, there are still 5–10% of the subjects who fail to produce protective anti-HBsAg titer after three times of vaccination irrespective of the source of the antigen [19]. The underlying mechanisms of the poor immune responses have not been elucidated [20]. It has been hypothesized that vitamin D levels could have an impact on immune responses to vaccines [21]. However, few data are available concerning the relationship between vitamin D level and vaccine responses against hepatitis B [22].
The present study revealed a statistical significant difference in the mean of vitamin D serum concentration between the different groups, where it was markedly higher in UVB-exposed groups compared to both negative control and vitamin D-supplemented groups during short- and long-time intervals. Our results are in agreement with Kalajian et al. [23] who postulated that UVB light lamp is more effective in producing vitamin D3 than sunlight. It has been claimed that regular UVB exposure increases serum vitamin D concentration to levels exceeding that obtained through oral cholecalciferol by at least 20 µg [24]. In addition, other factors as strategies employed by health care providers including (type, dose and duration of vitamin D supplementation) and environmental factors may explain the decreased vitamin D levels in vitamin D-supplemented group [25].
We assessed different anti-HBsAg isotypes (IgG, IgM and IgA) levels as well as anti-HBsAg IgG avidity% to evaluate the role of vitamin D as a potential HBV vaccine adjuvant. The present study revealed that the means of anti-HBsAg isotypes (IgG, IgM and IgA) as well as anti-HBsAg IgG avidity% were significantly higher in immunized rabbits that did not receive extrinsic vitamin D support (negative control group) relative to their partners exposed to either UVB or supplemented with oral vitamin D3 during both short- and long-time intervals.
The remarkable reduction in anti-HBsAg isotypes following immunization of vitamin D supplemented rabbits (group III) may be explained on that the status of vitamin D at the time of initial vaccination may influence the subsequent secondary hepatitis B vaccine response where low vitamin D status at initial vaccination was associated with poorer vaccine response [26]. In addition, it has been observed that vitamin D supplementation beginning 3 days after the initial hepatitis B vaccination did not influence the hepatitis B vaccine response [27]. Moreover, the observed reduction in both antibodies’ levels and avidity in UVB-exposed group may be attributed to the possible immunosuppressive effect following exposure to UVR [28], where the observed upregulation of vitamin D status in UVB-exposed group could be a compensatory mechanism to overcome this immunosuppression.
Furthermore, our study revealed that vitamin D serum concentration was positively correlated with anti-HBsAg IgG levels and avidity in negative control and vitamin D-supplemented groups during short- and long-time intervals while it was negatively correlated with anti-HBsAg IgM levels in negative control group. It has been observed that high vitamin D level successfully boosters immunization-induced specific-antibody titers, where vitamin D may modulate vaccine responses through its interaction with antigen presentation, dendritic cell migration as well as the subsequent activation of T and B cell antibody responses[29].
In concordance, it has been shown that adult mice vaccinated subcutaneously or intramuscularly with inactivated vaccine co-administered with 1,25-(OH)2D3 enhanced systemic immune responses where vitamin D was reported to improve HBV vaccine's humoral immune response when used as adjuvant [30]. On the contrary, other study demonstrated that vitamin D supplementation promotes a higher TGF-β plasma level in response to vaccination without improving antibody production, while other study observed no correlation between vitamin D levels and vaccine responses [22].
Despite the immune-modulatory role of vitamin D in response to viral vaccines, the negative association with anti-HBsAg IgM may be related to Ig class-switch recombination which occurred with the beginning of vaccine intake from IgM towards IgG and IgA [31].
Although the present findings are notable, the study should be expanded by assessing vitamin D and UVB dose–response curve. It can be concluded from the above results that UVB radiation may act as a double edged sword in response to HBV vaccine response, since it is a major source of vitamin D; however, being associated with a reduced vaccine response. In addition, vitamin D may have a possible immunomodulatory role in the development of premium HBV–vaccine response.
Funding
Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB).
Declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Sara Youssry, Email: sara.youssry@alexu.edu.eg, Email: saranour5000@yahoo.com.
Thanaa Shalaby, Email: th_shalaby@yahoo.com.
Hossam Ghoneim, Email: hossameldin.mohamed@alborglab.com.
References
- 1.Guvenir M, Arikan A. Hepatitis B virus: from diagnosis to treatment. Pol J Microbiol. 2020;69(4):391–9. doi: 10.33073/pjm-2020-044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Revill PA, Chisari FV, Block JM, Dandri M, Gehring AJ, Guo H, et al. A global scientific strategy to cure hepatitis B. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:545–558. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30119-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elmaghloub R, Elbahrawy A, Didamony GE, Elwassief A, Saied Mohammad AG, Alashker A, et al. Hepatitis B virus genotype E infection among Egyptian health care workers. J Transl Int Med. 2017;5(2):100–105. doi: 10.1515/jtim-2017-0012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Schmit N, Nayagam S, Thursz MR, Hallett TB. The global burden of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: comparison of country-level prevalence estimates from four research groups. Int J Epidemiol. 2021;50(2):560–569. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burton AR, Pallett LJ, McCoy LE, Suveizdyte K, Amin OE, Swadling L, et al. Circulating and intrahepatic antiviral B cells are defective in hepatitis B. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(10):4588–4603. doi: 10.1172/JCI121960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yang S, Tian G, Cui Y, Ding C, Deng M, Yu C, et al. Factors influencing immunologic response to hepatitis B vaccine in adults. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27251. doi: 10.1038/srep27251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.WHO (2017) Weekly epidemiological record. 92:369–92
- 8.Public Health England (2017) Hepatitis B: the green book, Chapter 18. vol 7. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hepatitis-b-the-green-book-chapter-18#history.
- 9.Lang PO, Aspinall R. Can we translate vitamin D immunomodulating effect on innate and adaptive immunity to vaccine response? Nutrients. 2015;7(3):2044–2060. doi: 10.3390/nu7032044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Abdelgawad A, Saoud H, Mohamed A, Fathi M, Mokhtar E. Evaluation of BCG vaccine immunogenicity in relation to vitamin D status in a group of Egyptian children. Open J Pediatr. 2020;10:320–331. doi: 10.4236/ojped.2020.102033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sławin A, Brydak LB, Doniec Z, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Mastalerz-Migas A. Serum vitamin D and immunogenicity of influenza vaccination in the elderly. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2021;1324:21–8. doi: 10.1007/5584_2020_580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hoan NX, Tong HV, Song LH, Meyer CG, Velavan TP. Vitamin D deficiency and hepatitis viruses-associated liver diseases: a literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(4):445–460. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i4.445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jhorawat R, Jain S, Pal A, Nijhawan S, Beniwal P, Agarwal D, et al. Effect of vitamin D level on the immunogenicity to hepatitis B vaccination in dialysis patients. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2016;35(1):67–71. doi: 10.1007/s12664-016-0621-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Fahmy SR, Gaafar K. Establishing the first institutional animal care and use committee in Egypt. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2016;11:2. doi: 10.1186/s13010-016-0035-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Chandra P, Wolfenden LL, Ziegler TR, Tian J, Luo M, Stecenko AA, et al. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency with UV light in patients with malabsorption syndromes: a case series. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2007;23:179–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0781.2007.00302.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lebas F. Vitamins in rabbit nutrition: literature review and recommendations. World Rabbit Sci. 2000;8(4):185–192. doi: 10.4995/wrs.2000.438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Yucel F, Akcael E. Development of sandwich ELISA systems for the diagnosis of hepatitis B virus surface antigen and its antibody in human sera. J Microbiol Exp. 2018;6(2):77–82. doi: 10.15406/jmen.2018.06.00191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fialová L, Petráčková M, Kuchař O. Comparison of different enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods for avidity determination of antiphospholipid antibodies. J Clin Lab Anal. 2017;31(6):e22121. doi: 10.1002/jcla.22121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang L, Liu J, Lu J, Yan B, Song L, Li L, et al. Antibody response to revaccination among adult non-responders to primary Hepatitis B vaccination in China. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11:2716–2722. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1045172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fourati S, Cristescu R, Loboda A, Talla A, Filali A, Railkar R, et al. Pre-vaccination inflammation and B-cell signaling predict age related hyporesponse to hepatitis B vaccination. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10369. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sadarangani SP, Whitaker JA, Poland GA. “Let there be light”: the role of vitamin D in the immune response to vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2015;14(11):1427–1440. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2015.1082426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Viard JP, Assuied A, Lévy Y, Souberbielle JC, Thiébaut R, Carrat F, et al. No positive association between vitamin D level and immune responses to hepatitis B and Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccination in HIV-infected adults. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(12):e0168640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168640. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kalajian TA, Aldoukhi A, Veronikis AJ, Persons K, Holick MF. Ultraviolet B light emitting diodes (LEDs) are more efficient and effective in producing vitamin D3 in human skin compared to natural sunlight. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11489. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11362-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ala-Houhala MJ, Vähävihu K, Hasan T, Kautiainen H, Ylianttila L, Viljakainen HT, et al. Comparison of narrowband ultraviolet B exposure and oral vitamin D substitution on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(1):160–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10990.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Mazahery H, von Hurst PR. Factors Affecting 25-Hydroxyvitamin D concentration in response to vitamin D supplementation. Nutrients. 2015;7:5111–5142. doi: 10.3390/nu7075111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Grant WB, Boucher BJ, Bhattoa HP, Lahore H. Why vitamin D clinical trials should be based on 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;177:266–269. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kashi DS, Oliver SJ, Wentz LM, Roberts R, Carswell AT, Tang JCY, et al. Vitamin D and the hepatitis B vaccine response: a prospective cohort study and a randomized, placebo-controlled oral vitamin D3 and simulated sunlight supplementation trial in healthy adults. Eur J Nutr. 2021;60:475–491. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02261-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hart PH, Norval M. Are there differences in immune responses following delivery of vaccines through acutely or chronically sun-exposed compared with sun-unexposed skin? Immunology. 2020;159(2):133–141. doi: 10.1111/imm.13128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jafarzadeh A, Keshavarz J, Bagheri-Jamebozorgi M, Nemati M, Frootan R, Shokri F. The association of the vitamin D status with the persistence of anti-HBs antibody at 20 years after primary vaccination with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in infancy. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2017;41(1):66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Jafarzadeh A, Keshavarz J, Bagheri-Jamebozorgi M, Nemati M, Frootan R, Shokri F. The association of the vitamin D status with the persistence of anti-HBs antibody at 20 years after primary vaccination with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in infancy. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2017;41:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Stavnezer J, Schrader CE. IgH chain class switch recombination: mechanism and regulation. J Immunol. 2014;193(11):5370–5378. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]