Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2022 Jun 6;11(7):e00923-21. doi: 10.1128/mra.00923-21

Complete Genome Sequences of Two Bacillus velezensis Strains Isolated from California Raisin Vineyard Soils

Jeffrey D Palumbo a,, Teresa L O’Keeffe a, Steven Huynh b, Bertram Lee b, Craig T Parker b
Editor: Leighton Pritchardc
PMCID: PMC9302157  PMID: 35658558

ABSTRACT

Bacillus velezensis strains JP3042 and JP3144 were isolated from California raisin vineyard soils and were selected for further study of in vitro antifungal activity. Here, we present the complete genome sequences of these strains to aid in the understanding of their antifungal activity and diversity within the species.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Bacillus velezensis is a Gram-positive soil and rhizosphere bacterium within “operational group Bacillus amyloliquefaciens” of the Bacillus subtilis species complex (1). This group exhibits antibacterial (24), antifungal (5, 6), antinematodal (7), and plant growth-promoting activities (8). B. velezensis strains JP3042 and JP3144 were isolated from cultivated vineyard soil in Fresno, California, by spreading soil suspensions in sterile 0.05% Tween 80 on 10% tryptic soy agar containing 100 mg/L cycloheximide, with incubation for 48 h at 28°C. Whole-genome comparisons via the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB) (9), calculated with FastANI v1.3 (10), classified both strains as B. velezensis (average nucleotide identity [ANI] of 98.08% for strain JP3042 and ANI of 99.10% for strain JP3144 with respect to B. velezensis type strain NRRL B-41580 [GenBank assembly accession number GCA_001461825.1]). Bacterial cultures were grown for 16 h at 28°C in 50% tryptic soy broth for genomic DNA extraction (sucrose-Tris, with phenol-chloroform cleanup [11]).

Sequencing was performed using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) and Illumina platforms. ONT libraries were prepared with the ligation sequencing kit (SQK-LSK109) and native barcoding expansions 1 to 12, following the manufacturer’s protocols. Genomic DNA was sheared using g-TUBES (Covaris) and size selected (>15 kb) using BluePippin High Pass Plus (Sage Sciences). DNA repair and end preparation were performed for 30 min at 20°C and then for 30 min at 65°C. Libraries were loaded on a R9.4.1 flow cell for 21-h runs at 22 fmol and 28 fmol on a MinION sequencer (MIN-101B), with a MinIT v19.05.2 controller running MinKNOW v3.3.2 and Guppy v3.0.3 with settings for high-accuracy base calling and Q scores of ≥7. Illumina libraries were prepared using the KAPA LTP library preparation kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA). Libraries were loaded into the MiSeq system and sequenced using MiSeq reagent kit v2 with 2 × 250 cycles (Illumina, Inc.).

De novo assembly of ONT reads was conducted with Canu v1.8 (12) with default settings and a genome size of 4.2 Mb. Coverage parameters are listed in Table 1. Assemblies created 1 chromosomal contig for each strain. Chromosomes were circularized manually by finding overlap repeats at the contig ends. Chromosomes were rotated manually so that dnaA was the first gene, in agreement with previous genomes (13). MiSeq reads (listed in Table 1) were trimmed to a quality score of >Q20 and minimum read length of 50 nucleotides [nt] using the BBDuk v38.84 plug-in Geneious Prime v2021.2.2 (Biomatters, Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand) and were assembled to the respective Canu-based genomes with the reference assembler within Geneious Prime to validate ONT base calling. Final base calls were determined using the Geneious Prime Find Variation module with a minimum coverage of 20× and minimum variant frequency of 0.8. Protein-, rRNA-, and tRNA-coding genes in each genome were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v5.2 (14).

TABLE 1.

Sequencing and genome statistics for the B. velezensis strains in this study

Parameter Data for:
Strain JP3042 Strain JP3144
ONT sequencing
 No. of raw reads 110,622 133,172
N50 (nt) 16,935 15,778
 Fold coverage 429 476
Illumina sequencing
 No. of raw reads 938,016 1,249,238
Genome size (nt) 4,066,227 4,155,652
GC content (%) 46.3 46.1
No. of predicted coding sequences 3,849 3,993
RNA
 No. of rRNA operons 9 9
 No. of tRNA genes 86 86
No. of predicted prophages 3 5

Genome statistics are listed in Table 1. Using PHASTER (upgrade 6) (http://phaster.ca) (15, 16), one prophage region was found to be common to strain JP3042 (positions 1240251 to 1272153) and strain JP3144 (positions 1221512 to 1253885). Additional prophage regions were identified in strain JP3042 (positions 1737025 to 1792263 and 2165798 to 2189239) and strain JP3144 (positions 1168176 to 1180549, 1822239 to 1963515, 2687353 to 2722233, and 2724825 to 2736208).

Data availability.

Genome sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession number CP082243 for B. velezensis strain JP3042 chromosome (BioProject accession number PRJNA758083, BioSample accession number SAMN20999035, and SRA accession numbers SRR16873780, SRR18143749, SRR18439287, SRR18439288, and SRR18439289) and accession number CP082283 for B. velezensis strain JP3144 chromosome (BioProject accession number PRJNA758085, BioSample accession number SAMN21001928, and SRA accession numbers SRR16872929, SRR18142940, SRR18435833, SRR18435834, SRR18438238, and SRR18438239).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, CRIS projects 2030-42000-054-00-D and 2030-42000-055-00-D.

Contributor Information

Jeffrey D. Palumbo, Email: jeffrey.palumbo@usda.gov.

Leighton Pritchard, SIPBS, University of Strathclyde.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Fan B, Blom J, Klenk HP, Borriss R. 2017. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis form an “operational group B. amyloliquefaciens” within the B. subtilis species complex. Front Microbiol 8:22. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Scholz R, Molohon KJ, Nachtigall J, Vater J, Markley AL, Sussmuth RD, Mitchell DA, Borriss R. 2011. Plantazolicin, a novel microcin B17/streptolysin S-like natural product from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. J Bacteriol 193:215–224. doi: 10.1128/JB.00784-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chen XH, Scholz R, Borriss M, Junge H, Mogel G, Kunz S, Borriss R. 2009. Difficidin and bacilysin produced by plant-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens are efficient in controlling fire blight disease. J Biotechnol 140:38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chen XH, Vater J, Piel J, Franke P, Scholz R, Schneider K, Koumoutsi A, Hitzeroth G, Grammel N, Strittmatter AW, Gottschalk G, Sussmuth RD, Borriss R. 2006. Structural and functional characterization of three polyketide synthase gene clusters in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB 42. J Bacteriol 188:4024–4036. doi: 10.1128/JB.00052-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chowdhury SP, Hartmann A, Gao X, Borriss R. 2015. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42: a review. Front Microbiol 6:780. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Koumoutsi A, Chen XH, Henne A, Liesegang H, Hitzeroth G, Franke P, Vater J, Borriss R. 2004. Structural and functional characterization of gene clusters directing nonribosomal synthesis of bioactive cyclic lipopeptides in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain FZB42. J Bacteriol 186:1084–1096. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.4.1084-1096.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Burkett-Cadena M, Kokalis-Burelle N, Lawrence KS, van Santen E, Kloepper JW. 2008. Suppressiveness of root-knot nematodes mediated by rhizobacteria. Biol Control 47:55–59. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.07.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Idriss EE, Makarewicz O, Farouk A, Rosner K, Greiner R, Bochow H, Richter T, Borriss R. 2002. Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effect. Microbiology (Reading) 148:2097–2109. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-7-2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2022. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 50:D785–D794. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jain C, Rodriguez RL, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. 2018. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miller WG, On SL, Wang G, Fontanoz S, Lastovica AJ, Mandrell RE. 2005. Extended multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. helveticus. J Clin Microbiol 43:2315–2329. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.5.2315-2329.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27:722–736. doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tran TD, Huynh S, Parker CT, Hnasko R, Gorski L, McGarvey JA. 2018. Complete genome sequences of three Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains that inhibit the growth of Listeria monocytogenes in vitro. Genome Announc 6:e00579-18. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00579-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhou Y, Liang Y, Lynch KH, Dennis JJ, Wishart DS. 2011. PHAST: a fast phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W347–W352. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Genome sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession number CP082243 for B. velezensis strain JP3042 chromosome (BioProject accession number PRJNA758083, BioSample accession number SAMN20999035, and SRA accession numbers SRR16873780, SRR18143749, SRR18439287, SRR18439288, and SRR18439289) and accession number CP082283 for B. velezensis strain JP3144 chromosome (BioProject accession number PRJNA758085, BioSample accession number SAMN21001928, and SRA accession numbers SRR16872929, SRR18142940, SRR18435833, SRR18435834, SRR18438238, and SRR18438239).


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES