Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 20.
Published in final edited form as: Essays Biochem. 2020 Sep 4;64(2):251–261. doi: 10.1042/EBC20190080

Meiotic CENP-C is a shepherd: Bridging the space between the centromere and the kinetochore in time and space

Jessica E Fellmeth 1, Kim S McKim 1
PMCID: PMC9299508  NIHMSID: NIHMS1822773  PMID: 32794572

Abstract

While many of the proteins involved in the mitotic centromere and kinetochore are conserved in meiosis, they often gain a novel function due to the unique needs of homolog segregation during meiosis I. CENP-C is a critical component of the centromere for kinetochore assembly in mitosis. Recent work, however, has highlighted the unique features of meiotic CENP-C. Centromere establishment and stability require CENP-C loading at the centromere for CENP-A function. Pre-meiotic loading of proteins necessary for homolog recombination as well as cohesion also rely on CENP-C, as do the main scaffolding components of the kinetochore. Much of this work relies on new technologies that enable in vivo analysis of meiosis like never before. Here we strive to highlight the unique role of this highly conserved centromere protein that loads onto centromeres prior to M-phase onset, but continues to perform critical functions through chromosome segregation. CENP-C is not merely a structural link between the centromere and the kinetochore, but also a functional one joining the processes of early prophase homolog synapsis to late metaphase kinetochore assembly and signaling.

INTRODUCTION

The centromere is a lynchpin for inheritance of the genetic material. During M-phase (mitosis or meiosis) all associated DNA along the chromosome follows its centromere to the specified daughter cell without deviation. Errors in chromosome segregation result in cell aneuploidy which is a hallmark of cancer and a leading cause of development disorders and infertility. Understanding meiotic aneuploidy specifically is a complex task because there isn’t a good ex vivo model (cell culture does not mimic meiosis), therefore much of the work is accomplished in organismal models. In meiosis, the centromere has two main functions: 1) to act during early prophase as a centromere clustering site and potentially a loading zone for homolog synapsis and cohesion 2) during prometaphase and metaphase to act as the attachment site for the transient microtubule-binding kinetochore apparatus.

CENP-A is the histone 3 variant that epigenetically marks the centromere. It is a very stable component of the centromere that is a receptacle of post-translational modifications (from acetylation to methylation, ubiquitylation to phosphorylation) that signal to other centromere components for loading or unloading necessary for supporting the main functions of the centromere (1). CENP-C is a more dynamic centromere protein that is also found localized at the centromeres throughout the cell cycle in both mitosis and meiosis (Figure 1) (27).

Figure 1-. CENP-C localizes at centromeres in all stages of meiosis e in Drosophila.

Figure 1-

EGFP-CENP-C (green) expressed in Drosophila oocytes co-localizes with CID antibody (Red, Drosophila CENP-A). Blue is DNA. Scale bars represent 5μm.

In meiotic cells (specifically Drosophila, budding yeast, and vertebrates) it appears that the majority of centromere-localized proteins (including cohesins and synaptonemal complex components as well as CENP-A itself) load onto centromeres very early, namely in pre-meiotic S-phase or in zygotene of meiosis I (MI) (817). The kinetochore proteins, in contrast, do not do so until prometaphase of MI. The tight regulation of early loaded proteins (CENP-A and cohesins), especially in oocyte meiosis, is accompanied by a stable phenotype where prophase knockdown yields no meiotic phenotype because they are already loaded and stably incorporated (8). Unpublished work from our lab indicates that shRNA’s to cohesin components expressed in late prophase after pachytene do not exhibit cohesion defects indicating the stably loaded complexes are unaffected. On the other hand, prophase knockdown of kinetochore components results in severe meiotic errors. CENP-C seems to bridge this gap. CENP-C has been shown to have a broad range of dynamic loading throughout the cell cycle from interphase through mitosis and meiosis in human cell culture (3), Drosophila cell culture (6, 18), Drosophila embryos (19), and Drosophila oocytes (Figure 1, Fellmeth and McKim unpublished data). It is present on centromeres prior to M-phase onset, but knockdown results in kinetochore and cell cycle failure. Here we focus on recent developments investigating the roles of CENP-C in either the early centromere functions such as centromere establishment and homolog synapsis as well as later tasks such as kinetochore assembly and signaling.

CENTROMERE INSTALLATION AND IDENTITY

During S-phase, the existing CENP-A is segregated equally to each new strand, leaving each chromosome with half the amount that they started with. The cell then uses the existing centromeres as an epigenetic template for re-establishment before the next round of division. CENP-A is typically deposited in a DNA-replication independent manner unlike canonical H3 (2022). Therefore, during replication, the amount of CENP-A nucleosomes per chromosome is halved and the newly inserted nucleosomes contain H3 as a placeholder for later CENP-A incorporation (6, 23, 24). One would not expect vast differences in centromere establishment between mitotic and meiotic cells, because all of these steps occur outside of M-phase. However, there is significant variability in centromere formation across species and even cell types within the same organism. In mitotic cells, the centromere is a necessary loading dock for formation of the kinetochore which in turn is required for accurate chromosome segregation. Clarifying whether these functions remain in meiotic cells is pertinent where the unique needs of homolog synapsis and recombination occur.

The process of centromere renewal occurs in three main steps: 1) licensing, 2) deposition, and 3) stabilization. CENP-C is critical for all three steps and its early loss (prior to centromere re-establishment) results in failure to form functional centromeres while later CENP-C loss (after CENP-A deposition) can lead centromeric instability and dissociation (Figure 2A) (25, 26).

Figure 2-. Model of CENP-C activity throughout meiosis.

Figure 2-

While there is evidence of these proteins in meiotic tissue, the interactions in the vertebrate model depicted here are largely based on mitotic data. A) In vertebrates and fission yeast, CENP-C and MIS18C recruit CENP-A to the centromere via the HJURP/CENP-C/CENP-A complex. In Drosophila, Mis18 is absent and it appears that CAL1 takes over the role of Mis18 and HJURP combined to bring CID and CENP-C together. This meiotic interaction has been confirmed in Drosophila spermatocytes (2, 43, 44). B) CENP-C is important for SC and cohesion assembly which promotes centromere clustering (55). The presence of CENP-C and its interaction with Meikin have been shown in mice (98). C) The CCAN, CENP-C, and MIS12C recruit KNL1C/SPC105R and NDC80C to create a functional kinetochore (122).

  1. Licensing The cell must actively “read” the nucleosomes present along a new chromosome, identify places rich in CENP-A nucleosomes as centromeric regions, and mark them in order to recruit the machinery for deposition of new CENP-A. Centromeric H3 tails contain post-translational modifications different than non-centromeric H3, which also acts as a marker for centromeric chromatin and this potentially acts to recruit the Mis18 complex which is a CENP-A licenser in most organisms with regional centromeres (as well as yeast with point centromeres) (1, 27). In these organisms, the Mis18 complex functions with the aid of CENP-C, RbAp46/48, and HJURP binds to centromeric regions, and recruits CENP-A loading machinery (2734).

  2. Deposition Once the sites for CENP-A placement have been identified, the cell must then replace H3 histones with CENP-A histones until they are at the desired, pre-replication concentration. The presence of the Mis18 complex at the centromeres then brings in CENP-A via its chaperone HJURP (or Scm3 in fission yeast and Cal1 in flies) (3541). In Drosophila, CAL1 contains binding domains for both CID (CENP-A homolog) and CENP-C but there is no Mis18 homolog. Despite the differences in licensing, the mechanism relating CENP-A initial amount to CENP-A deposited amount may be consistent between Drosophila and humans (27). CAL1 has been proposed to act as the limiting factor in centromere establishment in mitotic cells as CENP-C potentially prevents the excessive release of CAL1 from the nucleolus (42, 43). Drosophila spermatocytes depleted of CAL1 show a dramatic reduction in CID (2, 44). CENP-C also plays a role in CENP-A loading in mitotic cells (2, 4, 6, 32, 4547), and likewise in male meiotic cells depleted of CENP-C, there is a loss of centromeric CID though the reduction is not as significant as in the CAL1 knockdown (2). This difference in CID reduction indicates that the tripartite complex of CAL1, CID, and CENP-C is not a case of all or nothing loading but rather CAL1 and CID might localize together independent of CENP-C. A study analyzing Cal1 and Cenp-C mutants, also in Drosophila sperm, observed similar results indicating that a loss of CAL1 or CENP-C leads to a reduction in CENP-A centromere localization (43). CENP-C has been shown to bind CENP-A, HJURP, and DNA at the centromeres in HeLa cells and in vitro (48, 49). This relationship appears to be reciprocal where loss of either CAL1 or CID causes a reduction in CENP-C localization as well (2, 4).

  3. Stabilization Newly formed CENP-A nucleosomes are not stable on their own and can be rapidly degraded and replaced with H3 histones in an effort to prevent neocentromere formation unless they are marked for stability (43, 44, 5055). The mechanism of this regulation is still largely unclear, though there is evidence that the CENP-A binding protein, CENP-N (part of the CCAN), acts as a clamp between the DNA and CENP-A further stabilizing its incorporation (56). This hypothesis was further supported by in vitro evidence that CENP-C and CENP-N act to promote CENP-A nucleosome stability (25, 26).

It is interesting to see that CENP-C plays a role in each step of centromere establishment in multiple systems: recruiting the Mis18 complex for licensing in vertebrates and fission yeast, regulating CAL1 release from the nucleolus in Drosophila, contributing to chaperone duties for deposition, and increasing stability of the formed CENP-A nucleosomes for maintenance. These critical functions likely contribute to the reason that CENP-C is one of very few components of the inner centromere that are conserved in all eukaryotes (5760).

CENTROMERE CLUSTERING AND PAIRING

The clustering and then pairing of centromeres in early prophase I is critical for accurate homolog segregation. Clustering occurs when all centromeres bunch together into a single or relatively few foci, while pairing is only between two homologous centromeres. It is predicted that centromere clustering is important to facilitate homologous chromosome pairing (6163). In addition, early pairing between non-homologous centromeres could be a protective measure against centromeric crossovers and these pairs ultimately swap to homologous as synapsis progresses. CENP-C plays a role in both the clustering and pairing of centromeres as is evidenced by the loss of pairing of homologous centromeres and a failure to maintain clustering in CENP-C mutants in Drosophila oocytes (Figure 2B) (55).

SYNAPTONEMAL COMPLEX AND COHESION AT THE CENTROMERE

Meiosis is accompanied with very specific requirements distinct from mitosis, chiefly the regulation necessary for segregating homologs while maintaining sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis I. The process of homolog segregation begins in pre-meiotic S-phase with homolog pairing and the establishment of centromeric cohesion. This is followed by creation of double-stranded breaks (DSB’s) some of which mature into crossovers during early prophase I. This process is facilitated by the formation of the synaptonemal complex (SC). Both of these processes are critical for homolog segregation as crossovers mature into chiasmata which are a key structure for homolog cohesion (64), and the cohesins themselves are necessary for SC formation (8). Both of these processes contribute to genomic stability and mutants in these genes result in high levels of aneuploidy associated with infertility (65, 66). A key feature of both of these complexes is that they load and perform their functions very early (primarily pre-meiotic S-phase).

The synaptonemal complex holds homologous chromosomes together and regulates genetic recombination during meiosis through interactions with the chromosome axis. The complex is composed of lateral elements that run parallel to the chromosomes and transverse elements that are perpendicular to the axis and hold together homologs. The transverse element is C(3)G (in Drosophila) or SYCP-3 (in mice) but the lateral elements (also known as axis proteins) are unknown (9, 67, 68).

The centromere is an initiating site for SC formation in yeast and Drosophila during early prophase, as well as the last site of localization after arm SC has dissolved later in prophase (6972). Studies of CENP-C mutants have not revealed a SC loading impairment, however they do fail to retain centromeric SC later in pachytene (55). These same mutants exhibit a centromere clustering defect (mentioned in the previous section) which is in agreement with other studies indicating that the SC itself also plays a role in centromere clustering (55, 71) though because of the late SC phenotype in CENP-C mutants, this relationship is not likely directly through CENP-C itself. It’s also not entirely clear if this represents the true nature of CENP-C’s relationship with SC loading because the mutants tested were not true null, only hypomorphs.

Cohesins serve multiple functions in meiosis including co-orientation of sister chromatids in MI (73, 74), repressing centromeric crossovers necessary for fidelity of homolog segregation (75, 76), and assembly of the synaptonemal complex (8). Meiotic cohesins are highly enriched in the pericentromeric regions (7782). This enrichment relies on the Ctf19 complex (CCAN) in budding yeast (8385) and recent work has identified that this is by recruitment of the Scc2/4 loaders (86) through phosphorylation by Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) (87). This discovery is exciting because it demonstrates a direct link from DDK and DNA replication to cohesion establishment, though the two functions are not dependent on each other (88). Specifically, DDK is recruited to centromeres by Ctf3 (the Mis6 CCAN component) and then phosphorylates Ctf19 (the CENP-P CCAN component), which then recruits Scc2/4 (NIPBL/Mau2 cohesin loader) if Scc1 is present (86, 87). While Drosophila are lacking the CCAN, they do have meiotic pericentromeric cohesion enrichment and this potentially requires CENP-C in place of the missing CCAN components.

Recent work in Drosophila oocytes indicates that there are two distinct subsets of meiotic cohesins, one required for synaptonemal complex formation between homologs early in prophase (C(2)M, Stromalin, and NippedB), and one that maintains sister chromatid cohesion until metaphase II (SUNN/SOLO/ORD) (8). The evidence from Drosophila oocytes indicates that, while loss of centromeric CENP-C leads to a destabilization of the SC, the meiotic cohesion complex responsible for SC assembly (C(2)M complex) is not the one primarily located at the centromere (SUNN/SOLO) (8, 55). Loss of the SUNN/SOLO/ORD complex does result in a centromere clustering defect similar to that observed in CENP-C and SC mutants (55, 71, 72, 89, 90). All of this data cumulatively indicates that while the precise relationship is not yet clear, the CENP-C functions of synapsis, cohesion, and centromere clustering involve the loading or maintenance of cohesins (SUNN/SOLO/ORD in Drosophila) and centromeric SC.

CENTROMERES AND RECOMBINATION

Recombination is a critical component of meiosis and necessary to promote genetic diversity and chromosome segregation. However, crossovers occurring at or near the centromere are associated with errors in segregation leading to aneuploidy (76, 91, 92). Potentially in response to this or other unidentified reasons, the cell has developed mechanisms to prevent recombination in pericentromeric regions, and recent work has identified components of the centromere as being critical for this function (72, 9092).

Early work identified that the structure of the heterochromatin itself can repress DSB formation and subsequent recombination (93, 94), yet other regions of heterochromatin were not equally repressed indicating that this cannot be the only mechanism. Relocation of the centromere itself still yields the same level of repression in the new region, and combined with the previous observations, it has lead to investigations into the role of centromere localized proteins in CO repression (95). The most important consideration in selecting potential proteins of interest is timing. DSB formation and repair occur during early prophase, long before the kinetochore has formed, when only the CCAN, CENP-C, and Mis12 are found at the centromere (96, 97). Work in budding yeast has identified the Ctf19 complex (CCAN) as being responsible for preventing centromere-proximal DSB’s as well as preventing recombination in any DSBs that do occur (75). They also showed that this effect is in part due to enhanced cohesins near the centromere, potentially promoting double strand break repair from sister chromatid templates rather than homologs, and partly due to recruitment of the SC protein Zip1. Whether this effect is then performed by CENP-C in organisms lacking the CCAN (such as Drosophila) or another unidentified component is unknown. Though it is tempting to think that CENP-C may also play a role in this critical protective mechanism due to its localization and involvement in cohesion.

KINETOCHORE ASSEMBLY AND FUNCTION

The kinetochore is a transient multi-complex structure existing in M-phase that links the chromosome to the spindle microtubules in order to direct the accurate segregation of genetic information into daughter cells. Unlike centromere proteins which do not appear to vary between mitosis and meiosis, there are components of the kinetochore such as Meikin, and Aurora Kinase C that have meiosis specific functions (98, 99).

The kinetochore is made up of the KMN network which is in turn a series of three complexes: Knl1c, Mis12c, and Ndc80c. Due to its interphase localization, we have classified the Mis12 protein itself as a centromere protein here, but the other components of the complex (Dsn1, Nsl1, and Pmf1) load during M-phase and are part of the inner (or chromatin proximal) kinetochore by interacting with the CCAN via CENP-C (Figure 2C) (100103). The Mis12c binds directly to CENP-C via its Nnf1 subunit (100) and is stably incorporated in mitotic centromeres similar to CENP-C (3). The Mis12c in turn recruits Knl1/SPC105 via its Nsl1 subunit. Knl1/SPC105 then forms a dimer with Zwint (absent in Drosophila) and is a hub for checkpoint signaling. This potentially cooperates with CENP-C to recruit the Ndc80c (made up of Ndc80, Nuf2, SPC24, and Spc25) that is the microtubule receptor of the kinetochore (104109).

In most organisms, the CCAN and CENP-C act in parallel to recruit Mis12C and then the outer kinetochore during M-phase (100, 101, 110112). However, Drosophila provides a unique opportunity to study CENP-C without redundant pathways because the CCAN is lacking in this system. For example, in HeLa cells, the N-terminus of CENP-C has been shown necessary for Mis12C recruitment as well as KNL1, but only partially responsible for recruitment of NDC80 indicating that this critical component is probably also recruited by CCAN components (102). In Drosophila, NDC80 binding is completely obliterated by loss of SPC105R but it is unclear whether CENP-C has NDC80 binding properties as well (100, 113116).

The kinetochore is also a site for critical checkpoint signaling via the chromosome passenger complex (CPC) and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). AURKB has been shown to phosphorylate Dsn1 of the Mis12C which initiates kinetochore assembly and that this activity is regulated by CENP-C (117121).

CONCLUSION

CENP-C has proven to be an integral component of the centromere from the beginning of meiosis to the end. It functions in the earliest stages of centromere identity by recruiting CENP-A and its chaperone, and then stabilizing newly formed CENP-A nucleosomes. It also supports centromere clustering and appears to have a role in cohesion establishment, homolog synapsis, and crossover distribution. CENP-C is also critical for kinetochore assembly and chromosome segregation. It appears to be the only centromere-localized protein, excluding the histone variant itself CENP-A, that is present and necessary early in prophase as well as present and necessary for kinetochore structure and function during prometaphase and metaphase. Being such a critical meiotic component, studying CENP-C can be difficult because early meiotic failures tend to mask later phenotypes. One approach to this problem, possible in systems like Drosophila, is to identify separation of function mutants and use available genetic tools to knock out CENP-C activities at specific times during meiosis.

The unique loading patterns and combination of functions attributed to CENP-C raise many questions. Labs currently investigating CENP-C are certainly focused on a broad range from structural analyses and binding with CENP-A nucleosomes, involvement in cohesion and synapsis, function in kinetochore assembly, and the relationship with SAC signaling molecules in metaphase. These studies may reveal why CENP-C is required early during meiotic pachytene, why it is loaded during prophase in the pause between pachytene and metaphase, and is this loading before nuclear envelope breakdown important for kinetochore function during the meiotic divisions.

Summary Points.

  • CENP-C is a critical component of the centromere as loss of CENP-C results in loss of centromere identity, aneuploidy and cell death.

  • CENP-C is known in mitotic cells to be necessary for centromere establishment as well as kinetochore assembly. While recent work in meiosis has confirmed this, there is new evidence that CENP-C is also necessary for meiotic prophase activity.

  • New studies have explored the use of techniques that make it easier to observe the effects of CENP-C on in vivo meiosis.

Footnotes

Competing Interests: The authors report that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Srivastava S, Foltz DR. Posttranslational modifications of CENP-A: marks of distinction. Chromosoma. 2018;127(3):279–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dunleavy EM, Beier NL, Gorgescu W, Tang J, Costes SV, Karpen GH. The cell cycle timing of centromeric chromatin assembly in Drosophila meiosis is distinct from mitosis yet requires CAL1 and CENP-C. PLoS biology. 2012;10(12):e1001460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hemmerich P, Weidtkamp-Peters S, Hoischen C, Schmiedeberg L, Erliandri I, Diekmann S. Dynamics of inner kinetochore assembly and maintenance in living cells. The Journal of cell biology. 2008;180(6):1101–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Erhardt S, Mellone BG, Betts CM, Zhang W, Karpen GH, Straight AF. Genome-wide analysis reveals a cell cycle-dependent mechanism controlling centromere propagation. The Journal of cell biology. 2008;183(5):805–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McKinley KL, Cheeseman IM. The molecular basis for centromere identity and function. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology. 2016;17(1):16–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Mellone BG, Grive KJ, Shteyn V, Bowers SR, Oderberg I, Karpen GH. Assembly of Drosophila centromeric chromatin proteins during mitosis. PLoS genetics. 2011;7(5):e1002068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Watanabe R, Hara M, Okumura EI, Herve S, Fachinetti D, Ariyoshi M, et al. CDK1-mediated CENP-C phosphorylation modulates CENP-A binding and mitotic kinetochore localization. The Journal of cell biology. 2019;218(12):4042–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gyuricza MR, Manheimer KB, Apte V, Krishnan B, Joyce EF, McKee BD, et al. Dynamic and Stable Cohesins Regulate Synaptonemal Complex Assembly and Chromosome Segregation. Current biology : CB. 2016;26(13):1688–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Page SL, Hawley RS. c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein. Genes Dev. 2001;15(23):3130–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Voelkel-Meiman K, Moustafa SS, Lefrançois P, Villeneuve AM, MacQueen AJ. Full-length synaptonemal complex grows continuously during meiotic prophase in budding yeast. PLoS genetics. 2012;8(10):e1002993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Eichinger CS, Kurze A, Oliveira RA, Nasmyth K. Disengaging the Smc3/kleisin interface releases cohesin from Drosophila chromosomes during interphase and mitosis. Embo j. 2013;32(5):656–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rankin S Complex elaboration: making sense of meiotic cohesin dynamics. Febs j. 2015;282(13):2426–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gause M, Misulovin Z, Bilyeu A, Dorsett D. Dosage-sensitive regulation of cohesin chromosome binding and dynamics by Nipped-B, Pds5, and Wapl. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(20):4940–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cunningham MD, Gause M, Cheng Y, Noyes A, Dorsett D, Kennison JA, et al. Wapl antagonizes cohesin binding and promotes Polycomb-group silencing in Drosophila. Development (Cambridge, England). 2012;139(22):4172–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Weng KA, Jeffreys CA, Bickel SE. Rejuvenation of meiotic cohesion in oocytes during prophase I is required for chiasma maintenance and accurate chromosome segregation. PLoS genetics. 2014;10(9):e1004607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kuleszewicz K, Fu X, Kudo NR. Cohesin loading factor Nipbl localizes to chromosome axes during mammalian meiotic prophase. Cell Div. 2013;8(1):12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Biswas U, Wetzker C, Lange J, Christodoulou EG, Seifert M, Beyer A, et al. Meiotic cohesin SMC1β provides prophase I centromeric cohesion and is required for multiple synapsis-associated functions. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(12):e1003985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lidsky PV, Sprenger F, Lehner CF. Distinct modes of centromere protein dynamics during cell cycle progression in Drosophila S2R+ cells. Journal of cell science. 2013;126(Pt 20):4782–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Schuh M, Lehner CF, Heidmann S. Incorporation of Drosophila CID/CENP-A and CENP-C into centromeres during early embryonic anaphase. Current biology : CB. 2007;17(3):237–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shelby RD, Monier K, Sullivan KF. Chromatin assembly at kinetochores is uncoupled from DNA replication. The Journal of cell biology. 2000;151(5):1113–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sullivan B, Karpen G. Centromere identity in Drosophila is not determined in vivo by replication timing. The Journal of cell biology. 2001;154(4):683–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Verreault A Histone deposition at the replication fork: a matter of urgency. Molecular cell. 2003;11(2):283–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dunleavy EM, Almouzni G, Karpen GH. H3.3 is deposited at centromeres in S phase as a placeholder for newly assembled CENP-A in G(1) phase. Nucleus (Austin, Tex). 2011;2(2):146–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jansen LE, Black BE, Foltz DR, Cleveland DW. Propagation of centromeric chromatin requires exit from mitosis. The Journal of cell biology. 2007;176(6):795–805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cao S, Zhou K, Zhang Z, Luger K, Straight AF. Constitutive centromere-associated network contacts confer differential stability on CENP-A nucleosomes in vitro and in the cell. Molecular biology of the cell. 2018;29(6):751–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Falk SJ, Guo LY, Sekulic N, Smoak EM, Mani T, Logsdon GA, et al. Chromosomes. CENP-C reshapes and stabilizes CENP-A nucleosomes at the centromere. Science (New York, NY). 2015;348(6235):699–703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Nardi IK, Zasadzińska E, Stellfox ME, Knippler CM, Foltz DR. Licensing of Centromeric Chromatin Assembly through the Mis18α-Mis18β Heterotetramer. Molecular cell. 2016;61(5):774–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fujita Y, Hayashi T, Kiyomitsu T, Toyoda Y, Kokubu A, Obuse C, et al. Priming of centromere for CENP-A recruitment by human hMis18alpha, hMis18beta, and M18BP1. Developmental cell. 2007;12(1):17–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dambacher S, Deng W, Hahn M, Sadic D, Frohlich J, Nuber A, et al. CENP-C facilitates the recruitment of M18BP1 to centromeric chromatin. Nucleus (Austin, Tex). 2012;3(1):101–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maddox PS, Hyndman F, Monen J, Oegema K, Desai A. Functional genomics identifies a Myb domain-containing protein family required for assembly of CENP-A chromatin. The Journal of cell biology. 2007;176(6):757–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.French BT, Straight AF. CDK phosphorylation of Xenopus laevis M18BP1 promotes its metaphase centromere localization. Embo j. 2019;38(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moree B, Meyer CB, Fuller CJ, Straight AF. CENP-C recruits M18BP1 to centromeres to promote CENP-A chromatin assembly. The Journal of cell biology. 2011;194(6):855–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.French BT, Westhorpe FG, Limouse C, Straight AF. Xenopus laevis M18BP1 Directly Binds Existing CENP-A Nucleosomes to Promote Centromeric Chromatin Assembly. Developmental cell. 2017;42(2):190–9.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Stellfox ME, Nardi IK, Knippler CM, Foltz DR. Differential Binding Partners of the Mis18α/β YIPPEE Domains Regulate Mis18 Complex Recruitment to Centromeres. Cell Rep. 2016;15(10):2127–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Camahort R, Li B, Florens L, Swanson SK, Washburn MP, Gerton JL. Scm3 is essential to recruit the histone h3 variant cse4 to centromeres and to maintain a functional kinetochore. Molecular cell. 2007;26(6):853–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen CC, Dechassa ML, Bettini E, Ledoux MB, Belisario C, Heun P, et al. CAL1 is the Drosophila CENP-A assembly factor. The Journal of cell biology. 2014;204(3):313–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Foltz DR, Jansen LE, Bailey AO, Yates JR 3rd, Bassett EA, Wood S, et al. Centromere-specific assembly of CENP-a nucleosomes is mediated by HJURP. Cell. 2009;137(3):472–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Williams JS, Hayashi T, Yanagida M, Russell P. Fission yeast Scm3 mediates stable assembly of Cnp1/CENP-A into centromeric chromatin. Molecular cell. 2009;33(3):287–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sanchez-Pulido L, Pidoux AL, Ponting CP, Allshire RC. Common ancestry of the CENP-A chaperones Scm3 and HJURP. Cell. 2009;137(7):1173–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dunleavy EM, Roche D, Tagami H, Lacoste N, Ray-Gallet D, Nakamura Y, et al. HJURP is a cell-cycle-dependent maintenance and deposition factor of CENP-A at centromeres. Cell. 2009;137(3):485–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Pidoux AL, Choi ES, Abbott JK, Liu X, Kagansky A, Castillo AG, et al. Fission yeast Scm3: A CENP-A receptor required for integrity of subkinetochore chromatin. Molecular cell. 2009;33(3):299–311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schittenhelm RB, Althoff F, Heidmann S, Lehner CF. Detrimental incorporation of excess Cenp-A/Cid and Cenp-C into Drosophila centromeres is prevented by limiting amounts of the bridging factor Cal1. Journal of cell science. 2010;123(Pt 21):3768–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kwenda L, Collins CM, Dattoli AA, Dunleavy EM. Nucleolar activity and CENP-C regulate CENP-A and CAL1 availability for centromere assembly in meiosis. Development (Cambridge, England). 2016;143(8):1400–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Raychaudhuri N, Dubruille R, Orsi GA, Bagheri HC, Loppin B, Lehner CF. Transgenerational propagation and quantitative maintenance of paternal centromeres depends on Cid/Cenp-A presence in Drosophila sperm. PLoS biology. 2012;10(12):e1001434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Milks KJ, Moree B, Straight AF. Dissection of CENP-C-directed centromere and kinetochore assembly. Molecular biology of the cell. 2009;20(19):4246–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Allu PK, Dawicki-McKenna JM, Van Eeuwen T, Slavin M, Braitbard M, Xu C, et al. Structure of the Human Core Centromeric Nucleosome Complex. Current biology : CB. 2019;29(16):2625–39.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Falk SJ, Lee J, Sekulic N, Sennett MA, Lee TH, Black BE. CENP-C directs a structural transition of CENP-A nucleosomes mainly through sliding of DNA gyres. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23(3):204–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sugimoto K, Yata H, Muro Y, Himeno M. Human centromere protein C (CENP-C) is a DNA-binding protein which possesses a novel DNA-binding motif. Journal of biochemistry. 1994;116(4):877–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Politi V, Perini G, Trazzi S, Pliss A, Raska I, Earnshaw WC, et al. CENP-C binds the alpha-satellite DNA in vivo at specific centromere domains. Journal of cell science. 2002;115(Pt 11):2317–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nechemia-Arbely Y, Miga KH, Shoshani O, Aslanian A, McMahon MA, Lee AY, et al. DNA replication acts as an error correction mechanism to maintain centromere identity by restricting CENP-A to centromeres. Nature cell biology. 2019;21(6):743–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bobkov GOM, Gilbert N, Heun P. Centromere transcription allows CENP-A to transit from chromatin association to stable incorporation. The Journal of cell biology. 2018;217(6):1957–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Huang A, Kremser L, Schuler F, Wilflingseder D, Lindner H, Geley S, et al. Phosphorylation of Drosophila CENP-A on serine 20 regulates protein turn-over and centromere-specific loading. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(20):10754–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Moreno-Moreno O, Medina-Giró S, Torras-Llort M, Azorín F. The F box protein partner of paired regulates stability of Drosophila centromeric histone H3, CenH3(CID). Current biology : CB. 2011;21(17):1488–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Moreno-Moreno O, Torras-Llort M, Azorín F. Proteolysis restricts localization of CID, the centromere-specific histone H3 variant of Drosophila, to centromeres. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(21):6247–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Unhavaithaya Y, Orr-Weaver TL. Centromere proteins CENP-C and CAL1 functionally interact in meiosis for centromere clustering, pairing, and chromosome segregation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110(49):19878–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Guo LY, Allu PK, Zandarashvili L, McKinley KL, Sekulic N, Dawicki-McKenna JM, et al. Centromeres are maintained by fastening CENP-A to DNA and directing an arginine anchor-dependent nucleosome transition. Nat Commun. 2017;8:15775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Burkin DJ, Jones C, Burkin HR, McGrew JA, Broad TE. Sheep CENPB and CENPC genes show a high level of sequence similarity and conserved synteny with their human homologs. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1996;74(1–2):86–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fukagawa T, Brown WR. Efficient conditional mutation of the vertebrate CENP-C gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(13):2301–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.McKay S, Thomson E, Cooke H. Sequence homologies and linkage group conservation of the human and mouse Cenpc genes. Genomics. 1994;22(1):36–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Saitoh H, Tomkiel J, Cooke CA, Ratrie H, 3rd, Maurer M, Rothfield NF, et al. CENP-C, an autoantigen in scleroderma, is a component of the human inner kinetochore plate. Cell. 1992;70(1):115–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Klutstein M, Cooper JP. The Chromosomal Courtship Dance-homolog pairing in early meiosis. Current opinion in cell biology. 2014;26:123–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Zickler D, Kleckner N. Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(6). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Alleva B, Smolikove S. Moving and stopping: Regulation of chromosome movement to promote meiotic chromosome pairing and synapsis. Nucleus (Austin, Tex). 2017;8(6):613–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Walker MY, Hawley RS. Hanging on to your homolog: the roles of pairing, synapsis and recombination in the maintenance of homolog adhesion. Chromosoma. 2000;109(1–2):3–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lake CM, Hawley RS. The molecular control of meiotic chromosomal behavior: events in early meiotic prophase in Drosophila oocytes. Annu Rev Physiol. 2012;74:425–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.McKim KS, Jang JK, Manheim EA. Meiotic recombination and chromosome segregation in Drosophila females. Annu Rev Genet. 2002;36:205–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Dobson MJ, Pearlman RE, Karaiskakis A, Spyropoulos B, Moens PB. Synaptonemal complex proteins: occurrence, epitope mapping and chromosome disjunction. Journal of cell science. 1994;107 (Pt 10):2749–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Lammers JH, Offenberg HH, van Aalderen M, Vink AC, Dietrich AJ, Heyting C. The gene encoding a major component of the lateral elements of synaptonemal complexes of the rat is related to X-linked lymphocyte-regulated genes. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14(2):1137–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Gladstone MN, Obeso D, Chuong H, Dawson DS. The synaptonemal complex protein Zip1 promotes bi-orientation of centromeres at meiosis I. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(12):e1000771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Newnham L, Jordan P, Rockmill B, Roeder GS, Hoffmann E. The synaptonemal complex protein, Zip1, promotes the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes at meiosis I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(2):781–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Takeo S, Lake CM, Morais-de-Sa E, Sunkel CE, Hawley RS. Synaptonemal complex-dependent centromeric clustering and the initiation of synapsis in Drosophila oocytes. Current biology : CB. 2011;21(21):1845–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Tanneti NS, Landy K, Joyce EF, McKim KS. A pathway for synapsis initiation during zygotene in Drosophila oocytes. Current biology : CB. 2011;21(21):1852–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Watanabe Y, Nurse P. Cohesin Rec8 is required for reductional chromosome segregation at meiosis. Nature. 1999;400(6743):461–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sakuno T, Tada K, Watanabe Y. Kinetochore geometry defined by cohesion within the centromere. Nature. 2009;458(7240):852–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Vincenten N, Kuhl LM, Lam I, Oke A, Kerr AR, Hochwagen A, et al. The kinetochore prevents centromere-proximal crossover recombination during meiosis. Elife. 2015;4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Rockmill B, Voelkel-Meiman K, Roeder GS. Centromere-proximal crossovers are associated with precocious separation of sister chromatids during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2006;174(4):1745–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Lengronne A, Katou Y, Mori S, Yokobayashi S, Kelly GP, Itoh T, et al. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature. 2004;430(6999):573–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Glynn EF, Megee PC, Yu HG, Mistrot C, Unal E, Koshland DE, et al. Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS biology. 2004;2(9):E259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Weber SA, Gerton JL, Polancic JE, DeRisi JL, Koshland D, Megee PC. The kinetochore is an enhancer of pericentric cohesin binding. PLoS biology. 2004;2(9):E260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kiburz BM, Reynolds DB, Megee PC, Marston AL, Lee BH, Lee TI, et al. The core centromere and Sgo1 establish a 50-kb cohesin-protected domain around centromeres during meiosis I. Genes Dev. 2005;19(24):3017–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nonaka N, Kitajima T, Yokobayashi S, Xiao G, Yamamoto M, Grewal SI, et al. Recruitment of cohesin to heterochromatic regions by Swi6/HP1 in fission yeast. Nature cell biology. 2002;4(1):89–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bernard P, Maure JF, Partridge JF, Genier S, Javerzat JP, Allshire RC. Requirement of heterochromatin for cohesion at centromeres. Science (New York, NY). 2001;294(5551):2539–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Eckert CA, Gravdahl DJ, Megee PC. The enhancement of pericentromeric cohesin association by conserved kinetochore components promotes high-fidelity chromosome segregation and is sensitive to microtubule-based tension. Genes Dev. 2007;21(3):278–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Ng TM, Waples WG, Lavoie BD, Biggins S. Pericentromeric sister chromatid cohesion promotes kinetochore biorientation. Molecular biology of the cell. 2009;20(17):3818–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Fernius J, Marston AL. Establishment of cohesion at the pericentromere by the Ctf19 kinetochore subcomplex and the replication fork-associated factor, Csm3. PLoS genetics. 2009;5(9):e1000629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fernius J, Nerusheva OO, Galander S, Alves Fde L, Rappsilber J, Marston AL. Cohesin-dependent association of scc2/4 with the centromere initiates pericentromeric cohesion establishment. Current biology : CB. 2013;23(7):599–606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Hinshaw SM, Makrantoni V, Harrison SC, Marston AL. The Kinetochore Receptor for the Cohesin Loading Complex. Cell. 2017;171(1):72–84.e13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Natsume T, Muller CA, Katou Y, Retkute R, Gierlinski M, Araki H, et al. Kinetochores coordinate pericentromeric cohesion and early DNA replication by Cdc7-Dbf4 kinase recruitment. Molecular cell. 2013;50(5):661–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Khetani RS, Bickel SE. Regulation of meiotic cohesion and chromosome core morphogenesis during pachytene in Drosophila oocytes. Journal of cell science. 2007;120(Pt 17):3123–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Yan R, McKee BD. The cohesion protein SOLO associates with SMC1 and is required for synapsis, recombination, homolog bias and cohesion and pairing of centromeres in Drosophila Meiosis. PLoS genetics. 2013;9(7):e1003637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nature reviews Genetics. 2001;2(4):280–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Koehler KE, Hawley RS, Sherman S, Hassold T. Recombination and nondisjunction in humans and flies. Hum Mol Genet. 1996;5 Spec No:1495–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Ellermeier C, Higuchi EC, Phadnis N, Holm L, Geelhood JL, Thon G, et al. RNAi and heterochromatin repress centromeric meiotic recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107(19):8701–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Westphal T, Reuter G. Recombinogenic effects of suppressors of position-effect variegation in Drosophila. Genetics. 2002;160(2):609–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Mather K Crossing over and Heterochromatin in the X Chromosome of Drosophila Melanogaster. Genetics. 1939;24(3):413–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Meyer RE, Chuong HH, Hild M, Hansen CL, Kinter M, Dawson DS. Ipl1/Aurora-B is necessary for kinetochore restructuring in meiosis I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Molecular biology of the cell. 2015;26(17):2986–3000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Miller MP, Unal E, Brar GA, Amon A. Meiosis I chromosome segregation is established through regulation of microtubule-kinetochore interactions. Elife. 2012;1:e00117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Kim J, Ishiguro K, Nambu A, Akiyoshi B, Yokobayashi S, Kagami A, et al. Meikin is a conserved regulator of meiosis-I-specific kinetochore function. Nature. 2015;517(7535):466–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Dieterich K, Soto Rifo R, Faure AK, Hennebicq S, Ben Amar B, Zahi M, et al. Homozygous mutation of AURKC yields large-headed polyploid spermatozoa and causes male infertility. Nat Genet. 2007;39(5):661–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Przewloka MR, Venkei Z, Bolanos-Garcia VM, Debski J, Dadlez M, Glover DM. CENP-C is a structural platform for kinetochore assembly. Current biology : CB. 2011;21(5):399–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Petrovic A, Pasqualato S, Dube P, Krenn V, Santaguida S, Cittaro D, et al. The MIS12 complex is a protein interaction hub for outer kinetochore assembly. The Journal of cell biology. 2010;190(5):835–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Screpanti E, De Antoni A, Alushin GM, Petrovic A, Melis T, Nogales E, et al. Direct binding of Cenp-C to the Mis12 complex joins the inner and outer kinetochore. Current biology : CB. 2011;21(5):391–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Przewloka MR, Venkei Z, Glover DM. Searching for Drosophila Dsn1 kinetochore protein. Cell Cycle. 2009;8(8):1292–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Musacchio A The Molecular Biology of Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Signaling Dynamics. Current biology : CB. 2015;25(20):R1002–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell. 2006;127(5):983–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.DeLuca JG, Gall WE, Ciferri C, Cimini D, Musacchio A, Salmon ED. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell. 2006;127(5):969–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.London N, Ceto S, Ranish JA, Biggins S. Phosphoregulation of Spc105 by Mps1 and PP1 regulates Bub1 localization to kinetochores. Current biology : CB. 2012;22(10):900–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Shepperd LA, Meadows JC, Sochaj AM, Lancaster TC, Zou J, Buttrick GJ, et al. Phosphodependent recruitment of Bub1 and Bub3 to Spc7/KNL1 by Mph1 kinase maintains the spindle checkpoint. Current biology : CB. 2012;22(10):891–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Yamagishi Y, Yang C-H, Tanno Y, Watanabe Y. MPS1/Mph1 phosphorylates the kinetochore protein KNL1/Spc7 to recruit SAC components. Nature cell biology. 2012;14(7):746–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Cheeseman IM, Hori T, Fukagawa T, Desai A. KNL1 and the CENP-H/I/K complex coordinately direct kinetochore assembly in vertebrates. Molecular biology of the cell. 2008;19(2):587–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Liu ST, Rattner JB, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. The Journal of cell biology. 2006;175(1):41–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Hori T, Okada M, Maenaka K, Fukagawa T. CENP-O class proteins form a stable complex and are required for proper kinetochore function. Molecular biology of the cell. 2008;19(3):843–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Radford SJ, Hoang TL, Gluszek AA, Ohkura H, McKim KS. Lateral and End-On Kinetochore Attachments Are Coordinated to Achieve Bi-orientation in Drosophila Oocytes. PLoS genetics. 2015;11(10):e1005605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Przewloka MR, Zhang W, Costa P, Archambault V, D’Avino PP, Lilley KS, et al. Molecular analysis of core kinetochore composition and assembly in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2007;2(5):e478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Schittenhelm RB, Chaleckis R, Lehner CF. Intrakinetochore localization and essential functional domains of Drosophila Spc105. Embo j. 2009;28(16):2374–86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Orr B, Sunkel CE. Drosophila CENP-C is essential for centromere identity. Chromosoma. 2011;120(1):83–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Bonner MK, Haase J, Swinderman J, Halas H, Miller Jenkins LM, Kelly AE. Enrichment of Aurora B kinase at the inner kinetochore controls outer kinetochore assembly. The Journal of cell biology. 2019;218(10):3237–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Hara M, Ariyoshi M, Okumura EI, Hori T, Fukagawa T. Multiple phosphorylations control recruitment of the KMN network onto kinetochores. Nature cell biology. 2018;20(12):1378–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Huis In ‘t Veld PJ, Jeganathan S, Petrovic A, Singh P, John J, Krenn V, et al. Molecular basis of outer kinetochore assembly on CENP-T. Elife. 2016;5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rago F, Gascoigne KE, Cheeseman IM. Distinct organization and regulation of the outer kinetochore KMN network downstream of CENP-C and CENP-T. Current biology : CB. 2015;25(5):671–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Zhou X, Zheng F, Wang C, Wu M, Zhang X, Wang Q, et al. Phosphorylation of CENP-C by Aurora B facilitates kinetochore attachment error correction in mitosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2017;114(50):E10667–e76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Liu Y, Petrovic A, Rombaut P, Mosalaganti S, Keller J, Raunser S, et al. Insights from the reconstitution of the divergent outer kinetochore of Drosophila melanogaster. Open Biol. 2016;6(2):150236-. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES