Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Jun 21;11(7):e00388-22. doi: 10.1128/mra.00388-22

Five Complete Salmonella enterica Serotype Reading Genomes Recovered from Patients in the United States

Hattie E Webb a,b,#, Kaitlin A Tagg a,b,#, Justin Y Kim a,b, Elizabeth A Miller c, Timothy J Johnson c, Arancha Peñil-Celis d, Fernando de la Cruz d, Jason P Folster b,✉
Editor: David Raskoe
PMCID: PMC9302092  PMID: 35727013

ABSTRACT

Between 2018 and 2019, Salmonella enterica serotype Reading caused a large, multistate outbreak linked to contact with raw turkey products in the United States. Here, we provide five Salmonella Reading reference genomes collected from US patients between 2016 and 2018.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Salmonella enterica serotype Reading is uncommonly associated with human illness, but caused a multistate outbreak linked to contact with raw turkey products from 2018 to 2019 in the US (1). Previous phylogenetic analyses identified three Hadar clades. Clade 1 contained the “emergent” 2018 to 2019 outbreak-associated subclade, which was genetically distinct from a “contemporary” subclade of previously circulating Reading strains, partially due to the acquisition of mobile genetic elements (MGE) (2). Clade 2 primarily contained human isolates, and its pangenome was considerably smaller than those of the other clades, but further analysis to understand these differences was not performed (2). Closed sequences of Reading are required for pangenome exploration and to further understand the novel “emergent” subclade, but only 11 are currently available (3, 4), and none are from US patients. Here, we generated five complete clinical Reading sequences from Clades 1 and 2 to serve as references.

Five Reading isolates from human illnesses were chosen for long-read sequencing to represent human-associated Reading diversity before and during the outbreak: two “contemporary” Clade 1 isolates (2018), one “emergent” Clade 1 isolate (2017), and two Clade 2 isolates collected before the outbreak (2016 to 2017). Isolates originated from clinical diagnostic or public health laboratories (PHL) as part of the CDC’s national passive Salmonella surveillance (https://www.cdc.gov/nationalsurveillance/salmonella-surveillance.html); thus, isolation methods vary by site (5). Serotype was confirmed in silico using SeqSero2 v0.1 (6). Genomic DNA was extracted (Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit, modified manufacturer’s protocol, Promega, WI, USA) from cultures incubated on tryptic soy agar-sheep blood overnight (37°C). Libraries were prepared (Rapid Barcoding kit SQK-RBK004; manufacturer’s protocol, Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT], Oxford, United Kingdom) and sequenced for 72 h on a GridION sequencing platform (R9.4.1 flowcells; ONT). Reads were base-called using Guppy v4.2.2 and filtered for quality using MinKNOW (ONT). Hybrid assemblies were generated, polished, circularized, and rotated using Unicycler v0.4.8 (conservative option) (7); the corresponding Illumina short reads (previously generated at PHL through PulseNet, https://www.cdc.gov/pulsenet/) were accessed through NCBI’s Short Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra). Assemblies were quality controlled using QUAST v5.0.2 (8) and blastn v2.9.0 (9). Resistance determinants and plasmid replicons were detected using an internal workflow that employs the ResFinder database (downloaded 30JUL2020; 90% identity, 50% coverage) and the PointFinder scheme for Salmonella spp. (downloaded 30 August 2019), and an in-house database adapted from PlasmidFinder (90% identity, 60% coverage; https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/), all implemented in staramr v.0.4.0 (https://github.com/phac-nml/staramr). Plasmid taxonomic units (PTUs) were identified using COPLA (10). Sequence types (ST) were determined using staramr (multilocus sequence typing [MLST] software [https://github.com/tseemann/mlst] and the PubMLST database [11]). The default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified.

Consistent with the previous analysis (2), Clade 1 genomes were larger than Clade 2 genomes by at least ~110 kb, due to the presence of plasmids and MGE (Table 1). Of note, PNUSAS014950 contained a ~10-kb resistance plasmid (replicons ColpHAD28 and Col440II, PTU not assigned; Table 1) that was previously found to be significantly more common in the “emergent” 2018 to 2019 outbreak-associated subclade (2). This plasmid was first seen in Reading in 2014 and may be of particular interest for further investigation (2).

TABLE 1.

Summary information for five Salmonella enterica serotype Reading genomes isolated from humans in the USa

Strain no. NCBI accession numbers
Short-read
Long-read
GC content (%) Total size (bp) Collection yr Cladeb ST Resistance determinants Plasmid replicon(s) PTU
BioSample Short read SRA GenBank Long read SRA Mean read length No. of reads Contig N50 (bp) N50 (bp) Mean read length (bp) No. of reads No. of contigs
PNUSAS060563 SAMN10601908 SRR8327737 CP093147, CP093148 SRR18753113 241 835,744 4,678,719 10,579 5,144.1 208,391 2 52.19 4,680,815 2018 Clade 1 contemporary 412 None ColpVC PTU-E11
PNUSAS039653 SAMN09199050 SRR7155940 CP093129, CP093130, CP093131 SRR18753114 245 1,043,912 4,681,904 11,665 5,454 201,613 3 52.06 4,742,074 2018 Clade 1 contemporary 412 None IncI2(delta), ColpVC PTU-I2, PTU-E11
PNUSAS014950 SAMN07193435 SRR5659649 CP093132, CP093133 SRR18753116 241 556,070 4,647,387 11,386 4,975.5 148,565 2 52.20 4,657,771 2017 Clade 1 emergent 412 bla TEM-1C ColpHAD28, Col440II No PTU assignedc
PNUSAS003019 SAMN05437761 SRR3979113 CP093134 SRR18753117 240 1,431,150 4,543,956 12,425 5,968.3 284,196 1 52.19 4,543,956 2016 2 93 None None None
PNUSAS020177 SAMN07436240 SRR19599933 CP094293 SRR18753115 255 4,123,842 4,544,675 13,652 6,436.9 146,777 1 52.19 4,544,696 2017 2 93 None None None
a

ST, sequence type; PTU, plasmid taxonomic unit.

b

Whole-genome core single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based phylogenetic clade as defined by Miller et al. (2).

c

No PTU assigned, but query is part of a sHSBM cluster of size 2 using COPLA (https://castillo.dicom.unican.es/copla/ [10]).

Data availability.

The sequences discussed here have been deposited in GenBank and SRA under the accession and BioSample numbers listed in Table 1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We would like to acknowledge the state and local public health laboratories that participated in the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) and PulseNet.

This work was supported through the CDC. The findings and conclusions of this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the CDC. This report is a product of activities approved by the CDC Internal Review Board (approval no. 7172).

Contributor Information

Jason P. Folster, Email: jpfolster@cdc.gov.

David Rasko, University of Maryland School of Medicine.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Hassan R, Buuck S, Noveroske D, Medus C, Sorenson A, Laurent J, Rotstein D, Schlater L, Freiman J, Douris A, Simmons M, Donovan D, Henderson J, Tewell M, Snyder K, Oni O, Von Stein D, Dassie K, Leeper M, Adediran A, Dowell N, Gieraltowski L, Basler C. 2019. Multistate outbreak of Salmonella infections linked to raw turkey products: United States, 2017–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 68:1045–1049. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6846a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Miller EA, Elnekave E, Flores-Figueroa C, Johnson A, Kearney A, Munoz-Aguayo J, Tagg KA, Tschetter L, Weber BP, Nadon CA, Boxrud D, Singer RS, Folster JP, Johnson TJ. 2020. Emergence of a novel Salmonella enterica serotype Reading clonal group is linked to its expansion in commercial Turkey production, resulting in unanticipated human illness in North America. MSphere 5:e00056-20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00056-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li C, Tyson GH, Hsu C-H, Harrison L, Strain E, Tran T-T, Tillman GE, Dessai U, McDermott PF, Zhao S. 2021. Long-read sequencing reveals evolution and acquisition of antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in Salmonella enterica. Front Microbiol 12:777817. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.777817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhao S, Li C, Hsu C-H, Tyson GH, Strain E, Tate H, Tran T-T, Abbott J, McDermott PF. 2020. Comparative genomic analysis of 450 strains of Salmonella enterica isolated from diseased animals. Genes 11:1025. doi: 10.3390/genes11091025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tolar B, Joseph LA, Schroeder MN, Stroika S, Ribot EM, Hise KB, Gerner-Smidt P. 2019. An overview of PulseNet USA databases. Foodborne Pathog Dis 16:457–462. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2019.2637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zhang S, den Bakker HC, Li S, Chen J, Dinsmore BA, Lane C, Lauer AC, Fields PI, Deng X. 2019. SeqSero2: rapid and improved Salmonella serotype determination using whole-genome sequencing data. Appl Environ Microbiol 85:e01746-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01746-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. 2017. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol 13:e1005595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Mikheenko A, Prjibelski A, Saveliev V, Antipov D, Gurevich A. 2018. Versatile genome assembly evaluation with QUAST-LG. Bioinformatics 34:i142–i50. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Redondo-Salvo S, Bartomeus-Peñalver R, Vielva L, Tagg KA, Webb HE, Fernández-López R, de la Cruz F. 2021. COPLA, a taxonomic classifier of plasmids. BMC Bioinformatics 22:390. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04299-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jolley KA, Maiden MC. 2010. BIGSdb: scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 11:595. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The sequences discussed here have been deposited in GenBank and SRA under the accession and BioSample numbers listed in Table 1.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES