Abstract
Certain life experiences can have a profound effect on human emotions. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, patients are reporting mood disturbances at much higher levels. Multiple encounters with real and imagined threat, prolonged isolation, and loss of control have adversely impacted the country’s behavioral health. However, most people will not pursue psychological care when needed, and some who pursue it will be unable to access it. Nurse practitioners and other health care professionals are in an optimal position to help. Psychological research explains some of what is driving this phenomenon and offers suggestions of benefit to patients, families, and colleagues.
Keywords: COVID-19, mental health, nurse practitioner, stress, trauma
The United States (US) is experiencing a 3- and 4-fold increase of anxiety and depression, overdose deaths are at an all-time high, a quarter of our youth are reporting suicidal ideation, and a greater prevalence of these disorders is being seen among people of color.1, 2, 3 The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has exposed the world to a variety of constant stressors and created mitigating strategies that have isolated people from significant others and diminished control over events and outcomes. In addition, a variety of co-occurring traumatic social events have exacerbated the fear and helplessness that many, especially our more vulnerable citizens, commonly experience. Most people do not seek psychological care from mental health specialists, instead they bring their concerns to their primary care providers.4 Yet, even these professionals are experiencing health risks to self and family, increased workloads, extraordinary exposure to patient deaths, inadequate support, and helplessness over infection and hospitalization rates, with nursing staff feeling the greatest distress.5 , 6 These are very difficult times.
The holistic perspective on patient care, specialty training in psychophysiology and neuroscience, and the accessibility of nurse practitioners (NPs) in health care place them in an optimal position to help patients manage mood in these extraordinary times. This brief review of selected models of depression and anxiety illuminates the role that this pandemic and accompanying social events seem to be playing in the inordinate rise of psychological distress and offers information for NPs to incorporate in their care of patients and each other.
Stress
NPs and other clinicians are well aware that chronic stress can adversely affect the brain and other organ systems and lead to lifestyle changes (eg, overnutrition, sleep disturbance, smoking, and substance misuse) that can exacerbate underlying medical conditions such as cardiovascular disease, asthma, diabetes, gastrointestinal disorders, and accelerated aging.7, 8, 9 When threatened, humans and animals experience an immediate psychophysiological response that recruits the cardiovascular, immune, respiratory, endocrine, and digestive systems. Neuroendocrine changes mediated by the amygdala and the hippocampus trigger the sympathetic-adrenal-medulla axis, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and the brain’s prefrontal cortex to influence the decision to fight, freeze, or flee a dangerous situation.10 , 11
Among the events that can trigger a stress response are the death of a loved one, economic insecurity, accidents, or a dysfunctional marriage. Persistent exposure to a stressful situation may impair attention, concentration, memory, and organizational abilities, and can lead to hypervigilance, irritability, nightmares, intrusive thoughts, guilt, numbing, and aggressive behavior.12 , 13
Stress is not always adverse or traumatic; the most common response to life’s burdens is resilience. For example, individuals preparing for an examination or performance are helped by the increased vigilance, focused concentration, hyperarousal, and motivation that stress triggers. A continuum exists where an arousal experience produces an emotional and behavioral response with a quick return to baseline when the stimulus diminishes or the individual copes successfully. A stress response follows a more intense or enduring stimulus and prompts a greater emotional and behavioral response with longer-term psychophysiological distress. Finally, trauma is the consequence of a significant and prolonged stimulus that produces an immediate and vigorous emotional response with limited behavioral choices and neuropsychological changes that interfere with future functioning.14
The body reacts automatically to aversive stimuli such as an extreme change in temperature, but psychological processes play an integral role in responding to most stressful stimuli. Individuals undertake a complex process of evaluating the dangerousness of a stimulus and their capacity to manage it.15 This subjective appraisal mediates the psychophysiological response in that a seemingly dangerous situation for one individual may not present the same threat to another. When an innocuous stimulus is imagined to be lethal, a response is triggered as if it were real. Length of time and the perception of available resources, such as social supports, finances, and health, influence whether the situation is judged to be harmless, challenging, or dangerous and determines the type of response.16
During this COVID-19 pandemic, the combination of social isolation and a strong desire for information has invited individuals to spend more time with news stories and social media, resulting in elevated stress levels among some.17 Unfamiliarity about the nature, danger, and spread of this coronavirus has prompted some individuals to wash groceries, avoid public gatherings, and to meet strangers with apprehension.18 Most organizations successfully negotiated the move to remote work, but difficulties with child care, technology, and sharing space at home made the execution a challenge for others. Then came the stories of the lack of masks, the scarcity of ventilators, the shortage of hospital beds (especially in the intensive care unit), and images of refrigerated trailers serving as morgues. In addition to our public health emergency, the country experienced a racial reckoning with the murder of George Floyd, multiple episodes of anti-Asian hate, an attack on the Capitol as the votes for president were being recorded, a war in Ukraine, and a series of mass shootings.19, 20, 21
Exposure to adverse events through stories and media accounts alone can produce symptoms called secondary trauma.22 Surveys of individuals who were not immediately present at a tragic event (eg, World Trade Center on 9/11) found evidence of stress among those with only a media experience of the catastrophe.13 , 23 Symptoms of posttraumatic stress syndrome have been found among 20% of individuals with no prior history of trauma who have simply been shown disturbing videos of violent events.24 Even 5 minutes per day of exposure to video accounts of terrorism produced anxiety and behavioral problems in school children.25 Among health care workers, listening to patients’ reports of trauma and providing care to victims of violence, accident survivors, and those with medical illness can create secondary trauma that leads to burnout.26, 27, 28
The chronic need for vigilance in response to a variety of health, emotional, and social dangers added to the frustration of disruptions of work and daily life. This, along with the dramatic cultural and political events of the past 2 years, has left many people short-tempered, exhausted, impatient, hyperreactive, and bordering on burnout.29 Creating awareness of these issues among patients and colleagues, identifying contributing factors, and encouraging some rethinking and self-care can increase the sense of control and lessen the adverse impact of these important factors.
Isolation
Humans are social animals who create relationships with others for mutual aid, protection, procreation, health, and happiness.30 Social interactions teach us about ourselves and others and contribute to a mental template about what to expect of both.31 A child’s physical, emotional, and cognitive development is highly dependent on caregivers who continuously monitor and favorably adjust the external environment.32 Adults with meaningful attachments to others enjoy better mental health, longer life, and greater economic security than those without.33 , 34 As with stress, periods of social disconnection can be adaptive and refreshing, but the beneficial effects of isolation weaken when social relationships are unusually diminished or constrained.
The cognitive and affective experience of social isolation is loneliness. Even before the pandemic, loneliness was a common experience among older people,35 youth,36 and those with chronic illness independent of education, wealth, or social network.37 , 38 Perception, again, plays a prominent role in that one can feel lonely in a group of acquaintances and quite happy when alone, depending on the subjective assessment of each condition. Loneliness results when people view their social relationships as less than desirable, with relief possible only through reunion with a particular person.39 Psychologists describe this emotion as a nonconscious signal, like physical pain, that motivates a person to act when the social network seems unable to provide what is needed.40 This feedback increases efforts at socialization, or for those who fear further rejection, it can prompt greater withdrawal.41
Prolonged periods of loneliness are associated with the development of depression, anxiety, anger, insomnia, and cognitive decline.42 , 43 Social isolation and loneliness are powerful predictors of suicide, especially with co-occurring insomnia.44, 45, 46 Investigations into the disturbing prevalence suicide among US military and veterans confirmed this connection.47, 48, 49 Loneliness is found to be twice the contributor to premature death and cardiovascular illness as obesity and 4 times that of environmental factors, due to complex neurophysiological consequences (eg, altered inflammatory and immune responses, and elevated cholesterol, heart rate, vascular resistance, and blood pressure) and an adverse impact on self-care or social support.32 , 34 , 50 , 51
After a review of 2 decades of human and animal research, the authors of the Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness posit 8 neurophysiological pathways between loneliness and medical illness that include poor sleep quality, heightened activation of the HPA axis, selectively activated sympathetic tonus, altered transcriptome dynamics, decreased viral immunity, increased inflammatory response, increased prepotent responding, and depressive symptomatology.30 Vigilance to threats of loss and negative social stimuli are evident on neuropsychological testing and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies of lonely people and not just in their illness behaviors.52 These mind-body relationships are seen across species and are purposeful in that they protect the organism from predatory attack, but prolonged activation puts the body at risk.
The COVID-19 pandemic brought lockdowns of entire cities, travel restrictions, quarantines of the medically ill (eg, university students, nursing home residents), and informal decisions to separate loved ones, neighbors, and friends. For example, in as few as 9 to 13 days, quarantined health care workers, students, and patients in a variety of studies reported symptoms of anxiety, depression, insomnia, irritability, suspiciousness, and exhaustion.53 Interventions to reduce the loneliness, irritability, anxiety, and depression of social isolation include skill training, interpersonal support, social events, and cognitive-behavioral techniques for managing maladaptive thinking.36 , 54 The most successful strategies train people to analyze their thought process to correct negative and dysfunctional perceptions, assumptions, and attributions and to replace these with more adaptive and optimistic ideas.55 , 56
Learned Helplessness
Helping people to break free from the consequences of prolonged exposure to stress and isolation is challenging. More than 5 decades of research finds that many animals and humans can be conditioned to experience helplessness in as few as 90 minutes.57 , 58 Many such subjects exhibit pessimism, sadness, irritability, weight loss, anhedonia, and poor concentration like those with depression.59 The interactive effect of an outcome beyond control and an individual’s negative perception of that event can promote pessimistic attitudes and helpless behavior. Pessimists who perceive their failure to manage adversity as permanent, pervasive, and personal are more vulnerable to depression than optimists who perceive adversity as temporary, specific, and external.60
In a series of laboratory experiments, dogs that were shown a light before receiving an electric shock quickly avoided it by jumping to a neutral side. However, when escape was prevented, the animals escalated their effort to flee before surrendering. Even after the barrier was eliminated, the animals continued to respond passively to shocks, and evidenced a diminished capacity to master subsequent challenges, as if they expected to fail. Psychologists call this inability to control outcomes learned helplessness.61 Helpless dogs could recover their capacity to escape, but only after they were dragged by the leash to safety multiple times.57
Pessimistic individuals are prone to develop physical illnesses from persistent failures to take care of themselves or due to psychophysiological change. College students with negative attitudes, for example, had more frequent illnesses than their optimistic peers and demonstrated poor nutrition, sleep, and self-care when they became ill.62 In a 35-year study of adults, health assessments at 5-year intervals revealed pessimistic individuals had worse health than their optimistic peers.63 In other studies, optimistic patients had reduced risk of cardiac events and death from all causes.64 , 65
Neuroscientists have proposed several underlying mechanisms for learned helplessness and the increased risk for medical illness. The medial prefrontal cortex that detects the experience of not being in control regulates the activity of the dorsal raphe nucleus. In adverse situations that appear to be inescapable, 5-hydroxytrtryptamine receptors are activated in the dorsal raphe to produce passivity. The amygdale’s role in assessing dangerousness is an important influence on the fight/flight/freeze response to stressors. As is the case with exposure to stress and isolation, learned helplessness activates the HPA response which releases adrenocorticotrophic hormone and reduced activity in a variety of monoaminergic systems.58 , 66
Lockdowns and quarantines initially increase anxiety and then give way to a sense of learned helplessness as people feel powerless to control their environment,67, 68, 69 The lack of control over exposure to the virus and the undependability of personal protective equipment, masks, testing, ventilators, and work schedules have left many health care professionals feeling burned out.5 , 6 Most businesses made a successful transition to remote work, but many did not, while unemployment reached historic highs.70 Entering a third year, parents have become teachers, and teachers have become frustrated with the demands of online education as have their students.71
The murder of George Floyd brought national attention to the pervasive danger and uncertainty that people of color feel about their relationship with law enforcement.19 Episodes of violence against Asian American and Pacific Islanders have stirred vigilance and vulnerability among people of East and Southeast Asian origin.20 Even the confidence that the country had the agency to elect a president was challenged. This perfect storm of uncontrollable events will be very likely to leave those who perceived them as permanent, pervasive, and personal in great distress.60
A Way Forward
If one wanted to test the influence of the combined effect of psychological stress, social isolation, and learned helplessness on humans, this extraordinary experience with COVID-19 would certainly qualify. History reveals that abnormal levels of mental illness persist for as many as 3 years after the biological resolution of a pandemic.72 The US Surgeon General warns that COVID-19 will continue to interfere with young people achieving developmental milestones, learning social skills, solving problems, forming relationships, and mastering schoolwork for quite some time.73 Adult survivors of COVID-19 evidenced significant mental illness, insomnia, and neurocognitive decline at 1 year, especially among those hospitalized.74
Before this pandemic, the workforce shortage in the US limited the access to behavioral health care.75 Fortunately, most problems do not require medication or an appointment with a mental health specialist; there are many ways to bring psychological care to people in need.76 New models are integrating behavioral health care into medical settings to improve screening, medication access, patient education, and care coordination.77 Psychiatric mental health nurse NPs are providing leadership in this work in primary care practices.68 , 78 , 79 These professionals provide medication and psychotherapy to patients and supervision and consultation for their NP colleagues and other professionals.80 By partnering with primary care NPs, even during the pandemic, substance use disorders, depression, anxiety, and comorbid conditions with chronic medical illness have been reduced.77
There are many traditional psychological interventions such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy,81 social skills and relationship training for loneliness,36 , 54, 55, 56 , 82 and a variety of evidence-based strategies for traumatic stress83 that benefit patients. However, for many individuals, just feeling connected to and understood by a compassionate NP or other health care professional is comforting, empowering, and efficacious.84 , 85 Conveying the simple idea that one’s thoughts can influence feelings and behaviors and that perceiving adverse events as temporary, specific, and external vs permanent, pervasive, and personal can provide some patients with hope.83 As the world struggles to rebuild in a postpandemic period, NPs can play an important role in improving mental health and healing to those in need.
Biography
Nicholas A. Covino, PsyD, is president of William James College and a practicing psychologist in Newton, MA. He can be reached at nicholas_covino@williamjames.edu.
Footnotes
In compliance with standard ethical guidelines, the author reports no relationships with business or industry that may pose a conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . December 17, 2020. Overdose Deaths Accelerating During COVID-19: Expanded Prevention Efforts Needed.https://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2020/p1218-overdose-deaths-covid-19.html [Google Scholar]
- 2.Czeisler M.É., Lane R.I., Petrosky E., et al. Mental health, substance use, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, June 24-30, 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(32):1049–1057. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6932a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McKnight-Eily L.R., Okoro C.A., Strine T.W., et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in the prevalence of stress and worry, mental health conditions, and increased substance use among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic—United States, April and May 2020. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(5):162–166. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7005a3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Olfson M., Kroenke K., Wang S., Blanco C. Trends in office-based mental health care provided by psychiatrists and primary care physicians. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75(3):247–253. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Vizheh M., Qorbani M., Arzaghi S.M., Muhidin S., Javanmard Z., Esmaeili M. The mental health of healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;19:1967–1978. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00643-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sockalingam S., Clarkin C., Serhal E., Pereira C., Crawford A. Responding to health care professionals’ mental health needs during COVID-19 through the rapid implementation of project ECHO. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2020;40(3):211–214. doi: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Duric V., Clayton S., Leong M.L., Yuan L.L. Comorbidity factors and brain mechanisms linking chronic stress and systemic illness. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:1–16. doi: 10.1155/2016/5460732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. (2005/2014). Excessive Stress Disrupts the Architecture of the Developing Brain: Working Paper 3. Updated Edition. https://developingchild.harvard.edu/resources/wp3/
- 9.Simon N.M., Smoller J.W., McNamara K.L., et al. Telomere shortening and mood disorders: preliminary support for a chronic stress model of accelerated aging. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;60:432–435. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Godoy L.D., Rossignoli M.T., Delfino-Pereira P., Garcia-Cairasco N., de Lima Umeoka E.H. A comprehensive overview on stress neurobiology: basic concepts and clinical implications. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:127. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Matthieu M.M., Andre I. Using stress, appraisal, and coping theories in clinical practice: assessments of coping strategies after disasters. Brief Treat Crisis Interv. 2006;6(4):337. doi: 10.1093/brief-treatment/mh1009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.American Psychiatric Association . 5th ed. American Psychiatric Association; 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marshall R.D., Bryant R.A., Amsel L., Suh E.J., Cook J.M., Neria Y. The psychology of ongoing threat: relative risk appraisal, the September 11 attacks, and terrorism-related fears. Am Psychol. 2007;62(4):304–316. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.62.4.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Richter-Levin G., Sandi C. Labels matter: is it stress or is it trauma? Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01514-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. Springer; 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lupien S., McEwen B., Gunnar M., et al. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10:434–445. doi: 10.1038/nrn2639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhong B., Huang Y., Liu Q. Mental health toll from the coronavirus: social media usage reveals Wuhan residents’ depression and secondary trauma in the COVID-19 outbreak. Comput Human Behav. 2021;114 doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shamim K., Ahmad S., Alam M.A. COVID-19 health safety practices: influence on grocery shopping behavior. J Public Affairs. 2021;21 doi: 10.1002/pa.2624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Eichstaedt J.C., Sherman G.T., Giorgi S., et al. The emotional and mental health impact of the murder of George Floyd on the US population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(39) doi: 10.1073/pnas.2109139118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wu C., Qian Y., Wilkes R. Anti-Asian discrimination and the Asian-white mental health gap during COVID-19. Ethn Racial Stud. 2021;44(5):819–835. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2020.1851739. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pew Research Center . Published April 20, 2021. Amid a Series of Mass Shootings in the U.S., Gun Policy Remains Deeply Divisive.https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/04/20/amid-a-series-of-mass-shootings-in-the-u-s-gun-policy-remains-deeply-divisive/ [Google Scholar]
- 22.Figley C.R. In: Compassion Fatigue: Coping with Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder in Those Who Treat the Traumatized. Figley C.R., editor. Brunner/Mazel Publishers; 1995. Chapter 1: Compassion Fatigue As Secondary Traumatic Stress Disorder: An Overview; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Neria Y., DiGrande L., Adams B.G. Posttraumatic stress disorder following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks: a review of the literature among highly exposed populations. Am Psychol. 2011;66(6):429–446. doi: 10.1037/a0024791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ramsden P. Viewing violent news on social media can cause trauma. Paper presented at: British Psychological Society; May 6, 2015; Liverpool, UK. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/05/150506164240.htm
- 25.Wang Y., Nomura Y., Pat-Horenczyk R., et al. Association of direct exposure to terrorism, media exposure to terrorism, and other trauma with emotional behavioral problems in preschool children. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1094:363–368. doi: 10.1196/annals.1376.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Figley C.R. In: Secondary Traumatic Stress: Self-care Issues for Clinicians, Researchers, and Educators. 2nd ed. Stamm B.H., editor. Sidran Press; 1999. Compassion Fatigue: Toward a New Understanding of the Cost of Caring; pp. 3–28. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ogińska-Bulik N., Gurowiec P.J., Michalska P., Kędra E. Prevalence and determinants of secondary posttraumatic growth following trauma work among medical personnel: a cross sectional study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021;12(1) doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1876382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Beck C.T. Secondary traumatic stress in nurses: a systematic review. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011;25:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2010.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Spiner T. 14 emerging trends: the pandemic era has changed attitudes toward science and mental health. Monitor Psychol. 2022;53(1) https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/01/special-emerging-trends [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cacioppo J.T., Cacioppo S. In: Olson J.M., editor. Vol 58. Academic Press; 2018. Loneliness in the Modern Age: An Evolutionary Theory of Loneliness (ETL) pp. 127–197. (Advances in Experimental Social Psychology). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bowlby J. Hogarth Press; 1969. Attachment and Loss. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Schore A.N. Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Ment Health J. 2001;22(1-2):7–66. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(200101/04)22:1<7::AID-IMHJ2>3.0.CO;2-N. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Feeney B.C., Collins N.L. A new look at social support: a theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015;19(2):113–147. doi: 10.1177/1088868314544222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.House J.S., Landis K.R., Umberson D. Social relationships and health. Science. 1988;241(4865):540–545. doi: 10.1126/science.3399889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine . National Academies Press (US); 2020. Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Opportunities for the Health Care System. external icon. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Eccles A.M., Qualter P. Review: Alleviating loneliness in young people—a meta-analysis of interventions. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020;26(1):17–33. doi: 10.1111/camh.12389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qualter P., Vanhalst J., Harris R., et al. Loneliness across the life span. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):250–264. doi: 10.1177/1745691615568999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Petitte T., Mallow J., Barnes E., Petrone A., Barr T., Theeke L. A systematic review of loneliness and common chronic physical conditions in adults. Open Psychol J. 2015;8(suppl 2):113–132. doi: 10.2174/1874350101508010113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Peplau L.A., Perlman D. In: Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research, and Therapy. Peplau L.A., Perlman P., editors. John Wiley; 1982. Chapter 1: Perspectives on Loneliness; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cacioppo J.T., Cacioppo S., Capitanio J.P., Cole S.W. The neuroendocrinology of social isolation. Annu Rev Psychol. 2015;66:733–767. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cacioppo J.T., Hawkley L.C., Ernst J.M., et al. Loneliness within a nomological net: an evolutionary perspective. J Res Pers. 2006;40:1054–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cacioppo S., Bangee M., Balogh S., Cardenas-Iniguez C., Qualter P., Cacioppo J.T. Loneliness and implicit attention to social threat: a high-performance electrical neuroimaging study. Cogn Neurosci. 2016;7(1-4):138–159. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2015.1070136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Cacioppo J.T., Hughes M.E., Waite L.J., Hawkley L.C., Thisted R.A. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychol Aging. 2006;21(1):140–151. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cacioppo S., Grippo A.J., London S., Goossens L., Cacioppo J.T. Loneliness: clinical import and interventions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):238–249. doi: 10.1177/1745691615570616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Van Orden K.A., Witte T.K., Cukrowicz K.C., Braithwaite S.R., Selby E.A., Joiner T.E., Jr. The interpersonal theory of suicide. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):575–600. doi: 10.1037/a0018697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.McClelland H., Evans J.J., Nowland R., Ferguson E., O’Connor R.C. Loneliness as a predictor of suicidal ideation and behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. J Affect Disord. 2020;274:880–896. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hom M.A., Hames J.L., Bodell L.P., et al. Investigating insomnia as a cross-sectional and longitudinal predictor of loneliness: findings from six samples. Psychiatry Res. 2017;1(253):116–128. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nichter B., Stein M.B., Monteith L.L., et al. Risk factors for suicide attempts among U.S. military veterans: a 7-year population-based, longitudinal cohort study. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2022;52(2):303–316. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lester P.B., Harms P.D., Bulling D., Herian M., Spain S. University of Nebraska Public Policy Center; 2011. Evaluation of relationships between reported resilience and soldier outcomes. Report #1: Negative Outcomes (Suicide, Drug Use and Violent Crime)http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/publicpolicypublications/128 [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hom M.A., Chu C., Schneider M.E., et al. Thwarted belongingness as an explanatory link between insomnia symptoms and suicidal ideation: findings from three samples of military service members and veterans. J Affect Disord. 2017;209:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Rico-Uribe L.A., Caballero F.F., Martín-María N., Cabello M., Ayuso-Mateos J.L., Miret M. Association of loneliness with all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cacioppo S., Capitanio J.P., Cacioppo J.T. Toward a neurology of loneliness. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(6):1464–1504. doi: 10.1037/a0037618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Holt-Lunstad J., Smith T.B., Baker M., Harris T., Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):227–237. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Masi C.M., Chen H.Y., Hawkley L.C., Cacioppo J.T. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219–266. doi: 10.1177/1088868310377394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cacioppo J.T., Adler A.B., Lester P.B., et al. Building social resilience in soldiers: a double dissociative randomized controlled study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2015;109(1):90–105. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zagic D., Wuthrich V.M., Rapee R.M., Wolters N. Interventions to improve social connections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022;57(5):885–906. doi: 10.1007/s00127-021-02191-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Overmeier B., Seligman M.E.P. Effects of inescapable shocks upon subsequent escape and avoidance learning. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1967;63:28–33. doi: 10.1037/h0024166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Maier S.F., Seligman M.E.P. Learned helplessness at fifty: insights from neuroscience. Psychol Rev. 2016;123(4):349–367. doi: 10.1037/rev0000033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hiroto D.S., Seligman M.E. Generality of learned helplessness in man. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1975;31(2):311–327. doi: 10.1037/h0076270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Abramson L.Y., Seligman M.E., Teasdale J.D. Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. J Abnorm Psychol. 1978;87:49–74. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.87.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Maier S.F., Seligman M.E.P. Learned helplessness: theory and evidence. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1976;105(1):3. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.105.1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Lin E.H., Peterson C. Pessimistic explanatory style and response to illness. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(3):243–248. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(90)90007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Peterson C., Seligman M.E., Vaillant G.E. Pessimistic explanatory style is a risk factor for physical illness: a thirty-five-year longitudinal study. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;55(1):23–27. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.55.1.23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rozanski A., Bavishi C., Kubzansky L.D., Cohen R. Association of optimism with cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(9) doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Lee L.O., James P., Zevon E.S., et al. Optimism is associated with exceptional longevity in 2 epidemiologic cohorts of men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116:18357–18362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900712116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Vollmayr B., Gass P. Learned helplessness: unique features and translational value of a cognitive depression model. Cell Tissue Res. 2013;354(1):171–178. doi: 10.1007/s00441-013-1654-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.López Steinmetz L.C., Leyes C.A., Dutto Florio M.A., Fong S.B., López Steinmetz R.L., Godoy J.C. Mental health impacts in Argentinean college students during COVID-19 quarantine. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12 doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.557880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Khan A.G., Kamruzzaman M., Rahman M.N., Mahmood M., Uddin M.A. Quality of life in the COVID-19 outbreak: influence of psychological distress, government strategies, social distancing, and emotional recovery. Heliyon. 2021;7(3) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ziegler A., Bedenlier S., Gläser-Zikuda M., Kopp B., Händel M. Helplessness among university students: an empirical study based on a modified framework of implicit personality theories. Educ Sci. 2021;11:630. doi: 10.3390/educsci11100630. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics News release: The Employment Situation November 2020. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/empsit_12042020.pdf
- 71.Garcia A., Powell G.B., Arnold D., et al. Learned helplessness and mental health issues related to distance learning due to COVID-19. Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama. 2021:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Taylor S. The psychology of pandemics. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2021;18:581–609. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072720-020131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Office of the Surgeon General. Protecting Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2021. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-youth-mental-health-advisory.pdf [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Xie Y., Xu E., Al-Aly Z. Risks of mental health outcomes in people with covid-19: cohort study. BMJ. 2022;376 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Covino N.A. Developing the behavioral health workforce: lessons from the States. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2019;46(6):689–695. doi: 10.1007/s10488-019-00963-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Cummings N.A., O’Donohue W.T. Routledge; 2008. Eleven Blunders that Cripple Psychotherapy in America: A Remedial Unblundering. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Reising V., Diegel-Vacek L., Dadabo L., Corbridge S. Collaborative care: integrating behavioral health into the primary care setting. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc. Published online August 25, 2021 doi: 10.1177/10783903211041653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Emerson M.R. Implementing a hybrid-collaborative care model: practical considerations for nurse practitioners. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019;40(2):112–117. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2018.1524533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Gerrity M. Milbank Memorial Fund; 2016. Evolving Models of Behavioral Health Integration: Evidence Update 2010-2015.https://www.milbank.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Evolving-Models-of-BHI.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 80.American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA) 2019. Expanding Mental Health Care Services in America: The Pivotal Role of Psychiatric-Mental Health Nurses. An Informational Report Prepared by The American Psychiatric Nurses Association.https://www.apna.org/files/public/Resources/Workforce_Development_Report_Final_Draft_6_25.pdf [Google Scholar]
- 81.Beck J.T. (Third Edition) Guilford; 2020. Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Brooks S.K., Webster R.K., Smith L.E., Woodland L., Wessely S., Greenberg N. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet. 2020;395:912–920. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Watkins L.E., Sprang K.R., Rothbaum B.O. Treating PTSD: a review of evidence-based psychotherapy interventions. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:258. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Cuijpers P., Reijnders M., Huibers M.J. The role of common factors in psychotherapy outcomes. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019;15:207–231. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Norcross J.C., Wampold B.E. Evidence-based therapy relationships: research conclusions and clinical practices. Psychotherapy (Chic) 2011;48(1):98–102. doi: 10.1037/a0022161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
