Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease characterized by itch and clinical heterogeneity regarding the age of onset, morphology, distribution, and severity of lesions. Severe AD has a significant impact on the quality of life of affected children and their caregivers. Children with moderate‐severe AD inadequately controlled with topical therapy have limited treatment options, such as systemic corticosteroids or phototherapy, often prescribed as off‐label treatments, often with unfavorable benefit‐to‐risk ratio adverse events. Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody with proven effectiveness and a relatively safe adverse effect profile in patients with type 2 inflammatory diseases, including AD. We report three pediatric cases of severe AD successfully treated with dupilumab.
Keywords: allergy, atopic dermatitis, children, dupilumab
Key Messages.
Children with severe atopic dermatitis (AD), inadequately controlled with topical therapies, have limited treatment options with poor quality of life. Dupilumab is the first biological therapy proven to be effective in patients with uncontrolled moderate‐to‐severe AD with an acceptable safety profile.
1. INTRODUCTION
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by intense itching and recurrent eczematous lesions. AD affects any part of the body but typically shows age‐related morphology and distribution. Diagnosis relies exclusively on these clinical features. The estimated prevalence is about 15%–20% in children, while severe AD accounts for up to 8%. 1 In children with moderate‐to‐severe AD, skin lesions often involve a large body surface area. Moreover, the related itch increased risk of bacterial and viral skin infections, sleep deprivation, activity restriction, poor school performance, depression, and anxiety, significantly impacting the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their caregivers. Unfortunately, children with moderate‐to‐severe AD inadequately controlled with topical therapies have limited treatment options, such as systemic corticosteroids and/or phototherapy often prescribed off‐label; their use is often associated with unfavorable benefit‐to‐risk ratio and multiple adverse events2, 3, 4
Dupilumab is a fully human monoclonal IgG4 antibody that blocks the alpha‐chain of the receptors for IL‐4 and IL‐13, inducing the downregulation of type 2 (Th2) inflammation. 5 Several studies reported that dupilumab significantly improved the outcomes in children with severe AD inadequately controlled with standard therapy, including signs, symptoms, and QoL, with an acceptable safety profile.6, 7
We reported a case series of three pediatric patients affected by severe AD, unresponsive to standard treatments, who showed a rapid clinical improvement after the first administrations of dupilumab (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Patient's characteristics
| Case I | Case II | Case III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at AD onset, years | 8 | 5 | 1 |
| Sex | Male | Male | Female |
| Ethnicity | Caucasian | South Asian | Turkish |
| Coexisting allergic diseases | Asthma, food allergy, and allergic rhinitis | Allergic rhinitis | Allergic rhinitis |
| Skin prick tests a |
Sensitization to dust mites, cat, kiwi, and shrimp |
Sensitization to dust mites | Sensitization to dust mites and nuts and peanuts |
| Total serum IgE, a KU/L | >5000 | 3458 | >5000 |
| Blood eosinophil count, a cells/ mm3 | 2090 | 150 | 1080 |
| Previous treatment for AD |
Galenic formulation of topical steroids and moisturizing creams. Brief cycles of systemic corticosteroids. |
Galenic formulation of topical steroids and moisturizing creams. Brief cycles of systemic corticosteroids. |
Galenic formulation of topical steroids and moisturizing creams. Brief cycles of systemic corticosteroids. Phototherapy. Oral Cyclosporine. |
| Pretreatment scores b | |||
| EASI | 42.6 | 47.1 | 65.6 |
| PO‐SCORAD | 101.8 | 72.5 | 101.8 |
| IGA | 5/5 | 3‐4/5 | 5/5 |
| POEM | 25/28 | 24/28 | 28/28 |
| DLQI | 18/30 | 16/30 | 20/30 |
| Post‐treatment scores b | |||
| EASI | 10.7 | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| PO‐SCORAD | 33.9 | 13 | 27 |
| IGA | 1/5 | 1/5 | 1/5 |
| POEM | 6/28 | 0/28 | 1/28 |
| DLQI | 2/30 | 0/30 | 2/30 |
| Side effects to dupilumab | None | None | None |
Abbreviations: DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Score; IGA, Investigator Global Assessment; POEM, Patient‐Oriented Eczema Measure; SCORAD, Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis.
At baseline.
The severity of clinical features was measured by the disease activity scores at baseline ad after every administration of dupilumab.
2. CASE I
A 12‐year‐old Caucasian male patient was evaluated to our for severe AD that required hospitalization for bacterial skin infection. His family history was positive for atopy. Despite the initial first‐line treatment with topical therapy and the subsequent need for systemic corticosteroids, the child suffered from multiple exacerbations of AD that severely limited his school activities and sleep. The severity of clinical features, measured by the disease activity scores (EASI), confirmed the clinical picture of severe AD. Therefore, treatment with dupilumab (200 mg subcutaneously [SC] every two weeks) was started with a rapid improvement in signs, symptoms, and quality of life (QoL) after the first administrations (Figure S1). To date, the child underwent ten administrations, presenting a great and constant improvement of the disease and his QoL. There were no adverse effects during the treatment.
3. CASE II
We evaluated a 12‐year‐old South Asian male patient, for severe AD with skin lesions involving a large body surface area, including neck, genital area, trunk, back, and limbs, with a significant nocturnal itch, highly limiting his ability to sleep. The child developed several exacerbations of his AD after every discontinuation of topical steroids. The disease remained poorly controlled, and the patient had a poor quality of life. Considering the lack of response to standard therapy, he was treated with dupilumab (200 mg SC every two weeks). with a rapid and significant improvement of the skin lesions and QoL (Figure S2). Currently, the patient has received six administrations of dupilumab, presenting a great and constant remission of his disease without adverse effects.
4. CASE III
Since the first year of life, a 9‐year‐old Pakistani female patient presented severe AD that required several hospitalizations for viral (herpes simplex virus) and bacterial (Staphylococcus aureus) skin infections. The child presented diffuse eczematous lesions with hyperkeratosis and excoriations. She experienced constant itch limiting her daily activities and school performance (Table 1). First‐line therapy with topical therapies was started. After every discontinuation of topical steroids, AD severely relapsed. Therefore, she also underwent a brief cycle of phototherapy without improvement. Then, three cycles of oral cyclosporine A were prescribed with the improvement of her AD. However, after three months of therapy, she developed diffuse hypertrichosis and gingival hyperplasia with gingivitis; thus, cyclosporine was stopped. Her disease remained poorly controlled with extensive eczema, dry skin, and intense itch. Biological therapy with dupilumab (200 mg SC every two weeks) was started with a rapid improvement of the skin lesions and QoL. (Figure S3). To date, she underwent seventeen administrations, presenting a great and constant improvement of the disease and her QoL. No side effects were reported during the treatment.
5. CONCLUSION
We report a case series of three patients successfully treated with dupilumab, supporting its use in children with moderate‐to‐severe AD. AD is a chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease. Due to its chronic nature and frequent relapses, living with AD can be a burden, particularly for those requiring long‐term, systemic treatment. Moreover, most available treatments may often complicate toxicities and side effects, also compromising the QoL of patients and their families. 3 Dupilumab is the first biologic with proven effectiveness and a relatively safe adverse effect profile in children and adults with Th2 inflammatory diseases, including AD and asthma.5, 8 So far, dupilumab has proven effective in patients with uncontrolled moderate‐to‐severe AD with an acceptable safety profile.6, 7
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Authors declare they have no conflict of interests.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Martina Votto contributed to conceptualization (equal) and writing—original draft (equal). Francesco Delle Cave contributed to writing—original draft (equal). Maria De Filippo contributed to writing—review and editing (equal). Alessia Marseglia contributed to conceptualization (equal); writing—review and editing (equal). Gian Luigi Marseglia contributed to supervision (lead); writing—review and editing (equal). Valeria Brazzelli contributed to conceptualization (equal); supervision (lead); and writing—review and editing (equal). Amelia Licari contributed to conceptualization (equal); supervision (lead); and writing—review & editing (equal).
Supporting information
Figure S1: Case I. Pretreatment: A, B, C, D, E. After 10 administrations of dupilumab: F, G, H, I.
Figure S2: Case 2. Pretreatment: A, B, C, D. After dupilumab: E, F, G, H.
Figure S3: Case 3. Pretreatment: A, B, C, D, E. After 17 administrations of dupilumab: F, G, H, I.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Open Access funding provided by Universita degli Studi di Pavia within the CRUI‐CARE Agreement. [Correction added on 11‐May‐2022, after first online publication: CRUI‐CARE funding statement has been added.]
Votto M, Delle Cave F, De Filippo M, et al. Rapid response to dupilumab treatment in children with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis: A case series. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2022;33 (Suppl. 27):31–33. 10.1111/pai.13623
Martina Votto and Francesco Delle Cave equally contributed as co‐first author.
REFERENCES
- 1. Weidinger S, Novak N. Atopic dermatitis. Lancet. 2016;387:1109‐1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Bieber T, et al. Consensus‐based European guidelines for the treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:657‐682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wollenberg A, Barbarot S, Bieber T, et al. Consensus‐based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32:850‐878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Licari A, Ruffinazzi G, De Filippo M, et al. A starch, glycyrrhetinic, zinc oxide and bisabolol based cream in the treatment of chronic mild‐to‐moderate atopic dermatitis in children: a three‐center, assessor blinded trial. Minerva Pediatr. 2017;69:470‐475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Licari A, Castagnoli R, Marseglia A, et al. Dupilumab to treat type 2 inflammatory diseases in children and adolescents. Paediatr Drugs. 2020;22:295‐310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Paller AS, Siegfried EC, Thaçi D, et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids in children 6 to 11 years old with severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double‐blinded, placebo‐controlled phase 3 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83:1282‐1293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Cork MJ, Thaçi D, Eichenfield LF, et al. Dupilumab provides favourable long‐term safety and efficacy in children aged ≥6 to <12 years with uncontrolled severe atopic dermatitis: results from an open‐label phase IIa study and subsequent phase III open‐label extension study. Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:857‐870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Votto M, De Filippo M, Licari A, et al. Biological therapies in children and adolescents with severe uncontrolled asthma: a practical review. Biologics. 2021;15:133‐142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1: Case I. Pretreatment: A, B, C, D, E. After 10 administrations of dupilumab: F, G, H, I.
Figure S2: Case 2. Pretreatment: A, B, C, D. After dupilumab: E, F, G, H.
Figure S3: Case 3. Pretreatment: A, B, C, D, E. After 17 administrations of dupilumab: F, G, H, I.
