Abstract
The sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems powerfully regulate internal organs1, but the molecular and functional diversity of their constituent neurons and circuits remains largely unknown. Here we use retrograde neuronal tracing, single-cell RNA sequencing, optogenetics, and physiological experiments to dissect the cardiac parasympathetic control circuit in mice. We show that cardiac-innervating neurons in the brainstem nucleus ambiguus (Amb) are comprised of two molecularly, anatomically, and functionally distinct subtypes. One we call ACV (ambiguus cardiovascular) neurons (~35 neurons per Amb), define the classical cardiac parasympathetic circuit. They selectively innervate a subset of cardiac parasympathetic ganglion neurons and mediate the baroreceptor reflex, slowing heart rate and atrioventricular node conduction in response to increased blood pressure. The other, ACP (ambiguus cardiopulmonary) neurons (~15 neurons per Amb) innervate cardiac ganglion neurons intermingled with and functionally indistinguishable from those innervated by ACV neurons, but surprisingly also innervate most or all lung parasympathetic ganglion neurons; clonal labeling shows individual ACP neurons innervate both organs. ACP neurons mediate the dive reflex, the simultaneous bradycardia and bronchoconstriction that follows water immersion. Thus, parasympathetic control of the heart is organized into two parallel circuits, one that selectively controls cardiac function (ACV circuit) and another that coordinates cardiac and pulmonary function (ACP circuit). This new understanding of cardiac control has implications for treating cardiac and pulmonary diseases and for elucidating the control and coordination circuits of other organs.
Introduction
The autonomic nervous system is a vast network of neurons under involuntary control that is essential for maintaining physiological homeostasis throughout the body. In 1921, Langley divided the autonomic nervous system into the opposing sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems, which generally act antagonistically within a given organ through release of norepinephrine (typically mediating “fight or flight” responses) and acetylcholine (typically mediating “rest and digest” responses), respectively1. This provided a foundation for modern physiology and medicine that has remained mostly intact a century later2. Despite the vaunted position of the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems, the molecular, cellular, and functional diversity of their constituent neurons and circuits remains largely unknown, most notably at the central nervous system level2,3.
One critical organ controlled by the autonomic nervous system is the heart. The parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems powerfully influence heart rate, rhythm, and contractility to meet internal and external demands4. Classical physiological studies have shown that the sympathetic nervous system exerts control of heart rate on a time scale of seconds, while the parasympathetic nervous system exerts control on an even faster, beat-to-beat timescale and is thus thought to be responsible for the tight coordination between cardiac and pulmonary function5. Cardiac parasympathetic outflow originates from brainstem preganglionic neurons, residing primarily in the nucleus ambiguus (Amb) in the medulla4. A minority of cardiac parasympathetic neurons are located in the dorsal motor nucleus of vagus, which controls ventricular inotropy and excitability, but does not control heart rate6. Amb neurons innervate cholinergic neurons in parasympathetic cardiac ganglia located on the surface of the heart, and these ganglion neurons in turn innervate the sinoatrial (SA) node, atrioventricular (AV) node, and myocardial tissue. Acetylcholine release from these ganglion neurons reduces heart rate, AV conduction velocity, and myocardial contractility by engaging cardiac muscarinic receptors. Altered sympathetic-parasympathetic signaling balance to the heart has been implicated in a wide range of cardiovascular diseases7–9, and is molecularly targeted by common cardiac therapies such as β-blockers and atropine, but the neuronal cell types within the cardiac parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems have not been molecularly defined.
Results
Targeted scRNAseq of AmbCardiac neurons
To molecularly define parasympathetic neurons that control the heart, we retrogradely labeled and transcriptionally profiled cardiac-innervating neurons from the mouse brainstem using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). Wild-type postnatal day 1 mice were injected with fluorescent retrograde neuronal tracer cholera toxin B into the pericardial space to label parasympathetic ganglia across the epicardial surface. After one day to allow tracer uptake into pre-ganglionic terminals and retrograde transport to the cell bodies in the brainstem, ~50–60 fluorescently-labeled cell bodies were observed in the nucleus ambiguus (Amb). Labeled cells (hereafter called AmbCardiac neurons) were distributed bilaterally in Amb in a stereotyped pattern (Extended Data Fig. 1); similar distributions of AmbCardiac neurons have been observed in adult rats10, cats11, and dogs12. Because of the small number of AmbCardiac neurons, we aspirated whole retrograde labeled Amb neurons directly from acute brainstem slices (Fig. 1a). We did the same for an intermingled outgroup population of Amb neurons that does not innervate the heart, by retrograde labeling and aspirating neurons that innervate the cricothyroid laryngeal muscle (hereafter called AmbLaryngeal neurons, ~28 per Amb). Following sequencing, 151 AmbCardiac neurons and 52 AmbLaryngeal neurons passed quality control (mean: 1.9 million reads, 7761 genes detected per cell, Extended Data Fig. 2), suggesting we achieved cellular saturation by sequencing more than the numbers of AmbCardiac and AmbLaryngeal neurons per Amb.
Graph-based clustering of the expression profiles of the combined AmbCardiac and AmbLaryngeal neuron datasets revealed three clusters of cells (Fig. 1b). One (Cluster 3) largely corresponded to AmbLaryngeal neurons (Fig. 1c) and the two others to AmbCardiac neurons. Comparison of AmbCardiac and AmbLaryngeal expression profiles identified over 500 differentially-expressed genes (Supplementary Tables 1, 2), including two known markers of AmbLaryngeal neurons, neuropeptide genes Calca and Calcb13, as well as Dlk1, a regulator of somatic fast motor neuron fate14 (Fig. 1d). The ~390 genes selectively expressed in AmbCardiac neurons (Supplementary Tables 2, 3) include transcriptional (Tbx3) and splicing (Celf6) regulators, as well as genes that regulate synaptic connectivity or projection targets (Cntn5, Cdh8, Efna5), electrophysiological properties (Kcna5), input signaling (Npy2r and Cnr1), and disease processes (Snca).
To determine if the ascertained AmbCardiac genetic signature includes genes that more generally define brainstem parasympathetic neurons, we used the Allen Brain Atlas15 to examine expression of available AmbCardiac-specific genes in other brainstem parasympathetic nuclei. This identified 26 AmbCardiac-specific genes including Celf6, Kcna5, Tbx3 and Dgkb that are also expressed in parasympathetic neurons of the dorsal motor nucleus of vagus (10N), which controls thoracic and abdominal viscera, as well as parasympathetic neurons of the facial nerve controlling the lacrimal and salivary glands (Lac/Sal) (Extended Data Fig. 3, Supplementary Table 3). These genes are not expressed in adjacent somatic cranial motor nuclei, suggesting they are general markers of visceromotor neurons; we confirmed their expression in a recent adult scRNAseq dataset from 10N3. We also found AmbCardiac-specific genes that were expressed in 10N but not Lac/Sal or were not expressed in brainstem parasympathetic nuclei other than Amb (Supplementary Table 3). Thus, our scRNAseq analysis of AmbCardiac neurons identified both general features of brainstem parasympathetic neurons and specific features of AmbCardiac neurons.
Two types of AmbCardiac neurons
Sub-clustering of AmbCardiac neurons (Fig. 1b,c) without AmbLaryngeal neurons confirmed they are not a homogeneous population, and identified two molecular subtypes (Fig. 2a) that did not further sub-cluster. We designated these subtypes ACP and ACV, for reasons described later. Both ACP and ACV expressed similarly high levels of cholinergic marker Slc18a3 and cranial motor neuron transcription factor Isl1 (Fig. 2b), as expected for Amb neurons16, whereas over 200 genes distinguished the two molecular types (Supplementary Tables 4, 5, 6). The differentially-expressed genes included neuropeptide and neurotransmitter receptors such as thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor (Trhr), tachykinin receptor 3 (Tacr3), and melanocortin receptor 4 (Mc4r) that were selectively expressed in the ACP population, as well as growth hormone secretagogue receptor (Ghsr), serotonin receptor 3B (Htr3b), somatostatin receptors 2 and 5 (Sstr2, Sstr5), purinergic receptor P2Y1 (P2ry1), and leptin receptor (Lepr) that were selectively expressed in ACV. We also found subtype-specific transcription factor genes, neuropeptide precursor genes, voltage-gated ion channel genes, and genes known to regulate axon guidance and neuronal connectivity (Supplementary Table 6).
To localize the two molecular types of AmbCardiac neurons in the brainstem, we retrogradely labeled AmbCardiac neurons and immunostained for ACP marker Calbindin (Calb1) and ACV marker Butyrylcholinesterase (Bche). As predicted by scRNAseq, AmbCardiac neurons consisted of one subpopulation that expressed high levels of Calbindin and low levels of BChE (ACP) (Fig. 2c), and a second subpopulation with high levels of BChE and undetectable Calbindin (ACV) (Fig. 2d), with only rare neurons (2–3 neurons per Amb) expressing neither marker. Strikingly, we observed a stereotyped topographic arrangement of the two subpopulations. ACP neurons (~10–20 per nucleus) were located in the rostral Amb, below the compact formation of the nucleus, whereas ACV neurons (~30–40 per nucleus) were located exclusively caudal to ACP, surrounding the loose formation of the nucleus (Fig. 2e,f). ACP and ACV marker expression and distributions were similar in adult mice (Extended Data Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 6). Thus, AmbCardiac neurons are comprised of two molecularly and anatomically distinct subtypes, ACP and ACV.
ACP and ACV target distinct heart neurons
To identify the cardiac projection targets of ACP neurons, we used a genetic strategy combined with an adeno-associated virus (AAV) reporter to specifically label this cell type. The rostral Amb of Calb1Cre mice was injected with a Cre-dependent AAV encoding fluorescent protein eYFP (Fig. 3a), which labeled ACP but not ACV neurons (Extended Data Fig. 5c–e), and did not drive expression in 10N or the nodose-jugular complex (Extended Data Fig. 5g–i). Three weeks after AAV injection, eYFP-positive fibers were found innervating cardiac ganglionated plexuses (GPs) on the left atrial surface surrounding the pulmonary veins (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b), the GPs known to mediate cholinergic effects on the heart17. When either left or right ACP neurons were labeled, most eYFP-positive fibers innervated a GP around the base of the left pulmonary veins as well as a GP around the inferior pulmonary veins (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b). Within innervated GPs, eYFP-positive fibers coursed toward specific cholinergic ganglion neurons where they terminated in cholinergic, Calbindin-positive synapses surrounding each target neuron. Fibers from a single side of the brainstem provided all the cholinergic input for a given target neuron (Fig. 3b), suggesting that ganglion neurons do not receive mixed left and right inputs. Thus, although both left and right ACP neurons generally innervate the same subset of cardiac GPs, they innervate a private subset of cholinergic ganglion neurons within these GPs.
A similar strategy was used to label ACV neurons in the left or right caudal Amb and identify their cardiac targets (Fig. 3a), substituting a GhsrCre driver specific for ACV neurons relative to ACP neurons (Extended Data Fig. 5a–d,f,j–l). Unlike ACP neurons, ACV neurons in the right and left Amb showed different GP targeting patterns. eYFP-positive ACV fibers from left Amb innervated all GPs, whereas right ACV neurons primarily innervated a GP at the base of the right pulmonary veins (Extended Data Fig. 6a–c), a GP rarely innervated by ACP neurons (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b,d). eYFP-positive fibers of ACV neurons terminated in cholinergic, Calbindin-negative synapses that surrounded each cholinergic target neuron, providing its entire cholinergic input (Fig. 3d), just like ACP neuron targets. Strikingly, although ACP and ACV target neurons were intermingled, ACP and ACV neurons almost never innervated the same neuron (Fig. 3c,d).
We conclude that both ACP and ACV neurons innervate cholinergic cardiac GPs. Left and right ACP neurons innervate the same subset of GPs, whereas left and right ACV neurons innervate different sets of GPs. Although each GP receives a mixture of innervation from different sides and different AmbCardiac cell types, individual ganglion neurons receive all of their input from a single side and a single cell type, implying a mechanism that ensures individual ganglion neurons receive only one input. Such a mechanism could be mediated by classical axon guidance cues, repulsive cues, or cell adhesion molecules (Supplementary Table 6), and may serve to avoid interference between the two pathways.
ACP and ACV both slow the SA and AV nodes
To determine the effects of ACP neuronal activation on the heart, we optogenetically activated this cell type in transgenic mice. Red-shifted channelrhodopsin bReaChES18 was expressed in ACP but not ACV neurons using a Cre-dependent AAV encoding bReaChES delivered into rostral Amb of Calb1Cre mice (Extended Data Fig. 5c–e) along with a fiber optic cannula. Two to four weeks later, bReaChES-expressing ACP neurons were stimulated with a laser while recording the electrocardiogram (ECG) and respiration under isoflurane anesthesia. Photostimulation of left ACP neurons (Fig. 4a) caused an immediate, ~50% reduction in sinus rate with simultaneous prolonging of the P-R interval, occasionally leading to second-degree AV block (Fig. 4b,d,e). Upon stimulation cessation, the heart rapidly returned to normal sinus rhythm. Both SA and AV node effects of left-sided ACP stimulation were abolished by pre-treatment with muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine (Fig. 4d,e), consistent with ACP neurons mediating these effects through cholinergic ganglion neurons that activate cardiac muscarinic receptors, and not through withdrawal in sympathetic tone. Photostimulation of right ACP neurons (Fig. 4f) resulted in a similar atropine-sensitive bradycardia, but no first- or second-degree AV block (Fig. 4g,i,j). Thus, left ACP neurons slow sinus rate and AV node conduction velocity, whereas right ACP neurons slow only sinus rate.
To determine the effects of ACV neuronal activation on the heart, we used the same optogenetic approach in GhsrCre mice. Photostimulation of left ACV neurons resulted in a ~40% reduction in heart rate with simultaneous AV block (Fig. 4c,d,e). Photostimulation of right ACV neurons reduced heart rate by ~50% but with no first- or second-degree AV block (Fig. 4h–j). Cardiac effects of left and right ACV stimulation were both fully blocked by atropine, as for ACP neurons (Fig. 4d,e,i,j). Thus, the effects of ACV neuron activation on the heart were similar to ACP: left ACV stimulation slowed sinus rate and AV node conduction velocity, whereas right ACV stimulation slowed only sinus rate. Similar cardiac responses and left-right asymmetry have been observed with vagus nerve stimulation in other mammals19. In addition to these cardiac responses, Amb photostimulation in Calb1Cre and GhsrCre mice also resulted in apnea or reduction in respiratory rate, however this respiratory effect was not altered by atropine (Extended Data Fig. 7a–d) and thus was attributed as an artifact of opsin expression in interneurons of the overlapping pre-Bӧtzinger complex breathing control region (Extended Data Fig. 7e–h).
We conclude that, despite their molecular and anatomical differences, optogenetic activation of ACP or ACV neurons results in virtually identical inhibitory effects on cardiac SA and AV node function, and because the effects are blocked by atropine they are likely mediated through their projections to cholinergic ganglion neurons.
The baroreflex selectively activates ACV
We sought to identify physiological stimuli that activate ACP and ACV neurons. AmbCardiac neurons are known20 to mediate the baroreceptor reflex, a classic cardiovascular reflex essential for homeostatic maintenance of arterial pressure and end-organ perfusion21. Aortic arch baroreceptors convert increases in blood pressure to an afferent neuronal signal that results in activation of AmbCardiac neurons, which counteract the increases in blood pressure by decreasing heart rate22. To determine if ACP and ACV neurons are activated by the baroreceptor reflex, we induced the reflex with phenylephrine, a peripherally-acting α1-adrenergic receptor agonist that causes vasoconstriction and reflex activation of AmbCardiac neurons leading to bradycardia20. Awake wild-type mice were administered phenylephrine, and 150 minutes later animals were euthanized and ACP and ACV neurons immunostained for c-Fos, a neuronal activity marker (Fig. 5a). In vehicle-treated control mice, neither ACP or ACV neurons expressed c-Fos, indicating ACP and ACV activity is off or low under baseline conditions (Fig. 5b, Extended Data Fig. 8a,b). However, in phenylephrine-treated mice, we observed robust activation of ACV neurons (Fig. 5b,d), with ~70% staining positive for c-Fos. The effect was selective for ACV because ACP neurons remained c-Fos-negative under these conditions (Fig. 5b,c, Extended Data Fig. 9). Thus, the baroreceptor reflex selectively recruits ACV neurons.
ACP neurons also innervate and control the lung
A clue to ACP neuron function came from our discovery that they also innervate another organ. The lung receives innervation from the same branch of the vagus nerve as the heart23, and pulmonary and cardiac function are known to be tightly coordinated24. In parallel studies of lung innervation, we observed Calbindin-positive innervation of pulmonary ganglia. To determine if ACP neurons project to lung, we immunostained pulmonary ganglia in Calb1Cre mice after labeling ACP neurons with eYFP (Fig. 6a). Surprisingly, we found that in addition to innervating cardiac ganglia, ACP eYFP-positive/Calbindin-positive terminals also innervated most pulmonary cholinergic ganglia (75%) that surround proximal airways of the lung (Fig. 6b,g). Similar to cardiac ganglia, ACP fibers entered pulmonary ganglia and surrounded individual cholinergic ganglion neurons (Fig. 6c). In contrast with cardiac ganglia, almost all cholinergic pulmonary ganglion neurons were innervated by Calbindin-positive fibers (Fig. 6c). In similar experiments with ACV neurons, we observed only rare pulmonary ganglia (3%) that contained eYFP-positive/Calbindin-negative ACV fibers (Fig. 6d–g). Thus, ACP neurons innervate cholinergic pulmonary ganglia and are the major if not exclusive source of cholinergic input.
To determine if single ACP neurons project to both heart and lung, we used sparse labeling approaches to clonally label ACP neurons in individual mice. Multiple mouse lines and AAV dose optimizations were tested to lower the efficiency of genetic labeling to increase the likelihood of labeling just a single ACP neuron (Methods). The number of GFP-labeled ACP neurons was determined by immunostaining and counting each ACP neuron in every brainstem section spanning Amb. In rare cases (3 out of >50 mice), a single ACP neuron was labeled with GFP in an individual mouse (Fig. 6m–o, Extended Data Fig. 10). In in all three of these clones (two left ACP neurons, one right ACP neuron) the single, labeled ACP neuron projected to both heart and lung, terminating in cholinergic Calbindin-positive synapses that surrounded cholinergic ganglion neurons in both organs (Fig. 6m–o, Extended Data Fig. 10). In all three cases, the ACP clone innervated only the heart and contralateral lung, innervating a variable fraction (3–100%) of the neurons in each targeted cardiac or lung ganglion and totaling ~10–30 innervated ganglion neurons in the lung and ~12–16 innervated ganglion neurons in the heart (Supplementary Table 7). Thus, single ACP neurons innervate both organs, sending dual projections to heart and lung.
Cholinergic pulmonary ganglia mediate bronchoconstriction25, and previous studies have shown that chemical stimulation of rostral Amb with an excitatory amino acid causes bradycardia and a simultaneous ~15% increase in total lung resistance26, indicating bronchoconstriction. To determine if ACP neurons mediate bronchoconstriction, ACP neurons in the right Amb were optogenetically activated in isoflurane-anesthetized, mechanically-ventilated, paralyzed Calb1Cre mice while respiratory mechanics and ECG were recorded (Fig. 6h). We found that immediately following optogenetic stimulation, the previously-described bradycardia (Fig. 4) was accompanied by a ~5–12% increase in total lung resistance (Fig. 6i,k). Like the cardiac effect, ACP-mediated bronchoconstriction was abrogated by atropine administration (Fig. 6k). In contrast, optogenetic activation of ACV neurons had little effect on total lung resistance (~1–2%) (Fig. 6j,k), despite driving a similar reduction (~50%) in heart rate as ACP neurons (Fig. 6l).
We conclude that ACP, but not ACV neurons innervate and control the lung in addition to the heart, and they mediate these pulmonary effects through collateral projections to cholinergic ganglion neurons along proximal airways.
The dive reflex activates ACP neurons
To find a physiological function for ACP neurons, we considered cholinergic reflexes involving coordinated cardiopulmonary responses. The mammalian dive reflex is a powerful, evolutionarily ancient reflex that conserves vital oxygen stores while submerged underwater27. Upon nasal water immersion, afferent signals to the brainstem rapidly trigger apnea, bradycardia, peripheral vasoconstriction, and bronchoconstriction. Amb mediates the dive-induced bradycardia and bronchoconstriction26–29, the two functions we showed above that ACP neurons control. To determine if ACP neurons are activated by the dive reflex, we induced this reflex in isoflurane-anesthetized wild-type mice by exposing them to 10 brief (10 s) nasal immersions in thermoneutral (~30°C) water over 30 minutes (Fig. 5e). ECG monitoring confirmed dive reflex activation of bradycardia during nasal immersion (Extended Data Fig. 8e). ACP neuronal activity was then assessed 120 minutes later by c-Fos immunostaining, as above in the baroreflex experiments. We found robust induction of ACP neurons by nasal immersion (~70% of ACP neurons c-Fos-positive vs. ~10% in control, non-immersion mice) (Fig. 5f,g, Extended Data Fig. 8c). Only a small fraction of ACV neurons were induced under the same conditions (~20% of ACV neurons c-Fos-positive vs. ~10% in the control) (Fig. 5f,h, Extended Data Fig. 8d). Thus, opposite to the baroreceptor reflex, the dive reflex preferentially activates ACP neurons.
Discussion
We have molecularly, anatomically, and functionally characterized the parasympathetic brain neurons that control cardiac function in mice, and defined two parallel circuits (Fig. 7). One is the classical cardiovascular control circuit that is activated by increases in blood pressure and mediates the baroreceptor reflex. The central neurons of this circuit are ~35 neurons in the right and left Amb (~70 total) that we designate ACV (ambiguus cardiovascular). They are selectively activated by increases in blood pressure and directly project to and activate cholinergic cardiac ganglion neurons, which slow the SA node rate and AV node conduction velocity to homeostatically maintain blood pressure. The other is a newly identified circuit that controls both cardiac and pulmonary function. It is mediated by a smaller and more rostral population of Amb neurons (~15 neurons in right and left Amb, ~30 total) we designate ACP (ambiguus cardiopulmonary). Like ACV neurons, ACP neurons project to and regulate cholinergic cardiac ganglion neurons that slow the SA and AV nodes, although through a distinct subset of cardiac ganglion neurons intermingled with those innervated by ACV. However, the most surprising and significant feature of ACP neurons is that they additionally project to and activate cholinergic pulmonary ganglion neurons that drive bronchoconstriction. Remarkably, single ACP neurons innervate both heart and lung, a rare example of a neuron that sends efferent projections to multiple organs. ACP neurons are specifically activated by the dive reflex, and thereby mediate the coordinated reduction in both cardiac and pulmonary function to conserve myocardial oxygen consumption and possibly protect the lungs while redistributing air from conducting to diffusing air spaces during water immersion.
The ACV circuit might be deployed during other states requiring a cardiac-specific parasympathetic output4 such as expiration (respiratory sinus arrhythmia), detection of noxious stimuli or ischemia in cardiac ventricles (Bezold-Jarisch reflex), non-REM sleep, and various emotional states. The baroreceptor reflex may be the ancestral function of the ACV circuit, given the widespread conservation of this reflex in both terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates30. The dive reflex is widely conserved in terrestrial vertebrates31, suggesting ACP neurons arose after ACV neurons, but soon after the transition to land. Indeed, this may be the ancestral function of ACP neurons because the dive reflex would have been especially valuable in early terrestrial intermediates moving between sea and land. A priority will be to identify other physiological states that engage the ACV and ACP cell types in addition to the canonical functions described here.
The identification of ACV and ACP could inform novel therapeutic approaches. While the cardiac sympathetic system can be therapeutically targeted by β-blockers with relative cardioselectivity, the cardiac parasympathetic system has resisted such targeting due to the challenges of developing muscarinic subtype-specific compounds32. Impaired parasympathetic signaling to the heart is independently associated with sudden cardiac death in patients with a history of myocardial infarction7, patients with heart failure8, and in otherwise healthy adults9. Hyperactivity or impairment in this pathway is also thought to drive baroreceptor reflex dysfunction in certain neurological disorders21. Thus, the molecular identification of ACV neurons and their distinct receptor profile could enable novel therapeutics that specifically target the pathological baroreceptor reflex circuit in cardiovascular and neurological disease. Another priority is to investigate whether the ACP circuit contributes to reflex bronchoconstriction33, pathological cardiorespiratory reflexes such as the Cushing reflex24, or to asthma, a disease in which airway and cardiac vagal hyperreactivity can co-occur34, and to target ACP neurons accordingly.
Finally, the discovery of the ACV and ACP circuits provides a cellular resolution glimpse into how the central autonomic nervous system is organized to coordinate intra-organ as well as inter-organ physiology. It is now important to employ the approach described here to molecularly and functionally identify the central parasympathetic and sympathetic neurons and circuits that control all organs, an effort that will be aided by the general parasympathetic gene signature described here. Elucidating these circuits could allow precision control of specific organs, reflexes, or combinations of organs in health and disease.
Methods
Mice
Wild-type mice were C57BL/6NCrl obtained from Charles River (strain 027). Calb1-IRES2-Cre knock-in mice36 and Calb1-2A-dgCre-D knock-in mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (stock 028532 and 023531), and mice heterozygous for these alleles were used for experiments. Ghsr-IRES-Cre knock-in mice37 were generously provided by J. Zigman; although variability between mice in Cre recombination efficiency has been reported for this line37, we used mice homozygous for the GhsrCre allele for all experiments to increase Cre expression and recombination efficiency, and only analyzed mice in which recombination occurred and the expected BChE+ (ACV) neurons were labeled with AAV-encoded eYFP. Male or female mice were used for all experiments. Mice were housed and bred in the animal facility at Stanford University in accordance with Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidance and were maintained on a 12-h light–dark cycle with food and water provided ad libitum. All mouse experiments were approved by the Stanford University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Retrograde labeling of AmbCardiac neurons
To label Amb heart-innervating neurons for subsequent single cell RNAseq or immunostaining, cholera toxin B (CTB) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 or 555 (Invitrogen C22841 or C22843), which has previously been used to label AmbCardiac neurons10, was injected into the right atrial pericardial space of postnatal day 1 (P1) wild type mice. Mice were deeply anesthetized by hypothermia by placing them on a latex-covered ice block for 5–7 minutes. Analgesia was administered using buprenorphine (0.025 – 0.05 mg/kg, SC). Mice were maintained on the ice block and a ventral incision was made in the skin overlying the right ribcage using surgical scissors. A thoracotomy was performed between the ribs overlying the right atrium using surgical scissors. A pulled glass micropipette (Drummond 5–000-2005) filled with 1% CTB conjugate (diluted in PBS + 0.05% Fast Green dye) was inserted under the pericardium and 1 uL of solution was injected using a syringe pump (World Precision Instruments UMP3) at 10 nL/s to fill the pericardial sac, while any visible leakage of CTB out of the injection site was removed with a surgical spear. The incision was closed with a suture. Mice recovered on a 37°C heating pad until the righting reflex was regained, typically within two minutes, and then were returned to the litter.
Retrograde labeling was observed in a stereotyped distribution in the “external formation” of Amb. As noted by others for rats10, labeling was occasionally observed in the “compact formation” of Amb, which contains esophageal motor neurons38. This labeling likely results from leakage from the pericardium into the adjacent esophagus after surgery, so labeled neurons in the Amb compact formation were avoided when isolating neurons for single cell RNAseq. The ACP marker Calbindin was not expressed in the compact formation of Amb (Fig. 2c,e and Allen Brain Atlas), validating this approach.
Retrograde labeling of AmbLaryngeal neurons
CTB-488 or −555 was injected bilaterally into the cricothyroid muscles of P1 wild type mice. Mice were deeply anesthetized by hypothermia and analgesia was administered using buprenorphine (0.025 – 0.05 mg/kg, SC). A ventral incision was made in the skin overlying the larynx and the fat pads and sternohyoid muscles were dissected away to reveal the cricothyroid muscles. A fine glass micropipette filled with CTB conjugate was inserted into the muscle and 10 nL of solution was injected over 1 minute to fill each cricothyroid muscle. The skin was sealed with VetBond tissue adhesive (3M). Mice recovered on a heating pad until the righting reflex was regained and then returned to the litter. 1–3 days after injection, ~28 neurons were labeled in the Amb “external formation”, exclusively in the rostral compartment below the compact formation. This distribution in the mouse Amb is similar to the observed distribution in rats38.
Isolation of AmbCardiac and AmbLaryngeal neurons for single cell RNAseq
P1 wild type C57BL/6NCrl mice (n = 28 mice) were injected with 1 uL CTB-488 or −555 into the pericardial space, and 16 other mice of the same age and genotype were injected with 10 nL CTB-488 or −555 into the cricothyroid muscle. P2–4 mice were anesthetized with saturating vapors of isoflurane and rapidly decapitated. The brain was immediately placed in cold (4°C) physiological artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF)39 containing (in mM): 124 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1.5 CaCl2, 1 MgSO4, 25 NaHCO3, 0.5 NaH2PO4, and 30 D-glucose, equilibrated with 95% O2 and 5% CO2 (pH=7.4). Brains were embedded in 4% low melting point agarose (Invitrogen 16520050) and 220 μm sagittal slices were cut on a vibratome (Leica Biosystems) while the aCSF bath was maintained at 4°C with continuous equilibration. Slices were transferred to an electrophysiology rig equipped with an upright fluorescent microscope (Leica) and maintained for up to 4 hours in the same aCSF solution at 22°C (neonatal medullary slices of the same region remain healthy for at least 4 hours, as measured by maintenance of a physiological breathing rhythm40). Borosilicate capillaries (Sutter Instrument B150-86-10) pulled to a large bore diameter (~1/4–1/3 soma diameter) were lowered onto fluorescent Amb neurons near the surface of the slice and a seal was obtained on a labeled neuron. Gentle suction was applied by syringe to aspirate the soma out of the brain slice. Immediately after extraction and while still attached to the pipette, each aspirated cell was inspected under alternating fluorescent and brightfield illumination using the 40x objective to ensure that no other cells or visible debris were attached to the neuron or the pipette. The neuron was then immediately expelled into 4 μL lysis buffer41, snap frozen and stored at −80°C until cDNA synthesis.
Single cell RNAseq
cDNA synthesis was performed using the plate-based SmartSeq2 protocol41, with 20 cycles of amplification during the PCR step. Amplified cDNA was purified twice with 0.7x AMPure beads (Fisher A63881). cDNA quality and concentration were then assessed by capillary electrophoresis on a Fragment analyzer (AATI) before sequencing library preparation. Illumina sequencing libraries for cDNA from single cells were prepared as previously described41. Briefly, cDNA libraries were prepared using the Nextera XT Library Sample Preparation kit (Illumina, FC-131–1096). Nextera tagmentation DNA buffer (Illumina) and Tn5 enzyme (Illumina) were added, and the sample was incubated at 55°C for 10 minutes. The reaction was neutralized by adding “Neutralize Tagment Buffer” (Illumina) and centrifuging at room temperature at 3,220 × g for 5 minutes. Samples were then indexed via PCR by adding i5 indexing primer, i7 indexing primer, and Nextera NPM mix (Illumina). Following cDNA sequencing library preparation, wells of each library plate were pooled using a Mosquito liquid handler (TTP Labtech), then purified twice using 0.7x AMPure beads. Libraries were sequenced on a NextSeq 500 (Illumina) using 75bp paired-end sequencing.
Single cell RNAseq data analysis
cDNA sequencing reads from the the obtained AmbCardiac (191) and AmbLaryngeal (77) neurons were pruned for low nucleotide quality scores and adapter sequences using Skewer42 (version 0.2.2), and aligned to the mm10 genome using STAR43 (version 2.6.1d) in two-pass mapping mode, in which the first pass identifies novel splice junctions and the second pass aligns reads after rebuilding the genome index with the novel junctions. Neurons with less than 500,000 aligned reads or more than 1800 counts of the glial gene Apoe indicating significant glial mRNA contamination were removed from the analysis before clustering, resulting in 151 AmbCardiac neurons and 52 AmbLaryngeal neurons with high quality transcriptomes (mean: 1.9 million reads and 7761 genes detected per cell) (Extended Data Fig. 2a–c).
Using Seurat v3.1.4 (https://satijalab.org/seurat/), read counts per gene were normalized across cells, scaled per 10,000 and converted to log scale using the ‘NormalizeData’ function. These values were converted to z-scores using the ‘ScaleData’ command and highly variable genes were selected with the ‘FindVariableFeatures’ function (dispersion function: LogVMR). Principal components were calculated for these selected genes using the ‘RunPCA’ command. Clusters of cells with similar expression profiles were detected using the Louvain method for community detection including only biologically meaningful principal components (see below) to construct the shared nearest neighbor map, as implemented in the ‘FindClusters’ function (resolution: 0.4). Differentially-expressed genes for each defined cluster were identified using the ‘FindMarkers’ command in Seurat using the Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Although all neurons that passed quality control expressed high levels of neuronal-specific genes (Extended Data Fig. 2d), they also contained low levels of glial transcripts (Extended Data Fig. 2e) presumably from attached glial mRNA, processes, or cells that were not visible under a 40x objective. To exclude such non-neuronal genes from the clustering, principal components containing non-neuronal genes were excluded. The 3 identified neuronal clusters had similarly low levels of glial gene expression (Extended Data Fig. 2e), indicating that these genes did not drive clustering. In addition, all differentially expressed genes between neuronal types (Supplementary Tables 1–6) examined in the Allen Brain Atlas or localized by in situ labeling in this paper were expressed in Amb neurons and not glia, further demonstrating that the AmbCardiac, AmbLaryngeal, ACP, and ACV cell types were separated based on Amb neuronal genes. Although scRNAseq was performed at an early postnatal time point at which cardiac parasympathetic innervation is occurring44, ACP and ACV marker expression was conserved between neonatal and adult time points as assayed by immunostaining (Extended Data Fig. 4) and the Allen Brain Atlas (Supplementary Table 6); however, there may be subtle changes in gene expression not detected by these methods.
AAV cloning, injections, and fiber optic implantations
To optimize AAV transduction efficiency, we tested major serotypes that target neurons (AAV1, 6, 8, 9, DJ) and found that AAV6 gave the best transduction of Amb neurons. We also tested three different promoters (Ef1a, hSyn, CAG) and found that CAG gave the best expression in Amb neurons. The recombinant adeno-associated viral vector AAV6-CAG-DIO-bReaChES-TS-eYFP, used for projection mapping experiments (denoted as AAV-DIO-eYFP) and optogenetic experiments (denoted as AAV-DIO-bReaChES), was produced by replacing the ChR2-eYFP sequence in pAAV-CAG-DIO-ChR2(H134R)-eYFP (Addgene #127090) with the sequence for bReaChES-TS-eYFP, a red-shifted channelrhodopsin18, and virions were produced at the Janelia Viral Tools facility (3.21×1012 viral genomes per mL). The same AAV-injected mice used for optogenetic experiments (Figs. 4, 6) were subsequently used for projection mapping (Figs. 3, 6) by visualizing the eYFP-tagged neuronal terminals as detailed below. One Calb1Cre mouse injected into Amb with AAV6-CAG-Flex-GFP (UNC Vector Core, 3×1012 viral genomes per mL) was included in the Fig. 6 ACP lung projection mapping experiments.
Adult mice (> 6 weeks of age) were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane (for induction, and 1–2% for maintenance) for AAV injections. Anesthetized mice were placed in a stereotactic instrument (David Kopf Instruments, Model 940), with body temperature maintained at 37°C using a feedback-controlled heating pad (Physitemp, TCAT-2LV). Mice were pre-treated with analgesic (carprofen 5 mg/kg SC and buprenorphine SR 0.5–1.0 mg/kg SC). To target ACP neurons in the rostral Amb, 400 nL AAV vector was injected into Calb1Cre mice at the following stereotactic coordinates: 2.4 mm caudal to lambda, ±1.33 mm lateral to lambda, 4.9 mm ventral to the brain surface. To target ACV neurons in the caudal Amb, 500 nL AAV vector was injected into GhsrCre mice at 2.95 mm caudal to lambda, ±1.3 mm lateral to lambda, 4.8 mm ventral to the brain surface. Immediately following AAV injection, a fiber optic cannula (Thorlabs CFM12L05–10) was implanted 350 μm (ACP) or 500 μm (ACV) above the injection site and secured to the skull with dental cement (Parkell C&B Metabond). Mice in which the AAV transgene was not expressed in Amb neurons were excluded from analysis (with the exception of Extended Data Fig. 7e–h where we specifically characterized the non-Amb neurons). Mice recovered for 2–4 weeks before optogenetic and projection mapping experiments.
Optogenetic stimulation with ECG
Mice injected with AAV6-CAG-DIO-bReaChES-TS-eYFP and recovered as above were anesthetized with isoflurane (3% induction, 1–2% maintenance) and body temperature maintained at 37°C. Single lead ECG was recorded using needle electrodes (ADInstruments MLA1213), an ADInstruments Octal Bio Amp, and an ADInstruments PowerLab data acquisition system. Respiration was simultaneously recorded using a spirometer (ADInstruments). The implanted fiber optic cannula was connected using a fiber optic cable (Thorlabs M77L01) to a 577 nm laser (CNI Laser). Laser light was delivered using the following parameters: 10–15 mW power from the fiber tip, 10 ms pulse width, 40 Hz. To assess the role of muscarinic receptors, atropine (Sigma A0132, dissolved at 50 mg/mL in ethanol, then prepared as a 0.5 mg/mL working solution in PBS) was administered (10 mg/kg, I.P.) and optogenetic stimulation was repeated 20 minutes later. To calculate the percent change in heart rate, the minimum sinus rate (60 divided by the P-P interval in seconds) during stimulation was subtracted from the sinus rate immediately before stimulation and divided by the pre-stimulation sinus rate. To calculate the percent change in P-R interval, the P-R interval immediately before stimulation was subtracted from the maximum P-R interval during stimulation and divided by the pre-stimulation P-R interval.
Optogenetic stimulation with respiratory mechanics and ECG
Mice injected with AAV6-CAG-DIO-bReaChES-TS-eYFP and recovered for 3–4 weeks as above were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane, tracheostomized with an 18G cannula, and attached to the Flexivent (SCIREQ) as previously described45. Core temperature was maintained at 36–37°C with a heating pad, with the Flexivent delivering 1–2% isoflurane in pure oxygen. The mice were ventilated at 10 mL/kg at 150 breaths/minute with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) set at 3 cm H2O. ECG was recorded as described above. Prior to the evaluation of respiratory mechanics, mice were paralyzed with vecuronium bromide (Sigma 76904, 0.1–0.2 mg/kg i.p.) to stabilize the airways and eliminate breathing efforts. Vecuronium was used due to its lack of vagolytic properties. The compliance, elastance, and overall resistance of the respiratory system (Rrs) were measured every 3 seconds with the Snapshot-150 maneuver before, after, and during optogenetic stimulation (10 s, 20 Hz), with the entire trial lasting ~50 seconds. The trial was repeated 20 minutes after atropine (10 mg/kg, I.P.) delivery. To calculate the relative change in Rrs, the difference between the maximum Rrs value obtained during optogenetic stimulation and the average baseline Rrs was divided by the average baseline Rrs, which was defined as the average of the Rrs values measured in the 10 seconds prior to optogenetic stimulation.
Induction of baroreceptor reflex and dive reflex
Wild-type juvenile (postnatal day 21) mice were used for all baroreceptor and dive reflex experiments because the dive reflex is more pronounced earlier in life27. To induce the baroreceptor reflex, awake mice in their home cage were either injected with phenylephrine (10 mg/kg, I.P.) (Tocris 2838, dissolved in PBS) to induce peripheral vasoconstriction, or with PBS vehicle as control. Mice remained in their home cages and were transcardially perfused 150 minutes following injection, to allow time for pressor effects and baroreflex activation (~20 min)46 and c-Fos protein expression (~120 min)47, and brains were then fixed and immunostained for neuronal activity markers as described below. In control studies, we found that ACP neurons were not activated by phenylephrine injection 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes before perfusion (Extended Data Fig. 9), the same result obtained at the 150 minute time point (Fig. 5), consistent with prior studies showing rostral Amb neurons are not barosensitive48.
To induce the dive reflex, mice were first anesthetized with isoflurane (3% induction, 2% maintenance) and maintained on a 37°C heating pad while recording single-lead ECG, and then subjected to nasal immersion. Anesthetized mice in the Dive condition received a total of 10 nasal immersions in thermoneutral (~30°C) water (every 3 minutes over a 30-minute period). Immersions lasted between 5–10 s and were terminated when stable reflex bradycardia was observed on the ECG recording. Similar water temperature and dive immersion times have been used for dive reflex studies in awake rats49 and mice50. Isoflurane control mice were anesthetized and maintained identically without nasal immersions. All mice remained under anesthesia continuously until transcardial perfusion 120 minutes after completion of the 30 min dive period, and brains were then fixed and immunostained for neuronal activity markers as described below.
Classical neuroanatomical and ablation studies localized the key neurons controlling the baroreceptor and dive reflexes to AmbCardiac neurons20,27 and excluded contributions from other brainstem nuclei, consistent with our optogenetic stimulation, activity mapping, and neuroanatomical data. However, despite optimization of the AAV vector and promoter (see Methods, above, AAV cloning, injections, and fiber optic implantations) we were unable to achieve the high transduction efficiencies necessary to demonstrate a requirement for ACV and ACP in the baroreceptor and dive reflexes and formally exclude a contribution from the non-activated AmbCardiac cell type, since activation of small subsets of ACP or ACV (20–40% unilaterally) is sufficient to reproduce reflex bradycardia (Fig. 4, Extended Data Fig. 5d), whereas our AAV transduction efficiencies for ACP and ACV were 60% and 20% (Extended Data Fig. 5d).
Brain and heart immunostaining
Mice were euthanized with CO2, transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), and tissues were post-fixed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C. Brains and hearts were cryoprotected in 30% sucrose at 4°C overnight. Cryoprotected tissue was embedded in optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound and sectioned at 25 μm (Leica CM3050S cryostat). Sections were permeabilized in PBS + 0.3% Triton X-100, blocked for 1 h in block buffer (PBS + 0.3% Triton + 10% normal donkey serum), and incubated with primary antibodies in block buffer at 4°C overnight. Slides were washed three times, incubated in secondary antibodies in block buffer for 1 h at room temperature, washed three times and a coverslip was applied with Prolong Gold antifade reagent. Primary antibodies used in this study were: Rabbit anti-Calbindin (Swant CB38, 1:2000), Chicken anti-Calbindin (Novus Biologicals NBP2–50028, 1:1000), Goat anti-BchE (R&D Systems AF9024, 1:100), Chicken anti-GFP (Aves Labs GFP-1010, 1:1000), Goat anti-VAChT (Millipore ABN100, 1:500), Rabbit anti-c-Fos (Synaptic Systems 226 003, 1:5000). Species-specific donkey secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, 568, or 647 were obtained from Life Technologies or Jackson ImmunoResearch and used at a 1:500 dilution. Stained neurons were counted manually from z-stacks acquired on a Zeiss LSM 780 confocal microscope. The presence or absence of Calbindin was used to differentiate ACP and ACV neurons (punctate background Calbindin staining outside of ACP and ACV neurons is likely Calbindin+ fibers coursing through medulla). ACP neurons were defined histologically as Calbindin-positive cell bodies with low BChE expression (distinguishing them from Calbindin-positive interneurons in the pre-Bӧtzinger complex, which express no BChE). ACV neurons were defined as BChE-positive, Calbindin-negative cell bodies. For smFISH, sections were processed with a RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Assay v2 kit (Advanced Cell Diagnostics) according to manufacturer instructions with the probe Mm-Ghsr-C2 (426141-C2) and immunostaining was performed afterwards as above. For c-Fos experiments, control and stimulus samples were processed and imaged together in the same immunostaining experiment to minimize variability.
For cardiac immunostaining, due to anatomical variability in ganglia locations, ganglia were divided into ganglionated plexuses (GPs) in four quadrants to compare innervation patterns across animals. To estimate the proportion of GP neurons innervated by a given cell type (Extended Data Fig. 6a), the observed proportion of innervated cells (innervated neurons / total GP neurons) was divided by the labeling efficiency of the cell type (eYFP+ cell bodies / total cell bodies of cell type on given side). For clonal labeling analysis of ACP terminals in the heart, every fourth section of cardiac ganglia was stained, and ganglion neuron counts were multiplied by four.
Lung immunostaining
Lungs were collected and immunostained as previously described51. Briefly, mouse lungs were perfused and inflated with 2% low melting point agarose (Invitrogen) before fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA)/PBS at 4°C for 6 hours or overnight. Vibratome sections (300–350 μm) of individual lobes were blocked in PBS with 3% BSA, 5% normal donkey serum, and 0.5% Triton-X and incubated at 4°C with primary and secondary antibodies for three and two nights respectively. Following staining, the sections were dehydrated in methanol and cleared with benzyl alcohol:benzyl benzoate (BABB) for imaging. The following primary antibodies were used: 1:500 rabbit anti-Calbindin (Swant CB38a), 1:100 goat anti-ChAT (Millipore AB144P), 1:500 chicken anti-GFP (Aves GFP-1010), and 1:300 mouse anti-Tuj1 (Covance MMS-435P or R&D MAB1195). All Alexa-Fluor-conjugated, species-specific secondary antibodies from Jackson ImmunoResearch or Invitrogen were used at 1:250. Ganglia in extrapulmonary airways were not examined.
Clonal labeling of ACP neurons
For clonal labeling of ACP neurons, multiple AAV-based approaches were tested in parallel to reduce the efficiency of ACP neuron labeling and increase the likelihood of labeling just a single ACP neuron. To determine whether a single ACP neuron had been labeled, one month after AAV injection sagittal sections (25 μm) of the entire Amb including >150 μm of laterally surrounding tissue were immunostained for GFP and robust ACP and ACV markers (Calbindin and BChE). Each tissue section (25 μm, ~15 sections per Amb) was optically sectioned (~4 μm) and systematically scanned for labeled ACP cell bodies (typical diameter: ~20 μm). We excluded any mouse (n = 10 mice excluded) in which any brainstem section contained a fold, damage, or inadequate staining, because a labeled cell in the affected area could have been missed. All ACP neurons were counted by examining each optical section from all tissue sections, and only mice in which all Amb sections were intact (n = 48 mice) and only a single ACP neuron was labeled with GFP (n = 3 of 48 mice) were included in the analysis. For Clone #1 (Fig. 6m–o), 200 nL of AAV6-CAG-FLEX-ArchT-GFP (UNC Vector Core, 5×1012 viral genomes per mL) (denoted AAV-FLEX-GFP) was injected into the rostral Amb of Calb12a-dgCre mice, which were then injected with 200 mg/kg trimethoprim (IP) five days later and sacrificed one month after AAV injection. Of the 21 injected mice, only one contained a single labeled ACP neuron (in left Amb). Clone #2 (Extended Data Fig. 10a–c) was identified in a rare case in which injection of AAV6-CAG-DIO-bReaChES-TS-eYFP (denoted AAV-DIO-eYFP) in a GhsrCre mouse labeled a single ACP neuron (in right Amb). For Clone #3 (Extended Data Fig. 10d–f), 50 nL of AAV6-CAG-FLEX-ArchT-GFP was injected into the rostral Amb of Calb1Cre mice. Of the 37 injected mice, only one contained a single labeled ACP neuron (in left Amb).
Statistics and data collection
All results are presented as mean ± S.D. with all data points displayed. All statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism. All statistical tests used are listed at the end of each figure legend. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. Mice were randomized to reflex groups and then randomized to control or stimulus conditions. No blinding was used for data collection. All physiological recordings were analyzed with the same automated scripts applied to all mice.
Extended Data
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Brian Hsueh for advice on optogenetics and assistance with pilot experiments, and Kevin Yackle for guidance on neuron aspiration for single cell RNAseq. We also thank Jeffrey Zigman for providing the Ghsr-IRES-Cre mouse line, Kim Ritola and the Janelia Viral Tools facility for producing the bReaChES vector, Andrew Olson and the Stanford Neuroscience Microscopy Service (supported by NIH NS069375) for providing an electrophysiology rig, the Stanford Functional Genomics Facility for providing sequencing services, and the Stanford Research Computing Center for providing computational resources through the Sherlock cluster. We thank Kyle Travaglini for discussions on single cell RNAseq analysis, Stephen Chang for discussions on ECG traces, and the Krasnow Lab for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript. A.V. was supported by the Stanford Medical Scientist Training Program and a Lubert Stryer Bio-X Stanford Interdisciplinary Graduate Fellowship, A.R.Y. by a Walter V. and Idun Berry Fellowship, and Y.L. by a Damon Runyon Fellowship. M.A.K. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
Footnotes
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability
Singe cell RNA sequencing data from AmbCardiac and AmbLaryngeal neurons is available on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO accession number GSE198709).
References
- 1.Langley JN The autonomic nervous system. (W. Heffer & Sons, Ltd., 1921). [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ernsberger U & Rohrer H Sympathetic tales: subdivisons of the autonomic nervous system and the impact of developmental studies. Neural Dev 13, 20 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Tao J et al. Highly selective brain-to-gut communication via genetically defined vagus neurons. Neuron (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Palma JA & Benarroch EE Neural control of the heart: recent concepts and clinical correlations. Neurology 83, 261–271 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Appel ML, Berger RD, Saul JP, Smith JM & Cohen RJ Beat to beat variability in cardiovascular variables: noise or music? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 14, 1139–1148 (1989). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gourine AV, Machhada A, Trapp S & Spyer KM Cardiac vagal preganglionic neurones: An update. Auton. Neurosci 199, 24–28 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.La Rovere MT, Bigger JT Jr., Marcus FI, Mortara A & Schwartz PJ Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators. Lancet 351, 478–484 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mortara A et al. Arterial baroreflex modulation of heart rate in chronic heart failure: clinical and hemodynamic correlates and prognostic implications. Circulation 96, 3450–3458 (1997). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jouven X et al. Heart-rate profile during exercise as a predictor of sudden death. N. Engl. J. Med 352, 1951–1958 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Panneton WM, Anch AM, Panneton WM & Gan Q Parasympathetic preganglionic cardiac motoneurons labeled after voluntary diving. Front. Physiol 5, 8 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Massari VJ, Johnson TA, Llewellyn-Smith IJ & Gatti PJ Substance P nerve terminals synapse upon negative chronotropic vagal motoneurons. Brain Res. 660, 275–287 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bennett JA, Kidd C, Latif AB & McWilliam PN A horseradish peroxidase study of vagal motoneurones with axons in cardiac and pulmonary branches of the cat and dog. Q. J. Exp. Physiol 66, 145–154 (1981). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lee BH, Lynn RB, Lee HS, Miselis RR & Altschuler SM Calcitonin gene-related peptide in nucleus ambiguus motoneurons in rat: viscerotopic organization. J. Comp. Neurol 320, 531–543 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Muller D et al. Dlk1 promotes a fast motor neuron biophysical signature required for peak force execution. Science 343, 1264–1266 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lein ES et al. Genome-wide atlas of gene expression in the adult mouse brain. Nature 445, 168–176 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cordes SP Molecular genetics of cranial nerve development in mouse. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 2, 611–623 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rajendran PS et al. Identification of peripheral neural circuits that regulate heart rate using optogenetic and viral vector strategies. Nat Commun 10, 1944 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rajasethupathy P et al. Projections from neocortex mediate top-down control of memory retrieval. Nature 526, 653–659 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Hamlin RL & Smith CR Effects of vagal stimulation on S-A and A-V nodes. Am. J. Physiol 215, 560–568 (1968). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cheng Z, Zhang H, Yu J, Wurster RD & Gozal D Attenuation of baroreflex sensitivity after domoic acid lesion of the nucleus ambiguus of rats. J Appl Physiol (1985) 96, 1137–1145 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kaufmann H, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L & Palma JA Baroreflex dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med 382, 163–178 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wehrwein EA & Joyner MJ Regulation of blood pressure by the arterial baroreflex and autonomic nervous system. Handb. Clin. Neurol 117, 89–102 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.McAllen RM & Spyer KM The location of cardiac vagal preganglionic motoneurones in the medulla of the cat. J. Physiol 258, 187–204 (1976). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arrigo M & Huber LC Eponyms in cardiopulmonary reflexes. Am. J. Cardiol 112, 449–453 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Undem BJ, Myers AC, Barthlow H & Weinreich D Vagal innervation of guinea pig bronchial smooth muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985) 69, 1336–1346 (1990). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Haselton JR, Solomon IC, Motekaitis AM & Kaufman MP Bronchomotor vagal preganglionic cell bodies in the dog: an anatomic and functional study. J Appl Physiol (1985) 73, 1122–1129 (1992). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Panneton WM & Gan Q The Mammalian Diving Response: Inroads to Its Neural Control. Front. Neurosci 14, 524 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mukhtar MR & Patrick JM Bronchoconstriction: a component of the ‘diving response’ in man. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol 53, 155–158 (1984). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mazzone SB & Canning BJ Evidence for differential reflex regulation of cholinergic and noncholinergic parasympathetic nerves innervating the airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165, 1076–1083 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Armelin VA et al. The baroreflex in aquatic and amphibious teleosts: Does terrestriality represent a significant driving force for the evolution of a more effective baroreflex in vertebrates? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol 255, 110916 (2021). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Andersen HT Physiological adaptations in diving vertebrates. Physiol. Rev 46, 212–243 (1966). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Saternos HC et al. Distribution and function of the muscarinic receptor subtypes in the cardiovascular system. Physiol. Genomics 50, 1–9 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee LY & Pisarri TE Afferent properties and reflex functions of bronchopulmonary C-fibers. Respir. Physiol 125, 47–65 (2001). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sturani C, Sturani A & Tosi I Parasympathetic activity assessed by diving reflex and by airway response to methacholine in bronchial asthma and rhinitis. Respiration 48, 321–328 (1985). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Paxinos G, Franklin KBJ The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, Second Edition. (Academic Press, 2001). [Google Scholar]
- 36.Daigle TL et al. A suite of transgenic driver and reporter mouse lines with enhanced brain-cell-type targeting and functionality. Cell 174, 465–480 e422 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mani BK et al. The role of ghrelin-responsive mediobasal hypothalamic neurons in mediating feeding responses to fasting. Mol Metab 6, 882–896 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bieger D & Hopkins DA Viscerotopic representation of the upper alimentary tract in the medulla oblongata in the rat: the nucleus ambiguus. J. Comp. Neurol 262, 546–562 (1987). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yackle K et al. Breathing control center neurons that promote arousal in mice. Science 355, 1411–1415 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang X, Hayes JA, Picardo MC & Del Negro CA Automated cell-specific laser detection and ablation of neural circuits in neonatal brain tissue. J. Physiol 591, 2393–2401 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tabula Muris C et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of 20 mouse organs creates a Tabula Muris. Nature 562, 367–372 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jiang H, Lei R, Ding SW & Zhu S Skewer: a fast and accurate adapter trimmer for next-generation sequencing paired-end reads. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 182 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dobin A et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fregoso SP & Hoover DB Development of cardiac parasympathetic neurons, glial cells, and regional cholinergic innervation of the mouse heart. Neuroscience 221, 28–36 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McGovern TK, Robichaud A, Fereydoonzad L, Schuessler TF & Martin JG Evaluation of respiratory system mechanics in mice using the forced oscillation technique. J Vis Exp, e50172 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tang JM et al. Response Gene to Complement 32 Maintains Blood Pressure Homeostasis by Regulating alpha-Adrenergic Receptor Expression. Circ. Res 123, 1080–1090 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Kovacs KJ Measurement of immediate-early gene activation- c-fos and beyond. J. Neuroendocrinol 20, 665–672 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.McAllen RM & Spyer KM Two types of vagal preganglionic motoneurones projecting to the heart and lungs. J. Physiol 282, 353–364 (1978). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.McCulloch PF Training rats to voluntarily dive underwater: investigations of the mammalian diving response. J Vis Exp, e52093 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hult EM, Bingaman MJ & Swoap SJ A robust diving response in the laboratory mouse. J. Comp. Physiol. B 189, 685–692 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Desai TJ, Brownfield DG & Krasnow MA Alveolar progenitor and stem cells in lung development, renewal and cancer. Nature 507, 190–194 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bron R, Yin L, Russo D & Furness JB Expression of the ghrelin receptor gene in neurons of the medulla oblongata of the rat. J. Comp. Neurol 521, 2680–2702 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Sherman D, Worrell JW, Cui Y & Feldman JL Optogenetic perturbation of preBotzinger complex inhibitory neurons modulates respiratory pattern. Nat. Neurosci 18, 408–414 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Singe cell RNA sequencing data from AmbCardiac and AmbLaryngeal neurons is available on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO accession number GSE198709).