Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0270663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270663

Effectiveness of couple education and counseling on knowledge, attitude and uptake of cervical cancer screening service among women of child bearing age in Southern Ethiopia: A cluster randomized trial protocol

Samuel Yohannes Ayanto 1,*, Tefera Belachew 2, Muluemebet Abera Wordofa 1
Editor: Patricia Evelyn Fast3
PMCID: PMC9302843  PMID: 35862407

Abstract

Background

Cervical cancer occurred nearly in 570 000 women and 311 000 women died from the disease worldwide in 2018. Of the new cases diagnosed globally in 2012, approximately 85% of the burden took place in low- and middle-income countries. Human Papilloma virus is the necessary cause for the development of cervical cancer and the majority of these infections resolves naturally but progress to precancerous lesions whenever there is persistence and delay in treatment. Majority of the cervical cancer cases, over 80% in sub-Saharan Africa including Ethiopia, have been detected at a late stage mainly due to poor early preventive measures. Therefore, utilization of early preventive measures could increase timely detection and treatment of precancerous changes and significantly reduce morbidity & mortality due to advanced disease.

Methods

In this interventional study we will randomly assign 16 clusters (kebeles) in to the intervention and the control arm using block randomization. The study will employ a cluster randomized controlled trial. Women are eligible to participate in this study when they satisfy certain eligibility criteria; being in the age range of 30–49 years, no history of hysterectomy, did not receive cervical cancer or pre-cancer treatment and non-pregnant. Home based couple education and counseling will be provided to the eligible participants within the intervention group, while the control group receives standard of care. Base line and end line surveys will be completed by interviewing 288 eligible women to evaluate the effect of couple education and counseling on the knowledge, attitude and cervical cancer screening uptake. Generally the intervention lasts for six months. The results of baseline & end line surveys will be compared between the groups to determine the effectiveness of the intervention. Blinding is not possible due to the clustering of the trial arms.

Discussion

Findings of the study will inform the regional or national scale up of the intervention modality to achieve the screening targets set by the Ethiopian government and world health organization.

Trial registration

PACTR, PACTR202108529472385. Registered on 05 August 2021, https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=16037

Introduction

Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) is the necessary cause for the development of cervical cancer. Nearly all sexually active women are infected with HPV during their lifetime but majority of the infections resolve naturally within 24 months [1]. However, approximately 12% of these acute infections become persistent and can progress to precancerous lesions or invasive cervical cancer over decades, when not detected and treated early [2]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5519520/pdf/fpubh-05-00178.pdf The precancerous lesions progress to advanced cancer stages usually within 10 to 20 years. This extended course in the progression of HPV infection to advanced cancerous stage provides an opportunity for the implementation of effective screening programs to prevent the development of cervical cancer through early detection and treatment modalities [1].

In 2012, the global cancer statistics showed that there were an estimated 527,600 new cervical cancer cases and 265,700 deaths worldwide [3]. Also, in 2018, cervical cancer occurred nearly in 570 000 women and 311 000 women died from the disease globally [4]. Cervical cancer in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) accounted for approximately 85% of new cases and 87% of deaths that occurred globally in 2012 [5]. But in resource-rich countries the incidence and mortality due to cervical cancer were two to four times lower than what had been seen in resource scarce countries. The highest disease burden was demonstrated in southern and eastern Africa [4]. These statistics describe that there have been disproportionately heavy burden of cervical cancer among women in less developed regions of the world [1].

Larger proportions of cervical cancer cases and deaths occurred in Sub-Saharan African countries in 2018. Of the highest regional incidence and mortality rates observed in Africa, Eastern Africa shared the highest mortality rate due to cervical cancer in the year [6]. Also studies reported that the highest prevalence of cervical infection with HPV is recorded in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) countries [7]. Based on the projections made by World Health Organization (WHO), cervical cancer will be responsible for 443,000 deaths in 2030 globally [8] of which 98% will occur in low income countries, with SSA facing the highest number of deaths [5].

In Ethiopia, in a trend analysis of the cancer registry data, 5293 cervical cancer cases were diagnosed between 1997 and 2012 and accounted for 31.8% of all new cancer cases [9]. Also the trend analysis of cancer from 1998 to 2010 in Ethiopia showed that, malignancy involving cervix is among the leading malignancies in the country [10]. The estimated number of new cases of cervical cancer was 6047 with age specific incidence rate of 22% that accounts for about 20% of all identified female cancer cases in 2015 [11]. According to world’s summary report, about 6,300 new cervical cancer cases and 4,884 deaths due to cervical cancer occur each year in Ethiopia that makes cervical cancer the second-most common, and the second-most deadly cancer in the country among the target group [12].

Cervical cancer incidence and mortality have been considerably reduced in high resource countries during the last few decades. This is mainly due to the implementation of screening packages for the detection of precancerous cervical lesions and HPV infection. The availability of improved treatment options also played their role in this regard [13]. However, in low- and middle income countries where access to screening and treatment services is limited, cervical cancer remains a significant public health problem [6].

As a cervical cancer preventive measure, the Ethiopian Federal Ministry of Health (FMOH) in collaboration with the Pathfinder piloted Visual Inspection with Acetic acid (VIA) screening services combined with access to cryotherapy in 2009 for people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). These services have been later on scaled up into public healthcare facilities and standardized with the subsequent development of comprehensive cervical cancer prevention and control guideline in 2015 [14]. Nearly 1% of age-eligible women ever received screening in Ethiopia before the implementation of this guideline [15]. But more recent studies reported an uptake of 9.9% –15.5% in selected populations in Southern and Southwest Ethiopia [1618]. Though the progress shows a favorable trend, it is far away from 80% target coverage nationally set for the 30–49 years target population by 2020 [19] which calls urgent public health interventions.

Evidence suggests that the availability and utilization of screening programs combined with effective treatment options lead to a significant reduction in the morbidity and mortality associated with advanced cervical cancer. In Ethiopia, despite the availability of screening services, only few of the eligible women underwent screening for cervical pre-cancer. Moreover studies have not been conducted to determine the effectiveness of locally adapted interventions which could increase cervical pre-cancer screening uptake among eligible women. Our research, therefore, aims to test the effectiveness of leaflet assisted home based couple education and counseling on knowledge, attitude and uptake of cervical cancer screening among eligible women.

Methods

Objectives

The objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of leaflet assisted home based couple education and counseling in increasing the knowledge, attitude and uptake of cervical pre-cancer screening services among eligible women. Two groups of women are compared where the intervention group receives home based couple education and counseling while the control group receives the usual standard of care available in routine service delivery schemes.

Trial design

This study is a two arm parallel cluster randomized trial that will be conducted in the Southern people regional state of Ethiopia.

Study setting

The geographic location for our study is Kembata Tembaro and Hadiya zones which are located in the Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples’ Regional State. The total number of age eligible women (30–49 years) for cervical cancer screening in the study zones constitutes 19.2% of women of reproductive age group residing in the zones. Kembata Tembaro zone comprises 8 districts and 3 city administrations with the total number of 150 clusters or kebeles, the smallest administrative units, of which 9 are located in the city administrations. The zone has one general hospital, four primary hospitals, 33 health centers and 138 health posts. Hadiya zone is administratively organized in to 13 districts and 4 city administrations having a total number of 329 clusters. The zone has one comprehensive specialized hospital, three primary hospitals, 61 health centers and 317 health posts.

The health care of women of child bearing age in general and maternal & child health care services in particular are of the main strategic pillars of the health service delivery efforts in the zones. Cervical cancer prevention and control activities are being integrated in to the routine health care delivery as an important health service package for the women’s health. Currently, cervical cancer screening services are being implemented at selected hospitals and health centers of the zones where our research activities will base these facilities.

Participants’ eligibility

The study participants are women of child bearing age who are eligible for cervical cancer screening according to the Ethiopian national cervical cancer prevention and control guideline [14]. Accordingly women aged 30–49 years are targets for cervical cancer screening program and our research will be carried out within this program framework. Women will also satisfy the requirements of legal residency within their respective living quarters for at least six months, have not had received the screening services within the last 5 years, non-pregnant, beyond three months of postpartum, have not had hysterectomy, have not been diagnosed for any gynecological cancer including cervical cancer. These eligible women will be identified through censusing or health post records.

Recruitment of participants

The Kembata Tembaro and Hadiya zones where the study districts have been situated belong to administrative structures in the Southern Nations, Nationalities and People Regional State of Ethiopia. These two zones were among the low performing zones as identified by the regional health bureau regarding utilization of cervical cancer screening services in 2021. This scenario drew the attention of the researchers to conduct this trial in these settings. Initially two districts, one from each, will be identified from the two zones for this study based on the availability of cervical cancer screening services. Then, sixteen geographically non-adjacent clusters or kebeles will be identified from the existing kebeles within the two study districts.

First, all possible non adjacent kebeles within each district will be listed. Then, among all non-adjacent kebeles, those which are relatively far apart to each other will be selected and included in the study. Therefore, non-adjacency and greater distance between kebeles will be the two selection criteria. Even though, it is difficult to indicate the distance in figures between included kebeles, we will leave at least one kebele between kebeles included for our research which may serve as buffer area between them. All the study clusters are kebeles located in the rural areas of the districts with the average population size of five thousand.

We will randomly assign the selected clusters in to intervention and control groups using block randomization technique as indicated in details below. We will conduct a census and/or use health post records to identify all the eligible women for cervical pre-cancer screening in the selected clusters. Subsequently, sampling frame will be created. Then, we will employ simple random sampling technique to select study participants from each cluster for each arm. Equal number of participants will be selected from each cluster.

Those women who consent to participate in the study will be included and requested to sign an informed consent to ensure voluntary participation. Selected women at each arm will be reached by health extension workers and the data collectors at their home. Once consent is obtained, each participant will be interviewed to complete a baseline survey. The baseline questionnaire includes items on cervical cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, screening experiences, and socio-demographic variables. Similarly end line survey will be conducted at six months.

Randomization

The clusters or kebeles are the units of randomization in our study. Initially, eight non-adjacent clusters from each district will be identified from the two districts. Before randomization, we will stratify the clusters by the study districts and create separate list of clusters alphabetically for each district. The stratification will be done to evenly distribute any known and unknown district level confounders across the study arms. Each cluster will be assigned a unique cluster code. Then, the statistician will assign the eight clusters in to two blocks of size 4 according to the order they appeared alphabetically. The statistician will randomly select the randomization sequence of clusters for each block using the sealed lots of the six possible permutations within the block.

The clusters in each block will be randomly assigned to intervention and control arms according to the randomization sequence evident by the selected permutation within in the block for the stratum. We will repeat the same process for blocks of clusters in the other stratum. Consequently, four clusters will be obtained from each district which will form eight clusters to the intervention arm and eight clusters to the control arm maintaining 1:1 random allocation ratio. Both the stratification and randomization techniques will help actual and potential confounding factors distribute evenly across the study arms which will eventually ensure comparability of the arms.

The statistician will be made unaware of the actual study arms to mask the knowledge about which group will receive the intervention and which group will receive the usual care. This will be achieved by representing the study arms and clusters by confidential codes. Health extension workers will carry out identification of eligible participants’ for the study and subsequent intervention administration activities. Assessors will also be made blind to the nature of clusters with respect to intervention administration.

Contamination reduction

When women from intervention kebeles join those women in the control kebeles during social occasions including funeral, wedding, marketing etc., there will be a possibility to contaminate the intervention messages through informal discussions of ideas regarding the intervention activities. As a result individuals from control kebeles may gain some intervention messages which may affect the intervention effect unfavorably. To reduce such an undesirable effect of information contamination, a buffer zone will be used to create non-adjacent clusters of the two study arms using clusters that will not take part in our study.

Intervention description

The full version of the proposed intervention modality is brochure assisted home based education and counseling followed by formal invitation for cervical pre-cancer screening. The intervention will be implemented among research participants in the intervention arm. All the selected research participants who consented to participate in the intervention will be provided with the proposed intervention. Generally, the intervention will be delivered to the woman at three contact points during the intervention period. Of these contacts, the husband will take part during the second intervention schedule to receive education and counseling together with his wife. He with his wife will receive education on the key issues of cervical cancer and its screening. The husband will also be counseled on the importance and the way how he will provide support and encouragement to his wife for cervical pre-cancer screening. Finally, the woman will receive educational material during the first visit and formal letter of invitation, during the last visit, which reinforces key messages of the intervention and importance of screening for cervical pre-cancer.

The educational and counseling material is organized to address susceptibility to cervical cancer, its seriousness, the benefits of screening and barriers to screening with the objective to build cues to action and develop woman’s self-efficacy using health belief model. The intervention is organized and designed to bridge the knowledge gap and positively influence women’s belief system related to cervical cancer and its screening. This, in effect would bring positive behavior change among women to use cervical pre-cancer screening services.

The educational brochure consists of five sections. Section one provides general information on the definitions, magnitude and incidence of the disease. Section two gives information and knowledge of risk factors, signs and symptoms, complications, and preventive modalities of the disease. Section three offers an explanation of the eligibility criteria, screening schedule, benefits and barriers to screening services to encourage participants to adopt positive behaviors. Section four explains the meanings of screening results, available treatment options, cost and location of the service. Finally, section five explains the importance of male involvement in woman’s cervical pre-cancer screening uptake.

Implementation of the intervention

Each woman will receive a total of three contacts during the intervention period. Accordingly, each eligible woman in the intervention clusters will be physically visited three times at her residential home. During the initial contact, a maximum of 45 minutes leaflet guided education & counseling session will be held with the woman to convey information on cervical cancer and its screening and counsel the woman to encourage the uptake of screening service. At the end of the session, discussion will be held with the woman to address any questions and concerns she may have. The woman will also be provided with the educational brochure for further reading at least once per week by themselves or to be read by any literate person within the family or neighborhood. The date of the subsequent follow up visit will be made consensually with the emphasis to attend the session together with her husband.

A follow up visit will be made to each woman one month after the initial visit with the objectives to re-emphasize important points of the material and make encouragement for screening. During this visit both the woman and her husband together will receive key information on cervical cancer and the importance of its screening. The husband will also be counseled on the importance and the way how the woman receives his support and encouragement to get screened for cervical cancer. Additionally any misconceptions related with the information will be corrected and barriers to screening will be addressed during this visit. Repeated follow up visits will be made in a case of absence of the couples.

Finally, the second follow up visit, which is the last visit of the proposed intervention modality, will be made one month after the first follow up visit to convey key messages about cervical cancer and its screening and address any unresolved concerns related to cervical cancer and its screening. Also, a formal letter of invitation will be granted during this visit for free screening services available in the nearby health facility. During all the visits eligible women will be asked key questions at the end of education and counseling session to check their comprehension. Also screening preparedness plan will be continuously negotiated with the woman at each visit as an encouragement for cervical cancer screening.

The intervention period lasts for six months in two phases. Phase one involves the first three months of active delivery of the proposed intervention at which time intervention will be provided to each woman in a monthly base. The second phase consists of the last three months of the intervention period. During the last three months women will not receive any intervention scheme but left unvisited with the objective to provide a period of rehearsal & translation of their knowledge in to practice. The health extension workers of the respective intervention clusters will be trained on the provision mechanisms of the intervention to couples at their homes. The overall framework of study implementation process has been depicted in the figure (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Implementation framework of the study process.

Fig 1

The nature of the health problem not being widely recognized among the rural communities convinced the research team to design three home visits in the trial package. Until recent years, in a majority of the cases cervical cancer has given less attention in the health system in our country and awareness level on cervical cancer among the rural communities is generally lower than expected. As a result we planned to test the effect of structured health education and counseling approach in a home environment with three home visits.

Standard of care

Basically families in the study clusters receive a standard of care through home visits. Generally, the usual standards of care provided to families within the health extension program through home visits are preventive and pronmotive health care services. Health extension workers provide preventive and promotive services to households at home level with the objective to develop behavioral change among households on the health care services included in the health extension packages. These services are packaged under four major program areas such as disease prevention and control; family health; personal hygiene and environmental sanitation; and health education and communication [20].

Under disease prevention and control, for example, health extension workers promote behavioral change activities that target different health problems. They also promote the utilization of health care services including disease screening services among the families. These services are common to all households within the kebele as the usual standard of care. Apart from these, the control group will not receive any innovative health care services such as structured home based couple education and counseling services during the study period. But the group will be exposed to the innovative intervention after the trial period through the routine services delivery schemes.

Implementation of screening service

Those women who visit the screening facilities will receive the service according to the national guideline. Women will be provided with the specific information how they will access the service delivery location and whom they will contact within the health facility. Accordingly women who come from the study clusters for screening will be linked to the administrative procedures of the health facility to receive the screening service. A trained health professional will undergo assessment & counseling and conduct the screening procedure using visual inspection techniques according to the guideline. Any woman with positive precancerous screening results will receive treatment immediately after the results become available on the same day visit and be counseled to receive a follow up screening after one year. Those women who are tested negative will be counseled to receive a regular screening service after five years. All women who receive the screening will be registered on the format prepared for study purpose.

Compliance parameter

Eligible women in the intervention clusters will be repeatedly visited in a case of absence to resolve the problem of compliance to full intervention package. Despite these efforts, due to different reasons, the eligible women in the intervention clusters may not fully comply with the proposed intervention as per the recommendations within the intervention package. This might exert undesirable effect on the uptake of the screening services. The impact of variability in the compliance to the proposed intervention requirements will be considered during analysis as a dose response function. Therefore, compliance checklist will be used to track the level of women’s compliance to our proposed intervention package to account for during data analysis.

Trial protocol summary

We have indicated a summarized version of the intervention description in the table (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of the intervention description.

Content of the intervention Dosage Frequency Duration Compliance parameter
Leaflet guided couple education & counseling 30–45 minutes intervention Every month Two months No of couples educated & counseled
Leaflet guided couple education & counseling and formal invitation 30–45 minutes intervention Once a month One month No of couples educated & counseled; and formally invited

Primary outcome

The primary outcome of this study is the completion of cervical cancer screening test within 6 months of the baseline assessment. Participants will be interviewed using the survey questionnaire and tracked via health records review for completing the screening service. The screening proportions will be determined for each study arm at the baseline & end line. The difference in the screening proportions between intervention and control arms will be calculated. Finally, the effectiveness of the intervention will be measured as a difference of the differences in the screening uptake between the study arms.

Secondary outcomes

We will also assess the progress of participants’ knowledge and attitude by measuring their knowledge and attitude at baseline and end line. The effect of the intervention on participants’ knowledge and attitude will be determined and compared between the study arms.

Reliability of measures

Generally, the nature of the data collection tool we designed is adapted from different published studies and structured to fit the study context which contributes to the reliability of the measures. When we specifically come to the internal consistency of measurement items designed to measure attitude, its reliability will be assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha and appropriate corrections will be applied based on the findings of the test. The cutoff value we will use for Cronbach’s Alpha test is 0.70 or above. The other intervention we will employ to ensure the reliability of the measures will be training of the data collectors on the standards and techniques of data collection both before baseline and end line survey. Also, the same data collectors will assess study participants both during the base line and the end line survey.

Participant timeline

The participant timeline suggesting enrolment, intervention delivery and assessment has been shown in the table (Table 2).

Table 2. Participants’ timeline of enrolment, intervention and assessment.

Activity Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8
Participants Enrolment
Baseline assessment
Intervention
End line Assessment

Sample size

As a requirement, we identified the proportion of current cervical cancer screening service utilization from existing literatures to be 15.5% among age eligible women [18]. This has been taken as a baseline proportion for the study and considered to be the proportion for the control arm. We will expect an absolute difference of 20% increase in screening proportions between the study arms which gives the effect size or change in screening proportion due to the intervention to be 0.2. This produces the expected end line proportions of cervical cancer screening for the study to be 35.5% and considered as the proportion for the intervention arm.

The power of the study to detect the real statistical difference is set to be 80% and 5% significance level for one-tailed test has been used. We also considered the design effect of 2 to adjust for the loss of variability that would happen due to the effect of clustering and 5% as a compensation for incomplete and non-response rates that might happen during the data collection time. Considering the above assumptions and parameters, we arrived at a total of 288 study participants basically with the help of Gpower software. The required number of clusters we determined for the study is sixteen.

Sampling procedure

Sixteen clusters (kebeles) will be selected from the two study districts where cervical cancer screening service is currently available. Sixteen clusters are taken based on the recommendation that taking fewer subjects from many clusters give better representation of the sample than taking many participants from fewer clusters. The clusters will be randomly assigned in to intervention and control groups. Census will be carried out in the selected Kebeles to identify women who are eligible for screening and create sampling frame. Then, simple random sampling technique will be performed to select study participants from each arm. We will select equal number of participants from each cluster which consequently leads to selection of 18 participants per cluster. The same sample of participants will be used at the end of the intervention phase, six months later, to measure the outcome variables (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Sampling procedures of the study participants.

Fig 2

Data collection methods

Data will be collected using structured questionnaire designed for meeting the specific research purpose. The tool has been developed based on the research objectives from relevant literature sources. The data collection instrument will be pretested to check for its clarity, logical sequence, cultural appropriateness etc. and appropriate modification will be made accordingly. Participants will be interviewed to complete baseline survey after randomization of the clusters and end line survey at the end of the intervention period in six months. Participants will be measured for socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge, attitudes, and cervical cancer screening uptake.

Data will be collected through face to face interview technique using paper printed data collection tools contacting each woman at her residential home. Data collectors will go to each selected woman’s home physically by carrying all the data collection tools and communicate verbally with the local language to get the required information. Two different teams will be assigned for the intervention administration and data collection for the purpose of masking the intervention from data collectors. Both the baseline and end line data will be collected by the same individuals to ease the data gathering process.

Confidentiality of the data

The information we will obtain from the participants will be kept confidential and used only for the purpose of the study. No personal identifiers will be recorded on the information and data recording sheet and only codes will be employed. The completed data checklists will be kept in a secure manner until it will be officially discarded.

Data management

Specific cluster and individual codes will be assigned for each of the completed questionnaire. The data will be entered using Epi info version 7.2.4.0. The data will be edited and transported to either SPSS or STATA to carry out the desired statistical analysis.

Statistical analysis

Base line screening proportions will be computed after randomization and before the intervention administration to measure the last 5 years screening performances of women in both arms with 95% confidence interval. The groups will be examined and compared at base line for any statistical differences in terms of base line participants’ characteristics and their screening experiences. The baseline characteristics will be compared using chi-square test for categorical variables and the results will be indicated in chi-square value with p-value. The continuous variables of the groups at the baseline will be compared using independent sample t-tests and the results will be shown as mean, standard deviation and p-value. A one-sided P value of 0.05 will be used to determine statistical significance.

After completing the end line survey, proportions of women that will be screened during the trial period will be calculated with the corresponding confidence interval. We will also compare the before and after intervention scores of participants’ knowledge and attitude of intervention group using paired sample t-test. A similar analysis will be done for the control group to compare the before and after intervention knowledge and attitude scores. Then we will employ the independent-sample t-test to determine the effectiveness of the intervention on knowledge and attitude by comparing participants’ knowledge and attitude scores between the two groups. The results will be computed in terms of the value of the test statistic, means, standard deviations and p-value at 5%.

Finally, we will use Generalized Estimating Equation analysis technique to test the independent effect of the intervention on the uptake of cervical pre-cancer screening services. The effect size of the intervention, confidence interval and associated P-value will be determined during the analysis. Intention to treat approach will be employed to analyze the data.

Data monitoring

Data will be monitored throughout the trial period with particular emphasis to baseline assessment, intervention period and end line assessment time. A team of field supervisors will carry out the responsibility of monitoring and auditing the overall trial data.

Dissemination plan

The findings of this trial will be disseminated to relevant stake holders in the local community. The findings will also be communicated to the scientific community through publication of the results in the peer reviewed journals.

Discussion

Cervical cancer screening is among the national maternal health intervention priorities in Ethiopia. Even with free screening services available, majority of eligible women do not use the service as expected. Effective locally adapted strategies to increase the uptake of cervical screening have not yet been tested across the nation. The development of nationally sound effective intervention strategies based on reliable research findings needs to be in place to increase the low coverage of the screening services evident currently. The results of this study could increase the uptake of the existing low cervical pre-cancer screening services utilization. Consequently, determining the effectiveness of leaflet assisted home based couple education and counseling on the uptake of cervical cancer screening with subsequent recommendations may help increase the rates of screening among the eligible group. This intervention strategy may also serve as a bridge in reducing cervical cancer morbidity & mortality among the risk groups.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist

(DOC)

S1 Fig

(TIF)

S1 Appendix

(DOCX)

S1 Protocol

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Jimma University for granting ethical approval of this research activity.

Abbreviations

FMOH

Federal Ministry of Health

HBM

Health Belief model

HDI

Human development Index

HIV

Human Immunodeficiency Virus; HPV: Human Papilloma Virus

LMICs

Low and Middle Income Countries; SSA: Sub Saharan Africa

TASH

Tikur Anbesa specialized hospital; VIA: Visual Inspection with Acetic acid

Data Availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.

Funding Statement

This research will be carried out by financial support from Jimma University. The University has no role over the design, data collection, management and analysis, report writing, interpretation and the decision to submit the report for publication process.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. Comprehensive Cervical Cancer Control: a guide to essential practice. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2014: p366–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.A Adebamowo SN, Olawande O, Famooto A, Dareng EO, Offiong R and Adebamowo CA. Persistent Low-Risk and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infections of the Uterine Cervix in HIV-Negative and HIV-Positive Women. Front. Public Health 2017; 5:178. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65(2):87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Heal 2019;8(2):e191–203. Available from: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136(5):E359–86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.De Vuyst H, Alemany L, Lacey C, Chibwesha CJ, Sahasrabuddhe V, Banura C, et al. The burden of human papilloma virus infections and related diseases in sub-Saharan Africa. Vaccine 2013;31(S5):F32–46. Available from: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.07.092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.World Health Organization. Projections of mortality and causes of death, 2015 and 2030. 2015. Available from: https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/projections/en/. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abate SM. Trends of Cervical Cancer in Ethiopia. Gynecol Obstet (Sunnyvale) 2015; 5:103; doi: 10.4172/2475-3173.1000101 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tigeneh W. Pattern of Cancer in Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital Oncology Center in Ethiopia from 1998 to 2010. Int J Cancer Res Mol Mech 2015; Volume 1.1: Available from: 10.16966/2381-3318.103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Memire ST, Habtemariam MK, Asefa M, Deressa BT, Abayneh G, Tsegaye B et al. Estimates of Cancer Incidence in Ethiopia in 2015 Using Population-Based Registry Data. J Glob Oncol 2018; Available from: 10.1200/JGO.17.00175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bruni L, Albero G, Serrano B, Mena M, Collado JJ, Gómez D, et al. ICO/IARC Information Centre on HPV and Cancer (HPV Information Centre). Human Papillomavirus and Related Diseases in the World: Summary Report 11 March 2022. Date accessed 13 March 2022. Available from: https://hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/XWX.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Denny L., de Sanjose S., Mutebi M., Anderson B. O., Kim J., Jeronimo J. Interventions to close the divide for women with breast and cervical cancer between low- income and middle-income countries and high-income countries. The Lancet 2017; 389(10071), 861–870. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31795-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia MOH. Guideline for Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control in Ethiopia. 2015. Available from: https://www.iccp-portal.org/system/files/plans/Guideline%20Eth%20Final.pdf.
  • 15.Gakidou E, Nordhagen S, Obermeyer Z. Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: Low average levels and large inequalities. PLoS Med 2008; 5(6): e132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Aweke YH, Ayanto SY, Ersado TL. Knowledge, attitude and practice for cervical cancer prevention and control among women of childbearing age in Hossana Town, Hadiya zone, Southern Ethiopia: Community-based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(7): e0181415. Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Dulla D, Daka D, Wakgari N. Knowledge about cervical cancer screening and its practice among female health care workers in Southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Health 2017; 9:365–72. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S132202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nigussie T, Admassu B, Nigussie A. Cervical cancer screening service utilization and associated factors among age-eligible women in Jimma town using health belief model, South West Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health 2019;19(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0705-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Federal Ministry of Health. National Cancer Control Plan 2016–2020 of Ethiopia. Disease Prevention and Control Directorate. 2015. Available from: https://www.iccp-portal.org/sites/default/files/plans/NCCP%20Ethiopia%20Final%20261015.pdf.
  • 20.Wang H, Tesfaye R, Ramana G N V, Chekagn CT. Ethiopia Health Extension Program. Washington, DC; 2016. Available from: 10.1596/978-1-4648-0815-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Patricia Evelyn Fast

24 Feb 2022

PONE-D-21-32347Effectiveness of Couple Education and Counseling on Knowledge, Attitude and Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Service among Women of Child Bearing Age in Southern Ethiopia: a cluster randomized trial protocolPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ayanto,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 10 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Patricia Evelyn Fast, MD, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Thank you for the opportunity to review this interesting approach. The reviewers have identified some ways in which you can clarify your presentation to help readers understand the protocol and judge its validity. Please pay particular attention to questions of how the kebeles are selected for intervention and how you will determine if they are basically comparable, as well as whether the sample size is adequate.

In addition, I would suggest that you be clear on the intervention to be tested. In the title and description this is described as couple counselling, however it appears that there is also a component of individual counselling that is much more intense than Standard of Care, with two home visits. Perhaps a description of 'standard of care' would help.

In addition, please state clearly what data will be available to readers--will all relevant data be included in the publication, or will some of it be deposited, in anonymized form, in a database or provided in some other way.

Some minor suggestions are appended as well.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a good study and I look forward to seeing the results. A few suggestions to improve the paper:

1. In general, the tenses used makes it unclear whether the study has started or will be starting in future. Perhaps the authors could address the tenses in the paper to consistently be present or future tense and not both.

2. The Kebeles are the smallest administration unit - the authors can add more details to clarify what the Kebeles really are e.g. describe the hierarchy of the regions (i.e. province, district, zone, kebeles etc...) what the population is like for an average Kebele, average distance between Kebeles included, selection criteia for the Kebeles, were the Kebeles in the intervention and control arm matched on any characteristics prior to randomization? Is this a rural, urban or semi-urban setting

3. Recommend to add details of what the standards or control to the intervention is. This is to ensure that systems in place in the control arms are the same and no cluster has adopted an innovative way to improve uptake of screening for cancer services by women in a particular Kebele in the control arm.

4. Why did the authors choose Kembata Tembaro and Hadiya zone?

5. The sample size is not justified clearly. It doesn't seem that this sample size can lead to determination of effectiveness of intervention. Is it likely that the study results can lead in implementation of this strategy or a change in policy? Perhaps the authors should term this study as a pilot study i.e. "Pilot testing of education and counseling of knoweledge, attitude and uptake of cervical cancer screening..."

Reviewer #2: Thank you for tie opportunity to review this manuscript.

The protocol submitted for publication describes the procedures of a study of an important public health concern. cervical cancer is a significant cause of mortality among women in Africa. There are minor issues that need revision;

1. It would be important to collect some data from the male partners of the women in both arms and have at least qualitative data that can enrich the data that will arise from the assessments of the female volunteers.

2. Under data monitoring, is it better to consider calling it study monitoring as the monitoring doesn't only involve data monitoring but also monitoring other aspects such as ethical issues.

3 Other comments will be found in attachment

Reviewer #3: Only two issues to be addressed:

1. Reliability of the measures proposed to be used in the protocol should be documented in the manuscript (see its importance from a recent commentary: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31253883/).

2. Statistical tests should be reported with more details (e.g., the effect size, confidence interval and statistical power, etc.)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Willam Kilembe

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-32347_reviewer.pdf

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-32347_reviewer .pdf

PLoS One. 2022 Jul 21;17(7):e0270663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270663.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


30 Mar 2022

Responses to reviewers

Dear the editor and reviewers of our manuscript, we thank you very much for the commitment you have demonstrated and careful assessment of the manuscript for its potential maturity. We found all the specific comments and questions important for further improvement of the protocol and considered them in our manuscript. The way we considered them in our manuscript is described point by point in the following sections of this letter. Corrections have been made to the manuscript according to the specific comments. We also included responses to few questions in this rebuttal letter.

Question: Issues regarding references

Response: The entire reference list has been reviewed. There had been problem in three references listed in the 16th, 17th and 18th order. The problem we recognized is in the format of their citation. These references had been cited in Harvard style unlike the rest references which has been corrected to meet the standard of citation used in the manuscript. Reference number 12 has been replaced by most recent one. All the references have been edited and written in a complete manner.

Question: how the kebeles are selected for intervention and how you will determine if they are basically comparable, as well as whether the sample size is adequate

Response: We have provided additional elaborative descriptions to clarify these questions in the manuscript. For example, issues on how the intervention kebeles will be selected from the existing kebeles within the study districts and the issue of their comparability have been addressed. Concerning the sample size issue, we believe that the size of the sample is adequate for our study to make inferences on the bases of the study findings from the sample. With regard to this, we have tried to elaborate about the sample size we used in the methods section. As you read in the manuscript, we used appropriate statistical parameters based on the objectives of the study. For example, we used the effect size of 20% in which most researchers recommend for effectiveness studies as a rule of thumb. Also we used commonly recommended power of 80% and 95% confidence interval. In addition to maximize our sample size in order to overcome the effect of clustering, we considered the design effect of two to increase the sample size by 100%. Also non response rate of 5% have been added. Therefore, we addressed all the sample size concerns and requirements to maintain the minimum sample size required for our study to enable us infer the findings for the population.

Question: the intervention is much more intense than Standard of Care, with two home visits

Response: Basically families in the study clusters usually receive a standard of care through home visits. This include, mainly preventive and promotive health care services that target different health problems including cervical cancer. This is achieved through home visits made by health extension workers deployed at community level. Such education and counseling services in a usual care is not delivered using structured and organized educational material to guide the education & counseling service. The nature of the topic of interest is the main factor to design three visits in the trial package. For one thing, awareness level on cervical cancer in the rural setting is generally lower than expected. Until recent years, in a majority of the cases cervical cancer has given less attention in the health system in our country and not well recognized health problem among the rural community. As a result we want to test the effect of structured health education and counseling approach in a home environment with three home visits.

Question: please state clearly what data will be available to readers

Response: We described that data that will be generated from research participants and used for the research will be made available for the readers of our research work upon reasonable request. I.e. all relevant data that will be generated will be made ready for research purposes, publication requirements and other related matters upon request.

Question: In general, the tenses used makes it unclear whether the study has started or will be starting in future. Perhaps the authors could address the tenses in the paper to consistently be present or future tense and not both

Response: All the relevant tenses in the manuscript have been corrected to future tenses as to meet the requirements of our future plan of the study.

Question: the authors can add more details to clarify what the Kebeles really are e.g. describe the hierarchy of the regions (i.e. province, district, zone, kebeles etc...) what the population is like for an average Kebele, average distance between Kebeles included, selection criteia for the Kebeles, were the Kebeles in the intervention and control arm matched on any characteristics prior to randomization? Is this a rural, urban or semi-urban setting.

Response: all the concerns have been addressed within the manuscript in the methods section.

Question: Recommend to add details of what the standards or control to the intervention is. This is to ensure that systems in place in the control arms are the same and no cluster has adopted an innovative way to improve uptake of screening for cancer services by women in a particular Kebele in the control arm.

Response: These issues have been described in details in the methods section.

Question: Why did the authors choose Kembata Tembaro and Hadiya zone?

Response: These concerns have been justified in the methods section of the manuscript.

Question: The sample size is not justified clearly. It doesn't seem that this sample size can lead to determination of effectiveness of intervention.

Responses: We tried to justify the sample size as much as we can in the sample size section.

Question: Is it likely that the study results can lead in implementation of this strategy or a change in policy? Perhaps the authors should term this study as a pilot study i.e. "Pilot testing of education and counseling of knowledge, attitude and uptake of cervical cancer screening..."

Responses: This strategy or approach can be seen as an innovative type to be tested and will be scaled up in a larger context whenever effective in the trial. Basically, regardless of its label the study tests effectiveness of the proposed intervention. Labeling the study differently than the original makes no difference and does not change the nature and outcome of the study. Therefore, the authors preferred the labeling to be as it was in the original manuscript and approved protocol. Dear reviewer, does not this give meaning? This is not to disregard the labeling proposed by you but to indicate the preference to the original labeling by the research team. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Question: It would be important to collect some data from the male partners of the women in both arms and have at least qualitative data that can enrich the data that will arise from the assessments of the female volunteers.

Response: Basically, this is invaluable observation and we appreciate it but at this junction it will be practically beyond the scope of the study for which ethical review board has granted approval for its implementation. Male partners are included in this study only to create supportive environment to the female partner during the process of screening service utilization. In the intervention package, we are interested to see whether male involvement promotes cervical cancer screening utilization among women group. The trial is not intended to explore the opinions of the male partners. As a result we could not entertain the comment in the manuscript.

Question: Under data monitoring, is it better to consider calling it study monitoring as the monitoring doesn't only involve data monitoring but also monitoring other aspects such as ethical issues

Response: We recognize that your view may be important to improve the journal’s format. But we followed the journal’s guideline for the manuscript preparation. The journal’s format for the manuscript preparation dictates us to do so. Perhaps, the concept of data monitoring might apply particularly to the critical data management points in the research process. When actual research report is generated data monitoring applies to every aspect of data processing from data collection to report writing. It is within this understanding that we labeled the section as data monitoring.

Question: Other comments will be found in attachment

Response: the comments provided within attached document were incorporated

Question: Reliability of the measures proposed to be used in the protocol should be documented in the manuscript

Response: this issue has been documented in the manuscript as per the comment under a separate heading known as “reliability of measures”.

Question: Statistical tests should be reported with more details (e.g., the effect size, confidence interval and statistical power, etc.)

Response: Statistical tests have been described in details to include important statistical parameters according to the comment indicated.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responses to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Patricia Evelyn Fast

15 Jun 2022

Effectiveness of Couple Education and Counseling on Knowledge, Attitude and Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Service among Women of Child Bearing Age in Southern Ethiopia: a cluster randomized trial protocol

PONE-D-21-32347R1

Dear Dr. Ayanto,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Patricia Evelyn Fast, MD, Ph.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for your diligence in addressing the reviewers' comments. The paper is much improved in its clarity.

I have attached a few very minor wording comments (grammatical) for your consideration. Please also look carefully at the final comments of Reviewer # 2 for possible minor adjustments to the wording of the paper, to clarify the approach to literacy of participants.

'

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does the manuscript provide a valid rationale for the proposed study, with clearly identified and justified research questions?

The research question outlined is expected to address a valid academic problem or topic and contribute to the base of knowledge in the field.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Is the protocol technically sound and planned in a manner that will lead to a meaningful outcome and allow testing the stated hypotheses?

The manuscript should describe the methods in sufficient detail to prevent undisclosed flexibility in the experimental procedure or analysis pipeline, including sufficient outcome-neutral conditions (e.g. necessary controls, absence of floor or ceiling effects) to test the proposed hypotheses and a statistical power analysis where applicable. As there may be aspects of the methodology and analysis which can only be refined once the work is undertaken, authors should outline potential assumptions and explicitly describe what aspects of the proposed analyses, if any, are exploratory.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Is the methodology feasible and described in sufficient detail to allow the work to be replicable?

Descriptions of methods and materials in the protocol should be reported in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce all experiments and analyses. The protocol should describe the appropriate controls, sample size calculations, and replication needed to ensure that the data are robust and reproducible.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors described where all data underlying the findings will be made available when the study is complete?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception, at the time of publication. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above and, if applicable, provide comments about issues authors must address before this protocol can be accepted for publication. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about research or publication ethics.

You may also provide optional suggestions and comments to authors that they might find helpful in planning their study.

(Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed the comments and questions raised and I have no further questions or comments.

Reviewer #2: Thank you for the chance for me to offer further review.

Minor comment.

We assume that the participants are all literate. If not, please ensure that the consents are translated and that there is provision for a witness on the consent form.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: WILLIAM KILEMBE

Reviewer #2: No

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE D-21-32347 comments.docx

Acceptance letter

Patricia Evelyn Fast

12 Jul 2022

PONE-D-21-32347R1

Effectiveness of couple education and counseling on knowledge, attitude and uptake of cervical cancer screening service among women of child bearing age in Southern Ethiopia: a cluster randomized trial protocol

Dear Dr. Ayanto:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Patricia Evelyn Fast

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Checklist

    (DOC)

    S1 Fig

    (TIF)

    S1 Appendix

    (DOCX)

    S1 Protocol

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-32347_reviewer.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-21-32347_reviewer .pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses to reviewers.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE D-21-32347 comments.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. All relevant data from this study will be made available upon study completion.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES