Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jul 22.
Published in final edited form as: Stem Cell Res. 2021 Apr 8;53:102342. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2021.102342

Generation of a homozygous LRP2 knockout human embryonic stem cell line (FDCHDPe010-A-56) by CRISPR/Cas9 system

Jie You a,b,c, Yun Cheng a,b,c, Xian-Jie Yang d, Ling Chen a,b,c,*
PMCID: PMC9303849  NIHMSID: NIHMS1822847  PMID: 33878707

Abstract

LRP2 is mainly expressed in the cell membrane of epithelia, maintaining normal endocytosis of nutrients from the extracellular microenvironment and mediating growth factor signals. The deficiency of LRP2 can result in abnormal lysosomal and mitochondrial function as well as insufficient resistance to oxidative stress. LRP2-KO animals show enlarged eyes and malfunction of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE). We were able to generate an LRP2-KO human embryonic stem (ES) cell line using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing and differentiate the mutant ES cells into RPE cells. Thus, this LRP2-KO human ES line will facilitate studying cellular mechanisms of eye disease due to LRP2 deficiency.

2. Resource utility

Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 2 (LRP2) is a cell surface protein mainly expressed in the apical surface of epithelia. LRP2 has been shown to be a multifunctional receptor, playing roles in maintaining normal endocytosis of nutrients and other substances, as well as mediating growth factor binding. Deficiencies of LRP2 can result in perturbed membrane trafficking and dysfunctional lysosomes and mitochondria (Marzolo MP, 2011). Humans with recessive LRP2 mutations develop Donnai-Barrow syndrome with craniofacial anomalies including ocular hypertelorism, forebrain defects, and mild holoprosencephaly (Christ et al., 2012; Rosenfeld et al., 2010). LRP2 knockout mice show an enlarged ocular appearance, and exhibit abnormal retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) endocytosis (Cases et al., 2017; Patel et al., 2007). To establish human disease models, we generated an LRP2-KO human embryonic stem cell (HESC) line using CRISPR/cas9 system. Differentiating LRP2-KO ES cells into RPE cells will further studies of LRP2 function in ocular development and diseases.

3. Resource details

To generate the LRP2 knock-out HESC line, we used a CRISPR/cas9 system based on Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 (SaCas9), which edits the genome with efficiencies similar to those of SpCas9, while being > 1 kb shorter (Ran et al., 2015). To improve the efficiency of screening for mutated clones, a DNA fragment containing the CMV promoter sequence, GFP sequence, and poly-A sequence was inserted into XhoI endonuclease sites of the px601 plasmid (Addgene #61591) by homologous recombination. A guide RNA was designed targeting the second exon of the common sequence of three transcripts (exon17 of transcripts 1 and 2; exon 3 of transcript 3) of LRP2 (Fig. 1A) by utilizing http://crispor.tefor.net/crispor.py. The synthesized oligo was inserted into the vector described above. Then, the plasmid was transfected into wild-type HESCs (H9 [Wi Cell Research Institute, Madison, WI, USA]) by lipofection. Forty-eight hours later, GFP positive cells were sorted by FACS and seeded as single cells in the presence of ROCK inhibitor.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Characterization of LRP2 knockout human embryonic stem cell line (FDCHDPe010-A-56).

Among all the expanded HESC clones, a single clone carrying a 2-bp deletion (Fig. 1B), as confirmed by Sanger sequencing, was chosen for further research. The deletion resulted in a frameshift mutation at amino acid No.96 (No.870 of transcripts 1,2; NO.107 of transcript 3) in the common sequences of the three transcripts, leading to a premature stop codon at amino acid No.117 (No.891 of transcripts 1,2; NO.128 of transcript 3; Fig. S1A), and truncation of the subsequent 3764 amino acid that contains critical domains, conserved sites, including the transmembrane domain (Fig. S1B). In addition, the CRISPR cut site in the LRP2 protein is predicted to be part of LDLR class B repeat (No.415–4304aa of transcript 1,2; No.1–3541aa of transcript3) and thus may disturb the formation of the predicted beta-propeller structure, which is critical for ligand release and recycling of the receptor (Davis et al., 1987; Springer, 1998).

The LRP2 gene-edited cell line showed morphologies typical of pluripotent stem cells (Fig. 1E). Immunostaining studies with the LRP2-KO HESC line showed the expression of several pluripotency markers, including OCT4, SOX2, and Nanog (Fig. 1C). Flow cytometry analysis further confirmed comparable percentages of OCT4 positive cells (>98%) in the LRP2-KO HESC line and the wild-type HESC line (Fig. 1D). Karyotype analysis demonstrated that the LRP2-KO cell line had a normal female karyotype (46, XX), with no gross chromosome structure abnormalities (Fig. 1I). Trilineage differentiation assays were conducted in vitro to confirm the expression of markers for ectoderm (PAX6), mesoderm (BRACHYURY), and endoderm (FOXA2) (Fig. 1F). Short tandem repeat (STR) analysis showed that the LRP2-KO HESC line matched the parental cell line of origin. These cells were free of mycoplasma contamination (Fig. 1J). Off-target analyses were conducted using primers from http://crispor.tefor.net/crispor.py, and Sanger sequencing confirmed that no predicted off-target sites were present in the LRP2 mutant HESC line. LRP2-KO HESC cells were subsequently induced to differentiate into RPE, which displayed a polygonal morphology, produced pigment like human RPE, and expressed typical RPE markers ((ZO-1 in the cell membrane, MITF in the nucleus and RPE65 in the endoplasmic reticulum and plasma membrane) (Fig. 1G) (Buchholz et al., 2013; Foltz and Clegg, 2017). The absence of detectable levels of LRP2 protein in the differentiated LRP2-KO cells was confirmed by Western blot (Fig. 1H). The above pieces of information of the LRP2-KO hESCs were summarized in Resource Table and Table 1.

1. Resource Table.

Unique stem cell identifier FDCHDPe010-A-56

Alternative name(s) of stem cell line LRP2-KO hESCs
Institution Eye & ENT Hospital, Shanghai Medical School, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
Contact information of distributor Jie You, 513yj45@163.com;
Ling Chen, linglingchen98@hotmail.com
Type of cell line ESC
Origin Human
Additional origin info Age: blastocyst stage
Sex: female, 46, XX
Ethnicity: N/A
Cell source N/A
Clonality Clonal
Method of reprogramming N/A
Cell culture system used mTeSR™1
Genetic modification Yes
Type of modification Induced mutation
Associated disease Endocytosis deficiency disease
Gene/locus Gene:LRP2
Locus:2q31.1
Method of modification CRISPR/Cas9
Site-specific nuclease (SSN) delivery method Plasmid transfection
All genetic material introduced into the cells Cas plasmid
Karyotyping
Analysis of the nuclease- targeted allele status
Method of the off-target nuclease activity surveillance Targeted PCR/sequencing
Name of transgene or resistance N/A
Inducible/constitutive system Transient expression of Sacas9 and GFP under CMV promoter
Data archived/stock date December 2020
Cell line repository/bank N/A
Ethical approval This study was approved by the ethics committee of Fudan University affiliated Eye & ENT Hospital (KJ2011-04)

Table 1.

Characterization and validation.

Classification Test Result Data

Morphology Photography Normal Fig. 1 panel E
Pluripotency status evidence for the described cell line Qualitative analysis (i.e. Immunocytochemistry, western blotting) [mandatory] Positive for OCT4, SOX2, NANOG Fig. 1 panel C
Quantitative analysis (i.e. Flow cytometry, RT-qPCR) Flow cytometry: Oct4: > 98% Fig. 1 panel D
Karyotype Karyotype (G-banding) and higher-resolution, array-based assays (KaryoStat, SNP, etc.) 46XX, Resolution 400 Fig. 1 panel I
Genotyping for the desired genomic alteration/allelic status of the gene of interest PCR across the edited site or targeted allele-specific PCR + sequencing: Homozygous 2-bp deletion Fig. 1 panel B, H
PCR WB: Completely knock- out
Transgene-specific PCR N/A N/A
Verification of the absence of random plasmid integration events PCR/Southern PCR detection: No plasmid backbones Figure S1 panel C
Parental and modified cell line genetic identity evidence STR analysis, microsatellite PCR (mPCR) or specific (mutant) allele seq 9 loci tested Available with the authors
D5S818, D13S317, D7S820, D16S539, vWA, Th01, AMEL, TPOX, CSF1PO, 100% matched Available with the author
Mutagenesis / genetic modification outcome analysis Sequencing (genomic DNA PCR or RT-PCR product) PCR + sequencing: Homozygous 2-bp deletion Fig. 1 panel B
PCR-based analyses N/A N/A
Southern Blot or WGS; western blotting (for knock- outs, KOs) WB: Completely knock- out Fig. 1 panel H
Off-target nuclease analysis- PCR across top 5/10 predicted top likely off-target sites, whole genome/exome sequencing No off-target effect Available with the author
Specific pathogen-free status Mycoplasma Negative Fig. 1 panel J
Multilineage differentiation potential Trilineage differentiation Expressing three germ layers formation: Ectoderm (PAX6), Mesoderm (BRACHYURY) and Endoderm (FOXA2) Fig. 1 panel F
Donor screening (OPTIONAL) HIV 1 + 2 Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C N/A N/A
Genotype - additional histocompatibility info (OPTIONAL) Blood group genotyping N/A N/A
HLA tissue typing N/A N/A

4. Materials and methods

4.1. Cell culture

Wild-type HESC and LRP2-KO HESC lines were cultured in mTeSR™1 (Stem Cell Technology) on Matrigel®-coated plates (Corning). When colonies reached 70–80% confluency, ReLeSR™ (Stem Cell Technology) was used to detach and dissociate large clones. Cells were passaged at a 1:3 ratio, and single cells were obtained using Accutase (Sigma-Aldrich) before plasmid transfections and FACS sorting. Post-FACS recovery medium was utilized to promote adherence of single cells (Peters et al., 2008).

4.2. Gene targeting

LRP2-sgRNA was designed, synthesized, and cloned into the vector described above. Lipofetamine3000 (Thermofisher Scientific) was then used to transfect 5ug of the engineered plasmid into 5×105 HESCs. GFP positive cells were sorted through FACS and seeded as single cells until large enough for screening. Clones were manually picked and genomic DNA used for Sanger sequencing using primers listed in Table 2. Only clones that showed appropriate indels at the designed sgRNA targeting site were selected for further analyses.

Table 2.

Reagents details.

Antibodies and stains used for immunocytochemistry/flow-cytometry
Antibody Dilution Company Cat # and RRID

Pluripotency Markers Rabbit anti-OCT4 1:100 for immunostaining
1:60 for flow cytometry
Abcam Cat# ab181557, RRID: AB_2687916
Rabbit anti-SOX2 1: 100 Abcam Cat# ab92494, RRID: AB_10585428
Rabbit anti-NANOG 1: 100 Abcam Cat# ab21624, RRID: AB_446437
Differentiation Markers Rabbit anti-PAX6 1:100 BioLegend Cat# PRB-278P, RRID: AB_291612
Rabbit anti- BRACHYURY 1:100 Abcam Cat# ab209665, RRID: AB_2750925
Rabbit anti-FOXA2 1:100 Abcam Cat# ab108422, RRID: AB_11157157
RPE Markers Rabbit anti-ZO-1 1:100 Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 402200, RRID: AB_2533456
Mouse anti-MITF 1:100 Abcam Cat# ab3201, RRID: AB_303601
Mouse anti-RPE65 1:100 Novus Biologicals Cat# NB100-35 RRID:
AB_10002148
Western Blot analysis Rabbit anti-LRP2 1:300 Proteintech Cat# 9700-1-AP, RRID: N/A
Secondary antibodies Alexa Fluor 594 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) 1:1000 Yeasen Cat# 34212ES60, RRID: N/A
AlexaFlour488 goat anti-rabbit IgG 1:1000 Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# A-11008, RRID: AB_143165
AlexaFlour555 goat anti-mouse IgG 1:1000 Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat#A-21422, RRID: AB_2535844
Peroxidase-Conjugated Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H + L) 1:5000 Yeasen Cat# 33101ES60, RRID: N/A
Nuclear stain DAPI 1:1000 Abcam Cat# ab104139, RRID: N/A
Site-specific nuclease Nuclease information N/A N/A
Delivery method
Selection/enrichment strategy FACS FACS
Primers and Oligonucleotides used in this study
Target Forward/Reverse primer (5′–3′)
Targeted mutation analysis/sequencing LRP2, 2nd Exon of common sequence of three GCAGTATCTGGAGAATCTCTGTTTG/
transcripts GAGTTTCCACTAAATCTTGTCATTCAGC
gRNA oligonucleotide/crRNA sequence LRP2 GGCCAAGCCATTGGGCCATCC
Potential random integration-detecting PCRs PB1 ATACGATGTTCCAGATTACGCT/ GGTGTTTCGTCCTTTCCACAAG
PB2 CGTGTTTATCTCGTCAACTTGTTGG/CCAGTTTGGAACAAGAGTCCACTAT
PB3 CTCGAGGCGTTGACATTGAT/GTGGCACCGGTAGTTAGCC
Top off-target mutagenesis predicted site sequencing POT1 CTTTGCCCGGCCAAGAATTC/TCTGTCAGGCATCATGCTGGG
POT2 GTGGCATTCCGAATTCTGGC/GTGTTCACACCAGAGCCTGAG
POT3 CAGATGGTCAGAGCAGGCTC/TGATGAACCCTTGGGCCAAAG
POT4 CAGACGTGCCGATGAAGAGA/CCACAGGAACACTAGGCCAGT
POT5 AGTTTACTTGGTGTTCATTACCCA/TGGGCATTTGGAGGGACATCG

4.3. Immunostaining

Passaged cells were seeded on a 24-well plate and cultured for 3–4 days. After 3 washes with PBS, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10–15 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 for 15 min, and blocked in 4% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were then incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, followed by secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Both primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in the blocking medium. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (Abcam) for 5 min at room temperature. Images were taken by an inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany). The antibodies used are listed in Table 2.

4.4. Flow cytometry analysis

Typically, 1×106 cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed in 4% formaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Cell permeabilization was performed by slowly adding 100% cold methanol to pre-chilled cells to a final concentration of 90% methanol, and then incubating for an additional 10 min on ice. Cells were subsequently incubated with primary antibody for 1 h and then with the corresponding secondary antibody for 30 min at room temperature. The primary and secondary antibodies were diluted with 3% BSA. Cells were resuspended in 500ul pre-chilled PBS, detected with flow cytometry (Beckman coulter Inc, MoFlo XDP), and analyzed for percentages of signal-positive cells among total cells by Summit5.2 software.

4.5. Differentiation of HESC and LRP2-KO HESC

Trilineage differentiation assays were carried out according to instructions of the Trilineage differentiation kit (Stem Cell Technology). Briefly, appropriate amounts of ES cells were seeded on Matrigel-coated plates. Then, cells were treated with lineage-specific differentiation medium respectively. About 5 or 7 days later, typical germ layer markers were detected by immunostaining. The antibodies used are listed in Table 2.

For directed differentiation of LRP2-KO HESC cells into RPE, a previously published protocol was used with mild modification (Foltz and Clegg, 2017) and cytokines were added step by step to induce stem cell transformation.

4.6. Western blot

Cells were washed twice with cold PBS, incubated with RIPA lysate containing 1% PMSF on ice for 15 min, and centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 15 min to obtain the supernatant. After SDS-PAGE electrophoresis (Tanon Science Inc, Shanghai), the lysates were transferred to 0.45um PVDF membranes and incubated with LRP2-specific polyclonal antibody (Proteintech Group) at 4°C overnight. Then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with secondary antibody, rinsed, and detected by chemiluminescence with HRP substrate (Millipore). The antibodies used are described in Table 2.

4.7. Karyotype analysis

Cells in their logarithmic growth phase were treated with 10ug colchicine and then incubated for 4 h at 37°C, 5% CO2. Single cells were obtained using Accutase. Standard cytogenetic procedures were performed by ZhenHe Bioscience Inc, Shanghai using the GTG-band method.

4.8. STR analysis

STR analysis was authenticated by iCell Bioscience Inc, Shanghai.

4.9. Off-target analysis

Potential off-target sites (POTs) were identified using the website service http://crispor.tefor.net/crispor.py to predict possible site-specific cleavage by CRISPR/Cas9. The PCR products of POTs were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. POT primers are listed in Table 2.

4.10. Mycoplasma test

Mycoplasma tests were performed using the EZ-PCR Mycoplasma Test Kit (Biological Industries, BI) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Data

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81870660) and Shanghai Science and Technology Foundation (18ZR1405900) to L. Chen.

Footnotes

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scr.2021.102342.

References

  1. Buchholz DE, Pennington BO, Croze RH, Hinman CR, Coffey PJ, Clegg DO, 2013. Rapid and efficient directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into retinal pigmented epithelium. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2, 384–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cases O, Obry A, Ben-Yacoub S, Augustin S, Joseph A, Toutirais G, Simonutti M, Christ A, Cosette P, Kozyraki R, 2017. Impaired vitreous composition and retinal pigment epithelium function in the FoxG1::LRP2 myopic mice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Basis Dis. 1863, 1242–1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Christ A, Christa A, Kur E, Lioubinski O, Bachmann S, Willnow TE, Hammes A, 2012. LRP2 is an auxiliary SHH receptor required to condition the forebrain ventral midline for inductive signals. Dev Cell 22 (2), 268–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Davis CG, G JL, Südhof TC, Anderson RG, Russell DW, Brown MS, 1987. Aciddependent ligand dissociation and recycling of LDL receptor mediated by growth factor homology region.pdf. Nature 760–765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foltz LP, Clegg DO, 2017. Rapid, directed differentiation of retinal pigment epithelial cells from human embryonic or induced pluripotent stem cells. J Vis Exp. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Marzolo MP FP, 2011. New insights into the roles of Megalin LRP2 and the regulation of its functional expression.pdf. Biol. Res. 89–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Patel N, Hejkal T, Katz A, Margalit E, 2007. Ocular manifestations of donnai-barrow syndrome.pdf. J. Child Neurol. 22, 462–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Peters DT, Cowan CA, Musunuru K, 2008. Genome Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells. StemBook, Cambridge (MA). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ran FA, Cong L, Yan WX, Scott DA, Gootenberg JS, Kriz AJ, Zetsche B, Shalem O, Wu X, Makarova KS, Koonin EV, Sharp PA, Zhang F, 2015. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186–191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rosenfeld JA, Ballif BC, Martin DM, Aylsworth AS, Bejjani BA, Torchia BS, Shaffer LG, 2010. Clinical characterization of individuals with deletions of genes in holoprosencephaly pathways by aCGH refines the phenotypic spectrum of HPE. Hum Genet 127 (4), 421–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Springer TA, 1998. An extracellular β-propeller module predicted in lipoprotein and scavenger receptors, tyrosine kinases, epidermal growth factor precursor, and extracellular matrix components.pdf. J. Mol. Biol. 837–862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data

RESOURCES