ABSTRACT
Pemphigus vulgaris is a rare autoimmune mucocutaneous blistering disease clinically presenting as vesicles, bullae, and erosion and histologically characterized by suprabasal split and acantholysis. It usually affects mucous membranes and skin. Recurrent oral ulcers can only be the clinical manifestation before progressing into skin lesions. This can lead to the delayed diagnosis of this disease. Here we report a case of pemphigus vulgaris which was diagnosed after years of suffering from an oral ulcer that eventually progressed to widespread skin blistering and ulceration. The patient was treated with oral prednisolone which showed improvement within a week. Physicians should consider the differential diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris in patients presenting with a recurrent oral ulcer.
Keywords: delayed diagnosis, oral ulcer, pemphigus vulgaris
INTRODUCTION
Pemphigus includes a group of chronic autoimmune blistering diseases. Pemphigus vulgaris is the commonest one that affects the skin and mucous membrane. The oral cavity is the most commonly involved and initial site of this disease.1 Recurrent oral ulcer can be the only early manifestation of this disease which can lead to diagnostic confusion and delay in management.2 We present the case of full-blown cutaneous lesion of pemphigus vulgaris after one and half years of recurrent oral ulcer.
CASE REPORT
A 27-year-old male patient presented with chief complaints of fluid-filled blisters on the skin (Figure 1) followed by ulceration involving widespread areas of the body for 3 months. On the careful assessment of past history, the patient was suffering from a painful oral ulcer for one and half years which caused him difficulty swallowing. He had suffered a weight loss of 8 kg due to limited intake of food due to painful swallowing. Other comorbidities include diabetes mellitus for 2 years controlled with insulin. Past dental and personal history was non-contributory. He did receive antiseptic gel and oral analgesics for oral ulcers without any improvement.
Figure 1. Clear fluid-filled blister.
On general examination, the patient is moderately built, and all his vital signs were within normal limits. On oral examination, there were multiple intraoral ulcers over the soft palate, and hard palate (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Oral cavity ulcers in soft and hard palate.
Fluid-filled vesicles were not seen in the mouth. There were widespread ulcers covered with crusts over the whole body including the scalp, back and genitalia (Figure 3 A, B, C). Nikolsky's sign was positive.
Figure 3. A) Ruptured blister with crust in scalp, B) Ruptured blister in Back and C) Ruptured blisters in Penis.
A provisional diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris was made. The list of differential diagnoses included bullous pemphigoid and bullous systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A skin biopsy of the lesion was performed from the left lower leg under local anesthesia and sent for histopathology. Histopathological examination revealed suprabasal split and acantholysis with few inflammatory cells. Based on clinical and histopathological findings a final diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris was made. Antinuclear antibody was negative.
The patient was treated with oral prednisolone 1mg/kg/ day. The patient showed improvement within weeks of starting treatment. The patient was discharged on the 10th day on request and was scheduled for follow-up after 2 weeks. Gradual tapering of the steroid dose was planned. He didn't come for further follow-up care in our institution.
DISCUSSION
Pemphigus vulgaris is a life-threatening mucocutaneous blistering disease. This disease is rare with a global incidence of 0.1-0.5 per 100,000 per year with a higher incidence in Ashkenazi Jews, Japanese, and populations of Mediterranean ancestry.3 The disease is mediated by circulating immunoglobulin G autoantibodies against the epithelial cell junction called desmosomal cadherin, desmoglein 1 and 3, resulting in loss of cell adhesion called acantholysis.4
Pemphigus vulgaris predominantly affects the skin and mucus membrane. The mucosa is almost always involved. Oral mucosa is the most common site. The majority of patients only have oral ulcers for which they visit medical professionals.5 This disease can be diagnosed at an early stage but still, diagnostic delays are common in oral pemphigus vulgaris.6 Patients can only have oral ulcers which may cause a delay in diagnosis of this potentially life-threatening condition. The oral ulcer is then followed by skin lesions in most cases.2 Skin involvement causes flaccid blister with clear fluid which eventually ruptures resulting in painful erosion which will be covered by a crust that lacks the tendency to heal. Our patient also had an oral ulcer for one and a half years which then progressed to a skin lesion. Our patient had very few intact blisters and the majority of blisters were ruptured and covered with crusts.
Pemphigus vulgaris typically affects 40-60 years of age.7 Our patient was only 27 years when he was affected. This suggests that we should consider the diagnosis even at an early age. Nikolsky's sign is positive in pemphigus vulgaris which means applying lateral pressure on an intact blister will result in separation of the normal epidermis and extension of the blister.8 Nikolsky's sign was positive in our present case. Histopathologic findings in the pemphigus vulgaris are suprabasal split and acantholysis which was seen in our case.
Pemphigus vulgaris has a mortality rate of 60-90% without treatment.9 Life-threatening complications like sepsis, fluid, and electrolyte imbalance may occur. Corticosteroid is the mainstay treatment of this disease which was used in this case. Alternative treatment includes rituximab and adjuvant therapy like mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine. One of the trial suggested that combination of rituximab and prednisolone over the prednisolone alone as first-line therapy for pemphigus vulgaris.10 The high cost of rituximab limited the use of rituximab in our case. Our patient responded to prednisolone monotherapy.
The delay in the progression from oral to skin lesion made the diagnosis late in our case. An early diagnosis while the patient was suffering from an oral ulcer may have prevented the progression of disease to the cutaneous lesion. All physicians especially dental and otolaryngology doctors should keep differential diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris in patient presenting with recurrent oral ulcer even at an early age.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to acknowledge the patient hirself and his relatives who gave consent for this clinical case report.
Consent:
JNMA Case Report Consent Form was signed by the patient and the original article is attached with the patient's chart.
Conflict of Interest
None.
REFERENCES
- 1.Mustafa MB, Porter SR, Smoller BR, Sitaru C. Oral mucosal manifestations of autoimmune skin diseases. Autoimmun Rev. 2015 Oct;14(10):930–51. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arpita R, Monica A, Venkatesh N, Atul S, Varun M. Oral Pemphigus Vulgaris: Case Report. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2015 Oct;25(4):367–72. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v25i4.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kneisel A, Hertl M. Autoimmune bullous skin diseases. Part 1: Clinical manifestations. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2011 Oct;9(10):844–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2011.07793.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hammers CM, Stanley JR. Mechanisms of Disease: Pemphigus and Bullous Pemphigoid. Annu Rev Pathol. 2016 May 23;11:175–97. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Da Silva K, Mandel L. Early manifestation of pemphigus vulgaris. A case report. N Y State Dent J. 2007 Apr;73(3):42–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Daltaban O, Ozcentik A, Akman Karakas A, Ustun K, Hatipoglu M, Uzun S. Clinical presentation and diagnostic delay in pemphigus vulgaris: A prospective study from Turkey. J Oral Pathol Med. 2020 Aug;49(7):681–6. doi: 10.1111/jop.13052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ingold CJ, Khan MA. StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Jan, [2022 Jun 7; ]. Pemphigus Vulgaris. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Maity S, Banerjee I, Sinha R, Jha H, Ghosh P, Mustafi S. Nikolsky's sign: A pathognomic boon. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Feb;9(2):526–30. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_889_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bystryn JC, Rudolph JL. Pemphigus. Lancet. 2005 Jul 2;366(9479):61–73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66829-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Joly P, Litrowski N. Pemphigus group (vulgaris, vegetans, foliaceus, herpetiformis, brasiliensis). Clin Dermatol. 2011 Aug;29(4):432–6. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]