In the article [1], there is an error in Table 5 on page 939 which also affected a sentence on page 941 under section 3 Results, second sentence in sixth paragraph.
TABLE 5.
Logistic regression, dependent variable of healed or not, and independent variables as listed
| Variable | B | p | OR | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSA1 | 1.91 | 0.00015 | 6.7 | 2.52–18.02 |
| Ethnicity2 | 0.007 | 0.92 | 1.08 | 0.28–4.14 |
| African American Other a | 1.72 | 0.045 | 5.57 | 1.04–29.83 |
| Area at randomization (cm2) | −0.13 | 0.014 | 0.88 | 0.79–0.97 |
| BMI | −0.071 | 0.094 | 0.93 | 0.86–1.01 |
| Constant | 3.54 | 0.017 | 34.33 | |
Note: Reference groups: 1SOC; 2Caucasian. Bold values are statistically significant (P < .05).
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Includes Hispanic, Asian, Middle‐Eastern, and Native Hawaiian races/ethnicities.
The OR value 6.74 for BSA1 was incorrect in Table 5. The correct value should have been 6.7. The correct data is shown below:
Correspondingly, the following sentence on page 941,
The treatment (BSA) dominates the other variables and increases the odds of healing by 6.74 (P = .00015).
Should have read:
The treatment (BSA) dominates the other variables and increases the odds of healing by 6.7 (P = .00015).
REFERENCE
- 1. Armstrong DG, Galiano RD, Orgill DP, et al. Multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate a bioactive split thickness skin allograft vs standard of care in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2022;19(4):932‐944. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
