Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 2022 Jul 5;90(7):e00198-22. doi: 10.1128/iai.00198-22

Oral Administration with Live Attenuated Citrobacter rodentium Protects Immunocompromised Mice from Lethal Infection

Shuyu Wang a, Xue Xia a,*, Yue Liu a,§, Fengyi Wan a,b,c,d,e,
Editor: Guy H Palmerf
PMCID: PMC9302154  PMID: 35861565

ABSTRACT

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are important causative agents for foodborne diseases worldwide. Besides antibiotic treatment, vaccination has been deemed as the most effective strategy for preventing EPEC- and EHEC-caused foodborne illnesses. Despite substantial progress made in identifying promising antigens and efficacious vaccines, no vaccines against EPEC or EHEC have yet been licensed. Mice are inherently resistant to EPEC and EHEC infections; infection with Citrobacter rodentium (CR), the murine equivalent of EPEC and EHEC, in mice has been widely used as a model to study bacterial pathogenesis and develop novel vaccine strategies. Mirroring the severe outcomes of EPEC and EHEC infections in immunocompromised populations, immunocompromised mouse strains such as interleukin-22 knockout (Il22−/−) are susceptible to CR infection with severe clinical symptoms and mortality. Live attenuated bacterial vaccine strategies have been scarcely investigated for EPEC and EHEC infections, in particular in immunocompromised populations associated with severe outcomes. Here we examined whether live attenuated CR strain with rational genetic manipulation generates protective immunity against lethal CR infection in the susceptible Il22−/− mice. Our results demonstrate that oral administration of live ΔespFΔushA strain promotes efficient systemic and humoral immunity against a wide range of CR virulence determinants, thus protecting otherwise lethal CR infection, even in immunocompromised Il22−/− mice. This provides a proof of concept of live attenuated vaccination strategy for preventing CR infection in immunocompromised hosts associated with more severe symptoms and lethality.

KEYWORDS: oral administration, live attenuated bacterium, immunocompromised hosts, humoral immunity

INTRODUCTION

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) are among leading etiological agents for foodborne diseases, which have remained an enormous economic burden and a significant public health issue around the world (16). These sophisticated human pathogens utilize a type III secretion system (T3SS) to intimately adhere to intestinal epithelial cells and form the characteristic attaching/effacing (A/E) lesions, resulting in diarrheal symptoms and self-limiting infections in immunocompetent populations (1, 2, 7). EPEC is a frequent cause of infantile acute diarrhea in the lower middle-income countries (LMICs), whereas Shiga toxin-producing EHEC causes a wide spectrum of diseases ranging from mild diarrhea to severe clinical complications including hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) (15). Citrobacter rodentium (CR) shares approximately 66.7% of encoded genes and most pathogenic mechanisms including the T3SS and A/E lesions with human pathogens, thus being considered a murine equivalent of EPEC and EHEC (810). CR infection in mice has been widely used as a small animal model to study EPEC/EHEC pathogenic mechanisms and host immune responses against enteric bacterial infections, since EPEC and EHEC fail to colonize and infect mice (812). A growing amount of evidence demonstrates that while immunocompetent people suffer mild symptoms and recover quickly from EPEC and EHEC infections, those infections in immunocompromised populations may result in more severe symptoms, even lethality (13, 14). Consistently, immunocompetent mouse strains display little to no mortality to CR infection; in contrast, certain immunocompromised mice such as interleukin-22 knockout (Il22−/−) and C3HeJ mice are susceptible to CR infection with substantially elevated mortality rates (810, 15, 16). IL-22 plays a critical role in inflammation, tissue protection, regeneration, and antimicrobial defense (17). In particular, human populations with IL-22 deficiency, such as autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type patients (carrying autoantibodies against IL-22), are more susceptible to various infections than healthy controls with normal IL-22 levels (1820). Of note, the pathogenic mechanisms of A/E pathogen infections have been actively investigated in immunocompetent hosts; however, the crucial host–pathogen interactions during infections in immunocompromised hosts, in particular those associated with severe symptoms and mortality, remain elusive.

The severe outcomes in immunocompromised mice during CR infection indicate that some disease phenotypes and complex virulence regulatory mechanisms could be masked by the mild symptoms and self-limiting infection of CR under immunocompetent conditions. Our recent study using CR infection in Il22−/− mice as an immunocompromised infection model reveals that E. coli secreted protein F (EspF), a multifunctional effector secreted via T3SS (2126), is crucial for CR infection-caused severe morbidity and mortality in Il22−/− mice via damaging tight junction (TJ) strands and disrupting colon epithelial barrier function (16). Chromosomal deletion of espF (encoding EspF), but not other TJ-damaging effector genes espG (encoding E. coli secreted protein G) and map (encoding mitochondrial associated protein), completely attenuates CR-induced lethality in Il22−/− mice (16). In contrast, similar to wild-type CR, EspF knockout (ΔespF) strain exhibits almost identical colonization, proliferation, and clearance in the infected mice, and causes colonic inflammation, indicative of infection-elicited host immune responses. The strikingly attenuated virulence of ΔespF CR, even in the immunocompromised Il22−/− mice, hints at the potential for this strain as a prototype to develop live attenuated vaccines that mimic natural infections for preventing A/E pathogen infections associated with severe outcomes in immunocompromised hosts; in particular, no vaccines against EPEC or EHEC have been licensed yet so far (27).

While mimicking natural infection and eliciting stronger immune response, live attenuated bacterial vaccines may harbor the risk of residual virulence, especially for immunocompromised hosts. We recently showed that during A/E pathogen infections, UshA, a genotoxin with DNA cleavage activity, is injected via the T3SS into host cells, where it elicits DNA damage and promotes far-reaching impact on accelerating colonic tumor formation (28). In this study, we further attenuated the DNA damaging capacity of ΔespF CR by generating ΔespFΔushA CR to avoid the potential of CR infection for tumorigenesis, examined whether infection with ΔespFΔushA provides protective immunity, and assessed its impact on CR infection in the susceptible Il22−/− mice as well as immunocompetent C57BL/6J mice. Our results demonstrate that the oral administration of live avirulent CR strain offers significant protective effects against the otherwise lethal CR infection, even in immunocompromised hosts.

RESULTS

Deletion of EspF and UshA attenuates CR infection-caused morbidity and mortality in Il22−/− mice.

To eliminate UshA-conferred long-term impact of CR infection on colon tumorigenesis, we generated ΔespFΔushA strain where the ushA gene was chromosomally deleted in the parental ΔespF CR (Fig. 1A). While UshA deletion was previously reported to compromise growth of nonpathogenic E. coli in minimal media (29), ΔespF, ΔushA, or ΔespFΔushA strain, in comparison to wild-type CR, exhibited no growth defects when cultured in rich medium LB broth or Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) that mimics host conditions (Fig. 1B). These results suggest that double knockout of EspF and UshA does not impact CR metabolism and growth in vitro. To assess the impacts of EspF and UshA on CR virulence, we infected Il22−/− mice with wild-type, ΔespF, ΔushA, and ΔespFΔushA CR strains. Although the colonization and proliferation of these strains in the infected animals were almost identical, as analyzed by viable CR recovered from the feces postinfection (Fig. 1C), infection with wild-type CR resulted in consistent body weight loss, elevated clinical scores, and 100% lethality within 14 days postinoculation (dpi), whereas ΔespF CR failed to do so (Fig. 1D to F), consistent with our previous observations (16). Interestingly, infection with ΔushA CR caused comparable body weight loss, severe diarrhea, and mortality to wild-type CR in Il22−/− mice (Fig. 1D-F), indicating a dispensable role of UshA in CR virulence. In contrast, Il22−/− mice displayed substantial resistance to ΔespFΔushA CR infection, with transient body weight loss, mitigated diarrhea severity, and abolished mortality (Fig. 1D–F). These results suggest that ΔespFΔushA CR shares comparable virulence to its parental ΔespF strain during lethal infection in Il22−/− mice and that UshA deletion doesn’t affect the replication, colonization, and virulence of CR in vitro and in vivo. Thus, ΔespFΔushA CR is an avirulent strain with substantially attenuated pathogenicity in the immunocompromised Il22−/− mice.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

EspF and UshA deletion attenuates CR infection-caused morbidity and mortality in Il22−/− mice. (A) Upper, diagrams show Citrobacter rodentium (CR) espF and ushA genes and PCR products amplified using the gene-specific primer pairs. Bottom, representative image of amplified PCR products using the indicated primer pairs from the CR strains as indicated. (B) Growth curves of wild-type (WT), ΔespF, ΔushA, and ΔespFΔushA CR in LB medium or Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM), at 1:100 dilutions from the overnight cultures. OD600, optical density measured at a wavelength of 600 nm. (C) Colonization kinetics of CR in Il22−/− mice inoculated with 2 × 109 CFU of each CR strain as indicated. (D–E) Body weight loss (D) and clinical scores (E) of Il22−/− mice at indicated periods postinoculation with the indicated CR strains. (F) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the survival rate in Il22−/− mice inoculated with the indicated CR strains. Data are mean ± s.e.m., with specific n numbers indicated, and representative of at least two independent experiments. ***, P < 0.001 and ****, P < 0.0001, for ΔespF CR versus WT CR in blue and ΔespFΔushA CR versus WT CR in red, respectively.

Infection with ΔespFΔushA strain elicits robust systemic and humoral immunity against CR.

CR infection induces CR-specific antibodies in infected hosts, thus facilitating the clearance of this bacterial pathogen (30, 31). Despite the markedly attenuated virulence, the ΔespFΔushA strain shared similar CR burdens and clearance kinetics as its wild-type equivalent in Il22−/− mice (Fig. 1C to F), which led us to examine whether ΔespFΔushA CR infection elicited CR-specific antibody response in the survived animals. To this end, Il22−/− mice were orally inoculated with either live ΔespFΔushA CR or inactivated ΔespFΔushA strain pretreated with formalin (Fig. 2A and B); the serum and fecal samples were collected from these animals after the clearance of CR, i.e., at 26 dpi, to analyze CR-specific antibody responses. As illustrated by enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs), infection with live ΔespFΔushA CR, compared to the inactivated control, in Il22−/− mice caused augmented levels of antibodies that specifically recognize the whole bacteria of CR (Fig. 2C–I). In addition, live bacterial infection elicited systemic immune responses, in particular the CR-specific antibodies including IgG (as well as the IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3 subtypes), IgM, and IgA, which were all significantly elevated in the serum samples collected from Il22−/− mice infected with live ΔespFΔushA CR, in comparison to those from inactivated control-inoculated animals (Fig. 2C–I). Moreover, the inactivated CR barely triggered fecal IgA response in the infected animals, whereas the CR-specific fecal IgA titers were notably elevated in Il22−/− mice even after ΔespFΔushA CR clearance (Fig. 2J). Besides the whole bacteria, the soluble fractions from sonicated CR solution were utilized in ELISAs to examine whether the dynamic host–pathogen interactions during live ΔespFΔushA CR infection facilitate the presentation and recognition of native antigens within CR by host immune systems. Indeed, the levels of serum IgG, IgM, and IgA, as well as fecal IgA specific for CR soluble fractions, were substantially elevated in Il22−/− mice infected with live ΔespFΔushA CR, in contrast to those in the animals challenged with inactivated control (Fig. 3A–D). Consistently, the SDS-PAGE separation followed by immunoblot assays revealed that a wide range of proteins, in particular those with molecular weights ranging from 10–15 kilo-Dalton (kDa) and 25–55 kDa, in the whole cell lysates of wild-type CR were detected by the serum antibodies derived from Il22−/− mice infected with live ΔespFΔushA CR (Fig. 3E). In striking contrast, the separated CR lysates were scarcely recognized by the serum antibodies collected from inactivated control-infected animals (Fig. 3E). These results demonstrate that oral administration of live ΔespFΔushA CR, but not inactivated strain, elicits robust and systemic immune responses in the survived Il22−/− mice, generating a collection of antibodies that recognize the antigens on the surface and inside of CR.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

ΔespFΔushA CR infection elicits specific antibody responses in Il22−/− mice. (A) A schematic of infection experiment in Il22−/− mice with ΔespFΔushA Citrobacter rodentium (CR) or formalin-inactivated ΔespFΔushA CR. The serum and fecal samples were collected at 26 days postinoculation (dpi). (B) Representative images of ΔespFΔushA CR and formalin-inactivated CR on a MacConkey agar plate after overnight culture. (C–I) CR-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) (C), IgG1 (D), IgG2a (E), IgG2b (F), IgG3 (G), IgM (H), and IgA (I) levels in the serum samples collected from Il22−/− mice infected with ΔespFΔushA CR or formalin-inactivated CR at 26 dpi. (J) CR-specific IgA levels in the feces collected from Il22−/− mice infected with ΔespFΔushA CR or formalin-inactivated CR at 26 dpi. OD450, optical density measured at a wavelength of 450 nm. Data are mean ± s.e.m., with specific n numbers indicated. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; and ****, P < 0.0001.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Live ΔespFΔushA CR infection triggered antibody responses recognize biomolecules inside of CR. (A–C) Citrobacter rodentium (CR) lysate-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) (A), IgM (B), and IgA (C) levels in the serum samples collected from Il22−/− mice infected with ΔespFΔushA CR or formalin-inactivated ΔespFΔushA CR at 26 days postinoculation (dpi). (D) CR lysate-specific IgA levels in the feces collected from Il22−/− mice infected with ΔespFΔushA CR or formalin-inactivated CR at 28 dpi. OD450, optical density measured at a wavelength of 450 nm. (E) CR whole cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblot (IB) using three serum samples collected from Il22−/− mice infected with the indicated CR strains at 26 dpi, with DnaK as a loading control. Data are mean ± s.e.m., with specific n numbers indicated. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001.

Oral administration of ΔespFΔushA CR effectively protects Il22−/− mice from lethal infection.

To assess whether ΔespFΔushA CR-elicited antibody responses in Il22−/− mice are sufficient to confer protective immunity, Il22−/− mice inoculated primarily with live ΔespFΔushA CR or inactivated control were subjected to a secondary infection with wild-type CR (Fig. 4A). Consistent with our previous observations (Fig. 1F), the gradual colonization and clearance of ΔespFΔushA CR (Fig. 4F) caused transient body weight loss in Il22−/− mice (Fig. 4G); both live and inactivated ΔespFΔushA CR-infected animals survived. At 28 dpi, they were rechallenged with wild-type CR (Fig. 4A). While CR infection causes measurable inflammation and minimal morphological changes in the colons of immunocompetent animals, CR challenge in immunocompromised Il22−/− mice results in more severe inflammation and substantial shortening in colon lengths (16). Indeed, secondary infection with wild-type CR triggered discernible morphological damage in the colons of Il22−/− mice that were primarily inoculated with the inactivated control (Fig. 4B), with substantially shortened colon lengths (Fig. 4C). In contrast, the colons derived from Il22−/− mice subjected to primary ΔespFΔushA and secondary wild-type CR infections, exhibited almost normal morphology and lengths compared to those from uninfected Il22−/− animals (Fig. 4B and C). In line with the wild-type CR-caused colonic tissue damage (Fig. 4B and C), markedly elevated CR burdens were detected in the liver and the spleen of Il22−/− mice primarily infected with inactivated control (Fig. 4D and E), whereas the increased CR burdens in these peripheral organs were abolished in the animals preinfected with live ΔespFΔushA CR (Fig. 4D and E). As expected, the CR burdens gradually increased and peaked at 6 days after secondary wild-type CR infection in Il22−/− mice preinoculated with inactivated strain (Fig. 4F), and these animals suffered from substantial body weight loss (Fig. 4G) and resulted in 91% lethality (Fig. 4H). In contrast, the maximal burdens were extensively reduced, and wild-type CR was cleared as rapidly as 2 days post-secondary infection in Il22−/− mice orally administered with live ΔespFΔushA CR (Fig. 4F). Crucially, neither body weight loss nor diarrheal symptoms occurred in the live ΔespFΔushA CR-administered Il22−/− mice post-secondary challenge with wild-type CR, and all these animals survived for at least 20 days (Fig. 4G and H). These results suggest that the robust and systemic immune responses elicited by live ΔespFΔushA CR are sufficient to protect immunocompromised Il22−/− mice from an otherwise lethal infection with wild-type CR.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

ΔespFΔushA CR infection completely protects Il22−/− mice from lethal CR infection. (A) A schematic of infection experiment in Il22−/− mice infected primarily with ΔespFΔushA Citrobacter rodentium (CR) or formalin-inactivated ΔespFΔushA CR, followed by a secondary oral challenge with wild-type (WT) CR at 28 days postinoculation (dpi). (B) Representative images of the cecum and the colon derived from Il22−/− mice, primarily infected with ΔespFΔushA CR or formalin-inactivated CR and secondarily infected with WT CR, at 8 days post WT CR infection, or uninfected Il22−/− animals. (C) Colon lengths of Il22−/− mice infected as in (B). Each data point represents a single animal (n = 4). (D–E) CR burdens in the liver (D) and the spleen (E) derived from Il22−/− mice infected with ΔespFΔushA CR or formalin-inactivated CR and secondarily infected with WT CR, at 8 days post WT CR infection. Each data point represents a single animal (n = 4). (F) Colonization kinetics of CR in Il22−/− mice at indicated periods postinoculations with the indicated CR strains as in A. (G) Body weight loss of Il22−/− mice at indicated periods postinoculations with the indicated CR strains. (H) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the survival rate in Il22−/− mice at indicated periods postinoculations with the indicated CR strains. Data are mean ± s.e.m. with specific n numbers indicated. Data in B are representative of three independent experiments and in F–H are summarized from two independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.0001.

ΔespFΔushA CR administration provides protection to CR infection in wild-type C57BL/6J mice.

We further assessed the impact of live ΔespFΔushA strain-elicited immune responses on protecting CR infection in immunocompetent animals. Wild-type C57BL/6J mice inoculated primarily with live ΔespFΔushA CR or inactivated control were subjected to a secondary infection with wild-type CR (Fig. 5A). As expected, live ΔespFΔushA CR minimally affected the body weight and survival of the infected wild-type C57BL/6J mice (Fig. 5B and C), despite a gradual colonization and clearance of CR (Fig. 5D). At 28 dpi, these mice were rechallenged with wild-type CR (Fig. 5A). Consistent with previous reports that immunocompetent mouse strains display little to no mortality with mild symptoms to CR infection, secondary wild-type CR infection did not affect the body weight and lethality of wild-type C57BL/6J mice preinoculated with either live or inactivated CR strain (Fig. 5B–C). However, the CR burdens peaked at 10 days and were gradually cleared within the 4th week after secondary wild-type CR infection in the mice preinoculated with inactivated CR, whereas the maximal burdens of wild-type CR were substantially attenuated, followed by a rapid clearance at 2 days post-secondary infection in wild-type C57BL/6J mice orally administered with live ΔespFΔushA CR (Fig. 5D), similar to our findings in the immunocompromised Il22−/− mice (Fig. 4F). Hence, these results demonstrate that live ΔespFΔushA strain-elicited immune responses dampen the burdens and facilitate the clearance of CR infection, thus offering protection in immunocompetent wild-type C57BL/6J animals as well.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

ΔespFΔushA CR infection protects wild-type C57BL/6J mice from CR infection. (A) A schematic of infection experiment in wild-type (WT) C57BL/6J mice infected primarily with ΔespFΔushA Citrobacter rodentium (CR) or formalin-inactivated ΔespFΔushA CR, followed by a secondary oral challenge with WT CR at 28 days postinoculation (dpi). (B) Body weight changes of WT C57BL/6J mice at indicated periods postinoculations with the indicated CR strains. (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of the survival rate in WT C57BL/6J mice at indicated periods postinoculations with the indicated CR strains. (D) Colonization kinetics of CR in WT C57BL/6J mice at indicated periods postinoculations with the indicated CR strains. Data are mean ± s.e.m. with specific n numbers indicated and summarized from two independent experiments. ****, P < 0.0001.

DISCUSSION

Nonantibiotic strategies to treat EPEC and EHEC infections have emerged as a crucial option to limit the increase in antibiotic resistant strains (6), or the only option for disease where antibiotic therapies are not recommended (32), in particular where antibiotic treatment of EHEC infection could lead to bacterial membrane damage and increased production and release of the Shiga toxins (33). In the past decades, significant efforts have been made to identify efficacious vaccines against A/E pathogens, particularly EHEC, which include Shiga toxin-based vaccines (34, 35), bacterial ghost-based vaccines (36, 37), protein-based vaccines (3840), peptide-based vaccines (41, 42), plant-based vaccines (43, 44), DNA-based vaccines (4548), polysaccharide-based vaccines (49, 50), adjuvant enhanced vaccines (41, 51), and others. These subunit and whole inactivated vaccines offer great safety; however, the potential epitope alternation by inactivation process and the lack of dynamic host–pathogen interaction-conferred native antigen presentation during natural infections may reduce the protective effects against pathogen infections. Notably, the T3SS machinery and the Shiga toxins have long been deemed as promising antigens for the most effective vaccination strategy to prevent A/E pathogen-caused foodborne diseases (27); however, no vaccines against EPEC or EHEC have been licensed so far.

The risk of residual live attenuated vaccines, especially for immunocompromised people, is a common concern for vaccine safety (52). Moreover, clinical trials using wild-type EHEC (O157: H7 strain) cannot be performed on human volunteers, due to the severity of disease (27). While causing self-limiting infections and mild symptoms in immunocompetent hosts, A/E pathogens are known to result in severe symptoms and even mortality under immunocompromised conditions (15, 16). Hence, there are only a few previous studies using live attenuated bacterium-based vaccines for preventing EPEC and EHEC infections (53, 54). Of note, the accumulating knowledge about critical host–pathogen interactions during A/E pathogen infections in immunocompromised hosts suggests the potential feasibility of live attenuated vaccine strategy. In particular, our recent study showed that ΔespF strain completely diminished wild-type CR-caused lethality in the immunocompromised Il22−/− mice, although deletion of EspF did not affect the colonization, proliferation, and clearance of CR (16). Considering the potential far-reaching impact of CR infection on colon tumorigenesis, ΔespF strain has been further genetically manipulated to delete ushA gene encoding UshA, a newly discovered genotoxin conserved in A/E pathogens (28). Phenocopying its parental ΔespF strain, ΔespFΔushA CR infection fails to cause mortality in the immunocompromised Il22−/− mice. Indeed, mimicking natural infection, oral administration of live ΔespFΔushA CR, compared to the inactivated control, elicits more robust systemic and humoral immunity with elevated levels of CR-specific antibodies. Moreover, inoculation of inactivated control produces antibodies recognizing several CR antigens; by contrast, live ΔespFΔushA CR-administrated Il22−/− mice generate antibodies specific for a wide range of antigens on the surface and inside of CR, likely due to the preservation of native antigens and the antigen presentation facilitated by dynamic host–pathogen interactions during live infection. Consequently, oral administration of live ΔespFΔushA CR elicits perfect protective immunity protecting the immunocompromised Il22−/− mice from lethal infection with wild-type CR, especially the accelerated CR clearance at two days post-secondary infection. As expected, in contrast to subunit vaccines based on only one or few virulence factors, oral infection with ΔespFΔushA CR in Il22−/− mice promotes an efficient immune response against an array of known and yet unidentified virulence determinants. Thus, our results provide a proof of concept of live attenuated vaccination strategy for preventing A/E pathogen infections in immunocompromised hosts associated with more severe symptoms and lethality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ethics statement.

All animal experiments were performed according to the protocol approved by the Johns Hopkins University’s Animal Care and Use Committee and in direct accordance with the NIH guidelines for housing and care of laboratory animals. Wild-type (WT) and Il22−/− (IL-22 knockout) mice in C57BL/6J background (16) were maintained in a specific pathogen-free facility and given autoclaved food and water ad libitum.

Reagents and antibodies.

Luria-Bertani (LB) broth, Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM), LB plates, and MacConkey plates were purchased from VWR (Radnor, PA). Formalin (F8775) and sulfuric acid (258105) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Antibodies used were DnaK (8E2/2) antibody from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Halethorpe, MD) and horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugated antibodies specific for mouse IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgM, and IgA from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX) and SouthernBiotech (Birmingham, AL).

Bacterial strains and growth conditions.

Wild-type (DBS 100 strain), ΔespF, and ΔushA Citrobacter rodentium (CR) strains were described previously (16, 28). The ΔespFΔushA CR strain was generated with the “scar”-free in-frame deletion method based on the suicide vector pRE112 via allelic exchange, as described previously (16, 28). CR strains (listed in Table 1) were validated by genomic PCR using gene-specific primer sets with detailed sequences in Table 2. CR strains were grown from single colonies on LB plates in LB broth at 37°C overnight with shaking. For growth curve measurement, the overnight CR culture was diluted at 1:100 and grown in LB broth or DMEM at 37°C with shaking, and 100 μL of bacterial culture was taken at indicated time periods to read OD600 on a 96-well plate using a POLARStar Omega Plate Reader (BMG Labtech, Cary, NC). Formalin-inactivated CR was prepared as previously described (55). Briefly, after centrifugation at 4°C, the pelleted CR culture was washed twice with ice-cold sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 and resuspended in PBS containing formalin (3%, vol/vol), followed by incubation at 4°C for 16 h.

TABLE 1.

Citrobacter rodentium strains used in this study

Strain or genotype Deficiency Source or reference
Wild-type CR, DBS 100 None 16
ΔespF EspF 16
ΔushA UshA 28
ΔespFΔushA EspF, UshA This study

TABLE 2.

PCR primers used in this study

Primer ID Sequences
espF_Up_150F 5′-AATCCTCTCGACCGCAAATCATTTC-3′
espF_Gene_217R 5′-ATCTCAGTCTTTACCCCCTATTGC-3′
espF_Dn_58R 5′-ATTATGTGAGGGGATAGTAGTGAGTTATTTTCT-3′
ushA_Up_210F 5′-ACGGCGCAGCGGAGCCGGGAAT-3′
ushA_Gene_350R 5′-CATGATTGCCGACGGCCATTGCGTCATAG-3′
ushA_Dn_280R 5′-CGATCTGGCCGCCATTCTGGACGCA-3′

CR infection in mice.

Eight-week-old wild-type C57BL/6J and Il22−/− mice were fastened for 6 h before oral inoculation with 200 μL of PBS containing 2 × 108 CFU of indicated CR strains. Mice were monitored for body weight, fecal CR burden, and morbidity for 28 days postinoculation. The disease clinical scores were calculated as the sum of weight loss and diarrhea, as previously described (56).

CR burden analysis.

For fecal CR burden analysis, stool was collected from live animals at various times postinoculation; for CR dissemination analysis, the liver and the spleen were collected from euthanized mice at indicated time periods postinoculation. The stool and tissue were homogenized, diluted in PBS, plated on MacConkey agar plates, and incubated overnight at 37°C. CR CFU were enumerated the following day and normalized to the stool or tissue weight (16).

Enzyme-linked immunoassays (ELISAs).

Antibody titers against CR were determined by ELISA, as previously described (30). Briefly, 96-well high-binding polystyrene plates (VWR) were coated per well with 100 μL of wild-type CR solution (2 × 109 CFU/mL in water) or CR soluble supernatants generated from CR solution (2 × 109 CFU/mL in water) post sonication and centrifugation 38,000 × g at 4°C for 30 min. Plates were air-dried at room temperature overnight, fixed in 0.15% glutaraldehyde in 0.15 M phosphate, pH 7.0 for 5 min, and treated with 0.15 M glycine in 15 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 at room temperature for 10 min, followed by blocking with PBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.5% Tween 20 at 4°C overnight. After washing, serially diluted mouse serum or fecal solutions were incubated for 2 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated antibodies as indicated. Captured HRP was visualized with tetramethyl benzidine-H2O2 in acetate buffer, and reactions were stopped with 2 N sulfuric acid and read at optical density 450 nm.

Immunoblot.

Immunoblot assay was conducted as previously described (56). In brief, wild-type CR cells were harvested and lysed in 0.4 mL of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 10% SDS) for 30 min. The lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min, followed by a separation by SDS-PAGE under reduced and denaturing conditions. The resolved protein bands were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes, immunoblotted with the indicated mouse serum samples and appropriate secondary antibodies, probed by the Super Signaling system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions, and imaged using a FluorChem E System (Protein Simple, Santa Clara, CA).

Colon tissue analysis.

Colon tissue harvest was performed as previously described (56). Briefly, after euthanizing mice, the cecum and the colon were removed under aseptic conditions and subjected to imaging and length measurement using a FluorChem E System (Protein Simple).

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 9.0.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Standard errors of means (s.e.m.) were plotted in graphs. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t test, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc test, or log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test (survival curves). Significant differences were considered: ns, nonsignificant difference; * at P < 0.05; ** at P < 0.01; *** at P < 0.001; and **** at P < 0.0001.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the Wan lab members for constructive and productive discussions.

F.W. conceived and designed this study; S.W., X.X., and Y.L. performed experiments; S.W., X.X., Y.L., and F.W. analyzed data; and F.W. wrote the manuscript, with input from all authors.

Research in the Wan lab is supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health AI137719 and CA244350 (F.W.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

We have no conflict of interest to report.

Contributor Information

Fengyi Wan, Email: fwan1@jhu.edu.

Guy H. Palmer, Washington State University

REFERENCES

  • 1.Mead PS, Griffin PM. 1998. Escherichia coli O157:H7. Lancet 352:1207–1212. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)01267-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nataro JP, Kaper JB. 1998. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 11:142–201. 10.1128/CMR.11.1.142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Garmendia J, Frankel G, Crepin VF. 2005. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infections: translocation, translocation, translocation. Infect Immun 73:2573–2585. 10.1128/IAI.73.5.2573-2585.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Santos AS, Finlay BB. 2015. Bringing down the host: enteropathogenic and enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli effector-mediated subversion of host innate immune pathways. Cell Microbiol 17:318–332. 10.1111/cmi.12412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nguyen Y, Sperandio V. 2012. Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) pathogenesis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2:90. 10.3389/fcimb.2012.00090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Torres AG. 2017. Escherichia coli diseases in Latin America—a “One Health” multidisciplinary approach. Pathog Dis 75:ftx012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nougayrede JP, Fernandes PJ, Donnenberg MS. 2003. Adhesion of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to host cells. Cell Microbiol 5:359–372. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2003.00281.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Collins JW, Keeney KM, Crepin VF, Rathinam VA, Fitzgerald KA, Finlay BB, Frankel G. 2014. Citrobacter rodentium: infection, inflammation and the microbiota. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:612–623. 10.1038/nrmicro3315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wiles S, Clare S, Harker J, Huett A, Young D, Dougan G, Frankel G. 2004. Organ specificity, colonization and clearance dynamics in vivo following oral challenges with the murine pathogen Citrobacter rodentium. Cell Microbiol 6:963–972. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00414.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mullineaux-Sanders C, Sanchez-Garrido J, Hopkins EGD, Shenoy AR, Barry R, Frankel G. 2019. Citrobacter rodentium–host–microbiota interactions: immunity, bioenergetics and metabolism. Nat Rev Microbiol 17:701–715. 10.1038/s41579-019-0252-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Caballero-Flores G, Pickard JM, Nunez G. 2021. Regulation of Citrobacter rodentium colonization: virulence, immune response and microbiota interactions. Curr Opin Microbiol 63:142–149. 10.1016/j.mib.2021.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Woodward SE, Krekhno Z, Finlay BB. 2019. Here, there, and everywhere: how pathogenic Escherichia coli sense and respond to gastrointestinal biogeography. Cell Microbiol 21:e13107. 10.1111/cmi.13107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liesman RM, Binnicker MJ. 2016. The role of multiplex molecular panels for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections in immunocompromised patients. Curr Opin Infect Dis 29:359–365. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mayer CL, Leibowitz CS, Kurosawa S, Stearns-Kurosawa DJ. 2012. Shiga toxins and the pathophysiology of hemolytic uremic syndrome in humans and animals. Toxins (Basel) 4:1261–1287. 10.3390/toxins4111261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zheng Y, Valdez PA, Danilenko DM, Hu Y, Sa SM, Gong Q, Abbas AR, Modrusan Z, Ghilardi N, de Sauvage FJ, Ouyang W. 2008. Interleukin-22 mediates early host defense against attaching and effacing bacterial pathogens. Nat Med 14:282–289. 10.1038/nm1720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Xia X, Liu Y, Hodgson A, Xu D, Guo W, Yu H, She W, Zhou C, Lan L, Fu K, Vallance BA, Wan F. 2019. EspF is crucial for Citrobacter rodentium-induced tight junction disruption and lethality in immunocompromised animals. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007898. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sabat R, Ouyang W, Wolk K. 2014. Therapeutic opportunities of the IL-22-IL-22R1 system. Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:21–38. 10.1038/nrd4176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pan HF, Zhao XF, Yuan H, Zhang WH, Li XP, Wang GH, Wu GC, Tang XW, Li WX, Li LH, Feng JB, Hu CS, Ye DQ. 2009. Decreased serum IL-22 levels in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Chim Acta 401:179–180. 10.1016/j.cca.2008.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim CJ, Nazli A, Rojas OL, Chege D, Alidina Z, Huibner S, Mujib S, Benko E, Kovacs C, Shin LY, Grin A, Kandel G, Loutfy M, Ostrowski M, Gommerman JL, Kaushic C, Kaul R. 2012. A role for mucosal IL-22 production and Th22 cells in HIV-associated mucosal immunopathogenesis. Mucosal Immunol 5:670–680. 10.1038/mi.2012.72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yamazaki Y, Yamada M, Kawai T, Morio T, Onodera M, Ueki M, Watanabe N, Takada H, Takezaki S, Chida N, Kobayashi I, Ariga T. 2014. Two novel gain-of-function mutations of STAT1 responsible for chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis disease: impaired production of IL-17A and IL-22, and the presence of anti-IL-17F autoantibody. J Immunol 193:4880–4887. 10.4049/jimmunol.1401467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.McNamara BP, Koutsouris A, O'Connell CB, Nougayrede JP, Donnenberg MS, Hecht G. 2001. Translocated EspF protein from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli disrupts host intestinal barrier function. J Clin Invest 107:621–629. 10.1172/JCI11138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Garber JJ, Mallick EM, Scanlon KM, Turner JR, Donnenberg MS, Leong JM, Snapper SB. 2018. Attaching-and-effacing pathogens exploit junction regulatory activities of N-WASP and SNX9 to disrupt the intestinal barrier. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:273–288. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.11.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Weflen AW, Alto NM, Viswanathan VK, Hecht G. 2010. E. coli secreted protein F promotes EPEC invasion of intestinal epithelial cells via an SNX9-dependent mechanism. Cell Microbiol 12:919–929. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01440.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Peralta-Ramirez J, Hernandez JM, Manning-Cela R, Luna-Munoz J, Garcia-Tovar C, Nougayrede JP, Oswald E, Navarro-Garcia F. 2008. EspF interacts with nucleation-promoting factors to recruit junctional proteins into pedestals for pedestal maturation and disruption of paracellular permeability. Infect Immun 76:3854–3868. 10.1128/IAI.00072-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang X, Du Y, Hua Y, Fu M, Niu C, Zhang B, Zhao W, Zhang Q, Wan C. 2017. The EspF N-terminal of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 EDL933w imparts stronger toxicity effects on HT-29 cells than the C-terminal. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:410. 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McNamara BP, Donnenberg MS. 1998. A novel proline-rich protein, EspF, is secreted from enteropathogenic Escherichia coli via the type III export pathway. FEMS Microbiol Lett 166:71–78. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rojas-Lopez M, Monterio R, Pizza M, Desvaux M, Rosini R. 2018. Intestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: insights for vaccine development. Front Microbiol 9:440. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu Y, Fu K, Wier EM, Lei Y, Hodgson A, Xu D, Xia X, Zheng D, Ding H, Sears CL, Yang J, Wan F. 2022. Bacterial genotoxin accelerates transient infection-driven murine colon tumorigenesis. Cancer Discov 12:236–249. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Wang L, Zhou YJ, Ji D, Lin X, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Liu W, Zhao ZK. 2014. Identification of UshA as a major enzyme for NAD degradation in Escherichia coli. Enzyme Microb Technol 58–59:75–79. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2014.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Maaser C, Housley MP, Iimura M, Smith JR, Vallance BA, Finlay BB, Schreiber JR, Varki NM, Kagnoff MF, Eckmann L. 2004. Clearance of Citrobacter rodentium requires B cells but not secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) or IgM antibodies. Infect Immun 72:3315–3324. 10.1128/IAI.72.6.3315-3324.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kamada N, Sakamoto K, Seo SU, Zeng MY, Kim YG, Cascalho M, Vallance BA, Puente JL, Nunez G. 2015. Humoral immunity in the gut selectively targets phenotypically virulent attaching-and-effacing bacteria for intraluminal elimination. Cell Host Microbe 17:617–627. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goldwater PN, Bettelheim KA. 2012. Treatment of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) infection and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). BMC Med 10:12. 10.1186/1741-7015-10-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kimmitt PT, Harwood CR, Barer MR. 2000. Toxin gene expression by Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli: the role of antibiotics and the bacterial SOS response. Emerg Infect Dis 6:458–465. 10.3201/eid0605.000503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bitzan M, Poole R, Mehran M, Sicard E, Brockus C, Thuning-Roberson C, Riviere M. 2009. Safety and pharmacokinetics of chimeric anti-Shiga toxin 1 and anti-Shiga toxin 2 monoclonal antibodies in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3081–3087. 10.1128/AAC.01661-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mejias MP, Hiriart Y, Lauche C, Fernandez-Brando RJ, Pardo R, Bruballa A, Ramos MV, Goldbaum FA, Palermo MS, Zylberman V. 2016. Development of camelid single chain antibodies against Shiga toxin type 2 (Stx2) with therapeutic potential against Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS). Sci Rep 6:24913. 10.1038/srep24913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mayr UB, Kudela P, Atrasheuskaya A, Bukin E, Ignatyev G, Lubitz W. 2012. Rectal single dose immunization of mice with Escherichia coli O157:H7 bacterial ghosts induces efficient humoral and cellular immune responses and protects against the lethal heterologous challenge. Microb Biotechnol 5:283–294. 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2011.00316.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cai K, Tu W, Liu Y, Li T, Wang H. 2015. Novel fusion antigen displayed-bacterial ghosts vaccine candidate against infection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Sci Rep 5:17479. 10.1038/srep17479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cheng Y, Feng Y, Luo P, Gu J, Yu S, Zhang WJ, Liu YQ, Wang QX, Zou QM, Mao XH. 2009. Fusion expression and immunogenicity of EHEC EspA-Stx2Al protein: implications for the vaccine development. J Microbiol 47:498–505. 10.1007/s12275-009-0116-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gansheroff LJ, Wachtel MR, O'Brien AD. 1999. Decreased adherence of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli to HEp-2 cells in the presence of antibodies that recognize the C-terminal region of intimin. Infect Immun 67:6409–6417. 10.1128/IAI.67.12.6409-6417.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gao X, Cai K, Li T, Wang Q, Hou X, Tian R, Liu H, Tu W, Xiao L, Fang L, Luo S, Liu Y, Wang H. 2011. Novel fusion protein protects against adherence and toxicity of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 in mice. Vaccine 29:6656–6663. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhang XH, He KW, Zhang SX, Lu WC, Zhao PD, Luan XT, Ye Q, Wen LB, Li B, Guo RL, Wang XM, Lv LX, Zhou JM, Yu ZY, Mao AH. 2011. Subcutaneous and intranasal immunization with Stx2B-Tir-Stx1B-Zot reduces colonization and shedding of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in mice. Vaccine 29:3923–3929. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wan CS, Zhou Y, Yu Y, Peng LJ, Zhao W, Zheng XL. 2011. B-cell epitope KT-12 of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7: a novel peptide vaccine candidate. Microbiol Immunol 55:247–253. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2011.00316.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Amani J, Mousavi SL, Rafati S, Salmanian AH. 2009. In silico analysis of chimeric espA, eae and tir fragments of Escherichia coli O157:H7 for oral immunogenic applications. Theor Biol Med Model 6:28. 10.1186/1742-4682-6-28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wen SX, Teel LD, Judge NA, O'Brien AD. 2006. A plant-based oral vaccine to protect against systemic intoxication by Shiga toxin type 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7082–7087. 10.1073/pnas.0510843103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bentancor LV, Bilen M, Brando RJ, Ramos MV, Ferreira LC, Ghiringhelli PD, Palermo MS. 2009. A DNA vaccine encoding the enterohemorragic Escherichia coli Shiga-like toxin 2 A2 and B subunits confers protective immunity to Shiga toxin challenge in the murine model. Clin Vaccine Immunol 16:712–718. 10.1128/CVI.00328-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Garcia-Angulo VA, Kalita A, Kalita M, Lozano L, Torres AG. 2014. Comparative genomics and immunoinformatics approach for the identification of vaccine candidates for enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Infect Immun 82:2016–2026. 10.1128/IAI.01437-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tapia D, Ross BN, Kalita A, Kalita M, Hatcher CL, Muruato LA, Torres AG. 2016. From in silico protein epitope density prediction to testing Escherichia coli O157:H7 vaccine candidates in a murine model of colonization. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Riquelme-Neira R, Rivera A, Saez D, Fernandez P, Osorio G, del Canto F, Salazar JC, Vidal RM, Onate A. 2015. Vaccination with DNA encoding truncated enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) factor for adherence-1 gene (efa-1') confers protective immunity to mice infected with E. coli O157:H7. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 5:104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Konadu E, Robbins JB, Shiloach J, Bryla DA, Szu SC. 1994. Preparation, characterization, and immunological properties in mice of Escherichia coli O157 O-specific polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccines. Infect Immun 62:5048–5054. 10.1128/iai.62.11.5048-5054.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ahmed A, Li J, Shiloach Y, Robbins JB, Szu SC. 2006. Safety and immunogenicity of Escherichia coli O157 O-specific polysaccharide conjugate vaccine in 2–5-year-old children. J Infect Dis 193:515–521. 10.1086/499821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cataldi A, Yevsa T, Vilte DA, Schulze K, Castro-Parodi M, Larzabal M, Ibarra C, Mercado EC, Guzman CA. 2008. Efficient immune responses against Intimin and EspB of enterohaemorragic Escherichia coli after intranasal vaccination using the TLR2/6 agonist MALP-2 as adjuvant. Vaccine 26:5662–5667. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Minor PD. 2015. Live attenuated vaccines: historical successes and current challenges. Virology 479–480:379–392. 10.1016/j.virol.2015.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu J, Sun Y, Feng S, Zhu L, Guo X, Qi C. 2009. Towards an attenuated enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 vaccine characterized by a deleted ler gene and containing apathogenic Shiga toxins. Vaccine 27:5929–5935. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.07.097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Calderon Toledo C, Arvidsson I, Karpman D. 2011. Cross-reactive protection against enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection by enteropathogenic E. coli in a mouse model. Infect Immun 79:2224–2233. 10.1128/IAI.01024-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Takahashi K, Hanamura Y, Tokunoh N, Kassai K, Matsunishi M, Watanabe S, Sugiyama T, Inoue N. 2019. Protective effects of oral immunization with formalin-inactivated whole-cell Citrobacter rodentium on Citrobacter rodentium infection in mice. J Microbiol Methods 159:62–68. 10.1016/j.mimet.2019.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hodgson A, Wier EM, Fu K, Sun X, Yu H, Zheng W, Sham HP, Johnson K, Bailey S, Vallance BA, Wan F. 2015. Metalloprotease NleC suppresses host NF-κB/inflammatory responses by cleaving p65 and interfering with the p65/RPS3 interaction. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004705. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES