Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Springer Nature - PMC COVID-19 Collection
2022 Jul 13;32(7):1321–1342. doi: 10.1007/s11442-022-1999-0

Gentrifying rural community development: A case study of Bama Panyang River Basin in Guangxi, China

Huayun Tan 1,2,3, Guohua Zhou 1,4,✉
PMCID: PMC9281182

Abstract

Rural gentrification is deeply characterized by institutional context and spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Based on a diachronic field investigation, this paper constructs an analytical framework for gentrifying rural community development (GRCD) with a “community” theoretical perspective and analytical approach, defines the concept of GRCD, and analyzes the main characteristics, formation mechanism and regulation path of a typical gentrifying rural community in the Panyang River Basin of Bama County, Guangxi. Driven by factors such as the complex flow and heterogeneous living space practices of the host-guest community, the longevity “myth” led by commercial capital and consumption demand, and multiple action logics and desertification community governance, great changes have occurred in the social space and material landscape of the rural longevity community. Such changes include comprehensive reconstruction of the resident population, surface interaction and social separation of the host-guest community, residential structure change and settlement landscape renewal, and delocalization of the healing landscape and lifestyle changes. We propose policy insights in three areas: public and localization institutional arrangements, shared and comfortable gentrifying rural community making, and inclusive and synergistic gentrifying rural community governance. Through these aspects, we provide insights from the Chinese case for the gentrification and community development of rural areas in the Global South.

Keywords: gentrifying rural areas, community development, community making, community governance, rural amenity

Foundation: National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.42001205, No.41971224

Footnotes

Author

Tan Huayunn (1981–), PhD and Associate Professor, specialized in tourism geography and rural geography. E-mail: tanhuayun108@163.com

Contributor Information

Huayun Tan, Email: tanhuayun108@163.com.

Guohua Zhou, Email: uuy828@163.com.

References

  1. Argent N, Tonts M. A multicultural and multifunctional countryside? International labour migration and Australia’s productivist heartlands. Population, Space and Place. 2015;21(2):140–156. doi: 10.1002/psp.1812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bao J G, Yang B. Institutionalization and practices of the “rights to tourist attractions” (RTA) in “Azheke Plan”: A field study of tourism development and poverty reduction. Tourism Tribune. 2022;37(1):18–31. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carrosio G, Magnani N, Osti G. A mild rural gentrification driven by tourism and second homes. Cases from Italy. Sociologia Urbana E Rurale. 2019;119:29–45. doi: 10.3280/SUR2019-119003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Castro-Arce K, Vanclay F. Transformative social innovation for sustainable rural development: An analytical framework to assist community-based initiatives. Journal of Rural Studies. 2020;74:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Clyde W R. The new and the old in community development. Social Work. 1958;3(3):49–56. [Google Scholar]
  6. Cohen S A, Duncan T, Thulemark M. Lifestyle mobilities: The crossroads of travel, leisure and migration. Mobilities. 2015;10(1):155–172. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2013.826481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ding Y Z, 2020. Research and enlightenment of the sources of the Chinese concept “community”: Commemorating the 110th anniversary of Fei Xiaotong’s birth. Ethno-national Studies, (4): 20–29, 138. (in Chinese)
  8. Fei X T. Absent dialogue-human research in China: Personal experience. Reading. 1990;10:3–11. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gosnell H, Abrams J. Amenity migration: Diverse conceptualizations of drivers, socioeconomic dimensions, and emerging challenges. Geojournal. 2011;76(4):303–322. doi: 10.1007/s10708-009-9295-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Guo Y Z, Liu Y S. The process of rural development and paths for rural revitalization in China. Acta Geographica Sinica. 2021;76(6):1408–1421. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hines J D. The post-industrial regime of production/consumption and the rural gentrification of the New West Archipelago. Antipode. 2012;44(1):74–97. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00843.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kocabiyik C, Loopmans M. Seasonal gentrification and its (dis)contents: Exploring the temporalities of rural change in a Turkish small town. Journal of Rural Studies. 2021;87:482–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.09.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kondo M C, Rivera R, Rullman S. Protecting the idyll but not the environment: Second homes, amenity migration and rural exclusion in Washington State. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2012;106(2):174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kordel S. The production of spaces of the ‘good life’: The case of lifestyle migrants in Spain. Leisure Studies. 2016;35(2):1–12. doi: 10.1080/02614367.2014.962592. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kordel S, Pohle P. International lifestyle migration in the Andes of Ecuador: How migrants from the USA perform privilege, import rurality and evaluate their impact on local community. Sociologia Ruralis. 2016;58(1):126–146. doi: 10.1111/soru.12133. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kvartiuk V, Curtiss J. Participatory rural development without participation: Insights from Ukraine. Journal of Rural Studies. 2019;69:76–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lees L, Shin H B, López-Morales E. Introduction. In: Lees L, Shin H, Lopez-Morales E, editors. Global Gentrifications and Comparative Urbanisms. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2015. pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lees L, Shin H B, López-Morales E. Planetary Gentrification. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lendvay M. Watermelon production as the driver of community resilience: More-than-human agency and the transforming rural assemblage. Journal of Rural Studies. 2021;86:375–386. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.06.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Li Y H, Westlund H, Liu Y S. Why some rural areas decline while some others not: An overview of rural evolution in the world. Journal of Rural Studies. 2019;68:135–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. López-Morales E. A rural gentrification theory debate for the Global South? Dialogues in Human Geography. 2018;8(1):47–50. doi: 10.1177/2043820617752005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Macrae G. Community and cosmopolitanism in the new Ubud. Annals of Tourism Research. 2016;59:16–29. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2016.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Maloutas T. Contextual diversity in gentrification research. Critical Sociology. 2012;38(1):33–48. doi: 10.1177/0896920510380950. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matarrita-Cascante D, Brennan M A. Conceptualizing community development in the twenty-first century. Community Development. 2012;43(3):293–305. doi: 10.1080/15575330.2011.593267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Mccrea R, Walton A, Leonard R. Rural communities and unconventional gas development: What’s important for maintaining subjective community wellbeing and resilience over time? Journal of Rural Studies. 2019;69:87–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.01.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nelson P B. Spatial and temporal scale in comparative approaches to rural gentrification. Dialogues in Human Geography. 2018;8(1):40–46. doi: 10.1177/2043820617752006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nelson P B, Hines J D. Rural gentrification and networks of capital accumulation: A case study of Jackson, Wyoming. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 2018;50(7):1473–1495. doi: 10.1177/0308518X18778595. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pablo A G. Heritage and rural gentrification in Spain: The case of Santiago Millas. International Journal of Heritage Studies. 2017;23(2):125–140. doi: 10.1080/13527258.2016.1246468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Perkins H C, Mackay M, Espiner S. Putting pinot alongside merino in Cromwell District, Central Otago, New Zealand: Rural amenity and the making of the global countryside. Journal of Rural Studies. 2015;39:85–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.03.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Phillips M, Smith D P. Comparative approaches to gentrification: lessons from the rural. Dialogues in Human Geography. 2018;8(1):3–25. doi: 10.1177/2043820617752009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Phillips M, Smith D P, Brooking H, et al. Re-placing displacement in gentrification studies: Temporality and multi-dimensionality in rural gentrification displacement. Geoforum. 2021;118(7):66–82. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.12.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Qi Q, 2014. Community and culture: The review of Wu Wenzao’s “community study”. Zhejiang Social Sciences, (3): 13–18, 155. (in Chinese)
  33. Qian J X, He S J, Liu L. Aestheticisation, rent-seeking, and rural gentrification amidst China’s rapid urbanisation: The case of Xiaozhou village, Guangzhou. Journal of Rural Studies. 2013;32:331–345. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ruiz-Ballesteros E, Gálvez-García C. Community, common-pool resources and socio-ecological systems: Water management and community building in southern Spain. Human Ecology. 2014;42(6):847–856. doi: 10.1007/s10745-014-9705-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Solana-Solana M. Rural gentrification in Catalonia, Spain: A case study of migration, social change and conflicts in the Empordanet area. Geoforum. 2010;41(3):508–517. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sutherland L A. Return of the gentleman farmer? Conceptualising gentrification in UK agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies. 2012;28(4):568–576. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.05.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sutherland L A. Agriculture and inequalities: Gentrification in a Scottish parish. Journal of Rural Studies. 2019;68:240–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Tan H Y, Xu C X. A study on the types and mechanism of seasonal immigrant community in Bama Panyang river basin. Human Geography. 2018;33(5):46–54. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tan H Y, Xu C X. Research on the characteristics and mechanism of rural gentrification driven by amenity migration: A case study of longevity villages in Panyang river basin of Bama county. Economic Geography. 2019;39(1):207–214. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tan H Y, Xu C X. The spatial pattern and formation mechanism of amenity migration-based rural gentrification: A case study of Panyang River Basin of Bama in Guangxi. Tourism Tribune. 2021;36(2):40–53. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tan H Y, Zhou G H. Evolution process and mechanism of rural gentrification based on actor-network theory: A case study of Panyang River Basin of Bama County, Guangxi. Acta Geographica Sinica. 2022;77(4):869–887. [Google Scholar]
  42. Toolis E E. Restoring the balance between people, places, and profits: A psychosocial analysis of uneven community development and the case for placemaking processes. Sustainability. 2021;13:7256. doi: 10.3390/su13137256. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Torkington K. Place and lifestyle migration: The discursive construction of ‘glocal’ place-identity. Mobilities. 2012;7(1):71–92. doi: 10.1080/17450101.2012.631812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang K, Xu H G, Huang L Y. Wellness tourism and spatial stigma: A case study of Bama, China. Tourism Management. 2020;78:104039. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104039. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Westhuizen M V D, Beukes J W, Greuel T. Authentic African community development practices in a diverse society: A transdisciplinary approach. Verbum et Ecclesia. 2021;42(1):a2150. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wu X L, Li Y. Comparison of community development models from a global perspective. Administrative Tribune. 2021;28(5):128–137. [Google Scholar]
  47. Xiao L. Review the “study of community” and “community studies”: A review of recent researches on urban community in China. Sociological Studies. 2011;26(4):185–208. [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang Q Y, Lu L, Huang J F, et al. Uneven development and tourism gentrification in the metropolitan fringe: A case study of Wuzhen Xizha in Zhejiang Province, China. Cities. 2022;121:103476. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2021.103476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zukin S. Socio-spatial prototypes of a new organization of consumption: The role of real cultural capital. Sociology. 1990;24(1):37–56. doi: 10.1177/0038038590024001005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Geographical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES