Skip to main content
International Wound Journal logoLink to International Wound Journal
. 2022 Jul 15;19(5):1276. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13841

Corrigendum

PMCID: PMC9284635  PMID: 35838174

In the article [1], there is an error in Table 5 on page 939 which also affected a sentence on page 941 under section 3 Results, second sentence in sixth paragraph.

TABLE 5.

Logistic regression, dependent variable of healed or not, and independent variables as listed

Variable B p OR 95% CI
BSA1 1.91 0.00015 6.7 2.52–18.02
Ethnicity2 0.007 0.92 1.08 0.28–4.14
African American Other a 1.72 0.045 5.57 1.04–29.83
Area at randomization (cm2) −0.13 0.014 0.88 0.79–0.97
BMI −0.071 0.094 0.93 0.86–1.01
Constant 3.54 0.017 34.33

Note: Reference groups: 1SOC; 2Caucasian. Bold values are statistically significant (P < .05).

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.

a

Includes Hispanic, Asian, Middle‐Eastern, and Native Hawaiian races/ethnicities.

The OR value 6.74 for BSA1 was incorrect in Table 5. The correct value should have been 6.7. The correct data is shown below:

Correspondingly, the following sentence on page 941,

The treatment (BSA) dominates the other variables and increases the odds of healing by 6.74 (P = .00015).

Should have read:

The treatment (BSA) dominates the other variables and increases the odds of healing by 6.7 (P = .00015).

REFERENCE

  • 1. Armstrong DG, Galiano RD, Orgill DP, et al. Multi‐centre prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate a bioactive split thickness skin allograft vs standard of care in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J. 2022;19(4):932‐944. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Wound Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES