Skip to main content
Life Science Alliance logoLink to Life Science Alliance
. 2022 Jul 13;5(11):e202201531. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202201531

Decreasing pdzd8-mediated mito–ER contacts improves organismal fitness and mitigates Aβ42 toxicity

Victoria L Hewitt 1,2, Leonor Miller-Fleming 1, Madeleine J Twyning 1, Simonetta Andreazza 1, Francesca Mattedi 3, Julien Prudent 1, Franck Polleux 2,4,5, Alessio Vagnoni 3, Alexander J Whitworth 1,
PMCID: PMC9279675  PMID: 35831024

The authors provide the first description of the impact of reducing pdzd8-mediated mito–ER contacts which prolongs lifespan, reduces age-related locomotor decline, and protects against mitochondrial toxins. pdzd8 loss is also protective against neuronal toxicity from Aβ42.

Abstract

Mitochondria-ER contact sites (MERCs) orchestrate many important cellular functions including regulating mitochondrial quality control through mitophagy and mediating mitochondrial calcium uptake. Here, we identify and functionally characterize the Drosophila ortholog of the recently identified mammalian MERC protein, Pdzd8. We find that reducing pdzd8-mediated MERCs in neurons slows age-associated decline in locomotor activity and increases lifespan in Drosophila. The protective effects of pdzd8 knockdown in neurons correlate with an increase in mitophagy, suggesting that increased mitochondrial turnover may support healthy aging of neurons. In contrast, increasing MERCs by expressing a constitutive, synthetic ER–mitochondria tether disrupts mitochondrial transport and synapse formation, accelerates age-related decline in locomotion, and reduces lifespan. Although depletion of pdzd8 prolongs the survival of flies fed with mitochondrial toxins, it is also sufficient to rescue locomotor defects of a fly model of Alzheimer’s disease expressing Amyloid β42 (Aβ42). Together, our results provide the first in vivo evidence that MERCs mediated by the tethering protein pdzd8 play a critical role in the regulation of mitochondrial quality control and neuronal homeostasis.

Introduction

Because the vast majority of neurons are postmitotic, maintaining functional neurons throughout an organism’s lifetime requires tight regulation of organelle functions and cellular homeostatic mechanisms. Mitochondria and the ER extend throughout neuronal compartments including axons and dendrites, and both are vital and interdependent contributors to neuronal health (Wu et al, 2017). Mitochondria-ER contacts (MERCs) are controlled by a variety of contact site-resident proteins and contribute to a range of functions required for proper development and maintenance of postmitotic neurons, including regulation of calcium homeostasis, lipid biogenesis, organelle reshaping and dynamics, and metabolic signalling (Giacomello & Pellegrini, 2016; Paillusson et al, 2016). Dysregulation of MERCs is particularly damaging to neurons as they are especially susceptible to calcium overload, oxidative and ER stresses, and to altered mitochondrial function, localization, and transport (Misgeld & Schwarz, 2017; Lee et al, 2018a).

As MERCs are modulated by a number of different protein complexes, the detrimental effects of MERCs dysregulation are varied because of the diversity of these contact site functions (Martino Adami et al, 2019). The critical function of MERCs in regulating cellular responses to damage and stress is underscored by the finding that many human patient cellular models and animal models of age-related neurodegenerative diseases have been shown to have disrupted MERCs. Both reduced MERCs (Sepulveda-Falla et al, 2014; De Vos & Hafezparast, 2017) and increased MERCs (Zampese et al, 2011; Area-Gomez et al, 2012; Gómez-Suaga et al, 2019) have been implicated in neurodegenerative diseases. Consequently, there is still little consensus on how altered MERCs contribute to neurodegeneration, even within a single disease model (Erpapazoglou et al, 2017). The various functions of MERCs make it likely that multiple mechanisms might be involved and, with an ever-expanding toolkit, we can now better define the molecular identities and specific functions of ER–mitochondria tethering complexes and begin to unify many of the seemingly conflicting discoveries in this rapidly growing field (Csordas et al, 2018).

Pdzd8 is one of the most recently identified proteins that mediates mammalian MERCs (Hirabayashi et al, 2017) and is proposed to be a paralog of Mmm1 (Wideman et al, 2018), a component of the fungal-specific ER mitochondria encounter structure and first MERC complex identified (Kornmann et al, 2009). In Drosophila melanogaster pdzd8 is highly expressed in neurons and, therefore, we explored the consequences of its depletion by RNAi in neurons both at the cellular and at the organismal level. Importantly, we also describe how the phenotypes associated with neuron-specific depletion of pdzd8 change with age and may contribute to healthy aging. We show the MERCs mediated by pdzd8 tethering regulate mitochondrial turnover through mitophagy and that reducing these contacts prolonged locomotor activity and lifespan in Drosophila. We also report that reducing excess MERCs observed in an Aβ42 model of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) correlates with improved motor performance in this model. Together, our results show the critical contribution of MERCs to neuronal and organismal homeostasis by elucidating the consequence of excess and reduced MERCs in an in vivo model.

Results

Characterization of fly pdzd8

The D. melanogaster gene CG10362 encodes an uncharacterized protein in the PDZK8 family (Lee & Hong, 2006). The product of CG10362 has a similar predicted domain structure to mammalian Pdzd8 (Fig 1A). Expression of CG10362 in flies is low but is most highly expressed in the central nervous system (FlyAtlas 2; Fig S1A) (Leader et al, 2018) and is enriched in neurons over glia (Fig S1B) (Davie et al, 2018). This specificity in expression in Drosophila provided not only an excellent opportunity to explore the neuronal functions of this newly discovered MERCs protein but also to investigate the functional relevance of MERCs in adult and aging neurons. Based on the sequence homology and functional analysis presented here, we propose that CG10362 encodes the fly ortholog of mammalian Pdzd8 and will hereafter refer to CG10362 as pdzd8.

Figure 1. Expression of pdzd8-RNAi reduces mitochondria-ER contacts.

Figure 1.

(A) Domain organisation of Drosophila pdzd8 (CG10362) compared with mouse Pdzd8 showing percentage identities of conserved domains based on Clustal Omega alignments. Overall percentage identity of the amino acid sequences is 21%. SMP (synaptotagmin-like mitochondrial lipid-binding proteins) 33% identical, PDZ (PSD95/DLG/ZO-1) 36% identical, C1 (C1 protein kinase C conserved region 1 also known as Zn finger phorbol-ester/DAG-type signature) 47% identical; TM: predicted transmembrane domain, CC: coil–coil domain. (B) Electron microscopy images of cell bodies of the posterior protocerebrum of 2-d-old adult brains showing representative images of ER, mitochondria, and MERCs in soma from nSyb>LacZ-RNAi and nSyb>pdzd8-RNAi flies. Scale bar 500 nm. Mitochondria without identifiable ER contacts marked with magenta *, mitochondria forming ER contact marked with yellow * with yellow arrow indicating contact location, organelles that did not contain clear cristae are marked with a cyan * and were excluded from the analysis. (C) Percentage of mitochondria in contact with the ER from controls and pan-neuronal nSyb>pdzd8-RNAi flies quantified from EM images of 2-d-old adult brains. n = 3 brains per genotype, numbers on bars indicate number of mitochondria analysed. (D) SPLICS puncta indicating MERCs in axon bundles of larval neurons from controls and nSyb>pdzd8-RNAi flies. Quantified puncta highlighted with V. Scale bar 5 μm. (D, E) Quantification of SPLICS puncta in (D). n = 11 animals per genotype, P = 0.0198, unpaired t test with Welch’s Correction. (F) Representative structured illumination microscopy images of ER (green, ER-Tomato) and mitochondria (purple, mitoGFP) in larval epidermal cells from controls and da>pdzd8-RNAi flies. Scale bar = 5 μm. (F, G) Binarized images of ER and mitochondria shown in (F). (H) Quantification of colocalization of ER and mitochondria using Mander’s Correlations in 12 control cells and 14da > pdzd8-RNAi cells (1 field of view per cell) compared using an unpaired t test with Welch’s Correction. P = 0.012.

Figure S1. Expression and tissue specificity of pdzd8.

Figure S1.

(A) Tissue-specific expression of pdzd8 in 7-d-old adult males from Leader et al (2018). FPKM, fragments per kilobase of exon model per million reads mapped providing a normalized estimation of gene expression based on RNA-seq data. (B) SCope transcriptome data from the unfiltered adult fly brain dataset. (C) Relative abundance of pdzd8 transcript in controls compared with pdzd8-RNAi normalized to the relative to geometric mean of housekeeping genes αTub84B, vkg, COX8, and Rpl32; P = 0.0134. (D) Replicate of Fig 1B LacZ-RNAi with high magnification examples of MERCs (D′-D‴). Scale bar 500 nm. (E) Representative structured illumination microscopy images of ER (green) and mitochondria (purple) in L3 larval neurons. Scale bar = 5 μm.

To characterize the function of pdzd8 in flies, we used the GAL4–UAS system to manipulate its expression (Brand & Perrimon, 1993). Ubiquitous expression of an RNAi construct targeting pdzd8 strongly reduces its mRNA levels in larvae (Fig S1C). To determine whether MERCs were decreased in neurons expressing pdzd8-RNAi, we analysed adult fly brains by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and manually identified contacts between ER and mitochondria, with the experimenter blind to conditions (Figs 1B and S1D). These results showed that the proportion of mitochondria in contact with ER in the soma of adult fly neurons is significantly reduced in flies expressing pdzd8-RNAi compared with controls (Fig 1C).

To confirm that pdzd8-RNAi reduces MERCs in axons as well as soma, we adapted the recently developed MERC quantification tool, SPLICS, a split-GFP-based contact site sensor (Cieri et al, 2017), to create a SPLICS transgenic reporter line. The SPLICS construct targets β-strands 1–10 of GFP to the mitochondrial outer membrane and β-strand 11 to the ER membrane. Where these membranes are in close proximity, fluorescent puncta are produced by reconstitution of the split-GFP (Fig S2A). To validate this tool in Drosophila, we expressed SPLICS in motor neurons (Fig S2B) and compared the number of puncta in control axons and those expressing a well characterized artificial mitochondria-ER tether developed by Csordas et al (2006) and Basso et al (2018). Expression of this synthetic mitochondria-ER tether induces formation of ∼5 nm MERCs through targeting motifs that anchor it in both the mitochondrial outer membrane and the ER (Fig S2C). The density of SPLICS puncta in the axons expressing the tether was four times higher than controls (Fig S2D and E), indicating that the SPLICS reporter was able to report a change in MERCs resulting from expression of the synthetic tether in neurons in vivo.

Figure S2. SPLICS and tether constructs used in this study.

Figure S2.

(A) Cartoon of SPLICS targeting and mode of action (Created with BioRender.com). (B) Density of SPLICS puncta in axons is different in different axon bundles. Scale bars: fluorescence, 5 μm; light, 30 μm. (C) Cartoon of the synthetic tether construct targeting and mode of action (Created with BioRender.com). (D) SPLICS puncta indicating contact sites in larval axons. Scale bar = 5 μm. (D, E) Quantification of SPLICS puncta in (D). n = 9 larvae per genotype, three ROIs averaged per larva, unpaired t test with Welch’s Correction.

Using this SPLICS construct, we detected a significant decrease in the density of SPLICS puncta in central larval axons (bundles projecting to segments A7 and A8) expressing the pdzd8-RNAi compared with LacZ-RNAi controls (Fig 1D and E). Whereas pdzd8 expression is low beyond the nervous system (Fig S1A), ubiquitous knockdown of pdzd8 also reduced the extent of MERCs measured by fluorescence colocalization of ER and mitochondrial signals by super-resolution microscopy (structured illumination microscopy) in larval epidermal cells (Fig 1F–H), corroborating our results using TEM and SPLICS analysis.

Consistent with the first reported function of Pdzd8 at MERCs in mouse neurons (Hirabayashi et al, 2017), we observed a reduced number of MERCs (Fig 1), but no obvious changes in mitochondrial or ER morphology in fly larval or adult neurons upon pdzd8 knockdown (See Figs 1B, D, and F, S1D and E, 4A and B and F–I, and 5A and C). Together, these data support that CG10362 encodes the Drosophila ortholog of Pdzd8 and functions like mammalian Pdzd8 to regulate MERCs. We next sought to investigate the consequences of loss of pdzd8 from neurons on organismal phenotypes.

Figure 4. Knockdown of pdzd8 in larval neurons causes minor defects, whereas increasing MERCs is detrimental in axonal mitochondria size and motility.

Figure 4.

(A) Representative images of mitochondrial morphology and distribution in larval axons. Mitochondria were detected using mitoGFP in controls (LacZ-RNAi) and pdzd8-RNAi expressing larvae. Scale bar = 5 μm. (A, B, C) Mitochondrial length (B), and mitochondrial density (C) in the larval axons shown in (A) were analysed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparisons. n = 10, 10, 13 animals, data points represent different axons, all differences ns. (D) Representative kymographs showing motility of mitoGFP signal in controls and pdzd8-RNAi–expressing larvae. Stationary mitochondria appear as vertical lines, moving mitochondria form diagonal lines in anterograde or retrograde directions. (D, E) Quantification of mitochondrial transport shown in (D), analysed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparisons, n = 14-25 larvae, P < 0.0001. (F) Representative images of NMJs and mitochondria of controls and pdzd8-RNAi labeled using mitoGFP. magenta = mitoGFP, green = anti-HRP (neuronal membrane). Scale bar = 10 μm. (G, H, I) Quantifications of total volume, P = 0.0036, (G), mitochondrial volume, P = 0.002 (H) and mitochondrial density (I) of 16–20 NMJs were compared using an unpaired t test with Welch’s Correction.

Figure 5. Pan-neuronal pdzd8-RNAi increases mitophagy during aging.

Figure 5.

(A) Representative images of MitoQC signal in wandering L3 larval ventral ganglia. magenta = mCherry, green = GFP, images show a single plane of a Z stack. Scale bar = 2 μm. (A, B) Quantification of MitoQC puncta shown in (A), n = 9 ROIs, differences ns. (C) Representative images of MitoQC signal in adult brains in 2- and 20-d-old flies, magenta = mCherry, green = GFP. Scale bar = 5 μm, image shows a single plane of a Z stack. (D, E) Quantification of MitoQC signal in adult brains and compared using an unpaired t test with Welch’s correction (n = 7–9 ROIs, P = 0.0072) (E) the Representative images of MitoQC signal in 14-d-old fly wings. Only mCherry signal (magenta) is shown for clarity. Wing nerve are outlined (white). Scale bar = 5 μm. (F) Quantification of MitoQC signal in aged fly wings at 2, 14, and 30 d post-eclosion using a one-way ANOVA with Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparisons. n (2 d) = 33, 26 wings (14 d) = 24, 31 wings (30 d) = 32, 12 wings. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Reduced mitochondria-ER contacts are protective in aging neurons

Knockdown of pdzd8 in fly neurons produces viable adults. There was no impact on the locomotor performance of pan-neuronal pdzd8-RNAi knockdown in young flies assessed in a climbing assay (Fig 2A). Surprisingly, we found that loss of pdzd8 dramatically slowed the age-associated decline in climbing ability (Fig 2A). To corroborate these striking results, we repeated the analysis alongside additional independent controls including another control RNAi (luciferase-RNAi) and another inert transgene (mitoGFP), with equivalent results (Fig S3). Importantly, this effect was also reproduced by motor neuron-specific pdzd8 knockdown (Fig S4A). Strikingly, the increase in locomotor activity was accompanied by a significant increase in lifespan (Fig 2C).

Figure 2. Lifespan and locomotor activity changes in aged flies with pan-neuronal driven alterations in tethering.

Figure 2.

(A, B) Locomotor activity of flies was assessed during aging by negative geotaxis climbing assays on the indicated days. n > 50 flies per genotype. Flies expressing (A) pdzd8-RNAi or (B) synthetic tether were compared with LacZ-RNAi controls. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc correction. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. (C, D) Lifespans in standard growth conditions and food. (C) Flies expressing pdzd8-RNAi were compared with LacZ-RNAi controls. n = 97, 108 per genotype, median survival 44 versus 52 d, P < 0.0001. (D) Flies expressing the synthetic tether were compared with LacZ-RNAi controls. n = 74, 85 per genotype, median survival 52 versus 33 d, P < 0.0001.

Figure S3. pdzd8 knockdown delays aged motor decline compared with multiple controls.

Figure S3.

(A, B, C, D, E) Locomotor activity following pan-neuronal knockdown of pdzd8 or controls (mitoGFP, Luciferase-RNAi or LacZ-RNAi) at 2 d (A), 10 d (B), 20 d (C), 30 d (D), and 40 d (E) post-eclosion. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc correction. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

Figure S4. Phenotypic characterization of altered tethering in motor neurons.

Figure S4.

(A) Motor neuron-specific aged climbing assay showing pdzd8-RNAi compared with LacZ-RNAi controls. (B) pdzd8-RNAi rescues aged climbing defect resulting from pdzd8 overexpression, rescued by co-expression with pdzd8-RNAi. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc correction. (C) ATP levels in fly heads normalized to total protein content and show mean ± SD, n = 3, 40 flies per replicate, compared using a two-tailed t test, all differences ns. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001. (D) OK371>tether expression resulted in severely deformed NMJs on muscle 4 and made it impossible to distinguish NMJs type 1s and 1b synaptic boutons (therefore, mitochondrial density could not be quantified).

In contrast, increasing MERCs by expression of a synthetic mitochondria-ER tether in all neurons resulted in a climbing defect in young flies and a significant acceleration of the age-related decline in climbing (Fig 2B), consistent with previous reports (Basso et al, 2018). This climbing defect was exacerbated with age (Fig 2B) and associated with a substantially reduced lifespan (Fig 2D). Consistent with these results, increased expression of pdzd8 also resulted in decreased climbing ability with age (Fig S4B). Notably, this effect was suppressed by co-expression of the pdzd8-RNAi, further validating the specificity of this transgene (Fig S4B). Therefore, decreasing pdzd8-mediated MERCs in neurons prolonged lifespan and protected against locomotor decline with age, whereas increased MERCs in neurons accelerate the age-related decrease in locomotor activity and decreased lifespan.

Loss of neuronal pdzd8 promotes survival in the presence of mitochondrial toxins

To investigate how reduction of pdzd8-mediated MERCs improved fitness, that is, prevented age-related decline in locomotor activity and increased lifespan, we assessed whether reducing pdzd8 expression in neurons may protect from additional stresses during aging. We assessed lifespan in flies aged on food with limited nutrients (5% sucrose, 1% agar) and found that in contrast to flies aged on a rich diet (Fig 2C), neuronal expression of pdzd8-RNAi no longer extended the lifespan in comparison to controls (Fig 3A). When an additional oxidative stress was introduced by adding hydrogen peroxide to the food, the flies expressing pdzd8-RNAi died faster than controls (Fig 3B). Thus, in the presence of general stresses, pdzd8-RNAi was not protective.

Figure 3. Knockdown of pdzd8 protects flies against mitochondrial toxins.

Figure 3.

Lifespans of flies expressing pan-neuronal pdzd8-RNAi were compared with LacZ-RNAi controls when aged on a restricted diet of food containing 1% agar with 5% sucrose. (A) Lifespan with dietary restriction alone. N = 62 versus 64, median survival 20 versus 19 d, difference ns. (B) Lifespan with addition of 5% hydrogen peroxide. Median survival: 63 versus 74 h, n = 67, 74, P = 0.0002. (C) Lifespan with addition of 1 mM rotenone. Median survival: 11 versus 20 d, n = 66, 57, P < 0.0001. (D) Lifespan with addition of 5 μg/ml antimycin A. Median survival: 74 versus 68 h, n = 72, 68, P = 0.0002.

Because of the function of pdzd8 at MERCs, we examined whether the protective effects caused by the pdzd8 depletion in neurons were more specifically associated with mitochondrial dysfunction. To address this, we fed the flies mitochondrial toxins—rotenone, a complex I inhibitor, or antimycin A, a complex III inhibitor—to block the electron transport chain and cause dysfunctional mitochondria. Reducing pdzd8 levels in neurons significantly prolonged the survival of flies fed with both mitochondrial toxins, rotenone (Fig 3C), or antimycin A (Fig 3D), compared with control flies. As improved mitochondrial function could also contribute to the protective effects of loss of pdzd8 in neurons we measured ATP levels in young or aged fly heads expressing pdzd8-RNAi but found no significant differences (Fig S4C). These results indicated that neuronal loss of pdzd8 protects flies from damage specifically induced by mitochondrial toxins but not general cellular stresses.

Modulating MERCs causes axonal transport and NMJ defects

Although mitochondrial motility is important for neuronal health, it remains an open question whether decline of mitochondrial transport in neurons contributes to aging (reviewed in Mattedi and Vagnoni [2019]). We first tested the hypothesis that decreased ER–mitochondrial tethering contributes to the protective effect of pdzd8 down-regulation in aging through changes in mitochondrial motility. Examining the distribution and morphology of mitochondria in axons of larval CCAP neurons (Park et al, 2003), we found no significant change in mitochondrial length or density in axons when comparing control to pdzd8-RNAi or synthetic ER–mitochondria tether-expressing neurons (Fig 4A–C). However, while increasing tethering dramatically decreased mitochondrial motility (Fig 4D and E), loss of MERCs mediated by knockdown of pdzd8 had no impact on axonal transport in larvae (Fig 4D and E).

To better understand the effects of altered MERCs in neurons, we analysed the morphology of mitochondria located in boutons of larval neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) on muscle 4. Knockdown of pdzd8 led to smaller NMJs and a significant reduction of mitochondrial volume, but overall, no change in mitochondrial density compared to control flies (Fig 4F–I), showing that mitochondria distribute normally in these smaller NMJs. Increased tethering, however, resulted in severely deformed NMJs (Fig S4D), and made type 1s and 1b synaptic boutons indistinguishable. Together, these results show that increasing tethering has dramatic and detrimental effects early in development but reduced tethering through pdzd8-RNAi expression has more limited effects during these early stages of neuronal development.

Reducing pdzd8 expression increases mitophagy in aged neurons

We hypothesized that the reduced sensitivity to mitochondrial toxins observed in pdzd8-RNAi flies may be due to improved mitochondrial quality control mechanisms. Thus, we analysed the levels of mitophagy, the clearance of damaged mitochondria by autophagy, in these neurons using the mitoQC mitophagy reporter (Allen et al, 2013; Lee et al, 2018b). MitoQC is a pH-sensitive mCherry-GFP fusion protein targeted to the mitochondrial outer membrane which provides a read out of mitophagy when mitochondria are targeted to the acidic lysosome where GFP is quenched leaving mCherry-only puncta. Mitophagy was detected in neuronal soma of both larval and adult brains (Fig 5A and C). Although there was no significant difference in mitophagy levels in larval or young adult neurons expressing pdzd8-RNAi, mitophagy was significantly increased in the brains of 20-d-old pdzd8-RNAi animals compared to controls (Fig 5A–D).

The majority of mitochondria in neurons are found in the neurites, so to examine mitophagy in axons of aged flies, we analysed mitoQC signal in axons of the adult fly wing in situ (Vagnoni & Bullock, 2016) (Fig 5E). Here, in contrast to the adult brain cell bodies, we observed an age-dependent increase in mitophagy in axons of control flies (Fig 5F). Furthermore, consistent with our previous results, pdzd8 knockdown further increased mitophagy in axons of aged flies (Fig 5E and F). Together, these results indicate that loss of pdzd8 promotes the turnover of mitochondria in aging neurons, which could lead to the decreased age-associated decline in locomotor activity and increased lifespan observed in pdzd8-RNAi animals.

Reduced MERCs is protective in a fly model of AD

So far, our results indicate that the loss of pdzd8 is protective against mitochondrial insults, prevents the age-related decrease in locomotion and increases lifespan. Because mitochondrial dysfunction is a common feature of many neurodegenerative diseases, and altered MERCs have been documented in some, we next sought to explore the neuroprotective potential of pdzd8 depletion in an age-related neurodegenerative disease model. To this end, we turned to an AD fly model where the expression of pathogenic Aβ42 has been shown to cause neural dysfunction, due in part to oxidative stress (Rival et al, 2009).

Because increased MERCs have also been associated with AD (Area-Gomez et al, 2012; Del Prete et al, 2017), we first used the SPLICS reporter to determine the number of MERCs in larval axons. Consistent with other cellular and organismal models, flies expressing the Aβ42 showed an increase in SPLICS puncta, indicating MERCs are increased in axons of this model of AD (Fig 6A and B). This was accompanied by a significant climbing defect in young flies that worsens rapidly with age (Fig 6C) (Crowther et al, 2005). Thus, we hypothesized that reducing pdzd8-mediated MERCs could be protective in this progressive neurodegenerative disease model associated with increased MERCs. Interestingly, pdzd8 knockdown reduced MERCs back to control levels in Aβ42 flies (Fig 6B). Moreover, reduction in pdzd8 was sufficient to significantly restore locomotor function in young and 10-d-old Aβ42 flies (Fig 6C).

Figure 6. Reducing pdzd8-mediated MERCs rescues the locomotor defects in an Alzheimer’s disease model.

Figure 6.

(A) SPLICS puncta indicating MERCs in axon bundles of larval neurons from Aβ42 expressing flies compared with controls. Quantified puncta highlighted with V. (A, B) Quantification of SPLICS signal in (A) using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc correction, n = 6 larvae per genotype, three ROIs averaged per larva. (C) Locomotor (climbing) activity of flies of the indicated ages, comparing control versus Aβ42 with control or pdzd8-RNAi. n > 65 flies. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc correction. (D) Quantification of MitoQC signal in aged fly wings at 2 and 10 d post-eclosion using Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s post hoc correction, n = 14 wings. (E, F, G) Representative recordings of mitochondrial calcium retention capacity, monitoring extramitochondrial Calcium-Green 5N fluorescence levels (AU), of mitochondria from flies of the indicated genotypes. Arrows indicate calcium pulse where retention capacity is exceeded. (E, H) Quantification of calcium retention capacity in (E). n = 3, one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s correction. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

To address the underlying mechanism behind this rescue we first hypothesized that increased mitophagy may improve neuronal function. Examining mitophagy in wing axons, we confirmed the age-dependent increase in mitophagy in control animals, which was exacerbated by Aβ42 expression, but we found this was not further increased by pdzd8-RNAi (Fig 6D).

As MERCs mediate ER-to-mitochondria calcium transfer, and loss of Pdzd8 increases intracellular calcium dynamics in mouse neurons (O’Hare et al, 2022), we next explored whether calcium handling was altered in this AD model. Functional mitochondria can take up substantial amounts of calcium released from the ER before exceeding their so-called calcium retention capacity (CRC). In comparison to control flies, Aβ42 expressing flies have a dramatically reduced CRC (Fig 6E–H). However, pdzd8 knockdown was able to partially rescue CRC in Aβ42 flies (Fig 6E–H). Thus, taken together, these results show that reducing pdzd8-mediated MERCs is protective in this model of AD which manifests increased MERCs. The beneficial effects are likely mediated at least in part by reduced ER–mitochondrial calcium transfer.

Discussion

Here we have identified and characterized the putative Drosophila ortholog of the mammalian MERC tethering protein Pdzd8 (Hirabayashi et al, 2017). The sequence divergence between Pdzd8 and its yeast paralog Mmm1 and the additional domains present in Pdzd8 (Wong & Levine, 2017), made the relationship between these paralogs difficult to identify (Wideman et al, 2018). Whereas the conserved predicted domain structure strongly suggests Drosophila CG10362 encodes the fly ortholog of mouse Pdzd8, the overall sequence identity of these proteins is low (21%), implicating more species-specific functional specialisations.

Using RNAi, we characterized the effects of pdzd8 depletion in Drosophila with a focus on neurons where this protein is most highly expressed. We found that knockdown of pdzd8 reduces contacts between the ER and mitochondria in epidermal cells measured using super-resolution microscopy analysis of ER and mitochondria labeled with fluorescent reporters, in motor neurons monitored by the fluorescent contact site reporter SPLICS, and in the soma of adult neurons using TEM. These data suggest that pdzd8, like its mammalian ortholog, functions as a tether between ER and mitochondria. The only other neuronally expressed tethering protein that has been characterized in flies is the Drosophila ortholog of Mfn2, Marf (Hwa et al, 2002). However, the analysis of Marf is complicated by its additional roles in mitochondrial and ER morphology (Debattisti et al, 2014; Sandoval et al, 2014; El Fissi et al, 2018). Whereas mammalian Pdzd8 is expressed in a range of tissues (Hirabayashi et al, 2017), in flies, pdzd8 mRNA expression is low outside the nervous system. Knockdown of pdzd8 and expression of a synthetic tether therefore provided a unique opportunity to simply and selectively examine the function of MERCs in Drosophila neurons.

We found that increased ER–mitochondrial tethering in neurons strongly impairs climbing ability and reduces lifespan of flies, consistent with previous reports using this construct (Basso et al, 2018). Other similar manipulations have also been shown to result in dopaminergic neuron loss (Lee et al, 2018c) and detrimental effects on sleep in ventral lateral neurons (Valadas et al, 2018). Here, we also observe highly abnormal NMJ development associated with increased MERCs, and smaller but otherwise structurally intact NMJs upon pdzd8 knockdown. The function of the yeast paralog Mmm1 and of its Synaptotagmin-like mitochondrial lipid-binding protein (SMP) domains suggests that disruptions in lipid transfer at the mitochondria-ER interface due to less pdzd8 might contribute to these developmental defects (Jeong et al, 2017; Kawano et al, 2018; Shirane et al, 2020); however, whether lipid biogenesis defects could contribute to a protective effect of pdzd8-RNAi in neurons remains an open question.

Transport of mitochondria is intimately linked to the health of neurons, at least in the peripheral nervous system (De Vos et al, 2008; Harbauer, 2017; Misgeld & Schwarz, 2017). Although there is some evidence that increased MERCs may be directly associated with decreased mitochondrial motility (Krols et al, 2018), this has not been shown in neurons which are particularly sensitive to mitochondrial transport imbalance (Maday et al, 2014). Our data suggest that axonal mitochondrial transport defect contributes to the detrimental effects of increased tethering and adds to the evidence that efficient mitochondrial transport is essential for healthy aging neurons, as seen in many models of neurodegenerative motor disorders (Baldwin et al, 2016).

In contrast to the detrimental effects of increased tethering, reducing MERCs by knockdown of pdzd8 in Drosophila neurons dramatically delayed age-associated decline in locomotor activity and significantly extended median lifespan compared with control animals. Our results corroborate a recent study showing that adult Pdzd8-deficient mice display increased locomotor activity compared with control littermates (Al-Amri et al, 2022).

Because decline in mitochondrial transport is proposed to contribute to neuronal aging (Vagnoni & Bullock, 2018), we hypothesized that reducing tethering in the aging flies might be protective by allowing sustained mitochondrial motility (Mattedi & Vagnoni, 2019). However, we detected no change in the percentage of motile mitochondria in larval neurons with reduced pdzd8 expression. Because knockdown of pdzd8 also prolonged the survival of flies fed mitochondrial toxins, this suggests that the protective effects of reducing MERCs might instead result from more efficient clearance of damaged mitochondria.

Clearance of damaged mitochondria via mitophagy is also thought to be a key factor in healthy aging of neurons (Pickrell & Youle, 2015; Whitworth & Pallanck, 2017; Ma et al, 2018). It remains unclear, however, whether increased or decreased mitophagy in neurons is protective during aging (Montava-Garriga & Ganley, 2020) and if specific neuronal populations are more susceptible to mitochondrial turnover. Here we provide the first in vivo evidence that mitophagy may be regulated by pdzd8-mediated MERCs. Mitophagy levels did not change in young flies with less pdzd8, but when aged, these flies displayed significant increases in mitophagy in both soma and axons.

MERCs mediated by pdzd8 may limit the rate of mitophagy, analogous to the protective role that mitochondrial fusion is thought to play during starvation-induced autophagy (Gomes et al, 2011; Rambold et al, 2011; Rana et al, 2017). Consistent with this, increasing several MERC proteins can slow toxin-induced mitophagy in non-neuronal cultured cells (McLelland et al, 2018; McLelland & Fon, 2018), and MERCs might directly regulate mitophagy in mammalian neurons (Puri et al, 2019). Pdzd8 has also been found to mediate contacts between the ER and lysosomes (Guillen-Samander et al, 2019) and three way contacts between the ER, mitochondria and late endosomes (Elbaz-Alon et al, 2020; Shirane et al, 2020). Pdzd8 function at any of these contact sites could potentially alter mitophagy and future work should explore the mechanisms behind our observed increases in mitophagy.

Altered MERCs have been reported in patients and cell models of AD (Area-Gomez et al, 2012). We also observed excess MERCs in a fly model of AD which was reversed by knockdown of pdzd8. Importantly, reduction of pdzd8 was sufficient to significantly reduce their age-associated decline in climbing. Although boosting mitophagy has been shown to be protective in worm and mouse AD models (Fang et al, 2019), our data indicate that this is not further up-regulated in the AD flies upon loss of pdzd8 so unlikely to account for the rescue. In contrast, we found that the CRC was much reduced in the AD flies, consistent with excess calcium transfer from excess MERCs, and this was partially restored by reduction in pdzd8.

In summary, we propose that reducing pdzd8-mediated MERCs may be protective in aging neurons via a number of mechanisms including increased turnover of damaged mitochondria and reducing excess mitochondrial calcium buffering. As regulators of multiple aspects of mitochondrial biology, manipulating MERCs may provide an avenue for enhanced mitochondrial homeostasis to help promote healthy aging of neurons.

Materials and Methods

Husbandry

Flies were raised under standard conditions at 25°C on food containing agar, cornmeal, molasses, malt extract, soya powder, propionic acid, nipagin, and yeast in a 12 h:12 h light:dark cycle.

Genetics

Drosophila lines used in this study were obtained as indicated in Table S1, or generated as described below. Detailed genotypes for each sample are shown in Table S2. All mutant lines used in this study were backcrossed to an isogenic w1118 strain (RRID:BDSC_6326), for four to six generations before use. For all integration events, multiple independent lines were initially isolated, verified by PCR and assessed for consistent effects before selecting a single line of each integration site for further study. Wherever possible, inert UAS lines such as UAS-LacZ-RNAi and UAS-mitoCherry are used as dilution controls to ensure equal numbers of UAS constructs in control and experimental conditions. Unless otherwise stated, male flies were used in all experiments.

Table S2 Genotypes in figures. (15.3KB, docx)

New lines

SPLICS

The SPLICSs construct with an 8–10 nm range from Tito Cali & Marisa Brini (Cieri et al, 2017), was amplified from pSYC-SPLICSs-P2A using (TAAGCAGCGGCCGCTGATTTAGGTGACACTATAG) and T7 forward primer (TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG) and cloned into pUAST.attB between NotI and XbaI sites. Flies were injected by BestGene to insert into attP16 (II) and attP2 (8622, III) and the attP16 site gave better signal and so was used in this work. The number of puncta produced in the axon bundles driven by nSyb-GAL4 varied with a consistently more puncta than in the central axons bundles in the peripheral bundles (Fig S2B).

pdzd8-HA

pdzd8-HA was synthesized by Genewiz based on the cDNA GenBank sequence LD34222 (AY118553.1) (Sayers et al, 2020), and cloned into pUAST.attB between EcoRI and XbaI. The University of Cambridge Department of Genetics Fly Facility generated lines by injection of this construct into the attP40 landing site.

Climbing

The startle induced negative geotaxis (climbing/locomotor) assay was performed as described previously (Andreazza et al, 2019). Briefly, a maximum of 23 males were placed into the first tube of a counter-current apparatus, tapped to the bottom, and given 10 s to climb 10 cm. This procedure was repeated five times (five tubes), and the number of flies that has remained into each tube counted and the climbing performance expressed as a climbing index (Greene et al, 2003). The same flies were aged and assayed again on the indicated days post-eclosion.

Lifespan

For lifespan experiments, groups of ∼20–25 males were collected with minimal time under anesthesia (CO2), placed into separate vials with food and maintained at 25°C. Flies were transferred into fresh vials every 2–3 d, and the number of dead flies were recorded. Percent survival was calculated using https://flies.shinyapps.io/Rflies/. To assess lifespan in a diet with restricted nutrients, flies were raised in standard conditions then transferred to tubes containing food made from 5% sucrose and 1% agar and flipped every 2–3 d. Lifespans in the presence of mitochondrial toxins and hydrogen peroxide were also performed on food made from 5% sucrose and 1% agar cooled to less than 50°C before adding toxin at 1:1,000. Rotenone (R8875; Sigma-Aldrich) was dissolved in DMSO (1 mM final concentration) and antimycin A (A8674; Sigma-Aldrich) (4 μg/ml final concentration) dissolved in 70% ethanol. Flies in toxin assays were starved for 5 h before being placed on food containing toxins. Flies in rotenone assays were monitored twice a day and flipped every 2 d. Flies in antimycin A assays were monitored three times a day and flipped every 2 d.

Fluorescence microscopy

Imaging of larval axons was performed as described by Wang and Schwarz (2009) with the following variations: wandering third instar larvae were pinned at each end dorsal side up to a reusable Sylgard (761028; Sigma-Aldrich) coated slide using pins (FST26002-10; Fine Science Tools) cut to ∼5 mm and bent at 90°. The larvae were cut along the dorsal midline using micro-dissection scissors. Internal organs were removed with forceps without disturbing the ventral ganglion and motor neurons. Larvae were then covered in dissection solution (Godena et al, 2014). The cuticle was then pulled back with four additional pins. The anterior pin was adjusted to ensure axons are taut and as flat as possible for optimal image quality.

Movies were taken using a Nikon E800 microscope with a 60× water immersion lens (NA 1.0 Nikon Fluor WD 2.0) and an LED light source driven by Micromanager 1.4.22 Freeware (Edelstein et al, 2014). A CMOS camera (01-OPTIMOS-F-M-16-C) was used to record 100 frames at a rate of 1 frame per 5 s (8 min 20 s total). Axons were imaged within 200 μm of the ventral ganglion in the proximal portion of the axons and no longer than 1 h after dissection. Movies were converted into kymographs using Fiji (Schindelin et al, 2012) and mitochondrial motility quantified manually with the experimenter blinded to the condition.

For SPLICS imaging in axon bundles, at least three ROI 50 × 12 μm were quantified per animal and averages for each larva were plotted. For SPLICS quantification puncta intensity varied considerably, so blinded manual counting was used.

To image NMJs, larvae were dissected as described above and fixed for 20 min in 4% formaldehyde in PBS. After blocking for 1 h in 1% BSA/0.3% Triton X-100/PBS solution, anti-HRP was added at 1:500 and samples agitated gently overnight at 4°C. After three washes in 0.3% Triton X-100/PBS at room temperature, samples were incubated with Alexa Fluor 594 at 1:500 for 1 h in 1% BSA/0.3% Triton X-100/PBS solution. Samples were then washed in 3× in PBS before being mounted in Prolong Diamond. NMJs were imaged on a Nikon Eclipse TiE inverted microscope with appropriate lasers using an Andor Dragonfly 500 confocal spinning disk system, using an iXon Ultra 888 EMCCD camera (Andor), coupled with Fusion software (Andor) using a 60× NA 1.49 objective. NMJs on muscle 4 from segments A3 and A4 (NMJs on these segments are the same size [Nijhof et al, 2016]) were captured in Z stacks with 0.3 μm step size and analysed using Imaris (x64 9.2.0) to determine NMJ volume, mitochondrial volume, and mitochondrial number.

For MitoQC imaging, samples were fixed for 30 min in 4% formaldehyde (16% 100503; VWR) diluted in pH 7.0 PBS. Adult brains were mounted in Prolong Diamond Antifade Mountant (P36961; Thermo Fisher Scientific) using spacers and imaged on a Carl Zeiss LSM880 confocal laser-scanning system on an Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss), coupled with ZEN software (Carl Zeiss) using a 100× Plan-APOCHROMAT/1.4 oil DIC objective. Images are shown in false colour with magenta puncta representing mCherry signal indicating where the reporter is in an acidic environment of a lysosome and the GFP has been quenched (Allen et al, 2013).

Imaging of wings was performed as described by Vagnoni and Bullock (2016). Briefly, flies were anaesthetized with CO2 and immobilised with their wings outstretched on a cover glass with a fine layer of Halocarbon oil (VWR). A second cover glass was then added on top of the fly to stabilize the sample. Live imaging in the wing nerves was performed using a Nikon spinning disk system essentially as described previously (Morotz et al, 2019). The mitoQC puncta were annotated with Fiji using the Cell Counter plugin and quantified with the experimenter blinded to the genotype.

For imaging of the larval epidermal cells, the larvae were dissected as described above, but the nervous system was also removed before fixation. The samples were washed in PBS and the muscles were then removed (Tenenbaum & Gavis, 2016). The dissected filets were mounted in Prolong Diamond Antifade Mountant using No. 1.5H High Precision Deckglaser cover slips and placed under a weight for 24 h. Nikon Structured Illumination Microscopy imaging was performed on a Nikon Ti Eclipse with an Andor DU-897 X-5835 camera and SR Apo TIRF 100× (NA1.5) objective run using NIS-Elements 4.60. Images were analysed in Fiji (Schindelin et al, 2012) using the Coloc2 plugin.

Transmission electron microscopy

TEM was performed at Cambridge Advanced Imaging Center (CAIC). Brains of 2-d-old adult flies were fixed in 2% glutaraldehyde/2% formaldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 2 mM CaCl2 and 0.1% Tween 20 (based on method described in Celardo et al [2016]), overnight at 4°C. Samples were then washed 5× with 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer and then treated with osmium for 2 d at 4°C (1% OsO4, 1.5% potassium ferricyanide, and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4). Samples were then washed 5× in distilled water and treated with 0.1% aqueous thiocarbohydrazide for 20 min in the dark at room temperature. Samples were washed another 5× in distilled water then treated with osmium a second time for 1 h at room temperature (2% OsO4 in distilled water). Samples were then washed another 5× in distilled water before being treated with uranyl acetate bulk stain for 3 d at 4°C (2% uranyl acetate in 0.05 M maleate buffer pH 5.5). After a final 5× wash in distilled water, samples were dehydrated in 50/70/95/100% ethanol, 3× in each for at least 5 min each. Dehydration was completed by two further treatments with 100% dry ethanol, 2× in 100% dry acetone, and 3× in dry acetonitrile for at least 5 min each. Quetol resin mix (12 g Quetol 651, 15.7 g NSA, 5.7 g MNA, 0.5 g benzyldimethylamine) made with an equal volume of 100% dry acetonitrile and samples placed in this mix for 2 h at room temperature. Samples were then incubated in pure Quetol resin mix for 5 d, exchanging the samples to fresh resin mix each day. After 5 d, the brains were embedded in coffin moulds and cured at 60°C for at least 48 h. Ultrathin sections were cut on a Leica Ultracut E at 70-nm thickness. Sections were mounted on 400 mesh bare copper grids and viewed in a FEI Tecnai G20 electron microscope run at 200 keV using a 20-μm objective aperture. Images were taken in the cell bodies of the posterior protocerebrum where the organelle morphology was most distinct. Quantification of the percentage of clearly identifiable mitochondria in contact with ER was performed manually as described by Celardo et al (2016), and the experimenter was blinded to the genotype.

qPCR

Five female wandering third instar larvae per sample were washed briefly in 1× PBS, placed in RNAse free tubes and frozen on dry ice. Larvae were homogenized in Trizol and RNA isolated by phenol:chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. DNAse treatment using Invitrogen TURBO DNA-free rigorous procedure was performed before measuring RNA concentration with a Qubit RNA HS Assay Kit (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies). Reverse transcription reactions used 1.32 μg of RNA using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) with Oligo(dT)23VN as per manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting cDNA was used for qPCRs using PowerUp SybrGreen (A25742; Applied Biosystems). Primers for pdzd8 were PDZD8-F TTCTGTTTGGCTTCTCCTGG, PDZD8-R TTGAGGAACTGCGACTGATC designed using RealTime qPCR Assay Entry (https://www.idtdna.com). αTub84B (Fwd: TGGGCCCGTCTGGACCACAA, Rev: TCGCCGTCACCGGAGTCCAT), vkg (Fwd: CGAGGATGTTACCCAGAGATC, Rev: TGCGTCCCTTGATTCCTTTG), COX8 (Fwd: CAGAGCCGTTGCCAGTC, Rev: CTTGTCGCCCTTGTAGTCC), and Rpl32 (Fwd: AAACGCGGTTCTGCATGAG, Rev: GCCGCTTCAAGGGACAGTATCTG) were used as housekeeping genes with their values combined to compare knockdown with the geometric mean (Taylor et al, 2019).

ATP

ATP levels were measured in 2- and 20-d-old fly heads with 40 flies per genotype and three biological replicates. The ATP levels were measured as described by Tufi et al (2019) with minor modifications. Briefly, heads were homogenized in 6 M guanidine-Tris/EDTA extraction buffer and subjected to rapid freezing in liquid nitrogen. Luminescence produced from homogenates mixed with the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega) was measured with a SpectraMax Gemini XPS luminometer (Molecular Devices) and normalized to total protein, quantified using the Pierce BCA method (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Calcium retention capacity

Mitochondrial isolation and calcium flux methods were adapted from Tufi et al (2019). Briefly, 50 whole adult flies (day 5) were homogenized using a 2 ml Wheaton Dounce Tissue Grinder and with a loose-fitting pestle in 400 μl of mitochondrial isolation buffer (225 mM mannitol, 75 mM sucrose, 5 mM Hepes, 0.1 mM EGTA, pH 7.4, and 2% BSA). The homogenates were spun at 1,500g at 4°C for 6 min before being filtered through a 70 μm nylon cell strainer (352350; Falcon). The filtrate was centrifuged at 7,000g at 4°C for 6 min and the resulting pellet was resuspended in 200 μl mitochondrial isolation buffer without BSA. Protein concentration was quantified using a BCA assay and the mitochondria were resuspended at 1 mg/ml in assay buffer (250 mM sucrose, 10 mM MOPS-Tris, 5 mM/2.5 mM glutamate/malate-Tris, 5 mM Pi-Tris, 10 μM EGTA, and 1 μM Calcium Green 5N, pH 7.4). The fluorescent intensity of Calcium Green was measured kinetically at 25°C using the CLARIOstar Plus (BMG LABTECH) (Ex. 485, Em. 530). The mitochondria were pulsed with 10 μM CaCl2 every 5 min for a total of 50 min. The CRC was determined by the total concentration of CaCl2 successfully buffered by the isolated mitochondria where buffering is considered successful if the extramitochondrial calcium level has been returned to 50% of the level before addition.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 9 software. Data are reported as mean ±95% CI unless otherwise stated in figure legends. Climbing was assessed using a Kruskal–Wallis non-parametric test with Dunn’s post hoc correction for multiple comparisons. Lifespans were compared using log-rank Mantel–Cox tests. Number of flies and P-values are reported in the figure legends.

Mitochondrial transport was analysed using ordinary one-way ANOVA and Holm–Sidak’s multiple comparison. ATP measurements were analysed by two-tailed t test. Values are not significantly different to controls unless otherwise stated.

SCope (http://scope.aertslab.org/) was used to visualize transcriptome data from the unfiltered adult fly brain dataset (Davie et al, 2018).

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments

Acknowledgements

We thank Vinay Godena, Caspar Baldwin, Alvaro Sanchez-Martinez, Tom Gleeson, Juliette Lee, and Wing Hei Au for help with various aspects of the fly work; Ana Terriente-Felix for help with stock maintenance and generating lines; Luis Gracia for developing the lifespan data analysis tool (https://flies.shinyapps.io/Rflies/); David Pate and Steve Drinkwater for all their help setting up our fly lab; Carlo Viscomi and Hiran Prag for useful critical discussion; Richard Mann and Sumaira Zamurrad for help with completing the fly work; Cristiane Benincà, Jordan Morris, and the Wohl Cellular Imaging Centre at King’s College London for their help with microscopy; Karin H Muller, Lyn Carter, and Filomena Gallo for their help with TEM at the Cambridge Advanced Imaging Center (CAIC); and Jane Stinchcombe and Sam Loh for their help in interpreting this data. We thank Megan Oliva and Erin Barnhart and her laboratory for their critical reading of the manuscript. We thank Isabel Palacios for the Aβ-Arctic flies and Luca Scorrano and Valentina Debattisti for the synthetic tether line. Other stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center which is supported by grant National Institutes of Health (NIH) P40OD018537. This work was supported by Medical Research Council core funding (MC_UU_00015/6 and MC_UU_00028/6 to AJ Whitworth; MC_UU_00015/7 and MC_UU_00028/5 to J Prudent) and European Research Council Starting grant (DYNAMITO; 309742) to AJ Whitworth; a NC3Rs David Sainsbury fellowship and Skills and Knowledge Transfer grant (N/N001753/2 and NC/T001224/1), an Academy of Medical Sciences Springboard Award (SBF004/1088), and a van Geest Fellowship in Dementia and Neurodegeneration and van Geest PhD studentship awards to A Vagnoni. VL Hewitt was funded by an EMBO Long-Term Fellowship (ALTF 740-2015) and co-funded by the European Commission FP7 (Marie Curie Actions, LTFCOFUND2013, GA-2013-609409). Stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center which is supported by grant NIH P40OD018537.

Author Contributions

  • VL Hewitt: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

  • L Miller-Fleming: data curation, investigation, methodology, and writing—review and editing.

  • MJ Twyning: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing—review and editing.

  • S Andreazza: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing—review and editing.

  • F Mattedi: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, and writing—review and editing.

  • J Prudent: supervision, funding acquisition, investigation, and writing—review and editing.

  • F Polleux: supervision, funding acquisition, investigation, and writing—review and editing.

  • A Vagnoni: data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, and writing—review and editing.

  • AJ Whitworth: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al-Amri AH, Armstrong P, Amici M, Ligneul C, Rouse J, El-Asrag ME, Pantiru A, Vancollie VE, Ng HWY, Ogbeta JA, et al. (2022) PDZD8 disruption causes cognitive impairment in humans, mice, and fruit flies. Biol Psychiatry 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.12.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen GFG, Toth R, James J, Ganley IG (2013) Loss of iron triggers PINK1/Parkin-independent mitophagy. EMBO Rep 14: 1127–1135. 10.1038/embor.2013.168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andreazza S, Samstag CL, Sanchez-Martinez A, Fernandez-Vizarra E, Gomez-Duran A, Lee JJ, Tufi R, Hipp MJ, Schmidt EK, Nicholls TJ, et al. (2019) Mitochondrially-targeted APOBEC1 is a potent mtDNA mutator affecting mitochondrial function and organismal fitness in Drosophila. Nat Commun 10: 3280. 10.1038/s41467-019-10857-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Area-Gomez E, del Carmen Lara Castillo M, Tambini MD, Guardia-Laguarta C, de Groof AJC, Madra M, Ikenouchi J, Umeda M, Bird TD, Sturley SL, et al. (2012) Upregulated function of mitochondria-associated ER membranes in Alzheimer disease. EMBO J 31: 4106–4123. 10.1038/emboj.2012.202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baldwin KR, Godena VK, Hewitt VL, Whitworth AJ (2016) Axonal transport defects are a common phenotype in Drosophila models of ALS. Hum Mol Genet 25: 2378–2392. 10.1093/hmg/ddw105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Basso V, Marchesan E, Peggion C, Chakraborty J, von Stockum S, Giacomello M, Ottolini D, Debattisti V, Caicci F, Tasca E, et al. (2018) Regulation of ER-mitochondria contacts by Parkin via Mfn2. Pharmacol Res 138: 43–56. 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brand AH, Perrimon N (1993) Targeted gene expression as a means of altering cell fates and generating dominant phenotypes. Development 118: 401–415. 10.1242/dev.118.2.401 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Celardo I, Costa AC, Lehmann S, Jones C, Wood N, Mencacci NE, Mallucci GR, Loh SHY, Martins LM (2016) Mitofusin-mediated ER stress triggers neurodegeneration in pink1/parkin models of Parkinson[R8S2Q1M7]s disease. Cell Death Dis 7: e2271. 10.1038/cddis.2016.173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cieri D, Vicario M, Giacomello M, Vallese F, Filadi R, Wagner T, Pozzan T, Pizzo P, Scorrano L, Brini M, et al. (2017) SPLICS: A split green fluorescent protein-based contact site sensor for narrow and wide heterotypic organelle juxtaposition. Cell Death Differ 25: 1131–1145. 10.1038/s41418-017-0033-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Crowther DC, Kinghorn KJ, Miranda E, Page R, Curry JA, Duthie FA, Gubb DC, Lomas DA (2005) Intraneuronal Aβ, non-amyloid aggregates and neurodegeneration in a Drosophila model of Alzheimer[R8S2Q1M7]s disease. Neuroscience 132: 123–135. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.12.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Csordas G, Renken C, Varnai P, Walter L, Weaver D, Buttle KF, Balla T, Mannella CA, Hajnoczky G (2006) Structural and functional features and significance of the physical linkage between ER and mitochondria. J Cell Biol 174: 915–921. 10.1083/jcb.200604016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Csordas G, Weaver D, Hajnoczky G (2018) Endoplasmic reticulum–mitochondrial contactology: Structure and signaling functions. Trends Cell Biol 28: 523–540. 10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Davie K, Janssens J, Koldere D, De Waegeneer M, Pech U, Kreft L, Aibar S, Makhzami S, Christiaens V, Bravo Gonzalez-Blas C, et al. (2018) A single-cell transcriptome atlas of the aging Drosophila brain. Cell 174: 982–998.e20. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. De Vos KJ, Grierson AJ, Ackerley S, Miller CC (2008) Role of axonal transport in neurodegenerative diseases. Annu Rev Neurosci 31: 151–173. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.061307.090711 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. De Vos KJ, Hafezparast M (2017) Neurobiology of axonal transport defects in motor neuron diseases: Opportunities for translational research? Neurobiol Dis 105: 283–299. 10.1016/j.nbd.2017.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Debattisti V, Pendin D, Ziviani E, Daga A, Scorrano L (2014) Reduction of endoplasmic reticulum stress attenuates the defects caused by Drosophila mitofusin depletion. J Cell Biol 204: 303–312. 10.1083/jcb.201306121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Del Prete D, Suski JM, Oules B, Debayle D, Gay AS, Lacas-Gervais S, Bussiere R, Bauer C, Pinton P, Paterlini-Brechot P, et al. (2017) Localization and processing of the amyloid-β protein precursor in mitochondria-associated membranes. J Alzheimers Dis 55: 1549–1570. 10.3233/jad-160953 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dietzl G, Chen D, Schnorrer F, Su KC, Barinova Y, Fellner M, Gasser B, Kinsey K, Oppel S, Scheiblauer S, et al. (2007) A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature 448: 151–156. 10.1038/nature05954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Edelstein AD, Tsuchida MA, Amodaj N, Pinkard H, Vale RD, Stuurman N (2014) Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software. J Biol Methods 1: e10. 10.14440/jbm.2014.36 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. El Fissi N, Rojo M, Aouane A, Karatas E, Poliacikova G, David C, Royet J, Rival T (2018) Mitofusin gain and loss of function drive pathogenesis in Drosophila models of CMT2A neuropathy. EMBO Rep 19: e45241. 10.15252/embr.201745241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Elbaz-Alon Y, Guo Y, Segev N, Harel M, Quinnell DE, Geiger T, Avinoam O, Li D, Nunnari J (2020) PDZD8 interacts with Protrudin and Rab7 at ER-late endosome membrane contact sites associated with mitochondria. Nat Commun 11: 3645. 10.1038/s41467-020-17451-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Erpapazoglou Z, Mouton-Liger F, Corti O (2017) From dysfunctional endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria coupling to neurodegeneration. Neurochem Int 109: 171–183. 10.1016/j.neuint.2017.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fang EF, Hou Y, Palikaras K, Adriaanse BA, Kerr JS, Yang B, Lautrup S, Hasan-Olive MM, Caponio D, Dan X, et al. (2019) Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-beta and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer[R8S2Q1M7]s disease. Nat Neurosci 22: 401–412. 10.1038/s41593-018-0332-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Giacomello M, Pellegrini L (2016) The coming of age of the mitochondria-ER contact: A matter of thickness. Cell Death Differ 23: 1417–1427. 10.1038/cdd.2016.52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Godena VK, Brookes-Hocking N, Moller A, Shaw G, Oswald M, Sancho RM, Miller CCJ, Whitworth AJ, De Vos KJ (2014) Increasing microtubule acetylation rescues axonal transport and locomotor deficits caused by LRRK2 Roc-COR domain mutations. Nat Commun 5: 5245. 10.1038/ncomms6245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gomes LC, Di Benedetto G, Scorrano L (2011) During autophagy mitochondria elongate, are spared from degradation and sustain cell viability. Nat Cell Biol 13: 589–598. 10.1038/ncb2220 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Gómez-Suaga P, Pérez-Nievas BG, Glennon EB, Lau DHW, Paillusson S, Mórotz GM, Calì T, Pizzo P, Noble W, Miller CCJ (2019) The VAPB-PTPIP51 endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondria tethering proteins are present in neuronal synapses and regulate synaptic activity. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7: 35. 10.1186/s40478-019-0688-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Greene JC, Whitworth AJ, Kuo I, Andrews LA, Feany MB, Pallanck LJ (2003) Mitochondrial pathology and apoptotic muscle degeneration in Drosophila parkin mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 4078–4083. 10.1073/pnas.0737556100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Guillen-Samander A, Bian X, De Camilli P (2019) PDZD8 mediates a Rab7-dependent interaction of the ER with late endosomes and lysosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 116: 22619–22623. 10.1073/pnas.1913509116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Harbauer AB (2017) Mitochondrial health maintenance in axons. Biochem Soc Trans 45: 1045–1052. 10.1042/BST20170023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hirabayashi Y, Kwon SK, Paek H, Pernice WM, Paul MA, Lee J, Erfani P, Raczkowski A, Petrey DS, Pon LA, et al. (2017) ER-mitochondria tethering by PDZD8 regulates Ca2+ dynamics in mammalian neurons. Science 358: 623–630. 10.1126/science.aan6009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hwa JJ, Hiller MA, Fuller MT, Santel A (2002) Differential expression of the Drosophila mitofusin genes fuzzy onions (fzo) and dmfn. Mech Dev 116: 213–216. 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00141-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jeong H, Park J, Jun Y, Lee C (2017) Crystal structures of Mmm1 and Mdm12-Mmm1 reveal mechanistic insight into phospholipid trafficking at ER-mitochondria contact sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: E9502–E9511. 10.1073/pnas.1715592114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kawano S, Tamura Y, Kojima R, Bala S, Asai E, Michel AH, Kornmann B, Riezman I, Riezman H, Sakae Y, et al. (2018) Structure-function insights into direct lipid transfer between membranes by Mmm1-Mdm12 of ERMES. J Cell Biol 217: 959–974. 10.1083/jcb.201704119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kornmann B, Currie E, Collins SR, Schuldiner M, Nunnari J, Weissman JS, Walter P (2009) An ER-mitochondria tethering complex revealed by a synthetic biology screen. Science 325: 477–481. 10.1126/science.1175088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Krols M, Asselbergh B, De Rycke R, De Winter V, Seyer A, Muller FJ, Kurth I, Bultynck G, Timmerman V, Janssens S, et al. (2018) Sensory neuropathy-causing mutations in ATL3 affect ER-mitochondria contact sites and impair axonal mitochondrial distribution. Hum Mol Genet 28: 615–627. 10.1093/hmg/ddy352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Leader DP, Krause SA, Pandit A, Davies SA, Dow JAT (2018) FlyAtlas 2: A new version of the Drosophila melanogaster expression atlas with RNA-seq, miRNA-seq and sex-specific data. Nucleic Acids Res 46: D809–D815. 10.1093/nar/gkx976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lee A, Hirabayashi Y, Kwon SK, Lewis TL Jr., Polleux F (2018. a) Emerging roles of mitochondria in synaptic transmission and neurodegeneration. Curr Opin Physiol 3: 82–93. 10.1016/j.cophys.2018.03.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee I, Hong W (2006) Diverse membrane-associated proteins contain a novel SMP domain. FASEB J 20: 202–206. 10.1096/fj.05-4581hyp [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Lee JJ, Sanchez-Martinez A, Zarate AM, Beninca C, Mayor U, Clague MJ, Whitworth AJ (2018. b) Basal mitophagy is widespread in Drosophila but minimally affected by loss of Pink1 or parkin. J Cell Biol 217: 1613–1622. 10.1083/jcb.201801044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Lee KS, Huh S, Lee S, Wu Z, Kim AK, Kang HY, Lu B (2018. c) Altered ER-mitochondria contact impacts mitochondria calcium homeostasis and contributes to neurodegeneration in vivo in disease models. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115: E8844–E8853. 10.1073/pnas.1721136115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ma P, Yun J, Deng H, Guo M (2018) Atg1 mediated autophagy suppresses tissue degeneration in pink1/parkin mutants by promoting mitochondrial fission in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell 29: 3082–3092. 10.1091/mbc.e18-04-0243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Maday S, Twelvetrees AE, Moughamian AJ, Holzbaur EL (2014) Axonal transport: Cargo-specific mechanisms of motility and regulation. Neuron 84: 292–309. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mahr A, Aberle H (2006) The expression pattern of the Drosophila vesicular glutamate transporter: A marker protein for motoneurons and glutamatergic centers in the brain. Gene Expr Patterns 6: 299–309. 10.1016/j.modgep.2005.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Martino Adami PV, Nichtova Z, Weaver DB, Bartok A, Wisniewski T, Jones DR, Do Carmo S, Castano EM, Cuello AC, Hajnoczky G, et al. (2019) Perturbed mitochondria-ER contacts in live neurons that model the amyloid pathology of Alzheimer[R8S2Q1M7]s disease. J Cell Sci 132: jcs229906. 10.1242/jcs.229906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mattedi F, Vagnoni A (2019) Temporal control of axonal transport: The extreme case of organismal ageing. Front Cell Neurosci 13: 393. 10.3389/fncel.2019.00393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. McLelland GL, Fon EA (2018) MFN2 retrotranslocation boosts mitophagy by uncoupling mitochondria from the ER. Autophagy 14: 1658–1660. 10.1080/15548627.2018.1505154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. McLelland GL, Goiran T, Yi W, Dorval G, Chen CX, Lauinger ND, Krahn AI, Valimehr S, Rakovic A, Rouiller I, et al. (2018) Mfn2 ubiquitination by PINK1/parkin gates the p97-dependent release of ER from mitochondria to drive mitophagy. Elife 7: e32866. 10.7554/elife.32866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Misgeld T, Schwarz TL (2017) Mitostasis in neurons: Maintaining mitochondria in an extended cellular architecture. Neuron 96: 651–666. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.09.055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Montava-Garriga L, Ganley IG (2020) Outstanding questions in mitophagy: What we do and do not know. J Mol Biol 432: 206–230. 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.06.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Morotz GM, Glennon EB, Greig J, Lau DHW, Bhembre N, Mattedi F, Muschalik N, Noble W, Vagnoni A, Miller CCJ, et al. (2019) Kinesin light chain-1 serine-460 phosphorylation is altered in Alzheimer[R8S2Q1M7]s disease and regulates axonal transport and processing of the amyloid precursor protein. Acta Neuropathol Commun 7: 200. 10.1186/s40478-019-0857-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nijhof B, Castells-Nobau A, Wolf L, Scheffer-de Gooyert JM, Monedero I, Torroja L, Coromina L, van der Laak JAWM, Schenck A (2016) A new Fiji-based algorithm that systematically quantifies nine synaptic parameters provides insights into Drosophila NMJ morphometry. PLoS Comput Biol 12: e1004823. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. O’Hare JK, Gonzalez KC, Herrlinger SA, Hirabayashi Y, Hewitt VL, Blockus H, Szoboszlay M, Rolotti SV, Geiller TC, Negrean A, et al. (2022) Compartment-specific tuning of dendritic feature selectivity by intracellular Ca(2+) release. Science 375: eabm1670. 10.1126/science.abm1670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Paillusson S, Stoica R, Gomez-Suaga P, Lau DHW, Mueller S, Miller T, Miller CCJ (2016) There[R8S2Q1M7]s something wrong with my MAM; the ER; mitochondria axis and neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Neurosciences 39: 146–157. 10.1016/j.tins.2016.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Park JH, Schroeder AJ, Helfrich-Forster C, Jackson FR, Ewer J (2003) Targeted ablation of CCAP neuropeptide-containing neurons of Drosophila causes specific defects in execution and circadian timing of ecdysis behavior. Development 130: 2645–2656. 10.1242/dev.00503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pickrell AM, Youle RJ (2015) The roles of PINK1, parkin, and mitochondrial fidelity in Parkinson[R8S2Q1M7]s disease. Neuron 85: 257–273. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pilling AD, Horiuchi D, Lively CM, Saxton WM (2006) Kinesin-1 and Dynein are the primary motors for fast transport of mitochondria in Drosophila motor axons. Mol Biol Cell 17: 2057–2068. 10.1091/mbc.e05-06-0526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Puri R, Cheng XT, Lin MY, Huang N, Sheng ZH (2019) Mul1 restrains Parkin-mediated mitophagy in mature neurons by maintaining ER–mitochondrial contacts. Nat Commun 10: 3645. 10.1038/s41467-019-11636-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Rambold AS, Kostelecky B, Elia N, Lippincott-Schwartz J (2011) Tubular network formation protects mitochondria from autophagosomal degradation during nutrient starvation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 10190–10195. 10.1073/pnas.1107402108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rana A, Oliveira MP, Khamoui AV, Aparicio R, Rera M, Rossiter HB, Walker DW (2017) Promoting Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission in midlife prolongs healthy lifespan of Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun 8: 448. 10.1038/s41467-017-00525-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Rival T, Page RM, Chandraratna DS, Sendall TJ, Ryder E, Liu B, Lewis H, Rosahl T, Hider R, Camargo LM, et al. (2009) Fenton chemistry and oxidative stress mediate the toxicity of the β-amyloid peptide in a Drosophila model of Alzheimer[R8S2Q1M7]s disease. Eur J Neurosci 29: 1335–1347. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06701.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sandoval H, Yao C-K, Chen K, Jaiswal M, Donti T, Lin YQ, Bayat V, Xiong B, Zhang K, David G, et al. (2014) Mitochondrial fusion but not fission regulates larval growth and synaptic development through steroid hormone production. Elife 3: e03558. 10.7554/elife.03558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Sayers EW, Cavanaugh M, Clark K, Ostell J, Pruitt KD, Karsch-Mizrachi I (2020) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 48: D84–D86. 10.1093/nar/gkz956 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B, et al. (2012) Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9: 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sepulveda-Falla D, Barrera-Ocampo A, Hagel C, Korwitz A, Vinueza-Veloz MF, Zhou K, Schonewille M, Zhou H, Velazquez-Perez L, Rodriguez-Labrada R, et al. (2014) Familial Alzheimer[R8S2Q1M7]s disease-associated presenilin-1 alters cerebellar activity and calcium homeostasis. J Clin Invest 124: 1552–1567. 10.1172/jci66407 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Shirane M, Wada M, Morita K, Hayashi N, Kunimatsu R, Matsumoto Y, Matsuzaki F, Nakatsumi H, Ohta K, Tamura Y, et al. (2020) Protrudin and PDZD8 contribute to neuronal integrity by promoting lipid extraction required for endosome maturation. Nat Commun 11: 4576. 10.1038/s41467-020-18413-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Summerville JB, Faust JF, Fan E, Pendin D, Daga A, Formella J, Stern M, McNew JA (2016) The effects of ER morphology on synaptic structure and function in Drosophila melanogaster. J Cell Sci 129: 1635–1648. 10.1242/jcs.184929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Taylor SC, Nadeau K, Abbasi M, Lachance C, Nguyen M, Fenrich J (2019) The ultimate qPCR experiment: Producing publication quality, reproducible data the first time. Trends Biotechnol 37: 761–774. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Tenenbaum CM, Gavis ER (2016) Removal of Drosophila muscle tissue from larval fillets for immunofluorescence analysis of sensory neurons and epidermal cells. J Vis Exp 54670. 10.3791/54670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Tufi R, Gleeson TP, von Stockum S, Hewitt VL, Lee JJ, Terriente-Felix A, Sanchez-Martinez A, Ziviani E, Whitworth AJ (2019) Comprehensive genetic characterization of mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter components reveals their different physiological requirements in vivo. Cell Rep 27: 1541–1550.e5. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Vagnoni A, Bullock SL (2018) A cAMP/PKA/Kinesin-1 axis promotes the axonal transport of mitochondria in aging Drosophila neurons. Curr Biol 28: 1265–1272.e4. 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Vagnoni A, Bullock SL (2016) A simple method for imaging axonal transport in aging neurons using the adult Drosophila wing. Nat Protoc 11: 1711–1723. 10.1038/nprot.2016.112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Vagnoni A, Hoffmann PC, Bullock SL (2016) Reducing Lissencephaly-1 levels augments mitochondrial transport and has a protective effect in adult Drosophila neurons. J Cell Sci 129: 178–190. 10.1242/jcs.179184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Valadas JS, Esposito G, Vandekerkhove D, Miskiewicz K, Deaulmerie L, Raitano S, Seibler P, Klein C, Verstreken P (2018) ER lipid defects in neuropeptidergic neurons impair sleep patterns in Parkinson[R8S2Q1M7]s disease. Neuron 98: 1155–1169.e6. 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Wang X, Schwarz TL (2009) Imaging axonal transport of mitochondria. Methods Enzymol 457: 319–333. 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)05018-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Whitworth AJ, Pallanck LJ (2017) PINK1/Parkin mitophagy and neurodegeneration – what do we really know in vivo? Curr Opin Genet Dev 44: 47–53. 10.1016/j.gde.2017.01.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Wideman JG, Balacco DL, Fieblinger T, Richards TA (2018) PDZD8 is not the [L8S2Q1M6]functional ortholog[R8S2Q1M7] of Mmm1, it is a paralog. F1000Res 7: 1088. 10.12688/f1000research.15523.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wong LH, Levine TP (2017) Tubular lipid binding proteins (TULIPs) growing everywhere. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1864: 1439–1449. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2017.05.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wu Y, Whiteus C, Xu CS, Hayworth KJ, Weinberg RJ, Hess HF, De Camilli P (2017) Contacts between the endoplasmic reticulum and other membranes in neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114: E4859–E4867. 10.1073/pnas.1701078114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zampese E, Fasolato C, Kipanyula MJ, Bortolozzi M, Pozzan T, Pizzo P (2011) Presenilin 2 modulates endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-mitochondria interactions and Ca2+ cross-talk. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108: 2777–2782. 10.1073/pnas.1100735108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table S2 Genotypes in figures. (15.3KB, docx)

Reviewer comments

Articles from Life Science Alliance are provided here courtesy of Life Science Alliance LLC

RESOURCES