Skip to main content
National Science Review logoLink to National Science Review
. 2021 Aug 20;9(6):nwab156. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwab156

From aniline to phenol: carbon-nitrogen bond activation via uranyl photoredox catalysis

Deqing Hu 1, Yilin Zhou 2, Xuefeng Jiang 3,4,5,
PMCID: PMC9283103  PMID: 35854944

Abstract

Carbon-nitrogen bond activation, via uranyl photoredox catalysis with water, enabled the conversion of 40 protogenetic anilines, 8 N-substituted anilines and 9 aniline-containing natural products/pharmaceuticals to the corresponding phenols in an ambient environment. A single-electron transfer process between a protonated aniline and uranyl catalyst, which was disclosed by radical quenching experiments and Stern-Volmer analysis, facilitated the following oxygen atom transfer process between the radical cation of protonated anilines and uranyl peroxide originating from water-splitting. 18O labeling and 15N tracking unambiguously depicted that the oxygen came from water and amino group left as ammonium salt. The 100-fold efficiency of the flow operation demonstrated the great potential of the conversion process for industrial synthetic application.

Keywords: C−N bond activation, C−O bond formation, uranyl cations, photoredox catalysis


From aniline to phenol: carbon-nitrogen bond activation and carbon-oxygen bond formation via uranyl photoredox catalysis with water at ambient environment.

INTRODUCTION

Csp2−N bond activation remains an intractable challenge with regard to the transformation of inert chemical bonds [1–3], due to the high bond dissociation energy [C−N BDE (PhNH2) = 102.6 ± 1.0 kcal/mol] [4], the intense coordinating ability [aTM (amines) = 0–1.9 vs. aTM (ethers) = −2.5–0.1] [5] and the inferior leaving ability [pKa (−NH2) = 36] [6,7] (Scheme 1a, left). Conventionally, prefunctionalization is the essential solution for C−N bond transformation in anilines, such as up-front operations to diazonium salts [810], quaternary ammonium salts [11–13], hydrazines and amines with vicinal directing groups [1418] (Scheme 1a, right). Akiyama et al. reported the pioneering progress of Csp2−N bond cleavage of undecorated aniline with stoichiometric palladium acetate [19]. Remarkably, the amino of 5-nitroanthranilic acid (5NAA), associated with tryptophan biosynthesis in the living system, was transformed into a hydroxyl group that was catalyzed by 5NAA-aminohydrolase at body temperature with water (Scheme 1b, left), which shed light on C−N activation [20]. Encouragingly, Nicewicz realized C−O bond activation via nucleophilic aromatic substitution accelerated by cation radical (Scheme 1b, right) [21–23]. With the development of the photocatalysis technique [24–28], it has been found that uranyl catalysts are characterized by a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) process and show superior oxidative ability [Eox = +2.60 V vs. saturated calomel electrode (SCE)] [29–36]. Following our previous work on uranyl photoredox catalysis [37,38], C−N bond activation in protogenetic anilines was realized to generate corresponding phenols at ambient environment with water via a synergistic process of single electron transfer (SET) and oxygen atom transfer (OAT) (Scheme 1c).

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Activation of carbon-nitrogen bond in aniline. (a) Catalytic activation of C−N bonds. (b) Proposed solutions. (c) This work.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We commenced the study with 4-(tert-butyl)aniline as reactant and uranyl nitrate hexahydrate as photoredox catalyst irradiated by blue light (460 nm) at room temperature. Lewis and Brønsted acids, considered as coactivators (Table 1, entries 1–8), were added to the system respectively, in which trifluoroacetic (TFA) supplied the optimal result with 85% isolated yield of the desired product. Compared with uranyl ion, Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2dtbpy·PF6 [E1/2 = +1.21 V vs. SCE] [39], Ru(bpy)3Cl2 · 6H2O [E1/2 = +0.77 V vs. SCE] [39] and riboflavintetra-acetate [E = +1.67 V vs. SCE] [26] were inefficient for the transformation (Table 1, entry 9). Solvents also played a crucial role; acetonitrile was the best choice (Table 1, entries 10 and 11). Control experiments further demonstrated that UO2(NO3)2 · 6H2O, TFA and light were all essential conditions (Table 1, entries 12–14).

Table 1.

Optimization conditions. General conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (4 mol%), acid (0.2 mmol) and H2O (0.6 mmol) were stirred in solvent (2 mL) at room temperature for 24 hours under blue light (460 nm). 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) yields with CH2Br2 as the internal standard. (a) Acid (30 mmol%). (b) Isolated yields. (c) Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2dtbpy·PF6, Ru(bpy)3Cl2·6H2O or Riboflavin tetraacetate instead of UO2(NO3)2·6H2O. (d) Without UO2(NO3)2·6H2O. (e) No light. NR = no reaction.

graphic file with name nwab156tbl1.jpg

Under optimal conditions, the scope of undecorated anilines was investigated comprehensively (Scheme 2). Diverse anilines with electron-rich substitutions produced corresponding phenols in an effective way, despite the fact that they were prone to being oxidized (2a–2e). Subsequently, we found that electron-neutral substituted aniline could be transformed smoothly (2f and 2g). For electron-deficient substrates (2h–2p), 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) was found to be a more helpful solvent, due to its ability to stabilize cation radicals [40]. Notably, halides were well tolerated under this condition (2h–2k), especially the commonly light-sensitive iodo-group (2k). Easily hydrolytic cyano- (2l) and carboxylic ester (2m and 2n) were preserved in this water-involving reaction. Furthermore, various active C−H bonds were well tolerated, such as acetyl (2p) and dually activated benzyl (2q–2s). Due to steric and electronic effects, polysubstituted phenol synthesis is always challenging but imperative, and phenols with 2,6-diisopropyl- (2t), 2,4,6-tritertbutyl (2u) and 3,5-dimethyl (2v) groups were successfully achieved in our system with sterically bulky hinderance. Besides, multiple substituents with distinct electronic properties, such as bromo- (2w), nitro- (2x and 2y), carboxylic ester (2z) and acid (2aa) groups, were compatible. Michael acceptor containing motif (2ab) was well preserved. Remarkably, when only one amino group of p-phenylenediamine was protected, highly selective conversion of the unprotected amino group occurred, which yielded 82% paracetamol, a clinically applied antipyretic and analgesic drug (2ac). Undecorated or substituted hydroxyl (2ad and 2ae) and thioethers with electron-rich or -deficient substituent group (2af and 2ag) were all compatible during C−N activation. The amino group on the condensed cyclics (2ah) and heterocylics (2ai-2ak) was smoothly activated, in spite of high electron density or coordinating effect. Moreover, a series of diphenylaminos could be transformed to diphenols successfully (2al–2ao). X-ray diffraction of 2ao (cambridge crystallographic data centre (CCDC) 2043527) further confirmed its structure. The applicability and compatibility of C−N activation were demonstrated in natural products and pharmaceuticals. Terpenoid (borneol and menthol) derivatives and amino-acid-containing molecules (valine and phenylalanine) were transformed into corresponding phenols (2ap–2as) in moderate yields. Subsequently, ibuprofen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, was proven to have 70% yield (2at). Late-stage modification of oxaprozin (2au) and indometacin (2av and 2aw) were achieved in spite of highly active sites on heterocycles. X-ray diffraction (CCDC 2050763) further confirmed the structure of 2av. Phenylpiperidine, N, N-dimethylanilines and phenyl-morpholine analogous yielded corresponding phenol efficiently, fulfilling the tough target of traditional cross coupling [18] (Scheme 3).

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Scope of anilines. Standard conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (4 mol%), TFA (0.2 mmol) and H2O (0.6 mmol) were stirred in CH3CN (2 mL) at room temperature under blue LED (460 nm) in the air, isolated yields. (a) UO2(OAc)2·2H2O (4 mol%), N2. (b) TFA (0.4 mmol). (c) HFIP (2 mL). (d) TFA (0.4 mmol), HFIP (2 mL), N2. (e) CH3NO2 (2 mL). (f) UO2(OAc)2·2H2O (4 mol%), HFIP (2 mL), N2. (g) UO2(OAc)2·2H2O (8 mol%), TFA (0.4 mmol), HFIP (2 mL), N2. (h) UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (8 mol%), TFA (0.4 mmol), HFIP (2 mL), N2. (i) TFA (0.4 mmol), CH3NO2 (2 mL). (j) 1 (0.1 mmol), HFIP (2 mL), N2. (k) 1 (0.1 mmol), HFIP (1 mL), N2. (l) 1 (0.1 mmol), CH3NO2 (2 mL), N2. (m) 1 (0.1 mmol), CH3CN (2 mL), N2.

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Transformation of tertiary anilines. Standard conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (4 mol%), TFA (0.2 mmol) and H2O (0.6 mmol) were stirred in HFIP (2 mL) at room temperature under blue light (460 nm), isolated yields. (a) UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (8 mol%), TFA (0.4 mmol), N2. (b) UO2(OAc)2·2H2O (4 mol%), TFA (0.4 mmol). (c) UO2(NO3)2·6H2O (8 mol%). (d) N2. (e) UO2(OAc)2·2H2O (8 mol%), TFA (0.6 mmol).

To further demonstrate the application potential of anilines, flow reactions were conducted, which were more efficient (0.68 mmol/h for 2a, 20 mmol scale) than those done with parallel reactors (0.04 mmol/h for 2a, 10 mmol scale). It is noteworthy that clinically applied pharmaceuticals, i.e. propofol and paracetamol by flow reactions could be, at most, 315 times as efficient as by tube operation, though the residue volume of flow pipeline was only ∼4.7 mL (<1/10 of the total volume) (Scheme 4).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Flow reaction. Standard conditions: 1 (20 mmol), UO2(NO3)2.6H2O (2 mol%), TFA (40 mmol) and H2O (60 mmol) were stirred in CH3CN/HFIP (25 mL/25 mL) at room temperature irradiated with blue light (435 nm) in the air, isolated yields. (a) TFA (60 mmol), HFIP (50 mL). (b) UO2(NO3)2.6H2O (3 mol%), TFA (60 mmol), CH3CN/HFIP (25 mL/45 mL).

The mechanistic study was carried out to understand the process. Firstly, radical quenching experiments with 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperinedinyloxy (TEMPO) and butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) suggested the radical property of this system (Scheme 5a, supplementary information (SI), Section IV-1). UV-vis absorption between catalyst and each component demonstrated that uranyl salt served as a photosensor. The addition of aniline salt to uranyl solution enhanced the absorption efficiency, illustrating the interaction between the uranyl species and aniline complex (Scheme 5b, SI, Section IV-2). Active uranyl cation was quenched by aniline/TFA complex, as detected by Stern-Volmer analysis (Scheme 5c, SI, Section IV-3), and energy transfer process was ruled out considering the lower value of the lowest triplet energy of the uranyl cation (ET = 58.5 kcal/mol) compared with that of anilines [41,42]. Meanwhile, the ammonium salt was instantaneously generated, as was monitored by 1H NMR experiments before C−N bond activation (Scheme 5d, SI, Section IV-4). Furthermore, the quenching effect between uranyl species and protonated anilines was much stronger than in those with Ir[dF(CF3)ppy]2dtbpy.PF6, Ru(bpy)3Cl2.6H2O and Riboflavin tetraacetate, revealing the unique interaction property between uranyl ion and substrate in the transformation (SI, Section IV-3).

Scheme 5.

Scheme 5.

Mechanistic studies of SET mode. (a) Radical quenching experiments. (b) UV-vis experiments. (c) Stern-Volmer analysis. (d) 1H NMR experiments in CD3CN.

Labeling experiments with H218O and 18O2 unambiguously demonstrated that the oxygen atom of the product phenols originated from water rather than oxygen atmosphere (Scheme 6a, SI, Section IV-5). According to previous studies [38,43,44], uranyl peroxide complexes were obtained from uranyl photolysis of water, which is responsible for the oxygen atom transfer. 15N NMR tracking experiments showed that only ammonium trifluoroacetate was obtained, which indicated that the amino group on anilines left in the form of ammonia followed by neutralization with TFA (Scheme 6b, SI, Section IV-6). In addition, both on-off experiments (SI, Section IV-6) and the quantum yield of 8.4 (SI, Section IV-7) demonstrated the existence of a radical chain propagation process during the transformation.

Scheme 6.

Scheme 6.

Mechanistic studies. (a) Oxygen labeling experiments. (b) 15N NMR experiments.

Based on the mechanistic study, a possible reaction pathway was depicted as shown in Scheme 7. Under blue light, uranyl photoredox catalysis was stimulated and generated *UO22+ through the LMCT process. Then, the single electron transfer process between *UO22+ and protonated anilines A brought forth UO2+ and radical cation B. Another uranyl peroxide dimer was generated from water-splitting [43,44], capturing B with C−O bond formation and C−N bond fracture to get the radical cation of phenol C. Single electron transfer between C and UO2+ afforded the desired product 2 and regenerated the catalyst. Meanwhile, the radical chain propagation process was also in progress during this transformation owing to the higher oxidation potential of intermediate C (E1/2 = 1.56 V) [45] compared with protonated anilines A (E1/2 = 0.89 V).

Scheme 7.

Scheme 7.

Proposed mechanism.

CONCLUSION

In summary, oxygen atom transfer from water to organic molecules via uranyl photoredox catalysis was discovered in photoredox circulation. Accordingly, C−N bond activation in undecorated anilines was systematically established at ambient conditions, generating a series of sensitive and fragile phenols. The 100-fold efficiency of the flow set-up indicated the industrial application potential of the strategy. Radical trapping experiments, Stern-Volmer analysis and 1H NMR experiments demonstrated the interaction between active uranyl species and protonated anilines. Further studies in uranyl catalysis are on-going in our laboratory.

Supplementary Material

nwab156_Supplemental_Files

Contributor Information

Deqing Hu, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Process, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.

Yilin Zhou, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Process, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China.

Xuefeng Jiang, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Process, School of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China; State Key Laboratory of Organometallic Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China; State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21971065), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (20XD1421500 and 20JC1416800), the Innovative Research Team of High-Level Local Universities in Shanghai (SSMU-ZLCX20180501), the Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

X.J. proposed and supervised the project. X.J. and D.H. conceived and designed the experiments. D.H. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. X.J., D.H. and Y.Z. prepared the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and participated in analyzing the experimental results.

Conflict of interest statement. None declared.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Ouyang K, Hao W, Zhang Wet al. Transition-metal-catalyzed cleavage of C–N single bonds. Chem Rev 2015; 115: 12045–90. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00386 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ricci A. Amino Group Chemistry: From Synthesis to the Life Science. Weinheim: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rappoport Z. The Chemistry of Anilines. Weinheim: John Wiley & Sons, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Luo YR. Comprehensive Handbook of Chemical Bond Energies. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Alvarez S. Coordinating ability of anions, solvents, amino acids, and gases towards alkaline and alkaline-earth elements, transition metals, and lanthanides. Chem Eur J 2020; 26: 4350–77. 10.1002/chem.201905453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Data Organic Chemistry. Chemical Data. https://organicchemistrydata.org/links/#chemical_data (6 August 2021, date last accessed).
  • 7. Internet Bond—Energy Databank (pKa and BDE). http://ibond.chem.tsinghua.edu.cn (10 April 2021, date last accessed).
  • 8. Mo F, Qiu D, Zhang Yet al. Renaissance of Sandmeyer-type reactions: conversion of aromatic C–N bonds into C–X bonds (X = B, Sn, P, or CF3). Acc Chem Res 2018; 51: 496–506. 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Li Y, Xie W, Jiang X.. Mechanistic study of a photocatalyzed C-S bond formation involving alkyl/aryl thiosulfate. Chem Eur J 2015; 21: 16059–65. 10.1002/chem.201502951 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zhang Y, Li Y, Jiang Xet al. Sulfide synthesis through copper-catalyzed C–S bond formation under biomolecule-compatible conditions. Chem Commun 2015; 51: 941–4. 10.1039/C4CC08367A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Wang D, Yang Z, Uchiyama Met al. From anilines to aryl ethers: a facile, efficient, and versatile synthetic method employing mild conditions. Angew Chem Int Ed 2018; 57: 3641–5. 10.1002/anie.201712618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Wang D, Kawahata M, Uchiyama Met al. Stille coupling via C–N bond cleavage. Nat Commun 2016; 7: 12937. 10.1038/ncomms12937 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Uemura T, Yamaguchi M, Chatani N. Phenyltrimethylammonium salts as methylation reagents in the nickel-catalyzed methylation of C−H bonds. Angew Chem In Ed 2016; 55: 3162–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Tang J, Fan F, Zeng Xet al. Reductive cross-coupling between unactivated C(aryl)–N and C(aryl)–O bonds by chromium catalysis using a bipyridyl ligand. J Am Chem Soc 2020; 142: 12834–40. 10.1021/jacs.0c05730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Zhao Q, Zhang J, Szostak M.. Ruthenium(0)-catalyzed cross-coupling of anilines with organoboranes by selective carbon–nitrogen cleavage. ACS Catal 2019; 9: 8171–7. 10.1021/acscatal.9b02440 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Cong X, Fan F, Zeng Xet al. Low-valent, high-spin chromium-catalyzed cleavage of aromatic carbon–nitrogen bonds at room temperature: a combined experimental and theoretical study. J Am Chem Soc 2017; 139: 15182–90. 10.1021/jacs.7b08579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ma Y, Pang Y, Cornella Jet al. Radical C−N borylation of aromatic amines enabled by a pyrylium reagent. Chem Eur J 2020; 26: 3738–43. 10.1002/chem.202000412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cao Z, Xie S, Shi Zet al. Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling of dimethyl aryl amines with arylboronic esters under reductive conditions. J Am Chem Soc 2018; 140: 13575–9. 10.1021/jacs.8b08779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Akiyama F, Teranishi S, Taniguchi Het al. Aromatic substitution of olefins. Arylation with anilines via the C−N bond cleavage in the presence of palladium (ii) acetate. J Organomet Chem 1977; 140: C7–9. 10.1016/S0022-328X(00)84403-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kalyoncu S, Heaner D Jr, Lieberman Ret al. Enzymatic hydrolysis by transition-metal-dependent nucleophilic aromatic substitution. Nat Chem Biol 2016; 12: 1031–6. 10.1038/nchembio.2191 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tay NES, Chen W, Nicewicz DAet al. 19F- and 18F-arene deoxyfluorination via organic photoredox-catalysed polarity-reversed nucleophilic aromatic substitution. Nat Catal 2020; 3: 734–42. 10.1038/s41929-020-0495-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Pistritto V, Schutzbach-Horton M, Nicewicz DA. Nucleophilic aromatic substitution of unactivated fluoroarenes enabled by organic photoredox catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 2020; 142: 17187–94. 10.1021/jacs.0c09296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Tay NES, Nicewicz DA.. Cation radical accelerated nucleophilic aromatic substitution via organic photoredox catalysis. J Am Chem Soc 2017; 139: 16100–4. 10.1021/jacs.7b10076 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Yu X, Chen J, Xiao W. Visible light-driven radical-mediated C–C bond cleavage/functionalization in organic synthesis. Chem Rev 2021; 121: 506–61. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Li X, Tung C, Wu L.. Semiconducting quantum dots for artificial photosynthesis. Nat Rev Chem 2018; 2: 160–73. 10.1038/s41570-018-0024-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Marzo L, Pagire SK, König Bet al. Visible-light photocatalysis: does it make a difference in organic synthesis? Angew Chem Int Ed 2018; 57: 10034–72. 10.1002/anie.201709766 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Staveness D, Bosque I, Stephenson CRJ.. Free radical chemistry enabled by visible light-induced electron transfer. Acc Chem Res 2016; 49: 2295–306. 10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Romero NA, Nicewicz DA.. Organic photoredox catalysis. Chem Rev 2016; 116: 10075–166. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Cowie BE, Purkis JM, Arnold PLet al. Thermal and photochemical reduction and functionalization chemistry of the uranyl dication, [UVIO2]2+. Chem Rev 2019; 119: 10595–637. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Li Y, Su J, Li Jet al. Photocatalysis with visible-light-active uranyl complexes. Sci China Chem 2013; 56: 1671–81. 10.1007/s11426-013-4965-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Hu D, Jiang X.. Perspectives for uranyl photoredox catalysis. Synlett 2021; 32: 1330–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Yu J, Zhao C, Shi Wet al. Visible-light-enabled C-H functionalization by a direct hydrogen atom transfer uranyl photocatalyst. Chem Eur J 2020; 26: 16521–9. 10.1002/chem.202003431 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Capaldo L, Merli D, Ravelli Det al. Visible light uranyl photocatalysis: direct C–H to C–C bond conversion. ACS Catal 2019; 9: 3054–8. 10.1021/acscatal.9b00287 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Arnold PL, Purkis JM, Rutkauskaite Ret al. Controlled photocatalytic hydrocarbon oxidation by uranyl complexes. ChemCatChem 2019; 11: 3786–90. 10.1002/cctc.201900037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Wu L, Cao X, Dolg Met al. Visible-light photocatalysis of C(sp3)-H fluorination by the uranyl ion: mechanistic insights. Angew Chem Int Ed 2018; 57: 11812–6. 10.1002/anie.201806554 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. West J, Bedell A, Sorensen EJ.. The uranyl cation as a visible-light photocatalyst for C(sp3)-H fluorination. Angew Chem Int Ed 2016; 55: 8923–7. 10.1002/anie.201603149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Li Y, Hu D, Jiang Xet al. Selective late-stage oxygenation of sulfides with ground-state oxygen by uranyl photocatalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed 2019; 58: 13499–506. 10.1002/anie.201906080 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Zhou Y, Hu D, Jiang X.. Uranyl-photocatalyzed hydrolysis of diaryl ethers at ambient environment for the directional degradation of 4-O-5 lignin. JACS Au 2021; 1: 1141–6. 10.1021/jacsau.1c00168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Prier CK, Rankic DA, MacMillan DWC.. Visible light photoredox catalysis with transition metal complexes: applications in organic synthesis. Chem Rev 2013; 113: 5322–63. 10.1021/cr300503r [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Schulz L, Waldvogel SR.. Solvent control in electro-organic synthesis. Synlett 2019; 30: 275–86. [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Ryoka M, Tsuneo K, Morio S.. Uranyl ion-sensitized isomerization of the stilbenes in solution. Bull Chem Soc Jpn 1975; 48: 3028–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Tung CH, Zhang L, Li Yet al. Intramolecular long-distance electron transfer and triplet energy transfer. Photophysical and photochemical studies on a norbornadiene-steroid-benzidine system. J Am Chem Soc 1997; 119:5348–54. 10.1021/ja9619925 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Petrus E, Segado M, Bo Cet al. Unveiling a photoinduced hydrogen evolution reaction mechanism via the concerted formation of uranyl peroxide. Inorg Chem 2020; 59: 8353–60. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.0c00757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. McGrail BT, Pianowski LS, Burns PC.. Photochemical water oxidation and origin of nonaqueous uranyl peroxide complexes. J Am Chem Soc 2014; 136: 4797–800. 10.1021/ja502425t [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Li C, Hoffman MZ.. One-electron redox potentials of phenols in aqueous solution. J Phys Chem B 1999; 103: 6653–6. 10.1021/jp983819w [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

nwab156_Supplemental_Files

Articles from National Science Review are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES