Abstract
Background
Physical inactivity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic may have hindered the development of fundamental movement skills in preschoolers. This serial cross-sectional study compared fundamental movement skills by age group before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019–2020), among Japanese preschoolers aged 3–5 years.
Methods
Of the 22 preschools within Unnan City, Shimane Prefecture, Japan, 21 (95.5%) and 17 (77.3%) participated in the 2019 and 2020 surveys, respectively. We analyzed 608 and 517 preschoolers in both surveys. Fundamental movement skills were objectively assessed with a 25 m run, standing long jump, and softball throw, based on the Japanese physical activity guidelines for preschoolers. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare the fundamental movement skills data between periods.
Results
For the 25 m run, participants aged 5 years were faster before than during the pandemic (p = 0.018), while participants aged 3 and 4 years showed no significant differences. Participants aged 3–5 years showed no significant differences before and during the pandemic for the standing long jump (p ≥ 0.072). For the softball throw, all grades scored higher before than during the pandemic (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
These findings suggest that the COVID-19 pandemic impeded the development of fundamental motor skills, especially for object control skills. This highlights the need for interventions aimed at developing fundamental motor skills in preschoolers during and after the pandemic.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1265/ehpm.22-00049.
Keywords: Preschoolers, Japan, COVID-19, Physical fitness, Fundamental movement skills
Introduction
The World Health Organization declared the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak a pandemic on January 30, 2020 [1]. Subsequently, owing to the rapid spread of the disease, the Japanese government declared a nationwide state of emergency from April 16 to May 14, 2020. The pandemic has secondarily affected young children. For example, objectively assessed physical activity decreased and sedentary time increased [2]. This is a critical problem, as physical inactivity in early childhood may ultimately diminish physical proficiency [3, 4].
Notably, fundamental movement skills (FMS) are developed during the preschool years [5]. Sufficient FMS are associated with appropriate body weight and better cardiorespiratory fitness [6]. In turn, young children with sufficient FMS may participate in high-level physical activity in adolescence [7–9]. Despite the importance of mastering FMS during early childhood, the COVID-19 restrictions have delayed the achievement of minimum proficiency. Two studies have demonstrated the pandemic’s negative effect on the motor development of schoolchildren [10, 11]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have reported the influence of the pandemic on FMS among preschoolers (aged 5 years or younger). Therefore, this study aimed to analyze the differences in FMS by age group before and during the pandemic (2019–2020) in children aged 3–5 years in Unnan City, Shimane Prefecture, Japan.
Methods
The study was conducted in Unnan City (population 39,032; area 553.4 km2), a rural municipality in Shimane Prefecture, Japan. Data for this serial cross-sectional study were obtained from FMS surveys among preschoolers aged 3–5 years (grades 1–3) as part of the Unnan City Early Childhood Exercise Program, based on the Unnan City Basic Educational Plan, developed by the Board of Education and Child Policy Division (BECPD) at Unnan City Hall [12]. All 22 local preschools were invited to participate. In this study, the term preschool includes nursery schools, kindergartens, and authorized centers for early childhood education and care (ECECs). The principal of each preschool decided whether or not to participate. The BECPD issued letters explaining the study to the parents or guardians of all preschoolers. The surveys were subsequently conducted at each preschool from October to November in 2019 and 2020. According to the opt-out process, the parents/guardians were free to ask questions or refuse participation, as explained on the affiliated website. The BECPD approved the collected data for use in secondary research. Personal identifiers were stripped from the data analyzed in this study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shimane University (#2856).
The Early Childhood Exercise Guidelines in Japan acted as the standardized assessment method according to which FMS were evaluated. These methods included the 25 m run (m/s), standing long jumps (cm) (locomotor skills), and softball throws (m) (object control skills) [13]. Two trials were conducted for each test item, and the best score was analyzed. Anthropometric measurements included objectively measured height (cm) and weight (kg) status without shoes and with light clothing, to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.1 kg, respectively. The Kaup index [weight in kg/(height in m)2] data were divided into two categories employing the following cut-off scores: non-overweight: <18.0; overweight: ≥18.0 kg/m2 [14].
The sample’s sex distribution and preschool types were compared before and during the pandemic. We presented continuous anthropometric parameters and FMS data as medians and interquartile ranges, with between-period comparisons by age group conducted via the Mann-Whitney U test. Independent-samples tests were conducted based on the null hypothesis that the participants’ FMS scores by age group are at the same level at the two-time points (see Additional file 1). The percentage of overweight participants in the two surveys was compared using a Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test. To adjust for multiple comparisons (3 groups × 3 measures = 9 comparisons) in FMS, Bonferroni-adjusted p-values were calculated. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 for two-sided tests. All the data were analyzed with SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Table 1 shows the participants’ characteristics. Of the 22 preschools, 21 (95.5%) and 17 (77.3%) participated in the 2019 and 2020 surveys, respectively. This study included 641 and 539 preschoolers in each survey. After excluding missing data, we analyzed 608 (94.9%) and 517 (95.1%) participants, respectively. The percentage of boys and girls before and during the pandemic was not significantly different in any grade (p ≥ 0.055). Further, no significant difference was found before and during the pandemic in the percentage of preschool types (p = 0.746).
Table 1.
Participants’ characteristics
| Before (2019) | During (2020) | P valuea | |||
|
|
|
||||
| n | % | n | % | ||
| Overall | 608 | 517 | |||
| Boys | 318 | 52.3 | 251 | 48.5 | 0.231 |
| Girls | 290 | 47.7 | 266 | 51.5 | |
| Three years old | 179 | 140 | |||
| Boys | 97 | 54.2 | 60 | 42.9 | 0.055 |
| Girls | 82 | 45.8 | 80 | 57.1 | |
| Four years old | 169 | 171 | |||
| Boys | 84 | 49.7 | 89 | 52.0 | 0.745 |
| Girls | 85 | 50.3 | 82 | 48.0 | |
| Five years old | 260 | 206 | |||
| Boys | 137 | 52.7 | 102 | 49.5 | 0.515 |
| Girls | 123 | 47.3 | 104 | 50.5 | |
| Type of preschool | 21 | 17 | |||
| Nursery school | 10 | 47.6 | 10 | 58.8 | 0.746 |
| Kindergarten | 4 | 19.0 | 2 | 11.8 | |
| ECEC | 7 | 33.3 | 5 | 29.4 | |
ECEC; authorized center for early childhood education and care
aP for Chi-square test.
Table 2 shows the comparison of FMS before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The comparison of anthropometric parameters and FMS before and during the pandemic revealed the following: regarding height, participants aged 3 years were notably taller during the pandemic than before (p = 0.005), while those aged 4 and 5 years did not show significant differences (p ≥ 0.159). Regarding weight, children aged 3 years were notably heavier during the pandemic than before (p = 0.005), while those aged 4 and 5 years again did not indicate a significant difference (p ≥ 0.136). There was no significant difference before and during the pandemic for the Kaup index and overweight participants (p > 0.09).
Table 2.
Comparison of fundamental movement skills before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
| Three years old (first grade) | Four years old (second grade) | Five years old (third grade) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Before (2019) | During (2020) |
Effect size
(r or φ) |
P
valuea |
Before (2019) | During (2020) |
Effect size
(r or φ) |
P
valuea |
Before (2019) | During (2020) |
Effect size
(r or φ) |
P
valuea |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
| Median or % | (IQR or 95%CI) | Median or % | (IQR or 95%CI) | Median or % | (IQR or 95%CI) | Median or % | (IQR or 95%CI) | Median or % | (IQR or 95%CI) | Median or % | (IQR or 95%CI) | |||||||
| Anthropometric parameter | ||||||||||||||||||
| Height (cm) | 97.8 | (95.1–100.4) | 99.3 | (95.3–102.2) | 0.16 | 0.005 | 105.5 | (102.8–107.9) | 105.1 | (102.0–107.8) | 0.08 | 0.159 | 111.9 | (108.7–115.4) | 112 | (109.6–115.0) | 0.01 | 0.799 |
| Weight (kg) | 14.6 | (13.3–15.8) | 15.2 | (14.0–16.4) | 0.16 | 0.005 | 16.7 | (15.7–18.0) | 16.5 | (15.0–18.0) | 0.08 | 0.136 | 18.7 | (17.3–20.5) | 18.9 | (17.5–20.8) | 0.05 | 0.322 |
| Kaup index (kg/m2) | 15.2 | (14.6–15.9) | 15.4 | (14.9–16.0) | 0.08 | 0.129 | 15.1 | (14.3–15.8) | 15.0 | (14.4–15.7) | 0.02 | 0.740 | 14.9 | (14.2–15.8) | 15.1 | (14.4–15.9) | 0.07 | 0.147 |
| Overweight (%)b | 0.6 | (0.0–3.1) | 3.6 | (1.2–8.1) | 0.11 | 0.090 | 1.8 | (0.4–5.1) | 1.8 | (0.4–5.0) | −0.001 | 1.000 | 5.0 | (2.7–8.4) | 5.8 | (3.0–10.0) | 0.02 | 0.695 |
| Fundamental movement skill | ||||||||||||||||||
| 25 m run (m/s) | 3.4 | (3.1–3.6) | 3.2 | (2.9–3.6) | 0.14 | 0.135 | 3.9 | (3.7–4.2) | 3.9 | (3.6–4.2) | 0.05 | 1.000 | 4.3 | (4.0–4.5) | 4.2 | (4.0–4.5) | 0.14 | 0.018 |
| Standing long jump (cm) | 77.0 | (66.0–88.5) | 77.5 | (60.0–90.0) | 0.01 | 1.000 | 99.0 | (91.0–112.0) | 101.0 | (88.0–112.0) | 0.01 | 1.000 | 113.5 | (101.0–125.5) | 118.0 | (106.0–128.0) | 0.12 | 0.072 |
| Softball throw (m) | 3.0 | (2.5–3.5) | 2.5 | (1.5–3.0) | 0.28 | <0.001 | 5.0 | (3.5–6.0) | 4.0 | (3.0–5.0) | 0.24 | <0.001 | 6.3 | (4.5–8.3) | 5.0 | (4.0–7.0) | 0.22 | <0.001 |
IQR; interquartile range, CI; confidence interval
aP values for Mann–Whitney U test for continuous data and a Chi-squared or Fisher exact test for categorical data. To adjust for multiple comparisons (3 groups × 3 measures = 9 comparisons) in fundamental movement skills, Bonferroni-adjusted p-values were calculated.
bOverweight was dichotomized using a cut-off (≥18.0 kg/m2) on the Kaup index [14].
For the 25 m runs, participants aged 5 years were faster before than during the pandemic (p = 0.018), while participants aged 3 and 4 years showed no significant differences. All participants aged 3–5 years showed no significant differences in the long jumps before and during the pandemic (p ≥ 0.072). For the softball throws, all grades scored higher before than during the pandemic (p < 0.001).
Discussion
In this study, we compared FMS scores in preschoolers before and during the pandemic by age group. We found that all participants scored significantly worse on softball throws during the pandemic, while participants aged 5 had slower 25 m run times during the pandemic. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate FMS in preschoolers in the COVID-19 context. However, although the FMS scores worsened during the pandemic, the effect size was small (r ≤ 0.28). One of the reasons might be that the assessment period of this study was short-term (one year). Additionally, possibly because the preschoolers engaged in some physical activity with parents at home during the pandemic. Our findings supported the pandemic’s negative effect on the motor development of schoolchildren as demonstrated in two previous studies in Japan and Portugal [10, 11]. Considering these results, future studies should implement closer monitoring of FMS changes in school children.
Our results indicated participants’ poor performance on the 25 m run and softball throw during the pandemic. Recent reviews support the associations between physical activity level and FMS [3, 15]. Although we did not assess physical activity levels, fewer opportunities for vigorous physical activity during the pandemic may have hindered the development of FMS. Under the emergency conditions, all kindergartens were temporarily closed (from April 18 to May 17, 2020). During this time, the BECPD requested that nursery schools and ECECs students refrain from visiting the childcare facility. However, we were unable to identify whether specific students in these nursery schools and ECECs were absent. During the one-month self-restraint period, home play and preschool activities may not have entailed vigorous physical activity; that is, there were limited opportunities to develop FMS.
Moreover, the participants’ object control skills were poorer than their locomotor skills during the pandemic. Locomotor skills are viewed as phylogenetic because they develop “naturally” and require minimal formal instruction and feedback [16]. By contrast, object control skills are considered ontogenetic because they are more culturally determined and require formal practice and feedback to reach a competent level [16]. Although locomotor skills require adequate practice and instruction to reach proficient performance, the throwing motion may be more affected by personal inexperience rather than running and jumping motions. For example, ball sports typically require specialized conditions (e.g., specialized equipment or a team of participants). The coronavirus may be transmitted by coming into physical contact with objects previously touched by infected individuals [17]. Therefore, preschools may have restricted ball-related activities. However, parents, caregivers, and teachers could incorporate physical activity including movement skill-related components into children’s daily routine while adhering to infection prevention regulations [17–19]. Our study demonstrates the importance of vigorous physical activities in increasing FMS development among preschoolers during the pandemic [20].
Several limitations of this study should be noted. Our findings cannot be generalized because the study was performed in a single rural city. Next, there might have been a selection bias because of 5 non-participating preschools in the 2020 survey. Our results might have underestimated the negative impact of the pandemic on FMS, if these preschools were reluctant to allow children to participate in physical activity during the pandemic. Finally, we did not investigate the potential effects of frequency or type of physical activity in the preschool/home. Our research design also precludes causal inferences.
Conclusions
Lower performance was exhibited in the 25 m runs and softball throws in preschoolers aged 3–5 years during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic statistics. This indicates that FMS growth may have been impeded due to the pandemic restrictions. This highlights the need for interventions aimed at developing FMS in preschoolers during and after the pandemic.
Abbreviations
- COVID-19
coronavirus disease 2019
Supplementary information
Additional file 1: The study methodology.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Board of Education and Child Policy Division (BECPD) at Unnan City Hall approved the collected data for use in secondary research. All 22 local preschools were invited to participate, the principal of each preschool decided whether to participate or not. The BECPD issued letters explaining the study to the parents or guardians of all preschoolers. The surveys were subsequently conducted and collected at each preschool from October to November in 2019 and 2020. According to the opt-out process, parents/guardians were free to ask questions or refuse participation, as explained on the affiliated website. The personal identifiers were stripped from the data analyzed in this study and the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shimane University (#2856).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Availability of data and material
Data cannot be shared for ethical reasons.
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant numbers 19K11500, 19K14152).
Author contributions
T.A. and N.F. planned and conducted this study. J.K. collected the data, while T.A., J.K., and N.F. performed statistical analyses, interpreted the results, and organized the paper. J.K., M.K., and S.O. made substantial contributions to data analysis and draft revisions. K.U., C.T., and Y.M. critically appraised the paper and made final suggestions. Y.M. helped supervise the project. All authors reviewed and revised the manuscript and agreed to its submission.
Acknowledgments
We deeply appreciate the study participants. We thank the staff of the Board of Education and Child Policy Division and the Physical Education and Medicine Research Center UNNAN from Unnan City Hall, who helped conduct this study.
References
- 1.Sohrabi C, Alsafi Z, O’Neill N, Khan M, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, et al. World Health Organization declares global emergency: a review of the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19). Int J Surg. 2020;76:71–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Alonso-Martínez AM, Ramírez-Vélez R, García-Alonso Y, Izquierdo M, García-Hermoso A. Physical activity, sedentary behavior, sleep and self-regulation in Spanish preschoolers during the COVID-19 lockdown. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:693. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18020693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Jones D, Innerd A, Giles EL, Azevedo LB. Association between fundamental motor skills and physical activity in the early years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sport Health Sci. 2020;9:542–52. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.López-Bueno R, López-Sánchez GF, Casajús JA, Calatayud J, Tully MA, Smith L. Potential health-related behaviors for pre-school and school-aged children during COVID-19 lockdown: a narrative review. Prev Med. 2021;143:106349. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Bolger LE, Bolger LA, O’Neill C, Coughlan E, O’Brien W, Lacey S, et al. Global levels of fundamental motor skills in children: a systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2021;39:717–53. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1841405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lubans DR, Morgan PJ, Cliff DP, Barnett LM, Okely AD. Fundamental movement skills in children and adolescents: review of associated health benefits. Sports Med. 2010;40:1019–35. doi: 10.2165/11536850-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Barnett LM, van Beurden E, Morgan PJ, Brooks LO, Beard JR. Childhood motor skill proficiency as a predictor of adolescent physical activity. J Adolesc Health. 2009;44:252–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lopes VP, Rodrigues LP, Maia JA, Malina RM. Motor coordination as predictor of physical activity in childhood. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21:663–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Robinson LE, Stodden DF, Barnett LM, Lopes VP, Logan SW, Rodrigues LP, et al. Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med. 2015;45:1273–84. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0351-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ito T, Sugiura H, Ito Y, Noritake K, Ochi N. Effect of the COVID-19 emergency on physical function among school-aged children. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:9620. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Pombo A, Luz C, de Sá C, Rodrigues LP, Cordovil R. Effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on Portuguese children’s motor competence. Children (Basel). 2021;8:199. doi: 10.3390/children8030199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Board of Education, Child Policy Division. Unnan city hall. The Unnan city early childhood exercise program (Unnan-shi Youjiki Undou puroguramu); 2016. (Japanese). https://www.city.unnan.shimane.jp/unnan/kosodate/soudan/appr02.html; Accessed Dec 22, 2021.
- 13.Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Japan. The early childhood exercise guidelines (Youjiki Undou Shishin); 2012. https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/sports/undousisin/1319772.htm; Accessed Dec 22, 2021.
- 14.Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare. Japan. Outline of the results of the longitudinal study of births in the 21st century (special report): 2001 baby trails (Preschool Edition); 2001. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/syusseiji/tokubetsu/yougo.html; Accessed Apr 7, 2022.
- 15.Xin F, Chen ST, Clark C, Hong JT, Liu Y, Cai YJ. Relationship between fundamental movement skills and physical activity in preschool-aged children: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:3566. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goodway JD, Ozmun JC, Gallahue DL. Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults. Burlington: Jones and Bartlett Publishers Learning; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19. Considerations for youth sports administrators; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/community/schools-childcare/youth-sports.html; Accessed Dec 22, 2021.
- 18.Guan H, Okely AD, Aguilar-Farias N, Del Pozo Cruz B, Draper CE, El Hamdouchi A, et al. Promoting healthy movement behaviours among children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4:416–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30131-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Staying active; 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/coronavirus-disease-covid-19-staying-active; Accessed Jan 27, 2022.
- 20.Van Capelle A, Broderick CR, van Doorn N, Ward RE, Parmenter BJ. Interventions to improve fundamental motor skills in pre-school aged children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sci Med Sport. 2017;20:658–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1: The study methodology.
Data Availability Statement
Data cannot be shared for ethical reasons.
