Abstract
Background
Glaucoma is one of the most common eye diseases in the elderly and the major cause of irreversible vision loss worldwide. Adherence to life-long therapies is crucial to prevent glaucoma progression. The current study aims to assess the educational element and its impact on glaucoma medication compliance over short and long periods.
Methods
This was a survey-based, prospective, interventional study, conducted via interviews of all glaucoma patients presented to the Ophthalmology Center at King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC), Makkah, Saudi Arabia. To achieve the study’s aim, a questionnaire with 31 items was utilized, followed by a structured program between September 2019 to June 2021. After that, a second questionnaire was used after a one month to one year to re-evaluate the intervention. Data was automatically collected in Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) and entered into IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) for analysis.
Results
Non-compliance was detected in 15.7% of all recruited patients (n=134). However, the non-compliance percentage dropped to 10 (7.5%) after the structured program (P=0.028). Contributing factors were low educational level, bilateral eye disease, duration of treatment more than two years, and having more than two eye treatment bottles; however, the P-value was insignificant.
Conclusions
About one-sixth of our glaucoma patients were found to be non-compliant. However, the non-compliance reduced by more than half after the structured educational program. Treatment adherence can be improved by implementing awareness and correcting the beliefs about illness and medicines, thus potentially delaying disease development.
Keywords: improve patient outcomes, patient education, eyedrops, anti-glaucoma medications, drug compliance, glaucoma
Introduction
Glaucoma is one of the common aging eye diseases and the major cause of irreversible vision loss in adults worldwide [1]. The global prevalence of glaucoma is 3.57% among individuals aged more than 40 years [2]. Locally, glaucoma affects 5.6% of the population aged 40 years and older in Riyadh [3]. In comparison, a higher prevalence of 17.7% is reported in a single center in the western region of Saudi Arabia [4].
Management of glaucoma is life-long. The main goal of the treatment is to prevent the progression of vision loss, which can only be done by lowering the intraocular pressure (IOP). Medical therapy, laser, and surgery are all available options; however, medical therapy is preferred by both ophthalmologists and glaucoma patients, as it is the safest. Therefore, adherence to life-long therapy is crucial in reducing its effect on vision [5,6]. On the other hand, sub-optimal adherence to anti-glaucoma medications is the primary cause of progressive visual field loss and eventual blindness [7,8].
Studies identified further interference to adherence, including poor education, lack of motivation, forgetfulness, and difficulties in drop application [9]. Besides the availability of medications at a reasonable cost, simplifying treatment regimens and interactive health education appear to be the most critical factors for improving compliance [10]. Since many of the reasons that contribute to poor adherence have to do with patient knowledge about glaucoma and familiarity with therapy, these issues could be mitigated by better or alternative communication and education strategies [11]. It has long been assumed that patient education has a positive effect. However, it is still questionable how much patient education, which improves knowledge, can improve medication adherence [11,12].
Patients' practice toward anti-glaucoma drugs varies in the literature, with recent studies reporting non-compliance rates ranging from 16% to 67.5% [5,13]. Nevertheless, the scarcity of data observed in Makkah is due to limited studies investigating this subject. Quantifying the responsible issues is crucial in improving patient care [11,14]. Hence, it is crucial to evaluate them to determine their efficacy in both long- and short-term circumstances. Therefore, this study was undertaken to investigate the pattern of compliance before and after a structured educational program among glaucoma patients at King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC), Makkah, Saudi Arabia. The current study aims to assess the educational element and its impact on glaucoma medication compliance over short and long periods.
Materials and methods
Research design, population, and sample size determination
This survey-based, prospective interventional study was conducted via interviews between September 2019 and July 2021. It included all glaucoma patients attending the Ophthalmology Center at KAMC, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Patients aged less than 18 years and in-patients were excluded; a total of 188 patients participated in this study.
Data collection tool and method
A modified questionnaire inspired by previously published studies was used for data collection [7,15]. Validity was assessed before distribution. Both Arabic and English languages were used in the questionnaire.
The patients were interviewed by senior medical students in a private room in the ophthalmology clinic to fill out the first questionnaire. After that, the patients were subjected to a structured program, which consisted of educational brochures about glaucoma and a video explaining the appropriate method to use eye-drop medications. Finally, patients were approached via phone calls to complete the second questionnaire to evaluate the intervention after one month to one year (see Appendix).
The information presented in the educational program brochure was collected from the American Optometric Association and the American Academy of Ophthalmology [16-18]. In addition, the educational video was created by the media department in KAMC explaining the appropriate method of applying eye drops.
Concerning questionnaires, the first questionnaire comprised 31 items, divided into three parts; Part 1 contained demographic information about the patient’s age, gender, nationality, educational level, address, and additional information if the patient uses a wheelchair, systemic diseases, and ocular disease (whether unilateral and bilateral); Part 2 included detailed information about the glaucoma status, anti-glaucoma medication, duration of the treatment, number of eye medication bottles, and number of drops the patient is applying; Part 3 included compliance data assessing four domains: awareness, knowledge, practicing difficulties, and satisfaction. The short-term assessment was done after one month, and the long-term evaluation was done after a year. The second questionnaire with five items was used to re-evaluate the compliance.
Data, generated in percentage, was used to segregate compliance and non-compliance. A percentage of 100-75 was classified as compliant and a percentage range from 50-25 was classified as non-compliant.
Ethical consideration
Approval was obtained for the study from the Institutional Review Board of KAMC, Makkah, Saudi Arabia (approval number 18-457), and the data was collected anonymously. The study participants were informed about the aim of this study and the benefits of their participation. Verbal informed consent was taken from the participants. For confidentiality, patients were identified by serial study code and initials linked to the patient’s name and medical record number (MRN) in a separate identification log sheet.
Data analysis
After data were extracted, it was revised, coded, and fed to IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). All statistical analysis was done using two-tailed tests. P-value less than 0.05 was statistically significant. Descriptive analysis based on frequency and percent distribution was done for all variables. Pearson's Chi-square test was used for categorical values to assess the association between the level of compliance and socio-demographic data.
Results
General characteristics of the participants
The recruited sample consisted of 188 glaucoma patients, of whom 134 (71.3%) completed a re-evaluation of compliance (the second questionnaire). Table 1 shows the socio-demographics of the patients, distributed according to their follow-up period. More than half, 74 (55.2%), of the participants were between 51 and 70 years. The number of males, 67 (50%), was equal to females. The majority of patients were Saudis (129; 96.3%) and 104 (77.6%) were residents of Makkah city. About a third of these subjects, 40 (29.9%), had education above university level, while 37 (27.6%) were illiterate. Of the subjects, 21 (15.7%) had associated ocular diseases like cataracts, 13 (9.7%) had retinal detachment, and nine subjects (6.7%) had diabetic retinopathy. Common systemic diseases like diabetes mellitus and hypertension were found in 78 (58.2%) and 62 (46.3%) patients, respectively.
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristic of glaucoma patients attending King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
| Variables | Follow-up after 30 days | Follow-up after 12 months | |
| N=50 (37.3%) | N=84 (62.7%) | Overall (n=134) | |
| Age | |||
| 18 to 30 | 7 (14%) | 7 (8.3%) | 14 (10.4%) |
| 31 to 50 | 8 (16%) | 18 (21.4%) | 26 (19.4%) |
| 51 to 70 | 28 (56%) | 46 (54.8%) | 74 (55.2%) |
| > 70 | 7 (14%) | 13 (15.5%) | 20 (14.9%) |
| Gender | |||
| Male | 29 (58%) | 38 (35.2%) | 67 (50%) |
| Female | 21 (42%) | 46 (54.8%) | 67 (50%) |
| Nationality | |||
| Saudi | 48 (96%) | 81 (96.4%) | 129 (96.3%) |
| Level of education | |||
| Illiterate | 16 (32%) | 21 (25%) | 37 (27.6%) |
| Middle/Primary school | 8 (16%) | 18 (21.5%) | 26 (19.4%) |
| High school | 12 (24%) | 19 (22.6%) | 31 (23.1%) |
| University and above | 14 (28%) | 26 (31%) | 40 (29.9%) |
| Residence | |||
| Makkah | 37 (74%) | 67 (79.8%) | 104 (77.6%) |
| Using wheelchair | |||
| Yes | 9 (18%) | 5 (6%) | 14 (10.4%) |
| Ocular disease | |||
| Cataract | 1 (2%) | 20 (23.8%) | 21 (15.7%) |
| Retinal detachment | 9 (18%) | 4 (48%) | 13 (9.7%) |
| Diabetic retinopathy | 4 (8%) | 5 (6%) | 9 (6.7%) |
| Ocular trauma | 2 (4%) | 2 (2.4%) | 4 (3%) |
| Others | 1 (2%) | 3 (3.6%) | 4 (3%) |
| Systemic disease | |||
| HTN | 24 (48%) | 38 (45.2%) | 62 (46.3%) |
| DM | 28 (56%) | 50 (59.5%) | 78 (58.2%) |
| Heart disease | 9 (18%) | 8 (9.5%) | 17 (12.7%) |
| Mental/neurological | 0 | 4 (4.8%) | 4 (3%) |
| Arthritis | 9 (18%) | 4 (4.8%) | 13 (9.7%) |
| Asthma/allergy | 2 (4%) | 0 | 2 (1.5%) |
| Oncology | 3 (6%) | 2 (1.2%) | 4 (3%) |
| Renal disease | 3 (6%) | 1 (1.2%) | 4 (3%) |
| Others | 1 (2%) | 2 (2.4%) | 3 (2.2%) |
Glaucoma and anti-glaucoma medication
Table 2 illustrates factors related to anti-glaucoma medications distributed according to the follow-up period. Eighty-nine subjects (66.4%) were on anti-glaucoma medications in both eyes. 43 (32.1%) of the patients were on medications for more than six years. 37 (27.6%) and 44 (32.8%) of these patients were on two and three bottles, respectively. Moreover, only 77 (57.5%) of the patients applied one drop from each bottle.
Table 2. Disease pattern and anti-glaucoma medication use among glaucoma patients attending King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
| Variables | Follow-up after 30 days | Follow-up after 12 months | |
| N=50 (37.3%) | N=84 (62.7%) | Overall (n=134) | |
| Eye treated | |||
| Bilateral | 32 (64%) | 57 (67.9%) | 89 (66.4%) |
| Unilateral | 18 (36%) | 27 (32.1%) | 45 (33.6%) |
| Duration of treatment | |||
| <6 months | 7 (14%) | 7 (8.3%) | 14 (10.4%) |
| >6 months | 10 (20%) | 17 (20.2%) | 27 (20.1%) |
| >2 years | 12 (24%) | 21 (25%) | 33 (24.6%) |
| >4 years | 5 (10%) | 12 (14.3%) | 17 (12.7%) |
| >6 years | 16 (32%) | 27 (32.1%) | 43 (32.1%) |
| Number of eye medication bottles currently taken. | |||
| 1 eye bottle | 11 (22%) | 14 (16.7%) | 25 (18.7%) |
| 2 eye bottles | 7 (14%) | 30 (35.7%) | 37 (27.6%) |
| 3 eye bottles | 18 (36%) | 26 (31%) | 44 (32.8%) |
| 4 eye bottles | 10 (20%) | 10 (11.9%) | 20 (14.9%) |
| 5 eye bottles | 4 (8%) | 4 (4.8%) | 8 (6%) |
| Number of drops applied from each bottle. | |||
| 1 drop | 29 (58%) | 48 (57.1%) | 77 (57.5%) |
| 2 drops | 17 (34%) | 29 (34.5%) | 46 (34.3%) |
| 3 drops | 2 (4%) | 5 (6%) | 7 (5.2%) |
| More than 3 drops | 2 (4%) | 2 (2.4%) | 4 (3%) |
Compliance data
Table 3 illustrates compliance data before the educational program assessing four aspects: awareness and knowledge, practice, difficulties, and satisfaction with anti-glaucoma medication.
Table 3. Compliance data before educational program assessing four aspects among glaucoma patients attending King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
| Variables | Overall (n=134) |
| Knowledge/Awareness | |
| Do you think applying more than one drop is more effective? | |
| No | 91 (67.9%) |
| Do you know about the progress of glaucoma? | |
| The condition becomes better | 38 (28.4%) |
| The condition becomes stable | 66 (49.3%) |
| The condition becomes worse | 30 (22.4%) |
| Do you think glaucoma can be cured? | |
| No | 73 (54.5%) |
| Do you know glaucoma is chronic and needs lifetime medication? | |
| Yes | 72 (53.7%) |
| Practice | |
| Do you use medications during fasting? | |
| Yes | 103 (76.9%) |
| Do you think using eye medication during fasting will break your fast? | |
| Yes | 30 (22.4%) |
| Are you using the eye medication regularly? | |
| Yes | 86 (64.2%) |
| How much are compliant to your doctor instructions? | |
| Excellent (100%) | 44 (32.8%) |
| Good (75%) | 69 (51.5%) |
| Fair (50%) | 15 (11.2%) |
| Poor (25%) | 6 (4.5%) |
| Have you been instructed the way of using eye medications? | |
| Yes | 96 (71.6%) |
| Do you put eye drops by yourself? | |
| Yes | 99 (73.9%) |
| Do you usually need help? | |
| Yes | 53 (39.6%) |
| If yes who helps: | |
| Son/daughter | 38 (28.4%) |
| Wife/husband | 15 (11.2%) |
| Maid | 6 (4.5%) |
| Other | 6 (4.5%) |
| Difficulties | |
| Do you face difficulty in applying eye drops? | |
| Yes | 44 (32.8%) |
| Do you suffer any symptoms while using medications? | |
| Burning | 74 (55.2%) |
| Eye Redness | 27 (20.1%) |
| Itching | 34 (25.4%) |
| Dryness | 16 (11.9%) |
| Tearing | 9 (6.7%) |
| Blurred vision | 10 (7.5%) |
| Bitter taste | 11 (8.2%) |
| Headache | 3 (2.2%) |
| Shortness of breath | 1 (.7%) |
| If poor compliance, what are the reasons for missing the dose: | |
| Forgetfulness | 39 (29.1%) |
| Carrying a lot of medication | 5 (3.7%) |
| Sleep disturbance | 1 (.7%) |
| Traveling | 2 (1.5%) |
| Unavailability of drugs (empty bottles of drugs) | 12 (9%) |
| Laziness | 21 (15.7%) |
| Satisfaction | |
| Are you comfortable after using your medication? | |
| Yes | 128 (95.5%) |
| Do you get your medication from hospital pharmacy? | |
| Yes | 130 (97%) |
Awareness/Knowledge
A total of 91 subjects (67.9%) were aware that applying more than one drop is ineffective. Sixty-six subjects (49.3%) believed that the condition's progression became stable. In addition, 73 subjects (54.5%) believed glaucoma could not be cured, while 72 subjects (53.7%) were aware that glaucoma is a chronic condition and requires lifelong medication.
Practice
A total of 103 subjects (76.9%) used eye medications during fasting, while 30 subjects (22.4%) believed that using eye medication during fasting would break their fast. Of the total subjects, 86 (64.2%) confessed to using eye medication regularly. Regarding the level of compliance with doctors’ instructions, 44 subjects (32.8%) had 100% compliance, while the majority, 69 (51.5%) of the patients, had 75% compliance. On the other hand, fair and poor compliance was detected among 15 (11.2%) and six (4.5%), respectively. Ninety-six subjects (71.6%) had instructions about using eye medications appropriately. While 99 subjects (73.9%) were applying the eye drops by themselves, 53 patients (39.6%) needed help applying eye drops, usually by their family members (57; 42.5%).
Difficulties
Fourty-four subjects (32.8%) faced difficulties applying eye drops. Seventy-four subjects (55.2%) had a burning sensation, 34 patients (25.4%) had itching, 27 patients (20.1%) had redness of the eye, one patient (0.7%) reported shortness of breath, and three patients (2.2%) reported headaches. The most frequently reported reason for not using medications regularly was forgetfulness in 39 subjects (29.1%), followed by laziness in 21 (15.7%).
Satisfaction
A total of 128 subjects (95.5%) were comfortable using their medication and 130 subjects (97%) got their medication from the hospital pharmacy.
Second questionnaire
Table 4 illustrates the evaluation of compliance issues after the educational program. A total of 130 subjects (97.0%) benefited from the exercise in using their medications. Also, 97 subjects (72.4%) understood the information in the brochure. The majority, 124 subjects (92.5%), felt comfortable with their eye medications. As for the re-evaluation of compliance to doctor instructions, the majority, 71 subjects (53%) had 100% compliance (excellent), 53 subjects (39.6%) had 75% compliance (good), while six (4.5%) had 50% compliance (fair), and four subjects (3%) had 25% compliance (poor).
Table 4. Evaluation of compliance issues after structured interventional program among glaucoma patients attending King Abdullah Medical City, Makkah, Saudi Arabia (n=134).
| Variables | Follow-up after 30 days | Follow-up after 12 months | |
| N=50 (37.3%) | N=84 (62.7%) | Overall (n=134) | |
| Was our explanation and presentations helpful in using your medications: | |||
| Yes | 48 (96%) | 82 (97.6%) | 130 (97%) |
| Are you feel comfortable using your medications? | |||
| Yes | 32 (64%) | 65 (77.4%) | 124 (92.5%) |
| Were you able to understand the information in brochure? | |||
| Yes | 48 (96%) | 76 (90.5%) | 97 (72.4%) |
| Compliance with your doctor instructions: | |||
| Excellent (100%) | 30 (60%) | 41 (48.8%) | 71 (53%) |
| Good (75%) | 16 (32%) | 37 (44%) | 53 (39.6%) |
| Fair (50%) | 4 (8%) | 2 (2.4%) | 6 (4.5%) |
| Poor (25%) | 0 | 4 (4.8%) | 4 (3%) |
Compliance before and after the intervention with respect to sociodemographics
Twenty-one subjects (15.7%) had poor compliance before the intervention in comparison to only 10 subjects (7.5%) after the intervention with P value 0.028, which was statistically significant. As per the compliance data with regards to the time of follow-up, a high percentage of poor compliance was detected among those who had followed up after one year (60%) compared to (40%) of those who had followed up after a month (P=0.855). Poor compliance was higher among those who had bilateral eye disease (80%) in comparison to unilateral eye disease (20%) (P=0.344). The compliance data with regards to duration of the treatment showed that 70% of the patients who had treatment for more than two years had poor compliance, compared to 30% who were treated for less than two years (P=0.966). Moreover, 80% of poor compliant patients were using more than two eye drops compared to 20% of the patients who were using less or equal to two eye bottles (P=0.083). As for the compliance data about age, gender, and systemic disease presence, poor compliance was detected among the subgroups equally (P=0.148, 1.00, and 0.074, respectively) (Table 5).
Table 5. Relation between compliance and sociodemographics of patients after structured interventional program.
Note: * significant p, at the 0.05 level
| Variables | Compliance after the educational program | |||
| Total | Good Compliance | Non-compliance | P-value | |
| Compliance before the educational program | ||||
| Good compliance | 113 (84.3%) | 107 (86.3%) | 6 (60%) | *0.028 |
| Poor compliance | 21 (15.7%) | 17 (13.7%) | 4 (40%) | |
| Follow-up period duration | 0.855 | |||
| After (30 days) | 50 (37.3%) | 46 (37.1%) | 4 (40%) | |
| After (12 months) | 84 (62.7%) | 78 (62.9%) | 6 (60%) | |
| Age | ||||
| <50 years | 40 (29.9%) | 35 (28.2%) | 5 (50%) | .148 |
| >50 | 94 (70.1%) | 89 (71.8%) | 5 (50%) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 67 (50%) | 62 (50%) | 5 (50%) | 1.00 |
| Female | 67 (50%) | 62 (50%) | 5 (50%) | |
| Nationality | ||||
| Saudi | 129 (96.3%) | 119 (96%) | 10 (100%) | 0.518 |
| Non-Saudi | 5 (3.7%) | 5 (4%) | 0 | |
| Level of education | ||||
| High school | 31 (23.1%) | 29 (23.4%) | 2 (20%) | 0.394 |
| Illiterate | 37 (27.6%) | 35 (28.2%) | 2 (20%) | |
| Primary/Middle school | 26 (19.4%) | 22 (17.7%) | 4 (40%) | |
| University and above | 40 (29.9%) | 38 (30.6%) | 2 (20%) | |
| Residence | ||||
| Makkah | 104 (77.6%) | 98 (79%) | 6 (60%) | 0.165 |
| Outside Makkah | 30 (22.4%) | 26 (21%) | 4 (40%) | |
| Systematic disease | ||||
| Yes | 99 (73.9%) | 94 (75.8%) | 5 (50%) | 0.074 |
| Not known | 35 (26.1%) | 30 (24.2%) | 5 (50%) | |
| Eye treated | ||||
| Bilateral | 89 (66.4%) | 81 (65.3%) | 8 (80%) | 0.344 |
| Unilateral | 45 (33.6%) | 43 (34.7%) | 2 (20%) | |
| Duration of treatment | ||||
| more than two years | 93 (69.4%) | 86 (69.4%) | 7 (70%) | 0.966 |
| less than two years | 41 (30.6%) | 38 (30.6%) | 3 (30%) | |
| Number of eye medication bottles | ||||
| more than two bottles | 62 (46.3%) | 60 (48.4%) | 2 (20%) | 0.083 |
| less than two bottles | 72 (53.7%) | 64 (51.6%) | 8 (80%) | |
| Difficulty in applying | ||||
| Yes | 90 (67.2%) | 41 (33.1%) | 3 (30%) | 0.843 |
| No | 44 (32.8%) | 83 (66.9%) | 7 (70%) | |
Discussion
Poor adherence to topical glaucoma medication is a worldwide issue. It is not limited to ophthalmological conditions, as only 50-70% of prescribed dosages are taken for other chronic medical conditions such as hypertension. In addition, poor adherence to medical therapy is costly to both the patient and the healthcare system, resulting in higher resource consumption [19]. According to a recent Cochrane systematic review, there is insufficient evidence to advocate for any specific intervention for glaucoma medication adherence. However, an improved understanding of the most fundamental factors may enhance interventions [19]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the level of adherence to glaucoma medication before and after an educational program in Saudi Arabia that provides preliminary data to improve glaucoma medication adherence.
Approximately one-sixth (15.7%) of glaucoma patients were not adherent to their medications in this study. The rate noted in the current study is less than the earlier studies done in Saudi Arabia. In 2012, the non-adherence rate in Riyadh was 19.4% [7], whereas, in 2017, it was 27.4% and 27.8% in Riyadh and Jeddah, respectively [6,20]. Internationally, nearly similar data were reported in Korea (27.4%) and the United States (27%) [21,22]. In contrast, higher rates was reported in other countries: 39.2% in Brazil [23], 43.8% in Ethiopia [24], 49% in India [13], 50% in Israel [25], 51.6% in United Kingdom [26], 53.6% in Egypt [27] and 60% in Turkey [28]. This wide variation in the non-adherence rate can be justified partly by the variability of study methodologies (subjective or objective) and non-uniform compliance definitions. The adherence to glaucoma medication could improve by identifying and addressing the responsible barriers [6].
The current study evaluated the importance of educational status as it critically influences patients' compliance with glaucoma medication. Our study showed that the rate of non-adherence to glaucoma medication dropped significantly to 7.5% after the structured interventional program (P=0.028). The result was statically significant. Similarly, a relatively large randomized control trial (RCT) conducted in the United Kingdom demonstrated that a personalized patient care package that includes educational sessions enhanced prescription collection after 12 months and significantly reduced IOP variations and clinical management adjustments after 24 months [29]. This result confirms that an accurate understanding of the condition and constant reminders are fundamentally linked to compliance, and lack of awareness about their disease's progression and the permanent component of glaucoma blindness can lead to poor treatment adherence.
Since financial implications could be the reason for poor adherence to glaucoma medications, it is worth mentioning that the evaluated glaucoma patients are exceptional, in which ophthalmic services and drugs are either free or paid by the insurance company in most cases for Saudi residents. As a result, the expense of medication is less likely to be a barrier in this demographic, resulting in non-adherence to glaucoma medical therapy. However, despite this free healthcare system, the non-adherence of 15.7% of glaucoma patients must be investigated further to find a solution [6].
Although demographics and socioeconomic variables were not significantly associated with adherence to glaucoma treatment, a pattern was observed in the current study. A longer follow-up period and longer duration of glaucoma were associated with the poor adherence rate after the educational program. This finding is comparable to a prior study that assessed adherence over four years of follow-up as the prevalence of poor adherence increased over time, highlighting the known concern that adherence to chronic medication is a widespread problem among glaucoma patients [30]. To address this issue, Newman-Casey et al. found that if patients are over 70% adherent during their first year of treatment, they are unlikely to experience decreased adherence in the following years. As a consequence, to improve longer-term adherence, it may be vital to keep patients come back for more frequent visits to eye care providers for the first two years after starting glaucoma medications in order to allow more time for discussions about medication adherence issues or the consideration of alternative treatments if adherence declines [30].
Limitation
The current study design, like most research, has several limitations. To begin, our study was a survey-based, prospective, interventional study in study design, and patients were interviewed to complete the questionnaire. Therefore, the subjective nature of the study and the need to rely on patients' memory could be biased. However, the study sample is diverse in age, gender, and educational level; therefore, we do not believe this will impact the overall conclusion. In addition, this is a single-center experience, and the sample size was small; thus, the study's results may have been limited. Furthermore, objective studies in different centers are recommended.
Conclusions
Around one-sixth of our glaucoma patients were found to be non-compliant. However, the non-compliance fell by more than half after the structured educational program. These findings suggest that the role of the physician is vital in patient education regarding administering glaucoma drops, correcting wrong beliefs about illness and medicines, and adjusting treatment to their healthcare needs and can improve adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy, potentially delaying disease development.
Appendices
Questionnaire I
A. Personal information
1. Age:
☐ 18-30
☐ 31-50
☐ 51-70
☐ Above 70 years
2. Gender:
☐ Male
☐ Female
3. Nationality:
☐ Saudi
☐ Non-Saudi
4. Residence:
☐ Makkah
☐ Outside Makkah
5. Educational level:
☐ Illiterate
☐ Middle/Primary school
☐ High school
☐ University and above
6. Are you using a wheelchair:
☐ Yes
☐ No
7. Chose any ocular disease you have:
☐ Glaucoma
☐ Cataract
☐ Retinal detachment
☐ Diabetic retinopathy
☐ Ocular trauma
☐ Others:
8. Choose any systemic disease you have:
☐ Heart disease
☐ HTN
☐ DM
☐ Arthritis
☐ Oncology
☐ Mental and neurological disease
☐ Others:
B. Topical ophthalmic medication
1. Eye treated:
☐ Unilateral
☐ Bilateral
2. Duration of treatment:
☐ <6 month
☐ >6 month
☐ >2 years
☐ >4 years
☐ >6 years
3. Number of bottles of eye medication you are using:
☐ 1 eye bottle
☐ 2 eye bottles
☐ 3 eye bottles
☐ 4 eye bottles
☐ 5 eye bottles
4. Number of eye drops you are applying from each bottle:
☐1 drop
☐ 2 drops
☐ 3 drops
☐ More than 3 drops
C. Compliance data
a. Awareness/knowledge
1. Do you think applying more than 1 drop is more effective:
☐ Yes
☐ No
2. Do you know about the progress of glaucoma:
☐ The condition becomes better
☐ The condition becomes stable
☐ The condition becomes worse
3. Do you think glaucoma can be cured:
☐ Yes
☐ No
4. Do you know glaucoma is chronic and needs lifetime medication:
☐ Yes
☐ No
b. Practice
1. Do you use medications during fasting:
☐ Yes
☐ No
2. Do you think using eye medication during fasting will break your fast:
☐ Yes
☐ No
3. Do you comply with your doctor's instructions:
☐ 100 %
☐ 75 %
☐ 50 %
☐ 25 %
4. Do you put eye drops by yourself:
☐ Yes
☐ No
5. Have you been instructed on the way to use eye medications:
☐ Yes
☐ No
6. Do you usually need help:
☐ Yes
☐ No
7. If yes, who helps:
☐ Son/daughter
☐ Wife/husband
☐ Maid
☐ Other:
c. Difficulties
1. Do you face difficulty in applying eye drops:
☐ Yes
☐ No
2. Do you suffer any symptoms while using medications:
☐ Burning
☐ Eye Redness
☐ Itching
☐ Dryness
☐Tearing
☐ Blurred vision
☐ Bitter taste
☐ Headache
☐ Shortness of breath
3. Are you using the eye medication regularly:
☐ Yes
☐ No
4. If no, what are the reasons for missing the dose:
☐ Forgetfulness
☐ Carrying a lot of medication
☐ Discomfort
☐ Cost of medication
☐ Traveling
☐ Unavailability of drugs (empty bottles of drugs)
☐ Laziness
5. Are you comfortable after using your medication:
☐ Yes
☐ No
6. Do you get your medication from the hospital pharmacy:
☐ Yes
☐ No
7. Do you get your medication through insurance:
☐ Yes
☐ No
Questionnaire II
1. Was our explanation and presentations helpful in using your medications:
Yes
No
2. If yes, How much much:
80%-100%
50%-70%
20%-40%
Less than 20 %
3. Are you feel comfortable using your medications?
Yes
No
4. Were you able to understand the information in the brochure?
Yes
No
5. Compliance to your doctor instructions:
100%
75%
50%
25%
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Review Board of King Abdullah Medical City (KAMC), Makkah, Saudi Arabia issued approval 18-457
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.Compliance with primary open-angle glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma suspect preferred practice patterns in a retail-based eye clinic. Stanley J, Huisingh CE, Swain TA, McGwin G Jr, Owsley C, Girkin CA, Rhodes LA. J Glaucoma. 2018;27:1068–1072. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng CY. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.The prevalence and determinants of glaucoma among 40 years and older Saudi residents in the Riyadh Governorate (except the capital) - a community based survey. Khandekar R, Chauhan D, Yasir ZH, Al-Zobidi M, Judaibi R, Edward DP. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2019;33:332–337. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2019.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Prevalence of glaucoma types and legal blindness from glaucoma in the western region of Saudi Arabia: a hospital-based study. Eid TM, el-Hawary I, el-Menawy W. Int Ophthalmol. 2009;29:477–483. doi: 10.1007/s10792-008-9269-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adherence to topical glaucoma medications in Ethiopian patients. Tamrat L, Gessesse GW, Gelaw Y. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2015;22:59–63. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.148350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Adherence to medical treatment and its determinants among adult Saudi glaucoma patients in Riyadh City. Shadid A, Alrashed W, Bin Shihah A, et al. Cureus. 2020;12:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Compliance of glaucoma patients to ocular hypotensive medications among the Saudi population. Osman EA, Alqarni BA, AlHasani SS, Al Harbi SS, Gikandi PW, Mousa A. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2016;32:50–54. doi: 10.1089/jop.2015.0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Improving adherence to glaucoma medication: a randomised controlled trial of a patient-centred intervention (The Norwich Adherence Glaucoma Study) Cate H, Bhattacharya D, Clark A, Fordham R, Holland R, Broadway DC. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-14-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Barriers to adherence with glaucoma medications: a qualitative research study. Lacey J, Cate H, Broadway DC. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:924–932. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Strategies to improve glaucoma compliance based on cross-sectional response-based data in a tertiary healthcare center: the Glauco-Jung study. Gupta VS, Sethi H, Naik M. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2015;9:38–46. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Improving adherence to topical medication in patients with glaucoma. Tapply I, Broadway DC. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;15:1477–1489. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S264926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Adherence improvement in Dutch glaucoma patients: a randomized controlled trial. Beckers HJ, Webers CA, Busch MJ, Brink HM, Colen TP, Schouten JS. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91:610–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2012.02571.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Compliance to topical anti-glaucoma medications among patients at a tertiary hospital in North India. Rajurkar K, Dubey S, Gupta PP, John D, Chauhan L. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018;30:125–129. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Compliance and persistency in glaucoma follow-up treatment. Schwartz GF. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16:114–121. doi: 10.1097/01.icu.0000156139.05323.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Adherence to topical glaucoma medications and associated factors in Gondar University Hospital Tertiary Eye Care Center, northwest Ethiopia. Anbesse DH, Yibekal BT, Assefa NL. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2019;29:189–195. doi: 10.1177/1120672118772517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.M. Fingeret, Mancil GL, Bailey IL, et al. Optometric Clinical Practice Guideline: Care of the Patient with Open-angle Glaucoma Reference Guide For Clinicians. Vol. 1. St. Louis, MO : American Optometric Association; 2011. Care of the Patient With Open - Angle Glaucoma Reference Guide for Clinicians; pp. 1–161. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern®. [ Oct; 2015 ];Gedde SJ, Vinod K, Wright MM, et al. Ophthalmology. 2021 128:0. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.American Optometric Association: Glaucoma. [ Jan; 2022 ];https://www.aoa.org/healthy-eyes/eye-and-vision-conditions/glaucoma?sso=y
- 19.Factors affecting adherence to topical glaucoma therapy: a quantitative and qualitative pilot study analysis in Sydney, Australia. Spencer SK, Shulruf B, McPherson ZE, et al. Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019;2:86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Compliance of glaucoma patients to their medical treatment in Jeddah. Abdujawad KW, Alhussain E, Ahmad AM, Madani FM, Bakkar SA, Abduljawad KW. http://ijmrp.com/Admin_Portal/Upload/Vol4Issue1/85%20IJMRP%204(1)%20410-19.pdf Int J Med Res Prof. 2018;4:410–419. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Treatment patterns and medication adherence of patients with glaucoma in South Korea. Kim CY, Park KH, Ahn J, et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:801–807. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.The most common barriers to glaucoma medication adherence: a cross-sectional survey. Newman-Casey PA, Robin AL, Blachley T, Farris K, Heisler M, Resnicow K, Lee PP. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:1308–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Patients’ compliance to clinical treatment that benefit from the Brazilian National Glaucoma Program. Araújo TA, Medeiros DM, Paiva IB, de Andrade CG, da Silva Rocha C, Britto DC, Santos MB. https://www.rbojournal.org/en/article/patients-compliance-to-clinical-treatment-that-benefit-from-the-brazilian-national-glaucoma-program/ Rev Bras Oftalmol. 2020;79:258–262. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Level of glaucoma drug adherence and its associated factors among adult glaucoma patients attending Felege Hiwot Specialized Hospital, Bahir Dar City, Northwest Ethiopia. Assem AS, Fekadu SA, Yigzaw AA, Nigussie ZM, Achamyeleh AA. Clin Optom (Auckl) 2020;12:189–197. doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S274850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Noncompliance with ocular hypertensive treatment in patients with primary open angle glaucoma among the Arab population in Israel: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Masoud M, Sharabi-Nov A, Pikkel J. J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:405130. doi: 10.1155/2013/405130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Glaucoma treatment adherence at a United Kingdom general practice. Tse AP, Shah M, Jamal N, Shaikh A. Eye (Lond) 2016;30:1118–1122. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Analysis of factors affecting patients' compliance to topical antiglaucoma medications in Egypt as a developing country model. Abu Hussein NB, Eissa IM, Abdel-Kader AA. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:234157. doi: 10.1155/2015/234157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Adherence to glaucoma medication, illness perceptions, and beliefs about glaucoma: Attitudinal perspectives among Turkish population. Guven S, Koylu MT, Mumcuoglu T. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021;31:469–476. doi: 10.1177/1120672120901687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Individualised patient care as an adjunct to standard care for promoting adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy: an exploratory randomised controlled trial. Gray TA, Fenerty C, Harper R, Spencer AF, Campbell M, Henson DB, Waterman H. Eye (Lond) 2012;26:407–417. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Patterns of glaucoma medication adherence over four years of follow-up. Newman-Casey PA, Blachley T, Lee PP, Heisler M, Farris KB, Stein JD. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2010–2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]