Skip to main content
Frontiers in Aging logoLink to Frontiers in Aging
. 2022 Jul 7;3:935220. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2022.935220

Longevity-Promoting Pathways and Transcription Factors Respond to and Control Extracellular Matrix Dynamics During Aging and Disease

Tinka Vidović 1, Collin Y Ewald 2,*
PMCID: PMC9301135  PMID: 35874275

Abstract

Aging is one of the largest risk factors for cancer, type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis, cardiovascular diseases, and other age-related pathologies. Here, we give a detailed description of the interplay of chronic age-related pathologies with the remodeling of the extracellular matrix during disease development and progression. Longevity-promoting signaling pathways slow or prevent age-related diseases. In particular, we focus on the mTOR signaling pathway, sirtuins, and canonical longevity-promoting transcription factors, such as FOXO, NF-κB, and Nrf2. We extend our analysis using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing and transcriptomic data and report that many established and emerging longevity-promoting transcription factors, such as CREB1, FOXO1,3, GATA1,2,3,4, HIF1A, JUN, KLF4, MYC, NFE2L2/Nrf2, RELA/NF-κB, REST, STAT3,5A, and TP53/p53, directly regulate many extracellular matrix genes and remodelers. We propose that modulation of these pathways increases lifespan and protects from age-related diseases in part due to their effects on extracellular matrix remodeling. Therefore, to successfully treat age-related diseases, it is necessary to better understand the connection between extracellular matrix components and longevity pathways.

Keywords: extracellular matrix, healthy aging, matrisome, collagen, mTOR signaling pathway, FOXO transcription factors, NF-κB transcription factor, Nrf2 transcription factor

Introduction

Aging is defined as a time-dependent functional decline of physiological processes. The aging process is one of the highest and most critical risk factors for cancer, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative, and other age-related pathologies. Although the aging process seems to be a stochastic decay of physiological processes and complicated (Freund, 2019; Vertti-Quintero et al., 2021; Statzer et al., 2022b), recently, the field has defined nine hallmarks of aging: genomic instability, epigenetic changes, loss of proteostasis, dysregulated nutrient sensing, mitochondria dysfunction, cellular senescence, stem cell exhaustion, altered intercellular communication, and telomere attrition (Lopez-Otin et al., 2013). One aspect not included in the hallmarks of aging is the recent emerging, yet not understood role of the extracellular matrix during aging and longevity. Here in this review, we focus on extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling upon longevity-promoting pathway activation. We will give a detailed description of how some of the essential aging signaling pathways and transcription factors influence the extracellular composition and propose that modulation of these pathways increases lifespan and protects from age-related diseases due to their effect on ECM remodeling.

The cells are surrounded by extracellular matrices (ECMs), which are crucial for tissue structure, function, and intercellular communication. The ECM is attached via cell surface receptors such as integrins and discoidin domain receptors to the cells. There is a decline in ECM integrity during aging due to the accumulation of damage from collagen fragmentation, oxidation, glycation, cross-linking, and formation of protein aggregates. This decline in ECM integrity leads to loss of organ support and functions and can drive cellular aging and disease progression (Ewald, 2020).

It was shown that cells in a proper environment can live much longer than the maximal lifespan of the animal (Harrison, 1979; Magrassi et al., 2013) and that placing senescent cells into a young ECM rejuvenates them (Choi et al., 2011). Systems-level approaches using mice showed an association with age on the mRNA and protein level (Williams et al., 2022), suggesting dynamic ECM remodeling even during older ages. One of the strongest correlating gene expression signatures with extended lifespan across tissues was Coro7, which is important for cytoskeleton remodeling that usually occurs in response to changes in the ECM (Vitiello et al., 2021). Furthermore, overexpressing collagens is required and sufficient for longevity in C. elegans (Ewald et al., 2015), indicating an important role of ECM homeostasis in healthy aging. Thus, directly altering ECM composition can slow the aging of the entire organism.

The functions and phenotypes of collagens and other extracellular matrix genes are well conserved, allowing the interchangeability of findings across species for discoveries (Statzer and Ewald, 2020). To enable a complete picture of all proteins that form, remodel, and are associated with the ECM, the matrisome was in silico defined and validated with proteomics approaches across several species (Naba et al., 2016; Teuscher et al., 2019a). The extracellular proteins that form the matrix are collagens, proteoglycans, and glycoproteins [ca. 300 proteins; (Naba et al., 2016)]. The remaining ca. 700 proteins are secreted proteases, such as metalloproteases and cathepsins, which remodel the ECM, growth factors, and other proteins associated with the ECM (Naba et al., 2016). In total, the matrisome comprises about 1,000 proteins or 5% of the genome (Naba et al., 2016; Shao et al., 2020). Remarkably, in single-cell RNA sequencing experiments, the matrisome gene expression signatures can predict cell identity and the cellular status during mouse and chick limb development, suggesting that each cell produces its unique ECM (Sacher et al., 2021). Furthermore, the matrisome composition enables cancer-type identification (Socovich and Naba, 2019). This led to the concept of the matreotype, which is a snapshot of the ECM composition associated with or caused by a phenotype or physiological status, such as health or disease (Ewald, 2020). Our group has exploited this concept by using the human GTEx (Statzer et al., 2021) expression data and defining the youthful matreotype to probe against drug gene expression profiles (Statzer et al., 2021). In this way, novel longevity-promoting drugs were identified and validated by lifespan assays using C. elegans (Statzer et al., 2021), demonstrating the usability of the matreotype in cross-species approaches. Notably, 41 out of the 47 known longevity-promoting drugs showed significant changes in ECM expression (Statzer et al., 2021), begging the question of what are the underlying molecular pathways covering these health-promoting reprogramming. Thus, we performed a literature search on the reciprocal interactions between longevity-promoting pathways and ECM remodeling. Although many reviews about the key longevity-promoting pathways, such as mTOR, FOXO, NF-κB, NRF2, and sirtuins, exist (Tilstra et al., 2011; Blackwell et al., 2015; Martins et al., 2016; Watroba and Szukiewicz, 2016; Ewald et al., 2018; Weichhart, 2018; Schmidlin et al., 2019), they focus mainly on intercellular changes and extracellular changes are less explored.

Role of Longevity-Assurance Pathways in ECM Remodeling and Age-Related Diseases

mTOR Signaling

An important aging pathway that significantly influences ECM remodeling is the mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR)/Akt signaling pathway (Figure 1). The mTOR kinase is an evolutionarily conserved protein present in two functionally and structurally different multiprotein complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2 (Guertin and Sabatini, 2007). The mTORC1 has five subunits: catalytic subunit mTOR, the regulatory-associated protein of mTOR (Raptor), mLST8 subunit, PRAS40, and DEPTOR subunit (Figure 1). PRAS40 and DEPTOR are the negative regulators of the mTORC1 complex (Peterson et al., 2009). The mTORC2 has six subunits: mTOR, rapamycin-insensitive companion of mTOR (Rictor), mSIN1, Protor-1, mLST8, and DEPTOR, where DEPTOR is the only endogenous inhibitor of mTORC2 (Laplante and Sabatini, 2009). The tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) with two subunits (TSC1 or hamartin and TSC2 or tuberin) regulates mTORC1 activity. The TSC1/2 is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for a small GTPase Rheb, and TSC1/2 activation leads to the inactivation of mTORC1 since active GTP-bound Rheb is necessary for mTORC1 activity (Figure 1) (Tee et al., 2003).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Outside-in and inside-out interplay of longevity pathways and extracellular matrix components. Extracellular matrix components influence longevity pathways and transcription factors. Constitutive activation of the mTOR signaling pathway and transcription factor NF-κB can lead to the development of age-related diseases. By contrast, FOXO, NRF2, and sirtuins activation relate to an increased lifespan.

The mTORC2 influences cell survival, metabolism, and proliferation via phosphorylation and, thus, activation of Akt (Manning and Cantley, 2007). Akt can phosphorylate and therefore inactivate the transcription factor FOXO, which is associated with oxidative stress resistance (Calnan and Brunet, 2008). Furthermore, the mTOR is an essential central controller of ribosome biogenesis, protein synthesis, and cell growth (Jacinto and Hall, 2003). Phosphorylation by mTOR activates p70 ribosomal S6 kinase (p70S6K) and inactivates eIF4E-binding protein (4E-BP1) (Figure 1). Thereby, mTOR kinase influences the translation by preventing the binding of 4E-BP1 to eIF4E, and eIF4E can promote cap-dependent translation. The mTOR also phosphorylates and thereby inactivates retinoblastoma protein (pRb), leading to positive regulation of RNA polymerase I and III activity (Asnaghi et al., 2004).

Phosphorylation of TSC2 by Akt, Erk, or ribosomal S6 kinase inhibits the tumor suppressor complex TSC1–TSC2 (Figure 1). Because the TSC1–TSC2 complex is a negative regulator of mTORC1, its inhibition leads to mTORC1 activation. Activated mTORC1 promotes cell growth and proliferation by promoting translation, and many growth factors act via mTORC1 to influence proliferation (Ma and Blenis, 2009). Activated mTORC1 signaling inhibits the insulin–PI3K–AKT pathway, and this negative feedback loop has an essential role in insulin-resistant diabetes and cancer (Easton et al., 2006; Um et al., 2006; Ma and Blenis, 2009). By contrast, reducing mTOR signaling promotes autophagy, mRNA splicing fidelity, hydrogens sulfide signaling, and other mechanisms promoting lifespan increase across species (Harrison et al., 2009; Blackwell et al., 2019; Liu and Sabatini, 2020; Statzer et al., 2022a).

Mechanical stretching can activate the Akt/mTOR pathway via β1 integrin (Figure 1), leading to phosphorylation of 4E-BP and ribosomal S6 and causing an increase in the synthesis of collagen, a major structural component of ECM (Mousavizadeh et al., 2020). The composition of ECM exhibits regional variation and dynamic changes related to age, disease, or injury. These changes in ECM can even impact the function of astrocytes. Astrocytes are the most abundant cell type in the central nervous system (CNS), and astrocytes become activated in response to CNS injury, inflammation, or disease. ECM can influence whether astrocytes be in a resting or activated state, and astrocyte wound recovery after mechanical injury varies on different ECM substrates. Johnson et al. tested the recovery of astrocytes grown on different ECM proteins after mechanical stimuli (i.e., scratch) and found that recovery of the scratch was ECM-dependent and that blockage of β1 integrins inhibited astrocyte growth. Therefore, β1 integrin mediates ECM-dependent wound response. They also showed that rapamycin can block wound response on astrocytes grown on tenascin-C and that this effect is mediated by mTORC1 Johnson et al. (2015).

Tissue damage resulting from trauma, disease, or aging can result in organ damage, and tissue regeneration is critical for restoring normal organ functions. Activation of mTOR stimulates the regeneration of neurons and astrocytes, muscles, liver, and intestines, and these effects are mainly mediated by mTORC1. Therefore, disruption of mTORC1 signaling is harmful to tissue regeneration (Wei et al., 2019). Moreover, it was shown that treatment with mTOR inhibitor rapamycin impairs wound healing (Ekici et al., 2007). The mTOR is the master regulator of the inflammatory response in both immune and non-immune cells. Since mTOR plays a critical role in chronic inflammation, it is not surprising that mTOR activation is implicated in many chronic inflammatory diseases (Suto and Karonitsch, 2020). In general, inflammation proceeds to fibrosis (Wick et al., 2010), an excess deposition of amorph collagens (Teuscher et al., 2019b). Thus, inhibiting mTOR can alleviate the chronic inflammatory response, a major driver of fibrotic collagen deposition (Figure 1).

Since tissue regeneration is necessary for restoring tissue homeostasis, mTOR activation in damaged tissue can lead to quicker remission by enhancing tissue regeneration and replacing damaged and lost tissue structures. Therefore, as described in a review from Wei et al. (2019), it is necessary to develop tissue-specific drugs; developing mTOR tissue-specific agonists and antagonists is of great clinical importance. In the very early stages of the disease, when damage to organs is not present, mTOR inhibitors could be more useful in preventing inflammatory damage to organs. Although, in stages where healing and tissue regeneration are happening, tissues may benefit more if a tissue-specific mTOR agonist that increases tissue regeneration is administered. However, since there is a connection between impaired wound healing and the development of tissue fibrosis, this mTOR agonist should be taken very shortly and with great caution.

One of the stages of wound healing is the proliferative phase, in which fibroblasts create the ECM. It was shown that epithelial cells proliferate and migrate faster upon upregulation of the PI3K/mTOR signaling pathway, thereby accelerating wound repair (Castilho et al., 2013). But what if mTOR activation becomes constitutive and causes excessive matrix deposition and reduced ECM remodeling? Fibrosis can happen, and injury is one of the leading causes of fibrosis, and mTOR inhibitors show promise in treating fibrosis (Lawrence and Nho, 2018). Woodcock et al. (2019)showed that the mTORC1/4E-BP1 axis plays a significant role in mediating the fibrogenic effects of TGF-β1, the most potent pro-fibrotic mediator. Therefore, targeting the mTOR pathway could be a potentially promising antifibrotic strategy. Aging is a risk factor for fibrotic diseases and increases the likelihood of developing fibrosis upon injury (Murtha et al., 2019). mTOR inhibition increases lifespan and delays age-related diseases in flies, C. elegans, and mice (Kapahi et al., 2004; Harrison et al., 2009; Blackwell et al., 2019). Since tissue fibrosis is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality and more than 45% of deaths in the United States can be attributed to fibrotic disorders (Wynn, 2004), one of the reasons why mTOR inhibition increases lifespan may be due to preventing fibrotic disorders in tissues. This hypothesis needs to be still experimentally validated. If it proves to be correct, then the connection between mTOR and excessive matrix deposition could become one of the most important factors for lifespan extension and delay of age-related diseases.

Sirtuin Activity

Sirtuins (silent information regulator 2) are NAD+ (nicotine adenine nucleotide)-dependent histone deacetylases (HDAC). Histone acetyltransferase (HAT) causes acetylation of lysine residues on a histone or other proteins, while histone deacetylases reverse this reaction. Acetyl-ADP-ribose, nicotinamide, and a deacetylated peptide substrate are products of this deacetylation reaction. Nicotinamide (NAM) is an endogenous inhibitor of sirtuin activity in vivo and in vitro. The human genome encodes seven sirtuins, and they are found in different cellular compartments: Sirt1, Sirt6, and Sirt7 are mainly in the nucleus, Sirt2 is in the cytoplasm, while mitochondrial sirtuins are Sirt3, Sirt4, and Sirt5 (Michan and Sinclair, 2007).

Osteoarthritis is linked to the changes in Sirt1 activity in the cartilage. Sirt1 plays a role in ECM synthesis and promotes cell survival (Dvir-Ginzberg and Steinmeyer, 2013). It was shown that miR-122 induces ECM damage in chondrocytes by inhibiting Sirt1. The miR-122 expression was significantly increased in osteoarthritis cartilage, while Sirt1 expression was significantly decreased. The overexpression of miR-122 increased the expression of ECM catabolic factors (Bai et al., 2020). Moreover, deacetylation of FOXO4 by Sirt1 could activate the Sox9 expression and maintain the ECM stability of cartilage (Ma et al., 2021). Sirt1 also has an anti-inflammatory effect on chondrocytes by deacetylating and inactivating NF-κB. Therefore, Sirt1 could be a therapeutic target for osteoarthritis (Moon et al., 2013).

Advanced age is associated with aortic stiffening, and interventions that increase Sirt1 also lower age-related aortic stiffness. Machin et al. showed that in transgenic mice that overexpressed Sirt1 aortic elastin was maintained during aging, compared to the wild type that showed a decrease in aortic elastin. Moreover, there were an age-related increase in aortic collagen, advanced glycation end products, and calcification in wild-type mice compared to Sirt1 transgenic mice (Machin et al., 2020). Sirt1 plays a significant role in both bleomycin-induced fibrosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Activation or overexpression of Sirt1 attenuates, while Sirt1 knockdown promotes the pro-fibrogenic activity of TGF-β1 in lung fibroblasts. Therefore, activation or overexpression of Sirt1 could be a therapeutic strategy for IPF (Zeng et al., 2017). Resveratrol, a polyphenol compound that can activate Sirt1, decreases ECM deposition in bleomycin-treated mice by regulation of autophagy, and this process is Sirt1-dependent. Resveratrol treatment reduces fibrotic markers fibronectin, collagen I, and collagen IV and increases the levels of autophagy markers Atg5 and LC3BII (Mise et al., 2014). The overexpression of Sirt1 has a protective function in renal fibrosis, and the protective function is mediated by attenuation of TGF-β1-induced ECM expression (Huang et al., 2014). Expression and activity of Sirt1 decreases in the aged kidney. Another mechanism by which Sirt1 could protect from tubulointerstitial damage in the aged kidney is by deacetylating HIF-1α. It was shown that chronic HIF-1α activation promotes fibrosis. During hypoxia, Sirt1 is downregulated, which allows the activation of HIF-1α. Sirt1 inhibitor sirtinol enhances apoptosis and ECM accumulation. Kidneys from aged mice have more apoptosis and higher expression of ECM proteins (Ryu et al., 2019). The overexpression of connexin 43 also improves renal function in diabetic nephropathy by upregulating Sirt1 expression and enhancing Sirt1-dependent deacetylation and inactivation of HIF-1α (Sun et al., 2020).

Sirtuins control the activity of several longevity-promoting transcription factors. The activities of NF-kappaB, Foxo, and Nrf2, are controlled by Sirt1: deacetylation of NF-kappaB causes inactivation, while Foxo deacetylation results in activation (Figure 1) (Michan and Sinclair, 2007). There were conflicting results about the role of deacetylation on Nrf2 transcriptional activity (Kawai et al., 2011; Ding et al., 2016), most probably because of different cell conditions. Sirt1 activation positively affects lifespan extension and is protective against age-related diseases like diabetes type II, cancer, neurodegenerative, and cardiovascular diseases (Donmez and Outeiro, 2013; Donmez and Outeiro, 2013Imai and Guarente, 2014). Caloric restriction (CR) can activate Sirt1 by upregulating AMPK and increasing cellular levels of NAD+, and some of the positive effects of CR on lifespan are mediated by Sirt1. It was also shown that pharmacological induction of sirtuin activity could mimic the positive impact of CR without actually applying CR (Watroba and Szukiewicz, 2016). Sirtuins regulate many functions that have a role in aging, like DNA repair, genome stability, inflammatory responses, apoptosis, mitochondrial function, and cell cycle (Watroba and Szukiewicz, 2016). Therefore, sirtuins cooperate with NF-κB, FOXO, and p53 (Ren et al., 2019) and can indirectly affect the lifespan by regulating these transcription factors.

Longevity Pathways and Transcription Factors Control ECM Remodeling During Disease and Aging

FOXO Signaling

The Forkhead family of transcription factors comprises of more than 100 members in humans and, as a characteristic, they contain a conserved DNA-binding domain called the forkhead box (Zanella et al., 2010; Genin et al., 2014). While the invertebrate genome has one Forkhead Box O (FOXO) gene, mammals have four FOXO genes: FOXO1, FOXO3, FOXO4, and FOXO6 (Hannenhalli and Kaestner, 2009). FOXO transcription factors influence and control cell cycle arrest, cell death, metabolism, DNA repair, oxidative stress resistance, and differentiation and can act as a tumor suppressor (Figure 1) (Martins et al., 2016; Tia et al., 2018). Several post-translational modifications, such as acetylation/deacetylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination, arginine, and lysine methylation, modulate FOXO transcription factors in response to stress (Brunet et al., 2004; Calnan et al., 2012). The FOXO subfamily is an essential transcriptional effector of the insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway and acts as one of the critical regulators of longevity. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptors lead to the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway, and AKT can phosphorylate FOXO leading to FOXO’s translocation from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (Figure 1). The phosphorylation and inactivation of FOXO by Akt lead to the suppression of FOXO-dependent gene expression (Guo et al., 1999; Murphy et al., 2003; Puig et al., 2003).

The essential molecular pathway of insulin signaling is conserved through evolution (Curran and Ruvkun, 2007). In C. elegans, loss-of-function mutations in the Insulin/IGF-1 receptor/daf-2 signaling pathway can more than double the lifespan of an animal (Kenyon et al., 1993). Recently, it was shown that even at the end of life, degradation of daf-2 can double the lifespan of very geriatric C. elegans (Venz et al., 2021). One of the key regulators of this pathway in worms is the transcription factor daf-16/FOXO, which is required for the large lifespan extension produced in C. elegans by inhibiting insulin/IGF-1 signaling (Lin et al., 1997; Murphy et al., 2003; Ewald et al., 2018). Willcox et al. (2008) first reported that genetic variation in FOXO3A is strongly associated with human longevity. Several later studies confirmed the association of FOXO3 polymorphisms with extreme longevity (Anselmi et al., 2009; Li et al., 2009). FOXO induces transcription of Sestrin3, a highly conserved antioxidant. Sestrins can activate AMPK, and the exact mechanism of this activation is unknown (Budanov and Karin, 2008). Because of AMPK activation, FOXO can inhibit mTORC1 in a TSC2-dependent manner, and inhibition of mTORC1 is one of the possible mechanisms by which FOXO activation extends lifespan (Hay, 2011). FOXO also, directly and indirectly, regulates several stress response genes, DNA repair genes, proteostasis, metabolism, cell cycle genes, immune function, Parkinson’s disease, and collagen remodeling, thereby improving homeostasis and promoting longevity (Webb et al., 2016).

Fibrosis is a universally age-related disease that involves almost all organs. It is typically initiated by injury and eventually results in excessive collagen deposition, destruction of the organ’s normal structure, and end-organ failure. Forkhead box proteins O1 and O3 (FOXO1/3) have favorable inhibitory effects on fibroblast activation and ECM production and are promising targets for anti-fibrosis therapy. In fibrotic disorders, activated fibroblasts are typically resistant to apoptosis. Therefore, inducing apoptosis of activated fibroblasts may prove effective in fibrotic disorders. FOXO1/3 can modulate the activation and cause apoptosis of fibrogenic effector cells. The fibrogenic effector cells contain fibroblasts and myofibroblasts, active forms of fibroblasts (Xin et al., 2018). Accelerated aging and cellular senescence are driving pulmonary fibrosis. Rehan et al. showed that downregulation of the SIRT3-FOXO3a pathway in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) drives senescent myofibroblast formation and lung fibrosis. Moreover, restoring the SIRT3-FOXO3a pathway leads to apoptosis of senescent myofibroblasts, fibrosis resolution, and lung regeneration. SIRT3/FOXO3a overexpression leads to the upregulation of proapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Bcl-2 proteins drive the programmed cell death of senescent myofibroblasts by activating the intrinsic apoptosis pathway (Rehan et al., 2021). Another promising approach is by a peptide (FOXO4-D-Retro-Inverso (DRI)) that blocks the interaction of FOXO4 with p53, which drives senescent cells into apoptosis (Baar et al., 2017). Treating bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis mice with FOXO4-DRI reduced the number of senescent cells and myofibroblasts, attenuated collagen deposition, and downregulated ECM receptors (Han et al., 2022), suggesting a FOXO4-dependent reprogramming to ameliorate pulmonary fibrosis.

Characteristic of cardiac fibrotic diseases (heart failure and diabetic cardiomyopathy) is cardiac myofibroblast (CMF) conversion. TGF-β1 is a crucial protein involved in CMF conversion, and it was shown that FOXO3a is a negative regulator of CMF conversion induced by TGF-β1 (Vivar et al., 2020). Since ECM production and proliferation of fibroblasts also have a role in wound healing, FOXO1/3 activity should not be increased in the early stages of injury to allow injury repair. Still, it should be increased in the late stages of injury to suppress fibrosis and scar tissue formation (Xin et al., 2018).

It is known that vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) apoptosis accelerates atherosclerosis and promotes the breakdown of the ECM, and a mechanistic link between these two processes could be FOXO3a. Transcriptional activation of MMP13 (matrix metalloproteinase 13) is mediated by FOXO3a and could explain, at least in part, how FOXO3a activation induces ECM breakdown (Yu et al., 2018). FOXO3a activation not only affects ECM breakdown but can also inhibit fibroblast proliferation. During fibroblast interaction with ECM, there is a proliferation permissive signal that involves activation of the integrin/PI3K/AKT pathway. When fibroblasts are attached to collagen, there is a decrease in PTEN and PP2A phosphatase activity and an increase in PI3K/AKT activity (Figure 1). Both inhibition of PTEN and decrease in PP2A activity inhibit FOXO3a and promote fibroblast proliferation by preventing FOXO3a-mediated upregulation of cell cycle inhibitor p27 (Nho and Kahm, 2010).

Last, osteoarthritis is the most common age-related disease that affects joints, and with aging, the expression of FOXO transcription factors is reduced, which diminishes their chondroprotective effects. Duffy et al. (2020) showed that FOXO transcription factors regulate ECM genes in human chondrocytes. Since increased catabolism in the ECM of the articular cartilage is a crucial factor in the development and progression of osteoarthritis (Rahmati et al., 2017), it is possible that by regulating ECM genes, FOXO transcription factors play a significant role in the development and progression of osteoarthritis.

In summary, FOXO1/3/4 are promising targets for anti-fibrotic therapy. When activated, FOXO1/3 can cause apoptosis of fibrogenic effector cells, but FOXO activity should not be increased in the early stages of injury to allow injury repair. Moreover, FOXO transcription factors have chondroprotective effects, and the positive effect of FOXO activation on osteoarthritis may be mediated by the regulation of ECM genes by FOXO.

Transcription Factor NF-κB

The transcription factor NF-κB is a pivotal mediator of inflammatory responses. NF-κB is composed of five subunits: NF-κB1 (p50), NF-κB2 (p52), RelA (p65), RelB, and c-Rel, and these subunits are bound to specific κB enhancers as homo- or heterodimers (Gilmore, 1999). The p50 and p52 subunits cannot activate transcription on their own because they lack transactivation subunits. Thus, p50 and p52 homodimers are inhibitory subunits of NF-κB (Kang et al., 1992; Plaksin et al., 1993; Driessler et al., 2004). The NF-κB subunits are usually in the cytoplasm bound to the inhibitory IκB family of proteins. There are two signaling pathways essential in the activation of NF-κB: canonical and non-canonical (or alternative) pathways. The canonical pathway responds to various cytokine receptors and involves phosphorylation and ubiquitin-dependent degradation of inhibitory IκB proteins by a multi-subunit IκB kinase (IKK) complex (Figure 1). The IKK complex has two catalytic subunits, IKKα and IKKβ, and regulatory subunit NEMO or IKKγ. The non-canonical pathway connects with phosphorylation and ubiquitin degradation of NF-κB2 precursor protein, p100, resulting in the generation of p52 and nuclear translocation of p52/RelB (Figure 1). Deregulated NF-κB signaling is the hallmark of inflammation, and a better understanding of NF-κB signaling could lead to better therapy of inflammatory diseases (Liu et al., 2017). Since inflammatory diseases increase with aging, it is not a surprise that the overactivation of NF-κB is one of the transcriptional signatures and drivers of aging (Osorio et al., 2016).

Oxidative, genotoxic, and inflammatory stresses lead to the activation of NF-κB, which regulates the expression of genes involved in cell cycle, cellular senescence, apoptosis, and inflammation (Tilstra et al., 2011). Most age-associated diseases share increased inflammation, and NF-κB signaling is upregulated in atherosclerosis, osteoarthritis, neurodegeneration, osteoporosis, and cardiovascular diseases [reviewed in (Tilstra et al., 2011)]. Inflammaging characterizes the activation of innate immunity that happens because of the immunosenescence of adaptive immunity (Franceschi et al., 2000). Inflammaging is connected with an increase in NF-κB activation and a decline in autophagy and apoptosis. Senescence can cause apoptosis resistance, which relates to a senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP; Figure 1). SASP is a condition in which senescent cells secrete many factors associated with inflammation and oncogenesis (Coppe et al., 2010). Inflammatory cytokines secreted from senescent cells stimulate NF-κB signaling. The characteristic of senescent cells is a permanent growth arrest, and normal cells become senescent after exposure to genotoxic stress or after a defined number of divisions. Furthermore, the senescent cells can remodel their microenvironment by altering the expression and organization of key ECM components (Mavrogonatou et al., 2019). The expressions of collagen and elastin have shown differentially expressed patterns in senescent cells, depending on the cell type. At the same time, increased levels of different MMPs, ADAM17, and ADAMTS5, were detected in different models of senescence. By contrast, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) are primarily downregulated in senescence (Levi et al., 2020). An aberrant ECM could drive cellular senescence, as described in Blokland et al. review. Remodeling and injury can cause the breakdown of the ECM and the release of ECM fragments that act as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and activate pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) on cells of the innate immune system. The activation of PRRs induces NF-κB-mediated pro-inflammatory cytokine release, similar to SASP Blokland et al. (2020). When NF-κB signaling is activated, the expression of MMPs is increased. MMPs are responsible for the degradation of ECM, and these changes might even contribute to skin wrinkling, which is characteristic of premature skin aging (Pittayapruek et al., 2016). Furthermore, the degradation of the ECM is one of the first steps in tumor cell invasion. One of the MMPs, MMP-9, is associated with cancer invasion and metastasis and can lead to the development of several inflammatory diseases, diabetes, cardiovascular, and neurodegenerative diseases (Mondal et al., 2020).

Arterial aging increases the incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. Some of the characteristics of aged arteries are ECM deposition, elastin fracture, and matrix calcification/glycation (Wang et al., 2014). Inflammation drives the activation of MMPs, which degrade extracellular matrices that can lead to hypertension and atherosclerotic effects within the arterial wall. Hence, MMP inhibition can attenuate age-associated pathophysiologic arterial remodeling in animal models of hypertension and atherosclerosis (Wang et al., 2015).

Shear stress can lead to the activation of NF-κB depending on the ECM composition. For instance, endothelial cells plated onto a collagen or laminin matrix do not activate NF-κB upon shear stress, but when plated onto fibronectin and fibrinogen activate NF-κB in response to shear stress (Orr et al., 2005). Fibronectin and fibrinogen depositions are found in vasculature sites that are prone to develop of atherosclerosis, and thus, Nf-κB might be a driver in the development of atherosclerosis (Kutuk and Basaga, 2003). Furthermore, Li et al. (2013) showed that high pulsatility flow over-polarizes the endothelial cells, leading to NF-κB activation, while normal pulsatile flow that moderately polarizes cells could protect cells. Cellular polarity describes the asymmetric distribution of biomolecules, cellular components, and structures that is transmitted to new cells during cell division. This asymmetry is required for correct cell division, differentiation, motility, and cell migration (Bornens, 2008; Lee and Vasioukhin, 2008; Budovsky et al., 2011). Disruption of epithelial cell polarity can even cause cancer development and affect its progression. Many processes dependent on cell polarity are compromised during aging (e.g., leakier epithelial barriers, older adults have impaired vascular function, and an increased risk of developing cancer). Therefore, it could be that cellular polarity has a significant role in aging and cellular senescence (Soares et al., 2014), and inappropriate ECM composition and NF-κB activation might be underlying drivers of this.

Remodeling the ECM is one of the hallmarks of tumor progression to more advanced stages. ECM remodeling in tumors is characterized by the stiffening of normally wavy collagen bundles into thick linear bundles. Fischer et al. (2021)proposed that wavy ECM bundles are physical barriers for cancer cells and can also serve as a “cell polarization barrier” where high amplitude waves depolarize tumor cells and prevent their directional migration and dissemination, suggesting that the microenvironment of solid tumors has a significant role in tumor progression. It was also shown that the fibronectin matrix is upregulated in lung cancer, and fibronectin is known to contribute to both tumor metastasis and chemotherapy resistance. Cho et al. (2020)showed that lung cancer cells seeded onto the 3D model of tumor-associated ECM activates the TLR4/NF-κB signaling pathway, leading to an increase in IL-8 production. Since IL-8 contributes to the resistance of lung cancer cells via EGFR inhibitors (Liu et al., 2015; Fernando et al., 2016), targeting molecular mechanisms that connect an increase in the fibronectin content to an increase in Nf-κB signaling and IL-8 production could be a therapeutic strategy. The cancer cells need to acquire a mesenchymal phenotype to metastasize, which includes enhanced migratory capacity (Kalluri and Weinberg, 2009).

Nf-κB plays one of the major roles in epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), the first step of the metastatic process. Activated NF-κB induces multiple EMT transcription factors, including Twist1, Snail2, and ZEB1/2 (Chua et al., 2007; Storci et al., 2010; Li et al., 2012). Some ECM molecules, like type I collagen, are also implicated in EMT. Type I collagen promotes EMT through integrin-linked kinase (ILK). ILK by inducing phosphorylation of AKT (Figure 1), GSK-3β, and IκB causes activation of the NF-κB, Snail, and LEF-1 transcription factors. An increase in the expression of these transcription factors reduces the expression of epithelial marker E-cadherin. At the same time, it promotes the expression of mesenchymal marker vimentin, which leads to stimulation of EMT and cell migration (Medici and Nawshad, 2010).

In summary, changes in ECM composition upon injury or mechanical stress can lead to NF-κB activation, which is implicated in atherosclerosis and plays a significant role in EMT and the progression of tumors.

Transcription Factor Nrf2

Nrf2 (nuclear factor E2-related factor 2) is a conserved cellular sensor of chemical- and radiation-induced oxidative stress. It binds to the antioxidant-response element (ARE) and regulates the expression of the ARE-mediated antioxidant genes (Figure 1) (Blackwell et al., 2015). Nrf2 belongs to a subset of basic leucine zipper genes, and a cytosolic inhibitor Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) continuously targets Nrf2 for degradation. Oxidative stress causes Nrf2 release from Keap1, translocation to the nucleus, binding to ARE, and activation of gene expression (Figure 1) (Kaspar et al., 2009). Increasing oxidative stress is the characteristic of aging, and it is implicated in the development of age-related diseases. Nrf2 activation is impaired with aging, and induction of many antioxidant genes declines with aging. Changes in the levels of Keap1 during aging might be a reason for the impaired activity of Nrf2 during aging (Zhang et al., 2015). The cells are more sensitive to oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and protein aggregation when NRF2-mediated transcription is decreased, which promotes the aging phenotype. Reduced Nrf2 activity can increase oxidative stress and lead to the development of age-associated diseases (Schmidlin et al., 2019). Therefore, Nrf2 activation could be a promising strategy for preventing age-related diseases.

Oxidative stress has been increasingly recognized to be implicated in the development of osteoarthritis (Bolduc et al., 2019). Kubo et al. (2022)showed that Nrf2 deficiency results in SOX9 suppression and that in older age, Nrf2-KO mice develop an osteoarthritic articular cartilage degeneration. Sox9 has an essential role in regulating cartilage ECM homeostasis, and it can regulate chondrocyte differentiation by promoting type II collagen expression (Akiyama, 2008). Sox9 can also inhibit ECM degradation by inhibiting RUNX2, a key regulator of osteoarthritis development and progression (Orfanidou et al., 2009). Thus, Nrf2, by regulating the expression of SOX9, helps to protect cartilage ECM homeostasis (Kubo et al., 2022).

Oxidative stress is implicated in the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and Nrf2 could be a therapeutic target for the intervention and prevention of COPD (Boutten et al., 2011). The transcription factor Nrf2 can also protect against pulmonary fibrosis. Bleomycin is an antineoplastic drug that can cause pulmonary fibrosis. It was shown that bleomycin induces higher protein levels of MMP2, TGF-β, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), and tenascin-C in Nrf2 −/− mice than in Nrf2 +/+ mice. Deletion of Nrf2 causes increased susceptibility to pulmonary fibrosis induced by bleomycin, and Nrf2 could protect against fibrogenesis (Cho et al., 2004). Sulforaphane, an Nrf2 activator, has antifibrotic effects on the liver, lungs, and muscles. Sulforaphane can reduce muscle fibrosis in mdx mice through Nrf2-mediated suppression of TGF-β/Smad signaling and fibrogenic gene expression (Sun et al., 2016). Astaxanthin, a carotenoid compound with high antioxidant activity, was shown to have a reno-protective effect and can inhibit high glucose-induced renal fibrosis by promoting Nrf2/ARE signaling. Induction of Nrf2 signaling by astaxanthin leads to the inhibition of TGF-β, fibronectin, and ICAM-1 expression induced by high glucose (Xie et al., 2018). A study from Shin et al. suggests that Nrf2/HO-1 signaling plays a protective role against cyclosporin A-induced renal fibrosis by modulating EMT gene changes. EMT plays a crucial role in the metastatic process and can cause fibrosis since generated myofibroblasts are a primary source of ECM production Shin et al. (2010). Nrf2 has a protective effect in streptozotocin-induced diabetic nephropathy by inhibiting TGF-β and reducing ECM production (Jiang et al., 2010).

During aging, skin becomes thin and drastically loses collagen. Lee et al. showed that the skin thickness of Sod3+/+ overexpressing mice was increased during aging compared to wild-type mice. Extracellular superoxide dismutase or SOD3 can promote collagen production in aged mice by activating AMPK and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways. Hence, the extracellular SOD3 and Nrf2 could be potential therapeutic targets for antiaging in the skin (Lee et al., 2021). Transcription factor Nrf2 could also be a potential therapeutic target for cataracts. The incidence of cataracts increases with aging, and some of the flavonoids that can activate Nrf2 have protective effects from cataract formation by increasing Nrf2 activity and attenuating MMP-9 expression (Hilliard et al., 2020).

Nrf2 is considered both a tumor suppressor and oncogene regarding cancer (Sporn and Liby, 2012). Its antioxidant function could mediate both tumor-suppressing and oncogenic effects (Milkovic et al., 2017). Indeed, reactive oxygen species (ROS) participates in all processes in tumorigenesis, from cancer initiation to malignant transformation. ROS can cause oxidative DNA damage and mutation in tumor suppressors and proto-oncogenes. Low levels of ROS are associated with increased cell proliferation and survival (Ivanova et al., 2016). Because of Nrf2’s antioxidant function, it could be that Nrf2 activation by drugs could be used to prevent cancer and other diseases. But what if Nrf2 becomes constitutively activated in cancer cells? High levels of ROS are associated with apoptosis, the release of cytochrome c in the cytosol, oxidation of cytochrome c, and only oxidized cytochrome c can activate caspases (Brown and Borutaite, 2008). High ROS levels could lead to the apoptosis of cancer cells, and the antioxidant function of Nrf2 will protect cancer cells from oxidative stress and apoptosis.

Nrf2 activation can prevent cancer development, but Nrf2 inhibition could lead to cancer cell death if malignant transformation is already present. Similar to cancer, there are conflicting evidence about the role of Nrf2 in senescence. It was long thought that the relationship between Nrf2 and cellular senescence is an inverse one, where reduced Nrf2 activity correlates with increased senescence (Fulop et al., 2018; Yuan et al., 2021). Recently, Hiebert et al. (2018) identified the unexpected role of Nrf2 in the induction of cellular senescence and cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) phenotype through the regulation of matrisome. Activating Nrf2 in fibroblasts promotes cellular senescence by producing a senescence-promoting matrisome, leading to accelerated wound closure and increased tumor growth (Hiebert et al., 2018; Hiebert, 2021). In summary, it could be that depending on cell type and cellular fitness, Nrf2 activation could lead to both positive and negative effects. It is possible that in young and non-senescent cells, Nrf2 activation inhibits tumorigenesis, but old and senescent cells can lead to increased cancer cell survival. Thus, Nrf2 activity needs to be tightly, time-dependent, and tissue-specifically controlled to enable beneficial and health-promoting effects.

Matrisome Genes as Targets of Longevity Transcription Factors

Longevity transcription Factors Can, Directly and Indirectly, Regulate Matrisome Genes

As outlined above, the key canonical longevity pathways are interconnected and play major functions in preventing age-related diseases. Dysregulation of ECM composition is a major driver of many pathologies, such as high quantity and amorph deposition of collagens in fibrosis, increased ECM stiffness during cancer, altered ECM secretion of senescent cells (SASPs), or degradation of ECM in osteoarthritis. Previously, we described that many longevity pathways could influence the dysregulation of ECM remodeling. We discussed that the extracellular matrix components could regulate longevity transcription factors, that is, outside-in signaling (Figure 1). Outside-in signaling usually results in an inside-out signaling since cells respond and adapt to their surrounding ECM (Qin et al., 2004). This ensures bidirectional signaling across the plasma membrane to adapt cell function to its environment. Thus, we hypothesized that these longevity-promoting transcription factors that respond to changes in the ECM (i.e., outside-in signaling) would also directly participate in signaling from the inside-out. This implies that these transcription factors would transcribe ECM or matrisome genes that would adapt to the extracellular environment, including remodeling of the ECM.

To address this hypothesis, we used the Harmonizome database, which contains a collection of processed datasets from over 70 major online resources (Rouillard et al., 2016) to find target genes of transcription factors from published chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChiP-seq) studies. We used “CHEA Transcription Factor Targets” dataset (Lachmann et al., 2010) from the Harmonizome database to obtain transcription factor gene targets. We extended our list of longevity transcription factors and included several other important but less established longevity-promoting transcription factors that we have not covered in detail earlier. These are the STAT and GATA family of transcription factors, AP-1/JUN, HIF1A, MYC, CREB, KLF4, REST, and TP53. Fischer et al. (2022) review in detail all transcription factors that are regulators of longevity. In this way, we obtained a more comprehensive analysis.

Next, we stratified target genes of transcription factors as matrisome and non-matrisome genes (Figure 2; Supplementary Data S1). There are 1,027 matrisome genes or 5% of the genome (Naba et al., 2016; Shao et al., 2020; Statzer and Ewald, 2020), and we observed that the longevity transcription factors directly bind between ∼2–11% of matrisome genes out of the total genes they regulate (ranging from 9–331 matrisome genes compared to 314–8,501 total genes; Figure 2 ). Taking the 5.14% of the genome are matrisome genes as the baseline, then 4 out of 17 transcription factors (HIF1A, JUN, NFE2L2/Nrf2, RELA/ NF-κB) assessed here showed significant enrichment for binding onto matrisome genes (>6% matrisome genes; Figure 2). While FOXO1 and FOXO3 only bind 2.8% and 1.7% of matrisome genes, respectively (Figure 2), a previous extensive analysis of conserved FOXO targets revealed that collagen remodeling genes are among the FOXO targets that change with age (Webb et al., 2016), suggesting that these few matrisome genes may be sufficient to repair the underlying tissue deterioration during aging. On the other hand, the second most enrichment for matrisome genes was observed with the Nrf2 ChIP data (Figure 2). In addition to re-establishing redox balance, Nrf2 is crucial for wound healing and recently has been shown to target matrisome genes to drive cellular senescence (Hiebert et al., 2018; Hiebert, 2021). The highest enrichment for matrisome genes was observed with RELA/NF-κB (Figure 2), suggesting that NF-κB not only regulates inflammation but also might directly orchestrate ECM remodeling. Thus, these ChIP-seq data suggest that longevity-promoting transcription factors directly target ECM genes.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Direct regulation of matrisome genes by longevity transcription factors. We used previously published ChIP-seq studies to find target genes of transcription factors that are associated with longevity. We divided the target genes of each transcription factor into matrisome and non-matrisome genes. From selected longevity transcription factors, MYC regulates the highest number of overall genes, while the largest number of matrisome genes is regulated by STAT3.

To identify common ECM remodelers of longevity transcription factors, we listed collagen, and ECM regulators (e.g., ECM proteases and inhibitors, ECM crosslinkers, etc) in Table 1. The most common collagen targets were collagen type IV (11/17 TF), V (8/17 TF), I (7/17 TF), XVIII (6/17 TF), and VI (5/17 TF), and the most common ECM regulators were ADAMTS5, EGLN3, SULF2, P4HA2, PAPPA, FAM20B, and ADAM23 (#/17 TF stands for the number of transcription factors out of the total 17 transcription factors; Table 1). However, in general, there was a poor overlap of ECM remodelers across the different transcription factors, suggesting tissue/disease-specific regulation.

TABLE 1.

List of transcription factor target genes from ChIP-seq studies stratified to collagen and ECM regulators matrisome gene categories.

CREB1 FOXO1 FOXO3 GATA1 GATA2 GATA3 GATA4 HIF1A JUN KLF4 MYC MYC NFE2L2 RELA REST STAT3 STAT3 STAT5A TP53 TP53
Collagen COL13A1 COL2A1 COL12A1 COL18A1 COL17A1 COL12A1 COL12A1 COL14A1 COL13A1 COL27A1 COL14A1 COL1A2 COL11A1 COL11A1 COL26A1 COL16A1 COL11A2 COL4A3
COL15A1 COL15A1 COL19A1 COL4A1 COL4A4 COL22A1 COL18A1 COL15A1 COL28A1 COL1A2 COL11A2 COL12A1 COL27A1 COL24A1 COL12A1 COL4A5
COL16A1 COL18A1 COL1A1 COL4A1 COL2A1 COL16A1 COL4A2 COL25A1 COL13A1 COL13A1 COL4A3 COL13A1 COL4A6
COL17A1 COL1A1 COL23A1 COL4A2 COL4A1 COL18A1 COL5A1 COL4A1 COL16A1 COL14A1 COL4A6 COL18A1 COL5A1
COL1A1 COL22A1 COL25A1 COL6A3 COL4A2 COL19A1 COL5A2 COL5A1 COL17A1 COL16A1 COL6A1 COL1A1 COL5A2
COL5A1 COL23A1 COL26A1 COL4A5 COL1A1 COL5A3 COL8A1 COL18A1 COL17A1 COL6A5 COL23A1 COL6A3
COL9A3 COL24A1 COL27A1 COL4A6 COL20A1 COL6A1 COL22A1 COL21A1 COL8A2 COL24A1 COL8A1
COL27A1 COL4A5 COL5A1 COL24A1 COL9A1 COL4A2 COL22A1 COL26A1 COL8A2
COL2A1 COL5A1 COL6A1 COL25A1 COL9A2 COL5A3 COL23A1 COL27A1 COL9A3
COL4A2 COL9A1 COL6A2 COL6A5 COL24A1 COL2A1
COL4A3 COL8A2 COL6A6 COL4A1
COL4A4 COL7A1
COL5A1 COL8A1
COL5A3 COL9A2
COL9A1
ECM regulators ADAM11 CELA2A ADAM17 ADAM11 ADAM11 ADAMTS5 ADAMTS1 EGLN3 ADAM12 ADAM17 ADAM12 MMP2 ADAM17 ADAM19 ADAM11 A2M PAPPA ADAMTS5 ADAM12 MMP28
ADAMTS1 F10 ADAM19 ADAM19 ADAM18 AMBP ADAMTS15 LOXL2 ADAM23 ADAM19 ADAM15 MMP21 ADAM22 AGT ADAM12 ADAM10 PCSK5 ADAMTS6 ADAM15 OGFOD2
ADAMTS17 PLG CTSO ADAMTS14 ADAM19 CST11 ADAMTS5 P4HA1 ADAM30 ADAM23 ADAM17 MMP23B ADAM23 CTSB ADAM2 ADAM11 PLAT ADAMTSL3 ADAM19 P4HA1
ADAMTS2 SERPINA5 HPSE ADAMTS17 ADAM23 CTSF ADAMTS6 P4HA2 ADAMTS1 ADAMTS18 ADAM18 MMP24 ADAMTS6 CTSL ADAM20 ADAM12 PLOD1 CTSC ADAM21 PAPPA
ADAMTS20 SERPINA9 ITIH3 ADAMTSL4 ADAMTS14 MMP19 ADAMTS8 PLOD2 ADAMTS12 ADAMTS4 ADAM2 MMP25 ADAMTSL4 CTSS ADAM21 ADAM18 PLOD2 CTSH ADAM22 PCSK6
ADAMTS3 LEPRE1 ADAMTSL5 ADAMTS3 P4HA2 CST3 ADAMTS18 CD109 ADAM23 MMP28 AMBP HPSE ADAM23 ADAM22 PZP FAM20A ADAM30 PLOD2
ADAMTS5 MMP15 CD109 ADAMTS4 PLOD1 CTSA ADAMTS2 CST3 ADAM29 MMP7 CST6 ITIH2 ADAM29 ADAM23 SERPINA1 LEPREL1 ADAM8 PRSS12
ASTL MMP17 CELA1 ADAMTS5 SULF2 HRG ADAMTS5 CSTB ADAM8 MMP9 CSTB MMP1 ADAM32 ADAM29 SERPINA11 PZP ADAMTS13 PRSS2
CPN2 PAPPA CPN2 ADAMTS6 HYAL2 AGT CSTL1 ADAM9 NGLY1 CTSB MMP3 ADAM7 ADAM7 SERPINA3 SERPINA11 ADAMTS14 SERPINA3
CTSL SERPINA11 CTSB ADAMTS9 KAZALD1 CD109 CTSW ADAMTS1 OGFOD1 CTSC MMP9 ADAMDEC1 ADAM9 SERPINB3 SERPINB5 ADAMTS16 SERPINB1
CTSZ SULF2 CTSC ADAMTSL1 MMP27 F9 EGLN2 ADAMTS10 OGFOD2 CTSO PAPPA ADAMTS13 ADAMDEC1 SERPINB7 SERPINB6 ADAMTS18 SERPINE2
EGLN3 CTSD ADAMTSL2 P4HTM FAM20B F12 ADAMTS13 P4HA1 EGLN3 PI3 ADAMTS16 ADAMTS10 SERPINE1 SERPINE1 ADAMTS19 SERPINF1
HPSE2 CTSE ADAMTSL4 TGM2 HTRA3 FAM20B ADAMTS16 PLG HABP2 PLAU ADAMTS2 ADAMTS12 SERPINE2 TGM1 ADAMTS2 ST14
HYAL2 CTSF ADAMTSL5 TIMP3 HYAL4 HTRA1 ADAMTS17 PLOD1 MMP7 SERPINA1 ADAMTS20 ADAMTS16 SERPINF2 ADAMTS20 SULF2
HYAL3 CTSL C17orf58 ITIH2 HYAL1 ADAMTS19 PLOD3 P4HA1 SERPINA3 ADAMTS4 ADAMTS17 SERPING1 ADAMTS3 TGM1
LOXL3 CTSS CD109 LEPREL1 HYAL2 ADAMTS2 PRSS12 PAPPA SERPINB1 ADAMTSL1 ADAMTS18 SERPINI1 ADAMTS5 TGM3
MMP14 CTSZ CELA1 LOX HYAL3 ADAMTS20 PRSS3 SERPINA12 SERPINB8 BMP1 ADAMTS19 SULF2 ADAMTS6 TGM6
MMP9 EGLN1 CTSB LOXL4 LOX ADAMTS4 SERPINA1 SERPINB9 SERPINE1 CELA2A ADAMTS20 TGM2 ADAMTSL1 TIMP3
OGFOD2 EGLN3 CTSS MEP1A MASP2 ADAMTS5 SERPINA10 SERPINE1 SERPINE2 CST11 ADAMTS3 TIMP3 ADAMTSL4 TLL1
P4HA2 FAM20B EGLN3 MMP14 MMP11 ADAMTS7 SERPINA6 SERPINF1 SERPINH1 CST8 ADAMTS4 TLL1 ASTL TLL2
PAMR1 HPSE FAM20B MMP16 MMP14 ADAMTS8 SERPINB11 SLPI SLPI CSTL1 ADAMTS6 CD109
PLOD3 HPSE2 HPSE2 PAPPA MMP15 ADAMTSL1 SERPINB6 SULF1 TGM1 CTSF ADAMTS9 CELA3A
SERPINB13 HTRA3 LEPREL2 PLAU MMP16 AMBP SERPINB9 TGM3 TGM2 EGLN3 ADAMTSL1 CPN2
SULF2 KY LOXL4 PRSS12 MMP17 BMP1 ST14 TLL1 F12 ADAMTSL4 CSTA
TIMP3 LOX MEP1A SERPIND1 OGFOD1 CPN2 SULF2 FAM20B ADAMTSL5 CTSB
LPA MMP10 SERPINE1 P4HA2 CST3 TGM5 KAZALD1 CD109 CTSD
MASP1 MMP2 SPAM1 P4HTM CST7 TGM6 KY CPN2 CTSW
MMP14 MMP24 TLL1 PLOD1 CTSA TIMP2 LOX CST7 FAM20A
MMP15 MMP8 TMPRSS15 PLOD3 CTSD TMPRSS15 LOXL4 CTSO FAM20B
MMP27 P4HA2 SERPINA3 CTSL MASP2 CTSS FAM20C
MMP8 PCSK5 SERPINB5 CTSZ MMP16 CTSZ HPSE
OGFOD1 PCSK6 SERPINB6 EGLN2 MMP24 EGLN3 HPSE2
P4HA1 PLAT SERPINE2 EGLN3 OGFOD2 F12 HTRA1
P4HA2 PLAU SERPINI1 ELANE P4HA1 F13A1 HYAL1
PAPPA PLG ST14 F13B P4HA2 FAM20B HYAL2
PCSK6 SERPINB12 SULF2 F2 P4HTM HPSE2 HYAL3
PLG SERPINB2 F7 PLAT HTRA1 KY
PRSS12 SERPINB6 HABP2 PLOD3 KAZALD1 LEPREL1
SERPINB1 SERPIND1 HTRA1 PZP KNG1 LOX
SERPINB9 SERPINE1 HYAL1 SERPINA10 KY LOXL3
SERPINH1 SERPING1 HYAL2 SERPINA5 MEP1A LOXL4
TGM1 SERPINH1 ITIH1 SERPINA6 MMP13 MMP14
TGM2 TGM1 LEPREL2 SERPIND1 MMP15 MMP2
TGM2 LOX SERPINE3 MMP20
TGM3 LOXL1 SERPINI2 MMP21
TGM4 LOXL3 SPAM1 MMP23B
TGM6 LOXL4 SULF2 MMP24
TIMP3 MMP10 TGM2 MMP25
TLL1 TGM4 MMP28
TLL2 TLL1 MMP9
TLL2 P4HA3
TMPRSS15 PAMR1

With the ChIP-seq, we established the matrisome targets; we next wanted to determine the matrisome genes differentially expressed by these longevity transcription factors. From the Harmonizome database (Rouillard et al., 2016), we used the processed Gene Expression Omnibus dataset “Signatures of Differentially Expressed Genes for Gene Perturbations” (Edgar et al., 2002; Barrett et al., 2013) to find mRNA expression profiles for cells or tissues, following a genetic perturbation (knockdown, knockout, overexpression, and mutation). For comparison, we stratified collagen and ECM regulator genes from the list of differentially expressed genes after transcription factor gene perturbation (Table 2). We noticed that there is a difference between a set of matrisome genes that are differentially regulated after transcription factor perturbation and those matrisome genes that are directly regulated by the transcription factor. We noticed little overlaps between the set of matrisome genes that were differentially regulated after transcription factor perturbation and those matrisome genes that were directly regulated by the transcription factor. This could indicate that longevity transcription factors can, directly and indirectly, regulate matrisome genes. However, further studies comparing ChIP-seq with RNA-seq in the same experimental settings are needed to provide stronger evidence for such a conclusion. Since these transcription factors can regulate ECM genes, it is possible that by regulating matrisome genes, these transcription factors influence longevity.

TABLE 2.

List of collagen and ECM regulator genes differentially regulated after transcription factor perturbation. KD = knockdown; KO = knockout; OE = overexpression.

Transcription factor Cell or tissue Species Perturbation Collagen genes (downregulated) Collagen genes (upregulated) ECM regulators (downregulated) ECM regulator genes (upregulated) GEO accession
CREB K562 myeloid leukemia cell line Human Depletion COL19A1 COL15A1 ADAM23 PRSS2
SERPINE1
GDS3487
COL1A2 ADAMTS18
CST9
MMP10
SERPIND1
SERPINI1
FOXO1 LSK Mouse KD - - ADAMTS8 SERPINA7 GDS2720
MMP12 CTSW
P4HTM MMP12
SERPINA11 PRSS12
FOXO1 T reg Mouse KO - COL9A3 ADAMTS6 ADAM8 GSE40655
ADAMTS8 ADAM9
EGLN3 CST7
ITIH5 FAM20A
PAPPA2 PLG
SERPINB7
TGM2
FOXO1 CD8 T cells Mouse KO COL27A1 COL10A1 ADAMTS15 ADAMTS4 GSE46025
CTSE F10
SERPINA9
GATA1 Megakaryocytes Mouse KD - - ADAMTSL1 ADAM7 GDS1245
F10 ADAMTS15
F13A1 EGLN2
MMP19 TGM2
SLPI
TGM3
GATA3 Basal breast cancer cells Human Ectopic expression COL8A1 COL4A5 CST2 CST6 GDS4080
CST4 LOXL1
LOX MMP1
PRSS12 MMP12
MMP3
PAPPA
PRSS3
TIMP4
GATA4 Endothelial-derived cells Mouse Inactivation - - ADAM9 CELA2A GDS3663
ADAMTS19 F10
F13B PCSK6
HTRA4 SERPINA12
LEPRE1 SERPINB7
P4HA3
PLAU
SERPINA6
SULF2
TGM6
GATA4 Jejunum Mouse KO - - CD109 ADAM18 GDS3486
LOXL3 ADAMTS7
SPAM1 LEPRE1
TMPRSS15 MEP1A
GATA4 Adult heart during pressure overload Mouse KO - - ADAM10 CTSK GDS4782
ADAM28 FAM20C
CTSC ITIH5
CTSF LEPREL1
MEP1A PCSK6
MMP11 TGM1
MMP12 TGM2
MMP15 TIMP3
SERPINB8 TIMP4
JUN B lymphoid cells Mouse KO - - ADAMTSL5 BMP1 GDS4205
CTSE OGFOD1
CTSO SERPINB1
EGLN3 SERPINB5
LEPREL2
PLOD2
MYC Medulloblastoma Human KD - COL15A1 CTSL CTSB GSE22139
COL1A1 HYAL4
COL4A1 ITIH5
COL5A1 LOX
COL5A3 MMP10
COL6A2 MMP7
MMP9
PLAU
SERPINE1
MYC MCF10A cells Human OE - - CPN2 MMP7 GSE43730
OGFOD1 PRSS12
SERPINB3 ST14
SERPINE1
SERPINE2
SULF1
NFE2L2 Liver Mouse KO COL15A1 COL22A1 CTSC ADAMDEC1 GDS514
COL2A1 EGLN2 CTSE
PRSS2 MMP9
SERPINF1
SERPINI1
STAT3 Cultured embryonic stem (ES) cells Mouse OE - - ADAM22 CTSG GDS3444
ADAM7 SERPINB1
MMP13 SERPIND1
MMP3 TLL1

Conclusion

This review focused on the emerging evidence that longevity-signaling pathways promote extracellular matrix remodeling. There is a decline in ECM integrity during aging due to the accumulation of damage from collagen fragmentation, oxidation, or glycation. These changes in long-lived macromolecules of ECM can lead to the formation of cross-links and aggregates. A decline in ECM integrity leads to the loss of organ support and functions and can drive cellular aging and disease progression. We described in detail how ECM components influence the activity of some of the well-known longevity pathways, like mTOR, FOXO, Nrf2, and Sirtuins. Changes in ECM composition can cause dysregulation of longevity pathways and drive the progression of age-related disease. Moreover, we showed that many longevity transcription factors could regulate matrisome genes. Changes in the activity of longevity pathways can modify ECM composition, but the modification of ECM components can also change the activity of longevity pathways. In the future, it is necessary to develop new therapeutics that will directly target ECM components, possibly in combination with targeting longevity pathways to promote increased healthspan.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Ewald Lab for critical reading and feedback on the manuscript. Figure 1 was created with BioRender.com (Licence number: CY23UUCCUO).

Author Contributions

TV and CE conceived the outline of the review. TV did the literature search and wrote the manuscript in consultation with CE.

Funding

Funding was provided from the Swiss National Science Foundation SNF P3 Project 190072 to CE. Open access funding was provided by ETH Zurich.

Conflict of Interest

TV is employed by Tinka Therapeutics. CYE is a co-founder and shareholder of Avea Life AG and is on the Scientific Advisory Board of Maximon AG and Galyan Bio, INC.

The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fragi.2022.935220/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Akiyama H. (2008). Control of Chondrogenesis by the Transcription Factor Sox9. Mod. Rheumatol. 18 (3), 213–219. 10.1007/s10165-008-0048-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anselmi C. V., Malovini A., Roncarati R., Novelli V., Villa F., Condorelli G., et al. (2009). Association of the FOXO3A Locus with Extreme Longevity in a Southern Italian Centenarian Study. Rejuvenation Res. 12 (2), 95–104. 10.1089/rej.2008.0827 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Asnaghi L., Bruno P., Priulla M., Nicolin A. (2004). mTOR: A Protein Kinase Switching between Life and Death. Pharmacol. Res. 50 (6), 545–549. 10.1016/j.phrs.2004.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baar M. P., Brandt R. M. C., Putavet D. A., Klein J. D. D., Derks K. W. J., Bourgeois B. R. M., et al. (2017). Targeted Apoptosis of Senescent Cells Restores Tissue Homeostasis in Response to Chemotoxicity and Aging. Cell 169 (1), 132–147 e116. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bai Y., Chen K., Zhan J., Wu M. (2020). miR-122/SIRT1 Axis Regulates Chondrocyte Extracellular Matrix Degradation in Osteoarthritis. Biosci. Rep. 40 (6), BSR20191908. 10.1042/BSR20191908 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrett T., Wilhite S. E., Ledoux P., Evangelista C., Kim I. F., Tomashevsky M., et al. (2013). NCBI GEO: Archive for Functional Genomics Data Sets-Uupdate. Nucleic Acids Res. 41 (Database issue), D991–D995. 10.1093/nar/gks1193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blackwell T. K., Sewell A. K., Wu Z., Han M. (2019). TOR Signaling in Caenorhabditis E Development, Metabolism, and Aging. Genetics 213 (2), 329–360. 10.1534/genetics.119.302504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Blackwell T. K., Steinbaugh M. J., Hourihan J. M., Ewald C. Y., Isik M. (2015). SKN-1/Nrf, Stress Responses, and Aging in Caenorhabditis E . Free Radic. Biol. Med. 88 (Pt B), 290–301. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blokland K. E. C., Pouwels S. D., Schuliga M., Knight D. A., Burgess J. K. (2020). Regulation of Cellular Senescence by Extracellular Matrix during Chronic Fibrotic Diseases. Clin. Sci. (Lond) 134 (20), 2681–2706. 10.1042/CS20190893 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bolduc J. A., Collins J. A., Loeser R. F. (2019). Reactive Oxygen Species, Aging and Articular Cartilage Homeostasis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 132, 73–82. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.08.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bornens M. (2008). Organelle Positioning and Cell Polarity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9 (11), 874–886. 10.1038/nrm2524 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Boutten A., Goven D., Artaud-Macari E., Boczkowski J., Bonay M. (2011). NRF2 Targeting: A Promising Therapeutic Strategy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Trends Mol. Med. 17 (7), 363–371. 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brown G. C., Borutaite V. (2008). Regulation of Apoptosis by the Redox State of Cytochrome C. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Bioenerg. 1777 (7-8), 877–881. 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.03.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Brunet A., Sweeney L. B., Sturgill J. F., Chua K. F., Greer P. L., Lin Y., et al. (2004). Stress-Dependent Regulation of FOXO Transcription Factors by the SIRT1 Deacetylase. Science 303 (5666), 2011–2015. 10.1126/science.1094637 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Budanov A. V., Karin M. (2008). p53 Target Genes Sestrin1 and Sestrin2 Connect Genotoxic Stress and mTOR Signaling. Cell 134 (3), 451–460. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Budovsky A., Fraifeld V. E., Aronov S. (2011). Linking Cell Polarity, Aging and Rejuvenation. Biogerontology 12 (2), 167–175. 10.1007/s10522-010-9305-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Calnan D. R., Brunet A. (2008). The FoxO Code. Oncogene 27 (16), 2276–2288. 10.1038/onc.2008.21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Calnan D. R., Webb A. E., White J. L., Stowe T. R., Goswami T., Shi X., et al. (2012). Methylation by Set9 Modulates FoxO3 Stability and Transcriptional Activity. Aging 4 (7), 462–479. 10.18632/aging.100471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Castilho R., Squarize C., Gutkind J. (2013). Exploiting PI3K/mTOR Signaling to Accelerate Epithelial Wound Healing. Oral Dis. 19 (6), 551–558. 10.1111/odi.12070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen Q., Tao J., Xie X. (2018). Astaxanthin Promotes Nrf2/ARE Signaling to Inhibit HG-Induced Renal Fibrosis in GMCs. Mar. Drugs 16 (4), 117. 10.3390/md16040117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cho C., Horzempa C., Longo C. M., Peters D. M., Jones D. M., McKeown-Longo P. J. (2020). Fibronectin in the Tumor Microenvironment Activates a TLR4-Dependent Inflammatory Response in Lung Cancer Cells. J. Cancer 11 (11), 3099–3105. 10.7150/jca.39771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cho H.-Y., Reddy S. P. M., Yamamoto M., Kleeberger S. R. (2004). The Transcription Factor NRF2 Protects against Pulmonary Fibrosis. FASEB J. 18 (11), 1258–1260. 10.1096/fj.03-1127fje [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Choi H. R., Cho K. A., Kang H. T., Lee J. B., Kaeberlein M., Suh Y., et al. (2011). Restoration of Senescent Human Diploid Fibroblasts by Modulation of the Extracellular Matrix. Aging Cell 10 (1), 148–157. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00654.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chua H. L., Bhat-Nakshatri P., Clare S. E., Morimiya A., Badve S., Nakshatri H. (2007). NF-κB Represses E-Cadherin Expression and Enhances Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition of Mammary Epithelial Cells: Potential Involvement of ZEB-1 and ZEB-2. Oncogene 26 (5), 711–724. 10.1038/sj.onc.1209808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Coppé J.-P., Desprez P.-Y., Krtolica A., Campisi J. (2010). The Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype: the Dark Side of Tumor Suppression. Annu. Rev. Pathol. Mech. Dis. 5, 99–118. 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Curran S. P., Ruvkun G. (2007). Lifespan Regulation by Evolutionarily Conserved Genes Essential for Viability. PLoS Genet. 3 (4), e56. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Ding Y.-W., Zhao G.-J., Li X.-L., Hong G.-L., Li M.-F., Qiu Q.-M., et al. (2016). SIRT1 Exerts Protective Effects against Paraquat-Induced Injury in Mouse Type II Alveolar Epithelial Cells by Deacetylating NRF2 In Vitro . Int. J. Mol. Med. 37 (4), 1049–1058. 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2503 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Donmez G., Outeiro T. F. (2017). SIRT1 and SIRT2: Emerging Targets in Neurodegeneration. EMBO Mol. Med. 5 (3), 344–352. 10.1002/emmm.201302451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Driessler F., Venstrom K., Sabat R., Asadullah K., Schottelius A. J. (2004). Molecular Mechanisms of Interleukin-10-Mediated Inhibition of NF-κB Activity: A Role for P50. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 135 (1), 64–73. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02342.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Duffy T., Bekki H., Lotz M. K. (2020). Genome‐Wide Occupancy Profiling Reveals Critical Roles of FoxO1 in Regulating Extracellular Matrix and Circadian Rhythm Genes in Human Chondrocytes. Arthritis Rheumatol. 72 (9), 1514–1523. 10.1002/art.41284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Dvir-Ginzberg M., Steinmeyer J. (2013). Towards Elucidating the Role of SirT1 in Osteoarthritis. Front. Biosci. 18 (1), 343–355. 10.2741/4105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Easton J. B., Kurmasheva R. T., Houghton P. J. (2006). IRS-1: Auditing the Effectiveness of mTOR Inhibitors. Cancer Cell 9 (3), 153–155. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Edgar R., Domrachev M., Lash A. E. (2002). Gene Expression Omnibus: NCBI Gene Expression and Hybridization Array Data Repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 30 (1), 207–210. 10.1093/nar/30.1.207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ekici Y., Emiroglu R., Ozdemir H., Aldemir D., Karakayali H., Haberal M. (2007). Effect of Rapamycin on Wound Healing: An Experimental Study. Transplant. Proc. 39 (4), 1201–1203. 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ewald C. Y., Castillo-Quan J. I., Blackwell T. K. (2018). Untangling Longevity, Dauer, and Healthspan in Caenorhabditis E Insulin/IGF-1-Signalling. Gerontology 64 (1), 96–104. 10.1159/000480504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Ewald C. Y., Landis J. N., Abate J. P., Murphy C. T., Blackwell T. K. (2015). Dauer-Independent insulin/IGF-1-Signalling Implicates Collagen Remodelling in Longevity. Nature 519 (7541), 97–101. 10.1038/nature14021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ewald C. Y. (2020). The Matrisome during Aging and Longevity: A Systems-Level Approach toward Defining Matreotypes Promoting Healthy Aging. Gerontology 66 (3), 266–274. 10.1159/000504295 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Fernando R. I., Hamilton D. H., Dominguez C., David J. M., McCampbell K. K., Palena C. (2016). IL-8 Signaling Is Involved in Resistance of Lung Carcinoma Cells to Erlotinib. Oncotarget 7 (27), 42031–42044. 10.18632/oncotarget.9662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Fischer F., Grigolon G., Benner C., Ristow M. (2022). Evolutionarily Conserved Transcription Factors as Regulators of Longevity and Targets for Geroprotection. Physiol. Rev. 102, 1449–1494. 10.1152/physrev.00017.2021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fischer R. S., Sun X., Baird M. A., Hourwitz M. J., Seo B. R., Pasapera A. M., et al. (2021). Contractility, Focal Adhesion Orientation, and Stress Fiber Orientation Drive Cancer Cell Polarity and Migration along Wavy ECM Substrates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118 (22), e2021135118. 10.1073/pnas.2021135118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Franceschi C., Bonafè M., Valensin S., Olivieri F., De Luca M., Ottaviani E., et al. (2000). Inflamm-Aging: An Evolutionary Perspective on Immunosenescence. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 908, 244–254. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06651.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Freund A. (2019). Untangling Aging Using Dynamic, Organism-Level Phenotypic Networks. Cell Syst. 8 (3), 172–181. 10.1016/j.cels.2019.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Fulop G. A., Kiss T., Tarantini S., Balasubramanian P., Yabluchanskiy A., Farkas E., et al. (2018). Nrf2 Deficiency in Aged Mice Exacerbates Cellular Senescence Promoting Cerebrovascular Inflammation. Geroscience 40 (5-6), 513–521. 10.1007/s11357-018-0047-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Genin E. C., Caron N., Vandenbosch R., Nguyen L., Malgrange B. (2014). Concise Review: Forkhead Pathway in the Control of Adult Neurogenesis. Stem Cells 32 (6), 1398–1407. 10.1002/stem.1673 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gilmore T. D. (1999). The Rel/NF-κB Signal Transduction Pathway: Introduction. Oncogene 18 (49), 6842–6844. 10.1038/sj.onc.1203237 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Guertin D. A., Sabatini D. M. (2007). Defining the Role of mTOR in Cancer. Cancer Cell 12 (1), 9–22. 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.05.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Guo S., Rena G., Cichy S., He X., Cohen P., Unterman T. (1999). Phosphorylation of Serine 256 by Protein Kinase B Disrupts Transactivation by FKHR and Mediates Effects of Insulin on Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-1 Promoter Activity through a Conserved Insulin Response Sequence. J. Biol. Chem. 274 (24), 17184–17192. 10.1074/jbc.274.24.17184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Han X., Yuan T., Zhang J., Shi Y., Li D., Dong Y., et al. (2022). FOXO4 Peptide Targets Myofibroblast Ameliorates Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis in Mice Through ECM-Receptor Interaction Pathway. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 26 (11), 3269–3280. 10.1111/jcmm.17333 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Hannenhalli S., Kaestner K. H. (2009). The Evolution of Fox Genes and Their Role in Development and Disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10 (4), 233–240. 10.1038/nrg2523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hansen M., Taubert S., Crawford D., Libina N., Lee S.-J., Kenyon C. (2007). Lifespan Extension by Conditions that Inhibit Translation in Caenorhabditis E . Aging Cell 6 (1), 95–110. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00267.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Harrison D. E. (1979). Mouse Erythropoietic Stem Cell Lines Function Normally 100 Months: Loss Related to Number of Transplantations. Mech. Ageing Dev. 9 (5-6), 427–433. 10.1016/0047-6374(79)90083-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Harrison D. E., Strong R., Sharp Z. D., Nelson J. F., Astle C. M., Flurkey K., et al. (2009). Rapamycin Fed Late in Life Extends Lifespan in Genetically Heterogeneous Mice. Nature 460 (7253), 392–395. 10.1038/nature08221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Hay N. (2011). Interplay between FOXO, TOR, and Akt. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1813 (11), 1965–1970. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.03.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Hiebert P. (2021). The Nrf2 Transcription Factor: A Multifaceted Regulator of the Extracellular Matrix. Matrix Biol. Plus 10, 100057. 10.1016/j.mbplus.2021.100057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Hiebert P., Wietecha M. S., Cangkrama M., Haertel E., Mavrogonatou E., Stumpe M., et al. (2018). Nrf2-Mediated Fibroblast Reprogramming Drives Cellular Senescence by Targeting the Matrisome. Dev. Cell 46 (2), 145–161. e110. 10.1016/j.devcel.2018.06.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hilliard A., Mendonca P., Russell T. D., Soliman K. F. A. (2020). The Protective Effects of Flavonoids in Cataract Formation through the Activation of Nrf2 and the Inhibition of MMP-9. Nutrients 12 (12), 3651. 10.3390/nu12123651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Huang X.-Z., Wen D., Zhang M., Xie Q., Ma L., Guan Y., et al. (2014). Sirt1 Activation Ameliorates Renal Fibrosis by Inhibiting the TGF-β/Smad3 Pathway. J. Cell. Biochem. 115 (5), 996–1005. 10.1002/jcb.24748 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Imai S., Guarente L. (2014). NAD+ and Sirtuins in Aging and Disease. Trends Cell Biol. 24 (8), 464–471. 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Ivanova D., Zhelev Z., Zhelev Z., Aoki I., Bakalova R., Higashi T. (2016). Overproduction of Reactive Oxygen Species - Obligatory or Not for Induction of Apoptosis by Anticancer Drugs. Chin. J. Cancer Res. 28 (4), 383–396. 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2016.04.01 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Jacinto E., Hall M. N. (2003). Tor Signalling in Bugs, Brain and Brawn. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 4 (2), 117–126. 10.1038/nrm1018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Jiang T., Huang Z., Lin Y., Zhang Z., Fang D., Zhang D. D. (2010). The Protective Role of Nrf2 in Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Nephropathy. Diabetes 59 (4), 850–860. 10.2337/db09-1342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Johnson K. M., Milner R., Crocker S. J. (2015). Extracellular Matrix Composition Determines Astrocyte Responses to Mechanical and Inflammatory Stimuli. Neurosci. Lett. 600, 104–109. 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.06.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Kalluri R., Weinberg R. A. (2009). The Basics of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. J. Clin. Invest. 119 (6), 1420–1428. 10.1172/JCI39104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kang S.-M., Tran A.-C., Grilli M., Lenardo M. J. (1992). NF-κB Subunit Regulation in Nontransformed CD4 + T Lymphocytes. Science 256 (5062), 1452–1456. 10.1126/science.1604322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Kapahi P., Zid B. M., Harper T., Koslover D., Sapin V., Benzer S. (2004). Regulation of Lifespan in Drosophila by Modulation of Genes in the TOR Signaling Pathway. Curr. Biol. 14 (10), 885–890. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kaspar J. W., Niture S. K., Jaiswal A. K. (2009). Nrf2:INrf2 (Keap1) Signaling in Oxidative Stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 47 (9), 1304–1309. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2009.07.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kawai Y., Garduño L., Theodore M., Yang J., Arinze I. J. (2011). Acetylation-Deacetylation of the Transcription Factor Nrf2 (Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2) Regulates its Transcriptional Activity and Nucleocytoplasmic Localization. J. Biol. Chem. 286 (9), 7629–7640. 10.1074/jbc.M110.208173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kenyon C., Chang J., Gensch E., Rudner A., Tabtiang R. (1993). A C. E Mutant that Lives Twice as Long as Wild Type. Nature 366 (6454), 461–464. 10.1038/366461a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kubo Y., Beckmann R., Fragoulis A., Conrads C., Pavanram P., Nebelung S., et al. (2022). Nrf2/ARE Signaling Directly Regulates SOX9 to Potentially Alter Age-Dependent Cartilage Degeneration. Antioxidants 11 (2), 263. 10.3390/antiox11020263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kutuk O., Basaga H. (2003). Inflammation Meets Oxidation: NF-κB as a Mediator of Initial Lesion Development in Atherosclerosis. Trends Mol. Med. 9 (12), 549–557. 10.1016/j.molmed.2003.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Lachmann A., Xu H., Krishnan J., Berger S. I., Mazloom A. R., Ma'ayan A. (2010). ChEA: Transcription Factor Regulation Inferred from Integrating Genome-Wide ChIP-X Experiments. Bioinformatics 26 (19), 2438–2444. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Laplante M., Sabatini D. M. (2009). mTOR Signaling at a Glance. J. Cell Sci. 122 (Pt 20), 3589–3594. 10.1242/jcs.051011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Lawrence J., Nho R. (2018). The Role of the Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in Pulmonary Fibrosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19 (3), 778. 10.3390/ijms19030778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lee M. J., Agrahari G., Kim H.-Y., An E.-J., Chun K.-H., Kang H., et al. (2021). Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase Prevents Skin Aging by Promoting Collagen Production through the Activation of AMPK and Nrf2/HO-1 Cascades. J. Investig. Dermatol. 141 (10), 2344–2353. e2347. 10.1016/j.jid.2021.02.757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lee M., Vasioukhin V. (2008). Cell Polarity and Cancer--Cell and Tissue Polarity as a Non-Canonical Tumor Suppressor. J. Cell Sci. 121 (Pt 8), 1141–1150. 10.1242/jcs.016634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Levi N., Papismadov N., Solomonov I., Sagi I., Krizhanovsky V. (2020). The ECM Path of Senescence in Aging: Components and Modifiers. FEBS J. 287 (13), 2636–2646. 10.1111/febs.15282 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Li C.-W., Xia W., Huo L., Lim S.-O., Wu Y., Hsu J. L., et al. (2012). Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Induced by TNF-α Requires NF-κB-Mediated Transcriptional Upregulation of Twist1. Cancer Res. 72 (5), 1290–1300. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Li M., Tan Y., Stenmark K. R., Tan W. (2013). High Pulsatility Flow Induces Acute Endothelial Inflammation Through Overpolarizing Cells to Activate NF-κB. Cardiovasc Eng. Tech. 4 (1), 26–38. 10.1007/s13239-012-0115-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Li Y., Wang W.-J., Cao H., Lu J., Wu C., Hu F.-Y., et al. (2009). Genetic Association of FOXO1A and FOXO3A with Longevity Trait in Han Chinese Populations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18 (24), 4897–4904. 10.1093/hmg/ddp459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Lin K., Dorman J. B., Rodan A., Kenyon C. (1997). daf-16: An HNF-3/forkhead Family Member that Can Function to Double the Life-Span of Caenorhabditis E . Science 278 (5341), 1319–1322. 10.1126/science.278.5341.1319 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Liu G. Y., Sabatini D. M. (2020). mTOR at the Nexus of Nutrition, Growth, Ageing and Disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21 (4), 183–203. 10.1038/s41580-019-0199-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Liu T., Zhang L., Joo D., Sun S.-C. (2017). NF-κB Signaling in Inflammation. Sig Transduct. Target Ther. 2, 17023. 10.1038/sigtrans.2017.23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Liu Y.-N., Chang T.-H., Tsai M.-F., Wu S.-G., Tsai T.-H., Chen H.-Y., et al. (2015). IL-8 Confers Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors by Inducing Stem Cell Properties in Lung Cancer. Oncotarget 6 (12), 10415–10431. 10.18632/oncotarget.3389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. López-Otín C., Blasco M. A., Partridge L., Serrano M., Kroemer G. (2013). The Hallmarks of Aging. Cell 153 (6), 1194–1217. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Ma X. M., Blenis J. (2009). Molecular Mechanisms of mTOR-Mediated Translational Control. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10 (5), 307–318. 10.1038/nrm2672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Ma Z. X., Xu H., Xiang W., Qi J., Xu Y. Y., Zhao Z. G. (2021). Deacetylation of FOXO4 by Sirt1 Stabilizes Chondrocyte Extracellular Matrix upon Activating SOX9. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 25 (2), 626–635. 10.26355/eurrev_202101_24621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Machin D. R., Auduong Y., Gogulamudi V. R., Liu Y., Islam M. T., Lesniewski L. A., et al. (2020). Lifelong SIRT-1 Overexpression Attenuates Large Artery Stiffening with Advancing Age. Aging (Albany NY) 12 (12), 11314–11324. 10.18632/aging.103322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Magrassi L., Leto K., Rossi F. (2013). Lifespan of Neurons is Uncoupled from Organismal Lifespan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 110 (11), 4374–4379. 10.1073/pnas.1217505110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Manning B. D., Cantley L. C. (2007). AKT/PKB Signaling: Navigating Downstream. Cell 129 (7), 1261–1274. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Martins R., Lithgow G. J., Link W. (2016). Long Live FOXO: Unraveling the Role of FOXO Proteins in Aging and Longevity. Aging Cell 15 (2), 196–207. 10.1111/acel.12427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Mavrogonatou E., Pratsinis H., Papadopoulou A., Karamanos N. K., Kletsas D. (2019). Extracellular Matrix Alterations in Senescent Cells and Their Significance in Tissue Homeostasis. Matrix Biol. 75-76, 27–42. 10.1016/j.matbio.2017.10.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Medici D., Nawshad A. (2010). Type I Collagen Promotes Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition through ILK-Dependent Activation of NF-κB and LEF-1. Matrix Biol. 29 (3), 161–165. 10.1016/j.matbio.2009.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Michan S., Sinclair D. (2007). Sirtuins in Mammals: Insights into Their Biological Function. Biochem. J. 404 (1), 1–13. 10.1042/BJ20070140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Milkovic L., Zarkovic N., Saso L. (2017). Controversy about Pharmacological Modulation of Nrf2 for Cancer Therapy. Redox Biol. 12, 727–732. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Mise N., Fernandez I. E., Eickelberg O. (2014). Resveratrol Regulates ECM Remodeling in Lung Fibrosis. Eur. Respir. J. 44 (Suppl. 58), 3914. [Google Scholar]
  96. Mondal S., Adhikari N., Banerjee S., Amin S. A., Jha T. (2020). Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and its Inhibitors in Cancer: A Minireview. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 194, 112260. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Moon M.-H., Jeong J.-K., Lee Y.-J., Seol J.-W., Jackson C. J., Park S.-Y. (2013). SIRT1, a Class III Histone Deacetylase, Regulates TNF-α-Induced Inflammation in Human Chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 21 (3), 470–480. 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Mousavizadeh R., Hojabrpour P., Eltit F., McDonald P. C., Dedhar S., McCormack R. G., et al. (2020). β1 Integrin, ILK and mTOR Regulate Collagen Synthesis in Mechanically Loaded Tendon Cells. Sci. Rep. 10 (1), 12644. 10.1038/s41598-020-69267-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Murphy C. T., McCarroll S. A., Bargmann C. I., Fraser A., Kamath R. S., Ahringer J., et al. (2003). Genes that Act Downstream of DAF-16 to Influence the Lifespan of Caenorhabditis E . Nature 424 (6946), 277–283. 10.1038/nature01789 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Murtha L. A., Morten M., Schuliga M. J., Mabotuwana N. S., Hardy S. A., Waters D. W., et al. (2019). The Role of Pathological Aging in Cardiac and Pulmonary Fibrosis. Aging Dis. 10 (2), 419–428. 10.14336/AD.2018.0601 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Naba A., Clauser K. R., Ding H., Whittaker C. A., Carr S. A., Hynes R. O. (2016). The Extracellular Matrix: Tools and Insights for the "Omics" Era. Matrix Biol. 49, 10–24. 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Nho R. S., Kahm J. (2010). β1-Integrin-Collagen Interaction Suppresses FoxO3a by the Coordination of Akt and PP2A. J. Biol. Chem. 285 (19), 14195–14209. 10.1074/jbc.M109.052845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Orfanidou T., Iliopoulos D., Malizos K. N., Tsezou A. (2009). Involvement of SOX-9 and FGF-23 in RUNX-2 Regulation in Osteoarthritic Chondrocytes. J. Cell Mol. Med. 13 (9B), 3186–3194. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00678.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Orr A. W., Sanders J. M., Bevard M., Coleman E., Sarembock I. J., Schwartz M. A. (2005). The Subendothelial Extracellular Matrix Modulates NF-kappaB Activation by Flow: A Potential Role in Atherosclerosis. J. Cell Biol. 169 (1), 191–202. 10.1083/jcb.200410073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Osorio F. G., Soria-Valles C., Santiago-Fernández O., Freije J. M. P., López-Otín C. (2016). NF-κB Signaling as a Driver of Ageing. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 326, 133–174. 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.04.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Peterson T. R., Laplante M., Thoreen C. C., Sancak Y., Kang S. A., Kuehl W. M., et al. (2009). DEPTOR Is an mTOR Inhibitor Frequently Overexpressed in Multiple Myeloma Cells and Required for Their Survival. Cell 137 (5), 873–886. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Pittayapruek P., Meephansan J., Prapapan O., Komine M., Ohtsuki M. (2016). Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Photoaging and Photocarcinogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17 (6), 868. 10.3390/ijms17060868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Plaksin D., Baeuerle P. A., Eisenbach L. (1993). KBF1 (P50 NF-Kappa B Homodimer) Acts as a Repressor of H-2Kb Gene Expression in Metastatic Tumor Cells. J. Exp. Med. 177 (6), 1651–1662. 10.1084/jem.177.6.1651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Puig O., Marr M. T., Ruhf M. L., Tjian R. (2003). Control of Cell Number byDrosophilaFOXO: Downstream and Feedback Regulation of the Insulin Receptor Pathway. Genes Dev. 17 (16), 2006–2020. 10.1101/gad.1098703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Qin J., Vinogradova O., Plow E. F. (2004). Integrin Bidirectional Signaling: A Molecular View. PLoS Biol. 2 (6), e169. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Rahmati M., Nalesso G., Mobasheri A., Mozafari M. (2017). Aging and Osteoarthritis: Central Role of the Extracellular Matrix. Ageing Res. Rev. 40, 20–30. 10.1016/j.arr.2017.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Rehan M., Kurundkar D., Kurundkar A. R., Logsdon N. J., Smith S. R., Chanda D., et al. (2021). Restoration of SIRT3 Gene Expression by Airway Delivery Resolves Age-Associated Persistent Lung Fibrosis in Mice. Nat. Aging 1 (2), 205–217. 10.1038/s43587-021-00027-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Ren Z., He H., Zuo Z., Xu Z., Wei Z., Deng J. (2019). The Role of Different SIRT1-Mediated Signaling Pathways in Toxic Injury. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 24, 36. 10.1186/s11658-019-0158-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Rouillard A. D., Gundersen G. W., Fernandez N. F., Wang Z., Monteiro C. D., McDermott M. G., et al. (2016). The Harmonizome: A Collection of Processed Datasets Gathered to Serve and Mine Knowledge about Genes and Proteins. Database 2016, baw100. 10.1093/database/baw100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Ryu D. R., Yu M. R., Kong K. H., Kim H., Kwon S. H., Jeon J. S., et al. (2019). Sirt1-Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Interaction is a Key Mediator of Tubulointerstitial Damage in the Aged Kidney. Aging Cell 18 (2), e12904. 10.1111/acel.12904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Sacher F., Feregrino C., Tschopp P., Ewald C. Y. (2021). Extracellular Matrix Gene Expression Signatures as Cell Type and Cell State Identifiers. Matrix Biol. Plus 10, 100069. 10.1016/j.mbplus.2021.100069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Schmidlin C. J., Dodson M. B., Madhavan L., Zhang D. D. (2019). Redox Regulation by NRF2 in Aging and Disease. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 134, 702–707. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2019.01.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Shao X., Taha I. N., Clauser K. R., Gao Y., Naba A. (2020). MatrisomeDB: The ECM-Protein Knowledge Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (D1), D1136–D1144. 10.1093/nar/gkz849 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Shin D.-h., Park H.-M., Jung K.-A., Choi H.-G., Kim J.-A., Kim D.-D., et al. (2010). The NRF2-Heme Oxygenase-1 System Modulates Cyclosporin A-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Renal Fibrosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 48 (8), 1051–1063. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.01.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Soares H., Marinho H. S., Real C., Antunes F. (2014). Cellular Polarity in Aging: Role of Redox Regulation and Nutrition. Genes Nutr. 9 (1), 371. 10.1007/s12263-013-0371-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Socovich A. M., Naba A. (2019). The Cancer Matrisome: From Comprehensive Characterization to Biomarker Discovery. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 89, 157–166. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.06.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Sporn M. B., Liby K. T. (2012). NRF2 and Cancer: The Good, the Bad and the Importance of Context. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12 (8), 564–571. 10.1038/nrc3278 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Statzer C., Ewald C. Y. (2020). The Extracellular Matrix Phenome across Species. Matrix Biol. Plus 8, 100039. 10.1016/j.mbplus.2020.100039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Statzer C., Jongsma E., Liu S. X., Dakhovnik A., Wandrey F., Mozharovskyi P., et al. (2021). Youthful and Age‐Related Matreotypes Predict Drugs Promoting Longevity. Aging Cell 20 (9), e13441. 10.1111/acel.13441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Statzer C., Meng J., Venz R., Bland M., Robida-Stubbs S., Patel K., et al. (2022a). ATF-4 and Hydrogen Sulfide Signalling Mediate Longevity in Response to Inhibition of Translation or mTORC1. Nat. Commun. 13 (1), 967. 10.1038/s41467-022-28599-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Statzer C., Reichert P., Dual J., Ewald C. Y. (2022b). Longevity Interventions Temporally Scale Healthspan in Caenorhabditis E . iScience 25 (3), 103983. 10.1016/j.isci.2022.103983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Storci G., Sansone P., Mari S., D'Uva G., Tavolari S., Guarnieri T., et al. (2010). TNFalpha Up-Regulates SLUG via the NF-kappaB/HIF1alpha Axis, Which Imparts Breast Cancer Cells with a Stem Cell-Like Phenotype. J. Cell. Physiol. 225 (3), 682–691. 10.1002/jcp.22264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Sun C., Li S., Li D. (2016). Sulforaphane Mitigates Muscle Fibrosis Inmdxmice via Nrf2-Mediated Inhibition of TGF-β/Smad Signaling. J. Appl. Physiology 120 (4), 377–390. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00721.2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Sun X., Huang K., Haiming X., Lin Z., Yang Y., Zhang M., et al. (2020). Connexin 43 Prevents the Progression of Diabetic Renal Tubulointerstitial Fibrosis by Regulating the SIRT1-HIF-1α Signaling Pathway. Clin. Sci. (Lond) 134 (13), 1573–1592. 10.1042/CS20200171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Suto T., Karonitsch T. (2020). The Immunobiology of mTOR in Autoimmunity. J. Autoimmun. 110, 102373. 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.102373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Tee A. R., Manning B. D., Roux P. P., Cantley L. C., Blenis J. (2003). Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Gene Products, Tuberin and Hamartin, Control mTOR Signaling by Acting as a GTPase-Activating Protein Complex toward Rheb. Curr. Biol. 13 (15), 1259–1268. 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00506-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Teuscher A. C., Jongsma E., Davis M. N., Statzer C., Gebauer J. M., Naba A., et al. (2019a). The In-Silico Characterization of the Caenorhabditis E Matrisome and Proposal of a Novel Collagen Classification. Matrix Biol. Plus 1, 100001. 10.1016/j.mbplus.2018.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Teuscher A. C., Statzer C., Pantasis S., Bordoli M. R., Ewald C. Y. (2019b). Assessing Collagen Deposition During Aging in Mammalian Tissue and in Caenorhabditis E . Methods Mol. Biol. 1944, 169–188. 10.1007/978-1-4939-9095-5_13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Tia N., Singh A. K., Pandey P., Azad C. S., Chaudhary P., Gambhir I. S. (2018). Role of Forkhead Box O (FOXO) Transcription Factor in Aging and Diseases. Gene 648, 97–105. 10.1016/j.gene.2018.01.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Tilstra J. S., Clauson C. L., Niedernhofer L. J., Robbins P. D. (2011). NF-κB in Aging and Disease. Aging Dis. 2 (6), 449–465. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Um S. H., D'Alessio D., Thomas G. (2006). Nutrient Overload, Insulin Resistance, and Ribosomal Protein S6 Kinase 1, S6K1. Cell Metab. 3 (6), 393–402. 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Venz R., Pekec T., Katic I., Ciosk R., Ewald C. Y. (2021). End-of-Life Targeted Degradation of DAF-2 Insulin/IGF-1 Receptor Promotes Longevity Free from Growth-Related Pathologies. Elife 10, e71335. 10.7554/eLife.71335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Vertti‐Quintero N., Berger S., Casadevall i Solvas X., Statzer C., Annis J., Ruppen P., et al. (2021). Stochastic and Age‐Dependent Proteostasis Decline Underlies Heterogeneity in Heat‐Shock Response Dynamics. Small 17 (30), e2102145. 10.1002/smll.202102145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Vitiello D., Dakhovnik A., Statzer C., Ewald C. Y. (2021). Lifespan-Associated Gene Expression Signatures of Recombinant BXD Mice Implicates Coro7 and Set in Longevity. Front. Genet. 12, 694033. 10.3389/fgene.2021.694033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Vivar R., Humeres C., Anfossi R., Bolivar S., Catalán M., Hill J., et al. (2020). Role of FoxO3a as a Negative Regulator of the Cardiac Myofibroblast Conversion Induced by TGF-β1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Res. 1867 (7), 118695. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2020.118695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Wang M., Jiang L., Monticone R. E., Lakatta E. G. (2014). Proinflammation: the Key to Arterial Aging. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 25 (2), 72–79. 10.1016/j.tem.2013.10.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Wang M., Kim S. H., Monticone R. E., Lakatta E. G. (2015). Matrix Metalloproteinases Promote Arterial Remodeling in Aging, Hypertension, and Atherosclerosis. Hypertension 65 (4), 698–703. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Wątroba M., Szukiewicz D. (2016). The Role of Sirtuins in Aging and Age-Related Diseases. Adv. Med. Sci. 61 (1), 52–62. 10.1016/j.advms.2015.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Webb A. E., Kundaje A., Brunet A. (2016). Characterization of the Direct Targets of FOXO Transcription Factors throughout Evolution. Aging Cell 15 (4), 673–685. 10.1111/acel.12479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Wei X., Luo L., Chen J. (2019). Roles of mTOR Signaling in Tissue Regeneration. Cells 8 (9), 1075. 10.3390/cells8091075 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Weichhart T. (2018). mTOR as Regulator of Lifespan, Aging, and Cellular Senescence: A Mini-Review. Gerontology 64 (2), 127–134. 10.1159/000484629 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Wick G., Backovic A., Rabensteiner E., Plank N., Schwentner C., Sgonc R. (2010). The Immunology of Fibrosis: Innate and Adaptive Responses. Trends Immunol. 31 (3), 110–119. 10.1016/j.it.2009.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Willcox B. J., Donlon T. A., He Q., Chen R., Grove J. S., Yano K., et al. (2008). FOXO3A Genotype Is Strongly Associated with Human Longevity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (37), 13987–13992. 10.1073/pnas.0801030105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Williams E. G., Pfister N., Roy S., Statzer C., Haverty J., Ingels J., et al. (2022). Multiomic Profiling of the Liver across Diets and Age in a Diverse Mouse Population. Cell Syst. 13 (1), 43–57. e46. 10.1016/j.cels.2021.09.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Woodcock H. V., Eley J. D., Guillotin D., Platé M., Nanthakumar C. B., Martufi M., et al. (2019). The mTORC1/4E-BP1 Axis Represents a Critical Signaling Node during Fibrogenesis. Nat. Commun. 10 (1), 6. 10.1038/s41467-018-07858-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Wynn T. A. (2004). Fibrotic Disease and the T(H)1/T(H)2 Paradigm. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4 (8), 583–594. 10.1038/nri1412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Xin Z., Ma Z., Hu W., Jiang S., Yang Z., Li T., et al. (2018). FOXO1/3: Potential Suppressors of Fibrosis. Ageing Res. Rev. 41, 42–52. 10.1016/j.arr.2017.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Yu H., Fellows A., Foote K., Yang Z., Figg N., Littlewood T., et al. (2018). FOXO3a (Forkhead Transcription Factor O Subfamily Member 3a) Links Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Apoptosis, Matrix Breakdown, Atherosclerosis, and Vascular Remodeling Through a Novel Pathway Involving MMP13 (Matrix Metalloproteinase 13). Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 38 (3), 555–565. 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.310502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Yuan H., Xu Y., Luo Y., Wang N.-X., Xiao J.-H. (2021). Role of Nrf2 in Cell Senescence Regulation. Mol. Cell Biochem. 476 (1), 247–259. 10.1007/s11010-020-03901-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Zanella F., Link W., Carnero A. (2010). Understanding FOXO, New Views on Old Transcription Factors. Curr. Cancer Drug Targets 10 (2), 135–146. 10.2174/156800910791054158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Zeng Z., Cheng S., Chen H., Li Q., Hu Y., Wang Q., et al. (2017). Activation and Overexpression of Sirt1 Attenuates Lung Fibrosis via P300. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 486 (4), 1021–1026. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.03.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Zhang H., Davies K. J. A., Forman H. J. (2015). Oxidative Stress Response and Nrf2 Signaling in Aging. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 88 (Pt B), 314–336. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.05.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Frontiers in Aging are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES