Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Jun 8;11(7):e00256-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.00256-22

Gut Microbiome 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Taxonomic Profiling of Hospitalized Moroccan COVID-19 Patients

Sofia Sehli a, Abdellah Idrissi Azami a, Nouzha Dini a, Nihal Habib a, Bouchra Chaouni b, Salsabil Hamdi c,g, Najib Al Idrissi a, Saaid Amzazi d,e, Imane Allali d,e, Chakib Nejjari a, Hassan Ghazal a,f,
Editor: Jelle Matthijnssensh
PMCID: PMC9302072  PMID: 35674437

ABSTRACT

We explored the gut microbiome composition in four Moroccan patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during hospitalization and treatment, using 16S rRNA gene amplicon metataxonomic profiling, and compared it with that in four healthy severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)-free control subjects.

ANNOUNCEMENT

To characterize the gut microbiome of hospitalized Moroccan patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were treated with azithromycin antibiotic and chloroquine, we analyzed the fecal microbiomes of four Moroccan COVID-19 patients at the Cheikh Khalifa International University Hospital in Casablanca, Morocco. We compared those gut microbiomes to those of four control subjects who were never in contact with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and thus were not hospitalized and not under treatment. The COVID-19 patient cohort had a male/female ratio of 1:3 and an age range of 30 to 57 years, while the control cohort had a male/female ratio of 2:2 and an age range of 32 to 63 years. The COVID-19 treatment protocol includes chloroquine (Nivaquine; Sanofi Morocco) at 500 mg twice per day for 7 days and azithromycin at 500 mg on day 1 and then 250 mg on days 2 to 7.

The four COVID-19 patients were hospitalized in the intensive care unit for 2 weeks following a positive diagnosis in April 2020. The first case of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Morocco was detected in March 2020 (1). Fecal samples (100 mg) were taken 10 days following the start of treatment, in Sarstedt tubes containing 2.5 mL of RNAlater solution. The samples from the four control subjects were taken during the second half of 2019. Approval for sequencing of fecal microbiomes from human subjects was obtained from the local ethics committee: Ethics Committee for Biomedical Research (CERB) and Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS) (approval number: CERB/UM6SS/06/21). A QIAamp DNA stool minikit (Qiagen, Germany) was used to extract DNA. The hypervariable V3 to V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified as described by Klindworth et al. (2) using the primers S-d-Bact-0341-b-S-17 (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and S-d-Bact-0785-a-A-21 (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 40 s, annealing at 55°C for 2 min, and extension at 72°C for 1 min, with a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. The Nextera XT index kit (Illumina, USA) was used to index PCR products, attaching dual indices and Illumina sequencing adapters. The Illumina MiSeq sequencer generated paired-end reads with an average size of 300 bases and an average number of reads per sample of 137,000.

The DADA2 (v.1.16) (3) pipeline was utilized for 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence data bioinformatic analysis. Amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were aligned to create a phylogeny using DECIPHER (4). Phangorn (5) was used to build a phylogenetic tree. Taxonomic assignment was determined by mapping the ASV table to the SILVA database (6) using DADA2. Phyloseq (7) was utilized to measure alpha and beta diversities. To characterize the different taxonomic compositions between SARS-CoV-2-free subjects and COVID-19 patients, we used DESeq2 (8). Plots were created using ggplot2 in R.

Our 16S rRNA gene metataxonomic profiling method revealed microbiome composition and richness changes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, whose gut microbiomes were enriched with opportunistic pathogens such as Escherichia/Shigella (range, 52% to 63%) and depleted of beneficial commensals such as Bacteroidetes (0% to 20%). Proteobacteria (53% to 83%) was the most dominant phylum in the COVID-19 patient group, followed by Firmicutes (21% to 35%), Bacteroidetes (5% to 8.2%), and Actinobacteria (3.4% to 5.2%). In the control group, Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum (43% to 68%), followed by Bacteroidetes (32% to 44%), and Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria had very low abundances (3.2% to 5% and 3.5% to 5.4%, respectively). Interestingly, six genera were present only in the COVID-19 samples, namely, Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group; Succcinivibro, a marker of human diarrheal feces (9); Libanicoccus (10); NK4A214 group (11); Citrobacter (12); and Rothia, which is likely involved in pneumonia (13) (Fig. 1). These findings support the expected impact of antibiotic treatment on the microbiome diversity of COVID-19 patients but point toward potential specific gut microbiota-SARS-CoV-2 interactions. A large cohort is needed to generalize these results.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

(A) Alpha diversity measures, including the average Shannon-Wiener (alpha) diversity index, abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) index, and Simpson index, for 16S rRNA gene amplicons from stool samples from four COVID-19 patients (cases) and four control subjects, as represented in the box plots; each box represents quartiles, the horizontal lines within the boxes represent the medians, and the vertical lines outside the boxes are the outliers. (B) Bar plot depicting the microbial abundance at the family level within the control and COVID-19 (case) samples.

Data availability.

The raw sequence data from this project have been deposited under the BioProject accession number PRJNA728736. The Sequence Read Archive (SRA) accession numbers for the raw sequence data for the COVID-19 patients are as follows: SRX10859493, SRX10859492, SRX10859491, and SRX10859490. The SRA accession numbers for the raw sequence data for the control subjects are as follows: SRX10859497, SRX10859496, SRX10859495, and SRX10859494.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This research Article Processing Charge (APC) was paid by Mohammed VI University of Health Sciences (UM6SS).

Contributor Information

Hassan Ghazal, Email: hassan.ghazal@fulbrightmail.org.

Jelle Matthijnssens, KU Leuven.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Chaouni B, Allali I, Sehli S, Rhalem W, Azami AI, Habib N, Hamdi S, Wakrim L, Bakkali A, Mahmoud M, Bouguenouch L, Idrissi NA, Bakri Y, Amzazi S, Barrijal S, Ghazal H. 2020. Genomic evidence of multiple SARS-CoV-2 introductions into Morocco. 9:679. F1000Research doi: 10.12688/f1000research.24810.2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Klindworth A, Pruesse E, Schweer T, Peplies J, Quast C, Horn M, Glöckner FO. 2013. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Holmes SP. 2017. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J 11:2639–2643. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wright ES. 2015. DECIPHER: harnessing local sequence context to improve protein multiple sequence alignment. BMC Bioinformatics 16:322. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0749-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Schliep K, Potts AJ, Morrison DA, Grimm GW. 2017. Intertwining phylogenetic trees and networks. Methods Ecol Evol 8:1212–1220. doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.12760. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, Peplies J, Glöckner FO. 2013. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.de Oliveira Santos E, Thompson F. 2014. The family Succinivibrionaceae, p 639–648. In Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F. (ed), The prokaryotes: Gammaproteobacteria, 4th ed. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hagan T, Cortese M, Rouphael N, Boudreau C, Linde C, Maddur MS, Das J, Wang H, Guthmiller J, Zheng N-Y, Huang M, Uphadhyay AA, Gardinassi L, Petitdemange C, McCullough MP, Johnson SJ, Gill K, Cervasi B, Zou J, Bretin A, Hahn M, Gewirtz AT, Bosinger SE, Wilson PC, Li S, Alter G, Khurana S, Golding H, Pulendran B. 2019. Antibiotics-driven gut microbiome perturbation alters immunity to vaccines in humans. Cell 178:1313–1328.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Calderón-Pérez L, Gosalbes MJ, Yuste S, Valls RM, Pedret A, Llauradó E, Jimenez-Hernandez N, Artacho A, Pla-Pagà L, Companys J, Ludwig I, Romero M-P, Rubió L, Solà R. 2020. Gut metagenomic and short chain fatty acids signature in hypertension: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 10:6436. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63475-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kus JV, Burrows LL. 2007. Infections due to Citrobacter and Enterobacter, p 1–12. In Enna SJ, Bylund DB (ed), xPharm: the comprehensive pharmacology reference. Elsevier, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ramanan P, Barreto JN, Osmon DR, Tosh PK. 2014. Rothia bacteremia: a 10-year experience at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. J Clin Microbiol 52:3184–3189. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01270-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence data from this project have been deposited under the BioProject accession number PRJNA728736. The Sequence Read Archive (SRA) accession numbers for the raw sequence data for the COVID-19 patients are as follows: SRX10859493, SRX10859492, SRX10859491, and SRX10859490. The SRA accession numbers for the raw sequence data for the control subjects are as follows: SRX10859497, SRX10859496, SRX10859495, and SRX10859494.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES