Skip to main content
Wiley Open Access Collection logoLink to Wiley Open Access Collection
. 2020 Oct 6;38(1):180–186. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12517

The Unseen Picture: Issues with Health Care, Discrimination, Police and Safety, and Housing Experienced by Native American Populations in Rural America

Mary TG Findling 1,, Robert J Blendon 1, John M Benson 1, Carolyn Miller 2
PMCID: PMC9290671  PMID: 33022083

Abstract

Purpose

Despite increased national attention to improving rural health, rural Native American populations face unique problems that are often unseen in aggregate research on the rural United States. The objective of this study was to examine rural Native Americans’ experiences with serious problems across domains important to health, using rural Whites as a comparison group.

Methods

Using 2 probability‐based national telephone surveys (2017 and 2019), we examined rural Native American adults’ reported problems in health care, discrimination, police and safety, and housing. We then compared Native American‐White differences in reported problems across domains.

Findings

Among rural Native American adults, 33% reported recent problems accessing health care when they needed it, 28% reported they or family members recently experienced major problems paying for medical bills, and 28% reported recent problems with health care quality. Several Native American‐White differences were reported, including experiencing racial violence (34% vs 5%, P < .001), discrimination in health care (19% vs 3%, P = .003), unfair police treatment (27% vs 5%, P = .002), and major housing problems (48% vs 26%, P < .001).

Conclusions

Rural Native American adults report ongoing and widespread problems with health care, discrimination, the police, safety, and housing. These findings support many national policy recommendations to improve federal funding and oversight for programs serving Native American populations living in rural areas.

Keywords: American Indian/Alaska Natives, health care, Native Americans, rural health, social determinants of health


Despite recent increases in national attention to improving rural health, 1 , 2 , 3 Native American populations living on tribal lands and in other rural areas face unique problems often unseen in the larger picture of research on rural America. In particular, survey research has been limited in its ability to include representative samples of rural Native Americans because they are hard to reach, 4 , 5 , 6 though recent news highlights several issues they face. For example, Wall Street Journal investigations documented major shortfalls in health care provided to rural Native American populations through the Indian Health Service, including calls from the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General to improve problems with health care funding, quality, and oversight. 7 , 8 In addition, the Government Accountability Office, Department of Justice, and US Commission on Civil Rights have repeatedly requested improved federal funding and oversight for Native American populations living on tribal lands and in other rural areas. 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13

Rural Native American populations face distinct and exacerbated health disparities compared to their White counterparts. 2 , 5 , 14 , 15 , 16 Though precise estimates vary depending on both the definition of rural and the inclusion of race as American Indian/Alaska Native alone or multiracial, a significant share of Native Americans live in rural America, both within and outside of tribal lands. 17 , 18 However, because they comprise a low percentage of the total rural population, rural Native Americans are not typically well represented in national surveys. 4 , 5 , 6

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gathers data on the rural Native American populations’ basic health status and behavioral indicators, 5 but research gaps remain examining their reported life experiences apart from the general rural population. To our knowledge, no prior probability‐based studies using national samples have recently examined rural Native Americans’ personally reported experiences with serious health care, discrimination, police and safety, or housing problems. We conducted 2 polls in 2017 and 2019 to examine their experiences, using rural Whites as a comparison group.

Methods

Study Design and Sample

Data used in this study were obtained from 2 original, nationally representative, probability‐based cell and landline telephone polls of US adults. Rural was defined as geographic areas outside of metropolitan statistical areas. The first poll was conducted from January 26 to April 9, 2017, about experiences of discrimination against several minority groups in America. The second poll was conducted from January 31 to March 2, 2019, on economic‐ and health‐related experiences facing adults in rural America. Both surveys were jointly designed by Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and National Public Radio and were fielded by SSRS, an independent survey research firm. Harvard researchers were not directly involved in data collection and de‐identified datasets were used for analysis, thus the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health Office of Human Research Administration classified these surveys as “not human subjects research.”

The final analytic samples included 317 Native American adults and 1,066 White adults aged 18 years and above living in the rural United States. Native Americans were oversampled in both surveys to obtain adequate sample sizes for the analysis. For race, respondents self‐identified as Native American, American Indian, or Alaska Native. Multiracial respondents were asked which race they identified with most and were included in the sample if they identified mostly as Native American, and “Native American” was used in follow‐up questions.

Survey completion rates were 74% (survey 1) and 76% (survey 2) among respondents who answered initial demographic screening questions. Overall response rates were 10% (survey 1) and 8% (survey 2), calculated based on the American Association for Public Opinion Research's (AAPOR) RR3 formula. 19 While these response rates are not ideal, they are consistent with response rates of telephone polls by prominent survey organizations. 20

Survey Instrument

Questions were developed following AAPOR best practices, after conducting a review of the existing survey data. Questionnaires were reviewed by external experts for bias, balance, and comprehension and were pretested among a subset of respondents before being conducted among the full samples. We analyzed 16 questions. Some questions (eg, discrimination) were only asked among a randomized half‐sample of respondents to limit the burden on their time. For sensitive topics such as harassment, we used a validated method 21 to ask whether some experiences happened to the respondent or their family members. Question wording is available in online Appendix A.

Statistical Analyses

After calculating descriptive statistics, we calculated the percentages of adults reporting their experiences for each question using survey weights. We used pairwise t tests of differences in proportions to make uncontrolled comparisons between rural Native American and White respondents. We only report results with at least 10 percentage points’ difference as robust enough to have statistical and practical implications, with statistical significance at P < .05.

To compensate for nonresponse bias and variations in the probability of selection, data were weighted by household size and composition, cell phone and landline use, and demographics using US Census data on gender, age, education, race/ethnicity, and region to reflect the true population distribution of Native American and White adults in the rural United States. We also used random‐digit dialing and random selection of respondents within households to attain a representative sample. Analyses were conducted using STATA version 15.0 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX).

Results

The characteristics of rural adults from 2 surveys included in this study are presented in Table 1. Most rural Native Americans did not have a college degree, and a majority lived in households earning < $50,000 annually. Among rural Whites, most did not have a college degree, while approximately half lived in households earning < $50,000 annually.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Study Samples of Rural Native American and White Adults a

Survey 1 Survey 2
Rural Native Americans (N = 178) b Rural Whites (N = 174) Rural Native Americans (N = 139) Rural Whites (N = 892)
Weighted percentage of respondents c
Gender
Male 44 48 48 49
Female 56 52 52 51
Age
18–29 y 20 21 15 18
30–64 y 61 49 60 54
65+ y 18 30 25 27
Education
No college degree d 85 80 89 79
College degree or more 14 20 11 20
Household income
<$25,000 46 32 49 27
$25,000–<$50,000 26 21 25 21
$50,000–<$75,000 8 15 8 17
$75,000+ 19 26 12 24
US region of residence e
Northeast 4 10 2 13
Midwest 19 28 25 36
South 38 43 44 37
West 39 18 28 15
a

Native American and White adults ages 18+.

b

The sample size shown reflects the total number of respondents in each category.

c

Percent of US population estimated with survey weights to adjust for unequal probability of sampling; may not add up to 100% due to rounding and do not know/refused responses that are included in the total n but not reported.

d

Includes those with some college experience (including business, technical, or vocational school after high school) but no college degree, as well as those with a high school degree or General Educational Development certificate or less.

e

Regions defined by US Census Bureau 4‐region definition.

Table 2 shows reported experiences with health care, discrimination, police and safety, and housing problems. For health care, 33% of rural Native Americans reported problems accessing health care when they needed it in the past few years, while 28% reported they or family members experienced major problems paying for medical bills in the past few years. In addition, 28% of rural Native Americans reported recent problems with health care quality. There were no statistically significant differences between rural Native Americans and Whites on any health care measures.

Table 2.

Differences in Reported Experiences with Health Care, Discrimination, Police and Safety, and Housing Issues between Rural Native Americans and Rural Whites

N a Rural Native Americans weighted % Rural Whites weighted % P value for difference
Health care
Experienced problems with health care access 1,031 33 27 .284
Experienced major problems paying for medical bills 1,031 28 19 .091
Experienced problems with health care quality b 515 28 29 .824
Discrimination
Experienced discrimination when trying to rent a room/apartment or buy a houseb,c 141 24 4 .015*
Experienced discrimination in police interactionsb 169 22 7 .024*
Avoided calling the police because of concerns of discrimination b 169 21 0 .004*
Experienced discrimination when going to a doctor or health clinicb 183 19 3 .003*
Avoided doctor or health care because of concerns of discrimination/poor treatmentb 183 14 4 .046*
Police and Safety
Been threatened or harassedb,d 169 37 10 <.001*
Experienced violenceb,d 169 34 5 <.001*
Rated local community as unsafe from crime b 515 27 10 .016*
Unfairly stopped or treated by the policeb,d 169 27 5 .002*
Unfairly treated by the courtsb,d 169 23 8 .039*
Housing
Experienced any major housing problems 1,031 48 26 <.001*
Experienced major problems paying for housing 1,031 20 9 .015*
Reported homelessness is a major problem in the local community b 520 19 16 .564
*

Rural Native American adults significantly different from rural White adults at P < .05.

a

Authors’ analysis of 2 surveys of 317 Native American and 1,066 non‐Hispanic White adults living in the rural United States (total N across both surveys, all analyses use weighted data). Do not know/refused responses included in the total N for each question. Full question wording is available in online Appendix A.

b

Question only asked among a half‐sample of respondents to limit the time burden.

c

Housing question only asked among respondents who have ever tried to rent a room or apartment, or to apply for a mortgage or buy a home.

d

Questions asked if events have happened to you or a family member because you or they are [Native American or White].

On the topic of discrimination, more than 1 in 5 rural Native Americans reported experiencing racial discrimination in several areas, including when trying to find housing (24%), discrimination in police interactions (22%), and avoiding calling the police due to concerns about discrimination (21%). About 1 in 5 rural Native Americans (19%) reported experiencing racial discrimination when going to a doctor or health clinic, while 14% reported avoiding seeking needed health care due to fear of unfair treatment. Higher shares of rural Native Americans reported problems across all discrimination measures compared to rural Whites (Whites reporting housing discrimination: 4%, P = .015; discrimination in police interactions: 7%, P = .024; avoided calling police: 0%, P = .004; discrimination in health care: 3%, P = .003; avoided health care: 4%, P = .046).

When it comes to police and safety, 37% of rural Native Americans reported race‐related threats or harassment against themselves or family members and 34% reported racial violence against themselves or family members. More than 1 in 4 rural Native Americans (27%) rated their local community as unsafe from crime, 27% also reported they or Native American family members were unfairly stopped or treated by the police, and 23% reported they or family members were unfairly treated by the courts because of their race. Higher shares of rural Native Americans reported problems across all police and safety measures compared to rural Whites (Whites reporting racial threats/harassment: 10%, P ≤ .001; racial violence: 5%, P ≤ .001; community unsafe from crime: 10%, P = .016; unfair police treatment: 5%, P = .002; unfair treatment by courts: 8%, P = .039).

In housing, 48% of rural Native Americans reported any major housing problems while living in their current residence, including problems with drinking water safety, electricity, and mold or other environmental problems. Online Appendix B contains details on housing problems. Financially, 20% of rural Native Americans reported major problems paying for housing within the past few years, while 19% reported homelessness as a major problem in their local community. Compared to rural Whites, higher shares of rural Native Americans reported major housing problems (Whites: 26%, P < .001) and major problems paying for housing (Whites: 9%, P = .015). There was not a statistically significant difference between Native Americans and Whites for viewing homelessness as a problem.

Discussion

This study provides a snapshot of rural Native American adults’ reported life experiences across areas that may drive their poor health outcomes observed in other studies, 5 , 15 with 4 important findings.

First, despite living in the post‐Affordable Care act era, at least one‐quarter of the rural Native American population reported facing serious problems with health care costs, access, and quality. Similar shares of rural Native American and White adults reported these health care problems, suggesting greater rural‐urban disparities in health care than racial disparities within rural areas. Several provisions in the Affordable Care Act have the potential to improve health care for both rural communities and Native American populations. However, in order to meaningfully improve health care access, affordability, and quality, policy makers should also address long‐standing underfunding of the Indian Health Service and other common barriers to care for rural Americans, including access to specialists. 12 , 13 , 22 , 23

Second, it is concerning that one‐fifth of the rural Native American population reported discrimination in clinical health care encounters and 1 in 7 avoided seeking health care due to anticipated discrimination. These results underscore significant policy opportunities identified elsewhere to eliminate discrimination and unfair treatment of Native Americans, in health care and beyond. 14 , 24

Third, rural Native American adults widely reported experiencing violence, harassment, discrimination, and unfair treatment by the police and courts, which is consistent with prior research findings without regard to rurality. 11 , 12 , 25 , 26 , 27 While national attention to racism within policing has increased in recent years, it has largely centered on the experiences of Black Americans. 10 , 28 Additional, focused attention is needed to improve law enforcement and reduce discriminatory policing practices impacting Native American populations living in rural areas. 11 , 12 , 25 , 26

Fourth, nearly half of rural Native American adults reported at least one major problem while in their current residence, which is consistent with other research documenting housing shortages in Indian Country, and substandard housing where housing exists. 10 , 12 More research and funding are needed to support rural Native American populations’ unique housing problems, as distinct from rural communities generally.

Limitations

Several limitations should be considered when interpreting our results. Although we oversampled rural Native American adults, both the sample size and some questions that were only asked of half the sample constrained our ability to examine heterogeneity within their diverse experiences across different geographies, cultures, heritage, traditions, and tribal affiliations. Future research should explore these differences, as well as protective factors that may improve experiences and health outcomes in areas we studied. Self‐reported data may introduce recall bias, and responses to sensitive topics may be underreported. 21 We also were not able to compare rural Native Americans to their nonrural counterparts. Because the sample was not evenly distributed geographically across Native American and White populations, regional differences may have impacted reported experiences. Our low response rate is an important limitation, though prior studies suggest that low response rates do not bias results if respondents are representative of the study population. 20 , 29 If surveys with low response rates use probability‐based samples and are weighted using Census parameters, they are expected to yield accurate estimates in most cases. 20 , 29 , 30 , 31 However, selection bias may remain related to the measured experiences. Despite these limitations, this study allowed us to examine experiences of rural Native Americans, which is difficult in survey research due to sampling challenges. 4 , 5 , 6

Conclusions

Rural Native American populations report widespread serious problems with health care, discrimination, the police and safety, and housing, which are all likely to be exacerbated by the COVID‐19 pandemic. 32 These problems are often unseen in the larger picture of research on rural America, as they differ from serious problems reported by rural Whites. Our findings support many national policy recommendations to increase federal funding and improve oversight for programs serving Native American populations living in rural areas, with goals of improving their health outcomes and reducing health disparities. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14

Supporting information

Supporting Information Available Online: Appendices A and B

Funding: This study was funded by grant 73713 from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Disclosures: Carolyn Miller is a senior program officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, which provided grant support for this work. Carolyn is a public opinion expert who provided critical feedback in drafting the surveys for this study, and she has reviewed the manuscripts but did not censor the authors' analyses or interpretation of the data in any way. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation did not have any contractual rights to review or approve the manuscript before submission. We have no other conflicts of interest to report.

References

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information Available Online: Appendices A and B


Articles from The Journal of Rural Health are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES