Skip to main content
Journal of the Endocrine Society logoLink to Journal of the Endocrine Society
. 2022 Jul 2;6(8):bvac103. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvac103

Palmar Striated Xanthomas in Clinical Practice

Nathalie Roy 1, Daniel Gaudet 2,3,, Diane Brisson 4
PMCID: PMC9291375  PMID: 35860753

Abstract

Context

Palmar striated xanthomas (PSX) are macular subcutaneous lesions conferring a yellow-to-orange coloration of palmar and finger creases that characterize dysbetalipoproteinemia, a disease associated with sustained plasma accumulation of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants. Although remnants accumulation may occur in any condition interfering with triglyceride-rich lipoprotein hydrolysis or clearance, the presence of PSX has not been systematically assessed across the spectrum of lipid disorders potentially associated with sustained or recurrent remnants accumulation.

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of (PSX) in a wide spectrum of lipid disorders ranging from very severe hypercholesterolemia (homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia) to very severe hypertriglyceridemia (chylomicronemia).

Methods

This study involved 3382 dyslipidemic White adult patients (1856 men and 1526 women) seen at the Chicoutimi Hospital Lipid Clinic (Quebec, Canada), covering a wide range of lipid disorders, from severe hypertriglyceridemia to severe hypercholesterolemia. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson χ 2 statistic, whereas univariate analysis of variance or nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis was used for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 5.1% (173/3382) of the studied patients presented PSX, a majority of them (67.1%) being women. PSX were observed in 18.8% of patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia and also among 14.1% of hypertriglyceridemic patients with partial lipoprotein lipase deficiency, 3.7% of patients with chylomicronemia, and in all those with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Overall, 10.7% of patients with PSX did not meet dysbetalipoproteinemia diagnosis criteria.

Conclusion

According to our study, the PSX prevalence estimate among patients without dysbetalipoproteinemia would be around 10% and they could be observed in a wide spectrum of lipid disorders associated with recurrent or sustained remnant lipoprotein accumulation.

Keywords: apolipoprotein E, dyslipidemia diagnosis, palmar striated xanthomas, remnant lipoproteins, dysbetalipoproteinemia


Palmar striated xanthomas (PSX) are subcutaneous lesions characterized by a yellow to brownish coloration of palmar and finger creases (Fig. 1) [1, 2]. Their physiopathology is not well described in the current literature. Extrapolating from the histologic findings related to other kinds of xanthomas, it can be hypothesized that an increased permeability of dermal capillaries to lipids is required to initiate the development of xanthomas. If triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoprotein remnants (intermediate-density lipoprotein, IDL) accumulate, the generated inflammatory response can lead to the formation of foam cells and the recruitment of inflammatory cells to form PSX [3-6]. A significant proportion of untreated patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia (formerly known as type III) present with PSX [7, 8], a clinical sign often referenced as pathognomonic of this disorder. Dysbetalipoproteinemia, a disease characterized by accumulation of remnants (IDL) in the plasma, is a highly atherogenic hyperlipidemia associated with increased peripheral and coronary artery disease risks [9, 10]. This remnant disease is most often associated with an apolipoprotein (Apo) E dysfunction and requires the presence of factors leading to an overproduction or a decrease of clearance of remnants, such as obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), or other factors. The genetic basis of ApoE abnormality is well documented and is most often (but not always) associated with polymorphisms in the APOE gene. There are 3 main gene variants, APOE2, APOE3, and APOE4, coding for corresponding ApoE isoforms; the most frequent in all populations is ApoE3. Compared to ApoE3, ApoE2 differs by one amino acid at position 158. This modification causes ApoE2 difficulties in binding to the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), LDLR-related protein, and heparan sulphate proteoglycans, which may ultimately lead to remnant accumulation [11, 12].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Palmar striated xanthomas.

However, remnant accumulation is not restricted to dysbetalipoproteinemia. It may also occur in any condition recurrently or sustainably interfering with TG-rich lipoprotein hydrolysis or remnant clearance, including postprandial dyslipidemia and chylomicronemia, partial lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency, or severe refractory familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), including homozygous FH (HoFH). The aim of this study was to assess the occurrence of PSX in patients with different lipid-lipoprotein disorders potentially associated with remnant accumulation.

Material and Methods

Participants and Clinical Data

This study included 3382 adult White individuals seen at the Chicoutimi Hospital Lipid Clinic. This regional reference clinic has been in service for 30 years and follows some 6000 adult and pediatric patients [13]. All individuals agreed to participate in studies on genetic determinants of T2D or coronary artery disease. The physical exam, including the assessment of the presence of PSX, was performed by 2 experienced lipidologists (including DG) at this specialized clinic before the start of any lipid-lowering therapy for all drug-naive patients. Dysbetalipoproteinemia diagnosis was confirmed by the presence of 3 or more of the following criteria: TGs greater than or equal to 1.7 mmol/L; TGs/ApoB less than 10 mmol/g; total cholesterol/ApoB greater than or equal to 6.2 mmol/g; very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol/TGs greater than or equal to 0.5; APOE2/E2 genotype; as well as the presence of PSX or tuberous xanthomas [9] (Table 1). Since the ApoE2 genotype is not the only possible cause of an ApoE dysfunction, some patients will carry only one apoE2 allele and, for some, none at all. Conversely, not all ApoE2 homozygous patients with a metabolic disorder will have dysbetalipoproteinemia. Diagnosis criteria were therefore used for all patients, even when the ApoE genotype was available.

Table 1.

Diagnostic criteria for dysbetalipoproteinemia used in this study

Presence of at least 3 of the following criteria
TGs ≥ 1.7 mmol/L
TGs/ApoB < 10 mmol/g
TC/ApoB ≥ 6.2 mmol/ga
VLDL-C/TGs ≥ 0.5
ApoE2/E2 genotype
Presence of palmar striated xanthomas or tuberous xanthomas

Abbreviations: ApoB, apolipoprotein B-100 measured on delipidated plasma; ApoE2/E2, homozygous for allele E2; TC, total cholesterol; TGs, triglycerides; VLDL-C, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

a In mg/dL, TC and TG levels are similar.

T2D was defined using Diabetes Canada clinical practice guidelines [14]. Waist girth was measured according to the procedures of the Airlie conference [15]. Obesity was defined as a body mass index greater than or equal to 30. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed by the presence of 3 or more of the following: waist circumference greater than 88 cm for women or greater than 102 cm for men; TGs greater than 1.7 mmol/L; high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol less than 1.3 mmol/L for women or less than 1.0 mmol/L for men; high blood pressure defined as greater than or equal to 130/85 (or on treatment for blood pressure) or blood glucose greater than or equal to 5.6 mmol/L [16]. Partial LPL deficiency was confirmed using genotyping. The simplified Canadian definition of FH and molecular diagnosis were used to confirm the FH diagnosis [17], whereas multifactorial (MCS) and familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) diagnoses were based on molecular analyses and diagnosis scoring systems [18, 19]. Although other clinical phenotypes are potential modulators of remnants accumulation, this study was restricted to the most prevalent and significant disorders in lipid clinic practice. Drug-naive lipid profiles were available for 2837 (84%) patients, while other patients received either statins (74.3%), fibrates (26.3%), ezetimibe (4.8%), resins (4.8%), or niacin (2.7%). Of these patients, 12.2% received more than one class of medications. Individuals gave their informed consent to participate in this study and were assigned a code that systematically deidentifies all clinical data [20].

This project was approved by the Chicoutimi Hospital Ethics Committee and IRB Services (now Advarra). Written informed consent was obtained from each patient. The work was carried out in accordance with the code of ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Biochemical Analyses

Blood samples were obtained after a 12-hour overnight fast from the antecubital vein into vacutainer tubes containing EDTA. Cholesterol, TGs, and glucose levels were measured by enzymatic assays on a CX7Analyser (Beckman) [21]. Total cholesterol was determined in serum and HDL after precipitation of VLDL and LDL (d > 1.006 g/mL) in the infranatant with heparin and manganese chloride (MnCl2). Serum LDL cholesterol levels were estimated using the Friedewald formula [22] unless the TG level was greater than 4.5 mmol/L, in which case a direct measurement was used [23]. For a subsample of 1118 patients, VLDL particles (d < 1.006 g/mL) were isolated by ultracentrifugation, whereas the HDL subfraction was obtained after precipitation of LDL with dextran sulfate and MnCl2. Cholesterol and TG levels were measured in each subfractions [24]. ApoB levels were determined using nephelometry, and nonesterified fatty acid levels were determined using an enzymatic assay. Serum glycerol concentrations were measured with an analyzer Technicon RA-500 (Bayer Corp), and enzymatic reagents were obtained from Randox Laboratories. The remnant cholesterol, defined as the cholesterol content of TG-rich remnant lipoproteins, was estimated by total cholesterol – (LDL cholesterol + HDL cholesterol) [25].

Genotyping

ApoE genotyping was performed using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis with the HhaI restriction enzyme. After cleavage of amplified sequences in specific regions, the DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis on a polyacrylamide gel [26]. The presence of FCS and FH-causing mutations in the LPL and LDLR genes, respectively, was identified using a mismatch polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism as previously described [27-31].

Statistical Analysis

Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson χ 2 statistic, whereas group differences for continuous variables were examined with a univariate analysis of variance or nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests followed by Game-Howell tests when the homogeneity of the variance was not respected. Statistical significance level was set at P less than .05. All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS package (release 25.0, SPSS).

Results

Table 2 shows that 5.1% (173/3382) of the study participants presented with PSX, most of them (67.1%) being women. Body mass index and mean fasting glucose levels were significantly higher in patients with PSX (P = .001). These differences remained statistically significant even among individuals without diabetes (P = .017 and .011). A total of 18.0% of patients with PSX were homozygote for APOE2, whereas 44.8% were APOE2 (P < .001).

Table 2.

Patients’ characteristics according to presence of palmar striated xanthomas

Without PSX
n = 3209
With PSX
n = 173
P
Age, y 47.7 ± 12.4 48.6 ± 13.0 NS
Female, n (%) 1410 (43.9) 116 (67.1) < .001
Menopausalb, n (%) 724 (56.6) 69 (64.5) NS
Waistc, cm 91.6 ± 13.5 91.6 ± 13.7 NS
BMId 27.5 ± 4.8 28.7 ± 5.2 .001
Fasting glucosea,e 5.2 (4.8-5.7) 5.4 (5.0-6.0) .001
ApoE2f, n (%) 486 (25.6) 77 (44.8) < .001
ApoE2/E2f n (%) 94 (5.0) 31 (18%) < .001

Data are mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. NS = P greater than .10.

Abbreviations: ApoE2, presence of one apolipoprotein E2 allele; ApoE2/E2, homozygous for allele E2; BMI, body mass index; NS, not significant; PSX, palmar striated xanthomas.

a Median (interquartile range). Among a subsample of (n):

b  = 1387;

c  = 3055;

d  = 3321;

e  = 3239;

f  = 2068.

The results presented in Table 3 illustrate that the presence of PSX is associated with higher plasma levels of total cholesterol (P < .001), TGs (P < .001), and Apo B (P = .073), but significantly lower levels of LDL (P = .001). Patients with PSX had significantly higher TG levels in all lipoprotein fractions (P ≤ .007). The occurrence of PSX was also associated with higher levels of remnant cholesterol, free glycerol, and nonesterified fatty acid and with higher values of VLDL cholesterol/VLDL-TGs, VLDL-cholesterol/TGs, and TG/ApoB ratios (P ≤ .001). Similar results were observed when analyses were conducted in women and men separately (data not shown).

Table 3.

Lipid profile according to presence of palmar striated xanthomas among patients without lipid-lowering medication

Without PSX
n = 2678
With PSX
n = 159
P
Total C, mmol/L 7.67 ± 2.26 8.93 ± 4.19 < .001
HDL-Cb, mmol/L 1.09 ± 0.37 1.07 ± 0.43 NS
LDL-Cc, mmol/L 5.06 ± 1.95 4.22 ± 2.92 .001
TGsa,d, mmol/L 2.20 (1.40-4.10) 4.8 (2.3-8.8) < .001
Non–HDL-Ca,e 6.20 (5.20-7.40) 6.50 (5.50-8.40) .009
ApoBf, g/L 1.28 ± 0.36 1.35 ± 0.47 .073
NEFAa,g 0.54 (0.40-0.71) 0.59 (0.49-0.77) .001
Glycerola,h 0.07 (0.05-0.10) 0.08 (0.06-0.12) <.001
Remnant Ca,i 0.90 (0.60-1.40) 1.70 (0.84-4.07) <.001
TC/ApoBBa,f 5.73 (4.97-6.89) 5.70 (5.05-7.66) NS
TGs/ApoBa,j 1.85 (1.15-3.60) 3.61 (1.86-7.29) <.001
non-HDL/ApoBa,k 4.81 (4.18-5.78) 4.90 (4.14-6.33) NS
Lipid profile from ultracentrifugation n (1118)
n = 970 n = 148
VLDL-TGsa, mmol/L 1.72 (0.95-3.09) 2.71 (1.14-4.18) <.001
VLDL-Ca, mmol/L 1.52 ± 1.75 2.38 ± 2.35 <.001
LDL-TGsa, mmol/L 0.42 (0.32-0.55) 0.48 (0.34-0.64) .007
LDL-C, mmol/L 3.73 ± 1.62 3.71 ± 2.53 NS
HDL-TGa, mmol/L 0.29 (0.24-0.38) 0.36 (0.27-0.45) <.001
HDL-C, mmol/L 0.95 ± 0.32 0.97 ± 0.39 NS
VLDL-C/VLDL-TGsa 0.59 (0.50-0.71) 0.68 (0.53-0.87) <.001
VLDL-C/TGsa 0.39 (0.33-0.45) 0.44 (0.36-0.57) <.001

Data are mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. NS = P greater than .10

Abbreviations: ApoB, apolipoprotein B-100 measured on delipidated plasma; C, cholesterol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NEFA, nonesterified fatty acid; NS, not significant; PSX, palmar striated xanthomas; TGs, triglycerides; VLDL, very-low-density-lipoprotein.

a Median (interquartile range). Among a subsample of (n):

b  = 2724;

c  = 2554;

d  = 2835;

e  = 2724;

f  = 1976;

g  = 1487;

h  = 1637;

i  = 2472;

j  = 1974;

k  = 1879.

The occurrence of PSX in relation to the clinical diagnosis is shown in Table 4. All genetically confirmed HoFH patients in this study presented with PSX. A statistically significant proportion of patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia (18.8%) and genetically confirmed partial LPL deficiency (14.1%) also presented with PSX. Between 5% and 10% of patients diagnosed with obesity, T2D, hypothyroidism, or a full metabolic syndrome had PSX. Some patients with refractory heterozygous FH or with MCS also presented with PSX. These diagnoses are not mutually exclusive; patients can have more than one diagnosis. Combinations of diagnoses involving dysbetalipoproteinemia are those associated with the highest prevalence of PSX: 29.1% among patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia and type 2 diabetes, and 26.1% among those with dysbetalipoproteinemia and obesity. Interestingly, the prevalence of PSX reached 18.8% in patients with T2D and hypothyroidism. All other combinations provided similar results to those shown in Table 4. We also found that 12.8% (5/39) of hypertriglyceridemic patients with myotonic dystrophy presented with PSX, a feature that has already been reported [32]. Highly similar results were observed among the whole sample and drug-naive patients (data not shown).

Table 4.

Presence of palmar striated xanthomas according to clinical diagnosisa

Total
No.
Without PSX
n (%)
With PSX
n (%)
Obesity 860 795 (92.4) 65 (7.6)
Type 2 diabetes 475 436 (91.8) 39 (8.2)
Metabolic syndrome 1467 1366 (93.1) 101 (6.9)
Partial LPL deficiency 348 299 (85.9) 49 (14.1)
Dysbetalipoproteinemia 799 649 (81.2) 150 (18.8)
Chylomicronemia (FCS/MCS) 27 26 (96.3) 1 (3.7)
Homozygous FH 8 0 (0.0) 8 (100.0)
Heterozygous FH 1185 1155 (97.5) 30 (2.5)
Hypothyroidism 290 262 (90.3) 28 (9.7)

Abbreviations: FCS, familial chylomicronemia syndrome; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; MCS, multifactorial chylomicronemia; PSX, palmar striated xanthomas.

a Diagnoses are not mutually exclusive; patients can have more than one diagnosis.

Among the 150 patients with dysbetalipoproteinemia and PSX, 20.7% were found to be homozygous for ApoE2, whereas the rate of PSX was 27.2% among the dysbetalipoproteinemia-ApoE2/E2 patients and 20.3% among the dysbetalipoproteinemia non–ApoE2/E2 homozygous individuals (P = .1). Finally, overall, 10.7% of patients with PSX in this study did not meet a sufficient number of criteria to have a diagnosis of dysbetalipoproteinemia (data not shown).

Discussion

A total of 5.1% of patients included in this study had PSX, including those with dysbetalipoproteinemia, HoFH, and partial LPL deficiency. The presence of PSX was also observed among 5% to 10% of patients with obesity, T2D, hypothyroidism, or metabolic syndrome and in some patients with heterozygous FH or severe hypertriglyceridemia (chylomicronemia). PSX were observed despite the absence of dysbetalipoproteinemia in more than 10% of patients. Various criteria and algorithms were used to diagnose dysbetalipoproteinemia [33-35]. The use of the Sniderman [33] or the Frederickson algorithm criteria [36] in the present study did not change the observation. PSX were seen in conditions other than dysbetalipoproteinemia, including in a variety of lipid disorders potentially associated with remnant (IDL) accumulation. It is noteworthy that, while age is known as a risk factor of dysbetalipoproteinemia and a well-known covariable of various potential modulators of remnant production or clearance, there is no statistically significant difference in age according to the presence of PSX in the present study. Moreover, to the best of our knowledges, there are also no data in the literature about the relation between PSX and patient age. Finally, not all patients who fulfill dysbetalipoproteinemia diagnosis criteria have PSX. However, the proportion of dysbetalipoproteinemia patients with PSX in this study is lower than that observed in previous studies, which reported a prevalence between 20% and 72% [37-39].

PSX are macular yellowish colorations of the palmar and finger creases that can easily be missed. The pathophysiology underlying the occurrence of this finding is not fully understood and poorly described in the literature. Walton et al [4] proposed that the palmar distribution of striated xanthomas could be related to minor traumas secondary to the pressure loading to which they are exposed. These repeated traumas, associated with remnant-induced inflammation, would ultimately lead to an increase in vascular endothelial permeability and leakage of lipids through the vascular endothelial wall [4, 12]). The accumulation of intracellular and extracellular lipids associated with the inflammation would ultimately lead to the progression of the lesion and formation of PSX. Considering that the cholesterol content of TG-rich lipoprotein is behind the inflammatory response associated with dyslipidemia and that dysbetalipoproteinemia is one of the best models of remnant accumulation (mostly IDL), our results are consistent with the fact that remnant concentrations might predispose individuals to PSX.

The presence of PSX has been previously reported in severe FH [40-44] as well as in other conditions, such as primary biliary cirrhosis [45-47], a disease associated with hepatic lipase (HL) activity reduction. HL deficiency interferes with remnant (IDL) hydrolysis and LDL production. In the later stage, primary biliary cirrhosis can be associated with the accumulation of lipoprotein-X, a phospholipid-rich and TG-poor lipoprotein [48]. The contribution of lipoprotein-X to the development of PSX is not documented. Patients with myotonic dystrophy can also exhibit PSX, when the linkage disequilibrium is with APOE2 instead of APOE4 [32]. Finally, PSX are observed in patients with multiple myeloma [49, 50], a disease associated with interference in the catabolism of lipoprotein by the paraprotein [51]. Except for myotonic dystrophy, these disorders were not represented in our study. However, taken together, these observations suggest that PSX is a clinical sign reflecting the importance of remnant metabolism in health and disease. Considering that remnant cholesterol is an important correlate of cardiovascular outcomes, independently of several other risk factors and, in some conditions, more important than LDL and HDL cholesterol levels [52, 53], this suggests that PSX could have an important implication in individual risk evaluation. Clinicians would benefit from adding this quite simple assessment during physical exams. With the still increasing obesity pandemic, PSX could be far more prevalent than initially thought.

In the study population, the prevalence of APOE2 in patients with PSX was approximatively 50%, among which 20% were homozygotes. In the Blom cohort, genotypes other than APOE2 explained 51% of dysbetalipoproteinemia cases [39]. Although it is well documented that APOE2 homozygocity confers an important susceptibility to ApoE dysfunction [8], our results concur with the view that other factors can contribute to remnant accumulation and to the pathophysiology leading to the formation of PSX as proposed by Murase et al [54].

The results of this study suggest that various elements characterizing a large spectrum of lipid lipoprotein disorders may contribute to remnant accumulation and to the expression of PSX in the absence of dysbetalipoproteinemia. Remnants accumulate secondarily to an increase of TG-rich lipoprotein production or a decrease of clearance (Fig. 2). Several lipid lipoprotein disorders can therefore lead to sustained or recurrent remnant accumulation, including partial LPL deficiency (genetic or functional), severe FH, including HoFH, HL deficiency, HDL-related disorders, and multifactorial hypertriglyceridemia [10]. Clinical phenotypes, such as obesity, high blood glucose, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and hypothyroidism, are potential modulators of remnant production or clearance. In patients with chylomicronemia (sustained TG concentration > 10 mmol/L), the ability to accumulate remnants depends on the underlying cause and the residual LPL activity available. Patients with complete LPL deficiency (FCS) are physiologically unable to produce remnants. Thus, the presence of PSX in a patient with chylomicronemia suggests the diagnosis of MCS, which is more frequent than FCS and is associated with some residual LPL activity.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Remnants and other lipoproteins accumulation according to type of lipid disorder. CM, chylomicron; CM-re, chylomicron remnants; FCHL, familial combined hyperlipidemia; FCS, familial chylomicronemia syndrome; FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; IDL, intermediate-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; MCS, multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome; VLDL, very-low-density lipoprotein.

The main strengths of our study are the large spectrum and the diversity of lipid lipoprotein disorders studied, the standardized clinical and biochemical phenotyping, and the availability of genetic data. Our does study have limitations, however. First, it was performed in a sample issued from a relatively homogeneous White population. Results must therefore be replicated in larger and more diversified samples. Besides being retrospective, the study was not designed to specifically detect the presence or absence of PSX, which may have led to misestimating their prevalence. However, because physicians who have performed physical exams are lipid specialists with great experience in the detection and documentation of PSX, we believe this potential bias was minimized. In addition, only 2 physicians performed all physical exams, which reduced the examiner effect. However, since PSX may regress and eventually disappear with several months of treatment, some could have been missed among patients on treatment. PSX were observed among 5.6% of drug-naive patients, while 2.6% of patients receiving lipid-lowering medication, or with an unknown treatment status, had PSX. Notwithstanding this difference in PSX prevalence, the combined analysis of lipid-lowering, drug-naïve, and nonnaive patients did not substantially affect the results obtained in the present study. It also would have been highly informative to have more data on PSX disappearance vs persistence as well as additional information on treatments and how adequately the clinical phenotypes included in the present study were controlled. The fact that cholesterol remnant levels were estimated and not directly measured is another limitation [55]. Finally, in our study, lipid lipoprotein levels were measured fasting. Considering that nonfasting lipid profile can add valuable information on remnant metabolism and the assessment of their transient accumulation, we did not consider the possible contribution of on-fasting lipid profiles to the occurrence of PSX. Fat meal challenges could have been added in this context [56], and such studies are ongoing. Further analyses, including receiver operating characteristics curves, are needed to specify the contribution of PSX and other variables to risk stratification.

Conclusion

Not all patients with PSX fulfill the criteria of dysbetalipoproteinemia diagnosis. According to our study, the PSX prevalence estimate among patients without dysbetalipoproteinemia would be around 10% and they could be observed in a large spectrum of lipid lipoprotein conditions associated with sustained remnant accumulation, which might explain their presence.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to all participants and the ECOGENE-21 staff.

Glossary

Abbreviations

Apo

apolipoprotein

FCS

familial chylomicronemia syndrome

FH

familial hypercholesterolemia

HDL

high-density lipoprotein

HL

hepatic lipase

HoFH

homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

IDL

intermediate-density lipoprotein

LDL

low-density lipoprotein

LDLR

low-density lipoprotein receptor

LPL

lipoprotein lipase

MCS

multifactorial chylomicronemia

PSX

palmar striated xanthomas

RFLP

restriction fragment length polymorphism

T2D

type 2 diabetes

TGs

triglycerides

VLDL

very-low-density lipoprotein

Contributor Information

Nathalie Roy, Lipidology Unit, Community Genomic Medicine Center, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal and ECOGENE-21 Clinical and Translational Research Center, G7H 7K9, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada.

Daniel Gaudet, Email: daniel.gaudet@umontreal.ca, Lipidology Unit, Community Genomic Medicine Center, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal and ECOGENE-21 Clinical and Translational Research Center, G7H 7K9, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada; Lipid Clinic, Chicoutimi Hospital, G7H 5H6, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada.

Diane Brisson, Lipidology Unit, Community Genomic Medicine Center, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal and ECOGENE-21 Clinical and Translational Research Center, G7H 7K9, Chicoutimi, Quebec, Canada.

Financial Support

This work was supported by ECOGENE-21, a non-for-profit research organization.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Data Availability

Some or all data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the present study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • 1. Rothschild M, Duhon G, Riaz R, et al. Pathognomonic palmar crease xanthomas of apolipoprotein E2 homozygosity—familial dysbetalipoproteinemia. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(11):1275-1276. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.2223 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Nagarajan DV, Boreham PA, Parfitt VJ. Palmar striated xanthomas. Postgrad Med J. 2003;79(938):690. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Braun-Falco O. Origin, structure, and function of the xanthoma cell. Nutr Metab. 1973;15(1):68-88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Walton KW, Thomas C, Dunkerley DJ. The pathogenesis of xanthomata. J Pathol. 1973;190(4):271-289. doi: 10.1002/path.1711090402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Rapp JH, Connor WE, Lin DS, Inahara T, Porter JM. Lipids of human atherosclerotic plaques and xanthomas: clues to the mechanism of plaque progression. J Lipid Res. 1983;24(10):1329-1335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Hu CH, Ellefson RD, Winkelmann RK. Lipid synthesis in cutaneous xanthoma. J Invest Dermatol. 1982;79(2):80-85. doi: 10.1111/1523-1747.ep12500030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Brewer BH Jr, Zech LA, Gregg RE, Schwartz D, Schaefer EJ. NIH conference. Type III hyperlipoproteinemia: diagnosis, molecular defects, pathology, and treatment. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98(5 Pt 1):623-640. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-98-5-623 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Blom DJ, O’Neill FH, Marais AD. Screening for dysbetalipoproteinemia by plasma cholesterol and apolipoprotein B concentrations. Clin Chem. 2005;51(5):904-907. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.047001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mahley RW, Rall SJ. Type III hyperlipoproteinemia (dysbetalipoproteinemia): the role of apolipoprotein E in normal and abnormal lipoprotein metabolism. In: Scriver CR, Sly WS, Childs B, et al. , eds. The Metabolic and Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease. McGraw-Hill Professional; 2001:2835-2855. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Marais AD, Solomon GAE, Blom DJ. Dysbetalipoproteinaemia: a mixed hyperlipidaemia of remnant lipoproteins due to mutations in apolipoprotein E. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2014;51(1):46-62. doi: 10.3109/10408363.2013.870526 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Marais AD. Apolipoprotein E in lipoprotein metabolism, health and cardiovascular disease. Pathology. 2019;51(2):165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2018.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Marais D. Dysbetalipoproteinemia: an extreme disorder of remnant metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2015;26(4):292-297. doi: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000192 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Gaudet D, Tremblay G, Perron P, Gagné C, Ouadahi Y, Moorjani S. Familial hypercholesterolemia in eastern Quebec: a public health problem? The experience of the hyperlipidemia clinic of Chicoutimi [article in French]. Union Med Can. 1995;124(2):54-60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee; Punthakee Z, Goldenberg R, Katz P. Definition, classification and diagnosis of diabetes, prediabetes and metabolic syndrome. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S10-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Lohman T, Roche AF, Martorel R.(eds.) The Airlie (VA) Consensus Conference. Standardisation of anthropometric measurement in. Human Kinetics Book ed1988.
  • 16. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; International Association for the Study of Obesity. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120(16):1640-1645. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ruel I, Brisson D, Aljenedil S, et al. Simplified Canadian definition for familial hypercholesterolemia. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34(9):1210-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.05.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Tremblay K, Gaudet D, Khoury E, Brisson D. Dissection of clinical and gene expression signatures of familial versus multifactorial chylomicronemia. J Endocr Soc. 2020;4(6):bvaa056. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvaa056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Moulin P, Dufour R, Averna M, et al. Identification and diagnosis of patients with familial chylomicronaemia syndrome (FCS): expert panel recommendations and proposal of an “FCS score.” Atherosclerosis. 2018;275:265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.06.814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gaudet D, Arsenault S, Bélanger C, et al. Procedure to protect confidentiality of familial data in community genetics and genomics research. Clin Genet. 1999;55(4):259-264. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.1999.550408.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. McNamara JR, Schaefer EJ. Automated enzymatic standardized lipid analyses for plasma and lipoprotein fractions. Clin Chim Acta. 1987;166(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(87)90188-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499-502. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Chen Y, Zhang X, Pan B, et al. A modified formula for calculating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values. Lipids Health Dis. 2010;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1476-511X-9-52 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Havel RJ, Eder HA, Bragdon JH. The distribution and chemical composition of ultracentrifugally separated lipoproteins in human serum. J Clin Invest. 1955;34(9):1345-1353. doi: 10.1172/jci103182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Varbo A, Benn M, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Jørgensen AB, Frikke-Schmidt R, Nordestgaard BG. Remnant cholesterol as a causal risk factor for ischemic heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(4):427-436. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Hixson JE, Vernier DT. Restriction isotyping of human apolipoprotein E by gene amplification and cleavage with HhaI. J Lipid Res. 1990;31(3):545-548. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2275(20)43176-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Vohl MC, Couture P, Moorjani S, et al. Rapid restriction fragment analysis for screening four point mutations of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in French Canadians. Hum Mutat. 1995;6(3):243-246. doi: 10.1002/humu.1380060307 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Normand T, Bergeron J, Fernandez-Margallo T, et al. Geographic distribution and genealogy of mutation 207 of the lipoprotein lipase gene in the French Canadian population of Québec. Hum Genet. 1992;89(6):671-675. doi: 10.1007/BF00221960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Bergeron J, Normand T, Bharucha A, et al. Prevalence, geographical distribution and genealogical investigations of mutation 188 of lipoprotein lipase gene in the French Canadian population of Québec. Clin Genet. 1992;41(4):206-210. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1992.tb03664.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Ma Y, Wilson BI, Bijvoet S, et al. A missense mutation (Asp250 → Asn) in exon 6 of the human lipoprotein lipase gene causes chylomicronemia in patients of different ancestries. Genomics. 1992;13(3):649-653. doi: 10.1016/0888-7543(92)90136-g [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Couture P, Vohl MC, Gagné C, et al. Identification of three mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene causing familial hypercholesterolemia among French Canadians. Hum Mutat. 1998;(Suppl 1):S226-S231. doi: 10.1002/humu.1380110173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Brisson D, Gaudet D, Mathieu J, Vohl M-C. Presence of palmar xanthomas in myotonic dystrophy identifies different patterns of linkage disequilibrium between the apolipoprotein E and myotonic dystrophy protein kinase loci. Genet Med. 2005;7(3):213-215. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000157130.81975.fe [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Fredrickson DS, Morganroth J, Levy RI. Type III hyperlipoproteinemia: an analysis of two contemporary definitions. Ann Intern Med. 1975;82(2):150-157. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-82-2-150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Boot CS, Middling E, Allen J, Neely RDG. Evaluation of the Non-HDL cholesterol to apolipoprotein B ratio as a screening test for dysbetalipoproteinemia. Clin Chem. 2019;65(2):313-320. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2018.292425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Mishkel MA, Nazir DJ, Crowther S. A longitudinal assessment of lipid ratios in the diagnosis of type III hyperlipoproteinaemia. Clin Chim Acta. 1975;58(2):121-136. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(75)80004-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. de Graaf J, Couture P, Sniderman A. A diagnostic algorithm for the atherogenic apolipoprotein B dyslipoproteinemias. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008;4(11):608-618. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Blum CB. Type III hyperlipoproteinemia: still worth considering? Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;59(2):119-124. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2016.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Koopal C, Marais AD, Visseren FLJ. Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia: an underdiagnosed lipid disorder. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017;24(2):133-139. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Blom DJ, Byrnes P, Jones S, Marais AD. Dysbetalipoproteinaemia—clinical and pathophysiological features. S Afr Med J. 2002;92(11):892-897. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Daroach M, Mahajan R. Palmar crease xanthomas in familial hypercholesterolemia. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58(4):491-492. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Sakuma N, Iwata S, Ikeuchi R, et al. Coexisting type III hyperlipoproteinemia and familial hypercholesterolemia: a case report. Metabolism. 1995;44(4):460-465. doi: 10.1016/0026-0495(95)90052-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Carmena R, Roy M, Roederer G, Minnich A, Davignon J. Coexisting dysbetalipoproteinemia and familial hypercholesterolemia. Clinical and laboratory observations. Atherosclerosis. 2000;148(1):113-124. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00212-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hopkins PN, Wu LL, Schumacher MC, et al. Type III dyslipoproteinemia in patients heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia and apolipoprotein E2. Evidence for a gene-gene interaction. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11(5):1137-1146. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.11.5.1137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Nestel PJ, Reardon MF, Fidge NH. Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia occurring with apoprotein E3 deficiency: report of two cases. Arteriosclerosis. 1984;4(2):124-129. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.4.2.124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hsu JC, Su TC, Chen MF, Liau CS, Lee YT. Xanthoma striatum palmare in a patient with primary biliary cirrhosis and hypercholesterolemia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20(11):1799-1800. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03989.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Macías-Rodríguez RU, Torre-Delgadillo A. Xanthelasmas and xanthomatas striatum palmare in primary biliary cirrhosis. Ann Hepatol. 2006;5(1):49. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Yang MY, Kim JM, Kim GW, et al. Xanthoma striatum palmare in a patient of primary biliary cirrhosis with autoimmune hepatitis. Ann Dermatol. 2017;29(3):358-359. doi: 10.5021/ad.2017.29.3.358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Jahn CE, Schaefer EJ, Taam LA, et al. Lipoprotein abnormalities in primary biliary cirrhosis. Association with hepatic lipase inhibition as well as altered cholesterol esterification. Gastroenterology. 1985;89(6):1266-1278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Burnside NJ, Alberta L, Robinson-Bostom L, Bostom A. Type III hyperlipoproteinemia with xanthomas and multiple myeloma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53(5 Suppl 1):S281-S284. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2005.04.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Chee L, Spearing RL, Morris CM, et al. Acquired myeloma-associated Type III hyperlipidaemia treated by nonmyeloablative HLA-identical sibling allogeneic stem cell transplant using a donor with essential thrombocythaemia (ET): evidence of engraftment without manifestation of ET in recipient. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005;35(12):1213-1214. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704973 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Misselwitz B, Goede JS, Pestalozzi BC, Schanz U, Seebach JD. Hyperlipidemic myeloma: review of 53 cases. Ann Hematol. 2010;89(6):569-577. doi: 10.1007/s00277-009-0849-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Castañer O, Pintó X, Subirana I, et al. Remnant cholesterol, not LDL cholesterol, is associated with incident cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(23):2712-2724. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Quispe R, Martin SS, Michos ED, et al. Remnant cholesterol predicts cardiovascular disease beyond LDL and ApoB: a primary prevention study. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(42):4324-4332. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Murase T, Ebara T, Okubo M. Hepatic lipase activity is decreased in Japanese patients with type III hyperlipoproteinemia. Clin Chim Acta. 2012;414:185-187. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.08.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Chen J, Kuang J, Tang X, et al. Comparison of calculated remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels with levels directly measured by nuclear magnetic resonance. Lipids Health Dis. 2020;19(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12944-020-01311-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Perez-Martinez P, Alcala-Diaz JF, Kabagambe EK, et al. Assessment of postprandial triglycerides in clinical practice: validation in a general population and coronary heart disease patients. J Clin Lipidol. 2016;10(5):1163-1171. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2016.05.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Some or all data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the present study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Journal of the Endocrine Society are provided here courtesy of The Endocrine Society

RESOURCES