Abstract
Hybrid lead halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have emerged as potential competitors to silicon‐based solar cells with an unprecedented increase in power conversion efficiency (PCE), nearing the breakthrough point toward commercialization. However, for hole‐transporting materials, it is generally acknowledged that complex structures often create issues such as increased costs and hazardous substances in the synthetic schemes, when translated from the laboratory to manufacture on a large scale. Here, we present cyclobutane‐based hole‐selective materials synthesized using simple and green‐chemistry inspired protocols in order to reduce costs and adverse environmental impact. A series of novel semiconductors with molecularly engineered side arms were successfully applied in perovskite solar cells. V1366‐based PSCs feature impressive efficiency of 21 %, along with long‐term operational stability under atmospheric environment. Most importantly, we also fabricated perovskite solar modules exhibiting a record efficiency over 19 % with an active area of 30.24 cm2.
Keywords: cyclobutane, green chemistry, hole-transporting materials, perovskites, solar cells
A molecularly engineered cyclobutane‐based hole‐transporting material synthesised using simple and green‐chemistry‐inspired protocols achieves an impressive efficiency of 21 % in perovskite solar cells and over 19 % in perovskite solar module with an active area of 30.24 cm2.
Introduction
Although organic–inorganic perovskites have been known since the 19th century, they have currently gained substantial attention in the field of photovoltaics and optoelectronics. [1] Over the recent years, organic‐inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have been attracting massive worldwide attention due to their low cost and facile fabrication. [2] Since 2009, when Miyasaka and co‐workers reported 3.8 % power conversion efficiency (PCE) of PSC, [3] the performance of these photovoltaic devices has increased dramatically and currently PCE exceeds 25 %. [4] Despite PSCs have skyrocketed in PCE, there are still several device issues that need to be resolved especially improving the long‐term stability.[ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ] HTM is one of the quintessential components required for efficient and stable PSC devices. These materials are responsible for the transport of the photogenerated carriers from the absorber towards the electrode. HTMs should demonstrate sufficient charge transport properties, adequate energy levels, especially HOMO level, and good thermal stability. Despite significant research efforts devoted to developing new HTMs, these materials are still a weak spot in the PSC devices. In this context, small organic molecules are particularly appealing since they offer a wide range of structural modifications leading to the desired properties, and are easy to synthesize, purify, and process.[ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] Numerous approaches in the development of such HTMs including linear, star‐shaped, or spiro‐centered structures were reported in order to match the required hydrophobicity, energy levels, and the charge carrier mobility.[ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ] To date, 2,2′,7,7′‐tetrakis‐(N,N‐di‐p‐methoxyphenylamine)‐9,9′‐spirobifluorene (spiro‐OMeTAD) dominates the field and despite its high price is routinely used as the gold standard for the research interests due to commercialization decades ago. [21]
As of the success of spiro‐OMeTAD, many research groups have been focused on spiro‐type compounds, expecting to improve the PCE with slight structural modifications.[ 22 , 23 ] Several groups studied central 9,9′‐spirobifluorene‐linked HTMs including dimethylfluorenyl‐, ethylcarbazolyl‐, and fluorinated methoxyphenyl‐terminated examples recently reported by Seo, [24] Chen, [25] and Yang, [26] respectively, as well as the development of new central spiro‐cored structures such as spiro[fluorene‐9,9′‐xanthene],[ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ] spirobisacridine, [32] thiophene‐containing spiro cores[ 33 , 34 , 35 ] and other spiro‐type derivatives.[ 36 , 37 ] However, the synthesis of such spiro‐type compounds typically requires a multi‐step reaction scheme involving low temperature (−78 °C), sensitive (n‐butyllithium), and aggressive (Br2) reagents resulting in a relative high material cost, consequently leading to a significant contribution to the total device cost and non‐negligible environmental impact.[ 38 , 39 , 40 ] The tedious synthesis and costly purification of HTMs may hamper large scale production and thereby could impede the overall commercial success of PSCs.
Therefore, the hunt is now on for new organic semiconductors that are prepared by simple, cost‐effective, and green chemistry without sacrificing the efficiency and would be easily scalable for a reasonable cost.[ 41 , 42 ] In this sense, the utilization of a synthetic protocols that reduces or eliminates the use of hazardous substances is highly desirable. Moreover, simple product work up and purification may also significantly reduce the final synthesis cost and the environmental issues.[ 43 , 44 , 45 ] Recently, several research groups have focussed on tuning the structure by decreasing the number of synthetic steps, thus reducing the synthetic complexity, cost of materials and environmental impact.[ 46 , 47 ]
Carbazole is known to be a promising core unit for molecular design since it can be substituted with a wide range of desired groups, allowing fine‐tuning of optical and electrochemical properties. [48] Various carbazole‐containing scaffolds as electron donating units in the periphery were routinely used to tune the HOMO level and applied in PSCs, showing comparable photovoltaic performance.[ 49 , 50 , 51 ] This includes star‐shaped SGT series,[ 52 , 53 ] benzodithiazole, [54] bismethylenebenzene,[ 55 , 56 ] bipyridine, [57] pyrene‐based [58] examples. Photodimerized carbazole is an attractive building block due to the simple, elegant and green synthesis and has been studied as excimer‐free and high hole carrier mobility material in early works.[ 59 , 60 , 61 ]
Herein, we disclose the development of novel HTMs, which comprises cyclobutane as a new structural core element for HTMs flanked by two differently substituted photodimerized carbazole arms in a branched fashion. The specific arrangement of carbazolyl groups onto cyclobutane core is also likely to facilitate the carrier transport process. Moreover, bulkiness and sterically hindered rigid trans‐configuration result in competition between the planarization and repulsive steric hindrance leading to a pseudo spiro type arrangement and diversified torsion angles. The effects of different peripheral carbazole substituents on various properties of newly synthesized molecules have been systematically investigated. Novel cyclobutane‐based HTMs have been successfully applied in PSCs, showing PCE up to 21 % and improved long‐term stability under atmospheric environment comparing to spiro‐OMeTAD. We also fabricated V1366‐based perovskite solar modules (6.5 cm × 7 cm) exhibiting a record efficiency over 19.0 % with an active area of 30.24 cm2 (corresponding to 16.78 % with an aperture area ≈34.36 cm2, a geometric fill factor of 88 %, the active area is used hereafter). Most importantly, to obtain novel HTMs we have applied protocols inspired by green chemistry, for the first time presenting that HTMs for PSCs could be synthesised eliminating the use of hazardous substances in order to reduce the adverse environmental impact without sacrificing the efficiency.
Results and Discussion
The general synthesis procedure for the preparation of cyclobutane‐based HTMs is shown in Figure 1. The synthesis starts with the photochemical cyclodimerization of low‐cost commercially available 9‐vinyl carbazole. This step only required photoirradiation of starting material in green solvent acetone at ambient temperature. Next, trans‐1,2‐bis(9‐carbazolyl)cyclobutane (1) was brominated using an aqueous bromate‐bromide mixture as a green brominating agent to eliminate the use of aggressive bromine. To yield V1321, an aqueous/THF four‐fold Suzuki cross‐coupling procedure was applied. With this we demonstrate that all 3 synthetic steps required to obtain V1321 were selected to reduce or eliminate the use of hazardous substances. Therefore, it could be classified as “green” HTM. To synthesise other HTMs presented in this work, 2 was reacted with the desired diarylamine‐based coupling partner under the standard Buchwald reaction conditions. Detailed synthetic protocols and full characterization of the compounds (NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis) are described in the Supporting Information.
Figure 1.
Synthetic route to novel hole‐transporting materials based on substituted cyclobutane.
Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used to determine thermal properties of the HTMs which are important to explore for processing temperatures and might affect the long‐term stability of the PSCs. TGA suggests that novel HTMs decompose in a range between 380–470 °C (Figure 3 a), far above the temperature for conventional device operation. From TGA results, there is a clear trend that higher molecular weight increases the thermal decomposition temperature (T dec). DSC measurements indicated that all new compounds are fully amorphous and have a glass transition temperature (T g) around 160 °C except V1296, which could exist in both crystalline and amorphous states as shown in Figure S9. Interestingly, all synthesized HTMs have higher T g than spiro‐OMeTAD (124 °C) meaning that the cyclobutane‐based HTMs should have better morphological stability. In comparison, V1367 has the highest T g of 215 °C and should result in improved quality of the HTM layer. Moreover, microscope pictures revealed that among the series only V1296 was prone for rapid formation of crystallization centers on the glass substrate, while other compounds resulted in fully transparent and amorphous films (Figure S10).
Figure 3.
a) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) data (heating rate of 10 °C min−1, N2 atmosphere). b) UV/Vis absorption (solid line) and photoluminescence (dashed line) spectra of V‐series HTMs in THF solution (10−4 M). c) Photoemission spectra of the charge transporting layers measured in air. d) Electric field dependencies of the hole‐drift mobility in synthesized HTMs.
V1296 has been chosen as a model compound for X‐ray crystallography due to the highest crystallinity among the series to confirm the trans‐cyclobutane configuration and study the arrangement of carbazole substituents as the different electron donors around the carbazole should not affect the central core geometry and were ignored. V1296 packs in orthorhombic spacegroup (Pbcn; No. 60) when grown by acetone vapor diffusion into chloroform solution. The following cell parameters were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction measurements: a=10.54500(10) Å, b=20.7442(4) Å, c=31.1322(4) Å, α=β=γ=90°, V=6810.09(17) Å3. The cell consists of four V1296 molecules (Z=4) with an asymmetric unit equalling to half molecule (Z′=0.5). Molecular geometry and packing are visualized in Figure 2, whereas detailed crystallographic data is provided in Table S1. As visualized in Figure 2 a, two carbazole units were found to be attached to the central cyclobutane core with the same bond angles of 119° and −119°, respectively, indicating the trans‐configuration. Moreover, as shown in Figure 2 b, the dihedral angle between the cyclobutane‐connected carbazoles is measured to be 98° revealing a pseudo spiro conformation and being close to the dihedral angle between spiro‐connected fluorenes in spiro‐OMeTAD (90°). [62] In addition, central cyclobutane ring was found to be not completely flat as demonstrated by different torsion angles shown in Figure 2 c.
Figure 2.
Molecular geometries of V1296 obtained by X‐ray diffraction analysis with an indicated bond (a) and torsional angles (b and c). d) View down crystallographic a‐axis of the molecular packing model. For clarity, diphenylamine groups are shown as wireframe, the cyclobutane ring is coloured in orange, and hydrogen atoms are omitted.
The ultraviolet‐visible absorption (UV/Vis) spectra in THF solutions of cyclobutane V‐series HTMs are shown in Figure 3 b. All new compounds have at least two major absorption peaks. The same absorption peak at 290 nm corresponds to localized π‐π* transitions arising from trans‐1,2‐bis(9‐carbazolyl)cyclobutane central scaffold, while absorption peaks at longer wavelengths arise from more intensive delocalization from the different conjugated substituents and are assigned to n‐π* transitions. The PL spectra revealed that significantly large Stokes shifts (100–150 nm) are observed for all molecules, therefore changes in the geometry of the molecules are expected upon excitation. The optical gaps (E g) were calculated from the intersection of absorption and photoluminescence spectra of thin films. They were found to be similar for all the compounds at around 3 eV (Figure S11).
The solid‐state ionization potentials (I P) of HTMs were determined using electron photoemission spectroscopy in air (PESA) of the thin films to assess the HOMO energy levels (Figure 3 c). I P values of novel cyclobutanes were found to be lower than 5.7 eV, which equals to the valence band (VB) energy of the triple cation‐based perovskite, therefore efficient hole transfer from perovskite to the cathode should be ensured. Based on E g and I P values, we calculated the electron affinities (E ea) in the range of 1.9–2.5 eV. Importantly, calculated E ea are smaller than the conduction band (CB) energy of the perovskite (−4.10 eV), ensuring the effective electron blocking from the perovskite to the electrode.
Xerographic time of flight (XTOF) measurements were used to determine the charge mobility of the V‐series layers. Dependences of hole drift mobility on electric field strength are shown in Figure 3 d. V1296 exhibited the highest zero‐field hole drift mobility (μ 0) among the series having the values of 1.7×10−4 cm2 Vs−1, outperforming that of spiro‐OMeTAD (μ 0=1.3×10−4 cm2 Vs−1). [63] The highest hole drift mobility of V1296 could be explained due to its crystalline nature, however, the rapid crystallization in the film might result poor film forming properties and deteriorated PSC performance. V1321, V1361, and V1366 showed one order of magnitude lower μ 0 values. The thermal, optical, and photoelectrical properties of the cyclobutanes are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Thermal, optical, and photophysical properties of newly synthesized compounds.
|
Cmpd. |
T m [°C][a] |
T g [°C][a] |
T dec [°C][a] |
λabs [nm][b] |
λem [nm][b] |
I P [eV][c] |
E g [eV][d] |
E ea [eV][e] |
μ 0 [cm2 V−1 s−1][f] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
V1244 |
– |
122 |
416 |
291, 303 |
450 |
5.07 |
2.91 |
2.12 |
7.9×10−6 |
|
V1296 |
320 |
159 |
406 |
291, 304 |
435 |
5.37 |
2.98 |
2.48 |
1.7×10−4 |
|
V1297 |
– |
162 |
382 |
289, 302 |
427 |
5.48 |
3.05 |
2.43 |
3.3×10−7 |
|
V1321 |
– |
148 |
421 |
291, 306, 334 |
420 |
5.34 |
3.13 |
2.21 |
1×10−5 |
|
V1361 |
– |
157 |
432 |
291, 315, 354 |
445 |
5.28 |
2.93 |
2.35 |
2.5×10−5 |
|
V1366 |
– |
173 |
439 |
291, 309 |
459 |
4.77 |
2.83 |
1.94 |
3.5×10−5 |
|
V1367 |
– |
215 |
477 |
291,318 |
471 |
4.78 |
2.79 |
1.99 |
2.5×10−6 |
[a] Melting (T m), glass transition (T g), and decomposition (T dec) temperatures determined by DSC and TGA, respectively (10 °C min−1, N2 atmosphere). [b] Absorption and emission spectra were measured in THF solution (10−4 M). [c] Ionization energies of the films measured using PESA. [d] E g estimated from the intersection of absorption and emission spectra of solid films. [e] E ea=I P−E g. [f] Mobility value at zero field strength.
The schematic energy level diagram of the devices containing different HTLs is shown in Figure 4 a, and the detailed preparation process is described in the see the Supporting Information. Figure S12 and Figure 4 b represent the SEM of a cross‐sectional view of PSC devices with spiro‐OMeTAD and V1366, providing a direct view of the PSCs individual layers: FTO/SnO2/perovskite/HTM/Au. Thickness of the perovskite films are about 700 nm with 70 nm of Au layer. However, the thickness of the V1366 layer is about 100 nm which is much thinner than that of the spiro‐OMeTAD layer (≈200 nm). This is due to the smaller molecule bulk and lower optimized concentration of the V1366 solution. Due to the absence of carrier transport layer, as shown in Figure 4 c, higher continuous‐wave photoluminescence (CWPL) intensity is found in the perovskite thin film. When the HTM layers are covered, the CWPL intensities decrease sharply, and both HTM materials exhibit similar hole extraction capabilities. Also, the PL lifetime shown in Figure 4 d obtained from perovskite thin films was 286 ns (Table S2), which is almost 2 times longer than the results from perovskite/spiro‐OMeTAD and perovskite/V1366 films.
Figure 4.
a) Schematic energy level diagram of the devices containing different HTLs. b) Cross‐sectional SEM image of the sample comprising FTO/SnO2/perovskite/V1366/Au layers. c) CW‐PL spectra (excitation: 480 nm) and d) PL lifetime of the perovskite thin films with or without spiro‐OMeTAD or V1366.
PSC devices using the different HTM materials were fabricated by sandwiching the perovskite thin films between an FTO/SnO2 anode and an HTM/Au cathode. Figure 5 a shows the typical current density—voltage (J‐V) curves (reverse scan) for the PSCs with spiro‐OMeTAD as a reference, V1244, V1321, and V1366, respectively. Devices having synthesised HTMs exhibit photoelectric conversion performance comparable to spiro‐OMeTAD, especially for the V1366, which showed even higher photocurrent. However, the devices with V1296, V1297, V1361 and V1367 as the HTMs exhibit relatively low PCE (Figure S14). Such deteriorated performance of V1296 and V1297 could be explained by quite deep HOMO levels, which could lead to the mismatch with the perovskite VB, while V1367 has one of the lowest hole drift mobility among the series. On the other hand, the PCE of 21 % consisting of J SC of 24.38 mA cm−2, a V OC of 1.092 V, and an FF of 79.1 % was achieved for the V1366‐based device in comparison to 21.64 % for the spiro‐OMeTAD with J SC of 24.17 mA cm−2, a V OC of 1.114 V, and an FF of 80.3 %, showing that molecular engineering of side‐arms fully dictates the performance of the final device. The J‐V hysteresis of the best devices is shown in Figure 5 b. A similar hysteresis index of 1.08 for spiro‐OMeTAD and 1.12 for V1366 device was found. A total of 20 solar cells in two groups were fabricated under the same conditions with spiro‐OMeTAD or V1366 as the HTM. Figure 5 c demonstrates the statistical distribution of all four photovoltaic parameters of the two groups of solar cells to show the reproducibility of each condition. All the photovoltaic parameters of them show a similar half‐width, which means the reproducibility of V1366‐based devices is comparable to that of spiro‐OMeTAD (Table S3). As shown in the Figure S13, we observe an iodine/lead atoms ratio (1.84) in the spiro‐OMeTAD/perovskite layer while a constant iodine/lead atoms ratio (1.42) is observed in the V1366/perovskite layer, which means more iodine should be diffused into the spiro‐OMeTAD between the interface of perovskite thin films and HTL.
Figure 5.
a) J‐V curves (reverse‐scan) of the PSCs based on V1244, V1321, and V1366 as HTMs and spiro‐OMeTAD as the reference. b) J‐V hysteresis of spiro‐OMeTAD and V1366. c) Statistical deviation of the photovoltaic parameters for solar cells with V1366 or spiro‐OMeTAD, respectively (10 different solar cells of each type). d) Photograph of the unsealed 6.5×7 cm solar module. e) J‐V curves of V1366‐based PSC module; the designated illumination area was estimated as 30.24 cm2; inset is the maximum‐power‐point power output of this module. f) Recently reported PCEs of perovskite solar modules with an active area of 10–100 cm2 and PCE over 15 % for both n‐i‐p and p‐i‐n architectures.
Another issue of importance to commercialization is the large‐scale production when translating from laboratory to manufacturing scale. To characterize the upscaling performance of the new HTM, we fabricated V1366‐based perovskite modules sized of 6.5×7 cm as shown in Figure 5 d. The module exhibited a PCE of 19.06 % with J SC of 2.99 mA cm−2, a V OC of 8.275 V, and an FF of 77 % as shown in Figure 5 e. And the PCE of the module stabilizes at ≈19 %, consistent with the reverse‐scan J‐V curve. To the best of our knowledge, the PCE value over 19 % is the highest PCE ever reported for non‐spiro‐OMeTAD based perovskite module. This is also illustrated in Figure 5 f and Table S4, to facilitate the comparison of the device itself, we summarized the recent reports with photovoltaic performance and device structure of perovskite solar modules prepared by different methods with an active area of 10–100 cm2 and PCE over 15 % including both n‐i‐p and p‐i‐n architectures. In addition, from the broader view, the highly efficient module using V1366 not only shows one of the state‐of‐the‐art performances for both n‐i‐p and p‐i‐n architectures but also clearly shows the proficient scalability and combined advantages of green‐chemistry approach developed V1366 HTM.
In addition to the PCE, the chemical stability was also evaluated showing the increased stability of V1366‐based device, which represents another important advantage of the new HTM. Figure 6 a, b shows representative XRD patterns of the perovskite thin films with spiro‐OMeTAD and V1366 before and after 5 h heating (85 °C) under ambient conditions (60 % RH). While the reference perovskite thin‐film shows decomposition to PbI2 after storage, the V1366‐based film maintains its good phase purity. It is most likely that the V1366 slows the moisture ingression kinetics, due to denser layer structure and less doping. The long‐term device stability is tested every 24 hours by operating the three PSCs per condition. While the reference device shows a decrease of more than 5 % in PCE after 550 h, almost no PCE loss is observed for the V1366‐based PSC, demonstrating the enhanced device stability.
Figure 6.
Long‐term stability of the perovskite thin films and devices. Representative XRD patterns of the perovskite thin films with different HTMs before and after 5 h heating (85 °C) under ambient conditions (60 % RH): a) spiro‐OMeTAD, b) V1366. The green and black dashed lines indicate the peak positions of the 001 reflection of the PbI2 crystal phase and the 110 reflection of the perovskite phase, respectively. c) Long‐term stability of PSC devices (stored in the drawer, tested every 24 hours, 15 %–20 % RH, RT) made with spiro‐OMeTAD and V1366.
Conclusion
Drawing the results together, we report the synthesis and a systematic study of the cyclobutane‐based hole‐transporting materials that are synthesized by simple and “green” chemistry. The impact of the different side‐arm fragments onto cyclobutane central core was revealed through the optical, electrochemical, photophysical, and photovoltaic measurements. It was found that cyclobutane fragment increases the glass transition temperature of final HTMs being more amorphous and morphologically stable. Additionally, hole drift mobility values of cyclobutane‐centered HTMs up to 10−4 cm2 Vs−1 order of magnitude, have been reached which outperforms spiro‐OMeTAD. The most efficient perovskite devices contained V1366 reaching the PCE of 21 % and excellent long‐term stability. Most importantly, we fabricated perovskite solar modules exhibiting a record efficiency over 19 % with an active area of 30.24 cm2. The results of this study cover the main requirements for the successful implementation of perovskite solar cell technology.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Supporting information
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgements
S.D.‐G., M.D., and V.G. acknowledge funding from the Research Council of Lithuania under grant agreement Nr. 01.2.2‐LMT‐K‐718‐03‐0040 (SMARTMOLECULES). The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number 526. K.R. acknowledges the funding received from MJJ Foundation. Open access funding provided by Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne.
S. Daskeviciute-Geguziene, Y. Zhang, K. Rakstys, G. Kreiza, S. B. Khan, H. Kanda, S. Paek, M. Daskeviciene, E. Kamarauskas, V. Jankauskas, A. M. Asiri, V. Getautis, M. K. Nazeeruddin, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202113207.
Contributor Information
Dr. Yi Zhang, Email: yi.zhang@epfl.ch.
Prof. Vytautas Getautis, Email: vytautas.getautis@ktu.lt.
Prof. Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin, Email: mdkhaja.nazeeruddin@epfl.ch.
References
- 1. Saparov B., Mitzi D. B., Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 4558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rong Y., Hu Y., Mei A., Tan H., Saidaminov M. I., Il Seok S., McGehee M. D., Sargent E. H., Han H., Science 2018, 361, 1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kojima A., Teshima K., Shirai Y., Miyasaka T., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 6050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Yoo J. J., Seo G., Chua M. R., Park T. G., Lu Y., Rotermund F., Kim Y. K., Moon C. S., Jeon N. J., Correa-Baena J. P., Bulović V., Shin S. S., Bawendi M. G., Seo J., Nature 2021, 590, 587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Divitini G., Cacovich S., Matteocci F., Cinà L., Di Carlo A., Ducati C., Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15012. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Han Y., Meyer S., Dkhissi Y., Weber K., Pringle J. M., Bach U., Spiccia L., Cheng Y. B., J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 8139. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Aristidou N., Sanchez-Molina I., Chotchuangchutchaval T., Brown M., Martinez L., Rath T., Haque S. A., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 8208; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2015, 127, 8326. [Google Scholar]
- 8. Leijtens T., Eperon G. E., Pathak S., Abate A., Lee M. M., Snaith H. J., Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ma S., Qiao W., Cheng T., Zhang B., Yao J., Alsaedi A., Hayat T., Ding Y., Tan Z., Dai S., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 3902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Yang Y., Peng H., Liu C., Arain Z., Ding Y., Ma S., Liu X., Hayat T., Alsaedi A., Dai S., J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 6450. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lian X., Zhao Z., Cheng D., Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2017, 648, 223. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Agarwala P., Kabra D., J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 1348. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Myers J. D., Xue J., Polym. Rev. 2012, 52, 1. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Saragi T. P. I., Spehr T., Siebert A., Fuhrmann-Lieker T., Salbeck J., Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Swetha T., Singh S. P., J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 18329. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Urieta-Mora J., García-Benito I., Molina-Ontoria A., Martín N., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 8541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Yan W., Ye S., Li Y., Sun W., Rao H., Liu Z., Bian Z., Huang C., Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1600474. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Teh C. H., Daik R., Lim E. L., Yap C. C., Ibrahim M. A., Ludin N. A., Sopian K., Teridi M. A. M., J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 15788. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Rakstys K., Igci C., Nazeeruddin M. K., Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 6748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Bakr Z. H., Wali Q., Fakharuddin A., Schmidt-Mende L., Brown T. M., Jose R., Nano Energy 2017, 34, 271. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bach U., Lupo D., Comte P., Moser J. E., Weissörtel F., Salbeck J., Spreitzer H., Grätzel M., Nature 1998, 395, 583. [Google Scholar]
- 22. Hawash Z., Ono L. K., Qi Y., Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 5, 1700623. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gangala S., Misra R., J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 18750. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jeon N. J., Na H., Jung E. H., Yang T. Y., Lee Y. G., Kim G., Shin H. W., Il Seok S., Lee J., Seo J., Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 682. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Deng Z., He M., Zhang Y., Ullah F., Ding K., Liang J., Zhang Z., Xu H., Qiu Y., Xie Z., Shan T., Chen Z., Zhong H., Chen C. C., Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 285. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jeong M., Choi I. W., Go E. M., Cho Y., Kim M., Lee B., Jeong S., Jo Y., Choi H. W., Lee J., Bae J. H., Kwak S. K., Kim D. S., Yang C., Science 2020, 369, 1615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bi D., Xu B., Gao P., Sun L., Grätzel M., Hagfeldt A., Nano Energy 2016, 23, 138. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Xu B., Bi D., Hua Y., Liu P., Cheng M., Grätzel M., Kloo L., Hagfeldt A., Sun L., Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 873. [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zhang J., Xu B., Yang L., Ruan C., Wang L., Liu P., Zhang W., Vlachopoulos N., Kloo L., Boschloo G., Sun L., Hagfeldt A., Johansson E. M. J., Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701209. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Xu B., Zhang J., Hua Y., Liu P., Wang L., Ruan C., Li Y., Boschloo G., Johansson E. M. J., Kloo L., Hagfeldt A., Jen A. K. Y., Sun L., Chem 2017, 2, 676. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chiykowski V. A., Cao Y., Tan H., Tabor D. P., Sargent E. H., Aspuru-Guzik A., Berlinguette C. P., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 15529; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 15755. [Google Scholar]
- 32. Drigo N., Roldan-Carmona C., Franckevičius M., Lin K. H., Gegevičius R., Kim H., Schouwink P. A., Sutanto A. A., Olthof S., Sohail M., Meerholz K., Gulbinas V., Corminboeuf C., Paek S., Nazeeruddin M. K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 1792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Saliba M., Orlandi S., Matsui T., Aghazada S., Cavazzini M., Correa-Baena J. P., Gao P., Scopelliti R., Mosconi E., Dahmen K. H., De Angelis F., Abate A., Hagfeldt A., Pozzi G., Graetzel M., Nazeeruddin M. K., Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 15017. [Google Scholar]
- 34. Rakstys K., Paek S., Sohail M., Gao P., Cho K. T., Gratia P., Lee Y., Dahmen K. H., Nazeeruddin M. K., J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 18259. [Google Scholar]
- 35. Gao K., Xu B., Hong C., Shi X., Liu H., Li X., Xie L., Jen A. K. Y., Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800809. [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhu X. D., Ma X. J., Wang Y. K., Li Y., Gao C. H., Wang Z. K., Jiang Z. Q., Liao L. S., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1807094. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wang X., Zhang J., Yu S., Yu W., Fu P., Liu X., Tu D., Guo X., Li C., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12529; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2018, 130, 12709. [Google Scholar]
- 38.See ref. [14].
- 39. Salbeck J., Weissörtel F., Bauer J., Macromol. Symp. 1998, 125, 121. [Google Scholar]
- 40. Salbeck J., Yu N., Bauer J., Weissörtel F., Bestgen H., Synth. Met. 1997, 91, 209. [Google Scholar]
- 41. Petrus M. L., Music A., Closs A. C., Bijleveld J. C., Sirtl M. T., Hu Y., Dingemans T. J., Bein T., Docampo P., J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 25200. [Google Scholar]
- 42. Petrus M. L., Schutt K., Sirtl M. T., Hutter E. M., Closs A. C., Ball J. M., Bijleveld J. C., Petrozza A., Bein T., Dingemans T. J., Savenije T. J., Snaith H., Docampo P., Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1801605. [Google Scholar]
- 43. Daskeviciene M., Paek S., Wang Z., Malinauskas T., Jokubauskaite G., Rakstys K., Cho K. T., Magomedov A., Jankauskas V., Ahmad S., Snaith H. J., Getautis V., Nazeeruddin M. K., Nano Energy 2017, 32, 551. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Vaitukaityte D., Wang Z., Malinauskas T., Magomedov A., Bubniene G., Jankauskas V., Getautis V., Snaith H. J., Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1803735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Daskeviciute S., Momblona C., Rakstys K., Sutanto A. A., Daskeviciene M., Jankauskas V., Gruodis A., Bubniene G., Getautis V., Nazeeruddin M. K., J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 301. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zhang F., Wang Z., Zhu H., Pellet N., Luo J., Yi C., Liu X., Liu H., Wang S., Li X., Xiao Y., Zakeeruddin S. M., Bi D., Grätzel M., Nano Energy 2017, 41, 469. [Google Scholar]
- 47. Zhang F., Wang S., Zhu H., Liu X., Liu H., Li X., Xiao Y., Zakeeruddin S. M., ACS Energy Lett. 2018, 3, 1145. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Jiang H., Sun J., Zhang J., Curr. Org. Chem. 2012, 16, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chen Z., Li H., Zheng X., Zhang Q., Li Z., Hao Y., Fang G., ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 3111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Liu X. X., Ding X., Ren Y., Yang Y., Ding Y., Liu X. X., Alsaedi A., Hayat T., Yao J., Dai S., J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 12912. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Yu W., Yang Q., Zhang J., Tu D., Wang X., Liu X., Li G., Guo X., Li C., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 30065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Kang M. S., Do Sung S., Choi I. T., Kim H., Hong M., Kim J., Lee W. I., Kim H. K., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 22213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Lu C., Choi I. T., Kim J., Kim H. K., J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 20263. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Wu F., Ji Y., Zhong C., Liu Y., Tan L., Zhu L., Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 8719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Magomedov A., Paek S., Gratia P., Kasparavicius E., Daskeviciene M., Kamarauskas E., Gruodis A., Jankauskas V., Kantminiene K., Cho K. T., Rakstys K., Malinauskas T., Getautis V., Nazeeruddin M. K., Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1704351. [Google Scholar]
- 56. Rakstys K., Paek S., Drevilkauskaite A., Kanda H., Daskeviciute S., Shibayama N., Daskeviciene M., Gruodis A., Kamarauskas E., Jankauskas V., Getautis V., Nazeeruddin M. K., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 19710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Wu F., Shan Y., Qiao J., Zhong C., Wang R., Song Q., Zhu L., ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 3833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Li D., Shao J. Y., Li Y. Y., Li Y. Y., Deng L. Y., Zhong Y. W., Meng Q., Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 1651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Tsutsumi N., Yamamoto M., Nishijima Y., J. Polym. Sci. Part B 1987, 25, 2139. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Sasakawa T., Ikeda T., Tazuke S., J. Appl. Phys. 1989, 65, 2750. [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ikeda T., Mochizuki H., Hayashi Y., Sisido M., Sasakawa T., J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70, 3689. [Google Scholar]
- 62. Ganesan P., Fu K., Gao P., Raabe I., Schenk K., Scopelliti R., Luo J., Wong L. H., Grätzel M., Nazeeruddin M. K., Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- 63. Rakstys K., Saliba M., Gao P., Gratia P., Kamarauskas E., Paek S., Jankauskas V., Nazeeruddin M. K., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 7464; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 7590. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer reviewed and may be re‐organized for online delivery, but are not copy‐edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Supporting Information







