Skip to main content
Journal of Inflammation Research logoLink to Journal of Inflammation Research
. 2022 Jul 17;15:4061–4085. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S368138

From Anti-HER-2 to Anti-HER-2-CAR-T Cells: An Evolutionary Immunotherapy Approach for Gastric Cancer

Jiangang Sun 1,*, Xiaojing Li 2,*, Peng Chen 1,, Yongshun Gao 1
PMCID: PMC9304417  PMID: 35873388

Abstract

Current Therapeutic modalities provide no survival advantage to gastric cancer (GC) patients. Targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) is a viable therapeutic strategy against advanced HER-2 positive GC. Antibody-drug conjugates, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and bispecific antibodies are emerging as novel drug forms that may abrogate the resistance to HER-2-specific drugs and monoclonal antibodies. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (CAR-T) targeting HER-2 have shown considerable therapeutic potential in GC and other solid tumors. However, due to the high heterogeneity along with the complex tumor microenvironment (TME) of GC that often leads to immune escape, the immunological treatment of GC still faces many challenges. Here, we reviewed and discussed the current progress in the research of anti-HER-2-CAR-T cell immunotherapy against GC.

Keywords: CAR-T, HER-2, gastric cancer, immunotherapy, target

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in incidence and fourth in mortality among all malignancies worldwide, which was equal to more than 1 million new cases and 769 thousand deaths in 2020.1 Given the considerable tumor heterogeneity, the five-year survival rate of advanced GC is reported to be less than 30%.2,3 At present, the treatment of GC mainly includes surgical resection,4,5 chemotherapy,6,7 traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) therapy,8 targeted therapy9,10 and immunotherapy11,12 (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Treatment strategies for gastric cancer. Surgical resection, chemotherapy, traditional Chinese medicine, targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

Based on the results of CLASS0113 and CLASS0214 clinical trials, laparoscopic total gastrectomy is a potentially safe alternative to open total gastrectomy for both advanced and early stage (I) GC patients. Recent studies have also reported high efficacy and low toxicity of TCM-based treatment of GC,8 although the molecular mechanisms are still unclear. Furthermore, perioperative chemotherapy for GC has reached a consensus based on the results of CLASSIC, MAGIC, RESOLVE and other randomized controlled trials conducted over the past decade.15 Despite advances in the molecular typing of GC and the development of targeted and immunogenic drugs, their clinical applications remain limited,16 especially for the human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER-2) positive,17 microsatellite instability-high18 and Epstein–Barr virus-associated19 subtypes. Moreover, studies have increasingly shown that conventional chemotherapy is not the optimum choice for perioperative treatment, and the outcomes of the patients depend significantly on the specific tumor stage and mutation status.

HER-2 is a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family,20 and is overexpressed in many solid tumors including breast cancer (BC), stomach cancer, colon cancer and ovarian cancer.21,22 The Phase 3 ToGA trial established trastuzumab as a first-line treatment for advanced HER-2 positive GC.23 However, lapatinib, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and pertuzumab have not shown encouraging results after first-line treatment progression.24 Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are now indispensable for GC treatment. The development of immune inhibitors against advanced GC cells has been one of the most significant improvements in recent years.25 Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) is a promising treatment strategy against cancers.26 Two CAR-T cell-based therapies have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat refractory leukemia and lymphoma.27 However, the efficacy of CAR-T cells against sarcomas and other solid tumors is limited due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME).28,29 Compared to conventional therapies, CAR-T cells can directly recognize antigens on the surface of tumor cells and kill tumor cells, thereby reducing the rejection response.30 New-generation cellular immunotherapies, such as combined immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokine-induced lymphocyte and T-cell targeted killing, are promising strategies against solid tumors31 but are still at the stage of clinical trials for GC.

Nevertheless, EGFR or CAR-T targeting alone cannot achieve ideal efficacy against GC due to the heterogeneity of tumor cells, immunosuppressive TME and antigen migration. Here, we reviewed and discussed the various immunotherapeutic strategies that have been developed so far to target HER-2 in GC.

Targeted HER-2 Therapy

Structure and Function of HER-2

The first EGFR was discovered in the 1970s, and since then four members of the family, namely EGFR/HER-1/ErbB1, HER-2/ErbB2, HER-3/ErbB3 and HER-4/ErbB4,32,33 have been characterized. The HER-2 and ErbB2 oncogenes were initially identified in rodents and humans, respectively, but were later found to be homologous to each other.34–36 All the members of HER family have the same extracellular domains, lipophilic transmembrane regions, intracellular domains containing tyrosine kinases, and carboxy-terminal regions.35,37 Binding of ligands to the extracellular domains of HER proteins leads to dimerization and transphosphorylation of their intracellular domains.38 However, ErbB2 has no direct ligand,39 and the crystal structure of its extracellular region indicates an extended configuration with four domains arranged in a manner similar to that seen in the EGFR dimer. Thus, ErbB2 has a ligand-independent active conformation.40,41 This is consistent with the fact that ErB2 homodimers are spontaneously formed in cells overexpressing ErbB2, which is the preferred dimer partner of other ErbB receptors.42 Activation of HER-2 and EGFR leads to the phosphorylation of the ErbB dimer, which stimulates the downstream RAS/MEK, PI3K/AKT, Src kinases and STAT pathways.43 HER-2 initiates GC development in the form of EGFR, HER-2 dimers, and HER-2/HER-3 dimers.

EGFR in GC

The EGFR family is highly expressed in 40–60% of GC tumors.44 Anti-EGFR drugs block the downstream signal transduction pathway in cancer cells45 by targeting the extracellular, transmembrane and intracellular regions of EGFR.46 EGFR-specific ligands, such as EGF, bind to their extracellular region and mediate homo/heterodimerization, resulting in autophosphoacylation of the receptor47 and activation of a series of downstream signal transduction pathways in GC cells48,49 including VAV2-RhoA,50 STAT5,51 PI3K/AKT/mTOR,52 etc. (Figure 2). The pathways culminate in the activation of transcription factors, leading to tumor cells’ proliferation, infiltration, and metastasis, inhibiting tumor cells’ apoptosis, and enhancing tumor angiogenesis.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Related molecular mechanisms of targeting HER-2 in gastric cancer. HER-2 is mainly involved in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer through EGFR, HER-2 dimer and HER-2/HER-3 dimer. The three receptors signal via the PI3K-AKT, RAS-MEK-MAPK, VAV2-RhoA and SRC-FAK pathways, thus affecting cell adhesion, migration, growth, proliferation and metastasis of gastric cancer cells.

HER-2/HER-2 Dimer in GC

The HER receptor exists as a monomer or as a homo/heterodimer,53 and HER-2 preferentially binds to the dimeric form.53,54 The HER-2 pathway is altered during GC development, either due to aberrant changes in HER-2 structure, dysregulation of downstream effectors of HER-2, or interaction of HER-2 with other membrane receptors.48 As shown in Figure 2, dimerization of HER-2/HER-2 activates the SRC-FAK,55 GRB2/SOS/JAK256 and RAS-MEK-MAPK signaling pathways in GC cells,57 and promotes cell adhesion, migration, growth, proliferation, and metastasis.

HER-2/HER-3 Dimer in GC

The HER-2/HER-3 heterodimer is the most mitogenic of all ErbB receptors,58,59 and is constitutively active in GC cells overexpressing the HER-2 gene.60,61 Recent studies have showed that the HER-2-HER-3 dimer is related to the occurrence, growth, metastasis and drug resistance of tumors. The HER-2/HER-3 dimer signals through the RAS-MEK-MAPK and PI3K-AKT pathways (Figure 2) upon EGF binding.62 Activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway can lead to tumor drug resistance, and preclinical trials of PI3K inhibitors have indicated that this pathway is a suitable target for tumor therapy.63 In addition, some studies have shown that inhibition of PI3K or MEK alone, or in combination with anti-HER-2 therapy, might be a reformative treatment scheme for some patients with HER-2 positive GC.64 Approximately 34–59% of the patients with HER-2 positive GC also overexpress HER-3 and are resistant to trastuzumab,65 which can be attributed to the negative feedback regulation of HER-3 mediated by the HER-2-dependent P13K-AKT pathway, making trastuzumab unresponsive to ligand-dependent dimerization of HER-2/HER-3.66

Drugs Targeting HER-2 in the Treatment of GC

Currently, drugs targeting HER-2 in the treatment of GC can be divided into four categories: first-generation HER-2 monoclonal antibody, second-generation HER-2 monoclonal antibody, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific antibodies. The latest research progress on these drugs is detailed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Drugs Targeting HER-2 in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer

Category Compound Mechanism of Action Clinical Trial Phase/ NCT No. Category Study Arms Period Median OS (m/ 95% CI) References
HER-2 monoclonal antibody Trastuzumab HER2 (domain IV): prevents ligand-independent dimerization, induces HER-2 endocytotic destruction, ADCC and inhibits HER-2 cleavage III/ 01041404 Advanced GC and AEG Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy 2005.09–2008.12 13.8 (12–16) vs 11.1 (10–13) [23]
II/ 01396707 Advanced GC Trastuzumab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin vs capecitabine plus oxaliplatin 2011.08–2013.02 21.0 (6.4–35.7) vs 9.8 (7.0–12.6) [67]
Pertuzumab HER-2 (domain II): inhibits dimerization III/01774786 Metastatic GC and AEG Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy vs placebo plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy 2013.06–2016.01 17.5 (16.2–19.3) vs 14.2 (12.9–15.5) [68]
Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor Lapatinib HER-1, HER-2, TKI II/ 00103324 Metastatic GC Lapatinib 2005.02–2006.05 4.8 (3.2–7.4) [69]
II/ 00486954 Advanced GC Lapatinib plus paclitaxel vs paclitaxel 2007.06–2009.01 11.0 (9.5–14.5) vs 8.9 (7.4–11.1) [70]
III/ 00680901 Advanced AEG Lapatinib plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin vs placebo plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin 2008.06–2012.01 12.2 (10.6–14.2) vs 10.5 (9.0–11.3) [71]
Afatinib NF NF NF NF NF [72]
Neratinib NF NF NF NF NF [73]
Antibody-drug conjugate Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) HER-2 (domain IV): all the referred for trastuzumab plus targeted delivery of an anti-microtubule agent II and III/ 01641939 Metastatic GC and AEG Trastuzumab emtansine vs taxane 2012.09–2013.10 7.9 (6.7–9.5) vs 8.6 (7.1–11.2) [74]
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) I/ 02564900 GC and AEG DS-8201a 2015.08–2018.08 12.8 (1.4–25.4) [75]
Trastuzumab duocarmazin (SYD985) I/ 02277717 Metastatic GC SYD985 2014.10–2018.04 NF [76]
ARX788 NF NF NF NF NF [77]
Bispecific antibodies ZW25 (Azymetric) Bispecific antibody that simultaneously binds to two HER-2 epitopes NF NF NF NF NF [78]
MCLA-128 ADCC and inhibits HER-2 NF NF NF NF NF [79]
Mm-111 HER-2/ HER-3 NF NF NF NF NF [80]

Abbreviations: ADCC, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity; AEG, adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction; CI, confidence interval; GC, gastric cancer; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; OS, overall survival; m, month; NCT, national clinical trial; NF, not found.

First-Generation HER-2 Monoclonal Antibody

Trastuzumab was the first monoclonal antibody approved by FDA to treat HER-2 positive GC.81 The TOGA trial demonstrated for the first time that the combination of trastuzumab and fluorouracil was superior to chemotherapy for the treatment of HER-2 positive advanced GC,82 and significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) of patients.82 Since then, several studies have confirmed the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab against advanced HER-2 positive GC.83,84 However, acquired resistance to trastuzumab has been a major challenge and has a genetic basis in some patients, which eventually limits its therapeutic efficacy.85 Early clinical studies had also reported cardiac side effects of trastuzumab, such as left-heart insufficiency and congestive heart failure.86

Second-Generation HER-2 Monoclonal Antibody

The second generation of HER-2 targeted drugs has been developed to counteract the emergence of trastuzumab resistance. Pertuzumab binds to the extracellular domain II of the HER-2, blocking ligand-induced heterodimerization of HER-2 and downstream signaling.87 It has been proved to significantly improve the outcomes in patients with advanced HER-2 positive BC compared to the combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab.88 Another study found that pertuzumab extended the median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with BC by 7.7 months compared to that of the placebo arm.89 However, the JACOB trial showed that the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy did not significantly improve the survival of HER-2 positive patients with GC or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) compared to the placebo.68 Therefore, more studies are needed to further determine the efficacy of pertuzumab in stomach and other cancers.

Small-Molecule TKIs

Small-molecule TKIs can also be used to target HER-2. For instance, lapatinib is an oral TKI specific for both EGFR and HER-2.90 It blocks HER-1 and HER-2 by reversibly binding to the cytoplasmic ATP binding sites in the tyrosine kinase domain.90,91 A Phase II trial using lapatinib as a first-line monotherapy for patients with HER2-positive GC failed to achieve the desired results, showing an overall response rate (ORR) of 11% and a median OS of 4.8 months.69 Besides, one study showed that lapatinib is not superior to trastuzumab as the first- and second-line treatment for advanced GC.70 However, evidence showed that the combination of lapatinib and capecitabine could effectively treat HER2-positive GC with bone and meningeal metastasis in patients who were unresponsive to trastuzumab and chemotherapy.92 This can be attributed to the fact that lapatinib can cross the blood–brain barrier unlike larger antibodies.93 Furthermore, lapatinib is also a more suitable option than trastuzumab for patients at risk of cardiac events.93 Nevertheless, it is still at the stage of clinical trials. Afatinib and neratinib are other potential TKIs,72,73 although there are no clinical studies related to GC.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates

The combination of anti-HER-2 antibodies with effective drugs or cellular immunotherapy can effectively ablate HER-2-overexpressing tumors. T-DM1 or T-DM1 is a HER-2-targeting ADC that consists of a stable thioether linker between trastuzumab and the cytotoxic agent maytansine, and is currently in phase III development for HER-2 positive cancer.94 The efficacy and toxicity of T-DM1 were established in patients with HER-2 mutant lung adenocarcinoma,95 and a subsequent study in patients with GC indicated stronger anti-cancer activity compared to trastuzumab.96 However, the randomized, open-label, adaptive Phase 2/3 GATSBY trial reported a similar efficacy of T-DM1 and taxane in previously treated patients with HER-2 positive advanced GC.74 Furthermore, most patients with HER2-positive BC or GC exhibited primary or acquired resistance to T-DM1.20,97 XMT-1522 is another HER-2 ADC that was found to be effective against T-DM1 resistant HER-2 positive BC and GC cell lines, as well as xenograft models.98

DS-8201a is an ADC specific to HER-2 that consists of a human monoclonal antibody connected to a topoisomerase I inhibitor through a cleavable peptide-based linker.98 The most recently developed HER-2-targeting ADCs include SUYD985 and ARX788. SYD985 couples a duocarmycin payload with trastuzumab,99 and ARX788 is a proprietary version of the monomethyl auristatin F payload connected via a non-cleavable linker.77 SYD985 has not been studied in GC, while ARX788 has shown antitumor effects in preclinical models of T-DM1 resistant HER-2 positive GC.77,100 Currently, more anti-HER-2 ADCs have been developed that can potentially overcome drug resistance and improve therapeutic outcomes in patients with GC.

Bispecific Antibodies

The fusion of two recombinant antibodies into bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) can achieve dual-targeting function.101 ZW25 (azymetric) is a BsAb specific for two HER-2 epitopes, the trastuzumab-binding ECD4 and pertuzumab-binding ECD2, and is effective and well tolerated in patients with various HER-2 positive cancers.78 However, its role in GC needs to be further explored. MCLA-128 is a full-length humanized IgG1 BsAb with enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), targeting HER-2 and HER-3.102 It has been shown to be effective against HER-2 positive GC and GEJC.79,103 The BsAb Mm-111 targets HER-2 and HER-3, and its binding to HER-3 blocks protein binding and inhibits modulin-activated HER-3 signaling.104 McDonagh et al showed that the combination of Mm-111 with trastuzumab or lapatinib improved antitumor activity, and may supplement existing HER-2 targeted therapies against drug-resistant or recurrent tumors.105 Triad or quadruple antibodies against tumor-specific antigens are also being developed to benefit more patients.

CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy for GC

CAR-T cell immunotherapy uses genetically engineered T cells to eliminate tumor cells expressing specific antigens.106 CAR-T cells were developed two decades ago and have since been divided into four generations based on the structure of intracellular signal transduction regions. Gross et al107 first proposed the concept of CAR-T therapy in 1989 and successfully constructed the first-generation CAR by combining the single-chain fragment variable (scFv) monoclonal antibody with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs) like CD3ζ and FcεRIγ.108 The second-generation CAR was constructed by Finney et al and consists of a costimulatory domain that can overcome the poor T cell amplification and cytokine production of first-generation CARs.109 The third-generation CAR was generated by combining two tandem costimulatory molecules to further enhance the effector function and in vivo persistence of the T cells.110 Fourth-generation CAR-T cells were engineered to secrete a large number of cytokines into the tumor site to activate the innate immune response and enhance the antitumor effect.111 The current status of CAR-T cell therapy against GC has been summarized in Figure 3A.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The CAR-T cell therapy and gastric cancer. (A) CAR-T cell treatment procedure for gastric cancer. Patients were assessed for suitability for CAR-T therapy, and mononuclear cells were isolated from patient blood using a peripheral blood cell separator, and T cells were further purified by magnetic beads. The T cells are genetically engineered by introducing a viral vector expressing the chimeric antigen receptor that recognizes tumor antigens, and the engineered CAR-T cells are expanded in vitro and injected back into the body; (B) targets of CAR-T cells in gastric cancer.

CAR-T Targets in GC

Several clinical trials are ongoing worldwide on first-, second-, and third-generation CAR-T cells112 targeting CD19, B7-1/B7-2, CD155, CEA, CLDN 18.2, EGFR, EpCAM, FOLR1, HER-2, HVEM, ICAM-1, LSECtin, MSLN, MUC1, NKG2D, PD-L1, PSCA and so on. Details are summarized in Table 2. The GC-related targets for CAR-T cell therapy include CLDN 18.2, FOLR1, HER-2, ICAM-1, MSLN, NKG2D, PD-L1 and PSCA (Figure 3B), and have been discussed in greater detail in the following sections. However, most clinical trials on CAR-T cell therapy have been on lymphoid leukemia, a considerable number of which have reported that CD19-targeting CAR-T cells can alleviate or even cure refractory and relapsed B-cell malignancies with a complete response (CR) rate of >80%.113 In recent years, CAR-T cells against hematoma antigens such as CD22,114 CD30115 and CD123116 have also been studied in clinical trials. For other solid tumors, tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) rather than tumor-specific antigens are the preferred targets for CAR-T cell therapy. The clinical studies on CAR-T cell therapy against solid tumors are listed in Table 3.

Table 2.

Tumor-Associated Receptors of CAR-T Cell Target

Receptor Full Name Related Diseases References
B7-1/B7-2 Cluster of differentiation (CD) 80/ CD86 B-Cell Malignancies [117,118]
CA125 Cancer antigen 125 (also known as MUC16) Epithelial ovarian cancers [119]
CAIX Carbonic anhydrase IX Renal cell carcinoma; glioblastoma. [120,121]
CD19 Cluster of differentiation 19 (also known as T-cell surface antigen leu-12) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; acute lymphoblastic leukemia [122,123]
CD23 Cluster of differentiation 22 B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia; acute lymphoblastic leukemia [59,124]
CD133 Cluster of differentiation 133 (also known as prominin-1) Glioblastoma; leukemia; hepatocellular carcinoma; gastric cancer [125–128]
CD155 Cluster of differentiation 155 Thymus [129]
CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen Colorectal cancers; pancreatic malignancy; liver metastases; solid tumors [130–133]
CLDN 18.2 Claudin 18.2 Gastric Cancer; solid tumors; pancreatic cancer [134–136]
CTAG1B Cancer/testis antigen 1B (also known as NY-ESO-1) Melanoma and ovarian cancer [137]
EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor Central nervous system; rhabdomyosarcoma; Breast cancer; gastric cancer; non-small-cell lung cancer; epithelial carcinoma [138–141]
EGFRvIII Variant III of the epidermal growth factor receptor Glioblastoma [142]
EpCAM Epithelial cell adhesion molecule Acute myeloid leukemia; hepatocellular carcinoma [143,144]
FAP Fibroblast activation protein Pancreatic cancers; Malignant pleural mesothelioma [145,146]
FOLR1 Folate receptor 1 Gastric cancer [147]
FR-α Folate receptor-α Breast cancer; ovarian cancer [148,149]
GD2 Disialoganglioside 2 Neuroblastoma, melanoma [150,151]
GPC3 Glypican-3 Mesothelin; hepatocellular carcinoma [152,153]
HER-2 Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 Gastric cancer; ovarian cancer, breast cancer, glioblastoma, colon cancer, osteosarcoma, medulloblastoma [139,154–159]
HVEM Herpes Virus Entry Mediator Lymphoma [160]
ICAM-1 Intercellular adhesion molecule 1 Breast cancer; gastric cancer [161,162]
IL13Rα2 Interleukin-13Ra2 Glioma [163]
L1-CAM L1 cell adhesion molecule Neuroblastoma, melanoma, ovarian adenocarcinoma [164,165]
LSECtin Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell lectin Liver inflammatory diseases [166]
MSLN Mesothelin Mesothelioma; ovarian cancer, pancreatic adenocarcinoma [167–169]
MUC1 Mucin 1 Cholangiocarcinoma; seminal vesicle cancer [170,171]
NKG2D Natural killer group 2D Cervical cancer, breast cancer; prostate cancer [172–174]
PD-L1 Programmed death ligand 1 Non-small cell lung cancer, gastric cancer; breast cancer [175–177]
PSCA Prostate stem-cell antigen Gastric cancer; prostate cancer [178,179]
PSMA Prostate-specific membrane antigen Prostate cancer; solid tumors [180,181]

Table 3.

CAR-T Related Clinical Studies in Solid Tumors

Receptor Clinical Trial Phase NCT No. Tumor Types Patients Study Arms Period Median OS (m/ 95% CI) References
CD133 II 02541370 HCC 21 CD133-CAR-T 2015.06–2017.09 12 (9.3–15.3) [126]
CEA I 02349724 CRC 10 CEA-CAR-T 2014.12–2018.12 NF [132]
CEA I 01373047 Liver metastases 8 CEA -CAR-T 2011.06–2013.07 3.75 (2–25.5) [182]
c-Met 0 01837602 BC 6 c-Met -CAR-T 2013.04–2018.08 NF [183]
EGFR I 03182816 NSCLC 9 EGFR-CAR-T 2017.03–2018.06 15.63(8.82–22.03) [184]
EGFR I 01869166 Metastatic PC 16 EGFR-CAR-T 2015.04–2019.05 4.9 (2.9–30) [185]
FAP I 01722149 MPM 3 FAP-CAR-T 2015.02–2019.07 NF [186]
MUC1 I 02587689 Metastatic SVC 20 MUC1-CAR-T 2006–2015.02 NF [171]
PSMA I NF Prostate cancer 6 PSMA-CAR-T 2008.09–2010.04 NF [187]
HER-2 I 01935843 BTCs/ PC 11 HER-2-CAR-T 2015.07–2016.06 4.8 (1.5–8.3) [188]
HER-2 I/ II 00902044 Sarcoma 19 HER-2-CAR-T 2010.06–2013.09 10.3 (5.1–29.1) [154]

Abbreviations: BC, breast cancer; BTCs, biliary tract cancers; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T; CD, cluster of differentiation; CEA, carcino-embryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval; CRC, colorectal cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FAP, fibroblast activation protein; GC, gastric cancer; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; MPM, malignant pleural mesothelioma; MUC1, mucin 1; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PC, pancreatic carcinoma; PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen; SVC, seminal vesicle cancer. OS, overall survival; m, month; NCT, national clinical trial; NF, not found.

CLDN 18.2

CLDN 18, a member of the CLAUDIN (CLDN) family, is encoded by the CLDN 18 gene and is expressed in the epithelium.189 CLDN 18.2, the second isotype of Claudine 18, is located in the extracellular membranes.190 It is usually expressed in primary GC tumors but may also be present in differentiated gastric mucosal epithelial cells.190 CLDN 18.2 is expressed in 70% of the primary and metastatic gastric adenocarcinomas, and therefore is considered as a potential therapeutic target in GC.191 Hua Jiang et al found that CLDN18.2-CAR-T cells are effective against CLDN18.2 positive tumors, including GC.134 Besides, Guoyun Zhu et al indicated that targeting CLDN 18.2 through ADCs or BsAbs may be effective against GC and pancreatic cancer.136

FOLR1

FOLR1 (folic acid receptor 1), also known as folic acid receptor α and folate-binding protein, is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol junction protein192 that is closely related to tumor progression and cell proliferation.193,194 It is overexpressed in the tumors of ovarian, breast, colorectal, kidney, lung, and other solid tumors, and is present at low levels in normal cells.195,196 As reported, FOLR1 is highly expressed in about one-third of patients with GC, and FOLR1-CAR-T cells have exhibited high anti-cancer activity in preclinical studies.147

ICAM-1

ICAM-1 (intercellular cell adhesion molecule-1) belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily of glycoproteins,197 and mediates cell–cell and cell-matrix adhesion.198 It is overexpressed in various cancers, including GC, and is associated with poor survival.199 Recently, Min IM et al reported encouraging results with anti-ICAM-1 CAR-T cells in thyroid tumor models.200 In addition, the strategy of anti-ICAM-1 CAR-T cells with or without chemotherapy has been found to be promising for the treatment of ICAM-1+ patients with advanced GC.161

MSLN

Mesothelin (MSLN) is a membrane protein (40 kDa) that is expressed in normal epithelial tissues and highly upregulated in breast, lung, pancreas, ovary, mesothelioma, and gastric tumor cells.201–203 MSLN-specific CAR-T cells have been engineered for solid cancers, including mesothelioma, pancreatic cancer, BC, lung cancer and GC.202,204–206 Jiang LV et al found that a peritumoral delivery strategy improved the infiltration of anti-MSLN CAR-T cells into a subcutaneous GC xenograft, which significantly inhibited tumor growth.202 Besides, Zhang Q et al discovered that MSLN-CAR-T cells reduced the growth of MSLN-positive tumor cells by significantly increasing the levels of T cells and cytokines.207 In addition, the growth of GC cells can also be inhibited by anti-MSLN-CAR-T cells,208 indicating its potential as a therapeutic option against GC.

NKG2D Receptor

Natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D) receptor is a lectin-like transmembrane glycoprotein that is expressed primarily in natural killer (NK) cells, CD8+ T cells and auto-immunosuppressed CD4+ T cells.209 NKG2D is expressed at low levels or entirely absent in normal tissues or cells, although its expression increases rapidly in response to pathogens, genotoxic drugs, or malignant transformation of cells.210 Therefore, NKG2D is a potentially suitable target for CAR-T cell therapy. In addition, Spear et al found that NKG2D-specific CAR-T cells not only killed the tumor cells directly but also activated the host immune system.211 At present, NKG2D-targeting CAR-T cells have been proved to be effective against multiple myeloma,212 glioblastoma,213 and hepatocellular carcinoma.214 Furthermore, the up-regulation of NKG2D levels in GC cells can sensitize them to NKG2D-CAR-T cells-mediated cytotoxicity.215 The currently ongoing clinical trials of CAR-T cells targeting NKG2D, including those in patients with GC, are expected to be completed in 2021 (NCT04107142).

PD-L1

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a member of the B7 family and the ligand of PD-1.216,217 It is composed of 290 amino acids218 and is expressed on the surface of several tumor cells, including lung cancer,219 BC,220 and GC.221 Chimeric switch receptor PD-L1 can enhance the function of CAR-T cells in solid tumors.222,223 CAR-T cells targeting PD-L1 effectively suppressed the growth of GC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) in animal models.224 Further research revealed the killing effect of PD-L1 on GC, therefore improving the killing effect of CAR-T cells in GC.177

PSCA

Prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) is a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol cell immobilized by a face protein that belongs to the Thy-1/Ly-6 family.225 Existing evidence has indicated that PSCA-CAR-T cells are effective against metastatic prostate cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).178,226 In vivo experiments have shown that PSCA-CAR-T cells inhibited the growth of prostate cancer PDX and extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice.227 A Phase I clinical trial was initiated to evaluate PSCA-CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed and refractory metastatic prostate cancer.228 In addition, Di Wu et al have confirmed the feasibility of anti-PSCA-CAR-T cells against GC,179 suggesting a potential clinical application.

HER-2-Specific CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of GC

Construction of HER-2-Targeted CAR

The CAR targeting HER-2 consists of an extracellular antigen-binding region, a transmembrane region, and an intracellular signal transduction region.229,230 The extracellular antigen-binding region is composed of a single-chain variable fragment (scFv) and the hinge region of the anti-HER-2monoclonal antibody.231 The variable weight chain and the variable weight chain constitute the scFv,232 which recognizes and binds to the TAAs on the surface of tumor cells.233 In addition, it determines the specificity of CAR antigens and can bind to multiple TAAs in an MHC-independent, non-restrictive manner.234,235 IL13Rα2 can also be combined with HER-2 on the surface of tumor cells by CAR-T cells, further enhancing their activation.236 The transmembrane region is involved in signal transduction, although it is unclear whether it also has an effect on the structure and biochemistry of CAR.237 Finally, CAR-T cells can also increase the immune response by releasing tumor cell killing factors. The details of the process are illustrated in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The specific mechanism of HER-2-CAR-T cells. The HER-2-targeting CAR is a synthetic receptor composed of extracellular antigen binding region, transmembrane region and intracellular signal transduction region. CAR-T cells bind to tumor cell surface antigens, which activates a series of responses within CAR-T cells to kill tumor cells.

Advances in HER-2-Targeted CAR-T Cell Therapy for GC

Current immunotherapeutic strategies against GC include nonspecific immunoboosters, tumor vaccines, adoptive cell transfer, and monoclonal antibodies.238 The HER-2 signaling pathway is a key target of the adoptive immune cell therapy against solid tumors.156 Although several HER-2 targeted drugs have entered clinical trials for patients with GC, the FDA has approved only trastuzumab for first-line treatment of patients with advanced GC.239–241 In addition, HER-2-targeted CAR-T cell therapy for GC is increasingly gaining attention to avoid drug resistance and improve treatment outcomes.241,242 Song et al produced genetically modified human T cells that express HER-2-specific CAR consisting of CD137 and CD3ζ,156 which not only recognized and killed HER-2+ GC cells in vitro but also showed effective and persistent antitumor activity against HER-2+ GC xenografts in vivo.156 This suggested that HER-2-targeted CAR-T cells might be suitable for the treatment of advanced HER-2+ GC, although their toxicity and immunogenicity will have to be verified in future trials.156,243–245 Furthermore, the focus of future studies would be to improve the antitumor activity of HER-2 targeted CAR-T cells by improving their proliferation capacity, function and persistence.

Ahmed et al constructed the second generation of HER-2-targeted CAR composed of FRP5-CD28-CD3ζ, and found that CAR-T cells had high affinity for HER-2 monoclonal antibody and specifically recognized and killed HER-2+ glioblastoma cells.246 HER-2-specific T cells have also been found to be effective against HER-2+ osteosarcoma cells.247 Sun et al successfully constructed a novel humanized chA21-28z CAR consisting of a chA21 single-chain variable region and an intracellular signal transduction region containing CD28 and CD3ζ. The CD4+ and CD8+ CAR-T cells248 recognized and killed HER-2+ ovarian cancer cells in vitro and significantly inhibited the growth of xenografts in mice.248 Taken together, HER-2 targeted CAR-T cell immunotherapy for GC can be further improved.

Current Status of Clinical Research on HER-2-CAR-T Therapy

HER-2-targeted CAR-T cell therapy is currently in the preclinical stage for GC, while clinical trials are underway for other solid tumors (summarized in Table 4). Ahmed et al administered high-dose HER-2-CAR-T cells to 10 patients with recurrent or refractory HER-2 positive sarcomas (5 osteosarcomas, 3 rhabdomyosarcomas, and 1 synovial sarcomas) who had received myeloablative therapy (fludarabine or fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide) and found that the combination of HER-2-CAR-T cells with other immunomodulatory agents cleared the tumors.154 The efficacy of CAR-T-HER-2 immunotherapy has also been demonstrated against tumors of the central nervous system,139 rhabdomyosarcoma,138 biliary tract cancers and pancreatic cancer.188 In addition, results of a phase I clinical trial indicated that the EGFR-CAR-T cell therapy was feasible and safe for patients with EGFR positive advanced NSCLC.184 Similar results were observed in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.185 O’Rourke et al suggested that overcoming adaptive changes in the local TME and addressing antigenic heterogeneity might improve the efficacy of EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII)-targeted strategies against glioblastoma.249 At present, more than 20 clinical trials are being conducted for HER-2-CAR-T therapy (Table 5), of which 2 are related to GC.

Table 4.

HER Family-Related CAR-T Clinical Studies in Cancers

Receptor Tumor Types Clinical Trial Phase NCT No. Patients HER-2-CAR-T Dose Level Period Median OS (m/ 95% CI) References
HER-2 Positive sarcoma I/ II 00902044 19 1×104 to 1×108 cells /m2 2010.06–2013.03 10.3 (5.1–29.1) [154]
HER-2 Biliary tract cancers and pancreatic cancers I 01935843 11 2.1×106 cells /kg 2015.07–2016.06 4.8 (1.5–8.3) [188]
HER-2 Central nervous system tumors I 03500991 48 NF 2018.06–2020.06 NF [139]
HER-2 Rhabdomyosarcoma I 00902044 1 1×108 cells/m2 2010.02-NF 20 (NF) [138]
EGFR Non-small cell lung cancer I 03182816 9 1×106 or 3×106 cells/kg 2017.07–2018.06 15.63 (8.82–22.03) [184]
EGFR Pancreatic carcinoma I 01869166 16 1.3×106 to 8.9×106 cells/kg 2015.04–2019.05 4.9 (2.9–30) [185]
EGFRvIII Glioblastoma I 02209376 10 1×108 to 5×108 cells 2014.11–2018.04 11.9(6.0–22.7) [249]

Abbreviations: CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T; CI, confidence interval; EGFRvIII, EGFR variant III; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; OS, overall survival; m, month; NCT, national clinical trial; NF, not found.

Table 5.

Ongoing Clinical Trials of HER-2-CAR-T Therapy

NCT No. Tumor Phase Study Title Locations EE Period Status
04650451 Gastric cancer, breast cancer, et al I/ II Safety and Activity Study of HER2-Targeted Dual Switch CAR-T Cells (BPX-603) in Subjects with HER2-Positive Solid Tumors City of Hope National Medical Center Duarte, California, United States; Winship Cancer Institute at Emory University Atlanta, Georgia, United States, John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, United States 220 2020.12–2021.04 Recruiting
04511871 Gastric cancer, breast cancer, et al I A Phase I Trial of CCT303-406 in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory HER2 Positive Solid Tumors Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University Shanghai, Shanghai, China 15 2020.07–2023.04 Recruiting
03198052 Lung cancer I HER2/Mesothelin/Lewis-Y/PSCA/MUC1/GPC3/AXL/EGFR/B7-H3/Claudin 18.2-CAR-T Cells Immunotherapy Against Cancers The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou, Guangdong, China 30 2017.07–2023.08 Recruiting
02442297 Brain tumor I T Cells Expressing HER2-specific Chimeric Antigen Receptors (CAR) for Patients with HER2-Positive CNS Tumors Houston Methodist Hospital Houston, Texas, United States; Texas Children’s Hospital Houston, Texas, United States 28 2016.02–2036.01 Recruiting
03500991 Pediatric glioma, et al I HER2-specific CAR T Cell Locoregional Immunotherapy for HER2-positive Recurrent/Refractory Pediatric CNS Tumors Seattle Children’s Hospital; Seattle, Washington, United States 48 2018.04–2021.03 Recruiting
03696030 BC, et al I HER2-CAR T Cells in Treating Patients with Recurrent Brain or Leptomeningeal Metastases City of Hope Medical Center; Duarte, California, United States 39 2018.08–2023.08 Recruiting
04684459 Peritoneal cancer I Dual-targeting HER2 and PD-L1 CAR-T for Cancers with Pleural or Peritoneal Metastasis West China Hospital, Sichuan University Chengdu, Sichuan, China 18 2021.03–2024.01 Active
03740256 Bladder Cancer, et al I Binary Oncolytic Adenovirus in Combination with HER2-Specific Autologous CAR VST, Advanced HER2 Positive Solid Tumors Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center Houston, Texas, United States 45 2020.12–2038.12 Recruiting
03618381 Pediatric solid tumor, et al I EGFR806 CAR T Cell Immunotherapy for Recurrent/ Refractory Solid Tumors in Children and Young Adults Seattle Children’s Hospital Seattle, Washington, United States 36 2019.06–2038.06 Recruiting
04430595 Breast cancer I/ II Multi-4SCAR-T Therapy Targeting Breast Cancer The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University Shenzhen, Guangdong, China 100 2020.06–2023.12 Recruiting
04483778 Pediatric solid tumor, et al I B7H3 CAR T Cell Immunotherapy for Recurrent/Refractory Solid Tumors in Children and Young Adults Seattle Children’s Hospital Seattle, Washington, United States 68 2020.07–2040.12 Recruiting
04020575 Breast cancer I Autologous huMNC2-CAR44 T Cells for Breast Cancer Targeting Cleaved Form of MUC1 (MUC1*) City of Hope Medical Center Duarte, California, United States 69 2020.01–2035.01 Active
04660929 Solid tumors I CAR-macrophages for the Treatment of HER2 Overexpressing Solid Tumors City of Hope National Medical Center Duarte, California, United States; UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States; Abramson Cancer Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States 18 2021.02–2023.02 Recruiting
02792114 Breast cancer I T-Cell Therapy for Advanced Breast Cancer Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States; Memorial Sloan Kettering Monmouth Middletown, New Jersey, United States; Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen Montvale, New Jersey, United States; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at Commack Commack, New York, United States; Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester Harrison, New York, United States; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York, New York, United States; Memorial Sloan Kettering Nassau Uniondale, New York, United States 186 2016.06–2022.06 Active
03423992 Glioma I Personalized Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Immunotherapy for Patients with Recurrent Malignant Gliomas Xuanwu Hospital Beijing, China 100 2018.03–2023.01 Recruiting
04995003 Sarcoma I HER2 Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells in Combination with Checkpoint Blockade in Patients with Advanced Sarcoma Texas Children’s Hospital Houston, Texas, United States 25 2021.12–2040.02 Not yet recruiting
00902044 Sarcoma I Her2 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Expressing T Cells in Advanced Sarcoma Houston Methodist Hospital Houston, Texas, United States; Texas Children’s Hospital Houston, Texas, United States 36 2010.02–2032.07 Active
03330691 Leukemia; lymphoma I A Feasibility and Safety Study of Dual Specificity CD19 and CD22 CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy for CD19+CD22+ Leukemia Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Los Angeles, California, United States; Children’s National Medical Center Washington, District of Columbia, United States; Riley Hospital for Children Indianapolis, Indiana, United States; Seattle Children’s Hospital Seattle, Washington, United States; Children’s and Women’s Health Centre of British ColumbiaActive, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 60 2017.11–2034.11 Recruiting
04903080 Ependymoma I HER2-specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells for Children with Ependymoma Pediatric Brain Tumor Consortium Texas Children’s Cancer Center Baylor College of Medicine 50 2021.09–2040.07 Recruiting
03684889 Leukemia; lymphoma I/ II CD19-specific CAR T Cells with a Fully Human Binding Domain for CD19+ Leukemia or Lymphoma Children’s Hospital Los Angeles Los Angeles, California, United States; Seattle Children’s Hospital Seattle, Washington, United States 16 2018.11–2036.12 Active

Note: The table data were downloaded from NIH; US National Library of Medicine. ClinicialTrials/.gov [homepage]; 2022. Available at: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/; 2022. Accessed July 11, 2022.278

Abbreviations: AXL, anexelekto; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T; CD, cluster of differentiation; CNS, central nervous system; EE, estimated enrollment; GPC3, glypican 3; HER, human epidermal growth factor receptor; MUC1, mucin 1; NCT, national clinical trial; PD-L1, programmed death ligand-1; PSMA, prostate-specific membrane antigen.

The Safety of HER-2-CAR-T

There are several concerns about HER-2-targeted CAR-T cell therapy. Side effects of CAR-T cell therapy include systemic toxicity associated with T cell activation and cytokine release, as well as local toxicity caused by the specific interaction between target antigens expressed by non-malignant cells and CAR-T cells.250,251

To avoid systemic toxicity while maintaining clinical efficacy, CAR-T cells should be injected at a threshold that activates cytokine secretion but not above the level that induces a cytokine storm.252 The degree of CAR-T cell activation is influenced by tumor burden, tissue distribution and antigen expression, affinity of the scFv to the antigen and the costimulatory elements included in the CAR.250,253 Therefore, tumor burden and antigen expression/distribution should be considered when designing CARs to reduce the risk of systemic toxicity. For instance, HER-2 is not a tumor-specific antigen and is also expressed in normal tissues.254,255 One study reported that patients with metastatic colon cancer developed acute respiratory distress and pulmonary edema 15 minutes after receiving HER-2-specific CAR-T cells, followed by multiple organ failure and even death, suggesting off-tumor effects caused by CAR-T cells that recognize HER-2 expressed in normal lung tissues.256 Differences in binding sites between various scFv and HER-2 might influence the antitumor and off-tumor effects of HER-2 blockade by CAR-T cell cells.257 Luo et al selected HER-2 and CD3-targeted CAR-T cells to reduce the damage to normal tissues.258 The route to administer CAR-T cells is another factor that affects toxicity. Katz et al found that the intraperitoneal rather than the intravenous injection of CAR-T cells had a stronger effect on peritoneal metastasis and ascites, along with less toxicity.259 Thus, the improvement of the safety level is a prerequisite for the clinical translation of HER-2-CAR-T cell therapy.

CAR-T cell therapy has been widely used to treat hematologic malignancies, but its use is limited in solid tumors due to factors, such as low penetration. Incorporation of the tumor-penetrating signal peptide iRGD can improve the penetration of HER-2-CAR-T cells and therefore improve their efficacy.260 The novel CAR design is also a viable direction for HER-2-specific CAR-T cell therapy.261 The HER-2 binding domain of HER-2-CAR-T cells is not limited to scFv; the designed ankyrin repeat protein (DARPin) has also been used to bind HER-2 in other tumors.262 Several novel DARPin molecules with high affinity to HER-2 receptor have been developed, including MP0274, DARPin 9.26, DARPin 9.29, etc.263,264 In addition, CAR-modified NK cells, cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells, and γδ T cells are other promising cell-based options.265,266 CAR-NK and CAR-CIK cells targeting HER-2 have achieved good efficacy against BC and glioblastoma multiforme,266,267 and are expected to be introduced into the treatment of HER-2 positive GC.

Conclusion

HER-2-targeted drugs were initially developed for BC and have since been extended to other HER-2-overexpressing tumors, such as stomach and gastroesophageal cancers.268 The first-generation HER-2 monoclonal antibody of trastuzumab is still the first-line treatment for GC, despite the high rate of drug resistance. The second generation of pertuzumab has not been extensively studied in GC patients.269,270 The conjugation of HER-2 antibodies to novel cytotoxic drugs such as T-DM1 was deemed promising for the treatment of HER-2 overexpressing tumors.94,271 However, studies showed that most patients with BC or GC exhibited primary or acquired resistance to T-DM1.97,272 Although the HER-2-targeting TKI lapatinib has achieved a good effect in BC, it has not been effective against GC.273 Bispecific antibodies with dual-targeting functions have also shown encouraging results,274 but further research is still needed. In short, these HER-2-targeted therapies may obviate the resistance to first-line drugs, reduce metastasis or prevent recurrence, and may also be used in combination with chemoradiotherapy and monoclonal antibodies to further improve first-line therapy in patients with GC.

CAR-T cells are a highly promising immunotherapeutic approach for ablating solid tumors. However, the efficacy of HER-2-targeted CAR-T therapy in GC141,156,188 needs to be supported by large-scale, multi-center and high-quality randomized clinical trials and evidence-based studies before full-scale clinical application. Given inherent heterogeneity, immunosuppressive TME and antigen migration, single target CAR-T cell immunotherapy cannot achieve ideal outcomes.275–277 Future researches on HER-2-CAR-T therapy in GC may focus on the following aspects: 1) upgrading the structural design of CARs to improve antitumor activity and migration capacity, as well as constructing CARs to target multiple antigens; 2) exploring more therapeutic subsets of T cells to reduce tumor immune escape; 3) reversing the immunosuppressive TME (for example, PD-L1/PD-L2 blockade) and enhancing CAR-T cell proliferation and cytokine production; 4) adjusting and optimizing treatment regimens to minimize CAR-T cell-induced adverse reactions. Therefore, with the continuous development of genetic engineering technology, HER-2-CAR-T cell therapy will become a safe and effective treatment for GC and other solid tumors in the future.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Xu DH, Li Q, Hu H, et al. Transmembrane protein GRINA modulates aerobic glycolysis and promotes tumor progression in gastric cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018;37(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0974-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zhang C, Chen Z, Chong X, et al. Clinical implications of plasma ctDNA features and dynamics in gastric cancer treated with HER2-targeted therapies. Clin Transl Med. 2020;10(8):e254. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Joshi SS, Badgwell BD. Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):264–279. doi: 10.3322/caac.21657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van der Veen A, Brenkman HJF, Seesing MFJ, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (LOGICA): a Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(9):978–989. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Griffith DM, Li H, Werrett MV, Andrews PC, Sun H. Medicinal chemistry and biomedical applications of bismuth-based compounds and nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev. 2021. doi: 10.1039/d0cs00031k [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kang YK, Yook JH, Park YK, et al. PRODIGY: a Phase III Study of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and S-1 Plus Surgery and Adjuvant S-1 Versus Surgery and Adjuvant S-1 for Resectable Advanced Gastric Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(26):2903–2913. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cui J, Cui H, Yang M, et al. Tongue coating microbiome as a potential biomarker for gastritis including precancerous cascade. Protein Cell. 2019;10(7):496–509. doi: 10.1007/s13238-018-0596-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hindson J. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer and oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;18(8):523. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00484-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meric-Bernstam F, Bahleda R, Hierro C, et al. Futibatinib, an irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring FGF/FGFR aberrations: a phase I dose-expansion study. Cancer Discov. 2021. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0697 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Salas-Benito D, Perez-Gracia JL, Ponz-Sarvise M, et al. Paradigms on Immunotherapy Combinations with Chemotherapy. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(6):1353–1367. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tarantino P, Modi S, Tolaney SM, et al. Interstitial Lung Disease Induced by Anti-ERBB2 Antibody-Drug Conjugates: a Review. JAMA Oncol. 2021. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: the CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321(20):1983–1992. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.5359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu F, Huang C, Xu Z, et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic vs Open Total Gastrectomy for Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer: the CLASS02 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(10):1590–1597. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pietrantonio F, Miceli R, Raimondi A, et al. Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Value of Microsatellite Instability As a Biomarker in Gastric Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(35):3392–3400. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01124 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yeoh KG, Tan P. Mapping the genomic diaspora of gastric cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00412-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Haffner I, Schierle K, Raimundez E, et al. HER2 Expression, Test Deviations, and Their Impact on Survival in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: results From the Prospective Multicenter VARIANZ Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(13):1468–1478. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Roudko V, Bozkus CC, Orfanelli T, et al. Shared immunogenic poly-epitope frameshift mutations in microsatellite unstable tumors. Cell. 2020;183(6):1634–1649 e1617. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen ZH, Yan SM, Chen XX, et al. The genomic architecture of EBV and infected gastric tissue from precursor lesions to carcinoma. Genome Med. 2021;13(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00963-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Goutsouliak K, Veeraraghavan J, Sethunath V, et al. Towards personalized treatment for early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(4):233–250. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0299-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sareyeldin RM, Gupta I, Al-Hashimi I, et al. Gene Expression and miRNAs Profiling: function and Regulation in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancers. 2019;11:5. doi: 10.3390/cancers11050646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Sliwkowski MX, Mellman I. Antibody therapeutics in cancer. Science. 2013;341(6151):1192–1198. doi: 10.1126/science.1241145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):687–697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mezni E, Vicier C, Guerin M, Sabatier R, Bertucci F, Goncalves A. New Therapeutics in HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: towards a Change in Clinical Practices?pi. Cancers. 2020;12:6. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Menyhart O, Pongor LS, Gyorffy B. Mutations Defining Patient Cohorts With Elevated PD-L1 Expression in Gastric Cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:1522. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yu C, Liu X, Yang J, et al. Combination of Immunotherapy With Targeted Therapy: theory and Practice in Metastatic Melanoma. Front Immunol. 2019;10:990. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xu Y, Jiang J, Wang Y, et al. Engineered T Cell Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: challenges and Opportunities. Front Immunol. 2021;12:725330. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.725330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Terry RL, Meyran D, Fleuren EDG, et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cell Therapy and the Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment in Pediatric Sarcoma. Cancers. 2021;13:18. doi: 10.3390/cancers13184704 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mao X, Xu J, Wang W, et al. Crosstalk between cancer-associated fibroblasts and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment: new findings and future perspectives. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01428-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sun Y, Li F, Sonnemann H, et al. Evolution of CD8(+) T Cell Receptor (TCR) Engineered Therapies for the Treatment of Cancer. Cells. 2021;10:9. doi: 10.3390/cells10092379 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pan MR, Wu CC, Kan JY, et al. Impact of FAK Expression on the Cytotoxic Effects of CIK Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Cancers. 2019;12:1. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Geng L, Wang Z, Yang X, et al. Structure-based Design of Peptides with High Affinity and Specificity to HER2 Positive Tumors. Theranostics. 2015;5(10):1154–1165. doi: 10.7150/thno.12398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Cohen S. The epidermal growth factor (EGF). Cancer. 1983;51(10):1787–1791. doi::: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yu Y, Rishi AK, Turner JR, et al. Cloning of a novel EGFR-related peptide: a putative negative regulator of EGFR. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001;280(5):C1083–1089. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.2001.280.5.C1083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Huang F, Shi Q, Li Y, et al. HER2/EGFR-AKT Signaling Switches TGFbeta from Inhibiting Cell Proliferation to Promoting Cell Migration in Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2018;78(21):6073–6085. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-0136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Quijano-Rubio A, Yeh HW, Park J, et al. De novo design of modular and tunable protein biosensors. Nature. 2021;591(7850):482–487. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03258-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kovacs E, Zorn JA, Huang Y, Barros T, Kuriyan J. A structural perspective on the regulation of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:739–764. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kumar A, Petri ET, Halmos B, Boggon TJ. Structure and clinical relevance of the epidermal growth factor receptor in human cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(10):1742–1751. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.1178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cho HS, Mason K, Ramyar KX, et al. Structure of the extracellular region of HER2 alone and in complex with the Herceptin Fab. Nature. 2003;421(6924):756–760. doi: 10.1038/nature01392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Arteaga CL, Engelman JA. ERBB receptors: from oncogene discovery to basic science to mechanism-based cancer therapeutics. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(3):282–303. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.02.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sliwkowski MX. Ready to partner. Nat Struct Biol. 2003;10(3):158–159. doi: 10.1038/nsb0303-158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Roskoski R Jr. The ErbB/HER family of protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2014;79:34–74. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2013.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yarden Y, Pines G. The ERBB network: at last, cancer therapy meets systems biology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(8):553–563. doi: 10.1038/nrc3309 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lieto E, Ferraraccio F, Orditura M, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an independent prognostic indicator of worse outcome in gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(1):69–79. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9596-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Qi Z, Qiu Y, Wang Z, et al. A novel diphtheria toxin-based bivalent human EGF fusion toxin for treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2021;15(4):1054–1068. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Chi A, Remick S, Tse W. EGFR inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer: current evidence and future directions. Biomark Res. 2013;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/2050-7771-1-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Arkhipov A, Shan Y, Kim ET, Dror RO, Shaw DE. Her2 activation mechanism reflects evolutionary preservation of asymmetric ectodomain dimers in the human EGFR family. Elife. 2013;2:e00708. doi: 10.7554/eLife.00708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhang J, Zhang F, Niu R. Functions of Shp2 in cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2015;19(9):2075–2083. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.12618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Katona BW, Rustgi AK. Gastric Cancer Genomics: advances and Future Directions. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;3(2):211–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Tegtmeyer N, Harrer A, Rottner K, Backert S. Helicobacter pylori CagA Induces Cortactin Y-470 Phosphorylation-Dependent Gastric Epithelial Cell Scattering via Abl, Vav2 and Rac1 Activation. Cancers. 2021;13(16):5498. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164241 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang M, Chen L, Chen Y, et al. Intracellular matrix Gla protein promotes tumor progression by activating JAK2/STAT5 signaling in gastric cancer. Mol Oncol. 2020;14(5):1045–1058. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12652 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wadhwa R, Song S, Lee JS, Yao Y, Wei Q, Ajani JA. Gastric cancer-molecular and clinical dimensions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10(11):643–655. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rubin I, Yarden Y. The basic biology of HER2. Ann Oncol. 2001;12:S3–8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/12.suppl_1.s3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Roskoski R Jr. The ErbB/HER receptor protein-tyrosine kinases and cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;319(1):1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.04.150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Nam HJ, Im SA, Oh DY, et al. Antitumor activity of saracatinib (AZD0530), a c-Src/Abl kinase inhibitor, alone or in combination with chemotherapeutic agents in gastric cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2013;12(1):16–26. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yu GZ, Chen Y, Wang JJ. Overexpression of Grb2/HER2 signaling in Chinese gastric cancer: their relationship with clinicopathological parameters and prognostic significance. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009;135(10):1331–1339. doi: 10.1007/s00432-009-0574-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Su CC. Tanshinone IIA inhibits gastric carcinoma AGS cells by decreasing the protein expression of VEGFR and blocking Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41(4):2389–2396. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3407 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Citri A, Skaria KB, Yarden Y. The deaf and the dumb: the biology of ErbB-2 and ErbB-3. Exp Cell Res. 2003;284(1):54–65. doi: 10.1016/s0014-4827(02)00101-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kaumaya PT, Foy KC. Peptide vaccines and targeting HER and VEGF proteins may offer a potentially new paradigm in cancer immunotherapy. Future Oncol. 2012;8(8):961–987. doi: 10.2217/fon.12.95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yokoyama H, Ikehara Y, Kodera Y, et al. Molecular basis for sensitivity and acquired resistance to gefitinib in HER2-overexpressing human gastric cancer cell lines derived from liver metastasis. Br J Cancer. 2006;95(11):1504–1513. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jenke R, Holzhauser-Rein M, Mueller-Wilke S, Lordick F, Aigner A, Buch T. SATB1-Mediated Upregulation of the Oncogenic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase HER3 Antagonizes MET Inhibition in Gastric Cancer Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;22(1):155. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Fukuda K, Funakoshi T. Metastatic Extramammary Paget’s Disease: pathogenesis and Novel Therapeutic Approach. Front Oncol. 2018;8:38. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Jabbour E, Ottmann OG, Deininger M, Hochhaus A. Targeting the phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway in hematologic malignancies. Haematologica. 2014;99(1):7–18. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.087171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mezynski MJ, Farrelly AM, Cremona M, et al. Targeting the PI3K and MAPK pathways to improve response to HER2-targeted therapies in HER2-positive gastric cancer. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02842-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Han ME, Kim HJ, Shin DH, Hwang SH, Kang CD, Oh SO. Overexpression of NRG1 promotes progression of gastric cancer by regulating the self-renewal of cancer stem cells. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(6):645–656. doi: 10.1007/s00535-014-1008-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ishii K, Morii N, Yamashiro H. Pertuzumab in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: an evidence-based review of its safety, efficacy, and place in therapy. Core Evid. 2019;14:51–70. doi: 10.2147/CE.S217848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ryu MH, Yoo C, Kim JG, et al. Multicenter phase II study of trastuzumab in combination with capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(4):482–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.12.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tabernero J, Hoff PM, Shen L, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (JACOB): final analysis of a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(10):1372–1384. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30481-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Iqbal S, Goldman B, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, et al. Southwest Oncology Group study S0413: a phase II trial of lapatinib (GW572016) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(12):2610–2615. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Satoh T, Xu RH, Chung HC, et al. Lapatinib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone in the second-line treatment of HER2-amplified advanced gastric cancer in Asian populations: tyTAN–a randomized, phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(19):2039–2049. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.6136 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Hecht JR, Bang YJ, Qin SK, et al. Lapatinib in Combination With Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Gastric, Esophageal, or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: TRIO-013/LOGiC–A Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(5):443–451. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.6598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.De Pauw I, Wouters A, Van den Bossche J, et al. Preclinical and clinical studies on Afatinib in monotherapy and in combination regimens: potential impact in colorectal cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;166:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.06.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Deeks ED. Neratinib: first Global Approval. Drugs. 2017;77(15):1695–1704. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0811-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Thuss-Patience PC, Shah MA, Ohtsu A, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine versus taxane use for previously treated HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GATSBY): an international randomised, open-label, adaptive, phase 2/3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(5):640–653. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30111-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Shitara K, Iwata H, Takahashi S, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201a) in patients with advanced HER2-positive gastric cancer: a dose-expansion, Phase 1 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(6):827–836. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30088-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Banerji U, van Herpen CML, Saura C, et al. Trastuzumab duocarmazine in locally advanced and metastatic solid tumours and HER2-expressing breast cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(8):1124–1135. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30328-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Barok M, Le Joncour V, Martins A, et al. ARX788, a novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugate, shows anti-tumor effects in preclinical models of trastuzumab emtansine-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer and gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020;473:156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.12.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Meric-Bernstam F. ZW25 Effective in HER2-Positive Cancers. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(1):8. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2018-162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.de Vries Schultink AHM, Bol K, Doornbos RP, et al. Population Pharmacokinetics of MCLA-128, a HER2/HER3 Bispecific Monoclonal Antibody, in Patients with Solid Tumors. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020;59(7):875–884. doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00858-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Kirouac DC, Du JY, Lahdenranta J, et al. Computational modeling of ERBB2-amplified breast cancer identifies combined ErbB2/3 blockade as superior to the combination of MEK and AKT inhibitors. Sci Signal. 2013;6(288):ra68. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2004008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Yang YM, Hong P, Xu WW, He QY, Li B. Advances in targeted therapy for esophageal cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):229. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00323-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Van cutsem E, Bang YJ, Feng-Yi F, et al. HER2 screening data from ToGA: targeting HER2 in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2015;18(3):476–484. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0402-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.An E, Ock CY, Kim TY, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of HER2 expression in the selection of gastric cancer patients for trastuzumab treatment. Ann Oncol. 2017;28(1):110–115. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw442 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wang DS, Liu ZX, Lu YX, et al. Liquid biopsies to track trastuzumab resistance in metastatic HER2-positive gastric cancer. Gut. 2019;68(7):1152–1161. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316522 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Okines AFC, Turner NC. Heterogeneous HER2 Amplification-a New Clinical Category of HER2-Positive Breast Cancer? Cancer Discov. 2021;11(10):2369–2371. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Dokmanovic M, King KE, Mohan N, Endo Y, Wu WJ. Cardiotoxicity of ErbB2-targeted therapies and its impact on drug development, a spotlight on trastuzumab. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2017;13(7):755–766. doi: 10.1080/17425255.2017.1337746 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Agus DB, Akita RW, Fox WD, et al. Targeting ligand-activated ErbB2 signaling inhibits breast and prostate tumor growth. Cancer Cell. 2002;2(2):127–137. doi: 10.1016/s1535-6108(02)00097-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Gleeson JP, Keegan NM, Morris PG. Adding Pertuzumab to Trastuzumab and Taxanes in HER2 positive breast cancer. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018;18(3):251–262. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1410132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):724–734. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1413513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Esteva FJ, Yu D, Hung MC, Hortobagyi GN. Molecular predictors of response to trastuzumab and lapatinib in breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010;7(2):98–107. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Bilancia D, Rosati G, Dinota A, Germano D, Romano R, Manzione L. Lapatinib in breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2007;18(Suppl 6):vi26–30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Jiao XD, Ding C, Zang YS, Yu G. Rapid symptomatic relief of HER2-positive gastric cancer leptomeningeal carcinomatosis with lapatinib, trastuzumab and capecitabine: a case report. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4116-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Voigtlaender M, Schneider-Merck T, Trepel M. Lapatinib. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2018;211:19–44. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-91442-8_2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.LoRusso PM, Weiss D, Guardino E, Girish S, Sliwkowski MX. Trastuzumab emtansine: a unique antibody-drug conjugate in development for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(20):6437–6447. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Griguolo G, Braso-Maristany F, Gonzalez-Farre B, et al. ERBB2 mRNA Expression and Response to Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Cancers. 2020;12:7. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Jhaveri KL, Wang XV, Makker V, et al. Ado-Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-amplified tumors excluding breast and gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinomas: results from the NCI-MATCH trial (EAY131) subprotocol Q. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(11):1821–1830. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz291 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Oh DY, Bang YJ. HER2-targeted therapies - a role beyond breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(1):33–48. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0268-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Le Joncour V, Martins A, Puhka M, et al. A Novel Anti-HER2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate XMT-1522 for HER2-Positive Breast and Gastric Cancers Resistant to Trastuzumab Emtansine. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18(10):1721–1730. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Menderes G, Bonazzoli E, Bellone S, et al. SYD985, a Novel Duocarmycin-Based HER2-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, Shows Antitumor Activity in Uterine and Ovarian Carcinosarcoma with HER2/Neu Expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(19):5836–5845. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Skidmore L, Sakamuri S, Knudsen NA, et al. ARX788, a Site-specific Anti-HER2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate, Demonstrates Potent and Selective Activity in HER2-low and T-DM1-resistant Breast and Gastric Cancers. Mol Cancer Ther. 2020;19(9):1833–1843. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-1004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Labrijn AF, Janmaat ML, Reichert JM, Parren P. Bispecific antibodies: a mechanistic review of the pipeline. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(8):585–608. doi: 10.1038/s41573-019-0028-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.de Vries Schultink AHM, Doornbos RP, Bakker ABH, et al. Translational PK-PD modeling analysis of MCLA-128, a HER2/HER3 bispecific monoclonal antibody, to predict clinical efficacious exposure and dose. Invest New Drugs. 2018;36(6):1006–1015. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0593-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Meric-Bernstam F. MCLA-128 Fights NRG1 Fusion-Positive Cancers. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(12):1636. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-NB2019-128 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Yu S, Liu Q, Han X, et al. Development and clinical application of anti-HER2 monoclonal and bispecific antibodies for cancer treatment. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2017;6:31. doi: 10.1186/s40164-017-0091-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.McDonagh CF, Huhalov A, Harms BD, et al. Antitumor activity of a novel bispecific antibody that targets the ErbB2/ErbB3 oncogenic unit and inhibits heregulin-induced activation of ErbB3. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(3):582–593. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Liu D, Zhao J, Song Y. Engineering switchable and programmable universal CARs for CAR T therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0763-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Gross G, Waks T, Eshhar Z. Expression of immunoglobulin-T-cell receptor chimeric molecules as functional receptors with antibody-type specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86(24):10024–10028. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.24.10024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Eshhar Z, Waks T, Gross G, Schindler DG. Specific activation and targeting of cytotoxic lymphocytes through chimeric single chains consisting of antibody-binding domains and the gamma or zeta subunits of the immunoglobulin and T-cell receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90(2):720–724. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.720 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Finney HM, Lawson AD, Bebbington CR, Weir AN. Chimeric receptors providing both primary and costimulatory signaling in T cells from a single gene product. J Immunol. 1998;161(6):2791–2797. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Finney HM, Akbar AN, Lawson AD. Activation of resting human primary T cells with chimeric receptors: costimulation from CD28, inducible costimulator, CD134, and CD137 in series with signals from the TCR zeta chain. J Immunol. 2004;172(1):104–113. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.1.104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Knochelmann HM, Smith AS, Dwyer CJ, Wyatt MM, Mehrotra S, Paulos CM. CAR T Cells in Solid Tumors: blueprints for Building Effective Therapies. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1740. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01740 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Im A, Pavletic SZ. Immunotherapy in hematologic malignancies: past, present, and future. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0453-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Schuster SJ, Tam CS, Borchmann P, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of tisagenlecleucel in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell lymphomas (JULIET): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(10):1403–1415. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00375-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Shah NN, Highfill SL, Shalabi H, et al. CD4/CD8 T-Cell Selection Affects Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Potency and Toxicity: updated Results From a Phase I Anti-CD22 CAR T-Cell Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1938–1950. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03279 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Ramos CA, Grover NS, Beaven AW, et al. Anti-CD30 CAR-T Cell Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(32):3794–3804. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01342 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Yao S, Jianlin C, Yarong L, et al. Donor-Derived CD123-Targeted CAR T Cell Serves as a RIC Regimen for Haploidentical Transplantation in a Patient With FUS-ERG+ AML. Front Oncol. 2019;9:1358. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01358 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Lin S, Cheng L, Ye W, et al. Chimeric CTLA4-CD28-CD3z T Cells Potentiate Antitumor Activity Against CD80/CD86-Positive B Cell Malignancies. Front Immunol. 2021;12:642528. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.642528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Wenthe J, Naseri S, Labani-Motlagh A, et al. Boosting CAR T-cell responses in lymphoma by simultaneous targeting of CD40/4-1BB using oncolytic viral gene therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70(10):2851–2865. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-02895-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Koneru M, Purdon TJ, Spriggs D, Koneru S, Brentjens RJ. IL-12 secreting tumor-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cells eradicate ovarian tumors in vivo. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4(3):e994446. doi: 10.4161/2162402X.2014.994446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Cui J, Wang H, Medina R, et al. Inhibition of PP2A with LB-100 Enhances Efficacy of CAR-T Cell Therapy Against Glioblastoma. Cancers. 2020;12(1):87. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Li H, Ding J, Lu M, et al. CAIX-specific CAR-T Cells and Sunitinib Show Synergistic Effects Against Metastatic Renal Cancer Models. J Immunother. 2020;43(1):16–28. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Ghorashian S, Kramer AM, Onuoha S, et al. Enhanced CAR T cell expansion and prolonged persistence in pediatric patients with ALL treated with a low-affinity CD19 CAR. Nat Med. 2019;25(9):1408–1414. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0549-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Myers RM, Taraseviciute A, Steinberg SM, et al. Blinatumomab Nonresponse and High-Disease Burden Are Associated With Inferior Outcomes After CD19-CAR for B-ALL. J Clin Oncol. 2021:JCO2101405. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Meric-Bernstam F. CAR Linker Length Modulates CD22-Targeted CAR T-cell Efficacy in ALL. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(7):1611. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-RW2021-065 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Bueno C, Velasco-Hernandez T, Gutierrez-Aguera F, et al. CD133-directed CAR T-cells for MLL leukemia: on-target, off-tumor myeloablative toxicity. Leukemia. 2019;33(8):2090–2125. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0418-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Dai H, Tong C, Shi D, et al. Efficacy and biomarker analysis of CD133-directed CAR T cells in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial. Oncoimmunology. 2020;9(1):1846926. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1846926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Han Y, Sun B, Cai H, Xuan Y. Simultaneously target of normal and stem cells-like gastric cancer cells via cisplatin and anti-CD133 CAR-T combination therapy. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021;70(10):2795–2803. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-02891-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Vora P, Venugopal C, Salim SK, et al. The Rational Development of CD133-Targeting Immunotherapies for Glioblastoma. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(6):832–844 e836. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2020.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Van Laethem F, Saba I, Lu J, et al. Novel MHC-Independent alphabetaTCRs Specific for CD48, CD102, and CD155 Self-Proteins and Their Selection in the Thymus. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1216. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01216 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Katz SC, Moody AE, Guha P, et al. HITM-SURE: hepatic immunotherapy for metastases phase Ib anti-CEA CAR-T study utilizing pressure enabled drug delivery. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8(2):158. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kumar J, Kumar R, Kumar Singh A, et al. Deletion of Cbl-b inhibits CD8(+) T-cell exhaustion and promotes CAR T-cell function. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(1):215. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Zhang C, Wang Z, Yang Z, et al. Phase I Escalating-Dose Trial of CAR-T Therapy Targeting CEA(+) Metastatic Colorectal Cancers. Mol Ther. 2017;25(5):1248–1258. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Zhang E, Yang P, Gu J, et al. Recombination of a dual-CAR-modified T lymphocyte to accurately eliminate pancreatic malignancy. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0646-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Jiang H, Shi Z, Wang P, et al. Claudin18.2-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor Engineered T Cells for the Treatment of Gastric Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019;111(4):409–418. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Luo H, Su J, Sun R, et al. Coexpression of IL7 and CCL21 Increases Efficacy of CAR-T Cells in Solid Tumors without Requiring Preconditioned Lymphodepletion. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(20):5494–5505. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Zhu G, Foletti D, Liu X, et al. Targeting CLDN18.2 by CD3 Bispecific and ADC Modalities for the Treatments of Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8420. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44874-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Klar AS, Gopinadh J, Kleber S, Wadle A, Renner C. Treatment with 5-Aza-2’-Deoxycytidine Induces Expression of NY-ESO-1 and Facilitates Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte-Mediated Tumor Cell Killing. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Hegde M, Joseph SK, Pashankar F, et al. Tumor response and endogenous immune reactivity after administration of HER2 CAR T cells in a child with metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3549. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17175-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Vitanza NA, Johnson AJ, Wilson AL, et al. Locoregional infusion of HER2-specific CAR T cells in children and young adults with recurrent or refractory CNS tumors: an interim analysis. Nat Med. 2021;27(9):1544–1552. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01404-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Xia L, Zheng Z, Liu JY, et al. Targeting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer with Combination Therapy of EGFR CAR T Cells and CDK7 Inhibition. Cancer Immunol Res. 2021;9(6):707–722. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-20-0405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Zhu Y, Zhu X, Wei X, Tang C, Zhang W. HER2-targeted therapies in gastric cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2021;1876(1):188549. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2021.188549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Maggs L, Cattaneo G, Dal AE, Moghaddam AS, Ferrone S. CAR T Cell-Based Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Glioblastoma. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:662064. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.662064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Huang SL, Wang YM, Wang QY, et al. Mechanisms and Clinical Trials of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Immunotherapy. Front Genet. 2021;12:691391. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.691391 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Maiti A, Daver NG. Lowering mTORC1 Drives CAR T-Cells Home in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(21):5739–5741. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Bughda R, Dimou P, D’Souza RR, Klampatsa A. Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP)-Targeted CAR-T Cells: launching an Attack on Tumor Stroma. Immunotargets Ther. 2021;10:313–323. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S291767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Lo A, Wang LS, Scholler J, et al. Tumor-Promoting Desmoplasia Is Disrupted by Depleting FAP-Expressing Stromal Cells. Cancer Res. 2015;75(14):2800–2810. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Kim M, Pyo S, Kang CH, et al. Folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for the treatment of gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198347. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198347 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Kandalaft LE, Powell DJ Jr, Coukos G. A phase I clinical trial of adoptive transfer of folate receptor-alpha redirected autologous T cells for recurrent ovarian cancer. J Transl Med. 2012;10:157. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-157 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Song DG, Ye Q, Poussin M, Chacon JA, Figini M, Powell DJ Jr. Effective adoptive immunotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer by folate receptor-alpha redirected CAR T cells is influenced by surface antigen expression level. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s13045-016-0285-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Moghimi B, Muthugounder S, Jambon S, et al. Preclinical assessment of the efficacy and specificity of GD2-B7H3 SynNotch CAR-T in metastatic neuroblastoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):511. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20785-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Yu J, Wu X, Yan J, et al. Anti-GD2/4-1BB chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy for the treatment of Chinese melanoma patients. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0548-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Meng M, Wu YC. Combination of AAV-CCL19 and GPC3 CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Immunol Res. 2021;2021:1782728. doi: 10.1155/2021/1782728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Pang N, Shi J, Qin L, et al. IL-7 and CCL19-secreting CAR-T cell therapy for tumors with positive glypican-3 or mesothelin. J Hematol Oncol. 2021;14(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13045-021-01128-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Ahmed N, Brawley VS, Hegde M, et al. Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) -Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells for the Immunotherapy of HER2-Positive Sarcoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(15):1688–1696. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.58.0225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Nellan A, Rota C, Majzner R, et al. Durable regression of Medulloblastoma after regional and intravenous delivery of anti-HER2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells. J Immunother Cancer. 2018;6(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0340-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Song Y, Tong C, Wang Y, et al. Effective and persistent antitumor activity of HER2-directed CAR-T cells against gastric cancer cells in vitro and xenotransplanted tumors in vivo. Protein Cell. 2018;9(10):867–878. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0384-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Szoor A, Toth G, Zsebik B, et al. Trastuzumab derived HER2-specific CARs for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer: CAR T cells penetrate and eradicate tumors that are not accessible to antibodies. Cancer Lett. 2020;484:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Teng R, Zhao J, Zhao Y, et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-modified T Cells Repressed Solid Tumors and Their Relapse in an Established Patient-derived Colon Carcinoma Xenograft Model. J Immunother. 2019;42(2):33–42. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Terlikowska KM, Dobrzycka B, Terlikowski SJ. Chimeric Antigen Receptor Design and Efficacy in Ovarian Cancer Treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):658. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073495 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Boice M, Salloum D, Mourcin F, et al. Loss of the HVEM Tumor Suppressor in Lymphoma and Restoration by Modified CAR-T Cells. Cell. 2016;167(2):405–418 e413. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Jung M, Yang Y, McCloskey JE, et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy Targeting ICAM-1 in Gastric Cancer. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;18:587–601. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2020.08.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Wei H, Wang Z, Kuang Y, et al. Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 as Target for CAR-T-Cell Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Front Immunol. 2020;11:573823. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.573823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Pituch KC, Miska J, Krenciute G, et al. Adoptive Transfer of IL13Ralpha2-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Creates a Pro-inflammatory Environment in Glioblastoma. Mol Ther. 2018;26(4):986–995. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.02.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Hong H, Stastny M, Brown C, et al. Diverse solid tumors expressing a restricted epitope of L1-CAM can be targeted by chimeric antigen receptor redirected T lymphocytes. J Immunother. 2014;37(2):93–104. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Kunkele A, Taraseviciute A, Finn LS, et al. Preclinical Assessment of CD171-Directed CAR T-cell Adoptive Therapy for Childhood Neuroblastoma: CE7 Epitope Target Safety and Product Manufacturing Feasibility. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(2):466–477. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Tang L, Yang J, Liu W, et al. Liver sinusoidal endothelial cell lectin, LSECtin, negatively regulates hepatic T-cell immune response. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(4):1498–1508 e1491-1495. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.051 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Montemagno C, Cassim S, Pouyssegur J, Broisat A, Pages G. From Malignant Progression to Therapeutic Targeting: current Insights of Mesothelin in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):32. doi: 10.3390/ijms21114067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Schoutrop E, El-Serafi I, Poiret T, et al. Mesothelin-Specific CAR T Cells Target Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res. 2021;81(11):3022–3035. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-20-2701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Yeo D, Castelletti L, van Zandwijk N, Rasko JEJ. Hitting the Bull’s-Eye: mesothelin’s Role as a Biomarker and Therapeutic Target for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Cancers. 2021;13(16):14. doi: 10.3390/cancers13163932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Supimon K, Sangsuwannukul T, Sujjitjoon J, et al. Anti-mucin 1 chimeric antigen receptor T cells for adoptive T cell therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6276. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85747-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.You F, Jiang L, Zhang B, et al. Phase 1 clinical trial demonstrated that MUC1 positive metastatic seminal vesicle cancer can be effectively eradicated by modified Anti-MUC1 chimeric antigen receptor transduced T cells. Sci China Life Sci. 2016;59(4):386–397. doi: 10.1007/s11427-016-5024-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Han Y, Xie W, Song DG, Powell DJ Jr. Control of triple-negative breast cancer using ex vivo self-enriched, costimulated NKG2D CAR T cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0635-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.He C, Zhou Y, Li Z, et al. Co-Expression of IL-7 Improves NKG2D-Based CAR T Cell Therapy on Prostate Cancer by Enhancing the Expansion and Inhibiting the Apoptosis and Exhaustion. Cancers. 2020;12(7):54987. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Zhang Y, Li X, Zhang J, Mao L. Novel cellular immunotherapy using NKG2D CAR-T for the treatment of cervical cancer. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;131:110562. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Liu M, Wang X, Li W, et al. Targeting PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer using CAR T cells. Oncogenesis. 2020;9(8):72. doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-00257-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Nelson MA, Ngamcherdtrakul W, Luoh SW, Yantasee W. Prognostic and therapeutic role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2021;40(2):519–536. doi: 10.1007/s10555-021-09968-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Zhao W, Jia L, Zhang M, et al. The killing effect of novel bi-specific Trop2/PD-L1 CAR-T cell targeted gastric cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2019;9(8):1846–1856. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Priceman SJ, Gerdts EA, Tilakawardane D, et al. Co-stimulatory signaling determines tumor antigen sensitivity and persistence of CAR T cells targeting PSCA+ metastatic prostate cancer. Oncoimmunology. 2018;7(2):e1380764. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1380764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Wu D, Lv J, Zhao R, et al. PSCA is a target of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in gastric cancer. Biomark Res. 2020;8:3. doi: 10.1186/s40364-020-0183-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Wang G, Zhou X, Fuca G, et al. Fully human antibody VH domains to generate mono and bispecific CAR to target solid tumors. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(4):548. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Zuccolotto G, Penna A, Fracasso G, et al. PSMA-Specific CAR-Engineered T Cells for Prostate Cancer: CD28 Outperforms Combined CD28-4-1BB “Super-Stimulation”. Front Oncol. 2021;11:708073. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.708073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Katz SC, Burga RA, McCormack E, et al. Phase I Hepatic Immunotherapy for Metastases Study of Intra-Arterial Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T-cell Therapy for CEA+ Liver Metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(14):3149–3159. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Tchou J, Zhao Y, Levine BL, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Intratumoral Injections of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells in Metastatic Breast Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res. 2017;5(12):1152–1161. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Ding Y, et al. Phase I clinical trial of EGFR-specific CAR-T cells generated by the piggyBac transposon system in advanced relapsed/refractory non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021;147(12):3725–3734. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03613-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Liu Y, Guo Y, Wu Z, et al. Anti-EGFR chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a phase I clinical trial. Cytotherapy. 2020;22(10):573–580. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.04.088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Hiltbrunner S, Britschgi C, Schuberth P, et al. Local delivery of CAR T cells targeting fibroblast activation protein is safe in patients with pleural mesothelioma: first report of FAPME, a phase I clinical trial. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(1):120–121. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.474 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Junghans RP, Ma Q, Rathore R, et al. Phase I Trial of Anti-PSMA Designer CAR-T Cells in Prostate Cancer: possible Role for Interacting Interleukin 2-T Cell Pharmacodynamics as a Determinant of Clinical Response. Prostate. 2016;76(14):1257–1270. doi: 10.1002/pros.23214 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Feng K, Liu Y, Guo Y, et al. Phase I study of chimeric antigen receptor modified T cells in treating HER2-positive advanced biliary tract cancers and pancreatic cancers. Protein Cell. 2018;9(10):838–847. doi: 10.1007/s13238-017-0440-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Chen YJ, You ML, Chong QY, et al. Autocrine Human Growth Hormone Promotes Invasive and Cancer Stem Cell-Like Behavior of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells by STAT3 Dependent Inhibition of CLAUDIN-1 Expression. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6):54. doi: 10.3390/ijms18061274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Bebnowska D, Grywalska E, Niedzwiedzka-Rystwej P, et al. CAR-T Cell Therapy-An Overview of Targets in Gastric Cancer. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):14. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061894 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Rohde C, Yamaguchi R, Mukhina S, Sahin U, Itoh K, Tureci O. Comparison of Claudin 18.2 expression in primary tumors and lymph node metastases in Japanese patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49(9):870–876. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Wen Y, Graybill WS, Previs RA, et al. Immunotherapy targeting folate receptor induces cell death associated with autophagy in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(2):448–459. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Ma DW, Finnell RH, Davidson LA, et al. Folate transport gene inactivation in mice increases sensitivity to colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2005;65(3):887–897. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Shivange G, Urbanek K, Przanowski P, et al. A Single-Agent Dual-Specificity Targeting of FOLR1 and DR5 as an Effective Strategy for Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(2):331–345 e311. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.07.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Kalli KR, Oberg AL, Keeney GL, et al. Folate receptor alpha as a tumor target in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;108(3):619–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.11.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Zuo S, Wen Y, Panha H, et al. Modification of cytokine-induced killer cells with folate receptor alpha (FRalpha)-specific chimeric antigen receptors enhances their antitumor immunity toward FRalpha-positive ovarian cancers. Mol Immunol. 2017;85:293–304. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2017.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.van de Stolpe A, van der Saag PT. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1. J Mol Med (Berl). 1996;74(1):13–33. doi: 10.1007/BF00202069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Ziprin P, Ridgway PF, Pfistermuller KL, Peck DH, Darzi AW. ICAM-1 mediated tumor-mesothelial cell adhesion is modulated by IL-6 and TNF-alpha: a potential mechanism by which surgical trauma increases peritoneal metastases. Cell Commun Adhes. 2003;10(3):141–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Jung WC, Jang YJ, Kim JH, et al. Expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and e-selectin in gastric cancer and their clinical significance. J Gastric Cancer. 2012;12(3):140–148. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2012.12.3.140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Min IM, Shevlin E, Vedvyas Y, et al. CAR T Therapy Targeting ICAM-1 Eliminates Advanced Human Thyroid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(24):7569–7583. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Chang K, Pastan I. Molecular cloning of mesothelin, a differentiation antigen present on mesothelium, mesotheliomas, and ovarian cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(1):136–140. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.1.136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Lv J, Zhao R, Wu D, et al. Mesothelin is a target of chimeric antigen receptor T cells for treating gastric cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0704-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Sotoudeh M, Shirvani SI, Merat S, Ahmadbeigi N, Naderi M. MSLN (Mesothelin), ANTXR1 (TEM8), and MUC3A are the potent antigenic targets for CAR T cell therapy of gastric adenocarcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 2019;120(4):5010–5017. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27776 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Beatty GL, O’Hara M. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for the treatment of solid tumors: defining the challenges and next steps. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;166:30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.06.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Morello A, Sadelain M, Adusumilli PS. Mesothelin-Targeted CARs: driving T Cells to Solid Tumors. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(2):133–146. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Watanabe K, Luo Y, Da T, et al. Pancreatic cancer therapy with combined mesothelin-redirected chimeric antigen receptor T cells and cytokine-armed oncolytic adenoviruses. JCI Insight. 2018;3(7):75. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.99573 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Zhang Q, Liu G, Liu J, et al. The antitumor capacity of mesothelin-CAR-T cells in targeting solid tumors in mice. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2021;20:556–568. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2021.02.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Zhao R, Cui Y, Zheng Y, et al. Human Hyaluronidase PH20 Potentiates the Antitumor Activities of Mesothelin-Specific CAR-T Cells Against Gastric Cancer. Front Immunol. 2021;12:660488. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.660488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Stojanovic A, Correia MP, Cerwenka A. The NKG2D/NKG2DL Axis in the Crosstalk Between Lymphoid and Myeloid Cells in Health and Disease. Front Immunol. 2018;9:827. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00827 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Basu S, Eriksson M, Pioli PA, et al. Human uterine NK cells interact with uterine macrophages via NKG2D upon stimulation with PAMPs. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2009;61(1):52–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2008.00661.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Spear P, Wu MR, Sentman ML, Sentman CL. NKG2D ligands as therapeutic targets. Cancer Immun. 2013;13:8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Baumeister SH, Murad J, Werner L, et al. Phase I Trial of Autologous CAR T Cells Targeting NKG2D Ligands in Patients with AML/MDS and Multiple Myeloma. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(1):100–112. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Weiss T, Weller M, Guckenberger M, Sentman CL, Roth P. NKG2D-Based CAR T Cells and Radiotherapy Exert Synergistic Efficacy in Glioblastoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78(4):1031–1043. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-1788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Sun B, Yang D, Dai H, et al. Eradication of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by NKG2D-Based CAR-T Cells. Cancer Immunol Res. 2019;7(11):1813–1823. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Tao K, He M, Tao F, et al. Development of NKG2D-based chimeric antigen receptor-T cells for gastric cancer treatment. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;82(5):815–827. doi: 10.1007/s00280-018-3670-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.de Vries NL, Swets M, Vahrmeijer AL, Hokland M, Kuppen PJ. The Immunogenicity of Colorectal Cancer in Relation to Tumor Development and Treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:7. doi: 10.3390/ijms17071030 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Jiang W, Pan S, Chen X, Wang ZW, Zhu X. The role of lncRNAs and circRNAs in the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in cancer immunotherapy. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01406-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Gong B, Kiyotani K, Sakata S, et al. Secreted PD-L1 variants mediate resistance to PD-L1 blockade therapy in non-small cell lung cancer. J Exp Med. 2019;216(4):982–1000. doi: 10.1084/jem.20180870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Yu H, Chen P, Xia L, et al. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment for non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9:11. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Yang Y, Zhang X, Lin F, et al. Bispecific CD3-HAC carried by E1A-engineered mesenchymal stromal cells against metastatic breast cancer by blocking PD-L1 and activating T cells. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0723-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Li Q, Zhou ZW, Lu J, et al. PD-L1(P146R) is prognostic and a negative predictor of response to immunotherapy in gastric cancer. Mol Ther. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.09.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Kobold S, Grassmann S, Chaloupka M, et al. Impact of a New Fusion Receptor on PD-1-Mediated Immunosuppression in Adoptive T Cell Therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107:8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv146 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Schlenker R, Olguin-Contreras LF, Leisegang M, et al. Chimeric PD-1:28 Receptor Upgrades Low-Avidity T cells and Restores Effector Function of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes for Adoptive Cell Therapy. Cancer Res. 2017;77(13):3577–3590. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Qin L, Zhao R, Chen D, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells targeting PD-L1 suppress tumor growth. Biomark Res. 2020;8:19. doi: 10.1186/s40364-020-00198-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Saeki N, Gu J, Yoshida T, Wu X. Prostate stem cell antigen: a Jekyll and Hyde molecule? Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(14):3533–3538. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-3169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Wei X, Lai Y, Li J, et al. PSCA and MUC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer as targets of chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(3):e1284722. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2017.1284722 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Weimin S, Abula A, Qianghong D, Wenguang W. Chimeric cytokine receptor enhancing PSMA-CAR-T cell-mediated prostate cancer regression. Cancer Biol Ther. 2020;21(6):570–580. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2020.1739952 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Kloss CC, Lee J, Zhang A, et al. Dominant-Negative TGF-beta Receptor Enhances PSMA-Targeted Human CAR T Cell Proliferation And Augments Prostate Cancer Eradication. Mol Ther. 2018;26(7):1855–1866. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Bai C, Gao S, Hu S, et al. Self-Assembled Multivalent Aptamer Nanoparticles with Potential CAR-like Characteristics Could Activate T Cells and Inhibit Melanoma Growth. Mol Ther Oncolytics. 2020;17:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2020.03.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Maher J, Wilkie S, Davies DM, et al. Targeting of Tumor-Associated Glycoforms of MUC1 with CAR T Cells. Immunity. 2016;45(5):945–946. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.10.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Wang HF, Wang SS, Huang MC, Liang XH, Tang YJ, Tang YL. Targeting Immune-Mediated Dormancy: a Promising Treatment of Cancer. Front Oncol. 2019;9:498. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Cheadle EJ, Gornall H, Baldan V, Hanson V, Hawkins RE, Gilham DE. CAR T cells: driving the road from the laboratory to the clinic. Immunol Rev. 2014;257(1):91–106. doi: 10.1111/imr.12126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Yu S, Li A, Liu Q, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells: a novel therapy for solid tumors. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0444-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Fesnak AD, June CH, Levine BL. Engineered T cells: the promise and challenges of cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(9):566–581. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.97 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Caruana I, Diaconu I, Dotti G. From monoclonal antibodies to chimeric antigen receptors for the treatment of human malignancies. Semin Oncol. 2014;41(5):661–666. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2014.08.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Hegde M, Mukherjee M, Grada Z, et al. Tandem CAR T cells targeting HER2 and IL13Ralpha2 mitigate tumor antigen escape. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(8):3036–3052. doi: 10.1172/JCI83416 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Quintarelli C, Guercio M, Manni S, et al. Strategy to prevent epitope masking in CAR.CD19+ B-cell leukemia blasts. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9(6). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Salguero-Aranda C, Amaral AT, Olmedo-Pelayo J, Diaz-Martin J, Alava E. Breakthrough Technologies Reshape the Ewing Sarcoma Molecular Landscape. Cells. 2020;9:4. doi: 10.3390/cells9040804 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Li C, Shen Q, Zhang P, et al. Targeting MUS81 promotes the anticancer effect of WEE1 inhibitor and immune checkpoint blocking combination therapy via activating cGAS/STING signaling in gastric cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s13046-021-02120-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Shi J, Li F, Yao X, et al. The HER4-YAP1 axis promotes trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive gastric cancer by inducing epithelial and mesenchymal transition. Oncogene. 2018;37(22):3022–3038. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0204-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Shi W, Zhang G, Ma Z, et al. Hyperactivation of HER2-SHCBP1-PLK1 axis promotes tumor cell mitosis and impairs trastuzumab sensitivity to gastric cancer. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2812. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23053-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Yu S, Hu C, Cai L, et al. Seven-Gene Signature Based on Glycolysis Is Closely Related to the Prognosis and Tumor Immune Infiltration of Patients With Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1778. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 243.Sawaisorn P, Atjanasuppat K, Anurathapan U, Chutipongtanate S, Hongeng S. Strategies to Improve Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapies for Neuroblastoma. Vaccines. 2020;8:4. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Thadi A, Khalili M, Morano WF, Richard SD, Katz SC, Bowne WB. Early Investigations and Recent Advances in Intraperitoneal Immunotherapy for Peritoneal Metastasis. Vaccines. 2018;6:3. doi: 10.3390/vaccines6030054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Zhao D, Klempner SJ, Chao J. Progress and challenges in HER2-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0737-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Ahmed N, Salsman VS, Kew Y, et al. HER2-specific T cells target primary glioblastoma stem cells and induce regression of autologous experimental tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(2):474–485. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Ahmed N, Salsman VS, Yvon E, et al. Immunotherapy for osteosarcoma: genetic modification of T cells overcomes low levels of tumor antigen expression. Mol Ther. 2009;17(10):1779–1787. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Sun M, Shi H, Liu C, Liu J, Liu X, Sun Y. Construction and evaluation of a novel humanized HER2-specific chimeric receptor. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(3):R61. doi: 10.1186/bcr3674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.O’Rourke DM, Nasrallah MP, Desai A, et al. A single dose of peripherally infused EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells mediates antigen loss and induces adaptive resistance in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Sci Transl Med. 2017;9:399. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Rafiq S, Hackett CS, Brentjens RJ. Engineering strategies to overcome the current roadblocks in CAR T cell therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17(3):147–167. doi: 10.1038/s41571-019-0297-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Schaft N. The Landscape of CAR-T Cell Clinical Trials against Solid Tumors-A Comprehensive Overview. Cancers. 2020;12:9. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Liu C, Qi T, Milner JJ, Lu Y, Cao Y. Speed and Location Both Matter: antigen Stimulus Dynamics Controls CAR-T Cell Response. Front Immunol. 2021;12:748768. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.748768 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Mulazzani M, Frassle SP, von Mucke-heim I, et al. Long-term in vivo microscopy of CAR T cell dynamics during eradication of CNS lymphoma in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(48):24275–24284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1903854116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Leko V, Rosenberg SA. Identifying and Targeting Human Tumor Antigens for T Cell-Based Immunotherapy of Solid Tumors. Cancer Cell. 2020;38(4):454–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.07.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Peters C, Brown S. Antibody-drug conjugates as novel anti-cancer chemotherapeutics. Biosci Rep. 2015;35:4. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Morgan RA, Yang JC, Kitano M, Dudley ME, Laurencot CM, Rosenberg SA. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol Ther. 2010;18(4):843–851. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Li D, Li X, Zhou WL, et al. Genetically engineered T cells for cancer immunotherapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2019;4:35. doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0070-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Luo F, Qian J, Yang J, et al. Bifunctional alphaHER2/CD3 RNA-engineered CART-like human T cells specifically eliminate HER2(+) gastric cancer. Cell Res. 2016;26(7):850–853. doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.81 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Katz SC, Point GR, Cunetta M, et al. Regional CAR-T cell infusions for peritoneal carcinomatosis are superior to systemic delivery. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016;23(5):142–148. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2016.14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Ding N, Zou Z, Sha H, et al. iRGD synergizes with PD-1 knockout immunotherapy by enhancing lymphocyte infiltration in gastric cancer. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1336. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09296-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Brown MP, Ebert LM, Gargett T. Clinical chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy: a new and promising treatment modality for glioblastoma. Clin Transl Immunol. 2019;8(5):e1050. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Proshkina G, Deyev S, Ryabova A, et al. DARPin_9-29-Targeted Mini Gold Nanorods Specifically Eliminate HER2-Overexpressing Cancer Cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(38):34645–34651. doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b10441 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Kasaraneni N, Chamoun-Emanuelli AM, Wright G, Chen Z. Retargeting Lentiviruses via SpyCatcher-SpyTag Chemistry for Gene Delivery into Specific Cell Types. mBio. 2017;8:6. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01860-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Shramova EI, Shilova MV, Ryabova AV, et al. Barnase*Barstar-guided two-step targeting approach for drug delivery to tumor cells in vivo. J Control Release. 2021;340:200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Anandappa AJ, Wu CJ, Ott PA. Directing Traffic: how to Effectively Drive T Cells into Tumors. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(2):185–197. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Zhang C, Burger MC, Jennewein L, et al. ErbB2/HER2-Specific NK Cells for Targeted Therapy of Glioblastoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108(5):658. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv375 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Merker M, Wagner J, Kreyenberg H, et al. ERBB2-CAR-Engineered Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells Exhibit Both CAR-Mediated and Innate Immunity Against High-Risk Rhabdomyosarcoma. Front Immunol. 2020;11:581468. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.581468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Van Cutsem E, Sagaert X, Topal B, Haustermans K, Prenen H. Gastric cancer. Lancet. 2016;388(10060):2654–2664. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30354-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(7):610–621. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Nadal-Serrano M, Morancho B, Escriva-de-romani S, et al. The Second Generation Antibody-Drug Conjugate SYD985 Overcomes Resistances to T-DM1. Cancers. 2020;12:3. doi: 10.3390/cancers12030670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Gradishar WJ. Emerging approaches for treating HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer beyond trastuzumab. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(10):2492–2500. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt217 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Pegram MD, Miles D, Tsui CK, Zong Y. HER2-Overexpressing/Amplified Breast Cancer as a Testing Ground for Antibody-Drug Conjugate Drug Development in Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(4):775–786. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1976 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Roukos DH. Targeting gastric cancer with trastuzumab: new clinical practice and innovative developments to overcome resistance. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(1):14–17. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0766-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Mohammadi M, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Golsaz-Shirazi F, et al. A Novel Anti-HER2 Bispecific Antibody With Potent Tumor Inhibitory Effects In Vitro and In Vivo. Front Immunol. 2020;11:600883. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.600883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Lu YJ, Chu H, Wheeler LW, et al. Preclinical Evaluation of Bispecific Adaptor Molecule Controlled Folate Receptor CAR-T Cell Therapy With Special Focus on Pediatric Malignancies. Front Oncol. 2019;9:151. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Luo X, Cui H, Cai L, et al. Selection of a Clinical Lead TCR Targeting Alpha-Fetoprotein-Positive Liver Cancer Based on a Balance of Risk and Benefit. Front Immunol. 2020;11:623. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Zhang Y, Li Y, Chen K, Qian L, Wang P. Oncolytic virotherapy reverses the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and its potential in combination with immunotherapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-01972-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.NIH; US National Library of Medicine. ClinicialTrials/.gov [homepage]; 2022. Available at: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/. Accessed July 11, 2022. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Inflammation Research are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES