Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Jul 22;12:12586. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16772-5

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and cerebellum

Renata Kabiljo 3,, Alfredo Iacoangeli 3, Ammar Al-Chalabi 2, Ivana Rosenzweig 1
PMCID: PMC9307771  PMID: 35869263

Abstract

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating, heterogeneous neurodegenerative neuromuscular disease that leads to a fatal outcome within 2–5 years, and yet, a precise nature of the association between its major phenotypes and the cerebellar role in ALS pathology remains unknown. Recently, repeat expansions in several genes in which variants appreciably contribute to cerebellar pathology, including C9orf72, NIPA1, ATXN2 and ATXN1, have been found to confer a significant risk for ALS. To better define this relationship, we performed MAGMA gene-based analysis and tissue enrichment analysis using genome-wide association study summary statistics based on a study of 27,205 people with ALS and 110,881 controls. Our preliminary results imply a striking cerebellar tissue specificity and further support increasing calls for re-evaluation of the cerebellar role in the ALS pathology.

Subject terms: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Computational biology and bioinformatics

Introduction

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a devastating, heterogeneous neurodegenerative neuromuscular disease predominantly affecting upper and lower motor neurons1, leading to death within 2–5 years1. About 15% of people with ALS have mutations in one of the 40 Mendelian ALS genes1. Recently, repeat expansions in several genes in which variants appreciably contribute to cerebellar pathology, including C9orf72, NIPA1, ATXN2 and ATXN1, have been found to confer a significant risk for ALS1,2.

Cerebellar degeneration in ALS has long been a contentious topic, with the consensus being minimal involvement of the cerebellum in ALS, or at best, a compensatory role for cerebellar function during progressive supratentorial degeneration3,4. This is, however, in opposition to compelling radiological and post-mortem pathologic evidence for extrapyramidal and cerebellar degeneration46. Accordingly, a recent imaging study of 161 people with ALS, stratified for ALS-associated C9orf72 and ATXN2 variants, described distinct focal cerebellar trophic change, preferentially affecting specific lobules5. Notably, a significant cerebellar pathology was also demonstrated in patients without these ALS-associated mutations5.

Based on these findings2,5, we explored whether significant cerebellar specificity of the ALS phenotypes could be confirmed by performing MAGMA tissue expression analyses on the ALS genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics.

Results

The ten most statistically significant genes in MAGMA gene-based analysis were MOB3B, C9orf72 (unless excluded), SCFD1, UNC13A, IFNK, G2E3, TNIP1, TBK1, BAG6 and EFTUD1. Complete list and MAGMA-dataset is available from https://fuma.ctglab.nl/browse/423.

Of 54 anatomical regions investigated, MAGMA-tissue-expression-profile-analysis revealed that the ALS-associated genes were significantly enriched for expression in the cerebellum and the cerebral-cortex [P(cerebellum) = 1.3 × 10−04; P(cerebellar_hemispheres) = 1.5 × 10−04; P(brain_frontal_cortex_BA9) = 3.3 × 10−04 and P(brain_cortex) = 1.2 × 10−04].

This enrichment was observed even when known cerebellar pathology-associated ALS-risk genes C9orf72, ATXN1, ATXN2 and NIPA1 were excluded in later analyses to avoid disproportionate enrichment (Fig. 1). It is of note that the region of the nucleus accumbens within the basal ganglia reached statistical significance during these analyses [P(nucleus accumbens) = 9.2 × 10−04]. Statistical significance for the most enriched tissues is listed in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

MAGMA tissue enrichment analysis of candidate genes for ALS, based on GTEx RNA-seq data of the 54 specific tissue types. Top 20 tissues are shown in figure. Significant tissues are marked with *.

Table 1.

P values for the most enriched tissues for MAGMA tissue enrichment analysis of candidate genes for ALS, based on GTEx RNA-seq data for 54 specific tissue types.

Anatomical region Complete No C9ORF72 No C9ORF72,NIPA1,ATXN1, ATXN2
Brain cortex 0.00012057 0.00011576 0.00011708
Brain cerebellum 0.00013406 0.00017257 0.00017868
Brain cerebellar hemisphere 0.00015471 0.00019659 0.00020407
Brain frontal cortex BA9 0.00033164 0.00033169 0.00033791
Brain nucleus accumbens basal ganglia 0.00098116 0.00092179 0.00092735
Brain anterior cingulate cortex BA24 0.0015641 0.0015002 0.0015101
Brain caudate basal ganglia 0.0023117 0.0021419 0.0021732
Brain putamen basal ganglia 0.0056439 0.0051024 0.005195
Brain hypothalamus 0.0073602 0.0076545 0.007772
Brain hippocampus 0.01405 0.01342 0.013692
Brain amygdala 0.021646 0.020465 0.020641
Pituitary 0.074125 0.079439 0.080076
Brain substantia nigra 0.12635 0.12497 0.12759
Testis 0.16764 0.16718 0.16765
Cells EBV-transformed lymphocytes 0.18536 0.18119 0.18576

Significant P values are bolded.

Discussion

We report a striking cerebellar tissue specificity for ALS. In addition, similar specificity is shown for the dorsolateral-prefrontal-region (the-Broadmann-area-9), the cortical-area targeted with distinct cerebellar inputs via thalamic-projections, essential for ‘higher’-cognitive functions such as working-memory, motor-planning, abstract reasoning and voluntary control of automatic movements7.

Moreover, we report that this specificity remains even when we exclude ALS-genetic variants known to contribute to cerebellar pathology in ALS.

In past, ALS has been similarly associated with widespread and differential basal ganglia involvement8. More specifically, changes in the regions of the nucleus caudatus, hippocampus, and in the region of the nucleus accumbens, have been proposed to present some of the key features of ALS8. Accordingly, these brain regions feature among the top ten enriched anatomical regions (see Fig. 1, Table 1). Statistically significant specificity has, however, only been demonstrated for the basal ganglia’s nucleus accumbens region (Table 1), and only in analyses that excluded the ALS-genetic variants known to contribute to cerebellar pathology in ALS, including C9orf72. This is perhaps somewhat contraintuitive to previous studies, which argued a more intensive basal ganglia involvement in patients with ALS carrying the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion8. Whilst the dissonance may reflect important aspects of our methodological limitations, we propose that our findings may also emphasise the complexity of the cerebellar role in the ALS-affected neurocircuitry. For example, a specific (focal) cerebellar pathology may arguably dictate differential downstream changes in functional connectivity between the sub-regions of the cerebellum, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the nucleus accumbens9,10. The cerebellum shares functionality in motivated behaviors9,10 with these subcortical and cortical regions, and thus, any distinct cerebellar changes may drive and underlie, at least in part, different ALS phenotypes, with significant clinical implications9.

In summary, the role of the cerebellum in exacerbating cardinal clinical manifestations such as motor disability, bulbar dysfunction, respiratory compromise, sleep and cognitive problems, is often overlooked, and symptoms traditionally primarily linked to supratentorial pathology4. Furthermore, a closed-loop connectivity between localised regions of the prefrontal cortex, nucleus accumbens and cerebellum, and the extent to which cerebellar output may contribute to the ALS pathology remain mostly unmapped. Further aggravating point is that it is also challenging to identify cerebellar signs clinically in patients with motor weakness.

Our findings cannot be taken to suggest causality, or indeed the valence of these cerebellar associations due to the methodological limitations of MAGMA-analyses. Nonetheless, while cerebellar signatures of specific ALS-genotypes are yet to be firmly established, our study further supports increasing calls for re-evaluation of the cerebellar role in the ALS pathology4,5.

Methods

For the purpose of this study, MAGMA11 gene-based analysis and tissue enrichment analysis were performed using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from a study of 27,205 people with ALS and 110,881 controls12, downloaded from https://surfdrive.surf.nl/files/index.php/s/E5RetKw10hC3jXy.

Three MAGMA-analyses were performed. During the first we analysed the entire GWAS-ALS dataset. To establish whether genes with known cerebellar involvement might be driving potential enrichment in cerebellum, we performed two additional analyses. For the first, all SNPs mapping positionally to C9orf72 were excluded (see Table 1, column ‘No C9orf72’. To the same end, additionally, all SNPs mapping positionally to C9orf72, ATXN1, ATXN2 and NIPA1 were excluded (see Table 1, the column ‘No C9orf72, ATXN1, ATXN2 and NIPA1’). MAGMA (v1.08) was invoked by FUMA (v1.3.7)13, an online tool for mapping and annotation of genetic associations. In MAGMA gene-based analysis, GWAS summary statistics are used to compute gene-based P values for protein coding genes by mapping SNPs to genes if SNPs are located within the genes. Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple testing.

Tissue-enrichment analysis was performed using the results of the gene-based analysis and the data from the Genotype—Tissue Expression (GTEx) project14, integrated in FUMA (v1.3.7)13. GTEx project traditionally includes 54 specific human body tissue types, amongst which are thirteen different brain regions14. Detailed information on the anatomical sampling sites, used databanks and the specific extraction methods can be found on https://www.gtexportal.org/. For example, for the cerebellar hemisphere please refer to https://www.gtexportal.org/home/tissue/Brain_Cerebellar_Hemisphere and for the cerebellum on https://www.gtexportal.org/home/tissue/Brain_Cerebellum.

Average gene-expression per tissue type was used as a gene covariate to test for a positive relationship between gene expression in a specific tissue type and genetic associations.

Ethics declarations

This study does not does report on experiments on humans. Only GWAS summary statistics have been used.

Acknowledgements

This research was funded in whole, or in part, by the Wellcome Trust's [103952/Z/14/Z]. For the purpose of open access, the author I.R. has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission. A.A.C. is an NIHR Senior Investigator (NIHR202421). This is in part an EU Joint Programme—Neurodegenerative Disease Research (JPND) project. The project is supported through the following funding organisations under the aegis of JPND—www.jpnd.eu (United Kingdom, Medical Research Council (MR/L501529/1; MR/R024804/1) and Economic and Social Research Council (ES/L008238/1)) and through the Motor Neurone Disease Association, My Name’5 Doddie Foundation, and Alan Davidson Foundation. This study represents independent research part funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. R.K., A.I. and A.A.C. receive funding from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, MND Scotland, Motor Neurone Disease Association, National Institute for Health Research, Spastic Paraplegia Foundation and Rosetrees Trust. We acknowledge use of the research computing facility at King's College London, Rosalind (https://rosalind.kcl.ac.uk), which is delivered in partnership with the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centres at South London & Maudsley and Guy's & St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trusts and part-funded by capital equipment grants from the Maudsley Charity (award 980) and Guy's and St Thomas' Charity (TR130505). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, King's College London, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author contributions

All authors conceived and planned the experiment. R.K. performed the analysis. All authors participated in writing the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Data availability

The complete FUMA gene based and tissue besed analysis results and parameters are available at https://fuma.ctglab.nl/browse/423.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Al-Chalabi A, Van Den Berg LH, Veldink J. Gene discovery in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Implications for clinical management. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017;13:96–104. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Tazelaar GHP, et al. ATXN1 repeat expansions confer risk for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and contribute to TDP-43 mislocalization. Brain Commun. 2020;2:fcaa064. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Abidi M, et al. Adaptive functional reorganization in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Coexisting degenerative and compensatory changes. Eur. J. Neurol. 2020;27:121–128. doi: 10.1111/ene.14042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pradat PF. The cerebellum in ALS: Friend or foe? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2021;92:1137. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bede P, et al. Genotype-associated cerebellar profiles in ALS: Focal cerebellar pathology and cerebro-cerebellar connectivity alterations. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2021;92:1197–1205. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Abidi M, et al. Neural correlates of motor imagery of gait in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2021;53:223–233. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Middleton FA, Strick PL. Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:700–712. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-02-00700.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bede P, et al. Basal ganglia involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology. 2013;81:2107–2115. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000437313.80913.2c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.D’Ambra, A. F., Jung, S. J., Ganesan, S., Antzoulatos, E. G. & Fioravante, D. Cerebellar Activation Bidirectionally Regulates Nucleus Accumbens Medial Shell and Core. 10.1101/2020.09.28.283952 (2021).
  • 10.Ballard IC, et al. Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex drives mesolimbic dopaminergic regions to initiate motivated behavior. J. Neurosci. 2011;31:10340–10346. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0895-11.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.de Leeuw CA, Mooij JM, Heskes T, Posthuma D. MAGMA: Generalized gene-set analysis of GWAS data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2015;11:e1004219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.van Rheenen W, et al. Common and rare variant association analyses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identify 15 risk loci with distinct genetic architectures and neuron-specific biology. Nat. Genet. 2021;53:1636–1648. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00973-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Watanabe K, Taskesen E, van Bochoven A, Posthuma D. Functional mapping and annotation of genetic associations with FUMA. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1826. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01261-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Consortium, G. T Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015;348:648–660. doi: 10.1126/science.1262110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The complete FUMA gene based and tissue besed analysis results and parameters are available at https://fuma.ctglab.nl/browse/423.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES