Abstract
Pregnant women at public medical centers in Porto Alegre, Brazil, were recruited for a study on screening and treatment of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). STIs were detected in 79 (23%) of 350 pregnant women and were found to be associated with infant low birth weight (adjusted odds ratio 5.8; 95% confidence interval 1.9-18).
Keywords: adverse infant birth outcomes, congenital syphilis, low birth weight, pregnancy, sexually transmitted infection
Infants born to mothers diagnosed with sexually transmitted infections during pregnancy had a higher odds of being born with low birth weight as compared to infants born to mothers without sexually transmitted infections.
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) adversely impact and disproportionately affect women of reproductive age and their newborns [1]. Though bacterial and protozoan STIs are curable with appropriate antimicrobials, these infections are associated with significant maternal morbidity and adverse neonatal outcomes such as stillbirth, low birth weight (LBW), and premature birth [2]. Approximately 50% of infants born to mothers with untreated genital Chlamydia (C.) trachomatis or Neisseria (N.) gonorrhoeae infection can become infected with conjunctivitis or pneumonia, Maternal infection also increases the infant's risk of vertical HIV acquisition [2]. Infants with congenital syphilis can have multi-organ failure, with serious complications in the skeletal, pulmonary, and central nervous systems, which can result in death [3].
STI burden varies geographically for pregnant women, with N. gonorrhoeae prevalence ranging from 1.2% in Latin America to 4.6% in Southern Africa; syphilis ranging from 1.1% in Asia to 6.5% in South Africa; C. trachomatis ranging from 0.8% in Asia to 11.2% in Latin America; and T. vaginalis ranging from 3.9% in Latin America to 24.6% in Southern Africa [4]. In Brazil, pregnant women are screened for HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B and C per Brazilian Ministry of Health and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Infections from C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, or T. vaginalis are often treated based on reported symptoms instead of diagnosing the etiology, which has poor sensitivity and specificity [5]. Our report aimed to elucidate associations between confirmed maternal STIs and neonatal birth outcomes.
DATA COLLECTION
Prospective demographic and laboratory data from 400 pregnant women enrolled in an STI screening protocol between September 2018 and November 2019 at the Santa Casa Hospital and 10 surrounding public prenatal clinics in the city of Porto Alegre, south Brazil, were collected as previously described [6]. All women (and their participating male partners) diagnosed with STIs were offered treatment within 24 hours of diagnosis, although there was no “test of cure” performed at the end of treatment or before delivery [7]. Infant birth data (gestational age, birth weight, length, head circumference, sex, delivery modality, and physical examination) were collected from health system records until the last enrolled patient delivered (February 2020).
Statistical Analysis
The final study size was a sample of convenience based on the availability of mother-infant dyad information [6]. Primary endpoints for this report were adverse infant outcomes (prematurity, LBW, or small for gestational age [SGA]).
Women 35 years of age or older were categorized as advanced maternal age (AMA). For syphilis infection, in the presence of a positive treponemal rapid test, venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) titers of at least 1:1 or “indeterminate” were considered positive, whereas positive treponemal results in the presence of a non-reactive VDRL were considered negative. LBW was defined as weighing less than 2500 g at birth. Preterm delivery was defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestational age. LBW/SGA/preterm composite outcome category was included to address the potential confounding effects of prematurity on infant birth weight. SGA was defined using the INTERGROWTH-21st criteria, weight-for-age Z-score of less than −1.28, calculated using “igrowup”-package for STATA.
Two-sample T-test and Pearson chi-square or Fisher’s exact test were used to compare mother-baby parameters in those with laboratory-confirmed STI when compared with those testing negative. Previously reported independent variables (age, ethnicity, alcohol use, drug use, educational attainment, sexual activity during pregnancy, presence of urogenital symptoms, and mode of delivery) [6] were used to assess the relationship of maternal factors with newborn baby outcomes (prematurity, LBW, infant sex, and physical examination findings). Variables trending toward significance (P < .1) to an adverse infant outcome were included in a multivariate logistic regression model to adjust for any interactions. All computations were done using SAS 9.4 and Stata 14.2.
RESULTS
A total of 350 pregnant women-infant pairs were included in the final analysis; 50 pairs were excluded due to insufficient infant birth information because of delivery at an outside institution or loss to follow-up.
Maternal characteristics and infant outcomes are summarized in Table 1. Of the 79 women who tested positive for an STI, 33 (9.4%) tested positive for C. trachomatis, 32 (9.4%) for syphilis, 19 (5.4%) for T. vaginalis, 7 (0.2%) for HIV, and 4 (1.1) for N. gonorrhoeae.
Table 1.
Maternal Characteristics and Neonatal Birth Outcomes (N = 350)
| Maternal Characteristics | Mean Value | Standard Deviation |
|---|---|---|
| Maternal age at enrollment (years) | 27 | SD ± 6 |
| Gestational age at enrollment (weeks) | 26 | SD ± 10 |
| N | % | |
| White Race | 190 | 54 |
| Alcohol use during pregnancy | 95 | 27 |
| Drugs use during pregnancy | 32 | 9.1 |
| Education (completed elementary school) | 230 | 66 |
| Symptoms of STI (Yes) | 137 | 39 |
| Negative STI tests | 103 | 30 |
| Diagnosed with STI (Yes) | 79 | 23 |
| Asymptomatic | 51 | 15 |
| One STI | 68 | 19 |
| Two concurrent STIs | 6 | 1.7 |
| Three concurrent STIs | 5 | 1.4 |
| Diagnosed GA 0-12 weeks | 10 | 2.9 |
| Diagnosed GA 13-28 weeks | 36 | 10 |
| Diagnosed GA 29-40 weeks | 30 | 8.6 |
| Neonatal Birth Outcomes | Mean Value | Standard Deviation |
| Age/gestational age (weeks) | 38.5 | ±1.7 |
| Birth weight (g) | 3260 | ±501 |
| Length (cm) | 48 | ±2.5 |
| Head circumference (cm) | 34 | ±1.8 |
| N | % | |
| Female infant | 166 | 47 |
| LBW | 17 | 4.9 |
| Small for gestational age | 42 | 12 |
| Preterm (total, GA <37 weeks) | 24 | 6.9 |
| Late preterm (GA 34-36 weeks) | 21 | 6 |
| Early preterm (GA 32-34 weeks) | 2 | 0.6 |
| Very early preterm (GA <32 weeks) | 1 | 0.3 |
| Cesarean delivery | 15 | 4.3 |
| Vaginal delivery | 9 | 2.6 |
| LBW or SGA or Preterm | 50 | 14 |
| Stillborn | 2 | 0.6 |
| Cesarian Delivery | 147 | 42 |
| Abnormal physical exams after birtha | 38 | 11 |
| Jaundice | 17 | 4.9 |
| Respiratory distress | 13 | 3.7 |
| Neonatal sepsis | 7 | 2 |
| Congenital cardiac anomaly | 4 | 1.1 |
| Corpus callosum agenesis | 1 | 0.2 |
| Obstructive uropathy | 1 | 0.2 |
| Neonatal abstinence syndrome | 1 | 0.2 |
| Petechiae | 1 | 0.2 |
| Meconium aspiration | 1 | 0.2 |
Low birth weight (LBW) defined as less than 2500 g; Small for gestational age (SGA) = -1.28 Z-score for sex/gestational age.
GA, gestational age.
Some infants were reported by examining pediatrician to have multiple abnormal findings: 3 had jaundice and respiratory distress, 1 had jaundice and cardiac anomaly, 1 with sepsis and cardiac anomaly, and 4 with sepsis and respiratory distress/dysfunction.
Analyses are summarized in Table 2. Both AMA and maternal STI were significantly associated with increased odds of LBW in multivariate regression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-17 and aOR 5.8, 95% CI 1.9-18, respectively). AMA also remained associated with increased odds of SGA (aOR 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-6.1) as well as any adverse infant outcome (LBW, SGA, or prematurity) (relative risk [RR] 2.0; P < .03, aOR 2.5, 95% CI, 1.2-5.4). Infant male sex was protective for prematurity (RR 0.4, P < .05, aOR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.88) as well as for any adverse infant outcomes (RR 0.51, P < .01, aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.23-0.83). In this cohort, C-sections were not associated with LBW (RR 2.4, aOR 2.5, 95% CI 0.86-7.4) or preterm delivery (RR 2.2, aOR 2.0, 95% CI 0.8-4.8).
Table 2.
Relative Risks and Adjusted Odds Ratios for Associations Between Maternal or Birth Characteristics and Infant Birth Outcomes (N = 350)
| Infant Birth Outcome | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBW | SGA | Preterm | LBW or SGA or Preterm | ||||||
| N (%) | RR (P-value) | aOR (95% CI) | RR (P-value) | aOR (95% CI) | RR (P-value) | aOR (95% CI) | RR (P-value) | aOR (95% CI) | |
| Maternal age >35 years | 48 (14) |
3.3
(.021) |
5.0
(1.5-17) |
1.9 (.055) |
2.7
(1.2-6.1) |
2.5 (.059) |
2.7 (1.0-7.4) |
2.0
(.025) |
2.5
(1.2-5.4) |
| Nonwhite Ethnicity | 160 (46) |
1.7 (.32) |
— | 1.1 (.82) |
— | 1.0 (1.0) |
— | 1.1 (.72) |
— |
| Low education | 120 (34) |
1.7 (.30) |
— | 1.47 (.24) |
— | 0.97 (1.0) |
— | 1.2 (.56) |
— |
| Alcohol use | 95 (27) |
0.35 (.17) |
— | 0.71 (.36) |
— | 1.1 (.82) |
— | 0.83 (.54) |
— |
| Drug use | 32 (9.1) |
1.5 (1.0) |
— | 1.3 (1.0) |
— | 2.3 (.71) |
— | 1.5 (.59) |
— |
| Maternal STI(any) | 78 (22) |
3.0
(.032) |
5.8
(1.9-18) |
1.7 (.089) |
2.1 (1.0-4.3) |
1.1 (.80) |
— | 1.3 (.32) |
— |
| Infant male sex | 179 (52) |
0.72 (.61) |
— |
0.56
(.050) |
0.52 (0.26-1.0) |
0.4
(.050) |
0.35
(.14–.88) |
0.51
(.014) |
0.4
(.23–.83) |
| Cesarean Delivery | 149 (43) |
2.5 (.078) |
2.5 (.86-7.4) |
1.1 (.72) |
— | 2.2 (.055) |
2.0 (.80-4.8) |
1.2 (.44) |
— |
LBW, low birth weight; SGA, small for gestational age; STI, sexually transmitted infection; RR, relative risk; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
“—” = not included in multivariate model. Bolded numbers represent significant P-value or CIs. For “Drug use” = only Marijuana and Cocaine were reported in this study population. Low education is defined as having not completed elementary school.
DISCUSSION
Our longitudinal prospective study involving 350 pregnant women focused on the prevalence of STIs and associated infant outcomes. This was a population of young women with self-reported low levels of education and a high nonwhite representation in a city in south Brazil, where most of the population is white.
Compared with those with laboratory-confirmed STIs, nearly twice as many women (39%) reported urogenital symptoms, which potentially represented symptoms from urinary tract infections, vaginitis, STIs such as Herpes Simplex Virus or Ureaplasma urealyticum not specifically tested for in our study, or noninfectious urinary changes associated with pregnancy. More than half of the women (65%) in our study who tested positive for any STI reported to be asymptomatic. Reports from multiple regions indicate that urogenital symptoms are poor predictors of laboratory-confirmed STIs, and previous analysis suggests that syndromic diagnosis of STIs during pregnancy is not well correlated with laboratory-confirmed diagnosis [5, 6].
Prevalence of a cesarean delivery in our cohort was 43%, which, despite being high, is still below the Brazilian national average of 55%, likely reflecting the lower socioeconomic and education status of women in our study [8]. Iatrogenic prematurity is a concern for populations with high C-section rates but was not observed in our cohort [8].
Like other reports, we found that AMA and maternal STI significantly correlated with one or more adverse outcomes in our univariate analysis [9]. Female sex was more significantly associated with adverse infant outcomes, which is contrary to general studies demonstrating that boys tend to have worse birth outcomes [10]. After logistic regression, AMA was significant for all adverse outcomes of interest including LBW and SGA, and the “any adverse outcome” category, which is congruent with other reports from Brazil [9]. Given the association between AMA and LBW, our lower prevalence of LBW when compared with regional surveys may underscore a mostly young cohort of women.
The presence of any laboratory-confirmed maternal STI demonstrated the strongest association with LBW, with nearly a 6-fold increase. Few studies have evaluated these outcomes, though one report in a cohort of HIV-positive pregnant women found that C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae were more significantly associated with adverse infant outcomes than either mono-infection [11]. Recent systematic reviews highlight this association between STIs and adverse infant outcomes, including LBW and prematurity [2, 12]. Though precise pathogenesis is unclear, it is thought that infection with accompanying cytokine release causes a local inflammatory response that adversely impacts placental integrity and function [4]. Some studies describe homology between human and chlamydial heat-shock proteins, hypothesized to be involved with premature rupture of membranes, miscarriage, preterm labor, fallopian tube damage, and embryonic rejection [2].
Furthermore, studies have shown reductions in LBW and SGA when pregnant women were treated for C. trachomatis [13]. Women in our study received treatment for their infection when detected on screening; however, a strong risk still remained for their infants. Most women were in their second or third trimesters at the time of enrollment; perhaps earlier detection and treatment could have improved outcomes. Furthermore, having an STI could represent a constellation of confounding factors not explored in our study, including increased risk-taking behaviors, limited health-seeking behaviors, limited healthcare access, or healthcare infrastructural limitations for STI screening and treatment. Though our study did not capture sufficient events to stratify analysis by each STI, we hope to evaluate this in future studies.
There were 2 infant deaths: one from complications of Trisomy 13 and the other of unknown cause. We were unable to draw any statistically relevant conclusions regarding those tragic outcomes. Urogenital symptoms were twice as often reported than confirmed STIs; thus, there could be other processes impacting infant morbidity such as urinary tract infections or other urogenital infections. The confounding impact of comorbidities such as gestational hypertension, metabolic derangements, pre-eclampsia, and other conditions affecting maternal-infant outcomes was unavailable for analysis. Although well-validated modalities to identify pathogens with high sensitivity and specificity were used, we cannot rule out false positives or false negatives, which may impact the final analyses [14].
CONCLUSION
In a population of mostly nonwhite, young women-infant dyads in a low-income setting in Brazil, maternal STI positivity was a strong predictor of LBW by nearly 6-fold. Even when mothers were screened and treated for STIs, a statistically significant risk for LBW was observed.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Cepheid Inc for the contribution of a GeneXpert machine for the duration of the study and our study team members, including Maria Fernanda Severini, Mariana Brignol, and Maristela Fleck.
Notes
Financial support. This work was supported by National Institute of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (grant number 5K23AI118584-04).
Potential conflicts of interest. Past 12 months, J. D. K. has received consulting fees from Abbott, Cepheid, Curative, Danaher, Roche, Talis Bio, and Visby Medical. The remaining authors reported no conflicts of interest.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
Contributor Information
Huan Vinh Dong, Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mei Leng, Department of Medicine, Biostatistics at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Regis Kreitchmann, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil; Federal University of Health Sciences, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jeffrey D Klausner, Division of Preventative Medicine, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Karin Nielsen-Saines, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nava Yeganeh, Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
References
- 1. Chesson HW, Mayaud P, Aral SO.. Sexually transmitted infections: impact and cost-effectiveness of prevention. In: Holmes KK, Bertozzi S, Bloom BR, Jha P, eds. Major Infectious Diseases. Disease Control Priorities. 3rd ed., Vol. 6. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2017:203–232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Adachi K, Nielsen-Saines K, Klausner JD.. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnancy: the global challenge of preventing adverse pregnancy and infant outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. BioMed Res Int 2016;2016:1–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Walker GJA, Walker DG.. Congenital syphilis: a continuing but neglected problem [published online ahead of print February 2007]. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2007.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Davey DLJ, Shull HI, Billings JD, Wang D, Adachi K, Klausner JD.. Prevalence of curable sexually transmitted infections in pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries from 2010 to 2015: a systematic review. Sex Transm Dis 2016; 43:450–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. van Gemert C, Hellard M, Bradshaw CS, et al. Syndromic management of sexually transmissible infections in resource-poor settings: a systematic review with meta-analysis of the abnormal vaginal discharge flowchart for Neisseria gonorrhoea and Chlamydia trachomatis. Sex Health 2018; 15:1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Yeganeh N, Kreitchmann R, Leng M, Nielsen-Saines K, Gorbach PM, Klausner J.. High prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in pregnant women living in Southern Brazil. Sex Transm Dis 2021; 48:128–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yeganeh N, Kreitchmann R, Leng M, Nielsen-Saines K, Gorbach PM, Klausner JD.. Diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections in male partners of pregnant women in Brazil [published online ahead of print July 26, 2021]. Int J STD AIDS. doi: 10.1177/09564624211032759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Rudey EL, Leal M do C, Rego G.. Cesarean section rates in Brazil: trend analysis using the Robson classification system. Medicine 2020; 99(17):e19880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Falcão IR, Ribeiro-Silva RDC, De Almeida MF, et al. Factors associated with low birth weight at term: a population-based linkage study of the 100 million Brazilian cohort. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020; 20:536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Galjaard S, Ameye L, Lees CC, et al. Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population. Biol Sex Differ 2019; 10:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Adachi K, Klausner JD, Xu J, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in HIV-infected pregnant women and adverse infant outcomes. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2016; 35(8):886–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Vallely LM, Egli-Gany D, Wand H, et al. Adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes associated with Neisseria gonorrhoeae: systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2021; 97:104–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Adachi KN, Nielsen-Saines K, Klausner JD.. Chlamydia trachomatis screening and treatment in pregnancy to reduce adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a review. Front Public Health 2021; 9:531073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Cepheid. Xpert ® CT/NG & Xpert ® TV. Accessed March 17, 2022. https://www.cepheid.com/Documents/Cepheid-Combo-Xpert-CTNG-TV-Brochure-US-IVD-0745-English.pdf
